Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Offer Flight For Free This Spring

hypnosec writes "Microsoft's Flight Simulator series, which was in dormant state until now, will see a re-launch this spring and that too for free. The name of this series will be simply Flight, and players will have free access to the digital sky with this simulator. In other words, it will be available as a free download; however, the user would need to buy additional content to enhance their experience. The content that can be purchased includes aircraft as well as new environments. Microsoft states that the most amazing part of this game is the user can experience some real life locations like Big Island of Hawaii along with 'region-specific weather patterns, foliage, terrain and landmarks.'" [Video demo here.] I'd like to know where the ESRB finds "crude humor" or "mild violence" in there.

18 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. I got my beta invite yesterday by DCTech · · Score: 5, Informative

    And I have to say I'm really impressed with the game. The free model seems great too, especially considering that there has always been a huge market place towards Flight Simulator aircrafts, scenery etc. Maybe they will work out some deals with third party developers too. But as I'm under NDA I wont say too much, but you can sign up for beta here. I suggest you do!

    1. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The free model seems great too

      Nope, there's an article just a few down saying that this model is broken, and since it was on Slashdot it must be true!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh look, another fucktard claiming "Shill! Shill!" against an informative post, just because they don't like MS! How unusual...

    3. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I free then to point out thousands of accounts that seem to be shills for Linux, Gnu, RMS etc etc?

    4. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by Missing.Matter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No... that was a contribution. It was on topic and relevent, contained information someone interested in this flight simulator might find interesting (a link to the beta signup) and an opinion about the quality of the game. The only problem you have with this post is that it is positive toward a company you don't like.

      You are the one getting argumentative, you are the one derailing the conversation, you are the one who is adding exactly 0 value to this discussion, and your stance boils down to an ad hominem attack. You look absolutely petty. So even if this person is being paid to say what he's saying, what you're doing is much much worse.

    5. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amazingly enough, people already do this, albeit not with Microsoft Flight Simulator. X-Plane pilots join up with virtual air traffic controllers to efficiently run the airspace in their virtual world. X-Plane is a pretty hardcore package though that appeals to a different set of people than Microsoft Flight Simulator.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:I got my beta invite yesterday by the_bard17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      FSX has plug-ins for VATSIM and IVAO, just like X-Plane. Furthermore, FSX and X-Plane pilots can see and interact with each other via the virtual environment, so it could be considered platform independent. Runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux, so it's *that* platform independent, too.

  2. * Planes and runways not included by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    the user would need to buy additional content to enhance their experience. The content that can be purchased includes aircraft as well as new environments

    Flap your arms all you want, cowboy, you're not leaving the ground.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:* Planes and runways not included by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft Flight without any add-ons would be better known as Microsoft Walk.

  3. Why isn't this on XBox360? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only games I play are on XBox360. I might be interested in that game/simulation. If I needed to buy some fancy control devices, so be it. But having my nice big TV and all it would make the flight simulation pretty nice. And doing the the Live networking would be kinda fun too where you could join groups of flyers and such... interacting with them and all.

    Not long ago, I saw my brother doing the flight sim thing on his PC. It was impressive enough, but not impressive enough for me to want to buy and set up a Windows PC... game system? Okay. But my stuff is Linux. I'm comfortable there... got some Apple stuff collecting dust but otherwise all Linux. A free game isn't enough to pull me back to Windows at home.

  4. Crude Humor and Mild Violence by abe+ferlman · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's probably the inflatable auto-pilot and the nun with the baseball bat.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    1. Re:Crude Humor and Mild Violence by borgasm · · Score: 4, Funny

      nah, the crude humor is that all the flights in the game are on-time, and you get a meal + beverage for free

  5. Re:Reminds of me Railworks 3 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've often wondered though. . . yeah, you can make money that way, but for every person who spends hundreds or thousands of dollars on DLC, I bet you have hundreds or thousands of players who never buy anything?

    That kind of logic is what's causing problems for the movie and music industries. It doesn't matter how many people are not paying for your product, it matters how many people are. Your job, as a capitalist business, is to maximise the product of the number of people who are paying by the amount that they are paying. The movie industry has spent a huge amount on marketing campaigns to try to get people to stop pirating their products, forgetting that their goal should have been to make people start paying for them.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Re:Reminds of me Railworks 3 by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next up, movie add-ons! You get a copy of the script for free. $5 gets you a copy showing the characters against a greenscreen with no CGI. Another $10 will add in backgrounds. $10 each for household items, guns, explosions and nudity.

  7. Re:no put meigs field back in as the default airpo by anypundit · · Score: 4, Informative

    no put meigs field back in as the default airport

    You won't be able to take off with the giant X's carved into the runway.

  8. Re:compares to flight gear? by yourlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't compare to FlightGear. FG is built with a focus on simulating the physics of flight.. It's seen some really nice improvements in the eye candy department as of late as well.

    Plus, with FlightGear, it's free, as in freedom, and as in beer, as in "here's the source code and all the artwork!"..

    There isn't a market place to buy new locations because the ENTIRE PLANET is available for free in FG. Not to mention hundreds of planes, from gliders to cargo/passenger jets, WWI bi-planes to WWII fighters and bombers, to F-15's, etc.

    Local weather phenomenon, real-time real-world weather conditions from live METAR data on the internet, multiplayer support allowing you to fly with people all over the world, all free.

    All for free... Any other flightsim is pretty much DOA as far as I'm concerned.

  9. Re:Reminds of me Railworks 3 by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'd never do that - people would too easily realise how empty most movies are without the eye candy of the explosions. Worst case scenario, people might actually start demanding well written stories that aren't full of holes.

    No, but they do do the reverse.

    You buy the DVD, you get the movie.

    Alternatively, you buy the "Directors Cut", you pay $3 more and get it with a couple of extra scenes which were left on the cutting room floor for a good reason and a director's commentary (which it turns out is fantastically boring and you can't bear to watch more than 5 minutes of).

    You could buy the "Special Edition" a couple of years later for $8 more. You get the Directors Cut version but the box is in a tin and includes a poster. The tin doesn't quite fit your bookcase and makes it look all untidy next to all the normal DVD cases; the poster you never take out and indeed you're surprised when a friend who's a real movie buff shows you it - you didn't even notice it in the tin.

    If you're patient and want something special, you buy the "10th Anniversary Special Edition" ten years after release for $10 more, you get the Directors' Cut, a "Making Of" documentary (where they cobbled together some footage from the original green-screen shots; occasionally these are interesting but as often as not you find the guys who make the movies are excellent behind the camera but terrible in front of it) and version with a different ending. Why was the ending different? Turned out that the original idea that looked great on paper really didn't work when it was filmed and edited, so they had to write another ending. You watch the original ending once, then never again.

  10. Better deals by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you really like flight sims, X-plane is the way to go. They have lots of free 3rd party content. If cheap is what you like, FlightGear is the way to go - open source with tons of add-ons, downloadable scenerey, but the graphics are not as pretty. Both have a linux (and mac?) version of course.