Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Can You Identify This UAV?

garymortimer writes "It's not as sexy as the Beast of Kandahar RQ 170 Sentinel, or as well known as a Predator. But we think the bird-shaped drone that crashed in Pakistan last week might be a U.S. special forces tool. At first it was thought to be a homemade job, but packs with FMC (which means 'Fully Mission Capable') written on them, and an American date style as well, really points to something else. sUAS News is not AvWeek or Flight International so getting scoops is tricky whilst holding down a day job. Our exclusive pictures of the damaged C130 that struck an RQ170 was pretty good for us. We would love to identify this drone. Maybe it is just a homebrew job, maybe it's not. It's not a Festo Smartbird, though, the most popular choice of pundits."

163 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Its a... by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an espresso machine. No, no wait. It's a snow cone maker...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Its a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it a water heater?

    2. Re:Its a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obviously it's a swamp-gas weather balloon manufactured by ACME.

    3. Re:Its a... by cobrausn · · Score: 3, Informative

      To the guy/gal that modded this Troll, it's a quote from True Lies. Cut TWX a break.

      --
      How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
    4. Re:Its a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is a Soviet MIRV-Six, from an SS-22N launch vehicle. The warhead contains 14.5 kilos of enriched uranium, with a plutonium trigger. The nominal yield is 10 kilotons.

      I love that movie.

    5. Re:Its a... by JamesP · · Score: 2

      No, it's swamp gas, or a weather balloon.

      Or maybe a common brushtail opossum

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    6. Re:Its a... by gnapster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heck, I thought it was hilarious without knowing it was a film reference.

    7. Re:Its a... by Anrego · · Score: 4, Funny

      I love that movie.. but damn... If you quoted that from memory, please help yourself to a free internet on the way out the door!

    8. Re:Its a... by smitty97 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you know what those things can do? Suck the paint off your house and give your family a permanent orange afro.

      wait, wrong movie...

      --
      mod me funny
    9. Re:Its a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To the guy/gal that modded this Troll, it's a quote from True Lies. Cut TWX a break.

      They'd really have egg on their faces if it turned out to be an Espresso machine.

    10. Re:Its a... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      In related news, the US government's recently released report has proven that the mysterious UAV is, in fact, merely swamp gas.

    11. Re:Its a... by jo42 · · Score: 1

      It is a badly made RC plane in some blokes shed somewhere in Bumfuckistan.

    12. Re:Its a... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      This is a Soviet MIRV-Six, from an SS-22N launch vehicle. The warhead contains 14.5 kilos of enriched uranium, with a plutonium trigger. The nominal yield is 10 kilotons.

      Wow, in that case the dude in the photo really shouldn't be holding it that close to his crotch.
      Then again, Schwarzenegger probably now wishes he truly fired blanks, damn fake movie props.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    13. Re:Its a... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Frankly I wouldn't be surprised if some PMC took a contract for...oh say 40 million, from the USA and THAT is what we got for the money. it looks like some half assed thing you'd get if more was spent on paychecks and bribes than on the actual device.

      What is sad is that while we still can't afford healthcare, or doing anything about the flood of illegals and a border you could just walk a nuke through i bet my soon to be inflated to nothing last dollar if that is a USA UAV we paid waaaaaaay too much money for it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Its a... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I even heard the Austrian accent when reading this. Kudos, good anonymous Sir.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    15. Re:Its a... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Wading bird?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    16. Re:Its a... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

      I can't quote it from memory, but I still remember the striptease from Jamie Lee Curtis that was interrupted much too soon.

      --
      I8-D
    17. Re:Its a... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      By getting clocked in the head with a really sturdy looking phone no less! Talk about a mood killer!

    18. Re:Its a... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      The cadence in which that whole dialog happened was absolutely perfect, to the point of almost being funnier than the lines themselves.

      Thinking about it, the scene where he is telling his wife they they are gonna die was perfect for the same reason. "They're gonna shoot us in the head or torture us to death or leave us here with the bomb..." (ok, I can't quote from memory like _some_ people, but we all know the scene!)

      Definitely one of Schwarzenegger's better movies :)

    19. Re:Its a... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 2

      For once I am in complete agreement with the Parent. Although I would have added "That's an SS50 long range rocket and mobile launcher... that missile is tipped with a 40 megaton fission-fusion nuclear warhead". I also hear The Barkays are still having trouble getting gigs.

    20. Re:Its a... by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Obviously it's a swamp-gas weather balloon manufactured by ACME.

      Ahhh, one of these?

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    21. Re:Its a... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      "...or they gonna leave us here when the bomb blows up."

      And, besides, one of the better movies? Nothing against Terminator, but True Lies is the best one he ever made - not the least for Jamie Lee Curtis' brilliance.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    22. Re:Its a... by black+soap · · Score: 1

      "but they were all bad."

  2. There was a TED talk about robot birds that size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.ted.com/talks/a_robot_that_flies_like_a_bird.html

  3. Shopped by geekoid · · Score: 1

    and I've seen a lot of shops~

    Seriously, it looks like the UAV the send out with recon groups.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Shopped by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Before anyone calls bullshit on the shop.......

      Look at a couple of things in the photo.

      First look at the rocks. That would be the hardest to alter to shadows on. This is either very early in the morning or right when the sun is setting. So the rocks are probably the most authentic part of the photo and could be used to match up the rest of it.

      Look at guy's shirt. The angle of the shadows *does* match the angle of the rocks. Look at the shapes too. What looks like "talons" on his shirt do look like they match up with what is protruding from the front of the wreckage.

      What does not look it matches up at all are the shadows on the rocks directly beneath the front of the wreckage. The angle of light source does not seem like it would create that kind of shadow. You can also clearly see rocks beneath the wings that still have lighting on the front of it that is consistent with the overall light source, the Sun.

      Based on the length of the shadows on the small rocks in the back, there should not be a shadow beneath the wings at all. Unless you had a strong secondary light source. If one was present though, what is creating the shadow on the left wing at its outermost edge?

      At first glance, it looks like it could be real because of how well everything matches above the wreckage, but I don't see how the shadows below the wreckage match the environment and light sources. That secondary shadow below would also cause additional shadows above. Kind of like chandeliers cause multiple shadows from your hands on the wall. Some lighter than others. Based on the angle of the lower shadow, we should be seeing a lighter shadow on the guys hands...... which we don't.

      If the shadow below it was completely missing, it would be more plausible. The most telling is where is the long shadow the whole wreckage should be casting behind it somewhere near the back wall?

      I think it is shopped too at this point, but I would of have not thought to look at it hard enough unless the poster pointed it out first.

    2. Re:Shopped by mhotchin · · Score: 2

      Dude, the light source is almost certainly vehicle headlights. Not single source, not point, not distant.

    3. Re:Shopped by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      woosh.

    4. Re:Shopped by EdIII · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the photo here.

      I appreciate the sound effects, but it already crashed.

  4. Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

    I thought of this first too, though by the looks of it, it'd have to have gone through about a billion revs to get to this guy if its flight characteristics were the same.

    I'd guess it's just a wing-like profile... it looks like a fixed shape. Though I loved the video on the original site... who decided to co-opt the original Airwolf theme music for their report.

  5. Wait! I know it! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    It's a hs1fa@*ldk NO CARRIER

  6. The US has lost enough tech to know by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    to install self destruct devices into "secret" new tech.

    1. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by chispito · · Score: 1

      It's just an RC airplane painted vaguely like a seagull. I don't see what the big deal is.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Except then someone gets killed when it blows up. Wether or not they are military / intelligence or public, the country owning the device is in a heap of bad PR and diplomatic pressure.

      Not saying right or wrong, the information or the tech might very well be life/death to protect .... just that you can NEVER win.

    3. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This does not look like a top secret device. No, really, it doesn't.

      It looks like a low cost "expendable" craft intended to fly over restricted air spaces.

      I say that because the wing and airframe profile appear to have been modeled on the "gliding" look and behavior of a large goose. It would be exremely wasteful of military ordinance to shoot down everything that looks like a goose 100ft in the air that flies over a restricted area.

      If I were to design such a craft, it would 1) be very slow and as near to silent as possible. 2) contain absolutely no stealth technologies that might give enemy engineers clues about our radar abilities, and 3) implement an FPGA based one time pad data encryption system to transmit recon data to the nearby recon team.

      Ths way if the craft crashes, gets shot down, or captured the expense of replacement is 1) very low due to nearly 100% plastic construction and cheap electronics. 2) data forensically uninteresting from either an engineering pov or from a data espianage point of view. 3) cannot be used to break mission critical data encryption technologies, due to 1:1 one time pad pairings, with quite possibly cheap commercial encryption methods. (256AES, etc.) By the time it is recovered and studied, that pad is black listed as belonging to an mia drone.

      This thing has "field recon" practically painted all over it. Lightweight plastic airframe, electronic only propulsion, small battery... all add up to being a disposable device with very short range, low airspeed, and short active runtimes.

      Whoever deployed this device was close by. (Unlike a predator which uses petrolium fuel and has a rigid metal airframe that can handle a reasonably fast cruise speed and can perform long mission flighttime, this device has none of those features, and as such cannot realistically be launched from miles away like a predator can.) This looks like it could well be a "backpack" type kit, that folds up for storage and portability. (That's how I would commision such a device anyway.)

      All that said, this kind of setup would lend itself well to commercial mass production, since nearly the entire airframe could be injection molded on the cheap. For similar reasons the design would lend itself well to hobby enthusiasts with access to fab labs. Having access to aviation grade CAD equipment, I would *LOVE* to get some detailed photos of every inch of the airframe (with a mm scale metric ruler in the shots) and of the internal cavities.

      I really would like to make some community models of this vehicle.

    4. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by mapsjanhere · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a badly put together Rumpler Taube model, you can even see the wooden interior in one of the pictures.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    5. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A small price to pay to keep the top secret 'RC plane' tech from landing in the hands of the terrorist! What would happen if the started flying these into building~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a badly put together Rumpler Taube model, you can even see the wooden interior in one of the pictures.

      I agree with this guy. Looks like a crude Taube 90

    7. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree, it looks like a RC plane, not a UAV of any sort.

      It's possible that thing might be somewhat more sophisticated than it looks (quick, send it to ifixit for a teardown!) but offhand it looks like any other RC plane that CFIT.

    8. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Informative

      I watched the video, which has additional views of the interior.

      The part mark plate on the component marked "fmc" and the few metal components of the fuselage of the airframe look suspiciously like lockheed martin's work.

      (Disclaimer: I work in aerospace. This looks like their engineering in the metal bulkhead design. If not them, a subsidiary. Do not know the model. The part mark placcard stinks of LM. BOEING uses inkjet partmarking, as did raytheon aero before hawker beech bought them.)

    9. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Guy's wanting photos with a mm ruler in them for scale reference....I suspect he means CAD like he said, because he wants to make drawings.

    10. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. The tailplane looks a lot like a Taube, but the wing shape is wrong.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    11. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Aes needs a keypair, iirc. The otp satisfies one of these keys, is specific for that mission and that data stream. (This opposed to reusing keys.)

      For weight, and intelligence reasons the device should not have any more onboard storage than a few mb of ram for the flight computer and for the camera to store the image data prior to encryption and broadcast, and some flight control software in nand. This won't need to do complicated vector math like a stealth fighter, so a sophisticated flight computer would be unnecessary.

      The design implies short range base stations which should be in direct transmission range. This means the feed should be live to avoid exactly the same problem you just described. (They capture the drone and playback what it was lookinng at. No storage, no local playback. Only a otp, for that one drone. The most they could glean is the encrypt type and the discriminator freq used for data. True random otps would make it computationally unsensible to use captured pads for forensic intelligence purposes.)

    12. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Also on the video you see the camera/target designator returned to it's place (the round hole in the apparent bottom, he's holding it upside down).

      I bet having this fly overhead could ruin your whole day. I'm assuming target designation as video would be much smaller. Even night vision would be smaller.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by snowgirl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      3) implement an FPGA based one time pad data encryption system to transmit recon data to the nearby recon team.

      I'm not sure if you're just not sure why a one-time pad encryption method is absolutely secure, and you're just throwing out buzzwords to sound like you'e providing security, or if you're thinking of a highly convoluted process that can be accomplished much more simply.

      Realistically, you need a true random pad to be generated and sent to both receiver and transmitter, and then once the pad is used, it need be "burned" (or otherwise reliably destroyed). As the pad needs to be generated prior to sending out the UAV, the whole transmitter could honestly be accomplished with a simple Z80, and a large store of RAM... there's no reason to complicate things by throwing an FPGA into the mix... if you intended the FPGA system to generate the pad on the fly, then that isn't a one-time pad... either the pad would end up being deterministic, and thus not be truly random (which I grant you, could still make the decryption intractable, but it wouldn't make it unbreakable, which is the whole purpose of a one-time pad... we have intractable encryption routines already, and they're well tested.), or it would need to additionally communicate the random pad to the receiver, which requires a secure transmission channel, and at that point, why not just transmit your communications through that channel instead?

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    14. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that you assume a single, repeated com channel, and not a military discriminator.

      This means that "eve" needs to already know the frequency to be monitoring prior to obtaining the otp to decode the recorded stream. When doing ANYTHING cryptographic, you don't want to have a consistent variable, or the system becomes security through obscurity. (Sony ps3, for instance. You simply don't repeat the same keypair and hold the salt if you want a secure transaction.)

      The discriminator should be hopping channels to avoid allowing eve to record the transmission. The encryption should make the raw transmission nearly indistinguishable from random noise for those people without the keys.

      The otp can be used to dynamically change aes keys reasonably safely, if needed, and to synchronize discriminators. Each otp is specific to a drone/station pair, is reloaded with real random data on each mission launch, and would be useless if captured after the fact.

      More fun can be had id the system is designed to kill all power to volatile memory on the event of a crash landing, killing the otp in the drone's memory in the process. Like I said, no persistent onboard storage other than flight control software in nand.

    15. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The otp is transmitted between the base station and the uav at preflight over a physical data connection prior to activation of the radio com link. Eve would have to live in the data cable to get to the otp when it would matter.

      The fpga is indended for extensibility after production. (Say, field replacable modular optical devices, or other special purpose snap ins. The idea is to be able to totally change the way the system behaves without requiring a screwdriver and soldering iron.) It can also be made to nuke itself in the event of a crash, and cheap ones are just that.. cheap.

      I agree, a z80 would be more than enough processing oomph, but you might need special functionality "right now" on the field prior to launch.

    16. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I say that because the wing and airframe profile appear to have been modeled on the "gliding" look and behavior of a large goose. It would be exremely wasteful of military ordinance to shoot down everything that looks like a goose 100ft in the air that flies over a restricted area.

      Yeah it might be wasteful, but it would also be a hell of a lot of fun!

    17. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If I were to design such a craft, it would 1) be very slow and as near to silent as possible. 2) contain absolutely no stealth technologies that might give enemy engineers clues about our radar abilities, and 3) implement an FPGA based one time pad data encryption system to transmit recon data to the nearby recon team.

      You don't think the constant stream of radio data coming out of the thing would give it away?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      You mean like all the other low power broadcasting devices all over that would give false positives, on top of the wasted logistics of aiming rf sniffers up every transient bird's bum?

      The idea is that it looks like a bird, and the enemy base crew rightly ignores it. It is a social engineering hack to gain unauthorized intelligence access.

      Much like people in call centers don't to background checks on everyone that calls, (and thus fall victim to such attacks), the ground crews of restricted areas don't check out every single thing that enters their airspace. The more realistic the cammoflauge, the less rf antennas get aimed at it.

      It could be screaming like nobody's business like a spark gap transmitter, and still be overlooked as the cause. (At least until one gets captured, and the ruse discovered.)

    19. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by jbeaupre · · Score: 2

      I had to look it up. Learned they were used for reconnaissance.

      Some good pictures here for those who are curious:
      http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=252658

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    20. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by EdIII · · Score: 1

      It's just an RC airplane painted vaguely like a seagull. I don't see what the big deal is.

      Is it a lesbian seagull?

    21. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Yet not smart enough to secure data in enemy territory and allow a private to gain access to it and walk away from it?

      I think we have some pretty impressive "big boom" technologies and their associated delivery systems, but other than that, I would not automatically assume they are doing everything possible to secure it after it has been shot down. It would have to be some pretty redundant and resilient self destruct technology to withstand whatever caused it to go down in the first place. Not to mention, space and weight is at a premium on small craft like that.

      Which do you think they would go with first? More sensors, communications, and weapons? Or a self destruct payload?

    22. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Probably to deceive the casual observer and/or to improve the aerodynamics.

      But it can also be to tweak the radar signature so the radar observer knows that it's 'his' bird.

      In all - a cheap surveillance drone. Nothing remarkable in reality.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    23. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Seems like you'd need a pretty big otp.

    24. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      My first thought was that it bears a passing resemblance to Nausicaä's mehve.

    25. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      If I were to design such a craft, it would 1) be very slow and as near to silent as possible. 2) contain absolutely no stealth technologies that might give enemy engineers clues about our radar abilities, and 3) implement an FPGA based one time pad data encryption system to transmit recon data to the nearby recon team.

      Ths way if the craft crashes, gets shot down, or captured the expense of replacement is 1) very low due to nearly 100% plastic construction and cheap electronics. 2) data forensically uninteresting from either an engineering pov or from a data espianage point of view. 3) cannot be used to break mission critical data encryption technologies, due to 1:1 one time pad pairings, with quite possibly cheap commercial encryption methods. (256AES, etc.) By the time it is recovered and studied, that pad is black listed as belonging to an mia drone.

      Good design ideas, but I don't think you quite grasp the concept of one-time-pad:

      • AES256 is not a one-time pad but a symmetric key algorithm
      • No need to blacklist a one-time pad if compromised, as you are supposed to use it only one time anyways. That's why it's called one-time pad after all...: Reusing a one-time pad compromises its integrity. However keys for AES would indeed need to get blacklisted if caught.
    26. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      FPGAs are great and all, but how much work do you need special-driven hardware for? I mean, if you're using a custom chip, then an FPGA makes sense, but anything you want to do in FPGA "hard"ware could be done with software as well...

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    27. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Seems like you'd need a pretty big otp.

      "We're going to need a bigger pad..."

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    28. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by p4g3m4s7r · · Score: 1

      As an aerospace engineering student and RC enthusiast I'd have to agree, this is just a cheap RC plane (notice the beer-can holder cockpit?). The only things that would seem to indicate otherwise are the fact that it's flying in Pakistan, has very thin wings for an RC plane (thin wings made of balsa just don't work), and the fact that it looks like there's some sort of foam injection in the body. The scotch-tape FMC's placed everywhere only confirm it's homemade, and the way the skin crumpled just screams MonoKote. There are chunks of balsa sticking out everywhere and the plastic control arms on the control surfaces are just like the ones I've used on every cheap RC plane I've built. On top of that, you have a fuselage with really poor aerodynamics, and the fact that it's just too big for a hand launch "disposable" UAV. And the four "apertures" on the bottom look like spots where they put washers to secure some sort of cheap landing gear. Also, the nose cone is a really common style used by RC enthusiast's because of how easily it hooks up to an electric starter. Maybe Al-Qaeda threw this together because they thought it looked like a bird? That wouldn't explain the writing in English, but would explain why it's a total piece of crap that I'd be way too ashamed to fly.

    29. Re:The US has lost enough tech to know by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      FMC is Aerospace-ese for "Flight Management Computer". Lots of companies both big and small (USA and foreign) make them.

  7. It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes ... by dougmc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To my (somewhat) trained eye, this looks like any other R/C airplane run by amateurs who fly them strictly within line of sight (though many have been putting FPV equipment so they can fly them with a first person view, often a few miles away.)

    From time to time our R/C planes do malfunction and will fly off out of our control, or something will go wrong and they'll crash and we won't be able to find and recover them. Perhaps it's just some hobbyist's plane that got away from him? It certainly looks like something a hobbyist made rather than an expensive commercial/military model.

    Though I guess this does bode poorly for the hobby -- ham radio operators don't bring their radios with them when they go to many countries because people often equate radios with spies ... I guess the next step is to equate people flying R/C planes with spies?

  8. Airwolf! and dirty video by Foo2rama · · Score: 2

    I think Bellisario should sue... They totally ripped off the Airwolf intro music.


    On a side note I love how they took the festo smart bird video and dirtied it up to look military lol...

    http://www.festo.com/cms/en_corp/11369_11439.htm#id_11439

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  9. One word, Roswell! by rstanley · · Score: 1

    Obviously is is part of an alien spaceship! Where are the remains of the pilots??? ;^)

    When will the Air Force show us samples of a weather balloon??? ;^)

  10. pshaw! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    It's obviously a pelican illuminated by the reflected glow of swamp gas.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:pshaw! by schmidt349 · · Score: 2

      Don't be ridiculous. What you have there is the Bolivian Navy on maneuvers in the South Pacific.

    2. Re:pshaw! by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      It's an apple.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  11. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I could tell you. But then I would have to kill you.

  12. The Good Guys Always Win - Even in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't know what the bird-thing is, but the background music to the (pakistani?) news video is definitely from the 1980s tv show Airwolf. lol.

    http://www.kalam.tv/ur/video/87696/index.html
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr_CJL1YQRc

  13. Ingenuous! by aglider · · Score: 2

    Do you really think that anyone who could identify that UAV, provided that it's a UAV, would respond to your question?
    Let's reason.
    Those who really can do it would be among:
    - people from the company who built it
    - people from the DoD who required/bought it
    - people from the army/company who operated it
    - spies from a dozen of countries.
    Now check one by one these categories. None will answer here as a comment. And not even as a private message, as Slashdot has none and because online stuff is traceable.
    I would also exclude the email (gary@yyyyyyyyyy) and the phone (0778 6666666) for the same reason.
    I would expect a few fake money request into your post box in the Somerset.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Ingenuous! by EdIII · · Score: 1

      as Slashdot has none and because online stuff is traceable

      Hah!!

      I'm surfing incognito right now with that special agent looking guy icon in the browser. Try and trace me now....

    2. Re:Ingenuous! by aglider · · Score: 1

      ... and that agent guy is also hiding your IP address!
      Look, instead of the real one you are 192.168.1.2!

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  14. It might be an American style date by chemosh6969 · · Score: 1

    ...whatever that means but it's not a military style date.

    1. Re:It might be an American style date by black3d · · Score: 1

      Where "some European" = "Almost every other country in the world." :)

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    2. Re:It might be an American style date by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      i tend to use yyyy-mm-dd for easier sorting.

    3. Re:It might be an American style date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's ISO-8601 standard date format. The choice of sensible people for decades now.

      I use it not just because it sorts properly; it is clearly neither the ambiguous European or American way, so there's no doubt what it means.

      For similar reasons I write the digit "7" the European way (with a stroke) but the digit "1" the American way (vertical line).

    4. Re:It might be an American style date by black3d · · Score: 1

      Likewise, I use YYYYMMDD for all files/folders/anything where I can enter a date, for precisely the sorting reason. :)

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    5. Re:It might be an American style date by couchslug · · Score: 1

      True, though I don't know many folks even in aircraft maintenance who use the military format anywhere but on required forms, 350 equipment condition tags, etc.

      I always used the "7 Dec 2009" style on informal entries and in the handwritten old-school "green logbooks".

      Maintenance documentation got the TO version:

      From TO 00-20-1
      "Manually record all dates on the forms prescribed in the 00-20-series Technical Orders by eight digits in the order of year,
      month, and day. Example: YYYYMMDD, 20091207 for 7 Dec 2009."

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:It might be an American style date by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I also picked up on that habit, though I often format it as yyyy.mm.dd
      I had already used it a bit to organize things for classes where the term started in one year and ended in the next (December/January/February), but coming across a collection of Led Zeppelin bootlegs organized with dates formatted in that manner got me to expand my general use of that date format.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    7. Re:It might be an American style date by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      As opposed to some European dates, where the date comes before the month in dd/mm/yy format.

      ...which is how American military dates are formatted. American military members will record the date as 1 September 2011, instead of September 1, 2011.

      The CIA on the other hand, who knows what those cats are up to...

    8. Re:It might be an American style date by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Given the US date format and the reasoning, surely 10 past 5 should be 10:5:00? ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  15. Re:FMC? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Military ineptness jokes aside, I'm pretty sure they don't go around labeling and dating parts of their vehicles with masking tape.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  16. Re:FMC? by couchslug · · Score: 2

    FMC is the usual term for Fully Mission Capable, and while I've never seen masking tape used to mark aircraft it is light enough to provide a good background for magic marker. (When marking light-colored surfaces, grease pencil was common in the Air Force years ago.)

    There is obviously no place for a "781" forms binder in such a small machine. :)

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  17. Who's That Pokemon? by kakyoin01 · · Score: 1

    It's Skarmory. *cerealguy.jpg*

    --
    The more you know, the more you have to say and the more you should listen.
  18. Re:FMC? by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Grease pencil on weapons placards was common (the Navy may still use it).

    When we deployed to Al Dhafra, grease pencils were even used for nose art:

    http://www.f-16.net/interviews_article33.html

    Note the old-school white placard on this O-2:
    http://farm1.static.flickr.com/54/432712455_fda36d0f7d.jpg

    Tape is available and produces the required contrast. There is no functional reason not to use tape and marker.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  19. Good luck by DarkOx · · Score: 2

    In the world of unacknowledged weapons and surveillance systems pretty much anything could be anything. Just because someone slapped some US military lingo and American formatted dates does not mean anything. Maybe it was built by someone who had been in the States and thought nothing of it but is not connected with the US officially, maybe someone else made it and used surplus American components, maybe someone wanted to try and embarrass the US by making it look American, maybe someone else is spying and does not want it know so just made the thing to look American encase it was captured.

    Just off the top of my head it could be:
    ISI
    CIA
    Israel
    Some engineering students who have been recruited by extremists
    A hobbyist

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  20. Whoops. by L1B3R4710N · · Score: 1

    Time to don the tin hats, people.

    --
    "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie/Ken Thompson, 1972
  21. It's the next Apple product by Megahard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody lost it in a bar.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:It's the next Apple product by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The iFlap was an iFlop

    2. Re:It's the next Apple product by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      ha!

  22. Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz by tronicum · · Score: 2

    Yes. the TED Video is a demonstration of the FESTO Smartbird, see also Youtube Video. This Video is a stupid mash-up. They seem to have found an small video drone, bird shaped, with fixed wings. Any of intelligence agency or a good RC plane builder can build those. But Smartbid is entirely different. As you can see in the above TED Video it has many organic build internal conjunction. The above shown picture and open body is much simpler. So maybe the found a RC Plane that looks like a bird. Maybe it was even used by a foreign power in an Arabic country. But that video does not give you any clues beside some shaky videos and pictures....

  23. One thing's for sure by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Whoever built it was intent on convincing people on the ground that it's nothing more than a vulture circling overhead for the past 3 days.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:One thing's for sure by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, reminds me of that scene from Rango where the bats grouped together and emulated a hawk to scare Rattlesnake Jake. Briefly. :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  24. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by mbone · · Score: 2

    You don't generally get too many hobbyists in war zones.

  25. Bird UAV by EEPROMS · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Bird UAV by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Not bad, you may have win a cookie!

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Bird UAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yup.
      http://www.theissaviation.com/AFRL%20Bird.html

    3. Re:Bird UAV by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      They have a news article about this machine and are speculating themselves as to what it might be

      http://www.suasnews.com/2011/08/7869/that-mystery-bird-shaped-drone/

  26. Re:Most likely by cavreader · · Score: 1

    These days the CIA is more "military" than the real military. They are the ones orchestrating the drone missions in that area.

  27. Re:FMC? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    I understand nose art, and labeling an aircraft to described what it's armed with, but would you stick a piece of masking tape on a missile and write "missile" on it?

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  28. have you considered a rc hobby kit? by blackcoot · · Score: 1

    they are surprisingly inexpensive ($500 plus some labor w/ analog video downlink). they are also likely to have been repaired quite frequently (that is if you're lucky and didn't leave a pile of kindle your last encounter with gravity).

    on an unrelated note, it's fun to watch confirmation bias in the wild.

  29. Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interestingly featured in this Pakastani military website.

    Took about 45 seconds to find on Google. Most of the time was spent opening the beer can.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  30. its a theiss bird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.theissaviation.com/AOL.html
    we have a bunch of these.

  31. It's a banana by rlp · · Score: 2

    or a red and blue striped golfing umbrella.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:It's a banana by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      No, its a small, off-duty chzecloslovakian traffic warden.

  32. Re:really? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    This isn't China... yet.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  33. Re:FMC? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 3, Informative

    Claymores have "Face Toward Enemy" written on them. Nothing would surprise me.

  34. obvious by Vokoder · · Score: 1

    clearly the next stage in evolution of cylon birds

  35. Tally Hawk by hort_wort · · Score: 2

    This is clearly a marketing ruse to encourage us to buy SilverHawks on DVD, which has a cyber-bird named Tally Hawk.
    Hmmmm it appears to only be $10 now....

  36. I know what it is. by McDrewbie · · Score: 1

    I think it is that paper airplane I threw over the cube wall.

  37. Re:FMC? by Ambvai · · Score: 1

    Seriously? I came across that in manga and thought it was a silly joke.

  38. Possible Identity of the Drone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This website: http://defensetech.org/2011/08/29/mystery-drone-crash-in-pakistan/#more-14195

    Notes that this Drone is likely a modified Lockheed Martin Desert Hawk. From the looks of it, it very well could be.

  39. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't generally get too many hobbyists in war zones.

    That sounds like crazy talk to me. Of course you get hobbyists in war zones - they're called the "inhabitants" of the newly-created "war zone". Right before it was a "war zone" is was a "place to live" where people probably did have hobbies.

  40. Re:FMC? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    Sadly, it is true...

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  41. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    Yes, but once it is a war zone we call them terrorists because their hobby *may* help the bad guys. If we can't pin terrorist on them we call them a sympathizer or some other tag that makes it ok to at least harass them.
    </whishful sarcasm>

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  42. Re:FMC? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    No, but if I had a bunch of components in a storage shed in a deployed location I'd mark the "good ones" after bench-checking them so users could "grab and go". It's a helluva lot easier than bouncing serial numbers off a logbook.

    FMC, PMC (Partially Mission Capable), NMC (Not Mission Capable), and other codes are the usual shorthand. If you need to make one out of two, "cann" (cannibalize) parts from the NMC equipment and have at it.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  43. Re:FMC? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Claymores have "Face Toward Enemy" written on them. Nothing would surprise me."

    OK. Picture a PLAIN Claymore. Not particularly intuitive.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  44. Was it carrying a coconut? by titanium93 · · Score: 1

    It could be a migrating Swallow.

    --
    Sigs are for losers
    1. Re:Was it carrying a coconut? by LittleRedStar · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

  45. Re:It's a Streetlight. by ProfMobius · · Score: 1

    You sir made my day :)

    --
    EULA : By reading the above message, you agree that I now own your soul.
  46. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by theArtificial · · Score: 1

    Yes, but once it is a war zone we call them terrorists because their hobby *may* help the bad guys. If we can't pin terrorist on them we call them a sympathizer or some other tag that makes it ok to at least harass them.

    Not to get in the way of a good rant, but other countries do this. Link.

    --
    Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  47. Yikes by mevets · · Score: 2

    I didn't know Pakistan was in Arkansas. I really have to get an atlas.

  48. Re:FMC? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2
    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  49. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by Skidborg · · Score: 2

    From what I've seen and heard, there are actually surprisingly large number of R/C hobbyists in the military. Sometimes those toys find their way into the line of fire.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  50. RQ-11 Raven by planet+x+pat · · Score: 1

    Could it be a modded raven?

  51. Homemade Job? by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While not very technically advanced, I'd say (based on my R/C and Military experience) that this is in fact some type of close recon UAV, deployed out of a backpack. These guys that are "interrogating" the craft are probably very lucky they weren't the intended target, as the person that launched it is probably on the next hill.

    I will add to the date controversy with this tidbit. The US Military writes their dates Day/Month/Year. It was one of the first things I had to learn. Hell I still do it to this day. I get asked all the time why I use the European convention. Then I have to explain, "no, it's the military convention".

    So let me suggest that it was deployed by an American, "civilian" organization? Who could that be?

    --
    We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
    1. Re:Homemade Job? by MarkusH · · Score: 1

      You know, if I was hired to run a convoy of supply trucks near a war zone, dropping a thousand dollars on a cheap UAV plus operator in the front cab seems like a wise investment. He could keep an eye out for ambushes, someone setting up IEDs, or even road problems that might delay us. I might even be able to expense it, depending on the contract.

    2. Re:Homemade Job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US Military writes their dates Day/Month/Year. It was one of the first things I had to learn. Hell I still do it to this day. I get asked all the time why I use the European convention. Then I have to explain, "no, it's the military convention".

      Trolling(?): It's the smart convention. Writings things down in a logically ordered way is preferrable to writing it down in a non-ordered way. So Day/Month/Year makes sense as is Day Month Year in regard to the unit. Year/Month/Day makes sense as well, as you start with the big unit and go to the smaller ones (2011/04/05 is very easy to sort through if you have a list of dates).
      Writing MIDDLE_UNIT/SMALLEST_UNIT/BIGGEST_UNIT is just... stupid. It also has no reasoning in daily use. Reading the month first is rarely more important than readin the day first. Change that, Land of the Brave and Smart and Technologically Advanced. Oh... and adapt the metric system, ffs!

    3. Re:Homemade Job? by commando_jim · · Score: 1

      Would the components necessarily have military style dates on them? I would expect a device like this to use as many commodity parts as possible to keep costs low. Is it possible that some parts would have markings on them intended for the US civilian market?

      I'm not familiar with military equipment so I don't know what lengths they go to in removing civilian markings from equipment.

    4. Re:Homemade Job? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      And you have to be at the gym in 26 minutes?

  52. It's Bubo from Clash of the Titans! by digitalamish · · Score: 1

    Harry Hamlin gotta eat!

  53. Re:FMC? by Shompol · · Score: 1

    I don't quite get it even with the inscription. Is it a directional explosive?

  54. Re:Most likely by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

    The scary thing is that they are more dangerous because they believe things like the geneva convention only apply to the army and such forces. The lack of accountability is truly troubling.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  55. Re:FMC? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    I don't quite get it even with the inscription. Is it a directional explosive?

    Yes, it's a directional explosive with lots of little metal balls for shrapnel inside. It has 700 1/8" steel balls, with an effective range of about 50 yds in a 60 degree wide cone that is very flat. Typically command detonated.

    See M18 or M18A1 Claymore on various wikis. GlobalSecurity has a chart showing the coverage area.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  56. Re:Yes I can by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    First things first - the video do show a handwritten date; 8/10/11, and that's the US way of writing a date, many other places in the world would write a date differently; 2011-08-10, 10/8-11 or so. It's just a rough indication, but a clue.

    And the basic design tells me that it's likely to be some cheap surveillance drone lightly masked to look like a bird of prey to fool the casual observer. Won't take much effort to design and develop something like that compared to the more heavy stuff that the US military is using.

    And it has probably been flying under the radar (pun intended) because it hasn't been sexy enough.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  57. Disposable surveillance by Cogent91 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does it look like it doesn't cost a million bucks? Which would be a nice change for substantial UAVs. I suspect its an early generation cheap surveillance drone. Fully mission capable as it is; its not like slapping a camera on a remote control plane is really that hard in this day and age.

  58. Who cares what the aircraft is... by goosesensor · · Score: 1

    I want a pair of them shoes!

  59. Re:FMC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The GP was speaking hypothetically you poor soul.

  60. So THAT's where it went by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's my son's science project. We couldn't get it past TSA, so decided to send it to the fair on it's own.

    1. Re:So THAT's where it went by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (However, the extra apostrophe did get past the TSA. Sorry 'bout that.)

  61. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    War isn't a hobby of the US?

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  62. Re:FMC? by c0lo · · Score: 1

    I don't quite get it even with the inscription. Is it a directional explosive?

    M18A1 Claymore directional antipersonnel mine, remote detonated, used mainly in ambushes, fires steel balls out to about 100 meters within a 60 arc in front of the device.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  63. Face Toward Enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you don't know which way to stand when you're holding a giant sword, you're in serious trouble when the battle happens.

  64. Re:Yes I can by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    First things first - the video do show a handwritten date; 8/10/11, and that's the US way of writing a date, many other places in the world would write a date differently; 2011-08-10, 10/8-11 or so. It's just a rough indication, but a clue.

    Yeah, that could never be imitated by a foreign intelligence agency so the USA gets the blame when one crashes...

    --
    No sig today...
  65. Re:Yes I can by neokushan · · Score: 1

    Why is everyone assuming it's an American date? Surely the more likely option is that it's FROM THE FUTURE.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  66. conspiracy by gavrc · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I saw something similar to this when I visited Microsoft...

  67. I can identify that craft by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

    That is known as an RVAE. The new drone that replaced soldiers doing ISTAR.

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  68. Re:FMC? by jpapon · · Score: 1

    Exactly... and it's not a mistake you're likely able to learn from.

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
  69. Re:It looks like any of the oodles of R/C planes . by Anonymus · · Score: 1

    The "if other countries do it, it's ok for us to do it too" argument? Really?

  70. Re:Yes I can by Talderas · · Score: 1

    That's the civilian way of writing dates.

    Military style is YYYYMMDD.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  71. Swallow by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

    It's clearly a swallow, probably meant for the transport of coconuts.

    --

    "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  72. Re:Yes I can by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Well if it was military, the date on an "inspection" sticker would more likely be in military Julian date first digit would be the year, 1 one since it's 2011 and the number of days in the year and the 10 of Aug would be the 222th day of 2011 so 10 Aug 2011 would be written as 1222. Most components are periodically inspected so if something needs re-inspection every 0 or 180 days, using day number dates make the arithmetic trivial. 8/10/11 is definitely civilian style dating. Of course writing 1222 would have been to obtuse to mean

    The term 'the 10th of August' is widely used by historians as a shorthand for the Storming of the Tuileries Palace on the 10th of August, 1792, the effective end of the French monarchy until it is restored in 1814. August 10

    Muslims and Arab Muslims in particular, and Al Queda especially like to use dates to send hidden messages. We've pretty much got the head chopped off the Al Queda snake maybe be we're delivering that message.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  73. Re:Yes I can by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    That's a filthy foreign style. McCarthy will be out soon to get you goddamn pinko "military industrial complex" preverts and stop you fiddling with our precious bodily fluids.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  74. Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz by stickystyle · · Score: 1

    Took about 45 seconds to find on Google. Most of the time was spent opening the beer can.

    You should learn to shotgun your beers, unless of course it was a Gunnies and if that's the case you should have spent two minutes pouring it.

    --
    Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
  75. Re:There was a TED talk about robot birds that siz by stickystyle · · Score: 1

    You should learn to shotgun your beers, unless of course it was a Gunnies and if that's the case you should have spent two minutes pouring it.

    Shit. I spelt Guinness wrong...here come the drunk spelling nazis.

    --
    Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
  76. Star Trek by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

    Looks like the Romulan warbird from Balance of Terror. Am I that old?

  77. Propaganda? by gstewart · · Score: 1

    Why do all these photographs reek of Pakistani propaganda to me? I feel like I'm looking at photos of UFO wreckage from Roswell.

    After the mission to kill Bin Laden in Pakistan, the Pakistani government don't like us very much, and I get the impression this could just be some ploy to provoke anti-American sentiment.

    To me, it looks more like a R/C plane with some unrelated bits and pieces that might not even fit into the craft. But, I'm certainly no authority on R/C planes or military surveillance craft.

  78. Re:Yes I can by Talderas · · Score: 1

    Noticing the woosh but I have to point this out.

    I'm pretty sure most foreign nations use DD/MM/YYYY for date formats. Because of that, my 20 year old Australian friend was able to drink in a bunch of bars in the US when he came for a visit.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  79. Re:FMC? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    It's molded into the plastic. There is a reason I said "picture" a plain one because US mines have lettering.

    Have some internal pics:

    http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t70805.html

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  80. Re:FMC? by black+soap · · Score: 1

    If you are rotating batteries, you might even want to write down the date you last charged it. Some batteries self-discharge pretty fast, so a technician might find that information real handy.

  81. Re:Yes I can by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Woosh yourself, but so far you've come up with evidence that one other nationality uses DD/MM/YYYY ; here in the UK, the norm is MM/DD/YYYY (but others are commonly seen, and I default to YYYY/MM/DD until a client objects).

    TTBOMK, only the Japanese use YYYY/MM/DD,, presumably because someone sat down and chose it in about 1860, rather than it developing by some randomly-seeded crystallisation as in most other cultures.

    (As someone who walks past the "Scottish Samurai's" family home when I go into the office, I'm regularly reminded that the late 19th century Japanese society was taking a deliberate look at what parts of global culture it was going choose, now that their original choice of isolation had been taken away.)

    [Sigh] hunts for a list , neglecting choice of separator ("it's a separator ; it's already performed it's function")... 20 big-endian countries listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country ; 109 little-endian; 6 middle-endian and several in official transition.
    However, since large amounts of media and culture are broadcast by some of the rump of middle-endian countries, then the recognition that what seems to be a date format might be ambiguous is a lot more widespread than the dominance of little-endian countries would suggest form that summary.

    Anyway, I'll use ISO 8601 as default - and say so - until the client informs me what their standard is. And since so few clients consist of only one nationality, it's rarely an issue that's not recognised as an issue.

    Hang on ...

    Because of that, my 20 year old Australian friend was able to drink in a bunch of bars in the US when he came for a visit.

    How does that become an issue? For the year number to have been ambiguous about his age ... by two or more years ... sorry, don't understand how that could happen. Julian/ Gregorian Calendar question? No, that would only give about 13 days error, not a couple of years. [PUZZLED]

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"