Slashdot Mirror


Making a Privacy Monitor From an Old LCD

ryzvonusef writes "Instructables Member 'Dimovi' utilized a spare LCD monitor and converted it into a 'privacy' monitor. He took apart the monitor's plastic frame, cutting out the polarized film with a utility knife and removed the film adhesive from the glass panel before reassembling the monitor, which now shines a bright white regardless of what is actually being displayed on the screen. He then removed the lenses from a pair of theater 3D glasses, and replaced it with the polarized film he had just removed from the monitor. Now, he is the only one who can see what he is doing on his computer."

185 comments

  1. Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Very interesting hack. It would be perfect for laptops that are used while travelling (watching pr0n during your flight?).
    I wonder how easy or difficult it would be to hack a notebook screen.

    lol, captcha: decency

    1. Re:Great hack. by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      A notebook screen should be fundamentally the same.

      As for the idea of watching porn during an airplane flight... the image on the screen is only the beginning of why doing that is frowned upon.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Great hack. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Very interesting hack. It would be perfect for laptops that are used while travelling (watching pr0n during your flight?).
      I wonder how easy or difficult it would be to hack a notebook screen.

      But wouldn't anyone with a pair of polarizing sunglasses be able to see your screen?

      I don't know enough about such things to know. I lent out my copy of Newton's Optics, and I keep my polarized sunglasses in a secret compartment I cut into the Enumeration of Lines of the Third Order.

      Anyway, leave me alone. I'm trying to kill Al Ghul and bang Talia without having to squat in the Lazarus Pit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Great hack. by satuon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Earphones have already solved the audio side of the problem.

    4. Re:Great hack. by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      I wonder how easy or difficult it would be to hack a notebook screen

      A little harder than a monitor I would think. Notebooks aren't easy to get apart and back together again.

    5. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for the last part, are there really laws against hiring exotic danceres to work on your airline as stewardasses? I don't think so. And for that matter, whose laws do you have to obey in the air?

    6. Re:Great hack. by Matheus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not that hard... I've done it several times (the dis-assembly/re-assembly part... not the screen hack)

      It helps significantly if you have the assembly manual but not required.

    7. Re:Great hack. by pulski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be willing to bet that the minute someone on an airplane sees you staring at an all white screen for any period of time there will be an Air Marshal tapping you on the shoulder.

    8. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      head phones would be required... but why would you want to on a plain in the first place...
      No elbow room sandwiched between two other passengers. Save it on your phone and use the bathroom like everyone else.

    9. Re:Great hack. by Dynetrekk · · Score: 1

      As for the idea of watching porn during an airplane flight... the image on the screen is only the beginning of why doing that is frowned upon.

      I like the idea. Personally, I often carry a polarizer in a back pocket. Now, I have yet another reason.

    10. Re:Great hack. by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      It helps significantly if you have the assembly manual but not required.

      I won't disassemble or reassemble any laptop that wasn't my own, for love nor money, unless I've got a manual... which pretty much limits that to Dell machines (LOVE their documentation online) or Apple computers (due solely to the existence of iFixit), but that's just IME, of course.

      Granted, when I first attempted tearing apart and repairing laptops (It's a computer, how hard could it be!), I either was unable to fix them, or ended up making the problem worse, or ended up with "extra" screws, or whatever. It's been many years, though. Perhaps newer machines are more friendly on the inside... but I somehow doubt it :P

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    11. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which laws do apply during flight depends...on many things, but the general rule is that while in flight the laws of the country of registration of the plane apply. For commercial flight not registered in the same country as the commercial operator of the flight, the operator country's laws do apply. This matters for what happens between the passengers inside the plane.

      The above statement is, obviously, overly simplified, since many things can complicate matters. For example the flight could be leased in a country to an operator dry renting or wet renting it to people/operators in other countries, the flight could be overflying some country which refuses to sign certain international treaties(or such a country could be the one of the mentioned leasers, owners, operators, renters etc.), also being in sovereign country's air or international waters does make a difference.

      It's a whole convoluted matter. most of the time more than one country laws do apply, sometimes for example the operator country laws apply regarding civil matter, but both the operator's and overflown country laws apply regarding penal matte(Except the USA most countries have just these two categories, no "federal" matter). There have been situations where even the country of the single passengers or passenger's corporate countries have been important(it has been tried to avoid country laws by signing contracts on board of planes operated by companies in fiscal heaven countries. Usually this kind of trick will not work)

    12. Re:Great hack. by ebolaZaireRules · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Umm... have you actually disassembled an Laptops LCD screen?
      after taking the actual display out of the case, don't be fooled by thinking that thin == simple.
      There are about 7 separate paged layers sandwiched into metal bezel... not actually hard to deal with, but if you dislodge one, you can destroy your screen (all the electronic connections are from 1 edge of the screen - the top, when I did it).
      Putting it back together was a bit difficult... the backlight shines up through the screen, and it took me a dozen tries to get it to the point where the screen was usable.

      It was a very fiddly job overall.... especially when in the end it was so easy to resolder the CCL that was attached to the bezel (I didn't need to dissassemble the display at all)...

      Mind you, the laptop in question is the better part of 10 years old, so you have an easier time of it.

      good luck...

      --
      The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
    13. Re:Great hack. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Yes, although they might have to tilt their head to get the polarization of their sunglasses oriented correctly in relation to the polarization of the screen.

    14. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am more surprised by the number of people here who do not seem to be concerned about collaborative work and sharing information with other people. Nobody here works with anybody else? errrm... never mind. Not *that* surprised.

    15. Re:Great hack. by Imagix · · Score: 1

      Except for those other people who have done the same thing to their LCD?

    16. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an easy enough solution to that. Write up a fake, but believable NDA. Keep documents or code which would be covered by the fake NDA up so that if an air marshal gets suspicious you can "make an exception" and show them.

    17. Re:Great hack. by Khyber · · Score: 5, Funny

      At which point you go "National Security. If you had the security clearance, you'd have the glasses to see past the security layer. Good day, sir."

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    18. Re:Great hack. by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      It would be perfect for laptops that are used while travelling (watching pr0n during your flight?).

      Flight attendant to other flight attendant: "The in-flight movie isn't in 3D. I wonder why all these passengers have 3D glasses on..."

    19. Re:Great hack. by Jeng · · Score: 2

      Now you can find lots of online videos of people dis-assembling smartphones and laptops.

      Youtube, it's for more than just stupid kitten videos now.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    20. Re:Great hack. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      entirely depends on the originating state of the airline. You obey that country's laws.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    21. Re:Great hack. by eliphalet · · Score: 1

      The main user would have to keep his/her head properly aligned. Sounds uncomfortable.

    22. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In singapore, you just close the door

      http://www.geek.com/articles/geek-cetera/private-airplane-suite-includes-bed-armchair-and-gadgets-20100731/

    23. Re:Great hack. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Pal, I do maintenance. Big stuff, small stuff, and everything in between. Electronics, hydraulics, electrical, heating, cooling, servo motors - you name it. If we take something apart, and put it back together, and we DO NOT HAVE any left over parts, we know that we've screwed up.

      Once in awhile, we have to open the patient back up, to put one or more of those spare parts where it belongs, but that doesn't happen very often.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:Great hack. by 117 · · Score: 2

      HP are pretty good with this kind of information now, too (and not just for laptops). There's a wealth of information and videos in their 'Customer Self Repair' section online here: http://h20464.www2.hp.com/index.html

    25. Re:Great hack. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Earphones don't solve the problem either.

      Here's a clue: Why do men like to view porn movies? And what do they usually do while watching them?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    26. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a clue: Why do men like to view porn movies? And what do they usually do while watching them?

      Enjoy an erection in one of many possible ways, or laugh at the plot and acting. Or be disappointed with the dreadful plot and acting. Or watch Caligula.

    27. Re:Great hack. by durrr · · Score: 2

      Before you do something stupid, know that there's polarizing filters for DSLR cameras, so not only would you risk being seen by people with polarizing glasses, you'd risk being photographed watching midget porn in public too. And in the picture it would look like you're doing it in a totally shameless manner too, not through invisible glasses.

    28. Re:Great hack. by mikael · · Score: 2

      You could get the maintenance manual for Sony Vaio laptops. So far, I've replaced the screen, the keyboard, the folding screen LCD-switch-latch circuit board, the hard disk drive (upgrades), memory (upgrade), CPU cooling fan assembly.

      Just about every computer repair shop wouldn't go as far as trying to replace a screen.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    29. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For my HP and Lenovo laptops finding the maintenance manuals was very easy.

    30. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do men like to view porn movies?

      Men watch porn movies for the plots and read porn magazines for the articles. Everyone knows that.

    31. Re:Great hack. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Lenovo's service manuals are also pretty easy to find. One of the many reasons why I always recommend Thinkpads.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    32. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earphones don't solve the problem either.

      Here's a clue: Why do men like to view porn movies? And what do they usually do while watching them?

      Do some research.

      Invite your boyfriend over to watch porn and observe, question, Dutch Rudder.

    33. Re:Great hack. by eggfoolr · · Score: 1

      There's audio?

    34. Re:Great hack. by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      In theory, yes. All he's done is removed the static polarizing filter from the display, and placed it in his glasses. As such, he needs to be precisely aligned to get proper color reproduction, Anyone else similarly aligned can see exactly what he sees. Alternatively, for a good time, take LSD and spin the monitor.

    35. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks a lot bin laden.

    36. Re:Great hack. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      Very interesting hack. It would be perfect for laptops that are used while travelling (watching pr0n during your flight?).

      Funny you should mention that given this story was published in CNN today! There might be a market for these things.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    37. Re:Great hack. by repvik · · Score: 1

      You will discover the qualities of porn audio when you move out of your mothers basement. Either that, or buy a pair of headphones and a lock.

    38. Re:Great hack. by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      Like David Cross, I can wait 5 or 6 hours until I'm in the cab on the way to my hotel...

    39. Re:Great hack. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      As for the idea of watching porn during an airplane flight... the image on the screen is only the beginning of why doing that is frowned upon.

      Earphones have already solved the audio side of the problem.

      Joke I know, but does *anyone* seriously watch porn with the sound turned up anyway?

      99% of it is unbearably badly dubbed (and cheesy, and unconvincing) crap that totally ruins the illusion. Urgh.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    40. Re:Great hack. by Meski · · Score: 1

      Is that a polariser in your pocket, or ....

      You *do* know that a lot of sunglasses contain polarisers, so your neighbour on the plane might get the action as well? Observe what happens with some monitors viewed through sunglasses when you've got the monitor in portrait, others seem to have it twisted 45degrees so as not to black it out whichever way it is.

    41. Re:Great hack. by Meski · · Score: 1

      When will I read ahead? :)

      There doesn't seem to be a standard (even within manufacturers) for which way the polarisation goes.

    42. Re:Great hack. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Of course not. You could have an expensive 3D TV and buy cheaper glasses meant for a cheaper 3D TV set or even from another manufacturer if there was.

    43. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (blank screen)
      fap fap fap fap..

      Yeah, problem completely solved.

    44. Re:Great hack. by ormondotvos · · Score: 1

      Any reason why polarized sunglasses worn by the guy behind you wouldn't translate the screen?

    45. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like one of those "it was a good idea at the time" what if someone is wearing sunglasses? Depending on the material used in the lenses of the sun glasses would this person not also be able to see the LCD monitor?

    46. Re:Great hack. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Older Thinkpads always had LCDs with very narrow viewing angles so that the person sat next to you couldn't read the screen without blatantly leaning over and alerting you to their voyeurism. I don't know if you could combine a narrow viewing angle with this hack.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Great hack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning :

      You will NOT be able to avoid getting dust between the layers if you open up an LCD.
      Been there, done that, not doing it again...

      Even the minutest of dust specles will be highly visible once you power up the display again. Blowing dust off with compressed air just charges electrostaticaly the surface so that it attracts more dust.

      Do this only in a clean room

  2. the down side by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool and clever hack. But it assumes that what you're displaying on the screen is more embarrassing than being seen wearing 3D glasses. An easier solution would be to just never let anyone into your lair.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:the down side by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Cool and clever hack. But it assumes that what you're displaying on the screen is more embarrassing than being seen wearing 3D glasses. An easier solution would be to just never let anyone into your lair.But then you'd have to hoover the Cheeto crumbs from under your Command Throne yourself.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:the down side by DC2088 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Doctor wore 3D glasses and then saved the universe. There's nothing to discuss here.

    3. Re:the down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since the film would be basically clear because it's polarization that does the work, he could apply the film to any regular pair of glasses, not something that looked like it came from a 3D movie theatre. If he normally wears glasses, he might have a regular pair and a computer pair. I do. A pair of bifocals for distance and reading, usually used when driving, and a pair for working with the computer and reading.

      Anyway, the polarization film applied to a regular pair of glasses wouldn't look any more out of place than any other pair of glasses.

    4. Re:the down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the time it wore those glasses he "merely" save humans from our robotic cousins... and the Daleks for good mesure.
      BUT
      Those were 'color 3D' glasses, not sunglasses to be worn in a dark room...

      Posting anonymous for pedentic tone :P

    5. Re:the down side by JustOK · · Score: 2

      yah, but a what cost? They weren't Rose coloured-glasses

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:the down side by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Nope, any proper polarized glasses would work here. For example, polarized sun glasses.

    7. Re:the down side by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Roomba...

    8. Re:the down side by tverbeek · · Score: 2

      Because polarization involves filtering out all of the light except the waves of a certain angle, they will inevitably look darker than Plain Old Glasses.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    9. Re:the down side by DC2088 · · Score: 1

      Ouuucccchhhh.

    10. Re:the down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. You don't need to use 3D glasses.

    11. Re:the down side by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      And being that my regular glasses are already polarized...

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    12. Re:the down side by Pope · · Score: 1

      But were they Rose-scented glasses? This is important!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    13. Re:the down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem on this end is that the polarization might run in the wrong direction on your current glasses. You may have to tilt your head at an angle to see clearly. At least by making your own glasses, you can make sure to apply things at the correct angle.

      On a related note, if I were to attempt this (and if I had a few spare laptops to try it on, you can be damn sure I would), I'd use regular run of the mill sunglasses with a frame that I can stand... preferably with fairly small lenses so the non-curvature of them would be nigh-unnoticeable, pop out those lenses and create new polarized ones. Just take a sheet of thin clear plastic, cut them to the exact shape of the old lenses, apply your film to these new flat, non-curved lenses as needed. Then you at least don't look like an idiot wearing them.

    14. Re:the down side by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

      Not to try and side-track the overall discussion too much, but my Roomba was the single best investment I have made. Wife wasn't real happy with the purchase, given that vacuuming was to be my given "chore".

    15. Re:the down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For the glasses, I used single use 3D glasses from the movie theater, but you can use whatever you want."

      You're limited to 3D glasses, you could buy a pair of cheap stylish reading glasses and do the same

    16. Re:the down side by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Smell my finger.

      I wish.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    17. Re:the down side by nomel · · Score: 1

      You can put the film on any pair of shades. All it requires is a linearly polarized filter. Unfortunately, you'll find a wide selection of sunglasses with linearly polazized lenses (advertised as reducing reflections) at your local gas station. Although, they might be 90 degrees off.

    18. Re:the down side by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      i don't get why he used 3d glasses. he could have gotten demo glasses (with the non refracting lenses) and added the film to them instead. then they would have just looked like sunglasses, instead of bluetard 3D glasses.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  3. Only one who can see the screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, unless anyone else is wearing polarized sunglasses in the vicinity.

    1. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly,

      What a dumb idea. All that effort to be clever, and foiled by a pair of Cheap Sunglasses(tm).

    2. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zaphod, is that you?

    3. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by neonKow · · Score: 1

      Polarized sunglasses are all horizontally polarized. Maybe you could work around that so that you need vertically polarized glasses.

    4. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Turn them 90 degrees. Bam! Vertically polarized.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    5. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by kiehlster · · Score: 2

      And to top it all off, don't all federal agents wear inconspicuous polarized sunglasses anyway? It's the MIBs, uh, here come the MIBs.

    6. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by adonoman · · Score: 1
      tilts head... Foiled again!

      If you're wearing a pair of polarized sunglasses, it's always good for a couple seconds of entertainment to sit there and look like an idiot tilting your head back and forth watching an LCD screen flip back and forth between normal and all black as the polarization lines up / goes perpendicular to the monitor's.

    7. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They would still have to orient them correctly and know whether it was a plane-polarized or circular-polarized filter. It would look a bit funny if someone was fiddling with a knob on their sunglasses, tilting their head at odd angles, or swapping 2 or 3 sets of them (I can't think of an easy way to switch from left to right circular-polarized shades without replacing the filter, but maybe there is a way).

    8. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what about circular polarization?

    9. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that, but, bad news is like one in eighty people look like shit with the glasses on. Especially Paula.

    10. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      what about circular polarization?

      Then any joker with a pair of 2D Glasses (or someone with regular 3D glasses and one eye closed) could read them :-)

      Seriously though - the hack relies on the fact that LCD displays use linearly polarized light internally.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    11. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Sure, unless anyone else is wearing polarized sunglasses in the vicinity.

      Yup. What you need is to hack one of the 3D systems that uses active LCD shutter glasses.

      The screen would rapidly alternate between showing the actual image and a screen full of dazzling random hash. The shutter glasses, synced to the monitor would block out the hash and allow the user to see the image. Use a sync cable rather than some optical system, let the frequency wander randomly a bit and include some rogue flickering with the hash to make it hard for a bystander with active glasses to get in sync.

      Or, don't watch porn in a shared office.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    12. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Turn them 90 degrees. Bam! Vertically polarized.

      Ouch, my neck!

      And, besides, that won't work if using circular polarization (which is what allows 3D movies to work even if a person tilts his head to the side).

    13. Re:Only one who can see the screen? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I also have both a circular polarizing and a regular polarizing filter for my camera... so all I'll have to do is look through my camera, and optionally press the shutter button :D

  4. Sunglasses by _merlin · · Score: 1, Informative

    He's the only person who can view it, apart from any clown with a pair of polarising sunglasses. What a gimp. Better off putting the effort into something worthwhile. It's easier to just use your computer in a room with a closed door.

    1. Re:Sunglasses by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wearing polarised sunglasses indoors is kind of obvious. For someone who works with sensitive information, yet is in a publicly accessible area, this is a genuinely great idea.

      Hell, I might even suggest this for my own workstation (back to the door, frequently working on sensitive data). I wear glasses anyway; It wouldn't be difficult to fit the film to the lenses I already require.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Sunglasses by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Hell, I might even suggest this for my own "work"station (back to the door, and I hate it when the boss sneaks in from behind).

      FTFY

    3. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Iirc polarizing sun glasses always have horizontal polarization (or was it vertical, can't remember, it's basically aimed at removing the rays reflected off water surface).

      You can require exact opposite polarization here, meaning that sunglasses wouldn't work.

    4. Re:Sunglasses by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Just turn your head sideways.

    5. Re:Sunglasses by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "For someone who works with sensitive information, yet is in a publicly accessible area, this is a genuinely great idea"

      no it's not. if you are working with sensitive info in a public area then you are being very, very, VERY stupid. at LEAST work against a wall where it is impossible for someone to walk up from behind.

      It's why the SQL guy at most corporations get's an office or a corner cube that has a single path in and no way for someone to look over his shoulder.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right! Nobody will ever thing of tiling their head sideways!

    7. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how polarization works if you believe that. All you would have to do is rotate the glasses until you reached the desired alignment,

    8. Re:Sunglasses by trout007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I did a quick test at my desk with my polarized sunglasses and two different monitors. Both blocked the light when I tilted my head 45 degrees to the right and it was at full brightness 45 degrees to the left. The image only was completely blocked in a very narrow range.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    9. Re:Sunglasses by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Yes, it is utterly irresponsible to expose unprepared and untrained people to the unspeakable horrors of O***le, M**QL or S** Server...

      Speak not their names lightly.

      --
    10. Re:Sunglasses by marcosdumay · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sunglasses have horizontal polarization. It's aimed at preserving the light reflected from horizontal surfaces, while filtering half of the light comming directly from the Sun.

    11. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My tablet and me: a bathroom story

    12. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You and several others who suggested this probably didn't think of two major problems:

      1. You're going to be pretty obvious
      2. You head weighs a LOT. Neck muscles are designed to keep your head straight and turn it, and tilt it for a few moments, mostly into front or back (i.e. getting view of your surroundings, what's right in front of you and above you). Prolonged attempt at even a modest 45 deg sideways tilt will have your neck muscles scream for mercy in just a couple of minutes unless you're very fit - we're just not designed for that kind of strain.

    13. Re:Sunglasses by poity · · Score: 1

      I think if someone wants your sensitive information, they will bear the social stigma attached to wearing sunglasses indoors.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    14. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remove glasses, hold in front of you, casually, at an angle to see the screen. Possibly even less obvious than wearing them indoors, depending on where he's sitting and you're standing.

    15. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I know, I actually exclusively use polarized glasses since I'm something of a swimming enthusiast in the summers (and I learned to hate water reflections), but things like my phone clearly not well visible with glasses on due to polarization issues.

      But as I mentioned in another post, try sitting for a while with a 45 degree tilt of your head for more then a few minutes, then report back on just how painful it was for your neck. Not to mention your extreme obviousness to the person you're "spying" on.

      And of course, it requires you to know what's going on, so you must have spent quite a bit of effort researching what's target doing. Most of the general "privacy screens" aren't designed to protect you against persistent offender who will research your method of protection. Against everyone else, it will work quite well, and this will include the occasional "person wearing polarizing sunglasses" who takes an occasional look at your screen but doesn't know how your protection actually works.

    16. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iirc polarizing sun glasses always have horizontal polarization (or was it vertical, can't remember, it's basically aimed at removing the rays reflected off water surface).

      You can require exact opposite polarization here, meaning that sunglasses wouldn't work.

      Sunglasses are vertically polarized and absolutely no one can turn their head sideways to change that. Almost forgot... :-).

      Reminds me of a Town & Country minivan I rented over the summer. It had a great satellite radio built in. Only problem was the display was polarized and I had to turn my head sideways to be able to read it while I was wearing my sunglasses.

    17. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      This is false. Sunlight is fully unpolarized, therefore it will not be hindered by polarization until it is polarized by being reflected. To quote wikipedia on the origin of usage of polarization in sunglasses:

      Some models have polarized lenses, made of Polaroid polarized plastic sheeting, to reduce glare caused by light reflected from polarizing surfaces such as water (see Brewster's angle for how this works) as well as by polarized diffuse sky radiation (skylight). This can be especially useful when fishing, for which the ability to see beneath the surface of the water is crucial.

      You're most likely thinking of polarized glasses reducing skylight.

      You may want to read up on how polarization actually works, and how polarizing has no effect on brightness of unpolarized light (beyond the impact of filter's imperfect optical properties of course).

    18. Re:Sunglasses by Xua · · Score: 1

      You can use polarized light filter for photo lens. It can be rotated to get rid of the right angle of polarization. Of course holding it before your eyes makes it obvious as well. By the way circular polarization (CPL) photo filters are still linear polarization filters (because they are meant to be rotated) but they convert linear polarization into circular because it is better for digital sensors. So if circular polarization is used on this monitor, this isn't going to help.

    19. Re:Sunglasses by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sunglasses have VERTICAL polarization. It's aimed at blocking horizontally polarized light such as glare from the highway or water.

    20. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Good point, but how long will you be able to do that without alerting your victim? They still need to be high enough to be between your eye and the screen, and close enough to your eyes to give you sufficient view of the screen.

      As noted, all methods of "privacy screening" are defeated by an offender willing to spend a significant effort to defeat them. That said, this will defeat all CASUAL people taking a peek, including those who are wearing polarized glasses.

    21. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure what I'm about to say is correct, but please do link me to some hard evidence (not a snippet from the wikipedia article on sunglasses) if I get my handwavery wrong. Unpolarized light just means that the light contains waves of different polarization, they're not all necessarily the same polarization. Now, an ideal polarized lens will only let in light of a specific polarization and stop light of an orthogonal polarization. So let's say that you have a polarizing filter that only lets through light with an X polarization. Light with only a Y component gets blocked. Light with only an X component gets passed through. However, light with both X and Y components will pass through, but the Y component will be stripped, so the magnitude of the light will only be the magnitude of the X component after passing through the filter.

    22. Re:Sunglasses by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

      Sunlight is fully unpolarized, therefore it will not be hindered by polarization ... polarizing has no effect on brightness of unpolarized light (beyond the impact of filter's imperfect optical properties of course).

      You are wrong.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizer#Malus.27_law_and_other_properties

      A beam of unpolarized light can be thought of as containing a uniform mixture of linear polarizations at all possible angles. Since the average value of cos^2 theta is 1/2, the transmission coefficient becomes I / Io = 1/2.

    23. Re:Sunglasses by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Looks like my definition of unpolarized light is a bit off. Unpolarized light does not just vibrate along one axis, but my point still remains. The filter will block one whole component of the wave as it passes through, but leave the other untouched.

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    24. Re:Sunglasses by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      I have a pair of those and it makes it tough to watch videos on my phone in landscape mode.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    25. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You are correct that one wavelength will be "stripped" - this is the entire point of the phenomenon we call polarization. Part where your hypothesis falls apart is where you assume that losing one dimension of the wave of light from the Sun reduces the amount of luminance carried by the wave of light from the Sun. This is false.

    26. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Beam of unpolarized light != Beam of unpolarized light from the Sun.

      Unpolarized light from the sun is very uniform in term of linear polarizations, unless it's reflected from a surface.

    27. Re:Sunglasses by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Unpolarized light from the sun is very uniform in term of linear polarizations

      And the transmission coefficient of that unpolarized light - a uniform mixture of linear polarizations - is 50%. You practically just quoted the passage from Wikipedia. I'm not sure if that means you didn't read it, or read it and just didn't understand it.

    28. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Actually I quoted from my head, and the last time I studied the subject was a two page lesson from high school physics over a decade ago. I just found the book in question and compared it to your link, and unfortunately it appears to not delve into the intensity issue, which is probably why I was wrong about it.

    29. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      postgresql FTW

    30. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just experimented a bit. w/ a pair of sunglasses, I was able to read a decent chunk of an LCD screen while holding them a bit above waist level. Tipping them back and forth a bit and I was able to scan the screen.

      I could also see most of the screen by hodling them a bit it and pretending to "inspect them for smudges."

      Anyway. This method of hiding laptop screen has come up *years* ago, and my opinion is same.
      Offers a false sense of security, and makes the laptop overall less functional if you need others to actually see the screen.

      If it entertains you, then, fine, do it. I'd just avoid watching kinky porn or something using this method.

    31. Re:Sunglasses by waives · · Score: 1

      Wow you actually admitted you were wrong... too bad you didn't do it before posting 3 "corrections" to other people's posts.

    32. Re:Sunglasses by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Part where your hypothesis falls apart is where you assume that losing one dimension of the wave of light from the Sun reduces the amount of luminance carried by the wave of light from the Sun. This is false.

      It's not false. It does, and necessarily so. It's the same reason which allows LCD displays to vary between completely dark and completely light. As the angle between the polarization of the light varies with the angle of the filter, the intensity will be reduced by the cosine of that angle.

      If you put two polarizing filters in line (with their polarizations aligned to each other), the second filter will not significantly diminish the intensity of the light passing through the first. However, if you rotate the 2nd filter 45 degrees in relation to the first, then it will block about 50% of the light passing through the first filter - even though all of that light was of the "wrong" polarization to this filter (wrong by 45 degrees, to be specific). It is reduced to the cosine of 45 degrees, which is 50%.

      As a matter of fact, if the 2nd filter is rotated 90 degrees in relation to the first filter, it will block all of the light (nearly, since it's not a perfect filter) - but if you place a 3rd filter between them, rotated 45 degrees in relation to both of them, you get more light through the 3 filters than you did through the original 2.

      If you want to test this, just take two pairs of polarizing sunglasses (or pop the 2 lenses out of one pair of polarizing sunglasses) and use an LCD computer monitor (there's a polarizing filter in the monitor already - if you were counting, you knew we need 3 filters to do this). Rotate one pair of sunglasses until the LCD looks completely dark; that's 90 degrees to the polarizing filter in the monitor. Then put the 2nd pair of sunglasses between the LCD and the 1st pair of glasses, tilted at a 45 degree angle... you'll discover that some light gets through, even though the first filter is still at 90 degrees to the filter in the LCD.

    33. Re:Sunglasses by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

      They will work fine, the image will just be the inverse (black and white swapped).

    34. Re:Sunglasses by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      In my defense, there were multiple false claims in addition to this correct one in those posts, such as claim that polarizing glasses were used to preserve reflections. But that doesn't excuse the fact that I was indeed wrong on this one. Let this be a lesson to all participants: sometimes one proper link and a short explanation of what part of the link explains the problem with the hypothesis goes much further then a lot of saying "because this is how it is".

    35. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been modding LCD's like this for a few years, I always warn my customers to watch out for people wearing sunglasses and tilting their head - that is all that is needed to see the screen image. Also reflections off shiny surfaces like plane windows are enough to see something.

    36. Re:Sunglasses by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Er, no.

      Why would you want to _preserve_ that light? And the sun is to bright to look into even if you cut the intensity by 50%.

      They are supposed to _cut out_ reflections from horizontal surfaces, like windscreens, water as the GP said, or the glass/plastic in front of the dashboard instruments...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    37. Re:Sunglasses by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Hell, I might even suggest this for my own "Slashdot reading"station (back to the door, and I my colleagues don't appreciate how useful pseudointellectual discussions on morality and armchair politiking are to my job).

      FTFFY

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    38. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give credit where credit is due. It's not very often that somebody comes back just to say that they were wrong. I've had to do it a few times myself. You have my respect.

      Posting anon because, hey, you know who I am anyway.

    39. Re:Sunglasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the sun is to bright to look into even if you cut the intensity by 50%."

      i look into the sun many many times through untinted glass. the sun could damage some species eyes but not mine. i also tried watching electric arc welding without protection. all it does is makes your eyes have a black spot that goes away shortly. i even wear nearsighted eyeglasses to see things.

      sunlight concentrated to a focal point and the eyes are still fine, despite thousands of times direct staring into the sun. i've used a magnifier to burn leaves and paper, but even then it takes tens or more seconds to start blackening it
       

  5. couldnt this be done in software ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surely a graphics programmer could coax an Nvidia/Ati card to give the same effect ?

    1. Re:couldnt this be done in software ? by Rhaban · · Score: 1

      Impossible: the graphic card can not have any control over the polarization of light emitted by the screen.

    2. Re:couldnt this be done in software ? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      surely a graphics programmer could coax an Nvidia/Ati card to give the same effect ?

      It's been done. See an example here

      Yes, it is what you're expecting.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:couldnt this be done in software ? by Aladrin · · Score: 2

      With a 3d monitor, it could be interesting to try. For 1 'eye', output the normal image. For the other, output exactly the opposite image. For normal vision, it would look like a solid image, but wearing 1 half of the 3D Glasses should give you the normal image.

      I think I'll try this later, with the standard 3D image viewer app.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:couldnt this be done in software ? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Do you understand what "polarization" is? As a phenomenon of physics, it falls pretty firmly in the "hardware" field.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:couldnt this be done in software ? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the same lines, only using it to make the monitor appear to be showing 'work' on one polarization, and 'play' on the other, so that a passer by sees microsoft word, and you with your glasses see the movie you are actually watching on the other polarization. Not really as easy as all that, but it could be done i suppose.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  6. How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    until someone hacks one of these newfangled 3D TVs to display 2 polarized pictures at once? Different polarities could carry different channels, people with the correctly-polarized glasses would see only one or the other...

    Hello playing PS3 while the missus watches TV!

    1. Re:How long... by tangelogee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sony kind of came out with that...the Playstation Display allows for two people to play fullscreen simultaneously.

    2. Re:How long... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      3D TVs are only 3D because traditional LCDs don't have a high enough frequency for shutter-lense 3D. You could use an old CRT for 3D just as well. Polarised 3D is only used in cinemas.

    3. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do newer TVs work? Old ones would need 2 tuners to "decode" 2 channels (e.g. for Picture in Picture features). Are newer TVs' processing units powerful enough or come with the right capabilities to decode 2 channels at once?

    4. Re:How long... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Funny, I have polarized 3d in my basement.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:How long... by pecosdave · · Score: 1
      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    6. Re:How long... by srjh · · Score: 1

      I'd have thought 3D televisions were by definition - in 3D mode they have a left image and a right image. Send different sources to the left and right channels and the TV won't know the difference.

      All you have to do is instead of having two pairs of glasses each with a left and right filter, have one pair with two left filters, and another with two right filters. Surely it's been done before.

  7. Obviously by Pond823 · · Score: 1

    "Now, he is the only one who can see what he is doing on his computer." As long as he wears his tin foil hat obviously.

  8. Done Before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Immediately thought of This.

    1. Re:Done Before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the URL much more amusing than the picture itself.

  9. Cool by aglider · · Score: 1

    This is a new product waiting for either a patent or a patent troll.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mel Brooks may have rights to the Cone of Silence, but I think that has expired.

    2. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate that I can't find a link to it, but back when breaking a notebook out on an airplane was so rare that everyone would want to watch what you were doing.. there was a company that offered this. They would remove the filter from your notebook (for some reason I remember it requiring them to shave it off), and coat your glasses, or sell you a pair of non prescription glasses with the correct coating.

      Prior art...

  10. but but by sgt+scrub · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you don't want anyone seeing what is on the screen aren't you usually naked? Glasses aren't going to hide much, IMHO.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:but but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for Clark Kent.

    2. Re:but but by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2

      So there I was, sitting at my computer and watching porn. Naked, of course. All of a sudden, my boss walked into my cubicle!

      Boss: What are you doing?

      Me: Working on a spreadsheet.

      Boss: Great! Keep up the good work.

      Whew! Saved by the privacy monitor!

    3. Re:but but by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      True and the people at the Kinko's will throw you out after a while.

  11. One problem... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    "Ok, time to get some work done on my computer. Where'd I put those glasses?!!!"

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:One problem... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Some people already have to ask that question.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:One problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      steps on glasses

      The Outer Limits Twist strikes again!

    3. Re:One problem... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Geez, that scenario happens to me many times a day already...

    4. Re:One problem... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that a Twilight Zone?

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    5. Re:One problem... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm pretty sure it was One Step Beyond.
      It was the episode with the actor that played the Riddler on the 50's Superman tv show.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:One problem... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Twilight Zone, "Time Enough At Last", 1959, and it was Burgess Meredith. My favourite episode ever.

      "Hen-REEEEEE!"

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  12. Useful, but not very private by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I suggested something similar to improve the contrast in the sonar room on submarines, without tripping up the people who were doing other things. Polarize the displays up and down, and the room lights side to side. People wearing polarized glasses could see the displays well, but the glare from the room lights would be diminished.

    I think the first description of such a system was in a golden age science fiction story. Car head lights were polarized diagonally. You'd wear glasses that allowed your light to be bright, but oncoming ca's headlights would be reduced. Of course unsuspecting pedestrians would be blinded.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Useful, but not very private by SoupGuru · · Score: 4, Informative

      It wasn't a scifi story. Edwin Land, Mr. Polaroid himself, did a lot of research in the area and proposed a combination of headlights and windshields. I remember reading a pretty interesting article in New Scientist about it. Here's the teaser before the "subscribe to read the full article" http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19426061.800-histories-still-dazzled-after-all-these-years.html

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    2. Re:Useful, but not very private by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't reflections mess up the polarisation of the room lights and ultimately bleed most of the light through? If I recall correctly, cinemas had to have new, ultra smooth projections screens in order for the polarised light to reflect back with its original polarisation...

  13. When I was 10... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to do the same thing with my calculator.

  14. Why not just buy a 3M privacy filter? by WillAdams · · Score: 3, Informative

    Recycling is cool and all, but it's not like this is a new / unique / unanticipated capability:

    http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/SDP/Privacy_Filters/

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:Why not just buy a 3M privacy filter? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Privacy filters prevent viewing the screen from other than directly in front of it. This solution means nobody can see what's on the screen at all unless they wear the glasses. It just looks like a blank white page with a lightbulb behind it.

      This glasses-based solution seems much more effective, especially for those who already wear glasses. Adding a polarised coating would cost pennies.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  15. Neat... by catmistake · · Score: 1

    But hardly a security feature... merely a privacy screen with a small aperture. Wouldn't any pair of polarized glasses reveal the screen? Also, superspies picking up the monitor's leaky signals would be unaffected by it. Also... seems like he has destroyed a perfectly good monitor (but I guess we have enough).

    1. Re:Neat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you claiming that this is not a security feature because it doesn't stop superspies?
      Are you one of those guys that also claims that anything short of throwing your discarded hard drives into a black hole is unsecure since it is theoretically possible to retrieve the information.

  16. He'll need a tin foil hat too.... by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    ....Or else he might look like an idiot.

  17. Inefficient. by vlm · · Score: 1

    Inefficient. Rather than making it harder to look at the screen, make viewers not want to look at the screen to begin with. Make the background image goatse. Also provides an interesting location to place the stereotypical "GUI trash can".

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  18. Just a bit too late by paiute · · Score: 1

    This guy could have used it: (allegedly) http://tinyurl.com/cd5s57a

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  19. Better way - and one that foils polaroid glasses by Dr.+Crash · · Score: 1

    The folks at Mitsubishi Research actually came up with glasses that work like the ones in "They Live"... without the special glasses, you see one image, with the special glasses, you see another (secret) image.

    Their paper is at
    http://www.merl.com/publications/TR2002-011/

    and the video is pretty darn amazing.

  20. Not impressed. by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pffftrrrt. Wake me up when they come up with a polarized PROJECTED image with seperate frequencies for each viewer. That would be kindof impressive.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Not impressed. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      http://www.geowall.org/

      Designed for different images for each eye, but you could easily do it your way.

    2. Re:Not impressed. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      You mean like in this documentary from 1988?

  21. Um, yeah... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Why do I have to see his screen to know what he's doing in his computer? in fact, why do I have to be on the same continent?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Um, yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he is not connected to the internet? I know, crazy idea.

  22. Not a bad idea--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bit too obvious to patent but it's the sort of idea a roomfull of Apple fanboys would drool over if the device were an iPad (watch for iSecurePad sometime in 2015). But like most security by obscurity, it really isn't. The images on the screen might not be directly visible but reflections of the screen in any non conducting surface (glass, dry erase board, wood veneer tabletop...) would be clear enough for bystanders to enjoy that goats.cx site.

  23. Privacy is underrated these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the internet makes keeping private things private more difficult, the need to implement solutions to protect that right has become more acute. I would like to see this sort of solution as standard for laptops. When I travel or am working on my laptop at the local coffee shop, I don't want others getting into my business. This technology would help tremendously to accomplish that! So, I say that it is a great proof of concept, and that laptop suppliers should provide it as a standard feature, or option on all laptops, netbooks, and tablets. Of course, once it becomes a common feature, others can just don their polarized specs and see what you are up to... Oh well, it was a great idea while it lasted! :-)

  24. Er....? by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Didn't we just spend the last 20 years designing laptop/lcd flatscreens so that they didn't have the damn single-point-of-viewing issue? I seem to recall the original, dim LCD screens being an enormous pain in the butt because if you moved your head about 3" to either side, you couldn't see anything.

    --
    -Styopa
  25. Doesn't 3M sell this kind of thing for $5 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing something like this on TV. 3M was advertising it for laptops (so you could do secure work at the airport without someone peeking over your shoulder to see what you are doing). If I were a longtime slashdot reader, I could point you to a link that lest you see what I mean. Oh well.

    1. Re:Doesn't 3M sell this kind of thing for $5 ? by treeves · · Score: 1

      More like $50 than $5, but yes. And if you are within the narrow viewing angle allowed by the filter, you can still see the screen.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  26. At last! Some privacy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate it when someone is looking my screen when I display my Facebook profile.

  27. Or you could just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where a pair of these

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasstron

    and turn off the main display.

  28. Which is why it's not going to work on me. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the minute somebody next to me starts using a device that blasts white light into my face, I'm going to put on my polarized sunglasses, which are always in my right inside jacket pocket.

    I wouldn't even be trying to defeat his privacy hack, I'm just very light sensitive so I always carry shades.

    Oh, look - pr0n!

  29. Contact lenses by chriswaco · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is polarized contact lenses so you don't look silly.

  30. Should have posted this myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had done this *exact* thing a few years ago when I was working at a big government research lab. At the time we were playing around with layering multiple LCD screens (with and without polarizing filters peeled off) to create a new kind of 3D display. After realizing the front polarizer could be removed to make a privacy monitor, we toyed with commercializing this idea or putting it to use for sensitive information at the lab (hence we didn't post the idea publicly). However, in the end we determined it is too simple to defeat for any serious purpose. Even if you make sure no one is wearing sunglasses nearby, a hidden camera with a polarizing filter could still record everything on your screen. By the way, regular polarized sunglasses (such as for driving) work just fine — there is no need to make special glasses as in the Instructable.

  31. Not a great solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this a long time ago, and I found that it was quite annoying to have to constantly hold my head exactly upright to view the screen properly. Also, I don't know if this is common, but my monitor's polarization was diagonal. This is probably a disadvantage; it would be nice to be able to use ordinary polarized glasses. (A weird angle doesn't give any extra security because the eavesdropper just has to tilt his head.)

  32. This is so fake it's absurd. by REALMAN · · Score: 1

    Explain to me how this is even remotely possible? Let's take something simple. Monitor displaying the number 5 and monitor displaying the number 4. How do the glasses know whether it's a 5 or 4? The computer is relaying the information to the monitor and not to the glasses. The liquid crystal film (LCD) is normally connected to the computer through the monitor. How is it connected now? This is such obvious bullshit that I don't understand how anyone could even consider it.

    --
    - A Frog in a pond utters an azure cry. -
    1. Re:This is so fake it's absurd. by jcr · · Score: 1

      It's not only possible, the idea's been around for over a decade. Take a look here. If you remove that vertical polarizer, the display looks white. I remember hearing back around 2000 or so about vendors who would peel the polarizing film of of your laptop display for you.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  33. Easily defeated. by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 1

    I hope this becomes a big hit. I'll be sneaking around in airport lounges with a bit of polarizing film on my cellphone camera, then make a fortune in insider trading.