Slashdot Mirror


EU Targets Facebook's Ad System

redletterdave writes "The European Commission plans to put a stop to the way Facebook gathers information about its users, including their political opinions, religious beliefs, whereabouts and sexual preferences, and how the social network sells that information for commercial purposes. A new EC Directive aims to ban targeted advertising unless users specifically allow it, and to amend the current European data protection laws to ensure consistency in how offending sites are dealt with across the EU. If the European Commission has its way, Facebook would suffer big losses in advertising dollars that fund its site, which would further damage the company's plans to go public next year. Facebook has defended itself, claiming its advertisers target wide demographics like age and location, rather than specific individuals. The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company denies outright that it misuses or mishandles user information."

170 comments

  1. those europeans... by clavo-t · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those Europeans doesn't understand the right of an American company to do what they want wherever they want

    1. Re:those europeans... by Sique · · Score: 1

      That's ok as long as American companies don't understand that those Europeans can have all the laws they want.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:those europeans... by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Those Europeans doesn't understand

      " Is our children learning? "

      — prof. George W. Bush

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    3. Re:those europeans... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      So soon the Americans will invade Europia and bomb them back to freedom.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    4. Re:those europeans... by clavo-t · · Score: 1

      ok, my mistake, but that hurts...

  2. Re:More info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seems like real, sudden outbreak of common sense. Go EU!. I am moving to it next year.

    It should be much cheaper to move there next year.

  3. Re:More info here by Bardwick · · Score: 1

    Assuming the EU exists.... Hope your talking about Germany...

  4. You can opt out by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Funny
    under options>settings>some data>settings options>options settings>user data>user data settings>user data settings options>ad's data>ad's data options

    Is that hard?

    1. Re:You can opt out by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The easier way to opt out is not to sign up for Facebook in the first place. Or what am I missing?

    2. Re:You can opt out by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      But you have to opt-out for each ad as it appears on your page. That's the problem!

    3. Re:You can opt out by similar_name · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget to block Facebook on your computer. Since every website that has a Facebook Like button or other widget loads that widget from Facebook. Facebook still knows many of the sites visited from your IP. Of course the same is true for Google widgets/ads and pretty much any widget.

    4. Re:You can opt out by skids · · Score: 1

      Your friends who are too lazy to call your phone won't invite you to their NYE party. But then, if they are that lazy, they will probably forget to buy eggnog too.

    5. Re:You can opt out by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      I'm all for this. I've been noticing ad's following me recently and it bothers me. For example the last few times I've been on /. the ads in the top right are reflecting places I have looked at on Newegg or Amazon. I would like to see this practice be curtailed and not just on facebook.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    6. Re:You can opt out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you have ads on /.?

    7. Re:You can opt out by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      NoScript to the rescue again, I guess.

    8. Re:You can opt out by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      will probably forget to buy eggnog too.

      ... and nothing of value was lost?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:You can opt out by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    10. Re:You can opt out by bfree · · Score: 1

      NoScript is only a partial solution to that problem as you will find plenty of sites with iframes loading php from facebook. Requestpolicy might help or you can try to maintain a hosts file which blocks all the various hosts they use.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    11. Re:You can opt out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOSTS, HOSTS, HOSTS. APK has been summoned, where art thou?

    12. Re:You can opt out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can put these lines of code in the ABE module that comes with NoScript (options - advanced):

      # This one allows Facebook scripts and objects to be included only
      # from Facebook pages
      Site .facebook.com .fbcdn.net
      Accept from .facebook.com .fbcdn.net
      Deny INCLUSION(SCRIPT, OBJ, SUBDOC)

      see http://noscript.net/abe/

    13. Re:You can opt out by Bucky24 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use Ghostery for Chrome. Works like a charm-I haven't seen a Facebook like button in almost a month.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    14. Re:You can opt out by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to block Facebook on your computer.

      Or block all of Facebook's IP ranges on your router (if it has that ability). I added their known IPv4 ranges to the facebook page on Wikipedia on 3 September 2011, but that information was removed by "Gary King" on 8 October. For educational purposes, the IPv4 ranges were (as of 3 September 2011):
      65.201.208.24 - 65.201.208.31
      65.203.134.64 - 65.203.134.79
      65.204.104.128 - 65.204.104.143
      66.92.180.48 - 66.92.180.63
      66.93.78.176 - 66.93.78.183
      66.220.144.0 - 66.220.159.255
      67.200.105.48 - 67.200.105.51
      69.63.176.0 - 69.63.191.255
      74.119.76.0 - 74.119.79.255
      99.188.162.240 - 99.188.162.247
      204.15.20.0 - 204.15.23.255
      208.252.1.128 - 208.252.1.159
      The reference I cited was at iBlockList, which may have been updated since then.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    15. Re:You can opt out by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Adblock will help you - block the loading of any resource from facebook.com or fbcdn.com except when directly visiting fb.

    16. Re:You can opt out by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      ShareMeNot for Firefox removes the Like buttons and its ilk. It also prevents Facebook, Google+ and the rest from tracking you.

    17. Re:You can opt out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghostery is bloated crap. I couldn't wait to uninstall it after my web surfing started to remind me of win 3.11

    18. Re:You can opt out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You == STAGNATED!

  5. Re:More info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, you just responded to an obvious goatse troll like it was a real post.

  6. The Internet should not be regulated by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not just Facebook, many other companies like Google do this. But although this regulation has good intentions, like all attempts at regulating the Internet it will be counterproductive and unenforceable. The Internet is based on anarchy, that's what made it big and drives it today. Securing their data is the duty of the users.

    1. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is not regulation of the Internet. This is regulation of advertising.

    2. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So Amazon should shut down, as no one can be expected to keep their credit card details secure on the net. Of course there should be regulation to protect people. Large websites, such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, et al. all can easily be assessed for compliance, and once compliant, a large part of the internet has been made compliant. How a user is supposed to actually *use* the internet without providing any data to it is going to severely limit the uses of the internet. We'll end up with LOLcats all over the place, and nothing of any actual use.

    3. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by forkfail · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about Facebook's constantly morphing privacy and security policies? How can the user protect their data from that?

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      So Amazon should shut down, as no one can be expected to keep their credit card details secure on the net. Of course there should be regulation to protect people. Large websites, such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, et al. all can easily be assessed for compliance, and once compliant, a large part of the internet has been made compliant. How a user is supposed to actually *use* the internet without providing any data to it is going to severely limit the uses of the internet. We'll end up with LOLcats all over the place, and nothing of any actual use.

      I don't think that the EU will forbid you to give your private data out voluntarily and for your own purposes. I believe the issue revolves around companies distributing your private data for their benefit and without your express permission.

      Express permission means "opt in" not "opt out". Opt out is often difficult if not impossible, especially in the case of facebook. Also it is not something that many, if not most, users know that they can do.

      You should add keeping IP addresses secret in your over the top argument, then no one could even connect to the internet.

    5. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Hentes · · Score: 0

      So Amazon should shut down, as no one can be expected to keep their credit card details secure on the net.

      Amazon shouldn't need credit card details, they should handle money transfers like a physical store.

      We'll end up with LOLcats all over the place, and nothing of any actual use.

      Yeah, the Internet certainly has no useful parts today...

      Lack of government regulation does not mean no regulations at all, the market forces can also shape the net.

    6. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Don't use Facebook.

    7. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by SkunkPussy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      specifically the fact that it has become common practice for sites to treat opt-out as informed consent, when its well known that if opt-in was in place extremely low numbers would opt-in.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    8. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by forkfail · · Score: 2

      But that's like saying, "Don't use the web".

      No, I'm not arguing that Facebook == the internet. However, if you're going to use the internet for anything other than getting docs, if you're going to use it for personal communication, then there has to be an element of trust with the entity that carries and stores your data.

      Would you say, "don't use email" if a bunch of providers out there started making the contents of your email public? Or how about if your bank started to publish your account balance - would it be your fault for having used on-line banking?

      --
      Check your premises.
    9. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Hentes · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily about not using the Internet, but rather not using unreliable services, and letting the free market sort out the trash. But yeah, there are many examples for why it is stupid to trust your email service or online bank with sensitive data.

    10. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a solution for that. Invalidate all EULA:s. If Facebook wants you to sign a contract, let them physically send you a contract and ask that you send it back.

    11. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by mmcuh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't use Facebook, and occasionally venture out of the basement?

    12. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Would you say, "don't use email" if a bunch of providers out there started making the contents of your email public? Or how about if your bank started to publish your account balance - would it be your fault for having used on-line banking?

      I would say "don't use email provider ", or "don't use bank ".

      There are other social networking sites other than Facebook (dozens still current, hundreds been and gone). If people ditched companies that treated them badly, some of their competitors would eventually get big enough to topple them. Hell, Facebook did that to the likes of MySpace, and Twitter is arguably doing the same thing to Facebook now.

    13. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not necessarily about not using the Internet, but rather not using unreliable services, and letting the free market sort out the trash."

      The "free market" has already spoken in this case, though. It's not like Facebook's anti-privacy policies are some kind of underground secret. On the contrary, it's regularly the subject of network late night comedy show jokes. Fact is, most people just don't care.

    14. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by forkfail · · Score: 1

      But the damage is already done, neh? Switch banks, after they release your data, or email providers after they do? At some point, shouldn't there be legal protections that don't allow these entities to break what amounts to a contract?

      And - I'd note that there's not a lot of point in using a "social networking" site that no one uses. Diaspora looks to be a really cool idea - but people have to use it if it's going to be anything other than a cool idea about distributed communication. Without users, it lacks the social part of social networking.

      --
      Check your premises.
    15. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Securing their data is the duty of the users.

      I don't think you understand the power of data mining. Humans are very, very bad at performing inference on many variables. Computers are very, very good at it. It's true that people have a responsibility to safeguard their own privacy, but that's no reason we should have artificial intelligence programs scanning people's every online move to infer as much as possible about them. That's fucking scary, and it's scary that you don't think it's scary.

    16. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Bucky24 · · Score: 2

      If the only social contact you have is through facebook I'd say that you're pretty anti-social already. Wall posts, messages, and facebook chat are not the same as a good face to face conversation. IE, hanging out.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    17. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have friends who use Facebook to organize events, you don't have friends.

    18. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it's not scary, I said that legal solutions to technical problems rarely work. If you are afraid of being tracked, there are many technical solutions to avoid it.

    19. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer that this happened via the browser, rather than through regulation of websites. Why does my browser even consider announcing my browsing habits to a third-party site, just because the site suggests that it should?

    20. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Just because a technical solution (may) exist doesn't mean we should solve a problem that way. Instead of laws against homicide, we could all just never leave our homes, or wear armor when we do. While this might seem empowering, it would make life suck.

    21. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by klingens · · Score: 1

      It's not a technical problem. The problem is facebook, google+, reddit, etc behaviour. That means it's a social or economic thing, and laws are the thing to regulate those. It won't solve the issue, but it's the normal way to mitigate it. Just like we put laws around the behaviour of murder, theft and fraud, so we can put laws around the behaviour of user tracking.

      What you are suggesting is a technical solution to a social problem. Ask about DRM creators about that one.

    22. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Wall posts, messages and facebook chat are an extremely common precursor to face to face conversation.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    23. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Which would mean users have to enter their details every time they buy something; whereas what a lot of people like is the fact that they can do it once and not have to do it again until they change. The fact that I can just go to Amazon, hit 1-Click on the item I want, and it then turns up tomorrow is why I tend to buy stuff from Amazon if I can.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    24. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Alas true. I only signed up for Facebook because my friends kept using it to organize events and generally getting together. E-Mail was apparently too complicated for them.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    25. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Most of my friends' hanging out is organized via Facebook. Our job hours tend to mean online is organization is the most practical way of communicating. Especially when we're organizing Christmas get togethers involving friends who now live in other bits of the country, but are heading back to spend Christmas with parents.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  7. It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... steps are taken to ensure that Big Brother doesn't get too big.

    While here in the US, those who most love to cite Orwell also tend to want there to be no limits to what corporations can do, even when it's the corporations (far more so than the government) that are filling the power niches.

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.

      The only reason this is done is to deflect and defuse negative attention away from the EU's own "Data Retention Directive", which basically says that any time you speak to anyone during your day the person you spoke to and time you spoke must be recorded and stored in the range of 1-2 years. As applied to e-mails, text messages and phone conversations made and received.

      You have kind of gotten your concepts mixed up.

    2. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by dave420 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's only ironic if you don't know what socialism is...

    3. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 0

      Ah - were you going to give me this week's Newspeak definition, then?

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by heinousjay · · Score: 0

      I vastly prefer a corporate system over a government system. I can choose to not do business with any given corporation.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    5. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Sique · · Score: 2

      No, you can't. Try to buy food without giving money to Nestlé or Monsanto for instance!

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem is, the end result of an unregulated free market is a monopoly, and without the counterbalance of government, corporations fill the role of government, and acquire the powers accorded to governments by the people. However, with this end result, there is no voting them out of office, and no one left to make laws to reign them in.

      --
      Check your premises.
    7. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty easy if I wanted. There's tonnes of niche brands and all sorts of different suppliers of fruit and vegetables. Sometimes it'll be 20% more expensive, sometimes it'll be cheaper but the kids want the "brand name" brand. But it's not hard to do.

      I'd rather have this choice than have some toothless, unelected "Union" tell me what to do.

    8. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      What's more ironic is that Orwell was a socialist himself. Interpreting 1984 as an attack on socialism is a gross misunderstanding - one that's taught by many teachers in the U.S. It's an attack on totalitarianism. Fascism, for example, is a free-market totalitarian system. Oceania was socialist because it represented Soviet Communism, the good intentions of Lenin warped into the totalitarianism of Stalin. It's important to note that Emmanuel Goldstein represented Trotsky, an opponent of Stalin's totalitarianism and Hitler's fascism.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    9. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fascism, for example, is a free-market totalitarian system."

      Utterly idiotic.

      Firstly, it takes an extreme act of mental acrobatics to imagine a system that is both totalitarian and free-market. If it's free-market that should mean I can buy whatever goods and services I want. I can quit my job, move to a cabin in the woods and produce death metal CDs that I sell at a stall in town. I can buy porn made in places that resemble the presidential palace. Totalitarianism implies highly rigid control over at the very minimum the social and inner sphere of people, but plenty of products should exist in a free market that directly affects and subverts this control.

      Secondly, fascism has at the very minimum at its core according to any commonly agreed definition some kind of movement based on the concept of the strength and unity of either a nation or a people (a 'united entity'), and moreover, that although businesses are privately operated, they should all serve the 'united entity'. Businesses that don't serve the 'united entity' (nation or people) whenever required will not survive in a fascist state. Yet a market where businesses have to kowtow to the government to please it isn't a free-market system. If businesses can choose not to sell to the government, or charge it market rates, then they are outside the fascist system.

      Not to mention all the statements by Mr. Fascism himself, Mussolini that directly and very explicitly totally contradict your statement. Hm, who should I lend more credence to - the man who coined the term 'fascism' and ran a nation based on the concept, or some fantasist on Slashdot? Maybe you were mixing it up with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_(epithet)

      Thirdly, you can absolutely say that 1984 is an attack on totalitarianism. But there's plenty of elements in there that overlap in various ways with most notions of socialism, like how "the man with the top hat", and how the only way to legitimately and ethically possess large amounts of money was through a lottery (paradox of all paradoxes!)

      "In the old days (it ran), before the glorious Revolution, London was not the beautiful city that we know today. It was a dark, dirty, miserable place where hardly anybody had enough to eat and where hundreds and thousands of poor people had no boots on their feet and not even a roof to sleep under. Children no older than you had to work twelve hours a day for cruel masters who flogged them with whips if they worked too slowly and fed them on nothing but stale breadcrusts and water. But in among all this terrible poverty there were just a few great big beautiful houses that were lived in by rich men who had as many as thirty servants to look after them. These rich men were called capitalists. They were fat, ugly men with wicked faces, like the one in the picture on the opposite page. You can see that he is dressed in a long black coat which was called a frock coat, and a queer, shiny hat shaped like a stovepipe, which was called a top hat. This was the uniform of the capitalists, and no one else was allowed to wear it. The capitalists owned everything in the world, and everyone else was their slave. They owned all the land, all the houses, all the factories, and all the money. If anyone disobeyed them they could throw them into prison, or they could take his job away and starve him to death. When any ordinary person spoke to a capitalist he had to cringe and bow to him, and take off his cap and address him as " Sir ". The chief of all the capitalists was called the King, and -"

    10. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I can choose to not do business with any given corporation.

      So, you're stuck with Apple then, since everybody else's computers have Windows preinstalled. And where are you getting your natural gas and electricity from? If you eat, you're doing business with Monsanto and ADM, even if you grow your own food. Cable TV? Well, your choices are Comcast, Dish, or an antenna.

      What are you going to do when there are only three huge players in an industry you can't live without and they all behave in exactly the same way?

      I can't affect a corporation at all; I'm one of seven billion prospective customers. With government at least I get a vote, meaningless as that vote may be.

    11. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just as socialism can lead to totalitarianism, so can capitalism.

      Totalitarianism is the result of the concentration of power. If this is at the hands of a socialist government, you get the USSR. If at the hands of a corporate state, you get Germany in 1938.

      It's about balance. And those who oppose all government in the US (sometimes for good reasons) never seem to have another counterbalance to growing corporate power. Remember, the second part of the famous quote about "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is that "men form governments to ensure these rights".

      --
      Check your premises.
    12. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Except it's not ironic, because in a socialist state (as they've been expressed throughout history) the government would of course not allow a private company to accumulate and control all this personal data on individuals. That's a right solely reserved for the government.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    13. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Sique · · Score: 1

      It's pretty hard. You don't even know which brands belong to Nestlé, and how many strains of seed and how many herbicides from Monsanto were used.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      corporations fill the role of government

      Without government, there can be no corporations, since the corporation is a creation of the government (granted such fun things as limited liability by government fiat)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    15. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      You prove the irony, especially with your sig line.

      --
      Check your premises.
    16. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      WTF, do you not get the context? That was a section of a children's book that Winston was copying into his diary. The whole point is that the government were a bunch of fucking liars, starting with lying to children.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    17. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 1

      I vastly prefer a corporate system over a government system.

      Ironically, a good corporate system needs a well-functioning government system in order to work. Clear rules & regulations for you and your competitors, good infrastructure etc. Look at Somalia or Afghanistan or Iraq for how well corporations do there without a functioning government.

    18. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      Free market doesn't mean free society.

      Fascist totalitarianism controls the market through fear and blatant corruption. Socialist totalitarianism controls the market through ownership. In the fascist system the market is 'free' because it's privately owned. 'Free' has many meanings.

      You cite Mussolini and that's all well and good, but I cite the original Mr. Fascism, Machiavelli. Of course, you probably knew I could easily retort your weak sauce argument and that's why you posted AC. I didn't claim that Orwell was a socialist because that was my interpretation of his fiction. I made that claim because Orwell himself made it:

      Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism, as I understand it. It seems to me nonsense, in a period like our own, to think that one can avoid writing of such subjects.

      In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated. And so for the last ten years, I have been convinced that the destruction of the Soviet myth was essential if we wanted a revival of the socialist movement.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  8. Re:More info here by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they keep this up I might join you. The USA will probably make facebook accounts mandatory so the NSA can track us better.

    Yes despite all the terrible press the EU gets especially in the UK, there are some nice things coming out of it like forcing mobile phone companies to all use mini-usb chargers. Sometimes I wish England would stop dicking about in EU and actually commit to something bigger than themselves for reasons other than personal greed.

  9. I have an easier idea... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2

    Don't post stuff to facebook that you wouldn't want public.

    I'm kidding, that's insane - who could possibly follow such a lunatic policy?

    1. Re:I have an easier idea... by CapnStank · · Score: 1

      Personal rule of thumb: Don't share anything on FB you wouldn't willingly share to a person you got stuck in a broken elevator with.

    2. Re:I have an easier idea... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Personal rule of thumb: Don't share anything on FB you wouldn't willingly share to a person you got stuck in a broken elevator with.

      Well, my conversation with other people in a broken elevator would concern the topic "how do we get out of here?"

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:I have an easier idea... by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      Personal rule of thumb: Don't share anything on FB you wouldn't willingly share to a person you got stuck in a broken elevator with.

      Well, my conversation with other people in a broken elevator would concern the topic "how do we get out of here?"

      Elevators have notoriously poor internet connectivity. So it's unlikely that you would be able to Google how to get out of the elevator even if the information was available on FaceBook.

      Sorry state of affairs that.

    4. Re:I have an easier idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal rule of thumb: don't join FB, don't ever have anything to do with it, filter it out from sites with adblock.

      Why?

      You have no control about anything you share there. This way you have control - don't give them the information in the first place.

    5. Re:I have an easier idea... by tbird81 · · Score: 0

      But the citizen's of Europe need some unelected representatives to be their nanny. They can't survive on their own!

  10. People don't understand facebook by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To understand facebook it might help to use google as an analogy.

    Google is an advertising company that happens to provide services that inspire people to see the ads that they sell.

    Facebook is a data mining company that happens to provide services that inspire people to provide the data that they sell.

    They both offer advertisements, the both do data mining. In many ways the companies are very very similar. The biggest difference is the interface that is presented to the public. They both offer most of their services in exchange for what they need to sell to make a living.

    If you don't want to pay the price than don't take the service they offer. Or, just click the buttons to avoid telling the world about the things you'd rather the whole world not know.

    /not a facebook fan and thinks people waste way too much time on it

    1. Re:People don't understand facebook by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the problem is, I can't fully opt-out of google!

      I build electronic things and I tend to frequent places like mouser and digikey to order my parts. how shocked I was to see googleapis listed in in the bottom tray of firefox as something was loaded from google. I have ZERO desire for my stuff to touch google. I'm trying to build a project. its none of their fucking business. but what requests are going to google? and WHY?

      more and more, I see google*this and google*that on varoius domains that my browser is trying to connect to. googleadservices, googleapis, whatever - there are remote connects from my system to google's and I can't seem to avoid it and its not even me, its the vendor who has made whatever deals with the devil and I'm stuck sending outgoing packets to the devil.

      I can fully opt not to ever touch FB. in fact, I don't have a FB account and so I'm safe. but while trying to order some items online, I can't seem to avoid google. that is just plain wrong. do no evil? bullshit.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:People don't understand facebook by mmcuh · · Score: 1

      That annoys me as well. Why the hell are people using off-site javascript files in their webpages for things that could just as well have been done locally? Just copy the bloody files, it's not like there are no decent free javascript libraries.

    3. Re:People don't understand facebook by bfree · · Score: 2

      I use my hosts file (or dnsmasq) to point googleapis to my local apache which has a jquery mirror to match theirs.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    4. Re:People don't understand facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDNs are handy for pulling javascript files. I use YUI things in a few projects. I could host them locally or have the biggest single time hit use a redundant geographically local mega-hosting site, I'll gladly take the hosted item.

    5. Re:People don't understand facebook by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      do no evil? bullshit.

      The motto wasn't "do no evil", it was "don't be evil."

    6. Re:People don't understand facebook by No,+I+am+Spratacus! · · Score: 1

      That's pro! If I had mod points, I would mod you up.

    7. Re:People don't understand facebook by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      A lot of times its for updates. As the AC below mentioned, YUI allows off-site hosting or on-site. I tend to use the off-site because if they put out a bug fix then it's updated automatically and I don't have to re-download whatever is affected. Also licensing issues might prevent the script from being hosted locally.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    8. Re:People don't understand facebook by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      If we extend your "if you don't like the price, don't use the service" advice to the real world, you will see that despite having far more choice in e.g. where to eat, where to shop, etc, there are even more laws governing business practices.

      Just because people are free to take their business elsewhere doesn't mean businesses should be free to do whatever they like.

    9. Re:People don't understand facebook by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      I happen to rather agree with you. My point was that people need to stop empowering facebook by turning over their lives to it on a daily basis. All that does is give facebook more of a commodity to sell. Without their product (your data) facebook becomes just another blip in web history.

  11. Easy solution for facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only allow people to use their accounts if they agree to allow target advertisement... That would almost guarantee the majority will keep targeted advertisement over losing their accounts.

    Anybody honestly believe such a law will have much effect on a site like facebook? This law would be more effective against sites where there isn't an incentive to keep an account. Of course, they could have a clause in the law that forbids such requiring permission to have an account but kinda doubt they thought of that.

  12. Re:Why would FB care anyhow? by dave420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't have a clue about the EC if you claim that. Stop reading the Daily Mail and start reading actual newspapers.

  13. Re:More info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do. I suggest we change the meme "Think of the children" to "Think of the Europeans" when discussing some stupid law that is designed to help theoretically helpless people.

  14. Re:More info here by masternerdguy · · Score: 2

    I dont click links here for obvious reasons.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  15. Easy opt-out by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Adblock+ works perfectly well for facebook just like it does for most other sites. I suppose an opt-in system is better, but adblock covers pretty much all websites while this half measure covers only facebook.

    1. Re:Easy opt-out by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      If people had to opt in for advertisements, advertising companies wouldn't make any money. In what world do you see that happening?

    2. Re:Easy opt-out by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't....

      http://hackademix.net/2010/05/26/google-analytics-opt-out-snake-oil/

      Noscript does. And I guess they have to emulate google features to do it cause of the state of the web.

    3. Re:Easy opt-out by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      The world in which I run noscript and don't associate my real name with my free online accounts.

      Not posting what I ate for breakfast on twitter helps too.
      It was... coffee!

      Data mine that.

    4. Re:Easy opt-out by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't....

      http://hackademix.net/2010/05/26/google-analytics-opt-out-snake-oil/

      Noscript does. And I guess they have to emulate google features to do it cause of the state of the web.

      I said that Adblock+ works perfectly well, I did not mention "Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on" which you linked.

    5. Re:Easy opt-out by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was under the impression we were still talking about tracking mechanisms, but ya if all you want to do is block ads then adblock+ is great. It won't stop you from getting tracked. Also noscript blocks javascript which google analytics happens to use to achieve its functionality, thus blocking Google analytics javascript blocks google analytics.

    6. Re:Easy opt-out by bfree · · Score: 1

      Maybe with the right list it will work, if so would you please tell us what list? The iframes to facebook php got past my browsers adblock plus and NoScript so dns seems the sanest way to cut them off at the knees,

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    7. Re:Easy opt-out by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      http://www.ghostery.com/
      Used with adblock it's very effective.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    8. Re:Easy opt-out by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Haha, I've heard of this one before, it's definitely a sleep taker if you catch my drift. Unfortunately I do not have enough tin foil in my home to make a hat large and thick enough to ever want to use this non-professionally and have yet had a reason to do so for profit. Just like comodo in paranoid mode, some things just don't add up to the why, but don't matter either.

    9. Re:Easy opt-out by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      it's definitely a sleep taker if you catch my drift

      No... I've never heard that phrase before...

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    10. Re:Easy opt-out by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      No, by running anything, noscript or adblock, you are opting out.

      Opting in would require you to install something to make adverts visable. And that would have to be something that the site doesn't tell you about, either (show me a website that says "Click here to install adblock+ and remove all adverts from our website"). You would have to want to see adverts badly enough that you would research of your own accord what piece of software would make it happen.

      That would never happen. If opting in was made mandatory, you would have popups on the page asking if you want adverts turned on, or pictured links to the software for activating adverts everywhere.

      Even here, on Slashdot, when I have good enough karma that I can turn off adverts, I still have to make the choice to opt out ("Tick to disable adverts") instead of them being removed automatically (with the option of turning them on).

      So no. We are going to be stuck with opting out of adverts for ever.

    11. Re:Easy opt-out by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Maybe with the right list it will work, if so would you please tell us what list? The iframes to facebook php got past my browsers adblock plus and NoScript so dns seems the sanest way to cut them off at the knees,

      I usually use both EasyList and Fanboy's List. Inevitably, I end up adding a few rules of my own, usually using the "element hiding helper" to block things like the "share on facebook, share on stumbleupon" etc links that sites usually have as they tend to make pages slower to load.

    12. Re:Easy opt-out by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I didn't word it correctly, it can cause a lack of sleep because of the realization that there is a lot more tracking going on than anybody thought and most of it is obscured by offshore IPs and domain names usually without PTR records. The tracking that goes on behind the scenes when surfing the web can make people a bit paranoid especially if your browser's security is wide open (no user config).

  16. Re:More info here by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Yea, you just responded to an obvious goatse troll like it was a real post.

    He just announced that if that goatse site is kept alive ("If they keep it up") he might also become a goatse troll ("I might join you.") :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  17. Nanny State! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay for the Nanny State! You know, you can just skip adding all of your personal information in there if you choose. Individual responsibility. What a concept!

    1. Re:Nanny State! by Sique · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to your logic, we should get rid of the police, the justice and the military, because protecting yourself and punishing perpetrators is solely your responsibility.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Nanny State! by blair1q · · Score: 0

      The primary goal of "nanny-state" bleaters is the elimination of taxes.

      There's a whole website for them:

      http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/07/102-things-not-to-do/

    3. Re:Nanny State! by forkfail · · Score: 1

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.

      --
      Check your premises.
  18. The best way to avoid facebook getting your info by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Informative

    The best way to avoid facebook getting your info:

    DO NOT SIGN UP FOR FACEBOOK.

    Yes, they have alternate ways of tracking you and getting your information- but if you don't sign up for facebook you get more spare time, and less privacy stolen.

    If you already are a member- quit now before you give away some other facet of your life.

    Honestly- we all know how evil they are by now- so why do people keep using them? Is it really worth giving away every piece of information of your life just to play crappy games (that most slashdotters could write a better version of in an evening).

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  19. Re:More info here by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

    Getting one thing right once in a while does not make up for the lack of accountability, NIMBY syndrome, waste and general stupidity that the EU manages to achieve. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, assuming that it's analog. IMO it deserves the terrible press that it gets, particularly in the UK.

  20. You're not facebook's customer people... by drachenfyre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously. If you aren't paying for it, you aren't the customer. You're the product being sold.

    1. Re:You're not facebook's customer people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously. If you aren't paying for it, you aren't the customer. You're the product being sold.

      The problem is that even if you're paying for it you aren't the customer. You're the product being sold.
      Say hi to subsidized smartphones, and even retail smartphones. :)
      Some kind of shitty era we're living in.

    2. Re:You're not facebook's customer people... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

      Seriously. If you aren't paying for it, you aren't the customer. You're the product being sold.

      That should be your sig line.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:You're not facebook's customer people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to a TV channel supplier, and an open source company.

  21. simply solved by StripedCow · · Score: 2

    Facebook will simply solve this by presenting their users with an annoying popup that only goes away if you agree (opt-in) to the new EULA.

    So there's not much significance to all of this.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:simply solved by Sique · · Score: 1

      If this causes Facebooks popularity to detoriate, more power to the E.U.!

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:simply solved by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      No license or contract can legalize a crime. The only thing a facebook EULA can do is provide a set of terms the costumer needs to respect to receive the continued use of the product. The EULA can not take away any rights, and it can not give facebook any additional rights.

    3. Re:simply solved by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      The problem is it won't. Most people will simply click through it, anxious to get on with their facebooking, without reading it.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  22. Re:More info here by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Too bad you are all bankrupt and the Euro is collapsing.

    Oh. Wait...

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  23. Misdirected hysteria by Old97 · · Score: 1

    The press loves to get people all worked up about data mining. Data mining itself is not an invasion of privacy. At that point you are just an anonymous set of attributes. The purpose of data mining is to understand and discover the relationships that exist among different data. It's an analysis performed on a large body of data from a large population or it doesn't work. Your personal identity is not important or useful for its purpose. Targeted advertising isn't an invasion either even if it uses information you've provided along with relationships discovered in data mining to try to put something in front of you that you may be interested in. That's actually a service. Facebook or Google are capable of providing targeted ads without providing your information to the advertisers or any other third party. The merely need to match the ads they display on your page to your characteristics. Do you think Google shares your gmail e-mails with others in order to target advertising to you based on an email's content? An invasion of privacy happens when without your permission the information you've entered is sold or given to others to use. That is what should require an "opt in" from the user. That isn't an internet specific thing either. Every company or institution that collects information from you as part of a transaction should be so restricted.

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    1. Re:Misdirected hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your description is good, but does warrant hysteria. It is important that you can't deduce the identity of an individual from statistics, and the EU privacy regime makes that point. But these statistics are highly personal in nature. We have only the company's vague assurances that humans are not accessing data on individuals.

      An opt-in would solve many of these problems for all parties. If you'd rather see ads relevant to you than generic "Drink Coca Cola" ones, you'd have that option. Hell, I might take it.

      At any rate, people are going to abuse the mined data. For example, police officers, nurses, city employees and other public employees routinely access public figures' and acquaintances' private data on computer systems in Finland, where that is highly illegal. The best protection against such data breaches is not to collect the data where it's not absolutely necessary.

  24. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 1

    And there's plenty of middle ground in-between: Anyone who posts their political affiliation, sexual preference, religion, graduation date and place, home town, phone number (PHONE NUMBER!?), voluntarily, does so with the specific intention of letting others see it. Things like purchases and browsing habits, personal and unsolicited data mining are somewhat involuntary, and are legitimate privacy issues. Things like getting political ads because you posted your political party affiliation on the page of a public, ubiquitous site, are not legitimate privacy concerns, because you have already chosen to make them public. They wouldn't be on facebook, otherwise: it's not as though you need to put it on paper to remind yourself of these bits of information, and 'close friends and family' would likely already know these details, so on some level it's pretty obvious that you want people to know these things about you easily. That includes corporations. Don't like it, then don't post it. The only thing facebook requires of you is name, age, and an email address. And I've never gotten one bit of spam or directed mail to that address.

  25. Participatory Totalitarianism ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is an interesting perspective - TED Talk last week

        http://www.tedxbrussels.eu/2011/speakers/kaliya_hamlin.html

  26. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Sique · · Score: 1

    And not going on sites that have a Facebook like button. Or are somehow affiliated with Facebook without telling you.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  27. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I was buying cell-batteries the other day and the retailer wanted me to enter a facebook user and password so it could automatically insert a facebook comment that I had purchased batteries from them.

    I remember thinking - WhyTF would I do that? Who on earth would want to post mundane information about what they buy online? IRS would looove to get a hold of their facebook profile no doubt.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  28. Pffft, Zuckerberg will solve this in five seconds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Change the terms and conditions to include "I agree to X".
    2. On the next login, show a "The terms and conditions changed" pop-up with miles of tiny text and a big "I agree" button next to the "Close my account". (Note how it doesn't say "delete".)
    3. Auto-logout everyone who hasn't logged out in the last 24 hours.
    4. Wait.
    5. PROFIT.

    (But at least the EU is stumbling in the right direction... this time.)

  29. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and don't associate with any one who uses Facebook

  30. Just How Gullible Are You? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company denies outright that it misuses or mishandles user information.

    Does anybody believe this any longer?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  31. Re:More info here by loufoque · · Score: 2

    You do realize the only reason the UK are doing fine today is because they took a lot of EU money a couple of years ago when they were in a crisis and the rest of Europe was not?
    There are 27 countries. Not everyone can benefit from it at the same time. The EU exists to regularize things between member countries, so that they can balance each other out. Sometimes a country is at the bottom of the balance, sometimes at the top.

  32. Just adds one click. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    When rights are revokable, they are useless. "If you want our service, you must agree to give up all your rights to sue, your right to due process, and your right to privacy." Well, then they aren't rights. When you must "explicitly" give permission, they will just add a single splash page that people will click through to get the service, then they will do the "illegal" things as before. The only "cure" is the anti-libertarian solution of preventing that contract. The person can agree to the boilerplate ToS, but then the site must then explicitly request for every sharing, and when denied, not retaliate against the user.

    Personally, I think the best compromise is a requirement that the user be notified on each and every instance of sharing, along with an opt-out for the information both in the primary database and the one it was transferred to. That was a failure for CAN-SPAM, where they can store your email forever and were never required by law to remove it from a list, unless they emailed you. So the list would be held by company A, who would then sell the list to people. That sold list would email you, and you could opt-out of that one, but the actual list you are on that generated that email was legally shielded, as the email came from a secondary source, protecting them from having to ever cull the master list.

  33. Apache, bind, linux by phorm · · Score: 1

    Not everything needs a customer... (unless you count customers as those who also contribute)
    Unfortunately a lot of scamware tends to put people off the concept that there are plenty of good things out there that are clean and free.

  34. Re:Best thing from the EU is the plane to NZ by __aavevi421 · · Score: 1

    I've chosen Brazil...

  35. Re:Why would FB care anyhow? by dave420 · · Score: 1

    I see you are also woefully ignorant of the EU and its workings.

  36. Re:Why would FB care anyhow? by Bucky24 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not about to make a statement like GP did, mostly because I don't believe that the EU will collapse anytime soon, but I also am ignorant of its workings. So care to enlighten us?

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  37. Datamine my life by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Is it good that so generic social networking site is run by an advertising company? Facebook's importance in people's lives has risen so high that maybe it should be run by some party with no financial interests. Or for humankind it should be recommended for everyone to move to something like Diaspora.

  38. Re:Why would FB care anyhow? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    I see you are also woefully ignorant of the EU and its workings.

    Only someone woefully ignorant of the EU and its workings could expect it not to collapse.

  39. Re:More info here by lgw · · Score: 2

    Which is great until countries start actively gaming the system, spending wildly because "of course we'll get bailed out". A bit less cycnically, it's easy for a political leader to give money to the people, and wait on austerity until it's externally imposed, at which point it's not the leader's fault, it's those evil EU baddies. Which could all still work unless most of the countries happen to need a bailout all at the same time, which is pretty much where we are today - it's doubtful there's enough strength left in the member countries that are doing well to help all the countries that need it.

    It's just as messed up in the US of course: we'll keep spending like drunken sailors as long as we possibly can, avoiding any attempt at a graceful solution because that would require admitting we have a problem, and an addict just doesn't do that until he hits bottom.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  40. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

    I use them mostly because anyone I want to talk to has moved away and that's the only way to get in touch. But also, as has been said on /. before, I have more control over my profile. Right now Facebook thinks I live in Timbuktu (it's pretty amusing to post something and see "near Timbuktu" on it), rather then being forced to use algorithms to determine where I am, which would probably be pretty accurate.

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  41. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

    There are some people who post on facebook what they ate for breakfast and when they go to the bathroom. I'm sure they'd love to be able to automatically post when they buy something.

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  42. Re:Best thing from the EU is the plane to NZ by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've chosen Brazil...

    I'm not sure that's an improvement.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  43. Re:Best thing from the EU is the plane to NZ by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

    As a New Zealand citizen, I laugh at your optimism. Welcome to the land of low wages, rampant alcoholism and child poverty.

    --
    mediocrity rules, man
  44. Re:More info here by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    I think one of the reasons the UK is doing ok is that they kept their own currency. Greece wouldn't be in such bad trouble if they still had their own currency.

  45. Re:Best thing from the EU is the plane to NZ by SleepyJohn · · Score: 0

    I have been in NZ for five years now, having removed my family from the EU when I finally saw the iron hand that is truly behind all the pompous hyperbole and handouts (I think the final straw was their Supreme Court's pronouncement that criticism of the EU or its bosses was on a par with blasphemy!), and we have not regretted a minute. I have just enjoyed the pleasure of being able to vote for who governs me, which is more than anyone in the EU can do in reality, for all the fluff and bullshit about European (toothless) Parliaments and so on. Not only can the people not vote for those who makes their laws, they don't even know who they are!

    There is no shortage of low wages, alcoholism and child poverty in the EU, however much its bosses may prattle to the Press about their 'Brave New World'; and it harbours a great many social evils far worse than them. And there is better weather and more room here. And I am not battered by Third World dictator brainwashing logos plastered all over everything from unneeded bridges and motorways that go nowhere to my children's school milk (yes, my children's school milk came loudly and ostentatiously courtesy of the wondrous EU!). I began to think I was living in North Korea.

    So, for me anyway, NZ beats the EU by 12,000 miles, which is a nice distance to be from Brussels. I can even tolerate the Metric System knowing that the people voted for it rather than having it foist upon them by an overbearing overlord. And I don't imagine I will be hauled before the courts for a wicked Crime against the State if I sell someone a pound of apples in the market.

    I may have missed some wondrous benefit of the glorious EU that makes it a better place to live than New Zealand, but I don't think so. Not for me, anyway. And I'm with Winston Churchill on the democracy issue - "Worst form of government, apart from all the others". And the EU is certainly one of the others.

  46. Re:Best thing from the EU is the plane to NZ by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Calling it a totalitarian state is an overstatement - for now, at least - but yeah, that seems mostly right. We (the Portuguese) are fucked too, yet sheepishly accept any and every imposition, despite being perfectly obvious that it just buries us faster.

  47. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Mitreya · · Score: 1
    DO NOT SIGN UP FOR FACEBOOK.

    Also, remember to draw up a contract forcing your friends not to tag you. I hear that most unsigned people have a fairly comprehensive profile based on information provided by others. Not the same, but still

    Let me guess... you answer is get rid of every friend that signed up for facebook (and live in a glorious cave)? Reality has to set in somewhere. I minimize my exposure to facebook by only allowing facebook to run java script when I want to use every once in a few weeks (amazing how many sites pop up, facebook.com was blocked from running java script... Just amazing). But I won't delete my profile just yet.

  48. Needed to proved funds!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is funny, sounds like television evangelists, give us your love, open your heart to facebook, and facebook will want you to stay to keep up with us, and facebook knows you are a sucker and have many friends as well as money to play Zygna games, money that facebook did not provided to you, and facebook wants you donate about 500-3000 more users, as well as spending vast amounts of money towards Zygna to help us spread your word. Mean while they are driving high end cars, buying expensive clothing, they own a 300,000 private jet, and 2-4 homes along beach front property.. lol

    Yeah it would be a shame if facebook went under, I see total world collapse from such a thing... lol Of course I am been sarcastic!!!!!!!

  49. Re:More info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming the EU exists.... Hope your talking about Germany...

    What about my talking about Germany? Finish your sentence, man!

  50. It is neither ironic nor surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Socialism contrary to what the average american think , is not about dictature, it is about social contract, and sharing resource (think health care). *somne* communist regime went all dictature and big brother, but it is not a feature per see of socialism. Case in point the most socialistic regime in europe are democratic.

    From that point of view, a true socialist regime will always be less big brother than a facist pro corporatist regime. The USA is really on the facist side , no matter what the consitution and amendement says. Look at how pro corporation law are , lobbyism and the rest, it becomes quite clear.

    Frakly, I think you are screwed in the US. Too many sheep accepting bad law fatalistically rather than fight them. It will have to get much worst, violentely so , before it can get better. But , hey, as one of your own said : sometimes the tree of liberty has to be refreshed with the blood of the tyrant.

  51. I for one prefer targeted advertising by Mouldy · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have adverts that are targeted to my personal interests and 'likes' than be bombarded with irrelevant crap that I'm not at all interested in. Do I want to have farmville adverts showing up on my FB page? No - I'm not a teenage girl. Do I want to be notified when ebuyer or have a sale on? Yes. What's more relevant to me; A band I like is playing a concert in my area, or, A rapper who makes my ears bleed is doing a gig in a different country?

    Say what you want about Facebook - but I like how their adverts quite often for something I'm genuinely interested in. IMO, that's what ALL advertising should be like. No matter how many times I see the Always adverts on TV - I'm never going to buy sanitary pads.

  52. Just by Drinking Coffee, You can Earn 131% or MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes! You can be a Millionaire in 2 months!!! That’s my Final Answer!!!

    According to OPEC, at the end of 2001, Coffee is the third largest traded commodity in the world. The 1st is Oil & the 2nd is Water. So, the next time you drink coffee, substitute this healthy DXN Lingzhi Coffee 3 in 1 to experience the sweet exotic aroma. This kind of coffee is recommended for all ages. Be an Investor & be Healthy!!! Imagine, in just a small investment of P2,500.00 (w/ major products), you can be an authrorized International Distributor in more than 154 countries, globally.

    So, there’s really a big chance that you can become a millionaire, isn’t it? Small investment, but BIG Time business!!! And you are not only helping yourself but you will also help other people to become healthy & wealthy.

    Remember, prevention is better than cure.

    Drink Coffee & be Wealthy!!!

    So, Act Now!!!

  53. Re:More info here by rich_hudds · · Score: 2

    Care to back up that claim with anything? The 'only reason' the UK is fine is because it took a lot of money from the EU? We didn't take a lot of money from the EU, we are massively net contributors every year.

    The UK has never defaulted on its debts and considering we invented the concept of a 'National Debt' that is saying something. There is no way we would give up that record easily as it saves us a couple of points on our interest payments in perpetuity.

    I think we may have renegotiated a couple of bilateral agreements with countries during the World Wars but we've never defaulted.

    The Eu is a trap that is steadily making Europe less democratic. It's just effectively removed the elected Greek and Italian governments using the excuse that they cannot be trusted to do the right things.

  54. I hate facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I never created a profile.
    this is such an invasion of your privacy.

  55. EU Law and Court by andersh · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's simple. The EU is similar to the US Federal government. The member countries are subject to EU law where applicable, they have signed treaties to that effect.

    If a member country does not apply the relevant law correctly, charges will be brought before the The Court of Justice of the European Union.

    If the member state loses the case it will be subject to punitive measures until it corrects the situation. There is a lot to lose for the member country in question.

  56. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a better idea, why not just turn on your connection to the internet.
    Just because there's a better idea doesn't mean new ideas cannot be created.
    Why is opt-in such an issue for people to grasp (not saying you do not?

  57. Re:More info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Too bad you are all bankrupt and the Euro is collapsing.

    Oh. Wait...

    You do realize it's those nice bankers and other financial goons in the US that caused this whole mess right? Not to mention their [insert your favorite insulting noun here] population living waaaaay above their means of course...

  58. Re:More info here by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I wish England would stop dicking about in EU and actually commit

    Speaking as someone who lives in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but who no longer lives in England, I've spent 4.5 of the last 6 years (since I got married, 6 years ago) trying to persuade the wife that if we're looking to move from our current flat, then we should look seriously at moving to somewhere in the EU, not on the borders as Britain is at the moment.

    (And no, I would not for one second consider moving back to Engerlandddd!)

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  59. Denials - HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zuckerberg, how about instead of denying what you aren't doing with private data you go ahead and publish a detailed list of what you *are* doing with it? No fair being nefarious and keeping some of it secret either!