Slashdot Mirror


NASA Reveals New Images of Apollo Landing Sites

sighted writes "Sharp new images from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter show the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites in amazing detail, including the last foot trails left by astronauts on the lunar surface." These pictures were grabbed after the LRO dropped its orbit from 50km above the surface to 25km.

37 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. Poor NASA server by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    That image is a hotlinked, bigass JPEG.

    A bunch of admins are probably running into the server room with fire extinguishers at this moment. And hopefully one with a Scottish accent is yelling over a cell phone that the server is overloaded and can't take any more.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Poor NASA server by Artraze · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eh, it's only 1MB (which is actually quite large considering uncompressed would be 1.8MB by my estimate). Given how carelessly pages are designed these days, you're probably saving 100+ requests and 1MB of data by them not linking the page...

      But hey, you don't have to listen to me; check out http://analyze.websiteoptimization.com/
      Total HTTP Requests: 312
      Total Size: 1828125 bytes

      Woohoo! Slashdot is doing them a favor.

  2. Wait by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTA;

    The images do not line up perfectly because of differences in lighting conditions, angle of the LRO Camera, and other variables.

    Like being on a different sound stage??

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Wait by m.ducharme · · Score: 2

      I sincerely hope that he does think he's funny. It's better than him being serious.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    2. Re:Wait by heroid1a · · Score: 2

      I think you will find they faked the moon landing hoax : it was one hell of a job, but doing it for real so they could fake the fake was truly the prank of the century.

  3. But what we really want to see is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the Apollo 18 landing site!

  4. They still won't belive it. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 5, Funny

    The 'never went to the moon' crowd will only believe it when the can see it with their own eyes. Which is fine by me. Take them there and let them look. Jjust remember no helmets now, the visors could be ultra high def curved monitors.

    1. Re:They still won't belive it. by arielCo · · Score: 2

      That's why it's crucial to ship them all.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  5. Re:No stars in the photo! by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    Yeah, then I think it's been 40 years and we've achieved precious little else except cargo trips to low earth orbit that blow up once in a while, and an "international space station" which no one ended up wanting to pay for, was plagued with delays and budget cuts, and despite being much more expensive has not really achieved much more than Skylab; and I get depressed. Oh and we put some toy robots on Mars.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  6. Freaking Flash (again!) by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the hell do they need to use Flash to display images? What moron thought a simple picture file would be enhanced by embedding it within another piece of software?

    Rule #2 of IT that should never be broken: Never let a web designer design your web page.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Freaking Flash (again!) by darkshot117 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know you can click the link to the actual image right? The flash part is just showing a slider comparison between high and low res older pictures.

    2. Re:Freaking Flash (again!) by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How, exactly, can we get that cool comparison-slider, without using something like Flash or HTML5?

  7. Re:It's a fake!!! by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you magnify the image, you can see Stanley Kubrick sitting in a director's chair in a crater.

    Oh wait. (rubbing my LCD screen) Dead pixels.

  8. How sad is this by sunking2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When our space program is reduced to trying to impress us all by looking 40 years in the past.

    1. Re:How sad is this by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      About as sad as the fact that a sizable chunk of the population needs proof, because they're too fucking idiotic to appreciate one of the biggest accomplishments of our civilization. If you had told people in the 1970's that this is how it would turn out, they would have laughed you out of the room.

    2. Re:How sad is this by Teun · · Score: 2
      Then it was 150 billion dollars well spend.

      If only GW would have spend a fraction of what became the Iraq war on an other moon or even Mars mission the US would have been admired by youth the world over, including the Muslim world.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    3. Re:How sad is this by GrahamCox · · Score: 2

      There've been too many government cover ups, too many covert operations, too many things that the government does that goes against the will of the people.

      Yes, and we know about them because sooner or later (usually sooner) they all came to light - someone leaked information, spilt the beans to the press, or just plain got caught. And when those conspiracies to get unravelled, they are usually laughable in their breathtaking arrogance and incompetence. To me, this proves that the moon conspiracy theories can't be true, or we'd all know all about it. It's just impossible that it could have been covered up successfully and competently to the extent that some believe it has.

  9. Re:Where did Apollo 18 Land? by Beelzebud · · Score: 2

    /dev/null is the best place for it.

  10. *Whew* by jomama717 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cernan and Schmitt were probably sweating this release out, thinking the image might reveal the ridiculous number of donuts they pulled in the moon buggy.

    --
    while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
    1. Re:*Whew* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      or the fact that Shepard forgot to rake his footprints in the sand trap.

  11. Letter of Marque and Reprisal by perpenso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The U.S. Congress is authorized by the Constitution to issue Letter of Marque and Reprisal. I say Congress should issue one to Buzz Aldrin and let him punch moon hoaxers in face. That includes some of the idiots posting around here, Jay and Silent Bob style tracking them down and ringing the doorbell on their Mom's house. ;-)

  12. Re:Won't convince the deniers of course. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Remember, for a conspiracy theorist, evidence against a conspiracy is evidence for a conspiracy.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. Re:No stars in the photo! by murdocj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    Except roving around for kilometers on Mars.

    But yeah, other than Mars Rovers... oh, and orbiting Saturn.

    Yeah, but other than Mars rovers and orbiting Saturn... oh, and orbiting Mercury. And ongoing missions to interstellar space. And a mission to Pluto. And orbiting an asteroid. And private space travel. And starting work on manned trips to asteroids...

    But yeah, other than that, what have the Romans ever done for us?

  14. Re:Fake Landing by Nadaka · · Score: 2

    does it have to be "or"? Could very well be "and".

  15. Re:It's a fake!!! by countertrolling · · Score: 2

    Of course it's fake. You think any reasonable person would park so far away and schlep all the way back to the ship in those damn suits?

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  16. Re:It's a fake!!! by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    You forgot to right click and select "Zoom-In" and then choose "Enhance".

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  17. Re:No stars in the photo! by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, then I think it's been 40 years and we've achieved precious little else...

    Correction: Since then, we've done a lot of important and useful work instead of wasting time on spectacular Cold War PR missions.

    NASA has achieved a lot more every year since then than they did on the Apollo missions. Sorry if it wasn't sexy enough for you, but the real work rarely is...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  18. Re:You haven't fooled me NASA! by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

    Or we need to ignore and marginalize dumb-fucks who get all of their information from other dumb-fucks.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  19. How poignant and sad... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...that we can see so clearly where we've been, but can't go there again.

    Of all the things ever predicted by science-fiction writers, did any of them predict that after we'd gotten to the moon, we'd let grass grow on the Saturn launching pads?

    "History records that the first successful voyage to the Moon was made in 2316 by Grzchopeng M'bennypacker. Some enthusiasts insist that unidentifiable metal fragments in the Taurus-Littrow valley are human artifacts, and are evidence that the United States reached the moon centuries earlier, but professional historians dismiss these as unproven speculation, and do not accept Frafnar Otsumix's alleged "decoding" of binary files alleged to be in what Otsumix calls "jpg" format. In any case, even if a handful of crude United States spacecraft somehow--by design or accident--managed reach the moon in the twentieth century, it is of no importance as nothing further came of it."

  20. Re:It's a fake!!! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

    There's no air on the moon, of course he's dead (no woosh required).

    Well, I'm glad there's no whoosh required, because without air there wouldn't be any.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  21. Re:You haven't fooled me NASA! by OzoneLad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What 'things?' There's no requirement for NASA to spend tax dollars to placating morons.

    Well, they do have to keep Congress happy.

  22. Re:Where did Apollo 18 land? by pissoncutler · · Score: 2

    I'm sure Hollywood has taken some license with the story, but I don't think it's fair to call it pure fiction. The actual Apollo 18 moon landing is just as real as any of the other moon missions, they were all filmed on the same soundstage in Studio City...

    Hold on, what's Buzz Aldrin doing here? Buzz, why? ... NOT IN THE FACE ... Oh the humanity...

  23. Re:Japanese Orbiter? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2

    Kaguya did its thing, then they crashed it to avoid creating more space junk. It took some seriously cool pictures and movies.

    ...laura

  24. Really? by Lifyre · · Score: 2

    There is only one answer of course...

    GODZILLA!

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  25. Re:You haven't fooled me NASA! by idontgno · · Score: 3, Funny

    But.. but...I LIKE reading Slashdot!

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  26. Re:No stars in the photo! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    What you missed is the ability to live day in, day out, month in, month out (now 10 years) in .... space. You know, that hostile place where we will have to live for ....years.... when (if?) we get motivated to move out of LEO. Yes, I'd like sexier things, bigger targets, more expansive visions but you only get what you pay for.

    We are much better at mundane station keeping than we were before the ISS. Hopefully we can put that knowledge to use before we forget it.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  27. Re:No stars in the photo! by TWX · · Score: 2

    Can't tell if sarcastic, or really thinks that putting a few humans on Moon for a bit is more valuable than huge amounts of data.

    That depends on what the humans in space achieve versus what the huge amounts of data are used for.

    Contrary to popular belief, knowledge is not power. Application of knowledge is power. If we don't use our knowledge to put humans, and likely other life forms representative of Earth, to live permanently off-planet, then it's really no different than all of the various sea-faring cultures that supposedly discovered the American continents in the centuries before Columbus but didn't really do anything with that knowledge. Right now, we're on that cusp, in that we've gone somewhere, but rather than continuing to develop that ability to keep going, we've pulled back. Perhaps pulling back for a time is wise and warranted, as the entire method employed to go to the moon was very highly specialized for only that particular mission and would be terribly ill-suited to going farther, but at some point we need to take all of that data from the other planets, from how our probes move through the solar system, and we need to actually go out there in the flesh.

    Maybe if we're smart we won't destroy what we find when we get there.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.