Slashdot Mirror


Lax Security At Russian Rocket Plant

theshowmecanuck writes "Reuters reports that there is little or no security at one of the main factories in Russia responsible for military and Soyuz rocket manufacture. Blogger Lana Sator was able to walk right into the empty (off hours) facility through huge gaps in the fences that no-one bothered to repair, and there was no security to stop them aside from some dogs that didn't bother them either. In fact Lana even has one picture of herself posing next to an apparently non-functional security camera, another of her sitting on what looks like to be possibly a partially assembled rocket motor (someone who knows better can fill us in), and has about 100 photos of the escapade all told on her blog about this (it's in Russian... which I don't speak... any translators out there?). Russian officials are said to be deeply concerned. I wonder if this has any bearing on why Russian rockets haven't been making it into space successfully, or whether it and the launch failures are all part of some general industrial malaise that is taking place."

84 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Translation by Stradenko · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Translation by statsone · · Score: 2

      rocket motor seems to be described as a test stand.
      Amazing how the lights are even left on and how there seem to be no locked doors.

    2. Re:Translation by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I deal with Russian all the time and find that Google Translate does a pretty decent job of Russian to English. Not so good the other way around, but in a pinch...

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
  2. Looks like ... by PPH · · Score: 1
    ... a Soviet era washing machine to me.

    another of her sitting on what looks like to be possibly a partially assembled rocket motor

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Looks like ... by folderol · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you need new glasses! There's about a 20 year age difference for a start. Also Elanor was not 'found' to be bogus, she was accused of it by people with vested interests, someone even claimed she photoshopped herself into stock photos, but if you take the trouble to actually go to her website you'll likely come away with a different viewpoint.

    2. Re:Looks like ... by Donwulff · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Elena aka KiddOfSpeed. They were bogus in that she took a guided tour and was not on a solitary motorcycle ride through the area as she had claimed on her site. In other words the photos weren't photoshopped, but everything else about it was fake. I was considering this possibility myself reading the headline; there must be guided tours into the Russian space-technology facilities as well. On the other hand it would not be hard to believe the facilities are not very secure or well guarded, and probably quite empty over the holidays.

    3. Re:Looks like ... by folderol · · Score: 1

      Clearly she was part of a group (otherwise how were there pictures of her) but I don't believe there were organised tours at that time. Also, I've never heard of organised motorcycle tours. Regardless of all of that, her trip itself was not bogus, nor was what she saw and commented on. Have you looked at here site? What about the related Serpents Wall? This is someone who had something to say, and I learned things from her.

    4. Re:Looks like ... by Donwulff · · Score: 3, Informative

      Timed release or whatever it's called. And the motorcycle part is just it: Motorcycles were forbidden there, but in none of her pictures was the motorcycle actually shown within the Chernobyl Zone of Alienation, which was probably one of the first clues people had that the story of her taking a motorcycle through there alone was bogus. Second clue was when a Chernobyl travel-guide told she'd been on their tour group.
      Now you might suggest its a conspiracy of them trying to cover up letting her in against rules, but Elena wrote on the site in response "I am being accused that it was more poetry in this story then reality. I partly accept this accusation, it still was more reality then poetry and it is why this site has millions of people visiting each month from the day when I put it online and I think I have right to say that people love it". If you go to the KiddOfSpeed website, you'll find a disclaimer from the person providing the hosting, "Regardless of what is true, this site has certainly made people think more about Chernobyl and this tragic disaster."
      So it would seem the people with "vested interests" to accuse her of making up things include both herself and the person currently hosting the site.
      Tours of the are have been available since 2002, and her website appeared in 2004. Wikipedia cites mainly Slashdot has having made the site famous. The site has ofcourse been changed numerous times since then with new pictures etc. Also Mary Mycio (who MAY have a vested interest in it) alleges many of the pictures are from books and different timeperiods.
      So in short, yes Elena's KiddOfSpeed story was fantasy. The images were of Chernobyl, but staged and not what they purpoted to be. As it relates to THIS story, the "solitary woman on unauthorized exploration of forbidden area" has a chance of being a fantasy. Looking cursorily over the site it's hard to imagine those pics being from a public tour, though the lack of actual rocket engines on site makes it a remote possibility.

    5. Re:Looks like ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also, I've never heard of organised motorcycle tours

      What do you call Sturgis?

      A nominally organized motorcycle rally.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Looks like ... by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

      Lana was not alone there, and since then she was interviewed by many major news agencies, the photos have been reprinted by newspapers and shown on TV. It is real.

    7. Re:Looks like ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who was formerly an engineer in the Russian space program. The visuals from the two photos linked in the summary are in line with how he described it. They are capable of some remarkable things, but they're not going to waste precious resources on unnecessary things like paint.

    8. Re:Looks like ... by tqk · · Score: 1

      Also, I've never heard of organised motorcycle tours

      What do you call Sturgis?

      A target for a copyright troll?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:Looks like ... by tqk · · Score: 1

      I can seriously see why they don't bother guarding it.. I can't see any real valuable tools or other fancy looking components laying around...

      Value lies in the eye of the beholder. I wonder if there's potential "dirty bomb" materials laying around in the back rooms. A little missed plutonium, selenium, ... goes a long way in the right circles.

      My first thought on seeing this story: more of the same, plus ca change ... May we please have that revolution in management I've been praying for for so long? Please?

      Damn, my $deity appears to be broken. :-P

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  3. Well, that's a face I haven't seen before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... and probably won't see ever again in the future.

    Sorry, sometimes it's so sad you get jaded.

  4. When you cut costs... by Mabbo · · Score: 1

    They're making these things as cheaply as possible. Know what happens when you do that? #1: Shit doesn't work as well as it should. #2: Repairs to things that aren't mandatory, like security systems and fences, they don't happen.

    1. Re:When you cut costs... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      They have the best security they need to prevent anybody from stealing these rockets.

      These things have great record of blowing up on the launch pad. Who wants to steal crappy rockets? Or even the designs for crappy rockets?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  5. Same as in any big beauracracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is exactly the same problem that's existed in any big beauracracy since the beginning of time.

    e.g. read how Feynman irked the guards at Los Alamos by leaving the secure area 5 times without entering.

    The beauracracy spends so much effort putting on a show at guarding the official entrances and any other place you might leave or enter? It can't even fit into the minds of the security guys.

    1. Re:Same as in any big beauracracy by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Actually, no... Feynman's reason for those antics was not to show that you can't guard things, but to show they weren't being guarded very well. He did believe things could at least be safer than they were.

    2. Re:Same as in any big beauracracy by budgenator · · Score: 2

      When I was stationed at Redstone, we found that MSFC had some junk-piles with uber space geek appeal. No fences around them, once you was on post, you could just walk up and look around, touch things, pick them up. Once a security guard stopped and check our ID, we told him what we were doing and he said "don't get hurt and just take pictures" and left.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Same as in any big beauracracy by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I must have missed the part where the parent poster was the hulk. For a better example, look at the big fuss recently about all the "stolen" moon rocks. It's exactly the kind of security show he's talking about. 30 years after the fact, a bunch of moon samples that were essentially given away or loaned out indefinitely by people who had de facto or outright official authority to do so, are now being treated as if they were stolen by the people who have them now. Basically, they left the barn door wide open in the past, now they've locked it up tight, but they want to act as if the horses that got out went through the locked door rather than the open one.

  6. A trifle surprising... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I imagine that the sophisticated espionage types who want to abscond with your rocket-building expertise(for competitive purposes, or because you aren't selling toys to their nation state of choice) probably aren't stopped by fences and dogs. If they are really serious, you've already hired them and they just walk in the front door every morning. If that is your concern, the prison-camp props probably aren't a huge deal.

    I am somewhat surprised, though, that they haven't had a greater incentive to repair the fence and put together something resembling a night watch for reasons of simple theft. Rocket surgery presumably involves some expensive tools, and big piles of parts and stock in various rather pricey metals and alloys. If your security is so fantastic that bored bloggers are wandering in, I'm amazed that the whole operation hasn't been melted down at the nearest scrapyard of loose morals...

    1. Re:A trifle surprising... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      These rocket motors are sold freely. For example, they are used in Atlas V rockets by Lockheed Martin & Boeing.

      So there's no great secret in their production. China or India might be interested in technologies used, but I somehow think they already have them.

    2. Re:A trifle surprising... by Amouth · · Score: 2

      having a product in hand and knowing how to build it are completely different things. I'm constantly in and out of plants that make products you can buy in stores in bulk.. but they all have a very strict no camera policy - and we have to sign NDA's because it is their process for building the products that is the important secrete.

      find an average product in your home.. a light bulb.. a pen.. a drink in the fridge.. all things you can buy - all things you your self MIGHT be able to make - even though you understand how it works and what is needed.. i doubt you have any idea how to make them in 100's or 1000' per min/hour. (not that these rocket motors are made at that rate, but if they where they would be a hell of a lot cheaper, see model rocket motors)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:A trifle surprising... by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there even a story about archiving know-how in companies a couple of weeks back that mentioned a company that ran and maintained an old plant but had no idea how it actually worked?

      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
    4. Re:A trifle surprising... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me if the cost establish the capital equipment to replicate the manufacturing process wouldn't greatly exceed the cost of just plain buying it from the Russians. The Russians have amortised their capital costs over thousands of units, all they have to do is maintain that infra-structure. The amount of un-repaired fences, un-swept floors and unpainted iron in the factory does make one skeptical that the Russians are treating the factory like a going concern.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:A trifle surprising... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      yeap - that is more common in process plants than people would like to believe.. people know how to do it - they just don't know why they are doing a particular step/task - only that they need to.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:A trifle surprising... by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      The kind of chemicals expected to be on site should be sufficient deterrent for 99% of casual metal thieves.

    7. Re:A trifle surprising... by NNKK · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not really what you were thinking of, but FOGBANK was a bizarre twist on/subversion of the idea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOGBANK

      Basically this material used in US nuclear weapons hadn't been made in 15+ years, and when they tried to make it again, the result failed in testing. Of course, people started assuming they'd "forgotten" how to make it, but it ended up being that they never knew how to make it in the first place -- impurities in one of the ingredients turned out to be important, and the ingredient they were getting 15 years later was "too pure".

  7. LAX security?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is Los Angeles Airport's security at a Russian rocket plant?!?

    There needs to be an investigation!

    1. Re:LAX security?!? by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing too... Had to read it three times.

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
  8. Just maybe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They think people are generally pretty decent and no one is going to come and steal their rockets.

    This OMGWTFTERRORISTS mentality is thankfully not yet universal.

    1. Re:Just maybe.... by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      Out of interest, when was the last time a terrorist used technology stolen from a government space agency to launch an attack? Ever?

    2. Re:Just maybe.... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      On the other hand how many launch failures have Russian space missions experienced lately? Not saying it happened, but destruction and sabotage doesn't need theft.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    3. Re:Just maybe.... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yep, this is my suspicion too.

      The rocket programme is a source of national pride for Russia, and what external forces would have an interest in sabotage? the rest of the world is dependent on Russia's launch facilities now for the most part, and let's be honest, the difficulty with a rocket programme isn't so much figuring out how to run one, that groundwork has mostly already been done and is pretty well known, but the issue is of cost to run the programme - even the US has had to pull back from funding this sort of thing.

      Providing the rockets are checked before final assembly/delivery then when the risk of sabotage is so low as there's simply no purpose to it I'm not sure what can go wrong. It's not as if terrorists are going to steal an entire rocket, and do we even know if this plant even contains the sensitive parts, the fuel and so forth? If this is just a plant where construction is carried out, or if these pics are simply from the mechanical construction part then I'm not sure what the big deal is - as GP said it seems to be that the "OMG Terrorists!" attitude is now being applied universally by Slashdotters, even though Slashdotters have long known the threat of terrorism is relatively minor and most security theatre surrounding it is pointless.

      Perhaps this is the fundamental difference between Russia being able to continue a state funded rocket programme, and the US not? Because the US burns money on unnecessary red tape and Russia just gets on with it. Sure Russia has had a number of failures recently, but the US has had a number of successive space failures too even with high security.

  9. Washington Post Article by Guppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Washington Post (reg required) just had a good report on how Russia's scientific base has changed for the worse. Apparently, the labs are populated with a bimodal mix of young and elderly scientists -- the middle has been hollowed out over the last two decades. And while a new funding push has sent money towards science, much of it is wasted through corruption:

    In Russia, the lost generation of science

    1. Re:Washington Post Article by cristianrsd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Over the last few I think Russia has lost ambision time and strength to continue developing diplomatic. While a considerable percentage of Russians want to emigrate to the U.S., and I say poruqe conosco to 3 Russians who want to emigrate to another country http://revertircaidadecabello.com/ Cristian

  10. Don't know what the fuss is about by folderol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I frequently walk in out-of-the-way places in Wales and Scotland and have often been suprised to round a bend and come across places where I simply should not be. However, I don't take photos or do anything to attract attention. I simply have a 'hmmm' moment or two, then quietly turn round and walk back the way I came.

    1. Re:Don't know what the fuss is about by folderol · · Score: 2

      Haven't a clue. If I knew what and where they were I wouldn't have gone there. Also, if I've been somewhere I shouldn't have I'm not going to be daft enough to give details! However, about 30 years ago I walked into the operational but deserted turbine hall of a Scottish hydro electric power station, and on another occasion walked onto a dam construction site in Wales. Found lots of interesting little packets covered by a tarpaulin.

  11. Hold the press! by jovius · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this be appraised as the first crowdsourced space program? And look how cute and friendly the puppies are! No full body scans either!

  12. Old Plant? by Skylax · · Score: 5, Informative

    This looks pretty vacant to me. Here the location on google maps:
    Khimki, Russia
    A little wikipedia research tells you that this is the old OKB-456 development and test facility for the RD-100 engine, a predecessor of the modern RD-107 engines. the plant was build right after WWII to build a copy of the german V2 rocket and probably has not been used for years. Todays Sojus rockets fly with the RD-107 or with its upgrades RD-117 and RD-118. These are produced by NPO energomash in samara at this location:
    Progress Plant, Samara

    This was a 5 min research, so I could be wrong.

    1. Re:Old Plant? by Skylax · · Score: 1

      Sorry it should be soyuz rocket. I'm german and we call it "sojus".

    2. Re:Old Plant? by rjames13 · · Score: 2

      If it is vacant then who is paying the power bill? The lights are on and the lift works.

    3. Re:Old Plant? by Skylax · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe 'vacant' is not the right word. It just looks like it has not been used for a long time and somebody forgot to switch of the electricty.

    4. Re:Old Plant? by Eadwacer · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of the photos is of an active test at the site (seen from a distance), and there's a link to a Russian news release that says (google translation): " The engine number A165 has been successfully fire tested: December 8th, 2011 at booth number 1-751 NEC JSC "NPO Energomash them. Academician VP Glushko "took LPS engine RD171M number A165 for" Zenit ". The test is successful, the comments on the process of testing have arisen. This was the last fire-LPS in the past year. " So, it's an active test facility

    5. Re:Old Plant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Khimki isn't out of the way; the best shortcuts into Moscow from the principal international airport Moscow-Sheremetyevo run through there. The area is a strange combination of old industrial sites and high-security gated communities.

      The site doesn't look abandoned, old facilities often look like this. I'll bet there is a genius old-school engineer keeping the thing running with duct tape and bubble gum. He probably comes out of retirement every time a test is fired.

    6. Re:Old Plant? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2

      In my Western experience, I have a hard time conceiving of power being provided by somebody other than a private commercial interest that'd rush right out and pull the meter the moment bills stopped getting paid. However, would a state-run facility receiving state-owned power in a non-capitalist nation even bother with a meter? In that situation, when the facility was shut down, would workers just throw anything of interest in trucks and drive away, not bothering to disconnect power or do any other rigorous decommissioning? Would the power provider know or care that the facility no longer had a reason to receive power?

      I'm just speculating here. I really don't know whether that might make sense at a facility like this one, and I don't know much about how things are/were run over there. I would be surprised to come across an abandoned factory that still had the lights on, but maybe my experience here isn't applicable over there?

    7. Re:Old Plant? by nebulus4 · · Score: 2

      This is an active R&D test facility. The photo of the document which can be found on the blog says it's a "ÐÐÐs-751" (R&D test facility) and according to Energomash's website they had 21 tests there in 2011 and more tests were planned in 2012.

      --
      "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
    8. Re:Old Plant? by nebulus4 · · Score: 1

      "ÐÐÐs-751" should read "NIK-751" in Russian.

      --
      "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
    9. Re:Old Plant? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't this pose a fire hazard in the long run? Abandoned factories tend to decay (metal rusts, plastic becoming brittle, ...), and eventually a short will develop, burning the whole thing to the ground.

      So, even in Soviet-Land, an abandoned factory still having power after all these years looks odd if it is not a huge pile of ashes.

  13. The summary is not accurate: it is a test stand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is not a "plant" where rockets or parts would be assembled. It is just a testing facility where new rocket engine designs can be mounted and studied. It provides a system for dealing with high-temperature engine exaust, which, naturally, is a problem if one wants to monitor the engine in a laboratory conditions. It also provides some measures to deal with test failures, mainly a fire-extinguishing system and blast doors. Apart from that, it is just another low-security building and there's nothing interesting there when no tests are being conducted. It has nothing to do with the actual rocket assembly. Just one big test stand.

  14. I used to be an adventurer like her.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's funny how this is an article about "lack of security" and not "cool photos of rocket plant".
    Americans..... just can't stand when people aren't being groped by a security guard.

  15. Re:Impressive photos by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Yeah! Lana is freaking James Bond! Anna Chapman, Natalie Portman, and all the others are just silly bit actresses while Lana's got the infiltration plus hardware shots to prove her mettle with The Power. And Reuters takes note. Dig on those photos!

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  16. That's not the motor by Chemisor · · Score: 5, Informative

    She's sitting in the socket into which the rocket motor is plugged. The motor is lowered through the doors in the ceiling and conected to the fuel and power lines in the socket. The big round red lid covers the exhaust pipe, which leads outside into that huge tower in the middle of the complex. And as for the security camera, there is no mention of it being broken. Lana says it's likely used to monitor the tests. Since there was no motor in the building at the time, there isn't much reason to watch it. Yeah, sure, there might be sabotage, but I doubt anybody would bother. General vandalism is the most likely threat and those kind of people aren't too keen on trudging a mile through the snow to get to the hole in the fence. Same goes for stealing metal and stuff; people will do it, but they probably won't bother if they have to haul it that far.

    1. Re:That's not the motor by Peil · · Score: 1

      Not exactly a mile through the snow, the site appears to be on the edge of a fairly large town.

    2. Re:That's not the motor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct, in my years of rocket testing in the 80-90s its called the thrust cup or thrust adapter... the motor being tested or validated is bolted to the big ring... you will notice the angled, radially arranged tubes leading to a central hub in the background which is obscured. A load cell or measuring device is bolted between the central hub and the immovable mass of a test stand. In this manner they can static test the motor's performance like a dynamometer does with automotive engines etc.

  17. The really strange thing by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    The really strange thing in all these pictures is there are not Chairs and almost no tables. I think this might be an abandoned site.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:The really strange thing by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Why would there be tables and chairs in shots of the exterior, the stairwells, on the factory floor, etc? Now if they were missing from photos of the break room that would a hint.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:The really strange thing by Lisias · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, no ones leaves functional elevators behind on abandoned sites. ;-)

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
  18. I think that will be more obvious then just 1 pesr by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    I think that will be more obvious then just 1 person snooping around.

  19. it is a real plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    stop wasting everyones time saying this plant is defunct or vacant. look at the pictures, the water in the tower one day and not the other. or look at their website where they specifically list the plant as a mailing address. http://www.npoenergomash.ru/eng/about/room/

    For display room of the enterprise visiting the letter with the request for visiting by group of employees of the organization (pupils of school or institute, etc.) with the indication of desirable time for visiting is necessary to send to address of the general director. It is necessary to apply the list of group to the letter with the indication of passport data (for minor schoolboys - only the list of group). Such letter should arrive in NPO ENERGOMASH 1-2 weeks prior to date of visiting for groups of citizens of the Russian Federation, for groups with foreign citizens - 2,5 months prior to date of visiting. Final time and date of visiting will be agreeed in the working order by employees of a display room by phone with the contact person of the organization (schools, etc.) specified in the letter.

    Information by phones: (495) 572-76-49; (495) 777-27-27, fax (495) 777-21-36.
    Address of the enterprise: 141400 Khimki Moscow area, street Burdenko, 1.

  20. RE: Russia by Archon-X · · Score: 2

    "Lax Security" is pretty much everywhere.

    USA: Genuine NASA motor:
    http://www.ninjito.com/images/2007-01-25/qx-door-3.jpg

    Russia, particle colliders:
    http://www.ninjito.com/2008-08-24/qx-collider-1.jpg

    France, air tunnels
    http://www.ninjito.com/_2010-05-07/qx-xx-4.jpg

    USA, a certain famous bridge in NYC
    http://www.ninjito.com/images/2009-10-07-NYC/qx-b-1.jpg

    The only reason this never comes to public attention is because generally, the people that do it don't want public attention.

  21. Glasnost by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    Used to be that ordinary Russians marveled at American openness, but now it's the other way round! You'll get arrested for taking a photo of the Brooklyn Bridge.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Glasnost by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      In Soviet USA, Brooklyn Bridge takes photo of you.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  22. Re:cool! by eharvill · · Score: 1

    Hah! Me too. Although the overall feel was more Half-Lifish IMO. Looks like it could be a model for an interesting FPS level/design.

    --
    At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
  23. Saved For Posterity by stoicio · · Score: 1

    Backed up the web page and images.

  24. Re:Really? by Anssi55 · · Score: 1

    Well, at least one picture shows a recent-looking label with "18.05.12", which looks to me like a due date for next inspection or something like that...

    Of course it always could be something else entirely.

  25. Re:Sickness still bigger ðan any industry by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    What the Romans called barbarians were all the people who didn't speak a language they new, and often them had more advanced technology. Romans understood the power of roads, and were very good at large stone construction and military construction, but in general their tech level was not very high. The barbarians didn't go out and occupy the land as the Romans left, they were already there all along.

  26. Re:Really? Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are probably correct, this is the next inspection date. But so what? It does not change the fact that the installation in question is a large test stand, by far the largest part of which is the system that deals with rocket engine's exaust. Again, it's whole point is to provide a "socket" where you plug an engine prototype in - it is the large tunnel closed by the red lid here: http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/3008/33213654.de/0_71e50_3a09f837_XXL.jpg - as you can guess, it is close to impossible to do anything with the engine when it's working and the exhaust stream is not safely isolated from the environment and removed from the lab. On the opposite side of the exhaust socket there's the fixture which is used to supply fuel and whatnot to the engine that's being tested. The gates through which the engine is being delivered to the lab are also shown on one of the other pictures. So, no assembly takes place there, only testing. And, as far as my understanding goes, the engines being tested on that site have nothing to do with the production units that are mounted on rockets. Thus saying "look how desolated it is" and something like that is the same as saying "look how desolated GM Crash Testing Site is, no wonder their cars suck" and suchlike.

  27. Re:Sickness still bigger ðan any industry by leandrod · · Score: 1

    Barbarians with more advanced technology ðan Romans? Now you have my attention, please provide any references.

    Actually, what really set apart Romans (including Greeks and oðer subjects of ðe empire) was a civic superstructure, not any technology; but ðat superstructure sure had technological implications. Only, at ðe time, ðe military aspect was more important ðan ðe technological one.

    Barbarians were not ðere all along, but ðey were already occupying parts of the empire, particularly around ðe borders, as Romans not left, but dwindled away due to lack of fertility, just as with our civilisation now. Ðe parallels are stunning.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  28. Re:Sickness still bigger ðan any industry by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Barbarians were not ðere all along, but ðey were already occupying parts of the empire, particularly around ðe borders, as Romans not left, but dwindled away due to lack of fertility, just as with our civilisation now. Ðe parallels are stunning.

    How are they not there, if they are in fact occupying?

    And not particularly around the borders, it would be more accurate to say, most of the people inside the Empire's borders, and everybody outside of it.

  29. Doom 3 by greencork · · Score: 1

    jezus, add a few zombies and imps, and you essentially got Doom 3

  30. blame capitalism by decora · · Score: 3, Insightful

    novaya gazeta recently had a story where they interviewed some actual technicians who work at actual rocket factories.

    basically the problem is that the managers are too focused on money, and the quality is slipping as a result.

    the quality assurance measures that used to be in place have been stopped and deemed too costly.

  31. What's the difference between the US and others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've walked into facilities who have absolutely no security in the US, France, Germany and the UK which would be considered important to the nation. Defense contractors who keep their backdoor open all day and a false sense of security with a locked front door and to facilities with no secretary and doors open all day long, you can waltz in, take what you want, and no one will notice, they'll think you work there or you're an outside contractor. Hell, even with a secretary, they just let you in without question. And to those who say they have "security" that there's no way that happens, I probably was already through your entire building without notifying anyone during one of your new installations in the building. You're part of the joke.

    Hell, I was at the Boeing plant in Long Beach where they build the C-17, and I just waltzed right into there without any questions from anyone, all that security they have there is a joke.

    The only reason no one blogs about it or posts pictures of these issues because they'll probably lose their jobs or not work with said companies ever again. Or they just simply don't care like me.

  32. Re:Fairly typical Russian mentality by nnull · · Score: 1

    This attitude is typical through out the world, not just Russians. Just that the Russians allowed it to overtake them that everyone is doing it on a regular basis that no one cares to belittle them about it.

  33. So? by Goonie · · Score: 1

    The Soyuz rocket family is now 45 years old, and liquid-fuelled rockets are of limited military utility. Virtually all modern missiles use solid-fuelled rockets because you don't have to sit there with the rocket on the launchpad waiting to fill it up. As such, the security implications of anyone getting a peek at a Soyuz would seem to be rather small.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  34. Re:cool! by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  35. Unreal by fak3r · · Score: 1

    this is unreal that, but completely believable considering the lackadaisical ways things are going in Russia these days. I always love seeing sites of people wandering through abandoned places in the old Soviet Union, but this is an operational facility where their (recently, much maligned) space program runs from. Wow, wonder if they'll ever pull out of this rut they've been in.

  36. The Difference Between American and Russian Tech.. by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    American tech and machines are all so clean. Gleaming, shiny, spotless and built in clean rooms where everyone wears body-covering overalls and face masks. In order to work on it, you need a special facility and all manner of special equipment and clothing.

    Whereas the Russian factories look like a steel mill. All you need to work on Russian equipment is a tool kit, shade tree and a bottle of vodka. And up until now, it's worked pretty good? To the point where we're dependent on them now.

    Perhaps that's part of the problem, rather than "sabotage" or "terrorism"? Things have become too dirty, and could use a little cleaning up.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  37. Re:Sickness still bigger ðan any industry by leandrod · · Score: 1

    Barbarians — mainly Germans — for many years were incorporated as auxiliarii to the legionarii, around ðe borders. As ðey suffered injustices — today we would say ‘discrimination’ — and sensed ðe empire crumbling down, ðey just took compensation by occupying lands more and more into ðe heart of ðe empire, until ðey reached Rome itself.

    Where you went wrong is ðat you seem think of Romans as ðose who inhabited Rome and ðe surrounded territories, and spoke Latin. Actually, all ðe submitted peoples were more or leß romanised, and spoke vulgar Latin and derivatives ðereof, sometimes along with ðeir own ancestral languages, but more often instead of ðem or in a combined language — which gave us Neolatin languages from Portuguese to Romanian, from French to Italian. Moreover, all of ðe empire eventually received Roman citizenship, with or without voting rights, so no freemen who lived in the empire, but ðe recently arrived German tribes at ðe borders, were considered Barbarians.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  38. you shouldn't blame the maintenance guy.... by ender89 · · Score: 1

    In the maintenance guy's defense, the only real difference between an operational Russian rocket factory and one that's been abandoned for 30 years is that most of the lights work in the former and more lazing about is done in latter. He probably didn't realize he was expected to repair fence gaps.

  39. Re:The Difference Between American and Russian Tec by ender89 · · Score: 1

    actually, other than the ak-47, Russian tech has been a by-word for "awful hunk of near junk which will kill you before days out." while they have had some elegance, ie giving cosmonauts pencils instead of billion dollar space pens, mostly their efforts are disastrous. Most of their original spacecraft were basically elaborate death traps, their cold war era missile defence systems nearly kicked off ww3, and I don't think they've ever made a decent automobile ever. And the American shuttle program was mostly shut down because NASA wouldn't let anyone strap guns/bombs to one.

  40. Re:The Difference Between American and Russian Tec by hxnwix · · Score: 1

    ie giving cosmonauts pencils instead of billion dollar space pens

    Oh dear lord, not this again. Please become less fucking stupid.