Slashdot Mirror


ICANN Begins "Land Rush" For .XXX Web Domains

Velcroman1 writes "The World Wide Web red-light district is poised to explode. After more than a decade of debate, rejections and legal challenges, the Internet's governing body began accepting applications for .xxx websites from the adult entertainment industry on Tuesday, Nov. 8 — otherwise called the 'begin printing money phase.' The so-called 'landrush' phase signifies the true launch of .xxx websites, following the Sept. 5 date when ICM Registry began accepting .xxx applications from trademarked companies — those looking to use a .xxx address and those seeking to prevent their company from appearing on a .xxx website."

68 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Can't wait for Slashdot.xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Open source porn! (Plus Apple stories)

  2. google.xxx by rwv · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can we expect a new, porn-only search engine? There's lots of money to be made with porn ads. It would be surprising to see what Google does with its own XXX site.

    1. Re:google.xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Time to register google.xxx for mad money!

    2. Re:google.xxx by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They already have that, it's called Xvideos.com.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:google.xxx by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      It would be surprising to see what Google does with its own XXX site.

      Programmer porn

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  3. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    By the other side, it just makes it easier to google with "site:.xxx". Anybody with more than one neuron will probably get both a .xxx and a .org or .net domains for the site.

  4. Re:Other Web Domains poised to explode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Shit, why don't they just do away with the tiered system altogether. I mean it's not like ".com", ".org", ".net", etc actually mean anything at all.

    I want a server named "This is my cool webpage" (yes, including spaces).

  5. goatse.xxx by vlm · · Score: 2

    The only valid use I can think of this is for goatse.xxx to return (actually it was a .cx, but whatever). Whats the QR code for that, anyway?

    In a way its a good idea... the over-controlling nutcases can think they are actually doing something by blocking the entire domain, while all the actual pr0n, not wanting to be blocked, remains in the .com domain.

    In a way its a bad idea, because most of the money will be generated by giant corporations buying the domain so pranksters/whatever can't abuse their name. Expect to see ibm.xxx purchased by ibm solely to keep other people from messing with it.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:goatse.xxx by masternerdguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually its not a bad idea. It's an awesome way to extort more money for domain hosting to offset the steadily dropping costs. If you don't register your XXX domain, someone else will. It's practically legalized extortion!

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:goatse.xxx by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      The only valid use I can think of this is for goatse.xxx to return (actually it was a .cx, but whatever). Whats the QR code for that, anyway?

      Haha good idea. A lot of QR code reading apps stupidly open a browser window with a page in it immediately instead of showing you the URL and giving you the option to open it. Great for goatse and browser attacks.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:goatse.xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    4. Re:goatse.xxx by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Mod "+1 I will never scan a QR code again"

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  6. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    True but it is not exactly hard to find porn on the internet whether you are looking for it or not.

  7. sarahpalin.xxx by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 1

    Porn? No, the XXX hell gates of mockery, intimidation and blackmail has just been blown wide open. I fail to see anything good or positive we can get out of this domain, looks like this is designed only to fill registrar's coffers.

  8. scam + blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a scam.

    I own a adult domain non-generic and working website.
    I have the trademark for it but they didn't let me register my domain.xxx because they have reserved thousands of popular words for a later auction.
    When i try to register it it says "RESERVED". My lawyer has contacted them without response.

    Also they have sold lots of valuable domains before september to investors without telling nobody, you can check register date in some generic domains.

    It can also be called blackmail.

    This domain will not succeed because its owned by speculators and cybersquatters.

    1. Re:scam + blackmail by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Without telling nobody? At least they told somebody.

    2. Re:scam + blackmail by somersault · · Score: 1

      It's also completely pointless. The "red light district of the internet" exploded in the 90s. I rarely even look at the domain names when browsing for porn.. who cares?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:scam + blackmail by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's definitely a cash-grab. It has no utility for the rest of us, nobody wanted it and it only makes for costly aggravation.

      I feel bad that folks like you that have to deal with this.

    4. Re:scam + blackmail by khallow · · Score: 2

      Blackmail doesn't mean what you think it means.

    5. Re:scam + blackmail by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Informative

      It can also be called blackmail.

      Extortion perhaps, but not blackmail: blackmail is when someone threatens to make private information public if you do not comply with their wishes.

    6. Re:scam + blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Officially notify them that you own the trademark and do not agree with this and that you are willing to pay the regular price for it.
      Also notify them that you will sue anyone who uses that domain for trademark infringement.

      Now the domain name is a tainted product.

      Make sure they realize that you will make sure that whoever does end up buying the domain will be informed that ICANN new it was a tainted product.

  9. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by alphatel · · Score: 1

    But if you look for it in .xxx Frank Shilling is where you are likely to find it. Don't expect that the landrush opportunity isn't already locked up in full.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  10. Re:Other Web Domains poised to explode by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    http://thisismycoolwebpage/

    Do you really want that?

  11. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Hentes · · Score: 1

    It's not necessary the only domain of a porn site.

  12. ICANN by Bloopie · · Score: 1

    ICANN has cheezcake?

  13. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    The man with the 7-figure pockets could get sexe.xxx and sexo.xxx, but not sex.xxx? After the battle over sex.com, I'm curious who was awarded that domain.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  14. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Lincolnshire+Poacher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > will soon be filtered out and go out out of business.

    The main environments in which such filtering would occur are libraries, schools and workplaces. Somehow I doubt there is much demand for porn originating from those environments anyway, at least not much money-raising porn.

    According to a recent article in the Economist, porn browsing is growing fastest on smartphones. The .xxx domain wouldn't be blocked on those devices unless attached to a corporate network.

    So who exactly will be blocking this?

  15. Re:Other Web Domains poised to explode by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    That should have read as
    http:/// this%20is%20my%20cool%20webpage/

  16. It's such a scam by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My company's attorney asked me if we needed to register all of our domains under their "Register your brand with .XXX so someone else doesn't" program. I told them that while we could do that, there's no reason why someone would want to use our domain for porn, and even if they wanted to, they could register under .org, .net, .info, or one of the dozens of country domains available to anyone (some domain speculator already grabbed our .org and .net domains). I asked him if he was prepared to spend thousands of dollars/year preemptively registering our domain and common mispellings across all available TLD's on the off chance that some porn operator thought that our company's would be attractive to people looking for porn (our company's name is associated more with industrial products than big bouncing boobs). I think he finally understood why this .xxx preregistration was such a scam.

    1. Re:It's such a scam by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      I think he finally understood why this .xxx preregistration was such a scam.

      Also especially because the .info and .biz TLD's are doing so well...

      As a side note, I don't get it. I clicked on the button to register the domain, and it took me to another page where I had to fill out another form and enter my CC info yet again. When I clicked register on that page, it took me to yet another page and I had to apply again...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:It's such a scam by Dewin · · Score: 1

      You're associated with industrial products, not big bouncing boobs? I'm sure there's an audience for that (Possibly NSFW).

      --
      Of course nobody reads the FAQ! If people read the FAQ, the Questions wouldn't be so Frequently Asked.
    3. Re:It's such a scam by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      If you noticed there were advertisements in that, you're gay.

      Speaking of which, I think I need a new 2-speed battery drill.

    4. Re:It's such a scam by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm a bit curious about what will show up on kernel.xxx.

  17. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    While you battled with your 7-figures about a single world, I registered every other word in the dictionary and created new niches of porn.

    You should check out our wildest newly added categories: categories

    (while joking, that list does sound like it could be made into a porno.)

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  18. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Any idiot who thinks otherwise and sets up a pr0n site will soon be filtered out and go out out of business."

    Um, no. You could not be more incorrect.
    Do you really think that the more successful sites are the ones not filtered?
    Think - existing filters already exist, AND they block a vast majority of porn sites.

    Sites like brazzers dot com etc all do just FINE and they are filtered 100%. Presuming they open brazzers dot xxx, they will STILL be filtered 100%.

    I /guess/ you could possibly make an argument that a .XXX level block is "shorter" or "simpler" than traditional URL pattern blocks that work within .COM, etc.
    But that's irrelevant ... it does not matter WHERE a site is located, it will be blocked.

    There's no real-world argument that .com sites are better at evading filters (and thus "not going out of business" because of it). Content filters are usually updated HOURLY, so they'll block every new porn site on any TLD. Smart filters will block the DNS nameservers which are owned by porn sites, so new sites can not slip through like say a "zero day warez" site might slip through.

  19. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Joce640k · · Score: 2

    Any idiot who thinks otherwise and sets up a pr0n site will soon be filtered out and go out out of business.

    People make money from porn on the Internet?

    Is there really any porn you can't get for free by the gigabyte?

    --
    No sig today...
  20. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Dunno, but I bet he's wined and dined the boss of ICANN. Maybe even thrown in a luxury yacht or two.

    --
    No sig today...
  21. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So who exactly will be blocking this?

    Entire countries?

  22. Carl Icahn!? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    My first read was why the hell is Carl Icahn getting into .xxx domain markets... doesn't he have anything better to do with his time?

  23. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the new sig.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  24. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by jittles · · Score: 1

    The main environments in which such filtering would occur are libraries...

    When was the last time you went thru the computer lab at a library??? *yuck*

  25. Phase names by sootman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > The so-called 'landrush' phase signifies the true launch
    > of .xxx websites, following the Sept. 5 date when ICM
    > Registry began accepting .xxx applications from
    > trademarked companies — those looking to use
    > a .xxx address and those seeking to prevent their
    > company from appearing on a .xxx website

    ... which is, in turn, known as the "extortion" phase.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Phase names by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 3, Funny

      and those seeking to prevent their company from appearing on a .xxx website

      Where at "microsoft.xxx" the truthful comment that their servers constantly go down on you, brings on an entirely new and unintended meaning...

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  26. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Jibekn · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're called fetishes, show me where I can get 40 hours of a midget beating a south American prostitute with a halibut while reciting the pledge of allegiance and ill stop paying for my porn.

  27. Re:Other Web Domains poised to explode by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    It does help organize things a bit. http://www.coolwebpages.co.uk/ you know immediately is english language, but also strictly British. .gov, .edu and .mil are generally safer than a .ru site to visit, and you know that you're going to have an epileptic seizure if you try reading the flashing text on a .jp site. You can figure out someone's nationality from their accent in speech, but a nationalized or regional top level domains are the only identifier about the location or level of trust you have before you click on a link.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  28. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Frenzied+Apathy · · Score: 1

    Is there really any porn you can't get for free by the gigabyte?

    How would you know how much porn is available for free? Hmmm?

    --
    The cake is a lie.
  29. Barebones servers... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    On slashdot.xxx

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  30. Extortion? by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that companies that registered a name should get it under all TLDs? Because that would make TLDs completely pointless.

  31. Synchronicity by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Funny

    A few articles ago there was an article about a better way to pack balls into something.
    Now this story.

    Coincidence? You decide.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  32. Land Value Tax by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    ICANN should hand out domains for _free_ on a first-come first-serve basis BUT maintain escrowed bids for all domain names. The annual fee for retaining control of those domain names should be the 1 year Treasury rate. The escrow accounts should yield to the highest bidder the 3 month Treasury rate. If there are groups of domains that have synergistic value together, they should be considered a composite domain by the bidder. The combination of bids (composite and individual) that yields the highest total annual fee to ICANN should define the highest bidder for each individual domain, hence which escrow accounts are paid the interest at the 3 month Treasury rate.

    The composite domain bidding needs some explanation:

    As an example, let's say that Joe wants acme.com, acme.biz and acme.xxx as a composite domain. He bids $60 for acme.com, $20 for acme.biz and $10 for acme.xxx making the appropriate deposits in escrow with ICANN. Sam comes along and bids $61 for acme.com but the other bids for individual domains acme.biz and acme.xxx are $19 and $9 respectively. The individual bids (totaling $89) in escrow receive no interest payments; Joe's (totaling $90) do. Moreover, the current owner of acme.com pays the 1 year Treasury rate on the $60 bid by Joe, not on the $61 bid by Sam. Conversely, the owners of acme.biz and acme.xxx pay interest on $20 and $10 respectively. Joe's escrowed bid for the composite domain receives the 3 month Treasury rate on $90. The owner of acme.com can, of course, accept Sam's bid of $61 at any time, in which case Sam starts paying the interest on the $60.

    The obvious implication of this is that there would be a dynamic and highly automated flow of money between escrowed bids, but domain domain speculation would be a thing of the past.

    If a domain name is defended as a legally recognized trademark, business name, etc. then no ICANN-mediated bidding is allowed and ICANN charges no fees.

    What should ICANN do with the revenue arising from the difference between the 1 year Treasury rate and the 3 month Treasury rate?

  33. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    You mean the ones that already do?

  34. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 3, Informative

    I cant say about other countries, but here in India, there are around 30-40 porn sites blocked, and on addition to that the entire .xxx domain is blocked

  35. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    How would you know how much porn is available for free? Hmmm?

    I think the better question would be....

    What the hell do you use the internet for....?

    :)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  36. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by bmo · · Score: 1

    >but here in India, there are around 30-40 porn sites blocked,

    That's not very many.

    --
    BMO

  37. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure mobile networks will be happy to charge an extra $1/MB for data to any site resolved via a .xxx domain name lookup...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  38. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Any idiot who thinks otherwise and sets up a pr0n site will soon be filtered out and go out out of business.

    Unlikely. The majority of people who actually pay for porn are probably watching at home on an unfiltered connection.

    The freeloaders who watch at work, or on mommy and daddy's connection aren't paying. They are the ones that will be filtered.

  39. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    >but here in India, there are around 30-40 porn sites blocked,

    That's not very many.

    -- BMO

    you missed the second part.
    in addition to these 30-40 (which are on .com/.net/etc), the ENTIRE .xxx domain is blocked

  40. Re:Extortion? by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Well, for example there wouldn't be a gmail.com without TLDs as it's already registered on a German domain. The Internet is much bigger than you think, and TLDs serve a useful purpose in keeping it sorted.

  41. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by S.O.B. · · Score: 2

    While reciting the pledge of allegiance? That's just going too far.

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  42. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by tunapez · · Score: 1

    Up all night honking me horn!

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  43. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So the sticky keyboard is being replaced with the sticky smartphone screen

  44. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They actually have some good ideas.

    "He wants to build trust: .xxx will be the only top-level domain to provide free virus scanning for all its sites. He also plans to create a payment system on the lines of iTunes and PayPal, which will shield users’ data and allow them to buy bits of content instead of paying a monthly subscription."

  45. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

    You missed the part where there are about 1 billion other porn sites on the web so the 30-40 doesn't even scratch the surface.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  46. I'd be amused to find out by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    I'd be amused to find out what would lie behind vaticano.xxx

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  47. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Why do you plan on filtering at home?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  48. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by ooloogi · · Score: 2

    I think that was the intended point: 0.00001% of non-.xxx blocked, while 100% of .xxx blocked - it shows that companies using an xxx domain will also provide access via other TLDs as well

  49. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by mjwx · · Score: 1

    So who exactly will be blocking this?

    Entire countries?

    Will the people in those countries be paying for Pr0n?

    Even if they could afford it, when the government controls the banks (had to resist making an ISR joke here) how could they? I can think of three nations off the top of my head who will block a $30 P/m pr0n site, yet you can get a shag from a live girl for less then that (in one of them, you could probably get two depending on your negotiating skills).

    What kind of person pays for Pr0n these days. Would .XXX be blocked in those countries. Not a problem for paysites, the free sites might not be so quick to join up.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  50. Re:There will be no pr0n in the .XXX domain by mjwx · · Score: 1

    While reciting the pledge of allegiance? That's just going too far.

    I think he means he's reciting the pledge of allegiance.

    But now I think about it, there's Nazi fetish pr0n, why not US patriotism fetish pr0n.

    Rule 34, I'll assume this one to be fulfilled, I have a high tolerance for freaky things but this would be beyond my ability to bear.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.