Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

PETA To Launch Pornography Website

Posted by samzenpus on from the one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other dept.

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are planning on launching an adult oriented website to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn. I'm not sure how mixing the two will win hearts, minds, or naughty bits, but Lindsay Rajt, PETA's associate director of campaigns, seems to think it's a good idea. She says, "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."

15 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by Kenja · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its PETA, they've been insane since day one. They euthanize animals, while declaring they are for animal rights. Their leder takes insalin derived from canines, while saying that no animals should be used for medical research. They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by CelticWhisper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention all the leg-humping dogs who would be up on sexual assault charges.

      No dude - this is a PETA article, not a TSA article.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    3. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by increment1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One can only hope that too much exposure doesn't result in people becoming sexually aroused by cruelty to animals. I really think that PETA should have thought this through a little bit more.

  2. The website's motto by killmenow · · Score: 5, Funny

    PETAPORN.COM: Where it's OK to beat your meat.

  3. Immoral Dilemma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing like humiliating women for the ethical treatment of animals.

    1. Re:Immoral Dilemma by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes to both questions, but I am dutch, maybe we have less hangups about it.
      I don't think that there is anything wrong with playing in a porno or even in a theatre production.
      I would not watch the porn with them in it though.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    2. Re:Immoral Dilemma by DaFallus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

      Why should my mother or my sister give a shit about what I'm ok with? How about what they're ok with? Some people aren't ok with their daughters learning math, or about evolution...

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
  4. Hustler did this by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the 80s, when we were teens sneaking copies of Hustler away from older brothers or swapping with neighbors I remember seeing several issues with both porn and horrible war footage.

    Flynt was not afraid to publish articles showing exactly what kind of destruction the US was, or had been, wreaking overseas. And he showed the cost it had on the soldiers as well.

    The nudity and sex were not the obscenity. The murder of civilians and the treatment of those who had signed up to serve the country was the real obscenity.

    1. Re:Hustler did this by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You bring in your audience with the product they want, and while they're there you give them the message.
      It's not exactly "new".

  5. mixing vids? by danbuter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So halfway through the sex scene, right when you're about to cum, it will switch to cows being slaughtered?

  6. Re:When PETA thinks it's a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was thinking the same things, perhaps this will only exacerbate the problem.
    "Thanks a lot PETA, I can't get off unless I kill an animal now!"

  7. Yes obviously it's stupid, that's the point by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course this is ridiculously idiotic. That's just what they're going for. Say something batshit insane that'll provoke media coverage and public reaction to show people that PETA still exists and believes in ending the suffering of animals or whatever. They have no intention of actually doing this, it's just another cynical attention-grabbing statement to remind people about PETA.

    Nothing to see here, just Slashdot getting trolled.

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  8. Singing! by Barny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Supersadomasochistinecrobestiality.

    Its when you get a hard-on making Lassie a fatality!

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  9. Re:Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operatio by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had to look into it, because it seemed to be a bit of a stretch, even for PETA. But damned if you weren't correct about that. Here's one of the links for folks interested. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/eight-animals/