Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

PETA To Launch Pornography Website

Posted by samzenpus on from the one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other dept.

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are planning on launching an adult oriented website to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn. I'm not sure how mixing the two will win hearts, minds, or naughty bits, but Lindsay Rajt, PETA's associate director of campaigns, seems to think it's a good idea. She says, "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."

8 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. The website's motto by killmenow · · Score: 5, Funny

    PETAPORN.COM: Where it's OK to beat your meat.

  2. Immoral Dilemma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing like humiliating women for the ethical treatment of animals.

    1. Re:Immoral Dilemma by DaFallus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

      Why should my mother or my sister give a shit about what I'm ok with? How about what they're ok with? Some people aren't ok with their daughters learning math, or about evolution...

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
  3. Re:When PETA thinks it's a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was thinking the same things, perhaps this will only exacerbate the problem.
    "Thanks a lot PETA, I can't get off unless I kill an animal now!"

  4. Yes obviously it's stupid, that's the point by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course this is ridiculously idiotic. That's just what they're going for. Say something batshit insane that'll provoke media coverage and public reaction to show people that PETA still exists and believes in ending the suffering of animals or whatever. They have no intention of actually doing this, it's just another cynical attention-grabbing statement to remind people about PETA.

    Nothing to see here, just Slashdot getting trolled.

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  5. Singing! by Barny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Supersadomasochistinecrobestiality.

    Its when you get a hard-on making Lassie a fatality!

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  6. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by CelticWhisper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to mention all the leg-humping dogs who would be up on sexual assault charges.

    No dude - this is a PETA article, not a TSA article.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  7. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by increment1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One can only hope that too much exposure doesn't result in people becoming sexually aroused by cruelty to animals. I really think that PETA should have thought this through a little bit more.