Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Adds $2 Charge For Paying Your Bill Online

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from geek.com (based on a report at Droid Life) that makes me consider quitting or at least suspending the very expensive service 3G data service I get from Verizon: "With 2012 about to start, it seems Verizon has decided paying your bill online or over the phone is now worthy of an extra charge. So, from January 15, anyone choosing to pay their monthly bill using either method will incur a $2 charge. Verizon is classing the charge as a 'convenience fee' which translates into them deciding allowing you to pay either online or over the phone is a convenience. They also explain in the FAQ above that the fee allows them, 'to continue to support these bill payment options.' Really, Verizon? When did offering online payments or accepting phone calls from customers get so much more expensive?"

60 of 562 comments (clear)

  1. Ah, America! by InterestingFella · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is completely reverse to what companies in my country have started doing. For a long time companies have started pushing people to use internet billing, and if you still want paper bill then that costs extra (because it really does, with printing and mailing). Sending invoice or auto-billing via internet saves them a lot, so I'm not sure I understand why Verizon would want to do thi.. oh right, more $$$.

    1. Re:Ah, America! by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's probably a wash, actually. Credit card charges will probably cost them as much as mailing that paper, which would be paid by check instead of credit card, usually.

      I think it's wrong and anti-customer, but there are actually reasons and it's not just a money-grab.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Ah, America! by Leebert · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is completely reverse to what companies in my country have started doing.

      Oh, that's very much the case here in the US as well. To the point of being obnoxious.

      I still opt for paper bills and mail in checks for the folks who don't take credit cards.

      Perhaps it's because someone at Verizon Wireless was bothered at how much they were paying for credit/debit card transaction fees, and figured this was the way to recoup that cost.

    3. Re:Ah, America! by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's two obvious reasons for this: Points on my credit card (i.e. free money/miles/ etc), and convienience. It allows me to watch only my credit card bill and pay it once. Also, there's a little bit of money to made on the float (not much these days w/ the low interest rates).

    4. Re:Ah, America! by PhotoJim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mail them a cheque (err, check, my American friends) and make a point. If millions of customers did this, their payment processing costs would go through the roof.

    5. Re:Ah, America! by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the American financial system is deliberately inefficient in order to extract as much wealth from us as possible.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Ah, America! by jpstanle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's the complete reverse in the rest of America, too. Everyone else is pushing for online payment and electronic billing because it saves on paper and postage costs.

      Verizon is the first company I've seen try to pull an asshat move like this. I think why Verizon is trying it now involves a couple things. For one, large telecoms like Verizon and AT&T have for years felt entitled to licenses to print money hand over fist, and whenever revenue drops due to market changes or technological development, their biggest priority is to find somewhere else to recoup that lost revenue. My guess here is that Verizon noticed that a majority of their customers were already paying their bills online, so they decided to start charging a fee to do it, knowing that their customer base already appreciates the convenience of online bill payment and inertia would prevent them from paying by mail. Other service providers, public utilities for example, likely have much older, entrenched, and less 'tech-savvy' customers so they need to provide incentives to move towards online billing and its associated cost savings.

    7. Re:Ah, America! by CaptBubba · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They really want you to set up an automatic funds transfer for the account instead of approving each payment individually. This is great for them and horrible for you because the funds are whisked out of your checking account regardless of if the billing is correct or not. It has the added benefit that most people will forget about it and then miss any rate increases.

    8. Re:Ah, America! by Xelios · · Score: 3, Funny

      My ISP charges 3â to mail a monthly statement in the interest of cutting down on waste paper and mailing costs, so I switched to online billing a long time ago. I don't really miss it because they were kind enough to keep sending an extra envelope with advertisements and "tell your friends" incentives every month, completely free!

      --
      Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
    9. Re:Ah, America! by razorh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nobody said anything about living on credit. I do the same thing InterestingFella does. I use my credit card for everything bills/gas/food/etc. and then when it's time to pay my credit card off at the end of the month I do a direct one time transfer from my bank account. I'm not living on credit even the least little bit. I don't spend what I don't have and in fact keep a decent 'cushion' in the bank at all times. I haven't lived paycheck to paycheck in a LONG time. If you pay your credit card off every month there is no interest to pay, no fees, AND you get points/miles/extra cash/cheaper gas. I would say NOT doing this is stupid.

    10. Re:Ah, America! by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the complete reverse in the rest of America, too. Everyone else is pushing for online payment and electronic billing because it saves on paper and postage costs.

      Verizon is the first company I've seen try to pull an asshat move like this. I think why Verizon is trying it now involves a couple things. For one, large telecoms like Verizon and AT&T have for years felt entitled to licenses to print money hand over fist, and whenever revenue drops due to market changes or technological development, their biggest priority is to find somewhere else to recoup that lost revenue. My guess here is that Verizon noticed that a majority of their customers were already paying their bills online, so they decided to start charging a fee to do it, knowing that their customer base already appreciates the convenience of online bill payment and inertia would prevent them from paying by mail. Other service providers, public utilities for example, likely have much older, entrenched, and less 'tech-savvy' customers so they need to provide incentives to move towards online billing and its associated cost savings.

      A majority of their customers certainly pay their bills online, but they do it automatically and are hence exempt from this fee. Verizon is doing something very simple, encouraging their customers to prefer the automatic process over the manual one. There is undoubtedly a price break to handling the exact same payment method month after month vs handling a unique one each time, and they know they will save more money than they will lose in pissed off customers.

    11. Re:Ah, America! by trum4n · · Score: 5, Informative

      BUT, having a credit card, and using it, and paying it off is actually all but required in this country. Having no credit history is just as damning as bankruptcy in America. Right now, I'm applying for a mortgage. I was told by the bank that my $20k+ in student loans and my $18k car loan...help me. It's twisted, but true. Also, living on credit and using a credit card for ease are not the same. Also, many banks DO charge for external transfers of money here.

    12. Re:Ah, America! by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use a credit card for everything I can because of the rewards I earn. I've received thousands of dollars in rewards (I just received what amounts to $800 in rewards for signing up with a credit card) and cash back (anywhere from 1% - 20% per transaction, depending on the situation and retailer) over the years. The trick is to use credit cards like debit cards by paying them off completely every month. Living on credit can be stupid (most people need a mortgage to afford a house though; having a mortgage is "living on credit") but we shouldn't confuse using credit cards with living on credit. I'll use debit cards as soon as they offer rewards as good as credit cards (they won't though because of regulations as well as other reasons).

    13. Re:Ah, America! by jovius · · Score: 3, Informative

      Credit cards or checks are not involved at all at least in Finland. I don't know if using them is even possible. The company sends a bill by email or then the monthly amount is directly charged from the given bank account. The customer, bank and a company can have a direct charging agreement. I'm also able to postpone the due date without an extra charge at least with my provider. Practically all of the bills are paid online and there isn't a culture of credit in the same sense as in the US. Anything paper related comes with an extra charge. The bank I use doesn't even provide cash services in their offices.

    14. Re:Ah, America! by Kelbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every time someone mentions using a credit card on the internet, somebody will reply that using credit cards is stupid, because they simply could not imagine that a credit card user could have his account set to automatically pay-off in full from a flush bank account.

      Then you have posts like these, where a flood of users reply to point out the obvious.

      Sounds like classic trolling to me.

    15. Re:Ah, America! by NardoPolo88 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you missed the point. They are recouping the fees charged by Visa and Master Card. Those fees have recently increased by the way. This is way you can still pay on line for *FREE* if you pay though your checking account. This is also why most of the smaller restaurants in my area and I'm sure other areas of the US have $10 and $20 minimums for credit cards. It is also why my uncle, who was also a small business owner, did like it when people paid with credit cards. You really should look into where this money goes before judging verizon to harshly for trying to get some of that money back. I for one will continue to pay online as I always have. Through my checking account that they already have stored on their server.

    16. Re:Ah, America! by fedos · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because in the US the banks actually discourage transfers by making them inconvenient and costly. For example, Bank of America charges $25 to send a domestic wire transfer and $12 to receive one.

    17. Re:Ah, America! by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, in our world, for one. Not paying a debt until it's due doesn't constitute credit, it's called "float" in financial circles. If someone sells you a good or service and doesn't require payment until the end of the month, then it's not "buying on credit" to hold off paying until that date. So, in short, you're right that it's not length of repayment that's a factor, but whether you're being extended credit (buying something for the promise of repayment against future income) or whether you're being given a float to allow you to gather the funds in the form agreed upon (which is why so many businesses started offering due dates for purchases in the first place).

      Virg

    18. Re:Ah, America! by jaymz666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Giving every company access to your bank account is stupid. With a credit card I can call the card and dispute a charge and have that money back while the card company and the billing company duke it out. If VZW or anyone else takes money directly from my bank account I have to fight with the bank and VZW until they refund my money, if ever.

    19. Re:Ah, America! by Theaetetus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's still credit even if you pay it off once a month. How quickly you pay it off doesn't matter. You're buying things and paying them off later, that's the definition of credit.

      Oh, then if that's your definition, "living on credit is stupid" is entirely wrong. Living with interest charges is stupid, but living on credit without interest is incredibly smart.

    20. Re:Ah, America! by SScorpio · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Being responsible with handling debits like student loans and a card loan are a great way for a bank to calculate their risks when giving you 100k+ for a house. Sure Johnny might be very responsible and has worked hard all his life paying off this education in cash as well as buying a car with cash. But to a bank they have no record that he has made monthly payment in a timely manor.

      I had a co-worker buying a house about five years ago. He always used a debit card and didn't have a credit history. He had a difficulty getting a long as he had a provide proof of monthly bill payments. This amounted to his apartment rent, and his monthly WoW charge. I think he still ended up needing a co-signer.

    21. Re:Ah, America! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      CC or debit charges cost them more really? So instead of saving them man hours by using an automated system to pay my bill, you reason that the extra cc or debit charges are costing them the same amount and that is the justification for charging a "convenience fee", yet I can walk into any Verizon store and pay my bill with the same CC or debit card and not pay that $2 fee, but they are still paying the same amount to run the card.

      I disagree, this is sure looks like a money grab.

      I'd be more likely to believe the $2 fees they collect from people paying by phone or online are put into a trust in the event of a data breach. Sort of a "ok the bad news, there was a data breach and we are getting fined, the good news we set aside a trust fund by charging phone pay and online pay customers a $2 fee, so the fine is covered".

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    22. Re:Ah, America! by LordKronos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You get convenience with banking too. I only watch over my bank account. I use visa/mastercard debit card too, so it is instantly removed from my account. Living on credit is stupid.

      Wrong. You are apparently too stupid to see the advantage of credit cards, even when someone directly points it out to you. Using credit card cash back, I make hundreds of dollars a year, and I don't pay 1 cent of interest or fees to the credit card companies. Most debit cards offer no cashback. There are a handful that offer up to 1% cash back, but none that offer more, wherase credit card companies often offer more. There are some that offer 2% on everything, and some up to 5% on various items. And occasionally there are even offers >5% .

      Additionally, if someone gets my visa card number and makes some fraudulent purchases, I simply dispute the charge, and since my credit limit is about 10 times what I actually use, my credit limit is slightly reduced but I never notice the difference. Meanwhile, my mortgage and car payments (deducted directly from my bank account) is completely unaffected. But for you, if someone gets your debit number, you certainly can disputed it, but your money will be missing for your account for up to 10 days. Meanwhile, you may incur overdraft fees, and your mortgage/car/other payments may bounce incurring fees. You may be able to get these fees reversed, but it's not going to be a painless process. You are going to have to spend time making calls/writing letters, sending documentation, etc. You can eliminate some of the overdraft fees by leaving a large buffer of cash in your checking account, but I generally consider that dumb since most checking accounts earn no interest, and the few that do only give you a tiny fraction of what you can get in a savings account.

      Finally, credit cards offer many additional benefits like extended warranties, replacement if items are lost/stolen. I know of no debit cards that offer these types of benefits.

    23. Re:Ah, America! by thejaq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't consider it credit until there is a cost to the debt or the credit liabilities exceed cash on hand. Otherwise it's not much different than organizing your check deposits and withdrawals. There is never any net liability. IMO bonuses offer absurd incentives. The +5%, +3%, +1% discount/cash back are serious discount to realize when you can simply direct all spending through the card, which dwarfs savings account interest for me. Also it yields a very nice credit score/available credit balance in the absence of secured credit/mortgage/ interest payments. It's a game, better to play it right than just sit out!

    24. Re:Ah, America! by RulerOf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may be technically correct, but "living on credit," has the connotation of accruing interest on debt. The GP is using the same tools and methods as those who do, but netting the opposite effect, much to his own benefit.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    25. Re:Ah, America! by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Informative

      You need a buffer between you and the people you owe money to. Getting cajoled into automatic payments is a trap. They often take place by ACH (bank draft) and you are at the mercy of the vendor for any refunds unless they draft a credit card. Watch that option slip away soon.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    26. Re:Ah, America! by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If that is your definition of "living on credit", then we need to understand that the term is not what is meant by most people who consider credit corrosive. When people talk about living on credit as a bad thing, it is carrying balances month to month and accepting the interest rates while only paying the minimum. That does happen all too frequently in the US and is a serious structural problem.

      However, using credit as a float is a sound business practice that has been used for centuries to ensure that payments can be made as needed while waiting for your customers/employers to pay up on their due date. You then pay off the float when the influx of cash comes in on a monthly basis, for instance. You may incur charges or interest, but these are usually fairly minimal compared to what you would deal with by carrying a balance with no end in sight.

    27. Re:Ah, America! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even a very good point can be stretched a bit far.

      I think that it's safe to say that millions of Americans have overextended their credit balances, in the past few years. Overextended to the point that they months of wages to the credit card companies.

      A revolving credit scheme, which is managed properly, paid on time, and incurs no interest, no penalties, and no fees is hardly in the same class as the millions of people who will never dig themselves out of debt.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    28. Re:Ah, America! by nelsonal · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't need to be a credit account, US ATM cards are frequently branded Visa/Mastercard and pay rewards when processed as credit cards (but they come from your account like a debit card, though it usually takes an extra day for processing).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    29. Re:Ah, America! by AngryDeuce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Contrary to popular belief, neither Verizon nor any other business is required to accept pennies, or any other method of payment it chooses not to, for that matter.

      The only entity that is required to honor pennies is the Federal Reserve and, by extension (I would assume), the government. So yeah, you can go down to the county treasurer's office and dump thousands of pennies on them, but show up at a local Verizon kiosk with 30 pounds of pennies and they are fully within their rights to tell you to go pound sand. They could even require you to pay them in gold if you signed a contract agreeing to do so. Hell, they could require you to pay in chocolate. There's nothing saying they have to accept the equivalent amount of currency in it's place, either; you agree to pay in gold, you are obligated to pay in gold.

      Obviously, in the interests of customer service, most businesses don't start a hissy fit over things like this, but there are limits. In my days working retail I used to turn people away with large amounts of change all the time, because I did not have the time nor resources to spend counting out pennies or dimes, being the sole employee on shift at the time, nor was I under any obligation to do so. The same principles allowing a business to deny excessively small currency like pennies are what allows them to deny large currencies, as well; we also accepted no bills larger than $20 as do many convenience stores.

    30. Re:Ah, America! by Khyber · · Score: 3, Funny

      "In Europe bank transfers are used for such and are entirely free for consumers"

      Hi, this is America. Not Europe.

      They charge us because they can. Bank transfers cost money. Money orders cost money. Everythign costs money.

      And it will CONTINUE until the EU gets off its ass and invades the USA.

      But you people won't do that, you're too placid and too cowardly, which means we'll be taking over your countries soon enough, just like we did Iraq.

      And then YOU will be paying for bank transfers.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    31. Re:Ah, America! by Garybaldy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't beat this guy. It is like trying to destroy a tank with a baseball bat. His definition of living on credit is different then every other persons. He is just credit card hater.

    32. Re:Ah, America! by AngryDeuce · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is nothing new, I've been paying a "convenience fee" to my electric company for paying online for years now. Ditto with my cable bill.

      Hell, they even charge a "convenience fee" at the DMV office here in Wisconsin when you renew online, which doesn't make a single fucking shred of sense at all, considering that they're already understaffed at the actual DMV offices (based on the ridiculous wait I experience every time I am forced to go down there) and pay the people working the counters considerably more than most counter workers get paid. If anything, you would think that the state would be fully encouraging people to pay online, but it seems even the state isn't opposed to sucking a little extra money off the top with "convenience fees".

      I'm not saying it's right, mind you, I'm just saying that this is nothing out of the ordinary.

    33. Re:Ah, America! by Shatrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Miles/points and other gimmicks mean nothing to me. The big advantage to paying for things the way you do, and the way I do as well incidentally, is that if you have to dispute something through Visa, Mastercard, and Discover it's like having a best friend in the mafia. They get results. On the other hand, if the money has already left your bank account you're probably boned.

      I will say that NOT doing it this way is a little "belt and suspenders" in terms of financial responsibility, but for some people that's what it takes to stay out of trouble.
      There are plenty of people with self-control problems that are better served by just removing the ability to overspend.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    34. Re:Ah, America! by hazem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The other obvious reason is that if the company taking the money takes too much. If they "accidentally" bill you for a year of service instead of a month, and you have this coming from your checking account, you suddenly may not be able to pay your rent/mortgage and might even have checks bounce.

      Sure you might get it all sorted out with the biller and your bank but in the mean time it can cause a lot of problems.

      Using a credit-card account as a buffer protects your checking account from these kinds of accidents. Plus banks tend to be more responsive to credit card problems than they are with checking account problems. With the first, it's their money that's messed with, with the latter it's yours.

    35. Re:Ah, America! by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have no illusions that the cost isn't eventually figured right back into the prices I pay. But what alternative do I have? Sure, if we could get NEARLY EVERYBODY to stop using credit cards, then perhaps we could start getting lower prices at the store to make paying cash/debit worthwhile (yeah, I know...laugh at the notion that the retailers wouldn't just gladly pocket the extra money). But the case is essentially the old prisoners dilemma taken to an enormous scale. If everyone (or even nearly everyone) made the optimal decision, then everyone would be better off. But the way things stand, it's in my best interest to get what I can, since there's pretty much no chance of things changing even if I take a stand.

    36. Re:Ah, America! by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that properly used, credit cards seem to make a ton of sense. In 6 months, I think I made nearly $400 off my Costco card (this is in addition to the money I made back on the Costco rebate itself).

      But, I have read that these cash-back/benefits programs are all subsidized by us. In effect, we pay more for goods and services overall to accommodate the merchant fees that subsidize the benefit programs. Although I've also read that the group that REALLY pays are people who pay cash, which is surprise, surprise, a lot of low-income people who don't have or can't get a credit card. I like to taunt my friends that pay only cash that they're putting money in my pocket.

    37. Re:Ah, America! by hajile · · Score: 3, Informative
      Wrong. From the Federal reserve FAQ http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm

      Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment? Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," states: "United States coins and currency [including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all United States money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law which says otherwise.

      Basically, if something can be sent to a collections agency (in this case the internal Verizon collections agency), the it is a DEBT and thus the creditor (VerizonWireless) CANNOT refuse payment. Since payment of a Verizon bill is frequently after some or all of the service has been given, their is debt (money owed for services previous rendered). Retail is different because there is no debt owed to the retailer since the merchandise ownership is only exchanges (barring a contract) after the payment has been given. (technically, it could be argued in some cases that a verbal contract has been established and thus a debt has been agreed to).

    38. Re:Ah, America! by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For every person out there who "carelessly" over-spends and digs themselves into debt, then glibly declares bankruptcy, we have several thousand people out there who've seen virtually no increase in pay over the last decade. Been repeatedly laid off, only to endure extended periods of unemployment. Get's hit with a medical bill of catastrophic proportions while having their health insurance eliminated by their employer. All the while sinking slowing into credit card debt just paying for the necessities of life. The average American, lost 15% of their real net wealth over the last 10 years, while the top 1% saw their personal wealth explode in value.

      In fact this is the standard picture for America's new vanishing middle class. The situation is grim, and these are not lazy irresponsible people. Many of these people have always been able to pay their bills in the past and are only now facing a situation where working even two jobs is insufficient to make ends meet. Sixty years ago, a man could go to virtually any school in the country with a GI loan, get a good job, buy a home, raise a family and put his kids through college. Today both parents work because they must. If they want college, they have to pick the one they can afford, and run up incredible debt (hoping that they've chosen a major which will allow them to pay off their debt within ten years of graduation.) The only places in the U.S that have houses that are affordable are in depressed economic communities. So one is forced to balance cost of living with ability to generate income. Families now simply slide into debt doing the things our parents took for granted. Now a young couple must live a lean spartan existence and work like dogs just to establish the possibility of a stable footing. The chances that any young couple just starting are going to be able to send their kids to college grows ever more remote.

      By the way, that bankruptcy affords little protection these days. In the face of economic collapse, many banks saw wisely to have Congress pass laws that ensure that you pay the lions share of your debt even if you file bankruptcy. So the consumer is naked, unprotected in a wilderness of ravening financial institutions, and when they raise their rates, its because they simply want more of your money for doing the same old thing. If the banks are issuing credit cards 6 months after a bankruptcy, its because they won't stop bleeding you until your dead. Its the consumer that has to live with the repercussions of bad credit for 7 years. The bank just keep bleeding the livestock.

      How's the old joke go? What's the difference between a tick and a banker? When you die a tick falls off, the banker just keeps sucking.

    39. Re:Ah, America! by danpbrowning · · Score: 3, Funny

      they have no record that he has made monthly payment in a timely manor.

      Is there anything they condo about that?

      --
      Daniel
  2. Arent online payments actuallt cheaper for them? by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Arent online payments actuallt cheaper for them?
    They need a small team of highly paid people instead of thousands of people across the country to collect cheques from drop boxes and cash at stores.
    If they have 1 person per store to collect cash, wouldnt they have to increase the no. by a lot to make up for the extra load created by this fee?

  3. Re:Arent online payments actuallt cheaper for them by berashith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    of course it is cheaper for them, that has nothing to do with the fee. Paying online or over the phone is quicker, easier, and cheaper for the consumer, therefore more convenient. If Verizon can leverage that convenience as a premium service, then they will bill for it. There are plenty of colleges and utilities that do this same thing. Pisses me off, but at least with Verizon there is some chance of moving to another company ( in some locations) as opposed to my water bill, which I pretty much just have to suck it up.

    These are the things that made AT&T swallowing T-mobile such a bad deal. More competition actually removes this kind of crap. Fewer companies makes collusion easier, and these fees will pop up everywhere.

  4. Fee is waived for certain cases. by bongey · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fee is waived if you pay by electronic check or auto pay. This only effects last minute payments.

    1. Re:Fee is waived for certain cases. by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For now.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:Fee is waived for certain cases. by dnahelicase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fee is waived if you pay by electronic check or auto pay. This only effects last minute payments.

      It appears this affects online payments, even if you make them early. Last minute has nothing to do with it. It's whether or not you give Verizon the ability to take money from you every month with blanket consent.

      It's not about saving transaction fees, it's about getting consumers to stop thinking about and analyzing their bill every month. That 1.99 data fee that was pissing everyone off? Now it's just a number on your statement that's pretty close to last month. Want to call an complain about it? They already have your money. Good luck getting it back. Most people are going to sit on the phone for 30 minutes to get back $1.99. However, many people will shortpay a bill when they are sure they aren't responsible for something. If you are a person that logs in to the website every month and views your bill and schedules a payment, you are probably looking at the details. If you are an autopay person, you probably aren't - and don't even remember your online password.

  5. It's about getting people to sign up for autopay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fee is waived for autopay.

    The economy sucks, they want all their accounts on autopay so the phone bill gets taken out before other bills if the customer's money can't pay them all.

    Beware of autopay. Once you bill is autopaid you have a lot less leverage in billing disputes.

  6. Re:Arent online payments actuallt cheaper for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cash and cheques don't incur the same fees as online processing, which usually entail VISA/MC/AMEX/etc taking their 2% or more of the transaction in fees. In addition, they are Non Qualified transactions. This is because the card is not present, thus there is a higher likelihood that there could be a charge back, so the processing company charges an additional fee.

    I think Verizon is idiotic for adding this surcharge that is so obviously a cash grab, but I would like to dispel the idea that the online transactions are inherently cheaper. They have staff at retail outlets for sales already, so the fixed costs for the rentals are already taken into account.

  7. Because of autopay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It says in the full article that they won't charge $2 if you use an electronic check or autopay. These are probably handled entirely by bank computers. This means that they get your money perfectly on time, Hope you don't notice when your bills go up, and they don't need to pay to keep so many servers going.

  8. NEVER give a creditor access to your bank account by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a dispute occurs they have your money and you have little recourse. With a credit card payments you can do a chargeback if they take too much. Using your bank's online bill pay gives you positive control, which means you decide how much to pay as opposed to Verizon deciding how much to take.

    Never EVER give a creditor access to your bank account. This includes Paypal.

  9. Verizon does ACH bill pay by multimediavt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have mine tied directly to my checking account and payments are done as ACH at no cost to me. Verizon also pushed me toward One Bill and then paperless billing to save the environment, and now they want to charge me $2.00 a month to do their job: I'm sorry, when I enter all the data and submit my bill every month *I AM DOING THE WORK FOR YOU!* It should not cost them a dime for me to submit my bill, directly to their systems, online.

    1. Re:Verizon does ACH bill pay by devman · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you read the fine article you'd know ACH transactions are exempt. So are all payments that are set up as recurring in Verizion's system, including credit cards. The only thing that gets charged as far as I can tell (and I could be wrong about this) is one off credit card payments. This is really a non-story.

  10. Re:I wonder if mailing a payment in is cheaper by dnahelicase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it cheaper for them to accept a payment via mail or at the store?

    You'll never know. Last time I got a cellphone I demanded the Verizon employee tell me what my bill would be for a normal month. Not the "45 voice + 30 data" but what the number I would actually be billed after taxes, fees, interest, gratuity, and graft. They couldn't tell me. They said there was no way to get that number until the bill was calculated because of the taxes. ATT could tell me within a nickel without any hesitation.

    Verizon has been struggling for a long time. If they don't get their activation fees, random fees, roaming charges, and payment fees - they would go broke. It's only fair that we consumers would help a struggling giant in this era where everyone is ditching their cell phones for landlines and carrier pigeons. We pay $35 to have the privilege of becoming their customer, $200 if we want to stop being a customer early - it's only fair we pay $24/year to stay their customer.

  11. people keep missing the point by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with how much it costs verizon. Businesses do not charge you based on what their costs are. They charge you based on what you are willing to pay.

    Quit arguing over whether or not the charge is justified. It doesn't HAVE to be justified. Either you're willing to pay it or you're not. Somewhere some verizon bean counters ran all the hard math that factors in their actual costs, in terms of providing the service, loss of business, handling angry phonecalls,bad press, etc, and figured this was a net-win, and so they did it. That's all there is to it. You're totally missing the point if you're trying to figure out why verizon is "justified" in making a change to their charges. If you're willing to pay for it, they're justified in charging for it. Nothing else matters in the business world.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  12. Re:Arent online payments actuallt cheaper for them by berashith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It probably does have a chance of backfiring, but I am sure they know how locked in their customers are, and how unwilling others may be to move. The risk is likely outweighed by the profit, and the bad PR will be replaced shortly by another cell company being even more assholish.

  13. RTFA to put this in perspective by SwansonMarpalum · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fee does not apply to either ACH or AutoPay transactions. This leaves credit card payment as the only mechanism which does incur the fee. Verizon can't come out and say that the fee is because you're using a credit card, because the terms between credit card processors (e.g. MasterCard, VISA) and merchants (in this case, Verizon) specifically forbid altering the price if a credit card is used. When you pay a merchant with a credit card, the merchant only gets 97-99% of the price you pay with the card. 1-3% goes to the credit card company. Verizon can accept payment in any of three ways, but one of them costs Verizon more than the other two ways, and they consequently charge a fee. It's not exactly in-line with their costs, but considering what a monthly phone bill for a smart phone costs, it's not grossly far off, either.

    --
    "Give away the stone, let the oceans take and transmutate this cold and faded anchor." - Maynard James Keenan
  14. Re:It's about getting people to sign up for autopa by digitalsolo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I autopay with my VISA. If I need to dispute, and VZW wants to argue, I call my bank, and they handle it. Done it before.

    --
    Just another ignorant American.
  15. They might have a problem with this in NYS.... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative

    New York State General Business Law Section 518: Credit card surcharge prohibited.

    No seller in any sales transaction may impose a surcharge on a holder who elects to use a credit card in lieu of payment by cash, check, or similar means.
    Any seller who violates the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars or a term of imprisonment up to one year, or both.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  16. No surcharges allowed by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    The credit card companies don't want merchants to add a surcharge for credit card payment. Calling it a "convenience fee" and then "waiving" it for ACH payment is a way for merchants to circumvent these contractual restrictions, much as some gas stations give a discount on gas purchased with a gift card (and gift cards must be paid for with cash or EBT card).

  17. Re:Phone Company? by Leebert · · Score: 3, Informative

    Counter-intuitively, Verizon and Verizon Wireless are different companies. Verizon owns a controlling share of Verizon Wireless, but a huge chunk of VZW is owned by Vodafone. (VZW is actually a DBA (Doing Business As), the company's real name is Cellco Parnership. Go figure.)

  18. It is not the complete reverse in America by assertation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever try to pay a parking ticket or some other municipal fee online? They will charge you a "convenience fee". My guess is because they have to pay the credit card companies something.

    My guess is that will eventually change when an older generation dies off or gets online. An efficiency expert will notice that they are employing staff to handle paper based payments........for very few payments. At that point they will encourage people to pay electronically. Probably by charging a fee for paper based payments.......the way my car insurance company does.