Slashdot Mirror


Airport Security: Thermal Lie-Detectors, Cloned Sniffer Dogs

PolygamousRanchKid writes with this quote from CNN about the future of airport security: "Earlier this year, the International Air Transport Association demonstrated its vision for the 'checkpoint of the future' — a series of neon-lit tunnels, each equipped with an array of eye-scanners, x-ray machines, and metal and liquid detectors. ... 'Known Travelers,' (those who have completed background checks with government authorities) for instance, will cruise through the light blue security corridor with little more than an ID check, while those guided through the yellow 'Enhanced' corridor will be subjected to an array of iris scans and sensitive contraband detectors. ... Feeling guilty? Got something to hide? A team of UK-based researchers claim to have developed a thermal lie-detection camera that can automatically spot a burning conscience. ... Professor Byeong-chun Lee, who established his reputation in 2005 as the driving force behind the world's first ever dog clone, has bought a new breed of super-sniffers to South Korea's Incheon Airport. They may look like an ordinary pack of golden Labrador Retrievers, but these dogs are all genetically identical to 'Chase,' a dog whose legendary snout kept him top of Incheon's drug-detection rankings right up until his retirement in 2007."

31 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please don't give the TSA any ideas!

    1. Re:Oh, god... by durrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks too efficient for TSA, their dream is a luggage shredder instead of a x-ray scanner, and a wipeout style obstacle course(that you have to run naked, with live streams to the public internet filming it all) with blaring sirens and powertripping functionaries with bullwhips lining the course to drive the herds onwards.
      Contracted at a cost of $12 billions, annually.

    2. Re:Oh, god... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Oh, they have their own plans; FTFA:

      In the United States, the Transport Security Administration (TSA) is not just relying on fancy gadgets and genetically enhanced nostrils to improve security: it's turning to good old-fashioned human instinct.

      Behavioural Detection Officers (BDOs) have been trained to engage passengers in casual conversation in an effort to weed out suspicious behavior.

      There is no word if the TSA plans to clone BDOs, like Korean Sniffer Dogs . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Oh, god... by jhoegl · · Score: 4, Funny

      They didnt mention it, but that is exactly what the "red corridor" will consist of.

    4. Re:Oh, god... by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 3, Funny

      Human cloning is banned. Expect the new batch of cloned TSA agents in approximately fifteen years.

    5. Re:Oh, god... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Human cloning is banned. Expect the new batch of cloned TSA agents in approximately fifteen years.

      Well, the obvious solution to this is to hybridize a TSA agent with the super nosed Labrador Retriever clone. You get the perfect employee - works for treats and an occasional pat on the head, can sniff out anything from marijuana to C4, lives about 10 years so no long term Social Security / Medicare costs and is one hell of a lot cuter than the vast majority of current TSA agents.

      What's not to like?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Oh, god... by phorm · · Score: 2

      What's not to like?

      Crotch sniffing?

  2. "...guided through the 'Enhanced' corridor..." by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Herded, you mean. Why do you people continue to put up with this crap? And don't try to tell me it's only in the USA. Europe was doing intrusive "screening" long before the USA started: we used to be criticised by Europeans for having "lax security" because we allowed people to get on airplanes without first proving that they were not armed criminals.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"...guided through the 'Enhanced' corridor..." by hedwards · · Score: 2

      Because when even many liberals don't see what's wrong with it those of us that do end up with no representation. I'm going to be flying again in a couple months and I'm going to take a plane out of Canada because I'm not interested in putting up with that unconstitutional crap.

    2. Re:"...guided through the 'Enhanced' corridor..." by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which liberals would you be referring to? The majority of politicians in the United States are conservatives, with varying degrees of conservatism. Long before the TSA, so-called "liberals" in the United States government so no problem with our prison population or the enormous power that the law enforcement agencies in this country have amassed. You already have no representation -- when will you start voting third party or perhaps running your own campaign?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:"...guided through the 'Enhanced' corridor..." by Anonymus · · Score: 2

      I should say "didn't do any of this shit before American flights started requiring all incoming flights to do it" because there is a lot of crap one has to go through now. My local airport just has a separate terminal specifically for American and Israeli flights so they can keep the bullshit to a minimum for passengers flying to less paranoid destinations.

    4. Re:"...guided through the 'Enhanced' corridor..." by jo42 · · Score: 2

      The majority of politicians in the United States are conservatives

      When did being a 'conservative' become equivalent to a head-up-yer arse fascist?

    5. Re:"...guided through the 'Enhanced' corridor..." by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      > Which liberals would you be referring to?

      Most of those I know. They kvetch about abuses but they can't see that the entire program is fundamentally wrong.

      > You already have no representation...

      I am, unfortunately, in a very small minority. Whlle many (though still a minority) dislike TSA and friends they don't seem to consider it important enough to have much effect on their votes or their behavior. They also would never, ever vote for a Republican and so the Republicans write them off while the Democrats take them for granted. Meanwhile, the supporters of the "war on terror" make it clear that being sound on security is critical for their support. Thus I have as much representation as does any menber of a small fringe minority. That's democracy (and yes, we do have democracy here. It just isn't the magic potion you want to believe it is).

      > ...when will you start voting third party...

      I've been voting third party (and writing-in when possible) for more than forty years. Most of the third parties are full of kooks, though.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  3. Misleading Summary by mutherhacker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The summary is completely misleading.

    According to TFA, thermal-lie detection, the dog clone, the bluetooth passenger tracking and the behavioral detection officers are in no way linked to IATA's vision of the checkpoint of the future. They are just independent developments in transport security but nonetheless irrelevant to IATA.

    For everybody's reference IATA is owned and funded by private airline companies. They are not government funded in any way IATA's website

  4. "Known traveller" lines? by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a load of crap.

    Anyone with a security clearance should be ashamed to use such a line for a multitude of reasons. Keep it real, and stand in line with those you are charged with protecting.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  5. Paranoia for Profiteering by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I didn't know any better, it seems like the media (still) buys into this idea of intense paranoia it is being sold to by government and private industry. It reminds people that there might be a terrorist on their plane. If there's no security the plane will blow up and you'll die. If there's 1000x more security, no terrorist, but the plane might still crash. Or, I'm willing to bet, 99.999999999% of the time you'll land safe and sound.

    This whole article sounds to me like profiteering.

    will cruise through the light blue security corridor with little more than an ID check, while those guided through the yellow 'Enhanced' corridor will be subjected to an array of iris scans and sensitive contraband detectors. ... Feeling guilty? Got something to hide? A team of UK-based researchers claim to have developed a thermal lie-detection camera

    "the world's first ever dog clone, has bought a new breed of super-sniffers"

    Hmmmm.... there;s 3 new growth industries right there. Iris scan, dector, the camera. These enchanced corridors will be built by some government contractor on a no-bid contract. Training these new dogs - the DEA and company will ask for budget increases.

    I don't live in the US. If you guys ever implement this, I'm staying out of the US. I'm not going to fly to a country where I have to board an American plane and go through DHS inspection.

    If our food, our homes and our cars were to go through this much scrutiny - are the airplanes REALLY checked very often? - then we'd be a lot safer. This is BS and everyone here knows it.

  6. Know what'll make airports REALLY safe for me? by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm simply not going to them any more. Society has turned them into a manifestation of cowardice and the very worst possible kind of decision-making. I won't support the industry any longer, at least insofar as I have a choice (I'm referring here to the use of my taxes, something out of my control.)

    I feel bad for those of you who must fly, I really do. All the jokes we used to make about the nazi's and the soviets and "papers, please", have come home to roost.

    I wonder how much longer we'll be free to drive without being subjected to this kind of thing?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Know what'll make airports REALLY safe for me? by El+Torico · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's even worse than the "papers, please" that we all know and fear. The TSA goons don't even know what they are looking at. I told one at Dulles Airport that my Common Access Card was in my wallet so I wasn't going to just hand my wallet over to him. He just gave me a blank stare for a second and then said, "What do you mean you won't give me your wallet?"
      I pulled out my CAC and explained what it was to him and why I just couldn't hand it over. In order to get through the checkpoint, I gave him my wallet and CAC after demanding that another TSA agent observe him while he had it. Yes, it's wasn't a win over the TSA, but at least two of those bureaucrats know what a Common Access Card is now.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    2. Re:Know what'll make airports REALLY safe for me? by Plugh · · Score: 2

      ...or, you could fight against the tyranny. Thousands of are are... and we're winning

  7. Trusted traveler ID check by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does anyone think the black market cost of a stolen, forged, or corruptly issued trusted traveler ID will be outside the budget of a terrorist group?

    1. Re:Trusted traveler ID check by HBI · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They don't care since it's all theater anyway. Why else have all the visible paraphernalia? Obscure security mechanisms, ala casinos, would be more effective if one wanted actual security.

      The intent was to convince people to fly again after 9/11. So they made it as in your face as possible. The people didn't come back in the numbers which flew before, so they've been tweaking the process since then, both to increase usage and to combat new scares like shoe bombers and underwear bombers. They're lost. They don't know how to fix the problem and continue to make it worse.

      They will never give up until forced to.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  8. Putting neon on the security theater. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "International Air Transport Association demonstrated its vision for the 'checkpoint of the future' â" a series of neon-lit tunnels, each equipped with an array of eye-scanners, x-ray machines, and metal and liquid detectors."

    Bomb in the lineup before you get to the neon tunnel.

    "Feeling guilty? Got something to hide? A team of UK-based researchers claim to have developed a thermal lie-detection camera that can automatically spot a burning conscience."

    Guilty? Hell no, I'm going to be going to Heaven as a beloved martyr in about five minutes!

  9. Checkpoint my ass by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 2

    So the terrorists will just divert to, what -- football stadiums, railway bridges, turnpikes.
    Are there any, btw. -- terrorists I mean.
    Or is this meant to control the population at large maybe.
    Just asking.

    1. Re:Checkpoint my ass by meerling · · Score: 2

      Targets are easy, and there is no viable way to protect them all. Anyone who's played a lot of the in depth strategy games would know that. For example, this last black friday would make a fantastic terrorist targeting opportunity. I can't see that kind of 'security' garbage being implemented at every major store/sale in the country, can you. Of course, you could also target a public pool during a hot summer, that'll get a couple hundred people easy.
      For that matter, why wait till conditions are good, make your own. If you're in a big city, use facebook, twitter, and other things to set up a really huge flashmob, right to your pre-arranged and boobytrapped killingfield. Heck, you could even post the film to youtube for extra awefulness.

      You can bet the terrorists have thought of all of these and many other far more devious things. Although it's true that you need to think of things like this to be able to combat it, the problem is there are too many possibilities to cope with. Security needs to be of the soft variety the quietly watches out for abnormal activities. Hard security needs to be placed at infrastructure critical points, and sorry, but civilian passenger flight terminals is NOT one of them. Sure people get crowded in there, but it's not really a lot of people, and there have always been easier targets with a higher 'yield' to terrorists. Attacking a plane or airport tends to be done when there are other concerns involved, otherwise it's a waste of resources. (Not that all terrorists are good at any of that stuff, but enough are.)

      The TSA needs to learn/employ real security and lay off the techno-woogie and ball-fondling, but then again, nobody said the TSA was smarter than the terrorists.

  10. Re:About time! by Threni · · Score: 2

    At airport prices you will not safe very much.

  11. Re:When flying while feeling guilty is outlawed by dgatwood · · Score: 2

    Or, put another way, except for most terrorists. After all, if they had even a modicum of guilt, they wouldn't commit such atrocities. Therefore, without even looking at this technology, we can fairly definitively state that it cannot possibly be effective at preventing terrorist attacks of any sort.

    That won't stop the TSA from spending billions of dollars to buy them and install them in airports across the country, though, and this is why our government is going broke. Want to shave of 8.1 billion dollars of ugly pork barrel spending? Dismantle the TSA.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  12. probulator by khipu · · Score: 2

    Oh, they should just install the probulator. At least you'll be treated with dignity.

  13. Government intrusion by Kohath · · Score: 2

    Wow, that government intrusion sounds horrible. Why can't the government just focus on making my health care decisions for me and deciding how much of my income I'll be allowed to keep?

  14. Re:Great by jon_doh2.0 · · Score: 2

    So, you're that person in the US taking the train? Don't you know that is reminiscent of European style socialism, you unpatriotic individual, you.

  15. Re:Right path by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

    Yes, this means that certain people cannot travel by air under any circumstances. That is as it should be.

    Just as long as you are willing to be one of those people.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  16. thermal lie detectors by Nyder · · Score: 2

    The thermal-imaging camera captures variations in facial temperature in response to questioning. "When someone is making something up on the spot, brain activity usually changes and you can detect this through the thermal camera," said professor Hassan Ugail, who leads the research.

    Dang, i guess the "bad" people will have to just work out stories ahead of time, so they always have an answer ready.

    --
    Be seeing you...