Slashdot Mirror


Israel Says It Will Treat Online Credit Card Theft As It Would Terrorism

In the wake of the online theft of at least 6,000 credit card numbers belonging to Israelis, Israel's Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said that "Israel has active capabilities for striking at those who are trying to harm it, and no agency or hacker will be immune from retaliatory action." Also at Reuters, with a few more details about the believed thief, known as OxOmar: "After Israeli media ran what they said were interviews conducted with OxOmar over email, the Haaretz newspaper said a blogger had tracked the hacker down and determined he was a 19-year-old citizen of the United Arab Emirates studying and working in Mexico."

263 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. How about spammers? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, if suddenly a few of these turkey's start getting the business end of a small caliber pistol to the back of the head it wouldn't be that bad would it?

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:How about spammers? by DCTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would that also include the likes of GroupOn and other sites who capture your email so they can spam you? It's the same matter, just legalized.

    2. Re:How about spammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes! How about making the senior executives at Groupon and the other asshole companies that have made the Internet a cesspool the subject of "shame" campaigns. Out them! They make money while causing a race to the bottom for business products and services. They get rich at everyone else' expense. Screw them!

    3. Re:How about spammers? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Noting would happen. Their profit margins would sky rocket just like dealing anything that can get you killed or thrown in jail.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    4. Re:How about spammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, as soon as you tell them that you no longer agree for them to have your details and yet they persist - I assume they have your details and they "spam" you because you said they could?

    5. Re:How about spammers? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Would that also include the likes of GroupOn and other sites who capture your email so they can spam you? It's the same matter, just legalized.

      Okey dokey and let's include Google and Facebook too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Retaliatory action? by vakuona · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are they going to do, kill him?

    1. Re:Retaliatory action? by retech · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course they'll kill them. Since Israel is ALWAYS the victim (sic) and the only way they can enact justice is to butcher the criminal and his family and his friends and his friend's families. And rightfully so. All those people were either active participants in the crime or had committed thought crime by inaction. They all deserve the same retribution. It's what Israel does best. I think we should send them more money because they are such a victim all the time they need more weapons.

    2. Re:Retaliatory action? by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 2

      That's how Israel normally treats terrorists.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    3. Re:Retaliatory action? by lordandmaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're a couple of decades late. These days Israel is ALWAYS the aggressor from what I hear.

    4. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's 5 pence. Go and have your sarcasm detector adjusted.

    5. Re:Retaliatory action? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, kill him?

      Unfortunately -- probably not.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    6. Re:Retaliatory action? by dmesg0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Israel is and always was the aggressor! They kill millions of innocent unarmed palestinians every day, use their heads to play soccer, and the rest of the bodies to provide blood for their matzos.

      Absolutely everybody knows that.

    7. Re:Retaliatory action? by fred911 · · Score: 2

      Proving that the best defence (more times then not) is a quick and aggressive offence. Not to mention excellent intelligence.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    8. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you are a victim of propaganda and I am sad for you that you are so narrow minded. Do you even know where Israel is on a map? Do you know its history? Do you know what "Palestinians" are and really come from? Do you even understand the conflicts? Do you think you understand Islam? Or even Judaism for that matter.

      Getting directly to the article and crime, first of all, this hacking was done for a mix of racial, religious, and political reasons. This would not have been done to another Arab country in this way. The hacker was very clearly a racist and a bigot. If you read Israeli newspapers, you will get much more coverage of the facts (suprisingly many israeli newspapers are left wing and anti-govt before you call bias). Moreover, how do you propose a nation handle what is a direct attack against its citizens. This is different than an attack on Twitter users world-wide, this is a nationally and racially target attack.

      Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis. There's always a bad egg in every basket, sure, but percentage wise Israelis are among the most humane, ethical, and moral people. Just ask all the illegal immigrants, many of whom come from places that vowed to destroy Israel. Israel may not allow them all to stay, but they at least take care of them, feed the, give them medical care. Conversely, those same people trying to stream across the Egyptian border are shot on sight by Egyptian forces. Just ask all the Jews who lived in Arab countries and are either dead or in Israel because they actually were in reality ethnically cleansed vs. the media side show we hear about from the Palestinians. Google Pallywood sometime to start.

      I think you are confusing several different things from nazi hunting to terrorist home destruction. I also think you are naive if you think that many of these people are "innocent." While it is possible to have terrorists, murders, ammunition, rockets, and such in your home by force, it's normally not needed in the places you seem to be implying. I suggest you dig up a history book and you really will see who the victims are. And yes, the Israelis are primarily the victims. They are the ones with citizens living in fear, constant terror attacks, people like you with endless streams of incorrect and malicious rhetoric. Yes, there are also "Palestinians" that are victims. There are unfortunately cases of mistakes, collateral damage, and such. But they are more victims of their leaders who seek to oppress their own people for their own financial and political gains. Whether is direct in using people as human shields or indirect by brain washing and indoctrination of children, it is sick and I pity those people.

      As far as money and weapons, you do realize that the enemies of Israel such as Egypt actually receive more US aid. If you are so worldly, you must also know that the Israeli people for a long time have not wanted the majority of the aid, and there is often calls by the government to end it. You would also know that much of the aid was a condition of Israel giving up the Sinai to Egypt, and something they didn't want to do and heavily regret today. In fact the Sinai is now quickly becoming one of the worst terrorist hot beds in the world, and has issues such as human smuggling under Egyptian rule. Additionally, the aforementioned peace with Egypt looks like it may be dissolved by the "democractic" Muslim theocracy that looks like it will seize control of Egypt. I feel sorry for Egyptians for once too.

      Finally, if you did some research, you would realize the Israel is indeed one of the most humane armies in the world, if not the most humane with active conflicts. The US has killed far more civilians than Israel ever has, and in Israel's case the term civilian is usually heavily debatable or simply media propaganda (you are not a civilian if you are firing guns or parked in an area that was for 2 days announced it would be bombed/destroyed). Indeed, if you compare the U

    9. Re:Retaliatory action? by alphatel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's 5 pence. Go and have your sarcasm detector adjusted.

      Seriously, only weeks after the US declares all terrorists will be held indefinitely without regard to citizenship. Pick up a CC you find on the street, expect to surrender your rights as an American.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    10. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they will whine like hell and get some support from the USA to bully a whole country because of the actions on a part of the population (this case, one person)

    11. Re:Retaliatory action? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
      Not necessarily. 3/4 of the people whose credit card numbers were stolen refuse to complain, because the thief is charging less on them than their kids were.

      They want to contact this guy to see what he can do about their kids cell phone bills.

    12. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, kill him?

      The goal here may not be to kill this hacker, but to inflate the number of people called terrorists, in order to justify all kinds of actions.

    13. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just like how hundreds of Israelis are driven off their land and have their olive groves bulldozed so Palestinian settlements can be built on their land? (free of any other races or religions of course). Isn't that how it works?

      Those poor poor Israelis, having to suffer with their billion dollars in aid so they can turn around and compete with the US.

      Now the ultra-orthodox are taking over Israel so the rest of the population can reap the Jewish extremism they have fostered.

    14. Re:Retaliatory action? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      In addition the same barbarians insist that the holocaust never happened, that it was an invention of Israel. People who spread that kind of lie should have their tongues cut out.

    15. Re:Retaliatory action? by lordandmaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, likewise.

    16. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmm... I wonder what the punishment should be for people that threaten other people about what they say? Let's make it something real nasty!

    17. Re:Retaliatory action? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Others spread a different lie. That the 6 million Jews were the only victims of the Holocaust. Never a few million other nationalities systematically murdered and burned or converted to soap.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    18. Re:Retaliatory action? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1
      Erratum:

      Never mind a few million people of other nationalities[...]

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    19. Re:Retaliatory action? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole agression vs. retaliation dichotomy is pretty meaningless when talking about two sides that have been trading blows almost continually for decades.

    20. Re:Retaliatory action? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      No, but they sure wish to try. Talk about adequacy...

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    21. Re:Retaliatory action? by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole agression vs. retaliation dichotomy is pretty meaningless when talking about two sides that have been trading blows almost continually for decades.

      Decades??? Try Millenia!

    22. Re:Retaliatory action? by chrb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis.

      Do citizens of Gaza and the West Bank count?

      you do realize that the enemies of Israel such as Egypt actually receive more US aid.

      Incorrect. Israel gets $3 billion per year. Egypt gets $1.3 billion. Israel has a population of 7.6 million. Egypt has 81 million. So per capita aid is many times higher for Israel.

    23. Re:Retaliatory action? by rot26 · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, kill him?

      Not as far as you know.

      Don't ask about how they're going to "extradite" him either.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    24. Re:Retaliatory action? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Man, i see you know a lot, but do you actually know that the israel tribe conquered the jewish tribe, by force, and founded the Israel? So who is the aggressor i ask?

    25. Re:Retaliatory action? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      I think that barbarian is our word, you, guys, you use another word, which for some strange reason is very close to the turkish word for anyone who is not "turkish". Funny, ain't?

    26. Re:Retaliatory action? by stanlyb · · Score: 2

      20 millions russians. That's how many (at least) were killed...

    27. Re:Retaliatory action? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Cut their tongue out, sew it back on ... and then cut it out again!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:Retaliatory action? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      I was actually talking about the victims of the (so called by the US and Israeli press) "Polish" concentration camps. There the toll was lower but still blood-curdling.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    29. Re:Retaliatory action? by DrVomact · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd reply, but I'm afraid the Mossad would treat me as a terrorist.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    30. Re:Retaliatory action? by cshark · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother to read the guy's post? No of course not. Why would anyone ever pay attention to someone who's pro-israel on the internet?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    31. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So I suggest you shove your snarky veiled anti-semetic, inaccurate, misinformed comment you know where.

      Critical of Israel != anti-semitic

    32. Re:Retaliatory action? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Kick ass post! Very well reasoned and accurate as far as I have seen as an open-minded foreign visitor (from New Zealand) to your country and your neighbours - even meeting some Hezbollah dudes in the Golan (who were total uncool arseholes in my opinion).

      I know you are just being modest for the uninformed, but from the statement "(suprisingly many israeli newspapers are left wing and anti-govt before you call bias)" I would remove the word "surprisingly". Anyone who has ever followed the Israeli points-of-view (in addition to others) couldn't miss the fact that Israel has a wide spectrum of opinions (a sign of a very healthy, open, and diverse society in my opinion).

      I hope that one day your neighbours value life and liberty as much as your countrymen do. Not all of the citizens of the world are fooled by the pro-terrorist propaganda, or the bullshit from their sychophants elsewhere.

    33. Re:Retaliatory action? by sco08y · · Score: 1

      I think you just won this thread.

    34. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When it is Israeli CC you do not have to worry about being held indefinitely, it will be quick and (hopefully) painless, look what they are still dong (rightfully) to any Germans connected with world war 2 half a century after, on the other hand what were you doing picking up (and using) a CC that does not belong to you?

    35. Re:Retaliatory action? by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis.

      Err, what? All that and you haven't heard of Mossad? They don't do much blowing up anymore, but plenty of the rest.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    36. Re:Retaliatory action? by wagnerrp · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they're killing millions of Palestinians every day, where are all these new Palestinians coming from? They must be rolling through the entire global population every decade or two. Surely such an untapped renewable resource could somehow be put towards power generation. Just think of all the energy stored in that biomass!

    37. Re:Retaliatory action? by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      Israeli soldiers who shoot civilians and children on purpose, instead of covering it up.

      [Citation needed]

    38. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So I suggest you shove your snarky veiled anti-semetic, inaccurate, misinformed comment you know where

      So sad. You lost the entire argument with that sentence, validating his claim that Israeli are always the victims. His comment wasn't antisemitic no matter how you spell it.

    39. Re:Retaliatory action? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Yes. They assassinate people in other countries pretty regularly.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    40. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So I suggest you shove your snarky veiled anti-semetic, inaccurate, misinformed comment you know where.

      Critical of Israel != anti-semitic

      Whenever an Israeli doesn't like some critical comment he always claims it's anti-semitic. It's much easier to attack the author than to answer the criticism.

    41. Re:Retaliatory action? by ClioCJS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yea, but things had been settled for quite some time before the world wars caused the west to simply decide "oh by the way, we're going to insert a country right here, get out of your house, you don't own it anymore".

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    42. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Breaking: The US says it will treat jaywalking as terrorism.

    43. Re:Retaliatory action? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      That's how ANY country normally treats terrorists.

      Except Muzzie countries where they throw roses at their feet and welcome them.

    44. Re:Retaliatory action? by makomk · · Score: 2

      Israel actually went a step further than that - they made a terrorist their Prime Minister!

    45. Re:Retaliatory action? by BenJury · · Score: 1, Troll

      > We just want to live and peace and be left alone

      Maybe, and this is just a thought, just maybe, you should stop invading the countries around you?

      --
      Blatant Advert: Android Apps!
    46. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis.

      Mossad murders people in other countries all the time.

      anti-semetic

      Or maybe it's anti-semitic to imply that Israel's government speaks for all Jews.

    47. Re:Retaliatory action? by BenJury · · Score: 3, Funny

      > their ancestral homeland

      Ah yes, and there we have it, when people bring their space fairies into the argument, you just know all logic and reason is lost.

      --
      Blatant Advert: Android Apps!
    48. Re:Retaliatory action? by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1
      I'm not against your right to spout massive Zionist rants, but give us some citations for fuck sake.

      suggest Israel stop giving technology, intelligence, military training, safe ports, protection, and everything else to the US. I am sure the families of US soldiers would thank you for this. And you personally should throw out your cell phone, computer, pretty much anything electronic, etc. because something inside or some piece was either invented or made in Israel.

      Really?

    49. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis.

      Uh, does the Lillehammer affair ring any bells?

      I'm sympathetic to the Israeli predicament -- as someone once said, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is a stalemate between two groups of people with nowhere else to go. But when you start implying that an entire people has blood on their hands because of their leaders, or because of actions undertaken in their name...well, just be careful what you're agreeing to. I'm not sure Israel comes out of that as well as you think it does, nor do I think they're as unilaterally victimized as you think.

      (BTW, the argument that the Palestinians should just move to other Arab countries is about as reasonable as saying that the Israelis should just move en masse to New York. Actually, it's less reasonable, since Israelis would be fairly well-received in New York, whereas most Arabs have contempt or distaste for actual, real-life Palestinians. They're an almost universally unwanted people -- which should give the Israelis pause, if they recall how recently they were in the same boat.)

    50. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for your input Mr. Bigot.

      They moved out of Europe because some jackass killed 7 million of them in the 40s, but I'm sure they were the aggressor then.
      Then they are constantly bombed by terrorists, again proving they are the aggressor.
      Now Iran supplies rockets to neighbors who are constantly firing them into Isreal targeting preschools and the like, again proving they are the aggressor.
      Also when they sent athelets to the olympics in Munic they were hunted down and killed, showing that they are the aggressor.

      If it wasn't for anti-semetic bigots like you, Isreal would probably be living in peace with their neighbors. But as long as people like you and Jimmy Carter keep spewing hatred and lies about them it is apparently ok to kill Jews in Isreal because they "had it comming".

    51. Re:Retaliatory action? by JonySuede · · Score: 2

      I will cite myself, with some emphasis added, citing Nietzsche in-another unrelated thread.

      Re:Subcaste (Score:4, Interesting)
      by JonySuede (1908576) on Friday January 06, @07:15PM (#38616880) Journal

      the ubercast Nietzsche is talking about is not the one the Nazi understood...

      From Beyond good and evil:

      What we nowadays call a “nation” in Europe is essentially more a res facta [something made] than a res nata [something born] (indeed sometimes it looks confusingly like a res ficta et picta [something made up and unreal]—), in any case something developing, young, easily adjusted, not yet a race, to say nothing of aere perennius [more enduring than bronze], as is the Jewish type. But these “nations” should be very wary of every hot-headed competition and enmity! That the Jews, if they wanted to—or if people were to force them, as the anti-Semites seem to want to do —could even now become predominant, in fact, quite literally gain mastery over Europe, is certain; that they are not working and planning for that is equally certain. Meanwhile by contrast they desire and wish––even with a certain insistence—to be absorbed into and assimilated by Europe. They thirst to be finally established somewhere or other, allowed, respected, and to bring to an end their nomadic life, to the “Wandering Jew.” And people should pay full attention to this tendency and impulse (which in itself perhaps even expresses a moderating of Jewish instincts) and accommodate it. And for this, it might perhaps be useful and reasonable to expel the anti-Semitic ranters out of the country.

      They were poked for so many years by the Muslim world, and by the western world as the worst interlude ever, that it is only normal for them to strongly react when they are specifically attacked by people of a specific religion.

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    52. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for the anti-Semitic bigots there wouldn't be an Israel.

    53. Re:Retaliatory action? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      An understanding of the benefits of a secular governments, precludes acceptance of any religious government or nation, specifically because secular governments were created as some random geopolitical event but as a direct results of the abuses of religious governments and nations.

      As for innocent, I know you buggers always refuse to accept it but innocent is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. With all the evidence publicly shown and challenged and then beyond a shadow of a doubt the person is judged guilty.

      Learn to separate a government from a country and it's people. The current extremist Israeli government routinely abuses a percentage of the population apparently for religious reason by as it turns out it has more to do with land thefts perpetrated my a small percentage of very wealthy Israeli's and the expense of other Israeli and Palestinians.

      Just for you information, no one ever considers it humane to conduct arrests, trials and, executions by firing a missile into crowded cities and shrugging at the bystanders killed and injured.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    54. Re:Retaliatory action? by slashchuck · · Score: 2
      --
      $sig not found
    55. Re:Retaliatory action? by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      >> their ancestral homeland > Ah yes, and there we have it, when people bring their space fairies into the argument, you just know all logic and reason is lost.

      You lack basic reading comprehension. The parent did not even imply a religious argument. Ancestral pertains to ancestors, which everyone has, without any reference to "space fairies".

      You know all logic and reason is lost when you refer to ancestors and get accused of bringing space fairies into the argument.

    56. Re:Retaliatory action? by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Yes, now is a good time to point out the poster's anti-Semitism. Being able to make a distinction like that would go a long way for your credibility too.

    57. Re:Retaliatory action? by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

      Most of the components in my cellular are produced in China. I don't care to dig into the origins of the invention of these components, but I doubt any of them are Israeli. And sharing of military technology is one-sided at best. Especially considering the first item listed under Israeli military equipment in USA use is, in fact, American. I'm not saying the Israelis don't have valuable technology, but we certainly wouldn't be defenseless and in the stone-age without Israeli innovation.

    58. Re:Retaliatory action? by bjourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you ever in your nationalistic fervor reflect upon the fact that in the last major bout between Israel and Hamas in December 2008, 1200 Palestinians were killed and what, 2 Israelis were? All 1200 were terrorists so it doesn't matter? Why is it that for every one Israeli killed, hundreds of Palestinians die and Israel can still maintain an image of taking the high ground and being the victim?

    59. Re:Retaliatory action? by slashchuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Motorola commercial cell phone was developed in Israel. Motorola has its largest development center in Israel Intel has four major development centers in Israel.

      Microsoft has one of its three strategic development centers outside the US in Israel. It is based on several startup companies that Microsoft has acquired in Israel, which are now part of this development center. Most of Windows NT technology was developed in Israel.

      AKAMAI technology was developed in Israel by Danny Lewin, its co-founder and CTO. Mr. Lewin was killed on 9/11 on one of the planes that hit the World Trade Center.

      SAP AG, the enterprise software leader, has its larger development center outside Germany in Raanana, Israel. This center, called SAP Labs Israel, is also based on several startup companies that SAP acquired in Israel.

      Checkpoint, the world leader in internet security and firewalls is an Israeli company.

      The AOL Instant Messenger was developed in 1996 by four young Israelis.

      Given Imaging, an Israeli company, developed the first ingestible pill-sized video camera, used for medical diagnostic without the need of an invasive operation.

      The Israeli company M-Systems developed the USB-Flash Drives, used for portable storage all over the world. The company was recently bought by SanDisk, an American company, the world leader in the flash storage market, established by an Israeli.

      IBM, Kodak, Cisco, HP, Google, Novell and many others, also have large scale research and development centers in Israel.

      --
      $sig not found
    60. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're 'invented people', even Newt Gingrich knows that. And because this invention is very efficient, they can roll out such huge biomass.

    61. Re:Retaliatory action? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      No, Israel does values lives. The hacker would be charged with theft.

      Israel will charge him with grand theft, and expect to see him spend 10 years in prison. And Israel and the justice system will find it to be theft. Just as any other countries justice system will find it.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    62. Re:Retaliatory action? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I agree with the author. I have muslim employees, and surprise, surprise, they are against the terrorism that is not in their beliefs and practices. My employes and friends are ones who have fled Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria. The muslims I know really want sharia law for religious decisions, and civil law -- law of the land for the rest (that includes rules of finance).

      The author is 99% right about the facts but one, How we can ask the dead about ethnic cleansing.

      Quote
        Conversely, those same people trying to stream across the Egyptian border are shot on sight by Egyptian forces. Just ask all the Jews who lived in Arab countries and are either dead or in Israel because they actually were in reality ethnically cleansed vs. the media side show we hear about from the Palestinians. Google Pallywood sometime to start.

       

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    63. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      What is your solution? To remove Israel from the map?

    64. Re:Retaliatory action? by ClioCJS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry, are people required to give a solution to posit a problem? Seems that attitude would thwart a lot of things (like math).

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    65. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      If your criticism is not tied to some constructive input what value does it have?

    66. Re:Retaliatory action? by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course they don't, those in the Gaza and West Bank Ghettos are Untermenchen.
      I like Israel, it's the closest thing in that part of the world that comes close to respecting the idea of law. What I don't like is that it's currently run by a bunch of corrupt fascists that think nothing of sending assassination squads to other countries under fake passports of those that think that Israel is their ally.

    67. Re:Retaliatory action? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Tell that to art critics, and all professors who ever had criticism over works of literature. And Siskel & Ebert while you're at it. You're operating on all kinds of fallacies here... Just admit your bias.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    68. Re:Retaliatory action? by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1

      Good post, but you should have been more careful about some of your facts, like the foreign aid one, it detracts from the truth of the rest of what you say. - a Jew

    69. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      What is my bias?

    70. Re:Retaliatory action? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2

      Maybe someone who would think of a solution would never even look at it until somebody else points out a problem. There's a place in this world for us pessimists, godammit.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    71. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Seriously, only weeks after the US declares all terrorists will be held indefinitely without regard to citizenship.

      There's a total derp line for you.

      If you can't even read the news, how would you know what it says? Oh, you wouldn't know. That's why you managed to believe that a complete absurdity is what was "declared." If you're concerned enough about it to be listening to the propaganda, how much more effort is it to find out what was actually in the law?

    72. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The whole agression vs. retaliation dichotomy is pretty meaningless when talking about two sides that have been trading blows almost continually for decades.

      Decades??? Try Millenia!

      Decades was correct. Please do not try to correct accurate information with simplistic propaganda. At least develop some propaganda that shows knowledge of the issue.

    73. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If your criticism is not tied to some constructive input what value does it have?

      Fail. He even gave you a hint regarding math.

      Your wild assertion that identifying problems is not constructive is itself not constructive, and does not posit any useful solution either.

    74. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, if they deny the existence of a people, and have never of Philistine, how closely are we supposed to read it?

    75. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Aww. Hypocritical American.
       

      Most of the world's Jews are American, and their most likely homeland is NY.

    76. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      An understanding of the benefits of a secular governments, precludes acceptance of any religious government or nation, specifically because secular governments were created as some random geopolitical event but as a direct results of the abuses of religious governments and nations.

      In the case of secularism in Western society, it was primarily the hyper-religious who disliked the effect that mixing government and religion was having on religion.

    77. Re:Retaliatory action? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis.

      The Israeli government and secret services have sanctioned killings of people on foreign soil who have not had any kind of trial. Or did you miss that?

      There's always a bad egg in every basket, sure, but percentage wise Israelis are among the most humane, ethical, and moral people.

      This is where you are going wrong. By saying that Israelis are among the most humane, ethical, and moral people, you are directly saying that on average people who are not Israelis are among the least humane, least ethical, and most immoral people comparatively. Can you not see that categorising people like this is idiotic?

    78. Re:Retaliatory action? by Genda · · Score: 1

      Sir, I have nothing but the greatest of respect for the Israeli people and I do have profound empathy for their fear and suffering. Though not Jewish, I have many friends who are and have shared their celebrations all my life. I've broken bread with my friends orthodox and not, Shabbat and Seder. I've stood beside a good friend as he joyfully blew his shofar, so believe me when I tell you I love your culture, and count your people among the very best of my friends.

      I think Israel has dealt with the Palestinians poorly. These were an angry and displaced people from the very start. I realize the Jews were themselves just confronting the emotional trauma of the holocaust, but if they'd embraced their angry neighbors, instead of a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye. If they'd have said at the very start "We're here as an attempt to address an unforgivable atrocity committed against our people and therefore we devote ourselves to ensuring that atrocities won't be further propagated in righting that wrong." The world might be a very different place today. Part of the problem is that of demonizing others. The Nazis portrayed Jews and less than animals, to be reviled, so slaughtering millions was acceptable. When Israel tries to portray Palestinians as animals deserving nothing but extermination, you simply hurt your own case and lower yourself to the level of those you despise most.

      I do not excuse the atrocities committed against Israel. I've spoken to a young man who lives in Jerusalem, who carried a girl blocks to a hospital in his arms after a bus bombing. She died in his arms and for the longest time he wanted to see every Palestinian slaughtered. I've also seen armed Jewish soldiers return rocks thrown by children with automatic machine gun fire on Palestinian land. I've seen innocent Palestinians killed, homes bombed and innocents tortured. I've seen Israel expanding settlements where they do not belong. And I've seen an Israeli slaughter his own Prime Minister for trying to bring equitable peace to the region. Israel has committed its own atrocities and what's happening in Palestine today is itself a genocide. Maybe its not fair, but I expect more of the Jewish people. I expect them to rise above their hate and fear and anger and find a moral solution that dignifies all parties. Maybe that's too much to much to expect of anyone, but I hope not.

      By the way, that young man who carried the girl? He's devoted his life to bringing peace to the Middle East. I can't tell you how proud I am of him

    79. Re:Retaliatory action? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Funny that your fantasy is not borne out in reality. Sure minority religious groups also did emigrate seeking religious freedom but they were only minorities and did not reflect the majority of emigres seeking freedom from religious persecution and who ensured secular government in the constitution of many countries. Hyper-religious do not pursue secular government they pursue religious home-lands with the humorous but deserved end result of endless disputes of who it the most correctly religious and who should leave for failing to adhere to religious perfection.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    80. Re:Retaliatory action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hod does this bullshit propaganda get modded up? Oh, right, megaphone.

    81. Re:Retaliatory action? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Pretty regularly, huh? Ok, name 5 instances.

    82. Re:Retaliatory action? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      If your criticism is not tied to some constructive input what value does it have?

      Tell that to art critics, and all professors who ever had criticism over works of literature. And Siskel & Ebert while you're at it. You're operating on all kinds of fallacies here... Just admit your bias.

      You were SO close to an epiphany there... but then you lost it.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    83. Re:Retaliatory action? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Obviously that is the correct solution.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    84. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      What happens to the Israelis?

    85. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      So what is your solution?

    86. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of people placing blame on one side or another. If the criticism has no mitigating advice tied to it, then how is it any more valuable than the other blame placers?

    87. Re:Retaliatory action? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      5? I can name over 20. Google: Do you use it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    88. Re:Retaliatory action? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      And Siskel & Ebert while you're at it

      Um... dude.... Siskel's been dead for around a decade.

      That said, I asked him, and he said he agrees with you, and finds your argument both salient and decidedly poignant! Bravo, good sir!

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    89. Re:Retaliatory action? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the lol :)

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    90. Re:Retaliatory action? by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      Rightful? Blatant coldblooded murder is is an action that can never rightful regardless of whatever the victim did. They deserve their right to a fair ant impartial trial regardless of their crime.

      How do you know some of those "Germans connected with world war 2" wasn't innocent? Their assassination policy is just as despicable as the chinese actions at Tienanmen square or any other despot who sends in the military against unarmed protesters/rebels

    91. Re:Retaliatory action? by Ofloo · · Score: 1

      Whatever there going to do, .. what this means is you don't get a trail, you have no human rights, and you could be held indefinitely just for theft, or at least when they think you stole something, cause last time I checked they don't even need proof, they just need to suspect you. It wasn't bad enough they let suspected terrorists go through this, .. I mean if you're accused of murder or mass murder you'd expect at least they got some proof, .. or at least that you get some sort of trail. Whatever they mean by it is bad.

    92. Re:Retaliatory action? by Ofloo · · Score: 1

      this is like in the dark ages where the king says you're guilty and you are.

    93. Re:Retaliatory action? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You dying in a fire.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    94. Re:Retaliatory action? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      I agree. But I also agree that Israel's two-faced behavior contributes to some bigoted anti-semitic attitudes.

      Israel isn't a free democratic state that has a constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion, and freedom from persecution. It is a "Jewish State". A democratic one that happens to be open to non-Jewish citizens, but they too often act as the "Jewish state" and alienate non-Jews. Particularly when they combat the Palestinians.

      It's not all Israel's fault. The Palistinian and other Middle East state leaders have deamonized every action and made it a "those evil Jews" issue. But their insane, over-reactionary use of force, and the Zionist ideology doesn't help.

      As an American, I've always been conflicted about Israel and our support for them. On the one hand, we ostensibly support them because they are a democracy. And true. They are (mostly). Arabs and Muslims are a well represented minority in government. They sit in the Knesset

      But they are also this quasi-theocracy. This idea that one particular group of people (based on race or religion) should enjoy special protection, or special citizenship offends my ideals of equality. This would be entirely academic and probably something I could live with if Israel behaved themselves and treated dealt with the Palestinians in a way that seems humane, just, and in good faith. But while the Palestinians seem just as bad sometimes, I don't see them doing that.

      The Arab Muslim population in Israel is a minority, but it's one that's growing faster than the Jewish majority. I am very curious to see how the Israeli government acts as this tipping point approaches. Will they stick to their democratic ideals? Or will keeping a "Jewish State" be more important?

    95. Re:Retaliatory action? by silanea · · Score: 1

      [...] percentage wise Israelis are among the most humane, ethical, and moral people. [...] you are not a civilian if you are [...] parked in an area that was for 2 days announced it would be bombed/destroyed

      Fascinating. I honestly cannot tell whether you are a troll or whether your moral compass stems from a wholly different dimension than mine.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    96. Re:Retaliatory action? by matfud · · Score: 2

      have to agree with this anon coward. Jews were hunted down and killed and it started quite a long time before WW2. The current problems are in part due to that; but mostly because the UK (along with the rest of the world) decided that a reparation for the holocaust (I don't like the way that name has been hi-jacked) created Israel. Yep stick a dispossessed ideological concept into the middle of one of the most fought over areas of the planet, call it a new country, and shout out "come all yea faithful". What the fuck did they think was going to happen?

    97. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking just about the ones who left, but about the whole Protestant Reformation.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state#Reformation

      It is very interesting history if you look further into it. It is because the State polluted religion that they adopted this "two kingdoms" approach.

    98. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      What are you so angry about?

    99. Re:Retaliatory action? by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, Israel values lives... Ever heard of the Lillehammer affair, if not you should check it up.
      That single instance is enough reason why assassinations can never be an acceptable solution to achieve "justice"

    100. Re:Retaliatory action? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I would say that's roughly the ration of kills to deaths as the current (recently ended?) war in the Middle East, native population: USA. Seems to work pretty well for them.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    101. Re:Retaliatory action? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      *ratio.

      God damn it...

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    102. Re:Retaliatory action? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of the holocaust or Viet-Nam? How many American and Viet-Namese lives were lost? Tell me it was worth the loss of life on both sides.

      Agent Orange -- remember that. You have American seniors with lung diseases that should have lived to a ripe old age, without a respirator.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    103. Re:Retaliatory action? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Good question. What is the proper way to deal with criminal tribalists who engage in aggressive war?

      Lets be realistic... we're not talking about a race of people with big noses here... we're talking about a group of people united around an ideology who set themselves above the rest of humanity and demonstrate their commitment to that believe it by either directly engaging in mass murder and rampant economic exploitation or facilitating it.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    104. Re:Retaliatory action? by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      What makes the Israelis criminals? What other nationalities or ethnicities would you like to see wiped from the map?

    105. Re:Retaliatory action? by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      I'm not American thank you very much.
      But I'll choose to answer that anyway, no I don't think the Vietnam war was worth the cost in life and yes the use of Agent Orange was a blatant war crime.
      But to differentiate that a bit, The American presence was requested by the legitimate government of the Republic of South Vietnam and as such the US participation in the war was legitimate.
      Mossads assassination of a Norwegian citizen was neither requested nor accepted by the Norwegian government and was as such a direct undeclared act of war(as is any intelligence activity in another nation where the local government has not given their express permission).

    106. Re:Retaliatory action? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I am and was responding to the Credit Card Fraud and Thefts.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    107. Re:Retaliatory action? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Well aren't they nomadic desert wanderers? Just sayin'

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    108. Re:Retaliatory action? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I sort of agree. I'm hoping that secularism will be the way in the middle east. Separate government from religion will go a long way towards equality.
      I don't mind people having differing beliefs but government should provide economic and social security for the populace and not foist religious 'holier than thou' attitudes on neighbours etc.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    109. Re:Retaliatory action? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I think if you look into it, it goes back to 1920, with origins in the 1800's. WWII interrupted creation of the state of Israel.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    110. Re:Retaliatory action? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      In the case of secularism in Western society, it was primarily the hyper-religious who disliked the effect that mixing government and religion was having on religion.

      No.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    111. Re:Retaliatory action? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sonny, when I was your age we were expected to express complete ideas, not just burp up a little into a web form.

    112. Re:Retaliatory action? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      "NO" is correct and all I had to say as the separation of church and state has been pretty much thrashed out since Henry VIII of England, followed by Cromwell etc. The main thrust of this was that the state wanted to divest the power of the church from government.
      It was only after I read more of your thread and responses that I realised you were talking about specific, more modern instances where the church probably wanted to protect vestiges of its former power.
      OTOH, about 1200 - 1000 years ago, the Roman and Eastern churches were happy to 'Christianise' certain Slavic kingdoms, invited by the Kings as they provided a ready made bureaucracy, a common written administrative language (Latin), tax collection, alphabets, education and a direct link to the Pope and Patriarch. A consequence of this provided a level of peace and economic development and to some extent becoming part of the Holy Roman Empire.
      In this guise, the Pope funded wars against the Ottoman Empire as late as the early 18th century to push back the encroaching Muslims from Vienna and the Kingdoms of Hungary and Serbia.
      So it's not like there was a watershed event that separated church from state, but worked mutually together for common purpose against a common foe.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  3. The new catch phrase apparently by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just call every crime terrorism.

    Sad really, as it 'normalizes' the true acts of terrorism. If everything is labeled terrorism, it becomes 'yet another crime' and is ignored.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Just wait til they make jaywalking into 'terrorism'. We'll see summary executions on the streets.

      That'll teach you to walk at the crosswalk!

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Morty · · Score: 4, Informative

      They didn't say it is terrorism, they said they would use the same tools as for terrorism. That is, they know it's not terrorism, but think that the same tools would be useful.

    3. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by hedwards · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I just feel sorry for whomever it is that's living next door to the thieves when Israel overreacts. Israel isn't exactly known for keeping any sort of perspective on things. Kill one of their citizens and they'll kill dozens of your citizens with little to no concern for innocent civilians.

    4. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Oswald · · Score: 2

      Well, TFA says the Israelis called these cyber-attacks, "a breach of sovereignty comparable to a terrorist operation, and must be treated as such." That's pretty close to calling it terrorism. Maybe they should pass a law making it "statutory terrorism".

    5. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Well...it certainly would.

    6. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by DCTech · · Score: 1

      Just like U.S., then.

    7. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, the USA is doing it too and it works for them. I mean, if you want access to a companies servers, just say they have some info on terrorists, poof, you get a warrantless search, say that guy might have ties with a terrorist cell, poof, phone & email tapping, bank account, GPS tracking, the works, with zero paperwork.

      But as long as it's for the children, I agree with them.

    8. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Tel Aviv is basically a borough in New York City, so, yes.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      We'll see summary executions on the streets.

      Although, this being a money-related crime, the executioners shall be wielding socks stuffed with lots of coins instead of axes.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2

      Who cares it becomes common ? The goal is to use the legal shortcuts created for terrorism in as many cases as possible.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    11. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by EyelessFade · · Score: 2

      I AM...THE LAW!

    12. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by cshark · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you obviously don't know or understand anything about the way Israel handles things. Please don't say things like this unless you've had the some education on the subject, please.

      The reason it's a big deal out there is because they don't have the kind of laws for consumer protection that we do. Someone steals your credit card, and runs up a $30,000 tab, you pay it... or you go to jail. Period. So think about it this way. If someone effectively bombs your life, by taking your credit card, and shoots you with a debt you cannot pay and the ire of a state that takes debt VERY seriously... how is it not an act of terrorism? That's literally destroying someone's life.

      What I'm wondering though, is if this means Israel will start negotiating with credit card thieves, and giving them what they want while getting nothing in return. We'll have to see.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    13. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Clearly the Arabs have been going about this all the wrong way. Instead of buying tanks and planes and firing rockets at Israeli towns, they should just have been stealing credit card numbers.

    14. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by cshark · · Score: 1

      So by that are you implying that credit card fraud should not be a crime?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    15. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      well they have in the past been fairly surgical - but they did accidentally kill some one by mistake in Norway

    16. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine if your country had been declared war upon (by multiple other countries) the very the day it was founded. Imagine if your country had been in an existential war with most of these countries more or less continuously for over half a century. Imagine if your country suffered an average of about 3 rocket attacks PER DAY for 8 straight years. Imagine if those same countries send suicide bombers into your country about once a month on average, and those attacks intentionally killed many hundreds of innocent civilians, and wounded thousands more. Imagine that your country has nuclear weapons, but refrains from using them against it's enemies.

      Now imagine that no matter how you react, someone who doesn't live under these conditions accuses you of overreacting and not having any sort of perspective.

    17. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Tel Aviv is basically a borough in New York City

      That's ridiculous.

      It's the other way round.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      ... and then using them to buy tanks, planes and rockets.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason it's a big deal out there is because they don't have the kind of laws for consumer protection that we do.

      If the problem is insufficient consumer protection laws, wouldn't the right solution be ... wait for it ... better consumer protection laws?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    20. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize that the Israelis have killed far more innocent civilians than the various terrorist groups they're fighting, right? Also, you do realize that Israel regularly violates international laws. Not to mention their pillaging of Palestinian resources and starvation of the people in Gaza.

      Of course Israel doesn't use Nuclear weapons, there's no way in hell that the US would continue to prop up their country if they went ballistic. Where exactly do you think they got those nuclear weapons.

      At the end of the day it's terrorists versus war criminals anybody that claims some sort of moral high ground for the Israelis really needs to study up on the matter. When all is said and done, they're every bit as evil as the people they claim to fight.

    21. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      And thus we see the word 'Terrorism' to encompass financial FRAUD.

      terrorism/terrizm/ Noun: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

      A POLITICAL tool to sow TERROR in the populace. To cow the state with horrifying acts upon the citizenry. By using it in this way you diminish the magnitude of fear true terrorism spreads.

      --
      Good-bye
    22. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      hear! hear! wish I had mod points for you - great post.

    23. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by ravenshrike · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except they haven't Oddly enough the supposed civilian statistics thrown up by the palestinians are weighted EXTREMELY heavily towards males over the age of 14 and under 40. Oddly enough, 14 is the exact age that Hamas and Fatah bring the kids into their organization.

    24. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Microlith · · Score: 1

      The reason it's a big deal out there is because they don't have the kind of laws for consumer protection that we do. Someone steals your credit card, and runs up a $30,000 tab, you pay it... or you go to jail. Period. So think about it this way. If someone effectively bombs your life, by taking your credit card, and shoots you with a debt you cannot pay and the ire of a state that takes debt VERY seriously... how is it not an act of terrorism? That's literally destroying someone's life.

      So basically, they've figured out how to exploit the lack of consumer protections in Israel and use them against Israeli citizens?

      I think the smarter thing here would be to fix the law instead of going "OMG TERRORISM!" But hey, I'm sure the banks love it, just like they probably love the punitive debt laws.

    25. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      Please note that I'm not necessarily taking a position on the circumstances of Israel's creation, or the tactics used by Israel, or even whether Israel has a "right to exist".

      I'm merely suggesting that if you found yourself in such a situation, and reacted as Israel does, and then got called out for "over-reacting", you'd think whoever called you out was either totally disingenuous or a fucking moron.

      Again, I'm not saying the GGP is totally disingenuous or a fucking moron - I'm saying that it's totally understandable for someone in Israel's position to think the GGP is totally disingenuous or a fucking moron.

    26. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      For me this raises a question... do Israelis have to pay interest on their credit card purchases/payments? If they do, isn't that against Mosaic law?

      In many other Mid-east countries, purchasing on credit is illegal, as it would too easily lead to a breach of Mosaic law.

      I know, Israel doesn't follow those laws in the political sphere anymore. But it seems to me that if targeted attacks against a nation's credit cards is considered terrorism (which, in a way, it is, as it causes FUD in a populace disproportionate to the actual effect of the crime), then financial exploitation on the part of banks should also be raised on similar grounds.

      Even though the kid's from a different (and opposed) nation, this attack on credit cards seems to me to be more along the lines of civil unrest, protesting the abuse of a nation's spending power in a way that everyone will notice.

      The reason I point this out is that I can see the US going down a similar route in the future, possibly even branding certain kinds of protest as "terrorism" with the appropriate PATRIOT-based punishment.

      This worries me. Hopefully in all cases, actions will be a bit more measured than the political bravado.

    27. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      It's easy to look at death counts and draw demonic conclusions, however it's a bit more complicated than that.

      As a reference I found 6500 Arab Palestinian (AP) vs 1100 Israeli killed in the conflict since september 2000. These numbers comes from what appears as a rather anti-Israeli site. Bloodthirsty demons right? Not so fast. One thing is that they also include deaths by other APs (like from a not so distant Gaza civil war). But more importantly they also completely ignore how Hamas rockets are typically launched from civilian sites, while keeping the inhabitants hostage.

      The above mentioned rockets doesn't kill that many. They're simply not precise enough. However they do cause a lot of terror. Imagine waking up in the middle of the night hearing a rocket strike close to your families house. Imagine this scenario goes on almost every day for years. Sooner or later, if not you, somebody you know well will die. What if you have the power to make it stop, but taking out the launch site, requires the death of 40 PA hostages. I suspect most would not wait for the death count to equal before taking action.

      However even ignoring this, one have to remember this is an official war. Hamas, the official government, doesn't even bother to hide their intentions of throwing all of Israel out of the region. They regularly attack with any means on hand. As such the numbers are very low. In the Iran-Iraq war, as much as 900k Iranians died. In WW2 around 26 million Soviets died. Even for a superpower such as the US vs Iraq couldn't protect hundreds of thousands deaths.

    28. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Please note that I'm not necessarily taking a position on the circumstances of Israel's creation, or the tactics used by Israel, or even whether Israel has a "right to exist".

      I am taking a position only on the first of these three. I haven't been there, so WTF do I know about how to resolve the issues in the region? The who, what, where, when, and how all pretty clearly point to a why, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by jackbird · · Score: 1

      When Hamas uses sugar as fuel for the rockets they lob at civilian areas over the border, what are the Israelis supposed to do?

      It's a totally honest question - what would you do to end the cycle of violence and repression in the region while guaranteeing that everyone who was born in Israel/Palestine gets to continue living there?

    30. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by chrb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the supposed civilian statistics thrown up by the palestinians are weighted EXTREMELY heavily towards males over the age of 14 and under 40.

      And how do you account for the civilian statistics thrown up by the Israelis? Palestinian civilian casualities in the second intifada:

      According to B'Tselem, of the 6,484 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces since the beginning of the Second Intifada, 3,036 did not take part in hostilities while 2,248 did so. The remainder (950 individuals) were either police officers killed at their police stations or otherwise uncertain as to whether they took part in the hostilities. 1,329 (20,5 percent) of those killed were minors. A further 53 Palestinians were killed by Israeli civilians.

      B'Tselem is an Israeli non-governmental organization (NGO). It calls itself "The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories". The group was founded on February 3, 1989 by a group of prominent Israeli public figures, including lawyers, academics, journalists, and members of the Knesset.

      B'Tselem is Israeli, it was founded by respected prominent Israelis, and it says 1329 Palestinian children were killed by Israelis in the second intifada, and that children were 20% of the total Palestinians killed. They also say that the majority of all Palestinians killed took no part in hostilities ie. most of the people killed by the Israeli military were civilians. Odd that you were moderated up to +5, when you offer no evidence for your personal opinion, and it is contrary to all the established evidence from both sides in the conflict.

    31. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by cffrost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would a consumer, knowingly liable for all potential credit card fraud, possess a credit card with a $30k limit that he/she can't afford to cover?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    32. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by ShmuelP · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just feel sorry for whomever it is that's living next door to the thieves when Israel overreacts. Israel isn't exactly known for keeping any sort of perspective on things. Kill one of their citizens and they'll kill dozens of your citizens with little to no concern for innocent civilians.

      Not according to Jonathan Sacerdoti in the New Statesman (most certainly not a pro-Israel publication). In fact, during Operation Cast Lead, Israel managed a better than 1:1 ratio (that is, one civilian per combatant killed). The UN estimate for similar assymetric warfare is 3:1 - that is three civilians for each combatant killed. And since then, they have done even better. In 2011, it was either 1:10 (Jane's correspondent in Israel) or 1:3 (Elder of Zion - factoring in numbers from PCHR).

      Look for the actual facts, not mass media accounts. And as a rule of thumb, I'd discount hysterical claims right after an event, until they are actually examined. (Cases in point: the whole Muhammed al-Dura story, which was later shown to be a hoax, the supposed "massacre" of hundreds or thousands in Jenin that turned out to be 52 or 53, mostly combatants).

      --
      Solution to blink tags: wrap them in another blink tag, with a javascript delay loop, so they cancel each other out
    33. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      OK, I give up - your incisive criticism of my thought experiment has convinced me of the error of my ways. Until my spelling and grammar are perfect, I will never again make the mistake of trying to communicate with anyone. The risk of sending someone's life spiraling down the tubes because of a misplaced apostrophe is just too great.

    34. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, why the fuck would you jump to that assumption? Stupidity?

      Well WTF do you think would cause idiot assumptions? What are you, stupid?

    35. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by slaad · · Score: 2

      We'll see summary executions on the streets.

      Although, this being a money-related crime, the executioners shall be wielding socks stuffed with lots of coins instead of axes.

      Why would executioners wield socks stuffed with axes?

      --


      ~Warning!~ The above is encrypted using rot676!
    36. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      seriously... how is it not an act of terrorism?

      It is NOT terrorism. It is fraud/theft. Here is a reference for you and the rest of congress so you can understand what "terrorism" really is:
      http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/terrorism

    37. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      First, direct answer to your question. As a nation striving to be accepted as a modern democratic society, inflicting collective punishment on civilian Arab population must not be an option, period. Even if it means abandoning near border settlements. Second answer - political will on behalf of Unites States. if Israel knew they could not indefinitely keep the status quo, negotiations for a two state solution would stop being such a sad joke. Arabs are willing to give up a lot. it is Israel that approaches the talks halfheartedly with barely hidden contempt for the Arabs.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    38. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Sad really, as it 'normalizes' the true acts of terrorism. If everything is labeled terrorism, it becomes 'yet another crime' and is ignored.

      To be fair, terrorism actually is 'yet another crime,' and ignoring it would probably be rather effective at reducing it. I'm not quite sure why we're freaking out about terrorism, when people are still more likely to be raped, murdered, stabbed, killed by industrial pollutants, or drown. Car crashes kill 400 times more people than terrorism. Even in the year of 9-11, terrorism wasn't in the top 10 causes of death in the US.

      Terrorism needs to be normalized... not that everything is terrorism now. But that dealing with terrorism is as much a part of life as dealing with poisonous snakes, drunk drivers, workplace harassment, and second hand smoke. And all expenditures and liberties we give up to deal with it needs to be in perspective.

    39. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      Someone steals your credit card, and runs up a $30,000 tab, you pay it... or you go to jail. Period. So think about it this way. If someone effectively bombs your life, by taking your credit card, and shoots you with a debt you cannot pay and the ire of a state that takes debt VERY seriously... how is it not an act of terrorism? That's literally destroying someone's life.

      Yes it is but it still does not make the crime worse than if it had happened in a country with reasonable civilized consumer protection laws. The fault for the destruction of that life and hence the terrorism lies with the state.

      Yet another proof that Israel is not the well functioning democracy they claim to be.

    40. Re:The new catch phrase apparently by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Imagine if your country had been declared war upon (by multiple other countries) the very the day it was founded

      Well you can always relocate. China sounds good. Lots of industrialisation., banks and business. Long way away from all those countries you don't get along with. I mean if you are not wanted and you basically have most of the world in support, then move.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  4. New Buzz Word? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    I guess terrorism is now just one more meaningless buzz word.
    I imagine that defining the work "terrorist" as "criminal" helps to get around a lot of that unnecessary red tape of the justice system.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  5. The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by dmesg0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here is an excerpt from 0xOmar's original post on pastebin:

    It's first part of our release, my goal is reacing 1 million non-duplicate people, which is 1/6 of Israel's population.

    ...

    What's fun for us?
    - Watching 400,000 people gathered in front of Israeli credit card companies and banks, complaining about cards and that they are stolen
    - Watching Israeli banks shredding 400,000 credit cards and re-generate new cards (so costly, huh?)
    - Watching people purchasing stuff for theirself using the cards and making Israeli credit cards untrustable in the world, like Nigerian credit cards
    - and much more...

    The alleged goal is to hurt lots of random people without any personal gain. And what is the goal of terrorism?

    1. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by vakuona · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God forbid that people ever be inconvenienced!

    2. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by tsotha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The goal of terrorism is, you now, terror, not "Aw crap, this is going to be a hassle."

    3. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Oswald · · Score: 1

      I think the key here is to decide if your use of "hurt" is appropriate. It conflates financial harm with the kind of physical suffering usually caused by terrorists. Personally, I don't think that's appropriate, but if you do then you would be right to side with the Israeli government on this issue.

    4. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by dmesg0 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The goal of terrorism is, you now, terror, not "Aw crap, this is going to be a hassle."

      Neologism: Hasselism. As in committing acts of hasselism. No relationship to David Hasslehoff.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Terrorism hurts and kills and maims people, you must have an inappropriate love of money to be confusing theft of money and inconvenience purchasing with violence and mayhem

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Spliffster · · Score: 1

      The guy, indeed, claims to have stolen 400'000 CC Numbers and not just 6'000 as mentioned in TFS:
      http://pastebin.com/13nJQQ9p

    8. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by tsotha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh huh. "Cyberterrorism" is a bullshit plea for funding in a post 9/11 political environment. It's not terrorism.

    9. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The alleged goal is to hurt lots of random people without any personal gain.

      Read those lines carefully. The goals seems more than anything to hurt Israeli banks. That may or may not be for personal gain--one can presumably play the money market towards that end. The fact that lots of random people are hurt is an indirect consequence, not the objective goal.

      And what is the goal of terrorism?

      "the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes." Now, if the above is an attempt to cause Israel harm through its banks or to change the banking system through political acts...but even then, there's no violence involved and while the suggested interpretation of resulting events from the leak are intimidating and coercive, the fact that they're actually releasing the credit card details make it more than just a threat. So, no, overall, I'd guess the term you're looking for is the term "asshole". Sure, terrorists might be assholes, but not all assholes are terrorists.

      If anything, this sounds like a case of (a) if all you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail--and Israel sure likes it anti-terrorism hammer--and (b) just another example of political corruption where instead of punishing the banks for somehow fucking up so badly that the information was leaked online and calling for their heads (figuratively) they're more interested in calling for the heads (literally) of the people who exposed just how fucked up securing that data was--an act that is ultimately self-defeating if it were meant to protect those random people who are hurt as instead of using the opportunity for a very public, open expose on the issues with the banking system as a justification to fix those problems they've chosen to focused on attacking the messengers (evil bastards that they are) and leaving tons of other crooks to do the same thing in secret (although I guess Israel could always send its secret police into other countries to execute the crooks, but they can't advertise that as a deterrent, so that rather counters the whole idea that this is more a symbolic thing to draw attention to avoid future breaches).

      In short, this is why calling everything terrorism is fucked up. It solves nothing, blurs the evil that terrorism is, and demonstrates how beholden governments are to their people: those (people and organizations) with money and not the average person.

      PS - This doesn't mean I don't think the leakers shouldn't be punished both for the breach and the leak. But that doesn't justify any claim of terrorism nor the focus on the leakers seemingly over and above those that allowed the leak. Either Israeli banks are secure or they are not. If they're not--which seems to be demonstrated--and one's whole country is dependent upon them, I'd be more upset and focused on them failing in their duty than the countless evil or assholic people in the world who would exploit such businesses. I mean, there's an implied fraud given the reasonable expectations of what a bank is supposed to be, a firm that will securely hold your money; it's harder to be upset at the child/man/bastard who shows everyone the emperor wears no clothes.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    10. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Hentes · · Score: 1

      So causing inconvenience is now on equal ground with murder? And a sin is much worse when the assailant gains nothing from it?

    11. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by chrb · · Score: 1

      The goal of terrorism is to effect geopolitical change by making people experience terror. If this hacker has geopolitical goals and the Israelis are terrified by his actions, then he is a terrorist. But it seems unlikely that having credit card details stolen would make a person feel terror.

    12. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      By that standard, 'Global Warming' alarmists would be terrorists.

    13. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Yeah "hurting" is not really hurting though. It's a shitty thing to do, but no one will be in physical danger as a direct result.

    14. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by cshark · · Score: 1

      Credit card fraud hurts and maims people in Israel, and any country where debters prisons exist.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    15. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Not for a long time have "terrorist" organizations explicitly gone for pure terror - damaging infrastructure and police and civil society making it cheaper to do a deal with your organization than continuing the fight is more the game today.

    16. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by g8oz · · Score: 2

      Fail. That is a politicized term as well. No blood, then no terrorism.

    17. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by cshark · · Score: 1

      Yes. It is. And I think the international community needs to do more about this kind of thing than they do.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    18. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by cshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not "oh crap, this is going to be a hassle," it's more like "Aw crap, I'm going to debters prison." Hassle doesn't even begin to describe it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    19. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit. If it was YOUR credit card, or your wife's, or child's (if you are older) then you would want your state to take action. If the goal of the heist was not ordinary crime (take a little money) but solely to disrupt your families life then what crime is closest precent to that? that's right, terrorism.

      To me it seems that your political views about "funding in a post 9/11 political environment" has overriden your human empathy. As in all such cases the best thing to do would be to put aside your political and worldviews for a while and ask yourself the very simple question, "What should be done if this happened to ME or MY FAMILY?". You should ask yourself this for every act of terrorism (physical or cyber), for every rocket fired into Israel (you'll get to ask this several times per day, although it is so common it won't make news elsewhere), or for every Palestinian home destroyed for settlers (see, injustice is not one-sided). Then you probably would be less inclined to dismiss the effect this has - it is not just some university pank. Even worse, it reflects the poisoned information being given to the youth of the Middle East.

    20. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2

      Ever lived without money? lost your life savings or had them stolen? with the inability to get credit due to problems in the past? what if your credit card was used to buy things from dodgy sites that showed up on your statements? what if this was done not to an isolated person but on a massive scale (a few percent of your citizens). Basically I think you are so dismissive of the effects of this only because it didn't happen to you personally. As I've said elsewhere, ask yourself what you would want yor government to do if this happened to YOU or your family. Then you might feel a little empathy.

    21. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by meglon · · Score: 1

      U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d)
      (2) the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;

      What's too bad is the world doesn't treat politically motivated fear-mongering as terrorism.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    22. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2
      Imaging if someone took all your hard-earned money. Imagine you had a crap credit rating because of identity theft. Imagine someone did this not only to you, but to your family and to anyone else they could find in a systematic way. Imagine that the person did this not for financial gain (like Mafia would), or perverse jollies (as Aonymous would), but because they wanted to hurt your country and its citizens (as in, as a terrorist would). If YOU were affected how would YOU feel? Would you want to government to take action, not at the level of a stolen wallet but direct greater effort to seek out and seize those responsible (as the effort make for terrorism investigations) ?

      That has nothing whatsoever to do with an "inappropriate love of money" (although perhaps suggesting this indicates an unhealth obsession with those who may have a "love of money" - and in case if may be a Christian I would suggest checking the Bible's often *misquoted* statement about this - the love of money is not the "root of all evil", it is the root of "all sorts of evil" [quite a difference!] - so there is nothing intriniscally evil about money, possessing it, or working hard to get it).

    23. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by amorsen · · Score: 2

      I would want my government and my banks to fuciking FIX their CREDIT CARD SECURITY and their BANKING LAWS!

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    24. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      0xOmar targeted Israelis for nationalistic reasons. This attack was not random or simply meant to cause a hassle.

    25. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by tsotha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it was YOUR credit card, or your wife's, or child's (if you are older) then you would want your state to take action.

      Sure. I'd want the state to do what it takes to stop him, just like I want them to stop bank robbers and shoplifters.

      To me it seems that your political views about "funding in a post 9/11 political environment" has overriden your human empathy.

      No, not really. I recognize bureaucrats twist language in an effort to get funding.

      As in all such cases the best thing to do would be to put aside your political and worldviews for a while and ask yourself the very simple question, "What should be done if this happened to ME or MY FAMILY?".

      "What should be done?" isn't the same question as "Is this terrorism?"

    26. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      Yes. Stealing someone's credit card is the same as suicide bombing them. Keep up the equivocation.

      Nevermind the fact that stealing credit cards is actually the opposite of "without any personal gain". Indeed, having someone else's credit card that you can spend with, even if only for an hour, counts quite squarely as "gain".

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    27. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by spmkk · · Score: 1

      The goal of terrorism is instability, either political or economic. "[M]aking Israeli credit cards untrustable in the world, like Nigerian credit cards" certainly qualifies.

    28. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by MrEd · · Score: 1

      instead of punishing the banks for somehow fucking up so badly that the information was leaked online and calling for their heads (figuratively) they're more interested in calling for the heads (literally) of the people who exposed just how fucked up securing that data was--an act that is ultimately self-defeating if it were meant to protect those random people who are hurt .. instead of using the opportunity for a very public, open expose on the issues with the banking system as a justification to fix those problems

      Terry Gillam's Brazil comes to mind. Everything that's called "Terrorism" in that movie is just "Central Services" screwing up and passing the buck. The worst terrorist of all is a heating repair man.

      --

      Wah!

    29. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Arker · · Score: 1

      If YOU were affected how would YOU feel? Would you want to government to take action, not at the level of a stolen wallet but direct greater effort to seek out and seize those responsible (as the effort make for terrorism investigations) ?

      No, I would want them to do their job properly, the last thing I would want them to do is go full-retard in my name and go down this 'war on everything' route.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    30. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Oswald · · Score: 1

      You seem so angry all the time. It's not good for your health or your reading comprehension.

      I didn't say I don't feel empathy for people whose accounts are hacked and who suffer financial loss. I never said money wasn't vital to life. I said stealing credit cards (even en masse) isn't the same as blowing people up and shouldn't be responded to as if it were. I said (listen closely, please), "Personally, I don't think that's appropriate...."

      I can't understand why you see fit to give such an accusatory and insulting response to a calm statement of a political opinion. You aren't a zealot, are you?

    31. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by X.25 · · Score: 1

      The alleged goal is to hurt lots of random people without any personal gain. And what is the goal of terrorism?

      I don't know. Like, stealing random peoples' land, killing thousands of them and putting them in ghetos?

      Sounds ok to me.

    32. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Rennt · · Score: 1

      How the fuck can the state justify inprisonment of fraud victims? The attack highlights willful injustice perputrated by the Israeli state on it's own people - no wonder the dude is labeled a terrorist.

    33. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Rennt · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but 'd kind of expect law enforcement to do its job.

      If law enforcement can't effectively do something about it because of broken laws, only then would expect the governement to do something... fix the laws.

      I would absolutely NOT be happy if my government waived the perp's rights with a label like "terrorist" or "enemy combatant". I would defend the rights of a fellow citizen, even if he wronged me.

      What if I am a suspect one day? What if you are?

    34. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      No. If you got robbed while carrying your life saving from the bank it still would not be terrorism.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    35. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      Here is an excerpt from 0xOmar's original post on pastebin:

      It's first part of our release, my goal is reacing 1 million non-duplicate people, which is 1/6 of Israel's population.

      ...

      What's fun for us? - Watching 400,000 people gathered in front of Israeli credit card companies and banks, complaining about cards and that they are stolen - Watching Israeli banks shredding 400,000 credit cards and re-generate new cards (so costly, huh?) - Watching people purchasing stuff for theirself using the cards and making Israeli credit cards untrustable in the world, like Nigerian credit cards - and much more...

      The alleged goal is to hurt lots of random people without any personal gain. And what is the goal of terrorism?

      The alleged goal is to hurt lots of random people without any personal gain. And what is the goal of terrorism?

      Wrong.

      The US Code of Federal Regulation states that terrorism is "...the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."

      Of course this places many first-world governments squarely in 'terrorist organization' camp, particularly the US and Israel. This is why this definition is downplayed or ignored, but rather replaced with a hand-waving 'complicated to define', or more recently, 'whatever we say it is'.

    36. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1
      My apologies Oswald if you regarded by tone as interrogatory, angry or insulting. It was intended to be open questions for yourself to think very hard about. Again, my it is my sincere regret that you took my statements as a personal accusation.

      I believe I understand your position, and thanks for re-clarifying. On one hand I agree with you, I mean, why conflate the leakage of personal financial information with terrorism? isn't that going too far? Perhaps it is.

      However I believe just because the crime was not physically violent or threatened with violence does not mean it is not terrorist or have a terrorist-like motivation - which is to cause disruption to the lives of civilians who have no fight with the perpetrator. Sure, it is not terrorism in the 'traditional' sense but if you accept a term of 'cyberterrorism' as having any meaning (I do) then this probably fits under that category. The laws that fit terrorism probably fit cyberterrorism as well, with regard to international jurisdictions, which agencies should do investigation etc. and that is why I believe the Israelis have chosen to try and fit terrorism and cyberterrorism under the same laws, rather than try and shoehorn organized crime laws (which it is not, due to different motivations and breath of affected civilians etc) or create a whole new set of laws that essentially only substitute the word 'terrorism' for 'cyberterrorism'. What should definitely differ is the method of enforcement and the rights of suspects and arrested individuals - which should be more liberal than in the case of physical terrorists (since the cyberterrorists are probably not a danger if they see their lawyer without access to a laptop etc).

      So I get why you have made your argument, and agree to the dangerous precedent that using terrorist laws could set. I hope you also get some of my point (even if you disagree) that existing terrorist laws cover most of the legal framework needed to deal with this (especially international cases) where ordinary criminal laws probably don't cut it. I think we could both agree that detainment and enforcement should differ between terrorism and cyberterrorism.

      I'm interested to hear your point of view on this.

    37. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1
      What if not one but 400,000 people got robbed (according to the reports)? What if this person wanted to rob everyone in the whole country? but not so much rob for pecuniary gain, but rob to try and screw your population and whole financial system (nb: this is Israel's system we're talking about, not America's - which we can agree needed no outside force to mess up). This was not done by one of your citizens, but by an international agent. Which set of law do you think would be closest to this event? should the government draft a whole set of laws just to cover this one case when existing terrorism laws cover nearly all the same aspects (international jurisdiction, agencies responsible, the powers delegated to them by the government to proceed with their duty, etc etc).

      I think I understand your reservation for condemning this (arguably) 'cyberterrorist' act as something other than routine fraud, but I do think this case is different due to the intent of the perpetrator.

    38. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1
      I think the question is not whether law enforcement can or can't do their job - I think what is being discussed is which laws should apply to this case.

      I agree that defending the rights of a fellow citizen is very important. However, in this case the perpetrator in question was a foreign national 'attacking' 400,000 people of the populace and banking system of another country. His motivation was not for personal financial gain (as existing organized crime legislation presumably handles - I don't know Israeli law) but for the disruption of citizen lives and banking system.

      In this case the closest existing laws dealing with an external foreign national attacking the institutions of another country are generally the terrorism laws that most countries have enacted. Now, I don't personally agree with many aspects of those laws, and certainly do not agree with how many of those laws are applied (where enforcement agents routinely ignore the safeguards put in place to preserve the rights of *citizens*), but to me it seems that
      * the perpetrator needs to be prosecuted in some way, lest copycat attacks start, and
      * the existing terrorism laws and agencies are probably the closest (but not perfect) fit to this 'cyberterrorism' case.
      For a citizen then using the terrorism laws for massive credit card theft would be an overkill - I'm with you on that one. For a non-citizen foreign national doing it from foreign territory, then I think that 'cyberterrorism' might not be such a bad term for it - leading to handling as a terrorist event.

    39. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      be careful, if you open your mind too much your brain may fall out

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    40. Re:The original 0xOmar post on pastebin by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      lol. What brain! :)

  6. The word "Terrorism" now has a whole new meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In no way am I condoning credit card theft, which is a crime and should be dealt with as such, but the current trend of labelling every crime or infraction as "terrorism" is somewhat disturbing. How long will it be before minor infractions such as speeding or jaywalking become "terrorism"?

  7. YeYe by wzzzzrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And in 3 years from now every western government will treat everything as it would terrorism.

    Film at 11.

    --
    On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
  8. Awwww, poor guy. by tsotha · · Score: 2

    If he's strangled by a hotel maid we'll know what happened.

    Not that I'll, you know, shed a tear.

  9. This is not theft by u17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The original owners did not lose their credit card numbers. Therefore it's not theft, it's unauthorised copying! I'm surprised that this is pointed out so many times under articles about file sharing, but not in cases like this.

    1. Re:This is not theft by Hentes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not the accounts that get stolen but the money. Just like a train robbery doesn't mean a theft of trains.

    2. Re:This is not theft by kharchenko · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points :)

    3. Re:This is not theft by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      This isn't like file sharing. When someone uses stolen credit card numbers the original owners get charged *real money*. Real people get hurt.

    4. Re:This is not theft by Arker · · Score: 1

      The sale in this case is not an actual thing that can be stolen, it is an abstract and entirely hypothetical (i.e. it is a potential not a thing.) The copyright system itself is a violation of property rights and of the fundamental principles of justice, although you are correct it does attempt to guarantee sales that doesnt mean there is any moral or ethical argument for coÃperating with that end. In the case at hand, the card numbers themselves have no intrinsic value anyway - they are only being sought for their practical function (to facilitate theft) and copyright isnt involved anyhow.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    5. Re:This is not theft by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I think the difference is split between stealing of the credit card number (as in the actual information printed on the card), and the unauthorized charges to the card. It's not the former that caused the harm, but the latter. Besides, I kind of doubt the actual information on the card is copyright-able, but if it was, I'm sure the issuing bank would have the copyright and not the "owner" of the card.

  10. True terrorism by formfeed · · Score: 5, Funny

    True terrorism is a criminal act that terrorizes beyond the actual incident. In my opinion, these things should also be added to that list:
    High school mobbing.
    Tail gating drivers.
    The NY Yankees.
    Clowns.

    1. Re:True terrorism by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Don't forget DRM, foreclosures, high school*, and Atari 2600 graphics.

      *That's not already on the list. Read carefully.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  11. a lot of crimes are terrorism... by joren02 · · Score: 1

    ...when they are done on a massive scale. But things like murder, theft, destruction of property,... are no acts if terrorism on their own, and to say they are is just ridiculous. Plus as already pointed out, you can't just call everything an act of terrorism just because it happens a lot. This way some lonely thug who steals one or a few credit cards will instantly be labeled a terrorist. The only thing they should do at the maximum is call a specific event an act of terrorism and everyone involved in that event can be labeled as terrorist.

  12. way to not screw around by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    way to not screw around.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  13. terrorism? by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

    What do they mean, is mossad going to start conducting credit card fraud themselves in foreign countries?

    --
    Rocket Surgeon.
  14. Israel bombing Palestinians for credit card fraud? by leftie · · Score: 1

    Israel gonna flatten Gaza Strip every time some Isreali gets their credit card swiped?

  15. The actual original article by Octorian · · Score: 1

    This is the original article that the linked articles are attempting to paraphrase:
    Israel vows to hit back after credit cards hacked

    While it doesn't add too much information, it might have slightly better wording.

  16. Re:Identity thief shoud be a capital crime. by biodata · · Score: 1

    Except this is not true. They still have their life, it is just less convenient than previously, hence it has not been stolen.

    --
    Korma: Good
  17. After all the advancements in cryptography by StripedCow · · Score: 2

    we still have an effectively broken payment system, and instead of fixing it, they are going after the symptoms...

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:After all the advancements in cryptography by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh it could be fixed, but the banks don't want to do this. Much cheaper to write it off as "bad debt" than implement systems that would prevent this (and prevent people's lives from being disrupted/ruined). To be fair, most customers would give you their credit card details for the promise of a $100 voucher (they give away personal details all the time do things like phone credit etc). Customers also don't like even the slightest inconvenience even for much greater security (if more than one authentication method is involved).

    2. Re:After all the advancements in cryptography by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      If every point of sale, transfer, bank network and card is well encrypted the GCHQ and NSA will be very unhappy.
      For how long will they be able set and flood the world with very low cost weak crypto is the question.
      http://cryptome.org/nsa-v-all.htm
      Setting the Data Encryption Standard (DES) was the hint.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. Que the Jew-jokes by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    you must have an inappropriate love of money

    Har har.

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  19. The founding fathers were "terrorists" by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    At least by the modern definition they were. They committed sabotage against a private corporation to protest something. These days sabotage (and cyber crime) are generally treated as terrorism. Two reasons:

    The wealthy and powerful consider destruction of property to be worse than actual violence against humans.

    We have made a very convenient category of crime called "terrorism" which exempts us from needing to engage in due process and allows us to slide into Stanford Prison Experiment/Lord of the Flies behavior. Hand and hand with that, we are allowed to dehumanize terrorists. So it is very convenient for us to use this category on anyone, when we want to stop thinking and start smacking down.

  20. In case his side of the story isn't out there by koan · · Score: 1

    Another (possibly real) treat from Pasetbin.com
    http://pastebin.com/13nJQQ9p

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  21. Kinetic is The new catch phrase apparently by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    Well this is the end game for "cyber war" eventually if you piss of some actor enough they wont just hack back they will go "kinetic" to use the modern term :-)

    Its going to suck if your an Arab studying in Mexico at the moment as it has been known for retaliation to get the wrong guy (as was the case in lillehammer)
    And given the provenance of the stuxnet hackers rating him out as a spy for the government to the Zetas or los Templarios might be a nastier way of getting him.

  22. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by bored_engineer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The average Israeli gets more USA federal tax dollars spent on them than the average USA citizen.

    Can you support this? I went looking, and it seems that Israel receives about $3,000,000,000 in aid. With a population of about 7.8 million people, this works out to less than $400/person.

    This page, the 2011 federal budget was about $3.5E12. If you focus on the social programs, retirement benefits and highway spending, then these account for about 68% of the federal budget. Dividing this total by a population of about 310 million people, I arrive at a total spending figure of about $7,700 per US citizen.

    I've double-checked everything and can't see where I've made a mistake, other than in the arbitrary decision to exclude all defense, research and interest payments.

  23. Re:Like they handle terrorists... by cshark · · Score: 1

    And then they'll negotiate with the credit card theif for years with constant interference from the US, give them the neighborhood they happen to live in at the time, and get nothing in return. Yeah, sounds like Israel to me.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  24. Finally some common sense! by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    This will nicely erode the too heavily charged term 'terrorism'.

    bjd

    1. Re:Finally some common sense! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      They should declare it identity theft and then declare identity theft as a capital crime. That would put an end to most fraudsters.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  25. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by brendank310 · · Score: 1

    Even so, those $7700 come from US tax payers. So really (and at the same time not really) they are getting them back.

  26. Terrorism? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Credit card theft? Meh.

    I can think of far more terrifying things.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  27. Shape of things by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure we can expect to see something similar in the US before long.

    Anyone who hacks into an account, or uses the Internet for crime (such as filesharing) or disrupts corporate activity by protesting in a park, is going to be treated as a terrorist and considered an enemy combatant. After all, when you threaten profits, you threaten everything we hold sacred. Let's just see what happens to the Occupy people who dare protest at the GOP Convention outside of the specified "Free Speech Zone" later this year.

    As we know, last week a bill became law that allows for "terrorists" to be held indefinitely without being charged. There already is a legal doctrine allowing assassination of citizens for being "terrorists".

    The message is clear: You. Better. Behave.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  28. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by slasho81 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The oft neglected fact is that US aid to Israel must be spent on US products and services. That money usually ends in the hands of military equipment manufacturers which employ US citizens who pressure their congressmen to continue to give that aid which is basically a subsidy for US factories of a very certain kind and location. Politics as usual.

  29. Erratum? by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    Erratum:

    Never mind a few million people of other nationalities[...]

    Including approximately two million German civilians of all ages and gender killed after the war during the ethnic cleansing of Eastern and Central European lands, where Germans had been living for many centuries. To be sure, Churchill and Roosevelt regretted this unpleasantness—but they wanted to keep Stalin happy, and Stalin wanted to hang on to that chunk of Poland that Hitler had given him. So the Poles got a chunk of Germany to "compensate" them, and, in turn, they expropriated and drove out the previous German tenants. In ex-Czechoslovakia, things went just as badly for the Sudeten Germans who lived there. To quote Eduard Bene upon his return in the wake of Allied troops: "Woe, woe woe, thrice woe to the Germans, we will liquidate you!". [After the Reich, Giles Macdonogh, 2007, Basic Books, New York, N.Y.]

    Yes, I know; of course they deserved it.

    I don't understand you "erratum" comment, by the way: do you truly think only Jews suffered persecution during the Second World War? Here's a quote from a pretty reliable source:

    3. How many non-Jewish civilians were murdered during World War II? Answer: While it is impossible to ascertain the exact number, the recognized figure is approximately 5,000,000. Among the groups which the Nazis and their collaborators murdered and persecuted were: Gypsies, Serbs, Polish intelligentsia, resistance fighters from all the nations, German opponents of Nazism, homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, habitual criminals, and the "anti-social," e.g. beggars, vagrants, and hawkers.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    1. Re:Erratum? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      I don't understand you "erratum" comment, by the way: do you truly think only Jews suffered persecution during the Second World War?

      On the contrary, (which, because of my sarcastic tone may be obscure) as I'm Polish. Erratum means (roughly) a correction to unedited and printed mistake.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    2. Re:Erratum? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      And GP and GGP are the same person.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  30. Re:Israel bombing Palestinians for credit card fra by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2

    No. They will soon flatten Gaza for the increasingly long-range rockets being fired every day from there. This probably doesn't make your news (probably only celebrity weddings and divorces, lol. If you check Israeli news from time to time (I check Ha'arertz to see the Israeli perspective) you will see that rockets or explosive planting attempts happen *every* day. This is why a smackdown will come.

  31. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by HonestButCurious · · Score: 4, Interesting

    US FMF grants to Israel in 2011, divided by the population of Israel in 2011, ends up as $384 per capita. The 2011 US budget, divided by the population of the US in 2011, ends up as $11,897 per capita. That's ignoring the fact that Israel has to spend the FMF money in the USA, in effect subsidising the American military-industrial complex.

    Protip: Don't post bullshit pseudo-statistics to Slashdot - we guys love our calculators.

  32. I'll get modded down, probably by msobkow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much as I have a problem with the way the Israelis oppress the Palestinians and deny them fundamental human rights....

    They're not wrong to call crackers who steal people's financial data terrorists.

    The people whose credit is being damaged and whose money is stolen are NOT the ones who make decisions for the Israeli government. Nor were the people who had their info stolen by Anonymous in North America or Europe.

    When you victimize the people at random, you are committing a terrorist act. You are punishing the innocent for the decisions and actions of the guilty who are not harmed in the LEAST when you victimize the people. Terrorism does NOT have to include death and murder.

    True, there is usually less inflammatory legislation in place that can be used to prosecute crackers, but it's also largely ineffective, because it's classed as a "white collar" crime. "White Collar" is a smokescreen for "business crime" laws, with watered down penalties to avoid "hurting" the unethical business people who get caught in fraud, extortion, money laundering, ponzi schemes, and other scams. It downplays the number of people who are hurt by their actions. Financial crimes which hurt hundreds, thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of people should have much harsher punishments and jail time than they do.

    Fines do not stop a business, nor do they punish the executives who made the illegal decisions. They're treated as a cost of doing business, and the company pays the tab because the executives are protected from financial damages by the very structure of a legal corporation. JAIL TIME FOR EXECUTIVES, not fines for companies! Their role as officers of the company does NOT protect them from personal prosecution for illegal management of a company. There is absolutely NOTHING in Canadian or US corporate law that says otherwise. It's just not done very often, because these buggers have DEEP pockets for lawyers to fight the charges tooth and nail.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I'll get modded down, probably by msobkow · · Score: 2

      Ask Martha Stewart -- she's an example of someone who WAS jailed for her "white collar" crimes. It CAN be done. But with the rarity of it, when it does happen, the guilty are likely to claim they were "singled out" for special prosecution. At least Martha had the dignity to accept and serve her sentence gracefully instead of making any such claims.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  33. That is just stupid by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Terrorists are not in it for money or financial gain, these scum are. Applying the wrong counter-strategy is just plain dumb. Not that I am surprises Israeli politicians are as dumb as the rest of them.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  34. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by bored_engineer · · Score: 2

    Hereis both support and dissent for Slasho81's position on where US aid to Israel goes. After looking at the link, and searching a bit more, I'd like to point out that Isreael's military imports far exceed the USA's .foreign aid to Israel. I don't necessarily support foreign aid to Israel, but I would like the facts of the support to be clear.

  35. If you think that's tough by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    If you think that's tough wait to see what they do to people downloading illegal copies of their Eurovision song contest entry.

  36. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting that I was responding to a particular fact. As I suggested in another response, I don't support aid to Israel or any other nation. Where assertions are made, they ought to be supported by numbers. Dutchwizzman made an assertion that isn't supported by the apparent facts.

    As my participation in Slashdot discussions increases, my opinion of contributions by ACs goes steadily down. Did you give any thought to your response?

  37. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by jmottram08 · · Score: 1
    The idea is that they save us money by policing the area for us. How much would a war with Iran cost? How much would a nuclear Iran cost us? How much can be saved by funding Isreal to help with these problems?

    And as has been stated, the aid must be spent on American goods or weapons, so its not like we just give them that much money, we might give them a plane or a missile that costs a -ton-, and then they use it to support our goals in the region. In effect it is paying for someone else to fight for us, to our mutual advantage.

  38. Re: tired of the previous subject by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

    funding 100% American arms production

    That's not quite true. Some of those funds go into research indiginous to Israel. As this article makes oblique mention of, Israel does its own research and modifies the weapons that it recieves. Some of these improvements may make their way into arms wielded by the USA.

    I want to stress that I don't support military or other financial support of any nation. I just want these facts to be straight.

  39. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

    I like your response better than mine above.

    Protip: Don't post bullshit pseudo-statistics to Slashdot - we guys love our calculators.

    I keep a calculator right next to my laptop. I'll leave you to guess which I use more often. :-)

  40. All part of the plan? by debrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those fabulous steps to Draconian governance from Western-style democracies are:

    1. Establish a basis for circumventing human rights (eg "terrorism" or "piracy" or "national security", etc.);

    2. Imbue state systems with financial gain from said basis (eg prison industrial complex, military industrial complex, etc.);

    3. Have said systems lobby for increased funding and authority, encroaching on traditional authorities (eg policing, prosecutors, media, voting systems, etc);

    4. Expand the application of the basis for circumventing human rights to other areas (eg immigration, child pornography, copyright violations, any other interests with lobbyists);

    5. Enact laws that undermine the financing of political dissension, and undermine systems that may allow any discourse critical of the established government;

    6. Engage in mass human rights violations, ghettoization, prison labour; State ignores human rights, imprisons or executes dissenters and acts with impunity and disregard for reason;

    7. The state becomes a vehicle for despots supported by demagoguery. Non tenet anguillam, per caudam qui tenet illam.

  41. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

    Given that Israel also funds their own military research, your point has its own multple. Double? Triple? Who knows? I suggested above that there is a return, but that return is difficult to quantify. While I don't support foreign aid, do you have some support that aid to Israel gives a return?

  42. So... by Bananana · · Score: 1

    ... they'll beat them until they admit their crimes?

  43. Put this in context by ZepHead · · Score: 1

    We are talking about Israel. For them, maybe killing one's money is tantamount to terrorism ala killing a Christian's child. We don't all think a like you know....

  44. Re:Bullshit by Smauler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shut the fuck up, racist.

    I'm fed up of being called racist because I'm critical of some country's policies. If you hadn't noticed, Syria is taking a bit more a bashing in the news than Isreal recently, and when I or other people comment upon that they get called anti-muslim.

    I know you are spouting pro-Semitic, racist vomit, because you're not addressing any of the issues, you're just name calling, and dropping people into your well defined categories.

  45. Then you shouldnt recall shit by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Secondly, last I recall, citizens in other countries don't fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped, and tortured by Israelis

    tell that to the bahraini who was murdered in a bahrain hotel room by 5 mossad agents. who didnt even need to avert hotel security cameras - probably to 'make an example' - and used 5 stolen passwords of real european citizens to effect the murder. it was even on cnn, and talked for days. and yet, you dont know even this, and say that 'citizens in other countries dont fear being blown up'............. wow. stupid. utterly stupid.

    you dont know this, and yet you are uttering blanket statements like the above. so basically, you dont know jack shit, and yet you have composed a long tirade about things you dont know ? from the liberty sinking to the samson option, the list of things you do NOT know is SO large that it would take a half a day to compose an article to educate yourself with references and links. i will refrain.

    so, next time, shut up. as an alternative, you can educate yourself. then you would be respectable and noteworthy.

  46. alternatively by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    israel can just stop fucking murdering foreign nationals in hotels in foreign countries, under the eyes of security cameras.

    what am i talking about ? if you dont know what that was, just shut up, and educate yourself before talking politics.

    1. Re:alternatively by sanzibar · · Score: 1

      How imperialistic of you. So how do you justify the drone attacks by your own country?

      I seem to recall more than one recent assassination by your country, illegal arms shipments, torture, secret prisons... we could go on and on.

      And since your so educated on Israel politics, please explain how Israel should respond to constant missile attacks, threats by neighboring countries and well funded enemies who's stated purpose and goal is the total destruction of their country. Please contrast this with your own countries policies and recent actions.

  47. In a related story... by Genda · · Score: 1

    Today a nuclear device was detonated in Abuja Nigeria. The source of the detonation is unknown and nobody is claiming responsibility, but sources say that ground zero appears to have been an internet cafe.

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by Alomex · · Score: 1

    The oft neglected fact is that US aid to Israel must be spent on US products and services.

    Correct, but is should be pointed out that this is true of most aid, to any country and from any country.

    Whenever you hear that, say, Canada gave $100M in food aid to drought ravaged African country, it usually means that a credit of $100M against surplus Canadian food stuff was issued to that country, so a lot of that aid ends up in the hands of farmers that were having problem selling their produce. A win-win situation if you ask me. This is a fact that the Ron Paul types routinely leave out.

  50. No one in Israel takes Danny Ayalon seriously by Protosotme · · Score: 1

    And neither should you. The guy is an asshole without any basic skills in foreign relations.

  51. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    There will be a nuclear Iran. That is unless US interferes, because there is no way Israel can stop (delay by a couple of years, yes) Iranian nuclear program on it's own. But that would mean dragging US into the conflict which kinda defeats the original purpose of arming them doesn't it?

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  52. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

    The calculation is more complicated than that. Israel gets that money for free, whereas the spending in the US is a transfer from US citizens to other US citizens, with some leakage out to foreign bondholders (about 4% of overall spending, roughly $450 per capita).) Also, while the aid to Israel is mostly (not all) spent on US armaments, they often get them at deep discounts, much lower than the US DOD would pay. This is done by writing off nearly new equipment as surplus, as with a substantial fraction of Israel's fighter aircraft.

    Your way of doing the calculation is like comparing rearranging the furniture in a house (US domestic spending) with giving away some of that same furniture.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  53. Re:Run to the USA to fund the murder of the purps? by jmottram08 · · Score: 1

    Returns are hard to quantify, but total foreign aid to Isreal is -relatively- small, and it is clear that Israel is delaying a nuclear Iran (read the news today), which would be very costly. Not necessarily that Iran would launch a missile at NY, but that they would/might give a bomb to terrorist groups for them to use.

    The thing to also remember is that even if a nuclear or dirty bomb didnt hit the US, it would still cost the US a TON, in direct aid, charity, heightened military, and business losses if it were to hit anywhere in the world.