Slashdot Mirror


Town Turns Off the Lights To See the Stars

Hugh Pickens writes "Stargazing skies all over the world are disappearing, as the sky above New York City is Class 9 on the Bortle ranking and American suburban skies are typically Class 5, 6, or 7. But some places are making an effort to preserve their skywatching heritage as Exmoor National Park was granted International Dark-Sky Reserve status in November and people in the Exmoor town of Dulverton were challenged to switch off their lights as part of the BBC's Stargazing Live, demonstrating that you don't need special equipment to see the stars more clearly, if you have a decent pair of binoculars. 'The whole idea is to show that even a small town, which is still quite dark, can give off quite a lot of light,' says astronomer Mark Thompson. The event in Dulverton gained a lot of support from local residents and businesses. 'It needed a bit of organization to get everyone to say yes,' says town mayor Chris Nelder. 'We want people to just enjoy the night sky, to treasure the fact we have them and to look after them,' adds Claire O'Connor from Exmoor National Park Authority."

68 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds awesome! by chrissfoot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wish my town would do this from time to time!

    1. Re:Sounds awesome! by XrayJunkie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. Its a great event especially for the kids. Maybe there will be more events of this kind in other cities/countries. But limited to small towns - you need a lot of people to agree switching the lights off.

    2. Re:Sounds awesome! by datavirtue · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I live in the country so I get a fairly good look at the sky. However, when I first moved into my house the first thing I did was go outside and shoot the mercury bulb with a pellet gun. The power company installs a "house light" on every property and they charge you about $10 a month to run it. I called and had them remove it later on. I told them it blew up one day and I didn't want it for safety reasons. Tried to get the neighbor to get rid of his, but he never looks at the sky so what does he care.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re:Sounds awesome! by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      You would be amazed to see the difference between the sky above a city or town and what it is like out in the country well away from lights but also from air pollution. When I go out of Silicon Valley, where you can see some stars, down to Pacheco Pass in the mountains southeast of the area, the difference is immense. You can see the Milky Way in all its glory, and then you realize what you see in the city is like having a gauze bandage around your head. Once the Illuminati kill off 99% of the population, those skies are going to be spectacular! Well worth it, I say.

    4. Re:Sounds awesome! by somersault · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most people are usually more worried about chopping off their fingers, falling down the stairs, and being able to watch TV.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Sounds awesome! by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've lived in cities all my life and AFAIK, I've never seen the Milky Way. I wouldn't even know it was supposed to visible in the night sky if I hadn't seen pictures of it in books. Human's have done amazing things to adapt to our environment, and we've become the most adaptive species in the planet's history. But there is always a cost, unfortunately.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Sounds awesome! by jefe7777 · · Score: 5, Funny

      maybe his light needs to have an unfortunate accident...

    7. Re:Sounds awesome! by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2

      Just go out into the country for the experience. It's worth it. One of the very few things I used to enjoy about Army training in the Mohave was the night sky.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    8. Re:Sounds awesome! by tixxit · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure pollution plays much of a role at all. Many parts of the country have pretty terrible air quality, but still have incredibly clear skies at night. Air pollution rarely stays in one place and the sticks can often be just as polluted as a nearby city.

    9. Re:Sounds awesome! by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd be most worried about car accidents. My wife can barely see at night with the lights as they are.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Sounds awesome! by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what you try to do - there are always enough "baddies" (whether trolls on the internet or criminals IRL) to ruin it for you.

      Then why worry about it? Shit happens. Punch it in the face.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    11. Re:Sounds awesome! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This summer, go out camping. And by camping, I don't mean parking a motorhome next to an electrical hookup. I mean the "What do you mean you forgot the coffee? It's a four hour canoe trip and three portages back to the car, you numbskull!" kind of camping. Then take a midnight paddle on a clear windless night when the lake is as still as glass. You'll see the stars above, and the stars reflected in the water below. It is magical.

      It's even better if you can get away in the winter, because the cold dry air doesn't hold as much pollution.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:Sounds awesome! by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You watch too much TV. Most criminals are not sophisticated enough to operate in darkness. Turning off more lights tends to be a deterrent, since the criminals can't see anything.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    13. Re:Sounds awesome! by JerkBoB · · Score: 2

      I've lived in cities all my life and AFAIK, I've never seen the Milky Way.

      You'd know it if you saw it. It's unmistakable, and it's breathtaking, the first time you see it in all its glory. I remember the first time like it was yesterday. I was 10, and at a summer camp in the wilds of West Virginia, right next to a national forest. 50 miles to the nearest city, nearest small town was ~10 miles away. I was out walking across the athletic field one night, and happened to look up. Nearly fell over, because the milky way was so astonishingly bright and beautiful. I grew up in a city, too, and I'd had no idea what an unpolluted night sky looked like.

      You should make it happen, at least once in your life. Really helps to put things in perspective.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    14. Re:Sounds awesome! by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

      That's a nice bulb you've got there...it would be a shame if nothing were to happen to it....

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    15. Re:Sounds awesome! by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

      One of the most amazing demonstrations of this was the one time I flew down to Florida to visit with friends and we headed to keywest at night. A couple hours of driving, we pulled over out in the middle of nowhere and instructed everyone out. Not that that's creepy at all, no sir. But once we got out, he turned out the lights on the car and said "Look up." Magnificent. Then he killed us while we were staring up.

      True story.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    16. Re:Sounds awesome! by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      You would be amazed to see the difference between the sky above a city or town and what it is like out in the country well away from lights but also from air pollution. When I go out of Silicon Valley, where you can see some stars, down to Pacheco Pass in the mountains southeast of the area, the difference is immense. You can see the Milky Way in all its glory, and then you realize what you see in the city is like having a gauze bandage around your head. Once the Illuminati kill off 99% of the population, those skies are going to be spectacular! Well worth it, I say.

      Actually, you don't have to go into the sticks. You just need to go *up*.

      One of the things I did during my private pilot training was night flights. Living in an area that's fairly heavily developed, once you get about 3000' AGL, the stars started coming out. And since the cockpit's quite dim, your eyes are in night vision mode.

      It's actually quite nice, and a good way for those of us who just don't like camping without modern conveniences.

      Most of the light pollution's at ground level, once you climbed your way above it, it doesn't interfere so much.

    17. Re:Sounds awesome! by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 2

      Once the Illuminati kill off 99% of the population, those skies are going to be spectacular!

      But surely the Illuminati are to blame?

    18. Re:Sounds awesome! by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, 'security' lights are great for muggers and rapists. There's nearly always somewhere to hide in the shadows and the bright lights make sure pedestrians don't get dark adapted enough to see them there.

    19. Re:Sounds awesome! by gnick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In White Rock (outside Los Alamos, NM), this is done every 2-3 months during the new moon. There's a large park (Overlook Park for anyone who cares) with no nearby houses. The street lights all go dark and the local astronomy nerds all bring out their telescopes (starting at about $1k and going well beyond $30k) to train on interesting stuff in the sky and talk to anyone interested about their gear and whatever they're trained on for people to come see. Really nice event for nerds and families alike. Nerdy families especially.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. Nice, but... by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's nice, but aren't the lights on for safety reasons? I mean, if they weren't serving any use, people wouldn't have them in the first place.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily... For instance, nearby my hometown they've installed several street lights... at a pass, at 1800 meters high, with nothing within at least 1km around. Would be eager to learn about the safety improvement of such an investment. At least since then I am now completely unable to observe anything from that location that used to have a pretty clear sky

    2. Re:Nice, but... by biodata · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It could just be security theatre. People are evolved/inculcated with fear of the dark, so lights make them feel safer. Is there any good evidence to show that providing street lighting makes things safer than people carrying their own light with them?

      --
      Korma: Good
    3. Re:Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The trouble is a lot street lamps waste a lot light into the sky instead projecting in down to where's its needed.

    4. Re:Nice, but... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 5, Informative

      That was my comment on the BBC article (which was subsequently voted into oblivion). The street near my friend's house has had its street lighting turned off at night recently (though for energy-saving purposes, not stargazing) and within a month there were two rapes and an assault right there on the street. It is not something I would have thought of right away, but speak to any woman who has ever had to walk home at night, alone, and they will tell you they feel much safer under street lights.

    5. Re:Nice, but... by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

      National Geographic mentioned this in an article on this a few years ago on light pollution (I'm too lazy to go find it). A lot of cities are slowing making the transition to lights that only shine downward and waste little into the sky. It's serves the dual purpose of 1) saving energy and 2) cutting down on light pollution.

    6. Re:Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The main reasons for street lighting is to make obstacles and pedestrians more visible to motorists, to allow pedestrians to move around without carrying a torch, and to make them feel safer.

      In this case, they'd closed the roads around the town for this stunt, so no need for worrying about cars, and a good fraction of the population of the town was out on the street, so there were fewer empty dark back alleys down which to get stabbed (plus it's a small rural town; if it's anything like mine crime is generally livestock related...), and everyone there knew about it months in advance, so I'd expect they were stocked up on torches and batteries. It was just a shame it was so cloudy!

      If you have never seen the stars without light pollution, go to somewhere in the middle of nowhere and have a look. It's quite hard to do in the UK, as our population density (and thus light pollution) is many times that of the US, so there aren't many really empty places left. It's a real tragedy that for a little convenience and marginal extra safety we've given up our window seat at the edge of the rest of the universe.

    7. Re:Nice, but... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The really pathetic thing is that we can spend less on lighting, have more light, and see the stars if we use lights with reflector hoods that put the light where we want it rather than where we don't. They tend to be even less attractive than streetlights normally are but that's not a law of physics.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Nice, but... by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People may say they feel whatever, but there are plenty of studies that show no correlation, or even an increase in crime.
       
      Light can be a great help to criminals. Not least of which they're easier to spot when waving a flashlight. Also, if your under a streetlight, EVERYBODY NOT under a light is automatically hidden from you. But when everyone is in equal lighting and can see equally, it's harder to hide.
       
          It's amazing how many people don't even know their eyes will adjust.

          Most probably some types of crime will go up and others will go down. I'll leave it to you type "street lights crime study" into google.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    9. Re:Nice, but... by DaveHowe · · Score: 2

      To be fair, you can usually get away with using better targeted, more directional lighting. Not only does focussing all the light down with appropriate reflectors mean less escapes skywards, but it means you can achieve the same levels of illumination with much lower power levels, saving money too..

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
    10. Re:Nice, but... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 2

      Erm, it's more to do with other people seeing that you are being assaulted. If you are in the light, you can be seen. If you are not, you can be attacked without anyone else being any the wiser. I think that was the reason all this happened.

    11. Re:Nice, but... by Hentes · · Score: 2

      Many lights serve only decorative purposes. Also, having everyone who wants to walk at night bring their own flashlight would be a lot more efficient.

    12. Re:Nice, but... by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2

      You are correct in that there are many factors different studies have tried to take into account. It depends on place too. Right now you could attack somebody in broad daylight on my street and nobody would see you. It's 20 degrees outside and people don't sit and look out their windows much. The fact remains that it's never been conclusive either way.
       
      We've had a rapist on the prowl in our area recently. He knocks on your door and then forces his way in. I'm pretty sure he doesn't care a whit about street lights.
       
      Rather than getting street lights up it is MUCH more effective to get employment up.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    13. Re:Nice, but... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      The capital of Australia, Canberra has street lighting designed like this. All lights have a small reflector cap on the top that ensure little light gets spilled upwards. This was done due to the close proximity of the capital to the Mt Stromilo Observatory.

      In reality though last time I walked around Canberra, while it does help it still does very little compared to taking a car out into the middle of nowhere. I remember taking some Japanese exchange students on a trip only 2 hours west of a major Australian city. They were in awe. They'd never seen the milky way before.

    14. Re:Nice, but... by mjr167 · · Score: 2

      We should lock them all up in their houses for protection and require them to have a male escort to go anywhere! They would be so much safer! You could then get rid of the rape laws because clearly any woman who manged to sneak away from her protectors to get raped really wanted it so its not rape. We can then burn her at the stake for being a whore and send the man to therapy for the trauma of being tempted by the evil, coniving temptress.

    15. Re:Nice, but... by Hentes · · Score: 2

      And how many incidents were before that? My guess is that your friend only became aware of crime after he got interested in the effects street lighting could have on it. Crime rates are higher during the night because there are less people, thus less witnesses on the streets. I have a hard time to believe that shining light on criminals will turn them lawful.

    16. Re:Nice, but... by ks*nut · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bullshit. The myth of lighting for security reasons is just that - a myth. Most outdoor lighting is still horribly inefficient in that it scatters light where it is not needed and wastes energy. And why are people so damned enamored of lighting tall buildings, billboards and street signs from below? There is also a lot of street lighting that doesn't light the street effectively and causes glare in drivers' eyes. Yes, I am an amateur astronomer and outdoor lighting (in general) sucks.

    17. Re:Nice, but... by bloodmusic · · Score: 3, Informative

      In British English—or, as the British say, "English"—"learned" is used in phrases such as "a learned professor", in which case it is pronounced with two syllables.
      Either "learnt" or "learned" are used interchangably in phrases like "I learnt a valuable lesson today".

    18. Re:Nice, but... by Xest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you completely missed his point.

      He pointed out that if everyone is in the same low level of light then everyone will see equally because their eyes will adjust, thus if someone is raping you you will be more easily seen in a dark bush by someone whose eyes are adjusted to the dark due to lack of lighting, whilst if someone has dragged you into a dark bush to rape you when they are walking in the light, because their eyes wont have adjusted to the dark it'll actually be harder for them to see you.

      What you say is only true if someone rapes you in the light, but what rapist is stupid enough to do that? Most happen after their victims have been dragged somewhere dark, where most people can't see because they're walking in the light and their eyes are adjusted to the light.

    19. Re:Nice, but... by smolloy · · Score: 2

      For astronomers that can actually be worse. For one, if they're not reducing the current through the light to take advantage that more of it is going to its intended target, then the increased reflected light from the street still causes light pollution. More importantly, those white lights emit all over the spectrum, and are incredibly hard to filter out. The ugly orange lights only emit at a couple of frequencies, and is very easy to filter out.

    20. Re:Nice, but... by mike449 · · Score: 2

      In Flagstaff, Arizona, you can see Milky Way from the downtown. I didn't research how bad is crime there, but when I was there I had a feeling of a safe place.

      http://www.flagstaffdarkskies.org/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Dark-Sky_Association

    21. Re:Nice, but... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My experience is that people who spent their formative years in the city feel more secure with more light, those who grew up in the country feel more secure with less light.

    22. Re:Nice, but... by simonbp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Crime is very low in Flagstaff, in fact among the lowest in the state: http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/az/crime/

      Flagstaff was the first Dark Sky City in the world, and achieved that by making nearly all outdoor lighting Low-Pressure Sodium (LPS) emission lamps. LPS is much lower power than High Pressure Sodium or Mercury (the typical alternatives), thus saving the city massive amounts of money on energy bills. In addition, LPS is monochromatic, making it easily blocked by even mildly sophisticated amateur astronomers. And the minimal skyglow has allowed the local research telescopes to survive, thus pumping tens of millions of dollars into the local economy.

      Speaking as a professional (and occasional amateur) astronomer, Flagstaff is much, much better off because its Dark Skies.

    23. Re:Nice, but... by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Few years back, there was an article in the Denver Post, one of those "10 Best Places in Denver" puff pieces. It offered the recently-built upscale subdivision of Highlands Ranch as the "Best Place For Stargazing" because it has "plenty of lights to illuminate the stars"...

      rj

    24. Re:Nice, but... by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      I wonder how it effects the distance one must travel out of town to see things get better though. I would think that would be where the real big advantage would be although that is just an untested (on my part anyway) guess. I know cities with normal lights make the sky a big pink mess in their direction from many miles away. Maybe this would be different?

    25. Re:Nice, but... by kimvette · · Score: 2

      The doesn't is wrong and the learnt is perfectly fine

      . . . and the "doesn't" is used in a perfectly cromulent way. :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  3. Fear of the dark... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in a very dark neighborhood... no streetlights within about a mile, and lots of trees (makes stargazing... challenging.) Unfortunately, some of the neighbors don't feel safe unless they leave lights running all night long. It's a very basic human trait: fear of the dark. We have less crime in my dark neighborhood than many nearby well-lit ones, but facts don't erase fear.

    1. Re:Fear of the dark... by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have less crime in my dark neighborhood than many nearby well-lit ones

      That's probably because burglars, too, fear the dark.

    2. Re:Fear of the dark... by Inda · · Score: 2

      Just like the Simpson's tra-map-poline joke, if you want something stolen in my neighbourhood, you add a padlock and chain.

      I have no light or even a fence at the bottom of my garden. All the garden tools are left where they fall (against a wall, normally) and yet they've never been stolen.

      Everyone else's sheds and garages are broken into yearly.

      Maybe the criminals are afraid of my dark and open garden?

      It's actually the stone flint pathways that puts them off. They're noisy to walk on.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:Fear of the dark... by tixxit · · Score: 2

      As an opposing point, I used to live in a neighbourhood where it was pretty common knowledge that if you didn't chain and padlock your BBQ to your house, it would be stolen within a couple weeks. Usually in daylight while people were at work/school. In this case, the thieves did go after the easiest targets.

  4. Amen to that by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've always lived in semi-rural or town areas in a fairly packed part of the UK. You can see a few stars on a good clear night but there's still a lot of light polution.
    I recently went on holiday to a farm in the middle of nowhere in the Yorkshire Dales. I was utterly astounded to find out you can actually see the Milky Way at night - it blew me away. I spent hours just lying on my back in the grass with my mouth open. Wine probably helped. I feel so bad I've missed such a wonder for all these years.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  5. No, they're not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You see, light causes shadows. And your pedestrian walking home at night will be walking in the light, therefore night blinded by the light (this is why you can't see as many stars at night in a lit street as opposed to your sheltered garden) that illuminates you and makes the shadows deeper.

    Meanwhile, the crafty mugger, hiding in the shadow, sees you well illuminated and highlighted out as a target and knows you cannot see them in the shadow, and jumps out on you and mugs you.

    The burglar can also see better to use his lockpicks to break into your house.

    Your "if they weren't serving any use, people wouldn't have them in the first place" is begging the question: did there have to be a use served for them to be left on 24/7?

    1. Re:No, they're not. by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

      I've heard advice that if you're at home and suspect somebody has broken in then you should turn all the lights out (or not turn them on at all). You know your way around in the dark, the intruder probably doesn't, so you're at an advantage. You can also shut your eyes tightly, turn a light on for a split second, turn it off, and bingo, you've got night vision and they don't.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  6. Home by SJHillman · · Score: 2

    This is why I like going back to my hometown, especially during the winter when the sky is cold and clear. Drive to the top of the nearest hill and you can see about ten billion more stars than possible within 20 miles of the city where I live now. My girlfriend grew up in the suburbs and is amazed by the sheer number of stars visible where I grew up. This is exactly the reason why we stick everybody in one big city in New York - so the rest of us in the state can still enjoy the great outdoors.

  7. Dark skies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I couple of years ago I went up to the middle of the Alleghany National Forest in the middle of the day (I live in a suburb of Pittsburgh) to wait until night to see what the skies were like from up there. I've been meaning to go to the Cherry Springs star parties for a while and missed my chance so I felt this would give me an idea of what some naked eye star gazing is like from a remote part of the woods.
     
    So I waited and the sky was really fantastic. I've never seen anything like that from around my local area. Even my local amateur observatory is overrun with light. It gives you a real appreciation for how good the skies can be given that even though I was in the middle of nowhere there was still some ground light.
     
    I wrapped it up around 1 AM because I just didn't want to be driving home half asleep. On the way home I came to one of the first semi-large populated areas (Kittanning, for those of you who know the local area) and I see a plume of light on the horizon. I was pissed to think that Kittanning was letting off so much light and the unbelievable contrast when compared to what I was enjoying the last couple of hours. Suddenly I started to realize that it wasn't light from Kittanning but instead was a nearly full moon rising. We simply don't get that kind of light from the moon when it's below the horizon. The light pollution is so bad that even that glow from the rising moon is washed out.
     
    It's a shame. It really is but I don't think society is going to roll back to sensible lighting habits for a handful of people who really want to see this kind of thing. After all, why watch the night sky when Survivor is on?

  8. worse than security theater? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Always consider the possibility that installing a light may aid criminal activity."

    http://www.britastro.org/dark-skies/crime.html#noreduction

    Bad guys who wave flashlights are easier to spot than bad guys who don't need extra lighting.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:worse than security theater? by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've had a woman complain at me for hanging around at 6:30 in the evening in a well lit area, just because the sky was dark. If it was 9PM in summer (when it's still bright as day here in Scotland), I doubt she'd have said anything at all.

      She kept saying things like "well, as a woman.. well, you know". And though I knew what she was trying to imply, I wanted her to come out and say it, so that she could hear how stupid it sounded. She never actually did get to the point though. If she was actually scared of me, she wouldn't have approached me and started chatting, she would have just called the Police.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:worse than security theater? by somersault · · Score: 2

      Well yeah, I was almost speechless at how retarded and insulting it was, but just didn't know what to say to something like that.

      Even though it was kind of obvious to me how ludicrous she was being, I couldn't figure out how to even start explaining it to her, because she was talking about feelings rather than logic. I also knew the feelings were based on absurd things like the sky being black instead of blue, despite the actual area we were in being effectively as bright as day and visible to pedestrians and passing cars. When I pointed those things out to her, she just continued to vaguely imply that I could be a rapist. It just seemed to me that when someone is that dumb, there is no reasoning with them.

      So many people just let themselves be brainwashed by horrible crap that they see on the news, and spend their time worrying they are going to be attacked by terrorists or raped or something, and as a result they make society miserable for everyone else. Obviously we have to take things like assault and rape seriously, but when you start implying that guys shouldn't be outside when it's dark, it's just depressing.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  9. International Dark Sky Association by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 4, Informative

    More info over at www.darksky.org . It costs a lot of money/oil to keep all those lights on. Is it worth it? Have your children seen the milky way?

    --
    Computers obey me.
  10. Well, you'd think, but no, not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most lights on are 80+% of the time being unused and just on "because who wants dark areas? The scary monsters might get you!"
    And you would think I was kidding, but humans are more afraid of the dark than most like to admit. Hiding behind about a hundred different excuses.
    I still know plenty of adults now who are scared hitless-missing-an-s of the dark. Like, genuinely scared.
    I'd be surprised if it was any lower than that to be honest.

    And more than anything, most lights are at a brightness WAY BEYOND anything needed for "safety".
    Yes, its fine if you use some nightlights to be able to see, but most of them are as bright as a desk light, if not brighter.
    That is completely unneeded.
    Most streetlights could be darkened by 75+% and still be useful for in-dwelling roads. (since, you know, CARS HAVE LIGHTS)
    In fact, it'd probably be slightly better since car lights would be noticeable around corners and the like compared to when street lights were AS BRIGHT AS THE SUN, so you would certainly know one was coming even if you were deaf.
    Imagine the energy saved by cutting all those probably thousands of streetlights in an average town, all those lights burning through that energy all night, not even needed by anyone.
    They aren't known as The Unsociable Hours for no reason, nobody is about, are they lighting the place up for the rats? (I know they technically go from 8 till 6, still)
    Not like cars need them, there aren't lights on the thousands of miles of road between towns.
    And humans technically should be wearing luminescent clothing at night in the first place if they actually want to be safe. Most don't due to ignorance and "it looks guff". Won't be saying that when you lose your arm.

    I rarely ever have the lights on after hours, besides some little LED lights to give basic definition to the room.
    Rarely being if other people were around, or if I am looking for anything.
    Anything that requires light should be done during the day is my thoughts on it.

    The amount of energy wasted on lights is horrendously awful. Same goes with heating. Overheating houses is the worst offense.
    Humans evolved OUTDOORS. Stop wasting money on so much heating. It annoys me greatly when someone is sitting there half naked and says "OH GOD ITS FREEZING PUT THE HEATING ON" or something like that. If you are too cold, put some clothes on damn it.
    Some people have heating up at ridiculous levels. I remember walking in to someones house once, in to the living room, it was like walking in to a sauna without the steam.
    I'm in Scotland at that. A place where it happily snows in the middle of a hot summer and nobody thinks twice about it.

  11. Yes... by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I don't normally respond to ACs - but you are right. At out last house the Council wanted to install a street light outside - at a cost of several thousand pounds. We demanded that they fit a reflective hood to keep the light away from our house, as I like to be able to see stars. They fussed a lot over a £10 add-on to an expensive streetlight which actually put more light where it was wanted.

    We got it. But why the argument was necessary in the first place I cannot imagine.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  12. The sky is unbelievable in the total dark. by fredrated · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About 35 years ago I got the chance to sail to Hawaii from San Francisco in a small (31') sail boat. Believe me, when you are 1000 miles from the nearest light the night sky is astounding. It is very obvious why the ancient people put so much stock in the night sky: it hangs over you like a presence you can feel.
    More recently I used to go to Death Valley for a good night sky, but that is becoming increasingly problematic. Even when there is no moon, there is so much light from Las Vegas and Los Angeles it looks like the moon about to rise (in two places!). *snif*

  13. Re:Nice, but... need better streetlamps by scharkalvin · · Score: 2

    Most outdoor lights are very wasteful because too much of the light doesn't go where it is needed. Most streetlights only throw about half of their output downward with the rest going sideways (and over the horizon toward the sky) or upwards. There ARE fully shielded streetlights that throw almost all of their light DOWNWARD and these can be of lower wattage to give the same effect without causing light pollution. Even better if they are low pressure sodium lamps which emit light on only two wavelengths of light that can be removed from telescopes and cameras with a simple filter. We need to outlaw all unshielded streetlamps and mandate the use of low pressure sodium lamps in them. Give cities 5 years to remove all existing old tech lighting. Not only will this give us back our skies, but will reduce our energy usage.

  14. IF people had the right light fixtures.... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This would be reduced significantly.

    Honestly, the U of M did this. they threw away all the crap street and building exterior lighting and replaced them with fixtures that do not waste light by spraying it upwards and sideways. All light is controlled.

    IT made a huge difference to the light pollution around their observatory on campus.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  15. Cruise Ships by camperdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish the cruise ships I'd travelled on had done this. It would have been awesome being in the middle of the ocean and seeing the stars. But no... the whole upper deck was brilliantly lit and there were strings of multicolored party lights hanging over the deck.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Cruise Ships by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hrm. I bet if there were enough interest, a cruise line might be willing to make a "stargazers" cruise and set-up with some telescopes/binoculars and some good astronomy teachers to show you how and where to look and use the equipment, etc... And, of course, alcohol. That's a cruise I might be interested in...

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:Cruise Ships by danwiz · · Score: 2

      The best night sky I've seen is in the midddle of the Mediterranian on a US Navy ship, during "wartime steaming" status. All running lights are out, and all exits to the ourside are double-doored with red lights between. There were so many stars visible that it looked fake.

  16. THIS is what I see from my area: by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Taken with a Canon EOS 50D camera -- no telescope.

    These too, though you have to be somewhat northerly to see this stuff.

    THAT is what YOU could see, if you could get your town to turn off the lights.

    Streetlights? Phooey. Just carry a flashlight. They also make special lamps that don't reflect a lot of light upwards if you must have light (why???)

    You -- and especially your kids, if you have any -- are missing a heck of a lot if you live, as most do, in the midst of light pollution.

    Trust me on this one: Outdoor artificial lighting is overrated.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.