Slashdot Mirror


PETA To Launch Pornography Website

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are planning on launching an adult oriented website to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn. I'm not sure how mixing the two will win hearts, minds, or naughty bits, but Lindsay Rajt, PETA's associate director of campaigns, seems to think it's a good idea. She says, "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."

52 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Funny

      For once PETA does something I approve of. Yes, get more female celebrities to pose nude! I'm sure it will turn me from an omnivore to a herbivore once I get enough exposure!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by Kenja · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its PETA, they've been insane since day one. They euthanize animals, while declaring they are for animal rights. Their leder takes insalin derived from canines, while saying that no animals should be used for medical research. They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

      Not to mention all the leg-humping dogs who would be up on sexual assault charges.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by CelticWhisper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention all the leg-humping dogs who would be up on sexual assault charges.

      No dude - this is a PETA article, not a TSA article.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    5. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by neoform · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, they've been full-on for a long time... I realized this when they released a film called "Chickens are people too". The obvious reply to that title is: "No, they aren't."

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    6. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by Kid+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

      Their leder takes insalin derived from canines, while saying that no animals should be used for medical research.

      They haven't derived "insalin" from Canines in ages. I'm sure their "leder" is using the modern brands of insulin.

    7. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Euthanize? Try eradicate... part of PETA's mission is the complete destruction of species that have made the mistake of getting along with humans.

    8. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by increment1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One can only hope that too much exposure doesn't result in people becoming sexually aroused by cruelty to animals. I really think that PETA should have thought this through a little bit more.

    9. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

      Yep, dogs humping in public. Shocking, isn't it? And best not to mention horses... At least cats do it in the dark, if a little noisily.

      Or just visit the zoo on a warm summer day. Most of the male animals have boners, in public, and in front of children. Obviously, they need to be convicted as child-molesting sex criminals. Hmmm, maybe that's why they're already locked up.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    10. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Don't they know you NEVER go full retard? Was there any doubt in their insanity after the "sea kitten" episode? For those that didn't hear, and I swear I ain't making this shit up, PETA demanded that all mentions of fish be replaced with the words 'sea kittens" because people wouldn't want to eat fish if they sounded cute and that several thousand years of tastes and diets could be changed by calling a trout a sea kitty. I guess someone forgot to tell them about catfish huh?

      What is sad is we really do need someone speaking out for the rights of animals to be treated with respect, we shouldn't make food animals suffer, nor should people be killing animals for fun or sport, but PETA left normal about 5 exits back and is way into "total drooling batshit crazy" country and they ain't never coming back. kinda like how the new head of MADD said their ultimate goal is to bring back prohibition. We all know that is batshit, and is as far from the original mission as you can get, so far that the original organizer and creator of MADD won't have anything to do with them. But in all these orgs it seems like the loony tunes always end up running the show.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least he got 'their' right...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Sometimes they do things that are so stupid and crazy that I wonder if there isn't some agent provocateur calling the shots at the top. They seem to actual WANT to discredit themselves.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by ravenshrike · · Score: 2

      Apparently they want to attract/guide young serial killers.

    14. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2

      They have animal shelters, and if an animal is in the shelter too long without being adopted, it's put down. This is in contrast to no-kill shelters run by other organizations, where they would put down only the animals that are beyond help.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    15. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by meerling · · Score: 2

      Insulin comes from a variety of sources to meet the medical requirements of patients. The one from bacteria is human insulin (product name 'Humalin', and they inserted the human gene for making insulin into a bacteria. There's more to it than that, but that's a whole article.), while most of the rest of the insulin on the market is either bovine (cow) or porcine (pig).
      Before the creation of Humalin, those two were just about all there was.
      I've heard tell there was a very limited amount of human insulin available, but it required the destruction of huge quantities of human blood to make, so it was only made available to a few of the people that couldn't take the others due to allergies or other complications. I don't have verification of that, and if you really want to know, go look it up yourself.

      I've never heard of anyone using canine (dog) insulin, but if it's true (probably isn't), it has to be really really rare.

    16. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by JosKarith · · Score: 2

      Entirety of /b/ decamping in 5...4...3...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    17. Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Now here's the clencher. SPCA shelter's do the same- and give the animal six months. PETA shelters "euthanize" any animal not adopted after 14 days !

      Right, so now PETA are at fault for not being soft on animals?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. /b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So PETA is creating /b in other words.

  3. When PETA thinks it's a good idea... by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

    ...you know that it isn't. What an absurdly idiotic joke. Then again, as an above poster said, they're probably going to get an influx of /b/tards that will just fap even harder at this stuff. I hope they leave comments open. They're going to get the opposite response they were hoping for.

    1. Re:When PETA thinks it's a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was thinking the same things, perhaps this will only exacerbate the problem.
      "Thanks a lot PETA, I can't get off unless I kill an animal now!"

  4. Sh*ting D*ck Nipples by 0racle · · Score: 3, Funny

    some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing

    So they're implementing Encyclopedia Dramatica?

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  5. Doin it wrong. by TehNoobTrumpet · · Score: 2

    So they're training people to beat off to pictures of animal suffering?

  6. The website's motto by killmenow · · Score: 5, Funny

    PETAPORN.COM: Where it's OK to beat your meat.

    1. Re:The website's motto by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Give a dog a bone"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  7. Immoral Dilemma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing like humiliating women for the ethical treatment of animals.

    1. Re:Immoral Dilemma by characterZer0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That aside, it's a silly prudish notion to think that pornography is any more or less humiliating than any other performance art.

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:Immoral Dilemma by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes to both questions, but I am dutch, maybe we have less hangups about it.
      I don't think that there is anything wrong with playing in a porno or even in a theatre production.
      I would not watch the porn with them in it though.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    3. Re:Immoral Dilemma by DaFallus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

      Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

      Why should my mother or my sister give a shit about what I'm ok with? How about what they're ok with? Some people aren't ok with their daughters learning math, or about evolution...

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    4. Re:Immoral Dilemma by Sir+Realist · · Score: 2

      No, and yes.

      What? Porn's porn. Local theater is terrible.

    5. Re:Immoral Dilemma by Yeknomaguh · · Score: 2

      Who says that all porn stars are coerced? Who says that even MOST porn stars are coerced? A female friend I have has done a number of porn videos. She makes really good money and she absolutely loves her work, and her agent makes sure she's never in an uncomfortable position (har har) and she always has the right to walk away from any shoot, which she has done. She has no misconceptions about what she is doing and is not ashamed by it whatsoever. If you asked me to name my strongest willed friend, she'd probably be it. Nobody is going to coerce her in to doing anything. Porn can be legitimate work. In fact, it usually is.

  8. Keep those PETAfiles off the internet by jpvlsmv · · Score: 3, Funny

    And get that Kitty porn off my screen, damnit.

    --Joe

  9. Hustler did this by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the 80s, when we were teens sneaking copies of Hustler away from older brothers or swapping with neighbors I remember seeing several issues with both porn and horrible war footage.

    Flynt was not afraid to publish articles showing exactly what kind of destruction the US was, or had been, wreaking overseas. And he showed the cost it had on the soldiers as well.

    The nudity and sex were not the obscenity. The murder of civilians and the treatment of those who had signed up to serve the country was the real obscenity.

    1. Re:Hustler did this by deKernel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So you are liking PETA to Larry Flynt...guess I actually do see the comparison.

    2. Re:Hustler did this by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You bring in your audience with the product they want, and while they're there you give them the message.
      It's not exactly "new".

  10. mixing vids? by danbuter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So halfway through the sex scene, right when you're about to cum, it will switch to cows being slaughtered?

  11. What kind of dork is going to fall for that? by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 2

    "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."

    Yeah, 'cuz nobody would expect that from PETA.

    --
    Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
  12. Yes obviously it's stupid, that's the point by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course this is ridiculously idiotic. That's just what they're going for. Say something batshit insane that'll provoke media coverage and public reaction to show people that PETA still exists and believes in ending the suffering of animals or whatever. They have no intention of actually doing this, it's just another cynical attention-grabbing statement to remind people about PETA.

    Nothing to see here, just Slashdot getting trolled.

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  13. Basically, they are going to give you 4chan.org/b by malakai · · Score: 2

    4chan has already evolved this ( randomly, ergo /b/ ) and the evolutionary outcome was people who can only fap to shocking images of puppies having their heads cutoff juxtaposed with teen webcams or pornographic images of my little ponies.....

    I don't think Rule 34 should ever be a marketing campaign.

    Why PETA thinks this is a good outcome, I don't know.

  14. porn with PETA ads by ThorGod · · Score: 2

    What they're planning, from the article:

    Visitors to the X-rated site will initially be presented with pornographic content as well as images from PETA's salacious ads and campaigns, Rajt said. Those images will be followed by pictures and video shot undercover of the mistreatment of animals. The site will also include links to vegetarian and vegan – using no animal products – starter kits as well as recipes.

    Either way, I don't see how this works out well for their message. How about online streaming of tv shows that hulu wont stream for free - supplemented with peta ads? Or, a paypal service - watch 15 minutes of peta ads, take a quiz on their policies, pass, and get $5? The porn angle is just too strange.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  15. Singing! by Barny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Supersadomasochistinecrobestiality.

    Its when you get a hard-on making Lassie a fatality!

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  16. Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operations by Quila · · Score: 2

    After all, PETA is one of the most prolific killers of animals in the country.

  17. PETA and Burning Man by Teppy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Porn is nothing new for PETA. This happened at Burning Man in 2006:

    First off, when it comes to art at Burning Man, pretty much anything goes. However, PETA's "art" consisted of a film loop of pigs being beaten to death, shown on a 15-foot screen, complete with sound. They placed this on the Esplanade, Burning Man's "main street." My camp was next door, and while we didn't actually do any of the following pranks, thinking them up was great fun.

    Our first prank was to go over with a plate of veal chops:

    Us: "Hi, guys. We're from BBQ camp, next door, and ... we're full. Would you like some veal chops? We're just going to throw them out."

    Our next prank:

    Us: "Hi, guys. We're so glad that you've taken the first step toward a sustainable planet by becoming vegan. But we hope that you'll take the next ethical step like we have. We're from Fruitarian camp, next door, and we would like to invite you to join us in embracing a fruitarian lifestyle, and avoid all but fruit that falls naturally from the tree."

    PETA: "If you guys are all fruitarians, how come you're all so fat?"

    Me: "Well, I can only speak for myself, but I've been a fruitarian now for a month, and already I've lost over 50 pounds. I feel great, and expect to be at my goal weight in just 10 more days."

    For our final prank, we planned to go masturbate in front of their pig-killing video:

    Us: "uhhh. Uhhhh. UUHHHH, Oh Yes!"

    PETA: "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING?"

    Us: "Oh, hey, sorry. We're from Bestiality Camp, next door. We were just enjoying the snuff films you guys are showing."

  18. This is gonna backfire by msobkow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've no doubt there are some sick, twisted people out there who are gonna get off on the animal cruelty pics. :(

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:This is gonna backfire by meerling · · Score: 2

      "...but it would take a really sick mind to perform pavlovian expriments like that..."
      You mean like PETA ?

  19. Re:Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operatio by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had to look into it, because it seemed to be a bit of a stretch, even for PETA. But damned if you weren't correct about that. Here's one of the links for folks interested. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/eight-animals/

  20. Re:Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operatio by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    Not only that but they actively fund domestic terrorists. So no big deal in their books. After all, they believe animals have more intrinsic value than you, or me, or that baby of yours, mine, or anyone elses that could be saved using a vaccine. Or stem cell treatment, or heart valve replacement or hell even insulin.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  21. makes sense.... by jythie · · Score: 2

    Well, PETA has always been more about getting laid then actually helping animals.. so this fits their pattern quite nicely.

  22. You have to know the real psychology of PETA by Quila · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They don't love animals, they just hate people.

  23. Re:Not the best idea by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 2

    You just have to think of it as a challenge.

    --
    My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
  24. Re:Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operatio by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how even blowing up a facility in order to free animals being tested on counts as Terrorism(tm) if you're not targeting people.

    Terrorism doesn't have to target people by direct violence. So long as the intent is to force others into accepting some political or ideological point through fear (whether of violence against them, or destruction against their property), and it is practiced systematically, it is terrorism.

  25. Shocked. by Sir+Realist · · Score: 2

    They want to shock people.

    On the internet.

    With graphic images.

    On a porn site.

    Weeeeeelll... its good to have goals I guess. Good luck with that one.