Slashdot Mirror
Researchers Create Renewable Carbon Dioxide Sponge
First time accepted submitter Babu V Bassa writes "Concerned about adding too much carbon dioxide to the atmosphere? Consider a roof top coating on your car with this new material. A multinational team of researchers have developed a renewable sponge like material to capture and store gaseous carbon dioxide. The organic material is made up of gamma-cyclodextrin. Conventional metal-organic frameworks, which also are effective at adsorbing carbon dioxide, are usually prepared from materials derived from crude oil and often incorporate toxic heavy metals and are also non-renewable. The research paper published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society claims that its synthesis is essentially carbon-neutral and have the demonstrated ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere makes them promising materials for carbon fixation."
Wood already works for "carbon fixation" and you can make things with it that people will actually keep. My mother has some "fixated carbon" in the living room over 100 years old. Just grow a tree and make a desk.
A way to fix carbon permanently is to bury it underground in a specially capped storage facility. Just so long as it doesn't decay, and just acts like a rock under the dirt, we're doing good.
I call the above 'burying paper in a landfill'. Al Gore has an old newspaper he keeps on his desk that was perfectly preserved in a landfill.
So we take trees, that suck CO2 out of the atmosphere, turn them into paper to sell and finance the operation. Collect the paper and "carbon sequester" it underground in a capped storage facility (landfill). We're saving the planet!
Given the above, the worst thing you can do is recycle paper.
The more recycled, the less new produced.
The less new paper produced, the fewer Douglas Fir trees planted in the managed forests.
The fewer new trees planted, the less CO2 pulled from the atmosphere.
Someone with more environmental awareness please show me where the logic is flawed. I'm unable to find it, and I've looked.
********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
Sounds good to me. All we have to do is get everyone on the planet to plant several tons of trees every year (30 billion tons CO2 emissions per year / 7 billion people). Should be easy!
What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
Better to make the car (or large portions of it) from wood.
Morgan has been using wood frames forever.
http://www.morgan-motor.co.uk/carpages/44/44.html
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
its 20 times worse than c02in regards to global warming.
Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
Sometimes, people need to get banged in the head with the obvious.
Perhaps I'm trolling, perhaps I'm not.
I always love how processes that claim to be carbon neutral exclude the largest sources of waste such as reagents and solvents used in processing which are in excess to 1000x the product achieved.
And yes while some of these can be recovered somewhat on an industrial scale their recovery is highly energy intensive process.
Except wood is one of the last materials you'd want to use in a car (well, in many things, but especially a car). It's heavy, weak, and highly susceptible to environmental degradation.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
The Chinese are building more nuclear plants these days and electric scooters are very popular there. I wouldn't be surprised to see them become more environmentally friendly than the US in the next 15-30 years.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
However, I do have a problem with these same liberals attempt to use the power of the state to force their bullshit green attitudes on the rest of us.
And I have a problem with fundamentalists and the far right attempting to use the power of the state to force their bullshit anti-science and war mongering agendas on the rest of us. I don't want Creationism anti-science taught in schools that are funded by my taxes. I don't want my taxes used to kill people, in far away places and here. (Honestly, I'd think that if the fundies were to answer the question that's hanging on the walls of most of their churches, i.e. WWJD?, we wouldn't be trying so hard to kill anyone. But hey, you know, that whole common sense thing is vastly over-rated.)
Yeah, mod me down. See if I care. Haters gonna hate.
Because methane is a pretty reactive molecule. So it reacts spontaneously. In the atmosphere Methane has a half life of about 8 years.
We don't worry much about methane for the same reason we don't worry about H2O. Water vapor causes roughly 60% of all greenhouse effects yet since a water molecule on is in the atmosphere for about 9 days there is not much to worry about.
Co2 has a half life of centuries. So while boiling water on the stove stays in the atmosphere for a few days and cow farts stay in the air for a decade, CO2 stays up there for centuries.
America - Why be green? The Chinese will still destroy the environment.
China - Why be green? The Americans will still destroy the environment.
Only if their manufacturing industry collapses. Remember that the reason you're sending all your money over there in exchange for cheap goods is twofold:
1. Labour is cheaper since unions are effectively banned
2. Environmental laws are effectively non-existent (as in, they exist but are ignored)
If their manufacturing plants start adhering to sane environmental regulations there will be higher overheads which will translate to less incentive to send manufacturing over there.
That is, if there is any manufacturing skill left in the west by then...
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife