Slashdot Mirror
Chemical Cocktail Turns Mice Clear
sciencehabit writes "Researchers have serendipitously discovered that a mixture of urea, glycerol, and soap makes membranes transparent. When they tried the mixture on a developing mouse fetus, they found that it removed all of the pigment from the cells, rendering the fetus completely transparent. The technique allowed scientists to see fluorescent neurons buried several millimeters in the brain."
I already see the next requirement from TSA..
Steinbeck's "Of Invisible Mice and Men".
make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
I found prior art!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kakweRCSd_s&feature=player_detailpage#t=87s
.
Prisencolinensinainciusol. Ol Rait!
http://www.milk.com/wall-o-shame/polytron.html
"The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
Is it me or is this the literal idea of the original HG Wells Invisible Man?
If the squirrels get a hold of this, there will be no stopping their agents now.
Only a matter of time.
I'm just gonna come out and say it.
Science is horrible
DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
Researchers serendipitously discovered that a mixture of urea, glycerol, and soap
I'm guessing this discovery was the result of someone taking a shower after some kind of urine-related lab prank...
Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Paul.Hampson@Pobox.Com
I seem to recall some prior art in this subject.
Lacking <sarcasm> tags,
Eaten alive by invisible rats.
Science is about making horrible dreams a reality.
Wait, that's not a baby mouse, that's a baby Predator!
Yes it will. Controls will be treated as well. Furthermore, this isn't a live technique. You fix the embryo with paraformadehyde first probably. This is for looking at morphology of cells or tissues, not living function. You have one mouse line with a mutation that causes blindness, one without, you cross in a fluorescent marker that makes their optic nerves glow. You get the embryos, fix them, do this thing to them, then you can clearly see how it's affecting the nerve, for example. A lot less disruptive than the alternative of cutting it into slices.
Kevin Bacon did it 11 years ago. To a gorilla. And then himself.
Mice aren't dumb enough to fall for that.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
First stop, the girls' shower room for a "deposit", second stop, the bank for a "withdraw."
Take the Red Pill.
FTA: "Scale is too strong to use on a living animal"
Yeah, I thought the same thing. It'd be kind of cool to see a transparent mouse. (If also disturbing.)
PS: I don't reply to ACs.
I know a few chemical cocktails that can make people THINK they're invisible. And bulletproof.
do() || do_not();
Scientist #1: We're having problems observing these neurons! Blasted plain optics!
Scientist #2: If only there were some way to make the mouse embryo transparent!
Bear Grylls: Soak it in piss! *gulp*
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
FTA: "Scale is too strong to use on a living animal"
Yeah, I thought the same thing. It'd be kind of cool to see a transparent mouse. (If also disturbing.)
To say nothing about what would happen if the next Lady Gaga got ahold of this stuff.
Still, it's an interesting development. Wonder if they can replicate the effect with something more conductive to living tissue. I'm thinking Transparent Eyes, or tough wooden windows that are much less likely to be broken into. Or for the truly green out there, a solid wood computer monitor.
Makes one wonder if there is a less toxic way to attain the same effect? Definitely an ice breaker at parties! On the flip side, adding this concoction to embalming fluid would almost certainly make for exciting funerals!!!
Now if only we could develop some sort of device for changing history, we could go back and make sure he doesn't give us any ideas.
More like the ghouls in Fritz Lieber's Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser books.
And what wrath have these foolhardy researchers brought upon this planet should these beings become unhappy with their new appearance?
Have gnu, will travel.
We did this in college, to fish.
[End Of Line]
But can they do this with aluminum??
Huh?
Invisible pr0n is no fun... well, at least not for most people.
C|N>K
Or clear chicken.
- That we turn ourselves invisible and take over the world?
- EXACTLY
All the more reason for the mandatory aluminum foil hat :)
As pointed out by Tim C, almost anything we do with mice is less cruel then what a cat does do a mouse when it catches it.
Notice they didnt do this on a living embryo.
Also anything that sells for $1.49 each as live snake food at a pet store apparently does not rate too highly on the
"concern about cruelty" scale. If the process caused them pain then yes it would be too cruel to use but
simply turning them transparent is probably not the worst thing that would happen to a lab mouse.
How does it feel to be a transparent animal? Ask a jellyfish. As long as they dont have to live
with other regular mice I dont see they would notice the difference.
No. Are you volunteering to never agree with anything because you don't agree with me in this specific instance? Of course not. The question is whether there is a limit of cruelty that's not worth what we get from the research that requires the cruelty.
--
make install -not war
But we're not cats.
--
make install -not war
That point is inside the limit. The limit is where we ask ourselves to stop, because our victim cannot.
--
make install -not war
It would also be blind and probably get cancer very easily among other things
everybody's copying Apple, this time with translucent mice.
They don't carry any money either.
Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Please take 60 seconds and read the article. Please?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
No.
More appropriately: Your question make no sense and show a lack of understanding about science. How do we know the outcome of an experiment? How can we say it wasn't worth any benefit without doing the experiment?
Any more questions?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Wouldn't transparent eyes be blind?
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
Oh, you meant see-through. Here I thought you meant that they found a way to make mice Clear (tm) without paying Scientology tens of thousands of dollars....
mark
We have pigment for a reason, presumably, so a fully developed animal would not survive direct sunlight?
Of course, a baby mouse would have fur, as well. Still, probably a really messed up looking mouse.
If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
Micro$oft says they have finally found a way to render mouse pointers visible, to be implemented in time for the release of Windows 9.
Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
I thought they'd figured out a way to turn mice into Scientologists. As if mice weren't annoying enough as it is.
My question makes no sense because it's your response applied to your post. So here are some less complex ones for you:
Yes. Have you ever heard of ethics? They're an organized way to know whether an action's benefits might not be worth the cost, even without doing the action and incurring the cost.
Also: what alternative science are you trying to use instead of the scientific method? Experiments aren't totally unpredictable invocations. There are almost always reliable expectations of the range of outcomes of the experiment.
And: how have you avoided common sense? Both your posts in this thread show it's a stranger to you. Everyone who's at least moderately adult knows that some possible benefits are not worth some costs. Common sense also tells us that some costs, like the charge for unlimited cruelty, are the highest possible.
Or just the simplest: is there any limit you recognize on cruelty to animals, regardless of the reasonable maximum benefit? Give an example to give some proportion to the estimated max benefit you postulate.
--
make install -not war
How did they find this formula? Did one of the researchers piss in a bottle of liquid soap?