Slashdot Mirror


Evidence Points To Huge Underground River Beneath Amazon

chill writes "Researchers at the department of geophysics of the Brazil National Observatory have showed evidence of the existence of an underground river that flows 13,000 feet beneath the Amazon. The newly-named Hamza is said to be 3,700 miles long, flowing 13,000 feet below the Amazon. Both rivers flow from west to east, but the Hamza flows at only a fraction of the speed of Amazon."

6 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. No a river, it's called an Aquifer by thomasdz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Geesh.... the term "underground river" evokes an image of a continuous flow of only water perhaps going through a long cave or something... not water travelling through rock, also known as an "Aquifer"

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
  2. Better article by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a better article: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/234077-Underground-River-Rio-Hamza-Discovered-4km-Beneath-the-Amazon

    Flowing at a rate of 1mm/hour, this is more like a gigantic seepage of ground water. I suppose calling it a "river" gets them into the newspapers...

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  3. One Question by Danieljury3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the water tessellated?

  4. Re:Hamza? by macs4all · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's just like the Grand Canyon is the European name for it, while its proper name, given by Native Americans, is Weemoteeuktuk.

    Cultural insensitivity aside, I think Grand Canyon is easier to remember.

  5. Re:Naming breaks ethical rules by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're wrong. The planetoid is named after a greek God. Which of course was named after Mickey Mouse's dog.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  6. Re:Hamza? by vbraga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Brazilians call themselves 'Brasileiros' instead of 'Brasilianos'. Interesting, 'Brasiliano' would be more appropriate from a linguistic point of view (the '-ano' suffix indicates someone who belongs or as born in a given place) than 'Brasileiro' ('-eiro' suffix indicates someone who performs a given action). 'Brasileiro' is used because the first (European) inhabitants used to perform the Brazil wood trade, hence the '-eiro' instead of the '-ano' suffix.

    Well, on a second though, that's not interesting at all.

    --
    English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.