Google Pulls the Plug On BlackBerry Gmail App

hypnosec writes "From later this month, Google has decided to stop providing its popular Gmail app for BlackBerry. This can be viewed as a shock for RIM as they are putting in strong efforts to prevent customer defections to handsets that run on Android and iOS. Thus, from 22nd November, BlackBerry owners will not be able to reach Gmail on their devices; only those users who already have Gmail installed will be able to access and use the Google app. On Tuesday, Google on its official apps update blog stated that the company will now be focusing on 'building a great Gmail experience in the mobile browser.'"

Comments

Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

This only affects the Gmail app, not accessing Gmail via BIS which is how almost all BB users access their Gmail.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[xmorg]

yea what about imap dot gmail dot com?

Re:Bad sumary much?

[monzie]

I use GMail and Google Apps email on my Blackberry via BIS. I still have the GMail application installed on my BB though. Why?

- Advantages of GMail Native app on the BB

1. You can only search emails which are on the device. You cannot search emails which you have in your inbox but not the device. This means you can only search for emails which you received since you started syncing the device with GMail. By default Blackberry devices store messages only for 30 days ( you can set it to upto 120 days I believe). So you also cannot search for emails before 30-120 even if BIS was set to sync to it

2. There is no support for labels. BIS will, by default, forward All emails that you receive regardless of the filters that you may or may not have setup for your mailings lists and other stuff. To work around this, I have had to set up a "to-me" and "cc-me" filter on the device. That is of course, sub-optimal.

Advantages of BIS over GMail native application

1. Contacts and Calendar sync ( though the Contact sync can occasionally be a bit buggy

2. Attachment support - there is no way to send attachments via the GMail native application

3. Real Push(tm) support - other than when they have a "core switch failover thing" and your smartphone then essentially becomes a dumbphone.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

"accessing Gmail via BIS which is how almost all BB users access their Gmail."

Says who? I used the Gmail App with BB.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[LordLimecat]

I use the app :( the search and labels features were kind of nice....

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

If Google wants to build a "great email experience", they've got a few basic things to do yet where gmail falls down hard. For instance, gmail supports multiple reply addresses for those who manage more than one domain or have more than one email home, but the filters don't let you set the reply field based on the to: field, you have to do it manually every time, so errors in reply addresses are quite common; They don't properly support mono-spaced fonts, so server reports and other data that depend on field alignment come out trashed; the "themes" they offer are so basic they're almost useless, you can't control font or backdrop colors, so calling it a "theme" is pushing the envelope a bit. You can't delete attachments in order to manage the amount of space you use (obviously they're just trying to get you to go over the "free" amount so you have to pay, but it's a PITA no matter why it's done -- many emails I have have binaries attached that are one-time or throwaway, but keeping the email itself is very important to me (development issues, etc.)) I should also note that all of these issues were handled properly by Eudora over a decade ago -- these capabilities aren't exactly brand new ideas, or for that matter, difficult in any way.

I like web-mail, the convenience is very high, but Google's implementation is strictly amateur. Reminiscent of of Google base, although that is even worse -- adding broadly unpredictable unreliability and no usable support to a minimalist (read, amateur) feature set.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

If you have the latest OS7, you can search in the server. Just go to advanced search and select to search in server. That's all. I think you can do this in previous versions by installing the Gmail plugin for BB email.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[scdeimos]

This only affects the Gmail app, not accessing Gmail via BIS which is how almost all BB users access their Gmail.

Reading fail much? That's exactly what is said: Google has decided to stop providing its popular Gmail app for BlackBerry.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

Non BB users won't understand what this means. GP clarified. Calm your anger, tool.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Pseudonym Authority]

I think that the best thing about the Gmail app was that it didn't truncate your email after 32Kb of HTML like the native email client did. Christ RIM, it's 2011, I can torrent on other phones and you want to cut me off at 32Kb per email to save bandwidth? It was bullshit like that that made you lose me as a customer.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[taylortbb]

The newer BIS versions actually permit you to search remotely in the native client and access your full email history. In your inbox go Menu -> Search By -> Advanced. There's an On Device/Remotely option. Used to be exclusively BES, but that's changed. If you don't see it delete and re-add the account in the email setup app, some of the newer features require initial (automatic) setup steps.

@Pseudonym Authority With newer devices that limit has been increased 10x. I've never had a message be truncated. That limit doesn't include external images or attachments.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually you CAN sync Contacts and Calendars with Google Sync , which is an application that you can install on the BB device

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Saintwolf]

You can't delete attachments in order to manage the amount of space you use (obviously they're just trying to get you to go over the "free" amount so you have to pay

I don't know about you, but I've been using gmail for about 3-4 years, have about 4000 unread emails and am barely over 3% of my allowance. Can you not just download the attachment, file it and delete the e-mail?

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

You've got what I need to do backwards. I want to delete the attachment and *keep* the email so I have a complete reference for the conversation. That's not possible as far as I know.

I do development with team members who are (decidedly) not local. I get builds, test binaries and datasets, etc. on a regular basis. They have no use after a day or so, once the issue, whatever it is, has been dealt with. But the discussions that go along with are, and often contain various levels of other issues.

And yes, I'm using many times the storage you are.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[starsky51]

Two lines down: "BlackBerry owners will not be able to reach Gmail on their devices"
I think that's what he was referring to.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[zippthorne]

Gmail DOES support html emails, though. If you're designing server reports to be sent to your gmail account, why not line them up by having the server build an html table?

Re:Bad sumary much?

[swalve]

It would be nice to have an easy button that removes the attachment, but you can probably just forward the email to yourself and remove the attachment that way.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[swalve]

You can just tell it to fetch the next chunk if it is that important. That's why Blackberry *kept* me as a customer. They care about keeping data usage down. I like a company that obsesses over the small things so I don't have to.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[xaxa]

You've got what I need to do backwards. I want to delete the attachment and *keep* the email so I have a complete reference for the conversation.

I used to do that using KMail (in KDE). I've just checked, and the functionality is still there: right click an attachment icon and select "Delete Attachment". The attachment is replaced with a meta-description "The attachment xxx has been deleted".

It seems Outlook can do this too (right click the attachment, "Remove"), although it doesn't leave the meta-information behind.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[MooseMuffin]

Also, labels/stars/archiving has been supported by the gmail plugin for a year or two, and is supported without the plugin in OS 7. GP is right though, in that you can't filter based on label. I've been using gmail's filters to both "apply label" and "skip inbox" to prevent certain mail from getting to the device.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Pseudonym Authority]

Look again, it will do that a few times, but eventually it just Truncates the message.

They care about keeping data usage down.

Not at all, another 64KB is nothing. Absolutely nothing in the face of everything else, like internet radio and youtube that come installed on the phone. That's like trying to only save the pennies from a burning pile of one hundred dollar bills.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

"Thus, from 22nd November, BlackBerry owners will not be able to reach Gmail on their devices; only those users who already have Gmail installed will be able to access and use the Google app."

The first part is misleading. If it were phrased as "From Nov. 22, Blackberry owners will not be able to download the Gmail app to their devices; only those users who already have Gmail installed will be able to access and use the Google app." I would have no problem with it.

Changing what you are talking about 1/2 way; oh, look a puppy!

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Anonymous Coward]

You're just wrong. On your settings page, where you add all your alternate email addresses, there is an option
that looks like this
When replying to a message:
        Reply from the same address the message was sent to
        Always reply from default address (currently user@example.com)

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

You're just wrong.

No, I'm not wrong. Those options don't do what I describe, or enable it. The idea isn't to reply with the same address a message was sent to. The idea is to reply with a "specific" address based on contents of the to field. For instance, 99% of the mail I get for one domain *should* go to tech support. But people send it to sales, to info, to me personally, etc. The reply address for all of this stuff should be support@... so that the conversation is archived in the right place and so that I am cued that I have a support issue to deal with, and so that the user sees that the right kind of attention is being paid to them. I don't want to reply with info@... or sales@..., even though that's what the emails were addressed to. I want to reply with support@... because that is, by *far* the most common case.

I handle quite a few domains, so this problem repeats itself with different email addresses. And that in turn means that "always use a specific address as a reply address" isn't the right answer, either. Now, comparing with Eudora, you can filter for any part of the incoming field (or about a zillion other things) and then take a very wide range of actions, pretty much as many as you need to -- and yes, those actions include setting the reply address. GMail, by comparison, simply falls on its face. But Eudora doesn't give me the mobility or device independence I need to deal with email; I'm no longer tied to a desk (and I can't be), yet I have to work these problems constantly. Having GMail constantly default to doing the wrong thing is inconvenient at best, and if I miss manually setting an email, I have fouled up the conversation. But GMail's spam filtering smarts (crowd sourced smarts, really) and webby convenience pretty much dictate that I use the service. And I handle a *lot* of email.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

I'm not designing them. I'm receiving them. They're already properly formatted text reports from various standard tools. This isn't some unique problem of mine; this is how most tools produce reports in the first place. Should I have to go in and make custom versions of every server tool to solve this problem, or does it seem more reasonable that GMail provide a simple switch that lets me use the filters to ensure I get the correct display? Considering that if I write all those custom reports, it only helps me, and GMail could help everyone who uses reports similar to these, the answer seems pretty obvious to me.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

That might work in some sense, but it's a big job to do this for all those stored conversations, and then what happens to the ordering of the emails?

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

Right. And so can Eudora. But not GMail.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[xaxa]

You can use GMail in KMail / Eudora / etc. It can be a bit clunky, but it should be good enough to delete attachments. You can even sort by size, which GMail can't do either.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[fyngyrz]

Can I do that on my portable devices -- iPad, iPod?

Re:Bad sumary much?

[zippthorne]

Hmmm...

Are we talking about the beta email product that google offers to everyone for free?

If so, there's still a workaround: use imap to get your emails using the client of your choice.

Re:Bad sumary much?

[Too Many Secrets]

These problems still exist in google apps for business. And their imap is horribly slow.

Garbage

[Anonymous Coward]

No self respecting BB user uses the Gmail app. It is clunky and slow. You use BIS with your Gmail account with the Gmail plugin. The article is tripe as well.

Re:Garbage

[bigstrat2003]

If being clunky and slow was something bad in BB user's eyes, they wouldn't be BB users.

*Flamebait, but also true

Re:Garbage

[reboot246]

BB's in anybody's eyes are bad.

You'll shoot your eye out kid!

Re:Garbage

[Anonymous Coward]

You can call it 'clunky', whatever that's supposed to mean, but RIMs messaging infrastructure is extremely fast when it's operating normally.

Re:Garbage

[bigstrat2003]

Well played.

Re:Garbage

[oztiks]

Nor Zimbra or ME for that matter! BB all in all is a pain in the ass for most collaboration apps that isn't MS. Collaborative email products give BB about the same amount support that grandma's tits get wearing tube top without a bra ...

Re:Garbage

[afabbro]

No self respecting BB user

Isn't that impossible?

Re:Garbage

[oakgrove]

I like how you added that last part in there.

Re:Garbage

[Anonymous Coward]

That was my point. If you use a blackberry, you use BIS or BES not some non blackberry ecosystem app. In my experience, as long as you are not using a CDMA blackberry and are running OS 6+ it is quite responsive.

Re:Garbage

[taylortbb]

In the past decade RIM has had 3 big outages. While less than ideal it's not exactly an awful track record either. Any system inevitably has some downtime.

Re:Garbage

[bigstrat2003]

The point isn't how much downtime they've had, the point is that they're adding another point of failure which doesn't need to be there. That's just silly.

Re:Garbage

[smash]

In the past decade, my corporate email ssytem has had maybe 2 major outages (and by major, i mean >4 hrs).

Given that RIM do this shit for a living as their core business (we're a mining company, not a mail provider), they should be better than this.

Re:Garbage

[taylortbb]

It does serve a useful purpose though. One, it provides push email service even for accounts only accessible over POP/IMAP/OWA. While obviously the push isn't instant, it does result in significant battery/data savings. It also enables compression, which I definitely appreciate when roaming. Compression also means better battery life.

You're right though that it doesn't strictly need to be there. I do think ActiveSync support is a good idea, and I do think we'll see it on BBX.

In either case my point wasn't really about the merits. In the years I've owned a BlackBerry I've only experienced two of those outages and they've been short enough. BlackBerry sure has its issues, but reliability is a pretty minor one.

Re:Garbage

[swalve]

I disagree. It is a risk-reward thing. You add a point of potential failure in exchange for guaranteed reward. I just bought a new Bold 9900. I logged into BIS on the new one and all my accounts got set up automagically for me. Up and running in like 30 seconds. (and then once I restored the device from the old one's backup, ALL my shit was back. Emails, text messages, ringtones, every customization I had made on the old one was back on the new one. Totally awesome.)

And the push email is just mindblowing. I've had emails pop onto the phone before the sending application was done telling me that the email was sent.

Re:Garbage

[swalve]

Agreed. And if rumor is true, nobody lost any data in those outages. It was just delayed. Plus, the phone still worked as a phone, texting and the web were still up.

Re:Garbage

[Anonymous Coward]

I have to agree - I support 3 BB users with BB Pro Server running on a VM on a low end server linked to exchange and still it's almost instantaneous. I send a test mail, bam! the phone buzzes. It's pretty impressive. All three are planning to switch, though; two want iphones, one wants a flip phone plus a 3G ipad...

Re:Garbage

[twiddler69]

BB users have been accustomed to clunky slow phones with limited features. I remember speaking with a prior BB user who told me how they loved their phone, but after showing them my Android phone and all it could do; they weren't too enthused about their BB afterwards. Eventually they ditched their BB phone for an iPhone and wished they had done so much sooner.

Re:Garbage

[Anonymous Coward]

There are self-respecting BB users? I thought the only BB users left had no other choice and were forced to use it by their company because they haven't updated their communications policy since 1997.

This is untrue

[Cito]

Users will still be able to check their gmail with the browser. Google is not blocking blackberry users.

Gmail only pulled the gmail app, but there are 3rd party gmail apps, the blackberry mail app also checks gmail with no problem, and you can also use the browser to check gmail.

Re:This is untrue

[Sir_Sri]

If anything this might be the start of big companies getting the clue - we already have an app for that*, it's called a web browser.

*obviously that doesn't apply for everything yet, but they're working on it.

Re:This is untrue

[bugs2squash]

I don't think you'd say that if you had ever used the BB browser. It's awful.

Re:This is untrue

[bigstrat2003]

Having suffered with a BB for my work phone for some time, I think that "awful" isn't really accurate. That's far too mild a term for the painful experience that browser offers.

Re:This is untrue

[shutdown -p now]

While it's true that many cases would be served well enough by a browser app, this one certainly isn't it. It's email - it's supposed to be served well by a stock email app (via IMAP or ActiveSync or whatever). The problem is that you then lose certain GMail-specific features, like labels.

Re:This is untrue

[taylortbb]

Any device shipped in the last two years has either come with or is upgradeable to OS 6, meaning a WebKit browser. OS 7 actually has a pretty nice browser, the 60 fps hardware acceleration means it's much smoother than Android when scrolling/zooming. Pages also load quite fast. Okay, not quite as fast as the iPhone 4S, but an iPhone 4-like browsing experience is hardly "awful".

Re:This is untrue

[beuges]

Yes, and while moving certain things to web apps makes sense, and while providing a web mail interface is pretty much essential, having Google tell BlackBerry users that they can just use the web browser for their gmail is both retarded and arrogant for one simple reason: The web browser cannot notify me about new mail.

The web browser cannot update my new mail icon on my home screen, nor can it make the LED blink to notify me of new mail.

Smartphone users, and I would go as far as to say especially BlackBerry users, expect mail notifications to be automatic. If this was a case of Google getting a clue and deciding to not duplicate efforts on mobile apps when they already have a mobile gmail page, then why haven't they also killed off their iPhone app as well? This has got nothing to do with 'we already have an app for that so why duplicate effort'. This is a deliberate move against RIM on Google's part.

I'd think that rather than being an elimination of duplicated work, the real source of this decision is the fact that Google happens to produce Android, and that by providing a crippled experience on BlackBerries, they'd hope to ride on the recent negativity surrounding BB and RIM and get BB users to move over to Android. They probably figure that the iPhone user base is more loyal to Apple and iPhone than to gmail, but that they have a shot targetting BB users instead.

Re:This is untrue

[DrXym]

More likely it's a combination of things - Google putting the boot into a competitor, lack of interest in the app, uncertainty about the platform's future, lack of resources and everything else. Mostly I think Google is just putting the boot in.

As for web browsers, yes you can produce a passable "app" from HTML5. However if you compare a native app like GMail, or Facebook to its mobile counterpart its usually the native app which stands out as being the most usable and responsive. Simple example, in native GMail I can hold my finger down on an article (called a long click) and the app responds by showing me a menu of actions I can do with the email. So I could delete the email or mark it as spam. In the mobile version, I have to check the the item and then a secondary floating menu appears that I have to drop down to access the equivalent functionality.

Re:This is untrue

[zippthorne]

Maybe, but the browser app should be persistent, so you can still type and read some of your emails when you're not connected to the network, and have it send and receive stuff when you are.

The other problem with browser apps is that they're often little more than web pages formatted for mobile devices. Even small latency and load times become an issue when every action you take requires a whole new page load in real time.

Re:This is untrue

[swalve]

The new one is fine. Blackberry suffered from being an early adopter. They came up with a way to make browsing work on a smartphone, and then were stuck with some of that legacy crap when a competitor improved upon it.

Re:This is untrue

[Anonymous Coward]

You're referring to the OLD browser. It's not 2008 any more, RIM bought Torch Mobile and has since had THE best mobile browser available, beats many desktop browsers.

Re:This is untrue

[NoseyNick]

It IS served by a stock email app. It's called BIS. You just use the incredibly easy "email setup" wizard on any device (except perhaps enterprise-only ones?). You don't need any app.

Re:This is untrue

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually labels are implemented as IMAP folders when I use Thunderbird to access email.

Re:This is untrue

[shutdown -p now]

They are, but it's not quite the same thing. Specifically, you can have email in more than one label - and, when they are exposed as IMAP folders, any non-GMail-aware client will treat the same email in two folders as two different emails, and download and track them separately.

Re:This is untrue

[shutdown -p now]

Let me quote myself:

The problem is that you then lose certain GMail-specific features, like labels.

As a blackberry user...

[damn_registrars]

I'll say that the gmail app isn't as universally useful on the blackberry as the gmail webpage. The biggest problem with it is that it is permanently linked to having data service available through your wireless carrier, while the webpage can work through your wireless carrier on a data plan, or anywhere that you have wifi (and most blackberries have had built in wifi for some time now). The webpage is at the point where it is very useful for the blackberry, and it supports at least two different modes for the phone depending on your needs as well.

So really, this isn't a big deal. Not to say that RIM isn't in trouble, but losing an app that wasn't that great to begin with isn't a huge blow to blackberries.

Re:As a blackberry user...

[beset]

I think I must have been one of the few users to like the Gmail app.

It's great for a number of reasons:

1) It doesn't weigh down your BB with loads of email in the core system
2) You load it up when YOU want to read your email, not when the email comes through
3) Closing it is a nice way of forgetting about work
4) You could search all your old mail

I actually got stuck in Madrid airport without BIS quite recently, so I tried the mobile web version of gmail. It was a terrible experience - it was unresponsive, the ui was too big, yet too cluttered, waiting for 2 pages to reload every time you wanted to look at a new email etc etc was a pain. And this was on wifi on Blackberrys latest and greatest (9900)

Long story short I will miss the gmail app. IT wasn't great, but it had a lot of plus points. Sure, I can got get the gmail plugin and set it up via the native app, but if I wanted to do that I'd have done it in the first place.

I've only recently converted to blackberry, I'm a fussy bugger about keyboards and it really can't be beaten. This makes me sad.

Re:As a blackberry user...

[damn_registrars]

I'm not sure we're in the same conversation, here. I am talking about using the web version of gmail instead for the gmail app.

1) It doesn't weigh down your BB with loads of email in the core system

Accessing gmail on the web doesn't, either.

2) You load it up when YOU want to read your email, not when the email comes through

Which is exactly how I use gmail on the web.

3) Closing it is a nice way of forgetting about work

I just point my browser to a different web page ... though more importantly what person of marginal sanity uses gmail for their work email?

4) You could search all your old mail

OK, this I haven't tried yet. I don't have all that much mail in my gmail account, and I can easily find what I need without using a search function.

I actually got stuck in Madrid airport without BIS quite recently, so I tried the mobile web version of gmail. It was a terrible experience - it was unresponsive, the ui was too big, yet too cluttered, waiting for 2 pages to reload every time you wanted to look at a new email etc etc was a pain. And this was on wifi on Blackberrys latest and greatest (9900)

I don't know when you tried it. I use it pretty well every day on my 8520 with wifi. It could be that google did something dramatically different to it for 9xxx series berries, but that seems unlikely.

Long story short I will miss the gmail app.

Nobody is forcing you to not use it. Google is not going to uninstall it from your phone. They just won't be releasing any new versions of it.

I've only recently converted to blackberry, I'm a fussy bugger about keyboards and it really can't be beaten. This makes me sad.

I'm not sure you actually read the story...

Re:As a blackberry user...

[Anonymous Coward]

So, you can do in-server search, it comes in-built with the latest BB email client (OS7). Just select advanced in the search field and choose to search in the server instead of the device. That's it, as simple as that.

Re:As a blackberry user...

[Anonymous Coward]

The Gmail app is nearly unusable. Anyone using a Blackberry who can is using BIS support to get gmail. Google never supported showing images or attachments in the crummy Bb gmail app.

Re:As a blackberry user...

[Anonymous Coward]

You can search your old mail using BIS with your gmail account but the menu for it is hidden pretty well. You have to go to "Advanced Search" and there will be a drop down labeled "Search Messages:" and "On device" will be selected, instead select "Remotely" and then fill in your search criteria, it will unfortunately take around 30-60 seconds to return the results but that is probably similar to any other implementation. I wish they didn't hide that feature that way, but it was a pre-existing menu for BES that they resused for BIS when the remote search feature was implemented a few years back.

Well that's not surprising

[Anonymous Coward]

The Gmall app is bu©ggy and slowý
ý
Posting this via my Blackbýerry Býold

Oblig. "This is news?..." post

[PessimysticRaven]

[See title]

[With a "BB-sucks-and-Google-KNOWS-IT-chaser..Toss in a WebOS comment and a RIM/HP merger-idea, for good measure]

Waiiiit a minute. That's almost crazy enough to work.

False

[pjh3000]

They're not pulling any app or email service, they're stopping development on a standalone Gmail app for BlackBerry, You can already get Gmail in the standard mail app and will continue to be able to do so.

Wary of this...

[ackthpt]

'building a great Gmail experience in the mobile browser.'"

Seems to be a function of time that Google's products become worse; more whizzy, but add no value; useable interface replaced by inexplicable interface and really useful, neat ideas, are not implemented in favor or more cruft.

Re:Wary of this...

[BasilBrush]

Are you saying there's something wrong with implementing Gmail in Flash?

Re:Wary of this...

[Anonymous Coward]

This is absolutely how I have felt for a long time. I simply do not understand the need to add massive amounts of script which simply confuse a user interface. I'm fine with New, Save buttons. Stop combining controls when there's really no logical reason to do so.

Re:Wary of this...

[Pseudonym Authority]

That is what happens when the realities of being an advertising company win against the ideals of being a tech company.

Re:Wary of this...

[Anonymous Coward]

There is something wrong when people want to use web browser to allow user have access to any service what would be better via native application.

It's dead jim...

[Lumpy]

Honestly they failed to evolve. It's their own fault for not moving foreward.

The last couple of blackberry's were great, but it was too little too late. Many many corporations are switching to Android phones and iphones that do a lot more WITHOUT the horribly overpriced special blackberry server and service fees.

They not only missed the boat, they priced themselves out of the market.

Re:It's dead jim...

[bobcat7677]

Lets not forget that that horribly overpriced blackberry enterprise server was also buggy as *ell and a complete bear to support. I can't count how many times I got paged to log in and restart the blackbery server service because it crashed for some unexplained reason so my bosses could get email. Now they have Iphones and Droids that just work and the blackberry server was retired...and I get a little more sleep.

Re:It's dead jim...

[daktari]

Many many corporations are switching to Android phones and iphones that do a lot more WITHOUT the horribly overpriced special blackberry server and service fees.

Yep. While I still use and like my BB, I *really* hate it that they don't let me use native BB mail application without BIS/BES. I just want to retrieve my mail over Wifi and this is something that is not possible on any BB device.

RIM's best bet

[LoudMusic]

I still think RIM's best bet is to make an enterprise grade 'app' for Apple iOS and Android to provide Blackberry style service on non-RIM hardware.

Re:RIM's best bet

[Anonymous Coward]

Why not stay in the hardware game? They seem to be able to make attractive devices. Start producing their own Android handsets and only provide the Blackberry software with their handsets.

Re:RIM's best bet

[damn_registrars]

I still think RIM's best bet is to make an enterprise grade 'app' for Apple iOS and Android to provide Blackberry style service on non-RIM hardware.

That is actually a really good idea for them. Unfortunately there is probably someone at RIM who looks at that idea and views it as being parallel to going from being Microsoft (where they were years ago) to being Novell (where they could potentially end up under that idea). And right now, not even Novell wants to be Novell.

They don't seem to see that the alternative - if they do nothing - will end up with them being like Palm.

Re:RIM's best bet

[Anonymous Coward]

I still think RIM's best bet is to make an enterprise grade 'app' for Apple iOS and Android to provide Blackberry style service on non-RIM hardware.

I still think RIM's best bet is to cut n run.

FTFY

-@|

Re:RIM's best bet

[Anonymous Coward]

Sounds good. They should make sure that the application displays in random resolutions and inconsistent behaviour of buttons in order to replicate the BB exerience.

Dick move

[scubamage]

Well, its a dick move to kick someone while they're down, but its sound business.

Re:Can't Say I Blame Google

[BasilBrush]

Why are they supporting Flash then?

That will be difficult...

[Anonymous Coward]

"On Tuesday, Google on its official apps update blog stated that the company will now be focusing on 'building a great Gmail experience in the mobile browser.'"

That's going to be difficult, because the Blackberry's browser is horrible. They should have stuck with the OS4 browser, it was superior in every way that's important. I can barely read anything in their current browser, they wanted to make it just as bad as the iPhone's browser, and succeeded.

The case for a BB applet.

[Anonymous Coward]

At work, we use Exchange and Blackberry mail goes to that. Contacts and Calendar also sync from Exchange.

I have the gmail app to keep my personal mail separate and I like it that way. It works well for me.
For Google Calendar, I have to use Opera as the BB browser can't do anything with it. I don't want my personal calendars in my work ones.

Re:The case for a BB applet.

[denobug]

Yup. I set mine up like that also. It also keeps personal contacts (email at least) away from corporate contact lists.

I wonder

[93 Escort Wagon]

What does Netcraft have to say about RIM?

Good for mobile, bad for everything else

[slagish666]

"Google on its official apps update blog stated that the company will now be focusing on 'building a great Gmail experience in the mobile browser.'" ...and a crappy experience anywhere else. The new-look Gmail is horrible. Takes me back to the 1990s. Is this where the Internet is headed?

Non BB users love talking smack about BlackBerry

[Anonymous Coward]

This article is junk. My Blackberry comes with INCREDIBLE support for gmail out of the box. Type your username and password, and you get your emails, calendar settings (that automatically go into your berry calendar), your filters, categories, starred items all work. I never installed the gmail app, so no big loss to me or any other blackberry owner.

Getting sick and tired of people telling me my phone is outdated and then watching them take 3 times as long as me to send an email or make a post. My coworkers all have berries, but every once in a while I go to a meeting with a someone who wants to pretend hes "in the know" by showing off his iphone. I give them the same challenge every time. If they can type 2 paragraphs on their iphone as quick as I can WITH MY EYES CLOSED on my Bold 9900, Ill switch to an iphone. I usually have enough time to go pour a coffee by the time there done. (That is NOT an exageration)

Don't believe the hype, there are lots of BB users out there who love there phones despite media constantly telling them they shouldn't.

The Setup for Microsoft . . .

[NicknamesAreStupid]

. . . to buy RIM this quarter.

Mobile Browser Gmail Blows...

[Phaedra]

I'll be the first to admit that the Gmail app isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer but IMHO it is a much better experience than the terribly mischaracterized 'great Gmail experience in the mobile browser' on my 9700. The Gmail app is one click to see all of my incoming mail and to easily search and retrieve current or archived mail is another click with the refresh times an order of magnitude better than going through the browser or using the RIM mail app for Gmail. The Gmail app at least had a slight 'feel' of regular Gmail whereas the RIM catch-all mail & message emporium works like a twitter feed, with none of the handy Gmail specific tie-ins that make using the Gmail app a relative pleasure. I'm sorry to see that it's being dropped rather than improved.

Re:Mobile Browser Gmail Blows...

[swalve]

There is an option to separate out the different email boxes on the phone. Been like that for a long time now.

Guess I'm the only one sad to see it go...

[sys_mast]

Usually the first app I loaded on a new blackberry. Basically just worked, not sure why so many here are negative about the app. Now if only google maps would return to showing traffic correctly.

I guess i'm a little confused as to why a basically completed app would be discontinued. Anyone with Google insight care to share the actual thought process behind the decision?

My hope is that the native BB mail app connects to mail the same as the Gmail app, meaning shows read emails correctly and has the contact's working the same.

Re:Non BB users love talking smack about BlackBerr

[jbolden]

BB is a terrific texting and email phone. Far and away the best texting and email experience even compared to texting phones.

I can type pretty fast on my iPhone using a the smart keyboard (an app). I touch type on a normal sized keyboard so eyes closed wouldn't matter on a regular keyboard, I never got that good with the phone but I easily could have.

Anyway if you care about typing why move away from a physical keyboard?

Forward

[qualityassurancedept]

Or just forward your gmail account emails to your account on your exchange server and read your emails from there instead.

Re:Forward

[xmorg]

anyone who uses exchange is an idiot.

Google Apps Sync?

[jackbird]

The article was unclear - does this just mean the crappy GMail app, or Google Apps Sync for BB, which syncs contacts and calendar to a (paid?) Google Apps account?

Losing Google Apps Sync would make some of my clients extremely unhappy...

Re:Google Apps Sync?

[taylortbb]

It just means the app. Given Google's desire for Google Apps to be taken seriously in the enterprise I doubt the BES Connector will be discontinued any time soon.

Re:Can't Say I Blame Google

[Anonymous Coward]

it's cheaper than paying all the lawyers to deal with the anti-trust issues.

FU

[Anonymous Coward]

FU

Ps

FU

so, /. groupthink....

[smash]

... is google evil yet?

Now they are, agreed

[Anonymous Coward]

Now they are, agreed.

Any pull of the rug like that.

What were the reasons for Google?

[G3ckoG33k]

What were the reasons for Google? Apart from the obvious that their decision that also happened to stab a competitor in the eye.

I just 'upgraded' my gmail to a slightly new interface, which apparently is motivated by the new Android-slates, and a long-term goal of insulation of the Google platform from the hardware.

To me it appears RIM was convenient roadkill, not a goal in itself.

Re:What were the reasons for Google?

[q.kontinuum]

If people use the web app, they are likely to be logged in during their whole browser session, giving more valuable data to google via google apis, google analytics etc. I wouldn't be surprised if Google provides a really great web application which will run very well on Blackberry as well. Googles core business is advertisement and data collection; I don't think it bothers them much if people are using Blackberry or Android, as long as Google gets the data and provides the ads.

I'm done.

[Anonymous Coward]

I use the blackberry mail for my work mail and the Gmail app for my personal mail. No Gmail app, no use for a blackberry in my next phone.

Re:I'm done.

[EmagGeek]

That's precisely what Google wants. They want you buying an Android phone.

Re:I'm done.

[q.kontinuum]

My reasoning is the different way around: No out-of-browser mail client, no use for that mail provider; if I were you, I would look for a new mail address instead. Since Google currently still supports IMAP, you can still use it with BB and already introduce a new address to all relevant contacts...

Re:Native apps are faster

[thegarbz]

Javascript is clunky and slow. The computer based browsers may be having a speed war, but on the phone browsers are still either painfully slow or crippled and don't handle Javascript well. On android the gmail app is a great example of that. It's much faster to press a button that fires up the app than to log into gmail, wait for not only the messages to download but the interface as well.

The only exception I have found so far is Facebook. That has to be the poorest app on any platform and I typically log into the Facebook mobile browser page to regain some speed and usability.

Nah

[Rix]

Palm will be back. They get bought out by some huge, doomed megacorporation every decade or so. Remember US Robotics? HP actually owns them now, too.

RIM will be the next Nortel.

Segregation of Email

[Anonymous Coward]

For a work BB where we are using BES I am unaware of a way to get my personal email pushed to the phone without installing the add in from BB (by our IS). Even then little segregation of traffic. The native app helped segregate email, logic mail is the main option now?

Re:Segregation of Email

[swalve]

Don't put your personal stuff on a work device.

Google is a monopoly and should respect small busi

[lsatenstein]

Google needs to be broken up into smaller competitive companies. Rim is an excellent product, Just because they don't run Android is not a reason to abandon a company that helped them to grow.

In the end Google will screw everyone with it's behaviour. I see it coming.

Re:Non BB users love talking smack about BlackBerr

[Anonymous Coward]

I can type pretty fast on my iPhone using a the smart keyboard

I've heard this far too often. I believe swype still holds the record for typing ON A TOUCHSCREEN. I found it trivial to beat that "world record" on a Bold or Torch keyboard, took me about 2 tries, and by the 3rd or 4th practice I was smashing it by several seconds. I won't even pretend to be fast, I'm no record-breaker, I was just using a PHYSICAL keyboard instead of typing on glass.

Improved data collection for Google...

[q.kontinuum]

I think for Google this makes a lot of sense. Users of the GMail application are not necessarily logged in with their browser session when browsing the Internet. When they can be convinced to use the web application, this might change, greatly increasing the value of all data collected with google analytics, google apis and whatnot.

From a consumer point of view this is a very good reason to dump my GMail account as soon as possible, before they close the imap access one day or make it in any other way less convenient.