Slashdot Mirror


US Student Loans Exceed $1 Trillion

sycodon writes "Politico reports that student loan debt now exceeds one trillion dollars, an amount that should impress even Dr. Evil. Politico further reports that this is one of the more concrete issues driving the OWS protests and provides some enlightening examples of their particular gripes."

50 of 917 comments (clear)

  1. You think the housing collapse was bad by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just wait until you see what happens if THIS group starts going en masse into default. At least with houses, there is some collateral there. What are you going to foreclose on when little Johnny goes into default on his $100,000 loan debt because he can't find a job? You going to foreclose on and resell his worthless degree?

    And, sadly, this is only going to get worse. Tuition has been going through the roof at universities in the U.S., even as wages for the jobs post-grads get afterwards have remained stagnant. The wages of parents and post-grads have stayed the same, but they're having to fork out more and more for tuition--driving them to even more debt. So it's hardly surprising to find out that student loan debt has increased over 63% in just ten years.

    So what do you think the end result is if this trend continues? Either large segments of the population are going to have to give up on college or they're going to have to put themselves in a position where default is almost an inevitability. I guess that could actually have one positive effect. It could finally dispel the idea that everyone can or should go to college (or that a college degree should be considered a prerequisite for any white collar job).

    And, BTW, you know who pays when someone defaults? The U.S. government foots the bill, since these loans are federally guaranteed. So Uncle Sam gets to fund the bailout on that one too, just like he did with the banks and domestic car industry.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by scubamage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since 1970, minimum wage has on average gone up about 300%. College tuition has gone up 994% (from 1200 a year at a public university to shy of 12000 a year). The cost of purchasing a home has gone up over 900% as well. Let's also not forget that every dollar is worth less, and when factoring in inflation and the consumer price index, minimum wage earners are making a good deal less than they did in 1970. Factor in that in the same timespan uneducated labor jobs have dropped by close to 70% in the US. So, people have no choice but to go to college, even the people who really shouldn't go, lest they live in poverty. They get no scholarships because they "just barely" managed to get in. They get a degree, and then can't find work. Working your way through school is now impossible with a minimum wage job, since, you're looking at 35 hours a week at minimum wage to be able to afford only tuition - that doesn't include books or board. In 1970, people were looking at 14 hours a week to be able to pay for school. This math also points out that its idiotic when baby boomers say, "people should work through college, that's what I did" because times are completely different. And as parent said, things are only going to get worse.

    2. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When it comes to greed, the Universities make the Wall Street banksters look like Buddhist monks in comparison.

    3. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by JBMcB · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can't default on student loans, they never go away. The fed will garnish your wages forever until they are paid off.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    4. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A resourceful person could do the equivalent of a college education for just the cost of an internet connection (or at the library for free).

      That's true. But when's the last time you saw "4-year degree or equivalent do-it-yourself degree" listed as a job prerequisite for a white collar job?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by scubamage · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, its not possible these days on average. The average public university costs close to 11034 a year according to the census. The average minimum wage is 7.35. That comes out to a 35 hour workweek alongside being a fulltime student (1823 hours). This is only public schools - NOT private schools. Not to mention prices for everything have gone up steeply. If they're trying to put themselves through school, its almost impossible to avoid debt. Baby boomers don't quite seem to understand the math, so here it is: A dose of Financial Reality.

    6. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by EllisDees · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >You have to declare bankrupcy & be able to show 'undue hardship'.

      Nope, student loans aren't even dischargable in bankruptcy. You are stuck with them for life.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    7. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by shadowsurfr1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Eh that's a good point. I've interned at the company I'll be working for after graduation for every summer since I got into college (started right after my freshman year). So far, I've done 5 summer internships and a 1 during the school year. Looking back, that's the best decision I could have made when it comes to my employment.

    8. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can't go into default in the normal sense. Most student loans can't be discharged in bankruptcy.

      They can be discharged on death. Because unemployed angsty grads never have problems with suicide, Congress wanted to incentivize it. (Not really, that's just a side-effect. It really is to not burden the family of someone who dies.)

      There are, however, really great loan forgiveness programs and loan repayment programs. It varies a little based on your exact loan, but generally, the current loans (which will change slightly next year, possibly) allow (1) income-adjusted repayment, where you repay the government based on your income and get the balance forgiven at the end of 30 years, regardless of how much you still owe, and (2) repayment for public service, where you get your student loans discharged after ten years of government service or not-for-profit work requiring the use of your degree.

      Amazingly, I believe the Government accounts for these MASSIVE loan forgiveness expenditures in the budget by calling them budget-neutral and completely ignoring them.

      They are great programs in several ways, which may be why they want to make them look good and not really account for them (they don't want to make programs which make public service work possible and which make college and graduate educations possible go away because of political pressures from the rich, who pay the most taxes and so would have the most interest in cutting those programs). Ultimately, of course, it is ridiculous to say they don't cost anything.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    9. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by dintech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There has been a 50% population increase in the US since 1970 and there aren't 50% more good universities, good jobs and houses. Supply and demand is doubly destructive. More cheap labour means wages don't have to rise as fast. Increase population means higher demands on available housing, pushing up prices and cost of living generally. Universities aren't immune to charging more for their product either. We now also have more women in work than in 1970, increasing competition in the job market.

      This doesn't account for 900% but accounts for some of it maybe.

    10. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Working your way through school is now impossible with a minimum wage job, since, you're looking at 35 hours a week at minimum wage to be able to afford only tuition - that doesn't include books or board.

      After my freshman year of college, which was stupidly at a private college, I took a year off, and worked 65 hours a week at 3 jobs (paper routes in the morning, lab rat stuff during the day, package handling 2nd shift). I paid down as much as I could in a year, and then went back to school.

      It's hard, but not impossible to pay your way through school today. It's not as fun as the lives of most college students, but it can certainly be done.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    11. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by imric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah supply and demand is broken. When you need a degree to get a job, and you need a job to live, then the demand side skyrockets.

      "With that kind of thinking, someone else needs to stop these kinds of people. They wont stop themselves. She should never been able to get those loans in the first place"

      Ah. So that she would most likely not have any chance to rise above the poverty line. Check. That'll fix the economy! When there is no discretionary pay left after food and shelter, it doesn't matter how cheap things get when imported from other economies after all - the market for anything is essentially zero.

      Get rid of the social stigma attached to being non-degreed, get rid of the bogus requirement to have a degree, any degree, in order to 'succeed' (heh - and THAT's defining success as 'marginally above the poverty line and insured so that medical expenses are less likely to bankrupt you'), and we'll talk.

      Until then this will continue.

      --
      Paranoia is a Survival Trait!
    12. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by SpeZek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Classic American blame-the-victim ideology. You've been taught all your life that success or failure is based primarily on personal, rather than environmental/social factors. So of course, to you, the fault lies in the people taking loans and unable to find jobs, and not in the perfect "free-market" that has no entry-level jobs for college graduates.

    13. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by LehiNephi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, houses are more expensive now than they were 40 years ago. They're also bigger (2700 sq ft today vs 1400 sq ft in 1970) and better-made, with more features. The cost of building the same house today that was the average 40 years ago hasn't changed nearly that amount. In addition, minimum wage makes for an absolutely useless measure of average household income. The ratio of median home price to median income (a much more useful statistic) has roughly doubled in the last 30 years, and if you ignore the housing bubble, the ratio increased from 3:1 to about 4:1. That hardly constitutes a tripling of housing price/income ratio; in fact, it means that price per square foot has dropped.

      I worked through college. My parents paid for my transportation to and from school and for phone calls home, but other than that, I was on my own. I'm now 30, and have a very good paying job (I'm in the top 20% income-wise). It's possible, but you gotta 1) choose the right school, 2) choose a useful major, and 3) work your tail off, all which requirements are increasingly ignored. It's also worth pointing out that the perception of a college education has created (in my opinion) a bit of a bubble. Just like the housing bubble, people are investing ridiculous sums of money into something which doesn't have near that amount of value. You can point the blame in any number of directions--at parents for pushing kids into college when the kid isn't made out for it, at the kids for choosing majors which provide no marketable skills, at colleges for helping perpetuate the perception that a college education is necessary to lead a comfortable life (and who can blame them, from a marketing perspective?), or at the government for artificially inflating demand by guaranteeing loans a ridiculously low interest rates.

      There are still LOTS of good-paying, non-college-degree-requiring jobs out there. The trades particularly are (and have been for some time) suffering from a shortage. Plumbers, electricians, welders, and the like. A good welder with his own equipment can make a very nice living.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    14. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by X0563511 · · Score: 3

      Punishment does little to get the money back that was owed.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by GospelHead821 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It most certainly should not be done. Maybe some of them are lazy but some of them are industrious and want a job but there's nothing suitable to be found. What incentive will companies have to create REAL jobs if they know they can get indentured servants assigned to them? If they have the choice between an employee that they have to pay a competitive wage, who can leave if he's unhappy or an indentured servant who they can pay practically nothing, who isn't legally permitted to leave, who do you think they're going to choose?

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    16. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by niftydude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe Little Johnny shouldn't borrow $100,000 if he doesn't have a reasonable plan for a career after graduation.

      Maybe the banks shouldn't loan little Johnny $100,000 if he doesn't have a reasonable plan for paying it back.
      Oh, what's that? The federal government guarantees all student loans? And the banks take advantage of that by loaning money to anyone and everyone who can claim to be studying, without performing any reasonable due diligence or oversight, because the banks know that one way or another, even if they bankrupt the student, they'll still get their money back?

      Come on, who do you think is at fault here - the young teenager taking the easy money being offered? Or the multinational corporation with packages designed to temp said teenager, and profit massively out of the situation?

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    17. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only way to get out is if - God forbids - you get permanently disabled or some other horrific event of that magnitude.

      Or just move abroad. Debt is linked to your US social security number, which no one outside the US will ever ask you for. I've met a great deal of Americans who moved to Europe or Asia and then decided to walk away from tens of thousands of dollars of debt, and I recently read an article (can't find the link, sorry) that now there's a rising trend of moving abroad to teach English just to escape creditors.

    18. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by AnonGCB · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sounds like government is at fault here for guaranteeing the loans.

      --
      http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    19. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What incentive will companies have to create REAL jobs if they know they can get indentured servants assigned to them?

      Georgia actually started a program to do pretty much something like that with the unemployed a few years ag. (I know, who would have thought a southern state would support slavery, right?). Basically, companies get free unemployed indentured servants for up to 8 weeks, with the only caveat being that they're supposed to receive "training" at the job. The program was scaled back drastically after it came out that most of the companies weren't providing any real training at all and were just using these people as free labor. Shocking, huh?

      Sadly, a lot of states are looking to adopt programs modeled on Georgia's. Even Obama is praising it as a model program.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    20. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've had FAR TOO MANY worthless instructors in my CS / IT classes who could do nothing on a keyboard but tell you everything you could ever wish to know about the damn theory.

      I see you lack experience in your domain: So you are going to fire them and replace them with you until you become the same within the system ? Where you have to deal with kids who "know better as you" and think "they understand the world", or whatever vision an experience educator will embody. And then lower your wage to pay for the early retirement of the other ?

      So you'd switch the problem from a flexible and creative group to a group who is supporting by carrying mortages, paying studies, feeding and sheltering the younger group ?? So the younger group has a higher income potential with less responsabilities? What planet do you come from ?

      The problem is economical, and the lack of taking risks; I always see in these kindof discussions "there isn't enough work" or "They don't want to give me a job" but in the current climate, that job always "sucks" or "isn't paid enough" or such and what not. But complain "the rich aren't giving you work" while those who are creating work are "giving it away to lazy idiots"...? *mouth falls open*

      Why not get together with your friends who do not have a job and are highly qualified, are trained in business and creative professions. And while you are are sending out applications, you apply that which you have been taught and start your own business and create work. If it's worthwhile, people will give money for it. If people give a buck for it, you have a buck to spend.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    21. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The program was scaled back drastically after it came out that most of the companies weren't providing any real training at all and were just using these people as free labor. Shocking, huh?

      Unfettered, unregulated capitalism at work.

      This is not to say that total socialism is the solution. The solution is somewhere midway - a tightly regulated capitalism that prevents abuses and provides a safety net for those who are ruined or harmed by the uncaring, unthinking actions of others while still providing rewards for innovators and hard workers.

    22. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Moryath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This.

      Additionally, start looking at how colleges are funded. 15 years ago, a "State College" meant that the institution was more than 50% funded by the state (e.g. tax and tariff and fee revenues). The cost was spread out, and the tuition costs were much lower.

      Tuition costs have "risen" basically on par with how state funding has fallen. Today, a "state college" gets between 15 and 20% "state funding" and the rest comes out of tuition. In other words, much more of the cost has been placed on the backs of the students, with the EXPECTATION that these students will have "federally guaranteed student loans" so that either the student winds up a slave to student debt, or if they default or die, the federal government picks up the tab.

      Welcome to the "conservative funding" shell game...

    23. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Antisyzygy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ok, so if your parents don't save then what do you do? What if they can't save because they are poor? I'd like to know how you would save for 4 years of college in a job that pays you shit wages. The only realistic option is the military basically. Say you make 10 dollars an hour 40 hours a week and have to live on your own. 4 years of college will run you about 44,000 dollars. You could make 83,000 in 4 years. Now lets subtract rent/food/bills from that. Lets say you have 200 in food a month, your rent is 400 and your bills top out at 150. Lets also factor in a car purchase of 3000 dollars and gasoline and car insurance which is about lets say 4600 a year (this is a low estimate btw). This would be like living in a modest apartment, with a decent car, an internet connection and utilities, and eating basic foods. 200*12*4 + 400*12*4 + 100*12*4 + 3000 + 4600*4 = 55,000. What is left? 28,000. Sure, thats enough for 2 years of college with books, however the 4 years you wait puts you at a disadvantage when you actually get out of school since you will be 4 years older than everyone else, delaying your financial future. This is also assuming you don't ever have any entertainment costs and you don't eat out for the whole 4 years, nor do you purchase any electronics such as a PC, and you probably don't have cable or an xbox. Its not as easy as you make it out to be.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    24. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Insightfill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Classic American blame-the-victim ideology. You've been taught all your life that success or failure is based primarily on personal, rather than environmental/social factors.

      Over the past few years, the conservative view has been getting more press, and that's changed slightly.

      YOUR success is based on personal factors. YOUR failure is blamed on external factors.

      OTHER people's success is based on external factors (dumb luck, handouts). OTHER people's failures is blamed on personal factors (lazy, greedy).

      You're dead-on regarding the external factors changing dramatically. People have just been taught to take the blame. When the housing market blew up, there were no rally cries to lynch the underwriters who forged the paperwork. Instead, the public was taught that their own personal greed was the root of the problem.

    25. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Maybe Little Johnny shouldn't borrow $100,000 if he doesn't have a reasonable plan for a career after graduation."

      Maybe Little Johnny shouldn't be told by every single adult as he's growing up that it is critically important to go to college, even if he goes into debt for it?

    26. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not all Americans share the "blame-the-victim" ideology, although I will grant you I see it far more than I like. What most Americans don't realize is that poverty, like wealth is hereditary I'm a second generation, my grandparents came from Mexico (legally) and lived in squalor in Southern California. My parents did a bit better than them, and I'm doing a bit better than my parents. The rags-to-riches stories that Americans are so fond of are the exception rather than the rule. It typically takes a long time for a family to attain wealth and student loans can be a way to accelerate the process. The increasing cost of education is the ruling class' way of combating what little social mobility is left.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    27. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This doesn't account for 900% but accounts for some of it maybe.

      You might be surprised. When you have a limited pool of something that can't expand, and more demand than supply, prices can go up almost exponentially.

      If you drive on a congested highway to work you might notice on a school holiday or delay that the time to commute changes dramatically. And yet, the change might have only taken 10% of the cars off the road. Basically a road can handle so many cars per minute and once you start hitting that level the queuing becomes massive.

      Look at home prices - when an area runs out of land for new homes the existing home values start going up dramatically. Gas prices are similar - when those hedge funds collapsed and stopped trading oil futures prices crashed - it isn't like people stopped driving their cars much or anything.

      In the case of a university consumers have very little flexibility - if they want an accredited education then there are only so many places to go and new options open up infrequently. Demand exceeds supply, and so prices can rise almost freely. Really the only constraint are limits on student borrowing. If next year the US government announced that students could borrow up to $1M/year in student loans you'd see tuitions skyrocket.

    28. Re:You think the housing collapse was bad by Solandri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that student loans are a demand-side distortion of the market. By providing student loans, you actually encourage the price of tuition to rise by increasing the amount people are willing/able to pay. That is why tuition has been far outstripping the rate of inflation. Normally prices are kept in check by how much an individual is able to afford at this moment in time. But loans allow one to time-shift money from the future into the present, thus providing a great amount of money in the present, but in exchange for decades if not a lifetime of debt. Most people are very bad at making decisions regarding this types of trade-off between money now vs. future debt (witness the number of people who continually carry a balance on their credit cards). Schools are exploiting this weakness in human rationality to run up the cost of tuition, and cheap student loans just exacerbate it.

      Education needs to be subsidized with supply-side distortions. Take the money currently provided as unrestricted student loans (leave the low-income assistance), and dump it into public universities. That should help lower the tuition at public unis, making them affordable to people who otherwise couldn't attend without student loans, while also exerting downward competitive price pressure on private universities and colleges. Normally I (as a fiscal conservative) wouldn't be for this - you're subsidizing a public "corporation" which competes directly with private corporations (universities and colleges). But the decades of student loans has so distorted the market that the private schools are swimming in money (which forces public universities to offer higher salaries to compete, thus raising their costs as well), and there's a lot of fat which needs to be trimmed to revert the college/graduate education market back to normal.

  2. non-profit? by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone that still believes that America's colleges and universities are "non-profit" institutions, should think again at this. For two of the most obvious examples, I cite you the "Bowl Championship Series" and most college sports in general (namely football and basketball), as well as the fact that student dormitories and student unions have largely been turned into country clubs, with just about every one of them having a Starbucks (heck, that's in the library now, too), and having such amenities as rock climbing walls, gyms with workout equipment that rival Gold's Gym, and many schools are giving every student their own iPad these days. Plus, when most schools in Division I pay their football or basketball coach twenty times the salary of the average professor, and four times the salary of the university president, you know something's fouled up,. . .

  3. Re:heh by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a hard time sympathizing with anyone who has voluntarily taken on large amounts of debt

    With almost any decent job these days requiring a 4-year college degree, what the hell do you expect? Unless your parents are upper-class or have had the foresight to save up the money (with no intervening crises to eat it up), your only hope to get anything better than slave wages at some manufacturing plant (that's probably going to China at any minute) is to get a highly-competitive scholarship or take out a student loan. And there are only so many scholarships to go around.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Re:heh by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Informative

    With almost any decent job these days requiring a 4-year college degree, what the hell do you expect?

    That is why high school is worthless now days. You might as well drop out with a GED and go to community college. High school and GED gets you the same job now days, there's no need to waste those 4 years when you could go to college and at least get an associates and move on to bachelors at a real school.

    Of course this only applies to the 99%, the 1% go to Ivy League high schools and Ivy League colleges so they don't need to worry about community college.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  5. There are two legitimate sides to this argument by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are plenty of students who majored in very reasonable and marketable courses of study and came out with a mountain of debt and dramatically worse job prospects than what were available when they began their studies. These people have a very real complaint.

    However there are also people out there who went to college and majored in drama, or comparative literature, or film studies, or any of a number of other fields that have very marginal job prospects even in a good economy. They are carrying debt because they took a foolish risk with 4 years of their lives. Of course, some of them may have been poorly informed by their college with regards to what they could do with their degree. Others didn't give a damn and set off determined to "study what I want" or whatever. This latter group dug their own hole and I don't have a lot of sympathy for them.

    In short, if you majored in engineering and then couldn't find a job after the economy went down the toilet while you were in school working your ass off, I feel for you. But if you spent four years in a field with ordinarily terrible job prospects and now you are shocked that you have no job prospects, I don't have much sympathy for you as you took a great opportunity and managed to squander it.

    However, those who excel at taking great opportunities and squandering them may yet have a future in American politics.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  6. Re:heh by royallthefourth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wont be the first or last to say it, but I have a hard time sympathizing with anyone who has voluntarily taken on large amounts of debt and doesn't understand that they made a poor choice.

    OK, let me get this straight:
    1. Don't go to college, can't find a job. Poor choice.
    2. Go to college, can't find a job. Poor choice.

    What we have here are a bunch of people willing to work, but the market is unable to find work for them. You blame the people, when the market is what's causing the problem.

  7. Again, banks are committing fraud by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are a couple things here that clearly indicate that banks are committing fraud.

    First, there is usury. Student loans are unsecured, but federally backed. There is very low risk to the bank. Yet interest rates charged tend to reflect that of high risk loans. Further, while payments are deferred, interest isn't. Not all of this is fully disclosed to the borrower. For instance, do all students know that they are payig interest rates comparable to normal loans, yet with normal loans a borrower can default on a loan. With student loans the must must be paid back, and garnishment of wages and other restrictions on one's livelihood are very easy. Unlike most loans, which are regularly renegotiated, the student loan, with exorbitant interest given the level of risk, is not.

    Then there is collusion in the defrauding of the american public. Much of the loan money goes to private distance Universities. These Universities are well known for having very high default rates, and are well known for being victims of straw men loans. In any other financial process, the banks would conduct due diligence to minimize exposure. However, as this is a way to transfer taxpayer money to private banks, there is almost no due diligence. The money is handed out. Banks know or should know the forms are fraudulent. There was one reported case of many forms asking for money to the same address. However, as there is no real risk, and it free money for the bank, no such diligence is performed and banks happily take tax payer money. Unfortunately, all risk and blame is placed on the university and student. While this is appropriate, more blame must be placed on the people who are fundamentally profiting from the fraud. The bankers.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  8. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My knee-jerk reaction is the same as yours. "Why did you take out loans you can't afford? Regardless of why, it's your fault for doing it."

    However, looking at the times we live in, I have a lot of sympathy for the OWS movement. I recently got my PhD in Physics from a top university, and was a triple major as an undergrad. All of this happened without a single penny of student debt, and in fact I was actually supporting one of my parents on my grad student stipend. While I was in school, employers were often contacting me with offers of, "Please quit! Come work for us at Facebook!", and "Please quit! Come work for us at Hedge Fund!" I flew out to a few of the places to interview just because I wanted to see the city. Now that I'm done, the job market has since collapsed. It's hard to even get a call back, even with a decade of programming experience, several publications in an emerging field a PhD, and international recognition for my programming abilities. My university is balking at paying me a $2150/month stipend for me to continue doing research there as a postdoc.

    I'm left thinking that leaving the good thing I had in high school and undergrad, a well-paying job in a contracting collective, was a big mistake. A huge mistake. Because even the opportunity cost of going to university for 10 years for free was greater than the value of the education. Now imagine you're one of the 99% who took out loans on the promise that they'd get a better paying job that would cover them in the future, and you're thrust into a workforce that doesn't want you. You can't bankrupt your way out of it. You can't take a job at McDonalds because the student loan payments are more than you'd be making. You feel like going to university in the first place as opposed to working a McJob was a mistake.

    So, I do have a lot of sympathy for them. I can't imagine being in that position, and the promises they were given by their institutions are worth about as much as the paper the diploma was printed on. Their student debt has them saddled for life--they can't default or bankrupt their way out of it. They'll be paying until they die. I wish I could do something to help them, but until someone will call me back for something other than evil (damn you hedge funds), I'm out of luck too.

    AC because this is embarrassing. I support you OWC. :(

  9. Re:as with real state, personal responsibility... by scubamage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Coming from your background, that's fine. Here's my story: my dad worked at Merck, and was earning well over 100k a year. I was told that my student loans wouldn't be a worry, and thanks to being a mediocre student in high school combined with his earnings, I didn't get much financial aide (not for want of talant, but because I was frequently sick and missed a lot of school). My parents wanted me to go to a highly ranked local private college for my CS degree. I didn't want to go, but they refused to sign my financial aide papers (FAFSA) if I didn't go where they wanted. I applied early admission, which barrs me from applying elsewhere. A quarter way through my junior year, my father has a series of heart attacks, is diagnosed with cancer and lyme disease. My mother is diagnosed with uterine cancer. Neither one lasted long. All of their money? Gone in an instant from medical bills. His pension? Merck decided to fire him after due to frequent illness thanks to the cancer, so it was lost. My situation? Newly graduated with over $100,000 in student debt thanks to interest rates peaking at 8%. Now, this is all my fault, I knew that money was racking up, but honestly it never clicked. Pair that with an utter lack of money management skills being taught in my school or by my parents, and it was a recipe for disaster. It was something I never knew I needed to know, or even thought to learn about it. Not everyone has something "seriously wrong with them" and that sort of world view will get you branded as shallow and ignorant. Some people honestly get screwed by student loans.

  10. Maybe it's not all about me by stomv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the issue is that the inflation rate for college tuition is well above the general inflation rate, that states are contributing a far lower percentage toward operating state unis and community colleges than they have in the past, and that more and more employers are requiring a 4 year degree for positions which don't really need one in the first place.

    Perhaps they're not protesting their own debt. Perhaps they're protesting the current situation -- created by banks, governments, universities, and employers -- which has helped foster the enormous tuition rates being charged for students *today*, thereby necessitating massive student loans or a society in which upward social mobility is unnecessarily reduced.

    Perhaps there's more to a strong and diverse society and culture than engineering. Perhaps your $USELESS_DEGREE has tremendous social value, and the real problem is that our current economic structure doesn't reward the people working in job($USELESS_DEGREE) well enough. Perhaps they think the problem is that we're simply not funding enough social workers and teachers and the arts -- not that there are too many young people with those degrees.

    Look -- I earned a whole bunch of college degrees on full scholarship in tUSA, in fields which pay reasonably well. This isn't about me. Yet, I do agree with the OWS protesters. College debt is too high. Sure, it was all taken voluntarily, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't change the circumstance for future high school graduates. I believe that the Federal Gov't should open more universities at free/low tuition, and not require military service to be admitted -- and focus on areas where we have a national interest. Health care, energy, infrastructure, etc. I believe that state governments should pour far more money into their state universities. I believe that both Fed and state gov'ts should hire more teachers and fund more arts. I support raising taxes on folks with more money [both income and wealth] to pay for it. I think that if we moved in that direction, we'd have a safer, healthier, *better* society.

    1. Re:Maybe it's not all about me by Insightfill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe that the Federal Gov't should open more universities at free/low tuition

      It was a goal of Reagan back when he was in California to specifically get rid of free/low-cost college. He saw college students protesting government activities and publicly complained that they were having it easy, and at government expense. With all that free-time they got to protest too much. So: he dramatically raised fees at the state unis. He couldn't raise tuitions, as they were protected. After a few years, there was even a court case that found that excessive fees were a de facto tuition, but by then it was too late.

      Now: the pendulum has swung too far. Instead of a bunch of college students with plenty of free time and nothing (of value) to lose, we have a bunch of college students and grads with so much debt that they've thrown in the towel and realized that they have nothing to lose; when you're staring at $0 of college debt, you're essentially in the same situation as an unemployed grad with $100K of debt. "Aw, fuck it," you say.

      We're fast entering a similar situation as the "Arab Spring": a bunch of unemployed young people with nothing to lose. Bloomberg stated as much and was taken to task for doing so.

  11. College Education Scam by advid.net · · Score: 4, Informative
    A must-see documentary about student loans :

    NIA today officially released the most comprehensive documentary ever produced about higher education in the U.S. NIA's hour-long documentary called 'College Conspiracy' exposes the facts and truth about America's college education system. 'College Conspiracy' was produced over a six-month period by NIA's team of expert Austrian economists with the help of thousands of NIA members who contributed their ideas and personal stories for the film. NIA believes the U.S. college education system is a scam that turns vulnerable young Americans into debt slaves for life.

    It also remind us:

    After the burst of the Real Estate bubble, student loans are now the easiest loan to receive in the U.S., and total student loan debts now exceed credit card debts.

    It was written May 16, 2011 ...

    1. Re:College Education Scam by jwhitener · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd never heard of NIA. I went to their site and read the 'about' section.

      I got a bit suspicious when I saw this: "Our food inflation report was featured on FOX News by Glenn Beck, who called NIA a "very credible" organization." I don't consider Glenn Beck very credible.

      Googling NIA lead me to this: National Inflation Association co-founder admits NIA is a FRAUD!

      And a ton of other articles basically saying that NIA is a scare scam to pump and dump gold/silver. Now it could very well be true that total student loans exceed pricey credit card debts, but does that 'fact' actually mean anything? More students than ever are going to school, largely because unskilled labor jobs are drying up. So its no surprise that there are more loans.

      I'd rather build a business that had an educated population to hire from and live in a community that voted intelligently than cut back on federal loans.

  12. Student loans are a replay of the health care by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It also is a replay of the mortgage market.

    When consumption of goods becomes third party in nature the costs explode. This happened in medical care when employers and the government started to pick up the tab. People didn't realize the costs of services and they have become used to not caring. As a result the services got more expensive over time, usually outstripping inflation.

    Student loans and student aid did the same thing. They separated the costs of education from the student. Oh sure the student knew they were going to pay but they didn't have to pay NOW and that was key. They had to make installment payments. That reduces the psychological sting all that money made.

    Schools then abused that through incredible marketing both direct and indirect. By having all sorts of support industries to include the press and such espouse all the benefits a high dollar education conferred. The one fact they left out was, the majority would never succeed. Everyone is not equal and the same education does not mean all parties have the same out come.

    As for the OWS, go read their site. If that doesn't frighten off people here then I would be shocked. It all centers around having GOVERNMENT become more oppressive. They want, want, want, want, and want. There is no talk about what they will do for others only what others should be compelled to do.

     

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  13. Re:Let experts, not salesmen, decide by imric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is almost true. There are some problems with your post, though.

    "Educators will tell you that perhaps college should be reserved for those with the ability and initiative to do the work. Not everyone is ready for a college education, or able to engage in the rigorous critical thinking required. That's not popular with the salespeople, who want to sell college to everyone."

    The 'salespeople' here are our government, trying to sell hope that even though they encourage industry to move offshore, there is a way for everyone to live happy fruitful lives. Education was that way. And it's necessary now; after all, to get a decent white-collar job now you need 'a degree'. It doesn't have to be related to your job. Jobs available (if you don't have a degree) will ensure that you live in poverty and die early.

    "High school is now four years of day care because those teachers figure the kids will really learn to spell in college."

    No. High school is now daycare because both parents now have to work to survive and NEED DAY CARE. Teachers are now expected to raise kids, but aren't allowed to punish them. Parents freak when 'little johnny' fails, and rather than take responsibility, they blame the teachers for their kids lack of effort - even though teachers have little or no power to make the kids do ANYTHING.

    "When they cheapen those, too, we're going to have to cut out the middleman and bribe our way into careers."
    Yes. Only the upper classes will be able to do this too. Oligarchy becomes permanent and the American Dream dies. A permanent, desperate underclass that will work like slaves for almost nothing will be available, and America will finally become 'competitive' with the third world. By becoming a third-world nation.

    --
    Paranoia is a Survival Trait!
  14. How Government Caused This by geoffrobinson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The government helps students take on loans -> colleges increase tuition because students can afford more thanks to the loans -> there is societal and economic pressure to help people go to college -> the government helps students take on loans ...

    The three sectors that increased much faster than inflation (housing, health care, higher ed) all have their cost subsidized by government. Is this a coincidence?

    And this is the relative size of the higher education bubble: http://www.di.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/tuition-housing-cpi1.jpg

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  15. Re:OWS = same whining leftists as always by jpstanle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Watching OWS protests, where we have largely a population of educated middle-class or higher kids (who are staggeringly wealthy by any world standard), who have spent their lives:
    - getting everything they need, and pretty much everything they want
    - have never known hunger
    - have always been basically healthy
    - have never seen war except as volunteers, which is pretty damn unlikely anyway (more importantly, have never faced the ravage of war across their homes)

    I recently graduated with a degree in Electrical Engineering, easily one of the most "Useful and Marketable" undergraduate degrees you can have. I am also a veteran who spent 2 years serving his country, 6 of them getting shot at in Kandahar. I have relocated to the DC-Metro area, one of the areas of lowest unemployment in the country. I BARELY found a job, and at a significantly lower salary than what my peers were being offered in 2007. My tuition costs more than doubled while I was in school. All the while, we've been dumping trillions of dollars to cover the asses of bankers and insurers underwriting ridiculous risks in order to make a quick buck.

    But sure, OWS is a bunch of whining leftist hippies. Seriously dude, get fucked.

  16. It is not hard to figure out why. by MarkvW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    dent loan debt is nondischargeable in bankruptcy unless the debtor can meet a very high burden of proving hardship.

    It's no wonder that lenders lend insane amounts, when they can hound their borrowers for years and years.

    No way is this in the long term interest of business, but since when has business ever cared about the long term. They buy their congressmen and this is what they get.

    Same thing for the goddamn mortgage industry. Banks get super-protection for their residential mortgages in bankruptcy, so they can write stupid mortgages without fear that the mortgage will be modified in a Chapter 13. This is a contributor to all the stupid loans.

    Then business sells us on the idea that it's all the debtor's fault. That's the stupidest thing of all. Sure it's the debtor's fault. When the moron takes the stupid home loan or the stupid mortgage, he has only himself to blame. But business interests want us to think: Fuck him. He can sort his own sorry shit out. And we're morons if we agree with that. If our stupid ass neighbor goes down with a bad mortgage--our property values suffer, our banks suffer, and we all suffer. We're all interdependent. Looking out for other people is looking out for ourselves. The frontier ethic doesn't work anymore when we're jammed together in cities.

    Enough of a rant. Now I'll get flamed by the small government people who would rather be governed by banks than by elected representatives.

  17. Third-worldization of the US by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You nailed it. We are becoming a third world nation.

    1) Huge wealth disparity between the rich elite and everyone else. (check)
    2) Decreasing access to health care for the masses. (check)
    3) Little social mobility. (check)
    4) Decreasing access to education for the masses. (check)

    --PM

  18. Re:Forgive Student Loans!!!1!! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Want to see a real uprising? Watch what the hard working middle class who already paid off their own student loans do when their earnings are taken away to forgive some occupy-wall-street-dirty-hippie's B.A. Art History debt.

    I remember how you guys rose up over the Wall Street bailout. Boy are those guys reeling from how you gave 'em the scowling of a lifetime.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  19. Really simple solution tested in practice: by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Make all education free for all. That's what Finland is doing, and it works brilliantly: the scientific output of this small (by population numbers) country is extremely high, as well as the effects of it on industry.

    Now the UK has introduced tuition fees that are, in most cases, about GBP 9000/year. Many universities in The Netherlands (where education is free for all, as well) are now marketing all-English language master programmes to UK students that cannot afford the tuition fees. That will cause an influx of people who will, by studying in The Netherlands, contribute to the science in that country, and most likely stay as PhD students, contributing even more.

    By the way, in addition to free education for all, the US should really introduce single payer, too. A system where children (as well as adults) are left without health insurance should alarm you.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  20. Re:as with real state, personal responsibility... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Coming from your background, that's fine. Here's my story: my dad worked at Merck, and was earning well over 100k a year. I was told that my student loans wouldn't be a worry, and thanks to being a mediocre student in high school combined with his earnings, I didn't get much financial aide (not for want of talant, but because I was frequently sick and missed a lot of school). My parents wanted me to go to a highly ranked local private college for my CS degree. I didn't want to go, but they refused to sign my financial aide papers (FAFSA) if I didn't go where they wanted. I applied early admission, which barrs me from applying elsewhere. A quarter way through my junior year, my father has a series of heart attacks, is diagnosed with cancer and lyme disease. My mother is diagnosed with uterine cancer. Neither one lasted long. All of their money? Gone in an instant from medical bills. His pension? Merck decided to fire him after due to frequent illness thanks to the cancer, so it was lost. My situation? Newly graduated with over $100,000 in student debt thanks to interest rates peaking at 8%. Now, this is all my fault, I knew that money was racking up, but honestly it never clicked. Pair that with an utter lack of money management skills being taught in my school or by my parents, and it was a recipe for disaster. It was something I never knew I needed to know, or even thought to learn about it.

    I'm sorry to hear about your parents' illness, but sorry to break it up to you. They were fucking stupid and they fucked you up. They projected their own ideals of life into you in a manner that only served to indulge their shallow, narrow-minded (and I dare say arrogant) world view (a particular trait in our culture which is what is putting us in the fucked up place we are right now). Their interests, their pushing their agenda on you, that never represented your best interests. I'm sure they loved you dearly, but love is not enough. I mean, what kind of parent would refuse to sign FAFSA papers for his children just because his children do not want to go to a private university?

    I mean, think about it. In that aspect, they fucked up in their parental duties, they played God, and as a result, they have loaded your life with $100K in debt that cannot ever be defaulted by the normal venues of bankruptcy. Sorry pal, I am not the one risking being branded as shallow and ignorant.

    And speaking of world views...

    Not everyone has something "seriously wrong with them" and that sort of world view will get you branded as shallow and ignorant.

    I'm sure that in your college education you were exposed to the concept of reading comprehension, and reading skills in general. This is what I wrote. Tell me how the "something fundamentally fucked up with you" passage applies to you (who went to a private university for a STEM degree):

    one should only get over $60K in student loans if you get a degree in medicine or law or STEM degree (in particular from a private university.) If you have $40K or more in student loans with only a B.A. degree in History from a public university, there is something fundamentally fucked up with you.

    So. Read.

    Some people honestly get screwed by student loans.

    No. People do not get screwed by students loans. People screw themselves with the decisions they make with them (or in your case, your parents screwed you up with them.) Your case does not represent a general case, and doesn't even represent the general case described in my description of things, so I don't what sort of mechanisms you are using when extracting meaning from written passages.

    Having said that, I have to say I sympathize with you. I do not know your situation (I also went through a terrible period of disproportionate personal debt - private credit debt - due to a lack of sound money skills.) But, unless you are facing health issues, or you are already married