Slashdot Mirror


Israel To Join CERN As First Non-European Member

First time accepted submitter WorldPiece writes "More accurately, first non-European full member. This comes with some opposition from groups pushing to boycott Israel academia in response to the Israeli government's policies. 'It is a vital part of our mission to build bridges between nations. This agreement enriches us scientifically and is an important step in that direction,' CERN's Director General Rolf Heuer, a German physicist, told the signing ceremony."

351 comments

  1. Good. by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Politics have no business in science.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Good. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, many politicians make it their business, to dabble their fingers in science to get it under their control. For the usual motives: money, power, etc.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it should never be public policy to distribute funds to science projects?

      Or develop laws regarding what a scientist can or cannot do?

      Or establishing copyright laws on discoveries and techniques?

    3. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, then I guess you would have no problem if Palestine is admitted as a full member? Or is this a Jewish solidarity thing?

    4. Re:Good. by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Would you have any problem with Iran joining the European Organization for Nuclear Research? Maybe you wouldn't, but I guarantee Israel would. And I'm not claiming Israel = Iran, just that many would argue a line must be drawn somewhere.

    5. Re:Good. by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Politics have no business in science.

      If there's funding involved, there's politics.
       

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Good. by bhartman34 · · Score: 2

      Not true at all. Many scientific endeavors have public policy and ethical considerations that very much are matters that should be political. Not everything that can be done in the name of science should be done.

    7. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just that. Science has no place in politics.

    8. Re:Good. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Palestine isn't officially recognized as a state right now, and would fall under Israel's admittance. It's internal politics in Israel itself that's keeping Palestine out at this point, not CERN itself.

      Let's see what happens after this week's UN vote on whether Palestine should be admitted as a state before we start throwing around statements like yours, yes?

    9. Re:Good. by mangu · · Score: 1

      you would have no problem if Palestine is admitted as a full member?

      No problem.

      As soon as Palestinian contribution to CERN becomes significant enough.

    10. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politics have no business in science.

      That's exactly the point.

    11. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the same about Iran's nuclear power program - but given this is /. I'm not sure that would help you grasp the hypocrisy....

    12. Re:Good. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      No, Israel would not oppose to Iran participating in a worldwide nuclear-research body. Iran has very talented nuclear engineers. That would be a terrific project for them.

      Oh, I'm Israeli.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    13. Re:Good. by quenda · · Score: 1

      Politics have no business in science.

      Heisenberg. 1941. Are you certain?

    14. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's really true then Israel wouldn't object to Iran building an indigenous nuclear power program, but they do - and given how Iranian nuclear scientists have been getting killed under mysterious circumstances in a way peculiar to the Mossad, it's even less believable.

    15. Re:Good. by rainmouse · · Score: 0

      So you would gladly cooperate with Nazi-Germany on making the Atombomb because it is just science?

      Cern are making atom bombs? Damn I mustn't have read TFA as clearly as I had previously thought.

    16. Re:Good. by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gather round while I sing you of Wernher von Braun
      A man whose allegiance is ruled by expedience
      Call him a Nazi, he won't even frown
      "Ha, Nazi schmazi," says Wernher von Braun

      Don't say that he's hypocritical
      Say rather that he's apolitical
      "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down
      That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun

      Some have harsh words for this man of renown
      But some think our attitude should be one of gratitude
      Like the widows and cripples in old London town
      Who owe their large pensions to Wernher von Braun

      You too may be a big hero
      Once you've learned to count backwards to zero
      "In German oder English I know how to count down
      Und I'm learning Chinese," says Wernher von Braun.

    17. Re:Good. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      "Politics have no business in science."

      You forgot to supply the attribution for your citation:
      "Signed, Werner Von Braun".

      Of course, it rings with more authority, when presented in the original German.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    18. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol, I bet you are an undergrad or new grad student. There is so much politics in science it is sickening.

    19. Re:Good. by sosume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that you are comparing the way the Arabs in Palestinian territories live to those trapped in Nazi concentration camps, shows that you have not paid attention in history class. Please observe how terrible life is for these poor people in Gaza: http://goo.gl/H4zY5 and then ask for a refund from your high school.

    20. Re:Good. by aravenwood · · Score: 1

      succinct and to the point. nice post.

    21. Re:Good. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Where exactly is GP making that comparison?

    22. Re:Good. by bjourne · · Score: 1

      No? Then how come Palestine is not a member of CERN too?

    23. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No? Then how come Palestine is not a member of CERN too?

      Simple. They're into rocket science instead of particle physics.

    24. Re:Good. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Politics have no business in science.

      CERN was founded by a political decision, and is publicly funded. So yes, politics do have business there. The very article says so: "It is a vital part of our mission to build bridges between nations." That's a political agenda right there.

      And in any case, allowing Israel in is a political decision. CERN is publicly operated, so any and all decisions concerning it are political by definition.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    25. Re:Good. by ilguido · · Score: 1

      I think that this choice has a lot to do with politics. It's part of the row that includes the Turkey-Israel harsh diatribe and the last statements about Cyprus. It's a warning: Israel is still our ally.

    26. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I'm sure your government would do *exactly* as you say.

      Hey, why don't you tell them to stop murdering children while you're at it.

    27. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret satanic league of stem cell researchers (SSLoSCR) would like add religion as a form of politics in your list.

    28. Re:Good. by obarel · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's the Israeli scientists that are responsible for Mossad operations.
      I mean, in every country the academia is responsible for counter-intelligence and military operations.

      Life is so easy when you group together people just because they were all born in the same country. That's why people think that Americans are stupid. I mean, George Bush is stupid; George Bush is American; hence all Americans are stupid. Even Aristotle couldn't fault this logic.

    29. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Heisenberg. 1941. Are you certain?

      Only about where he was, not where he went.

    30. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But industrial espionage does

    31. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're one Israeli. You can't say that any more than I can say that the US would not oppose Palestinian statehood. Maybe you mean than the average Israeli on the street wouldn't care, but we average folk don't get to set national policy. That's set by idiots who have no sense of long-term strategy: that's why Israel in the course of the last year committed acts of war against Turkey and Egypt, who up until then had been on friendly terms with Israel, and why the US spent the last ten years fucking up Iraq.

      ugh why is everything so stupid...

      anyway, propz on joining CERN.

    32. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you have any problem with Iran joining the European Organization for Nuclear Research?

      You might want to do s/European/Eurasian/ before having either Iran or Israel joining.

    33. Re:Good. by makomk · · Score: 1

      Iranian scientists aren't responsible for the fact Iran's leader is a giant asshole either, but that hasn't stopped Mossad assassinating them. They don't exactly have the option of ignoring Israeli politics and just doing science. Perhaps if scientists were less willing to cooperate with countries that murder other scientists, the Israeli government might actually be embarrassed enough to stop doing it - just a thought.

    34. Re:Good. by orange47 · · Score: 1

      if only Martians would join as first Non-Earth member, perhaps scientist would finally discover that Higgs thingy.

    35. Re:Good. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      organ harvesting: http://www.prisonplanet.com/israel-admits-harvesting-palestinian-organs.html

      The article you linked to used a misleading (and subsequently corrected) headline to further its anti-Israel propaganda agenda:

      We should not have put the headline "Israel admits harvesting Palestinian organs" on a story about an admission, by the former head of the Abu Kabir forensic institute near Tel Aviv, that during the 1990s specialists at the institute harvested organs from the bodies of Israeli soldiers, Israeli citizens, Palestinians and foreign workers without getting permission from the families of the deceased (21 December, page 15). That headline did not match the article, which made clear that the organs were not taken only from Palestinians. This was a serious editing error and the headline has been changed online to reflect the text of the story written by the reporter.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2009/dec/22/corrections-clarifications

    36. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am happy to hear you say that. Unfortunately, Netanyahu and Lieberman (the Israeli PM and FM) may think differently. While I like the Israeli public, I have issues with the politicians.

    37. Re:Good. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Does the Islamic University of Gaza or Birzeit University have particle physicists with the qualifications and desire to work on CERN?

    38. Re:Good. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      oh, go on then.

      for 10 points: Who is Iran's leader.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    39. Re:Good. by obarel · · Score: 2

      The Israeli government never gets embarrassed. That's a proven fact.

      This means that anything you do to harm the citizens of Israel simply harms the citizens of Israel. It doesn't change anything anywhere, just makes people's lives a bit more miserable.

      There's no problem with that, of course. Many people lead miserable lives, and not just in the middle east. Isolating Israel culturally, financially and scientifically would make many people feel good inside, so at least there is something positive about it.

      But I'm a bit sick of the old argument "if we do that, they'll change". In fact, some people in the Israeli government take pride in being isolated, and push towards it at all costs, just to have a common enemy and to score political points. Reality is a bit more complicated than a simple carrot/stick theory.

    40. Re:Good. by dotancohen · · Score: 2

      I am happy to hear you say that. Unfortunately, Netanyahu and Lieberman (the Israeli PM and FM) may think differently. While I like the Israeli public, I have issues with the politicians.

      You will find that most issues boil down to exactly this. 95 percent of Palestinian citizens would be friends with 95 percent of Israeli citizens if it were not for both sides' politicians. We both want the same thing: work and security for our families. Nobody really cares what the neighbours are doing, which prophets they revere.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    41. Re:Good. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Maybe you mean than the average Israeli on the street wouldn't care, but we average folk don't get to set national policy.

      And yet, we both live in a Demo(people)Cracy(rule). Maybe it's time to try Monarch 2.0?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    42. Re:Good. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      ...and given how Iranian nuclear scientists have been getting killed under mysterious circumstances in a way peculiar to the Mossad...

      In other words, you read some biased piece by an organization with an interest in making headlines (manufacturing news) and believe it, so Mossad is guilty. Never mind the counter arguments that you didn't read. People like you are tools. Useful idiots. You read it, so you believe it. It just matters which side of the argument that you read first.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    43. Re:Good. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Heisenberg. 1941. Are you certain?

      Well, according to him, I can't be...

    44. Re:Good. by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Pure research should be a global resource. Implementations of that research as products are another story.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    45. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Israeli here)
      1. Israel would probably not formally object, but then again there are right-wing people here who will try.
      2. Israel does not, never has, and never will claim it intends to destroy another country. Everyone here acknowledges Iranians' right to a country, and we even had good relations with them until the current fanatic religious regime took over. I truly feel sorry for the oppressed Iranians.

      The above statement obviously cannot be said for Iran or several other Arab countries for that matter.

    46. Re:Good. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 3, Informative

      The GP's comparison is over the top, but that link you posted is a ridiculous whitewash. Here some less happy pictures: link link link

    47. Re:Good. by cavreader · · Score: 1

      What acts of war were committed? The people killed trying to run the legal blockade were egged on by Turkey. The people killed by Israel in their response to a border attack which killed Israeli citizens was organised and carried out in Egyptian territory. Nobody every seems to mention the fact that those who attacked Israel also killed a couple of Egyptian police men and used thier uniforms as part of their strategy to enter Israeli territory. After the initial knee jerk response from the Egyptian government to satisfy the mob they backed away from further complaints unusually fast. Can't have any inconvenient facts messing up the protesting masses. You have madman in Syria methodically going city to city killing anyone who disagrees with their government policies and the Israeli critics and peace protesters seem to have no problem with that. Turkey killed 140 Kurds 2 weeks ago during an air strike in Iraqi territory and I have not seen anyone condemning this breech of sovereignty or mentioning the breakdown of the number of civilian versus combatant deaths in the attack. Anytime the US or Israel executes a military attack the first thing mentioned is how many civilians were hurt. Apparently Turkey has some advanced tech in their US made F-16's that can clearly identify combatants and civilians from 8000 feet.

    48. Re:Good. by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm Israeli.

      so how is the concentration camp called Gaza doing these days?

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    49. Re:Good. by nbauman · · Score: 2

      Actually the word democracy comes from the Greek demos (people) and Latin crassius (the worst). It's a system in which the worst people rule.

    50. Re:Good. by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Didn't realize it was quoting anyone. But regardless of who said it first, it's true.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    51. Re:Good. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So, Nazi scientists' research should have been accepted in all major scientific journals and circles?

      Yes, unless it's the research itself that's unethical (e.g. human experimentation).

      In fact, that is precisely how it was handled back in the day. I mean, do you seriously think that scientific papers authored by Nazi scientists were not published in the West?

    52. Re:Good. by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

      Politics has no science in business.
      Business has no politics in science.

      --
      __
      Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
      GW Bu
    53. Re:Good. by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      Iranian scientists aren't responsible for the fact Iran's leader is a giant asshole either, but that hasn't stopped Mossad assassinating them.

      The Mossad has been assasinating Iranian NUCLEAR scientists. Just as Iran would do the same to Israel's nuclear scientists if they got the chance. In the meantime, Iran's medical scientists and every other variety of scientist has a lot more to worry from his own government than from the Mossad.

    54. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat shit.

    55. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO. BAD.
      Now politics are VERY much involved in CERN, which is not just a shame but a tragedy.

    56. Re:Good. by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

      Quite well, in fact. I hear the obesity rate there is almost as high as the US. Apparently Israel is doing a terrible job at starving them..

    57. Re:Good. by Linzer · · Score: 1

      You have madman in Syria methodically going city to city killing anyone who disagrees with their government policies and the Israeli critics and peace protesters seem to have no problem with that.

      Syria is a third world autocracy like (unfortunately) many others. So yes, Israel is generally held to much higher standards than Syria. I hope most people in Israel regard it as a good thing.

      Even if everyone is appalled at what's happening in Syria, there is not much they can do about it. The Iraq-style approach doesn't have much appeal anymore.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    58. Re:Good. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Nice!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    59. Re:Good. by rtb61 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Now for a touch of reality, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Palestinian_exodus. Based upon the endless lies of Jewish Palestinians and a horde of European migrants, the expulsion of the majority of the population and denial of return and, the blatant theft of land, friendliness is highly unlikely.

      Consider the same in your country, if the majority were, killed, expelled and imprisoned and via biased religious apartheid based immigration turned into a minority. Whilst this has happened before to the shame of several major countries, what happens in our life times is our shared responsibility and shame.

      It is clear from the the outset, that one side wanted and worked towards religious apartheid, not just targeted at Muslims, but as demonstrated by the fundamentalists who actually spit on Christians against all others.

      Upon this basis that country based around the theft of land, the removal and expulsion of the original inhabitants and the continual denial of truth should be specifically excluded from all international organisation and trade. There is no place in this modern world for a pariah nuclear armed state.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    60. Re:Good. by the+entropy · · Score: 1

      I thought Israel was "The Only Democracy in the Middle East"(tm) (also, neatly ignoring Lebanon). Why can't the people do anything about it? You can just blame it on the rulers.

    61. Re:Good. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting that. It is an interesting article, I need to give it a more thorough read. You will find that I am not one of these unreasonable make-excuses zionist extremists. That said, of course I do have a bias for the Israeli side of the issue.

      Right off the bat I can say that there are quite a few heavily-biased statements and paraphrases. The article was obviously tendered by either pro-Palestinian or anti-Israeli interests. Note that pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli are far from the same thing! Failing to make the distinction is where most people not from Israel or Palestine go wrong. But even with the bias there is much good information.

      Thanks for the link. I see by your own comments that you've applied selective reasoning to the Palestinian-Israeli issue and not the same reasoning other equally-relevant issues. But in any case I appreciate the link.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    62. Re:Good. by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Their are no higher standards when it comes to killing people. It would be nice if any of the middle eastern countries were held to ANY standard, let alone a high standard, but the world at large gives these countries a free pass on murder, mayhem, radicalism, and animosity. If they take an ant-israeli or anti-us stance then they can certainly count on support or at least silence from the "progressives" who fan the flames of anarchy every time they get a chance. So while everyone is concentrating on attacking Israel thousands of people are dying from starvation in Africa and being killed by Muslim fanatics who routinely use torture and murder as their form of governing and the sad thing is they don't even try to deny their atrocities but the world still would rather concentrate their efforts against the only middle eastern state that actually has a stable society and laws that don't demand stonings and hangings as righteous sentences.

    63. Re:Good. by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      So you would gladly cooperate with Nazi-Germany on making the Atombomb because it is just science?

      Cern are making atom bombs? Damn I mustn't have read TFA as clearly as I had previously thought.

      Don't be ridiculous. But they ARE talking to the God particle, and that has to stop!

      Remember the Tower of Babel?

      Can't say we weren't warned. Zeus might not like it either, but he's pretty random.

    64. Re:Good. by obarel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because Israel is not a democracy, as such (despite the trademarks).

      People vote, but there is a lot of corruption in the government and many of its actions are undemocratic. Including the way it was elected (note that the current prime minister is not the leader of the party that received the largest number of votes, he's there because of some political slight-of-hand).

      But I get the basic principle: if a country is democratic, it should be punished for the actions of its leaders, because in principle the people can do something about them. If a country is not democratic, there's no point punishing it, because not only do the people suffer, they are also not in a position to do anything about it.

      So leaving Israel aside for a second, why would the US push for sanctions against North Korea? We all know the people there can't do anything about the government, and they suffer enough. The same could be said about Iran as well (not to mention Iraq, but that's a different story).

      I guess reality is just a bit more complicated than that.

    65. Re:Good. by marnues · · Score: 1

      Obesity is not a sign of well or good living anymore. In the United States it's much more indicative of being uneducated, rural, and/or poor.

    66. Re:Good. by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they're living well. Gaza is not and never has been a wealthy area (Arabs without oil), although I hear it has a fancy new shopping mall and a water park. If you have complaints against the state of the population perhaps you should direct them to the government in charge, who is doing very little to improve living conditions there? In any case my point was that they do have food there, and the situation is in no way comparable to the Nazi concentration camps.

  2. Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised the Elders of Zion allowed this to happen.

  3. wait a minute by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    Isreal is non-european ... it's definitely not african, it's not american, its not australian, and i have a hunch it's non-asian ... did we just discover a new continent ?

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    1. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geographically, it's just part of the middle east. Nothing remarkable. Bit of a water-shortage, which I recall they are planning to tackle through a system of pipelines and desalination plants.

    2. Re:wait a minute by sourcerror · · Score: 3, Informative

      Israel is actially in West-Asia. Geographically that place was never considered to be a part of Europe. However there are strong cultural ties.

    3. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel is neither part of the European continent or the political construct called "Europe".

      Israel is part of the middle East... like their good neighbors..

    4. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The area of present-day Israel has been considered part of Asia for thousands of years. Both the Jews and the Palestinians originate in Asia, according to Wikipedia respectively from the Fertile Crescent and the area between the Jordan and the Mediterranean. Why then would Israel not be Asian? ISTM having been enslaved in Egypt and som of them having lived in the West or Eastern Europe doesn't change their Asian heritage.

    5. Re:wait a minute by danish94 · · Score: 1

      Geographically, It's Asian.

    6. Re:wait a minute by danish94 · · Score: 1

      By that logic all humans are African. The whole species originated from africa and living all over the world does not change there african heritage.

    7. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel is part of the middle east. the middle east is part of asia.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia

    8. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eastern Europe is a part of the Western World, sorry. Forty years' interlude of communist occupation won't change that. Or does the European Union now encompass "two worlds"?

    9. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, however it is presently occupied by rich, white Eurasians, and now it's trying to gain legitimacy by joining these organizations in order to make it more difficult to rout out the occupiers. That government has no right to exist except by the force it uses to subjugate the natives. Another remnant of the British Empire which is as powerful as ever, but still slightly less so than the Roman Empire

    10. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That government has no right to exist except by the force it uses to subjugate the natives.

      The same could be said of any government. That's what a government is.

    11. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since BBC declared that Jews are Arabs (genetically speaking)
       
        http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/742430.stm

      Israel sits right in the Middle-East.

    12. Re:wait a minute by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Umm, are you trying to make this sound like news? Jews and Arabs are both semitic. Of course they are related genetically.

    13. Re:wait a minute by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Historically it was called "Asia Minor"

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re:wait a minute by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Eh? Most of the Jews in Israel come from Poland/Germany, about 70 years ago. They didn't kill them all you know.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:wait a minute by jopsen · · Score: 2

      ...presently occupied by rich, white Eurasians...
      ....has no right to exist except by the force it uses to subjugate the natives...
      ...Another remnant of the British Empire...

      It's funny how that's not so much different from the United States :)

    16. Re:wait a minute by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      No, Asia Minor is where Turkey is.

    17. Re:wait a minute by dskoll · · Score: 2

      Most of the Jews in Israel come from Poland/Germany

      That is not true. There are more Sephardim ("Oriental") Jews in Israel than Western.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel where it says: "Approximately 68% of Israeli Jews are Israeli-born, 22% are immigrants from Europe and the Americas, and 10% are immigrants from Asia and Africa (including the Arab World). Jews who left or fled Arab and Muslim lands and their descendants, known as Mizrahi or Sephardi Jews, constitute approximately 50% of Jewish Israelis."

    18. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the modern day country of Turkey is Asia Minor, because it was previously the Roman Imperial province of Asia and we later decided that there was more to Asia than just Ionia. The part of the Middle East that Rome controlled was called the province of Syria (due to the Assyrians) and it included the modern day countries of Syria, Jordan and Israel. Today we just consider the whole thing Asia, though where it ends is really just drawing line in the sand. For instance, is all of Russia in Asia?

    19. Re:wait a minute by arisvega · · Score: 1

      it's not american ...

      I think that it kind of is.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    20. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes it a bit easier to understand our very close relationship, doesn't it? Brothers in arms...

    21. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,
      What are continents?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uBcq1x7P34

    22. Re:wait a minute by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      Turkey actually straddles Europe and Asia... the line between the two continents goes right through Istanbul.

    23. Re:wait a minute by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Israel is actially in West-Asia.

      Israel lies to the west of the Syrian-African rift. Israel is therefore on the African continent. Even more so then Madagascar for instance. It just doesn't look that way on the map because maps use water for designating boundaries, not continental plates.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    24. Re:wait a minute by rainmouse · · Score: 2

      It just doesn't look that way on the map because maps use water for designating boundaries, not continental plates.

      To be fair, water was discovered a fair while before continental plates.

    25. Re:wait a minute by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      And theft of the Litani.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    26. Re:wait a minute by bjourne · · Score: 2

      Not really. They have many more traits in common with their Arab neighbours, even if they have a very hard time accepting it. Hebrew is closely related to Arabic, they eat similar foodstuff and have similar rules about what they can and can't eat and drink, similar religious rituals (circumcision for example), similar genetic makeup, music and so on.

    27. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, so stick to newtonian physics and counting 1, 2 and many. While the rest of us live in the modern world. I seriously hope you are not one of those thinking that the world was created some 6000 years ago.

    28. Re:wait a minute by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Not really. They have many more traits in common with their Arab neighbours, even if they have a very hard time accepting it. Hebrew is closely related to Arabic

      Modern Hebrew (as opposed to Classical Hebrew) is typologically Standard Average European. Study both Arabic and Modern Hebrew at the same time, and you'll be amazed at how dissimilar they are. Plus, a large percentage of Israelis use Russian as their everyday language.

      they eat similar foodstuff and have similar rules about what they can and can't eat and drink

      Only a minority of Israelis keep kosher. Those "similar rules" don't apply to most Israelis. And the huge Russian population keeps eating what it used to eat back in Russia, including pork, so no, not "similar foodstuff".

      similar genetic makeup

      European Jews show a markedly different genetic makeup than Jews from the Arab world, so no, no "similar genetic makeup".

      music

      I find young Israelis very clued up about a wide variety of music. Certainly after one has been to Tel Aviv, the music tastes of Arab youth seem very limited.

    29. Re:wait a minute by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Then what about the Eurovision song contest :P
      And I guess you mean Shephardic Jews. Ashkenzi Jews are culturally European.

    30. Re:wait a minute by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Continents are defined by plate tectonics. So West of Ural is Europe.

    31. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sephardim (From the word Spaniards) includes Turks, Belgians, Romanians, Italians, Dutches.
      My girlfriend is Turk and my best friend is Belgian - they both talk Ladino (Judaeo-Spanish)

    32. Re:wait a minute by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

      1. there is no such thing as a society that works without government

      2. democracy has been shown that consent of the will of the people actually works. in fact, works better than traditional forms of government that rely upon rule by force

      this should dispel all the anti-government trolls, the idiots who equate any government with the worst kind of government, and think somehow no government results in anything except somalia

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    33. Re:wait a minute by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Well yes, this is very true, but do you see the Middle East building a particle accelerator via international cooperation and then letting Israel in on it?

    34. Re:wait a minute by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Well yes, obviously, but there's a lot of people with vested interests in saying, "Jews are European, Arabs are Middle-Eastern, and never the twain shall meet."

    35. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many different names, but no mention of Levant and that Israel is actually in the M.E. as every other country surrounding it lies actually in what we call Middle East...

    36. Re:wait a minute by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Good point. I would also venture to say that water serves are more of a hindrance to communication / implement of transport than do continental boundaries.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    37. Re:wait a minute by reverseengineer · · Score: 2

      Europe and most of Asia are on a single plate- the creatively named Eurasian Plate (the Urals were created 250 million years ago and no longer mark a plate boundary). If you were to divide up the continents by plate boundaries, Eurasia would be a continent that stretched from half of Iceland to half of Siberia, but would not include the Arabian peninsula or the Indian subcontinent. Also, parts of the Pacific Northwest would be in Juan de Fucaland or something. So that's not the best way of doing things. While it may not be supported by geology, I think there is merit to the idea that Europe exists as a place distinct from the rest of Eurasia due to the long history of cultural separation (though by this notion, it's silly to consider vast Asia as a single location). The whole "Urals are the boundary between Europe and Asia" idea comes from an eighteenth century cartographer named Philip Johan von Strahlenberg, but really was only done to draw a definite (but arbitrary) line between two entities that had been considered separate since antiquity.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    38. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could make a film about democratic zombies. That would be great.

    39. Re:wait a minute by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Roman province of Syria did not include the modern country of Israel. The modern country of Israel was a separate province of the Roman Empire. The Romans called it Judea until after the Jewish revolt of 70 A.D. when they started calling Palestine.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    40. Re:wait a minute by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      While it may not be supported by geology, I think there is merit to the idea that Europe exists as a place distinct from the rest of Eurasia due to the long history of cultural separation

      True, but even in this definition, the western part of Russia should still be in Europe - it has much more common with Eastern European states (such as Romania or Poland) than it does with any undeniably Asian state. So "Europe is west of Urals" is still a useful definition.

    41. Re:wait a minute by quenda · · Score: 1

      Continents are defined by plate tectonics.

      Continents were defined long before anyone had heard of plate tectonics.

    42. Re:wait a minute by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Oh, completely agree- it might be an arbitrary line, but it is a useful one.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    43. Re:wait a minute by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      European Jews show a markedly different genetic makeup than Jews from the Arab world, so no, no "similar genetic makeup".

      Ahem. Bull. Shit.

      The closest genetic relatives of the Ashkenazis are the Yemeni Jews.

    44. Re:wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what a government is.

      Exactly :-)

    45. Re:wait a minute by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      the country itself did originate by the grace of the us i suppose

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    46. Re:wait a minute by the+entropy · · Score: 1

      Shhhhhh.... Don't talk about that, Israel doesn't steal

    47. Re:wait a minute by burris · · Score: 1

      Except Israel didn't really get started until after WWII, long after the entire world recognized that colonialism and ethnic cleansing are crimes against humanity. Of course, Israel's supporters would prefer we return to 19th century barbarism.

  4. Nice tech by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1

    Don't Israel have quite a considerable amount of tech industries these days? Be nice to get some official input from that.

    --
    I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    1. Re:Nice tech by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      They do, and there's been a large amount of investment in its tech sector by companies in the US and elsewhere. A lot of the newest CPU microarchitecture has been designed in Israel, such as Sandy Bridge (which is featured in the newer Core i7s and others).

  5. Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... joins any major international body in the 80's during their Apartheid ?...
    Just wondering what the reaction would have been....
    Just like then, I think BDS in a reasonnable mean to push the parties to make peace in the Middle-East...

    1. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      BDS is one piece of weapon in an arsenal diplomatic warfare. Yes, weapons can be used to push peace, but they are not, generally, considered a "peace device".

      BDS is particularly evil for several reasons. The most ironical is that it attempts to collectively punish all Israelis for what Israel is supposedly doing, thus using collective punishment to protest collective punishment. Presumably, this is okay because it's done by "the good guys"(tm).

      More to the point, BDS strives to prevent the other side from voicing its opinion to argue whether the acts protested are real, or just products of propaganda and distortion. In that respect, BDS is just another propaganda employed against Israel. Weapons may, in some rare circumstances, bring peace, but propaganda seldom does.

      More to the point, however, BDS strives under all that is "Academia". I can sometimes agree that economical sanctions are in order (nothing that Israel has justified, but I can see how others might disagree with that sentiment). I can understand a cultural boycott, though don't see how it ever does any good. An Academic boycott, however, is never justified.

      True discourse and exchange of ideas, some of which you might not like, is the cornerstone of academia. Shutting down someone else's voice is never an academic thing to do, least of all for political reasons.

      Shachar

    2. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmh... Never heard this kind of discourse when we BDS'ed massively South-Africa in the 80's...
      In fact, the BDS of SA Apartheid were unanimously supported.

      On the plus side, BDS is not about using f-16 to kill Palestinians or suicide-bombers to kill Isrealis...
      That's welcome, no ?

    3. Re:Did South-Africa ... by dskoll · · Score: 2

      Your question is irrelevant because Israel is not South Africa. It's not even like South Africa. The odious comparison is simply a propaganda point used to demonize Israel.

    4. Re:Did South-Africa ... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 0

      I'm curious. Does it hurt when your knee jerks like that?

    5. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Jimmy Carter, former US president, does make the comparison...
      he even wrote a book on this

    6. Re:Did South-Africa ... by mangu · · Score: 1

      The difference between Israel and South Africa in the 1980s is that South Africa limited the rights of their citizens based on race, while minorities in Israel have full civil rights.

    7. Re:Did South-Africa ... by MrHanky · · Score: 2

      Ah, right. BDS is "collective punishment" hence equivalent of Israel keeping the entire Gaza on the brink of collapse. How very perceptive of you.

    8. Re:Did South-Africa ... by bikehorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point of BDS is not to demonise the average Israeli(like you seem to believe) but to make Israeli citizens realise that it is the fault of the government which THEY ELECTED AND SUPPORTED that they are being shut out by the rest of the world. It is intended to remind them, peacefully, that they have the power to change this by electing a government whose policies do not violate international laws. If that means their scientists are blocked from participating in international projects due to BDS then it is upon the scientists, as some of their society's more educated members, to articulately protest to their government to alter its policies. Do you believe there is a better solution that regular citizens in the rest of the world could employ?

    9. Re:Did South-Africa ... by realityimpaired · · Score: 0

      Israel does a pretty good job of demonizing itself, thank you. Something about using live ammunition, air strikes, trade embargoes, and blockades against a civilian population. Bombing schools, red cross installations/hospitals, and UN facilities doesn't help, either.

      The Palestinians aren't without fault either in this, but if you seriously believe that it's all just anti-Israel propaganda then you may want to start thinking critically about the situation in that part of the world. It's been going on long enough that nobody really knows who threw the first punch, but the reality is that it's not going to get cleaned up and fixed until somebody puts down their damned gun and starts talking. It may interest you to know that most of the cease fires that've been negotiated between the Palestine and Israel in the last 15 years have been broken by Israel, not Palestine.

    10. Re:Did South-Africa ... by burris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you seriously suggesting that refusing to deal with people on a voluntary basis is somehow equivalent to blockading them, denying the importation of food after calculating the absolute minimum calories required to prevent mass deaths and joking about how it's "like a visit to the dietician, the Palestinians will get a lot thinner but won't die," destroying their capacity to make food by destroying chicken farms and flour mills, destroying sewage treatment pond retaining walls so they spoil farmland, destroying their electrical plants then denying the importation of parts to repair them, destroying thousands of homes and refusing to allow them to rebuilt by forbidding the importation of building materials, and denying the export of what little they do produce so they can't have any economy?

    11. Re:Did South-Africa ... by damburger · · Score: 2

      Did you read that article? There may be de jure equality but the situation on the ground is very different.

      Don't pretend that Israel is some poor, put upon liberal democracy. It isn't. That said, it seems churlish to refuse scientific cooperation with them. Isolation will only serve to make them more paranoid, more reactionary, and more likely to lash out in response to threats.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    12. Re:Did South-Africa ... by dskoll · · Score: 1

      So? Jimmy Carter has done and said a lot of things. Doesn't mean they're all true or all good.

    13. Re:Did South-Africa ... by dskoll · · Score: 1

      It may interest you to know that most of the cease fires that've been negotiated between the Palestine and Israel in the last 15 years have been broken by Israel, not Palestine

      Citation, please?

    14. Re:Did South-Africa ... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Right, exactly. And collective punishment is bad, agreed? So you think we should collectively punish the Israelis, because their leaders are collectively punishing the Palestinians, because their leaders have attacked Israel in the past? If so, who should collectively punish us when our leaders follow your advice? And who, in turn, should collectively punish our punisher?

    15. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is intended to remind them, peacefully, that they have the power to change this by electing a government whose policies do not violate international laws.

      But what if I disagree with you that my government is, indeed, violating international laws? If you will not hear what I have to say (because you are boycotting my academia), then how will you find out in case you are wrong?

      BDS is about saying "there is no chance we can possibly be wrong, and no further discussion is necessary", which is another way of saying it is just propaganda. It is also the anti-thesis of the most fundamental core academic value.

      Shachar

    16. Re:Did South-Africa ... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Yes, it almost sounds vaguely plausible.

    17. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 2

      Long though it may be, your comment still contains far too many mischaracterizations to comfortably fit into a single paragraph.

      1. I am not suggesting BDS is equivalent to anything in particular. I'm just stating that it is part of a propaganda warfare, rather than, like its supporters claim it is, a peaceful tool.
      2. I'm not sure where you took that quote from. It fits with neither anything I'm aware that Israel has done, nor anything I'm aware that my (not always smart) leaders have said. Care to give the precise origin?
      3. Long list of things Israel has, supposedly, done. Some of those are just a figment of someone's imagination. The rest are taken out of context so as to say "Israel is bad", rather than the more accurate "war is bad". In other words, it's propaganda.

      But without real discourse, how can you tell the two apart? How can you get the context you need in order to evaluate whether Israel is indeed so much worse than any other country involved in urban warfare since the beginning of time, or did your sources merely mislead you into hating a country for no really good reason? If you shut yourself off from criticism, you are willfully ignorant. Be so, if you wish, but don't call yourself "intellectual" or an academic.

      Shachar

    18. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      Wow. I guess we can take this as an example of being able to make anything out of anything.

      From the article you cite:

      The mainstream media in the US and Israel places the blame squarely on Hamas. Indeed, a massive barrage of Palestinian rockets were fired into Israel in November and December

      So, there was a barrage of rockets fired into Israel. The article fails to mention these were aimed at civilian population. But, no, we were in a ceasefire before that. Or were we? From the article:

      the ceasefire was remarkably effective: after it began in June 2008, the rate of rocket and mortar fire from Gaza dropped to almost zero

      Emphasis added.

      So, the Palestinian definition of "ceasefire" is "you don't shoot at us, and we hardly shoot at you as much as we want to".

      If two rockets a week is your definition of "ceasefire", then, yes, I guess you can say Israel is the one who broke it. If, like me, you like your ceasefire fire-less, then Hamass broke the ceasefire.

      Thus the latest ceasefire ended when Israel first killed Palestinians, and Palestinians then fired rockets into Israel.

      So, Palestinians firing 11 times over three months is a "ceasefire", but Israel firing once over the same period is "breaking the ceasefire". Nice.

      Shachar

    19. Re:Did South-Africa ... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      BDS is about saying "there is no chance we can possibly be wrong, and no further discussion is necessary", which is another way of saying it is just propaganda.

      BDS is about using soft power to create change.
      Or are you arguing that the BDS campaign against South Africa was "just propaganda"?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    20. Re:Did South-Africa ... by mangu · · Score: 1

      If you start boycotting countries because they have a minority that feels they are discriminated against then no country in the world will be left.

      I bet the Lapps in Norway or the Tyroleans in Austria have their complaints too. Or the Kurds in Turkey, Tibetans in China, Basques in Spain, Copts in Egypt, Tuaregs and Bedouins in North Africa... get the drift?

    21. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that, the way BDS is carried out, you cannot be sure whether the change you are trying to bring about is the right change.

      Shachar

    22. Re:Did South-Africa ... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. Does it hurt when your knee jerks like that?

      You shouldn't be one to talk of jerking-knees. Your legs are still swinging from the force of yours.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    23. Re:Did South-Africa ... by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      For one, it's not the Palestinian nation that's firing rockets, it's individuals within, and for two, most of the rockets they're firing don't actually have a warhead, and aren't actually any more dangerous than a bottle rocket. Rather different than using live ammunition and launching rocket air strikes, no?

      I have never said that either side is without fault. I am, however, drawing issue with people who seem to believe that no fault at all lies at the feet of the Israelis. As I said previously, it's mutual, and it's not ever going to end if they keep on down the current road they're taking. Somebody needs to put down the weapons, and take the other side seriously, and frankly, I think it should be the ones using live ammunition, bombing schools and hospitals, and running a blockade preventing even basic construction supplies from entering the other side's territory that should be making a few concessions here. They're essentially holding the entire west bank hostage, and that's not a negotiating position... it drives the people within to acts of desperation. If they want the rocket attacks to stop, then perhaps they should stop doing things that make people desperate enough to start lobbing rockets their way.

      I mean, do you understand the economic opportunity Israel is giving up on with the way they're handling the west bank? Most of it is arable farm land, in an area that's mostly desert. If the news reports of the rent situation in Israel are to be believed, there's a major economic problem developing in Israel in the near future, and having a supply of cheap food should be a high priority. If they took the Palestinians seriously, they have an opportunity to develop a major bread basket for the area, and work with the Palestinians to develop sustainable economic prosperity. but apparently, they'd rather just kill each other.

      You may want to read this article:
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7375994.stm

      There's some interesting numbers regarding the numbers killed by each side that may help you to understand why I'm less than sympathetic to the Israelis... nearly 10x as many Palestinians have been killed by Israelis as have been Israelis by Palestinians, and that's using the Israelis' own numbers. I'm not particularly sympathetic to the people shooting rockets into Israel either, but it's naive to believe that Israel is doing no wrong here. As I said in my previous post, neither side is without fault, and both sides are doing wrong to the other. It's not going to end until somebody matures enough to put down their fucking gun and start taking the other side seriously.

    24. Re:Did South-Africa ... by ja · · Score: 1

      This is by some complicated ancient accounting where only those in favor of the rulers (ie: Settlers in the territories, but not Palestinians) are allowed to vote, and where even larger parts of the population in the diaspora (ie: Palestinians but not Jews) will be shot on entry. And you will of course have to serve in the Army, which for Palestinians means you must be willing to expel your own relatives if this has not already happened. Yes, it's different, very

      --

      send + more == money? ...
    25. Re:Did South-Africa ... by dskoll · · Score: 1

      nearly 10x as many Palestinians have been killed by Israelis as have been Israelis by Palestinians,

      That's because the Israelis have better weapons and a more developed army. It's not through want of trying on the Palestinians' part.

      When Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza, the Palestinians were given an opportunity to show the rest of the world they could build a civil society. Instead, what they built was a fascist dictatorship that shoots rockets at civilian populations (which, by the way, is a crime against humanity.)

      What makes you think the West Bank won't go the way of Gaza if Israel withdraws? The precedents are not good.

    26. Re:Did South-Africa ... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that, the way BDS is carried out, you cannot be sure whether the change you are trying to bring about is the right change.

      Does this apply to any and all BDS campaigns? or only the one that affects Israel?
      Because I cannot begin to agree with the premise that you cannot know in advance whether all changes are right.

      Further, the Israel:Palestine issue cannot really be negotiated in good faith because of the enormous imbalance in power.
      Right now, Israel is threatening Palestine with economic consequences if they go through with the UN vote.
      BDS, right or wrong, is one way to non-violently change that imbalance of power.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    27. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you took that quote from. It fits with neither anything I'm aware that Israel has done, nor anything I'm aware that my (not always smart) leaders have said. Care to give the precise origin?

      According to Haaretz it was Dov Weissglas who said it.

      http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/as-the-hamas-team-laughs-1.180500

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    28. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      According to Haaretz ...

      Actually, it's "according to Gideon Levy". Take any anti-Israeli statement this man says with a grain of salt. The man was caught taking out of context, and in some cases downright lying, in order to make his point.

      Ben-Dror Yemini actually took the time to systematically analyze one of his rants (to the British "The Independent"). Someone took the time to translate the original article to English. You can read Ben-Dror's refutation of the piece (and the man) here.

      Shachar

    29. Re:Did South-Africa ... by burris · · Score: 3, Informative

      Two sources for the quote are ynet and Haaretz. The NYT passed it along too. The BBC reported on documents obtained by Gisha from the Israeli government detailing the blockade and containing estimates of the calories required by Gazans to stay alive.

      It took five minutes to Google this up. Open your eyes and see that what has been happening for decades now is real and not just some "narrative." Of course, I'm sure you can cook up some explanation of why it's a military necessity to prevent food from entering Gaza.

    30. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 0

      How could Israel refraining from blowing up children for fun could be the wrong type change?

    31. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      So, a quote from a meeting becomes, in your eyes "official policy". Nice. Are food actually stopped?

      There is control of Sugar, which is used to generate explosives (as there is for fertilizers, gas, and other stuff). That's what a "blockage" means - you filter out the provisions that are used against you. For the most part, there is no filtering of actual food. Just propaganda. See, for example, this.

      To quote the parent:

      It took five minutes to Google this up. Open your eyes and see that what has been happening for decades now is real and not just some "narrative."

      Shachar

    32. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Okay, it's your credibility versus a former POTUS. Sorry Brostoevsky, but, when an that happens, you will lose every time.

    33. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Were they state sponsored? This is what Israel gets when it fragments a group trying to crush it. Maybe Israel should stop systematically assassinating Palestinian leaders, then negotiations would have some force.

    34. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A number of militant groups operate in the Gaza Strip aside from Hamas. Further, the much feared rockets are crude homemade devices fashioned from pipes that can be setup and launched from anywhere in minutes. Hamas does the best they can to stop other groups and individuals but there is only so much they can do. It's not like they are a functional state with a well regulated military. The evidence suggests that Israel doesn't want Hamas to be very effective at policing the other groups, either, considering they took the opportunity to bomb the police cadet graduation ceremony a few months later.

    35. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      Can you cite a single case where Israel blew up children for fun?

      Shachar

    36. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      Please name two Palestinian leaders (i.e. - not people actively working to kill Israeli civilians, but people who actually lead political parties) that were assassinated by Israel over the last decade, so we have concrete examples at hand. I can't think of even one.

      Shachar

    37. Re:Did South-Africa ... by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Boycott, divestiture and sanctions can mean a lot of things. One distinction is inside or outside the settelements.

      I personally would never buy any product made in the settlements. I think the settlers are occupying land illegally (and that's what Theodor Meron, the legal counsel of Israel's foreign ministry in 1967, wrote in a memo at that time). At least some of the settlers are criminals, who celebrate Baruch Goldstein.

      I read the Goldstone report, and the B'Tselem reports that preceded it, and I don't even feel right buying products from a country that does that.

      The Jews in this country, and I think the Israeli government, were enthusiastic about boycotting the Soviet Union until they let Soviet Jews emigrate. They were enthusiastic about boycotting Switzerland until they got compensation for WWII.

      So why shouldn't we use the same methods to get the same freedom for Palestinians?

      I don't feel comfortable about boycotting Israeli academics. However, I'm even less comfortable about the Israeli policies restricting the freedom to travel of Palestinian students and academics (from Gaza to the West Bank, for example).

      Consistent policies, anyone? Stop killing grandmothers holding white flags with their 4-year-old and 7-year old children, stop killing Ezzelden Al-Ayesh's daughters, treat the Palestinians the way you want to be treated, and I'd be happy to see an end to BDS.

    38. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      not people actively working to kill Israeli civilians

      That isn't a criteria that ANY Palestinian meets in the eyes of the Israeli government. I doubt you would disagree with them. I've no doubt that without exception they have all spoken about attacking Israel, but how can they be blamed when such atrocities are being committed against them by Israel. Working under the same requirements, can you list an Israeli politician who isn't ``actively working to kill Palestinian civilians''?

    39. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has not been control of sugar. You're just making stuff up because you can't imagine that Israel would do the things it does.

    40. Re:Did South-Africa ... by mangu · · Score: 0

      And you will of course have to serve in the Army

      Nope. Although there are Arabs in the Israeli defense forces, even some generals, they are there voluntarily. Arab citizens of Israel do not have to serve in the Army.

      I'm not a Jew, but I do admire what Israel has accomplished. When you examine it closely, the constitution of Israel is very coherent and well thought out. The Law of Return guarantees a sanctuary country for those people who are in risk of being persecuted for being a Jew, independent of they having the traditional religious definition of a Jew. Israel is not a religious country.

      I think that's correct because Jews have always suffered from the problem of not being accepted in any nation, they have had a nationality but not a nation for two thousand years. In the 1930s no country would accept German Jews who were denied the German nationality, not even France, the UK, or the USA would accept Jewish immigrants from Germany.

      Palestinians are an entirely different matter. They are not persecuted for belonging to one nationality. A Palestinian nation has never existed. The lands around Jerusalem have never been a Palestinian nation in the normal sense, there is none of the tradition that's usually used to define a nation there.

      If you consider, for instance, the Basques or the Welsh those are groups of people who have a common history, language, traditions, customs, that are different from that of the country where they are in. There's a Basque nation in Spain, a Welsh nation in the UK.

      Palestinians do not have that difference, they are part of the same people who are now Jordanians. In fact, the people of the West Bank was perfectly satisfied with being part of Jordan until 1967, or rather until September 1970, the "Black September" when Yasser Arafat tried a coup to overthrow the Jordanian government and lost.

      TL;DR; by logic, I see very strong reasons for the existence of the country of Israel, very weak or no reason for Palestine.

    41. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For every case in which a "Palestinian" child was killed while throwing stones, being used as a human shield or straying unsupervised into a highly tense security buffer zone, there are five cases in which an Israeli child was killed or hurt, intentionally, while riding a bus, sitting in a cafe or sleeping in his bed at home.

      The case cited above does not count as "blowing up a child for fun". The Fogel family massacre in Ittamar, does.

    42. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Please name one Palestinian political leader who has expressed that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state?
      Perhaps you are unaware that the current Palestinian political leadership has stated that not all Palestinians will be considered citizens of the new Palestinian state if the UN recognizes it as a state. Not even all Palestinians currently living within the borders of this state will be considered citizens of it.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    43. Re:Did South-Africa ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In the 1930s no country would accept German Jews who were denied the German nationality

      There was one, actually - Dominican Republic. They still have a museum about that in Sosua.

      Kinda ironic, given Trujillo's treatment of Haitans. But then, as far as he was concerned, European Jews were "white", which is all that mattered to him.

    44. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Why should Israel exist as a Jewish state? It's not even for the race of Jews, but the religion of Judism. Seems a bit bigoted and rascist, don't you think? Especially when another group owned the land for over a thousand years.

    45. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Which group is that? The British did not own Palestine for 1000 years and before them the Ottomans did not either.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    46. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      The people living since the Roman imposed diaspora, over a thousand years ago, I would presume. The Palestinians did not show up one day after 29 November 1947, when the UN decided to colonize the place, and demand entry. They were already there and Israel demanded land.

    47. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Arabs may have lived in Palestine for quite some time, but they have only ever owned Palestine for short periods of time. Jews have lived in Palestine for all of that time as well.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    48. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      That isn't a criteria that ANY Palestinian meets in the eyes of the Israeli government. I doubt you would disagree with them

      That's just hate speech. It's much easier to win an argument if you put words in your opponent's mouth.

      No, I do not think all Palestinians are "actively working to kill civilians". Please note I did not count supporting war crimes (sorry, you want them called "terror acts") as active. I'm talking about planning, funding, training and carrying out violent acts deliberately targeted at civilians.

      You may not like my stress on intent (and you seem to ignore it everywhere else you reply to me), but the simple fact of the matter is that this is the scale by which international law distinguishes between unwanted but unavoidable deaths of civilians during war and crimes against humanity.

      Working under the same requirements,

      Like I said, these requirements make no sense. Even so, there are 11 Arab Knesset members. Do you think they are even talking about killing Palestinians? I know you believe that all Jews think so, but that's just because you find it hard to believe that others don't follow your low standards.

      can you list an Israeli politician who isn't ``actively working to kill Palestinian civilians''?

      Just how incompetent do you take Israel to be? Do you honestly believe that, had Israel wanted to kill Palestinians, we really couldn't have managed to kill way more than we have? Over the past decade, less Palestinians died as a result of Israeli acts than the amount of Syrians who died as a result of the Syrian government over the past six months. Doesn't that, in an on itself, show that Israel's intent is not to kill Palestinians?

      Oh, I forgot. You couldn't answer my question as asked, so you changed it.

      Shachar

    49. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hamas does the best they can to stop other groups and individuals [from launching rockets]

      Really? How do you know this?

    50. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      So Ben-Dror Yemini doesn't like Gideon Levy.

      What does that have to do with what Dov Weissglas said or didn't say?

      Did Haaretz disown the editorial?

      Did Dov Weissglas deny the quote?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    51. Re:Did South-Africa ... by ja · · Score: 1

      If you want full civil rights in Israel, yes, you'd have to serve in the army. I believe that you too are well aware of this and deceptively pretending otherwise is just plain foolish!

      --

      send + more == money? ...
    52. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      The practical upshot is that Gideon Levy is a source with low credibility level. This means that things reported by him range from accurate, through out of context and up to downright lies.

      Dov Weissglas did, in fact, deny the quote. Whether you believe the denial or not is not the point. The point is that there is zero indication that this actually turned into policy that Israel carried out. This quote, whether actually said or not, is not proof that Israel is starving the Palestinian population in Gaza. At best, it's indication that some such suggestion was raised by someone at some discussions on the matter.

      And this is precisely the sort of propaganda that makes Gideon Levy so unreliable. The question is not whether Dov Weissglas did or did not say that quote. The question is whether it turned, or even ever stood a chance of turning, into official Israel policy carried out in practice. If the answer is "no", then bringing it up is merely an attempt in slurring.

      The actual situation is that the Gaza strip is receiving adequate amounts of all non-military provisions.

      Shachar

    53. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Ok, Wiesglass did deny it.

      If you're so well informed about the unreliability of Levy why did you say this:

      I'm not sure where you took that quote from. It fits with neither anything I'm aware that Israel has done, nor anything I'm aware that my (not always smart) leaders have said. Care to give the precise origin?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    54. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Sun · · Score: 1

      Why should I avidly follow a known unreliable source? My time is precious too.

      Either way, like I said, it's not what people say in closed meetings. It's what the country actually does that should count.

      Shachar

    55. Re:Did South-Africa ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your idea of "fun" must be different than that of most people, obviously.

      Did you have "fun" posting that?

  6. Politics are really disappointing business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For advertising their part as being saviors of Jews from the evil fascists, the European left wing parties and their supporters are surprisingly antisemitic, and gravitate towards even more drastic antisemitic movements, such as the European islamists and Palestinian leadership. Outside the Islamic world there aren't many political groups that would have made so much in order to discriminate israeli and the Jews. It's a real surprise to me that this really affects decisions as high and far from political harangue as CERN.

    Israel has strong ties by both Europe and western culture, is run by a real democracy supporting free speech and it has high level of scientific expertise, interest in scientific inquiry and capable researchers. Palestinians, on the other hand have none of these, because their leadership doesn't value them. Why the decisions of Israel's membership in CERN should depend on Palestinians' and their supporters opinions, instead of Israel's capabilities?

    1. Re:Politics are really disappointing business by br00tus · · Score: 2
      "Israel has strong ties by both Europe and western culture, is run by a real democracy supporting free speech..."

      Wow it's great Israel is a democracy. Do the Arabs in the West Bank get to vote in elections?

      It's some democracy you have there when only Jews and a few token Arabs in the north can vote. Or where you have to, as of 2010, swear to a loyalty oath in order to vote - unless you're a Jew. You're not that bright spouting this democracy nonsense here - this is not the mass media where that stuff is spouted without question, with the other commissars nodding their head, this is a discussion forum on which you can be challenged.

    2. Re:Politics are really disappointing business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Wow it's great Israel is a democracy. Do the Arabs in the West Bank get to vote in elections?"
      Do Afghanistanis get to vote in American Elections? How about Iraqis? What about Mexicans?

      Arabs in the west bank are not Israeli citizens, they're a people who live in disputed territories, although many of them are Jordanian citizens.
      Israeli Arabs are citizens, however, and do vote in elections and are otherwise protected as equal citizens. Considering they make up more than 20% of the Israeli population and government, I'd hardly call that a "token" minority.

    3. Re:Politics are really disappointing business by Sun · · Score: 1

      Wow it's great Israel is a democracy. Do the Arabs in the West Bank get to vote in elections?

      Of course they do. As in the sentence "Abu Mazen was elected president of the Palestinian Authority".

      They do not get to vote in the Israeli elections, but, then again, neither do the residents of South Dakota (except for a "token few" who are Israeli citizens).

      Also, no loyalty declaration requirement. It never passed as law. I'm beginning to miss a "misinformed" moderation action.

      Shachar

    4. Re:Politics are really disappointing business by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      It's some democracy you have there when only Jews and a few token Arabs in the north can vote.

      So the 20% of Israel's population that is Arab and can vote are "a few token Arabs in the north"?

      Look, I oppose the occupation of the West Bank as much as anyone, but this is obviously about nationality on the Israeli side rather than about ethnicity. No, the two sides are not the same: in Israel, murdering an Arab civilian is considered an atrocity, in the West Bank, murdering a Jewish civilian is considered an accomplishment.

    5. Re:Politics are really disappointing business by br00tus · · Score: 1

      They do not get to vote in the Israeli elections, but, then again, neither do the residents of South Dakota

      South Dakota does not have Israeli troops inside of its northern, southern, western, and eastern border, not to mention military bases, roadblocks etc. The West Bank is part of Israel - why are not only Israeli troops, but massive settlements there otherwise? Yet the Arabs in this part of Israel can not vote. Yet the Jews can - even ones who just arrived from Russia and waltz into a government-subsidised West Bank settlement. The Zionists do this, then have the gall to trumpet about how they're a democracy.

    6. Re:Politics are really disappointing business by nbauman · · Score: 1

      in Israel, murdering an Arab civilian is considered an atrocity, in the West Bank, murdering a Jewish civilian is considered an accomplishment.

      "Is considered"? By whom? There are a lot of settlers who still celebrate at Baruch Goldstein's tomb. And Ezelden Al-Ayesh, the Gaza doctor, refused to call for violence against the Jews even after his daughters were killed.

  7. politics a vital part of the mission? by Artifex · · Score: 1

    "It is a vital part of our mission to build bridges between nations."

    I thought CERN was all about science. What's this about building bridges?

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "It is a vital part of our mission to build bridges between nations."

      I thought CERN was all about science. What's this about building bridges?

      International co-operation is pretty critical in science, without touching on politics at all. That's one of the great things about conferences. I went to a conference in the US earlier in the year, and met someone doing a PhD in hydrology. After chatting with them, it turned out that as part of their work they had collected a pretty comprehensive set of deep-sea water samples for an area I was interested in. I work on marine microbiology, and my university has no way of collecting deep-sea water samples. After a little discussion and a few polite emails later to her P.I., they kindly gave me pretty hefty aliquots of water from as deep as 5,600m below the sea surface. That stuff has been pretty central to the work in my PhD and like I said, I had no way of getting it on my own.

      International co-operation, collaboration and exchanges of ideas and equipment/samples is incredibly important and doesn't have to involve politics one bit.

    2. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Engineering is not science?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I thought CERN was all about science. What's this about building bridges?

      Building bridges facilitates Science by providing more sources of $$$.

      CERN is about science, but even Newton had to eat.

      I'm a bit taken aback that they've allowed a non-European country to join, but the United States is still relegated to "Observer status" (E.g. 'Source of $$$, but not allowed to participate or become a full member')

    4. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Bridge building is a sort of science!

    5. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CERN is certainly about science, but a key part of its mission was (and is) "let's get together and build this thing so we don't have another World War". Big-picture European politics has always been part of CERN's mission.

    6. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit taken aback that they've allowed a non-European country to join, but the United States is still relegated to "Observer status" (E.g. 'Source of $$$, but not allowed to participate or become a full member')

      Then you'll be glad to know that the US are not a "source of $$$" for CERN:
      CERN budget by states [2009 budget, seems to be the newest available].

      Yes, goods and services (designing and building stuff) did and do come from the US too, but those
      happen with full scientific involvement of several big American universities and research facilities.

      I have no idea where you got the idea from that the US don't participate in CERN research,
      or are even somehow forbidden to do so.

    7. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, the US doesn't contribute to CERN's budget, but US institutions fund their own research and participate in all the major experiments at CERN, as do numerous other institutions all around the world.

      In terms of scale, the funds going through visiting research teams are equivalent to around 10% of CERN's budget.

    8. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Engineering is union of applied science, business and art.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Sduic · · Score: 1

      Engineering is to Science, as Science is to Art.

      In other words, it's a matter of how conclusively argued wrong your perspective is.

      ...and yes, I'm being facetious.

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    10. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Engineering is not science?

      No, engineering is not science in the same way that a reader of a book is not an author. Engineering uses science. If you need further proof just look at the vast majority of universities: science and engineering and separate faculties.

    11. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      "It is a vital part of our mission to build bridges between nations."

      I thought CERN was all about science. What's this about building bridges?

      Absolutely. Despite all of the talk here about "Science should be above politics", this seems politically-motivated. If you want to expand CERN beyond the boundaries of Europe because you want to add the best scientific minds you can to your group, then just say so (and Israel has a first-rate groups of scientists and engineers). But leave politics out of it. Stick to the science, and leave "building bridges" to the diplomats, please. Just come out and say "Hey, Israel has top scientists and we want them in our group".

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    12. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Then again medicine is a separate faculty too, however I consider myself to be a scientist.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:politics a vital part of the mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've studied CERN's history quite thoroughly, quite recently (and I've partaken in experiments there, and been on-site for extended periods).

      A commonly accepted fact is that CERN to a big part was funded to keep science in Europe after the flight of academia towards the US just before/during WW2. The science was placed in the back seat during the decision process. Most discussions concerned _where_ it was to be built, and to some extent how it would be funded (but that was a lot easier to settle, France in particular where very generous in the beginning, giving legitimacy to the project).

      It is fascinating to read about the scientific background for CERN, since many of the delegates involved in the decision process seem to have had no clue what they were giving money towards. The main thing was to have a powerful scientific alliance in Europe, able to compete with the "national laboratories" in the US which had been proven successful. Many countries seem to have had the idea that it would help them with nuclear power/weapons, even though it was made very clear in the founding text that the purpose in no way was/is military, and the research conducted was/is not aimed towards nuclear energy.

      CERN itself is all about science (even though all decisions on higher level contain large portions of overhead concerning countries and their ROI), but its founding catalyst was almost exclusively political. It has been a succesful project in this respect, uniting many nations that in the 1950's were relatively academically (and politically) separated. With its inertia in this respect, it is certainly a good bet to be a bridge to new nations.

      In the papers there will surely be a spin concerning Israel and weapons or something like that, but that is just completely sensational and not even close to reality.

      Ref: "History of CERN", vol 1-3, Hermann, Krige, Mersits, Pestre. North Holland publishers, Amsterdam.

  8. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a country were judged by the behaviour of its fascist leaders, would the western world have so many economical and cultural ties with China?

  9. Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it is not the academic elite that are to place pressure on Israeli politics, then who? Hit them where it hurts.

    Politics IS a science. And science has politics. I wonder how many potential Palestinian scientists have gone undetected, untrained and unfunded?

    1. Re:Bad by dskoll · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder how many potential Palestinian scientists have gone undetected, untrained and unfunded?

      Probably dozens. Lebanon keeps Palestinians in poverty in refugee camps instead of integrating them into society. There were no universities at all in the West Bank prior to 1967. Hamas spends money on weapons that could be spent on education.

      Yes, indeed. Palestinian society, much like the rest of the Arab world, allows a criminal waste of human potential by diverting energy towards a conflict instead of towards building up civil society. That's why most Arab states have a low (and usually declining) human development index and shockingly inefficient economies compared to Israel.

      Devoting your energy to conflict and bitterness will destroy you before it destroys your enemy.

    2. Re:Bad by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No, politics is humanities and only THINKS it's a science. In fact, your statement sums up politics and its self-claimed license to pervert language because of its descent from the school of sophistry pretty well. Politics may claim to belong to science, but science rejects false claims. Therefore go stand in the corner on your own.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Bad by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      They've probably blown themselves up so they can get to their 72 virgins already.

    4. Re:Bad by dskoll · · Score: 2

      I wonder how many potential Palestinian scientists have gone undetected, untrained and unfunded?

      From TFA: "In a news release on the agreement, CERN said Israel had supported Palestinian students studying and working there, as well as sending mixed Israeli-Palestinian contingents to its summer study programme."

    5. Re:Bad by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any countries where the "academic elite" are the go-to chaps for changing public policy?

    6. Re:Bad by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Politics IS a science. And science has politics. I wonder how many potential Palestinian scientists have gone undetected, untrained and unfunded?

      As a student at the Technion, Israel's premier university, I can tell you that Arabs are very disproportionately overrepresented there. That's fine, there is good reason: the Arabs have strong motivation to work hard and push ahead. Despite the huge number of Arabs in Israeli universities, I do not recall a single political or racial event in my time at the Technion. Not one.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    7. Re:Bad by vga_init · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, they have to work hard in order to dismantle the state of Israel. No time for nonsense like "racial events."

    8. Re:Bad by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I know the Israelis don't permit any Palestinians from Gaza to leave for academic activities, Right?

    9. Re:Bad by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      Actually, Hamas interferes with Gazan student travel far more than Israel does.

    10. Re:Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO universities before 67 eh, good job spreading your propaganda. I guess the university I attended never existed then. As for comparing economies to Israel, no doubt Israel is an impressive economy, but getting billions annually from the us, Germany and Switzerland doesn't hurt either.

    11. Re:Bad by the+entropy · · Score: 2

      "Lebanon keeps Palestinians in poverty in refugee camps instead of integrating them into society"
      "Yes, indeed. Palestinian society, much like the rest of the Arab world, allows a criminal waste of human potential by diverting energy towards a conflict instead of towards building up civil society. That's why most Arab states have a low (and usually declining) human development index and shockingly inefficient economies compared to Israel."

      Of course in the case of Lebanon this has absolutely *nothing* to do with a 15 year civil war, sparked, in large part, due to the presence of the Palestinian refugees in the first place. From the Wikipedia article on the Lebanese civil war:

      Between 1968 and 1975, there was a gradual buildup in the assertion by Yasser Arafat's PLO of its right to fight Israel from the Lebanese south, in spite of Lebanese sovereignty. A sample of the incidents includes: Palestinian roadblocks in the city of Beirut killing Lebanese civilians; kidnapping by PLO militants of Lebanese gendarmes; Syria's backing of the PLO included punishing Lebanon by closing the borders between the two countries, which choked the Lebanese economy; incursions by Palestinian contingents of the Syrian Army such as the Palestine Liberation Army, the Al-Saiqa commandos, the Yarmouk Brigades, etc. into Lebanese territory and carrying out massacres against Christian villages in the north and the east; ineffective attacks by PLO militants against the Israeli north were often met with massive and deadly reprisals by Israel against the civilian population; the assassination of the Israeli ambassador in London led to Israel bombing Beirut Airport and destroying the entire fleet of the Lebanese national air carrier - MEA, Lebanese army air force bombing the Palestinian camps, etc. After these incidents, several accords were signed between the Lebanese State and the PLO (examples: The Cairo Accord of 1969 and the Melkart Accord of 1972), only to be violated by the PLO, then backed by Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Egypt.

      In the spring of 1975, this build-up erupted in an all-out conflict, with the PLO pitted against the Christian Phalange, and the ever-weaker national government wavering between the need to maintain order and catering to its constituency.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanese_Civil_War#First_phase_1975.E2.80.931977

      The peace that Lebanon has had since 1990 is still extremely fragile and integrating the Palestinians into Lebanese society would probably shatter that. But go ahead, plunge a nation back into civil war for the sake of potential scientific talent that is being wasted. I hate it when people do armchair politicking, things aren't as easy or uncomplicated as you think. I've spent the past 4 years of my life trying to make sense of this region I was born in, reading books and watching documentaries. And things are just incredibly complex. I used to think "just integrate the Palestinians" and I now know it's just not possible, do that, and someone *will* take up arms and fight it(yes, it's wrong, but they'll do it, so you better make your decision knowing this), I've talked to enough fundamentalists on all sides to know that most people here just aren't rational. But then, can you blame them? Almost everyone I know who's over 40 has lost someone close and feelings and emotions surrounding this issue are still very high.

    12. Re:Bad by marnues · · Score: 2

      Holy horse-shit batman, +5 Informative?!?!?!?! You may have missed the Arab Spring, revolutions carried out by predominantly educated Arabs trying to live a middle class life. I have many problems with previous (and probably future) Arab governments, but suggesting they devote their energy to conflict and bitterness only shows your ignorance. In fact your entire post is hyperbolic bullshit. Who are your sock-puppets? Or is Slashdot being overran with ignorance?

    13. Re:Bad by marnues · · Score: 1

      You seem to have missed the fundamental issue: humans are not beings of pure logical thought sourcing from perfectly accurate data. Ergo everything that involves multiple humans is politics. Rejection of this fact is a rejection of the science of human interaction. A scientist is a human first. That's why we have science.

    14. Re:Bad by marnues · · Score: 1

      Arabs and Israelis co-existing _is_ a political event. Until this is a non-issue, any interaction between Arabs and Israelis is political. Involvement from politicians or the political science department is not required.

    15. Re:Bad by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Arabs and Israelis co-existing _is_ a political event.

      Don't believe what the news tells you. We coexist perfectly fine. Only 1% of Arabs have problems with us, and only 1% of us have problems with Arabs. But those are the idiots who make the news.

      Would you have me believe that white Americans go around hanging blacks from trees all day, and all blacks are uneducated drug dealers? Because that is how the media portrays Americans.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    16. Re:Bad by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Holy horse-shit batman, +5 Informative?!?!?!?! You may have missed the Arab Spring, revolutions carried out by predominantly educated Arabs trying to live a middle class life.

      Just out of curiosity, were those educated Arabs also the ones burning down the Israeli Embassy?

      I had high hopes for the "Arab Spring" because it did seem to be largely motivated by secularists and intelectuals. I am far less optimistic today.

  10. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For a military state such as Israel, it is impressive that every now and then they come up with innovations; not very many, but they do come up with them.

    You do know that Israel has the highest number of patents per capita, right?

  11. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A good chunk of Israeli innovation comes in part because of the military, not in spite of it. Some major private sector industries here build on technological expertise originating with military projects (imaging and radio communications come to mind).

    Per capita, Israeli innovation hardly lags, but thanks for the backhanded compliment.

    I won't thank you for telling me I deserve a chance, but, hey, I'll admit that you deserve one too. Posting AC because I'm normally just a lurker here...

  12. Re:Military State by obarel · · Score: 1

    Patents = innovation.
    So patenting a linked list with two pointers is a sign of innovation?

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=Szh4AAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract#v=onepage&q&f=false

  13. Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Yes and no. There are very good reasons for keeping certain scientific results "secret". Even Einstein did that. Handing a criminal and inhumane state like Israel results without a filter in between is irresponsible.

    All that aside: What Israel is doing in an institution, which has "European" in its name, is beyond questionable.

    1. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      It was game over once they let them into Eurovision Song Contest.

    2. Re:Not good. by cavreader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "criminal and inhumane state" This accurately describes every middle eastern country that has been trying to remove the Jews for the past 70+ years. Since their military efforts showed that they could not fight their way out of a wet paper bag they switched strategies by abandoning those who where living in the sovereign territories that Jordan and Egypt controlled leaving them stateless. A small sacrifice to make sure Israel has to deal with all the problems. If the Palestinians are really suffering as much as people claim why has Egypt, Jordon, Lebanon, or Syria never allowed the Palestinians to settle in their lands? Why have all the Arab countries not kept their promise of providing financial aid? Of course they would never do this because it would mean putting an end to their relentless harassment of Israel. The Arabs are only using the Palestinians as a tool to provoke Israel into violent confrontations that result in Palestinian casualties so they can loudly proclaim to the world about the evils of Israel. They don't give a shit about the people being killed they just want feed their propaganda machines. Anti-US and anti-Israel rhetoric is the only issue that the entire Arab world can agree with and their politicians take full advantage of this to distract the masses and keep them from looking at their own government corruption and incompetence.

    3. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhhhhhh.... psst! You don't want to attract the attention of the Jewish Internet Defense Force do you?

    4. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two (or n) wrongs don't make a right.

    5. Re:Not good. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      All that aside: What Israel is doing in an institution, which has "European" in its name, is beyond questionable.

      About the same as Hawaii is doing in a country with "America" in the name. A name's just a name.

    6. Re:Not good. by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Never suggested it was. Just pointing out the lopsided efforts supporting a vendetta against Israel is providing cover for despots and state sanctioned violence against civilians. People are dieing in Africa from violence and hunger and could really use a flotilla to supply aid to those that really need help. Israel interdicts ships to search for weapons and then allows them to off load thier cargo for transport. Every country in the middle east blames every single problem they face on Israel (or the US) while never accepting any responsibility for their own incompetence.

    7. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and three rights make a left...

    8. Re:Not good. by dugeen · · Score: 1

      They have not been 'trying to remove the Jews'. That's a classic US media propaganda position. Their grievance would be just the same and just as valid if their lands had been seized by US-backed Methodist military colonists. The religion of their oppressors is entirely irrelevant.

    9. Re:Not good. by the+entropy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How this ever got to +4 insightful I will never know. Rather, it just shows how much pro-Israel propaganda has been successful in the west. The image of Israel as a beleaguered state, surrounded on all sides by enemies while it is only defending itself is largely a creation of the media and has no relation whatsoever to the actual history of the region.

      I will not go into a discussion of the conflict here as any not pro-Israeli posts get modded -1 overrated to oblivion but I will point out what I do know and that is wrong with your post. Though if anyone is interested "The Gun and the Olive Branches" is a very informative book(written by a British journalist).

      "If the Palestinians are really suffering as much as people claim why has Egypt, Jordon, Lebanon, or Syria never allowed the Palestinians to settle in their lands?"

      Each nation has its own situation, in the case of Lebanon(my country, which, by the way, is a democracy and where a large segment of the population does not really have a major issue with Israel -- the Christians, ~40% of the population, and I happen to be one), the Palestinians aren't given citizenship because doing so would upset the current balance of force in the country, tilting it towards the Sunni Muslim side. Given that the country is still in the early stages of recovering from a devastating 15 year civil war(in which the Palestinians played a major role igniting, but they weren't alone) and given the fact that Sunni/Chiite tensions continue to rise year-on-year in the whole area almost all analysts agree that attempting to assimilate the Palestinians into Lebanese society would shatter what fragile equilibrium currently exists.

    10. Re:Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99.9 of US of America is in America 100% of Israel isn't in Europe

    11. Re:Not good. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      100% of Hawaii isn't in America. 100% of Israel isn't in Europe. About 97% of the USA is in America (the other 3% being Hawaii). About 95% of CERN member states' territory is in Europe (including Israel, worked out very roughly).

      I'm not sure I see your point.

    12. Re:Not good. by cavreader · · Score: 2

      So what you are saying is that Lebanon and the other countries have pretty much the same damn problems as Israel does when it comes to dealing with the Palestinians so they can't really be expected to contribute aid (other than weapons) to the Palestinians but Israel should just bow down to the demands of the knuckleheads currently running half the government and the terrorists running the other half of the Palestinian "government". This is a textbook example hypocrisy. Those countries use the ongoing conflict to hide their own failures and it has been a winning strategy for the past 60 years. Egypt, Jordon, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and any other country in the vicinity do not want this current conflict to end. A conflict born on their aggression and abandonment of their own citizens who were living in the areas under dispute. Israel did not claim that land the Arabs withdrew from leaving a stateless population behind to harass Israel with. Any way if the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is solved who would be left to blame all their problems on? Their are a lot of Arabs making serious money because of this ongoing conflict. From weapon sales to stealing international aid and reselling it to those who actually need it while making a hefty profit. Arafat died a billionaire with bank accounts scattered all over the world. They certainly don't want the situation resolved either.

    13. Re:Not good. by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      Since when have territorial disputes ever been fair? You could go back to hominids fighting over antelope hunting grounds and it has never ever been fair and it will never ever be fair. If you're alive in this world your ancestors have been egregiously wronged, and they have also egregiously wronged someone else. If your ancestors had anything to do with what you deserve then you deserve a million bucks and a bullet in the brain simultaneously.

      As an American whose ancestors largely wiped out the Natives, I can't hold the theft of lands in 1948 against the current crop of Jews. Neither do I think they deserve a damn thing for being victimized by the Nazis ( or for any other victimization they have endured over the centuries ).

      If I were a Palestinian, the idea of living in a 'Jewish State' would be as unacceptable as the idea of living in a 'Christian or Islamic or Jewish State' is to me ( as an athiest ). However, I can't shake the feeling that if Palestinians had largely participated in democracy they wouldn't have ended up gerrymandered into ghettos as they seem to be now. The need to have a seperate Palestinian state seems as bigoted as the supposed need to have a Jewish state.

      IMO, a better gesture than giving away the land where the Palestinians already lived would have been to give away Utah, and let the Jews fight it out with the Mormons ;-P

      Israel's security depends on it having lots-o-nukes. That, and having a bunch of weak tyrannys around them. Tyrants intent on converting oil wealth into paper and willing to do the dirty work of oppressing the locals so that development in the M.E. doesn't end up consuming the oil resource before it can be exported both keep Israel safe, and keep the West in oil for the time being. HELPING to oust Gaddaffi boggles my mind. Major WTF???

      Then again doing stupid stuff may have value since it 'keeps em guessing'. I dunno.

      You'd think the US would be trying to play everyone off each other with an eye to keeping the black stuff flowing and keeping everyone weak.

       

      --
      ...
    14. Re:Not good. by cavreader · · Score: 1

      "They have not been 'trying to remove the Jews' Hamas pronounces this as their official goal on a daily basis. The Palestinian lands were purposely abandoned by those Arab countries that held sovereignty over those lands at the time. The Arabs did not accept the partitioning plan so there never was a Palestinian state. After getting their asses kicked on numerous occasions they now want to accept the partioned boundaries as if nothing ever happened. Creating a Palestinian state will just provide better artillery positions so they can continue their attacks on Israel.

    15. Re:Not good. by the+entropy · · Score: 1

      I, again, only speak about that country which I know most, Lebanon, and almost anyone I know here, and even the politicians, do want the conflict to end. I'll take personal experience, conversations I've had with many many people and extensive reading about my country and the region that I've done over the past 4 years over the word of someone who just asserts otherwise thank you.

      Second, the difference between Lebanon(or any other Arab state) and Israel in this issue of difficulties dealing with the Palestinians is that the Arab states did not take their lands away from them, nor did they force them(directly or indirectly due to conflict) to migrate en-masse from their lands. The Palestinians in Arab states are *refugees*, when a country of 4 million gets has ~0.5mil refugees you can be damn sure it's going to be troublesome dealing with them, especially if it isn't exactly stable to begin with. However, the Palestinians in Israel are *natives* you can bet Israel has to deal with them and find a solution to the problem.

    16. Re:Not good. by hjrnunes · · Score: 0

      This accurately describes every middle eastern country that has been trying to remove the Jews for the past 70+ years

      Perhaps you'd care to provide some reference for this claim? Because it sounds like BS. No, actually, it is BS. It's funny that tools like you never see fit to mention the fact that Zionists actually tricked, deceived and forced Eastern European Jews after WW2 to migrate to what is know known as Israel, by telling them that they we're to be moved into the US.

      You talk about propaganda machines, yet you're nothing but a mindless parrot of the largest propaganda machine probably ever set in motion in the history of mankind, funded by the American taxpayer. There is anti-US propaganda due largely to the fact that the US unconditionally supports Israeli policy, something that she doesn't do even with her closest ally the UK. Unconditional support to Israel has been detrimental to the interest and national security of the US and pretty much every civilized country in the world including, ironically, Israel itself. Arab states don't provoke Israel into violent confrontation. It's the other way around. You didn't see the Turkish navy killing Israeli civilians in international waters. But I saw Israeli commandos murdering nine Turkish civilians and one American in international water. The whole world did. I also saw the Israeli army bulldozing Rachel Corrie and shooting a UK civilian in the head the next day or two.

      This bullshit doesn't cut it anymore. I really don't know what you stand to gain by spilling this nonsense, but if you truly believe it, then let me tell you that if Israel and, to a larger extent, the US have a problem with terrorism, it's mainly due to shills like you that blindly refuse to acknowledge the plain fact that Israel is not the least interested in promoting peace in the region, as evidenced by her refusal to stop illegal settlements. I bet you also think Norman Finklestein is a self-hating Jew.

      PS: When I say Israel, I mean the Israeli state, ultra-orthodox segments of society and their Zionist lobby in the US. There are people in Israel that see the issue quite clearly, and struggle for a truly fair and balanced solution to the conflict. Obviously, you're not one of them.

    17. Re:Not good. by cavreader · · Score: 2

      Dude, Just look through yesterdays headlines or past 20 years of headlines and you will see that Hamas, who is theoretically in charge of at least half of the Palestinian territories, doesn't want UN recognition of Palestine statehood at the UN because that would mean acknowledging the fact that Israel actually exists. Their only goal has always been the elimination of Israel and all of it's non-Arab population. They have even put it in writing in their organization charter. They have been quite clear that this is and will remain their goal. Would any country in the world put up with a neighbor that is continually and loudly calling for their destruction on a daily basis and have proven more than willing to use indiscriminate violence to accomplish their stated goals? When the US vetoes or convinces enough UNSC members to vote against the Palestinian UN statehood recognition the wide scale violence will start again but this time around I seriously doubt that Israel will give a damn about any international sensibilities or how many people they kill as long as it removes the threat once and for all. The UN or NATO will do nothing to prevent this. The only country with the assets and capabilities on the scene is the US and they will not engage or obstruct Israel military operations. There is 0 percent chance of this happening. If Turkey or any other country in the area such as Iran was to try and hit Israel while they are busy with the Egyptian, Jordanian, and Syrian border fights the US would and could stop them. The US government and military understands that an Israeli defeat would end with half of the middle east ending up under a radioactive cloud.

    18. Re:Not good. by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      I, again, only speak about that country which I know most, Lebanon, and almost anyone I know here, and even the politicians, do want the conflict to end.

      Great! What have you done, so far, to achieve that goal?

      Second, the difference between Lebanon(or any other Arab state) and Israel in this issue of difficulties dealing with the Palestinians is that the Arab states did not take their lands away from them, nor did they force them(directly or indirectly due to conflict) to migrate en-masse from their lands.

      This is simply a lie. Well, a collection of lies, really.

      Te very charter which established Israel as a state also invited the Arab inhabitants to stay and be part of the process of building a new nation. The Idea that Israel forced them to move is ludicrous. The (Arab-initiated) war which followed certainly did lead to much occupation and displacement - namely, the territories currently known as "Palestine" were occupied by Egypt and Jordan, all Jews were expelled, and the Arab inhabitants were largely ignored and/or mistreated. This is all a matter of public record - I don't know how you can expect to tell such baseless lies and not be challenged on them.

    19. Re:Not good. by hjrnunes · · Score: 0

      Just look through yesterdays headlines or past 20 years of headlines

      Fox News headlines don't make neither an accurate nor fair description of the world they claim to depict.

      That talk is old. Hamas fires hand made rockets from the Gaza Strip into Israel. I calculated the kill ratio of these weapons from the casualty numbers of the last Gaza massacre (yes, because in a war, both sides are supposed to have military power. Hamas really doesn't) and it was about 400:1. This means that Hamas had to fire at least 400 rockets to get one casualty. I'm including military and civilian casualties, including one Israeli that died from a heart attack from being scared of the explosion of a rocket. Do I need to name the weapons the IDF has at its disposal (funded by the American taxpayer btw)?

      You are delusional. Israel is digging its own grave. Israel has no friends. It's nothing but a PR nuisance that every executive has to deal with, because it has a powerful lobby that has the US and the UK politians by the balls. But while the lobby managed to get those two into wars with Iraq and Afghanistan that didn't have any serious military power - both being crippled by both international sanctions and recent conflicts - the two powers still managed to lose those wars. Iraq is plunged in civil war, and the US is going to retreat from Afghanistan with the tail between the legs, without achieving absolutely nothing: as soon as Americans pull out, the old status quo is going to become the new status quo in Afghanistan.

      You are insane if you even think the US and NATO are going to risk a war with Turkey (that has considerable military power and, more importantly, military experience as they've been engaging in active ops against the PKK for the last decades, and is a NATO ally thus forcing every other ally to defend it in case of an unprovoked attack) and Egypt, risking turning the whole Middle East into an anti-American riot, jeopardizing the geo-economic interests of Anglo-American corporations.

      Israel is doomed. The artificial threat of terrorism that was created to divert attention from the colonization process that is being carried on Palestine by Jewish settlers no longer convinces. It just doesn't work anymore. People are fed up of having to undress at airports, of not having cell coverage in the subways, of living in constant fear, and they're starting to realize that it's all because a country whose very existence is questionable, doesn't give a shit about no one else except themselves, doesn't make the slightest effort for even attempting to negotiate a solution to the very mess it itself created, while at the same time murdering even foreign citizens from allied nations with an army equipped with weapons funded by those very allied citizen taxpayers. At the same time, millions of Israeli citizens are realizing that their state not only doesn't give a fuck about allied nations, it doesn't give a fuck about them, it's own citizens.

      Mark my words: Israel is doomed. Not that it will go without a fight. Unfortunately, it will probably make a lot more innocent victims before it finally collapses, especially because it's going to be fighting mainly itself. But it will collapse. And you know what? I don't think a lot of people gonna miss it and it's arrogant, dick-like attitude towards the rest of the world.

    20. Re:Not good. by hjrnunes · · Score: 0

      I don't know how you can expect to tell such baseless lies and not be challenged on them.

      Well I could say the exact same about you. But I will actually challenge you. Please provide references for your claims. Oh, and by the way, Zionist handbooks are NOT the public record.

      You inform us in your signature that you are not American. That's right. You're just an asshole. Now show us that public record.

    21. Re:Not good. by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      Given your commenting history and the fact that - in your first comment to me - you've chosen to resort to personal attacks in lieu of a rational argument, I was debating whether to bother responding at all. I'm quite certain about what it is that you would do with pearls. Still, I suppose I can at least give you a couple links. Here you go:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Palestine#Partition_between_Israel.2C_Jordan_and_Egypt

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Declaration_of_Independence#Context_and_content

      Those two pages document what I've said, and give you a starting point for further research, should you be so inclined. Don't expect any more until you change your attitude and demonstrate the ability to learn.

    22. Re:Not good. by hjrnunes · · Score: 0

      you've chosen to resort to personal attacks in lieu of a rational argument

      That's right. I did. And given that you actually bothered to go through my comment history, you surely noticed that this is something I don't do many times. Especially on these kinds of subjects.

      The reason I chose to do so is that, simply, I find it quite impossible to debate rationally with people that hold the beliefs and world-view that you obviously do. The fact that you simply parrot propaganda that has been shown over and over again to be just plain false and mischievous, and would do so even to the point where you would try to push it to someone that has been to (and I assume is from: user "the entropy" ) a country that has been savagely devastated only 5 years ago by the people whose actions and intentions you seek to defend, is pretty much revealing that rational argument is not possible. You will simply deny any objective facts presented and ultimately launch the definite ad-hominem attack of anti-semitism, compared to which my simple remark pales. You see, there's a pattern you people follow.

      Before I proceed to actually comment on the links you posted, let me tell you this: you are very lucky that it is me doing the ad hominem attack. Israeli ad hominem attacks are normally in the form of letal high speed lead projectiles, otherwise known as bullets. Any Palestinian or Lebanese person will be able to confirm this to you, if you ever have the courage to confront these people in person, without having them at gunpoint.

      The links you posted are ridiculous. The Israeli Declaration of Independence is meaningless to the purposes of this discussion, not to mention that it is hardly an independent and unbiased source of information.
      About the other link you posted on the partition of territory, I assume you intend to emphasise this part:

      During the first 6 months of 1949, negotiations between the belligerents came to terms over armistice lines that delimited Israel's borders. On the other side, no Palestinian Arab state was founded: Jordan annexed the Arab territories of the Mandatory regions of Samaria and Judea (today known as the West Bank), as well as East Jerusalem, while the Gaza strip came under Egyptian administration. During this time, Jordan and Egypt did not normalize the living conditions for the Palestinian refugees, neither did Israel after 1967. All Jewish inhabitants were expelled from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip until the Israel occupation in 1967.[citation needed]

      You'll want to notice the [citation needed] indicator. It means that anyone could have written this (it could have been you, AFAIK) and it is not referenced from any source, therefore it holds zero credibility.

      In the remote chance that you'd actually be interested in learning the truth about this conflict, I recommend the works of Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky. Bear in mind that this is probably forbidden literature in your political circles and that if your propaganda masters find you reading this, they'll take away your good-boy badge. Read at your own risk:

      Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict
      Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-semitism and the Abuse of History
      Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on Israel's War Against the Palestinians

    23. Re:Not good. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      lol. Pot. Kettle. Black.

      Come back when you grow up a bit, kid.

    24. Re:Not good. by cavreader · · Score: 2

      Israel has been at war or preparing for war for the past 65 years. Underestimating their war fighting capabilities is the main reason the Arabs were defeated in 48,67, and 73. In 73 the Arab attack was well coordinated, well trained, and well armed with USSR modern weapon systems such as SAMS, Sanger wire guided anti-tank missiles, night vision targeting scopes in their tanks, and a whole bunch of Soviet "military advisors". It was also Israel's biggest intelligence failure and they were taken by total surprise. The Arabs outnumbered the Israelis 6 to 1 in tanks and 20 - 1 in troops and they still got their assess handed to them. Israel will not go gently or quietly and frankly I doubt too many people in the world really give a shit if a couple of million Arabs go out in a radioactive flash. And with all the recent bullshit at the UN, embassy attacks, or Turkey's veiled threats the Israeli government has been very quite. And that should worry people. If Israel truly believes it is useless to engage diplomatically because it won't make any difference that only leaves a few options remaining. Capitulation or full on military actions and the chance of capitulation is pretty close to 0.

  14. Re:The problems with Slashdot by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Instead, most of what I see is volgarity

    So there are Russians on slashdot. Big deal - get over it. Also: learn to spell, troll.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  15. Re:Military State by dskoll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, what a condescending reply.

    Israel is not a "military state" in the sense that the military controls politics. It's a pretty dynamic democracy with a highly-diverse set of viewpoints. It also has a very educated labour force and a high number of high-tech companies and startups.

    Israel has long been known for innovation. Just google "Israeli Innovation".

    Those who propose BDS on the spurious basis of "Israeli Apartheid [sic]" are blind to reality, either out of ignorance or malice. While Israel is not perfect and its Arab citizens do suffer discrimination, it's nowhere near the level of South African Apartheid, and those same Arab citizens have more civil rights in Israel than in any Arab country.

  16. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed, patents isn't a good measure.

    Perhaps the nobel prices is a better one. From true Israelis it's not that many. But if you count their foreign supporters it's quite impressive.

  17. Re:Military State by paleshadows · · Score: 5, Informative

    For a military state such as Israel, it is impressive that every now and then they come up with innovations; not very many, but they do come up with them.

    Funny.

    I suggest you take a look at, e.g, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Start-up_Nation. Here's one paragraph (the source is backed by reference):

    "How is it that Israel -- a country of 7.1 million people, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies, in a constant state of war since its founding, with no natural resources -- produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the United Kingdom?[4] The Economist notes that Israel now has more high-tech start-ups and a larger venture capital industry per capita than any other country in the world."

    Or, e.g., browse the list that ranks the top-100 computer science departments in the world and observe where and how many times the Israeli flag appears in the list. (FYI, Israel has only 6 universities.)

    etc. etc.

  18. Re:Military State by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it has nothing to do with the billions of dollars that pour in to Israel each year as welfare from the U.S.

  19. what's CERN's geographical goal? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    What's more interesting to me than Israel joining specifically, is the "first non-European member of the European Organization for Nuclear Research". Is Israel simply an exception, or will CERN be moving to less of a European focus in the future? For example, Turkey has applied for membership; will they eventually join? Could other in-the-region-of-Europe states like Egypt join?

    1. Re:what's CERN's geographical goal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Turkey would count as non-European anyway. It has been present in several pan-European political and economic organisations for decades and has been a candidate for EU membership for years.

    2. Re:what's CERN's geographical goal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe its not only geography thing, Israel is really advanced in science, many universities in top 500 rank, and Israely scientists getting awards in science.Egypt ? maybe few scientists abroad, but nothing else.

    3. Re:what's CERN's geographical goal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CERN has opened geographically and accepts members regardless of their location.

      So the USA, Canada, Brazil... are all welcome to join CERN

    4. Re:what's CERN's geographical goal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel, like America, Canada, and Australia, is much closer to Europe economically, culturally, and politically than it is to its geographic neighbors.

  20. Re:Military State by arisvega · · Score: 0

    "How is it that Israel -- a country of 7.1 million people, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies, in a constant state of war since its founding, with no natural resources -- produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the United Kingdom?"

    With help from the US, and draconian law enforcement?

    Do you even think that Israel would exist today without US backup?

    Plus, the list you are mentioning (partially) and the concept of a "startup-up company" are economic indexes, and we all know how much they reflect the truth- You are missing the point of my post; so what if you get a "hit" on one of those? That doesn't cast away any dark age veils, and doesn't disentangle politics from research. If anything, it messes them up even more.

    Politicians are greedy, and want to have control on everything. Including economy and research. And AFAIK, even more so in Israel, because of the military background of prominent state officials.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  21. knives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And hopefully the CERN scientists won't be lying in wait with knives and bats to attack.

    Seriously, the guns only came out after the "activists" captured and nearly killed several Israelis who were using minimal force.

    1. Re:knives by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I'd try to defend my boat from pirates too.

  22. Re:Visits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't feed the troll.

  23. Surprised it didn't happen sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Israel is a science, technology and engineering powerhouse. A little research turned up that Israel ranks fourth in the world in scientific activity as measured by the number of scientific publications per million citizens and that Israel's percentage of the total number of scientific articles published worldwide is almost 10 times higher than its percentage of the world's population. (http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-ranks-fourth-in-the-world-in-scientific-activity-study-finds-1.4034). It's no wonder that CERN would be more than happy to welcome them as a member.

    1. Re:Surprised it didn't happen sooner by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Not surprising in the least, considering the long history of the Jewish people in science (both good and bad). Heck, before the hardliners way back in the day, some of the great science and cultural advances came out of the joint partnerships of Jews, Muslims, and Christians in Spain, while the rest of Europe was still piddling about in the Dark Ages.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  24. Re:Military State by lexsird · · Score: 1

    Military inspired innovations aren't anything new. We are communicating via the Internet which was in part started by a US DoD project. One could argue all technology is military based from the philosophical stand point, but why digress.

    What I fail to comprehend, at least feign to fail to comprehend is why not allow Palestinians to be part of the UN. Why? This forces them into a statehood with consequences for their actions. It would force elements like Hamas to conform or frankly to be killed/imprisoned as criminals, instead of being part of some chaotic rogue element that can slink back into the wood work. It would open the door for the UN to put the hammer to unruly elements such as again Hamas because the legitimate leadership of the Palestinians is weak.

    Two reasons why I think this is opposed. One it means the US welfare check would diminish or stop altogether if there is UN enforced and supervised peace. War is a profitable thing, we should know, we have more than our fair share of war profiteers here. Our warmongers and your warmongers have been in bed together for a LONG TIME. Now of course this has been necessary due to the nature of how the "homeland" has been returned to, taking it by force has been problematic. I think God knew this and is why he told you guys not to do that, but who's listening to God these days, we sure as hell aren't here, so who are we to complain?

    Secondly, the UN is a tricky thing and if you have too many enemies, allowing the Palestinians in could mean trouble if they are just going to be dicks about everything, and rabble rouse with a new forum to exploit. If that is the case, fuck 'em. But if they are earnestly trying to just survive and be peaceful neighbors and not get the shit kicked out of them, it would be great to help them out. Especially if you can bump off those that refuse to evolve and just want to be militant punks about everything, via sanctioned UN actions.

    Why bitch about this? It's not antisemitism; we are going broke. And as we are going broke, we are starting to turn into the modern Nazis here. Except instead of putting Jews in concentration camps, it will be minorities, the poor, the disabled, illegal aliens, etc. Multinational corporations have raped the ecology of the American ecology. Frankly put, the foundation of America, the American worker has been reamed in the butt by opportunistic trade policies that have been implemented so that said multinational corporations can exploit super cheap foreign labor and dump the products on our markets.

    We are taking a nose dive because this kind of thinking is unsustainable unless we just fully evolve into fascism, and we are goosestepping our way there quickly. Being a friend, I am advising to invest in peace with your neighbors. It would help to disarm the hawks and let us focus on sound economic policies that will make it difficult for us to turn into a full blown fascist war machine which the entire world would just fucking hate. I can understand reaching out to Europe because we seem a bit flaky at the moment. Obama may seem like a punk, but he's got his hands full with keeping the 4th Reich from happening during or after his watch.

    Lets face it we have the world problems we have for two reasons. One we will suck dick for oil. We have propped up dickheads to keep the oil flowing and we haven't cared what they do to the populations just as long as the oil has flowed. We have created fat cats who lord over their extremely poor populations and they have come to resent the shit out of our supporting them. We have propagated the hell out of the region with weapons, but who hasn't?

    Secondly we have backed you guys unquestioningly. We have gave money and weapons to you for decades now, not giving one shit what you do with it as long as you don't start WW3. Yes, you took the land by force. There was some fucked up shit that has happened to the Palestinians, and that is why they are so burning pissed off. We understand, we though had enough sense to kill off the indigenous peopl

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  25. Re:Military State by paleshadows · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it has nothing to do with the billions of dollars that pour in to Israel each year as welfare from the U.S.

    You are right. The 3$ billions per year Israel receives from the U.S. is ~1% of Israel's yearly budget. Importantly, most of the U.S. aid comes in the form of military equipment (that is, the actual funds flow directly to the pockets of U.S. military industry). It has nothing to do with start-ups and CS departments.

  26. Re:Visits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaza != Israel
    And if the scientists were armed and agressively awaiting to attack any Israely they see, then they have all the right to nuke them out once they enter the area under their control.

  27. Re:Military State by paleshadows · · Score: 1

    Politicians are greedy, and want to have control on everything. Including economy and research. And AFAIK, even more so in Israel, because of the military background of prominent state officials.

    Respectfully, it's clear you don't really know anything about Israeli exact science academia and high-tech industry, both of which rely very little on government money; most of their funding comes from international competitive research funds and international investors, respectively.

    If anything, Israel's army is a driving force for innovation.

    Bottom line: your thesis about Israel is nice. It's just unrelated to reality.

  28. Re:Military State by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    Yes, at least if we remove all outside influence from the area and left all the countries to their own devices. The Israelis would slaughter the competition.

  29. Re:Visits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since scientists aren't ones to bring weapons to try to beat up and kill soldiers, I would expect not.

  30. Re:STFU and GTFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't. Feed. The. Trolls! Is that so hard?

    Just let the mods deal with it.

  31. Israel is part of other European associations by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    UEFA (soccer) and they participate in the Eurovision song contest.

    Turkey is in a similiar scenario.

    Nothing earth-shattering except I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:Israel is part of other European associations by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Israel is always the "Cowboy Neal" option in Eurovision.

  32. Gaza != Israel ? by br00tus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Gaza is not Israel, then why did Israel have commandos with machine guns rappel onto a flotilla boat bringing food to people in Gaza? As far as the "area under their control", the area in the case of the flotilla raid was international waters. You know, international waters, like where the USS Liberty was when Israel killed 34 of its crew. It's funny how people sailing on a ship with food in international waters are the ones "agressively awaiting to attack any Israely they see", while the commandos rappelling onto the boat with machine guns (the "any Israelys (sic) they see" I guess) are not the aggressive ones. The Israeli commandos were armed with machine guns, the flotilla passengers were armed with nothing but pieces of wood from the mast and knives they grabbed from the kitchen.

    1. Re:Gaza != Israel ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar. The soldiers boarding the ship were armed with paintball guns and small personal pistols. The boat activists were armed with commando knives. Constantly repeating a lie does not make it true. The UN Pallmer report has determined that Israel had every legal right to stop the boat in international waters, even though the media preferred to ignore it.

  33. tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the feeling you're an anti-semite or want to legalize gambling or something

  34. Re:Military State by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a military state such as Israel, it is impressive that every now and then they come up with innovations; not very many, but they do come up with them.

    I can cite two clear counter-examples in tech. If you posted on a computer that using an Intel chip newer than an Pentium IV, the technology came from Intel's Israel development center. If you've played a game using a MS Kinect, that also came from Israel.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  35. Re:Military State by dskoll · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you even think that Israel would exist today without US backup?

    Well, it's impossible to answer "what if" questions, but Israel didn't receive substantial assistance from the US until after the 1967 war and it survived quite nicely from 1948-1967.

  36. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, at least if we remove all outside influence from the area and left all the countries to their own devices. The Israelis would slaughter the competition.

    Right. Because all <strike>Jews</strike> Israelis like to slaughter people. They enjoy it: they are different than you and me in this respect. Oh, and the above statement isn't raciest at all! It's purely based on facts! It's a shame we didn't solve this problem altogether 70 years ago.

  37. Israel should allow the IAEA into Dimona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and join the NPT.

    1. Re:Israel should allow the IAEA into Dimona by PPH · · Score: 1

      No mod points, but that's an interesting issue. There is crossover between nuclear reactor/weapon research and fundamental particle physics. What is CERN doing inviting people in who haven't signed on to not weaponizing whatever knowledge they take away from this organization?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Israel should allow the IAEA into Dimona by ja · · Score: 1

      Agreed

      --

      send + more == money? ...
  38. Re:Military State by vinlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just the systematic purging of Arabs in Jerusalem (by refusing permits to Arabs to modify or build new houses) though is not something you would expect to find in any true developed democracy conscious of it's minorities.

    You can wonder if a democracy can operate properly at all if it's main issues are related to security

    The fact that most of Israel's neighbours are fucked up countries as well (although Jordan doesn't seem bad imho and we can hopefully see positive things developing in Egypt) doesn't plead in any way that Israel is a democratic country. It'd be like comparing the US to Mexico and conclude that the US doesn't seem to have a lot of gun fights

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  39. Re:Military State by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I agree about Arab citizens (even though there are disturbing calls from even the mainstream parties to strip them of their citizenship or trade land where they live). People like their foreign minister who openly hates Arab citizens would have no place in mainstream American or European politics. However by apartheid people usually mean the currently implemented de-facto one state solution that includes the disputed territories. Millions of Arabs living their are limited in their basic civil and economic rights not unlike blacks of late Apartheid South Africa.

    And judging by Israeli plans for a two state solution their vision of a future Palestinian state is similar to South Africa's Bantustans, a caricature of a state designed to strip blacks South African's of their citizenship and provide whites in power with cheap controlled labor.

    I've been following the politics of ME for years, it's quite clear that Israel believes that they can keep the current status quo forever while bullshitting the rest of the world with half-hearted peace talks where they behave with barely hidden contempt for their negotiation partners. But the way things have been developing I think they are wrong and neither the International community nor their Arab neighbors are going to tolerate the stalling much longer.

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  40. Re:Visits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking the ship? That would be way to expensive, as there is a direct Easyjet flight from Geneva to Tel Aviv. They wish rappelling Israeli commandos were the worst that would happen.

  41. Chad Gadya, Chad Gadya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a poetic post, maybe we should translate it to Aramaic, put it to music, and sing it once a year?

    1. Re:Chad Gadya, Chad Gadya by c0lo · · Score: 1

      What a poetic post, maybe we should translate it to Aramaic, put it to music, and sing it once a year?

      At Eurovision song contest?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  42. History of CERN by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    I thought CERN was all about science. What's this about building bridges?

    CERN was founded in the post second world war period. Part of its aim was to build bridges between nations THROUGH science since it was well recognised that science provides a common goal to work towards and that scientists are usually pretty open minded about most things. It certainly worked for me - as a Brit I now have many friends and colleagues scattered around the globe from a huge variety of different national, cultural and religious backgrounds thanks to CERN.

  43. Accuracy by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Politics have no business in science.

    Accuracy does though - Israel is becoming and associate member NOT a full member of CERN. There is a difference!

  44. Re:Why? by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 1

    It's funny that with so many overwhelming abuses on human rights occuring around the world (sudan, congo, burma, chad, somailia, sri lanka, just to name a few) you're pretending to stop ignoring atrocities. This sort of language is useful political propaganda, but pretending israel is the same as nazi germany is demonstrating either extreme bias or extreme ignorance.

  45. legitimacy is derived from what works by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    in a land where people live peacefully, legitimacy is derived from the consent of the will of the people. in a land where people are in conflict, legitimacy is derived from force

    it would be ideal if the land in question were legitimately ruled by what people consent to. but the people who live there are all too happy to reach for bombs and guns, and so they have decided that the way of the bomb and the gun is what rules their lands. blaming outsiders is a convenient excuse for one's own failures. outsiders would have no rhyme or reason to get involved if one side or the other weren't asking outsiders to get involved: there'd be no way in, all sides would repulse the outsiders. but in a land where calling in foreign powers is perfectly acceptable because hatred of your neighbor because they are sunni, or kurd, or whatever, is more important than regional solidarity, is a land that will never rule itself

    the best thing about the Arab Spring is that those who spearheaded the overthrow of deeply unpopular governments insisted on no violence. because they knew this was all the excuse the government needed to respond with it's own violence. in this way, they won their own country

    now the question remains if the discipline of this path of no violence can be adhered to. unfortunately, the middle east is fractured by ancient vendettas and conflicts, between religions and tribes. it is very hard for such a land to be ruled by peace. too many are hellbent on blood as the only answer, to conflicts which are best left aside

    the arab world will never have peace, growth, and prosperity until the arab world itself, regardless of what outsiders do, put aside their own internal conflicts

    what is legitimate in the arab world? ideally, what arabs want, decided peacefully. it is up to arabs themselves to reach for peace themselves, as the Arab Spring shows, that is the way they free themselves form oppression, foreign, yes, but mostly domestic

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:legitimacy is derived from what works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could make a movie about Arabic zombies. That would be great.

  46. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel has all that tech but they can't figure out how to create a smoke screen without dumping white phosphorus on children?

  47. Israel is gonna spy the f**k out of CERN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only interest Israel wants with CERN is better job security for spies.

  48. Re:Military State by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Right. Because we all know that if you were a Jew or Israeli, you could easily walk into Israel. But if you walked into Saudi Arabia, you'd automatically be arrested and tossed into prison to be tortured. If you were a women, you'd be tortured and raped. And if we were in egypt and you were a reporter forget the possibility of being safe. You'd be raped, beaten and raped some more.

    Antisemitism is the norm in the middle east and has been for the last 2000 years, because it's the norm in Islam. And if you can't figure out that islam is a political system as in and as much a religious system you're doomed at understanding what's going on.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  49. Re:Military State by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Really? What does this barely coherent diatribe have to do with my rather well thought out reply to the GP? Next time if you want to say something to me please try to address the actual points presented.

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  50. "Non-European"? by vga_init · · Score: 0

    This is a joke, right? I can't imagine a country that's more European than Israel.

    1. Re:"Non-European"? by Slashdot+Assistant · · Score: 1

      France comes to mind.

    2. Re:"Non-European"? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      France is France :), but there are few countries more EU than France none the less (I guess the BeNeLux would be more EU, but that's about it).

  51. gibberish by br00tus · · Score: 1

    My "dispute" is calling Israel a democracy. "Arabs in the west bank are not Israeli citizens, they're a people who live in disputed territories" Yes, that's the point, Arabs in the west bank do not get to vote or have Israeli citizenship. Ergo, Israel is not a democracy.

    1. Re:gibberish by msobkow · · Score: 1

      That's stupid. US citizens don't get to vote in Canada. Canadians don't get to vote in the US. Why would Palestinians get to vote in Israel?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:gibberish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the point, Arabs in the west bank do not get to vote or have Israeli citizenship. Ergo, Israel is not a democracy.

      There is the arab population in Israel that does get to vote and hold public office. This is the arab population that chose not to leave Israel when the surrounding arab nations were "going to drive Israel to the sea". Obviously, the Israelis were not driven out to the sea. For the last 70 years, the arabs of judea (West of what? look at a map, it is on the east side of the country. the term west bank is a term used to de-legitimatize Israels right to exist), chose to live in armed conflict, constantly snatching defeat in the jaws of victory to regain their own arab state.

      So, yes, Canada is not a legitimate democracy because New Yorkers do not get to vote in their elections. Makes sense. Not.

    3. Re:gibberish by marnues · · Score: 1

      How is that an apt comparison? Do you even know what's going on in the Levant? If you do you certainly do not understand it.

  52. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every $ that you don't have to spend on military gives you an extra $ that you can spend on something else.(CS departments etc)

    Funny how intangible money can be.

  53. Here is the actual press release by zpiro · · Score: 1
    In short, Israel is an associate member state for at least 24months, after which they may become a member state.

    Israel to become Associate Member State of CERN


    Geneva 16 September 2011. CERN Director General Rolf Heuer and Israeli Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Nations Office and
    other International Organizations in Geneva, H.E. Mr. Aharon Leshno-Yaar today signed a document admitting Israel to CERN Associate Membership, subject to
    ratification by the Knesset. Following ratification, Israel will become an Associate Member of CERN for a minimum period of 24 months. Following this period,
    CERN Council will decide on the admission of Israel to full Membership, taking into account the recommendations of a task force to be appointed for this purpose.
    Israel has a long-standing relationship with CERN, and has been an Observer at the CERN Council since 1991.

    “It is a vital part of our mission to build bridges between nations. This agreement enriches us scientifically, and is an important step in that direction,” said CERN
    Director General Rolf Heuer. “I am very pleased that CERN’s relationship with Israel is moving to a higher level.”

    “I am very happy with this decision,” said Eliezer Rabinovici, Professor and Director of the Institute for Advanced Study at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem
    and Israel’s scientific observer to Council. “I view it as recognition of the Israeli contributions, both scientific and technological to CERN over the years. The Israeli
    scientific community is looking forward to the continuation of this joint adventure.”


    Israel has a strong tradition in both experimental and theoretical particle physics, with a major involvement in the OPAL experiment at CERN’s flagship
    accelerator through the 1990s, the Large Electron Positron collider. Israel’s accession to Observer status in 1991 followed an agreement to contribute funds to the
    CERN budget to support Israeli scientists, as well as providing equipment to CERN. The Israeli fund also contributed to LEP running, supported LHC construction
    and R&D for future accelerators. During its association with CERN, Israel has also supported Palestinian students at CERN,
    notably sending mixed Israeli-Palestinian contingents to CERN’s summer student programme.

    In 2009, Israel was accepted as a special Observer State, with the right to attend restricted Council sessions for discussions of LHC matters. Israel currently has
    a strong involvement in the ATLAS experiment, and participates in a number of other experiments at CERN.

  54. JIDF DETECTED by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    If you shut yourself off from criticism, you are willfully ignorant. Be so, if you wish, but don't call yourself "intellectual" or an academic.

    Funny, I could say the same to you.

    1. Re:JIDF DETECTED by Sun · · Score: 1

      It's a free forum. You can say whatever you like, whether true or not.

      Shachar

    2. Re:JIDF DETECTED by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Indeed you can, and some not unlike yourself take more advantage of that fact than others it would seem.

    3. Re:JIDF DETECTED by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Said "others" seem to be downmodding all GP's posts as "Troll". I'd say he's the one who's trying to maintain a rational, intelligent conversation here.

    4. Re:JIDF DETECTED by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      He was modded up before being modded down, that is how every political discussion goes. Meanwhile the AC of #37434496 sits on a (-1, Flamebait) because he civilly posted a news article that highlighted Israeli atrocities. He also calls boycotts ``diplomatic warfare'' (was Rosa Parks a soldier then?) and claims that the people who deny that Israel is absolutely correct all of the time are ignorant.

  55. Aliquots != Armaments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, politics aren't intrinsically linked to sharing of energy and arms research. I'm sure they'll cooperate, collaborate, and exchange with Iran too, as soon as a regime change happens to happen. But Netanyahu's "Nuclearly Ambiguous" Israel is a perfectly stable, sensible ally to trade nuclear research with. All in the name of science, of course.

  56. Re:Military State by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

    Well then, where are the Egyptian start-ups?

  57. Re:The problems with Slashdot by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I'm a Volga German, you insensitive clod!

  58. Technion by ja · · Score: 1
    About Technion:

    http://uprootedpalestinians.blogspot.com/2010/10/montreal-activists-launch-campus.html

    ... "an academic institution that not only places a major amount of its efforts in military technology, but also in promoting student/soldier cooperative programs, is therefore deeply implicated in the occupation and crimes committed by the military." ...

    --

    send + more == money? ...
    1. Re:Technion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that pretty much settles that argument doesnt it. The scientists that will be working at CERN work with the military to continue an illegal occupation (this is NOT in dispute).

    2. Re:Technion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll.

  59. Re:Military State by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Do you even think that Israel would exist today without US backup?

    I think a better question, given the track record of Arab-Israeli wars, would be, "do you even think that Arab nations surrounding Israel would exist today without Soviet backup"?

  60. Re:Military State by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I think you're reading into GP's words what he didn't say. The military record of IDF against Arab armies in a fair fight can quite concisely be summed up as "slaughter of the competition" - it was that one-sided - without having any negative connotations.

  61. History repeating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Germany in the 30's made a concerted effort to rid German physics of Jewish influence., See how well it worked out for them.

  62. weird?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how science and creationism fit into the jews religious perspective?

    1. Re:weird?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Israelis aren't religious, so the answer to your question is "easily".

  63. There are dues to be paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Israel going to pay them, or do they get a free pass like usual?

  64. Ban them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ban them everywhere until the agree to act like international citizens and not an apartheid race based society.

  65. Re:Military State by jawahar · · Score: 1

    A country is not made of land; a country is made of its people.

  66. What if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if some of that science is used to kill more Palestinians? Or used to clone European passports? Or used to invade its neighbours? Or used to subvert US politics?

    I don't want Israel involved in European affairs, anymore than I want my passport data made available to them, it is none of their business.

  67. New WMD to use on Palestinians by akayani · · Score: 1

    Great they will be able to make a neutron gun to fire on Palestinians from space. Use that old reactor that does nothing put produce plutonium and is still running 20 years past its useby date and was built using stolen technology. Perhaps find a god partial and claim ownership based on an existing patent on god. Wouldn't it have been better to BDS the god particle?

  68. Re:Military State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats a really good point!!! Especially when its all amerikkkan taxpayer money which then allows such silly statistics to be concocted suggesting that the ashkeNAZIs are all WUNDERKINDS. Its like saying "look at what the jews have done and made the desert bloom, arabs couldnt do that", omitting the fact that the Israeli occupiers have actually cut off the Palestinians water! For heavens sake people, UAE is blooming too, oh wait, they must have hired jews to do it.

    This is about nuclear physics, and non-signatory to the NPT . take a byte out of VANUNU why dont you??????

  69. Disproportionate scientific puppetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely the membership of CERN should have had the wherewithal to consider the plight of their fellow scientist VANUNU, and asked for his release prior to openly sharing data with a nuclear bbully. Oh wait just a moment, theyre not even bound by START or the Nuke NPT, so i guess CERNS all kosher.

  70. Re:Military State by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    And if you can't figure out that islam is a political system as in and as much a religious system you're doomed at understanding what's going on.

    Wow... [roll eyes]
    This will come as news to... pretty much anyone who knows more than what they hear on right wing talk radio. Despite what you may believe, Islam is no more a "political system" than is say Christianity. Not that politics isn't influenced by both, but to argue that "religion = political system" is to display a stunning lack of understanding of both. Such a generalization is almost certain to fit nowhere in reality. Are there Islamic states? Sure, but again, that doesn't really tell you much about the politics in those states. In point of fact, their politics are driven far more by ancient tribal dynamics than by some mythical unified "Church of Islam". Do some reading. Irshad Manji's "The Trouble With Islam" would be a good place to start.

  71. 200 Reasons why Israel should not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The war you don't see" by John Pilger http://www.fluxradio.org/thewar.zip After watching it, I think it is enough to make anyone barf and the corruption of the BBC

  72. Re:Military State by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I guess someone hasn't been paying attention to what's been going on in SE-Asia and Europe and therefore the realities of the world. And in turn, are actually "right wing" radio. Well I guess living in ignorance is just a fine dandy thing, or the that a modern system can come crashing down in the fantasy system of tribal dynamics.

    I suppose you could always travel the world, which might do you better.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  73. Re:Military State by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I'll let you think about why what I said, and what the GP said. And how it relates. Simply because you didn't understand it. Doesn't mean it doesn't apply. You know, much like how your inane post which had no coherence to the thread at all.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  74. Cern and Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now everything will be owned by the SENMACE corporations. The laws of the nations will be used to generate from the public commons within the CERN communities many discoveries paid for by the taxing paying people of the other nations that freely participate there, which discoveries will end up victim to copyright or patent packages to be sold off to the "profit making chests" of the feudal lord SENMACE.

    Monopolies [copyright, patent, and license of the pieces of the public commons] created from thin air, by a rule of law made by one of the nations have allowed a very few to accumulate and own all and to quash other independent competition of whatever kind simply by call on the nation that made the law to enforce it.

    Humanity has made its life in patent prison.

     

  75. Re:Military State by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    I guess someone hasn't been paying attention to what's been going on in SE-Asia and Europe and therefore the realities of the world..

    Well, thank you for verifying the degree of your misunderstanding. Would care to name the specifics and remove all doubt?

  76. Re:STFU and GTFO by Tsingi · · Score: 1

    Don't. Feed. The. Trolls! Is that so hard?

    Just let the mods deal with it.

    C'mon. It IS pretty hard.

    And look at you, posting as AC.

  77. Time to leave /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before these threads turn into all-out cries of "Kill the perfidious Jews!"

  78. Re:Military State by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    The fact that most of Israel's neighbours are fucked up countries as well (although Jordan doesn't seem bad imho and we can hopefully see positive things developing in Egypt) doesn't plead in any way that Israel is a democratic country. It'd be like comparing the US to Mexico and conclude that the US doesn't seem to have a lot of gun fights

    Actually, that analogy speaks against your point, rather than for it. Human behaviour is a spectrum. If you ask a Mexican whether the US has a lot of gun violence, the answer would be quite different than if you had asked a Canadian. If the Mexican government were criticizing the US for having excessive gun violence, and demanding that they do something about it, we'd laugh at their hypocrisy. We can only really judge the behaviour of a given state as it relates to other states. So it's perfectly valid to point out that Israel is largely democratic, and provides more freedom for it's Arab citizens than any Arab state. It's ridiculous for us to take Arab states seriously when they complain about human-rights violations.

    We CAN criticize certain Israeli policies, but we do so because we hold ourselves to a higher standard and expect them to do better; we don't need to legitimize states who are worse than Israel by pretending that theyâ(TM)ve suddenly started to care about human rights or the plight of Palestinians. And it's important to realize that no state exists in a vacuum - the behaviour of it's neighbours is a massive factor in the policies which Israel adopts. It's asinine to expect the same standards from a nation surrounded by hostile states as we do from one which has a good relationship with it's neighbours, and has had no serious threats for decades.

  79. Re:Military State by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    This will come as news to... pretty much anyone who knows more than what they hear on right wing talk radio. Despite what you may believe, Islam is no more a "political system" than is say Christianity.

    lol. Yes, Christianity is a political system. If you don't realize this, your history teachers have failed you completely. The main difference is that, today, Christianity generally acts on politics as an outside influence, while Islam is very much THE political system in many Islamic nations.