Slashdot Mirror


ACTA To Be Signed This Weekend

We've been following the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement for over three years, from its secretive beginnings, to the controversy and debate that followed, and to the document it eventually evolved into. Now, Japan has announced that the agreement will finally be signed on Saturday during a ceremony that follows an anti-piracy symposium on Friday. "The negotiation has been carried out among Australia, Canada, the European Union and its Member States, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United States, and reached a general agreement at the negotiation meeting held in Japan in October 2010, followed by the completion of technical and translation work in April 2011. ... The signing ceremony will be attended by the representatives of all the participants in the ACTA negotiations, and those that have completed relevant domestic processes will sign the agreement. The agreement is open for signature until May 1, 2013."

12 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. sigh by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well damn someone pass the lube I guess it's that time again.

  2. meanwhile in Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mexican Senate has already voted to not let president sign ACTA, yet, mexican IP officials and the content industry local representatives frequently make public statements about Mexico signing ACTA.

    They will be at the Japan's signing ceremony as witnesses, but a few congress members haven't officially informed about recent developments concerning ACTA.

    It's still as obscure as it was at the begining of the negotiations.

  3. ...like we needed a hole in the head. by shoutingloudly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't be shocked if this follows the pattern laid out in the case of the WIPO anticircumvention treaty. It did not require anything nearly as strong as the DMCA, but the content industry kept waiving it in congressional faces, demanding that we pass something far too draconian to be justified by the treaty we had actually signed. In principle, this is set up to be in line with extant US law, thus not requiring a full Senate confirmation, but I wouldn't be shocked if (a) the content industries rammed down much stronger interpretations down other countries' throats, and (b) they then came back to the US and demanded that we "harmonize" with these stronger interpretations.

  4. Yeah, so... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... how's that 'representative democracy' working out for 'ya? Feel represented yet?

    /me :braces for authoritarian collectivist downmod:

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Yeah, so... by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ron Paul.

      That's why you vote for Ron Paul who is very specific about States being more autonomous (because the federal government has no authority for pretty much anything it does at this point), and thus having more competition between government laws and Congressman/Senators should really live in their States now, with all the technology they must not be allowed to live in Washington DC and to do their business there. They should be required to live in their States, where people have more direct access to them AND this would force the lobbyists to come to every one of the States, to go visit 50 States (or at least half), and this would be more obvious and easy to track and to see how a Congressman/Senator changes his mind once the path of a lobbyist goes through his State.

  5. Lovely! by Sodel · · Score: 5, Informative

    America's top exports: pornography, hamburgers, movies, economic instability, and, of course, imbalanced copyright legislation. Damn it America, keep your garbage to yourself! We all have our own special interest lobby groups! The last thing we need is for our governments to feel the influence of YOUR lobby groups, too. There's hardly any highly developed countries left where people can live quiet lives with *sane* copyright legislation.

  6. Imaginary Property Warriors by cosm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is what the US will become. The warriors of intellectual property. If we can't manufacture, create, and export tangible things, then god-dammit we'll charge for any intangible a lawyer can serve papers on.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  7. Re:Obama 2012! by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you serious??

    Obama has been bombing Libya for months now without invoking the war powers act.

    If Bush had done that the Democrats would have organized marches with millions of participants protesting.

    Those millions just sit at home because it's "their guy" that is doing it this time.

    By the same token many of the Republicans that supported Bush's actions with respect to Iraq are now pissed off at Obama. Sure he's violating the war powers act and they can catch him on a technicality, but you sure as hell know they'd have been fine with Bush if he had violated it.

    Its all about "my team" vs. "your team" anymore. Americans don't stand on principle, they just proudly wear the label for their side that they belong to. And they belong to that side because they've always belonged to it.

    Its sickening.

    And of course both of our political sides happily sell us out to the Movie and Music industry, even though they're small potatoes compared to industries that'll be harmed by these brain dead laws and treaties.

  8. Re:Obama 2012! by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Bush had done that the Democrats would have organized marches with millions of participants protesting.

    If Bush had done that the Democrats would have organized marches with millions of participants protesting."

    Invading Iraq on a WMD/Terrorist pretext is wholly different proposition to providing air support to an in-progress popular rebellion.

    I'm not American, I don't care for Obama particularly, but the Libya actions seem to be attracting praise from people *worldwide*, whereas the Iraq debacle has ruined the reputation of the US the world over. This particular area is not something that you can or should reduce to partisan politics.

  9. Two words ... by tqk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Civil disobedience.

    No, I'm not a "pirate" and I don't steal stuff from "Rights Holders" and "Intellectual Property" evangelists. However, I do advocate boycotting them and everything they're selling for pushing draconian "legislation" such as ACTA. This sort of crap is not adding value to the world.

    Nobody *needs* anything they're selling.

    Don't buy it. Don't use it. Find other suppliers. There's plenty of them if you'd only look! Teach 'em how to rot in hell. Don't go there or play their game, and convince your friends not to as well.

    They're slime, they're acting like slime, and you need not put up with actions such as theirs. They're also co-opting your government and legal system against you.

    Just don't buy their !@#$. Watch 'em fade into history as they should.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  10. Petition created at Whitehouse.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Obama administration has made it possible to create petitions which, if they get sufficient signatures, will be
    responded to and potentially acted on. I've created one at http://wh.gov/4PW which I encourage all to read and
    sign if they agree with it. We can defeat this!

    1. Re:Petition created at Whitehouse.gov by andycal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OMFG what a terrible website experience ... no wonder only 11 signatures at the moment.
      requires sigin to vote.. ok
      pop up form incompatible with android touch kybd. ( click text area , lose kybd focus)
      use slide out kybd
      Sends validation mail.... ok
      It's not a link, I have to copy and paste
      Drops me to 404 page
      Move to laptop, try again
      Still, not a link, but copy paste better on laptop, whitehouse.gov says :Validation already used.
      Please login, requests email and password... ( I didn't ever get prompted for a password )
      request lost password
      New validation link, ( still not hot, copy paste) ... OK validated, but link valid only once, please set password.
      OK, logged in .. but *lost* is the link to the page I was on... where is that petition ?
      back to /. re-click link page comes up, .. but "Sign Petition" is still greyed-out
      click "signin" and my choices are "Sign out" and "Forgot Password"
      Now I will try logout and log back in.. will see if that works

      I get the feeling they don't actually want people to sign these things.