Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Offer Flight For Free This Spring

hypnosec writes "Microsoft's Flight Simulator series, which was in dormant state until now, will see a re-launch this spring and that too for free. The name of this series will be simply Flight, and players will have free access to the digital sky with this simulator. In other words, it will be available as a free download; however, the user would need to buy additional content to enhance their experience. The content that can be purchased includes aircraft as well as new environments. Microsoft states that the most amazing part of this game is the user can experience some real life locations like Big Island of Hawaii along with 'region-specific weather patterns, foliage, terrain and landmarks.'" [Video demo here.] I'd like to know where the ESRB finds "crude humor" or "mild violence" in there.

35 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. I got my beta invite yesterday by DCTech · · Score: 5, Informative

    And I have to say I'm really impressed with the game. The free model seems great too, especially considering that there has always been a huge market place towards Flight Simulator aircrafts, scenery etc. Maybe they will work out some deals with third party developers too. But as I'm under NDA I wont say too much, but you can sign up for beta here. I suggest you do!

    1. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The free model seems great too

      Nope, there's an article just a few down saying that this model is broken, and since it was on Slashdot it must be true!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by DCTech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about if you stopped following my posts and actually contributed to the discussion like I do? I have no idea why someone would upmod your off-topic post and down-mod my on-topic opinion, but oh well.

    3. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh look, another fucktard claiming "Shill! Shill!" against an informative post, just because they don't like MS! How unusual...

    4. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by g0bshiTe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually MS has always had some of the best flight sims out there. I've been a fan of MS flight sims since the days when Combat Flight Simulator and the MSN Gaming Zone reigned supreme. The bad thing is my current computer just can't handle flight since X was released.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    5. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Usually I just look at the post history of somebody to see if they have some sort of bias.
      You might not want to do that in this case.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I free then to point out thousands of accounts that seem to be shills for Linux, Gnu, RMS etc etc?

    7. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Missing.Matter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No... that was a contribution. It was on topic and relevent, contained information someone interested in this flight simulator might find interesting (a link to the beta signup) and an opinion about the quality of the game. The only problem you have with this post is that it is positive toward a company you don't like.

      You are the one getting argumentative, you are the one derailing the conversation, you are the one who is adding exactly 0 value to this discussion, and your stance boils down to an ad hominem attack. You look absolutely petty. So even if this person is being paid to say what he's saying, what you're doing is much much worse.

    8. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      NO they haven't. They've had some of the best looking visuals but their simulation part has always been - wanting. X-Plane has historically been the opposite. Meaning, X-Plane has historically lacked in visuals but offered superb simulation. Since X-Plane 9, it has generally met or beat MS in both visuals and simulation. About the only thing MS' offering beat X-Plane at has been some advanced avionics, such as Garmin 430 and 530, so on and so on.

      In a nut shell, if you really want a simulation, MS has never been much. If you want pretty visuals, MS has always been worth looking at. If you want both, these days, X-Plane is the only game in town.

      And in case you're wondering, when professionals want a low cost flight sim for real aircraft research and development, they reach for X-Plane too. MS' offering is never even considered simply because the flight models are laughable. X-Plane even has an FAA certified variant.

    9. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amazingly enough, people already do this, albeit not with Microsoft Flight Simulator. X-Plane pilots join up with virtual air traffic controllers to efficiently run the airspace in their virtual world. X-Plane is a pretty hardcore package though that appeals to a different set of people than Microsoft Flight Simulator.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    10. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by cvtan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mahalo for pointing out that Honolulu is not on the Big Island. Fun place to visit, but it's hardly serene".

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    11. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fight isn't Flight Simulator per-se. MS sold the Flight Simulator franchise to Lockheed Martin, Flight is a re-design from the ground up.

      http://www.flyingmag.com/blogs/fly-wire/goodbye-flight-simulator-hello-microsoft-flight

    12. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by ah.clem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is quite common; I have been doing it for many years on VATSIM (ATC Simulator) and flying with a virtual airline (DCA). It is a lot of fun if you are really into simulation (not games). For radio comms, Teamspeak is one of the popular voice systems. Realtime weather is also available once you log into the VATSIM servers. You do have to know your stuff, but the VATSIM folks are really pretty helpful and don't mind if you keep your plane parked for a few hours and just listen to the chatter to get an idea how to communicate properly. All of this is free to use but you have to fly responsibly or get bounced. I have never had a problem with griefers on VATSIM, probably because of the time commitment it takes to do a realistic simulation. We fly DC-3 aircraft; it is pretty amazing to do WW II re-enactments of major air ops and be in the middle of a dozen or so other C-47s while dodging flak on the way to drop zones. We have some actual pilots in the group, some retired, and some that can't make the medical. Yeah, it's incredibly geeky, but it's also a lot of fun. And it's all free; we all put time into creating historic flights/designing the environment we fly into/over and try to make it as historically accurate as possible.

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    13. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've been somewhat passively following this ordeal for about a month (maybe longer) now. Personally, I think if someone is constantly changing account names and trying to game the system, it's a clear violation of the "spirit of Slashdot" to begin with... so you are arguing with an AC who pointed this out. (Articulate are not.)

      Main Points:
      First post is well known to be the premium spot. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out they get the most views.
      He/they regularly changes accounts because they want to keep good karma so people read the posts. (I can't seem to find the post where they stated it, mainly because I don't remember which account it was posted under and I didn't keep the link. [didn't find it that important until now...])
      They get first post on Google/Android stories and Microsoft stories. Always with the same bias. (Usually "selling" something great about Microsoft either way...)

      Side Points:
      There are companies called "Reputation management" companies that specifically try to game online systems to try to steer opinion.
      Slashdot's Karma system is not flawless and can be exploited (Hell, everyone knows about sock puppets.)
      I personally don't like to be played.
      I can't help but watch this train wreck.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    14. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by the_bard17 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The flight models in X-Plane have been better due to Laminar Research's approach; MSFS has traditionally used look-up tables for aircraft modelling, whereas X-Plane uses finite element analysis. Even with FEA, though, Garbage In Garbage Out applies.

      Furthermore, XP is packaged with a variety of tools to create and manage aircraft models. Blender and GIMP can be used to enhance their visual modelling. There's a "free as in beer" world editor. Put it all together and the FS community can put together content for X-Plane.

      There's a lot of controversy being generated over at the AVSIM forums right now, due to rumors stating that there will limited opportunity for third parties to create (and distribute, free or otherwise) content for MS Flight. It's my belief that community support is what makes a flight simulator really shine. If MS has killed or maimed that community support for Flight, I'm not sure it'll go anywhere.

    15. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by the_bard17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      FSX has plug-ins for VATSIM and IVAO, just like X-Plane. Furthermore, FSX and X-Plane pilots can see and interact with each other via the virtual environment, so it could be considered platform independent. Runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux, so it's *that* platform independent, too.

  2. * Planes and runways not included by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    the user would need to buy additional content to enhance their experience. The content that can be purchased includes aircraft as well as new environments

    Flap your arms all you want, cowboy, you're not leaving the ground.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:* Planes and runways not included by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft Flight without any add-ons would be better known as Microsoft Walk.

  3. I prefer the old model... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3

    ...where you bought the game and then picked up community-created addons for free.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:I prefer the old model... by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those community-created addons weren't free. They cost a large amount of money, but people still loved them.

      That's odd. My FS2004 installation is 36GB and I only ever paid for one aircraft add-on... the rest of those gigabytes were all free addons.

    2. Re:I prefer the old model... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      MS is clearly trying to turn MSFS into a walled garden they can milk. This is the structure of a "freemium" MMO they're emulating.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:I prefer the old model... by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't mind so much for something like this. There are only a few simulated aircraft I'd like to fly, so if I could get those for cheap then I say no problem - I'll pay the few $$$. Better to let it be focused on the stuff that I actually want to do rather than pay a huge lump sum to get a bunch of stuff I have no interest in.

      Basically, the main plane I want is the Piper J3 Cub. Older stuff like a the Taylorcrafts, Luscombes, Aeronca Champ, etc, would all be nice too. Basically the stuff I'd actually want to fly in real life (which I currently can't - I have my PP-ASEL but can't get my medical renewed due to some issues - simulation is a good substitute).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  4. Why isn't this on XBox360? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only games I play are on XBox360. I might be interested in that game/simulation. If I needed to buy some fancy control devices, so be it. But having my nice big TV and all it would make the flight simulation pretty nice. And doing the the Live networking would be kinda fun too where you could join groups of flyers and such... interacting with them and all.

    Not long ago, I saw my brother doing the flight sim thing on his PC. It was impressive enough, but not impressive enough for me to want to buy and set up a Windows PC... game system? Okay. But my stuff is Linux. I'm comfortable there... got some Apple stuff collecting dust but otherwise all Linux. A free game isn't enough to pull me back to Windows at home.

    1. Re:Why isn't this on XBox360? by demonbug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only games I play are on XBox360. I might be interested in that game/simulation. If I needed to buy some fancy control devices, so be it. But having my nice big TV and all it would make the flight simulation pretty nice. And doing the the Live networking would be kinda fun too where you could join groups of flyers and such... interacting with them and all.

      Not long ago, I saw my brother doing the flight sim thing on his PC. It was impressive enough, but not impressive enough for me to want to buy and set up a Windows PC... game system? Okay. But my stuff is Linux. I'm comfortable there... got some Apple stuff collecting dust but otherwise all Linux. A free game isn't enough to pull me back to Windows at home.

      It is a flight simulator. Doesn't exactly match up with the gameplay demographic of consoles, though it does sound like there will be some arcadey options. Oh, and there is the fact that high-quality simulators are often CPU-bound, so they would have to make serious compromises to make it playable on a console. Not that this has stopped any other game companies from designing down to that level, and it is too early to really have an idea of how advanced the simulator element is, but that could be a real problem.

      Personally I like the idea of a flight sim, but so far the ones I've tried have all been pretty boring. While one can theoretically use them for actual flight training (if you get the extra-special dongle that doesn't do anything but cost you an enormous amount), to me the fun part is doing stupid shit that would get you killed in real life. PC sims like Flight Gear and X-Plane do a decent enough job of simulating routine flight dynamics, but as soon as you start doing anything remotely stupid (or fun) they just fall apart. And they don't even have the decency to show pieces of your plane flying apart when you hit things :( I'll probably give MS Flight a try, since it is free, but I'll likely stick with Il-2 for my flight sim cravings; the flight model might not have quite the same fidelity, but it rewards stupidity with bits and pieces flying off - and then there's the fact that you can blow shit up when you're tired of just flying.

  5. Sounds too much like Zynga's business model by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like they are taking a page right out of Zynga's playbook. Offer a game for free, get a user addicted, and then convince that user to spend money on "improve their game experience." I know a few people that have spent quite a bit of money on farmville, mafia wars, etc. with in-app purchases. Way more than anyone would spend to download a full version of a game.

    I'd rather pay up front for something and have a complete product (or at least, know how much of that product I'm getting). I'm real aversive to Zynga's model, because there is no way, up front, to know how much you are going to spend to get a good experience playing the game. You just have to keep buying more and more credits as time goes on.

    --
    No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
  6. Crude Humor and Mild Violence by abe+ferlman · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's probably the inflatable auto-pilot and the nun with the baseball bat.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    1. Re:Crude Humor and Mild Violence by borgasm · · Score: 4, Funny

      nah, the crude humor is that all the flights in the game are on-time, and you get a meal + beverage for free

    2. Re:Crude Humor and Mild Violence by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course I'm serious. And stop calling me Shirley.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  7. Re:Reminds of me Railworks 3 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've often wondered though. . . yeah, you can make money that way, but for every person who spends hundreds or thousands of dollars on DLC, I bet you have hundreds or thousands of players who never buy anything?

    That kind of logic is what's causing problems for the movie and music industries. It doesn't matter how many people are not paying for your product, it matters how many people are. Your job, as a capitalist business, is to maximise the product of the number of people who are paying by the amount that they are paying. The movie industry has spent a huge amount on marketing campaigns to try to get people to stop pirating their products, forgetting that their goal should have been to make people start paying for them.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. Re:Reminds of me Railworks 3 by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next up, movie add-ons! You get a copy of the script for free. $5 gets you a copy showing the characters against a greenscreen with no CGI. Another $10 will add in backgrounds. $10 each for household items, guns, explosions and nudity.

  9. Re:no put meigs field back in as the default airpo by anypundit · · Score: 4, Informative

    no put meigs field back in as the default airport

    You won't be able to take off with the giant X's carved into the runway.

  10. Re:compares to flight gear? by yourlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't compare to FlightGear. FG is built with a focus on simulating the physics of flight.. It's seen some really nice improvements in the eye candy department as of late as well.

    Plus, with FlightGear, it's free, as in freedom, and as in beer, as in "here's the source code and all the artwork!"..

    There isn't a market place to buy new locations because the ENTIRE PLANET is available for free in FG. Not to mention hundreds of planes, from gliders to cargo/passenger jets, WWI bi-planes to WWII fighters and bombers, to F-15's, etc.

    Local weather phenomenon, real-time real-world weather conditions from live METAR data on the internet, multiplayer support allowing you to fly with people all over the world, all free.

    All for free... Any other flightsim is pretty much DOA as far as I'm concerned.

  11. Re:no put meigs field back in as the default airpo by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Informative

    That was a sad day when the default was no longer Meigs. I think that was a throwback from Sublogic days when the developers were based in Champaign-Urbana.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  12. Re:Reminds of me Railworks 3 by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'd never do that - people would too easily realise how empty most movies are without the eye candy of the explosions. Worst case scenario, people might actually start demanding well written stories that aren't full of holes.

    No, but they do do the reverse.

    You buy the DVD, you get the movie.

    Alternatively, you buy the "Directors Cut", you pay $3 more and get it with a couple of extra scenes which were left on the cutting room floor for a good reason and a director's commentary (which it turns out is fantastically boring and you can't bear to watch more than 5 minutes of).

    You could buy the "Special Edition" a couple of years later for $8 more. You get the Directors Cut version but the box is in a tin and includes a poster. The tin doesn't quite fit your bookcase and makes it look all untidy next to all the normal DVD cases; the poster you never take out and indeed you're surprised when a friend who's a real movie buff shows you it - you didn't even notice it in the tin.

    If you're patient and want something special, you buy the "10th Anniversary Special Edition" ten years after release for $10 more, you get the Directors' Cut, a "Making Of" documentary (where they cobbled together some footage from the original green-screen shots; occasionally these are interesting but as often as not you find the guys who make the movies are excellent behind the camera but terrible in front of it) and version with a different ending. Why was the ending different? Turned out that the original idea that looked great on paper really didn't work when it was filmed and edited, so they had to write another ending. You watch the original ending once, then never again.

  13. Better deals by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you really like flight sims, X-plane is the way to go. They have lots of free 3rd party content. If cheap is what you like, FlightGear is the way to go - open source with tons of add-ons, downloadable scenerey, but the graphics are not as pretty. Both have a linux (and mac?) version of course.