Slashdot Mirror


ACTA To Be Signed This Weekend

We've been following the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement for over three years, from its secretive beginnings, to the controversy and debate that followed, and to the document it eventually evolved into. Now, Japan has announced that the agreement will finally be signed on Saturday during a ceremony that follows an anti-piracy symposium on Friday. "The negotiation has been carried out among Australia, Canada, the European Union and its Member States, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United States, and reached a general agreement at the negotiation meeting held in Japan in October 2010, followed by the completion of technical and translation work in April 2011. ... The signing ceremony will be attended by the representatives of all the participants in the ACTA negotiations, and those that have completed relevant domestic processes will sign the agreement. The agreement is open for signature until May 1, 2013."

30 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Obama 2012! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    and the republican candidates would've been better? president is a figurehead, don't' be a fool and think he's anything else.

  2. sigh by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well damn someone pass the lube I guess it's that time again.

  3. meanwhile in Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mexican Senate has already voted to not let president sign ACTA, yet, mexican IP officials and the content industry local representatives frequently make public statements about Mexico signing ACTA.

    They will be at the Japan's signing ceremony as witnesses, but a few congress members haven't officially informed about recent developments concerning ACTA.

    It's still as obscure as it was at the begining of the negotiations.

  4. ...like we needed a hole in the head. by shoutingloudly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't be shocked if this follows the pattern laid out in the case of the WIPO anticircumvention treaty. It did not require anything nearly as strong as the DMCA, but the content industry kept waiving it in congressional faces, demanding that we pass something far too draconian to be justified by the treaty we had actually signed. In principle, this is set up to be in line with extant US law, thus not requiring a full Senate confirmation, but I wouldn't be shocked if (a) the content industries rammed down much stronger interpretations down other countries' throats, and (b) they then came back to the US and demanded that we "harmonize" with these stronger interpretations.

  5. Yeah, so... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... how's that 'representative democracy' working out for 'ya? Feel represented yet?

    /me :braces for authoritarian collectivist downmod:

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Yeah, so... by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean the 2/3rds of the Senate that gets tens of thousands of dollars donated to their campaigns from the entertainment industry every time election season rolls around? Yeah, I'm sure those guys will put up a fight.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Yeah, so... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, go ask 10 random people on the street what they think should happen to copyright law, and see how many of them care. When no one cares, then the people who do care tend to get their way (which is, artists and recording industries. What, you don't think artists want longer copyrights? Don't be naive, they are like the rest of us and would gladly take more money).

      Representative democracy only works when people pay attention to government, and vote accordingly. When was the last time you voted or even contacted your representative based on copyright? I never have. Maybe I should, but there are other things I care about more.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Yeah, so... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I'd be more inclined to believe the Republicans would block it. They have a preexisting reason to disagree with things that they support, and in general they have less to gain. The states that have large entertainment industry backing are predominantly democrat. Both parties are in the pocket of big business interests, but they're not always the same big business interests...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Yeah, so... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      What, you don't think artists want longer copyrights?

      Depends on who you count as 'artists'. If you include writers, then actually most of us want shorter copyrights. It gives us a much stronger bargaining position with our publishers if they keep needing more new material because they're unable to make profits from huge back catalogues. Most writers only get a tiny trickle of royalties from books over 10 years old, but for the publishers that's a huge number of small trickles with almost no associated costs.

      I suspect it's similar for musicians. If the labels weren't able to keep milking records from the 60's-80s then they'd have a lot more of an incentive to look for new artists to sign...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Yeah, so... by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Representative democracy only works when people pay attention to government, and vote accordingly. When was the last time you voted or even contacted your representative based on copyright? I never have. Maybe I should, but there are other things I care about more.

      Most people vote based on what they are told by the media. A minority of people vote based on properly informed and developed opinion.

      Democracy is subject to the same 'forces', the same social manipulations and psychology, that underlie advertising. Advertising works and is well worth the billions that are spent on it. Advertising works just as well for 'informing' the public on how they should vote as it does for getting products off of the shelf.

      Therefore 'representative' democracy will always be representative of the will of easily manipulated people who are fed false information. Well-informed political debate and dialectic are kept as far away from democracy as possible.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:Yeah, so... by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ron Paul.

      That's why you vote for Ron Paul who is very specific about States being more autonomous (because the federal government has no authority for pretty much anything it does at this point), and thus having more competition between government laws and Congressman/Senators should really live in their States now, with all the technology they must not be allowed to live in Washington DC and to do their business there. They should be required to live in their States, where people have more direct access to them AND this would force the lobbyists to come to every one of the States, to go visit 50 States (or at least half), and this would be more obvious and easy to track and to see how a Congressman/Senator changes his mind once the path of a lobbyist goes through his State.

  6. Re:Obama 2012! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously. That's why you don't vote for the guy who can only give canned answers and fancy speeches.

    The Republicans are bad, but they can't get away with as much. If Bush or another Republican was pulling this BS the major media would be crucifying them. That's pretty much the only difference between parties. If it's a Democrat, the media ignores as much as they can, and tries to spin everything to be positive. . .if it's a Republican, it's the only time the media does it's job, making sure that every action is brought to public light.

    My criticism isn't as much that I think Democrats are worse, they just get away with a lot more. If you hate wars, corporate welfare and a police state under a Republican administration, you are a good American freedom lover who stands up for civil rights. If you hate wars, corporate welfare and a police state under a Democratic administration, you are a racist, extremist, and a danger to democracy.

    As bad as Republicans are, it's downright dishonest the double standard that the media in this country has. . . If Bush had run as a Democrat, he would have likely been hailed by the media as the best president ever in American history. I bet you.

  7. Lovely! by Sodel · · Score: 5, Informative

    America's top exports: pornography, hamburgers, movies, economic instability, and, of course, imbalanced copyright legislation. Damn it America, keep your garbage to yourself! We all have our own special interest lobby groups! The last thing we need is for our governments to feel the influence of YOUR lobby groups, too. There's hardly any highly developed countries left where people can live quiet lives with *sane* copyright legislation.

    1. Re:Lovely! by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 2

      Man.. it would would be nice if the US was second best at anything I care about (other than number of fighter jets, executions, people in prison and money shoveling)... and technically the US is second best at money shoveling, since the EU has a larger economy, combined, than the US... sure it's not a country, ok, you can't lose them all.

      The US emits more pollution than the EU and china combined, despite having just over half the economy (PPP GDP) of the two combined. The US uses 7 times as much water per capita and 4 times as much overall as the two combined.

      What are you aiming at here? It's all about fighter jets isn't it?

      Pew pew pew. BOOM.

  8. Imaginary Property Warriors by cosm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is what the US will become. The warriors of intellectual property. If we can't manufacture, create, and export tangible things, then god-dammit we'll charge for any intangible a lawyer can serve papers on.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Imaginary Property Warriors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is what the world will become, not just the US. Look at the ridicululous b.s. Apple has been able to pull over iPad and iPhone intellectual property, claiming ownership of any thin rectangular tablet device. Europe just passed a copyright extension specifically to give more money to the owners of the Beatles copyrights. And let's not forget that the original draconian copyright regime isn't called "the Berne convention": it's a European creation, rammed down everybodys throat at the insistence of European publishers and media moguls (who basically called the shots back then).

  9. Re:Obama 2012! by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you serious??

    Obama has been bombing Libya for months now without invoking the war powers act.

    If Bush had done that the Democrats would have organized marches with millions of participants protesting.

    Those millions just sit at home because it's "their guy" that is doing it this time.

    By the same token many of the Republicans that supported Bush's actions with respect to Iraq are now pissed off at Obama. Sure he's violating the war powers act and they can catch him on a technicality, but you sure as hell know they'd have been fine with Bush if he had violated it.

    Its all about "my team" vs. "your team" anymore. Americans don't stand on principle, they just proudly wear the label for their side that they belong to. And they belong to that side because they've always belonged to it.

    Its sickening.

    And of course both of our political sides happily sell us out to the Movie and Music industry, even though they're small potatoes compared to industries that'll be harmed by these brain dead laws and treaties.

  10. Re:Obama 2012! by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You should get into the fertilizer business with that amount of bullshit. Bush kidnapped and tortured people on a whim, stole hundred of billions of dollars from the nation in the form of unfunded wars and mandates, and still got reelected. Obama told schoolchildren that they should stay in school, and was excoriated in the media for Soviet brainwashing. He tried to reimburse doctors for helping patients write a living will, and was accused of setting of Nazi Death Panels. The guy can't get away with doing good things.

    Republicans can do whatever the hell they want, because their wing of the media owns the party and would never do anything to hurt them. The liberal wing of the media still takes Democrats to task when they do something wrong (watch Rachel Maddow for a week if you don't believe it), while the conservative media makes shit up to criticize them for whenever they try to do something right.

  11. Re:Obama 2012! by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Bush had done that the Democrats would have organized marches with millions of participants protesting.

    If Bush had done that the Democrats would have organized marches with millions of participants protesting."

    Invading Iraq on a WMD/Terrorist pretext is wholly different proposition to providing air support to an in-progress popular rebellion.

    I'm not American, I don't care for Obama particularly, but the Libya actions seem to be attracting praise from people *worldwide*, whereas the Iraq debacle has ruined the reputation of the US the world over. This particular area is not something that you can or should reduce to partisan politics.

  12. Two words ... by tqk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Civil disobedience.

    No, I'm not a "pirate" and I don't steal stuff from "Rights Holders" and "Intellectual Property" evangelists. However, I do advocate boycotting them and everything they're selling for pushing draconian "legislation" such as ACTA. This sort of crap is not adding value to the world.

    Nobody *needs* anything they're selling.

    Don't buy it. Don't use it. Find other suppliers. There's plenty of them if you'd only look! Teach 'em how to rot in hell. Don't go there or play their game, and convince your friends not to as well.

    They're slime, they're acting like slime, and you need not put up with actions such as theirs. They're also co-opting your government and legal system against you.

    Just don't buy their !@#$. Watch 'em fade into history as they should.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  13. Re:Yours is deeper and browner by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Liar, liar, liar.

    [Torture] is continued today under Obama.

    Lies. Rendition is still occurring, which is bad, but torture is not.

    Are banks and automobile companies really so different? Not to mention there is Libya...

    Banks were bailed out by Bush, liar. The car companies paid back most of their loans, and even if they hadn't, the money would have gone towards employing Americans during a recession instead of sabotaging Medicare with an unfunded prescription drug benefit. And Libya has cost the US about $1 billion dollars, compared to Iraq which has cost over $1 trillion.

    Methinks you have dropped all context [regarding Obama speaking to school children], as well as misunderstanding what "the media" did.

    By all means, liar, explain how Obama talking to school children really was an act of brainwashing.

    The Death Panels part came not from doctors writing wills but from forming, well, panels deciding how much care people would get - or not.

    LIAR! The Death Panels crap started over a section of the bill that would have provided optional will-writing services to people over a certain age, or with life threatening conditions. They then kept the lie going even after that section was dropped from the bill, because imbeciles like you were eating it up so well.

    Honestly, it is mind-boggling the way Republicans throw up a wall of lies when faced with criticism. Do you really believe that repeating your lie enough will make it true?

  14. Petition created at Whitehouse.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Obama administration has made it possible to create petitions which, if they get sufficient signatures, will be
    responded to and potentially acted on. I've created one at http://wh.gov/4PW which I encourage all to read and
    sign if they agree with it. We can defeat this!

    1. Re:Petition created at Whitehouse.gov by pearl298 · · Score: 2

      The Obama administration has made it possible to create petitions which, if they get sufficient signatures, will be responded to and potentially acted on. I've created one at http://wh.gov/4PW which I encourage all to read and sign if they agree with it. We can defeat this!

      I am signer number 2! Only 4998 more needed to get an official response! "SLASHDOTTING" might actually count for something at last!

    2. Re:Petition created at Whitehouse.gov by andycal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OMFG what a terrible website experience ... no wonder only 11 signatures at the moment.
      requires sigin to vote.. ok
      pop up form incompatible with android touch kybd. ( click text area , lose kybd focus)
      use slide out kybd
      Sends validation mail.... ok
      It's not a link, I have to copy and paste
      Drops me to 404 page
      Move to laptop, try again
      Still, not a link, but copy paste better on laptop, whitehouse.gov says :Validation already used.
      Please login, requests email and password... ( I didn't ever get prompted for a password )
      request lost password
      New validation link, ( still not hot, copy paste) ... OK validated, but link valid only once, please set password.
      OK, logged in .. but *lost* is the link to the page I was on... where is that petition ?
      back to /. re-click link page comes up, .. but "Sign Petition" is still greyed-out
      click "signin" and my choices are "Sign out" and "Forgot Password"
      Now I will try logout and log back in.. will see if that works

      I get the feeling they don't actually want people to sign these things.

  15. Re:Canada by Patch86 · · Score: 2

    A brief search on the BBC reveals that they do talk about it- rarely.

    Last article that mentions it (in passing): 21/09/2010.
    Before that: March 2010.
    Then: April 2009.
    Then: July 2008.

    And all the articles seem to be written by the same two columnists; not exactly by the current affairs journalists.

    Like you say; it stinks.

  16. Re:sorry, no lube left, suggestions? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let them have their fun. It's not entirely irrelevant, but near enough. For decades, sharing has been villified as piracy. And bans on the activity have proven time and again to be impractical to enforce. ACTA doesn't change any of that. If you aren't already, get used to being thought a criminal. And don't sweat about the possibility of being accused and threatened. The odds of it happening are low. Numbers are on our side.

    We'll just have to wait for the older generations to lose power. They won't admit that sharing is not evil and not theft, not unless they take one hell of a beating over the issue, which they probably won't. Once they're gone, we'll ditch these idiotic laws. Be nice if it happens sooner, through the election of Pirate Party politicians, but it will happen eventually, one way or another, as mortality catches up with them.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  17. UH, GUYS? by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 2

    This conversation is about ACTA. I know your petty partisanship seems mighty important to you, but the reality is it is not relevant to the wider picture at all. I believe there are numerous partisan argument forums on the web, please retire to one of those and let this thread be about something that actually matters at all.

  18. Re:Obama 2012! by mcvos · · Score: 2

    You can't blame this one just on the US. The EU was also involved, but unfortunately, the EU isn't really all that democratic. The Europarliament may have objected to ACTA on various occasions, the negotiators continued anyway.

    I hope this still requires parliamentary ratification. No idea whether it'll be the national or EU parliament, but I hope they take a very critical look at it. I think it'd be a very constructive signal if they rejected ACTA. I hope that'll prevent these kind of secret, uninformed negotiations in the future.

  19. Re:Yeah, so...lets have e-government by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly. There should be no reason for these guys all to fly to Washington DC, all to assemble in one room.

    Get them onto the Internet, connect them into a virtual room, have this thing broadcast over youtube.

    NO MORE PRIVATE BS CONVERSATIONS.

    Record everything they do. Anything that's not recorded must be illegal for them. Force them to live in places that they are supposed to represent.

    Have a huge ass LCD screen in every city of the State, constantly showing what the elected officials are doing.

    They better get used to this, because that's what they want to perpetrate on every one of YOU.

  20. Re:Obama 2012! by andydread · · Score: 2

    Iraq debacle? You mean the successful invasion of Iraq for the purpose of deposing the convicted mass murderer and general crackpot Saddam Hussein,

    You probably should turn of Fox News Channel. The President and his administration did not sell the war to the American people "For the purpose of deposing Saddam Hussein."

    after receiving proper authorization in the US gov't, international approval in the UN, and including a large multinational force?

    Cheney through Bush LIED to the world claiming weapons of mass destruction. "There are stockpiles we know where they are" "Mobile chemical factories" "Niger aluminum tubes" etc etc the list goes on and on. All a bunch of lies.

    You mean the debacle that has resulted in less than 4800 allied deaths in 8 years?

    That is the number being diseminated by Fox News. But if you get your head out of Fox News nether regions you will see the more accurate figures here

    The debacle where the Iraqi people are no longer under the thumb of the fascist Ba'ath party and out of the revolutions happening in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, etc... has the best bet for a fair and reasonable government?

    But I guess none of that counts since Bush did it.

    Do you have any proof that the Iraq war triggered the Arab spring? You have no clue what fascism is. The ba'ath party is an autocratic regime. I don't know how corporations play a part in propping up that regime. The Syrian people are still under the thumb of the Ba'ath party how many American lives should we sacrifice to free Syria from the Ba'ath party there? How about you be the first American to invade Syria? And what about the regime in Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Myanmar, Saudi Arabia, Eritrea, Turkmenistan and others. How much should we tax the American people to depose these murderous dictators? How much American lives should be sacrificed?