Slashdot Mirror


Italy Prepares '"One Strike" Anti-Piracy Law

angry tapir writes "The Italian government is preparing an anti-piracy law that could ban Internet users from access after one alleged copyright infringement, a lawyer and an analyst warned. ISPs would be required to use filters against services that infringe copyright, trademark or patents under terms of the draft law. The proposed changes to Italy's e-commerce directive were drafted in July by members of parliament belonging to the Il Popolo della Libertà (PdL) party of prime minister Silvio Berlusconi."

143 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. EZTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What will this mean for eztv.it?

    1. Re:EZTV by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      It becomes eztv.eu?

  2. Not surprising from that party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What could we expect from a government endorsed by the heirs of Mussolini's Fascist Party?

    1. Re:Not surprising from that party by leenks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The profound incompetence is a given in politics.

      There, fixed it for you.

    2. Re:Not surprising from that party by dintech · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the quicker they get rid of Berlusconi, the better it will be for everyone (except for big media and of course the tabloids).

    3. Re:Not surprising from that party by lexsird · · Score: 1

      Oh, you beat me to it. When I read the title that was the first thing that came to my mind.

      "So you follow politics?"
      "Yes! Puppet shows have become elaborate these days, huh?"

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    4. Re:Not surprising from that party by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunate, actually: The Romans were pioneers in applied politics(building on some Greek developments in theoretical politics and small-scale experiments). The Italians.... Not so much.

    5. Re:Not surprising from that party by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      we could expect them to invite the taliban next and have them block this whole uncontrollable internet alltogether perhaps

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  3. Filtering traffic eh? by GeneralTurgidson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So anything that gets by this amazing filter isnt considered piracy? Sweet.

    1. Re:Filtering traffic eh? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      if it's that simple i'd like to pre-order a few filters please ... i think it calls for an invisible intra-internet , the way it's going, if they can't see it, there's no problem, that seems to be the general idea

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  4. In Other Words by cosm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Italian government is acting as the protector of corporate profits. What a white knight they are! Can there be a "One Strike" bad politician law so that after their first major fuck-up they get to go to federal PMIA prison for a minimum of 1 year? What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:In Other Words by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, more directly of Berlusconi's corporate profits. Why the Italians haven't drowned this guy in the Tiber is quite beyond me. A crook, a disgusting old letch, and on top of it a complete ass, who for all his vaunted business skills, is still overseeing the drive to keep Italy one of the "I"s in "PIIGS".

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:In Other Words by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why the Italians haven't drowned this guy in the Tiber is quite beyond me.

      I'm not so sure he can be drowned. Judging from the quality of the poontang he gets, he must be able to breathe through his ears.

      Either that or the women are just hookers, which is probably more likely.

      You would think that if the people of Italy didn't drown Berlusconi for the way he's run the country, at least they'd drown him for having sex with an underage girl. But after having spent years living and working in Italy, I'm comfortable saying that most Italians don't really believe women are fully human. Women in Italy are treated at least as badly as those in the most conservative muslim countries, albeit in a less obviously ugly way. And I say this as the son of Italian immigrants. As a people they've got a lot to recommend them, but respect for women is not part of it.

      Hell, just last year an Italian man was given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of murdering his wife because she had been "disrespectful".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:In Other Words by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Not that Italy has ever been one to embrace fascism, but between this, putting the geologists on trial for murder for failing to protect the earthquake, the likelihood of economic default, and the population dying off faster than it's being replaced ... what the heck is going on over there? Oh, and they bought Chrysler, of all things.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:In Other Words by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Well, more directly of Berlusconi's corporate profits. Why the Italians haven't drowned this guy in the Tiber is quite beyond me. A crook, a disgusting old letch, and on top of it a complete ass, who for all his vaunted business skills, is still overseeing the drive to keep Italy one of the "I"s in "PIIGS".

      He's an ass but what the hell is with this preening moralism getting modded up on /.? Who the fuck cares whether he's a prude or a pervert and, moreover, what's wrong with setting the example that the elderly can have just as active a sex life as anyone else (aside from the fact that we'd rather not visualize it)? He's a single man and I'm just as happy for him getting his jollies as anyone else on this planet.

      You gain little by injecting your sexual politics into it, as though we should be less likely to support him (and I don't support him because, as I said above, he is an ass) because he sleeps around.

    5. Re:In Other Words by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      You mean showing disapproval of the Italian PM hiring underage hookers is "injecting my sexual politics"?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:In Other Words by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      How many politicians are there that we can be proud of ? I'm French, so I'm accounted for ^^ The US have jumped from Clinton to Sonny Bush to Obama, the USSR have Putin, the Canada just recently lost half of theirs, Belgium seem to have lost all of them... I have nothing on Cameron and Merkel, but I'm not following very closely.

      Berlusconi is slightly worse than those, but not at lot.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    7. Re:In Other Words by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      It's Italy. Nothing is going on over there... it's just Italy. This is the sort of stuff you should just expect coming from the Italian government. That's just... how they are. If you check your Big Book of European Stereotypes, dysfunctional government and bureaucracy will be listed under "Italy"

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    8. Re:In Other Words by Rhywden · · Score: 1

      Damn, sent this as AC. Once more, this time with the proper user:
      Here's a little movie by an Italian which about sums it up:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ10QTIXlEA

    9. Re:In Other Words by Rhywden · · Score: 2

      Well, it is. There's no legitimate reason for prostitution to be illegal and "underage" is an entirely arbitrary notion and changes from country to country.

      The problem is not so much the hookers but where he gets them from - the guy supplying the hookers is another crook...

    10. Re:In Other Words by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And crucifixion is slightly worse than stoning. Your point being?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:In Other Words by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Probably because the Italian media keeps telling the population what a nice guy Berlusconi is and how evil all the other politicians are.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    12. Re:In Other Words by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      And that listing is unjust. You should look into Belgian politics if you want truly surreal things. Compare Italy to Belgium and they almost seem to have a sane government.

    13. Re:In Other Words by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Belgium never had any to be proud of. The Belgian government is probably the most complex and incompetent government in the whole universe.

    14. Re:In Other Words by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      And that listing is unjust. You should look into Belgian politics if you want truly surreal things. Compare Italy to Belgium and they almost seem to have a sane government.

      Well, Italy has a government (loosely speaking). Belgium still does not.
      The question of sanity in government of either country is thus moot. Not that there's much evidence of sanity in Italy's government, anyway.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    15. Re:In Other Words by Teun · · Score: 1
      Yet the acting Belgian government since the last elections does run one of the best economies in the developed world.

      There seem to be advantages when a government is not allowed to tackle controversial issues :)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    16. Re:In Other Words by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Belgium has 6 governments of which one is 'fired' but still in place because we can't get the next bunch of thieves to agree on who steals what from whom. Belgium probably has the highest number of active politicians per citizen of the whole world.

    17. Re:In Other Words by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      It only seems that way, Belgium is on the verge of economic breakdown.

    18. Re:In Other Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is this law a litmus test on people reaction for full internet censorship?
      http://bilderberg2011.com/bilderberg-agenda/bilderberg-conference-2011-agenda-overview/

    19. Re:In Other Words by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why the Italians haven't drowned this guy in the Tiber is quite beyond me. A crook, a disgusting old letch, and on top of it a complete ass, who for all his vaunted business skills, is still overseeing the drive to keep Italy one of the "I"s in "PIIGS".

      Sounds like the history of Italy to me. Why the Italians haven't drowned almost every leader they've ever had is the big mystery. Why we don't do it in the USA is an even bigger one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:In Other Words by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Belgium never had any to be proud of.

      They have a righteous Formula 1 track.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    21. Re:In Other Words by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that track isn't a politician ;)

    22. Re:In Other Words by ultranova · · Score: 1

      It only seems that way, Belgium is on the verge of economic breakdown.

      The whole developed world is. In the US the basic problem is that they've been listening to Randian superhero fantasies for too long, and in Europe it's that the few sinking boats are chained to all the sound ones and thus take them with them. And simulatenously energy continues getting more and more expensive, climate change and associated extreme weather are hitting the big gear, Arab world is getting even more unstable, and various free-trade agreements make it difficult for any country to develop its own economy.

      It's just too many things coming to boil at once.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    23. Re:In Other Words by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      You mean showing disapproval of the Italian PM hiring underage hookers is "injecting my sexual politics"?

      Yeah, it is. You know why? Because it has absolutely nothing to do with his ability (or lack thereof) to be a functional Prime Minister of the government of Italy. It has nothing to do with his office whatsoever. Let me answer a question with a question then, would you rather elect a competent PM that slept around with underage hookers while pursuing sensible policies or a morally upright one that was incompetent and whose policies you opposed?

      Not that SB is competent or his policies sensible or that these are the only two choices, naturally. But my point is that his sex life is orthogonal to his role as Prime Minister. You can { bang hookers, not bang hookers } and be a { good, bad } PM. All 4 possibilities are there.

    24. Re:In Other Words by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Belgium is pretty much a Non-Country. Im an American, but this guy pretty much rocks : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ6rfxoEFI4

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    25. Re:In Other Words by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Yup, add to that that Belgium is pretty much 2 countries rolled into one chained together even more where one is economically sound and another is a train wreck, but due to the chained nature the train wreck is inhibiting the sound part of the country to stay sound (the minority in this country has veto rights on all levels, not just federal).... It's an ugly mess :(

    26. Re:In Other Words by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      in the last line of my post.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    27. Re:In Other Words by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Considering that it's Italy, a good old-fashioned Roman crucifixion may be more appropriate. Maybe I've been playing Fallout New Vegas too much lately, but it seems to me more and more that the Legion has the right idea about what to do with degenerates like this guy.
      Hate the game, not the frumentarii, or Berlusconi is Edward Sallow.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    28. Re:In Other Words by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to get this straight. He's violating Italian law (maybe even European law, considering the alleged origins of some of the girls), but that's okay? What you're saying is that the Italian Prime Minister is above the law.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    29. Re:In Other Words by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      That's a point in its favor.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    30. Re:In Other Words by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I've seen a lovely piece of advice which is strikingly on point.

      "Don't choose the lesser of two evils. Don't choose evil at all."

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    31. Re:In Other Words by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      And we Hungarians know that Kafka was a realist writer.

    32. Re:In Other Words by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      No, I'm saying that whether or not he's breaking the law has fuckall to do with whether his actions as Prime Minister were any good. Banging hookers doesn't hurt Italy. It's doesn't help either -- it's entirely orthogonal to Italy in general.

      Qua a Prime Minister, we should judge his actions as Prime Minister. Qua a person, we should judge his personal actions. The two have nothing to do with each other.

      [ PS. He's enough of a terrible PM that this attack is not only stupid, it's gratuitous. ]

    33. Re:In Other Words by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      But surely not trying to abuse his position as the head of government to get around potential prosecution over sexual relations with an underage prostitute is an abuse of power and abuse of process, which, so far as I can tell, would mean he would be unfit to be Prime Minister. You have this odd sort of angle where he can wantonly violate Italian law, but that's okay if he's a good Prime Minister. By definition, a head of government who violates legislation that said government is bound to uphold is not a good head of government.

      That's not even talking about clear conflicts of interest in pushing through legislation clearly designed for his own benefit. I'm talking about Italian criminal law here. Italians, like most other people in the industrialized world, are not allowed to have sex with minors. Yes, the precise age at which one ceases to be a minor varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but Italian law has set the age at 18, and he was paying and having sex with someone below the age at which Italian law recognizes the two parties can have consent.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    34. Re:In Other Words by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And let me underscore that not only did he break Italian law, but he also attempted to use his political position to deny an Italian prosecutors the right to pursue the charges against him. So, seeing as he violated laws regarding age of sexual consent AND abused his power to try to evade the legal consequences of that, please spell out for me clearly how he still could be a good Prime Minister.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    35. Re:In Other Words by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      But surely not trying to abuse his position as the head of government to get around potential prosecution over sexual relations with an underage prostitute is an abuse of power and abuse of process, which, so far as I can tell, would mean he would be unfit to be Prime Minister.

      This supposes that the job of the PM is to be a figurehead or a symbolic leader. I'd prefer placing the PM's priorities on actual leadership: passing good laws, running the government smoothly, making smart decisions. The idea of "unfit leader" is nonsensical elevation of character over actual performance and is the reason why we have so many crappy leaders in general -- because we are concerned with matters unrelated to the actual function required by the job. "Character voters" are the problem here, not the solution.

      You have this odd sort of angle where he can wantonly violate Italian law, but that's okay if he's a good Prime Minister. By definition, a head of government who violates legislation that said government is bound to uphold is not a good head of government.

      No, that's not OK -- his violation of the law might make him a bad person. Being a good PM doesn't "cancel out" being a bad person or vice versa. Many people are good people but bad at their jobs. Many people are good at their jobs but bad people. Many are good at both (and sadly many are bad at both).

      What's more, I don't think his job is to "uphold legislation" any more than an programmers's job to "uphold code". Indeed, the job of a PM is to produce quality legislation (and other Executive functions) that are in the country's best interest just as much as it's the coder's job to do his job well. Whether or not he's "upholding" anything is meaningless if he's delivering quality governance.

      I don't see what's "by definition" anywhere your argument. Government is there to govern, not for me to care whether he breaks the law in his spare time unless doing so actually harms the country in some material fashion.

      Italians, like most other people in the industrialized world, are not allowed to have sex with minors. Yes, the precise age at which one ceases to be a minor varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but Italian law has set the age at 18, and he was paying and having sex with someone below the age at which Italian law recognizes the two parties can have consent.

      Which is why I wouldn't invite him to dinner but no reason not to vote for him for PM.

    36. Re:In Other Words by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      And let me underscore that not only did he break Italian law, but he also attempted to use his political position to deny an Italian prosecutors the right to pursue the charges against him. So, seeing as he violated laws regarding age of sexual consent AND abused his power to try to evade the legal consequences of that, please spell out for me clearly how he still could be a good Prime Minister.

      He could be a good Prime Minister if he proposed and passed quality legislation, efficiently ran the government, made sensible plans for the future, appointed competent individuals to various posts, embarked on good foreign policy. You know, things that governments actually do in the course of GOVERNING . Boring stuff that only us silly policy wonks think about.

      But yeah, if the voters would rather have an honest idiot than a dishonest genius, so be it. Just don't complain when your legislation is stupid because you elevated character over competence.

      [ Of course, purely by accident you get someone that's both competent and of high moral character. I'd rather hedge my bets and let all competent takers come rather than waiting for that particular unicorn though. ]

    37. Re:In Other Words by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What I want to say is simply, I can do without either. Gimme a politician that works for me or don't expect me to put any kind of faith in your puppet theater called parliament.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re:In Other Words by Rhywden · · Score: 1

      Well, the guy got tips from politicians (Berlusconi among them) on how to bid for government contracts in order to win them. That's corruption.
      Later on he used his knowledge for blackmail against Berlusconi.

  5. Mamma Mia! by Master+Moose · · Score: 2

    Now I know many countries have proposed or implemented a 3 strike law (much like my own - NZ) mostly to cosy up to the US.

    How cosy does Italy want to be?

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
  6. This will never fly by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But that's not the point of this bill.

    It's the industry proposing something just short of decapitation, versus the current situation that non-profit file sharing is explicitly legal.

    Somewhere in the middle is "compromise" where everyone loses except the rent-seeking gatekeepers of culture.

    "See, it wasn't as bad as what we wanted"

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:This will never fly by mgiuca · · Score: 4, Informative

      "See, it wasn't as bad as what we wanted"

      This technique is so common that there's a name for it: The Door-in-the-face technique.

      The persuader attempts to convince someone to comply with a request by first making an extremely large request that the respondent will obviously turn down, with a metaphorical slamming of a door in the persuader's face. The respondent is then more likely to accede to a second, more reasonable request than if this second request were made without the first, extreme request. ... A reference point construal may explain this phenomenon, as the initial bad offer sets a reference point from which the second offer looks like an improvement.

    2. Re:This will never fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What compromise ?

      "I want to be able to down load music legally".... that happened
      "I only want 1 track not the whole album" .... that happened
      "Its too expensive".... and yet in real terms music has never been cheaper
      "We only want to audit the music" .... if that were true then 8bit, mono, 22KHz sampled music would suffice, however it all seems to be the highest quality

      The truth is there is only 1 compromise that would be acceptable, all music must be free, and the musicians should get a "real job" if they want to earn money because as soon as the music becomes free then live concerts will be considered a "rip off" as "the quality is not as good", "they did not play the songs I like","its too expensive".... etc.

    3. Re:This will never fly by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      You make some good points, though it was probably smart to post anon. We have gotten most everything we ever asked for.

      And while it might not be a popular opinion, I take no issue with people selling music. I do think the trillion dollar suits, and various other obscene reactions against anyone that shares songs, are totally absurd.

    4. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I want to use the music I buy on the medium I choose.
      I want to archive and store it where and how I please.
      I want to watch a movie without hours of ads for movies I don't give half a shit about.
      I want to store those movies on my (media) server hard drive instead of discs, which are prone to break and which I'd have to find first of all in the mess of my apartment.
      I want to play the games I buy without having to have a connection to the internet if it is not required for the game to work.
      I want to use software without handing in everything but my shoe size about me before it allows me to use it.
      I want to record and time shift shows off TV the way I see fit and I expect the ads to be skipable. That technology was already very available on Betamax.

      need I go on?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:This will never fly by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I want to not get punished for things I haven't even done just because someone claims I did it."
      How's that for a start?

      There's a reason why due process exists. This type of law is a punishment without a court being involved. It is not necessary to be proven guilty. It suffices that someone claims you are. That's what's bad about it. That's several orders of magnitude more important than any question of copyright. It's about the foundation of the rule of law. Due process. No punishment without conviction. That's what this is about. Therefore it's also completely irrelevant here what you think about downloading of music. I'd be against this type of law even if it were about murder, despite the fact that I definitely do not think murder should be legalized.

      Again, this is not about the legality of music download. This is about the foundation of the rule of law.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:This will never fly by gknoy · · Score: 1

      It's relatively challenging to find it on the internet; can you elaborate for those of us who are not going to buy the book just to understand the counter? :)

    7. Re:This will never fly by peppepz · · Score: 2
      Compromise? There should be no compromises about people's rights.

      I don't give a crap about music or movies and I don't want the copyright industry to bypass the judiciary system, to violate my privacy, to impose expensive and problematic filtering systems that *I* am going to pay whether I pirate music or not, to extort a fraction of my money every time I buy a blank medium because I *might* copy some music, or every time I pay my university fees because I *might* copy some book.

      In particular, I don't want anyone but a judge to have a say about my right to access the Internet.

      Given that, they can do whatever they want to protect their own rights.

    8. Re:This will never fly by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The truth is there is only 1 compromise that would be acceptable, all music must be free, and the musicians should get a "real job" if they want to earn money because as soon as the music becomes free then live concerts will be considered a "rip off" as "the quality is not as good", "they did not play the songs I like","its too expensive".... etc.

      I don't think people will ever start to diss live music. It's more a practical matter of whether the music you want to hear is played at a concert or music festival near you and if you happen to be available that weekend. With the Internet you can have a "long tail" of followers all over the world, but not many enough in one place to make a concert worthwhile. And assuming your kind of music is the kind you'd want to go to a concert for, maybe it's more for the romantic dinner or having the blues. And that the band wants to be road warriors traveling the world, not just play locally and stay with their family. The whole "You should get known over the Internet, then make money on performances" has a bit of a disconnect there.

      I'm honestly not concerned about music, so many people want to play an instrument there'll always be decent music. I am more concerned with TV and movies, which doesn't lend itself well to any performance - theater is a whole different business - and takes a ton of off-screen work in clothes, make-up, props, stages, lighting, camera, editing, sound effects, music, models, special effects and so on. Sure the actors and director may feel they get enough glory but the rest? All those people would probably not do the leg work so the actors can go on stage and shoot a scene without getting paid.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:This will never fly by Kjella · · Score: 2

      And if they don't want to sell on those conditions, have you justified downloading it off TPB or using AnyDVD or a nocd crack? Don't get me wrong, I see plenty wrong with what the MAFIAA is doing. But capitalism is supposed to be about voluntary transactions, where the seller has just as much right to not sell as the buyer has to not buy. And that the terms of the sale are binding, neither party can just unilaterally decide that I don't like them so I'll just break or ignore those conditions. Don't get me wrong, I'm no saint and ignore certain parts where I think the market and the law has completely screwed us over but your list of demands sound like an ultimatum. That you're entitled to always have it your way, which isn't really the case.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:This will never fly by houghi · · Score: 1

      The medium you choose? What if that is not produced anymore? Or never was produced? Many records where never released on 8-track.
      You are also saying that once you bought a book, you should be able to reproduce it in any way?
      I understand that you talk about personal use. But then what is personal use. Watching it together with your friend? Friends? How many? 1? 10? 100? 1000?
      The fact that you have a messy apartment should not be part of the discussion.

      I also could make a list that goes on and includes the delivery of the media by the main people of the medium ad perform life for me. I also want a pony.

      I would be happy with copyright back to 25 years. All the rest is just nice to have.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:This will never fly by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      This tactic is so ubiquitous even kids know about it.

      "If you want a puppy, ask for a horse."

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    12. Re:This will never fly by Cwix · · Score: 2

      They want to sell me the same movie multiple times, one for my tv, one for my computer, one for my phone.

      I do not wish to buy it multiple times. The MPAA should consider themselves lucky when someone buys one copy and puts it on other devices, instead of just getting it from the pirate bay.

      The cost is almost negligible to distribute the movie/music online. The price of the product should reflect that. It does not.

      I refuse to consume their wares because of this greedy attitude of theirs.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    13. Re:This will never fly by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this would work well against people who think that something being slightly better than something else means that it is good.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    14. Re:This will never fly by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      And if they don't want to sell on those conditions, have you justified downloading it off TPB or using AnyDVD or a nocd crack?

      That would likely depend on who you ask.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    15. Re:This will never fly by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      and the musicians should get a "real job" if they want to earn money

      For most musicians, that's the way things are right now. Just like it was back in the ancient days before the internet. Have you ever tried playing music? You'll be lucky if you can recoup the cost of your instrument. (If your instrument is the penny whistle or the spoons, then you might have a shot.)

    16. Re:This will never fly by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      "Its too expensive".... and yet in real terms music has never been cheaper

      I'd love to know where you buy your music from. I haven't seen a price change in albums since CDs first came out.

    17. Re:This will never fly by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      But capitalism is supposed to be about voluntary transactions, where the seller has just as much right to not sell as the buyer has to not buy.

      True, but you're ignoring the other side of capitalism: that everyone has the right to act and to use their own property in any manner which does not harm others, i.e. which does not prevent them from continuing to use their own property as is has been used in the past, subject to the same condition. Copyright enforcement is decidedly in violation of this rule, and thus anti-capitalistic.

      Copying information in your possession is something you already had the right to do. Copyright takes this right away involuntarily, and then forces you to give up something else to get it back. The second deal may be perceived as "voluntary" only if you ignore the first. What it actually amounts to is an agreement under duress.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    18. Re:This will never fly by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      A hypothetical related problem is, if I could had a futuristic Any Material Copier and just pointed at something you had and pushed the button, cloning it for myself with my resources.

      Would I be stealing?

      I'm not saying I'd go out and distribute the object and sell it, I'm saying I'd just use the own EXACT copy I created with my device.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    19. Re:This will never fly by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this would work well against people who think that something being slightly better than something else means that it is good.

      Unfortunately, that describes the vast majority of people. See: Lesser of Two Evils.

    20. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Capitalism already fails on a far more basic level of the whole copyright mess.

      Capitalism would dictate that we'd have had BluRay players that allow digital copies, if wanted with content (*cough* ads *cough*) removed, reencoded in whatever format the user pleases. Why? Because capitalism dictates that the customer will choose the product that fits his demand best. And a BluRay player with a digital, unencrypted output sure as hell would beat anything without, unless it is prohibitively more expensive, which is unlikely since the algorithms are available, documented and easy to implement. It takes a few more jacks, basically we're talking pennies here.

      Then why don't we have that? Because capitalism has no say in the whole deal. Because you MUST NOT create such a device. Despite capitalism dictating that it MUST come into existence. It's technically possible and it's (in the eyes of the customer, who would in a capitalist world be the deciding factor) the by far superior product.

      Please. Don't bring capitalism on the table when copyright is already on it. Capitalism has no "teeth" in a copyrighted world. The customer cannot (even more than usually) play his role. He cannot choose the superior product. It must not exist, hence it cannot be chosen. And that breaks the system.

      Aside of that: The terms of the sale are binding? Neither party can unilaterally decide that they don't like them anymore? And want to change the contract after it was agreed on it? Aside of the problem that I don't really see how this applies, I have two words for you: "Playstation" and "OtherOS".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Considering the price of pressing and moving a CD around, I'm not so sure that digital distribution is really that much cheaper. Aside of that, I can see your point and I refuse to buy content I bought multiple times. Either it's a license or a product. It cannot be both. If it's a license, I expect a replacement medium if the licensing contract forbids creating a copy myself. A license is a permission, not a physical medium, in this case the permission to use the content in the way the licensing agreement states.

      Or it's a product, but in this case the physical medium becomes my property and hence I can act upon it as I please. Which is especially in the case of console modding an interesting question.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:This will never fly by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Well when I consider the cost of a cd, I also take into account not just the pressing and shipping, but the stocking, displaying, and selling of the cd. They are also removed from the equation, which saves on space and labor costs.

      You do have a point that it really isn't that expensive to make and ship a cd though. I tend to think it was overpriced to start with.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    23. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Good example, an AMC would actually turn real goods into something akin to content today. People would be able to produce or multiply at home at leisure. Actually, I do think that the (commercial) production of goods would cease to exist in the long run, with people buying "designs" and building them at home, the reasons for that are below. Copyright infringement will still play a role, but a lesser one.

      It is actually an interesting thought experiment. In a nutshell, i.e. the tl;dr version: At first, gradually production of goods would be switched to those AMCs as they become faster (efficiency actually won't matter), the only limiting factor being the speed at which AMCs can crank out goods. At some point, they become available for private people, and at that point, economy will hit a big crisis: You need not buy anything anymore, unless an artificial "limit" is included that keeps you from producing as much food and other material goods you need. The question is, though, how should this limit work? By disallowing you to use a design? Then I design my own grapes and publish the design on the internet for everyone to download. Outlawing the use of any but "approved" designs (imagine the FDA butting in...)? Then you're up for another huge crisis: People will simply ignore that law, if you thought that copyright laws today are meaningless to most people, this WILL be meaningless. You can live without content. You cannot without food and water. So two possible outcomes: A world where "hand crafted" becomes something like a status symbol, where companies will try to come up with new features the user wants (read: gets told to want) and stay ahead of PD designs that copy those features eventually, or a world that resembles the game Paranoia, everyone's breaking the law and hoping that they don't get noticed.

      In general, copying is stealing is not really a big issue. In the utopian example, you needn't break the law because there would be enough PD goods available, the only special case to address is people wanting the latest features but not wanting to pay for them, and yes, in this case copying an item would be stealing if you gain a net benefit. If you copy your friend's cellphone, you would be stealing, you would after all create a net profit for you (i.e. a new phone) that results in a loss of sales. The same is actually true if you copy your chair to have two because you want to invite your girlfriend and she shouldn't have to stand next to the table. You created a profit for yourself, a second chair, to be used simultaneously as the first. It is essentially comparable to copyright and content today, where copying something from a friend (instead of buying it) or copying so you can use it in two places at the same time does indeed result in a lost sale. It's a different matter in case you copy your own raincoat and put it away for later, nothing of value was created. You would not have bought a second raincoat, you can only wear one at the same time.
      In the dystopian example, it doesn't matter since you already most likely broke the law at some other point, akin to today with copyright where I'd wager that EVERYONE here has at least one copyright infringment somewhere, if we keep digging long enough.

      And now, as threatened, the logic reasoning that led to the conclusion above.

      1. Assumptions and sources
      The AMC would have to be a full energy-matter transformation. Anything else is simply not viable. I tried a few other models, but they all either break apart at some point of the reasoning process or they have to be reduced to energy-matter transformation to work, so I can as well just handle this case. If anyone wants it, I'll elaborate why any "raw material" but energy fails, but I guess I bore you enough with the rest of this.
      It is also likely that copyright laws will be altered to include physical designs. I draw this conclusion from the treatment of "virtual goods" and designs in virtual environments like Second Life, and the fact that AMCs would essentially create an environment

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The medium I want needn't be supplied by the creator of the content, but I should be able to put the content on the medium of my choice, provided I have the means to read the medium the content is on now and write to the medium I want it to be on. I thought it's implicitly logic that I don't expect the content creator to supply me with maybe even impossible (like, say, a DVD with a BluRay 1080p movie) media. I expect a standardized medium that can be read by a fitting reader, and I would enjoy if this reader had an output that can be used to store the content on a different medium. I hope there is no ambiguity left now.

      If I bought a book, why should I not be allowed to scan it and read it on my computer screen? Why should I not print an e-book and read it on paper in bed? The content stays the same, doesn't it?

      Personal use is actually well defined under the copyright law I'm subject to, and limited to a certain amount of people. Anything beyond that number of people, or taking some kind of compensation from them for the explicit reason of showing them the movie (i.e. if you sell tickets), is considered a public display and subject to relevant portions of the law.

      And whether I clean my apartment should not matter to the question whether I can use the content. If you prefer, I hate digging through the hundreds of DVDs I bought to find the movie since my girlfriend thought that ordering them by the color of their sleeve instead of their name makes more sense. Happy?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      On those terms, no sale, keep your content.

      I can exist without content. Wonder if you can without money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:This will never fly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Back when they were new, CDs cost a lot more than records, often reaching twice the price. The reasoning was that it's a new technology and making them is more expensive since the machines are all shiny and new and there is lot of junk 'cause they don't work so well yet... yaddayadda. And they get cheaper soon, when the production price drops.

      Fewer and fewer stuff came out on records, CDs didn't get cheaper, though. Suddenly it was normal that we pay twice the price we paid for records. 5-6 bucks for records, now suddenly 10-12 for a CD. But, well, you have to understand, inflation...

      Prices kept going up. But hey, why are you complaining, we didn't increase the price SINCE CREATION.

      In other words, since back then it was profitable. Over the time of almost 20 years you could keep the same price. Inflation alone means that the price would have to be DOUBLED at the very least. Or, in other words, if you didn't overcharge shamelessly when you created those discs, you must have reduced your costs by over 95%.

      And if you can do that, you could make a LOT more money as a consultant...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:This will never fly by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      Very interesting analysis. I'll definitively "copy" your content into a text file of my own :P

      Thanks for posting it.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  7. Democracy? by Clsid · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of offense it takes for the Italian govt to take down your water or electric service. Pasta is taking over their brains it seems.

    1. Re:Democracy? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      not so much the pasta, but the hookers and blow.

  8. Double standards never benefit the unrich by mykos · · Score: 1

    I hope you are thoroughly modded up, good sir.

    Whenever there's a double standard, it's always the rich that are on the better end. Why is it that you never see double standards benefit the un-rich? At the very best, the less fortunate can hope for temporary equality, but never an advantage.

    1. Re:Double standards never benefit the unrich by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      You should take a look at Indian laws then,
      They have reservations for EVERYONE except middle class and above men

      (Assuming you mean Native-Americans or American-Indians or whatever new pet term there is now.)
      Have you ever been to a reservation? Not living in one is a good thing. (Maybe there are nice ones out there, but I've been to several in different states and all I have seen is abject poverty.)

      Looking at the Indian laws, you see that they're allowed to build casinos. What really happens is that a few tribes can actually build them in places where they'll make money. They get rich while the others get screwed.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
  9. trademarks or patent can = a strike? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    seeing how board trademarks and patent are just cut off all of Italy to save time.

  10. Welcome to even worse class disparity by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    This would be the proverbial sh*t hitting the fan, but it's a magic fan that doesn't throw the stuff back on the rich, political or famous figures, only the common folk. The first-mentioned group will just have all charges dropped behind the scenes automatically, with no mention to the public at all, while the common folk will lose Internet access even for minor stuff.

    1. Re:Welcome to even worse class disparity by mywhitewolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or, much more likely they inherited opportunities that aren't afforded to others. Once you have an advantage (ie money for the rich), then its prudent to keep on using your advantage to leverage yourself some more advantage... (ie, it's a lot easier to make money when you already have some).

      if they use that money to affect politics in ways that the majority are against, then the working class are already at a disadvantage as they can't afford to compete in the same domain.

      It has nothing to do with intelligence.

    2. Re:Welcome to even worse class disparity by peppepz · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work. If our world was ruled by "natural selection", then the stronger, outnumbering masses would physically revolt against the elite and take over their resources. They don't, because we have an "unnatural" system that grants us social peace.

  11. filter patent infringement? by kawabago · · Score: 1

    It's a bit hard to see how they filter out patent infringements, but doing so probably violates someones patent!

  12. Interesting... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    A three-strike law should be sufficient for movies and video games. A one-strike law is for something else... trade secrets perhaps. They say the law is also on a "fast track".

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  13. ciao a tutti by index0 · · Score: 1

    !list

  14. Will Big Media only get 1 strike if they pirate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...because the major record labels and movie studies have NEVER engaged in copyright infringement... ever.

    I'm SURE that this law would allow for the instantaneous shutdown of, say, the Recording Industry Association site if they are accused of copyright infringement.

  15. Berlusconis Media Empire by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Berlusconi own an italian media empire? Could this be a way to further solidify that power?

    --
    What?
  16. Shooting themselves in the foot by jspenguin1 · · Score: 3

    If this passes, every single MP that votes for this will suddenly find hundreds of copyright complaints against them...

    1. Re:Shooting themselves in the foot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just keep watching the webpage of Don Berlusconi's media empire and party. Some stock picture, some soundbite, some bullet for a list WILL be copied without consent of the rights holder.

      And then you got the bull by his cojones.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Shooting themselves in the foot by Hentes · · Score: 1

      They will just hide behind their parliamentary immunity .

  17. Ironic... by Brahma111 · · Score: 2

    It's ironic that the very openness of Internet that made it so popular itself is being challenged. This type of Draconian law has the potential to snowball into a much bigger piece of sh*t where content provider and producers can twist the law to gain all sort of mileage. It also doesn't behoove well for the sophisticated search engines. Heck..providing anything other than a link to the actual content might become illegal altogether. The case of Belgian newspapers going after Google news is not going to be one of case.

    1. Re:Ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Links are already illegal here in the U.S. of Hollywood

  18. Fun! by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 1

    I hope this passes, so I can pull up a comfy chair with some popcorn and watch the fallout.

    1. Re:Fun! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sure, I get to do all the work and you just watch them roast. C'mon, at least help a little!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. So Youtube will be blocked in Italy? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 2

    So Youtube will be blocked in Italy?

    Frankly this is just dumb. The internet is full of all kinds of copyright infringement. Even the giant corporations like AOL, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, etc are all benefiting from the free exchange, linking, and displaying of other people's media/content without any contract.

    Just go to huffingtonpost and see how many articles they link to, that they didnt write. Go to Youtube, and view all of the videos that violate copyright,

    The entire internet is based on sharing content.

    1. Re:So Youtube will be blocked in Italy? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmm.......

      File a complaint about copyright violations against every single US company that has some kind of (internet) presence in Italy. There are copyrighted pictures, text passages, layouts and whatnot without the proper paperwork been done on pretty much every page, all you have to do is find it.

      And then, let the US do the dirty work with da Don. Why get your hands dirty?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. The 1980s called. by scottbomb · · Score: 2

    They have this technology called a dial-up BBS the Italians might be interested in. I see a market for the development of high-speed dial-up modems and a resurrection for land-line telephones.

  21. it wont work by dudpixel · · Score: 1

    I'm predicting a massive surge in encrypted traffic to/from italy.

    --
    This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  22. Silvio Berlusconi by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 2

    Il Duce reborn.

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  23. They've gone stark raving mad ... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    This is the same government that is trying to send Italian geologists to prison because they can't predict earthquakes when, in fact, NO geologist on the planet can reliably predict when an earthquake will occur, even if they were given a latitude of several years, much less a particular day.

    Now, they want to transform their government into a cabal, in which corporations make the rules to minimize their own liability and maximize the liability of their customers and of their profits.

    These actions can only be explained by assuming that the Italian politicians are totally corrupt, which is a pretty good assumption there and here in America. Can we be far behind?

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  24. Ban Cisco from the Internet ? by bug1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cisco violated the GPL with Linksys.

    Lets see Italy ban Cisco from using the internet.

    What, the law only applies to individuals violating for personal use, its ok for companies to violating copyright for financial reasons. I get it now,

    MAFIAA is strong in Italy

    1. Re:Ban Cisco from the Internet ? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Berlusconi is a media mogul. Did you expect better?

  25. Re:Italy is a shitty country run by corrupt fascis by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    Italy uses a 24 hour clock so I'd say AM

  26. BRILLIANT! by Sasayaki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wholeheartedly support this "One Strike" law. As the first barrage in the torrent (heh!) of complaints, let me fire this one off:

    http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-steals-code-violates-linkware-license/

    I demand 100% complete disconnection of the MPAA, including subsidaries, partent companies, any company where any member of the MPAA (or subsidaries, parent companies, etc) is a shareholder in whole or in part, from ALL Italian users. They cannot connect to ANY Italian IP address, on pain of defying a court order (or whatever the punishment is for evading the 'one strike' law).

    Any "evidence" gathered against Italian internet users is null and void because in order to gather that evidence they had broken the "one strike" rule in Italy. And, of course, the MPAA would never download something they didn't actually own the rights to, therefore committing copyright infringement themselves, right? Never? ...

    Oh wait, the laws don't apply to those who make them? The MPAA is allowed to commit the worst kind of copyright infringement -- claiming you created something you didn't, and then using it for commercial purposes and making a bunch of money with it -- and that doesn't count as a strike? Because they are immune to their own law?

    Oh damn.

    Well, it was a nice thought anyway.

    --
    Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
  27. Bye bye Italy, been nice knowing you by kheldan · · Score: 1

    This will fail spectacularly. I anticipate Italy being completely off the internet in a few weeks once this goes into effect.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  28. Eh... by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Whaddya gonna do?

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Eh... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd have an idea, but my lawyer said it's still illegal to shoot the dog.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Corrupt? by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    I think it's plausible that the MPAA/RIAA or their local cutouts simply gave some of Berlusconi's cronies some big brown envelopes to introduce and fast-track this legislation. Given what we've seen of Mr Bunga Bunga in the past, nothing is surprising anymore.

    There's no keeping a good old corrupt rent-seeker down, is there?

  30. Comando Supremo by E.I.A · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a job for Benito. Why even wait for the first strike? Are the Italians getting soft? Do it Cheney Style; preemptively destroy them, and their children too. If they happen to be children - or teenagers - educate them: "Fascist education is moral, physical, social, and military: it aims to create a complete and harmoniously developed human, a fascist one according to our views" -Benny

    --
    Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck
  31. Mandatory Link by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

    Of course there's an Italian chapter of the Pirate Party. Perhaps they can, motivated by the success in Berlin, start to oppose these measures in parliament and start promoting true digital age copyright reform.

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    1. Re:Mandatory Link by empty+mind · · Score: 1

      From what I know they aren't a real party. I hope they'll eventually become it.

      --
      "I'm selling these fine leather jackets"
  32. Re:Italy is a shitty country run by corrupt fascis by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Unlikely. Nobody works at 11am in Italy. Either they're not in yet or at lunch break.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Re:Are these the same dipshits by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    And both have a leader you can't spell right as a foreigner and who is batshit insane. Essentially, Italy is Iran without oil but more corruption.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Because... by kikito · · Score: 1

    That's the most important economic problem the country has right now.

    People illegally downloading Berlusconi's songs.

  35. Re:pirate party by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    You overestimate the smarts of the Italians and underestimate the amount of power Don Silvio wields over the media. Imagine Fox News (and affiliates) with a market share of about 95%. And now try to wrest the power from the Reps.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Italy on a one strike law? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Won't fly. Considering how often they go on a strike, what will you do with them next week?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. This is not about copyright. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    This allows italys facist dictator (he is) to block any pesky revolutions or some such that might pop up.

  38. Not quite the truth by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    They are on trial for stating that it was SAFE despite numerious warnings. The claim is that because people where told it was safe, they returned to their houses to sleep inside and died. Those that didn't listen to the scientists saying it was safe stayed outside for the night and were safe.

    The scientist in question could have said, "We don't know, there are a lot of shocks, they might be the lead in fora big one, they might not". Then people would have chosen the safe options and slept outside and not have died.

    The real case is in finding out WHY the lead scientist was so willing to say it was SAFE, which is MAKING A PREDICTION, when you claim no prediction can be made.

    This case is NOT about scientist being unable to make a prediction, the case is why they made a prediction they now claim they couldn't make.

    And if you look more into the case, the scientists might have had other motives then the welfare of the people when they made the claim it was SAFE.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  39. Because Berlusconi owns most of the media by kholburn · · Score: 1

    And the rest is government run and he's the head of the government. What else would they say?

    Conflict of interest anyone?

  40. One strike and you're out.... by Tomsk70 · · Score: 1

    ....unless you pay certain people off beforehand, right Silvio?

  41. You know nothing about Italy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm Italian and I'm comfortably saying that you know NOTHING about italian culture. Women in Italy are considered in THE SAME way of the rest of Europe. No more, no less. I don't know why you feel the need to shoot all these BS, you clearly don't understand ANYTHING about Italy. And using a crazy person as a proof for what you're saying is just idiotic. Mad people are all over the world.
    "Women in Italy are treated at least as badly as those in the most conservative muslim countries". Ahahahah. This guy must be retarted. Italy treats women a lot better than american treats black people. This says a lot.

    1. Re:You know nothing about Italy. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm Italian and I'm comfortably saying that you know NOTHING about italian culture.

      My lady who has traveled through Europe says that she was never harassed so much as in Italy, and she's been to Peru... where she got grabbed and fondled by a stranger the minute she was alone for two minutes. Luckily, he was small and therefore relatively inoffensive, and she was able to shrug him off and regain her party. But in Italy, walking down the street gets you goosed (nearly with penetration!) by cads on bicycles, and she was groped in every crowd, et cetera. I think you are full of shit, which I would have thought anyway, since you do not have the courage of your convictions. I can tell, because you did not log in, that you do not believe what you have said.

      Italy treats women a lot better than american treats black people.

      Not really. Either way people are made to live differently from other people because they are different.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:You know nothing about Italy. by hjf · · Score: 1

      My lady who has traveled through Europe says that she was never harassed so much as in Italy,

      Because your wife must be an uptight anglo-saxon woman, who doesn't like being complimented by strangers a lot. In countries with "latin" culture, like all of South America and also Spain and Italy, it's socially accepted for a man to yell "que bella ragazza!!!" or similar. Sometimes (playfully) standing in their way. If you do that in any anglo-saxon country, the woman is likely to scream for help. It's a culture thing. Oddly enough, anglo-saxons like to be flattered. Saying "you look so good" to someone will generate a "thank you!" response from an american, but more like "oh please, don't say that" from a mexican.

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Complimentary_language_and_gender#Cross-cultural_overview_of_compliments

      and she's been to Peru... where she got grabbed and fondled by a stranger the minute she was alone for two minutes

      So what did they do to her in Italy? Introduced her to Berlusconi?

    3. Re:You know nothing about Italy. by empty+mind · · Score: 1

      Where has she been? Tell me please, I would like to know this (I'm not the same guy above).

      --
      "I'm selling these fine leather jackets"
    4. Re:You know nothing about Italy. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Your lady was experiencing culture shock, not gender degradation. If Italian women preferred coy metrosexuals Italian men would use a different mating strategy.

    5. Re:You know nothing about Italy. by jonfr · · Score: 1

      You are problay still living at home with your mom and dad. As that is common for italian men to do until they are 50 years old.

    6. Re:You know nothing about Italy. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Sometimes (playfully) standing in their way.

      Let me "playfully" stand in your way and let's see how you like it.

      Tell me in which other European country a man kills his wife for being "disrespectful" and he gets a suspended sentence? Crimes against women, such as rape, assault, etc actually have lesser penalties officially than the same crimes against men.

      There are not a lot of Americans who have spent as much time in Central and Eastern Europe as I have, and I can tell you when it comes to the mistreatment and disrespect of women there is no country as bad as Italy. Even Serbia or Montenegro or Croatia, just across the Adriatic from Italy, warn their women not to travel alone anywhere in Italy. The behavior toward women that's perfectly acceptable in Italy would never, ever be tolerated in Serbia. Now THAT'S saying a lot. When women are respect more by the Serbs than they are by Italians, you know there's a problem in Italy.

      And I'm not just talking about out and out violence. Normal daily behavior toward women in Italy is abominable.

      As I said, I'm Italian on both sides. My mom was from Rome and my dad from Sicily. I have a lot of family there for whom I care a great deal. But Italy is a nation with a lot of psycho-sexual pathology.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  42. Because Berlusconi is their "role model". by master_p · · Score: 1

    A large percentage of Italians want to be like him. They want fast cars, plenty of hookers, a large bank account, a football team and enough connections to drown any sense of democracy in Tiber.

    1. Re:Because Berlusconi is their "role model". by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      A large percentage of Americans want to be like him. They want fast cars, plenty of hookers, a large bank account, a football team and enough connections to drown any sense of democracy in Tiber.

      FTFY

  43. Copyright infringement != Internet by KreAture · · Score: 1

    Why do every new law regulating copyright allow attacking your internet connection?
    If I start copying CD's or DVD's, I can loose my email access?
    I know most of their searches happen online and on p2p networks, but the laws don't differentiate and the reactions are simply illogical.

  44. Sure! Why not? by Dwonis · · Score: 1

    What difference does it make, anyway, whether it's three strikes or one strike, if a "strike" is just an unproven allegation?

  45. I hope they'll do even more by empty+mind · · Score: 1

    Let them do this. Streaming of football matches may get blocked to a certain amount and people will start caring about all this "freedom" thing. You know, here the majority of people just don't give a fuck, but don't touch their weekly football match or something like this. Here the system is just fucked up, I cannot name a single politician who actually cares about Italy: it's only a game of having a seat, privileges and an income. Berlusconi is the best (worst) example fo this.

    The fact is that from the birth of the Italian Republic there has been a slow process of taking rights away so people are kind of used to being fucked in the ass. Time is coming to start a social revolution but we have to hit the bottom for people to notice the state of things.

    P.S.: Ever wondered what's the meaning of "Popolo delle Libertà" (Berlusconi's party)? Literally translated that would be "people of freedom".

    --
    "I'm selling these fine leather jackets"
  46. Forget Public WiFi by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that these will be the first to be quickly brought down on one strike. Libraries, universities, book stores... basically every public place that provides "free WiFi" will be cut off.

    I just don't see that working well at all.

    --
    Something witty.
  47. Lulz by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    Gee, wouldn't it be terrible if someone were to start hacking into bureaucrat's computers, download copyrighted material, which resulted in those same bureaucrats getting kicked off the internet?

  48. Let's imagine they succeed by Dima202 · · Score: 1

    So you take a legitimate subscriber give him the boot. Stage 1) Person looking for alternate isp Stage 2) If unsuccessful > very pissed off person that would do anything to get back into the 21st century Stage 3) Person find Bob, Bob is computer literate and wants to make some money. Stage 4) ISP wondering why they lost 50% of their subscribers and yet the load on their hardware had risen by 200% People try to go legit but can you really control the internet content you get 100% of the time? ex 1)Neighbor kid reads up on how to crack wireless networks > kid finds some Hollywood copyright porn > Neighbors get the boot > Wife kills husband > Wife Sentenced 50 years to life ex 2)A new virus is developed especially for the Italians > Virus downloads at least 3 Hollywood copyright porn titles and keeps it in a hidden directory > Virus spreads very slowly but progressively picking up speed > By 2020 half of Italy's women jailed for murder > Due to lack of females men move out of country > Italy bankrupt

    1. Re:Let's imagine they succeed by tftp · · Score: 1

      > Italy bankrupt

      Aren't they already there, without your Rube Goldberg machine?

  49. Utopia by adeft · · Score: 1

    What a wonderful crime-free world we live in where we can be blissfully disconcerned with hardened crimes and finally crack down on lesser offenses like copyright infringement.

  50. Libertà by rafadev · · Score: 1

    Yep, sounds exactly like "Il Popolo della Libertà" (The People of Freedom)

  51. Re:Yes. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    One could argue that if I remove the unskipable ads in front of the movie I reduce their value to the seller. That's actually a bit of a problem, since the price of the product includes the fact that whoever bought that ad paid money for it and hence (allegedly) reduced the price for the consumer. Ok. But why can't I buy it, at "premium price" without ads? It's like watching a movie on free TV vs. watching it on pay TV. One is interrupted by ads, one isn't.

    That it's not offered that way is the problem.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.