Slashdot Mirror


How the Year Looked On Slashdot

Happy New Year! It's that time (as of now!) for the UK, and since the Slashdot backend operates in Greenwich Mean Time, that seems as good a reason as any to welcome 2012 now instead of local midnight for any of the various U.S. time zones. Everyone has a different take on how to rank the events of the last year; read on below for a few notes on some of the goings on of the past 31,536,000 seconds (give or take). The list is pretty arbitrary, drawn from the thousand-ish stories that hit the Slashdot page in that time; please say in the comments what news hit you the hardest this year.

Politics and all that:

Events in the Middle East dominated much of the news, including in particular the ways that governments have been tracking (and sometimes imprisoning or killing) opponents; California-based Blue Coat flatly denied selling equipment to Syria to help that sort of tracking before 'fessing up to it. (And in the U.S., the Occupy movement set about occupying bits of various cities, drawing both admiration and scorn.)

Related: The nuttiness surrounding Wikileaks continues.

Then there's the still unfinished story of SOPA; at least in some cases, speaking loudly seems to've caused businesses to change their public stances as defenders of the law as proposed; could this be called washing SOPA out with mouth?

On the tech front:

Donald Knuth published the 4th volume (or at least the first installment of it) of his ambitious Art of Computer Programming.

Netflix's management decided to couple a change that many customers thought was a stupid rate increase with what many people (customers or not) felt was a stupid name change; the company at least agreed on the name change, and reverted it.

HP seemed to do an interesting dance, both by shaking up its management structure , then announcing it was considering a spin-off of its PC hardware business before canceling that maneuver. HP sent a different but similarly mixed set of messages with a fire sale on its WebOS tablets (to the disappointment of those who praised and wished more success to WebOS).

Nokia also did some shaking in place. It's been a rough year for phone junkies on the whole, with Blackberry outages and privacy debacles both intentional and accidental from RIM, and no joy for those who'd expected iPhone 5, along with a handful of security issues for Android phones made it a rough year for phone junkies.

Meanwhile, the Linux kernel reached the magical number 3.0, and then 3.1 even though Mr. Linux himself, true to form, downplayed the leap from 2.x as basically just a number. Notably, the kernel suffered a persistent power-use regression, but also (Yay!) a fix.

On the GUI front, Gnome3 and Ubuntu's Unity generated lots of excitement, particularly from those who dislike the changes they bring. Forks and workarounds ensued — open source abides. We've seen also quite a bit this year about the Raspberry Pi, IMO the most exciting hardware news stuff of the year.

Questions of the stars:

Speaking of the Raspberry Pi, we were glad to have had the chance this year to ask questions of Eben Upton, as well as of William Shatner and Phil Plait, The Bad Astronomer, among many others. (And though it's sad, must also note rejections to our requests to interview Steven Hawking, Tom Lehrer, Freeman Dyson a distinguished list, at least.)

Endings:

Several of the biggest names in technology will sadly no longer be around for the years to come. After years of uncertain health and swirling rumors, Steve Jobs succumbed to pancreatic cancer. Less known outside tech circles, both John McCarthy and Dennis Ritchie died as well, both leaving rich legacies of software and inspiration. For all that he thrived on being a bad penny to both sides of the political spectrum, Christopher Hitchens, too, will be missed. On the other side of the "world changing" coin, this year also brought the end for Usama Bin Laden, Muammar Gaddafi, and North Korea's not-particularly-dear leader Kim Jong Il.

A different kind of ending: after a few years of life support, 2011 witnessed (with CmdrTaco's help) the final flight of the U.S. Space Shuttle. Everyone who had a chance to see a Shuttle launch will have a great story to tell their children.

Coming attractions:

Whatever the eventual fate of the other players in the phone world, 2012 will probably mean the end of the road for Symbian phones.

It's time for a reality check on the space hotel that was predicted for 2012; I'd place my bet against. Less happily, the continuing push for surveillance and tracking means I wouldn't bet against the projected nationwide trials in the coming year of face-recognition and tracking software from the FBI.

Finally: the end is near. That is, the actual end of the world (versus this recent contender), as predicted by the Mayans, as interpreted by various non-Mayans, and massaged to give us a few more years (or at least a few more months). Or, you can choose to rotate your tinfoil hat one quarter turn clockwise and take NASA's word for it — whatever the fate of humanity, Earth itself will probably keep right on going; we hope you'll stick around for the rest of the story — we're still waiting for The HURD

161 comments

  1. 2012 by maweki · · Score: 4, Funny

    2012 will be the year, Linux finally comes to the desktop, I heared

    1. Re:2012 by Turnerj · · Score: 1

      So will Windows... oh wait :/

    2. Re:2012 by pbjones · · Score: 1

      well it finally came to the mainstream, as Android. (still sux)

      --
      There was an unknown error in the submission.
    3. Re:2012 by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2012 will be the year, Linux finally comes to the desktop, I heared

      Google could make it happen, a dedicated Android (Linux) version for desktop would be a guaranteed success, even now, lots of people are working on it [android-x86.org] in their free time, which is speaking for itself. Once Android is flagged official for desktop by Google big software and hardware players would have to consider it and they would port stuff over as there is no barrier of entry.

    4. Re:2012 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just in time for the desktop to be replaced by the, er..., tablet/hand/palmtop!

      Seriously though, the number one and number two phone and tablet operating systems are both Unix based, with Linux taking the lead for the number of users. Ten years ago who would have believed that BSD would be in millions of people's pockets, or that the most popular mobile OS would be open source with its proprietary rivals from the likes of Nokia and Microsoft rapidly dying off?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android's Achilles' heel is and probably always will be Java. It will never be a successful desktop product, never, simply because of the crapness that is Java.

      My Android phone is way more powerful (more RAM, faster processor) than any iPhone yet the apps stutter and scrape along at glacial speeds compared to iOS (ie. native) apps. You can tell exactly when the garbage collector runs every single time. It's shit. Java is shit.

    6. Re:2012 by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Yup. You're spot-on fella. Guess what? Linux is a great server platform. Know what else? You can own your own personal "cloud" at home and stream / sync all your data privately and securely between all your mobile devices and your Linux home server... In fact, you can load balance & increase uptime by setting up mutual redundant servers in each of your family's homes.

      On top of that, KDE and Gnome are both usable enough for my grandparents now, (you don't have to touch the terminal to use Linux). So, 2011 was the year of Linux on the Desktop, Laptop and Mobile phone for my family, and THEY LOVE IT.

    7. Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google could make it happen, a dedicated Android (Linux) version for desktop would be a guaranteed success

      You mean Microsoft and Google could make it happen; since Microsoft (apparently) owns significant portions of Linux. The Arab Spring never touched the Western world Intellectual Property.

      References:
      http://www.google.ca/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=linux+companies+that+pay+royalties+to+microsoft&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest

      http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/07/list-of-companies-that-pay-royalties-to.html

      http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/microsoft_news/231601809

      SCO is not dead, it just metastasized itself to the different legal departments of various corporations.

    8. Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mobile-on-desktop windows 8 would beat google to market... only thing in google's favor is every other windows release sucks, so windows 8 is already doomed.

    9. Re:2012 by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>I heared

      Uh, it's spelled HURD, buddy.

    10. Re:2012 by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      Hmm - I thought that the Apple OS has only a BSD shell & not a BSD kernel.

    11. Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for not only not getting the joke, but for doing your best to make sure no-one else gets a chance to, either.

      Cretin.

    12. Re:2012 by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Not "The Year of Linux" but "The Year of Linux on the Desktop".

      Linux has long been successful as a server OS, and now it's successful as a mobile OS. But all predictions of success as a desktop OS have so far been wrong.

      But you never know. Never say never. Duke Nukem Forever did eventually ship.

    13. Re:2012 by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Won't happen and here is why: For Linux to become a top notch world class desktop OS millions, more likely hundreds of millions, will have to be spent getting rid of the itch scratching and making it all a seamless cohesive unit and that is not only never gonna happen because with GPL its damned near impossible to build on top of and charge money for the product itself (as RH found out desktop users generally don't buy support contracts) and because the community would fight it tooth and nail every step of the way because they would consider it "dumbing down for the noobs" like being a PITA is a badge of honor or something.

      The best way to understand a thing IMHO is to look at its core so what IS Linux, what is its design and function? Well at its heart its a whole bunch of different smaller applications designed to pass text between each other using pipes simply because there are so many different groups working on so many different things pipes is the one "universal language' they can all agree on. Now this design works great in servers where you have guys paid good money to learn and understand the language but folks have to remember the consumer is NOT a geek, will NEVER be a geek, have NO desire to learn your geek languages or customs, in short they have about as much in common as a current Linux desktop user as your backyard has in common with Europa.

      It would take a complete tossing out of the current way of doing things and a HEAVILY user centric approach replacing it for Linux to suddenly be able to take on OSX and WinX as equals. Either a 10 year cycle would have to be adopted or a hardware ABI (Which Torvalds has made it clear won't be happening until he retires) brought in to fix the driver issues so little Suzy doesn't have hunt forums when Torvalds latest kernel tweak screws up her printer, you would have to have something like Apple or MSFT's GUI guidelines adopted across the entire ecosystem with STRICT enforcement rules and you would have to depreciate the living hell out of CLI to the point that like on Windows its buried in the back and never used by anybody anymore. hell the last couple of years HP sold Windows Home machines many were sold without even access to CLI because someone had deleted it by accident off the disc images and nobody even noticed that its access from the GUI was completely gone.

      To do these changes would frankly take away what many in the community like which is the ability to strip, fiddle, and hot rod the OS down to the lowest level to their heart's content. Let's face it folks a lot of what comes out of the linux community can be boiled down to some developer not liking what was available and scratching a personal itch which is fine and dandy but software developers are NOT designers of good GUIs and frankly never will be. You'd either have a GUI heavy "one size fits all" ala Apple or a VERY limited number of choices like Home, Workstation, Server, and embedded ala the MSFT way and that just goes against the grain for the community as it stands. that is why the ONLY gains you have seen is in places like Android where some corporation simply takes Linux away from the community and enforces its own rules. After all what IS Android? Its all GUI, no CLI, clicky clicky easy peasy with a very strictly controlled underpinning that costs Google close to a billion a year last I had heard. I just don't see any corporation spending that kind of money on a Linux desktop nor the community embracing it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah blah, same old.

      Linux has been on my desktop since 2002; that's all I'm interested in.

    15. Re:2012 by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The best way to understand a thing IMHO is to look at its core so what IS Linux, what is its design and function? Well at its heart its a whole bunch of different smaller applications designed to pass text between each other using pipes simply because there are so many different groups working on so many different things pipes is the one "universal language' they can all agree on. Now this design works great in servers where you have guys paid good money to learn and understand the language but folks have to remember the consumer is NOT a geek, will NEVER be a geek, have NO desire to learn your geek languages or customs, in short they have about as much in common as a current Linux desktop user as your backyard has in common with Europa.

      That's nice. Now how does this differ in principle from OLE, DDE or other similar technologies underlying mainstream OS's?

      The average user is NOT a geek, will NEVER be a geek, has NO desire to learn geek languages or customs, and consequently cares absolutely nothing about what Linux (actually Unix) is at core. All they care about is whether their applications work or not. They don't under Linux, so Linux isn't and won't be a mainstream OS unless Wine takes huge strides.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    16. Re:2012 by antdude · · Score: 1

      Heared? Nice typo. And you forgot a period/full stop after it. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    17. Re:2012 by musicmaker · · Score: 1

      Java is shit?
      Well go you, I guess they'll be hiring you as the Google CEO then, seeing that such a critical decision that has lead to an OS that is becoming dominant in the mobile market was so obviously wrong. I wonder then why it's used by HPC companies? Why in some cases, code written in Java and running using the JIT runs faster than it's compiled counterparts. Maybe it's not Java that's shit but the Dalvik VM? But then you wouldn't really understand all that would you because, well, Java is shit. Such insight and eloquence is clearly an indication of a deep understanding of compilers and runtimes. Why don't you just run along back to vim and gcc, go back to fighting in the playground with the other children over whose desktop MP3 app is better, and let the adults get on with real development.

      --
      Everyone is living in a personal delusion, just some are more delusional than others.
    18. Re:2012 by musicmaker · · Score: 1

      I guess when I install the latest Ubuntu, it'll give me that as an option during set up? Identify all my families computers and ask if I want to use them as redundant storage nodes? I guess it's smart enough to do bandwidth detection and therefore QoS too so it doesn't clog your internet connection when it's syncing? Let me get right on purchasing that mobile app for my iPhone that syncs my data with my Linux desktop. And I guess streaming my media from the cloud to my TV is just a matter of plunking down $99, unpacking and plugging in my linux box to my TV too? I guess I can have that secure cloud for free as well? I'm gonna go online right now and pick out my system to get that rolling!

      Oh wait, this is a fantasy dream I've been peddled for about a decade that still doesn't exist.

      Come join us in the real world where grandma doesn't have a sysadmin for a grandson in every house, doubly one who's prepared to spend countless hours configuring and maintaining this hodgepodge you're describing.

      Browser stats show Linux on the desktop is becoming irrelevant, mostly placing below "Other".

      Continue to try to sell your snake oil, I think most folks have stopped buying.

      --
      Everyone is living in a personal delusion, just some are more delusional than others.
    19. Re:2012 by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Because all of that is hidden behind a nice GUI that doesn't exist in Linux? tell me where is the "roll back drivers" button? or the find drivers button for that matter? Windows has had those since 1999 yet they still don't exist in Linux because at its core Linux is a CLI OS that has a GUI tacked on. this is why its trivial to change DEs, DEs are second class citizens and Linux will run without a DE at all if you so chose. With linux at the end of the day if ANYTHING goes wrong the ONLY answer you can get is "open up bash and type" because frankly often that is the only answer available. I was once given this huge CLI mess for a wireless card and I wrote "You guys are all smart and knowledgeable yes? Treat me like I'm one of my customers and give me a NON CLI solution to the problem, think of me as little Suzy the checkout girl and hold my hand and walk me through the GUI" and there were several long drawn out attempts at pulling it off in a GUI before one finally admitted "You can't do that in a GUI" and THAT is the problem in a nutshell, you can't do that in a GUI is often the state of affairs in Linux.

      Never before in history have users been more online centric in their computer usage but Linux if anything has worse numbers than ever, why? Does the web not work in Linux? of course it does but people today are used to and demand GUI answers to their problems and those GUIs simply haven't been written yet or are written VERY poorly in Linux. Frankly the GUIs for networking and sound especially are like something out of Windows 95 instead of a 2012 OS and if anything the developers all getting bad attitudes towards 'noobs" means that if anything the GUIs are getting LESS useful not more. I wish it weren't so but frankly Linux was making slow but steady progress then Canonical came along and threw the whole community into chaos and now its just a mess, it couldn't be a bigger clusterfuck if the head of canonical had been secretly placed there by gates himself.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. I've run out of crackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but have a surfeit of cheese.

    I can only hope my year gets better.

    1. Re:I've run out of crackers... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      You can have some of mine. These weird hemi-triscuits are overly flavourful.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:I've run out of crackers... by cvtan · · Score: 1

      That's just weird. I too have a surplus of cheese and not enough crackers...

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    3. Re:I've run out of crackers... by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

      a delicious cycle

    4. Re:I've run out of crackers... by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      ...but have a surfeit of cheese

      Alas, I have crackers but nothing to place upon them.
      ...
      This could be the beginning of a beautiful relationship.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  3. two engineering stories I liked by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Both from the first week of December, so admittedly I may be forgetting a lot of interesting stuff from the first 11 months of the year:

    Institutional Memory and Reverse Smuggling, a tale of document-management woes, corporate management foibles, and engineering archaeology

    Physical Models In an Age of Computers, a nice write-up of a large-scale physical model of the San Francisco Bay built in 1959 built to test some theories about how it'd behave if various proposed modifications were made

  4. Been 2012 for hours. by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 2, Funny

    What so this is a US site now?

    Where is the .us domain on the end then?

    Pfft, I'm off to Bunnings it's 10am here already and they've been open for hours already, blink and you might miss 2012.

    1. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't make this article any less valid.

    2. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm in Samoa you insensitive clod!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where is the .us domain on the end then?

      http://slashdot.us redirects to slashdot.org, actually.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by M8e · · Score: 2

      How does it feel to miss a friday? Are you all hungover? I'm usually hungover when i have missed a friday

    5. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      What so this is a US site now?

      Try reading the FAQ here, like you would any site if you were wondering the source of the site, at http://slashdot.org/faq , in the Editorial section. I clearly asks and answers:

      Note: Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. [snip]

      Reply: Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem.

      Then it goes on to explain why.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      So are there slashdot clones in other languages yet? The code is still available, isn't it? A lot of us here might encourage setting up instances that operate in other languages.

      It is sometimes annoying that we can't use non-Latin1 text here. Shis sorta limits discussions of east-Asia-related topics. One benefit that non-USians could bring is debugging the code for UTF-8. Why don't some of the complainers get to the job? Are the nice guys who run /. giving you some sort of hassle about it? If so, let us know ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by ddxexex · · Score: 2

      Only one I'm aware of is the japanese /. : http://slashdot.jp/

    8. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by garaged · · Score: 2

      A spanish barrapunto.org

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    9. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... I tried connecting to barrapunto.org, and my browser just hangs with a "Connecting to barrapunto.org" message.

      Oops; it just displayed a "The connection has timed out" message.

      Have we slashdotted it? ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    10. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmgtfy: barrapunto.com

    11. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      blink and you might miss 2012

      I'm narcoleptic, you insensitive clzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..............

    12. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, barrapunto.com works, while barrapunto.org still doesn't. But they both resolve to valid IP addresses, and I don't get a "connection failed" with barrapunto.org, so there's something listening there. I guess they just don't want to talk to me.

      The barrapunto.com site is indeed a tech forum that looks a lot like slashdot.

      So there are at least two such forums in languages other than English. It's not surprising that they're in Spanish and Japanese.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    13. Re:Been 2012 for hours. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      So does anyone have any idea how my message above got a "troll" rating? It strikes me as quite reasonable to ask about slashdot-like forums in other languages, especially when we've just read "accusations" that slashdot is US-centric. Why might someone consider this trolling?

      We might also note that the (few) replies have also been simple and informative, pointing to two sites that do look like clones of slashdot, in Japanese and Spanish. Unlike most "troll" posts, my question doesn't seem to have aroused any emotional responses, just straightforward, to-the-point replies.

      I am a bit disappointed that we didn't get more such pointers. I'd thought there might also be French, German, Russian, and Mandarin versions of slashdot by now, but I don't know how to look for them. (Google doesn't seem to be very helpful in this case. ;-) I wouldn't be surprised to read about similar sites in Hindi/Urdu, Arabic, Swedish or Malay, either. And I don't think it would qualify as trolling to ask if such sites exist. It's just a query about how far this approach might have spread.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  5. Slahdot in UK ? by avalancher · · Score: 1

    What is a "backend that operates in GMT"... I don't know what that means but from a completely foreigner point of view, slashdot is definitely US-centric (for the better or the worse), and I don't understand why it should comply to UK's standards.

    1. Re:Slahdot in UK ? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's common to run servers on UTC rather than in a local time zone, which is basically equivalent to GMT.

    2. Re:Slahdot in UK ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a "backend that operates in GMT"...

      Running computers on UTC makes sense. No time changes for DST for one, so crons dont run an hour earlier, an hour later, twice in one night, or skipping a night, depending on when you schedule them.

    3. Re:Slahdot in UK ? by maweki · · Score: 1

      in Winter.
      GMT conforms to DST

    4. Re:Slahdot in UK ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No it doesn't - in the UK we switch to BST in the summer (British Summer Time). There is not daylight saving in GMT.

  6. Steve Jobs by anss123 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    please say in the comments what news hit you the hardest this year

    Of the news reported on Slashdot I think SJ death hit me the hardest. I don't follow Apple or Jobs news so his death came out of nowhere. Didn't know he had cancer or that he was dying from it.

    If the Japan earthquake was reported here it wins by a huge margin. Well, there has been a lot of /. posts on the nuke plant, so I guess that or the earth quake wins out of the non-geek news.

    1. Re:Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't follow Apple or Jobs news so his death came out of nowhere. Didn't know he had cancer or that he was dying from it.

      I didn't either but I knew he had cancer because of the fallout from him getting into the queue (ahead of just as deserving people) for a liver transplant in Tennessee even he lived on the West coast.

      It's great being a famous billionaire with a private jet and plenty of fanboys - get to knock out all those poor kids who also need livers out of the way so you can continue with your life of creating consumer electronic toys.

      The doctors who gave Jobs and David Crosby their livers should be ashamed of themselves.

    2. Re:Steve Jobs by manu0601 · · Score: 0

      The doctors who gave Jobs and David Crosby their livers should be ashamed of themselves.

      They promoted one's merit (read: wealth) ahead of one's needs. Are you really surprised? I far as I understand, this is how USA is.

    3. Re:Steve Jobs by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Don't blame the doctors, it's the system.

      You have a private healthcare system in the US. Of course the wealthy get preferable treatment. If you want fair healthcare for all you need a state run national health service.

    4. Re:Steve Jobs by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      While it's not on the scale of either of those events in terms of real world impact, the departure of Rob Malda is clearly one of the most significant stories of the year in terms of Slashdot itself. I don't think it feels the same here without him.

    5. Re:Steve Jobs by rsborg · · Score: 1

      It's great being a famous billionaire with a private jet and plenty of fanboys - get to knock out all those poor kids who also need livers out of the way so you can continue with your life of creating consumer electronic toys.

      The doctors who gave Jobs and David Crosby their livers should be ashamed of themselves.

      You do realize that SJ himself recognized the ridiculous fact that his wealth enabled the prolongation of his life because he could "be anywhere in hours" which is what is needed to maximize odds for a liver transplant? He noted that and used his influence to make it more likely that those without his means might have increased chances for a healthy life [1].

      No it doesn't make what he did more ethical (cancer patients have the lowest survival rate for liver transplants), but in comparison to some rich and powerful folks who are secretive, private and never give back, this was a noble gesture to counterbalance what he did. In a lot of ways, that might be more important than his dying early and offering a single person in Tennessee a liver sooner.

      [1] http://www.businessinsider.com/how-steve-jobs-got-sick-2010-04

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  7. 'nutty' wikileaks caused some of the arab spring by decora · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i can think for example of the revelation that Microsoft made a deal with the dictator of Tunisia to allow the regime to stick it's own certificate authorities into IE's auto-approve list.

    MS's argument was that Tunisia was buying a lot of linux computers, and then wiping them and installing MS. the whole purpose of the document (leaked on the net, signed by Bill Gates) was to destroy linux and get the business of a corrupt, violent dictator.

    thats just the tip of the iceberg.

  8. no so many killers. by pbjones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2011 was a year where I heard the term x-killer less than usual. In the past the iPod-killer, the killer-app, etc. seemed to used every time something 'new' came out, and I was happy that the term didn't seem to show up as often.

    Nokia shifting to Windoze is my pick of the news. It will keep Nokia in the marketplace and it means that MS gets a foot in the door without a lot of development dollars being spent on hardware.

    The other memory 0f 2011 are the changes to the interfaces of MacOSX and Win8, both working more like an iPad but still retaining the old GUI under the facade. I'm including Win8 because of the Dev preview, which I count as a release (limited as it may be).

    It is also the year that I decided that computers are not interesting any more, having been doing this stuff since 1978, it has all become as exciting as a new toaster.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:no so many killers. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I saw the whole Nokia decision to ditch Symbian for WP7 was a huge failure for them. They said they were not a phone company, they were a software company. Now they are saying they are just going to make hardware with some crappy Nokia apps grafted into WP7 that people will complain about not being able to remove.

      I'm still waiting for a manufacturer to do some serious Android development. Samsung is about the closest because it makes more of its own hardware than most manufacturers (down to the chips used in the phone), but even do I think there is still massive scope for someone to set up a dev team and start pushing development forwards along with Google and gaining a competitive advantage at the same time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:no so many killers. by chrb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I nominate 2011 as the year of the patent lawsuit. Apple managed to get Samsung's products banned. In return, Samsung eventually got a revenge ruling banning Apple's products. Everybody in the phone industry went lawsuit crazy suing each other, and Microsoft earned more money from patent extortion against a competing product than they did by legitimately selling their own product.

    3. Re:no so many killers. by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Funny

      2011 was a year where I heard the term x-killer less than usual.

      That's funny, for me 2011 was the year where I first heard the term "X-Killer"... Eg: Wayland.

    4. Re:no so many killers. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      You shoulda seen the lawsuits we had back in the day! Check out the RIAA ones... fantastic. DeCSS. SCO. Microsoft's had some great ones. GPL scratch ups. Really the whole Copyleft story is great reading.

      The samsung one was pretty hilarious though, especially the "2001 a space odyssey" preexisting prototype evidence :P

  9. Not mentionning.... by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 1

    Bitcoins, anyone?
    With all the slashvertisements, and then the downfall of it, it's not mentionned in the list?

    1. Re:Not mentionning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares about ButtCoin?

      Now, watching Rupert and James Murdock slide into a cesspit of their own making: that was news.

  10. I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Occupy protesters have a lot to learn about how to present their arguments to the public, how to convince people who don't agree with them, and how to explain themselves to people who have no idea what they're talking about. Their dreams of changing the world won't happen without those skills and years of dedication.

    But they sparked a movement and made people aware there are issues. The question is whether they can stop their self-righteous whining about their "rights" and see themselves as the public sees them, so they can face up to facts and work on their public perception problems.

    No one shot at you like the Arab Spring protesters. You weren't under military guard like the Palestinians. You didn't spend decades fighting for the right to use effective medication without being arrested for it by the DEA. You weren't systemically abused like the black community before the civil rights movement.

    You spent over TWO MONTHS squatting in public parks without effectively delivering a message to the PUBLIC instead of amongst your own faithful at the protests. When there were conflicts with the police while you were being evicted, you were only maced and shot with rubber bullets. No one was killed. You had to scream in the faces of the officers for TWO MONTHS before they'd even go that far to get rid of the camps.

    Freedom of speech rights my ass. Occupy doesn't know what their rights are and what they mean, how to deliver a message, or how to work for change. Instead, they come across as a bunch of posers and whiners squatting in the parks and demanding the right to squat there for the rest of their lives while they wait for the world to change itself just because they discovered the world isn't fair.

    Despite that, Occupy was the news story of the year to me. It was a brief spark of hope dashed by the incompetence of self-styled "victims" who insult those who know what actual oppression is.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by msobkow · · Score: 1

      So of course after I post and reread the summary I find the mention of Occupy, making it look like I can't read as well as I can write. *LOL*

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, yet, the peeing on all* of our backs continues, all the while some people are more than happy to keep on with "I'm Singin' in the rain..." and we're encouraged to keep singing along.

      *the 99%, that is...

    3. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by msobkow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And as with any Occupy members, if you don't blindly agree with them, you're labeled as being of the "1%" even if you're on unemployment. After all, being of the "1%" is supposed to make you feel ashamed. Maybe someday I will be of the 1%, but if I am, it'll be because I WORKED to get there.

      But don't listen to anyone who tries to help you get the message out or who tries to teach you how to influence change. That'll take away time from you being able to cry "nobody listens to me" and "nobody understands" while you harass the police until they get pissed off enough to punch you in the face. Don't worry, as we've seen, if you get in their face for 2-3 months they WILL lose their patience and give you that damning "police abuse" video for you to share with everyone as proof of your victimization.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by cynyr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe i could support the Occupy people if I had some clue what they wanted. All they seem to want is for goverment to not be corrupt, rich people to pay taxes, and something else I think...

      While I generally support all of those goals, I can't really get behind them without knowing how they would like it. Do they have any ideas on how to makes those or whatever goals happen?

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    5. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And you seemed to completely overlook the really unique aspect of the Occupy movement in that it was truly of international scale. You referred only to US aspects of it. It is still occupying in other countries, as well. When did that ever happen before?

    6. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by chrb · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm surprised the Arab Spring wasn't included. There is certainly a technological angle. We have seen everything from Gadaffi blaming Wikileaks for sparking the revolutions, to a baby girl in Egypt being named "Facebook". Perhaps it was the Year of the Protester after all.

    7. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I don't think 'occupy' can be explained.

      you either get it or you do not.

      and 'getting it' seems to be whether you are symathetic the the mass suffering of others or if you think the world is just fine the way it is.

      but this can't be explained. I've never seen anyone switch sides on this, have you? its highly polarized (gee, just like class wars.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if I am, it'll be because I WORKED to get there.

      Nobody's gotten to the 1% through their own sweat in a long, long time.

      Occupy's problem is that it's less of a movement than it is an unfocused outpouring of anger. In the end, it won't get anything done (and that's the good news: it's managed to buck all the wranglers who thought they could corral it and break it to their will like the Tea Party ended up).

      just because they discovered the world isn't fair.

      I always wondered what it would look like when people realize the game isn't fair and quit.

    9. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Occupy movement isn't about giving you the answers. Rather than have some Official Party Manifesto handed down from above which outlines the Official Party Solution for you to sign off on, they merely want to call attention to the problems in our country, and leave the "figure out what to do" part to the people as a whole.

          In this way, it's both an anarchist protest, and the most American protest I've ever seen. I suppose it's little wonder some people really hate and demean it.

    10. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      When did that ever happen before?

      Scientology protests back in 08

    11. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by swillden · · Score: 2

      I'm sympathetic to mass suffering, and I think the world can be improved in all sorts of ways, but I still don't "get" Occupy. It seemed to be sort of a mass whine-in, without any clear goals. I'm all for protesting what's wrong with the world, and with trying to make it better, but you have to actually say what's wrong, and ideally propose how it can be fixed. Or if you can't actually articulate a solution, you ought to at least be able to describe the state you'd like to get to.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe i could support the Occupy people if I had some clue what they wanted. All they seem to want is for goverment to not be corrupt, rich people to pay taxes, and something else I think...

      In other words, you do have some clue of what they want.

      While I generally support all of those goals, I can't really get behind them without knowing how they would like it. Do they have any ideas on how to makes those or whatever goals happen?

      So, you'd get behind them if they had a suggested, workable course of action and until then you're just not willing to support their more abstract objectives. Hmm.. Some of that I get, as it's easy to rant about the problems of the world and one doesn't want to support a group that ends up deciding some crazy later on as the solution when it's nothing of the sort. But, the converse of that has often been to have a solution and then pretend to shoehorn it to solve the problem of the day. I'd say to a great extent, the fact that the Occupy movement hasn't gone out of its way to offer solutions is in part to not exclude a lot of people who would quickly hear any semi-formulated (as that's how it'll invariable start out) plan, quickly categorize it as right or left, and then use previous arguments of how each system is flawed--it obvious is since we're here precisely because both right and left have had a go at it and always failed to some degree--to discount the group as a whole; ie, it wants to set the stage for serious support of its objectives and only then to actually discuss a course of action so there will be actual discussion instead of pigeonholing.

      The other part, of course, is that I don't think the Occupy movement really hasn't a good idea how to real their goals really any more than the current political scene has a clue. I mean, sure, Republicans wave the free market around but then forget that the free market as an ideal can't exist as it requires a level of omniscience that's surreal and falling short of that ideal is used as but an excuse for why there are invariable problems when a heavily free market approach is taken instead of acknowledging there are limitations to the construct that is the free market. Meanwhile, Democrats so often wave legislation around as if by writing a law people or companies will actually follow them when it's often the point that those laws are either pointless, circumvented--often with the de facto blessing of those same Democrats--, or never fully applied or applicable to an actual problem.

      And my point isn't to say "well, they're both wrong some times, so we shouldn't listen to their ideas or ever follow their suggestions". It's to acknowledge that an actual discussion needs to take place that tries very hard to avoid reverting to a position of ideology for the sake of that ideology while losing sight of the big picture. Of course, a lot of people have their own agenda--hence the noted issue of corruption--so perhaps too often the big picture is being looked after, it's just not in the role of representing the people. That more fundamental problem isn't really inherently solvable; so, it leads one more to wonder how to at least counter it as it goes, and that's a point that's rarely heavily discussed as corruption behaves much like how computer viruses do with anti-virus scanners--there's always someone behind the scenes who can work to see if it takes but a single bit flip to pass the current test and it makes all the effort seemingly futile. That's the sort of distressing truth that makes it hard for someone to spend a lifetime working constantly to root out corruption when it occurs and install non-corrupt individuals to power.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    13. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>You spent over TWO MONTHS squatting in public parks without effectively delivering a message to the PUBLIC

      The public caught the message of them Squatting over police cars.

      I hate hippies. And seeing shit like that, literally, alongside of the drum circles, human microphones, and druggies was enough to turn me off on the movement. Even though I (and most people) completely agree that corporations have too much influence over the government.

      In other words, I agree with you.

    14. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I hate to dash your illusions of originality, but if anyone deserves "First Post" on being an international scale movement, it's the cannabis right's groups that have fought around the globe since before the '60s.

      Why do Occupy protesters think they're the first to ever rise up? Are they really that uninformed and naive about the history of the world and the nations they live in? Or are they just so arrogant they believe their own bullshit?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    15. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by msobkow · · Score: 1

      What a copout for not being able to explain yourself.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    16. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of how it's often said that men and women are different in how they want to be listened to when they have a problem: men want a solution to their problem, so if they tell you their problem, and you suggest some courses of action, they're happy. But women hate that, and just want you to listen without trying to fix things.

    17. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You both asked:

      I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy

      and answered your own question:

      Freedom of speech rights my ass. Occupy doesn't know what their rights are and what they mean, how to deliver a message, or how to work for change. Instead, they come across as a bunch of posers and whiners squatting in the parks and demanding the right to squat there for the rest of their lives while they wait for the world to change itself just because they discovered the world isn't fair.

      Despite that, Occupy was the news story of the year to me. It was a brief spark of hope dashed by the incompetence of self-styled "victims" who insult those who know what actual oppression is.

      The Occupy movement in the US is essentially the political equivalent of bitcoint: It takes large amounts of valuable time and energy and produces seeming random outputs that are claimed to be valuable but which in fact are largely useless despite the claims of their respective supporters.

      Excellent: “Daily Show” on class divisions at Occupy Wall Street

      Occupy’s Misogyny

      When are the feminists going to speak out on the abuse of women that’s happening at the hands of the Occupy crowd? Rapes and sexual assaults are rampant among the Occupy movement in cities across the nation. According to ABC News, this past Saturday night a 23-year-old reported being raped by a 50-year-old inside a tent at Occupy Philadelphia. Similarly, a 14-year-old child was allegedly raped at Occupy Dallas. And at Occupy Cleveland, a 19-year-old told police she was raped after sharing a tent with an unknown man. After reporting her rape at Occupy Baltimore, a young woman claimed occupiers refused to help find her attacker. Now reports of rape and attempted rape in Zuccotti Park are surfacing. These are just the ones that were reported.

      In addition to rapists, suicidal folks are causing emotional distress within the movement. After a 32-year-old man shot himself inside his tent at Occupy Burlington, Vermont protesters were so traumatized that they readily agreed to pack up and end their demonstration.

      Besides rapes and suicides, occupiers have injured women in the midst of their shameless attempts to grab attention. A couple weeks ago, I attended Americans for Prosperity’s “Defending the American Dream” Summit, which was crashed by Occupy D.C. I was able to depart safely, with my frightened guests in tow, as protesters hissed vile remarks in our direction. Others weren’t that lucky. The Daily Caller reports that an elderly woman was pushed down the stairs during the occupiers’ stampede into the convention center. Not one protester stopped to help her, even as she lay in pain from severe injuries to her wrists, ankles, and legs.

      Despite claiming to represent the 99%, Occupy Wall Street managed to cost at least 91 people their jobs: Milk Street Cafe, FiDi eatery that lost business due to Occupy Wall Street barricades, to close for good

      During a time when most city governments have having a very difficult time financially, the Occupy movment jacked up the costs. It cost Oakland CA about $2.4 million, LA is looking at $2.3 million, with some more big bills coming in shortly. Many other cities are in a similar position.

      A number of "Occupy" site around the world was hit by revelations that

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    18. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And before them, Women's rights activists. And before them, probably pro-democracy activists. They had a tough time of it in Germany and France, but those were harder days.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      Pointing out injustice, inequality, and corruption is not a worthless endeavor.

      Look at the civil rights movement. The leaders were vilified, propagandists twisted the message to turn people against it, and grandstanding assholes eventually rose to prominence. Look at modern feminism: the message, egalitarianism, is something that anyone should be able to get behind. And yet you constantly see terms like "feminazi" and people distancing themselves from feminism, saying things like, "Oh, I'm not a feminist. I'm an egalitarian." Feminism is vilified by those who have privilege and don't want to give it up. In many people's minds, feminism is a bad thing, even though they believe in the same things as feminists. The Tea Party made some good points early on in their formation -- things that the OWS protestors are trying to make, as well. However, the Tea Party was taken over by shills and infiltrators and moved back toward traditional Republican lines.

      Now, given all that history, is it really such a good idea to have clear leadership, a unifying doctrine, and a singular voice? All those things can be used against you. Once the problems are identified and acknowledged, solutions can be hashed out. OWS isn't about electing a specific politician or advancing a specific POV. It's about raising awareness. By withholding explicit policies and solutions, they keep the movement from being overtaken by astroturfers and political shills. With the absence of a policy statement, the OWS protestors can't simply become a mouthpiece for politics as usual, such as the Democratic or Republican parties.

      There are some whiny, entitled young adults uploading videos to YouTube, but if you look at them from the point of the uploaders, it's really not so hard to be sympathetic to them. They've been fed bullshit by the system all their lives. If that's made them a little bitter and entitled, I find it understandable. Now, like anyone else, I have to repress the urge to beat the entitlement complex out of them, but they still make some decent points. I think a lot of people focus waaay too much on the kids uploading videos to YouTube. The OWS protests were meant to be more than just disgruntled kids who have some vague complaints about society being unfair. To characterize the entire movement by that is, well, unfair, and this is probably the best (perhaps even only) way to attack the movement, since it was designed to have as few weaknesses as possible. It's smart of the opposition to focus on this, but it's also a very dirty move.

    20. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Maybe someday I will be of the 1%, but if I am, it'll be because I WORKED to get there.

      Someone still believes in the American Dream? It's not called a dream for nothing. It belongs in the naive 1950s. Do you still believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, Unicorns?

      Your hopes of being one of the 1% amount to this: 1) You had rich parents.
      2) You're a sociopath of a certain kind.
      3) You win the lottery.

      Working hard has never been the way. No matter how fast you shovel, those that have other people to do their shovelling will always beat you.

    21. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by roman_mir · · Score: 1
    22. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by swillden · · Score: 1

      Aha!

      I think I finally get Occupy! It wasn't intended to change anything, it was just people wanting to vent.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    23. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it's people wanting to vent, and then have this somehow change things for the better but without any clear determination of what exactly the problem is and what exact plan of action you're going to take to fix it.

      It's like a woman bitching and whining about her asshole boyfriend, but not wanting to make any firm decisions or plans about how to deal with the situation (like dumping him!), and getting mad if you suggest any course of action.

    24. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gates, Jobs, Zuckerberg, dipshits of Groupon, any shitty business owners raking in more than $250,000 per year, most senior consultants, bankers, investment advisors...might want to try doing something positive.

    25. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about Tom Burrell, but he looks like he might be one of those guys who actually did, through his own sweat, get into the 1%, and did so relatively recently. He didn't inherit his money--he worked for it.

      http://www.theroot.com/1-percent-occupy-movement-black-tom-burrell?wpisrc=root_more_news [theroot.com]

    26. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think 'occupy' can be explained.

      If you can't explain it, then I can't support it.

      you either get it or you do not.

      and 'getting it' seems to be whether you are symathetic the the mass suffering of others or if you think the world is just fine the way it is.

      Are you sure? Is that really what the Occupy movement is about? How do you know?

      Do you think it's possible to support someone's goals, without supporting their plan for how they intend to reach those goals? If so, then surely you can see how it would be possible for one to be sympathetic to the mass suffering of others, without supporting Occupy Wall Street's plan for how best to end that suffering. Except that since they appear to have no such plan, there's no way for me to know whether I would support it or not!

    27. Re:I'm surprised you didn't include Occupy by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1

      "illusions of originality"? I merely observed that the international nature of the particular protests had been overlooked by the original poster. No claim to originality that I can see. According to you and the other responder, there are indeed other cases about which I am now informed. Big whoops.

  11. I'd be most interested in statistics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be interested to see exactly what % of stories on /. involved in some form Apple, Copyright, Open Source, Microsoft, Actual scientific news, and so on and so forth.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the actual science stuff ended up being only a sliver.

  12. The old and the new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Oslo bombing and the Utøya massacre hit me the most last year. A tragic event in so many ways.

    2011 was a year of personal growth and 2012 will be even more so.

    Sad to see Google Wave go, glad to see Google+ arrive and grow.

    Happy about the new technology and sad about the corporate greed wrt lawsuits and the patent wars. 2012 will not be any better IMHO.

    At least I'll be 40 when the world goes under on Dec 21 :-)

  13. Re:Not tech companies! by paulmac84 · · Score: 2
    --
    One of the universal rules of happiness is always be wary of any helpful item that weighs less than its operating manual
  14. Suxnet Anyone? by Whiteox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I took a few years off Slashdot and only logged on because of boredom a few months ago.
    Here's my 2 cents worth on some of the issues that have surfaced in that time:

    I actually liked the Stuxnet saga and how the Iranian scenario was investigated and collaborated around the world. This is one of the first tech conspiracies of importance and those responsible for it have not owned up (yet). It also made me think of other digital servo equipment that are vulnerable in industry and consumer grade products.

    Flying copters with wifi/drones also interested me as the technology can now be bought/assembled for a few hundred dollars. A great at home project with lots of possibilities. On that, there was an assumption that Iran could not reverse engineer the captured drone, something I feel unlikely as their engineering and research faculties are quite well developed.

    US Bashing: I'm not a US citizen, but this should stop. Most of us are aware of US policy and the incredible problems that the US faces in their federal system. I think that most US Slashdotters are aware of the shit they are in. The fact that the whole world blames the US for bad economic policy and ineffectual wars and an idiotic congress that has hamstrung change makes them a laughing stock. OK, we get it. Now let's move on and maybe give some support.

    Atheism vs Religious beliefs: The problem here is to be one or the other, you have to accept the whole mindset/weltanshaung/worldview without exception. For example you cannot be an atheist and hope to argue successfully the mitochondrial Eve, pre-Big Bang and for that matter, the cause of it all which is consciousness. The same goes for religious beliefs. God MUST be involved in every part of life and history. Sometimes that is a pill too hard to swallow. Gnostic or agnosticism maybe an alternative as most proponents of religion do not follow the precepts of their god without exception. Personally, I just don't care. Richard Dawkins argues that rational thought can be a basis of ethics of morality without the need for fundamentalism. I tend to agree with that. Religion has too much baggage.

    Freedom of Speech: Wikileaks, filtering, bloghate, tweets, FB and whatever is supremely important. Freedom of Speech is a right that should have personal responsibility attached to it unless you want to be an anonymus coward.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    1. Re:Suxnet Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent p :)

  15. Re:Not tech companies! by timothy · · Score: 2

    Of course, there's the Kindle / Kindle Fire / Mechanical Turk ...

    Nowadays, it's nearly as easy to say that "no one's a tech company" as it is that "everyone's a tech company." (Starbucks is one of my most regular ISPs, really ...)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  16. travesty by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure how one can write a Slashdot "Year in Review" without mentioning my name, but as these things go, this one's not that bad.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. Nerds vs the World? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Nerd News vs World News?

    Well, Linux kernel 3.0 being ranked among the main news headlines like Osamas' death must be on of the main 2011 comparisons. Which is the more important in the long run? I am happy that Osama's ideas have very few mainstream followers.

    1. Re:Nerds vs the World? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      And yet missing other tech news.

      Like PSN being hacked and down for 6 weeks. Or the various breakins since that.

  18. 2012 - Off to a Good Start... by bit+trollent · · Score: 1

    Looks like you've gotten the year off to a good start by posting a hilariously angry rant about how New Years occurred in your time zone first.

    It's still 7:45 PM here in Texas, and I hope this is the last dumb thing I read this year.

    I've got a feeling it won't be...

  19. No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by Charmonium · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought CmdrTaco retiring from Slashdot is worthy of mention.

    1. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by thermopile · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This.

      Seriously, as far as slashdot goes, CmdrTaco's last missive and farewell really has to stand as a notable event in 2011, at the very least for Slashdot.

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    2. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus, the mysterious disappearance of the Bill Gates as a Borg icon for Microsoft stories,,, (It just about managed to survive to the latest "not as good as the HTML 3 version"[1] relaunch with a crappy illustrated version, but that seems to have disappeared in place of a generic Microsoft logo on new stories...

      Slashdot just isn't right anymore...

      [1] If anyone does know how to use this newfangled Javascript based comment system, just don't bother telling me how to use it, like all sensible people I turned it off when it was first introduced years ago, and have no intention of learning how it works./p

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    3. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by AngryNick · · Score: 0

      +1

    4. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

      +1 to that

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    5. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by weweedmaniii · · Score: 1

      Ditto

      --
      "If stupid things work...then they are not stupid."
    6. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Sooner after his departure Ghostery went from reporting zero to 4, and as of today 5, web-bugs on most slashdot pages.

      Could just be a coincidence, and awfully big coincidence though.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:No mention of CmdrTaco retiring? by inKubus · · Score: 1

      No one's made the Steve Jobs Borg Icon for Apple yet.. just give it time for this glorious torch passing. Meanwhile Gates gives another $2B away this year to eradicate malaria worldwide and saves 200M lives.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  20. Re:'nutty' wikileaks caused some of the arab sprin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link?

  21. Funniest comment of the year by cultiv8 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Re:For the sake of satisfying my curiosity...

    What code are they using to crash IE6?

    HTML code

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
  22. Tsunami & meltdowns by Maow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The tsunami & meltdowns were a story that went from incredibly, indescribably bad to worse and worse and, impossibly... worse.

    Left me with a sick feeling that wouldn't go away.

    One of the worst parts (as someone not directly affected, and bringing a technical angle into it) was reading in El Reg stories by their resident pro-nuke shill about how "radiation cannot escape even the fence surrounding Fukushima's property". Written *before* the first explosion.

    And a full page of "yeah! Greenies want us to all live in caves and freeze in the dark" comments getting way more thumbs up than down. I'm pro-nuke myself, but this ignored the reality of the problem as much as the worst "greenies" do in the opposite direction.

    This was followed by more nuke-shill posts doubling down on the stupid after the explosions, *never* acknowledging the seriousness of the situation, including the bravery of the guys on the ground working to fix the problems.

    So, on top of the incredible sense of loss I felt as a member of the human race, I also felt loss at the stupidity of highly educated, technically aware people whom I figured should've known better.

    To top all that off, my best friend I've ever had took sick, was hit by a vehicle, then, a week later (two weeks post-tsunami) died. I should add, this best friend ever was my dog. I didn't know how true the old cliche is; A Dog is a Man's Best Friend.

    The losses seemed to keep piling up and I was depressed for a long time.

    Yeah, fuck you 2011, buh-bye.

    1. Re:Tsunami & meltdowns by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      The Japan earthquake * tsunami * Fukushima hit me the most. Not only in /. but also because I was in Tokyo living the events in real time.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Tsunami & meltdowns by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Well, let's not sugarcoat the situation. The "greenies" were openly celebrating Fukushima while totally ignoring the SIXTEEN THOUSAND HUMANS DEAD in the tsunami. Seriously, they were celebrating because the crisis would help them to shut down nuclear power plants forever. Germany did, eh? Just look at any of the Slashdot threads and you'll find their comments, moderated up to +5 insightful.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Tsunami & meltdowns by Maow · · Score: 1

      The "greenies" were openly celebrating Fukushima while totally ignoring the SIXTEEN THOUSAND HUMANS DEAD in the tsunami.

      Bull. Shit.

      Greenies were NOT "celebrating" Fukushima. Nor were they ignoring the 20,000 or more dead from the tsunami, that's ridiculous bordering on stupid.

      But they also were NOT ignoring the long term problems with multiple meltdowns, fuel pool prompt criticalities, etc. They did point out the meltdown of shutdown reactors (remember, the fuel rods slammed into place immediately; reactors *still* melted down).

      There was some "I told you so" from the "greenies", and it appears that they were correct: when nukes go bad, they can go *very* bad. 30 more years until cleanup, at least.

      They were also correct in that when the regulators become industry promoters they fail at their original mission.

      Sure no-one has died... yet. But it's likely some people will get cancer in the coming decades from ingesting hot particles. But like cigarettes, we won't be able to point to the one cigarette (one ingested hot particle) that caused it.

      That does not ignore that other power generation also causes death, it merely points out that, in this case, the El Reg flak was idiotic to claim the radiation wouldn't escape the property line. And, when it did, he did not revise his claims but doubled down (I refuse to go find a link, but you can: Lewis Page at TheRegister.co.uk).

      tl;dr version:

      Utterly ignoring the Fukushima problem (pro-nuke shills) is every bit as bad as "greenies" wanting no nukes evar. Same-same lack of basis in reality.

    4. Re:Tsunami & meltdowns by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      How about some proof of this 'celebrating'?

      And no, the equivalent of 'We told you so' is not a celebration.

      And as for the tsunami victims, as callous as it may sound, that sort of death toll is a known risk in Japan. They have been living with earthquakes and tsunamis for ages; the sheer incompetence of the TEPCO management is not something they have similar experience with.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  23. The year at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blah blah blah, we hate Microsoft, blah blah blah.

    Bitter rant, Teh Lunix should have more users than Windoze, blah blah.

    We love Apple, despite them being the most brutal monopoly in tech. Anything but Microsoft!

    1. Re:The year at Slashdot by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I disagree; I've seen the tide turn on Slashdot's (and other more hardcore Linux sites) opinion on Apple over the course of the year. Not completely, but Apple is fast losing their goodwill from the pro-Linux and anti-MS crowds (which share many members of course).

  24. Bob Pease died in 2011 by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Pease

    just read the wiki, you'll see he was a big player, worthy of being mentioned.

    I didn't know him or even *of* him until this year, myself. but I can see he qualifies as 'greatness' by my standard, at least.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:Bob Pease died in 2011 by leftover · · Score: 2

      This. I had a lucky chance to meet Bob Pease in the 1980's and to converse with him several times over the years.
      Another was Jim Williams at Linear Technologies. Jim died after attending Bob's funeral.
      http://www.edn.com/article/518496-Analog_guru_Jim_Williams_dies_after_stroke.php

      They became 'famous' -- within the world of EE's -- and their only response
      was pure delight that they got to talk with more people about analog design. Jim helped me with some digital analog
      interplay noise issues that did not mean sales for LT, he just loved design and troubleshooting.

      Good people.

      --
      Bent, folded, spindled, and mutilated.
  25. what's all this new years stuff, anyhow? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

    hmm, the wiki actually is light on info about mr. pease.

    here's a better link: http://www.national.com/en/corporate/remembering_bob_pease.html

    tl;dr: he designed the lm331 (volt to freq converter) and lm337 (negative compliment to the famous lm317 voltage regulator chip). and many other things.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  26. People will recognize Steve Jobs vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that 64kb is enough!

    1. Re:People will recognize Steve Jobs vision by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      For some demo coders, 64 KiB is way too much!

  27. Re:HAPPY 2012 by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    Maybe next year.

    Where's the tidal wave and SIX nuclear power plants in Japan about to do the China Syndrome stories? Or is it because Godzilla didn't put in an appearance? I mean, really, this is a tech failure that literally put hundreds of millions of people at risk, forced several countries to change their energy plans to depend more on greenhouse-gas-emitting power, and it's not even half a sentence?

  28. To've by seyyah · · Score: 1

    2012 also saw the last minute coining of the contraction to've, which is unique in that it contracts the verb have in the infinitive rather than the auxiliary have found in perfect tenses (such as I've been to Moose Jaw).

    Then there's the still unfinished story of SOPA; at least in some cases, speaking loudly seems to've caused businesses to change their public stances as defenders of the law as proposed; could this be called washing SOPA out with mouth?

  29. Re:'nutty' wikileaks caused some of the arab sprin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems to be true. The wikipedia article could use some clean-up, but google found lots of other stories that substantially confirm the OP's claims.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  30. Watson Win by biff-mo · · Score: 1

    Probably the most significant AI milestone in a while.

    1. Re:Watson Win by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I would have thought that Google successfully having a fleet of autonomous vehicles roaming about in California without the public even noticing bests Watson. Fast natural language search vs Self Driving Cars. Yeah, I'm going with the cars...

  31. The system is rigged & they know it, by nido · · Score: 2

    but no one's told them what to be righteously angry about.

    If I had an audience with the protesters, I would point out the difference between a dollar bill and a dollar coin. Dollar bills represent money that the banking system (the Federal Reserve's shares are mostly owned by banks on Wall Street) has lent into circulation, and is collecting interest on, whereas Dollar Coins are debt-free money created by the government.

    This Bill was BORROWED from Wall Street.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:The system is rigged & they know it, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We Discordians have been using US paper currency as a propaganda platform since the 1950s, in an attempt to impart some actual value to it.

      Where've you been all this time, Sonny?

    2. Re:The system is rigged & they know it, by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Say WHAT? You think the coins have any different fiat value than the paper bills?

      You've got a lot of learning to do. Start by looking for videos from David Icke. I don't agree with everything he says, but he'll do a far better job of expaining currency, fiat, and the banking system than I ever could. Suffice to say, you're currently severely misinformed.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    3. Re:The system is rigged & they know it, by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Can we ask for nothing but coins when we withdraw money from a bank? (I'm thinking rolls of quarters.)

      --
      I come here for the love
    4. Re:The system is rigged & they know it, by nido · · Score: 1

      you can buy rolls of $1 coins from the mint for cost, free shipping...

      Circulating $1 Coin Direct Ship Program

      Hmm... looks like they're going to add a $12.50 feet. wtf? I think it's stupid - it's not like they were losing money before. 250 dollar coins * 0.12/coin = $30 cost. Even if shipping cost $15, they'd still make $205 a box.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  32. Positive Thing Out of Year by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many horrible things worldwide happened in 2011, but most striking positive thing for me was Kepler mission, the stars of the galaxy are full of planets of all kinds. It won't be long before we're taking spectrographic measurements of atmospheres of worlds in "goldilocks zones"

  33. Re:Google's cars by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I would have thought that Google successfully having a fleet of autonomous vehicles roaming about in California without the public even noticing bests Watson.

    Almost without the public noticing.

    "But it was being driven manually," you say.

    Yeah. Uh, huh. Right.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  34. No Duke Nukem Forever? by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 3, Funny

    No mention of Duke Nukem Forever?

  35. How it really looked by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man: You sit here, dear.
    Wife: All right.
    Man: Morning!
    Slashdot: Morning!
    Man: Well, what've you got?
    Slashdot: Well, there's last week's news and last month's news, last week's news political trolling and last month's news, last week's news and dupes, last week's news last month's news and dupes, last week's news last month's news political trolling and dupes, dupes last month's news political trolling and dupes, dupes last week's news dupes dupes last month's news and dupes, dupes political trolling dupes dupes last month's news dupes tomato and dupes, dupes dupes dupes last week's news and dupes, dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes flame wars dupes dupes dupes or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried last week's news on top and dupes.
    Wife: Have you got anything without dupes?
    Slashdot: Well, there's dupes last week's news political trolling and dupes, that's not got much dupes in it.
    Wife: I don't want ANY dupes!
    Man: Why can't she have last week's news last month's news dupes and political trolling?
    Wife: THAT'S got dupes in it!
    Man: Hasn't got as much dupes in it as dupes last week's news political trolling and dupes, has it?
    Wife: Could you do the last week's news last month's news dupes and political trolling without the dupes then?
    Slashdot: Urgghh!
    Wife: What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like dupes!
    Slashdot: You can't have last week's news last month's news dupes and political trolling without the dupes.
    Wife: I don't like dupes!
    Man: Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your dupes. I love it. I'm having dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes beaked beans dupes dupes dupes and dupes!
    Slashdot: flame wars are off.
    Man: Well could I have her dupes instead of the flame wars then?
    Slashdot: You mean dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes dupes...
    Vikings:! Lovely dupes! Lovely dupes! Lovely dupes! Lovely dupes! dupes dupes dupes dupes!

    (with apologies to Monty Python)

  36. The fallout from the NDAA and SOPA by msobkow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "We The People".

    Not "We The Citizens".

    The rights enshrined in the US Constitution are supposed to apply to everyone, especially those accused of criminal activities by the government.

    President Obama, the US Congress, and the US Senate are traitors to their own nation's values.

    What a shame the sheeple go along with it, sacrificing their rights in the name of a chicken-little "War on Terrorism" that couldn't stop a Texan from killing a half dozen people, several dozen cars from being fire-bombed over the past few days in California, or an incompetent underwear bomber from trying to set off his shorts.

    You should know from the experience of the Israelis that imposing police-state security on the people does not result in safety, only in government and military control of those being oppressed and occupied. Why do you think it'll work any better in the US than in Israel?

    I call on the world to demand that the UN veto be taken away from the United States. We cannot allow a government that doesn't respect it's own social mandates to have the final say on how other governments act. Letting someone who wants to arbitrarily jail and hold the accused for an indefinite time without charges or a quick and speedy fair trial have the final say on how the UN members are to respect human rights is so incredibly wrong-headed and stupid that I can't believe any nation in the world is willing to put up with it.

    If the Americans want to screw themselves into a police state, let them. But don't let them force that Orwellian nightmare on the rest of the world.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:The fallout from the NDAA and SOPA by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I call on the world to demand that the UN veto be taken away from the United States. We cannot allow a government that doesn't respect it's own social mandates to have the final say on how other governments act. Letting someone who wants to arbitrarily jail and hold the accused for an indefinite time without charges or a quick and speedy fair trial have the final say on how the UN members are to respect human rights is so incredibly wrong-headed and stupid that I can't believe any nation in the world is willing to put up with it.

      If the Americans want to screw themselves into a police state, let them. But don't let them force that Orwellian nightmare on the rest of the world.

      Nice pipe dream there, considering the USA has historically always contributed the most towards the UN's current operating budget [1]. Even if that weren't the case, what would happen when the UN mandates an action and the US doesn't agree with it? This is not a purely intellectual exercise, it's happened many times in the past. The US also has ~700 military bases through out the world with which to enforce it's empire. When force meets ideals, very often it's force that wins.

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  37. Re:'nutty' wikileaks caused some of the arab sprin by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

    Seems true, but also five years ago... Not saying that it's not bad, just that it's not exactly a 2011 news story.

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  38. Re:'nutty' wikileaks caused some of the arab sprin by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

    Replying to myself, I should read articles more thoroughly - it was revealed this year.

    Carry on!

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  39. What news? by drolli · · Score: 1

    I was hit by the Japanese Earthquake in March *before* it was news. In a safe distance (400km), however. The difference of the arrival time between the different frequencies of the shock told me that this *was* going to be bad news.

  40. Re:HAPPY 2012 by rdebath · · Score: 1

    Actually no, it's a political (money) failure. The problem with those reactors is that they're very very old and haven't been kept up to date with (probably expensive) safety features.

    Those reactors require an active, powered, cooling system to be able to shut down cleanly, this hasn't been true of modern designs for decades. A fully modern design can safely use purely passive cooling to go from maximum generating capacity to cold.

    However, there are a great many 'overaged' plants still running. The thing is these plants should be fitted with a passive shutdown (or instant shutdown) system by now. For example the AGC reactor design common with UK nuclear generation has a similar problem. It takes a long time to shutdown properly and while it doesn't need external power it does need a working cooling system.

    The problem is solved for the AGC reactors, small 'boron balls' can be used to 'poison' the reactions and permanently shutdown the reactor; however, these balls will get everywhere and be almost impossible to get out so if it's ever shutdown using this it'll never be reactivated.

    So we have an expensive addition that will never be used guess what.

  41. Patently bland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I can't believe lawsuits didn't even rate a mention in higlights reel. barely a day went by without another story on who was suing who for patent/copyright/trademark/all of the above/you spilt my milk infringements.. easily the biggest *yawn* topic of 2011. for me it took 20 years, but I finally realised its fundamentally broken. I hate IT now.

  42. its available now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iam running Android 2 on an asus netbook, came installed straight from the factory

    oh and its shit, if thats the best Android/Google could do then its woefully poor, crashing, things just dont work right, if that really is the future of computing god help us all

  43. Finally! by mshenrick · · Score: 1

    ...A website that runs on GMT, so I can tell when a comment is posted in my local time zone (Britain)!

  44. You're Quite Mistaken by Phoenix666 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    About a great many things when it comes to Occupy Wall Street. They are not self righteous whining posers unless you do not agree that Americans have the right to free speech, the freedom of assembly, the right to free and fair elections, and the many others enumerated in the Constitution.

    You are also quite mistaken about how the Occupy protesters "have a lot to learn" about messaging, organizing, persuading others, etc. New York is the worldwide capital of advertising, fashion, and image making in general and those industries were heavily represented at OWS. How do we know? Well, you heard about OWS for months; when was the last time you heard about traditional, take to the streets protests? Hint: it's not because the latter don't happen all the time but because the powers that be have grown quite expert at ignoring/dismissing/hiding them. But OWS got your attention precisely because they are expert at communicating.

    You're also mistaken about their goals. You did not need to look much farther than the Wikipedia entry to find them, but it is easier to get your information from Glen Beck/Rush Limbaugh/Fox News than to do a little independent checking.

    What is a legitimate question is to ask, what's next? Occupy Wall Street represents a different approach than the traditional approaches that the 1% have become past masters at pigeonholing/deflecting/defeating/ignoring. That's why they have gotten as much coverage as they have, because it's different. But how to take it to the next level is an open question. It will, however, be taken to the next level because the underlying issues have not been addressed and the government has not even started to pretend to address them. They're doubling down on tired forms and bankrupt memes.

    I hope OWS and the Tea Party forces team up; they differ on the margins but share the same core concerns--the system doesn't work any more for the vast majority of the American people. Crowd-sourced surveillance and expose of the 1%, the way they are trying to monitor and control us, I believe will be the straw that breaks the camel's back of the status quo. The 1% can only succeed under the cloak of night and in the comfort of their backrooms and private clubs. If we rip that cover away, the public revulsion will be instant and universal and ineluctable.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  45. Like a Member of My Family Dying by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    I have read /. almost from the beginning. My first user ID was four digit, but lost track and contact while making the transition from the West Coast to the East Coast. CmdrTaco, Hemos, CowboyNeal, heck, even Jon Katz are names that are woven into the DNA of my online experience. Every day for years I have seen their handles and known that somewhere in the universe something was OK. So when CmdrTaco signed off, it was like losing a member of my family. Losing Steve Jobs was sad, but nowhere near as immediate to me as that.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  46. timeline by cdgeorge · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should provide your own timeline feature.

  47. .org was US first by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    What so this is a US site now? Where is the .us domain on the end then?

    Despite the "global" moniker that's been lately added, when first created, the three-letter top-level domains were US-centric by virtue of the fact that the system we now call "the Internet" was a US-centric project. Same reason .mil is US military. Jokes about Al Gore aside, the US created the Internet, and thus there's a US-centric focus in some places -- such as the original top-level domains. If you dislike this, you're welcome to create your own global network project. Good luck with that.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  48. It's the Roman_Mir Comedy Hour!! by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Here is an explanation.

    That explanation describes the occupy movement as accurately as the Bible describes quantum mechanics. You could undoubtedly find an equally (or more) useful explanation at PBS Kids.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  49. you're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that explains the occupy movement less accurately than the bible explains quantum mechanics.

  50. Re:HAPPY 2012 by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    The failure was technical - the political and economic failures that led up to it are another matter. For example, the failure to build the seawall higher (it was on their todo list - as in "we'll do it some time in the future") was both economic and political, but the fallout (pun intended) wasn't limited to just political or economic.

  51. Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster by inKubus · · Score: 1

    By faaaar and away the 9.0 Japanese earthquake and the subsequent Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster was the most important story of the year. I'm not in Japan but Japan, the 3rd largest economy, was Stunned by it. We are still seeing economic and emotional effects. Not to mention just being sick for all those people who had to move or were hurt. And the fact that the land is now closed off for decades. I don't know how you can put Steve Jobs in the same category. Sure, he did a lot at Apple... I think it's weird to worship the guy though, especially when he was a well-known dick and basically his legacy trying to put an end to general purpose computing. I don't think it'll happen but they definitely tried. Ritchie is definitely far more worthy of worship, being the humble person he was. But when 100+ million people are affected by a natural disaster and then a big man-made disaster, that pretty much takes the cake over any single person dying, no matter where they were in the tree of the economy.

    Anyway, there were hundreds of stories on Slashdot about Fukushima, so many that I had to turn my back on them after a while because the situation was so depressing. I think we can start looking back at it now though for some closure. As far as I know it's still pretty fucked there, and yet Kim Kardashian marraige/divorce is the main story of the year on the pop news sites. Oh to be that uninformed and ignorant. I wish I could go back to before Fukushima and become blind and deaf for 9 months so I never had to hear about it..

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.