Slashdot Mirror


HP Rethinking Wisdom of Spinning Off PC Division

bdking writes "After signing off on former CEO Leo Apotheker's proposal to spin off or sell HP's personal computer unit, the company's braintrust is reassessing the wisdom of dumping a division that contributes nearly 30% of revenue and holds together a valuable supply chain." HP appears concerned not so much for the revenue generated by PC hardware, but instead by access to various distribution and supply channels. It seems that just announcing a spin-off has affected their access to retail distributors.

189 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. My thoughts by jesseck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I won't purchase an HP device (didn't before, either) and don't recommend them to friends and family (didn't then, either). This is just reinforcement of my beliefs. Who wants to own a device, that the manufacturer doesn't want themselves?

    1. Re:My thoughts by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't care what anyone says, the mid-range and high-end HP printers are still among the best. As much as I think HP seems poised to jump into a deep dark chasm, I hesitate to imagine what will happen if it actually does. I'm not terribly interested in their PCs and was stung by two of their notebooks, and their low-end printers are just as shitty as Lexmark's or Canon's, but if you're looking at mid-range color printers or at high end stuff, HP is tough to beat.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:My thoughts by middlemen · · Score: 2

      Have you tried Brother's printers. They work pretty well, are reasonably priced and have Linux drivers that work. I have been using their Laser printer for the past 3 years now and it has never disappointed me.

    3. Re:My thoughts by The+Fur · · Score: 2

      That is the sad part. They have always made great printers. But their PCs/laptops are crap for the most part. Even their customer support isn't good. The only people worse in CS and product is Sony imo. Their VIO line is a crapfest. If HP would concentrate on what they do best, printers, they could destroy the marketshare and make up for any losses they had from the PC/laptop market.

    4. Re:My thoughts by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      My personal preference is toward Samsung printers. They publish their own Linux drivers and haven't let me down in terms of reliability/performance.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Yes, because HP has shown themselves to be masters of the art of running a business....

    6. Re:My thoughts by ajlitt · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the cheap and DRM unencumbered ink and toner. From what I understand, the page counter in their toner cartridges is entirely mechanical and easy to reset.

    7. Re:My thoughts by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always had a rule when purchasing PCs. Now, this rule has since lost much of it's impact, since one of the manufacturers went poof, and the other two merged -

      Never buy a computer with PACK/PAQ in the name. At the time, this included Hewlett Packard, Compaq, and Packard Bell

      Although losing much of it's impact, the rule still stands (at least for me)

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    8. Re:My thoughts by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      their low-end printers are just as shitty as Lexmark's or Canon's

      Somewhere in China there's a factory that makes the internals for ALL cheap printers and depending on incoming orders puts them in a slightly different case and slaps a different sticker on the box. Ditto the laptops, clothes, etc.

      Its like being astounded that the quality of the clothes at walmart, target, and kohls are all about the same, when they all came outta the same political prisoner staffed sweatshop and arrived onshore inside the same shipping container. Its not like the more expensive store sprinkles their clothes with "cool dust" or something. At the bottom, its all just junk.

      Since the support for all of them is going to be a call center in India where a dude tells you to reinstall XP even if you tell him you have a mac, you may as well just buy the cheapest one.

      This does not explain why Brother's printers just absolutely rock. Work on linux outta the box, scanner/fax function works outta the box, supports ipv6 for something like a decade. Rare to have a mechanical problem, rarely jams. "Just works" kinda like HP stuff used to B.C. (Before Carly)

      There is a swamp at the bottom of the barrel where it all sucks, but a step up from that and there's some good products out there.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    9. Re:My thoughts by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2

      My personal preference is toward Samsung printers. They publish their own Linux drivers and haven't let me down in terms of reliability/performance.

      I heard Canon is suing them for making their printers shaped like a rectangle with paper trays. ;P

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    10. Re:My thoughts by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The HP Probooks-- specifically the 4000 line-- are remarkably good, and are among the best laptops Ive used.

    11. Re:My thoughts by YoungHack · · Score: 1

      I've never heard this rule, but it immediately resonated with my experience.

    12. Re:My thoughts by afidel · · Score: 1

      He said midrange and high end (ie LJ4250 and up), there's no DRM or toner page counters on those units.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:My thoughts by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how many businesses run $XXXXX HP printers because of the readily available toner and supply chains, the high availability of parts, and the decent reliability. I don't mind their workstations either, on the low-mid grade they are just as competitive as anybody else. They get pricey quick though, but our users don't need those, so no warrant for my research.

      On that note, my next home printer is going to 90% be a brother or cannon, I just can't seem to find myself to like HP photo printing (not sure about brother, cannon is amazing), which is a feature I require for my printers :)

    14. Re:My thoughts by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I work for an "HP Certified Reseller" so all of our clients get HP clients and servers. In general, their clients and workstations are total crap, their business notebooks are pretty mediocre for the price but I haven't had any major issues with them, their servers are also mediocre. HP monitors are some of the worst pains in the ass I've had to deal with, mostly due to issues with the monitors' firmware. However, I will admit that I really like HP printers and that's the one thing I would buy again from them, although I'm beginning to see a lot of printers with equal or superior capabilities (but quality unknown) from other vendors for half or a third of the price.

    15. Re:My thoughts by afidel · · Score: 1

      We like the Elitebooks, they've been about as reliable as our Lenovo Thinkpads at about 2/3rds the price.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:My thoughts by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Multi national businesses are coming to grips with a shrinking world, some will survive this transition. HP doesn't understand that a quick ROI is expensive, it will not survive at this rate. Some other company that can plan further ahead than the next dividend will take HP's place, that is life. I will miss hp, their reputation for making fine products isn't based on selling cheap crap, but its handlers are. I hope that hp sees the day when their share holders, and the its board members stop treating their collective heads like suppositories.

    17. Re:My thoughts by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Somewhere there's a plant that makes the internals for all the expensive printers too. I worked on a line that alternately spit out HP and some other brand(s) of laser printers, depending on the sales orders. Differences were in the outer housing and the pcb, mostly.

    18. Re:My thoughts by HiThere · · Score: 1

      My impression of the Brother linux drives is "lousy!!". The 410jw can't scan over a network, and every system upgrade means TRYING to find out how to reinstall the drivers. It's bad enough that I went out and bought an HP Officejet after buying a new Brother printer. I could get it to scan if attached via USB cable, but not over the network.

      OTOH, the HP would only print in draft mode on anything other than bog-standard paper. This is vile as one of my major uses involves printing on colored paper, and another involves printing on card stock. Anybody know of a decent printer/scanner?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re:My thoughts by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Brother. In this case, you actually can have all three of "faster, better, cheaper."

      AFAICT they've never done the advertising campaign to get that "enterprise-class" cachet (which in turn, again AFAICT, is based purely on what MBAs tell other MBAs, and has nothing whatsoever to do with quality or features) so you won't see many of them in big-corp workgroups. But if you're choosing a printer yourself for your home or small business, they're the way to go.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    20. Re:My thoughts by KliX · · Score: 1

      I recommend Brother printers to anyone that asks me for advice. I've never had a complaint, never had a breakdown.

      They are awesome. Ours is 10 years old and still as good as the day it was bought.

    21. Re:My thoughts by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      I've had a Brother at home (HL5250 DN) for over 4 years now, and I haven't had to buy toner for it even once yet. Granted, it's just light home use - we've probably only put a few reams of paper through it total - but that's still pretty impressive. And the number of paper jams has probably been no more than ten, and it's usually because we've done something stupid to jam the output tray.

    22. Re:My thoughts by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Yup. I wouldn't touch their low-end consumer printers. Expensive garbage. But we've got quite a few $300 and up Laserjets, and other than the NIC in one of the three year old units a few months ago (it's now sitting at home on my boss's computer hooked up via USB), they've been rock solid. I have an old 4P and 4000, and replacement parts are readily available, and those two units, well, they don't have any bells and whistles, but damn if they don't just blood well work.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    23. Re:My thoughts by gonz · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I have nothing but great stuff to say about my Brother printer. Cheap price, excellent usability, long lifetime including toner carts, really good drivers even for OS's that are newer than the printer, and a ton of advanced features that normally are only available for high end printers.

    24. Re:My thoughts by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      +1. I also like how they have an app to print stuff wirelessly from both iOS and Android.

      Used their inkjet MFC with great results for several years, just recently replaced it with a color laser which is also good.

    25. Re:My thoughts by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I'm partially a fan of HP (and Dell) because of bios utilities like HPCMI (and DCCU) that let you lock/unlock bioses on every computer in a flash and change the boot order (so you can unlock a floor full of computers, reimage them with a pxe boot, then lock them back down again).

    26. Re:My thoughts by bjwest · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for, my friend. Stay away from those cheep ass consumer printers and get something good. If the HP printer you bought doesn't use PCL or Postscript, throw it in the trash and buy a real printer.

      If a printer needs drivers, it was designed for Windows.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    27. Re:My thoughts by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      I picked up a demo 8460p elitebook. Its about as thick and heavy as most contestants on the Biggest Loser. Its like something out of Dell's late 1990s lineup. Its faux MacBook casing isn't helping matters either.

      For around the same price I'm switching to Lenovo, getting a much slimmer and nicer machine, and a heck of a lot less crapware on the standard image.

      Considering how many elitebooks have failed for us in the past couple of years (25%) as well as their docks, I'm happy to get rid of HP. May you have better luck than me, but you won't. HP is the newest winner to the race to the bottom.

    28. Re:My thoughts by afidel · · Score: 1

      25% failure rate? WTF are your people doing to them? We've had a 2-3% AFR over the last 3 years which is comparable to the T6x we were using when we started switching over. Our numbers are over a fleet of ~500 laptops. As for the standard image, we could care less as every machine gets our corporate image.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    29. Re:My thoughts by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Both my Brother-in-Law and I have purchased several laptops (dv6, dm4t) within the last year from HP and have had no problems with them. There are some complaints in the reviews about the touchpad interface, but they must have been resolved as we've never experienced those issues. I've never bought a HP desktop, so I cannot comment on those. In typical slashdot style, I always build my own desktops.

      We use HP workstations and HP blade servers at work and they are very reliable. HP is still the standard for laser printers. However, I prefer Epson over HP for ink jet printers as Epson tends to use less ink, which reduces cost.

      I would have no reservations about recommending a HP product to friends and family. Much like the IBM PC division, the HP PC division will live on, either as a division of HP or of another company.

    30. Re:My thoughts by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      That includes dock failures. The laptop themselves have a better rate without the dock issues.

      Its major faults were:

      1. Drive failure. Not sure if we got a run of duds, but I think 5% alone here.
      2. Fan failure. CPU fan would stick to 100% then die completely after a few days. Another 5%.

      All of these machines save one or two are pampered and usually docked. No heavy loads or anything. Just bum hardware.

      I have a couple of machines that don't use the standard image and its ridiculous how bad these HPs are. 3 ebook readers installed, tons of other shit, and a nice issue where if you uninstall one of these ebook readers, it decides to delete a system font. I'm done with HP.

    31. Re:My thoughts by bolthole · · Score: 1

      agreed

    32. Re:My thoughts by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Anyone have any thoughts on how kyocera printers compare? I've got one (a fs3900dn bought used on ebay) but since it's the first decent printer i've owned I don't have anything to compare it to. Their biggest advantage seems to be the long drum life.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    33. Re:My thoughts by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Granted, it's just light home use - we've probably only put a few reams of paper through it total - but that's still pretty impressive

      Afaict for a decent laser printer that is nothing unusual. Unlike inkets laser printers seem fine with periods of non-use and even the low end ones have pretty big cartridges.

      According to it's specs your printer should do 3500 pages (that's 7 reams single sided or 3.5 reams duplex) on the included "standard yeild" cartridge. I'm sure other printers I have looked at in a similar size/price range had were pretty similar specs.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    34. Re:My thoughts by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Never had an issue with Compaq (pre-merger), but I've never liked HP computers, and wouldn't touch a Packard Bell. After the HP/CPQ merger, I switched to Dell or clones I spec'd for PCs. I mostly use a Mac, but I make my living developing for and supporting PCs, so I've bought (or recommended purchase of) hundreds, installed and supported thousands of PCs from at least a dozen manufacturers, plus brand-x clones. So, I agree with the "pack" part of your rule, can't agree with the "paq" part.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    35. Re:My thoughts by operagost · · Score: 1

      25 years ago, both Apple and HP laser printers used print engines made by Canon.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    36. Re:My thoughts by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      On that note, my next home printer is going to 90% be a brother or cannon, I just can't seem to find myself to like HP photo printing (not sure about brother, cannon is amazing), which is a feature I require for my printers :)

      My B&W laser is a Brother. It's cheap to run, prints relatively quickly, and has built in Ethernet and Wireless capabilities. It works great, even under Linux, and the only computer I've run that required me to actually download/install a driver was a Windows XP laptop.... the built-in foomatic driver in CUPS has support for the printer.

      My colour laser is a Lexmark. It isn't as cheap to run as the B&W laser, but it's still fairly inexpensive to run. The print quality is pretty good, too. I usually don't print with that printer at all, because it's a beast on electricity (spikes to over 1KW draw when it's warming up the drum), but it still produces pretty nice colour prints when I want to.

      The last time I used an HP printer was 15 years ago. They are simply too expensive to buy and to run. Even when I worked for HP/Compaq, it was still cheaper to run a Brother laser. My employers gave up on HP a while ago, too... at work, the last time I used an HP printer was when I worked for them as well... since then it's always been Lexmark and Xerox.

    37. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Ok, I'm going to do my own "ask Slashdot" here. Anyone have any good suggestions for a business-grade color laser multifunction printer? (I only need the printer and scanner; I don't know why they bother with fax any more.) A used model is fine.

      I've had very good success in the past buying used HP printers on Ebay, first a LaserJet 2100M and then a LaserJet 2300d, which I still use. This 2300 is great; it supports Postscript, and has a 600N J3113A JetDirect ethernet card in it, so it's just used as a network printer for my home. The cartridges are only $25 on Ebay (remanufactured, never had any problem with them) and last forever (or 5/6000 pages they claim). It's been solidly reliable, except that I've never gotten the optional 3rd tray to feed properly for some reason despite changing the roller and separation pad (any suggestions?). And by buying it used, probably after it was leased to some small/medium-size company and not used very much, I got it at a dirt-cheap price. It's not the newest model (made in 2003 I think), but I want reliability and inexpensive usage, not some new piece of junk with expensive consumables and terrible reliability, as many are saying about newer HP printers.

      However, I really need color laser capability, plus it'd be nice to have a scanner with a reliable document feeder, especially one that could save to a network drive with SMB or FTP or whatever so I don't have to worry about scanner drivers and SANE support (though that works fine with my Canon LiDE scanner). I'll probably keep the 2300 for B&W prints since it's fast enough and the per-page cost is so cheap. Here's my list of requirements:
        - network support, including for scanner
        - no host-based drivers (I use Linux); Postscript support and maybe PDF
        - separate cartridges for different colors and black
        - very reliable (my 2300 claims a duty cycle of 50,000 pages per month)
        - good aftermarket cartridge support
        - under $500 (meaning I'm probably looking for some kind of discontinued business printer, not a consumer printer)

      Any suggestions?

    38. Re:My thoughts by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      I bought an HP "business class" laptop (HP 8510p), and I find the hardware excellent (although HP had pre-installed so much crap, I re-installed windows from scratch). The laptop is really well built, durable, and the keyboard feels nice. Compare that to the laptop that my sister got from Dell, where the touchpad broke after a year or so. But I hate HP consumer-level inkjet printers, because the ink cartridges expire artificially early, and I can't refill them.

    39. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The thing people miss here is that they think HP and other companies who only care about the next quarter are not successful, when in fact they're very successful, which is exactly why they pursue this strategy.

      Ask Leo Apotheker if he was unsuccessful in managing HP. He was very successful: he walked away with a giant bonus! He probably got more money just in that severance bonus than I'll make my entire life. How is that not successful?

      Same goes for Meg when she takes over. Even if the company has to close its doors next year, if she makes millions of dollars in pay and bonus, then that's a success.

      It's like this for nearly all large American companies. Of course, things are different in other countries; Chinese companies probably don't give their executives huge bonuses when the company fails and they're let go, but obviously, those Chinese CEOs aren't as successful because they haven't made as much money as the American CEOs, like the extremely successful Bob Nardelli of Home Depot who got $200m when he left there.

    40. Re:My thoughts by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I will put in my 2 cents for Brother printers. They are durable, inexpensive, and just work whether you are using Windows, OSX or Linux. Cannon and HP have given me problems. I also have a color Samsung laser printer that seems to be holding up pretty well, although it is used WAY less than the Brother printer I currently own.

    41. Re:My thoughts by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
      I have to disagree on this one. When compared to Dell, HP keeps takes a licking and keeps on ticking. I have had only one HP die on me before I was ready to retire it, and it was 10 years old when it finally went.

      In stark contrast, I have a graveyard of Dell's in my office at home, literally. Every Dell I have ever owned in the past ten years has died at least once. I have one 64 bit Dell laptop (Dec 2008) that has died three times due to the GPU issue for which there is a Class Action Suit that allows me to keep getting it repaired, until May 2012. It will keep going back until then. I had just received it back from Dell, newly repaired, set it up and configured it for my wife, and it failed again the second time she turned it on. That's Dell quality for you.

      My only complaint about an HP was when they put a third party application/driver on a Win2k machine for the keyboard hot keys, that kept pinging a web address that didn't exist, and my firewall software was seeing constant ICMP destination not found messages from the last router in that domain. Stupid, but the machine didn't die an early death. All I had to do was delete the executable and everything was good.

    42. Re:My thoughts by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Brother's printers. They work pretty well, are reasonably priced and have Linux drivers that work. I have been using their Laser printer for the past 3 years now and it has never disappointed me.

      I have heard many people say this about Brother Printers. My experience is different. I have a 10 yr old Laser Printer, HL1030 I believe, that I have had nothing but trouble with under Linux. I had the drivers working correctly once for about 6 months, but since I most use Windows now haven't bothered with it recently.

      That being said, the hardware itself is fantastic, and if their Linux support has improved then definitely try them.

    43. Re:My thoughts by anubi · · Score: 1

      I hate to counterpost a fellow slashdotter. I have been as much leery of HP and Compaq as anyone,

      HP got on my bad side when I was in University in the early 70's. I had bought a HP-45 calculator.. was right at $400, a helluva lot of money for a college student. I made that investment considering the time it would free. No sooner than I got it, a segment driver failed, making all "8"'s appear as a "0". Being in the EE curriculum, I took the calculator to the engineering lab and discovered the problem was nothing more than an open inductor. Try and plead as I would, HP would NOT send me another inductor. The rest of my career, I was very leery of HP, not because of the failed inductor, but my perception of HP as not caring one whit about their customer.

      I was irritated with Compaq because they used so many custom parts that I could find very few uses for a broken machine, as I could not patch it back together with parts I could get from other scrap machines.

      But, at the beginning of this year, I broke down and bought a HP-Compaq laptop (CQ-56) at Wal-Mart. It had everything I was looking for at a real good price.

      This machine had been really good to me. I am quite impressed with it, and recommend it to my friends. That's something I did not think I would ever do, giving the first impression I had of both companies was quite a bit less than stellar.

      My take on it is HP/Compaq has their act together, and it would be a shame to discontinue their machines.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    44. Re:My thoughts by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I'm not terribly interested in their PCs and was stung by two of their notebooks

      Were they notebooks with defective nVidia chipsets that delaminated from the motherboard, starting with Wifi failure and resulting in complete PC failure?

    45. Re:My thoughts by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in China there's a factory that makes the internals for ALL cheap printers and depending on incoming orders puts them in a slightly different case and slaps a different sticker on the box. Ditto the laptops, clothes, etc.

      While companies like Quanta and Foxconn make products for competing companies off the same assembly equipment, they build to spec/designs they're given. That's why rolling off the same lines you can end up with one brand / model of product with a lot of defects, and another that's rock solid. They just build what they're given.

    46. Re:My thoughts by jezwel · · Score: 1
      Looking at the network printers I have available, 42 (?!) are HP out of ~300 in total.

      We seem to have Canon, Brother, HP, Brother, Rocoh and Lexmark spread fairly evenly across our local sites.

      HP servers and PCs - no purchases for the last decade or so.

    47. Re:My thoughts by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Seconded on Brother's printers. I have a HL-2070n and it works great on Linux. (true, it thinks the printer is a 2060, but the closest-match driver still works flawlessly)

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    48. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      You are confusing the success of Leo with success of HP. The CEOs and higher management have been successful as you say.

      HP, on the other hand, has lost lots of market capitalization, profits, customer trust and good will over last 5 years. NOT a defining attribute of "success".

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    49. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Right, but why should the CEOs care about the company they're working for, as long as they're personally making lots of money in the deal?

    50. Re:My thoughts by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I think it uses PCL, though I'm not sure. The OfficeJet uses a standard Linux driver. The problem is in some internal firmware that detects the color of the paper and has decided that white is the only proper color. That's why draft mode works...because in draft mode that sensor is turned off.

      But space is tight, so I really need a combination printer/scanner. And I haven't heard anything good about the color laser printers. (Huge power consumption, lots of noise, environmental contamination with small particulates, etc.) So I'm avoiding them.

      Space is tight, and printing needs are quite light, so those huge monster printers are silly overkill. OTOH, I do want something sturdy. Something like the HP OfficeJet all-in-one G55 of a decade or so ago. I've still got one in operation, but it's paper feed is broken and repair appears impossible. (Mechanic can't get parts.) Also it doesn't have USB ports, but only a Cannon serial connection. And I want it to be networkable. Scanning over the network would be quite desirable.

      Cheap? Well, of course I don't want to pay more than I must, but that's NOT the top consideration. It's just that AFAIKT there isn't a decent answer. The current OfficeJet 6500A+ would be a decent answer if it weren't so limited to only using draft.

      Well, to be honest I don't need another printer right now. I'm just looking for options for the next time I do. I have not been pleased by what I saw the last time I went looking. So far the answers say I should look at Okidata and Samsung. (Xerox was reported to be too noisy, though otherwise reasonable...but I don't know what model was being referred to.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    51. Re:My thoughts by bjwest · · Score: 1

      Personally, I can't vouch for HP inkjet printers. I've owned nothing but Epson in the injket department. My current is a Stylus 6600 that I've had for about five years. I will admit it gets little use as I use my HP laserjet for most printing. When I do need color or to scan/copy something though, It's a little jewel. Ink may be a bit pricey, but it uses separate cartridges for all four colors and they last forever. Current cartridges are over two years old, and have only been cleaned/primed a few times and still print with no missing lines. Epson ink is, IMHO, the best and well worth the cost.

      If you do a lot of color printing, I think I'd go for a mid line laser. If the majority of your printing ( 75 to 80%) is B&W, go for a B&W laser and use a kinko's or something for color printing when you really need it. The ability to print color when you need it is nice, but do you really need that capability? I don't know just how much a color copy costs, but even at a quarter a page, using a printing service for only the pages with color on them will come out way cheaper than buying a color printer and ink every few months because you end up printing a bunch of crap in color that you don't need. Like I said above, I rarely use my inkjet. It gets turned on a couple of times a month when I need to copy something, and that's more often than not, just a B&W copy. It will go for several months without printing any color.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    52. Re:My thoughts by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, due to working with desktops and laptops a lot for home users and at work, I can recommend only two purchasing methods:
      1) If you are price sensitive, and don't expect your computer to last for more than a year or so (i.e. anything more is gravy to you), get the cheapest branded thing you like. I.e., Acer version eMachines, Acer, Asus, SystemMax whatever. Though I do suggest avoiding HP and Dell myself, each generally will make it to 1 year, and the warranty ensures that most of the time anyway.

      2) If you've got a bit more money to spend and don't want to plan on upgrading at a year or to plan to have a warranty visit during that time, buy a business class Lenovo (Thinkcenter, Thinkstation,Thinkpad) though the low end ThinkPad Edge hasn't lived up to this for me (sad face here as I bought one for my sister and she's had some issues), all the other (even cheap Thinkcenters) models have been more solid than ANY other computer brand I've ever bought that's still on sale. (Micron, IBM - though they are Lenovo right? used to be like this but now not available)

      Also, unless you get a certificate or special contract, the business support from Lenovo is awesome in comparison to anyone else I've tried. I can't say the times I've spent 45+ minutes on web chat, phone, or whatever with Dell and HP trying to convince them that yes, there is a broken part, and please fix it. HP's actually worse than Dell because Dell, once you get in touch with the *right* person (which can take 7 transfers IME) they will send out the part. HP support will ask you to change windows settings on a business desktop that doesn't turn on and the power light doesn't light...

      Lenovo only seems to have 2 numbers, one for consumer and one for business, so there's no transferring around. They always just let you send in the Laptop for diagnosis or send out the broken part replacement on a PC (though I only recall this happening once in the last 5 years - yes, you almost never have to call them).

      On the Ideacenter / consumer line, they do have slightly worse support, but so far I've only spent 20 minutes convincing them something was broken before getting to mail it in for repair. Not awesome, but far better than Dell / HP...

      Now, for Dell at least, I am aware I could take a class to get a cert that proves to them that I'm able to tell when the PSU fried itself... And I can buy the higher support contract to get right through to useful Enterprise support. But when I do all that, suddenly their price advantage vs Lenovo goes away...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    53. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't, the board and stakeholders have to make them care about the company.

      My response was to your statement that HP is very successful, ask Leo Apotheker if he was successful. These are two very different things, and in this case opposite. HP is a failure, Leo is successful. There is no relation and you attempted to equate the two.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    54. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't, the board and stakeholders have to make them care about the company.

      Why should the board do such a thing? The people on boards are all CEOs from other companies, and they all sit on each others' boards and cover for each other, so they can extract as much money from their companies as possible.

      My response was to your statement that HP is very successful, ask Leo Apotheker if he was successful. These are two very different things, and in this case opposite. HP is a failure, Leo is successful. There is no relation and you attempted to equate the two.

      No, I'm simply pointing out what's most important, which is the personal success of the CEO, not the corporation. For some reason, a lot of people have this weird idea that a company's success (especially long-term success) is somehow of importance, when that is simply not the case. Only the CEO's personal bank account is important, nothing else. If a CEO can make hundreds of millions of dollars by running his company into the ground, why should he care about its long-term survival or success? No one ever has an answer for this.

    55. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Why should the board do such a thing? The people on boards are all CEOs from other companies, and they all sit on each others' boards and cover for each other, so they can extract as much money from their companies as possible.

      Stakeholders need to force the board to make upper management care for the company. This is because stakeholders lose when company profits / share prices go down.

      I'm simply pointing out what's most important, which is the personal success of the CEO, not the corporation. For some reason, a lot of people have this weird idea that a company's success (especially long-term success) is somehow of importance, when that is simply not the case

      Do you know the meaning of the word "important"? For the CEO, CEO's personal account is important. For stakeholders, stakeholders' own personal account is important. "Important" is not a universal value as you are saying. Important is for someone to do something. Because of this grave misuse of the word "important", this entire paragraph of yours becomes meaningless.

      No one ever has an answer for this.

      True. When elementary words are assigned arbitrary meanings, questions can be phrased which are difficult to answer. For example, "What are you sleeping?"

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    56. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Stakeholders need to force the board to make upper management care for the company. This is because stakeholders lose when company profits / share prices go down. For the CEO, CEO's personal account is important. For stakeholders, stakeholders' own personal account is important.

      Ok, then how do you propose the stakeholders force the board to make upper management care for the company? I don't see any large corporations where there's an actual mechanism to do this. Instead, you have a bunch of CEOs sitting on each others' boards and promoting each others and their own interests, while running the companies into the ground. Shareholders get to vote, but that never seems to change anything (just like in national elections); it's still the same group of sociopaths at the top, they just switch chairs from time to time.

    57. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Well, stakeholders choose the board. That's a start.

      Oracle , Apple, IBM, Volkswagen, HSBC, Pfizer (break-up or not) have all found a solution. Just because HP can't, you say the solution is impossible to find?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    58. Re:My thoughts by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Do you mean stakeholders or shareholders? Both words exist, and though there is sometimes an overlap they aren't exact synonyms.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    59. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oracle , Apple, IBM, Volkswagen, HSBC, Pfizer (break-up or not) have all found a solution.

      And what solution was that?

      Oracle doesn't seem to have any "solution"; they're run by the same guy who started the company, Larry Ellison. Like many other big tech companies still run by their founders, these guys are in it for more than just the money, it's their "baby". Maybe they think they're building something great, maybe they're trying to carve a name for themselves in the history books, maybe they think business is like a big game and they want to "win", whatever it may be, they're not just hired guns. Oracle doesn't seem to be doing a great job with its Sun acquisitions and they're totally floundering with their open-source stuff (they just threw in the towel on OpenOffice), but since enterprise-class databases are their cash cow, they're still going, just like MS keeps going as long as Windows and Office bring in so much money.

      Apple is much the same, only more so: it is (or was, until very recently) run by the same guy who started the company, and obviously was in it for more than the money (probably the fame, or history books, or whatever). It's too soon to tell if it's all going to fall apart now that he's gone, but chances are good.

      HP isn't that different: they were great when their founders were running the place. After they left or died, it all went downhill. This happens to LOTS of companies. The people who start a company and are able to build it to greatness have some kind of personal stake in the venture, not just making money. The people who just want money take off earlier than that because they can sell the company to someone else and let them deal with the daily stress of running the place. Jobs didn't build Apple into its present state by being lazy and just showing up now and then and collecting a paycheck, he did it by being a workaholic, and you don't get that kind of dedication from hired guns.

      Volkswagen I don't think counts, because it's not an American company. Germans have a totally different culture from money-worshiping Americans. They probably have some different laws governing corporations too. Notice we don't see this kind of behavior in German companies at all, from what I can tell. There's lots of large, successful, and highly stable European companies, and you don't hear about them being run into the ground or their CEOs getting obscene golden parachutes for bad performance. I wonder what the difference is, besides culture. They probably have a law against interlocking directories, something this country used to have back in the early 1900s with the Clayton Act of 1914, but which no longer is enforced. HSBC is similar: it's a foreign corporation, with barely any presence in the USA.

      How IBM and Pfizer have avoided this, I don't know.

    60. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I chose the vaguer word, almost to avoid such pedantry on this part of the statement, but this is Slashdot, so ....

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    61. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Which is why I chose a variety of types of companies. I (almost) knew what your objection would be for Apple and Oracle and hence included IBM. Though HSBC and Volkswagen also could have suffered from the same problem but they didn't.

      Not being American is not a defence. None of your arguments to which I am replying, had anything to do with Americans. You were wringing your hands with companies in general and lamenting that business can never be done. I just showed you business is being done - like HP is failing, many others are succeeding.

      And what solution was that?

      How IBM and Pfizer have avoided this, I don't know.

      Haha. If you (or me) knew, we would be earning billions of dollars. Not wasting time on Slashdot. And if the solution could have been put in a Slashdot post, the world would be overflowing with trillionaires.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    62. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Not being American is not a defence. None of your arguments to which I am replying, had anything to do with Americans.

      How does this not have anything to do with Americans? The companies where we see this behavior are all American. When do you see CEOs of European companies getting giant golden parachutes after running their companies into the ground? You don't. Ergo, the problem is an American one. And as I said before, my theory is that it's partly due to the greed culture here, but probably even more due to the fact that the law on interlocking directories is not enforced, causing the people in these elite groups to all sit on each others' boards and cover for each other, hire each other to be CEO, etc. Obviously, a few companies have avoided this fate, and I'm interested to know how, although this may be only temporary. It wasn't that long ago that IBM looked like it was about to go belly-up; did their CEO during the PS/2 days get a giant golden parachute? Maybe not all companies are like this simply because not all the executives and board members are sociopaths and actually want to do a good job, though obviously many are.

    63. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      How does this not have anything to do with Americans

      Because your original argument didn't mention it. You are bringing this up now.

      The companies where we see this behavior are all American

      What behaviour? Successful companies not so successful any more? Sony? Toyota* ? The many British companies that Volkswagen swallowed? Britain was the world leader in quality motorcycle manufacturing, and now it has come to the saying "All the parts falling from this car are of the finest British manufacture".

      * not exactly a failure, but at the turn of the century, it was poised to beat VW and GM and had a huge lead on operating profits. It is a ghost of its former self.

      It wasn't that long ago that IBM looked like it was about to go belly-up; did their CEO

      Exactly. Companies go up and down. It has been a while, but even Apple was in trouble. They bounced back, and how. HP might bounce back too.

      because not all the executives and board members are sociopaths

      In fact it is personal profit that should lead stakeholders to rein in executives and board members. Nothing to do with not being sociopaths. You think Pfizer and IBM are excelling due to altruism of their board members?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    64. Re:My thoughts by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What behaviour? Successful companies not so successful any more? Sony? Toyota* ? The many British companies that Volkswagen swallowed?

      This has nothing to do with companies being successful, it's about companies that are driven into the ground, either intentionally or not, by executives who then collect enormous compensation even though they've been failures at leading the company.

      Companies fail all the time, even with the best of management. Bad luck happens. But do Japanese companies give out hundred-million-dollar bonuses to their executives when they fail? I don't think so.

      They bounced back, and how. HP might bounce back too.

      Why would they bounce back when they hire someone to run the company and give them an enormous amount of money even if they do a terrible job? What exactly is the incentive to do a good job? When companies in other countries bounce back, it's because they hire someone and make their pay dependent on the performance of the company in some way, just like the way normal employees get paid (i.e., you do great, you get a bonus and/or raise; you do a lousy job, you get fired with no bonus). Sometimes it even happens here, but the situation with golden parachutes is unique to America from what I can tell.

      In fact it is personal profit that should lead stakeholders to rein in executives and board members.

      It is personal well-being, prosperity, freedom, civil rights, and many other things that should lead voters to rein in their politicians. However, that never seems to work out very well in practice. Just look at the US Congress and President for prime examples. Sending out some ballots to stockholders doesn't seem to be working out too well for companies like HP, now does it?

    65. Re:My thoughts by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      So basically you are saying IBM and Pfizer do not exist.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    66. Re:My thoughts by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Color is mandatory, but volumes are quite low. Most of the time. I.e., except perhaps 3-4 days/year. Those days...well, so far we've often taken the work off-site. (CopyMax or some such.) But print quality is important, especially on the high volume jobs. And they can require double sided printing. Or printing on odd paper sizes.

      All of these, except the registration, could be handled adequate on the HP G55 (vintage around 2000) when it was new. The current model, however, is much less flexible, and really dislikes either odd colors of paper or odd sizes. (HP wasn't the only company to have made this wretched decision, though. The OfficeJet 6500+ was the only one that the store could demonstrate would allow itself to be overridden, even if only in draft mode.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  2. Swap thrashing by XanC · · Score: 1

    Time to reboot and upgrade the kernel or something.

  3. HPlix? by dzfoo · · Score: 2

    Did I miss something? Is HP begin run by Reed Hastings now?

              -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
    1. Re:HPlix? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      No but I hear that Darl McBride is presently being groomed to step in as CEO.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    2. Re:HPlix? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Netflix reconsiders spinning off its DVD service.

      HP reconsiders spinning off its PC business.

      What next... the White House reconsiders spinning off its Liberal wing?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:HPlix? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure they got rid of their liberal wing back in January 2009.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  4. Fire the board by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fire the board, they showed their stripes years ago with Carly, and again with other bungled decisions. They have got to be the most incompetent board for any company of their size in the world. The board lost the HP way long ago, and it hasn't changed that much since then.

    The whole rotting thing has got to go and the culture has to restored from the top. Nothing less will do.

    1. Re:Fire the board by Jeng · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was going to suggest that they fire the CEO and get someone who will do the job for less compensation and no golden parachute. I figure if they do that then their applicant pool would open up to up and comers who want to prove themselves while hopefully turning away those who just want a big payday.

      But your idea of firing the board probably makes more sense.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:Fire the board by laffer1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I recommend looking at who's currently on the board at HP. It explains everything. There's a ridiculous number of hedge fund managers and similar type people. They've only got one real HP person on the board and that person is from enterprise marketing or something like that. No one on the board understands their products or what they do except possibly this marketing person.

      You would think a company like HP would have at least a few people who've run tech companies on their board.

    3. Re:Fire the board by i.am.delf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The real HP was spun off by Carly into Agilent. As far as I know they are still doing just fine doing all those things that the original HP used to do.

    4. Re:Fire the board by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They really ought to experiment with outsourcing the board of directors to a call center somewhere.

      It would't necessarily generate better leadership; but 8-12 incomprehensible guys allegedly named "Robert" somewhere in the far east would provide incomprehensible decisions and inconsistent directions for several factors of ten less money...

    5. Re:Fire the board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How hard is it to understand ink?

      HP hasn't been a tech company since they spun off Aligent.

    6. Re:Fire the board by jd · · Score: 2

      Replace the board with members of the Psychic Hotline, and then have Dave Packard's ghost as CEO. No matter how badly it fails, it can't fail worse than the current board.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:Fire the board by kcbnac · · Score: 1

      The new CEO is just that. She's getting paid $1/year in compensation - and a significant portion (2/3?) of her stock options are based on the HP stock hitting certain $ values at certain points in the future.

      If they let her go, her parachute is worth 1.5 times her yearly compensation.

      Bonuses are the only way she can get cash outright.

      Had found the original info from Google Stocks on HPQ, they do news-by-day and list when articles came out graphed to the price, was at some other site when I saw it a few weeks ago:

      http://allthingsd.com/20110929/hps-new-ceo-takes-1-annual-salary-and-lots-of-stock-options/?mod=googlenews_editors_picks

    8. Re:Fire the board by Jeng · · Score: 2

      Actually since they understand the product better than the board and have a good idea of how the customers use and view the product they probably would generate better leadership.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    9. Re:Fire the board by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I feel that you don't quiet understand that the entire job of the Psychic Hotline is to fleece people, same as the current board of HP.

      I can see their new line-up of products for the dead, it will be a huge success they say, after all there are more people dead than there are alive so it's a very large untapped market.

      That would be one way they could fail worse than the current board. Although I probably shouldn't give the current board any ideas.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:Fire the board by indytx · · Score: 1

      The real HP was spun off by Carly into Agilent. As far as I know they are still doing just fine doing all those things that the original HP used to do.

      No, they're not. Half its business has been sold or spun off since it was spun off in an IPO. It's not like a whole new management team showed up when HP spun it off.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
    11. Re:Fire the board by eap · · Score: 1

      The board was changed out when Leo Apotheker became CEO last year. It is not the same board as under Fiorina or Hurd.

    12. Re:Fire the board by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      I find Steve to be a much more common alleged name.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    13. Re:Fire the board by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 2

      so basically her pay is based on short term stock values, relatively speaking. thats an awesome way to build a company that will endure!

    14. Re:Fire the board by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      I recommend looking at who's currently on the board at HP. It explains everything. There's a ridiculous number of hedge fund managers and similar type people. They've only got one real HP person on the board and that person is from enterprise marketing or something like that. No one on the board understands their products or what they do except possibly this marketing person.

      You would think a company like HP would have at least a few people who've run tech companies on their board.

      Do you even know the functions of the board? Do you even know who elects the board? Let me enlighten you. The board doesn’t run the company; the CEO and other top executives do. The board hires the CEO and votes on the CEO’s salary; the primary purpose of the board is to protect shareholders. The board is elected by shareholders to perform certain functions on the behalf of stockholders. Why shouldn’t hedge fund managers or other stockholders sit on the board? They own the company and who is better to safe guard their interests?

    15. Re:Fire the board by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to imagine what Carly was thinking when she sold the heart and soul of HP as Agilent:

      The historical HP has a problem. We pay excellent engineers huge amounts of money to design products that are to be sold to a relatively small specialist market. We design emergency room monitors, radio frequency analyzers, and countless other devices whose purpose I can barely fathom. We even invented the modern calculator. We put huge resources into developing low volume products, whose profit margin is not acceptably high. Because of this, the growth potential of HP is permanently capped. We will never be able to double or quadruple our revenue if we keep employing these expensive engineers. So I propose that we jettison them as the extra weight baggage they are. HP should concentrate on selling personal computers to the mass market. And printers and other peripherals. The profit margins on these devices are huge, and the market is nearly unlimited. We should farm out the technical know-how to other companies, and concentrate on marketing. HP above all should be a brand name, something that people trust. Brand names cost nearly nothing to maintain, and carry enormous value. By reducing the costs at HP through eliminating our engineers, by farming out our technical know-how to outside organizations who specialize in such things, by concentrating on marketing to the mass market, HP will be able to both take in more revenue and spend less on internal costs at the same time. The growth potential is nearly unlimited. By becoming a shell marketing company, HP will maximize shareholder value.

      Well Carly, we all know how that turned out. HP is floundering, and Agilent is still doing well. Good job Carly. You've done your MBA brethren proud.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    16. Re:Fire the board by perlith · · Score: 1

      Handy link: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/investor/board.html

      The second part of your post was in ignorance I believe. Former AOL CEO, Former Verizon President, current Nokia General Manager, current CEO of Lucent ... that's not bad for "people who've run tech companies" ... could do a lot better, could do a lot worse.

      The first part of your post was right on. Not enough diversity on HP's board of directors. Need at least one director from non-profit company, one from academia, and preferably another active CEO. If you want diversity in a board of directors for a profitable company, lookup Exxon-Mobil's board of directors --> http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/investor_governance_directors.aspx

      To the GP's post ... HP's board of directors has changed 6 of its 13 members this year alone (counting the new CEO).

    17. Re:Fire the board by innerweb · · Score: 1

      Hmm. You said it yourself, they (the board) hire the CEO (they select he person) and they set the priorities. Then the CEO has to execute those priorities and meet the board's goals. Think about that. Then think about derivatives, mortgages, and the economy in general. Then connect those dots with the fact that most boards look like HP's board. Any wonder why we have the issues we do today? It is all the same. Short term profits and stock prices outweigh long term investments and sound business policy. Quick dollars for the funds and the share holders, who bail when those end. Seems like the "functions of the board" is the issue anyway.

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    18. Re:Fire the board by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      She gets a 2.4 million minimum bonus guaranteed each year as part of the contract.

      If she gets the boot she gets 3.6 million at a minimum on her way out the door.

  5. MBA bullshit. by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thats what happens when mbas take over running of corporations. Everything is geared towards teaching of maximizing profit minimizing costs in those programs in ultimate end, and even if some programs incorporate engineering concepts like systems management and so on, the mba types eventually lack on strategic planning and vision.

    flop. thats what you get if you hire too much suits or put them in charge.

    1. Re:MBA bullshit. by sbrown123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has little to do with having an MBA. These boards are usually staffed with people assigned by majority holders for their ability to "maximize profits". But companies can only grow so much and the economy goes up and down. Investors don't want waves, only inclines. To keep their well paid jobs these MBA's, as you call them, do whatever they can. This usually means some imaginative book keeping, slashing staff, and trying to outsource where possible. The really good MBA's only stick around for a short period since their work always have a quick fall to follow. And who wants to be on a sinking ship?

    2. Re:MBA bullshit. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      What do you by really good? Really good for them you mean.

      Uh, yes. The really good ones come into a company, strip it bare to pump up their bonuses and then get out early enough to blame the collapse on their successor; the bad ones are that successor.

    3. Re:MBA bullshit. by msobkow · · Score: 2

      Corporations have an obligation to turn a profit.

      They do not have an obligation to turn an obscene profit, short-term profits, a high stock-market value, nor to line the pockets of executives and board members with "golden parachute" options.

      The whole world's corporations need to get back to research, innovation, and a focus on quality products. To hell with the hedge fund managers, the banks, and all the rest of the blood-suckers who do NOTHING for the economy except bleed it dry.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:MBA bullshit. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Thats what happens when mbas take over running of corporations.

      This is my number 1 rule of business: never let an MBA run your company.

      Ever

      I have yet to meet anyone with an MBA, in any capacity, who has any idea of what they're doing.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:MBA bullshit. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      you dont flop things with just one mba.

    6. Re:MBA bullshit. by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Maybe, just maybe, the bad actors in this scenario aren't the so-called MBAs, but the nitwits who set up incentive systems where driving a company into the ground is a lucrative move.

    7. Re:MBA bullshit. by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      Thats what happens when mbas take over running of corporations. Everything is geared towards teaching of maximizing profit minimizing costs in those programs in ultimate end, and even if some programs incorporate engineering concepts like systems management and so on, the mba types eventually lack on strategic planning and vision. flop. thats what you get if you hire too much suits or put them in charge.

      Of course, they have to maximize profit. How else are they going to stay in business? Shareholders own the company. They (shareholders) have tens of billions invested in the company, and they need a return on their investment. Would you open a saving account at a bank that pays no interest? I doubt it. For companies to stay in business and be competitive costs have to be managed. It seems that most posters here believe costs doesn’t matter, and costs are an excuse for the “MBA” to downsize or kill projects.

  6. Derp derp derp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When HP absorbed EDS they thought they'd finally be able to compete in the lucrative snake oil business of large scale "consulting" (a la IBM), but after a massive reorg and an almost precision extraction of any talent prevalent in the EDS husk they're left with nothing but the most clueless of drabs.

    To watch them flail around and try to bail out of this self-inflicted situation by dumping their hardware division has been entertaining.

    1. Re:Derp derp derp! by decsnake · · Score: 1

      Last year a major civilian govt agency awarded their IT support contract to HP. Since then HP has been flailing around wildly trying to actually deliver the support they are contracted for and the agency extends the incumbent contractors contract a few months at a time so they actually have support.

  7. It doesn't matter what happens. by idbeholda · · Score: 1

    When it comes to HP, they're already in such bad shape that a loss in revenue might actually save the company.

  8. What do they need with a supply chain? by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

    Back when the PC business was mostly Compaq, they made systems that needed all manner of proprietary components. If they have other products which rely on that supply chain they're so deep in the doo-doo that they won't climb out. But the CEO shouldn't worry because even getting fired from that job is more lucrative than many others are.

  9. CEOs should make more! by mrquagmire · · Score: 1

    These CEOs are obviously worth hundreds of times what a "normal" employee makes. We should pay them more for their outstanding decision making skills. Also looking at you, Reed Hastings.

    --
    giggity
    1. Re:CEOs should make more! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Peons are capable only of timid, limited, tactical failure. It takes a Visionary Leader to achieve Strategic failure on an grand scale.

    2. Re:CEOs should make more! by jd · · Score: 1

      Surely you're not suggesting HP's new CEO limit themselves to such mediocre core meltdowns when, with just a little more effort, they can achieve China Syndrome proportions?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  10. Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by zerofoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure everyone has their opinion, but after throwing away a bunch of $2000 HP printers in the last year, we've had enough.

    I started buying Xerox and Oki printers and so far, they have been fantastic. The Okis in particular seem to be built well enough to take a bullet, and the toner cartridges are huge compared to an equivalent HP printer, yet they are priced about the same.

    I think we are done with HP forever at this point.

    1. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Let's just mention that whoever is responsible for the atrocity that is the "HP Universal Print Driver" ought to spend an eternity with fire ants exploring their sinuses...

      Never have I seen software that is more baroque, or less reliable, at the seemingly simple task of sending PCL or postscript over a network to a printer with an embedded RIP.

    2. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Never have I seen software that is more baroque, or less reliable

      You have obviously not tried HP scanner software. Our scanner will not work on Windows (it did when new, but the UI was so confusing no one managed to do what they actually wanted to). It works on Linux OK though. Before we found that out, we switched to Cannon.

      No more HP stuff here!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      If you use an HP multifunction printer, its your own darn fault if bad things happen. I thought everyone knew to avoid those things.

    4. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      too true. We gave up on HP scanners about a decade ago, although to be fair, I can't say that Cannon or Epson have great software. It just doesn't suck as bad as HPs.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    5. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by kcbnac · · Score: 1

      Ha! My dad bought an HP desktop several years ago (his last off-the-shelf system, now we're building them from parts) - and his HP scanner wouldn't work with it. Something to do with the USB chipset in the motherboard prevented HP's scanner from working with an HP PC.

      Yes, a USB device with specific incompatibilities with a specific computer, by the same manufacturer.

    6. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by babywhiz · · Score: 1

      ".... after throwing away a bunch of $2000 HP printers in the last year...." Did you use offbrand toner? *ducks*

    7. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by archen · · Score: 1

      Ugh, does this bring up a sore topic where I work. We do a fair amount of printing, so I have to get a decent printer. Management (or purchasing) keeps deciding to get refilled cartridges to "save money". In the mean time these things have been notoriously poor quality and led to a lot of problems with printing, wasting time with install errors, and on top of that wrecking printers.

      We're moving to Kyocera printers here and I've shuffled in a managed print solution from a local company that charges on a per page basis. Course pretty much anything including setting the printer on fire every 3 months would come out cheaper than the way we've been doing it, but most of this all goes back to how expensive HP cartridges are.

    8. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah but how do Xerox and Oki work with Linux?

      OK, I imagine the Xerox isn't too bad considering they run Linux on the printer itself but Oki? Good luck.

      HP fully supports Linux. Their drivers may suck but at least they provide a fully functional Linux version. Fully functional as in every feature that is supported under Windows (scan, print, fax, etc). For this reason I have stuck with HP (well that and their print quality).

    9. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by Jeng · · Score: 1

      One of our HP printers got replaced by an Oki and it sucked balls. It has now been replaced again by another HP.

      Perhaps we just got a poor model, but that has been my only experience with Oki so far.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by lastx33 · · Score: 1

      You won't regret the move to Kyocera. I think their lasers are pretty much unbeatable. Nice print quality, reasonably cheap to run and well made and to top it all - no image drum to replace. I haven't regretted moving to them at all. I used to like HPs but find them fairly expensive to run but reliable as long as you avoid the lower cost models. The Kyoceras have panned out better overall though.

      --
      "You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead!" - Stan Laurel
    11. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      no image drum to replace

      Just to clarify for those reading along there is still a drum and technically it's still a consumable. Just a rather long life consumable (the one in my fs3900dn is rated at 300000 pages).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Oki and Xerox seem to be a better bet by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Before we found that out, we switched to Cannon.

      Balls!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Revenue from pre-bundled demoware by j-stroy · · Score: 1

    How much of that revenue comes from the huge bundle of pre-installed of demos?

    However, their PC tower at a big box store was competitive priced compared with a generic import computer store.

    Generally I don't support HP, tho I was very impressed with the Green packaging a friends new printer came with.. no plastic wrappers, instead it all was packaged in a re-usable shopping totebag and accessory pouch.

    1. Re:Revenue from pre-bundled demoware by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Generally I don't support HP, tho I was very impressed with the Green packaging a friends new printer came with.. no plastic wrappers, instead it all was packaged in a re-usable shopping totebag and accessory pouch.

      The design of which they probably outsourced to some 'green' marketing company. Nothing wrong with it - but it's hardly why we held HP in such esteem.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  12. From the Michel Dell school of management by Altus · · Score: 1

    shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  13. Email from HP about this by silverglade00 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just got an email from HP about this. HP's Personal Systems Group is the #1 PC maker on the planet, and that won't change. I can assure you our future is brighter than ever. Spirit of a Startup Our preferred course to harness our vision of the future is to build a separate, more agile company. It's time to think like a startup again. It's time to be nimble and revolutionary. It's time again for world-changing innovation. And so, it's time we realized we're at a crossroads in an evolving HP. But don't misunderstand: We-the same great folks who make HP PCs today-will make them tomorrow. We will continue to build on our legacy creating reliable, stylish, and high-performance PCs to improve your personal and professional life.

    1. Re:Email from HP about this by silverglade00 · · Score: 2

      Crap, forgot to format it... sorry everyone.

    2. Re:Email from HP about this by Briareos · · Score: 1

      You might have to ask HP themselves about that...

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    3. Re:Email from HP about this by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Funnier without the formatting. Sounds the HP salesman show tried to sell me HP junk.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  14. The obvious name... by Tenek · · Score: 2

    Well, somebody has to use the Quikster name, might as well be them.

  15. Xerox Printers by rwade · · Score: 1

    I'm sure everyone has their opinion, but after throwing away a bunch of $2000 HP printers in the last year, we've had enough.

    I started buying Xerox and Oki printers and so far, they have been fantastic.

    Your timing is prescient - all of our HP printers were recently replaced by Xerox machines at my workplace. They do put out some nice prints, although I wouldn't say they are better than the HP ones. I'm fairly insensitive to print-quality -- however, yesterday at a meeting with some clients that rarely see print-outs from my office, someone asked if we had just gotten new printers.

    Anyway -- I have noticed that what I would call our Xerox "workgroup-class" printers are really loud. The analogy "It sounds like it's barfing a sheet of paper at a time" was used by two different people on two different occasions.

    1. Re:Xerox Printers by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Anyway -- I have noticed that what I would call our Xerox "workgroup-class" printers are really loud. The analogy "It sounds like it's barfing a sheet of paper at a time" was used by two different people on two different occasions.
      We just got the same thing at our office and in addition to the noise is the fun of finding out where to turn off automatic form feed, since everybody is now dumping a blank page after every job

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:Xerox Printers by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Xerox makes some good stuff, but you have to look into their models pretty closely. One model I looked at was only $175, but toner cartridges for it were $200! I opted for my HP 1200 because cartridges were only $75 at the time, and the claimed pages-per-cartridge were the same as the Xerox.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  16. Good luck in retail! by soupforare · · Score: 1

    Especially Best Buy which is, I'm sure, a not insignificant partner. After the complete abortion that was Touchpad, retail stores are going to be hesitant about stocking up on product. HP shipped units to them, then almost immediately tanked the price and ran.

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  17. Good. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    the company's braintrust is reassessing the wisdom of dumping a division that contributes nearly 30% of revenue and holds together a valuable supply chain.

    Not to mention a significant chunk of jobs. We have enough unemployed (read: competition to get a job) as it is, thanks.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  18. is anyone surprised? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to belabor the point that the spin off wasn't a good idea. The problem now is that they're coming off as indecisive, unsure, rudderless, out of control, pick your metaphor.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:is anyone surprised? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Suicidal. That was the other one.

      Speaking of which, why do corporations persist in trying to spin off their (sometimes only) money making resources? For instance: Years ago I used to work for a utility. (For the purposes of this discussion, it doesn't matter which one.) They had (1) a commodity, and (2) a customer service system. They attempted to spin off their commodity, keeping only the customer service system, because of the perception that becoming "a service company" was somehow a good idea. Fortunately, cooler minds prevailed and as a result they still exist today.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  19. Re:Win 8 by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Lastly, Win 8 finally appears to be an upgrade that may finally pry people off Win XP and truly offer integration across smartphone, tablet, laptop, desktop and gaming (xbox).

    Uh, what?

    XP laptop and desktop users are waiting out Windows 7 so they can 'upgrade' to a crappy tablet interface?

    That's some good stuff you're smoking.

  20. Weird trends by Sedated2000 · · Score: 2

    I see a lot of really strange business trends going on. It seems so many companies are announcing terribly thought out decisions, and then reversing their opinion, and an entirely different set are content to do nothing but play a game with patents, where nobody builds or designs anything anymore, they just collect up the patents and sue people who actually are building and designing things. Why does this feel like some really weird corporate-hijinks fiction novel we're living in?

  21. Brother by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    Another satisfied Brother user. The designed-to-be-refilled toner cartridges are great.

    As for linux drivers, I find that's always the tip of the iceberg. Lack of linux drivers is an excellent indicator that windows versions get drop FAST, and crappy drivers in general. Canon, I'm looking at you.

  22. Re:Dumbasses! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't be so dismissive of MBAs... If you stop falling for the illusion that their 'business' is running businesses efficiently, and start viewing them as amoral rational actors feathering their nests at the expense of anybody whose pockets they can reach, you'll see that they are extraordinarily effective a locating targets, infesting them, sucking them dry, and then moving on, somehow not dragged down by their record of failure and occasional malfeasance...

    Never make the mistake of underestimating a superb parasite because it is lousy at whatever non-noxious lifeform it is mimicking...

  23. HP is lost... by sco_robinso · · Score: 2

    HP has always had extremely poor support at the consumer level, IMO. I remember about 10 years ago I wanted to buy a replacement Li-Ion battery for the OEM NiMH that came with my HP. With credit card and HP part number and SKU in hand, I called the HP store. I was transferred to literally 5 different people before I just gave up. I never did get a new battery, living with the ~40 minute degraded life of the NiMH for the next couple months.

    I've had great success with their printers, though. I still think at the mid-to-high business end, they're very solid machines. I recently worked at an office that used Ricoh's, and never again with I touch Ricoh printers. They can't even get simply LDAP right...

    1. Re:HP is lost... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had an HP scanner and it was great. But I moved across the Atlantic so it won't work anymore because the power adapter is 220V and they won't sell me a 110V adapter for less than the cost of a new scanner.

      That was one of the reasons why they lost a $1200 sale to Toshiba when I bought my laptop last year.

    2. Re:HP is lost... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      It says 220V and I'm not sure I want to risk finding out whether it's lying.

    3. Re:HP is lost... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Not much risk in plugging a something that wants 220V into 110V. Sure it won't work, but unlike plugging a something wanting 110V into a 220V source it won't release the magic smoke and trigger the circuit breaker either...

    4. Re:HP is lost... by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      I use LDAP on 105 Ricoh MFDs at the hospital I work at. Sure you are doing it right?

  24. Printers by jgotts · · Score: 1

    HP's best products are its laser printers. Its most profitable products are probably its inkjet cartridges. If HP spins off its PC business it's going to have a harder time selling its laser printers and inkjet cartridge cartridges (aka printers).

  25. Re:Well lets try this.... oh. Well then lets try t by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Brain trust? If I was making decisions like this for a company, I would *THINK* about the effects of the change and how that affects other parts of the company. I would do this *in advance*.

    This is why you're not a billionaire hedge-fund manager.

  26. Engineering bullshit. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Thats what happens when engineers take over running of corporation. Everything is geared towards teaching of maximizing profit minimizing costs in those programs in ultimate end, and even if some programs incorporate business concepts like systems management and so on, the engineers types eventually lack on strategic planning and vision.

    The PC business is a tough business to be in. You have a lot of competition. Dell, Lenovo, Apple. The home consumer market is more willing to hold on to their PC for 2 more years and get themselves an iPad or a smart phone. So what is this strategic plan of keeping desktops to the future? There isn't really much. You might as drop it to a smaller firm who will nurture it more, and try to really fit in the niche market segment.

    As I am using a Lenovo Think Pad right now, I have to say IBM is happy, Lenovo is happy, and the people who made the transitions from IBM to Lenovo are happy. The problem is sometimes companies get too diverse, and need to sell off units that they are distracting from their core business or perhaps may be hindering it mind share.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Engineering bullshit. by Super_Z · · Score: 1

      The problem is sometimes companies get too diverse, and need to sell off units that they are distracting from their core business or perhaps may be hindering it mind share.

      As an aside, Lenovo has moved into tablets, servers and financial services. Lenovo bladeservers, diskarrays and consultants are probably right around the corner.

  27. +1000. Universal Print Driver should be killed.... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ...with fire. And put through a wood chipper. Makes using networked HP printers, which we've used for decades, pure hell.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  28. I like my hp by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

    After getting tired of screwing around building PCs from parts I decided to get one of the hp ready to ship models. I'm quite satisfied. It was easy to set up, runs every game I want to play and is stable. I also had one of their TouchSmart all-in-one models (where the computer is built into a touch screen). It was quite nice but someone stole it. The point is, hp does have some good products coming out of the PC division. It would be stupid to let it go just because margins are small.

    1. Re:I like my hp by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It would be stupid to let it go just because margins are small.

      That's exactly what Freescale did when I worked there, except that they didn't spin off our division, they shut it down entirely, even though they had customers lined up (and some locked in with the current chip). Why? Because they couldn't get giant margins on this high-volume networking chip. They wanted 40% margins no matter what, even though the chip would be selling in the tens of millions, because they had a corporate decree that they must make 40% margin on ASICs. So one day, I came to work and we were all taken to a room and given our papers.

  29. We use HP machines by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    We buy oodles of them. A shipment of ten every week or so. We clone them and crank them and prep them and deploy them in a neverending cycle to keep our clients (many of whom are also growing) up to date with decent machines. Their business class desktops are reliable little workhorses, and my office was nervously considering the prospects of what we would have to do if the supply of HP boxes disappeared. I volunteered to hand build machines from kits, but I don't think my boss took me seriously.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  30. BGDAAAA!! by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    Don't even joke about that!!

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:BGDAAAA!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It doesn't matter. Judging by the trends in HP CEOs, Darl will only last 2 months. He will be replaced by Kim Jong Il, who will last a mere 3 weeks (and leave with a $100m golden parachute). The next CEO will be fired before she arrives in the building, and the one after her will be given her golden parachute before being offered the job. After that, things are going to get really bad...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  31. Shortsighted as usual by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    When I heard they were "considering" spinning off their PC division my first thought was...Guess who's sales of PC electronics just took a nose dive? Sure their margins are razor thin but they had sales. Who wants to buy a product that may not be supported in 6 mo. because the company that made it no longer supports it. Granted hp does that now but the consumer has the illusion of a supporting company. I've watched hp squander opportunity after opportunity. Perhaps it's the Digital Equipment Corporation curse. DEC floundered and it's carcass was purchased by Compaq in 1998. It gave Compaq indigestion and they were swallowed by hp in 2002. Now hp is circling the drain.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Shortsighted as usual by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's the Digital Equipment Corporation curse. DEC floundered and it's carcass was purchased by Compaq in 1998. It gave Compaq indigestion and they were swallowed by hp in 2002. Now hp is circling the drain.

      Maybe they'll get bought by Oracle?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  32. HP has an identity problem by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They started as a gadget company - lab devices. They got into printers. then computers. Then software services after buying DEC and EDS. I presume they were emulating IBM which moved mostly our of hardware into integrated services.

    1. Re:HP has an identity problem by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      They got into printers. then computers.

      Timeline check: I started working on my first HP computer in 1975. I didn't see a LaserJet until 1984.

      Now, if you had said lab devices, then calculators, then mini-computers, then personal computers, then printers, then network management software, then consulting, you might have had a point.

  33. Postscript by msobkow · · Score: 1

    I refuse to buy a printer that doesn't support postscript. Who needs vendor-specific drivers when there have been standardized page-layout languages for decades?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Postscript by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My old Brother laser supported PostScript, but printing PCL was a lot faster because rasterising a complex PostScript document (e.g. the output from LaTeX) on a 50MHz MIPS processor in the printer took a long time. I've recently bought a cheap Dell all-in-one colour LED printer. It can print from and scan to PDFs, and doesn't even need a computer: you can print PDFs directly from a USB device. It also talks SMB and FTP, so I can scan to an SMB or FTP server.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Postscript by msobkow · · Score: 2

      PCL works as well as postscript.

      The point is to avoid printers that require binary drivers or which try to leech off the system CPU to do the rasterization. Printers that do their own rasterization are not that much more expensive.

      Personally I have an HP LaserJet 1200. It's served me well for many years, though it's cartridges are getting pretty pricy nowadays. Even with the price increases, though, it's still a lot cheaper to run than any inkjet I've ever seen.

      When shopping for a printer, check the pricing and page counts on the cartridges. There are some real ripoffs out there. For example, one of the Xerox printers I looked at had cartridges that cost more than the printer itself!

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    3. Re:Postscript by msobkow · · Score: 2

      Then when your cheap crap won't work under Linux, a new version of Windows, or OS/X, don't come whining to slashdot that there are no drivers available.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  34. Mod up by padraic2 · · Score: 1

    Yep. As far as I'm concerned the best part of HP was spun off long ago.

  35. Access to retail the problem? by sirwired · · Score: 1

    WTF? Seriously? Is there some kind of legitimate fear that stores that can't sell HPs crappy PC's will stop selling their crappy printers? The other major printer companies don't sell PC's, and they seem to be doing just fine.

  36. Buying a HP computer not HP stock by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Yes, because HP has shown themselves to be masters of the art of running a business....

    I thought we were discussing buying a HP computer not HP stock? If they build a decent PC its an option, who cares about the boardroom/c-suite antics. Many computers are purchased from local white box PC clone shops. How likely are they to be around next year, yet they seem to remain an option.

    That said, it is terribly sad to be thinking of HP in this way.

    1. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      The AC above made fun of Slashdotters' business savvy, in a discussion about HP, who have shown they can't run a business to save their lives. It doesn't matter about how decent their PCs are if their boardroom antics threaten to cripple that; they're even planning to divest that division.

      As for local white box PC clone shops, apparently they're about as likely to be around next year as HP (and especially its PC division) is, probably more likely even.

      That said, it is terribly sad to be thinking of HP in this way.

      The HP you're thinking of is still around, it's called "Agilent" now.

    2. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by perpenso · · Score: 2

      The AC above made fun of Slashdotters' business savvy, in a discussion about HP, who have shown they can't run a business to save their lives. It doesn't matter about how decent their PCs are if their boardroom antics threaten to cripple that

      This discussion began with "I won't purchase an HP device", I think it is reasonable to return to that point. Regardless of the antics of the executives and board members *if* the folks in operations build a decent PC it remains a decent PC.

    3. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Not if it's going to have support dropped in a month. I'm sure your local shop has better prospects than that, and even if not, it's better to spend the money locally than on an apparently inept multinational corp that has already said it's going to divest that business. What moron would buy from them, when they can either gamble their money with a local shop, or buy from one of the other large competitors like Dell, Lenovo, etc. (the thread starter didn't specify laptops or desktops, so local shops might not be an option for laptops and Lenovo isn't an option for desktops).

    4. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by perpenso · · Score: 2

      Over the decades I have not needed support from a PC vendor other than the occasional driver on a website. YMMV of course. I am writing as an individual not someone managing an IT department.

      Even if divested the new owner will most likely honor warranties, offer drivers, etc. As I think Lenovo does for old IBM ThinkPads.

      Regarding ineptitude, my point is that I really only care if the folks in engineering and operations are inept.

    5. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Even if divested the new owner will most likely honor warranties, offer drivers, etc. As I think Lenovo does for old IBM ThinkPads.

      There's no guarantee of that, and in fact there's been plenty of cases where companies have shut down operations of a department and left their customers in a lurch. I saw this when I worked for Freescale and they shut down our division, screwing over all the customers who had designed their parts in and had millions of them installed around the world.

      Regarding ineptitude, my point is that I really only care if the folks in engineering and operations are inept.

      Totally irrelevant. It doesn't matter how great the engineers are when the upper management of the corporation lays them all off by surprise, as happened to me at Freescale, and happens all the time in tech companies.

    6. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Over the decades I have not needed support from a PC vendor other than the occasional driver on a website

      This is true, and relates to the question of dependability and reliability. I don't own any HP computers, but do have a HP 7410 network all-in-one device. It works excellently over the network, but I require that the HPLIP software which supports it be maintained and perhaps updated occasionally. Luckily, this is a set of Linux drivers and utilities which present much the same functionality as their bloated Windows siblings, but are much more compact and don't call home. I'd like the vendor to continue supporting them rather than rely on a cost-minimizing third party to do so. My confidence that HP will continue to support their own devices has been seriously undermined by their bizarre decision to spin off the PC business. Similar "logic" could lead to the printer division being spun off and crippled. A capricious vendor is an unreliable vendor, and I won't buy from that vendor in the future.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    7. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Why would Lenovo not be an option for Desktops? Just pick up a Thinkcenter or Thinkstation . . .

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    8. Re:Buying a HP computer not HP stock by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't realize they were still making them.

  37. I love my HP printers, HP laptops not so much. by BLToday · · Score: 1

    I had the HP6L and that thing was a workhorse for almost 10 years. My newer HP laser printers are very solid but some don't have Mac drivers.

    HP laptops on the other hand only last a little bit longer than the warranty period. They tend to overheat and fail almost as much as Acers from my experience.

  38. Not a serious problem. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Yeah, yeah, yeah 30% revenue, supply chain and channels of communication... Well it is not a serious problem. Easily solved by firing the CEO, pay for his/her golden parachute and then hiring another hot-shot CEO with a bigger parachute.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  39. PERHAPS, HP will bring back manufacturinging by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, HP would be better off bringing back manufacturing to the states and getting control of their pipelines. By doing what IBM, and Dell did, they will see that they lose the ability to compete with Chinese companies that simply steal the tech and idea. However, if HP brings it back, they gain control. To br

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:PERHAPS, HP will bring back manufacturinging by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      By doing what IBM, and Dell did, they will see that they lose the ability to compete with Chinese companies that simply steal the tech and idea.

      Or they could do what the people who *didn't* do what IBM and Dell did.

      Oh, yeah, that's right. They're all out of business.

  40. Re:Win 8 by afabbro · · Score: 1

    Uh, what?

    XP laptop and desktop users are waiting out Windows 7 so they can 'upgrade' to a crappy tablet interface?

    That's some good stuff you're smoking.

    Exactly. If people didn't move to Win 7, they're not moving. The only thing that will get people off Win XP is driver support.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  41. Re:Win 8 by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

    driver support.

    Read: Forced upgrades due to lack of driver support.

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  42. good for them by eyenot · · Score: 1

    not only will they make it through, they'll be less top-heavy and more bouyant in the end.

    i mean, why should they rethink it? they're going to revolutionize computing in two years. shouldn't the focus be on getting existing warehouse and/or factory space down to bare minimal and ready to process memristor based components? they can get ahead of the game by cleaning out and retooling right now.

    i wish i had the money to invest. surely remarks such as they're making will drive down the value of their stock, and they'll have another opportunity to only have shareholders on who are genuinely interested in the product and who know what they're got their hands on. this will make them smarter long-term investors who are more likely to hold onto their stock during mild troubles.

    it's a great strategy, if that's what they're doing. it should be a model for the future: being honestly concerned about one's own business decisions, in front of everyone. the whole "don't lose your cool" presence has........ strained...... things.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  43. HP LJ rule of thumb by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    If it does not support the PostScript Universal Printer Driver, they cut corners on the printer and you are gonna get bit.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  44. What's with CEOs and backpedaling lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These guys are making decisions that seem ridiculous on their face, and flip flop them weeks later.

    Is this a consequence of the decline of American education finally reaching the CEO-aged generation? Or are these people just idiots that will believe anything Excel or PowerPoint tells them?

  45. excuse me by unity100 · · Score: 1

    but systems management is an engineering discipline and field. please dont try to bullshit your way with stuff you dont know. it was only in mid 90s that the mba programs started to include systems management.

  46. I stand behind my previous statement by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    In the previous HP article

    Is it just me or does HP look like a fish laying on the dirt, flailing around gulping for non-existant water?

  47. Poor use of adjective by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1

    HP must be confusing the meaning of the word "wisdom"

  48. They've burnt their retail supply chain by Salvo · · Score: 1

    A few months ago, Harvey Norman (a large Australian Retail Chain - think Best Buy down under) had an exclusive on the HP TouchPads.

    They were going for a big Push on the weekend, with discounts of over $100 off List price. They had billboards at Bus Stops and had reserved prime advertising space in the big Daily Newspapers for Friday, Saturday and Sunday.

    On the Thursday before, Leo killed the Touchpad.

    The Harvey Norman group decided to retaliate by selling their entire stock of HP Products at Cost. They replaced their Newspaper Ads with iPad Ads including the slogan "The only Tablet you would want to buy". They also surplussed other electronic goods at or below cost price. (I picked up a Sony Blu-Ray player for less that AU$100.00).

  49. Innovation lacking by caywen · · Score: 1

    Innovation extends beyond slapping different plastic on the same old products. At least they are honest enough to admit they are not capable of actual innovation.

  50. Re:Buying a HP computer has many of same concerns by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    People who pay the extra money for a name brand PC with warranty and support wish for the company to be around, and to be able to provide future product care. If HP's executives no longer know how to run a business, that raises serious concerns for PC buyers (and enterprise ones too)

  51. Page counters by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    There are toner page counters in the high-end stuff. It's how the consumables monitoring/reporting works, and that's good to have. It's just the printer firmware doesn't refuse to work once the page count exceeds the rated life.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  52. Differences between brands by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    Somewhere in China there's a factory that makes the internals for ALL cheap printers and depending on incoming orders puts them in a slightly different case and slaps a different sticker on the box.

    While there are some shared laser print engines, I've also seen quite a bit of differentiation.

    For example, Espon's inkjets don't appear to share much of anything with HP. The carriage is a very different design, the paper feed mechanism is a different layout, the control software has nothing in common, and the drivers are night-and-day different. HP's drivers are hundreds of megabytes and buggier than Maine in June; Epson's are 3-5 MB and are well-behaved.

    Or compare HP's laser printers with Lexmark. Lexmark uses a two-piece design for consumables (separate toner and photodrum), while HP uses a single cartridge for both. Again, HP's driver is bloated and unstable; Lexmark's is compact and unobtrusive.

    Now, they might well all be assembled in the same factory in Malaysia, but if so, it's out of different parts.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.