Slashdot Mirror


Hard Drive Makers Slash Warranties

Lucas123 writes "Both Seagate and Western Digital have reduced their hard drive warranties, in some cases from five years to one year. While Western Digital wouldn't explain why, it did say it has nothing to do with the flooding of its manufacturing plants in Thailand, which has dramatically impacted its ability to turn out drives. For its part, Seagate is saying it cut back its warranties to be more closely aligned with other drive manufacturers."

95 of 445 comments (clear)

  1. LOL by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "For its part, Seagate is saying it cut back its warranties to be more closely aligned with other drive manufacturers."

    Yeah, the Maxtor buyout wasn't such a good idea after all, eh?

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "For its part, Seagate is saying it cut back its warranties to be more closely aligned with other drive manufacturers."

      Right, because differentiating yourself as a premium provider with a better than industry norm warranty wouldn't work. They would rather be "the same" as everyone else. Funny how I always hear car manufacturers claiming their "drive train" warranty is longer than the other guy. I guess that won't work in the drive market though. Not being sarcastic here - I'm sure these folks understand their market better than a random AC, so it must make sense.

    2. Re:LOL by ArundelCastle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh god... fuck Maxtor.
      But yes, when our local utilities raise rates, it's to be more "competitive" and "in line" with other regions.
      So instead of keeping the best warranty in the industry, Seagate is content to fall in line. Whatever, I don't truck with them anymore.

    3. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Translation.. "We'll copy everyone else so when the bad press starts we can say we weren't first".

      The real reason for the warranty reduction is that instead of sticking with Thailand they'll be sourcing lower quality components elsewhere to construct drives.

    4. Re:LOL by tixxit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you can read it as Seagate being content to fall in line. It could also be that consumers are not willing to pay the extra few bucks for a 5 year warrantied drive. If they were, then Seagate wouldn't have reason to cut it.

    5. Re:LOL by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Informative

      And it'll be a cold day in hell before I trust anything more important to my fetish porn collection to a WD drive...

      Why is that? Of all the drive problems I've ever had, from failures to DOAs to Linux incompatibility issues, the one manufacturer that has stood out as being the most reliable is in fact Western Digital. Why do you distrust WD?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    6. Re:LOL by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "For its part, Seagate is saying it cut back its warranties to be more closely aligned with other drive manufacturers."

      Right, because differentiating yourself as a premium provider with a better than industry norm warranty wouldn't work. They would rather be "the same" as everyone else. Funny how I always hear car manufacturers claiming their "drive train" warranty is longer than the other guy. I guess that won't work in the drive market though. Not being sarcastic here - I'm sure these folks understand their market better than a random AC, so it must make sense.

      This smells like the sort of move a company makes when it is run by bean-counters, rather than a leader with vision, seizing the high ground and pointing a finger back at spineless competition, while laughing out loud - "See, they are rubbish and we are the best!"

      Next: Enter the marketing wizards to put some sort of bombasitic and completely unfathomable positive spin on this - "Really, it's good for the market! Honest!"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:LOL by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      because people are too shortsighted to realize that a: you're buying a consumer grade drive and b: people think that if they get the "bad one" that fails early, that all drives of that brand are bad.

    8. Re:LOL by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep. The Great Google Hard Disk Study revealed that no brand was "more reliable" than any other.

      Every single manufacturer had troublesome batches and/or models. No brand was immune to this.

      FWIW the single biggest factor they found which correlated to failure was heat. If your drive runs hot then expect trouble.

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:LOL by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In such a brutally commodified market as HDDs, I suspect that all the companies are run by bean counters and the visionaries are dead.

      Because they are so cheap, per GB, mechanical HDDs aren't going anywhere for a decent chunk of the future; but they've been boxed in such that there isn't any noticeable room for 'visonary' development:

      1. Performance? If you want that, you'll be talking to a totally different company with a background in semiconductors, either Flash or DRAM, depending on how much money you are made of. Nothing stopping the HDD people from selling rebadges; but rebadging is not exactly a visionary(or terribly high margin) business.

      2. Reliability? Because servicing a warranty request isn't inexpensive(phone drones, fedex, etc.) anybody who can't deliver drives with a low failure rate during standard PC OEM warranty periods is going to find their sales limited; but reliability at the drive level isn't actually worth very much: The value of the world's spinny disks is peanuts compared to the value of the data on them. Most of the reliability money and R&D is going into RAID, advanced filesystems, various automated redundancy and backup solutions, etc. Again, nothing stops the HDD guys from selling rebadge RAID controllers or cloud backup services; but rebadging is not exciting.

      3. Features? If it doesn't just drop in and play nice with the SATA/SAS controllers of the world, including the legacy and currently shipping ones, it's a dud. If it has some cool feature that is supported only by your proprietary utility, on controllers that directly pass the necessary nonstandard commands, it isn't going to be wildly useful. If it achieves sufficiently broad adoption that OS and HDD controller support starts coming standard, it is no longer a unique competitive advantage...

      Cynically, there is also the fact that even people buying on the basis of desire for mechanical reliability don't have access to very good information: hardware and firmware revs change constantly, sometimes with a change in model designation, often not, some designs turn out to be workhorses, some are deathstars, some batches are bad, some aren't. Everybody has an emotional position on reliability, based largely on which brands failed them in the recent past; but unless they are buying in serious volume and somewhat behind the tech curve, data about the past are largely obsolete.

    10. Re:LOL by definate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This smells like the sort of move a company makes when it is run by bean-counters...

      Just so you know, warranty decisions are always made by "bean counters" (accountants) and actuaries. Doesn't matter what company it is, they're the ones that have to assess the impact it would have on the company, and what the company can reasonably take on. Engineers and similar would at most provide information to help them make that decision.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:LOL by EdZ · · Score: 5, Informative
      Not quite that simple. For the first 2 years of HDD life, that is only true above 45C. Below that, there was a correlation of failure with cooler temperatures, with the most reliable temperature being 45C! Above this, there was a rapid rise in the failure rate, though at the maximum temperature of 50C, the failure rate was similar to 25-30C. With older (3-4 yr old) drives, temperature than became a factor. The report itself concluded:

      In the lower and middle temperature ranges, higher temperatures are not associated with higher failure rates. This is a fairly surprising result, which could indicate that datacenter or server designers have more freedom than previously thought when setting operating temperatures for equipment that contains disk drives. We can conclude that at moderate temperature ranges it is likely that there are other effects which affect failure rates much more strongly than temperatures do.

      Study available here.

    12. Re:LOL by hedwards · · Score: 2

      Yes, but sometimes there are bad batches and the shorter the warranty the more likely it is that you'll lose a disk without getting a replacement. Personally, I had a lot of WD disks going south, turned out to be dirty power AFAICT.

      Seagate did have issues with a batch of 1tb disks a few years back. I remember Maxtor having issues with some of their 8.5gb drives years back.

    13. Re:LOL by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. The Great Google Hard Disk Study revealed that no brand was "more reliable" than any other.

      Every single manufacturer had troublesome batches and/or models. No brand was immune to this.

      FWIW the single biggest factor they found which correlated to failure was heat. If your drive runs hot then expect trouble.

      Wait, where in the Rather Poorly Written Google Hard Disk Study, linked by EdZ a few replies away from this one, does it say that reliability didn't vary with brand? All I see related to that is "Failure rates are known to be highly correlated with drive models, manufacturers and vintages [18]. Our results do not contradict this fact," specifically stating that reliability does indeed vary by manufacturer. Given the rather sloppy organization in the paper, however, I wouldn't be surprised if they contradict themselves elsewhere and make the claim that you've cited. Can you show us the quotation that gave you the impression that brand doesn't matter?

      http://research.google.com/archive/disk_failures.pdf

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    14. Re:LOL by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

      I guess I have to agree. At this point, if I build a desktop, it's raid1 to start with. The price of drives are so cheap, I start by assuming I'm getting what I'm paying for and buy two of them and then mirror.

      As for servers, as the size of drives has gone up, my interest in parity based raid solutions has proportionally gone down. Lots of drives in a raid10, either smart raid controllers or ZFS make my interest in a single drive basically nil.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    15. Re:LOL by kcbnac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I always seek out and buy the 5-year warranty drives. Even if it costs more (which about half the time I end up paying a few extra bucks for it) - it means they "trust" the hardware a bit more.

    16. Re:LOL by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This smells like the sort of move a company makes when it is run by bean-counters...

      Just so you know, warranty decisions are always made by "bean counters" (accountants) and actuaries. Doesn't matter what company it is, they're the ones that have to assess the impact it would have on the company, and what the company can reasonably take on. Engineers and similar would at most provide information to help them make that decision.

      As a Certified Management Accountant once told me - Accountants are there to advise, not run a company. The decision to go with the accountant's advice is, as stated above, a decision to not stand out as a company under the banner of "Quality"

      Raid10 is in my future. When the drive prices return to "normal" that is.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    17. Re:LOL by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are forgetting one friend:

      4. Size and Price. Most people frankly aren't gonna give a second thought to anything but size and price, you can trumpet your warranty to the high heavens but if the other guys offers a 2Tb for $50 even if it has a 30% failure rate after 1 years the average users are gonna run right over you to get to the cheap fatty.

      You are right though that in a commodity market frankly nobody really gives a shit. all the OEMs care about is the majority survive past the OEM warranty and honestly with the exception of the occasional bad batches most drives easily make 5 years whereas most folks are upgrading or replacing after 3 so again warranty doesn't really matter.

      I tell my customers to either have me get or pick up on their own a USB drive and backup often, and data they consider "must never lose" like family pictures have backed up in multiple locations including the cloud. I personally keep a 1Tb USB for OS images and keep my pics backed up there and in the cloud, the rest? meh its replaceable. All my games come from steam or GOG so no problems there, my tunes are on multiple drives AND DVDs, so frankly if a drive died tomorrow it really wouldn't affect me.

      I can see though why they've stopped having long warranties, i mean what was the size 5 years ago? something like 160gb? How many of the OEMs want to keep a pallet of those things in a warehouse for replacements? And dealing with customers i can tell you its NEVER the drive they care about, its all the data that went tits up that they aren't getting back and nothing the drive manufacturers are gonna do is gonna change that.

      So I don't really see a problem here. I again haven't seen any other than the occasional bad batch (like the current Seagate 1Tb Plus 7200RPMs which are shit) that won't make 5 years and most will be looking at a new machine or new drive before that. Once they get the flood mess cleaned up we'll be seeing $35 1Tb drives and $65 2Tb drives again and frankly nobody will give a shit about warranty again.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:LOL by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      Just so you know, warranty decisions are always made by "bean counters" (accountants) and actuaries.
      Correct. A warranty is basically an insurance policy that they throw in included in the price of the product. By reducing the warranty period, they are saying that their company feels that they are unwilling to bear the risk of making sure a product lasts five years. And since they are not willing to bear that risk, neither am I.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    19. Re:LOL by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Well as a little system builder I can say I've been bit in the ass by several of the bad batches, the Seagate 1Tb, The Maxtor diamondmax 200gb of a few years ago, the worst being the Maxtors they put in the optiplex of 2000, boy that was a POS.

      Sadly the best two drive manufacturers are getting out of the biz, and that's Samsung and Hitachi. Hitachi made some damned solid server drives and Samsung drives I've frankly put in places i'd never have the guts to put a Seagate or WD, places like construction sites and warehouse PCs, and damned if those babies don't keep right on humming through the grit and the vibration. I'm just glad i loaded all my machines with Samsung EcoDrives before the big flood screwed the prices, in Aug I was getting them at $35 for 1Tb and $65 for 2Tb.

      My advice is if you can find them score some Samsung or Hitachi drives before they are all gone, especially the Samsung EcoDrives. they were so good on cache management that I found their 1Tb EcoDrive beat the 400gb Seagate even though the Seagate was 7200RPM and the EcoDrive was only 5400RPM. They just made damned solid drives and the Eco series runs a good 20 degrees cooler than the Seagates in my own personal tests. after that I'd take WD and Seagate dead last, simply because after they bought out Maxtor their QA went to shit, especially on their drives over 640Gb. The rumor is its the cheap ass Maxtor ARM controllers and firmware that is causing them to go tits up, but a dead duck is a dead duck and I've had too many problems from those drives to mess with 'em anymore. If its Seagate it'll be sub 500gb or not at all for me.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    20. Re:LOL by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sandforce2 (1200) failures have nothing to do with MLC-vs-SLC, and everything to do with buggy firmware that can corrupt its config data and crash a few minutes after startup if it gets powered down (or put into sleep mode) "wrongly" with the scratch data in a partially-updated or corrupt state. Everyone was so obsessed with long-term data retention life and rewrite cycles that even WORSE failure modes ended up falling through the cracks and becoming the real problem, instead.

      Does it really matter whether the flash on a drive can survive 1000, 10000, or a million rewrite cycles if it keeps corrupting itself and has to be reformatted every few weeks or months due to a firmware bug Sandforce can't/won't fix?

    21. Re:LOL by Spoke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, it means that with the extra money they make on the drive (since it cost you more), they expect to be able to at least break even on warranty costs.

      For example, take 2 otherwise identical appearing drives - one costs $100 with a 3 year warranty, the other costs $120 with a 5 year warranty.

      Does the $120 necessarily mean that it's more likely to make it to 5 years before failing? Not at all - the two drives could be exactly the same. It just means that with the $20 they expect to be able to cover the extra warranty costs on those 5 year warranty drives on average.

    22. Re:LOL by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep, the only lesson to be learned here is backup, backup, BACKUP.

      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:LOL by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but the last company to slash their drives from 3 years, to 1 year warranty was Maxtor about 6 or 7 years ago, and they did so at the same time that I had 6 Maxtor drives fail personally in a 3 month period and all of different models, and I haven't bought a Crapstor drive ever since.

      In contrast the 5 year warranty Seagates and Western Digitals have always done be well, I know it's just an anecdote but I firmly believe a warranty most definitely is an indication of the quality of a company's product, and if a company is dropping warranty from 5 years to 1 year it implies they no longer have faith in the majority of their products being realistically able to last 5 years.

    24. Re:LOL by Taelron · · Score: 2

      And sometimes its fully justified... Let me explain while I will never purchase another Samsung drive...

      A few years back I was still working as an IT consultant and a client in San Francisco, a billion dollar a year organization, purchased 40 new workstations. All came with Samsung hard drives. Within 6 months half of the drives had failed.

      The client called their sales manager rather irrate after the 18th or 19th drive had failed. The sales manager assured them that it was bad luck and that they had gotten a bad batch of drives. Not to worry, its been sorted out. Still the client demanded new harddrives for all of the systems.

      A few days later a shipment of Samsung drives arrive. We install them into every machine...

      And within another six months, another 1/3rd of the "new" drives had failed as well.

      That client went as far as to state in all new pc acquisitions that Samsung drives NOT be used.

      I have seen a fair number of home user Samsung drives fail too. So I will never touch one myself. In fact I now carry that mindset over to all Samsung products. If two batches of bad drives can come out over the span of a year, then I have to question their Quality Control on ALL of their product lines.

    25. Re:LOL by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't even make sense at face value, and in fact, is just untrue. There are only 5 major HDD manufacturers these days, anyway: Hitachi, Samsung, Seagate, Toshiba, and Western Digital.

      Samsung: 5 years.
      Toshiba: 3 or 5 years, depending on product line.
      Hitachi: all over the map (1-5 years), but most seem to be 3 years.
      WD: Dropping some warranties from 3 to 2 years now.

      So, Seagate, *which* other drive manufacturerS were you aligning with by dropping (some) HDD warranties to 1 year?? Or did you just mean "aligning" as in collusion?

    26. Re:LOL by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can see though why they've stopped having long warranties, i mean what was the size 5 years ago? something like 160gb? How many of the OEMs want to keep a pallet of those things in a warehouse for replacements?

      For older drives, it's common practice for a warranty replacement to be a newer model than the broken one. I have a lot of drives with 5-year warranties and have gotten larger drives about half the time I sent in an RMA, and pretty much always got the latest equivalent in other specs, so cache might be higher, power use lower, etc.

      Also, every drive manufacturer is still selling new 160GB drives. No, I don't understand it, either, but it shouldn't be a stock problem for the manufacturer to replace even a five year old drive.

    27. Re:LOL by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      Most of the blue labeled drives came out of Optiplex 755's.

      The Dell small-form-factor and ultra-small-form-factor chassis are likely responsible for most of your drive deaths.

      If you have a user that actually loads the processor, the heat inside those boxes becomes frightful. For most "normal" users, it's probably not an issue, but if the cooling fan starts to spin up loud enough to hear, that's the sign.

      As for drive brands, I find that pretty much every manufacturer is equal. Out of about 40 drives that have seen 24/7 use for the last 8 years, I've had about 8 fail, and they are a mixed bag (Seagate, WD, pre-Seagate Maxtor, Samsung, and Hitachi), all at about the same percentage as the drive mix (i.e., more failed Maxtors and WD because there are more of those drives). Every drive had a five-year warranty at the time of purchase.

    28. Re:LOL by drsmithy · · Score: 2

      Yes, and then you have posters like the previous poster who bash "consumer grade" drives and instead push the more-expensive "enterprise-grade" drives. Now maybe I'm missing something, but my understanding is that one of the big differences between "consumer" and "enterprise" drives is the speed they operate at. You're not going to find a 5400 rpm "green" drive in the high-end space; instead, they're usually 10k or even 15k rpm.

      There's several "Enterprise" class 7200 rpm (and maybe even 5400s, for archival storage) drives out there as well (also often called "Nearline"). I don't know exactly what's different about them compared to consumer drives, but I have noted:

      * They typically have a much higher MTBF

      * They've always come with five year warranties (and still do, even after these recent changes)

      * They're typically noticably heavier (so something in the physical construction is clearly different)

      * They often have a SAS interface instead of SATA (means little to the average punter, but is important if you're putting them into a multipathed enclosure)

  2. Suspicious timing by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's that with the overhaul the plants needed, the new production isn't fully debugged yet, so the expected failure rate has increased?

    1. Re:Suspicious timing by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you really just blamed manufacturing plant floods on wall street ? really ?

      Sounded like he's saying that the hard drive manufacturers are blaming the floods for an excuse to boost their profit.

    2. Re:Suspicious timing by Captain+Hook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you really just blamed manufacturing plant floods on wall street ? really ?

      Umm, no, he hasn't just blamed manufacturing plant floods on wall street. Where did you even get that from?

      He's saying the drive to maintain/increase short term profitability is to blame.

      That would have happened with or without floods.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    3. Re:Suspicious timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or, alternatively, people are so desperate to get hard drive supplies at this time that they are willing to pay for both A) higher prices (I'm seeing double or more prices around here for popular ones), and B) shorter warranties. The latter will come in handy later even when prices are back to normal.

      "Cut warranty now, while customers are desperate and happy to get anything."

  3. Well this is disturbing. by gellenburg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I rarely have ever run into a hard drive go bad within a year (24" iMac though was a very expensive and notable exception).

    I HAVE however run into my fair share of HDDs go bad within 3 years and definitely 5 years.

    So -

    Does anybody know which manufacturers offer the BEST warranties? Here I was just getting ready to order some 3TB SATA 7200RPM drives for my Drobos.

    1. Re:Well this is disturbing. by cruff · · Score: 5, Informative
      Apparently you will just need to buy the higher-end drive models that continue to offer longer warranties. From the article:

      "Standard PC warranties are one year. Even so, WD will continue to maintain five-year warranties on its premium desktop/notebook products, including the WD Caviar Black, WD Scorpio Black and WD VelociRaptor products," a spokesperson wrote in an email reply.

    2. Re:Well this is disturbing. by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      honestly the 5 year warranty of some drives greatly affects which drive I buy. I am usually segate fan but if a Samsung has better warranty I will buy that instead. I remember when I found one time the drives form Segate I wanted where only 3 year so I bought WD and Samsung at the time. So if WD and Segate drop there warranty period and other makers keep higher warranty then my cash goes to the bigger warranty. If you don't stand buy your product then I have no reason to either.

    3. Re:Well this is disturbing. by fnj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The blacks and velociraptors may or may not be better quality drives (I highly doubt that they are), but you will notice that they are vastly higher PRICED drives - grossly overpriced in fact.. I wouldn't want them even if they were priced the same as the 5400 rpm drives. They run hotter, waste more power, and give a very slight real world benefit to desktops or personal servers.

    4. Re:Well this is disturbing. by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I rarely have ever run into a hard drive go bad within a year (24" iMac though was a very expensive and notable exception).

      We've got around a 1/10 failure rate with iMac drives within the first year. Their heat management sucks.

    5. Re:Well this is disturbing. by na1led · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would be cheaper and safer to buy 2 Low Cost Hard Drives and Raid them, than buying an expensive Hard Drive wth extended warrantees!

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    6. Re:Well this is disturbing. by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would anyone rely on warranties for data? That's just a roulette wheel with a big house advantage. Backup. Backup.

      Warranties aren't for data (they don't even try to reclaim data on broken drives) but for the drives themselves. The problem with shorter warranties is it removes the manufacturer's financial incentive to make a product that won't fall apart after 1 year.

    7. Re:Well this is disturbing. by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. Drive reliability doesn't save data, backing up data saves data, nothing more and nothing less.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    8. Re:Well this is disturbing. by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. Drive reliability doesn't save data, backing up data saves data, nothing more and nothing less.

      Except that for most home users who use large harddrives, disk drives are their only way to affordably back up their data. Therefore, it makes sense to purchase more reliable drives for safer backups.

    9. Re:Well this is disturbing. by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      honestly the 5 year warranty of some drives greatly affects which drive I buy. I am usually Seagate fan but if a Samsung has better warranty I will buy that instead. I remember when I found one time the drives form Segate I wanted were only 3 year so I bought WD and Samsung at the time. So if WD and Seagate drop their warranty period and other makers keep higher warranty then my cash goes to the bigger warranty. If you don't stand by your product then I have no reason to either.

      Jeebus. I think I could actually forgive the misspelling of Seagate (at least you were consistent), but your grammar/homophone abuse kills me: where/were, there/their, buy/by.

      I once had a coworker that largely taught himself English from books, newspapers and TV in his home country before moving to the USA. Very smart guy, but made English mistakes like this due to a lack of formal English education (which is difficult to correct as an adult)

      This post was quite intelligible despite the grammar/spelling errors, so cut him some slack, you don't know his native language.

    10. Re:Well this is disturbing. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apple designs have a rather long history(Apple III-present, somewhat intermittently) of running everything right near thermal redline in order to keep it quiet. On the plus side, it is pretty impressive how quiet some of their hardware is, especially given its chassis size(quiet is easy when you can just have a row of low-speed 120mm fans blowing over everything, much harder when you have a maze of teeny little air channels and speed controlled blowers and stuff); but it gets damn toasty in there...

    11. Re:Well this is disturbing. by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Drives aren't that expensive (even after the flood). If your data is that important to you, buy more drives.

      Whatever the manufacturer, the drive return rates are about 2-5%. It makes no sense to bet that the drive model you happens to be the 2% return rate, and even so that's a 1 in 50 chance you're taking. Unless a particular model/batch is so crap, it doesn't seem worth it to take extra effort just to search around to see which is more reliable.

      Whereas if you have independent copies of your data on two different drives, the odds of both drives failing would be 5% * 5% = 0.25%. Unless of course you keep both drives in the exact same place and they get destroyed by the same disaster :). If you're paranoid pick different manufacturers for each drive, and try to keep them in different places...

      --
    12. Re:Well this is disturbing. by infinitelink · · Score: 3, Informative

      RAID is so much for back-up (which I took the "safer" part to imply, but if I am wrong, my mistake). In my experience those who RAID for back-up come out sorely disappointed when something fails. Problems in the controller can mean corrupt data in all attached disks; the failure rates when [re]building data can be large... Depending on the level being used may be more or less useful for back-up, but really it's not back-up. RAID is data virtualization. I know it's trite to say ("...not back-up"), but really it could save your butt to observe it; where your comment is very valid, however (IMHO) is that done right the RAID should boost read and write times (making the extra expensive drives that are slightly faster superfluous).

      Also remember to have versioning with whatever back-up system you use (copies of data at different times and dates) so that issues with corruption don't leave you with two copies of useless files. If you really want to use it as a back-up solution, though, at least go to RAID 6. On those systems multiple drives may fail and if set right the others will have data in redundancy and keep on functioning; it still doesn't get around the problem of failure points and hardware faults in hardware common to every drive however: unless you are running servers for the world or building important software with a deadline, or perhaps writing a PhD 24/7, I think that is likely overkill though.

      A couple external drives, connected with SATA cables if your machine is current enough to support it (USB otherwise) and some software to duplicate important folders periodically to chronological folders, is good enough, cheap, and simple enough that most folks with average intelligence and access to Google can figure out from tutorials or from forum help.

      And of course since my last dealings with RAIDers who couldn't get data back, things might have significantly improved...

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    13. Re:Well this is disturbing. by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 2

      honestly the 5 year warranty of some drives greatly affects which drive I buy. I am usually Seagate fan but if a Samsung has better warranty I will buy that instead. I remember when I found one time the drives form Segate I wanted were only 3 year so I bought WD and Samsung at the time. So if WD and Seagate drop their warranty period and other makers keep higher warranty then my cash goes to the bigger warranty. If you don't stand by your product then I have no reason to either.

      Jeebus. I think I could actually forgive the misspelling of Seagate (at least you were consistent), but your grammar/homophone abuse kills me: where/were, there/their, buy/by.

      I once had a coworker that largely taught himself English from books, newspapers and TV in his home country before moving to the USA. Very smart guy, but made English mistakes like this due to a lack of formal English education (which is difficult to correct as an adult)

      This post was quite intelligible despite the grammar/spelling errors, so cut him some slack, you don't know his native language.

      Native language is Canadian, I mean English. Never been the best at it either. But this is what happens when I type fast and get back to my job.

    14. Re:Well this is disturbing. by gellenburg · · Score: 2

      Here was my problem:

      1 - Drive was bad. Very loud "clicking" noises w/i first 30 days of owning it.
      2 - Drive had confidential and proprietary data stored on it for work. No, I didn't set up FileVault. Never trusted it.
      3 - Taking it to Apple meant I would effectively be discarding the drive in direct violation of data handling standards I was subjected to at the time.
      4 - I would have been w/o my main workstation for about a week.

      Heading down to Fry's on a Wednesday afternoon and buying a $30 toolset that included needed Torx drivers and a new SATA hard drive meant I was back up and running in about an hour. (Total spend about $200 for drive & tools.)

      Swore after that I'd never buy another iMac because of the damn drive (& heat). Here I am on a 27" iMac with an SSD (which is the only reason why I bout another iMac because of the SSD option.) I'm just hoping Apple continues to make the Mac Pro when I'll be able to afford one again.

  4. um, er, what? by jshark · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I recall correctly (and I may not), wasn't Seagate one of the first (if not *the* first) to up their warranty to 5 years in an attempt to stand out from other HD manufacturers a few years back?

    --
    If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough.
    1. Re:um, er, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Therefore, what they're saying essentially amounts to: "We will no longer be able/willing to sell you a product which is superior to our competitors'."

    2. Re:um, er, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe they are saying, "we offered a feature that led to higher costs for us but did not see a large increase in sales, and have no confidence that this apparently little-valued feature will convince people to buy our product when our competitors lower their prices due to less warranty overhead."

  5. In other words.... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hard drive quality sucks, and almost all of them fail by 5 years so we are cutting back to avoid having to honor the warranty.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Drives are cheap, data is expensive. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since the warranties dont cover lost data, I've never really cared. When a drive fails, its the data that was on it I care about, not the 100$ worth of metal and electronics.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Drives are cheap, data is expensive. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I use a drive's warranty period as the time after which I expect it to fail. If your drive comes with a 1-year warranty, then I won't expect it to last more than one year. If your competitor's drive comes with a 5-year warranty, I'll expect to have to replace your drive five times before I replace theirs and I'll take that into account when deciding which to buy.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  7. There's a Fish in me hard drive! by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Sorry, the moment you took delivery the warranty expired. All due to flooding in Thailand factory.

    How we doing on warranties and longevity of SSD?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:There's a Fish in me hard drive! by edmudama · · Score: 5, Informative

      Intel has a 5 year warranty on their 320 SSDs, longevity/reliability seem pretty good if you believe the data being published by various 3rd parties.

      --
      More data, damnit!
    2. Re:There's a Fish in me hard drive! by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Intel has a 5 year warranty on their 320 SSDs, longevity/reliability seem pretty good if you believe the data being published by various 3rd parties.

      Of course it wasn't so good a few months back when people found their SSD claimed to be an 8MB drive after rebooting. A warranty is nice, but doesn't help much if you just lost all your data.

      I'm still waiting for the day I reboot my home server and discover the OS has gone. Hopefully the firmware fix really did fix it.

    3. Re:There's a Fish in me hard drive! by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > How we doing on warranties and longevity of SSD?

      The electronics themselves, or the data on them? Big, huge difference. Sandforce2 (1200 series) drives in particular are going through a data holocaust at the moment. The problem isn't the electronics failing, the problem is that Sandforce's braindamaged firmware gets the drive into a state that causes the firmware itself to crash after a few minutes, or causes the drive to go into "panic" mode and intentionally brick itself (taking your data with it) for your "protection" (nobody at OCZ has ever been able to give a good explanation about how, exactly, having your drive brick itself into "panic" mode as a "precautionary" measure so you have to send it in and get a replacement with your data gone forever is somehow a desirable feature).

      Don't believe me? Go to ocz.com's support forum, find the one for Vertex2/Agility2 drives, and read the daily tales of woe with no solution besides "wipe the drive and try again" (assuming it's not in Panic Mode & has to be returned for official reflashing). Apparently, other brands using the same controller (Patriot, etc) are no better. Sandforce makes vendors treat their chipset like a black box, they dropped the ball, and just kind of left everyone unfortunate enough to own a drive based on one of their controller chips hanging like a corpse from the gallows of a wild-west town.

    4. Re:There's a Fish in me hard drive! by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      Don't count on it. My Vertex2/120 got into "3-minutes-to-bluescreen" mode last week. It had the latest firmware. The worst part is that you can't even run ddrescue on it, because whatever it is that ddrescue does causes the drive's firmware to crash instantly. I can read files off of it ~3 minutes at a time, but OCZ/Sandforce can't be bothered to give us a recovery util to let us just rip the raw sectors in a dd-like manner for offline recovery. The official party line is that the drives aren't broken, because they can be made operational again via erasure and reformatting. Of course, that does nothing to get the data back.

      I'm so totally over this piece of $hit drive it's not funny. If I hadn't paid so much for it, I'd smash it to bits with a hammer and post the video to Youtube for lulz. The worst part is that there's nothing anywhere to suggest that it will be any more reliable after I've erased and reformatted it, and RAID1 mirroring with a second identical drive won't do a thing to help avoid this same failure mode.

    5. Re:There's a Fish in me hard drive! by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      Pretty much any drive using a Sandforce 1200 controller (and probably all Sandforce controller chips, for that matter) is vulnerable to the "8mb drive" bug, even one made by Intel. I believe Intel either called off their partnership with Sandforce, or put it on hold indefinitely, precisely because they weren't about to blindly put their faith in a black-box controller chip they couldn't try to fix themselves if something went wrong.

      The big problem with Sandforce is their insistence on keeping everything about their controller chips a black-box secret locked behind NDAs, and the way they insist on tying the hands of even their largest customers so they can't try to fix bugs themselves. It's several orders of magnitude harder to replicate and troubleshoot a black-box failure than to find a bug when you have the source in front of you and can examine its official logic directly. I believe this is the main reason why OCZ itself ended up walking away from them and buying Indilinx -- they got tired of playing Russian Roulette with every new generation of Sandforce drive controller that seemed to end up having the same fundamental problems as the drives that came before it.

  8. All kinds of reasons by poity · · Score: 2

    If I were suspicious I'd think they're calling up their old stock and selling them as new (3yr warranty in 2009, 1yr in 2011).
    If I were cynical I'd think they're calling up their refurb stock and selling them as new.
    If I were reasonable I'd think they probably already don't have enough to sell, much less replace for free.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  9. Re:Who uses warranties? by subreality · · Score: 5, Informative

    once it fails securely erasing the data can be an issue

    That's one of many good reasons for whole-disk encryption.

  10. MTBF by rabenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mean

    Time

    Bullshit

    Factor

  11. Re:Spinrite, for crying our loud by fnj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bullshit. Spinrite doesn't do shit for present drive technology. In the ancient era of MFM and RLL it actually did contribute a benefit.

  12. lots of experience with hdds by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've bought several dozen hard drives personally over the years, starting with scsi, and I work in a computer repair shop where I've replaced hundreds of failing and dead drives over my time, so I've got a pretty good sample size to work with.

    Long ago I used to buy quantum and seagate because I didn't have the money for backups and so I needed to rely on quality and warranty. Quantum was one of the best quality going, and seagate ruled the roost with its 5 year warranties.

    But as the years passed, lots of HDD manufacturers got bought out. Quantum went with IBM and quality absolutely flushed down the toilet about the time of the "IBM Deskstar/Deathstar debacle. Seagate also got bought out, and their quality went south as expected, but their warranties remained at 5 yr for most models.

    I continued to buy seagates, until I got so sick of dealing with failing drives and RMA hassles. I bought my last seagate about 2 years ago. (a pair of them) Two weeks after purchase, one of them suffered one of the loudest catastrophic head crashes I have ever heard - the drive sounded like an operating circular handsaw. (best buy was even surprised by the sound when I returned it) They offered me an immediate new replacement, and I instead got my money and bought a different brand. Now I see they're finally dropping their warranties, probably after an extended period of losing their shirts due to a never-ending flood of RMAs.

    So at this point I'm down to looking for quality, and only expecting a 1 or 2 yr warranty. Western Digital used to be crap, but while other brands went down in quality, WD seems to have come up. I'm still seeing a lot of samsung drives failing but they've improved. Haven't seen enough toshibas to really have an opinion on them, but I generally haven't had good experiences, especially with their externals. Right now I'm buying WD greens, they're cheap and fairly reliable. I try to avoid buying drives already in enclosures, because it's been my experience that they put the cheapest thing they can find in them, especially the USB-only enclosures, those are generally junk and slow to boot.

    May as well throw in my 2c on enclosures also. You get what you pay for when buying a single drive enclosure. A cheap usb-only case is going to be slow and I would be very surprised if the AC adapter lasts more than 2 yrs. My personal favorite at this time is made by OWC, their Mercury Elite Pro, it's got esata, dual fw800, fw400, and usb. USB speed can get up near 38mb/sec, fw400 and 800 top at theoretical maxes of 39 and 79, and esata I have yet to discover the speed limit on, it maxes the drives I have attached. $80 seems like a lot for an empty case, but it's worth it. Two at home and two at work, here I use them for data recovery because they're also tolerant of failing drives.

    If you need more storage, go with a Drobo. One at home and one here at work, I know a dozen people that have them and nobody has any complaints, they work as advertised, are easy for even a newbie to maintain, and so far have proven very safe. Stuff a drobo full of WD greens for cheap, reliable, large storage.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:lots of experience with hdds by tepples · · Score: 2

      esata I have yet to discover the speed limit on, it maxes the drives I have attached.

      I believe eSATA is up in the 150 MB/s range. To max that, you may need an enclosure that's a RAID in itself.

    2. Re:lots of experience with hdds by subreality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      best buy was even surprised by the sound when I returned it

      This, right here, is why your experience is an anecdote, not data. You're sick of this brand because of this, but this experience is an outlier in the eyes of someone who has a much larger data set.

      Not all drives are created equal, but the way people form their opinions on which ones are crap are highly nonscientific.

    3. Re:lots of experience with hdds by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to brush up on your disk drive history.
      Quantum sold its disk drive division to Maxtor which was acquired by Seagate, which is still independent.
      IBM sold its disk drive division to Hitachi which is in the process of being acquired by WD.

    4. Re:lots of experience with hdds by marauder · · Score: 2
      Why, I would be delighted to give you a complaint about Drobo. Here's one I prepared last year:

      I just want to take this opportunity to warn people off buying a Drobo and/or DroboShare. For those who haven't heard of it, Drobo is an impressive-sounding box that you slide drives in and out of as you like, and it manages all the RAID and defragging and whatnot.

      The acute problem is that without warning they can screw themselves up and refuse to mount. When this happens you are completely hosed because nothing except a Drobo can read the Drobo disk format. You will need to format and restore from backup. What's that, you say? You bought the Drobo because it seemed like the safest way to keep 8TB of storage going, given that that's really hard to back up? Tough tits. Yes, I know "RAID is not a backup" etc, and I did have actual backups from which I restored my data, but the difference between the Drobo marketing and the Drobo reality is staggering, especially given the Drobo cost.

      The chronic problems? Drobo is slow, glacially slow. For some reason the makers claim that it can be used as "primary" or working storage, which is a laugh since the access times are significantly slower than a plain USB2 drive which is already uncomfortably slow for serious work. It will drive you nuts. The management interface will drive you nuts. The way Drobo lies to the OS about its capacity and available space, so you have to use the management interface to find out this basic information, will drive you nuts. And you will live in fear that unmounting the device by any means other than the management software will corrupt your data unrecoverably. Gods forbid you knock the USB cable out by accident.

      DroboShare is the additional expensive component that turns Drobo from a USB drive into a NAS. It has its own problems. The least of which are that once you switch to DroboShare, neither Time Machine nor Lightroom will let you use the Drobo storage.

      I thought Drobo was a great idea, it sounded awesome when described, I think CK even had good things to say about it, but I was wrong. It was a very expensive disappointment. This is my story.

      tl;dr: Drobo and DroboShare suck, do not buy. Or if you must, buy my one.

      -marauder

      and then

      See also:

      http://www.devwebsphere.com/personal/2010/03/drobo-wont-mount-today-the-pain-continues.html

      All of http://www.devwebsphere.com/personal/drobo/ is a tragicomedy really, he bought one in 2009 and quite liked it for the first week, then spent 24 months battling with every problem I described and more, and he still hasn't given up! Me, I nearly stroked out when Disk Utility said "won't mount, can't fix, it's dead", and I never trusted it again after that.

      http://writelarge.com/node/319

      HTH.

  13. Single Hard Drives Are Unsafe At Any Cost by ausoleil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The failure rate for hard drives has been quite well known for some time now: it is precisely 100% +/- 0.0%.

    Truly, it is not a matter of IF a given hard drive will fail, it is a matter of WHEN.

    That means that having a mirrored pair as a minimum -- even on a home machine -- is not an optional frill, it is a necessity. Even better, offsite cloud storage offer replication globally of vital data that are irreplaceable.

    If warranties are dropping, so is reliability, and that means it is more vital than ever to CYA and have solid redundancies all the way from the data center to the family laptop.

    1. Re:Single Hard Drives Are Unsafe At Any Cost by am+2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The failure rate for hard drives has been quite well known for some time now: it is precisely 100% +/- 0.0%.

      Truly, it is not a matter of IF a given hard drive will fail, it is a matter of WHEN.

      That means that having a mirrored pair as a minimum -- even on a home machine -- is not an optional frill, it is a necessity.

      Uh, RAID is a very bad idea, unless you need 100% uptime (like on a server with hot swap). Broken drives can introduce data errors into the stream, which are eventually duplicated onto the other drive(s) as well. When the file system breaks due to this or some software bug, the file system on all disks is broken. For home use, the much better option is to use the second drive for frequent backups, ideally automated (so you can't forget to do it). The plus side is that the backup drive can be an external drive connected via USB/FireWire/eSATA/Thunderbolt, further decreasing the chance of blowing up both disks at once.

    2. Re:Single Hard Drives Are Unsafe At Any Cost by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      I have never in my life seen this happen, and I've been using RAID since the Linux kernel started supporting RAID.
      Through IDE, SCSI, SATA, on NAS & SAN as well. On Sun, Intel, NetApp, EMC hardware along with software emulated RAID.
      I've had drives die lots of times in those years.
      RAID is by no means a bad idea any more than wearing a seatbelt is a bad idea.
      RAID is redundancy (keeps you from going down fast & hard), not a backup. Both should be used, since no amount of RAID can save you from yourself.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    3. Re:Single Hard Drives Are Unsafe At Any Cost by Lost+Race · · Score: 2

      I have a hard drive made in 1991 that still works fine. 1000 megabyte Micropolis SCSI full-height (the size of two stacked CDROM drives). It cost so much back in 1991 that I still can't bear to retire it. :)

  14. This happened before... by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 2

    ...and they ended up relenting and increasing the warranty periods again because people stopped buying as many drives, etc. Apparently they didn't learn their lesson, or so it would seem to me.

  15. Re:Who uses warranties? by fnj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An excellent point with which I agree, but there is still a problem. If you only warranty a drive for one year, you will see to it that absolutely no engineering or quality control effort is expending to make them LAST for more than one year. This is fully in line with fiduciary responsibility, as well as being common sense.

    I have always seen the warranty period as a measure of the confidence the manufacturer has in their quality, which is the ceiling for the confidence *I* have in the manufacturer's quality.

  16. More racing to the bottom I see by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "For its part, Seagate is saying it cut back its warranties to be more closely aligned with other drive manufacturers."

    Yeah, because standing out as a "quality and support leader" would be a bad thing! If the competition lowers its quality and standards, it's always best to follow them down.

    This continued mentality sickens me.

  17. Calls the controller's attention to each sector by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Based on how I understand the Wikipedia article, I believe SpinRite is just a stronger version of the CHKDSK "surface scan". It reads each sector a few times (or a lot of times if the sector starts to return uncorrectable errors) and writes it back. This way, the drive's controller gets a fresh look at each sector of the hard drive to determine which sectors are in need of remapping soon.

  18. Who knew it was this easy? by danpbrowning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HDD manufacturers never realized that they had everyone over a barrel. When the Thailand flooding happened, they figured it was a nice opportunity to try some price collusion (triple prices after a 25% drop in production). They never thought it would go so well, and now they're scrambling to roll out similar changes everywhere else, such as dropping the warranty five-fold. Next they will discontinue all the low-end and low-capacity models to "be more consistent with the consumer electronics and technology industries". After that will be to demand a seat on the security council with veto power. Finally, the world. :D I, for one, welcome our hard drive manufacturing overlords. /tinfoil hat.

    --
    Daniel
  19. Re:Who uses warranties? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot seems almost unusable without noscript, what is going on?

    Right now, slashdot is unusable with noscript, there's some sort of 503 server error over and over again.

    It's those damned hard drives again. Can't get good ones anymore. Back in my day when Slashdot was run off of 10 megabyte MFM drives, we didn't have this problem.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  20. Re:NOOOOOOOOO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are the part of the reason everything is so expensive.

  21. english definition by DECula · · Score: 2

    "In the study of economics and market competition, collusion takes place within an industry when rival companies cooperate for their mutual benefit."

    --
    dreaded scurrilous bit-twiddler from Oklahoma
  22. Anyone else... by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember back oh 12-13 years ago when drive manufactures did this? All drive warranties dropped from 5 years to 1 year. This went on for about a year, then got hit with a massive collusion suit. It drove Fujitsu right out of the market. I get the suspicion that this is the same thing, I do not think this has anything to do with debugging the lines, or anything else.

    I really expect the same thing to happen, it smells and feels exactly the same.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  23. Western Digital slashed because of high fail rates by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They have extremely high fail rates on their "Green" and "Blue" lines of drives. Most "Green" drives are lucky to last 2 years without failing. I personally own 4 of their 2tb "Green" drives, and have had 9 failures and counting (in other words, I have had failures of replacements for replacements...).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  24. Re:HD reliability is now crap so of course they di by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should be buying their new 1.5 TB drives. Those 1.5 gb drives must be at least 12 years old.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  25. Another reminder to review hard drive management by ruckerz2k · · Score: 2

    What's your backup system like?

    How difficult is it to recover from a hardware failure?

    How will you know a hardware failure has occurred?

  26. Reliablility VS warranty by phorm · · Score: 2

    However, while general reliability may be the same, warranty support often is not.

    Some manufacturers make you go through some pretty major hoops to *prove* the drive is dead before issuing an RMA. Often it's "run our tool" which may or may not show real issues despite obvious symptoms (SMART errors, and the click of death, etc).

    Some manufacturers have a tendency to replace your equipment with crappy refurbished equipment which was not well-repaired.

    Most though, have stages where they range from good to suck. During the "good" periods all is well. During the "suck" periods they start a bell curve of customer loss until they approve, go under, or are bought out etc.

  27. Re:Who uses warranties? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Sledge hammers are cheaper, and far more satisfying when a disc full of data has just failed.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  28. Anecdotes About Hard Drives by JakFrost · · Score: 2

    Western Digital - Caviar Green

    Since we're trading anecdotes about hard drives I personally like the Western Digital Caviar Green hard drive line and use them for external storage and had only 2-failures (one-predicted) out of ~12-drives of various sizes throughout a 5-year period or so. None of this should mean anything to anyone because this is all anecdotal evidence and Google's research paper about hard drive failures is what you should be judging failures by not Slashdot posts.

    I like these slow 5400RPM or (IntelliPower Variable RPM) speed drives since I use them as floppies in my external caddies (i.e. cradles) connected with eSATA to my motherboard SATA controller. I plop them in, turn on the caddy, let the OS hot-detect the drive and mount it, I use it transfer stuff to them, then dismount them, and turn off the caddy the remove the drive sometimes while the platters are still spinning since I feel the gyroscopic effect.

    The slower rotational speeds and power-saving technology prevents them from heating up so much and I still get ~75 MB/s peak transfer rates for large multi-GB files with ~50 MB/s nominal and ~30 MB/s slow rates for small files. Awesome drives and Western Digital's online Warranty check and RMA process is simple and efficient.

    My drives all still have the 3-year warrant and that is fine. If the warrant suddenly drops to 1-year I'll still buy these drives for the performance and features that they offer and because they have been good to me.

  29. Re:Spinrite, for crying our loud by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

    Spinrite doesn't "repair" a drive in the classical sense. Rather, Spinrite will identify failing sectors, recover the data, then swap out the failed sector for a reserved sector. Data recovery is achieved by trying, trying again and trying yet some more using various strategies. For instance, hit a certain failing sector from various originating points on the drive in hopes that such subtle differences will allow enough unreadable bits to be read that ECC can take over.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  30. Re:SSD by 0123456 · · Score: 2

    Dear Muppet, why do you want your warez/pirate vids on solid state drive when even the slowest spinning platter can deliver more than enough bandwidth for full blu-ray rips?

    Dear Anonymous Coward, please try reading the thread before responding.

  31. the Reason by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    . While Western Digital wouldn't explain why

    The reason why is very simple. Seagate and Western Digital want to sell you extended warranties. In order to do so, they had to make the original warranty period so short that customers would want to buy the extended warranty.

  32. Re:Who uses warranties? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    But seriously I have never returned a drive for warranty as once it fails securely erasing the data can be an issue if ti doesn't spin up

    Even if it's spinning you can't erase everything because of automatic bad sector re-allocation, unless your drive supports SMART extended Secure Erase. And that's if you trust Secure Erase, and at least Seagate won't even give you a list of their drives that support it.

    When I send a failed drive in for repair, they can see my /boot partition - LUKS takes care of everything else for me.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  33. Re:Spinrite, for crying our loud by greg1104 · · Score: 2

    Earlier versions of Spinrite would talk to drives at a level below how DOS would access them. It would sometimes recover data that regular drive access calls wouldn't, by knowing tricks related to how MFM and RLL drives actually stored data.

    Nowadays, this cannot work. Drives abstract away access to their low-level internals. This allows them to do things like quietly remap bad sectors in a way the user doesn't even see. The work Spinrite used to do--find questionable sectors, read multiple times to get a good copy, then relocate to a better area of the drive--is being done in drive firmware. You can't see it, can't modify it; your only access to it are SMART statistics and calls to request various types of deeper checks. If you do a read of a bad sector, the drive is going to decide how many times to retry that read, and if it gets a good read after a bad one it will move that data somewhere else. That all happens without the software doing the read even realizing what happened.

    Spinrite started out as a great product, but it stopped being useful for anything a long time ago. The fact that it's still sold anyway makes me sad, as I used to have a lot of respect for its author.

  34. iterated prisoner's dilemma by epine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the $120 necessarily mean that it's more likely to make it to 5 years before failing?

    That's a bit of a haughty Socratic tone to explain basic cost/benefit bereft of leverage. As soon as you add volatility to production quality, the warranty liability creates a huge incentive to shift the dubious batch into USB drive appliances at Walmart or Costco.

    Without the warranty liability, there's little incentive for the drive manufacturer to bother with the complex logistics of sorting the better grades into the usage patterns less tolerant of failure.

    And you're also forgetting how good Detroit became at building cars able to last until the day the warranty expired with hardly any buffer. I know someone who did electronics design work at a major auto components company in the Great Lakes area and was given a stiff rebuke for choosing a part that cost pennies more (our of several dollars) with double the life expectancy. If the cheaper component is already rated to the warranty period, not one penny more. It turns out this is stupid economics. Eventually the consuming public figures it out. Many fat executive bonuses were paid before America nationalized the auto industry.

    Here's what enlightenment looks like: In recent design iterations, Intel has a rule that if a feature increases the power budget by 1%, it has to increase performance by 2%.

    I think the shorter warranties are a vote by the Seagate executive team to have a business model more like Detroit, and to collect as many performance bonuses as possible, before exiting their careers as the disk industry declines to Kodak levels of relevance.

    In iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, exp(caveat_emptor) as the number of iterations remaining declines.

  35. Re:Goes along with a post from about 2 weeks ago by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    SSD makers will notice a large increase in sales?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz