Slashdot Mirror


Ohio Supreme Court Drawn Into Magnetic Homes Case

The Ohio Supreme Court will decide if a builder will have to replace magnetized parts of two couples' homes, even though they signed a limited warranty which did not specifically cover replacing positively- or negatively-charged building materials. After moving into the homes the couples found that something was not quite right. Their TV screens were distorted. Cordless phones ran into interference. Computer hard drives were corrupted. Soon after, it was discovered that steel joists in the homes had become magnetized."

462 comments

  1. Why replace? by kimvette · · Score: 2

    Just rent a large degaussing coil.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody here have a large mallet I can borrow? I think that I can fix this one real cheap!

    2. Re:Why replace? by n5vb · · Score: 1

      You *could* heat them up above their Curie point. Not sure how strong they'd be after that though .. :p

    3. Re:Why replace? by wierd_w · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No shit.

      The navy used to degauss whole fucking battleships in the second world war.

      You can even buy commerical degaussing wands for repairing old crt deflection plates reasonably cheap, now that crt is essentially a dead technology. My old employer had several for just this purpose.

      What I want to know is how the hell the joists picked up such a magnetic potential in the first place.

    4. Re:Why replace? by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gives a whole new definition to "Attractive home in desirable neighbourhood"

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:Why replace? by Torinir · · Score: 2

      Bad wiring, perhaps? Running electrical wires in close proximity to the steel joists could cause magnetization of the joists over time. Iron and its alloys are pretty easy to magnetize in that manner.

    6. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The summary reads like BS anyway.
      If they actually have magnetic mono-poles in their house they should sell them for millions of dollars, instead of complaining about it.
      No one describes a magnet as "positively charged".
      Also charge is an entirely different property than magnetism.
      It seems far more likely the beams are not properly grounded and are possibly acting like an antenna, causing all kinds of interference.
      And unless they mounted their hard drives onto the "magnetic" beams I seriously doubt the field is strong enough to affect them.

      Finally I have to wonder how would these beams get magnetized?
      Did the electrician wrap some power cables around it?

    7. Re:Why replace? by Genda · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the flammable materials in the house would fail long before you damaged or even altered the joists. Why yes, we were absolutely able to eliminate that nagging magnetism... oh that, well yes only the metal parts survived the ensuing conflagration, but consider smoldering ashes a small price to have working electronics in a this modern world :-) No thanks required! good day.

    8. Re:Why replace? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bad wiring, perhaps? Running electrical wires in close proximity to the steel joists could cause magnetization of the joists over time. Iron and its alloys are pretty easy to magnetize in that manner./quote

      Last I checked we use alternating current in this country.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:Why replace? by icebike · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly.

      Further, the level of the magnetic field that would be required to corrupt a hard drive in a computer would yank the door knobs off and tools could be hung up just by throwing them against the wall.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further, the level of the magnetic field that would be required to corrupt a hard drive in a computer would yank the door knobs off and tools could be hung up just by throwing them against the wall.

      I hate when people post incorrect opinions as facts, yet they never seem to realize it turns a guy with a guess into a liar. Quit lying you lying liar.

      You are correct in that an "off" hard drive stored in a magnetic field will require a very very strong field to cause issues. But you were too stupid to consider the effect on a HD while it's writing. Can you imagine that a much smaller field could effect the heads? Even a .0001% error in head placement is a massive problem. But no, you are too stupid to consider the operation of the drive, and instead post your lies because you are too stupid to actually think about the issue.

    11. Re:Why replace? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      We still degauss ships. Neither the necessity, nor the art, was lost when the war ended.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:Why replace? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmm. I lined my last house with tongue and groove pine boards and noticed that adjacent boards contained slices through imperfections in the original trees. This is because the boards are produced, processed, transported and installed serially. So maybe the metal structural components of the house have a shared history? If they get heated in a foundry the magnetic poles will be free to align against the prevailing field, which could be quite strong if there is a lot of DC current around. Then they get stacked and installed in the house, still in the same orientation relative to each other.

    13. Re:Why replace? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Or heat the homes past the Curie temperatures. Hopefully with the builders still inside them. Then let them cool off.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re:Why replace? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not sure how strong they'd be after that though

      in b4 1,000,000 trolls claiming controlled detonations and inside jobs. Hurr Durr steel and concrete does not burn, etc, ad nauseam.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would think this might have happened before and they'd know to prevent it though. OTOH, maybe it's just rare enough to slip through. Maybe this explains some "haunted houses". Doors with steel in the knobs and low-friction hinges would open or close by themselves. Some people may bus susceptible to strong fields, and might hallucinate. Then again, you'd also think that checking alleged haunted houses for magnetic fields would be standard procedure also...

    16. Re:Why replace? by plover · · Score: 1, Troll

      Anybody here have a large mallet I can borrow? I think that I can fix this one real cheap!

      Why, are you going to smack the couple on their heads? That's where the defective part is located, not the house.

      --
      John
    17. Re:Why replace? by headhot · · Score: 1

      Welding.

    18. Re:Why replace? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      People still use magnetic mines? (Then again, I suppose if it works and is cheap, it will stay popular.)

      Anyway, the idea was that a battleship is hugely massive and hard to degauss compared to a few girders in a drywall construction home.

      Degaussing the home is therefor quite feasible, and there should be no need to replace the house, unless the magnetism is recurring, and if that is the case, what is causing it?

      I did not intend to assert that degaussing naval vessels was a lost art.

    19. Re:Why replace? by carlzum · · Score: 1

      I may be a liar making a guess, but a magnetic field powerful enough to displace a HD head even .0001% would do more than distort TV screens and phone signals. I have a hunch they were struggling to prove monetary loss, and data loss sounded good. "My wedding pictures and valuable business records are gone!"

    20. Re:Why replace? by Megane · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you ever taken a hard drive apart? There's a couple of real nice rare earth magnets in there for the voice coil, less than 3 inches from the heads, and maybe an inch from the platters. It would take one hell of a magnet to equal that strength at any distance, much less exceed it. It takes a lot of magnetism to flip the fields in those platters. The heads can provide that strength, just over a very small area.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    21. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit Sherlock. So do electro-magnets.

    22. Re:Why replace? by plover · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And this would affect their hard drives and TV how, exactly?

      Seriously, if the beams were magnetic enough to cause the claimed damage to the contents of the house, they wouldn't have been able to separate them from each other in this construction pile you've theoretically stacked up. They wouldn't even have been delivered, because they wouldn't have been able to scrape them off the forklifts, or lift them from the truck beds. Other vehicles passing them on the roads would have been stuck to the sides of their trailers. Once delivered, the carpenters' hammers would have flown through the air, heads permanently affixed to the beams.

      Yes, they could be magnetic enough to disrupt a compass reading. The earth's field is maybe 60 microteslas, so it's not a high bar to pass. But strong enough to erase a bit in a hard drive? The coercivity of the media is about 1700 Oe for cobalt, which takes a lot stronger field than that.

      --
      John
    23. Re:Why replace? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      honestly, It seems really odd to me that entire structural members could become magnetized incidentally during construction (magnetizing something that large is not exactly easy) Makes me wonder if its actually related to the electrical system in the building, not the structure itself.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    24. Re:Why replace? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And this would affect their hard drives and TV how, exactly?

      No argument there. Just discussing the ways that a field could be present.

    25. Re:Why replace? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And I have the feeling the technical illiteracy of this whole case extends into the courtroom. I also have to wonder what kind of television sets these people have. Are they claiming that flat panels were affected by stray magnetic fields?

      I also fail to see how a static magnetic field is going to bother a cordless phone, a computer, or any other piece of modern electronics. Maybe their neighbor is an amateur radio operator running a thousand watt linear in his living room. That would make a hell of a lot more sense than "magnetized joists."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    26. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Direct Current current around?

    27. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further, the level of the magnetic field that would be required to corrupt a hard drive in a computer would yank the door knobs off and tools could be hung up just by throwing them against the wall.

      I hate when people post incorrect opinions as facts, yet they never seem to realize it turns a guy with a guess into a liar. Quit lying you lying liar.

      You are correct in that an "off" hard drive stored in a magnetic field will require a very very strong field to cause issues. But you were too stupid to consider the effect on a HD while it's writing. Can you imagine that a much smaller field could effect the heads? Even a .0001% error in head placement is a massive problem. But no, you are too stupid to consider the operation of the drive, and instead post your lies because you are too stupid to actually think about the issue.

      You are the one who is being stupid. You think you've figured out how HDDs work but really you're no more informed than the person you're criticizing. Maybe less.

      HDDs use a voice-coil motor with closed loop servo control to position the heads. This means that even if there was a way for an external magnetic field to put a significant force on the heads, it would automatically be corrected for by the servo loop.

      But that's an important "even if". There isn't a lot of ferrous material in the head arm assembly, and the voice coil itself is held suspended between two fixed rare-earth permanent magnets of the "holy shit those are powerful" variety. (yes, that's right, HDDs include their own built-in extremely powerful magnets.) Plain old magnetized iron or steel can't generate nearly the same field strength, and would be located much further away from the heads than the internal magnets to boot.

    28. Re:Why replace? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I hate when people post incorrect opinions as facts, yet they never seem to realize it turns a guy with a guess into a liar. Quit lying you lying liar.

      He may be lying but he's actually correct. It's damned hard to affect a hard drive with any kind of external field: they're shielded pretty well for that reason. Also the voice coil positioning routines are pretty good at correcting positional errors on-the-fly: modern hard drives are fairly sophisticated real-time feedback systems. As other posters have pointed out, any field that intense would be having all kinds of other much more significant affects. Not to mention that a static field isn't going to have much of an effect on a cordless phone, as was also claimed.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    29. Re:Why replace? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I have heard if such an incident. If the source of the magnetism is not from within the house, then two others possibilities come to mind (this is a guess), which are: proximity to power lines (above ground or below) or maybe something geological?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    30. Re:Why replace? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A magnetized hull is detrimental to a number of electronic warfare devices. We're not so worried about mines, or even being detected, so much as we're concerned about the proper functioning of sonar, radar, gunplot, computers, etc ad nauseum.

      I have little idea whether TFS and TFA are accurate portrayals of the situation in Ohio, but I can say that the ships I served aboard had some interesting anomalies in navigation gear, tracking gear, and computers when the hull was highly magnetized.

      And, that doesn't touch on preservation. A steel hull, and an aluminum superstructure poses a real challenge in the prevention of corrosion. Shipbuilders use a bimetal thing to join the aluminum to the steel, but even so magnetic and electrical charges in the hull tend to cause problems. Electrical more than magnetic, but still, the magnetism is something that they take into account.

      To bad I didn't really study all this stuff when I was in. I am merely aware of the concern that the ship's officers and the hull tech people had about this stuff.

      TL/DR part - all that I'm certain of, is that we routinely passed through a degausing station when we returned to port. A couple times, we turned around and passed through it again.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    31. Re:Why replace? by Jawcracker+Fuzz · · Score: 1

      Cell phone: Flaky, work about half the time anyway.

      Hard Disk: Windows XP with every casino game known to man installed and out of date AV.

      CRT TV?: By this time the thermistor/varistor that drives the degaussing loop is fried. Turning the TV 90deg in an open wheat field with the nearest ferrous structure 20 miles away will wank the static RGB convergence.

      And it's your FAULT dammit!

    32. Re:Why replace? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all the aluminum shielding of the outer housing.

    33. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electro-magnets are not permenent, and permanent magnets can only be created with direct current.

    34. Re:Why replace? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Didn't they start becoming invisible and reappearing in the desert?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    35. Re:Why replace? by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

      Why is the couple defective?

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    36. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I hate when people post incorrect opinions as facts

      You're the one who is guilty of this. Two relevant facts:

      1. Head placement is performed by a servo feedback mechanism which uses the heads to sense the position of the tracks. Any external magnetic field (even a very significant one) will be compensated for by the servo feedback mechanism. The alternative (i.e. a purely predictive positioning mechanism) simply isn't feasible.

      2. Hard drives contain /very/ powerful magnets, both for the voice coil and for the drive motor. And those magnets are much closer to anything that matters than are the steel joists in question. Which means a far greater flux density for a given total flux.

    37. Re:Why replace? by dakohli · · Score: 1

      A steel hull, and an aluminum superstructure poses a real challenge in the prevention of corrosion. Shipbuilders use a bimetal thing to join the aluminum to the steel, but even so magnetic and electrical charges in the hull tend to cause problems.

      Cathodic Protection using sacrificial anodes.

    38. Re:Why replace? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      But.. I'm positive it's charged, so it's "positively charged" !

      And you should stop being so negative, mister...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    39. Re:Why replace? by tragedy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think checking alleged haunted houses for magnetic fields is standard procedure. The problem is, when they find the field, they decide it's evidence of paranormal activity.

    40. Re:Why replace? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      You realise that the magnetic field in this case would be a static field, not a moving one right?

    41. Re:Why replace? by lurker1997 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The whole thing is BS. I work (mostly used to work) with MRI equipment, both supercon and smaller permanent magnet based instruments. I have some permanent magnets for building MRI machines that have a surface field strength of about 0.5T (5000 Gauss) which would crush your finger to a pulp if it ever got stuck between them, and are all but impossible to separate if they ever get near each other. I have routinely used a PC within a few feet of these without any ill effects. If I had to guess, the 5 Gauss line, normally considered the safe distance for magnetic storage media, is maybe a foot. If the steel beams in this house are magnetized, I would be amazed if the remanent magnetization was even 5 G. No chance of there being such a large field (this is 10x earth's field) more than a few inches away from the beams, regardless of their magnetization. Furthermore, a permanent magnet would have no effect on cordless phones of any kind. A static magnetic field has nothing to do with a 900 MHZ or whatever radio signal coming from the phone.

    42. Re:Why replace? by cnaumann · · Score: 1

      Or just buy new flat screen TV.

    43. Re:Why replace? by tftp · · Score: 3, Informative

      A static magnetic field has nothing to do with a 900 MHZ or whatever radio signal coming from the phone.

      • All ferrites saturate; transformers stop working, inductors lose inductance, beads are not doing filtering anymore.
      • All circulators / isolators (if there are any in these phones) go bananas

      But it would take a very strong field to cause this. The phone would jump out of your hand and stick to the wall first.

    44. Re:Why replace? by plover · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they are filing a lawsuit claiming that the magnetized steel beams are affecting their hard disks. "Ninjas snuck into my house and erased them" would at least be statistically possible.

      The only effect a magnetized steel beam could have on a hard disk is if were used to crush it.

      --
      John
    45. Re:Why replace? by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

      That just suggests they're storing the wrong programs or data, not that they are defective.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    46. Re:Why replace? by tibit · · Score: 1

      That's only environmental containment. It shields against dust, not magnetic fields.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    47. Re:Why replace? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Yep. The head positioning is essentially a servo with torque output to the head arm, input being the signals from servo tracks on the platters themselves. The servo track is written at the factory and if you lose it, it cannot be rewritten in the field -- the drive's data is toast at that point. In a clean room you can open a hard drive, put your finger (as a damper) on the head arm close to the pivot point, and it will happily keep working without any errors. Access times go to hell, but otherwise it's OK.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    48. Re:Why replace? by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      I think their problems with TVs and phones more likely stem from the fact that each room framed with steel beams is now a Faraday cage. Wouldn't effect the disks though.

    49. Re:Why replace? by ace123 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Evidently, the coercivity of the media who reported on this story was high enough to be affected by these magnetic homes.

      (Sorry, it was only until after I read your comment that I discovered which type of media you were referring to.)

    50. Re:Why replace? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Then you haven't been here long enough.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    51. Re:Why replace? by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      Sounds bogus to me especially the hardisk part of the claim. Any tech could tell you a good/cheap place to find rare earth magnets is in a used hardisk. If a highly magnetized rare earth magnet can't delete data that is sitting right next to the platters how the hell can a joist do the same that is meters/feet away.

    52. Re:Why replace? by znerk · · Score: 2

      Further, the level of the magnetic field that would be required to corrupt a hard drive in a computer would yank the door knobs off and tools could be hung up just by throwing them against the wall.

      Actually, I used to work in a mom'n'pop tech shop, doing sales and repairs of home computer equipment. We had a woman come in with a corrupted Win95 install (this was back in '98 or '99), which we responded to by backing up her data, wiping, and reloading the OS. She was back a week later with the same issue, and we responded in exactly the same way. The third time she came in, she was so upset at us, and in such a hurry, she didn't take the refrigerator magnets off the case. It seems she collected refrigerator magnets, and stuck them to any metal surface in her home. The computer's case was metal, so it made perfect sense to her to use it to display a portion of her collection.

      The level of magnetism in most of the magnets was barely enough to keep it attached to the metal shrouding the PC, yet it was sufficient to corrupt her hard drive in a matter of days.

      I've also seen a huge amount of magnetic media, including disks, tapes, and hard drives, corrupted by the user setting it on top of a television or speaker.

      As an aside, but also supporting evidence: studies have shown that server hard drives can be affected by hard drives (in the same machine or in other servers) physically adjacent; causing issues not only via magnetic influence, but also via vibration. There are hard drive access algorithms built in to server systems to account for this, what makes you think a massive magnetic field is required for hard drive corruption?

      On the other hand, I'll grant the physical proximity argument has quite a bit of value; I doubt magnetism is the actual issue with these houses. The radio interference of "charged" ferrous materials is a more likely culprit... It might even be an issue for the FCC to investigate.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    53. Re:Why replace? by znerk · · Score: 1

      Static in relation to the house/room, perhaps, but are you missing that the platters of the hard drive are spinning?

      Physics comprehension for the win; I didn't think the concept "motion is relative" was that difficult to understand.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    54. Re:Why replace? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with the way their house was built. It's just what happens when you forget to type in 4 8 15 16 23 42.

    55. Re:Why replace? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Fridge magnets?
      You're going with that?

      Hint: there are magnets IN the drive way stronger than a foot high stack of fridge magnets.

      Open one up sometime.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    56. Re:Why replace? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is preventing the aluminum superstructure from _being_ the sacrificial anode.

    57. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steel beams don't automatically constitute a Faraday cage. If they did, mobile phones wouldn't work in most modern buildings.

      Not sure why you think it would block TV signals, which come down a cable in the US.

    58. Re:Why replace? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      True... but the sheet steel used to form the case of almost all PCs would provide very good magnetic shielding.

    59. Re:Why replace? by schroedingers_hat · · Score: 1

      Well that's easy. Just use a more reactive sacrificial cathode. I recommend Caesium, things will work out just fine.

    60. Re:Why replace? by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I bet magnetic crane abuse. A crane with strong electromagnet instead of hook is normally used to transport beams and other heavy elements between storage and cargo, but the duration is not enough to magnetize the beams. But if the operator decided to "have some fun" and waved the electromagnet above the beams in one direction several times, or otherwise abused the process - say, moving the "head" over the same bundle of beams multiple times on return trip after loading a bundle on a trach and going back for another, they could have become magnetized.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    61. Re:Why replace? by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      No one describes a magnet as "positively charged".
      Also charge is an entirely different property than magnetism.

      The thing about magnets is, we don't fucking know how they work.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    62. Re:Why replace? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      You must be both new here.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    63. Re:Why replace? by grrrl · · Score: 1

      I spent years working in a magnetics lab, with superconducting magnets up to 12 T. No HDDs ever failed that I am aware of.

    64. Re:Why replace? by znerk · · Score: 1

      Fridge magnets?
      You're going with that?

      Hint: there are magnets IN the drive way stronger than a foot high stack of fridge magnets.

      Open one up sometime.

      Yeah, I'm "going with that". All I know is that when she stopped putting dozens of fridge magnets all over her computer, she stopped having her Windows installation harf all over itself every few days.

      Sorry if that anecdotal evidence doesn't mesh with your view of reality; it was real, it happened, and I was there.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    65. Re:Why replace? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Somebody set their rolling mill up orientated north-south and not east-west. Depending on how the beams are manufactured it could be from a welding process as well.

      I work for a company that makes steel bars and magnetized bars are a common known problem we must warranty for to our customers. I wouldnt expect a home owner to know jack about that in terms of buying a house, but I would expect a contractor using steel beams to understand their product.
      Home contractors don't use more than a few beams per home. They probably got these cheaper by using imported ones that aren't as careful as American mills. It's still a manufacturing defect, even if it's one or those fringe cases you never use outside elementary school classes about mating magnets.

    66. Re:Why replace? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, if something is affecting the electronics in the drive, it can cause data corruption even if the physical writing process is unaffected.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    67. Re:Why replace? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Seems like total bullshit to me.

      Exactly how 'magnetized' would a steel joist have to be to wipe a hard drive at a distance? (hint: enough to lift the change out of your pocket)

      Do magnets even interfere with radio waves? Hope not, because the earth is a magnet.

      Only CRT TVs distort because of magnets and even assuming the joist is magnetized enough to distort it and your TV is close enough to the joist (unlikely) then it's far cheaper to buy a big plasma TV than go through all this crap. You just bought a new house fer glub's sake.

      Nope, they're a bunch of whiners who're looking for a payout. Even if you go in and fix things they'll never be convinced, they'll still lie awake at night thinking of the evil magnetic field.

      --
      No sig today...
    68. Re:Why replace? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine that a much smaller field could effect the heads? Even a .0001% error in head placement is a massive problem. But no, you are too stupid to consider the operation of the drive, and instead post your lies because you are too stupid to actually think about the issue.

      Try taking a hard drive apart sometime. There's big magnets INSIDE THEM that are so strong you'll have trouble pulling them apart with your bare hands.

      --
      No sig today...
    69. Re:Why replace? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the steel case of the PC would divert the magnetic field away from the hard drive.

      --
      No sig today...
    70. Re:Why replace? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It *might* affect a cordless phone. Not the radio waves but all the inductors and stuff inside it.

      But....as has been pointed out the field would have to be strong enough to yank the change out of your pocket as soon as you walked into the room.

      The Faraday cage effect of the steel structure is going to be worse for the phone than any magnetic field it could physically have.

      --
      No sig today...
    71. Re:Why replace? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      ...something geological?

      There must be loads of magnetic bracelet/insole/pillow peddlers who'd pay a fortune to live there. They could live forever!

      This isn't a problem, it's an opportunity!

      --
      No sig today...
    72. Re:Why replace? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because your computer casings are likely metalic and shortcutting the field. Otherwise your hardrive would instantly die on far far less strong fields. (Or more precisely the data on your hard drive would die)
      In trains in germany the back side of the seats have a small table that you can "swipe open". Ten years ago those tables where hold when not in use with a magnet. A big sticker on the table warned not to put a laptop on it. Many people did not see the sticker and destroyed their hard drives. Meanwhile the holding mechanism is a different one.
      (P.S. how can someone work in physics, and not know that HDDs save data magnetic or if he knows it, believe a strong external magnetic field would be harmless? Don't you learn anything in school in our days?)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    73. Re:Why replace? by grrrl · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that magnets cannot affect HDDs. I was making the point that magnetic fields generated in the vicinity of functional HDDs is highly unlikely to cause data loss.

    74. Re:Why replace? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      "Ninjas snuck into my house and erased them" would at least be statistically possible.

      Joking aside, if they really are seeing all these effects then the cause is probably human. Maybe the downstairs neighbor has a Frankenstein/Tesla/Van-der-Graaf playground set up and all this bad stuff happens whenever he plays his Thermin.

      --
      No sig today...
    75. Re:Why replace? by adolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      True... but the sheet steel used to form the case of almost all PCs would provide very good magnetic shielding.

      Flat sheet steel does little to curb static magnetic fields.

      Experiment: Find a CRT, and a magnet. Observe how they behave together. Next, put something steel (the side from a PC case?) between the two, and observer that they behave almost the same... Feel free to repeat with iron filings, aluminum and steel cans, old license plates, or whatever. It shields somewhat, and does a bit of scattering, but it's lousy (and certainly not "very good").

      One can use an appropriately curved chunk of curved steel to accomplish some shielding. See, for instance, shielded speakers, which use a cup to completely surround the magnet, sometimes in addition to a second magnet which is only used to help counteract the external field of the first.

      But, you know, your PC case isn't shaped like that.

      There are certain high-permeability materials (Mu-metal being one) which do far better, but they're pretty far removed from the common mild steel of a PC. (I haven't verified this, but I've read that Mu-metal is used on the back side of the neodymium magnets inside of a hard drive, and if that is the case it would easily explain how one side sticks ferociously to the side of the fridge, and the other side won't even pick up a paper clip.)

    76. Re:Why replace? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Creeping drive failure is not uncommon. Especially in that era.

      A competent and reputable manufacturer would have replaced the drive.

      On the first visit.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    77. Re:Why replace? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the steel case of the PC would divert the magnetic field away from the hard drive.

      Not if it was made out of the same steel as the eletro-magic beams used in those Ohio houses ;-)

    78. Re:Why replace? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I was making the point that magnetic fields generated in the vicinity of functional HDDs is highly unlikely to cause data loss.

      Year, and this point is simply wrong, it is highly likely not unlikely ...

      However if you have competent IT they know that you are working with magnetic fields and use either shielded HDDs or shield the whole computer (which is pretty simple to do).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    79. Re:Why replace? by redwraith94 · · Score: 2

      I second this post. Some hard drive media hits 4-10k Oersteds now, and my 2.1 Tesla NdFeB magnet can't erase today's hard drives while it is sitting on top of them, while they are running (they just slow down a bit). Also any of my phones, cordless, or cellular haven't even noticed the same magnets sitting on the outside of their cases. (With regard to call quality, it does mess with the gelocation / magnetic sensor) There is no way that those 'steel joists in the walls' have anywhere near that strong field right next to them, let alone over the air gap of an entire room. As for the T.V., throw away your crt, and get an lcd, led, or plasma, none of those technologies are effect by magnets. I also second the post about ac permanently magnetizing steel (it doesn't happen). Let alone the fact that you would need thosands of Amps, turns, or meters of wire to have a noticeable effect. Somebody never took their middle school physics class. Bloody Pagans.

      --
      I art more snarky, and terse than thou. I art Slashdot!
    80. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I stand by my original statement that it is highly UNlikely to cause data loss. Hard drives are sufficiently shielded already.

      I've had my macbook laptop (plastic case for the laptop, but presumably metal case for the HDD) nearby during high magnetic field experiments and never suffered any data loss, nor have the assortment of various as-is (no special shielding) computers scattered around the lab.

      Unless you have any evidence of experience with failed hard drives due to magnetic field exposure other than close quarters placement of a permanent magnet?

      And for the record, the magnetic field is easily sufficient to cause CRT screens to go funky colours.

      Also the statement about competent IT made me laugh. :)

    81. Re:Why replace? by newslash.formatblows · · Score: 1

      I don't think they make a magnet strong enough to lift change (US change, at least) out of your pocket. It's not ferrous. But yeah, this is crap. Wouldn't take much banging around with a hammer to remove whatever remnant of magnetization is left on a steel beam anyway.

    82. Re:Why replace? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Wrong point? Ever opened up a platter HDD? Lots of strong magnets in there.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    83. Re:Why replace? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "A competent and reputable manufacturer would have replaced the drive.

      On the first visit."

      Glad you don't work for me, you're not competent.

      A competent tech for any manufacturer would MAKE SURE THE SUSPECTED FAILING PART IS FAILING FIRST. If not, identify what is causing the actual MoF.

      Christ, that's troubleshooting 101. Just replacing parts ala "shotgun method" it is just wasteful.

      Speaking from former experience as a repair tech, and as a systems builder.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    84. Re:Why replace? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "the field would have to be strong enough to yank the change out of your pocket as soon as you walked into the room."

      As I will point out, whomever said that obviously has zero clue that today's currency in the USA is hardly magnetic. Even nickels aren't really made of much nickel.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    85. Re:Why replace? by PaulK · · Score: 1

      Zinc.

    86. Re:Why replace? by Bardwick · · Score: 1

      Still in use actually. I was on a carrier in 93 and 95. Degaussed both years during sea trials.

    87. Re:Why replace? by znerk · · Score: 1

      Creeping drive failure is not uncommon. Especially in that era.

      A competent and reputable manufacturer would have replaced the drive.

      On the first visit.

      A: We weren't a manufacturer.
      B: We tested the drive before we wiped and reloaded, of course.
      C: Informing her to not put the magnets back on the case appeared to resolve the issue.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    88. Re:Why replace? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Which BTW was EXACTLY what the Philadelphia experiment was all about.

    89. Re:Why replace? by omarius · · Score: 1

      Bidden or unbidden, EMF is present.

    90. Re:Why replace? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I usually only find 2 strong ones. Sometimes if I am lucky I find 4 strong ones but they are much smaller than the ones with only 2.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    91. Re:Why replace? by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      Could an ambient magnetic field scrag the seek calibration?

    92. Re:Why replace? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Maybe the downstairs neighbor has a Frankenstein/Tesla/Van-der-Graaf playground set up and all this bad stuff happens whenever he plays his Thermin.

      Last time I checked, houses don't have downstairs neighbors.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    93. Re:Why replace? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Very likely it is bad wiring causing the real problems, the magnetic beam is just a red herring. I'd almost bet money that they used aluminum wiring and screwed it up. They just need Ghost Hunters to go through the place with EMF meters.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    94. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the visual!

    95. Re:Why replace? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      unshielded longer HDMI and analog signal cables is all I could think of for the TV. Cordless phone is probably more a faraday cage effect.

    96. Re:Why replace? by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      • All ferrites saturate; transformers stop working, inductors lose inductance, beads are not doing filtering anymore.
      • All circulators / isolators (if there are any in these phones) go bananas

      Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    97. Re:Why replace? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Joists, not beams. So there's a lot of 'em in the house.

    98. Re:Why replace? by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      I don't the there would be enough steel beams to give you a mesh fine enough for a Faraday cage.

    99. Re:Why replace? by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I have heard if such an incident. If the source of the magnetism is not from within the house, then two others possibilities come to mind (this is a guess), which are: proximity to power lines (above ground or below) or maybe something geological?

      ahh yes geological. Maybe they failed to enter the numbers into their computer at the correct time.

    100. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "charge" appears at no point in the actual article. Since there is no attribution, the summary was probably written by samzenpus. He or she is technically illiterate, and you really shouldn't pay any attention to any technical terms he or she decides to use in a summary. The summary will be right or wrong only by accident.

      The interesting part to me is this:

      In 2004, couples Paul Jones and Latosha Sanders and Eric and Ginger Estep each paid around $145,000 for new houses built by Centex in Canal Winchester. When they later told Centex about the magnetized joists, Centex said that was not covered under the limited warranty included in their sales contracts.

      By signing the contracts, the buyers agreed to waive claims for repairs except those specifically mentioned in a separate document, which was available for inspection at a separate location and not before or at the time they bought the houses.

      They bought a house with a limited warranty, but the warranty document they signed didn't say what the warranty covered, and they weren't given a list of what the warranty covered? And two judges have already agreed with the builder that the warranty doesn't really cover anything? The buyers have terrible lawyers. Not only are they bamboozled by insanely stupid science, they're apparently bamboozled by laws.

    101. Re:Why replace? by BattleApple · · Score: 2

      What I want to know is how the hell the joists picked up such a magnetic potential in the first place.

      This is a stretch, but if you orient a steel bar with the north and south poles and hit it with a hammer, it will become magnetized.. maybe the joists were dropped from a height while they were pointing N/S

    102. Re:Why replace? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      To me it's more likely that they have some kind of electrical fault in their house - like a missing ground connection to the power grid that randomly cooks items due to overvoltage.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    103. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a contract once with a recruiting firm. I set up their PCs, network etc and did some coding for them.

      After a a few days a hard drive went corrupt. We replaced it, reinstalled the OS, then 2 more pcs died the next day. At this point I noticed the monitors were magnetically damaged or taking damage. They had color bands and were distorted. At first I thought the phones were causing it (due to a small magnet in the handset, but ruled that out by holding the handset next to the monitor to see if the distortion would follow the handset. It didn't. Then I moved the entire monitor around and the distortion moved as I moved the monitor.

      I noticed the furniture was metal, so for shits and giggles I took a blank I had knocked out from a steel box (running network wiring) and held it up to desk. It jumped out of my hand and stuck to the desk frame from over an inch away. I checked them all and sure enough every desk in there was very magnetized. He had picked up the desks at a office furniture surplus place.

      All of his monitors were ruined and hard drives were going bad from it. I pointed this out, he replaced the desks and chairs and the problems stopped. Degaussing the monitors didn't help much.

      So it doesn't take THAT much of a magnetic field to ruin media, at least back in the mid 90's. I didn't measure the field and I have no idea what the hard drives were made from but magnetized furniture can easily ruin computer hardware.

      If this guys beams were magnetized and his pc sat on the floor above them, personally I think it's quite possible he could see some effect from the field.A beam is a big chunk of metal compared to a desk and the distance from beam to box is probably actually closer than the pcs were to the desk, if the pc is sitting directly above the beam.

      Besides who says they had a stack of beams on the truck beds? If it's a main beam, they'd only need 2 for an average 2 story house. As well a lot of truck beds are covered in a layer of wood several inches thick. That might be thick enough to be able to lift the beams with only marginally more force than it would take if they weren't magnetized.

      I don't think you've fully considered this post.

    104. Re:Why replace? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Is possible that the magnets weren't affecting the hard drive itself but the data in the unshielded drive cables, causing corruption to be written to disk.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    105. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a blacksmith, the orientation of the steel's magnetic poles would occur at the curie point. which is depending on the alloy of steel between 1400 and 1600 degrees Fahrenheit. By the time the steel was rolled to stock (at foundry), and then formed to shape (at factory). Chances are the factory cold formed the studs. The steel would not be still aligning while it is being stacked. The steel would be magnetic in the sense a magnet would stick, not magnetic in the sense that it left the factory as a magnet.

      The problem the house is having is due to after installation of the metal studs and poor wiring. This could be caused by grounding issues in the home, where the electrical grounds are connecting to the house and not to the actual ground wire or a ground wire is touching a stud somewhere in the wall. Bottom line the Builder screwed up during installation, and needs to fix the home.

    106. Re:Why replace? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Or is Canadian. Pennies, nickels, dimes, quarters, and half dollars here are all copper or nickel plated steel, the loonie is bronze plated nickel, and the toonie is nickel with a copper centre.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    107. Re:Why replace? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      Anyway, the idea was that a battleship is hugely massive and hard to degauss compared to a few girders in a drywall construction home.

      Degaussing the home is therefor quite feasible

      A battleship is an independently moving vehicle. Good luck getting the house into a dry-dock....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    108. Re:Why replace? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current

      just because it's not ferrous doesn't mean you can't effect it with magnetic fields, it just makes it a good bit harder.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    109. Re:Why replace? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      A faraday cage does nothing to impede a signal coming in via coax or UTP, as anything being displayed on the TV these days would (unless they are using OTA, in which case they SHOULD be putting the antenna outside anyways if they want to enjoy watching it whatsoever)

      This covers phones as well, (excepting mobiles, which MIGHT be effected but those steel beams are not gonna do it...)

      Lets see... we'll go conservative in your favor and assume their mobiles are on the 800mhz band... That's a ~40cm wavelength. You'd have to space the beams 20cm apart to really start having success blocking that signal I believe.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    110. Re:Why replace? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Easily, considering most HDDs while 'shielded' have a heat venting hole that EMF can leak through.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    111. Re:Why replace? by Transkaren · · Score: 1

      Probably not, no. It'd have to be 1-1/4" or so (3.3 cm), which is effectively impossible with joists. If there's a concrete floor reinforced with some form of steel *fiber* - as opposed to rebar - I could see that interfering. Or steel mesh on the walls. Heh. I designed a house a few years ago that had chicken wire in the walls. I wonder if they can get 900Mhz reception?

      --
      -If it's worth doing, it's worth doing well.
    112. Re:Why replace? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Mu-metal acts as a short in the magnetic circuit. If it's merely attached to the back of a flat magnet, it won't do much as it's more-or-less an open circuit, magnetically: the magnetic field lines will pass right through it, they have nowhere else to go. If it were to go around the magnet, though, it'd be a whole different thing.

      You'll find Mu-metal shields around cathode ray oscilloscope tubes. I think every Tektronix scope I have has one. The metal is fragile in the sense that mechanical stresses from handling can easily kill its performance. It then has to be re-annealed IIRC.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    113. Re:Why replace? by tibit · · Score: 1

      One more thing: IIRC, 2D slices of magnetic circuits have analogs in 2D conductive electric sheets. Magnetic field lines are replaced with electric current. So you can visualize free space as some conductive material, and then imagine that Mu-metal on "back of the magnet" being a thin bar placed on such sheet with higher conductivity, and the magnet being two other conductive bars with a voltage source attached to them. You can measure the analog of magnetic field gradient using a voltmeter ;)

      The analogy of course has limitations, but if you can visualize flow of current in your head, you can visualize magnetic field lines, too.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    114. Re:Why replace? by rot26 · · Score: 1

      You've told this story so many times that you're starting to believe it yourself. Were you trained as a chimney sweep, perhaps?

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    115. Re:Why replace? by Jbcarpen · · Score: 1

      Ok, so they don't make a permanent magnet strong enough to lift change out of your pocket.

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
    116. Re:Why replace? by rot26 · · Score: 1

      Another graduate of the Close Cover Before Striking School of Electrical Engineering and Cosmetology.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    117. Re:Why replace? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Great. So the joists are magnetized in both directions, and you'll have to degauss them twice.

    118. Re:Why replace? by i_b_don · · Score: 1

      Maybe on the fourth try she got tired of taking it back to the same guys who couldn't seem to fix her problem?

      d

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    119. Re:Why replace? by i_b_don · · Score: 1

      ... but EIDE cables are always unshielded. They should have some checksum to validate the integrity of the data. Also, magnets wouldn't effect data traveling over data cables. If you had moving magnets that could generate noise on the cables, but stationary magnets won't do anything to data transmission.

      (The reason it effects your HDD is because it's a magnetic platter, not because of the electronics inside.)

      d

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    120. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually an excellent idea, albiet a little bit of an obvious solution. There is only one problem with it, though. Who is going to pay for it, the home owner, or the insurance company? Or did you miss the WHOLE FUCKING POINT OF THE DISCUSSION ISN"T WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT, RATHER WHO IS GOING TO FUCKING PAY FOR IT??

    121. Re:Why replace? by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      Actually they are small magnets, and have very strong magnetic field, in one direction only.

      Using a jeweler's screwdriver as a lever they separate very easily. Of course if you forget to remove the screws holding them in, they are very hard to remove.

      The magnetic field is very very localized. The backing plates they are attached to are thick enough to block the magnetic field on the other side. And by thick enough, I mean they are less than 5 mm in thickness.

      I routinely take apart hard drives for my office just so I can get the magnets. They serve as a very nice fridge magnet. They suck for holding the beer bottle opener though.

    122. Re:Why replace? by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Did the electrican wrap some power cables around it?

      That's what I'd guess. If you read the actual article and research the case a little (yeah, yeah, I know, I know) you find out that the house has a laundry list of defects that indicate massive builder incompetence. They've probably got 120vac lines wound around a spool in the wall behind the TV, because the electrician was too drunk to unwind it.

      Check this out, though, from the complaint:

      By signing the contracts, the buyers agreed to waive claims for repairs except those specifically mentioned in a separate document, which was available for inspection at a separate location and not before or at the time they bought the houses.

      These people displayed a level of moronism and susceptibility to salesdroid brainwashing that's really staggering. This gets down to the usual slashdot argument of "should people have to live by caveat emptor in an age when it's impossible for the average joe to know everything about everything, or is it legitimate for tax-supported government to mandate a certain level of integrity on the part of sellers in order to serve the common good?"

      I hate to advocate saving people from their own stupidity, but if we don't, then vicious amoral predators will band together to fleece the weakest and end up subverting government to concentrate all wealth and power in the hands of the most corrupt and... Oh, wait. Yeah, right, never mind, I guess.

    123. Re:Why replace? by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

      try touching a nickel with a magnet some time. Magnetism isn't limited to iron.

    124. Re:Why replace? by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to me that you've never heard of a duplex.

    125. Re:Why replace? by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, houses don't have downstairs neighbors.

      You don't get out much do you?

      Many houses are split family units with one family up stairs and the other down stairs.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    126. Re:Why replace? by godefroi · · Score: 1

      One particular corner of my parents' house would distort CRT monitors (rotate them, actually). This corner, unfortunately, was where my bedroom was. I had to pay a bit extra for the monitor with the "rotate" knob so I could dial it back in.

      Irritating.

      My drives were never wiped, however.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    127. Re:Why replace? by NexusJedi · · Score: 1

      Grues are really terrible neighbors.

    128. Re:Why replace? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to me that you've never heard of a duplex.

      My wording may have been bad, but these houses (from the article) have not been mentioned to be duplexes.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    129. Re:Why replace? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      agreed

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    130. Re:Why replace? by plover · · Score: 1

      Really? A knockout slug jumped over an inch to stick to a desk? That's an incredibly bold claim.

      I just did some quick desktop experiments with a bunch of different magnets recovered from hard drives. One was a half inch diameter neodymium disk, one was a broken half of a half-inch diameter neodymium disk, one was a 1.75 x .5 x .375 ceramic bar (it was from a very old MFM hard drive from the 1980s), and one was a one inch thick stack of neodymium magnets of varying shapes, with a half inch disk as the final magnet. The magnets were affixed to a vertical metal surface. A plastic ruler served as the test bed. A steel binder clip was used as the test subject. The arms of the clip were angled slightly down in such a way that allowed the clip to ride on the rounded edge of the spring steel portion and the back end was supported by one curve of the arms, minimizing the points of contact on the ruler and the resulting friction. The ruler was held horizontally in the air, and I slid the binder clip slowly towards each magnet's pole, measuring the distance between the clip and the magnet at the point where the binder clip was attracted to it. Here are my results.

      Whole disk: 3/4 inch.
      Half disk: 1/2 inch.
      Ceramic bar: 1-1/4 inch.
      Stack: 1-3/4 inch.

      As a double-check, I stood one of the whole neodymium disk magnets on edge, and slid it along the ruler with the flat side (pole) facing the vertical metal surface, and it jumped to the metal at a distance of 1-1/8 inch. The half-disk was able to make the jump at 1 inch. That's an actual neodymium magnet performing the same feat you claimed of a mild steel knockout slug.

      So you're telling me that this office furniture, also no doubt made of mild carbon steel, had a stronger magnetic field than an actual rare earth magnet created with the express purpose of being a powerful magnet? You were literally sitting on a revolution in magnetic technology, but didn't sell the furniture to Seagate for millions of dollars?

      Instead, you claim to us that this improbably super-magnetic furniture was at fault for the PCs going corrupt. That is, the PCs that you set up going corrupt. Since you described this as PCs in the mid 1990s, you're probably talking about Windows 95 or Windows 3.1 or 3.11 on DOS 6.2. You had just installed them, and they went corrupt within a few days.

      Occam's razor is going to suggest that while it's possible that a stray magnetic field magnetized the mask causing the color distortion you saw on the monitors, with the field possibly even originating from magnetized furniture, it's highly likely that the software of the day was corrupt all on its own for one of many very common reasons: new hardware with new and poorly tested or not-current driver software, bad installation media, unclean installation with a virus, infant mortality of the drives, or any of a half dozen non-magnetic reasons for corruption.

      There's just not enough truth in your story to believe that "unbelievably powerful magnets corrupted your computers".

      --
      John
    131. Re:Why replace? by skgrey · · Score: 1

      This is a great example of why I sincerely appreciate ./

      Thank you not only for saying what I was thinking about how ridiculous this story is and giving a great technical example, but for the brilliant imagery of a truck driving down the road and passing cars getting sucked magnetically toward the load. I actually laughed out loud at that. That made a terrible Friday quite a bit better.

    132. Re:Why replace? by newslash.formatblows · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Ferromagnetic_materials Mostly nickel, iron, cobalt. Copper & zinc - not much.

    133. Re:Why replace? by newslash.formatblows · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm familiar with eddy currents. And a stationary magnetic field is still not going to lift change out of your pocket.

    134. Re:Why replace? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      but the duration is not enough to magnetize the beams.

      Magnetization occurs very quickly, nanoseconds to milliseconds depending upon the material and the physical size and shape of the material.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    135. Re:Why replace? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      um, no. They might of screwed with the data moving along the bus, and it would take time.

      Do this:
      Find an old HD. Hook it up externally to the computer. Set a fridge magnet on it. See what happens to the data.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    136. Re:Why replace? by plover · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. I just imagined how stupid it would look if Michael Bay made a movie about it, then started typing. :-)

      --
      John
    137. Re:Why replace? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      The platters may be spinning, but current won't flow in the platters, so the fact that they're spinning pretty much means nothing. In any case, that's irrelevant to my post, since I was responding to an AC who suggested that the magnetic field would throw off the position of the heads in the hard drive and didn't say anything about the spinning platters. Moving the goalposts after the play is over is a pretty lousy rhetorical technique.

      I'd like to elaborate on the static vs moving magnetic fields and how they relate to the heads. A hard drive works in any orientation. It doesn't matter if it's upside down, sideways, lying at an angle, etc. So, the heads obviously can manage to operate with 1G working on them in any direction. Since it has to deal with all kinds of vibrations during operation, the g-forces the heads can withstand while still functioning normally are probably quite a lot higher than that. If the force of the magnetic field in this house were anywhere near 1G at the distance the computer is to the magnetized structural members then it would be really easy to find the magnetized parts by all the metal objects stuck to the wall/ceiling/floor. For that matter, unless the magnetic force is either pulling straight up or down, it would probably be dragging the whole computer across the desk if it were that strong. So, a static magnetic force that isn't dragging objects across the room, would not be strong enough to make any difference to the heads. A moving magnetic field probably wouldn't do anything unless it were incredibly strong as well, but it's possible to conceive of a moving field that could vibrate metal objects or even induce current in them in ways that might interfere with the heads in a hard drive without being noticeable to humans in the room. It's still not very likely.

    138. Re:Why replace? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      When you live in a basement for long enough, you start to discount the possibility that someone could live below you, I suppose.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    139. Re:Why replace? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      US nickels are actually 75% copper and 25% nickel which is not enough nickel to make them noticeably magnetic. On the other hand, old Canadian nickels are almost pure nickel and are clearly magnetic. Newer Canadian "nickels" are nickel-plated steel so they are magnetic too.

    140. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet magnetic crane abuse. A crane with strong electromagnet instead of hook is normally used to transport beams and other heavy elements between storage and cargo,

      Actually this couldn't happen. They only use magnets to move metal in scrap yards. All iron after the production process is moved using rigging such has wire rope or chains. The reason is people are close to the material when it is being moved either in a shop or when being erected. Magnets let go sometimes and you don't want to be standing at the end of a beam guiding it when the magnet lets go. Its also against safety requirements to move iron without proper rigging.

      This story is really BS. The only way I have seen iron used in construction that it effected radio signals or caused interference is layers of mats of rebar in concrete walls. This creates a Faraday cage so signals can't get out. Magnetism has nothing to do with it.

      I was a structural Ironworker for 20 years.

    141. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read that Mu-metal is used on the back side of the neodymium magnets inside of a hard drive, and if that is the case it would easily explain how one side sticks ferociously to the side of the fridge, and the other side won't even pick up a paper clip.

      I have more than 20 magnets taken out of harddrives (different manufacturers and sizes, from about 2GB to 200GB) stuck on various whiteboards at work. They are all extremely difficult to remove when stuck directly to the board, no matter which of the flat side faces the board.

    142. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if i wasn't too lazy to log in, i would plus you. score

    143. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad wiring, perhaps? Running electrical wires in close proximity to the steel joists could cause magnetization of the joists over time. Iron and its alloys are pretty easy to magnetize in that manner./quote

      Last I checked we use alternating current in this country.

      This situation sounds more like interference from "Data Over Powerlines" than magnetic interference. If the affected people contact the FCC to see if RF emissions are "leaking" in their area, perhaps the power company can be made to correct the problem. The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) is very proactive about this sort of problem, as well. Data over power lines is evil !!

    144. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to mention that the term "Broadband Over Powerlines" (BPL) is the correct nomenclature for this instance---it's RF imposed upon power lines for the purpose of bringing Internet access to rural areas, but is fraught with problems in the RF spectrum that causes a myriad of problems to all types of "receiving" devices.

    145. Re:Why replace? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      So what about someone abusing magnetic crane to move construction materials? We're not talking about regular operation, just "corner cutting" and the likes. Say, a bunch of beams sold as scrap from a bankrupt developer, halfway from scrapyard to iron works get redirected to a construction site, to be used as actual construction elements - because wow, so cheap!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    146. Re:Why replace? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think most houses old enough to be haunted would have been framed with wood rather than light-gauge steel anyway.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    147. Re:Why replace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it couldn't be present, for all the reasons he stated.

    148. Re:Why replace? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      The level of magnetism in most of the magnets was barely enough to keep it attached to the metal shrouding the PC, yet it was sufficient to corrupt her hard...

      I have to call bullshit here. If the magnets are so weak they barely stick to steal, then they are not going to hurt a harddrive. Even if you opened the drive and touched the platter, their magnetic field is just not strong enough. To understand this better, find the episode of Mythbusters where they test ways to erase a magnetic strip (i.e. credit card.)

      As an aside, but also supporting evidence: studies have shown that server hard drives can be affected by hard drives (in the same machine or in other servers) physically adjacent; causing issues not only via magnetic influence, but also via vibration.

      What study (must less studies)? Vibration I would accept. But neighboring magnetics... No. Just. No.

    149. Re:Why replace? by znerk · · Score: 1

      In retrospect, I think it is much more likely that the magnets were affecting the motherboard half an inch from the exterior wall of the tower, rather than the drives. It is even possible that the CPU was affected, which would explain the wonky behavior much better than the drives being affected. Data corruption doesn't necessarily indicate and issue with the storage device.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    150. Re:Why replace? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You can attach a neodymium magnet to a hard drive and not lose data. I hardly think a steel beam could produce enough magnetism to cause anything to happen to a hard drive.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    151. Re:Why replace? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      She must have forgot to remove the fridge magnets, but remembered to remove the 3 ton electromagnet.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    152. Re:Why replace? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, true.

      I theorize that the magnet is polarized with one end being north, and the other being south (instead of one flat side being north, and the other side being south).

      This fits well with my understanding of voice coils, as well: If it were polarized in any other direction, the head stack wouldn't move in a useful axis.

      So, covering one entire flat side of it will short the magnetic field on that side. Whether it's completely shorted or not is not important -- the field is still easily demonstrated to be extremely weak on the other side of whatever that backing plate is made from, while concurrently amusingly strong on the other side, and all that differentiates the two sides is a fairly thin bit of mostly-flat, stamped sheet metal.

      Meanwhile, the more I read about Mu-metal proper, the more I doubt that this is the same exact material (it primarily has to withstand the stress of a busy and relatively massive headstack - magnetic shielding is obviously secondary), but there's obviously a myriad of other metallurgical alternatives which perform the role of short-circuiting better than mild steel...

      As to re-annealing: Wouldn't raising the temperature above the Curie point be adequate? Or is that merely synonymous in magnetic parlance with "re-annealing"?

    153. Re:Why replace? by tibit · · Score: 1

      You've got me, I'm not sure how far you have to go to "re-anneal".

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    154. Re:Why replace? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Not sure why you think it would block TV signals, which come down a cable in the US.

      Uhhh... I've never known broadcast TV to come via anything but rabbit ears.

      Do you have many rooftop antennas in your area or something?

  2. I have to wonder... by Kiralan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... just how strong the magnetic field is, for it to affect the hard drive of a computer at any likely distance. It seems like metal objects would be flying through the air and sticking to the floor. Also, I have to wonder how a static magnetic field would affect most phones. Seems there would have to be an alternating field of some sort to do so. Finally, any links to the 'numbers' (field strength, gauss, whatever the proper term is)?

    --
    V for Vendetta: People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
    1. Re:I have to wonder... by Vegemeister · · Score: 2

      If it was strong enough to affect hard drives, it may have been strong enough to attenuate the phones' signals by cyclotron resonance.

      Of course, by the time hard disks are affected I think they'd start noticing dropped aluminum objects drifting lazily to the ground.

    2. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, something definitely seems fishy here. You have to have a really strong magnetic field to affect a hard drive from any distance. Are steel objects flying out of their hands and sticking to the corners of the room? And yes, magnetic fields should have zero effect on electronic equipment, unless it's moving (which creates an electric field). If the house is like those rotating restaurants, except much faster, and is spinning around a stationary phone, I can see how that would cause a problem...

    3. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty fucking likely to erase a hard drive. we had to open the cases to get a professional
      degausser to reliably erase hard drives.

      cause a crt to have distortion? yes. lcd? i dont think so. buy they a new flat screen.

      the steel beams are going to block cordless cell phones regardless of magnetic charge.

    4. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like BS to me. No random amount of metal is going to accidentally acquire enough of a magnetic charge to affect computer hard drives or phones. You can wave a magnet around a hard drive and nothing will happen: the field strength has to be significantly high at the platter to cause any damage. And by then you'd notice things being attracted to the walls way before caring about data corruption.

      (Minor) distortion in the picture of a CRT TV (these guys still use CRTs?) I can believe but not the others.

    5. Re:I have to wonder... by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yes, magnetic fields should have zero effect on electronic equipment, unless it's moving (which creates an electric field).

      And guess what a computer hard drive does 5400 to 10800 times a minute.

    6. Re:I have to wonder... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Magnets don't work that way. The claim is bullshit.

    7. Re:I have to wonder... by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

      ... just how strong the magnetic field is, for it to affect the hard drive of a computer at any likely distance. It seems like metal objects would be flying through the air and sticking to the floor. Also, I have to wonder how a static magnetic field would affect most phones. Seems there would have to be an alternating field of some sort to do so. Finally, any links to the 'numbers' (field strength, gauss, whatever the proper term is)?

      I'd love to know if they've checked the quality of the electricity supply in the house. Dirty power supplies can wreak havoc.

    8. Re:I have to wonder... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Magnetic fields also effect any electronics that involve electric currents, which is... all of them.

    9. Re:I have to wonder... by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

      but the casing of (all?) commercial HDDs is designed to attenuate magnetic fields. this is because there is a great big honking rare earth magnet built right into the drive, just inches away from the platter. It is used to drive the voice coil actuator that moves the head around. Having that just a few inches away from floppy diskette drives (now a rarity, but still) without such attenuation would have been "Bad, M'kay."

      to not only have sufficient magnetic flux at the platter surface, but also be sufficient to cause electrical eddies inside the platters due to the rotation, the walls would have to be several million tesla in magnetic potential.

      Flying forks and hallucenations would be occuring long before this would become a problem.

    10. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, so what? A hard drive is magnetically and EMI shielded, for one thing (it's encased in metal), but we're talking about a house's structural members interfering with a phone, not a hard drive interfering with a phone. Probably everyone here has both a hard drive (or several), and a phone (or several); anyone experiencing interference between the two? The house owners are complaining of the house itself causing problems with their hard drives and their phones, not of their hard drives interfering with their phones.

      Finally, hard drive platters, while coated with a magnetic substance, don't have much overall magnetism by themselves. Take one apart, take the platter out, and see if you can get it to stick to anything steel; it won't. The great source of magnetism in the HD is from the read-write head, which actually doesn't move very much (it just moves back and forth in a small arc), and also from some rather strong permanent magnets that are affixed to the HD chassis (used in the arm mechanism), and which don't move at all.

    11. Re:I have to wonder... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's surrounded by a Faraday's Cage... twice.

      I am very familiar with the effects of strong magnetic fields. To get such an effect you would have to have an active wide-band transmitter (to affect TV's, computers and everything else that's claimed) and the power consumption of the house alone (if it's even possible to create a magnet that size with the amount of ferro-magnetic material available) would be through the roof. A magnet with that power would require supercooling and at least a couple of residential power supplies from the power company to magnetize the space of a large living room.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    12. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Magnets, how do they work?

    13. Re:I have to wonder... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Static magnetic fields definitely /do/ affect CRT displays, and it doesn't require that strong of a field, either.
      Any regular old bar magnet will cause significant distortion (picture, color); actually this is one of the best ways of visualizing magnetic fields for students. Though it requires an old TV no one cares about it's a bit more exciting than iron filings or "black sand."
      The Exploratorium in San Francisco has an exhibit demonstrating this.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    14. Re:I have to wonder... by tibit · · Score: 1

      True to that. Have you ever played with the voice coil magnets from a hard drive? They are strong as hell, and in spite of being in a magnetic circuit there's plenty of leakage from them that's strong enough to let you feel stickiness of various hard drives to steel, no disassembly required. Try it -- you need to have different drives at hand as with some the effect is stronger than others. Even laptop drives, such as Hitachi's used by Apple, show this effect. Obviously, hard drives survive all that just fine. Two very strong magnets literally millimeters away from the platters.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    15. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      While it's been a long time since my EM Fields classes, I don't believe that is correct. You have to have a moving or changing magnetic field to create an electric field (which is why transformers for instance only work with AC), and generally, a static magnetic field should not affect electronics. There are some exceptions, however, for components which themselves use magnetism, namely inductors and transformers which have iron cores. If the static field is strong enough, it could saturate the iron cores of these components, causing them to not work as designed. But you don't see transformers much in modern electronics (they've been replaced with switch-mode power supplies), though you do see inductors, mainly in those SMPSes. Anyhow, the strength of a static magnetic field needed to have any effect on this stuff would have to be huge. Sticking your computer inside an MRI, for instance, would probably affect it. But an MRI is strong enough to suck in large metal objects from around the room at high velocity. There's nothing here saying this house's structural members were magnetized to that extent (nor would it be possible, I should think, unless they made them of exotic rare-earth materials which would of course make them poor structural members). If this were the case, the owners would be complaining that all their metal objects were sticking to the walls, a much worse problem than their phone not working!

    16. Re:I have to wonder... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>And yes, magnetic fields should have zero effect on electronic equipment

      You never used a TV before flatscreens, I take it?

      The electrons being shot out by a CRT are pretty sensitive to magnetic fields, and a strong source nearby definitely can warp or distort the scene being displayed. Permanently, too, if you are dumb enough to directly stick a magnet to the box.

    17. Re:I have to wonder... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      And guess what a computer hard drive does 5400 to 10800 times a minute.

      I have a pair of 15K RPM SCSI drives that beg to differ. ;-)

    18. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's true; in another post here I also mention that (sufficiently large) static fields will affect other magnetic components such as transformers and iron-core inductors. However, CRTs are pretty much dead these days except in a very few specialized applications. A lot of readers here probably don't even have any any more. I've got one here near me, but it's part of a 35-year-old oscilloscope....

    19. Re:I have to wonder... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      ... just how strong the magnetic field is, for it to affect the hard drive of a computer at any likely distance. It seems like metal objects would be flying through the air and sticking to the floor. Also, I have to wonder how a static magnetic field would affect most phones. Seems there would have to be an alternating field of some sort to do so. Finally, any links to the 'numbers' (field strength, gauss, whatever the proper term is)?

      I would think that for a magnetic field of the magnitude claimed tesla would be the appropriate measurement. 10,000 gauss= 1 tesla.

    20. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You never used a TV before flatscreens, I take it?

      I have, but like many people I've ditched CRT TVs, so this really shouldn't be a concern for most people. But yes, if you still have some antique equipment around (perhaps an old oscilloscope or arcade game), then static fields should be a concern for you, however even though CRTs can be affected by relatively weak fields (it's not like you need an MRI nearby to see the effect!), I seriously doubt that the frame members in a steel-framed house could create a field strong enough to make a noticeable difference on an old CRT. Steel framing is nothing new at all; while it's somewhat new for houses, it's been used in commercial buildings for what, over 100 years now? If there were any real problems with magnetization, we'd have seen it by now.

    21. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nice summary of the situation. It will keep you from looking silly: http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/affect.html

    22. Re:I have to wonder... by Commontwist · · Score: 2

      Static magnetic fields definitely /do/ affect CRT displays, and it doesn't require that strong of a field, either. .

      They certainly do. One lady in my former workplace got a brand new 23" CRT monitor (bloody heavy and not missing CRTs of that size!) but when me and a co-worker installed it the picture was wonky at the top. We figured--new monitor, CRT, needs to warm up--but after a day or two it was still bad. Tried another--same thing.

      At this point we started checking her desk area and discovered that she had a whole box of children's magnets right above her old monitor's location. Didn't affect the 17" CRT but the 23" protested. She even had the darn collection there long enough that it magnetized the metal shelving it was on, affecting the 23" even when we moved the magnets. Put CRT in different spot while someone else replaced shelf--not us for we had done more than enough thanks to her.

      Morale of story? Do NOT bring a collection of magnets near your working computer's location. Ever. Yeesh!

    23. Re:I have to wonder... by djwoodard · · Score: 1

      I was really surprised how far down I had to read before someone made this comment.

    24. Re:I have to wonder... by headhot · · Score: 1

      From what I remember of EE210, a moving curent creates both an electric field and a magnetic field (right hand rule). I forget if there is no moving charge and a magnetic field, if a electric field would exist.

    25. Re:I have to wonder... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      From what I remember of EE210, a moving curent creates both an electric field and a magnetic field (right hand rule). I forget if there is no moving charge and a magnetic field, if a electric field would exist.

      If there is a non-moving charge, an electric field will exist. If there is no charge, and a changing magnetic field, an electric field will exist, if I remember correctly (it'll induce a current, meaning there's an electric field kicking the charges). If there's no charge, and a static magnetic field, I don't think an electric field will exist.

    26. Re:I have to wonder... by dido · · Score: 1

      I think your estimate is a little too high. Several million tesla is comparable to the magnetic field of a typical neutron star (magnetars are even more so...). Such a field would not just wipe every hard disk in the house and cause forks to fly, such a powerful field would probably wipe every magnetic storage device on the earth. Remember that even 1 T is already a ridiculously high unit of magnetic flux density... In order to achieve the claimed effects you'd still need a pretty strong magnetic field, probably at about 100 T, still not small potatoes (given that the world record for a continuous magnetic field is only 45 T, and a non-destructive pulsed magnetic field is 91 T), and yes, such a field would not just send forks flying and cause hallucinations: it'd probably be more than enough to cause everyone in the house to levitate.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    27. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, by the time hard disks are affected I think they'd start noticing dropped aluminum objects drifting lazily to the ground.

      i feel like a piece of dropped aluminium has just whooshed past my head -- can you clarify what effect you're talking about here, so i can go read about it? i wouldn't have expected anything aluminium to be affected by a magnet.

    28. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hallucenations would be occuring

      I think they already are...

    29. Re:I have to wonder... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      yeaaah...... its not the exact same thing, but watch this, it explains it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcVG6c_OvYU
      copper is non magnetic, but the magnet induces a current as it falls, the current creating a magnetic field, which interferes with the falling of the magnet, slowing it. The same effect would happen with aluminum tubing as well (as aluminum is conductive) In theory, a piece of aluminum or copper dropped in a magnetic room would experience the same effect.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    30. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, but like many people I've ditched CRT TVs, so this really shouldn't be a concern for most people
      There are lots of CRTs still out there -- this place isn't populated entirely by yuppies, you know.

    31. Re:I have to wonder... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      and yes, such a field would not just send forks flying and cause hallucinations: it'd probably be more than enough to cause everyone in the house to levitate.

      Long before that happened it would have extracted any metal objects embedded in their bodies (fillings, surgical screws, leftover forceps, etc.) as well as most of the hemoglobin in their blood.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    32. Re:I have to wonder... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      My bad-

      Still, the energies needed to induce eddies in the platters at several meters distance, through mild paramagnetic materials like aluminum, would be "accutely noticable" due to the inverse square law being in effect.

      People would be seeing stars after walking through the room, if not outright having siezures. This is because eddies would be generated inside their bains as they moved through the field, and they would be functionally closer to the source of said fields than the disc platters, so the field strength would be functionally higher.

    33. Re:I have to wonder... by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      If magnetic material (like, in a Hard Drive) is moving inside a static magnetic field, it'll produce a current. That'd probably be enough to wreak havoc on a hard drive.

    34. Re:I have to wonder... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      It's surrounded by a Faraday's Cage... twice.

      I am very familiar with the effects of strong magnetic fields. To get such an effect you would have to have an active wide-band transmitter (to affect TV's, computers and everything else that's claimed) and the power consumption of the house alone (if it's even possible to create a magnet that size with the amount of ferro-magnetic material available) would be through the roof. A magnet with that power would require supercooling and at least a couple of residential power supplies from the power company to magnetize the space of a large living room.

      Yes. I've seen the results of careless use of big magnets. Back in the early 1980's I was doing some contract programming at a local teaching hospital. At the time, they were installing a new MRI system (archaic by modern standards: the thing had an entire building just to itself, and another one for the power supply and liquid helium tanks.) One day a workman was carrying a big window air conditioner down a hallway that backed up against the real wall of the MRI facility. It turned out that they were testing the big magnets that afternoon, and chose that moment to fire them up. The field literally lifted that air conditioner out of his arms, and flung it down the hallway to tear through the wall and slam against the back of the magnet housing. Fortunately the worker was facing towards the magnet, and suffered only minor injuries when the A/C was torn out of his hands. Had he been facing the other way .... well. He was damn lucky.

      The next time I stopped by I noticed that that entire section had been walled off.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    35. Re:I have to wonder... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      They certainly do. One lady in my former workplace got a brand new 23" CRT monitor (bloody heavy and not missing CRTs of that size!) but when me and a co-worker installed it the picture was wonky at the top. We figured--new monitor, CRT, needs to warm up--but after a day or two it was still bad. Tried another--same thing.

      I used to fix TVs back in high school. This was back in the days before many TV sets had built-in degaussers: over time the Earth's magnetic field would affect the picture. I wound myself a 120 VAC degaussing coil, and used that on a pretty regular basis when doing alignments. Makes a wonderful display when moved around near a color CRT.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    36. Re:I have to wonder... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2

      ... just how strong the magnetic field is, for it to affect the hard drive of a computer at any likely distance. It seems like metal objects would be flying through the air and sticking to the floor. Also, I have to wonder how a static magnetic field would affect most phones. Seems there would have to be an alternating field of some sort to do so. Finally, any links to the 'numbers' (field strength, gauss, whatever the proper term is)?

      I'd love to know if they've checked the quality of the electricity supply in the house. Dirty power supplies can wreak havoc.

      Personally, I think there's a strong RF source nearby. Neighbor with a shortwave transmitter or something like that.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    37. Re:I have to wonder... by log0n · · Score: 1

      You can easily corrupt hard drives and TVs using pro audio speaker magnets (in the range of 50-200oz). A few years ago I did some playing around with a spare HD and a loose 18" PA sub driver (150oz? magnet iirc). Dumb simple, I had both sitting on a table and just moved the hard drive progressively closer to the magnet, the replugging back into the computer. Finally, at 10" away the computer was no longer able to recognize the drive as bootable.

    38. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There are? It's not just geeks who have been buying flat-screen TVs for the last 5 or so years, they've been selling them like hotcakes at places like Costco, despite all the economic turmoil. The switchover to HDTV really spurred a new wave of TV-buying, and I think it's safe to assume most of those buyers got rid of their old CRT sets.

    39. Re:I have to wonder... by Zuriel · · Score: 1

      10800 is 15k in drivemaker's RPM.

    40. Re:I have to wonder... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      **(Minor) distortion in the picture of a CRT TV (these guys still use CRTs?) I can believe but not the others.**

      Not that uncommon actually. Most CRT consumer devices --monitors,TVs-- are shielded and also automatically degauss themselves when they are turned on. But that may not help if the magnetic field causing the problem is strong and persistent. Back in the days when LCD monitors were uncommon and expensive, I had a problem with a CRT monitor. in one office displaying unusable video. It took a while to figure out that the problem wasn't Windows (for once) or the video card. We eventually traced it to a maze of HVAC control wiring on the back side of the wall the monitor was sitting against. Since rearranging the (tiny) office to put the monitor further from the wiring was not very feasible, the meager IT budget paid for an LCD monitor.

      There seems to be a considerable literature on CRT monitors and magnetic fields

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    41. Re:I have to wonder... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      They certainly do. One lady in my former workplace got a brand new 23" CRT monitor (bloody heavy and not missing CRTs of that size!) but when me and a co-worker installed it the picture was wonky at the top. We figured--new monitor, CRT, needs to warm up--but after a day or two it was still bad. Tried another--same thing.

      In Ontario, they had a portable MRI machine in a big rig that they'd haul from hospital to hospital. My friend was working in Hospital, and would dread every time it came. As soon as they'd power up the magnets, he'd get a whole raft of complaints because every monitor in the hospital would go wonky.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    42. Re:I have to wonder... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Still, the energies needed to induce eddies in the platters at several meters distance, through mild paramagnetic materials like aluminum, would be "accutely noticable" due to the inverse cube law being in effect.

      FIFY. Dipole magnets drop as inverse cube. Now maybe the builder has been sticking powerful magnetic monopoles in the walls. In which case, the home owners have a massive valuable asset, at least till someone steals it.

    43. Re:I have to wonder... by EricScott · · Score: 1

      Ever take a hard drive apart? Just 25mm from the platters are a set of freaking strong magnets. This story doesn't make sense.

    44. Re:I have to wonder... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I am clearly not an expert but my understanding is that as strong as those magnets are, not only are they installed in pairs, but the magnetic effect of the r/w head is so tightly focused that it is far stronger still.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what if the house magnet causes the heads to be out of position by a tiny amount? Oops, write and read errors until your drives are useless. I agree you can't wipe a HD with a small magnetic field but that doesn't mean you can't break one with nothing other than a small magnetic field.

    46. Re:I have to wonder... by mikael · · Score: 1

      With a colour CRT, there is actually a mask for each electron gun (RGB) so that the beams line up with the phosphor elements in the screen. Placing a strong magnetic field close to the screen will distort this mask, so that the beams and phosphor elements would not line up.

      A monochrome TV is safe enough - the picture on the screen will distort in in the shape of the o)|(o pattern of a bar magnet.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    47. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a question of strength, Just the presence of a large area field over a length of time would create heavy attenuation and interference above the noise floor.

    48. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's true. I'm not an HD expert, but I did read that one factor there is that those freaking strong magnets in HDs are oriented so that their magnetic fields don't affect the platters. Even so, I'm sure I could stick some of my handy magnetic toys near my computer case and it wouldn't affect the HDs at all, and these are fairly strong little magnets. There's no way some steel beam located at best several feet from the computer is going to have an effect on it when real, purpose-built permanent magnets have no effect only inches away. Plain steel just can't be made to have magnetic fields that strong; that's why any serious magnet is really a ceramic composite of some rare-earth elements. High-carbon steel I'm guessing has even less magnetic potential.

    49. Re:I have to wonder... by tftp · · Score: 1

      If magnetic material (like, in a Hard Drive) is moving inside a static magnetic field, it'll produce a current. That'd probably be enough to wreak havoc on a hard drive.

      If magnetic material is moving inside a magnetic field no current will be produced simply because you don't have any conductor for that current to flow through.

      To prove this take two magnets and move them relative to each other. You will get varying forces and magnetic fields, but nothing else.

      If you want to generate a current you need to move a conductor through a static magnetic field (or vice versa.)

    50. Re:I have to wonder... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Are they trying to pickup a TV station using a small antenna placed within their steel framed house? That alone might explain the issue. Get a roof mounted antenna, or if you have one, check that the cabling is undamaged and properly connected. Blaming the steel frame for being magnetised is ridiculous.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    51. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop. Just stop.

      Think about all the shit your hard drive deals with every day. Magnetic variations (from adjacent hard drives, EM resonances inside the case, anything), mechanical vibrations, all while it's trying to read bits a couple um or so apart. Now do you think that's an open-loop system, and it just works anyhow? (Hint: if you think that, kill yourself now. You are too stupid to live.) If you think it's a servo, then you're absolutely right -- but then you'd realize it can cope with external fields more than large enough to cause more mundane effects like paperclips flying through the air and sticking to the joists in question.

    52. Re:I have to wonder... by cats-paw · · Score: 2

      hard drives are not magnetically shielded.

      I've taken apart several of them and them have aluminum cases which provide absolutely NO magnetic shielding.

      A faraday shield does not work on static magnetic fields, for that you need a case made of mu-metal or similar.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    53. Re:I have to wonder... by Reelin · · Score: 1

      would have to have an active wide-band transmitter (to affect TV's, computers and everything else that's claimed)

      While I agree with the view that the slashdot summary, if not the entire case, is bs, I do want to point out that you can indeed affect a CRT display with a permanent magnet if it is sufficiently close. To test this, set up an old CRT display on your computer and place a large speaker (the kind with a 4" - 6" ceramic magnet at the back) directly against the side of your monitor. Observe the distortion this creates.

      That being said there's no way the house itself is going to do this to a TV or monitor, the distances involved are just too great. And you can completely forget about affecting a hard drive for a number of different already mentioned reasons.

    54. Re:I have to wonder... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      A static field will have some effect on electronics by affecting the saturation point of inductors... but you'd need a ridiculously strong field for that to happen. Maybe if you were standing next to an MRI machine.

    55. Re:I have to wonder... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      TFA is a bit low on details but I imagine they mean poor TV reception, the occasional corrupting of magnetic media kept near a wall (do people still use floppy disks?) and so on. The journalist dumbed it down into a single sentence but it appears that both sides agree there is a problem, the only question is if the builder should be required to deal with it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    56. Re:I have to wonder... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      There are? It's not just geeks who have been buying flat-screen TVs for the last 5 or so years, they've been selling them like hotcakes at places like Costco, despite all the economic turmoil. The switchover to HDTV really spurred a new wave of TV-buying, and I think it's safe to assume most of those buyers got rid of their old CRT sets.

      There are a lot of flat screens around, but I imagine the majority of TVs in households are still CRTs.

      My TV is a CRT - I see no reason to replace it until it gives up (and no, I don't consider HDTV worthwhile - if I were replacing my TV then sure I'd get an HDTV, but I'm not going to replace a perfectly working TV just for that).

      Similarly my secondary monitor on my workstation is a CRT, now 14 years old. Again, since it is working fine, why would I bother to replace it? The energy savings I'd get aren't enough to offset the cost of a new monitor so until it dies I'll stick with it.

      Even a lot of households who have replaced their working TV with a flat screen have probably moved their old CRT into another room to use as a second TV rather than getting rid of it entirely.

    57. Re:I have to wonder... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, I knew about k=1000 and k=1024. But k=720 never before occurred to me.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    58. Re:I have to wonder... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Not everyone replaces the TV every five years. When I bought my current TV, flat screen TVs didn't yet exist.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    59. Re:I have to wonder... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Remember that even 1 T is already a ridiculously high unit of magnetic flux density... In order to achieve the claimed effects you'd still need a pretty strong magnetic field, probably at about 100 T,

      Not sure. You can wave a bit steel around near a 15T magnet (not at full field, with the metal about 1m away) and feel it. Not sure if the effect of a rotating hard drive would be enough to degauss it in that field though.

      still not small potatoes (given that the world record for a continuous magnetic field is only 45 T, and a non-destructive pulsed magnetic field is 91 T),

      Non destructive to what? They've reached 97.5T for a magnet which survives the pulse http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-08-los-alamos-world-record-pulsed-magnetic.html and the single turn has reached 240T http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/usershub/training/summerschool/documents/Monday/0840%20Boebinger%20Betts%20Intro%20to%20Pulsed%20Magnets%20rev.pdf. The single turn does destroy the coil each time, but since the Lorentz forces cause it to fly outwards, the sample survives.

      Well, most of the time. Sometimes it goes spectacularly wrong but that just adds to the fun :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    60. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harddrives are not magnetically shielded. A shield against a permanent magnetic field required a mu-metal shell. HDDs shells are made of cast and/or machined aluminium.

    61. Re:I have to wonder... by adolf · · Score: 1

      It's surrounded by a Faraday's Cage... twice.

      A Faraday cage does little or nothing when faced with a static magnetic field.

      At RF frequencies, it does work fine. But there's a world of difference between (essentially) DC and a few hundred KHz. Think of it as series inductance creating a low-pass filter.

      Come to think of it, I'd not be surprised in the slightest if a Faraday cage performed exactly like an inductor, complete with a first-order slope...

      (Please note that I'm considering the claim that they've experienced a hard drive failure to be a coincidence.)

    62. Re:I have to wonder... by dietlein · · Score: 1

      It's surrounded by a Faraday's Cage... twice.

      A Faraday cage (or two) does not block magnetic fields.

    63. Re:I have to wonder... by Starboyforever · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I call BS. I accidentally and stupidly left a box full of neodymium magnets sitting right on top of my portable 500GB external hard drive for about a week. When I discovered it I thought for sure my drive was toast but when I plugged it in it worked just fine and all of the data was intact. I was dumbfounded, to say the least. If my hard drive could survive the immediate proximity of such a strong field there is no way a few magnetic joists are going to harm a hard drive from yards away.

    64. Re:I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eddies inside the platter

      Ah, is he? Is he?

    65. Re:I have to wonder... by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      Made one myself with a transformer from a dead answering machine and a good-sized spool of wire from Radio Shack. Just left the wire on the spool, extracting the ends, instant coil. Very helpful. Don't see why the joist couldn't be similarly degaussed in a few minutes; just make a mongo version of the same (longer, to cut the n-cubed dropoff), plug that sucker in, and bring one end of it as close as possible to the offending steel.

      Never mind if the magnetism in the steel is strong enough to do squat, do this, and it will be gone anyway.

    66. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was happy to get rid of CRT TVs as soon as possible so I wouldn't have to suffer with the annoying high-pitched buzz that they all make. To me, none of them are "perfectly working", because they all have that design defect.

      I got rid of my 19" CRT monitor some time ago too, this time because much larger and higher-resolution LCD monitors were so cheap, and also because the LCD ones don't take up so much space on my desk.

    67. Re:I have to wonder... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      10800 is 15k in drivemaker's RPM.

      I'm sure I have some old laptop drives that are 4200 RPM too.

    68. Re:I have to wonder... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was happy to get rid of CRT TVs as soon as possible so I wouldn't have to suffer with the annoying high-pitched buzz that they all make. To me, none of them are "perfectly working", because they all have that design defect.

      I used to hear that... I guess I'm just getting old and deaf now :-/

      I got rid of my 19" CRT monitor some time ago too, this time because much larger and higher-resolution LCD monitors were so cheap, and also because the LCD ones don't take up so much space on my desk.

      My secondary monitor isn't especially big (I don't have the horizontal desk space for anything bigger in addition to my reasonably big primary), which makes it not actually that deep. I wouldn't want the screens of my monitors further away from me so replacing it with an LCD would just mean a big empty gap behind the monitor that isn't used for anything. Besides, the cat likes to sleep on top of the CRT and a TFT would be significantly less comfortable for him :)

    69. Re:I have to wonder... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I used to hear that... I guess I'm just getting old and deaf now :-/

      Strangely enough, I'm getting close to 40 and I can still hear them just fine. :-/

      replacing it with an LCD would just mean a big empty gap behind the monitor that isn't used for anything.

      I have a corner desk, so there's a huge space behind my dual monitors. I keep my stacks of CD-Rs and DVD-Rs back there (though they don't get used much any more), and some other junk.

    70. Re:I have to wonder... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Corrections:
      * "Moving current" is redundant. A current is moving charge.
      * Moving charges create magnetic fields.
      * Charges, moving or static, create electric fields.

      Also, time-changing magnetic fields create electric fields, and time-changing electric fields create magnetic fields.

    71. Re:I have to wonder... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      You need a time-changing magnetic field to create an electric field (and thus directly induce current). However, a static magnetic field will apply a force to any moving charge -- that is, any current. It's the Lorentz force.

    72. Re:I have to wonder... by blueg3 · · Score: 1
    73. Re:I have to wonder... by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

      It seems like metal objects would be flying through the air and sticking to the floor.

      Strangely, the Earth itself produces a field sufficient to cause this very effect at sufficiently low altitudes. It's not even restricted to metal objects!

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    74. Re:I have to wonder... by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      A hard drive disk rotates. Perhaps if it rotates in the vicinity of such a magnetic field, problems could occur?

    75. Re:I have to wonder... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Is that kibiRPM or kiloRPM?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "After moving into the homes the couples found that something was not quite right. Their TV screens were distorted. Cordless phones ran into interference. Computer hard drives were corrupted." And, their tinfoil hats were stuck to the ceiling.

    1. Re:Ceilings by Pete+Venkman · · Score: 1

      I don't care if you're an AC--THAT was funny!

    2. Re:Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must have bought it from that weird guy who wore a cape that looks like a comic book character.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto_%28comics%29

    3. Re:Ceilings by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      My first thought was that it was more of those "wireless/EM sensitive" nutters. If they have tangible proof though, well... this could turn out interesting.

    4. Re:Ceilings by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      "Their TV screens were distorted. Cordless phones ran into interference. Computer hard drives were corrupted."

      All these things have also occurred in my home. I think that the wooden studs in my house may have become magnetized.

    5. Re:Ceilings by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      "After moving into the homes the couples found that something was not quite right. Their TV screens were distorted. Cordless phones ran into interference. Computer hard drives were corrupted." And, their tinfoil hats were stuck to the ceiling.

      Ha ... my kingdom for a mod point.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Ceilings by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      My first thought was that it was more of those "wireless/EM sensitive" nutters. If they have tangible proof though, well... this could turn out interesting.

      Well, the odds are very high that they are nutters. Somebody send in a tech with a gaussmeter and a wideband spectrum analyzer and put this to rest.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Ceilings by lahvak · · Score: 1

      They are probably made from ironwood. Or from the stuff boomerangs are made of.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      household "Tin foil" (actually aluminium foil) isn't magnetic.

    9. Re:Ceilings by tibit · · Score: 1

      Their names and approximate location are given in the article. You can easily locate their home using county auditor's website. Surely some measurements could be made from the public right of way...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    10. Re:Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      household "Tin foil" (actually aluminium foil) isn't magnetic.

      Whoosh.

    11. Re:Ceilings by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I don't care if you're an AC--THAT was funny!

      Would you prefer him to be DC?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    12. Re:Ceilings by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      They forgot to mention that their youngest daughter was hearing voices in the static she could talk to.

    13. Re:Ceilings by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      Their names and approximate location are given in the article. You can easily locate their home using county auditor's website.

      Well... that and a compass should make it easy.

    14. Re:Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT the tinfoil hats - that's non-magnetic, but they surgical plates in their heads was another matter entirely!

    15. Re:Ceilings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call shenanigans! Tin and aluminum aren't attracted to magnets...

  4. could it be ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    maybe they're just on THE island.

  5. Hmm... by Torinir · · Score: 2

    I'm not certain that the company *should* win. But should and will are two different beasts.

    According to TFA "By signing the contracts, the buyers agreed to waive claims for repairs except those specifically mentioned in a separate document, which was available for inspection at a separate location and not before or at the time they bought the houses." The main point is that the restrictions were not available for review where the contract was being provided and signed. Hiding the restrictions on a contract prior to its acceptance? Smells really funky to me, and were I in their shoes, I wouldn't have signed it in the first place.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you knew anything about technology the first thing you'd see is fishy here is the home owners claims. I guess being technically minded is a prerequisite long gone from Slashdot though.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      In general buying a warranty from a salesman is a bad move. Free ones are fine if the price is otherwise right. However, if you are buying some kind of service contract, go 3rd party as you'll pay about a third as much and be less likely to get ripped off - you went to somebody because they were a good homebuilder, not a reputable warranty company.

      Oh, and always go with named exclusions, not named inclusions. It is WAY easier to find loopholes in the latter.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why states have the authority to say "Screw your contract, that ain't right, your contract is null for that purpose!"

      And this sounds like one of them, questions of the actual harm aside. I remember somebody saying that there was no way Drywall could be dangerous.

      Uh-huh. Turns out they were wrong.

    4. Re:Hmm... by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      I would hope the Ohio Supreme Court took this case in order to consider a point of law, not a point of fact.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    5. Re:Hmm... by danlip · · Score: 1

      It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'. I’m sorry, but if
      you can’t be bothered to take an interest in local affairs that’s your own problem.

    6. Re:Hmm... by Jibekn · · Score: 1

      drywall is no more harmful than dust.

    7. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...dust can be dangerous, and so was that from this Drywall.

    8. Re:Hmm... by znerk · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the giggle, and the nostalgic reference to Arthur's plight.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    9. Re:Hmm... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And sadly has never been present for most judges and juries. This has got to be the most idiotic and trivially falsifiable claim I've ever seen.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Hmm... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We're talking about basic physics here. There's no way those steel beams could put off a sufficiently large magnetic field to do what is being claimed. The homeowners are either fucking retards or liars. Period.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:Hmm... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      As for their claims, either the house was built on top of a giant iron meteorite or they have some electrical wiring problem.

      But what popped out of the article to me was what you quoted. I'm no lawyer, but there has to be some illegal about signing something that has conditions added later unless those conditions are signed on when presented later.
      I imagine Doug Adams writing something like this-
      "Why did you bulldoze my new house?!" "It was in the contract that we could use the materials for scrap." "Where in the contract?!?!" "Oh, in a separate document we drew up later, and put it someplace else, protected by a puma." "Warrgghhlshhhaaaa....."

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    12. Re:Hmm... by adamchou · · Score: 1

      I blame the couples for signing a contract with restrictions but doesn't provide the restrictions. That's asinine.

    13. Re:Hmm... by scrib · · Score: 2

      You make an excellent point. This case is not about whether the builder should be required to make "repairs," but about whether the homeowners should be allowed to sue in spite of the contracts. The Ohio Supreme Court could rule that the contract is invalid for any number of reasons and allow the homeowners' lawsuits to proceed.

      It is interesting that the court chose to hear this case, being that it is such a ridiculous claim. They may have chosen it with the idea that a seller can't make a contract that waives the buyers rights to sue for defects, no matter what they are. If so, it would be up to the lower courts to decide if these particular "defects" are real or imagined. It's just distracting to us techie people that the claims are so ridiculous on their face.

      I know, that's exactly what you said :)

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    14. Re:Hmm... by mroberg · · Score: 1

      dang, beat me to it... by a long shot

    15. Re:Hmm... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was just a shrinkwrap building agreement. You're only allowed to see it after you buy the house, and "Ts&Cs subject to change at any time without notice."

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  6. Interesting problem by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 2

    When I have signed contracts to purchase things, I have had to sign waivers limiting liability. Those waivers certainly covered reasonable expectations and disclaimed certain possible defects. This is a terrible problem for both sides, because it is just completely unexpected. I have never before heard of a steel beam's magnetization causing such difficulty. TFA is pretty slim on the real effects they are experiencing. I wonder if this is just one of those pseudo-scientific problems (magnetism = evil?) or if it is a real problem, or if it's just my reading comprehension. It would be interesting to see what the field measurements actually looked like. You'd need a very strong magnet to affect a TV from any significant distance.

    At least with smaller pieces of metal you can whack them a few times to re-randomize the magnetic domains. I don't know if that actually works for something large enough to support a building (you might have to hit it hard enough to damage it or the structure it supports). Depending on the alignment of the magnetic field it might be possible to form an electromagnet to cancel its field ("degauss" it). Or the structural members can be replaced and removed (I've done this in my house). Most of these options are pretty expensive (except for the first one where you hit it a lot with a hammer).

    It seems unfair for me, as a homebuyer, to get stuck dealing with a house which was built with nonstandard components (in the form of a magnetic structural support). From the builder's perspective it seems like this would be something that they would have to eat and then go after the material seller for their losses, if they can prove when the magnetization occurred.

    --

    Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    1. Re:Interesting problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      Degaussing structural steel can be done entirely with stuff you can buy at Harbor Freight for crying out loud. Who the heck needs to replace anything? It doesn't even cost anything. When you're done, return the welder to the store.

      I truly don't buy this story. It can't be just structural steel. I really need to dig into the court documents for this case, I'm in Ohio after all :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:Interesting problem by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      I don't buy they idea that the structural components are magnetized to a great enough extent to cause these problems, but even if they are, I fail to see how that makes them nonstandard. They are not any weaker in regards to their strength, and they are simply structural components. Should have used wood beam construction to begin with, stop letting builders get away with cheap building materials. Of course I don't have to worry about termites where I'm at.

    3. Re:Interesting problem by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the cost of the materials to perform degaussing - a bunch of wire, a rectifier and a variac along with a field sensor ought to be sufficient. It's the knowledge of what you have to do, which most people don't have (present readers possibly excluded from the definition of "most"). More importantly it's the damage you might have to do to the house to get access to the beam. Suppose the beam is in a finished area? No way you can pay a contractor to open the entire length of the house and then close it back up for less than 5k, plus you may not be able to live in the house at the time. If you want to replace the beam that's easily another 10-20k, depending on way more factors than I am aware of.

      --

      Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    4. Re:Interesting problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      I think most posts here miss the big picture: the magnetized structural steel is only, if anything, affecting old-style CRTs, nothing else. It's way cheaper to spend 2k on one or two nice flat panel TVs to replace the CRTs they are currently using than doing degaussing unless there's good access. Problem solved, and the homeowner will be quite happy too.

      The homeowner's other claims are bogus extrapolations, coming from lack of understanding. They may be telling the truth, but only as to what's observed, not as to what's the cause. Their other problems are coincidences. Lack of education makes people believe in whatever their minds make up. Reality ain't so.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:Interesting problem by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Easiest solution: lead paint! That should insulate those pesky electrons ;-)

    6. Re:Interesting problem by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be recommending a Harbor Freight welder unless you are willing to do some of your own repairs on the welder. I needed a spot welder and bought one from harbor freight and it has been some what problematic. It worked out of the box but after a few uses needed to have the switch replaced and some of the internal connections weren't as solid as they should have been and needed to be redone. After that experience I decided that when I bought a wire feed welder I would do some more research and Harbor Freight ones rank pretty near the bottom in reviews. Granted instead of spending $99-$150 for a cheep one from Harbor Freight or Northern Tool I ended up spending $250 for a Hobart one as it was the least expensive good wire feed. I have probably close to 80 hours of usage (duty cycle of about 20% as I am not a very fast or good welder yet) and it has been trouble free operation. You do get what you pay for when it comes to tools. Also I did find out that there are basically 2 camps for welders, Lincoln and Miller and both believe that theirs is the best and the other is crap much like the Ford and Chevy guys now if you aren't an iron worker by traded then it really doesn't matter as both companies make a quality product (Hobart is Miller machine just painted differently)

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:Interesting problem by tibit · · Score: 1

      My view is skewed because I had some hang of electronics for better part of my life, so if something electrical/electronics breaks down, and it's as simple as a welder, it's a second thought to fix it. With Harbor Freight stuff I usually open it up and retighten all fasteners anyway before throwing the switch for the first time. If there are soldered/crimped connections, I inspect them and repair/replace as needed.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  7. Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote..... by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 2

    ...get what you pay for.

    When homebuyers decide to get a house within their budget instead of stretching for extra rooms by going cheap on construction, they'll get better quality. Building a 2000 sq ft house on a 1500 sq ft budget means, necessarily, cutting some corners. If you don't realize that, you either aren't paying attention or you are deluding yourself.

    The quality on some of these new houses is really atrocious. I've seen cabinets fall apart after 10-12 years, decks rotting after 15, drywall that won't even hold a painting. I saw a dishwasher held to a cabinet by a pair of wood screws.

  8. Highly Suspect by bragr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you ever tried to kill a harddrive with a magnet? It basically requires passing a rare earth magnet closely over the platters several times before the data is reliably damaged and if they had that kind of magnetic fields it would cause much bigger problems. And while I don't know to much about the properties EM radiation, I believe that magnetic fields don't interfere with radio waves.

    My guess is that its the steel beams themselves are causing interference with the phones, that they incidentally had hdd failures (they have lived there for like 6 years), and the the steel beams have slight magnetic field because a small amount of current is passing through them (electricians like to ground to steel beams instead of running a ground line back to power box and putting to ground their) and they blame that weak magnetic field for their problems.

    This is all purely speculation because they don't give any real details about the field.

    1. Re:Highly Suspect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Actually depends on the field. Just remember you don't need to turn around and screw with the plate. You only need to screw around with the electronics. And if the controller screws up, well that's enough to corrupt data all on it's own.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Highly Suspect by bragr · · Score: 1

      I think it would be easier to mess with the data on the platter than the solid state electronics on the control board, especially since the disk is actually moving through the field as a result of the rotation while the control board is stationary.

    3. Re:Highly Suspect by timnbron · · Score: 2

      I did an experiment years ago on a 5 inch floppy disk and a fridge magnet. I had to put the magnet in direct contact with the disk surface itself before I got any corruption. If it took that much on a 1980s floppy, it must surely take much more on a shielded and enclosed hard drive.

      Cathode ray tubes certainly. Used to have lots of fun making the screen change colour, until my parents got upset. But it would still take a very strong field even for that.

      --
      There are some who call me ... Tim.
    4. Re:Highly Suspect by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Static magnetic have little to no impact on electronics. Also there would still be more leakage magnetism from the HDD magnets and drive motor than a steel beam from any distance.

    5. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 1

      Electronics typically don't give shits nor giggles about static fields, unless magnetic forces due to said fields mechanically damage the devices in question. About the only things that care about static fields are signal isolator chips that use magnetic technology. Those can get saturated with static fields -- I have an ILxxx series isolator (from NVE) and it'd stop working when placed on a PC board right next to the coil of a small safety relay. It was the static field that would cause it to stop working. Solution was to turn the relay 180 degrees around on the board, as the coil was then moved to the end far from the isolator chip. That relay had a fairly decent coil, I don't think you could ever magnetize structural steel in a typical U.S. 2-story home to produce such a field at any sane distance from said steel (1 foot or more).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:Highly Suspect by mortonda · · Score: 1

      electricians like to ground to steel beams instead of running a ground line back to power box and putting to ground their

      Citation please? That is quite contrary to code, and any building inspector would yank the electrician's license if they did that.

    7. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SD cards and usb flash drives easily corruptable with magnetism.

    8. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 1

      Hard drives are not shielded against static magnetic fields. Low-frequency shields are usually made from Mu-metal (or similar materials) and are fragile as hell -- they lose their shielding properties if you handle them incorrectly. You'll find them on cathode-ray oscilloscope tubes, and perhaps magnetometer-type instrumentation. You can easily check for that: get a non-stainelss steel screwdriver and move it around on the surface of hard drive's enclosure (don't touch electronics!). You'll feel it attracted to the voice coil magnets. Any shielding would work bidirectionally: it would short circuit the magnetic circuit and prevent the internal magnets from affecting outside of the drive, just as it'd prevent the converse: external field affecting the inside. Hard drives are enclosed in aluminum. Useless against static and low-frequency fields.

      Your other points are valid, of course.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    9. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it could be some sort of EM that interferes with the data transmission. Although with all the checksum in SATA I wonder how that is possible...

    10. Re:Highly Suspect by bragr · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it is contrary to code, but I've seen it done many times. They make special clamps that screw into the metal to make a good ground connection. A quick google search makes it seem like it isn't prohibited in homes in LA county, but I'm not a lawyer or electrician. http://www.ladpw.org/general/forms/download/1003.pdf?CFID=27792607&CFTOKEN=63377110

    11. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure the obvious caveat is that the structural steel itself has to also be grounded somewhere, and then it's just part of the ground circuit if you need to ground some electronics. Why run a wire to ground if you've got a steel beam going to ground already?

    12. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEC 250.52 (a) (2)

      250.52 Grounding Electrodes.
      (A) Electrodes Permitted for Grounding.
      (2) Metal Frame of the Building or Structure. The metal frame of the building or structure that is connected to the earth by any of the following methods:
      (1) 3.0 m (10 ft) or more of a single structural metal member in direct contact with the earth or encased in concrete that is in direct contact with the earth
      (2) By connecting the structural metal frame to the reinforcing bars of a concrete-encased electrode as provided in 250.52(A)(3) or ground ring as provided in 250.52(A)(4)
      (3) By bonding the structural metal frame to one or more of the grounding electrodes as defined in 250.52(A)(5) or (A)(6) that comply with 250.56 or
      (4) By other approved means of establishing a connection to the earth

      </troll>

    13. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait. Couldn't a faulty ground explain every single one of their problems including magnetized beams?

    14. Re:Highly Suspect by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      if the field were strong enough to have an effect on the platters or the circuits of the hard drive while it was inside the computer and inside the room they should be suing for the MRI machine hidden in their walls

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    15. Re:Highly Suspect by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      > Electronics typically don't give shits nor giggles about static fields, unless magnetic forces due to said fields mechanically damage the devices in question

      If the mag fields are strong enough you'll see synchrotron or even curvature radiations XD

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    16. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 1

      The charges in conductors move slowly, and a static magnetic field isn't going to change that. If you have any references where they clearly show synchrotron radiation in "nonexotic" conditions, please let me know. I'm looking for, specifically: metallic conductor, reasonable current densities for copper on a PCB, large static fields (1T+).

      Synchrotron radiation is had when you have speeds that can be achieved by charges in vacuum. If you tried to push electron gas through a conductor that fast, you'd vaporize the metal. Again: give references/arguments if I'm somehow wrong. Otherwise you completely misunderstand what synchrotron radiation is about.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    17. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 1

      This link shows typical residential single-family electrical hookup and says nothing about using structural steel as grounding conductor in a circuit.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    18. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 2

      The clamps are used to ground certain structural steel, as required by code in most places for commercial and multifamily buildings. The structural steel becomes grounded, but is not used as a grounding conductor. Key difference of one syllable.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    19. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 1

      Grounding electrode is not a grounding conductor for a branch circuit IIRC.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    20. Re:Highly Suspect by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      That's what I figured. The hard drive just failed on it's/Their
      own and they just clumped it with the rest of the problems they
      are having.

      Hard Drive magnets (especially the old ones) had/have some of
      the strongest magnets you can come across (freely) and they
      sit 1/4" or closer to the platters.
      ----

      I knew someone who lived next door to a popular radio station.
      They couldn't use their phone, or access their modem due to
      errors and many other quirks.

      It's possible this couple have a large antenna above them, emitting
      RF. I would imagine this has been ruled out - yet as you mentioned,
      so little facts make for a lot of speculation.

    21. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're 100% right, of course. No need for the "IIRC".

      NEC 250.4 (a) (5)

      [The ground circuit] shall be capable of safely carrying the maximum ground-fault current likely [...] to the electrical supply source. The earth shall not be considered as an effective ground-fault current path.

      Using a grounding electrode as a grounding conductor means you're using the earth as the ground-fault current path. It was a complete red herring. =) Of course, other sections apply too, such as 250.119 (paint it green!)

    22. Re:Highly Suspect by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the fun citations, AC :D The important thing to me is that I'd get a major chewing if the ground circuit was anything other than a wire of the proper gauge, all the way to the panel; The panel is then grounded by a heavy wire to a ground rod sunk very deep (was 10 or 12 feet?) into the ground. A pain to drive by hand. In commercial applications, the steel conduit can be used for ground, but only if the connectors are all set screw type. Compression fittings mean running another wire. Ah conduit, that brought up other concerns such as matching the number of circuits per phase to avoid extra heat load in the pipe.

    23. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right on with this. Most of the comments here are focused on the corruption of their hard drives which is pretty obviously not being caused by their home's construction. However negating that claim does little to negate their other reported issues. The possibility that their television and phone interference issues could be connected to faulty construction are entirely different matters to be considered.

      There is a natural human tendency to connect events happening in close proximity in any circumstance and since there is already an existing mythology regarding the susceptibility of hard drives to damage from magnetic fields it is hardly surprising the homeowners assumed the that all their problems with electrical devises sprung from the same cause.

      Nevertheless, the steel frame construction could still be playing a part in the interference issue. It might even be that the the magnetized beams and the electrical interference are actually both symptoms of some other issue (bad grounding, insulation, etc.).

    24. Re:Highly Suspect by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's all public information, should be easy to find out. Namely, FCC antenna registrations for example. Unless it's a nearby ham, but then it should be easy to see in google earth overhead views or from street view if it covers the area.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    25. Re:Highly Suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEC 250.118

      250.118 Types of Equipment Grounding Conductors.
      The equipment grounding conductor run with or enclosing the circuit conductors shall be one or more or a combination of the following:

      (1) A copper, aluminum, or copper-clad aluminum conductor. This conductor shall be solid or stranded; insulated, covered, or bare; and in the form of a wire or a busbar of any shape.
      [solid and flexible metal conduit & AC & MC within certain conditions]
      (9) The copper sheath of mineral-insulated, metal-sheathed cable.
      [...]
      (11) Cable trays as permitted in 392.10 and 392.60.
      (12) Cablebus framework as permitted in 370.3.
      (13) Other listed electrically continuous metal raceways and listed auxiliary gutters.
      (14) Surface metal raceways listed for grounding.

      That's the one I was looking for last night, but couldn't find.

    26. Re:Highly Suspect by jafac · · Score: 1

      I once used a bulk tape eraser on a hard drive.

      (this was around 1994, 1995, I think) - it KILLED the hard drive. Totally bricked. We had two theories over what had killed the drive. Either microcode on a flash chip had been erased by an induced current - or, there was some documentation from Seagate that seemed to indicate that; even when formatted, there were instructions encoded on the platter that directed the head on where to go. External read-write commands would never "see" or interact with this encoding, but the electronics ON the drive interacted with this encoding. Without the encoding, the drive head could not even leave the parking position.

      The first theory seemed more likely to me - but it's not what I expected to happen when I bulk-erased the drive.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    27. Re:Highly Suspect by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      My bad, for some reason I thought it was the roof alone
      and what I meant by: "It's possible this couple have a large antenna above them"
      A radio station like I mentioned would kinda stick out as the antenna is very large.

      You right it would be easy to find.

  9. degauss it by Bork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If its just a couple of beams, it can be degaussed using a arc-welded and a few wraps of the arc-welds cables around the beam. There is a more to the procedure but the tools are easy to obtain. Did this in the Navy, wrap a submarine in about 300 turns of cable and run a few thousand amps through them.

    1. Re:degauss it by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If its just a couple of beams, it can be degaussed using a arc-welded and a few wraps of the arc-welds cables around the beam. There is a more to the procedure but the tools are easy to obtain. Did this in the Navy, wrap a submarine in about 300 turns of cable and run a few thousand amps through them.

      And why would a residential house have more than one or two steel beams? I've seen them holding up basements but that's pretty much it. And if it was just one or two beams, the field would have to be absolutely intense or the family is putting all of their electronics on the floor in a straight line over the I beam.

      Something doesn't add up.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:degauss it by mhotchin · · Score: 2

      "wrap a submarine in about 300 turns of cable and run a few thousand amps through them."

      I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter!

    3. Re:degauss it by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Trying to replicate what they did with the Eldridge?

    4. Re:degauss it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:degauss it by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Did this in the Navy, wrap a submarine in about 300 turns of cable and run a few thousand amps through them.

      I think I saw that movie...

    6. Re:degauss it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The culprit: steel joists that had become magnetized, perhaps during construction."

      Most likely is i steel studs, instead of wood. Not an I beam.
      I could see it bothering a CR, but not much else.

    7. Re:degauss it by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      You forgot the "get off my LAWWWWWWN" part.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    8. Re:degauss it by kermidge · · Score: 1

      The Redlands link is a nice bit of history. Thanks.

    9. Re:degauss it by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I've seen houses made with metal beams instead of wood, but those are probably aluminum, not steel.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:degauss it by nwf · · Score: 1

      Houses can be built with steel joists instead of wood 2x4s. They are made from galvanized steel, however, its' relatively thin. I could see that messing up cordless phones and stuff, but not much else. Steel makes a relatively poor magnet since it can't hold much. That's why real magnets are rare earth because various elements help make better magnets. They are likely confusing RF interference and magnetic interference. They may have the former, but not the later. Plus, joists would be magnetized to to bottom, and I doubt you'd get much interference for a 8 foot long, thin gauge steel.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    11. Re:degauss it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.eaglespeak.us/2007/11/sunday-ship-history-degaussing-ships.html

    12. Re:degauss it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "wrap a submarine in about 300 turns of cable and run a few thousand amps through them."

      I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter!

      Newsletter title: "The Philadelphia Experiment Journal"

  10. Trust the Free Market by blair1q · · Score: 0

    "But Centex’s attorney, Michael Long, urged justices to trust the free market."

    That "free market" shit works on a macro scale. If thousands of people were affected by this, and Centex were already going out of business because they were returning their homes for a refund, then it might be a reasonable argument. But when a couple of people are screwed by the company, they do not have enough "free market" power to make Centex change a damned thing.

    Fuck Centex, and fuck their lawyer. Find for the plaintiffs and triple the damages. That's muh rulin'.

    1. Re:Trust the Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Free market" doesn't mean no courts. Without courts to enforce contract law, there wouldn't be a free market. There would be chaos.

      "Free market" does not mean anarchy. In some cases, you need government regulation to create a free market, because without regulation, there would be a natural monopoly.

    2. Re:Trust the Free Market by plover · · Score: 1

      I agree, triple damages for barratry. Their lawyer is indeed typical scum, trying to screw the little guy.

      So let's see, that works out to ... $0.00 * 3 == ... umm... multiply the borrow ... carry the zero ... remainder of, uh ... zero.

      Magnets don't work like that, nor do steel beams. Steel beams could disrupt RF, but probably not in any way that would cause a distorted image on their TV, especially if their TV broadcasters are transmitting ATSC. The only artifacts they'd likely be able to see would be pixelation or dropped frames, not "distortion".

      As far as the rest of the problems they're claiming, given their outlandish claims on damages due to the "magnetized steel beams", they would all have to be treated as equally suspect, and would require strong proof. Consider a doctor who has a patient say "Yeah, I've got an invisible pink unicorn bite here, a bruise from a yeti that hurts a lot but it faded yesterday, and two witches cast a headache spell on me." The only thing that doctor can do is refer the patient to a psychiatrist, because there's nothing to treat but his damaged mind.

      It's America, so you're free to sue Santa Claus for letting his reindeer shit on your roof, but there's no guarantee the courts will find in your favor; rather, there's a substantial risk that your attorney will get in trouble for filing a frivolous lawsuit on your behalf. A lawyer should know better.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Trust the Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That "free market" shit works on a macro scale."
      I think that if you look at the troubles that plague our county, you will see that the "free market" doesn't work at all.

    4. Re:Trust the Free Market by unitron · · Score: 1

      If their television has a CRT, then it works by using a changing magnetic field to move the electron beam around the screen, regardless of whether it's fed by an NTSC or ATSC tuner, and a strong enough nearby magnetic field can interfere with that.

      They weren't looking at the RF, they were looking at their screen. Distortion, to a layperson, can mean a mis-shapen picture on the screen.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Trust the Free Market by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      if it were that strong they should be able to throw nails onto the floor and watch them stick to the wall

    6. Re:Trust the Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "free market" works quite well on a micro scale. The big problem is this, from the article:

      By signing the contracts, the buyers agreed to waive claims for repairs except those specifically mentioned in a separate document, which was available for inspection at a separate location and not before or at the time they bought the houses.

      A free market requires openness. This is just fraud.

    7. Re:Trust the Free Market by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Take any permanent magnet and bring it near the screen of any CRT.

      You will see some pretty intersting distortion. Just don't do it too long or some of the magnetism will stick in your TV and you'll have to get your TV degaussed. Most CRT computer monitors have a degaussing button, or a degauss command in their OSD menu, to correct for this. Some high-end CRT TVs go through a degaussing cycle when they're powered on.

      Any permanent magnet of significant size and strength near a CRT will cause misalignment and color distorion.

      Steel definitely does work that way. Leave a steel stud near a persistent source of magnetism, let it get warm, bang on it a little, and you'll have a giant bar magnet. Put a few dozen of them in a house, and put a CRT right up against the wall, and you'll see the effect on the screen.

    8. Re:Trust the Free Market by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, it takes very little magnetic field strength to distort the picture on a CRT in unpleasant ways.

      A field strong enough to pick up a nail would distort the picture until it was a jumbled mess.

      Take a hobby-shop magnet and hold it a few inches from a CRT; you'll see the picture and colors distort slightly, but enough to make you think the TV needs repair. Hold it a centimeter from the CRT (about the distance it can make a nail jump) and you'll see it make a hole in the picture and turn the color into rainbows.

    9. Re:Trust the Free Market by blair1q · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that there aren't "micro" players in the markets that are big enough to make macro holes in it. We've given banks and corporations too much power, by fiat. We need to reverse those rules and make those fuckers work for us, not against us.

    10. Re:Trust the Free Market by plover · · Score: 1

      Agreed, CRT color distortion due to magnets (and permanent distortion due to magnetizing the mask) is certainly possible.

      But corruption of data? There are a dozen far more believable reasons than "magnets".

      --
      John
  11. junk science by t2t10 · · Score: 2

    Modern TVs aren't influenced by magnetic fields anymore. Static magnetic fields don't cause cell phone interference. And hard drives have such high magnetization that erasing them is extremely hard.

    1. Re:junk science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly the points I was going to make. There's a huge magnet already inside every hard drive, millimeters away from the platters. It doesn't erase them, because you need a biasing frequency to get the particles moving before you can perturb them. A static magnetic field, which is DC, will also not affect a cellphone which uses RF frequencies. And, even if they still have CRTs, the magnetic field from even the wall behind the set would be so small as to be unnoticed on the screen.

      If it's a flat panel TV and not a CRT, then that claim is complete bogus as well. The question is, how do we make money from this crowd?

    2. Re:junk science by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I have personally taken a radio shack reel to reel tape eraser (a 120 volt electromagnet with a handle and a button) to the top of a hard drive on more than one occasion with no effect.

    3. Re:junk science by unitron · · Score: 1

      While the drive was reading and writing?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:junk science by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      one time yes, but that was on a full height 5.25 MFM seagate, so its like hitting a tank with a water balloon, on the normal 3.5 drives no I zapped them then plugged them back in and did a chkdisk with sector scan.

      one could argue the magnets inside the disk itself are as strong if not stronger but those are pretty focused... I still call bunk on a chunk of steel with at least a quarter inch of insulation (drywall) effecting a computer maybe a foot past that often in a thin steel case itself, even if that was a I beam with romex wrapped around it like a magnet, but its really most likely those steel studs you can cut with a pair of snips.

    5. Re:junk science by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      I would expect, however, that steel wall studs could create either reduced signal strength, or severe multipath issues. Magnetized or not.

  12. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Why home buyers figure out that a brand new home in a band new subdivision is nothing but a great big PITA for the next 20 years. Get a nice old home if it's been standing for 100 years it's probably going to continue to do so if make sure the roof gutters and siding are in good order.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  13. Bullshit supreme by tibit · · Score: 3, Informative

    The people who claim they are affected are just mixing things that, to their uneducated minds, are the same thing. Static magneticity, radio waves, same difference, right?

    It reads like a bunch of BS. Do they still have CRTs in their TVs? In typical 2-story U.S. homes, there's structural steel in a few isolated places -- a beam or two in the basement, perhaps another beam and a column in the garage. That would, at best, cause some changes in color. It'd need to be substantial to cause geometric distortion of the image itself. You can have typical home speakers a few feet away from a color CRT and there's no effect. That structural steel would need to be magnetized quite well to see the effects they claim.

    Hard drives won't be affected by any remnant magnetization of structural steel that's a byproduct of production, shipping and storage in varied conditions. Same goes for wireless devices -- static fields do nothing much to them. I'll read their case and perhaps pay them a visit, I need to see it to believe it.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    1. Re:Bullshit supreme by Baloroth · · Score: 3

      Probably this. However, I do wonder if perhaps the magnetization of the joists isn't a cause, but rather an effect of whatever is messing with their equipment. No one seems to have even considered this possibility (although I do admit I have no real idea what would cause something like that.) Maybe they live next to a transformer or something?

      More likely, their drives are probably just failing over time. It looks like this contractor was rather cheap (there are a lot of other problems with the house as well, apparently), and that could easily cause problems with their phone lines, and improper electrical wiring could cause both the magnetized joists and CRT fluctuations. So, it seems likely they are blaming one thing for what is a multitude of factors. People do this all the time, especially when they don't want to admit they messed up in choosing a cheap-ass contractor.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:Bullshit supreme by Reverberant · · Score: 1

      In typical 2-story U.S. homes, there's structural steel in a few isolated places -- a beam or two in the basement, perhaps another beam and a column in the garage. .

      I'm pretty sure the complaint is referring to steel studs which are common nowadays in new homes.

    3. Re:Bullshit supreme by adolf · · Score: 1

      CRTs are affected by even the magnetism of the Earth, and will change ("distort") depending on their relative orientation. Better CRT displays, from back in the day at least, have a control (commonly labeled "rotation") to help offset this exact problem.

      Remember, CRTs work with magnetic fields: One might even say that all a CRT does is visualize magnetism. If any outside force changes those fields, the resultant picture will change accordingly and measurably.

      That said: I've had static magnetic fields of unknown origin mess with TVs before. I suspect it was an iron counterweight for a window sash causing the issue, but was never sure, since I simply moved the TV and the problem went away.

      I don't think I'd ever be lawyering up to go head-to-head with a builder over such an issue unless the kitchen knives had a hard time staying in the drawer, and the fillings were getting sucked out of my teeth.

      And even then, as others have pointed out, it's easy to degauss steel: Wrap a welding lead around it, and turn the welder on. Bonus points for gradually reducing amperage to maximize results.

      At worst, this entails the builder borrow an arc welding kit from somewhere, and pay someone to patch and paint some drywall. No big deal, and certainly a lot cheaper than a few hours with a lawyer. If it's not part of the contract, and it's a really big deal for some reason, then being reasonable ("OK, Mr. Builder, you degauss this beam and fix the drywall, I'll paint it and clean up") would have probably gone a long way...

    4. Re:Bullshit supreme by tibit · · Score: 2

      Those things are made from material so thin that they are very poor at being magnets, even if you purposefully magnetize them as much as you can...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:Bullshit supreme by the_raptor · · Score: 2

      I do wonder if perhaps the magnetization of the joists isn't a cause, but rather an effect of whatever is messing with their equipment.

      Do they live in the beam path of a military grade over-the-horizon radar? Because that is about the only likely suspect (apart from batshit insane home owners).

      My parents house has wiring so bad that it wipes out any AM radio (I discovered that when I took my shortwave rig there for a weekend) but it doesn't do anything to CRT/LCD monitors or affect FM TV/radio reception. To distort TV reception or interfere with electronics would take more power then I have ever seen bad wiring put out.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    6. Re:Bullshit supreme by adolf · · Score: 1

      CRTs (whether televisions, computer monitors, or vector displays) are easily influenced by magnetic fields, both static and otherwise. They operate using magnets, and it doesn't take much to disturb appreciably disturb them.

      That said: Bad wiring, in and of itself, doesn't make for radio interference. The singular exception to this is when there is arcing. But if that were the case the place would've likely already burned, or the fault would otherwise have destroyed/fixed itself, or at least things would smell funny on a regular basis...and you'd literally see arcing on analog TV broadcasts, in the form regularly-occurring horizontally-aligned lines of static.

      So, it's probably not arcing. But bad electronics and other noisy loads can cause all kinds of interference, however.

      The usual culprits are lamp dimmers and fluorescent ballasts, ugly switching supplies, and motors with bad brushes. Any noise generated by stuff like this will radiate throughout (and around) the house.

      And. It may not even be a problem inside the house: It might be the neighbor down the way, or a near(ish) farm or factory sharing the same leg. I mean: Your folks don't exactly have their own generating station, so whatever comes down the wire from outside is also going to radiate inside.

      If you're really curious about it, turn things off at their place one by one (either by unplugging them, or perhaps at the breaker panel in the case of dimmer-equipped lighting circuits and fixed equipment like the furnace and the dishwasher) until you narrow the problem down to a specific device which verifiably causes it, and then repair or replace that item.

      And if it's still noisy with literally everything off, the problem is not within the house. (There's ways to overcome that, as well, if it's important. My guess is that it's not important.)

      Useless anecdote: I was sure I had a wiring fault, grounding issue, bad plugs/wires/coil/distributor, or something else wrong in my work truck, since AM reception was totally hosed no matter where I was driving...though FM worked quite well. I ignored it for a long while since I didn't listen to AM much anyway. One day, on a whim, I pulled the cell phone charger out of the dashboard socket and -instantly- the AM reception went from "meh" to relatively awesome. And that's just a little DC-DC converter. (The charger subsequently died in a fire, just to ensure nobody else would ever find it and try to use it.)

      And more useless information: Analog (NTSC) broadcast television uses AM for video, and FM for audio.

    7. Re:Bullshit supreme by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      They are actually allowed to build residential buildings with those things? I can't honestly recall any recent construction around here being anything but wood beams.

    8. Re:Bullshit supreme by the_raptor · · Score: 1

      I have personally seen arcing in house circuits that went on for months without serious issue (share house, one guy kept replacing the fuse incorrectly and it would end up arcing under load and then vaporising). I have only isolated the issue down to some major pieces of equipment (water heater, and pool pump system) but couldn't be bothered taking it further.

      I just assume it is bad, local, wiring because my parents TV makes the same out-of-spec transformer whine* as TV's/monitors did in the share house with arcing fuses. But it is a rural area so anything could be on the local circuit.

      * Which my parents can't hear. Even lots of people my own age can't hear those high frequencies.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    9. Re:Bullshit supreme by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      Some friends of ours once called us over because they claimed their TV, radio, and wifi were not working well at their house, and their neighbors agreed that this was also affecting them lately.

      I went over with my analyzer and field strength meters, only to discover that their amplified TV antenna's power cord fell out, causing almost total loss to the digital converter box. The other "problems" quickly disappeared as well.... hmm... ;-)

    10. Re:Bullshit supreme by adolf · · Score: 1

      Naaah.

      The TV whines at about 15kHz. It's not out-of-spec, but just a loose winding on the flyback transformer. No big deal.

      I can't hear it much anymore except in extreme cases, but when I was a kid it'd drive me nuts. I could walk by houses on a quiet night and tell without looking if they had a TV on, or if they had more than one on (as long as they were tuned to different channels -- the slight difference in frequency would cause the sound to heterodyne).

  14. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    I agree, mostly cause I watched the neighborhood next to the one I lived in growing up.

    Our houses were made in the 50's, not really old for houses, but the sardine can developer projects on the other side of the hill were made in the early 90's, my parents house with reasonable but not insane maintenance is in great shape. 5 years after the developer cram houses were made the metal door jams were buckling and rusting, and the crappy nylon siding was cracking. now you go there and all the houses have some major foundation issues for anyone buying (though not major if its not a new investment) bricks are loose enough to just yank off the houses and most of the plastic frame windows have gaps big enough to stick your fingers in.

    Its not that "they just dont make them like they used to", its that "they make them as cheap as possible to maximize profit and run the hell out of town" and that is sad considering the outlandish price they ask.

    we are looking at houses, some are awesome, some are real beaters that need some love, none are built post 1980.

  15. "Implied warrant of Habitibility" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a long time City Planner, I'm surprised that the their attorney did not bring up the "implied warranty of habitability" that is a standard among housing disputes. The clause, included in most building codes, mortgages and fair housing laws has a broad meaning but insures that any housing sold and or rented is habitable. Making a case that the house is NOT habitable with the "magnetic" defects may require some digging around. But if a homeowner CANNOT enjoy the creature comforts of their home,(like TV or the internet) that is enjoyed by others due, whole or in part, to construction defects or errors, they may have a case. ADD the fact that the magnetic interference may interrupt or cause to behave erratically any medical devices, then you have an extra "clear and present danger" to the habitability of their house.

    Due diligence, like inspecting the list of defects covered, may not be probative in this case, if their attorney can prove that this condition happened in a prior building and was not specifically mentioned as a possible defect.

  16. Steel beams - in a home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only time I've seen steel beams in a home is just a single beam
    to replace the centre wood beam. It's a significant expanse, but you
    get a basement without support posts, etc. Homes (as far as I know)
    are stick-framed, not sky scrapers. This whole thing sounds shady...

  17. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easiest way to get rid of magnetism is with flame so just burn the house down.

  18. HDD BS by retech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a bulk tape eraser. Which is an electro-magnet. Tried to erase a few laptop and 3.5 hdds with it. I could pick the drives up by it holding onto the scant bits of ferrous metal in them but was unable to blank any of them. I tried one drive for 3 minutes and it still booted an OS just fine. If they had beams that could corrupt their drives their keys, belts, zippers, furniture and every damn thing in the house with metal would be stuck to that wall before that drive got nailed. It's just normal lifetime use/failure of the drive.

    1. Re:HDD BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reminds me of that cartoon where the mice are driving the cat crazy

  19. Is that a compass in your pocket? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Or are you just happy to see me?

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  20. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    why would someone buy a 20yo house instead of a 100yo house? Hmm...lets think on that a sec... Well, off the top of my head, how about the dramatically increased knowledge about, and regulations then concerning, electrical wiring during that time period? How about the dramatically different levels of insulation the houses would likely have? Because while an old house may be quaint, nothing sucks like paying high heating bills in the winter as your heat just runs straight out the walls, cracks, and single-pane windows - and then the cool does the same during the summer (oh wait, cooling? you likely don't have that, or it was cobbled on after-the-fact in a very ugly and inefficient way). Constantly chasing problems with your electronics because not only is the wiring faulty/flaky/without grounding/likely polarity swapped all over is AWESOME, let me tell you. Not having phone wiring in your house is ok these days, because hell - who has landlines anymore anyway. But it would be nice to have cable runs, which yeah - I guess you could run wires along the floor or something. Sounds great. I mean damn, the old house I owned was built in the 50s, and even it drove me nuts with the cloth-covered non-grounded wiring. Fragile crap I couldn't touch else it would crumble - ended up just throwing up my hands and replacing about 80% of the wiring in the house. And we didn't have an AC, because you know - people in that area just didn't have them in the 50s. But even if we did, it would have been too expensive to run - I took an infrared camera to it one winter and heat came from...everywhere. There wasn't some particular this or that I could improve, it was just...pouring out everywhere. Everyone I've known with an old house has the same problems. You really think that's somehow better? Really?

  21. Seperate document in a contract??? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    By signing the contracts, the buyers agreed to waive claims for repairs except those specifically mentioned in a separate document, which was available for inspection at a separate location and not before or at the time they bought the houses.

    I'm amazed that the courts would uphold part of a contract that... isn't part of the contract. That 'separate document' could be literally anything. Show up the day before signing the contract and see one 'separate document'. Show up with a warranty claim after the sale and see a different document. How would you be able to prove that the document is different if it isn't part of the contract, and you don't have your own copy of it???

    1. Re:Seperate document in a contract??? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      I agree, since there isn't a true "meeting of minds" in such a case. However, the courts don't. An example is with airline tickets, where the ticket contains very little and just refers to voluminous documents that can in theory be inspected at the airline's headquarters. The fact is that no one other than perhaps a few aviation attorneys knows what he is actually agreeing to when buying an airline ticket. The courts are fine with this.

    2. Re:Seperate document in a contract??? by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 1

      Luckily, there are many sane jurisdictions in the world where if an annex is not present at sign-up, it is not considered part of the contract, even if mentioned/refered to in it.

      I even know a place where if a part of the contract is too difficult to read (ex.: low-contrast writing on the back of the paper, 6-point typeface, etc.) that part is null and void. An untested theory includes convoluted language in that rule.

      --
      You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    3. Re:Seperate document in a contract??? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You should sign every page of a contract like that. Building a house from scratch (~1500-2500 sq. ft.) is easily a $250,000-500,000 deal depending on what you want, not reading every piece of the contract or at least having a lawyer go over it is your own fault even if it costs an extra $500. If you see that your contract says that there is another piece to it, go see it before signing away 5 years of income.

      Even newly built houses should have an independent building inspector come (not the one from the city as those only look to see if the house won't crash down on you). But I call baloney on the claims.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  22. The summary, as usual, is wrong. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    The state supreme court will only decide whether the case can proceed despite the waiver attached to the purchase agreement. The question of magnetization and its effects (if any) will be decided by a jury if the case goes to trial.

    BTW "magnetized" is not the same as "charged".

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Trouble is that most people are clueless to what they're getting, so you can pay a fair price for a 2000 sq ft house and still get crap, except you've spent more. To take a beloved group of workers here on slashdot, is the consultant with the highest price tag the best? And for what it's worth, the amount of hidden problems people take over when they buy old houses is usually larger, not smaller. Sellers will often sell at convienient times, kniwing things will break down very soon but not just yet.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  24. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 years after the developer cram houses were made the metal door jams were buckling and rusting, and the crappy nylon siding was cracking.

    Well, these new house developments definitely cut corners, sure, but five years for all that? Seems like you can sue the builders and have them fix it. I just bought a house from one of the sardine-can home builders and my contract includes a ten-year warranty for any structural defects.

    I mean, I got a mortgage, and I can't imagine the bank giving me a loan with collateral that could rot away like that. I'm pretty sure that if the builders want to sell to people who will get loans, they need to offer such warranties.

  25. Silly Story of the Week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really think the editors are idiots? You really think they don't know the difference between a ferromagnet and a charged object? When are you folks going to figure out that slashdot uses a tried and true formulaic mix of stories designed to maximize readership, which includes the Hilariously Stupid Story of the Week?

  26. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by hedwards · · Score: 2

    No kidding. My dad has been remodeling his house and in the process discovered the rather astonishing electrical circuits involved. One of which circles the entire house. And seemingly random splicings that could have burned the house down years ago.

    Not to mention things like the chimney lacking reinforcing in case of earthquakes.

  27. Fail. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    positive or negatively charged building materials.

    Submitter fails Physics. Magnetized materials don't have to be electrically charged (and usually aren't).

    After moving into the homes the couples found that something was not quite right. Their TV screens were distorted. Cordless phones ran into interference. Computer hard drives were corrupted. Soon after it was discovered that steel joists in the homes had become magnetized."

    Everyone mentioned in the article fails Physics, too. Hard drives have very strong magnets inside them, however distance and shielding prevent platters from being affected by those. Floppies and tapes can be damaged by magnets, not hard drives. Magnetic field can only affect electronics by magnetizing cores of coils to saturation or distorting images in CRTs. While old TVs (CRT) and radios (antenna coils' core? I guess, magnetizing it to saturation can render it ineffective) may have this problem, phones and modern TVs don't have CRTs and coils in circuits tuned to low enough frequency to be affected.

    Maybe they are all Juggalos?

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Fail. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Submitter fails Physics. Magnetized materials don't have to be electrically charged (and usually aren't).

      Unless there's something else they read but didn't cite, submitter apparently pulled "positive or negatively charged building materials" ex recto, as the cited story says nothing about it. (I certainly wouldn't sign a contract with any such clause - if I discovered I was living in a giant capacitor, I'd be pretty upset and want the builder to do something about it, e.g. they could attach electrodes to both plates and then grab one electrode with each hand.)

      Maybe they are all Juggalos?

      Fucking Slashdot submissions, how do they work?

    2. Re:Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Floppies and tapes can be damaged by magnets, not hard drives.

      While the strength of the equipment involved substantially differs from what this submission purports to discuss, I must correct you by noting that hard drives can indeed be damaged by magnets.

  28. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

    I didn't say buy and old house and leave it as it is. The price of the house plus a full interior remodel can be similar to building new. I live in a 109 year old house, first thing I did was replace the electrical with a two story house with open attic and basement it's pretty straight forward. Had electrical well above code in a weekend on a 3k square foot home. Cat 6, rg6 and speaker wiring in another couple weekends nearly up to full structured wiring specs (speakers were matched length straight runs). Hell I had fiber out the the garage in another weekend and a ditch witch rental. Figure a thousand in wire etc (those new ground fault bits are expensive).

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  29. It's about "right to sue", not about damages by clem.dickey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slashdot summary does not agree with the original article, which says the Supreme Court will only decide whether the couple has the right to sue (a matter of law). Only later might the question move to whether magnetized joists have caused any trouble, a matter of fact.

    1. Re:It's about "right to sue", not about damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Samzenpus is an idiot. The submission read as follows:

      "FTA: 'After they moved into brand-new homes, two Ohio couples discovered they were living inside magnets. Their TV screens were distorted. Cordless phones ran into interference. Computer hard drives were corrupted.
      The culprit: steel joists that had become magnetized, perhaps during construction. Now, the Ohio Supreme Court is weighing if the couples can sue the builder or if they gave up that right by signing sales contracts limiting what problems the homebuilder has to fix.'

      Sounds like bad science in danger of setting a legal precedent."

      In the process of "editing" the story, he claims the OH supreme court is going to decide whether the builder replaces the beams (untrue: submitter got it right, they're deciding if the couples can sue), and added that bit of stupidity about positive and negative charge (magnetism and charge are entirely different, notwithstanding the use of "positive" and "negative" to describe both of them sometimes).

    2. Re:It's about "right to sue", not about damages by DedTV · · Score: 3, Informative
      Exactly. The Ohio Supreme are not determining if the builder is liable. They are only determining if it's possible for them to be held liable for things not covered by the Home Warranty.

      Centex's argument is that whether it's their fault or not, it's not covered under the Home Warranty so they can't be held liable even if it was their fault and thus the Jones' can't sue them over it. The Jones' are arguing that they have the right to sue based on "Workmanlike manner" clauses in the law and that those clauses can't be waived.

      The only issue in this case is whether the "Workmanlike manner" clauses can be waived by contract. The issue of the floor joists and Centrex's liability would be determined in a separate case if the Supreme Court rules that the "Workmanlike manner" clauses can not be waived.

    3. Re:It's about "right to sue", not about damages by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that basic tech knowledge would be a prerequisite to being an editor on a site like Slashdot.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:It's about "right to sue", not about damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But facts do matter at this phase -- the facts asserted by the plaintiff's lawyer. If the contract gives a warranty for, say, electrical wiring but not for "magnetism", and they ask the court to rule on whether they have a right to sue the contractor for problems with "magnetism", the judge listens to both sides, reads the contract which says nothing about magnetism, agrees with the limits specified in the contract, and says "no". The judge may have done his or her job correctly, but the lawyer for the couples that own the house sure didn't, because whoever advised them that "magnetism" was the problem was an incompetent idiot who doesn't understand that magnetism strong enough to affect computer hard drives would be insanely strong. They'd have metal cutlery yanked off the plates as they walked by if it was that strong.

      The failure here was not the judge's adjudication on the matter brought to them, but the lawyer for bringing the wrong case, apparently without talking to a competent expert on the subject of "magnetism". It's obviously some kind of wiring problem, and I'm sure the builders know or suspect it's something like that, but the contractor's lawyer is under no obligation to tell anyone. I'd be very surprised if the house warranty excluded wiring as something under guarantee.

      They brought the wrong case, the contractors defended against that case, the judge adjudicated that case. There's a big mistake here, but the judge apparently did their job.

  30. I smell bullshit by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    If the joists were as magnetic enough to do what they claim, I would hesitate to walk through the house with steel toed boots. One could lose a foot that way.

    --
    The game.
  31. in Australia... by jezwel · · Score: 1
    *if* you can demonstrate it, this would be covered under our 'not fit for purpose' warranty that is by default applicable to any product sold, and would not need to go to such a high court level. Crazy.

    Would be interesting to see some of the proof though, cutlery sticking to walls?

  32. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    most dishwashers mount by 2 wood screws.

  33. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

    Hard to sue the builders when it's a corp formed just to build the one development then closed down there are no assets. Things have gotten better with them requiring an insurance company to cover that warranty.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  34. let me guess, they're upside down on the loan/home by Locutus · · Score: 1

    sounds suspect to me but I would not be surprised to hear they won their case given the populations understanding of this stuff.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  35. This burned me some years ago by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I was selling an old CRT (when they were worth something) and I put it on the floor beside my computer. When the guy came in to see it the whole image was screwed. After the guy left I picked up my monitor and it un-distorted. The beam in the floor had somehow become a compass spinning monster. But beyond messing with classified ad sales I don't know what other negative impact it might have had.

    1. Re:This burned me some years ago by unitron · · Score: 1

      You put it on the floor beside your computer. Was the computer running at the time?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:This burned me some years ago by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't expect strong magnetic fields from a PC because otherwise it would wreak havoc with the people who put the PC next to their CRT monitor. On the other hand, I have noticed computer monitors are generally better shielded than your typical CRT television.

  36. Solution: use a gigantic degaussing ring by microphage · · Score: 1

    Use a gigantic degaussing ring, similar to what they used on old CRT television tubes.

  37. Freshman Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even if the warranty they signed had covered "replacing positive or negatively charged building materials" I'm not sure how that would help them. What kind of charge are we looking at? Electric charge? Ground it. There is no "magnetic charge" out there. Or, rather, modern science has yet to observe such a thing.

  38. Ground Loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds more like a ground loop or hum modulation in the common electrical system... ground potential differences somewhere?

  39. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've very recently brought a very cheap ex council house built in 1938 - the wiring has been completely redone in 2007 and is to specs laid out in that year, the gas system & boiler (furnace) is up to 2004 regs, it has double glazing throughout, loft insulation, TRVs, energy saving bulbs, etc etc. In the UK, you must have an energy performance certificate when selling houses - the house is rated between A to F in terms of energy efficiency. The house got band C which is impressive for its age. The surveyor report rated the house as in "excellent" condition although it does need some superficial redecoration in all rooms.

  40. Expert Witness by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a case more in need of an expert witness than this one.

  41. Ferromagnetism by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    You'd need to have a superconducting magnet like one in an MRI machine to get effects like they're talking about. Steel, by itself, cannot sustain field strengths that high. Claim is total nonsense.

    1. Re:Ferromagnetism by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I agree.

  42. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    replace the electrical with a two story house with open attic and basement

    For my next trick, I'll replace the water lines so I have hot and cold running skyscrapers!

  43. Baloney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A huge number of buildings have been built using steel or iron, there has been over a century of constant construction all over the world. Amazing that these people are the first to experience a problem with magnetic fields!

  44. Every Commercial Building in the U.S.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The interior construction of most commercial buildings is drywall over steel studs. Low-rise Business Park type buildings have steel truss roofing and interior floors.

    Maybe that's why MS, Oracle, IBM, Morgan Stanley and all those mom & pop shops in the business parks are hosed up - all their electronics are under attack by the building's magnetic fields!

  45. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by flonker · · Score: 1

    The general contractor is personally liable. The individual contractors are also personally liable for their respective trades. Why do you think so many GCs declared bankruptcy after the "Chinese drywall" issues came to light?

  46. Feynman by Jimbookis · · Score: 1

    Christ, where's Richard Feynman when you need him? Having him as an expert witness in this case I am sure a small chuckle would be all that's needed for the judges to throw the case out.

  47. That's some crappy steel... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Low carbon steel is needed to retain or channel magnetic flux in any appreciable amount. And low-carbon steel is exactly the opposite of what you want for structural steel, where carbon is desired because of the strength it lends. I'd want the steel replaced because it's lousy steel, not because it's magnetized...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  48. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 1

    Most dishwashers are held in place with exactly two screws. Wood screws are nicer than typical - most of the time I see drywall screws.

    Otherwise you're absolutely right, you get exactly what you pay for. If you don't know enough to assess the property on your own, or you don't pay a qualified inspector (and even more rare - an honest and knowledgeable one) to tell you about the house and heed his warnings, you're stupid. Quality of materials and workmanship is not that hard to inspect by eye.

    --

    Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
  49. Drawn to the case? by mfnickster · · Score: 2

    Why do you suppose the court was attracted to this case? It seems like it could be very polarizing.

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  50. check the buyer's financials. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    look into the homeowners financials, i bet anyone $100 that these people cannot afford their payments and are trying to use ignorant courts to defraud the builders.

    nothing in this case makes sense

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  51. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    no. Replacing all the wiring, plumbing and insulation in the house - plus retro-fitting cooling ducts in without it looking horrible - is *not* a minor thing that keeps an old house cheaper than a new house. Unless you're doing it completely yourself, and you have months (and the skill...) to do it, you will be spending far more to do all that than it would cost to just get a new house. If you have the time to completely gut and remodel your entire house, then great, but most of us don't.

  52. Clown sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking magnets, how do they work?

  53. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by tibit · · Score: 1

    The banks have no clue what the collateral is. They send an appraiser who does a joke of an appraisal and that's it. The residential mortgage underwriting system in the U.S. is fundamentally broken.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  54. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by guruevi · · Score: 2

    Dangerous electrical wiring has been replaced in most places (the ones where the leads run uninsulated in the spaces in the walls divided by the wooden beams). Insulation is likewise easily fixed either on the exterior or the interior. It's also been noticed lately that new, fully insulated houses might be worse for your health than those with "holes in the wall". The air gets stagnant and mold develops much easier in these super insulated houses. I just replaced ALL my windows with double pane, LoE3 glass for ~$5000 done by a professional and that alone helps a lot. The siding has insulation and the attic has been finished so all of that (floor and rafters) has insulation. Sure there is still heat pouring out here and there but it's not too bad and as I said, keeps the air from getting stagnant.

    Also, most wiring issues (disconnected ground, polarity reversal) can easily be fixed usually at the socket that's misbehaving. Grounding shouldn't be an issue if the wiring has been done since the mid-60s but for really old houses you just need to re-run electricity (a $2000-$5000 job for a professional).

    Extra cable and CAT5 runs (installed it last summer) behind my siding to the basement to every room. It's invisible, you just need a drill. I installed a 220V line to get a AC unit and it cools the whole house. I could've gotten it with the heating system (if you use forced air, uses the same ducts). AC is not really necessary in a lot of places, you just need to circulate air and that helps a lot, you could use the basement as a heat sink as well.

    Get an inspector before you buy though, it'll cost you $100-200 but they can point out a lot of potential issues. My house had a CO leaking heater furnace (the heating elements were rusted through) something you can't see with the naked eye.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  55. Wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Slashdot suggesting that it isn't normal for pocket change to stick to the ceiling?

  56. Effectively haunted by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    By an electromagnetic poltergeist.

    Pretty creepy.

  57. Names, anyone? by darkonc · · Score: 1

    I can't get to the text of TFA, and I can't find the names of either the plaintiff or the defendant. Without that, it's too difficult to track down the case and related documentation.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  58. Either bogus, or electrical wiring by Animats · · Score: 2

    Obviously they don't have a "magnetic beam" problem. They might have some electrical wiring problem. Those are easy to find.

    Only once have I seen a real "magnet problem". I was trying to get a flux-gate compass to work in a mobile robot at Stanford, and was getting bogus results. So I got an ordinary needle compass, and observed that it didn't point north. I walked around with the compass plotting directions, and the center of the problem was a small building about a block away. When I went into the building, I saw "High Magnetic Field" warning signs, and found out there was a superconducting magnet in there. A big one. Even there, it was only one gauss just outside the lab.

    1. Re:Either bogus, or electrical wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An NMR? Got to keep outside the circle!

    2. Re:Either bogus, or electrical wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a neat story. Beats most of the drivel on slashdot anyways.

    3. Re:Either bogus, or electrical wiring by UBfusion · · Score: 1

      Since at least in three occasions I've seen a hard disk die because of PSU/UPS/mains failure, I'd say that an electrical problem could be a possible cause. For example, ground loops can cause large currents flow between the electrical ground and water pipes, if the installation is particularly faulty.

      What bothers me is the inadequacy of their lawyer - how can he sue a construction company without having an expert research report/testimony on the problems? Did he even care to google for "magnetized joists"?

    4. Re:Either bogus, or electrical wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. That's makes me wonder if we'll start having problems with magnetic compasses when everyone is driving around in an electric car with a powerful rare-earth magnetic electric motor.

    5. Re:Either bogus, or electrical wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the building's structural steel was magnetized by one or more HDDs aligned in just the right way on a full moon. Throw some cordless phones in the mix and it's a lead pipe cinch.

  59. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by mldi · · Score: 1

    Why home buyers figure out that a brand new home in a band new subdivision is nothing but a great big PITA for the next 20 years. Get a nice old home if it's been standing for 100 years it's probably going to continue to do so if make sure the roof gutters and siding are in good order.

    Any house requires regular maintenance. Some of the problems the new homes have involve how the house settles. This can cause basement leaks, cracked paint/drywall, and all sorts of random problems. However, unless you made a terrible deal, most of these things are probably covered by some kind of warranty if the house is "new" enough. Build quality differs from house to house but I've never heard of someone who's owned a house for at least 5 years and has never had a single problem with it, no matter how old it was.

    --
    If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  60. Earth's magnetic field magniizes soft iron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody who has worked with soft iron/steel - like railroad rails - learns from experience that the earth's magnetic field slowly magnetizes the iron/steel. It happens faster when there are shocks, as a train passing over the rail.

    Didn't anyone anymore do the demonstration in elementary school where one hammers on a soft iron rod and sees how it becomes magnetized?

  61. Apathetic Bl**dy Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "By signing the contracts, the buyers agreed to waive claims for repairs except those specifically mentioned in a separate document, which was available for inspection at a separate location and not before or at the time they bought the houses."

    It was on display on the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard.'"

  62. Lightning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen color CRTs get screwed up by lightning-induced magnetic fields. A direct hit to a lightning rod can draw thousands of amps of current for a millisecond or so. That induces a potent short-lived magnetic field that can magnetize nearby objects.

  63. tinfoil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell the to put on their tin foil hats on and forget about it. Hard drive being erased? check your local trojan. phone/tv interference, check for a local radio station. I bet they have a 100KW station in their back yard.

    magnetic beams, right! and they are made from unobtainium.

  64. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Really depends on how bad the old house is, and how much the new houses cost. In my area, a decent old house could save some money. But like you said, time and energy (as in doing the work) are also expenses.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  65. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by shatteredpottery · · Score: 1

    Depends. My 100 (ok, I exaggerate. It's 99) year old house has, um a 175A panel and all modern wiring. Cost me $6k, took an electrician about a week, done just before we moved in (we'd expected it, and it means our insurance rate is low, too). It's got blown in insulation, done before I bought it, but essentially the same as my neighbor's 10yo house. And single-pane windows aren't that much worse than double on an old house. Unlike a modern house, they are generally inset about 4 inches. This isn't just aesthetic - there's a boundary layer that gets trapped, even in high winds, which is not the case with modern flush windows. Yeah, that's what those "cute" sills and frames are for - they're actually functional. More heat is lost to convection than to radiation, so don't put too much stock in your infrared pix. People weren't stupid 100 years ago, or even 1000 years ago. Oh, and cooling? Hah. Don't need aircon. Double-hung windows have a purpose, again it's not just aesthetics. Open both top and bottom, and the hot air goes out the top, sucking cool air in the bottom. You won't get better than outside ambient air temp, but that's usually adequate in the Pacific NW. And you get a constant air recirc and breeze,*even in a room with only the window open. Bliss. And I could go on about the gallery design of such houses.

    Unlike my neighbor (10yo house again), I don't have mold growing on the drywall in my basement, the foundation's quite done settling, and my 1953 GE gas furnace, while not as efficient as his THIRD furnace, is definitely more reliable. With a programmable thermostat, my costs are low. I did have to replace a thermocouple once ($25). But I'm pretty sure, if you include the various replacements/tinkering he's had to do, it's WAY cheaper to run, even if it uses more gas.

    Downsides: plaster walls. Hate em. Hard to put holes in. Hard to fix. Though they kill sound better than drywall. Erm, that's about it. I definitely spend less time and effort on repairs than my neighbors. But the, say, $10k and 2 weeks I paid/took to bring it up to code was much less than the price differential between it and a new house.

    As an aside, most (not all) houses build during and after WWII, say to 1955 or so, suck really bad. The build quality and materials are significantly inferior to early 1900's houses, or to modern houses. They do tend to be leaky, drafty, and have all sorts of terrible engineering (flush, metal pane windows, leaky cripple walls, etc).

    --

    A witty saying is worth nothing - Voltaire

  66. Magnetized cranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to hire an electrician to fix their wiring.

  67. Its the Dharma station 6 by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    Seriously,
    The Island is causing it.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  68. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by adolf · · Score: 2

    The dishwasher is just an appliance, not a structural item. How many screws hold the washing machine, clothes drier, fridge, or tank water heater in place?

    The two screws are just there to keep the thing from tipping forward annoyingly when the racks are all the way out. They're perfectly adequate for this role (actually, one screw in the right spot would be adequate -- three points define a plane...).

    I've seen children swing from cabinet doors, teenagers slam them with wild abandon, and homeowners who don't know how to tighten a screw when things get wonky with time. I've seen top dollar decks rot from general lack of maintenance. And I've seen folks who are unqualified to hang anything on any wall, because the first thing they do is reach for a hammer and a nail, and when that doesn't work, they find a bigger hammer.

    My house has some drywall that is 50 or 60 years old, just 3/8" thick, and brittle. It holds stuff just fine, provided that appropriate fasteners are used in appropriate ways. It's not rocket surgery.

    Some people try to take care of their things. Some people don't think they have time to figure out how. The former group is proud of their collection of tools and earned experience. The latter bemoans every failure as being someone else's problem without ever considering if there were something they could have done differently.

    *shrug*

  69. Worsens corrosion in fact by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    The bimetal is for structural integrity not corrosion prevention. Boatbuilders who have to use an aluminum superstructure on a steel hull (usually for stability reasons) will normally isolate them using an insulating gasket and insulated bolts, or a gap filling adhesive with standoffs. This is to prevent the problem described by tragedy above, but is not as strong as an AlFe bond. The hull of course does not get electrically charged (it is in seawater, Dummkopf...), it is current flows due to differences in surface potential that cause the problems.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  70. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe what they were adovcating is buying an old house, having it torn down to its studs and redoing everything. BTW I agree with it, it is a lot of work but I would rather buy a house that has settled, has a history (stood the test of time) and rebuild it. Assuming there is redeeming qualities to it. Oh and right yeah I have done that several times over...

  71. solid brick vs cheap wood framed by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Round where I live the option is 20 year old wood framed, dry wall and clad modern places, versus brick built 100 year old houses. I've lived in both, and I prefer solid brick built houses. Much better build quality on the older places, much more solid. As another poster has noted, my place has done all it's settling. Insulation isn't so good for keeping the heat in, but definitely bettter sound insulation. Definitely you need to update the electrics and check out the quality of plumbing, but you need to do that in any property over 20 years old (in the UK electric regulations change about once every ten years so you need to be thinking about keeping your electrics up to date if you want to sell the place).

      Modern places you can punch your first through the wall, mine, you need a heck of a drill to put up a picture frame. Mind you this at least is a bit easier than the last place, a 1720s house. Not a lot you can do with 2 foot thick stone walls apart from route everything round them.... :-)

  72. Builder by kurtis25 · · Score: 1

    Centax must have a pretty bad warranty or their is more to the story... Standard warranties cover structural defects for 5-10 years so it sounds like these folks but a home without a substandard warranty. Having worked for a home builder fixing latent defects (defects which cause structural damage thus are covered by a structural warranty, ie mold from bad masonry gets on the frame of the home, in order to fix the frame the masonry and mold must be fixed). I'm guessing the house was poorly built and likely has electrical and or plumbing issues. That being said some homes or parts of homes just have charges (i'm a builder not a scientist so I don't know the technically correct term). In some homes the walls become charged and attract dust along the beams creating rather odd shadow like dust lines on the interior walls where the beams are. This can be caused by weather (hot / cold, wet / dry (from running humidifiers), improper insulation, plumbing, electrical issues, etc. but isn't an actual structural defect. I'll venture to say about the same thing is happening in this house but I doubt their list of issues is valid.

  73. Re:junk science - not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The merit claim says "crt televisions", "cordless phones", and "computer hard drives". The first two are very definitely affected by minor magnetic fields. I do doubt the hard drives are that easily affected but I would expect that the computers were older instead of being newer technology. The owners moved into these houses 6 years ago and probably did not buy new electronics at the time, so the tv, computer and cordless phone would be older technology.

    BTW, I have a cheap android cell phone which when laid down next to my desktop ( 1 year old) produces interface with the sound, cheaper electronics are not always shielded that well.

    Claim is unlikely but not entirely impossible. If anything is going on in these houses, it is probably some sort of faulty wiring issue using the steel beams as a ground. The builder is not arguing that there is no problem, he is arguing a magnetic field is not a warranty item.

  74. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's not rocket surgery." What a great mixed metaphor.

  75. Nonsense by gweihir · · Score: 1

    The TV is the only one of these that can actually happen, but only if it is not an LCD. Static magnetism has zero influence on wireless transmissions. It can also not be strong enough in steel to do any harm to HDDs. For that you need several orders of magnitude more.

    And for the submitter: There is no "positive" or "negative" and no "charge" in magnetism. Seems you failed physics 101.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  76. Either that or by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    By an electromagnetic poltergeist.

    Pretty creepy.

    Either that or magneto is their next door neighbour

  77. Many Dorms.... by Drago3711 · · Score: 0

    When I was in college one of my first dorm walls was a magnetic metal sheet (it was an OLD building) and we never had any electronics problems...except horrible cell signal. It was useful when hanging posters.

  78. Magnetic field simply affecting wires and cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with the other posts calling this BS. I'm wondering if the real problem is simply that cables and wiring that are in close proximity to the steel joists are being affected. Does that jive?

  79. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    It doesn't need to be 100 years old, but find one with the old heavy wood floor trusses and a real wood sub floor (real plywood works as well but not the cheap MDF they use now). My neighborhood was built in the late 60s early 70s and the houses are all in good condition and were made from real wood. Granted the previous owner of my house should not have ever been allowed to touch tools, but now that most of his screw ups have been corrected I haven't had any problems. I do however need to rewire the house as there is just too much wire in it as all 36 breakers in the panel are filled and each one controls something in my 1900 sq. ft. house. Also the previous owner liked to party so the sheet rock has a lot of patch work that has been done and doesn't look the greatest so when I replace that I will rewire the house and get some 10 gauge wire in it instead of the 12 gauge that is currently code for the minimum as well as running network, cable tv, and phone throughout the house.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  80. Can't Be True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Materials used in building will not hold much of a magnetic charge at all. You can take cheap steel and make a weak magnet but that's all you'll get. And just about anything will cause it to lose its magnetic strength. Hit it with a hammer a few times and watch its charge drop.
                High strength spherical magnets are used to pull dents out of brass musical instruments. People who use them usually do suffer injury as they will jump quite a distance and fingers or hands caught in between get mashed bad. It is sort of like having one in a room and sliding it inside a dented tuba and then bringing the other in the room and wiggle it near the other side of the brass so that the ball shape rolls out the dent. But eventually you get just a little careless and you get hurt.

  81. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Sounds similar to when I helped my dad redo his house that was built in 1921. It had the old octopus furnace in the basement, no AC, no insulation and that old fabric covered wire. The interior walls were all plaster over lath and once we had those down you could see light from outside. After spending a summer gutting the house and redoing the interior and siding it was a really nice little house that had a finished basement. It had proper insulation, good wiring, refinished oak floors, oak doors and oak cabinets, modern central heating and air and even a shower (previously it only had an old cast iron bath tub). These changes really upped the value of the house and dramatically lowered utility and insurance costs as the building is no longer a fire hazard. The improvements have probably paid from them selves in utility and insurance savings over the last 12 years.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  82. Mythbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like a job for Mythbusters!

  83. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rocket Surgery?

    Do tell...that sounds fantastically dangerous and interesting at the same time.

  84. Stupid question by pkinetics · · Score: 1
    I was curious and started reading a little about welding. One of the tips was:

    Q: Does An AC Output Have Any Advantages? A: Yes, if you need to weld on material that's become magnetized from friction, such as when hay, feed or water constantly rub against a steel part. A DC output won't work because of "arc blow," where the magnetic field blows the molten filler metal out of the weld puddle. Because an AC output alternates between polarities, it enables you to weld magnetized parts.

    With all things hypothetical, and that I am not an electrical engineer (please feel free to correct me) just someone who has worked on his house too often, couldn't something like fiberglass insulation, induce a static charge that could magnetize the joist? (A friend of mine was hauling insulation into his house, and vacuumed the stuff that fell out, and the static electricity blew out his vacuum cleaner and tripped the circuit. He told me never to vacuum without misting it first). I don't know how much and even if it is possible, but since most wiring is run along joists and studs, etc, can the current be altered enough by the magnetized beams to mess with an electrical device?

    I know how to do basic electrical work around the house. This kind of stuff exceeds my basic knowledge.

  85. Hammerfest by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    You'll remember that when the Germans set up V2s to fire at London, what the RAF noticed as handy targets were the identical oriented sheds - in which teams of soldiers with little hammers would tap the fuselages first, so that magnetic targetting would work. Don't you know there's a war on?

  86. I call BS by stinkydog · · Score: 1

    Magnetized steel beams are not the likely culprit. How did it make it this far with such a lousy summary? This reads as a grounding issue. The symptoms fit perfectly. The steel beams are connected to earth at one potential and the grounding rod / waterline bond is at another. Somewhere in the house, connections are bridged so current is flowing from one ground path to the other on a high resistance link. The fix is to bond the building steel to the common earth that the electrical panel is utilizing with a hefty piece of copper wire. Drain the imbalance and modern electrical equipment starts working correctly.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  87. Buy them solid state drives and led/lcd TV's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like the cheapest solution is just to replace all of their TV's with LCD/LED TV's,
    and replace all hard discs with solid state drives of the same size.

  88. Give up. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    You are attempting to argue through the presentation of data derived from direct observation.

    That's science. You will find that does not work as a mode of argument.

    Get somebody famous (like Stephen Hawking or Snooki) to say you are right and it won't matter if you've misinterpreted your data or not. That always works better than the scientific method (observing reality, formulating hypotheses and making experiments) for convincing people of things on the Internet.

    PS: Incidentally, if it was an original IBM PC/XT or something similar, there may have been wirewound inductors on the mobo that were close enough to the case to be tweaked by a fridge magnet. You probably wouldn't see anything like that in a modern computer.

    1. Re:Give up. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      not really.
      You are attempting to argue through the presentation of data derived from direct observation by an untrained source.

      That's not science, that's crap.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Give up. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. :)

      You need a preacher-man to tell you what to believe, or you will be incapable of believing it. A "trained" man.

      For some people, the preacher-man has to wear robes and a funny collar. For others, the preacher has to wear a white lab coat and have a sheepskin on his wall. But in either case, the basic idea of evaluating observations rigorously through hypotheses and experimentation is not present. Instead, all data that does not conform to dogma is discarded out of hand.

      See, even if I don't necessarily believe that another person's theories are valid, I will always defend a person's use of direct observation and physical experimentation against any dogma-based, faith-in-the-preacher-man attacks. You can be wrong by any method, including the scientific method, but it's the best method we've got, and the interesting science is in the corners, where the anomalous observations are reported.

      Nobody ever discovered anything important by saying "that guy's reports don't match the textbook answers, so he must be wrong!" but lots of advances have come from somebody saying "this guy's report doesn't make sense - let's investigate."

  89. well, at least part of it is not true by sribe · · Score: 1

    Computer hard drives were corrupted.

    Bullshit. Corrupting hard drives from a distance of a few feet requires ***MASSIVE*** magnetic force.

  90. Leopard by greghodg · · Score: 0

    I don't get the bewareoftheleopard tag for this article. These people _want_ their house torn down, not the other way around!

    1. Re:Leopard by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I think it's a reference to a specious argument.

      If I were MORBO, I would say:

      "MAGENTS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY"
      also:

      "I will DESTROY you."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. Screwing up TV reception and HDDs? by BillX · · Score: 1

    Maybe the house was built over an Amish burial ground.

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  92. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with each breaker controlling exactly one thing? 14 Gauge is the minim for 15 amp circuits 12 for 20 (if you do not live in the us you might have 30 amp regular circuits and need 10 gauge). I like having one outlet per breaker my electrical inspector did not care for it to much but he still passed it. I do have all the smoke/co2 alarms on one breaker but they have battery backup and needed an extra wire to communicate between themselves and the home security system. It also make it much easier when I put in the sub pannel for the gen's transfer switch.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  93. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately few people care about the beauty of a well finished old growth wood floor course they also think pergo looks nice. Houses used to be something you passed down from generation to generation, and people wonder why these idiots got us into sub prime mortgages.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  94. Everyone is ignoring the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They built the home over an old graveyard and didn't move the bodies.

  95. Just a few of 'em. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    A magnetized hull is detrimental to a number of electronic warfare devices. We're not so worried about mines, or even being detected, so much as we're concerned about the proper functioning of sonar, radar, gunplot, computers, etc ad nauseum.

    Then somebody's not worrying about the right things.

    A magnetized hull is a problem for:
      - Magnetic compasses (and dip sensors) for input to the navigational system. (Not just on the ship itself, but also for other devices nearby, such as other ships.)
      - Magnetometers for detecting enemy resources - like subs.
      - The ship itself being detected due to its own magnetic field.
      - CRT based displays (if the magnetization is extreme.)

    The rest of the stuff you mention (sonar, radar (except for big CRT screens), computers, etc.) could really care less about fields resulting from stray magnetization of the hull. If a steel hull were completely saturated it still would be too weak to be an issue - except maybe for old-style ferrite floppy disks or reels of magnetic tape sitting directly against it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  96. TVs could be affected by weak DC magnets. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    To get such an effect you would have to have an active wide-band transmitter (to affect TV's, ...

    CRT TVs can be affected by moderate ambient DC (and low-frequency AC) mag fields - comparable to the local magnetic field from the Earth. They deflect the electron beam. Such a weak field wouldn't be noticed on a black-and-white TV. But on a color set - especially an older one - it can drastically affect both the color convergence and the interaction of the beams with the shadow mask, resulting in blotches of color, patchy or overall shifts in color (as beams are partially deflected to the wrong phosphor dot, and other visible effects. Magnetization of the shadow mask also does this.

    A color set (especially an older one with the triangular gun arrangement and perhaps no - or a defective - automatic degausser) may need to be adjusted for its location and orientation in a room. And a magnetized steel beam would exacerbate the problem beyond that experienced from just the Earth's field.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:TVs could be affected by weak DC magnets. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      a) Who uses CRT's still? I think the claim was about reception on TV's and phone's which would not be affected by a static magnetic field.
      b) Their TV would be several feet away from either the floor or the ceiling (where those metal beams would be). The weak magnetic field of those beams would have no effect. If they did, you would see all kinds of dust, tools, keys inching towards the metal beam although having your keys suspended in air would be pretty cool.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:TVs could be affected by weak DC magnets. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      a) Who uses CRT's still?

      People who already have them.

      b) Their TV would be several feet away from either the floor or the ceiling (where those metal beams would be). The weak magnetic field of those beams would have no effect.

      Back in the '60s I had an old (at the time) color TV - and a friend who worked at a used computer company. At one point he got hold of some alnico magnets out of the voice-coil actuators for some of the washing-machine style disk drives. He bought one over to my place. From diagonally across the living room + dining room + hall we were able to totally wreck the color on the TV just by rotating the magnet. Dipole field falls off with inverse CUBE and these magnets were only a few inches long (pole to pole). So a magnetized region on a floor joist I-beam right under the set whould have done a LOT more to that particular set.

      If they did, you would see all kinds of dust, tools, keys inching towards the metal beam although having your keys suspended in air would be pretty cool.

      Nope. Nowhere near that must field is required. Electron beams in shadow-mask tubes are exquisitely sensitive to small magnetic fields. If the field is strong enough to make a compass misbehave it's strong enough to tweak the color on those old sets.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  97. Video of Oral Arguments in This Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ohio Supreme Court broadcasts oral arguments live on a cable feed, and I watched the arguements for this case. The recorded feed (both audio-only and video) is at: http://www.supremecourtofohiomedialibrary.org/MediaSearchResults.aspx. Look for "Case No. 2010-1826 Paul Jones et al. v. Centex Homes"

    The Supreme Court preview summary of the oral arguements may be read at: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/oralArguments/11/1004/1004.asp#OA101826.

  98. Nobody In Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To let the judges know the claims in the case are entirely bogus? Not one Ohioan to point out the ludicrousness of it?

  99. Measure and quantify... by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Measure and quantify what is going on!

    Magnetism is easy to measure.

    Older large tube displays did have circuits to
    degause and normalize the system.. Rotating
    some big 21+ inch monitors could see alignment
    changes as it was moved from north-south to east-west
    so it does not take a large field but they were designed to
    deal with this. In the years since the original litigation
    the digital transition has taken place so no OLD TV
    is likely in service and if so could be replaced for a
    couple hours of legal time.

    One possible interaction is ground loop currents from
    multi phase power distribution. Ground loops can
    move astounding currents and if the connections to
    the steel were just so and some steel bolted but insulated
    by rust and other steel welded resulting in odd paths and
    grounding currents perhaps hundreds of amps could
    be flowing because of bad or anomalous earthing.

    Again this can be tested and measured...

    Ground loops are scarry. years ago some friends were pulling
    a wire across a roof that had transformers on it. The
    cases of the transformers were 'ground'. As the wire
    was pulled tight (make shift antenna) it touched
    both and promptly turned red and fuse linked in a big
    shower of sparks. We did check it and have it rechecked
    and it was all "correct" however the length of the grounds
    to common earth was long enough (resistive and inductive) to generate
    a low voltage astoundingly high amperage current.

    Ohio is electrical storm country. Get lightening rods
    installed and verify earthing for the entire structure at
    the same time.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  100. AFTER MOVVING INTO THE HOUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have a feeling someone shipped their computer and their CRT screen to close to their sub-woofers been their done that.....

  101. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why would someone buy a 20yo house instead of a 100yo house? Hmm...lets think on that a sec...

    Don't forget the best part, asbestos !

  102. Re:junk science - not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cordless phones are not affected by magnetic fields. And for practical purposes, CRT televisions don't exist anymore; if that's they problem, it can be fixed for less than $200.

    You cell phone causes audio interference because it emits RF.

  103. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by causality · · Score: 1

    Some people try to take care of their things. Some people don't think they have time to figure out how. The former group is proud of their collection of tools and earned experience. The latter bemoans every failure as being someone else's problem without ever considering if there were something they could have done differently.

    Fuck man, you said it. I can't tell you how many times I've tried to explain this notion, usually in the context of computer security.

    In so many words it amounts to, "you're not a baby anymore, you're as helpless as you choose to be, learning can be a joyful process of discovery and amazement, independence is a virtue, and the more personal freedom and integrity you have the less you blame others for your problems".

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  104. Re:Chose builder that gives you the lowest quote.. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    I actually wouldn't mind one breaker controlling one thing, but there are 4 rooms on 2 floors (not near each other) that are on 1 breaker, the light in the garage and one of the 3 exterior lights are on another breaker while the other 2 exterior lights and garage door are on another. The rest of the house is similarly wired. There is no rhyme or reason for how it is wired. I would love to have 1 room 1 breaker with major appliances like the fridge, stove, chest freezer, etc.. on their own circuit, and a 220v circuit in the garage. It isn't that big of a house to justify the about of wire that is in it given the number of outlets and appliances. I have a gas dryer, gas furnace, and gas water heater.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  105. Re:Worsens corrosion in fact by Cramer · · Score: 1

    Actually, the hull is charged as part of the protection system. It's a very small charge (less than a volt if I remember correctly) but enough to get current flowing out the zinc annodes. (vs. the hull itself.)

    The issue with aluminium/steal junctions is that it creates a bimetal junction, which is a thermocouple and will create a current.