Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What To Do With Spammers You Know?

courteaudotbiz writes "For years, a business named Compu-Finder has been sending spam all around the province of Quebec, Canada. In their emails, there is a phone number where we can reach them, and an unsubscribe link that you can click and seems to work, but even after asking them on the phone, by email or with their unsubscribe link, to unsubscribe me, I still receive 10 — 15 spams a week coming from this company. Many bloggers, journalists and radio chroniclers talked about them, but they seem to be untouchable. Still, it is easy to find the names, addresses and phone numbers of the shareholders and administrators of the company. How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?"

46 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Aren't there laws against that? by NixieBunny · · Score: 3

    Document it thoroughly and submit a report to the authorities. If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

      Also helps against neighbours who play loud music in the middle of the night...

    2. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by mcavic · · Score: 2

      I live in an apartment building where all of the master breakers are accessible, and I've often wanted to do that, but never had the balls.

    3. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      No, their host is theplanet.com in texas. (do an nslookup on their latest site name theutraining.com - 174.123.135.180 - they keep changing it, for obvious reasons).

      Report it to abuse@theplanet.com

  2. Getting your point across by jdavidb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?

    Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?

    1. Re:Getting your point across by lcarnevale · · Score: 2

      Set up a filter that forwards all the messages to the shareholders and administrators.

    2. Re:Getting your point across by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      True. The thing with spam, like much advertising, is that it's based on wishful thinking and something almost like superstition. They spend money on advertising, and unless they're a huge megacorporation doing serious market research, they just sort of hope that it pays off. Unless there is a big dive in profits that correlates with a marketing campaign, ideally with many angry letters to give the marketroids a hint at what's going on, they'll assume it's all hunky-dory.

      They spam, profits are roughly the same or increase, it works! Spam more! And it repeats like that until they get hit with a clue bat.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Getting your point across by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      The issue with spam is that it is so cheap that even incredibly low rates of return can still be profitable. Like one in a million rates of return, or even the prospect of one day getting a single hit.

    4. Re:Getting your point across by pugugly · · Score: 2

      Thus the issue is being handled at the wrong end. Create a spam system yourself, and spam Quebec. Some small number of people will respond positively to your campaign. Use the profits from the campaign to hire assassins and have those people killed.

      When you can no longer afford to hire killers to eliminate people that respond positively to spam, the problem will have been defacto resolved.

      In order to eliminate ethical concerns, this process should probably be automated - otherwise the profits might actually tempt you and you might forget that we're doing this for a greater good. And that would be wrong.

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    5. Re:Getting your point across by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rather, his request is a thinly-veiled plea for vigilante/mass action from the Slashdot community. That kind of making them understand.

      Like calling 1.800.861.6618 or emailing them at conseil@theumanage.com (ooh, that's the first time I've made a mailto link in a /. discussion — wonder if it'll work) or at conseil@www.cfcible.com, or just visiting their website a bunch.

      Which could actually happen, I wouldn't be surprised. I stand by, curiously awaiting report of the results.

    6. Re:Getting your point across by gmack · · Score: 2

      Report them to their ISP.

    7. Re:Getting your point across by Uhyve · · Score: 2

      And all of their public email addresses...

    8. Re:Getting your point across by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Commerce isn't the majority of spam these days... most of it (that I've ever seen that is) is worm chatter. Bots trying to spread the infection.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  3. Don't call or unsubscribe by gearloos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Usually having a phone number is great!... for the spammers. It now gives them another reference for you and more info to sell and abuse. as for unsubscribing, well, that just shows them that a live human actually is at that address and reading email from spammers.. Goldstrike if you called and unsubscribed.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by bzipitidoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why was this modded down? It's all too true. Don't unsubscribe, don't call. All that does is confirm that you look at their spam. Mark the offending messages as spam, and filter them out, that's all.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    2. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as for unsubscribing, well, that just shows them that a live human actually is at that address and reading email from spammers.. Goldstrike if you called and unsubscribed.

      If they use the unsubscribe link in order to actively maintain you on their list, that smells like fraud to me.

      Remember that something doesn't have to be in direct contravention of your country's Data Protection Act (or equivalent) to be spam -- contract law still holds, and if they offer a way to unsubscribe, you take it and they don't unsubscribe you, that's a breach of agreed terms.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by dbug78 · · Score: 2

      This isn't the first time I've heard the "don't unsubscribe" wisdom. It's logical but doesn't reflect reality.

      At my last job, I was asked frequently about the volume of spam. I got less than almost anyone else in the office despite having one of the most widely publicized email addresses. Why? Because I unsubscribed whenever I got something. When I was able to convince others to unsubscribe, they saw drastic decreases in spam.

      This theory relies on the idea that spammers stop spamming people they don't get a reply from, and that's lunacy. The only time they give up on an address is if the email is rejected or if they cease operations. That being the case, there's no harm in trying to unsubscribe.

      To address the initial question, if this company is so notorious why aren't they blocked at the SMTP server? Your IT people ought to be able to blacklist them with very little effort.

  4. show up at their door by james_van · · Score: 2

    with pitchforks and torches

  5. Arson is your friend. by Surt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Really, it's the only way to get through to some people.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Arson is your friend. by wintercolby · · Score: 2

      Light a fire for a man and he's warm for a day, light him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. --Terry Pratchett

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Arson is your friend. by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Hey! My cat says that when she is made aware of the existence of any other cat...

      Well, not in those exact words, but she can't actually speak. The intent is clear though.

      I wonder if I could train her to go into these homicidal rages at spammers?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  6. As a start... by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Publicise the names and personal details of their CEO and board of directors.
    Subscribe their email addresses to every spam product and service you can find.

    1. Re:As a start... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  7. First Hand Experience... by what2123 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can speak on this company from a first hand account. I work for an ESP, I actually manage all our mail servers and work closely with ISPs and mail vendors to help out GOOD CLIENTS. I say this because Compu-Finder (although they have an official name that is different) was a client of ours. They were a BAD-CLIENT. We have many tools that are in place to help our clients ensure that best practices are followed as well as easily available to contacts of the client, e.g opt-outs and suppressing those contacts from future emails. Compu-Finder did everything they could to get around built in mechanisms to keep "contacts" subscribed. Well Finally after battling with them on changing their practices we finally fired them. They are the kind of company that makes me cringe because I know there are real, legitimate, marketers out there that do use email to engage clients and keep them up-to-date but they are the ones that make it bad for any sender.

    1. Re:First Hand Experience... by fifedrum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and I work on the other end, supporting a few million email accounts. I like ESPs like you, because you work diligently to keep your senders on the up and up, but this scumbag will just move on to some other ESP, or worse, start connecting with hosted email providers like us, and spam from there.

      There is no way to defend against it EXCEPT to put their phone numbers and domains in black lists from the start. That, and as per a suggestion above, kill it with fire.

    2. Re:First Hand Experience... by what2123 · · Score: 2

      You should be familiar with MAAWG then. I am a committee member and one major point that comes up with is Vetting. For the most part, we are attempting to have ESPs have an open network of communication regarding business that are known as bad or corrupt in some form and literally BAN them from sending from a MAAWG member. This of course isn't live or current yet but eventually it could work to promote much better sending via known, good ESPs, not the fly-by-sender ESPs that exist everywhere.

  8. Block it and move on by Lev13than · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Block it and move on by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ironically, getting nothing is exactly what he wants. It's funny how much time we spend trying to get people to stop wasting our time.

    2. Re:Block it and move on by Nanoda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      After all the spam I've gotten in the past ~15 years? If I found out there was a spammer in my own city, I'd be willing to spend at least a couple of evenings trying to shut them down.

    3. Re:Block it and move on by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If all you are interested in is money, then indeed the best thing is to do nothing. If however you value other things, then the return might be worth it.

      Not everything can be easily calculated in an amount of dollars.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Block it and move on by Tom · · Score: 2

      Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?

      The satisfaction of seing a spammer ruined would be worth several hours of my time for me. Sure it is pure and evil revenge. However, doing to them the only thing that makes them stop is... well, the only road you can take to eventually make them stop.

      Blocking their domain seems like the low-cost solution. Until you realize that you need to block not only their domain, but hundreds of others as well. Increasing the risk of spamming by making them pay, on the other hand, has effects beyond the one you sued or took out of business.

      I still wish we'd all band together and simply get a dozen or so of the highest profile spammers killed. Everyone who's annoyed by spam paying just 10 cents would get us more than enough money to hire a couple top-notch hitmen. I'm quite sure that after this, the only spammers who'd still dare doing that business are the organized criminals. That's not a good thing, but then at least the grey area would have been clearly removed and we might finally get some actual government action on the problem.
      Plus we'd have eliminated at least half of the spam.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  9. Fight spam with real mail by cronos1013 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a simple and SUPER fun way to combat this. Get the google toolbar with auto fill for forms, and sign up for every free thing on the market you can with their address. This was done to a spammer a couple years back in the US and I guess once your postal mail volume reaches a certain ammount they stop delivering it, and bill you if you dont pick it up. If 10000 people sign them up for 1000 deliveries of junk real mail, they might get the picture. Maybe....

  10. Re:This is Canada by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah, but it's Quebec.

    Make sure they follow the language laws, if not, report them to the language police. They're apparently quite vicious.

    Also, Quebec has very special status in Canada since they basically want to do everything themselves and only give token attention to Ottawa (they have their own sales tax - QST, that the Harper Government (tm) is paying $4B or so for them to change it to an "H" to implement the HST which would do the same thing). Quebec can easily make it very hard for a business that's not obeying its laws to do business inside Quebec, even if they're not in Quebec.

    It's why in Canada there's lots of things that are "excluding Quebec" - not just sweepstakes/lottos/etc, but also products that basically are unavailable to be shipped to Quebec. They have the requisite French, but they don't meet some other part of Quebec law and are therefore disallowed.

  11. Re:How to fight spam by Phreakiture · · Score: 2

    The CAN-SPAM act loses what little punch it has as soon as you cross the state line from New York into Quebec . . .

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  12. Like a telemarketer by wintercolby · · Score: 2

    I got a call from a telemarketer on my cell phone at 3AM one day. I called the number back and found that it was a standard voice/prompt setup. I randomly dialed buttons until I got to a dial by extension choice. I then dialed every extension I could think of, leaving voicemails on every line, stating that the next time I get called on my cell phone at 3AM I would sue the company out of existence. Where I live the law is on my side on this, it is illegal to call before 9AM or after 7PM here. It must have gotten through to one of the people I left a voicemail for, because they never called again. Harass them more than they harassed you by wasting their time, and they'll find a way to stay out of contact with you.

    And never, ever, ever click unsubscribe from anyone but the most reputable companies. It lets the spammers know that someone at that address actually reads those emails, and they don't mind sharing it with their sister companies.

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
  13. File a lawsuit! Or many! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Informative
    There are some people or companies that will clean up their act when they have been sued. Sometimes it takes more.

    Within a week after I had been contacted by one drug spammer that I sued, my spam load went down by 50%.

    Another Spammer I sued, put in place a strong anti-spam policy and apparently quite effective.

    When I went after Avtech Direct (Arlene Sediqzad and Gary Hunziker ) for spamming, I also helped arrange 21 lawsuits against them. After this was over, Sediqzad told me she wish she never heard of e-mail, and had not heard of it until Gary Hunziker got her into using it. Another spammer, Robert Smoley, stopped, only because he was charged, pled guilty, and sentenced to 40 months. They also seized over $40M of money and property from him. I think that is one of my most productive 45 minute phone calls with an IRS agent ever.

    But this company you talk to is like Smoley, or Ralsky who needs to be sued multiple times or imprisoned for a while before they stop spamming.

  14. If you're willing to spend money on a stamp... by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

    Or, even better, if you can get their fax number how about full-color Goatse in the mail or by fax? By email too, but Goatse coming out of a fax machine seems like it would be a nice gift to send them.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  15. why not help others? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At first glance we see this is the personally efficient way to handle the situation. Block their mail and move on. But then we might wonder if we're being a little selfish, not engaging our computer skills to help out others, the many others who are negatively affected by this spam. A little altruism is generally recognized as a noble thing...

    This could lead us to thinking about the systems that have been developed for reporting spam, how individuals have been empowered to spend little effort in reporting, and how, when summed, that individually trivial effort, of thousands and thousands of people, collectively makes powerful anti-spam effect.

    Then maybe we complete the circle, realizing that we are the beneficiaries of these powerful anti-spam systems, that our time is greatly saved by these systems, and that we are not just being altruistic in our contributions, we are helping ourselves.

    The personally efficient way to handle many things is this way, being helpful to the larger community that you are by nature a member of, and personally capitalizing on the beneficial effects of the economies of scale and other mass dynamics/synergistic effects.

    This is where selfishness meets altruism. So, why not help others, when you are really helping yourself?

  16. Re:If Fire Doesn't Work by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  17. Re:My favorite response by Belial6 · · Score: 2

    One should go one step further. The problem with your proposal is that a free speech argument would be made. You are not offering a service to the individual, and there is no way that receiving any kind of mail is going to be counted as a service by any court. You need to supply a service to the spammer.

    Ad to your letter that one of the services that your business provides is "marketing consulting", and that the address they are sending the spam to is the evaluation request address. Thus, by submitting their work to that address they are requesting your "marketing consulting" services. Then when you send them your bill, make sure that you give them a fair assessment of their marketing strategy. E.G. "After careful consideration, we have determined that your marketing method is a poor choice." You have then had services requested, and you have services supplied. Personally, my marketing consulting is really good, and due to the nature of the work is not an billed at an hourly rate. My rates are $1500 as a promotional price for the first analysis, further analysis are $10,000 for standard email evaluation, and $20,000 for drug, dating, or sex industries email evaluation.

    The promotional price would work out well because it falls within the values covered by small claims court, so you don't need a lawyer. If you get a judgement in the first case, it seems unlikely that a court would not recognize that the spammer was in a preexisting business relationship with you, give that he has previously been order by the court to pay his bill for those exact same services. This should make it much easier to find a lawyer who would be willing to take the subsequent, higher value cases on contingency.

    I don't know Quebec law well enough to know if this would apply to them.

  18. Re:DNS block by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    Now, they just come at you from a new IP address within hours.

    Greylisting is your friend. Your mail server gives them a service temporarily unavailable error. If their mail server follows the SMTP standard, it comes back a few hours later from the same IP address and gets let through. Most spammers are interested in volume, and don't waste resources following up like that. And if they do, and it happens to be a new IP address, then they get delayed again for having a new IP address.

    It doesn't take long for Greylisting filters to learn legitimate hosts, especially if you receive a fair amount of mail from said hosts, and within a day or two you won't notice any delays at all with legitimate mail.

  19. Re:This is Canada by CCurzon · · Score: 2

    Toss the spammers on their asses,
    Fa la la la la, la la la la

  20. Re:This is Canada by openfrog · · Score: 2

    Quebec has a special legal status in Canada because Canada is still, last I checked, a federation.

    That being said, Francophones are welcoming, friendly people. Some people live here without ever uttering a French word and Quebecois go out of their way to accommodate them. Those who want to learn French are actually annoyed by it.

    Montreal is a truly multicultural city, and every small culture is free to express itself, in all manners, restaurants, soccer team fans, and they are and do feel appreciated.

    Look at the crime rates, those don't lie: Montreal is one of the safest and coolest city in North-America. But don't tell, we don't want to get over-crowded.

    Don't believe Haper's propaganda. He is out to spend public money on prisons, so his new friends will finance his re-election.

    And come visit us, before talking nonsense.

  21. Bill them for email processing by GiantRobotMonster · · Score: 2

    I once had a similar problem; endless spam coming from a trying-to-be-legitimate business despite numerous requests for them to stop it.
    Ultimately I emailed every administrative contact I could find for the company with something along the lines of:

    "Thank you for trying the Robot Monster Unsolicited Email Processing Service.
    While your first email is processed for free, any additional emails are processed at a fee of $1000.
    A 10% discount is available if payment is received prior to the email.
    Any additional emails sent to this email address will be interpretted as an acceptance of these charges."

    I was kinda disappointed I never heard from them again -- was looking forward to sending them invoices.

  22. Auto-Forward rule by yotto · · Score: 2

    Send them an email, carboned to every email address for everybody in the company you can find. That email says something along the lines of:

    I am getting a large amount of spam emails from your company. I have tried normal channels to get them to stop, but they have actually gotten worse. I am appealing to you to put a halt to these emails. I will forward you examples of the emails I have received.

    Then set up an auto-forward rule that forwards every single spam to that same list, with the text:

    Here is an example of the spam I am receiving from your company. As I acquire more examples, I will forward them on as well.

    I bet they'll stop in a few days.

  23. Yep, you are right. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and Al Capone was not a gangster, he just cheated on his taxes.