Slashdot Mirror


Next Apple iPhone To Have a 4 Inch Display?

dkd903 writes "According to reports from Macotakara, Hitachi Displays Ltd and Sony Mobile Display Corporation has started shipping the screens for the iPad 3 and a 4-inch LCD screen for an unnamed iOS device. It would be fairly safe to assume that the 4-inch display will be for the next iPhone – the iPhone 5."

330 comments

  1. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have something 4 inches to show you...

    1. Re:First Post by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      4 inches is what I'm not showing to you

    2. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sdfasdf

  2. Here We Go.... by RobinEggs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can we just agree that Apple hardware articles are flamebait by default, especially the ones about the mere possibility of new Apple hardware, and stop frickin posting them?

    1. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, especially since 3D printing is supposed to change everything, what's the point of these stories when I can just 3D print a screen with ten times the resolution?

    2. Re:Here We Go.... by ThorGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can we just agree that Apple hardware articles are flamebait by default, especially the ones about the mere possibility of new Apple hardware, and stop frickin posting them?

      Plenty of the more popular things posted on this site are polarizing. Look at some of the things that aren't polarizing, how many comments they get, and contrast with the number of comments here. I'd argue it'd be irrational to not run stories that *always* get a large number of comments.

      I love the theoretical physics posts, for instance, but they usually average 30-50 comments. This Apple post, though, might run 100 comments (or more) and it's just on screen size!

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    3. Re:Here We Go.... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Quantity does not equal quality.

    4. Re:Here We Go.... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quantity does not equal quality.

      But quantity DOES equal ad revenue, and that's what it's all about.

    5. Re:Here We Go.... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 0

      That's not what your mother said ... booya :-)

    6. Re:Here We Go.... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can we just agree that Apple hardware articles are flamebait by default, especially the ones about the mere possibility of new Apple hardware, and stop frickin posting them?

      Can we just agree that a huge number of articles on Slashdot, period, are flamebait by default? Anything that mentions {Apple,Microsoft,the Linux community,BSD} will probably get the usual pile of shouting from both sides, anything that mentions global warming will probably get the usual pile of shouting from both sides, anything about Gummint {forcing people to do XXX, nudging people to do XXX, refusing to give money to people who don't do XXX, encouraging people to do XXX} will probably get the usual pile of shouting from both sides, anything about the RIAA/MPAA will probably get the usual pile of shouting (mostly against the RIAA/MPAA in this case),, etc., etc., etc..

    7. Re:Here We Go.... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Can we just agree that Apple hardware articles are flamebait by default, especially the ones about the mere possibility of new Apple hardware, and stop frickin posting them?

      Agreed. We all know an Apple product isn't official until someone "unintentionally" leaves one in a bar.

    8. Re:Here We Go.... by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Regardless of what the 4" screen is for, if they're coming out with any 4" iOS device then that is pretty important news to me as an iOS developer because it will mean that I'll have to contend with a new screen size soon. I vote for continuing to post articles like this one.

    9. Re:Here We Go.... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can we just agree that a huge number of articles on Slashdot, period, are flamebait by default?

      Your "flamebait" is my "topical", "interesting" and "discussion-worthy".

      It is a sad world-view that sees any topic that engenders a lot of comments, even argument as necessarily "flamebait".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Here We Go.... by Rubinstien · · Score: 4, Funny

      I must have missed the article about the government forcing/nudging/encouraging people to do triple-X, and refusing to give money to people who don't. Interesting.

    11. Re:Here We Go.... by artor3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the sort of attitude that leads to news stations reporting meaningless scandals and outright fabrications, instead of real news. It's like offering a recovering alcoholic a beer. On some level they may want it, but it's bad for them and you'd be an ass to do so.

      If you just want to rack up a bunch of comments, make Slashdot into a 24/7 "discussion" board for global warming and religion. That might rake in the advertising dollars in the short term, but the site would suck.

    12. Re:Here We Go.... by gnapster · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, they will still mod you down. But it will take between minutes and weeks for you to realize it has happened.

    13. Re:Here We Go.... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      No, that's what your dad said.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    14. Re:Here We Go.... by nightfell · · Score: 1

      Can we just agree that Apple hardware articles are flamebait by default, especially the ones about the mere possibility of new Apple hardware, and stop frickin posting them?

      Looks like your post is a self-fulfilling prophesy.

      There was nothing incendiary about the story. So why flame it?

    15. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that iCultists get so butt hurt over any slight hint of criticism? Apple fanboys, your corporate masters aren't as flawless as you were brainwashed to believe.

    16. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This asshole is right.

    17. Re:Here We Go.... by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it'll never happen. The last iPhone was supposed to be 4" too, and I'm pretty sure the one before that as well. This rumor comes out every single week on Mac rumor sites. Why slashdot decided to talk about this one and not the others, is anyone's guess. Just don't encourage them, or they'll start posting these stories every day with new rumors that never come true.

      There's a very specific reason for why the iPhone is 3.5" and that is usability. Apple cares less about the spec sheet numbers and more about how people feel using the thing. 3.5", they decided in the beginning, was the perfect size. It corresponds to the reach of most people's thumbs, and allows for the device to fit nicely in your hand and pocket.

      Apple also doesn't want to dilute its "retina" display marketing with a lower resolution, or make your job, as an iOS developer, harder with a new resolution that's not doubled in both directions.

      The stories you should pay attention to are the ones about the new iPad 3 screens. They are supposed to be retina displays, so expect a third resolution to have to worry about (3GS, 4/iPad, and now iPad 3), though thankfully again it'll just be a doubling in both directions.

    18. Re:Here We Go.... by scooter.higher · · Score: 2

      ...a 24/7 "discussion" board for global warming and religion...

      Fox News beat you to it...

      --
      Ramen
    19. Re:Here We Go.... by krenaud · · Score: 1

      Very few applications rely on knowing the exakt physical size. For all applications except virtual rulers and such it is the resolution which is important and Apple does not have to change if they decide to increase the screen by .5 in.

    20. Re:Here We Go.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Speaking of revenue it strikes me that putting out FUD before xmas and the January sales is a good way to divert people considering an iPhone to a competitor, or at least make them wait for the new version. Companies like to keep new products quiet until a week or two before they hit the shelves because sales of the old model drop off dramatically.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Here We Go.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      iOS isn't resolution agnostic? Seriously, in 2011?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Here We Go.... by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate our Lord, the almighty Climate Antichrist so much?

      --
      Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
    23. Re:Here We Go.... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Apple has perhaps the greatest marketing department that has ever existed. They know how to make people want to buy their shit. They know what kinds of information to stifle and how to allow buzz-generating rumors to get around. I halfway suspect it's Apple themselves that generate many of these rumors, but I think they just know how to make sure those things get around. There's a reason new iPhones are usually released around June/July rather than Novemberholidayshoppingtime like most electronics: Apple knows that early adopters will buy the product immediately, and Apple knows that those who have to wait for Christmas presents will not want to wait the extra 8 months to get the next new one regardless of what awesome rumors may or may not be spreading around. To a company like Apple, these sorts of rumors -- true or not -- can only serve to be a positive factor upon their bottom line.

    24. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and it's just on screen size!"

      I agree with everything you've said but this. It's about the size of something else, too.

    25. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has as well one of the best designers and engineers and usability experts working to create a product what does not need in-house marketing but everyone else does it for them, for free. And most (99%) customers really loves their products and markets it for their friends and colleges.

      So you do not need to start rumors (what should be 100% accurate so people would not feel bad when they ain't true, that is a proof when competitors does them as they want company products not to fill rumored features and specs as it drops sale rate) itself but competitors try to use it to use as FUD tactics against you (apple in this case).

    26. Re:Here We Go.... by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      iOS isn't resolution agnostic? Seriously, in 2011?

      Of course it is.
      But user interfaces are usually built for a certain screen size. So if Apple adds a new screen size, apps will have to supply additional UI.

    27. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope... Neither is Windows Phone.

      They do not need to know physical size as resolution is pre-ordered. Android applications what use native widgets works but those what have own buttons and graphics does have same problem.

      That is one reason Why Windows Phone sucks at smartphones as you have same amount of data recardless of screen size, while Android allows to get more data to screen with bigger screens.

      Have you compared Windows Phone on 3.5" (or were the 4" smallest?) screen and 4.5" screen? It is HUGE on bigger phone. Tiles are bigger than stamps and it hurts to eyes to browse such device or use as everything is so big.
      Windows Phone works OK'ish on 2-3" screen sizes but then it is just too big.

      I bought Samsung Note smartphone because I want to have space on home screens and have reasolution agnostic interface. So only system is Android.

    28. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Squat.
      Remove gently by turning left slightly, then right, while simultaneously pulling out.
      Rinse.
      Set aside for use shortly.

    29. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you know that it is God's will that the world is warming. She said she would not flood the world again, so She is going to cook us all.

      Repent now, all ye sinners!!!!

    30. Re:Here We Go.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      iOS developers dont worry about resolutions. Tehy worry about screen size.

      Apple Devices have resolution independent graphic APIs since the lat 1980s

      Yes, if you think to provide an icon as image in pixel formarts ... then this is utterly your fault.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    31. Re:Here We Go.... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      It broke my heart Sunday to see the guy next to me using the same (different platform, same app) scripture reader for his 9.7" iPad that I use on my Kindle Fire when I noticed we were using he same amount of screen for the app itself. His "vastly superior" tablet that he cannot put in a jacket pocket had black space on the sides & bottom & the top was the iOS stuff then black space before the app. We both had about 7" usable space for the app.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    32. Re:Here We Go.... by mspohr · · Score: 1
      I was amazed to see that the Kindle Fire (7" diagonal) has the same horizontal pixel count (1024) as the larger iPad (9.7" diagonal). It's vertical pixel count, however, (600) is less than the iPad's 768. This means that smaller screen of the Fire has a much higher resolution than the iPad which should make it easier to read.

      My Macbook air (11.6" diagonal) has 1344 x 768 resolution and this gives good definition. It does seem that the iPad is due for an upgrade to a better screen. However, I doubt that the resolution will be something as simple as a factor of 2. Most likely, it will be some odd ratio. This is the reality of the world of small devices and it would be good to come up with a generalized method to deal with this (such as automatic scaling) rather than re-writing code for each new device.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    33. Re:Here We Go.... by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      I must have missed the article about the government forcing/nudging/encouraging people to do triple-X, and refusing to give money to people who don't. Interesting.

      I'll just forward you to the documentary about it, then: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0295701/

    34. Re:Here We Go.... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Can we just agree that a huge number of articles on Slashdot, period, are flamebait by default?

      Your "flamebait" is my "topical", "interesting" and "discussion-worthy".

      It is a sad world-view that sees any topic that engenders a lot of comments, even argument as necessarily "flamebait".

      A topic that engenders comments and argument based on facts isn't flamebait. A topic that engenders comments from, for example Apple haters who assert that the only reason anybody buys Apple products is that they're idiots bedazzled by shiny objects or that the only reason anybody doesn't like {Macs, iPhones/iPads/etc. Mac OS X, iOS} is that they Just Don't Get It, not so much.

    35. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS developers dont worry about resolutions. Tehy worry about screen size.

      Apple Devices have resolution independent graphic APIs since the lat 1980s

      Yes, if you think to provide an icon as image in pixel formarts ... then this is utterly your fault.

      You don't know what you're talking about. iOS icons are provided as pixel maps, not vector images. And no, Apple hasn't had true RI in its user interface since the 1980s. In fact, they still don't have it today. They have some steps toward it, but it's not all there yet.

      It's not for lack of trying either. It just turns out to be very difficult to make a high performance res-independent UI framework which always looks good at any size.

    36. Re:Here We Go.... by Meski · · Score: 1

      You mean like Apple seeing the release of the Galaxy Nexus, and wanting to cool its sales down some?

    37. Re:Here We Go.... by Meski · · Score: 1

      I'm not a iOS coder (I code on the dark side) but I was thinking it would be strange to not have logical rather than physical graphics systems on anything these days.

    38. Re:Here We Go.... by Meski · · Score: 1

      The Kindle reader on the iOS does this? Bizarre, the Android one uses the entire screen.

    39. Re:Here We Go.... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the Kindle reader, but I wouldn't be surprised if it works the same way. My understanding is that the iPad is (often, can't be always) using the same resolution apps as the iPhone, so it basically letterboxes the screen. Really a pity.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    40. Re:Here We Go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call "flamebait" what I find interesting, yet you feed your own apparent definition of a troll. Hmm, soft targets and low common denominators. #firstworldproblems

  3. Won't sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my iPhone loving friends rubbish the size of the high end android phone screens and say they don't want anything bigger than the current iScreen.

    1. Re:Won't sell. by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      except... if the next one is 4", then that would make the "current iScreen" 4", so they'll be happy. Don't you know how Apple works?

    2. Re:Won't sell. by Kenja · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well yea, they dont want anything that Apple isn't offering, until Apple does and then they claim that its the best thing ever and even though others had it first Apple is responsable for making it popular and therefore gets its invented by credit.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Won't sell. by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      I still have no idea why people want a 4" screen (size) as opposed to screen resolution. Isn't the whole beauty of retina display because of the high screen resolution?

    4. Re:Won't sell. by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Dont confuse resolution with pixel density. Frankly, I doubt we'll see a 4" iPhone, but perhaps there will be an iPadMini.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:Won't sell. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Because some of us have large hands. I can type on an iPhone, but it's actually much easier to type on a 4.3" Android device, even though the Android keyboard isn't quite as good as the iOS one (though it's gotten very close).

    6. Re:Won't sell. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Since an iPad is a large iPod, there already is an iPadMini. It's called the iPod.

    7. Re:Won't sell. by bonch · · Score: 1

      Do you actually know any of the people you and the grandparent poster are describing, or are you guys making them up for purposes of trolling? The majority of iPhone users don't even know or care what size the screen is.

    8. Re:Won't sell. by bonch · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Android supporters constantly claim that these kinds of people exist, yet they are never seen. Are they some kind of bogeyman invented to have something to mock? Real Apple fans are even bitchier than Android fans when it comes to criticizing Apple, as any visit to an Apple forum will prove. It seems Android has become a rallying point for two kinds of users--budget buyers not interested in phone quality and cross-armed, spec-obsessed techies who hate things that are popular.

    9. Re:Won't sell. by kyrre · · Score: 0

      How about this guy? http://dcurt.is/2011/10/03/3-point-5-inches/ This blog post was refered to by the tech press a while ago. Many people seemed to agree with Apple that 3.5" should be enough for anybody with this reasoning.

    10. Re:Won't sell. by hexagonc · · Score: 1

      Okay, I have to respond to this. Not trying to flame anyone (so you can keep your flame retardant suit in the closet) but in what ways are the iPhone keyboard better than the Android ones? As the owner of an iPod Touch (with retina display), iPad and HTC EVO 4G, I really want to know. I've heard this again and again and again but never with any accompanying details or specifics. Are you talking about the stock keyboard (and which version, since I've read that the Gingerbread stock keyboard was an improvement over previous stock keyboards)? Are you saying that none of the Android replacement keyboards are better than the iPhone keyboard?

      I can give very specific reasons for why I prefer Android keyboards on the whole to the iOS keyboard. (1) Pretty much all the Android keyboards offer better visual hints when it comes to extended characters (e.g., punctuation, numbers and symbols) because they appear next to the primary character on the key, (2) Pretty much all Android keyboards are easier to use for entering complex passwords with upper and lower case letters because, again, you can see immediately when the letter you are typing is going to be uppercase or lowercase, (3) this could be a matter of taste, but in most situations I prefer the swiping type keyboards like Swype or FlexT9 to any tapping keyboard. I can usually type the fastest and most accurately with this input style, (4) I like the autocorrection of Android keyboards like Swiftkey better than what is available in iOS.

      Having said all of this, I have noticed that when purely tap-typing, I seem to be slightly more accurate with the iOS keyboard. I'm not sure why this is, but it could simply be due to the spacing between the characters is better for the size of my fingers.

    11. Re:Won't sell. by danbob999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are so right!

      That's why I laugh at my friend's 50" TVs. My 19" one is so much better because the pixel density is so higher!

      Pixel density for the win. Steve Jobs said it was all that mattered. And Steve Jobs can't be wrong.

    12. Re:Won't sell. by danbob999 · · Score: 0

      This guy have really small thumbs.

    13. Re:Won't sell. by bonch · · Score: 0

      Many people seemed to agree with Apple that 3.5" should be enough for anybody with this reasoning.

      What people seemed to agree with that? One guy with a blog? The tech press?

    14. Re:Won't sell. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      when purely tap-typing, I seem to be slightly more accurate with the iOS keyboard

      That's your answer right there. Most people don't spend most of their time typing in numbers and special characters, nor even capitalizing much.

    15. Re:Won't sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cross-armed, spec-obsessed techies who hate things that are popular.

      You constantly claim that these kinds of people exist, yet they are never seen. Are they some kind of bogeyman invented to have something to mock?

      The "just look at Slashdot" reply you just thought of is a non-answer that serves only to affirm the latter case.

    16. Re:Won't sell. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Actually, even the 7" diagonal Kindle Fire is very easy to hold and operate with one hand (which is why I bought it... the iPad is just too big). I don't have large hands so it should also work fine for most people. The Fire also has a 1024 x 600 screen. The 1024 pixel count is the same as the larger screen iPad so you get great resolution which makes it easy to read.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    17. Re:Won't sell. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Lol. You got modded troll for posting something that is 100% undeniably true.

    18. Re:Won't sell. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I still have a 19" TV I view from my couch 10 feet away. I don't know why anyone would want a bigger screen to see things on or to interact with.

    19. Re:Won't sell. by Meski · · Score: 1

      They're all baristas. Not that there's anything wrong with that. (well, apart from the StarBucks ones)

    20. Re:Won't sell. by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      I thought the iPad was the iPodPro...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  4. iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why do people keep referring to the next iPhone as the iPhone 5? Let's count together shall we?

    Original iPhone: iPhone 1
    iPhone 3G: iPhone 2
    iPhone 3GS: iPhone 3
    iPhone 4: iPhone 4
    iPhone 4S: iPhone 5
    Next iPhone: iPhone 6

    Now, if Apple decides to call the next iPhone the iPhone 5, then I'll gladly eat my words, but until then, c'mon now.

    1. Re:iPhone 5? by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because the 4S really is the iphone 5 beta release or RC1. It's not a real phone but a hardware test platform to sort out the bugs.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that it's mainly an incremental upgrade.

      So most of the bugs that exist have been there for a while.

    3. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next one will probably be the 4GS because it will probably have LTE. I wouldn't even be surprised if they keep the design the same again.

    4. Re:iPhone 5? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lets try again, shall we?

      Original iPhone: iPhone 1,1
      iPhone 3G: iPhone 2,1
      iPhone 3GS: iPhone 2,2
      iPhone 4: iPhone 3,1 (its really the 3!)
      iPhone 4S: iPhone 3,2
      iPhone 5: iPhone 4,1 ??

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    5. Re:iPhone 5? by mattventura · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 4 was legitimately the fourth phone, so you could just consider the 4S to be the 4.5th iPhone so that the iPhone 5 is still the 5th iPhone.

    6. Re:iPhone 5? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Lets try again, shall we?

      Original iPhone: iPhone 1,1
      iPhone 3G: iPhone 2,1
      iPhone 3GS: iPhone 2,2
      iPhone 4: iPhone 3,1 (its really the 3!)

      If they had called it iPhone 3, there would have been a serious case of heads asploding.

    7. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be iPhone 6. Just as iPhone 4 is actually the 4th iPhone.

    8. Re:iPhone 5? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      iPhone 4S: iPhone 5 Next iPhone: iPhone 6

      How about Next iPhone: iPhone 4GS; for 4G support?

      *** Technically the current latest iPhone ought to have been the iPhone 4G, and the iPhone 4GS should have followed it

      Then next iPhone after the next one; iPhone 6.

    9. Re:iPhone 5? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with the current design - I stuck with my iPhone 4 since the upgrade wasn't compelling (dual core, yeah it's a bit faster, but the big upgrade is an app they pulled from the app store and disabled, then bundled with the phone and called it a 4S? Please). I like the current design of the 4/4S better than the 3G/3GS but I want a larger screen. The way I see it, my iPhone 4 is just fine for now. I do wish it had 64GB of storage, but I'll continue to manage.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    10. Re:iPhone 5? by Deorus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The iPhone 4S' identification string reads "iPhone4,1".

    11. Re:iPhone 5? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of Windows version numbers.
      1 - 2 - 3 - NT4? - ...huh? - 7!

    12. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 4S is iPhone 4,1 which throws your whole "5-informative" rating into doubt. Sent from my iPhone 4,1.

    13. Re:iPhone 5? by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1

      Everything makes perfect sense when you decide you can just make something up.

      --
      -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
    14. Re:iPhone 5? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      To make life worse? 7 is actually Windows NT 6.1, Vista and 2008 are NT 6.0, 2003 and XP x64 are NT 5.2, XP x86 is NT 5.1, and 2000 is 5.0.

      It's not the seventh release either! (1.01, 2/286, 2/386, 3.0, 3.1, 3.11 For Workgroups, NT 3.51, NT 4, 95, 98, Me, 2000, XP, and Vista all preceded it—it's more like Windows 15.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    15. Re:iPhone 5? by stormeru · · Score: 0

      I bet they will name it just iPhone, it's time to get rid of the version number. Then you will be buying the latest iPhone every time they release a new version and that's it.

    16. Re:iPhone 5? by tsa · · Score: 1

      Actually it's a lot faster. But still not worth the upgrade in my opinion.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    17. Re:iPhone 5? by Carrot007 · · Score: 2

      Nt major versions 3.1, 3.5, 4.0, 2000, XP, vista, 7.

      7 is release 7.

      Simple if you ain't a dumb kid.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    18. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first iPhone and iPhone 4 were the only correctly named iPhones.

      Original iPhone: iPhone 1
      iPhone 3G: iPhone 2
      iPhone 3GS: iPhone 3
      iPhone 4: iPhone 4
      iPhone 4S: iPhone 5
      iPhone 5: iPhone 6

    19. Re:iPhone 5? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 5 will add a 4" screen and another minor software update and STILL won't be worth upgrading to.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    20. Re:iPhone 5? by BrokenBeta · · Score: 1

      Are you really expecting Apple to call the next iPhone the "iPhone 6"?

      Ok, Nullsoft did it for a laugh, but for Apple to do it, would be very surprising. Even Windows doesn't follow its own internal version numbers (they had a chance with Windows 7 to do this, but Windows 7 is actually internally 6.1, so they missed it.) Everything about Apple is neat and tidy, it would *really* surprise me if they were fickle enough to skip a version number on the box and then explain to their users why.

      Also, I don't think the internal version number is stored the way you have it anyway.

    21. Re:iPhone 5? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Actually if that's the order to 7 Vista would be release 7... did you read your list or was that a joke?

    22. Re:iPhone 5? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Released version names perhaps, but the internal versions are what was described in the previous post..

      Also xp and 7 aren't really major versions, since they were minor updates to the previous versions, major versions were 3.1 (first release), 4.0, 5.0 (2000), 6.0 (vista).

      Also your specifically describing "NT", whereas "Windows" has had many more versions including the versions that were just applications running on top of dos.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:iPhone 5? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      You're missing 2003/XP64. That was a major release, it introduced the 64 bit OS. So at best, 7 is release 8, unless, of course, you start looking at point releases as minor, in which case there are only 4 releases.

      MS's math just doesn't work out no matter how you slice it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    24. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's actually 6.1 or something.

      Version numbers were along the lines of 3.1, 3.5, 4.0, 2000 (5.0), XP (5.1), Vista (6.0), 7 (6.1).

      Check Start -> Run -> winver [enter]

      It'll tell you the REAL version number.

    25. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, Vista is os 7.0, windows 7 is os 7.1. google it.

    26. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand, each iPhone actually has two version numbers? The iPhone 3G, it's both the second and the first iPhone? And what about the iPhone 3GS, it's both the second and the second (?!) iPhone? Isn't that redundant? Or is the second number not a version number but something else entirely?

    27. Re:iPhone 5? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Right, because Apple wants to look like they can't count from 4 to 5.

    28. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nt major versions 3.1, 3.5, 4.0, 2000, XP, vista, 7.

      7 is release 7.

      Simple if you ain't a dumb kid.

      NT 4 = 4.0
      2000 = 5.0
      XP = 5.1
      Vista = 6.0
      Win7 = 6.1

      I guess Win8 = 7.0

    29. Re:iPhone 5? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Also 3G and 3GS refers to the 3G network, not the 3rd generation iPhone.

    30. Re:iPhone 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I count eight...

      3.1, 3.5
      4.0
      2000 (5)
      XP (6)
      Vista (7)
      7 (8)

    31. Re:iPhone 5? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Also your specifically describing "NT", whereas "Windows" has had many more versions including the versions that were just applications running on top of dos.

      They don't count the same things. Officially, there is no code from the Windows 95 related line that exists in 2000, XP or later.

  5. I kinda hope not. by DWMorse · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I kinda hope it doesn't. It might have advantages, having a screen the size of a toaster. The only problem is having a screen the size of a toaster.

    I like a phone I can use with one hand easily. This whole post was typed with my right hand only, on my iPhone 4.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:I kinda hope not. by grcumb · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you're left handed then? 8)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:I kinda hope not. by jon3k · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can easily type with one hand on a 4" screen (even 4.3"). Have you tried a 4" phone? Did you consider that 3.5" might not be the right size for every person?

    3. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I can easily type with one hand on a 4" screen (even 4.3"). Have you tried a 4" phone? Did you consider that 3.5" might not be the right size for every person?

      Ahh but this is Apple. iPhone users have to live with whatever screen size is fed to them, there is no choice in the Apple world.

    4. Re:I kinda hope not. by jittles · · Score: 2

      I have a big hand and actually prefer a larger phone. My 4" screen is great.

    5. Re:I kinda hope not. by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have an iPhone 4 and I really like the screen on it. I remember when the first Evo 4G came out and one of my coworkers got it on launch day. He was really happy with it, but all I could think was "That's one really big phone". The 4.3" screen just made the thing humungous. I like how well the iPhone slips in my pocket.

      The way Apple works, if they did this they would drop the 3.5" model and I wouldn't have a choice if I wanted to stay in the iPhone line.

      Personally, I think this is just more "I made up something about Apple!" news, like the 7" iPad 2 that was supposed to come out last year, the iPhone 4-and-a-half that was supposed to come out between the Verizon iPhone and the iPhone 5 (which was supposed to come out), etc.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the bezel was made smaller, a 4" screen could be included without making the phone bigger than its current dimensions.

    7. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters, because Apple users will use whatever they're given. They'll adapt to whatever Apple throws out next because that's the right thing to do. Any less would be disrespectful to Apple.

    8. Re:I kinda hope not. by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Informative

      5" is too big, the bottom end of a tablet size. 4 - 4.2" is about the sweet spot for a touchscreen cell phone. 3.5" is about the bare minimum an adult male can manipulate. I have a 4" screen (seems to be about standard for android phones) and using a friend's iPhone feels very cramped in comparison, especially for things like reading text more than a paragraph long. 4" is about the bare minimum for extended reading.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:I kinda hope not. by mug+funky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that's interesting because there's a bit of truth in it.

      it could be argued that Apple can't refine it's interfaces beyond a certain point because users adapt to Apple while Apple adapts to it's users.

      perhaps we need competing products so Apple can watch people's complaints about their competitor's interfaces in order to get some fresh ideas for their own, because feedback about their own devices would be tainted by sycophant users who say "doubleplusgood" to everything they buy.

    10. Re:I kinda hope not. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The way Apple works, if they did this they would drop the 3.5" model and I wouldn't have a choice if I wanted to stay in the iPhone line.

      Here is where Steve Jobs' design philosophies fall down. We are not talking about the aesthetics of the device, we are discussing how the dimensions of the phone match the user. Hand size, how well the eyes work, etc.. One size does not fit all.

      As has been mentioned by others, I expect the same people who would defend the 3.5" screen as the "right" size will defend a 4" screen as the "right" size if and when Apple produces such a phone. Personally, I love my T-Mobile Galaxy S2 with its 4.5" screen. Yes, it's big, but it fits in my pocket and in my hand. I have large hands, so one-handed operation is not a problem for me.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re:I kinda hope not. by dissy · · Score: 1

      It gets even worse as far as rumors go

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzsBwnv_dAg

      I would love a phone with those features. But I don't believe anything in that concept video will actually turn up on the new iPhone.

      I still have a 3gs, and only skipped the 4 for recent budget changes. The 4s doesn't seem like a great step up from the 4, if I had to buy now.

      But since my phones battery is still going strong, I'll hold off until at least the 5 is out either way.

      If this one is true about the 4" screen, I might end up rethinking that, and just picking up a cheap used 4.

      Short of waiting until launch day and being disappointed, there's not much harm to hope.
      Unfortunately with Apple, you can't make any plans ahead of time.

    12. Re:I kinda hope not. by DWMorse · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I previously owned a Droid X, hence my reference to the disadvantage of a screen the size of a toaster.

      I like my handheld portable devices to be handheld. I'm a 6' guy with fairly large hands, great for guitar, bass, and piano. I also have good eyesight, so I don't need a large screen, just high pixel density. /shrug

      It'd be entertaining to see an iPhone "Pro" with a bigger screen, and an iPhone "Mini" that's usable. ;)

      --
      There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    13. Re:I kinda hope not. by Dracos · · Score: 4, Funny

      The way Apple works, if they did this they would drop the 3.5" model and I wouldn't have a choice if I wanted to stay in the iPhone line.

      They would also advertise a new iPhone with a 4 inch screen as if it was the first phone ever to have a screen bigger than that of the current iPhone.

    14. Re:I kinda hope not. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Here is where Steve Jobs' design philosophies fall down. We are not talking about the aesthetics of the device, we are discussing how the dimensions of the phone match the user. Hand size, how well the eyes work, etc.. One size does not fit all.

      What design philosophies are you talking about? You seem to be assuming one about having a single screen size. But iPod came in a variety of screen sizes, as of course do Macs.

      The do indeed believe in one handed operation, and if that is made easier for a significant number of people with a 4" they'd consider it.

      I doubt Apple will think a 4" worthwhile, but if they did there's nothing in their history to indicate that would mean dropping the 3.5".

      *IF* the report of Apple buying 4" screens is true, and that's a big if, then it's probably for a different device. Perhaps a game console. They're already the biggest handheld games platform with the iPhone/iPod touch. But there are lots of games genres that would benefit from joysticks and buttons. Or maybe it's for a remote for a TV or full sized console. Or maybe it's for an automotive device.

    15. Re:I kinda hope not. by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      I think they could easily get another half inch out of the screen by using more of the existing surface as a screen rather than a black/white boarder that serves no purpose on the top and bottom. Well it might serve a purpose but they might have found a way to move the unimportant things (like, you know the parts that make it a phone, microphone and speakers) off to the side rather than tying up front of device real estate.

    16. Re:I kinda hope not. by DWMorse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not true at all. If Apple makes a screen that makes their device unusable to me, I will a.) not buy it and b.) move to another device that IS usable. Why do you start out presuming that most people inconvenience themselves by using Apple products? Let the market speak for itself. If I find the device unwieldy, I'll skip it and buy one that isn't. Presuming I even need to replace this sucker anytime soon.

      --
      There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    17. Re:I kinda hope not. by similar_name · · Score: 2

      The iPhone 4s has a total diagonal of a little over 5 inches. Depending on how it's done a 4 inch screen does not necessarily mean a bigger phone.

    18. Re:I kinda hope not. by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      What design philosophies are you talking about? You seem to be assuming one about having a single screen size. But iPod came in a variety of screen sizes, as of course do Macs.

      iPods with different screen sizes? You mean the NON-touchscreen devices? All iPod touches have 3.5" screens. Macs with different sizes? Since when were Macs hand-held devices? Not good examples.

      The do indeed believe in one handed operation, and if that is made easier for a significant number of people with a 4" they'd consider it.

      The availability of devices with larger screens from HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. suggests very strongly that a significant number of people do benefit from larger screens and the lack of a larger screen device from Apple suggests that Apple did not consider it.

      As I have showed that your suggestions don't tally with known facts, I won't bother with the rest of your suppositions.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    19. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can easily type with one hand on a 4" screen (even 4.3"). Have you tried a 4" phone? Did you consider that 3.5" might not be the right size for every person?

      Did you defend the original iPhone when the haters claimed it was too big for writing with one hand?

    20. Re:I kinda hope not. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming one about having a single screen size. But iPod came in a variety of screen sizes, as of course do Macs.

      The pre-touch ipods didn't have the same app ecosystem the touch ones do so changing the resolution didn't really affect anyone but Apple in terms of software. And on Macs (or PCs in general) you don't generally target fixed resolutions anyway. If they start having iphones with different screen sizes then you have the issues of targeting multiple resolutions because i would think they're highly unlikely to double the already high resolution just to go from 3.5" to ~4". Alternatively they could reduce the ppi but then that might (i didn't do the math on it) mess with their 'retina display' marketing, not sure they would do that. So whilst they could do it and they very well might, i think i would have to agree with you that given their history it does indeed appear unlikely.

    21. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 4.3" screen on my phone. It is quite easy to touch the entire screen with my thumb.

    22. Re:I kinda hope not. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2

      I think it's more likely that there are more people for whom the 3.5" is the better size. Unless they're planning on having two screen size options for the next iPhone. No idea how likely that is. Apple certainly aren't going to make two sizes unless there they think it's more important than a marketing advantage, which seems to be the main reason some manufacturers are making larger phones -- to "differentiate" themselves", rather than because they spent more effort on R&D than Apple.

    23. Re:I kinda hope not. by wzinc · · Score: 0

      Good call. Androids, etc w/4in+ screens look ridiculous.

    24. Re:I kinda hope not. by symbolset · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a certain amount of truth in this. People, and their fingers, come in different sizes, different visual acuities. Some are more graceful than others. Some have purses to carry their phones in, some shirt pockets, some cargo pockets. Some prefer a physical keyboard, others a choice of onscreen keyboards. Some need a cheaper phone to suit their wallet, some more battery life, some more storage, some the slimmest possible device. In Android serving these needs is called "choice." On other platforms it's called "fragmentation" and is held to diminish the main.

      The Jobsian vision is to make the one best phone they can, and continue to make several historical revisions. This increases economies of scale and hence margins. It simplifies developer needs and update complexity so that one app works on all phones and updates can be swift and sure. It gives a great experience if it suits your needs, and the design is engineered toward a human curve that should fit most. Because it delivers a premium experience for the people it's engineered for they can charge a premium price for it. But if your needs diverge from this solid design that suits most: too bad.

      I wouldn't say Jobs' design philosophies are falling down here. By all reports these devices serve so many people so well that customer satisfaction is as high as any product gets, for all products, for all time. Apparently the engineers are masters of the standard deviation and excel at serving huge numbers of people with what they want, even before the people themselves know what that is. And hence the devices are as profitable as consumer products get and then 6x times that. So much so that they gather an estimated two thirds of the profits in the smartphone trade with something like 20 percent of sales. I would call that a win both for Apple and for their well-served customers.

      But if it's not for you, it's not. Apparently there are other companies eager to serve the outliers on the curve like you and me. So many in fact that you can find a phone to suit any conceivable assortment of needs that aren't contradictory. These phones can't run the proprietary iOS, but they do run software deemed by many to be close enough in utility and with a grand assortment of applications. In their eagerness to please these phone vendors get bold and try seriously crazy things: pico projectors, 5" screens, detachable keyboards, gamepads for keyboards, phones that dock to a tablet or smartbook, HDMI 1080p outputs, all kinds of stuff. Some of these extreme solutions become niche markets that don't sell many units - on some of them the manufacturer loses money. In general they're not as profitable as iPhone, but it beats earning $10 on a $200 laptop, or $3 on a BluRay player - and it's honest work.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    25. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the fact that the iPhone outsells every smart phone on the planet? There isn't a single handset that beats it.

      Exactly where has the 3.5 form factor failed?

      No one said that all people must love 3.5" screens, and it would be foolish to do so. I myself like a larger screen but I don't want to deal with the quirks in Android and the market is a little too wild west for my tastes. I don't fault others for their choice. It's more of a Gnome/KDE thing for me. Some prefer a thousand configuration options. Some don't. You make it seem as if the lack of a 4" screen was some terrible mistake on Apple's part, when in reality, the lack of such a screen hasn't harmed them in the slightest, the market is strong, and 'normal' people really don't give a shit.

    26. Re:I kinda hope not. by grcumb · · Score: 1

      This whole post was typed with my right hand only, on my iPhone 4.

      So you're left handed then? 8)

      Down-modded?!?

      Man, left-handed people really can't take a joke, I guess. 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    27. Re:I kinda hope not. by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      iPods with different screen sizes? You mean the NON-touchscreen devices?

      I mean the iPods. Only one of which - the iPod touch - had a touchscreen.

      The availability of devices with larger screens from HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. suggests very strongly that a significant number of people do benefit from larger screens

      It might suggest that to you. People who know however are aware that Apple bought up the entire world production of 3.5" screens. That's why the Andoid copies of iPhone don't also copy the screensize.

      a larger screen device from Apple suggests that Apple did not consider it.

      Are you suggesting that everything that you ever considered, you went ahead and did? You must be a very impulsive person then, unable to rationally balance the pros and cons of possible actions.

      Rational people weigh up the pros and cons of things they consider, and only do some of them.

      Your tone sounds rather foolish, using the language of logic whilst being resolutely illogical.

    28. Re:I kinda hope not. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      As an iPhone developer, I agree absolutely about the reasons why they probably won't do it. I guess what I was trying to say was that that it's a design choice, not a design principle.

    29. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The availability of devices with larger screens from HTC, Samsung, Motorola, etc. suggests very strongly that a significant number of people do benefit from larger screens and the lack of a larger screen device from Apple suggests that Apple did not consider it.

      Well there's a leap of logic. Availability means nothing. Plenty of phones are brought to market and fail miserably. High-volume sales of these devices, however, would imply a market demand for them.

    30. Re:I kinda hope not. by kimvette · · Score: 2

      That video is photoshopped. You can tell by the pixels. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    31. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huhuh.. you know what they say, big hands, big...uh thingies..

    32. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean the iPods. Only one of which - the iPod touch - had a touchscreen.

      The iPod touch is now in its 4th generation and all have had 3.5" screens. Thus, it invalidates your point and supports mine.

      People who know however are aware that Apple bought up the entire world production of 3.5" screens. That's why the Andoid copies of iPhone don't also copy the screensize.

      I'm sure it is soooo difficult to change a manufacturing process from 3.7" to 3.5" (that's sarcasm, in case you did not realize). If a manufacturer can make and sell a 3.7" screen, they can easily sell a 3.5" screen, unless, perhaps Apple has some kind of anti-competitive agreement with the manufacturer? And, just to show your rather weak grasp on facts, a quick use of Google reveals that 3.5" Android phones do exist.

      Your tone sounds rather foolish, using the language of logic whilst being resolutely illogical.

      What do you call people who resolutely ignore the facts? (Hint, that's yourself!)

    33. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good call. Androids, etc w/4in+ screens look ridiculous.

      yeah ridiculous like the 9.7" iphone without phone that they call the ipad

    34. Re:I kinda hope not. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      huhuh.. you know what they say, big hands, big...uh thingies..

      gloves?

    35. Re:I kinda hope not. by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "Apple certainly aren't going to make two sizes...."

      Depends on how you look at it, I guess. Won't Apple probably drop the 3GS and sell the 4 / 4S as the inexpensive models when the 5 ships? Just like they do now with the 3GS / 4 / 4S lineup.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    36. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends on what 4" is measuring.

      They could put a 4" screen in the current case, although i wish they wouldn't - the current case was one of those idea that looks good on paper, looks good in prototype, but isn't very good - apple does that a lot. original imac. the ugly snowball thing. the cube. the original mac pro plastic case, original air.

      they could just make a widescreen and hold the width the same to get their 4" diagonal measurement. I'd *like* that. widescreen with the current dot pitch and case size.

    37. Re:I kinda hope not. by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "I mean the iPods. Only one of which - the iPod touch - had a touchscreen."

      What about the new touchscreen on the iPod nano? It's not an iOS device, but it IS an iPod, and it DOES have a touch screen.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    38. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you have problems manipulating something bigger than 4" with your right hand then ... oh, never mind.

    39. Re:I kinda hope not. by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      It depends on the size of your hands. I have fairly large hands and I can extremely fast using swype on my samsung galaxy s2. Much faster than I can on my ipod touch 4g anyway..

    40. Re:I kinda hope not. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You mean like still using the same target for delete and eject on the Mac?

    41. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still use your hands to type? Man, upgrade!

      - spoken on my HTC

    42. Re:I kinda hope not. by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. iPhone has 960 x 640 resolution. What resolution does your 4" Android run at?

      And you can always change the font size.

    43. Re:I kinda hope not. by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      If they could make that structurally sound, it would probably look good. You could make the bezel almost nothing. There would be a usability issue to contend with though: with too small a bezel you risk accidental touches being picked up by the screen close to the edges.

    44. Re:I kinda hope not. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      My clumsy digits have trouble ringing out a clear A-chord on an electric guitar without some fancy finger gymnastics - it's not the resolution that's the problem; it's the finger size:screen-width ratio. Before you go making dialing wand jokes, my BMI is 23.0.
       
      To answer your original question, IIRC the Nexus S has a 800x480 resolution. As I reach 30, I find that larger font sizes make me less likely to want/need reading glasses. More than 80 characters wide @ 480px on a 4" screen is reaching a certain level of absurdity. There's a reason why newsprint has been the font size it has for so many years.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    45. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would mean that Apple would have to realize that there are different needs out there, not just the iHuman they are modeling all their stuff for and forcing everyone to think is the awesome.

    46. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched from an old Nokia N70 to Samsung Galaxy S2. They weight the same, the Nokia is a lot smaller but the Samsung is so thin that actually slips much better in my pockets. It's almost invisible from outside whilst the Nokia would make a visible bulge. The Samsung also feels lighter. Maybe we sense density and not mass.

    47. Re:I kinda hope not. by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      The only people who whine about a 4+ inch screen being "too big" are people who've never actually USED one. Put something like an Evo 4g next to an iPhone. The phone itself is not much larger - it's just that the iPhone wastes so much space with those massive bezels on the top and bottom.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    48. Re:I kinda hope not. by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      And why do you think a screen that is only slightly larger will become "unusable" when the keyboard space (in portrait mode) will barely change? Have you ever tried one of these "evil" 4+ inch phones?

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    49. Re:I kinda hope not. by Mithent · · Score: 1

      I don't think that making things smaller makes the screen less cramped. In particular, UI elements for a touch device need to be a certain physical size to make them usable, and a higher resolution screen (which I'm all for) means you need to render them at a higher DPI. A larger screen allows for more content room, and I find 3.5" cramped in that respect nowadays too.

    50. Re:I kinda hope not. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Yeah but who actually buys those small size condoms? I swear they make them just so guys can feel good knowing that there are people smaller than them out there, even if the shelf is always fully stocked and no-one ever seems to buy them...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you said "sweet spot", I think you meant "my favorite size"
      and when you said "3.5" is about the bare minimum an adult male can manipulate"
      I think you meant "I don't like screens that small"

      From a business perspective, since the #1, #2, and #3 phone sold are all 3.5"
      devices, I would say that is the "sweet spot"

    52. Re:I kinda hope not. by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Structurally, the "screen" is glass touchscreen bonded to glass LCD underneath. Taking the back off reveals that that too is nothing significant.
      Making the underlying LCD a little wider/taller would not impact the outer dimensions and in my opinion would only improve the unit.
      I have a 4 and I do find myself tapping accidentally when I grip the device.
      From my old WinCE PDAs, WinMo phones and through Android I've always maintained that a large screen is important for a device that you will spend a lot of time looking at intently.
      Games, the net, e-books, movies, SSH and pictures all require your eyes to be pointed at a screen for long periods of time. The bigger the screen the easier on your eyes it is, I would have thought. Plus, when you're using tabbed browsing, or you can't get rid of the status bar, you really need the extra screen real estate.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    53. Re:I kinda hope not. by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      iOS NEEDS the ability to use aftermarket keyboard programs.

      I have come to iPhone4 from Android and the one daily irritation is the lack of a decent input framework.

      On Android I use SwiftKey (not the X, the old one). Having Hacker's keyboard in there too makes SSH easy to do.

      Why can't Apple see that their "dumb keyboard" is deficient for a "smart phone"?
      Even adding the Jailbreak mod "Autocorrection Bar" didn't help, it made the "space-space=period" disappear and didn't really predict my text enough to keep it installed.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    54. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > makes their device unusable to me

      You'll buy it. After all, iTunes makes the device unusable already and you still buy it.

    55. Re:I kinda hope not. by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Plus, when you're using tabbed browsing, or you can't get rid of the status bar, you really need the extra screen real estate.

      On that matter I've found Opera Mobile to be the best browser choice on my little "old" Android phone. The fact that you can remove all chrome (address bar only shows when at the top of the page or it is active in some way, tab bar and other controls only show when the action button is pressed) makes it usable for occasional breif browsing (checking a bus time table, reading the news headlines in the queue at the cafe, ...) even on the 320x240 screen.

    56. Re:I kinda hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Galaxy Note and can not understand why people would buy anything smaller. I am even thinking about getting a Galaxy Tab 7.7 instead.

    57. Re:I kinda hope not. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think the 3.5 is a hold over from when displays were a significant cost of the device, and to help prop up the after market add ons. 4" will require retooling for most iphone accessory manufacturers, and wide availability of accessories has been a major selling point of the platform for years. You don't go changing form factors but once every few generations.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    58. Re:I kinda hope not. by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      My Android couldn't run Opera properly on the stock Orange ROM, MoDaCo's finest, nor CM 7+ (currently on 7.1.0).
      The idea of Opera is sound, the program does several things really well, but for showing pages, using JavaScript forms, and several other tasks MobileSafari kicks it's arse.

      ymmv

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    59. Re:I kinda hope not. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with the current case? I think it's the best iPhone case they've done and I'm glad they've stuck with it for a while longer. And what's wrong with the original iMac?

    60. Re:I kinda hope not. by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      I thought MobileSafari was iOS only. Maybe I'll give it a try some time. Though I've made a point of avoiding it after removing the thing (and everything else Apple) when I was irritated by it auto-installing along with an update to QuickTime some while back, I can be bitter like that.

    61. Re:I kinda hope not. by DWMorse · · Score: 1

      Read more of the thread. I've also owned a Droid X, which I just recently sold. Nice for movies and games. Not great for phoning.

      --
      There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    62. Re:I kinda hope not. by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Yes, i use MobileSafari on iOS.
      I hate having to have iTunes installed because I have an iOS phone, and all the crap that comes with it should be opt-in, not foist-ware.
      Sandboxie is nice for programs on Windows that you don't like running riot on your box.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  6. apparently iphone 4S doesn't bring in enough hits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    God, we've been talking about the iphone 5 every week for over a year now. I know blogs are desperate for page views, but this is getting old.

  7. As I keep telling my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Four inches should be enough for anyone.

    1. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Did she look at the Dell Streak?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0

      ...Anyone made in Asia.

      You know, like the iPhones are.

    3. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Four inches should be enough for anyone.

      Unless you're holding it wrong.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remind me not to accept "facetime" requests from you.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    5. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      she told me you would say that.
      sent from my 10" netbook

    6. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honey, you're happy to see me!

      Nope. That's my phone.

    7. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, many women I know think they need more than a 5" one.
      But really, have they tested what's good for them?
      Everyone has different needs because everyone's experience and physical limitations
      vary significantly.
      Besides my wife is fine with the situation, it's a 2g iPhone.

    8. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four inches should be enough for anyone.

      The problem is because of you your wife thinks the current iPhone is 4". If she ever gets her hands on a ruler you're going to have a lot of explaining to do.

    9. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by 517714 · · Score: 2

      2g? Doesn't that make it iNcest?

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    10. Re:As I keep telling my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ronaldinho, is that you?

  8. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's a dumb idea. Like fucking Kathleen Fent without a rubber.

  9. iPod by argonaut · · Score: 1, Redundant

    A new iPod? Don't the current iPods run iOS as well?

    1. Re:iPod by mattventura · · Score: 1

      Only the iPod touch.

    2. Re:iPod by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I do believe that this is the only place outside of Apple's marketing material where I've seen someone write this product's official name, "iPod touch", rather than "iPod Touch", or worse, "iTouch". Good on you.

      Oh, and when I say, "Apple's marketing material", I'm including Gruber's web site.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  10. Irony by Crimson+Wing · · Score: 0

    Seems like I just read an article on Gizmodo not a month ago about how iPhones will never have more than a 3.5" display.

    --
    Sig? What's that? Oh, 'signature'...and it's supposed to be witty? Right...
  11. Didn't Samsung or HTC patent 4 inch screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Couldn't resist...

  12. It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't think it's crazy for Apple to make a larger iPhone if they see a demand for it. But I do think it would be crazy if they eliminated to pocket-sized version. Many men keep their iPhones in a pocket, and without a cover, it just barely works - depending on the pocket. A phone with a 4" screen would just not be easily pocketable. Sure men could get purses too and carry their phones in there. Then the increase in size wouldn't matter so much. But most won't, if the only advantage they gain is having bigger phone to use.

    This is making me think that Apple plans to split their iPhone market and introduce two simultaneous model lines, one bigger and one smaller. Yes, it's a little bit inelegant, but I'm sure they did their focus group research and decided that there is demand for this.

    1. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone with a 4" screen would just not be easily pocketable. Sure men could get purses too and carry their phones in there. Then the increase in size wouldn't matter so much. But most won't, if the only advantage they gain is having bigger phone to use.

      Funny, my phone has a 4" screen and slides quite easily into my pocket. It's also thin enough that I rarely even notice it's there unless I receive a call/txt. Oh wait, you iPhone zealots don't want a bigger screen because then it won't fit in your pocket after you slap a giant otterbox on it so you don't scuff it's "magica" exterior...

    2. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by poly_pusher · · Score: 2

      I have a Droid 3 with a 4 inch screen. It's keyboard makes it bulkier than most phones and way bulkier than an Iphone. It's very easily pocketable so any Iphone with a similar screen size will be even more so.

    3. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't understand why so many people here think a 4" screen is gigantic. Remember that screen size is measured on the diagonal. The current iPhone has a 3.5" screen; a 4" screen would be 14% bigger. Look at an iPhone 4 and you'll see that the display doesn't even take up the whole surface of the device (the bezel on the iPhone is in fact much larger than most other smartphones). Increasing it to 4" could just mean that the display takes up more of the front-face of the device: you wouldn't even have to make it bigger than the current iPhone. Besides, there are lots of Android phones with screens of 4" or more. They are not absurdly big, and plenty of people carry them around in their pockets.

      The headline should really read: "Rumour that next-gen iPhone may have incrementally larger display, similar to competing devices already doing well on the market". Not exactly a big deal, here.

    4. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      As others have noted, we're talking some really small pockets here if you can just barely fit an iPhone there. I carry a 4.3" phone (Galaxy S2) in my jeans pocket pretty much daily, and there's plenty of room left there.

      From this experience, as well as past one with iPhone 4 and Nexus One, I have concluded that screen size doesn't really matter for pocketability, so long as it's below 5" or so. What matters more is thickness (obviously) and weight (heavier phone pulls the pocket down more - ironically, it makes the smaller but heavier iPhone 4 less convenient to carry in the pocket than the larger but lighter SGS2)

    5. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by mirix · · Score: 4, Funny

      GP is obviously referring to his excessively tight hipster jeans.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    6. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Mah never got the phone in a pocket thing at least with good phones (I use a cheap free bee now so I don't care). You have nice shiny screen so you don't want it to get scratched. That rules out the keys/change pocket. I don't put anything in my back pocket because I'm both not crazy about pick pockets and b) don't want to sit my fat ass on it (both because it isn't comfortable and because said big ass is likely to break it). So that leaves the wallet pocket. That would be a pain tryng to keep the wallet (which is roughly the size of a smartphone) and said phone fitting in the pocket and getting the appropriate device out without accidentally pulling out the other one each time. So ... holster or craptacularly cheap (can you feel your phone bend when you dial a number? I can :-)) phone for me.

    7. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought your comment was funny, but I ain't riskin no karma on it :P

    8. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. As a samsung infuse owner, I must say that the iphone feels like a thick, heavy brick with a tiny screen now.

      That said, the infuse doesn't have quite as much battery life, so I would've preferred it to be very slightly thicker (it could still be a whole lot thinner than an iphone) and have a bigger battery. Then again, I was able to solve the battery life problem by getting a set of two spare batteries and an external battery charger for $20. Good luck doing that with an iphone. It really isn't a hassle at all, since most of my battery problems are from forgetting to plug in or not having time to charge, I can just swap when I'm home.

    9. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by makomk · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why so many people here think a 4" screen is gigantic.

      Possibly because Steve Jobs said it was and they haven't caught up with the times yet? If the iPhone 5 is released with a 4" screen, expect the complaints to disappear and be replaced with complaints that anything smaller than 4" is too small.

    10. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Robb · · Score: 1

      The Nokia N9 has a 3.9" screen and is same size as the iPhone so I can't imagine Apple coming out with anything much smaller.

    11. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      I carry my Evo 3D and my wallet in the same front pocket just fine (just like I did with my Evo 4G and iPhone 3GS before it). Maybe you're accidentally buying women's jeans with those absurdly tiny pockets?

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    12. Re:It would be dumb to replace the smaller one by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      No just my balls are so large they take up most the room in the crotch area.

  13. Didnt' this get released last month? by rjejr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Didnt' we just spend the last 6 months saying the iPhone 5 was going to have this screen? Or at least the iPhone 5 was definetly going to be released in October? Isn't this all getting to be a bit too much Apple speculation? At least the Apple iTV is a whole new project so maybe we can just speculate on that for a few months.

    1. Re:Didnt' this get released last month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about that, I'm already searching news about the iPhone 7 which should be available in 2014.

  14. iPad Pygmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It almost sounds more like a pocket sized iPad. Unless it's the long rumored iPhone without a home button which is the most likely option. They aren't likely to change the size so a longer screen size is the most likely and not a bigger overall phone.

    1. Re:iPad Pygmy by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It almost sounds more like a pocket sized iPad

      They should change the name, then. Maybe something more evocative of being pocket sized... Like iPod. Yeah, that'll get 'em lined up. Oh, but it's got a touch screen, too. Have to work that into the name, too, to make sure they know this isn't their un-hip older brother's iPod. We need to ask Marketing what to call it.

      iNtroducing: The iPod Fondle!

    2. Re:iPad Pygmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iNtroducing: The iPod Fondle!

      I bet this guy can't wait to upgrade!

      *runs*

  15. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by marcroelofs · · Score: 1

    Ask the guys left, right and in front of you. If you have an iPhone then statistically they will have an Android, based on salesfigures. iPhone is about 3 years delayed in features and not a real OS.

  16. Blasphemy by marcroelofs · · Score: 1

    He's hardly dead and already they start meddling with the _absolute truths_ according to the Messiah.

    1. Re:Blasphemy by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      He's hardly dead and already they start meddling with the _absolute truths_ according to the Messiah.

      Happens to every religion.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  17. Seriously?! by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a massive Apple fanboi and proud to admit it but, seriously, we're already posting articles about the iPhone 5? Really? It's literally a year away and we're already discussing it? Give it a damn rest!

    Not to mention the rumour is that the screen is for a _NEW_ iOS device. If you're going to rumour-monger, at least get the rumours right...

    Garbage like that is what gives good Apple fanbois like me a bad name...

    1. Re:Seriously?! by exomondo · · Score: 1

      but, seriously, we're already posting articles about the iPhone 5? Really? It's literally a year away and we're already discussing it?

      How long do you think it takes to design and build a new device? If Apple are building a new device to be sold next year (if it's the next iPhone and they fall back to their original schedule it's 7-8 months away) then the time when they would be beginning to order the components is now. Whether these rumors have any substance is another matter though, if they are going to a 4" iphone display that leaves questions about what the resolution would be.

    2. Re:Seriously?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only one thing to say: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVkH9Hgvda4
      (For the record: I am not interested in any device that doesn't at least replace its OS and boot code. [I don't ask when I want to physically modify it. I own the thing, Mr. Manufacturer, so fuck you.] Because if I can't automate my work away, it's worthless to me. I don't buy it as a hipster e-penis. So I have no interest in wasting my time with rigid-functionality cripple-gadgets.)

    3. Re:Seriously?! by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      "... screen is for a _NEW_ iOS device..."
      So you are saying that the iphone 5 is not a new IOS device? really?

      "... If you're going to rumour-monger, at least get the rumours right..."
      So you are admitting that you work for Apple, and have just given out forbidden information?
      Because unless you actually work for Apple, and are privy to their iphone5 plans, you are just as clueless as everybody else as to Apple's design plans for the iphone.

      "I'm a massive Apple fanboi and proud to admit it"
      I should have stopped reading at that point instead of falling for the obvious Troll. Oops.

    4. Re:Seriously?! by dabooda · · Score: 0

      I don't buy it as a hipster e-penis. So I have no interest in wasting my time with rigid-functionality cripple-gadgets.)

      THEN DON'T BUY IT!

      I don't see the value in a Louis Vutton wallet because in my opinion they look awful and are overly expensive for what they are. I don't, though, go around criticising people for having them. I just make my choice as a FREE CONSUMER and not buy one.

      I used to think Apple fanboys were preachy and annoying but they have nothing on the Andriod Ninnies that feel the need for everyone to have Android phones.

      --
      "Yeah Tommy, before Zee Germans get here ..."
    5. Re:Seriously?! by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      It's this or the other thing that's a year away: the US presidential election.

      Choose your poison.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    6. Re:Seriously?! by symbolset · · Score: 2

      I'm hearing May, which is like 6 months - not "literally a year". The 4s was a stopgap to get the Q4 trade because the fabs weren't ready with the quad-core chips and the hi-rez screens. Tegra 3 and other quad-core Android phones will be out at MWC in February and Apple can hardly wait 6 months after that if they want to stay a premium brand. Innovation in mobile is still accelerating (thank goodness!) Let's be thankful for competition.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:Seriously?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garbage like that is what gives good Apple fanbois like me a bad name...

      Garbage like that gives tech gossip columnists a bad name. Fanboyism is what gives fanboys a bad name.

      ("Fanboi"? Really? If you're not gay you might want to rethink that spelling.)

    8. Re:Seriously?! by djmurdoch · · Score: 2

      I'm hearing May, which is like 6 months - not "literally a year".

      He was using "literally" in the figurative sense.

    9. Re:Seriously?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to think Apple fanboys were preachy and annoying but they have nothing on the Android Ninnies that feel the need for everyone to have Android phones.

      Do not forget /. editors. Way to catch up with the UK last week

      and on ilounge as well but no they have to wait for this week to put it up because it is now on appleinsider.

      What is the point of putting up stories about the hipster item du jour if you are a week late?

    10. Re:Seriously?! by swb · · Score: 1

      Don't you think they work on multiple devices at once? I would assume that there are maybe 2-3 teams working on the future devices.

      I don't know how they split the workload, maybe there's some advanced R&D team working on $current_model+3, where they might actually be engaged with the suppliers who provide the technologies they want (retina display, etc), with an advanced prototype team working on $current+2, and some kind of final production group that finalizes the prototype and deals with release engineering.

      Or maybe each group sticks with their device through the actual release and then moves back to being advanced R&D.

      But either way, it's likely they have multiple pipelines running at once.

    11. Re:Seriously?! by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Heh, silly iFan's, having to wait a year for a new iDevice to come to market. Those in the Android camp have a new top of the line device coming out every few weeks.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    12. Re:Seriously?! by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Don't you think they work on multiple devices at once? I would assume that there are maybe 2-3 teams working on the future devices.

      Of course they would, what's your point?

    13. Re:Seriously?! by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Built-in iOS trackpad on the new 15" MBA?

  18. Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Articles like this are from an industry that wants to create disappointment with Apple products. It's pretty hard to be disappointed in non-existant products, but by trying to build anticipation and then having it be countered by Apples actual announcements they hope to cause negative feelings.

    1. Re:Misdirection by marcroelofs · · Score: 1

      So you say you were disappointed but that it wasn't Apple's fault. Wow, even the pope has less loyal followers.

  19. 4 inch is a piker...try the by bricko · · Score: 0

    Galaxy Note....with 5.2 inch screen and stylus. Now that is a phone.

    1. Re:4 inch is a piker...try the by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      Galaxy Note....with 5.2 inch screen and stylus. Now that is a phone.

      A stylus? A stylus? Were you in some sort of cryogenic storage? Check your calendar, dude - it's the 21st century already.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:4 inch is a piker...try the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, a stylus.

      Are you telling us that people here in the 21st centurey should not be expected to rise above finger painting? For note-taking? We're not all characters from Idiocracy, thanks very much.

      Business knows that it needs the stylus to make their fancy new i-devices useful, and all the big manufacturers are all stepping up to provide.

      Jobs is dead, so now the world can undergo some much needed cult de-programming and actually 'think different' for real.

    3. Re:4 inch is a piker...try the by Cyberllama · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suppose anytime you want to write something in your own handwriting or create some kind of art you do it by fingerpainting. After all, big fat sausage fingers are all you really need, right? Of course if you're like me, you get tired of washing paint off your fingers all day long and listening to bank tellers complain that they can't read the amount on your checks. That's why some crazy people are of the opinion that perhaps there are occasions when fingers aren't ideally suited to all the sorts of tasks you might want to perform on a piece of paper and/or a hand-held computing device based on a paper metaphor.

      Old devices had styli because the screens were resistive and needed pressure to register touches. Since pressure is a function of force per area, a smaller area (tip of the stylus vs tip of the finger) needs less force applied in order to register touches. It was a necessity that capacitive screens did away with by making fingertips practical.

      But just because they are no longer a necessity, doesn't mean they aren't actually still useful for some tasks. If you want to do artwork and or handwriting on a tablet, a stylus is still the best way to go. Just because a screen is capacitive like your iOS devices screen doesn't mean you can't use a stylus if and when it's the right tool for the job--you just need a capacitive stylus.

      If you weren't of a mind to do any handwriting/art on your tablet/phone whatever, then simply don't ever use the stylus. Continue using your fingers and you'll enjoy the same user experience you would with any other device. Having the extra choice won't hurt you.

    4. Re:4 inch is a piker...try the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stylus doesn't mean you have to go back to capacitive screens, just gives consumer another method of entry if they want it. Not everyone likes fat fingering a virtual keyboard, and using your finger to jot down stuff would be subpar if you could just use a stylus.

    5. Re:4 inch is a piker...try the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Styli? Ryli?

    6. Re:4 inch is a piker...try the by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Jobs is dead, so now the world can undergo some much needed cult de-programming and actually 'think different' for real.

      I think I might have to post that on Facebook....

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  20. So, in other words by EmagGeek · · Score: 0

    The new iPhone still won't have as large a screen or be as usable as my Android phone, which is a true 4G LTE phone as opposed to Apple's latest and greatest, cutting edge 3G phone that was obsolete 6 months before it was released.

    This isn't the phone you're looking for... you can go about your business... move along.

    1. Re:So, in other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Compensating much?

  21. Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Sensi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hitachi promotes a touch screen that's pressure sensitive. Are we finally going to see an iOS device that uses a stylus for note taking?

    I sure hope so. I've been waiting for years for such a device.

  22. Screen size isn't phone size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The screen could be 4" diagonal with a taller (thinner) aspect ratio and still fit in the 4/4S form factor.

    1. Re:Screen size isn't phone size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the "retina" display having such a high DPI, that might be a possibility. Although, that's not a very backward compatible option.

  23. If it's not AMOLED it'll be polarizing by tepples · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look at some of the things that aren't polarizing

    Except it's impossible to have an article about a new device with an LCD panel without it being polarizing, because polarizing is how LCDs work. In order for it not to be polarizing, it'd have to be AMOLED or something.

    1. Re:If it's not AMOLED it'll be polarizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which the new screen isn't, since it is described as near OLED power consumption, and not AMOLED in any way shape or form.

      If OP had read the article, we wouldn't even had had to have this discussion. Sheesh!!!!!!!!

    2. Re:If it's not AMOLED it'll be polarizing by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately, AMOLED devices require polarized filter to reduce reflection from the aluminium backplate behind the AMOLED layer. So they are polarizing too (easy to check - just rotate AMOLED-based phone while wearing polaroid glasses).

    3. Re:If it's not AMOLED it'll be polarizing by Polkyb · · Score: 1

      erm... no. I tried that on my Galaxy Sii and the wife's S wearing my polaroids... There's no polarised filter on either of those devices.

      --
      I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
    4. Re:If it's not AMOLED it'll be polarizing by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      There is. It might be that your wife's glasses are not really polaroids (my prescription glasses definitely are) and I can see my Galaxy S screen changing brightness as I rotate it. All OLED screens use polarizing filter to reduce glare.

  24. 3.5" is too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what she said.

    Seriously, 1.5" of the iPhone size is the top and bottom border used for what? Something to grip while it's in landscape mode?

  25. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask the guys left, right and in front of you. If you have an iPhone then statistically they will have an Android, based on salesfigures.
    iPhone is about 3 years delayed in features and not a real OS.

    Considering that iPhone is not an OS, you're correct on that point, anyways.

  26. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me as well...although I still think they can do it on the current hardware. But, a 4" writing tablet wouldn't be large enough, IMO. I'd love to see a purchased-separately stylus for the iPad 3. Don't see it happening, though.

  27. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're confused. You're comparing a phone model with an OS.

    iPhone is the most popular smartphone.
    iOS ships on more devices than Android.

  28. So the daily Jobs bowel movement posts keep comin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought we were done with those, but,
      every rumor,
      every idiosyncracy,
      every non-newsworthy, trivial, bieberite thing about it,
    is a front page /. post.

    The integrity of the process (yeah, I know, have I read /. lately) is in jeopardy. Please stop, before Netcraft gets involved.

  29. Re:apparently iphone 4S doesn't bring in enough hi by caitsith01 · · Score: 2

    Yep. I look forward to the front page stories about new alleged rumoured possible screen sizes for HTC, Nokia, Sony etc... oh wait, those won't get published. Because they're irrelevant and boring. Like this story.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  30. Steve Jobs - TEH VISIONARY!!!1!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs.. heh..

    >.. Steve took the opportunity to rip on bigger rivals, saying that making a phone so big "you can't get your hand around it" helps, but that "no one's going to buy that." - 16th July 2010.

    What a visionary.

  31. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RE: Stylus

    Will. Never. Happen.

  32. Not the Apple Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple is all about a consistent user experience. Changing the screen size of the iPhone is going to cause a lot of trouble for people used to the iPhone keyboard at its current size. Also, Apple seems to be of the opinion "if you want a bigger screen, buy an iPad!"

  33. bigger display means a bigger... by tyme · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tend to agree with John Gruber of Daring Fireball that all of these rumors of larger screen iPhones are just bullshit, except for one detail: a larger screen would mean a larger phone body, which would allow for a larger battery, and would give even longer battery life. Battery life is the name of the game in mobile devices, and the larger display would give Apple an opportunity to get an additional leg up on their competition. It would also be helpful to have more battery capacity if they were upgrading the iPhone to 4G, which seems to need a lot more power.

    While I tend to find Gruber's arguments about maintaining the dimensions of the UI by maintaining the dimensions and resolution of the display convincing, the change in dimensions of the iPhone interface going from a 3.5" to a 4" screen doesn't seem to be much of a concern. The greater concern is that the 4" screen is too large for many people to comfortably access the full screen with their thumb while holding the phone in the same hand (though that could be alleviated by narrowing the bezel around the screen).

    So, while I'd love to bet against the rumor mongers clamoring for a 4" display on the next iPhone, I think that it might actually happen. A 4G phone will need a bigger battery, and I think Apple would rather make the phone face larger, than make the phone thicker, and that make a 4" display an easy sell.

    --
    just a ghost in the machine.
    1. Re:bigger display means a bigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      a larger screen would mean a larger phone body, which would allow for a larger battery, and would give even longer battery life.

      One small problem, larger screens require more power to make them the same brightness. The iPad2 and the iPhone 4S have nearly identical chips in them, according to previous logic the iPad should have a whole lot more battery life.

    2. Re:bigger display means a bigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Larger screen = Larger battery
      Larger screen = Larger Wattage

      Do you see the irony in your comment?

  34. !iPhone5 by msauve · · Score: 1

    "It would be fairly safe to assume that the 4-inch display will be for the next iPhone â" the iPhone 5"

    Isn't is obvious? The 5" display is for the MacBook Mini.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  35. IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Cyberllama · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ""The IGZO technology is perfect in that it offers near-OLED power consumption while having a lower cost and thinness that is only 25% greater than OLED, based on our checks," said Jeffries analyst Peter Misek."

    So let me get this right. It's 25% thicker than OLED and uses MORE power, but it costs less to make. On the face of it, that doesn't seem like a very Appley component choice. On the other hand, getting high quality (Super) AMOLED screens means dealing with Samsung, something which Apple doesn't seem to want to do at the moment for silly grudge purposes. So the question becomes, "Does Apple want to sacrifice product quality in exchange for a small savings and sticking it to Samsung?"

    If Steve Jobs were still around, I'd say "Yes."--he had a well noted penchant for carrying a grudge to extremes. I'd like a bigger screen as much, or more than the next guy, but I'm not 100% sure how plausible this whole story seems to me in a post-Steve Apple era. On the other, other hand, it might have more to do with the fact that Samsung is too big to bully, and Apple likes to have total control over it's supply chains.

    1. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""The IGZO technology is perfect in that it offers near-OLED power consumption while having a lower cost and thinness that is only 25% greater than OLED, based on our checks," said Jeffries analyst Peter Misek."

      So let me get this right. It's 25% thicker than OLED and uses MORE power, but it costs less to make. On the face of it, that doesn't seem like a very Appley component choice.

      Unless they can actually make enough to ship the best selling smartphone with it. Which they couldn't with OLED.

    2. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " IGZO [...] display's reaction speed can be more swiftly controlled. In doing so, panel makers will be able to offer screen resolutions higher than the current Full High Definition."

    3. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      "Appley component choice"

      Jobs is dead, same thing happened when Jobs was booted, we ended up with very large very bloated very confusing era of apple that no one cared to understand, solely surviving on educational contracts, a few fanboi's and a few power apps that apple workstations could deliver

      Jobs came back and we got cute little all in ones that looked good on your desk, and sexy towers to represent power, we got handheld devices that were not the size of a sheet of paper and less power than a IIGS (though fuck jobs on the IIGS that should have been released much sooner), Apple people are about bigger better and beefier, it was Jobs and his asshole making things sleek sexy and appealing to the masses.

      Though this time he is not coming back.

    4. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Notice they don't say if it has OLED picture quality. It could very well be a very poor quality screen.

    5. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple uses many Samsung parts already in the iPhone 4s, and iPad

    6. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by nightfell · · Score: 1

      Except that OLED screens are relatively shit in terms of image quality.

      Apple still buys plenty of components from Samsung.

    7. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      There may have been a time when that was true (and not just a rumor about why they chose IPS for the iPad), but I doubt it's the case anymore.

    8. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      There were only 2 Samsung components in the iPhone 4, and the 4s is down to just 1--the A5 processor itself (the flash memory is Hynix). I'm sure in the long run Apple probably wants to find an alternate supplier for the processor as well, but TI's offerings aren't as impressive atm.

    9. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 4s is down to just 1. Maybe that's just normal market forces at play, but the flash memory is now made by Hynix.

    10. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Jobs was booted the company became more profitable. It was only after Sculley was removed and it was discovered that you could not put lipstick on a pig to make it more attractive that Apple's failure to update the OS found it giving back all profits made up to that point that threatened the comapny's survival.

    11. Re:IGZO doesn't sound very impressive to me by nightfell · · Score: 1

      And that doesn't support your thesis that Apple would use inferior technology simply to stick it to Samsung. After all, if IGZO was so bad, they could just use IPS displays from other companies.

      Their decision to go with IGZO over IPS or AMOLED is based on tradeoffs with the various technologies. The reason they are rumored to be going with IGZO is one primary reason: yield.

      In order to make a retina display for the iPad (what initiated their interest in IGZO), they need to go with IGZO, as it's currently the best option for high density displays at the sizes and volumes Apple needs. This is the first I've heard about it for an iPhone, but it does have the benefit of being thinner than the current display, and it further utilized the investment they've made on the iPad side, which is one of Tim Cook's trademark skills.

  36. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

    The device you are looking for is a Samsung Galaxy Note. I've been waiting for something like it ever since my Palm Vx passed away years ago ;(

  37. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    You can buy a capacitive stylus and it will work just fine if all you want it for is *note taking*. The only reason you need true pressure sensitivity is for art purposes--where you can control the thickness of a line, for instance, by how hard you press. There are any number of companies who are currently extremely eager to sell you a stylus for an iPad or iPad 2--just look for them and you'll find them.

  38. Re:So the daily Jobs bowel movement posts keep com by symbolset · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's a submit story link on every page. Want better content? Click it.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  39. its actually not for the iphone, its for this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=j1G2O85jlIQ#!

  40. Re:So the daily Jobs bowel movement posts keep com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what this has to do with CoSO4 . 7H2O (bieberite) http://webmineral.com/data/Bieberite.shtml

  41. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by Zorque · · Score: 1

    Look on Ebay for a Newton, sounds right up your alley!

  42. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    The only reason you need true pressure sensitivity is for art purposes--where you can control the thickness of a line, for instance, by how hard you press.

    You say that as if it's a smaller market than basic written note taking.

    You're also not thinking about all the potential uses developers will find for such functionality. One off the top of my head would be to press harder to write in bold -- much quicker and more intuitive than toggling the bold button at the edge of the screen.

  43. Well you're modded to oblivion already by symbolset · · Score: 1

    But the answers are "quad core, SDHC, HDMI 1080p, porn apps, Flash, keyboard, kickstand, smartbook dock, Tegra 3" and of course the golden "choice of form factors and prices".

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Well you're modded to oblivion already by mattventura · · Score: 1

      I've never understood the obsession with hdmi ports on phones. I have never once felt the need to connect my phone to a TV, and I certainly don't carry around an HDMI cable with my phone. Also, even adobe is phasing out flash on smartphones, so android won't even have that "feature" much longer.

    2. Re:Well you're modded to oblivion already by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My kids get a big kick out of doing YouTube and Angry Birds on the big screen. Now and then I get a customer with an HDTV in the conference room I can do a slide presentation on or refer to PDF documents with, from my phone. It only takes one million-dollar deal to make it worthwhile and then some for my company, my smartphone and me, so today we're money ahead. I bring the laptop and projector anyway because I'm a boy scout and believe in being prepared - but if it's there I use it. Believe it or not having the phone that does that sells the completely unrelated SAN or network or server technology better than its specs does. It's probably cynical to exploit this, but whatever. The geeks selling the good gear have the good gear, so it may be a legitimate bias. People don't buy rockets from Ford, generally.

      It also helps to not be dishing retro crap, but that's on point for neither your comment nor TFA.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  44. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by symbolset · · Score: 1

    This. Apple will never sell a phone or tablet that uses a stylus.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  45. Re:apparently iphone 4S doesn't bring in enough hi by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Yes, but at least we were informed of a new release of Linux Mint!

    Oh, and that Firefox added another integer to their hourly release cycle!

    There are going to be lots of stories that don't interest people on an news aggregation and discussion site.

  46. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Linux is a computer, right? ;)

    You might want to check your terminology before dispensing statistics.

  47. Big whoop by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I've had a FIVE inch screen for over a year. But, of course, the iDrones will stand in line for an extra .5"

  48. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by marcroelofs · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but you all know what I mean. Since the AC said "Why the FUCK would anyone buy an android P.O.S. when the iPhone 5 is just around the corner?", thus comparing Android with iPhone, I stayed in the same line.

    Anyway, according to http://www.macrumors.com/2011/11/15/android-tops-50-share-of-smartphone-sales-but-apple-still-dominating-profits, your numbers are incorrect. "Popular' in my book means 'best sold', and every sold iOS there are 3 Androids, hence my example.

    So, to paraphrase the AC: Why the FUCK would anyone buy an iPhone P.O.S. when an Android is already better NOW than the next iPhone?

  49. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by marcroelofs · · Score: 1

    For the record, tell that to the AC

    And there are more Linux's installed than Mac's ;-)

  50. While we're speculating by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Are you sure it's for a phone?

    Maybe Apple is planning an iPad Mini ? Or say a "book style" unit with 2 separate 4" display panels, intended for use as an e-reader.

    In any case, with a display larger than the iPhone, but without the iPad 2's bulkiness.

    1. Re:While we're speculating by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Well Samsung just came out with the Galaxy player which are 4 and 5 inch Galaxy S(esq) devices meant to compete with the iPod touch. I say "esq" because they it seems as they don't have Super AMOLED screens.

  51. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Ah, so now it's the quantity = better side of the coin, now that we're not comparing Windows to Linux installs ;)

    I kid, I kid.

  52. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by Kotoku · · Score: 1

    iOS most certainly does not ship on more devices. The iPhone is the most popular single device but Android is in use far more overall.

    http://mashable.com/2011/09/26/android-sales-2-to-1-iphone/

  53. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by mysidia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The iPad display is already capable of pressure sensitivity. Ten-one design/makers of Pogo sketch showed off a demo of using pressure sensitivity for sketching and "palm rejection" back in 2010.

    The problem is apparently iPad app developer's aren't allowed to access pressure sensitivity information, because no interface has been exposed by the iOS official APIs.

    Until Apple chooses to include it in the API, no 3rd party apps will be able to leverage the functionality, because it would require using 'private frameworks' which is against Apple's rules that app store applications must follow for approval by Apple.

  54. iPad Mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this "unnamed iOS device" isn't for the iPhone 5 (yet) but instead for what is now known as the iPod Touch, which I suspect will soon be called the iPad Mini or something like that before long. I certainly could see how this ends up being a 4" 1280X720 screen for such a device.

  55. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it.

    I doubt it highly.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  56. Its the atv3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No... not the iPhone 5, nor iTouch, nor iPad Nano... this is the Apple TV sj was working on... no longer just a settop box, its a dedicated mobile video and gaming device (or mobile settop box) designed to compete with the Sony Vita.

  57. Apple may be a prima donna, but by caywen · · Score: 0

    but they aren't dumb enough not to completely ignore market forces. Android phones with screen sizes greater than 4" have been selling like crazy. There are rumors that the HTC Titan (a Windows Phone) with a massive 4.7" display, amazingly enough, have been selling far better than expected. The reviewers don't seem to mind - they seem to gloss over or overlook the large screen size impact on form factor. The consumers don't seem to mind - they seem to eat it up. I'm sure this had some small factor in the decision-making (if TFA is actually true).

    Will they increase the resolution? Probably not - small, incremental jumps in resolution just tend to tick off developers. So, why increase the screen size at all? It feels like they are following their marketing noses on this one.

  58. I surely hope not! by fadir · · Score: 1

    I like that the iPhone display is smaller than the gigantic Android displays. My hands are not the biggest and I can use the iPhone with one hand. No longer if the screen is getting significantly bigger.

  59. Remote control or gaming device controller? by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's for a gaming device controller? They may have built on Nintendo's Wii U idea and combined it with Kinect's voice control.

    It would be amazing to control TV with a multi-touch enabled remote control .. Actually even with an iPad would be cool. And of course the Piece de Resistance would be decent natural language voice control.

    "TV, record tomorrow's yankees game" "TV, record HBO in the background" "TV, remind me to change stations when Modern Marvels start" "TV, flip back to the game when the commercials end" "TV, discovery channel" ... etc. etc. the possiblilities are endless.

  60. That would be the only way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using a thinner aspect ratio. I measured the diagonal on my 4S, the max size screen with the same aspect ratio one could use before bumping into the antennae is roughly 3-13/16" ( or 3.8125"). Unlike everyone else I won't speculate, it will be interesting to see what Apple does, and I'll buy the second iteration of the upcoming phone.

  61. Great... by Deathnerd · · Score: 1

    Another resolution I have to design for when doing app designs... *re-edits his templates*

  62. SlashDot Fanbois and Fandroids... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    ...appear to have a huge OCD display.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  63. A 4" iPhone ? Only over Steve Jobs Dead Body! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too soon ?

  64. Next Apple iPhone To Have a 4 Inch Display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good news! Thanks for sharing.

    www.large-battery.com

  65. iPad 3? It's bad when editors don't even read shit by LocalH · · Score: 1

    Hitachi & Sony working with Apple on 4-inch iOS device, iPad 4 to see new display technology

    Hitachi and Sony are reported to have teamed up to supply Apple with 4-inch LCD displays for an unspecified iOS device that will hit the market in 2012. Meanwhile, Apple is also said to be working on a fundamentally distinct display technology for the iPad 4.

    Meanwhile, macotakara.jp also cites the same sources as saying that an unspecified Taiwanese company will soon be "providing LCD technology faces" to Apple for a "fundamentally changed" iPad 4 that will be manufactured by a new process.

    The only mention of the iPad 3 is a reference to a WSJ article.

    --
    FC Closer
  66. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by catmistake · · Score: 1

    iOS most certainly does not ship on more devices.

    Let's see... Android ships on... (1) smartphones (2) tablets (3) netbooks = 3 devices

    and... iOS ships on (1) iPhone (2) iPad (3) iPod Touch (4) AppleTV = 4 devices

    Appears that iOS ships on one more device than Android.

  67. I don't think so. by Amiralul · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1. Re:I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I have owned the htc evo 4g w/ a massive 4.3 inch screen since it came out. I'm a fairly standard 6 foot American male, And I can touch every inch of the screen with my thumb, this is the most ridiculous FUD I think I have ever seen.

  68. Unjustified complaints by robi5 · · Score: 1

    A lot of commenters assume the phone would be linearly wider. But the curreni Iphone case could roughly accomodate a 4" screen by eliminating borders on the side. And then we haven't considered a different aspect ratio; a 5" screen may fit in easily.

  69. Re:Is that really much different? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    Wonder which fucking idiot marked you as redundant. People just get all excited over nothing. Bah, a bunch of sheep

  70. Apple Product Cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm somewhat astonished this isn't posted yet, so just for good measure:

    "An obscure component manufacturer somewhere in the Pacific Rim announces a major order for some bleeding-edge piece of technology..."

    http://www.misterbg.org/AppleProductCycle/

  71. I have tiny hands, seriously small. by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and I still switched to Android partially because of the availablility of 4.3" screens, they are SO much better.

    Yes yes I know pixel resolution blah, however they are still quite competent screens. Infact I'll go as far as to say, the reason people think the iphone 4 screen is so good (it is) is heightened due to the 3G and 3GS being so bad.
    No seriously, plug the specs in to a calculator, the 3G/S screen is AWFUL.

    I have 800x480 on my 4.3" screen and yes the iphone looks better at fine stuff but mine still looks fantastic and it's big, nice and big. If I was a public transport user, this is actually an acceptable size to catch simpsons or southpark etc on in the morning on my phone.

    While I'm at it,........ the iphone has only ONE button, all the other buttons MUST be drawn on the damn screen. Options, back, etc - all on the main screen. You might be used to it but I've trained myself off it now, I think the one button philosophy is an utter joke. 4 buttons is not unmanagable in the slightest. This frees up even MORE real estate - and it's consistent (hello apple!) because I can find my options (menu) button in the same location /EVERY/ time.

    Best technical decision I've made in years. Iphone 3 -> 3GS -> 4 -> 4.3" Android phone, never, ever going back. â(TM)¥

  72. The Button Is Going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cannot see the form factor changing - would be a massive upheaval with so many docking stations etc.. no longer fitting etc.. but I can see them dropping the button and going 100% screen.

  73. apple./. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Late with the news for nerds.

    Weren't you tipped off about this about Thursday last week?

  74. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

    I'm probably nitpicking a much too subtle joke, but it's a bit disingenuous to count the iPhone and Ipod Touch as different devices, since one is just an iPhone without the phone part, basically. And Android also ships on media players such as Egreat R200S, so it's at best a tie between them.

  75. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    You're still confusing phones and OSs. I said:

    "iPhone is the most popular smartphone.
    iOS ships on more devices than Android."

    You're disputing the second of those statements. The one that deals with OSs. But your link doesn't include iPod touches or iPads. As I said iOS ships on more devices than Android.

  76. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Despite the use of the word "device" in the title of the chart, that analysis is only of smartphones, and doesn't include iPad or iPod touch, which are both iOS devices.

    Here's the primary source.
    http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-u-s-market-new-smartphone-buyers-increasingly-embracing-android/

  77. This is SO revolutionary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see Apple finally pushing the limits of technology. So when will they file for their patent on 4" displays?

  78. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Note that the current iPod touch is a year old and so most closely matches the iPhone 4, rather than the current iPhone 4S. Even then there are differences besides the lack of telephony. Memory is 256MB vs 512MB. The rear camera 0.7 MegaPixel vs 5 MegaPixel. And it lacks GPS and compass.

    As a result it has a different PCB and comes in a smaller and lighter package. It is a different device, it's not just the same device with a component missing.

  79. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    iPhone : a range of devices by one company

    Android : an operating system used by many companies to produce many ranges of competing devices some of them phones

    iOS : an operating system used by one company on almost all of it's current product range .... These are not directly comparable in any meaningful way....

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  80. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    They are comparable so long as care is taken to compare like with like.

    iPhone is comparable with a specific phone series from another manufacturer. Such as the Samsung Galaxy (Galaxy A, Galaxy S, Galaxy SII etc.)

    Android is comparable with iOS, provided all devices that each OS is shipped on is included, phones, tablets, media players, set top boxes etc.

    Incidentally, iOS isn't on "almost all of Apple's product range". Macs ship with OSX. They are related, but they're also significantly different.

  81. Marketing is why Apple can't have a larger display by danbob999 · · Score: 0

    They put all their marketing effort into pushing the idea that what mattered was the pixel density. So even if they can't put a larger display in the current case (which would make a better phone from any point of view), their marketing department would be against the idea since it would lower the pixel density. They could also double the resolution again but that will be too expensive for a while.

  82. Use filters! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Go into your account settings and use those filters!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  83. Re:So the daily Jobs bowel movement posts keep com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From your link:
    Bieberite: Color: Pinkish red, Flesh pink.

    How oddly appropriate. Even naughty. A dash of color. Some excitement.

    Unlike smooth monochrome devices for sheeple who are happy talking to a bar of soap.

  84. Re:So the daily Jobs bowel movement posts keep com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought we were done with those, but, every rumor, every idiosyncracy, every non-newsworthy, trivial, bieberite thing about it, is a front page /. post.

    The integrity of the process (yeah, I know, have I read /. lately) is in jeopardy. Please stop, before Netcraft gets involved.

    This is Slashdot, a division of Apple. What would you expect?

  85. missed market opportunity by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    If you sell a tablet that uses a stylus, you have a built in repeat market for replacement styluses. You just need to include some built in RFID dohickey to enforce lock-in in your design.

    Think Marketing.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  86. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by drummerboybac · · Score: 1

    Sure about that?

  87. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

    In that case, Conwon D3 is one example of an Android media player, and a very good one going by the reviews. Android wins again! /jk

  88. Actually, it would be 30% larger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked, a screen has 2 dimensions, so the important measurement is area. ;-)

  89. Because (btw) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (4 / 3.5)^2 = ~1.3 times larger

  90. DUUUUHHHHHHH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be fairly safe to assume that the 4-inch display will be for the next iPhone

    Safe in that you likely wouldn't get physically harmed by making such a claim... but not "fairly safe" in that it seems clear to be true. How many times are we going to hear rumors before we stop believing them?

  91. Re:apparently iphone 4S doesn't bring in enough hi by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    Plus their conclusion is so obviously wrong. This is plainly destined for the new macbook air mini.

  92. Disappointed at iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bought an iphone last year but it often doesn't work well.
    Disappointed at its quality!

    www.large-battery.com

  93. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    Just because macrumors made a mistake, doesn't mean you can use that mistake as your "evidence".

    Macrumors wrote iOS when they meant iPhones.

    If you are comparing Android the operating system, please compare it to iOS the operating system.

    http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-15/tech/29997318_1_ios-android-google says 130 mil devices in July 2011
    http://www.unwiredview.com/2011/06/06/apple-ios-stats-200-million-devices-sold-25-million-ipads-14-billion-apps-downloaded-and-more/ says 200 mil devices in Jun 2011

    Can you teach me how 130:200 can be turned into 3:1 ?

    Thank you very much.

  94. Re:Hitachi Makes a Touch Screen That's Pressure Se by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    That Ten One Design video doesn't say how it's done. I'm guessing it measures the size of the touch area. That's not the same as genuine pressure sensitivity that you can get from something like a Wacom stylus. I'm guessing that's also why Apple are keeping it as a private API -- it probably doesn't work as well as they would like it to.

  95. Re:Thanks for the reminder! by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    The problem is people are not careful, often deliberately so ...

    Most Apple favouring bias it to one manufacturer and the US, and Apple is top

    Most Android favouring bias it to all Android devices and Europe, and Android is top

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  96. hmm this is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""The IGZO technology is perfect in that it offers near-OLED power consumption while having a lower cost and thinness that is only 25% greater than OLED, based on our checks," said Jeffries analyst Peter Misek."

    So let me get this right. It's 25% thicker than OLED and uses MORE power, but it costs less to make. On the face of it, that doesn't seem like a very Appley component choice. On the other hand, getting high quality (Super) AMOLED screens means dealing with Samsung, something which Apple doesn't seem to want to do at the moment for silly grudge purposes. So the question becomes, "Does Apple want to sacrifice product quality in exchange for a small savings and sticking it to Samsung?"

    If Steve Jobs were still around, I'd say "Yes."--he had a well noted penchant for carrying a grudge to extremes. I'd like a bigger screen as much, or more than the next guy, but I'm not 100% sure how plausible this whole story seems to me in a post-Steve Apple era. On the other, other hand, it might have more to do with the fact that Samsung is too big to bully, and Apple likes to have total control over it's supply chains. iphone