Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Funding a $50 Drone-Droppable Spy Computer

Sparrowvsrevolution writes "At the Shmoocon security conference, researcher Brendan O'Connor plans to present the F-BOMB, or Falling or Ballistically-launched Object that Makes Backdoors. Built from just the disassembled hardware in a commercially-available PogoPlug mini-computer, a few tiny antennae, eight gigabytes of flash memory and some 3D-printed plastic casing, the F-BOMB serves as 3.5"-by-4"-by-1" spy computer. With a contract from DARPA, O'Connor has designed the cheap gadgets to be spy nodes, ready to be dropped from a drone, plugged inconspicuously into a wall socket, (one model impersonates a carbon monoxide detector) thrown over a barrier, or otherwise put into irretrievable positions to quietly collect data and send it back to the owner over any available Wi-Fi network. O'Connor built his prototypes with gear that added up to just $46 each, so sacrificing one for a single use is affordable."

86 comments

  1. this is awesome by masternerdguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    But what happened to using cockroaches as the spies of the future?

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:this is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keith Richards sued.

  2. Funding by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I drop F-bombs all the time, at a considerably cheaper cost.

    --
    And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
    1. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess that explains why your enemies developed those SOAP missiles. They're great for dealing with F-bombs. :)

    2. Re:Funding by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      SOAP got put on the shelf. Haven't you been paying attention to current affairs?

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    3. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard Congress was thinking about dropping the SOAP.

  3. Re:Cockroaches by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 5, Funny

    They respond unfavorably to being impacted by a presidential shoe.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  4. Report over WiFi??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it normal for a warzone to have functioning WiFi?

    1. Re:Report over WiFi??? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Is it normal for a warzone to have functioning WiFi?

      Sure, just like it's normal to take things that drop out of the sky and plug them into the wall.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Report over WiFi??? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Is it normal for a warzone to have functioning WiFi?

      At the rate Iran is going, with creating its own walled-off internet you may find it, but it can't communicate out.

      As for North Korea .. pfft. There's probably only one cell phone in the country and it's in the hands of Dear Chubby and absolutely no Star Bucks.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Report over WiFi??? by masternerdguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have limited access cyber cafes that run a government monitored and filtered internet via a North Korean Linux distribution. Linux being used as a tool of oppression really pisses me off.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    4. Re:Report over WiFi??? by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      As for North Korea .. pfft. There's probably only one cell phone in the country and it's in the hands of Dear Chubby and absolutely no Star Bucks.

      Yeah, that'd be ample reason to invade them. Gotta be a bigtime market there for cheap throwaway cell phones, overpriced coffee and all the rest of the 'benefits' of 'civilisation'. They find any oil under Pyongyang yet?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    5. Re:Report over WiFi??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was oil, we'd be halfway there, but there's that little issue of the nukes, too.

      The US doesn't attack anyone that could defend themselves or retaliate.

    6. Re:Report over WiFi??? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      What exactly are you imagining a "warzone" is in this day and age?

    7. Re:Report over WiFi??? by Esteanil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, just like it's normal to take things that drop out of the sky and plug them into the wall.

      Yup, that's normal.

      According to a test run by Homeland Security:

      Computer disks and USB sticks were dropped in parking lots of government buildings and private contractors, and 60% of the people who picked them up plugged the devices into office computers. And if the drive or CD had an official logo on it, 90% were installed.

      Borrowed from Bruce Schneier ( http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2011/06/yet_another_peo.html )

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    8. Re:Report over WiFi??? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      And if the drive or CD had an official logo on it, 90% were installed

      What, like Vestron Video or Vivid Entertainment?

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    9. Re:Report over WiFi??? by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also Borrowed from the same source:

      The problem is that the OS trusts random USB sticks. The problem is that the OS will automatically run a program that can install malware from a USB stick. The problem is that it isn't safe to plug a USB stick into a computer.

      To which the proper response is:

      The problem is the operating system you've chosen Mr. Schneier.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Report over WiFi??? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      What exactly are you imagining a "warzone" is in this day and age?

      Cleveland?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Report over WiFi??? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Is it normal for a warzone to have functioning WiFi?"

      Soon, impatient one, soon....

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Report over WiFi??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know Mr. Schneier doesn't actually get to choose the OS for every machine in the world (much as he might like to), right? As long as some people (most of whom are neither the famous security analyst Bruce Schneier, nor any other Mr. Schneier) do in fact choose Windows for real installations, that makes Windows's trust of random USB sticks a real problem. What sort of security analyst do you suppose sticks their head in the sand?

      Moreover, whatever OS you'd favor (I'd guess Linux, though with a 5-digit UID you've probably actually heard of other free *N*Xen) is likely vulnerable as well. No, not to the simple autorun approach, since it doesn't trust filesystems -- but it probably does trust USB sticks plugged in. Say the USB stick contains a hub, a mass storage device, and an HID* -- can you tell me your favored OS, in a typical desktop config, will not accept keystrokes and pointer commands from the HID?

      * I'm sure it's obvious, but the HID could either inject a stored keystroke sequence (e.g. to download an exploit from the internet), or receive remote commands via RF -- combine with a TEMPEST rig to maximize shits and giggles.

    13. Re:Report over WiFi??? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for you, part of the definition of Free software is that the license can't discriminate against persons or groups, and the license can't discriminate against fields of endeavor.

      Of course, with the "integrity of the author's source code" clause, Linus et. al could force Best Korea to use a name other than "Linux" (or whatever app/chunk-o-code/etc you care to think about) in order to protect the reputation of the name "Linux".

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    14. Re:Report over WiFi??? by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they build a mesh network! That's why they drop 1000.

    15. Re:Report over WiFi??? by subk · · Score: 1

      To which the proper response is:

      The problem is the operating system you've chosen Mr. Schneier.

      Umm... Windows has a policy kit. Have you heard of it?

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  5. Cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you really want to break the enemy send them a Nintendo Wii.

    1. Re:Cheaper by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      If you really want to break the enemy send them a Nintendo Wii.

      The advice of Jimmy Buffett - Fly over and drop millions of five dollar bills. A week later, fly over and drop off mail order catalogs. Peace, full employement and um.. underwear.

      Often wondred if that approach would actually be more effective.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Cheaper by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, in most places where we might want to do such a thing, the local government/warlords would drive around, take all the money, and kill anyone who tried to keep some for themselves.

    3. Re:Cheaper by RDW · · Score: 1

      Often wondred if that approach would actually be more effective.

      Well, they pretty much tried it last time:

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/feb/08/usa.iraq1

  6. Really.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're calling it the F-BOMB? Fuck that.

  7. Coverage? Can you hear me now? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "over any available Wi-Fi network."

    In cities this may not be a problem (though who runs an unencrypted Wifi AP in the city?!!?!?) but in rural areas I suspect WIFI may be hard to come by. It needs a better backup.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  8. So, if I demonstrate dropping one of these... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    on TV will the FCC fine me?

  9. Re:Cockroaches by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    So does the spy listening to the audio signal coming in from the cockroach.

  10. Progress of World Wars? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Once said, the next World War will be conducted with Nuclear weapons, the one following will be conducted with sticks and stones.

    Looks like things are playing out a bit different.

    The next World War to be conducted over networks by millions of tiny spybots?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Progress of World Wars? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In either case, most of the actual fighting will be done by small robots. And as you go forth today remember always your duty is clear: To build and maintain those robots.

      Quote from an episode of The Simpsons.

    2. Re:Progress of World Wars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. We know.

      Do you have any insightful XKCDs to post?

  11. Re:Coverage? Can you hear me now? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    "over any available Wi-Fi network."

    In cities this may not be a problem (though who runs an unencrypted Wifi AP in the city?!!?!?) but in rural areas I suspect WIFI may be hard to come by. It needs a better backup.

    So avoid AT&T territory...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  12. Not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hope we never meet. People who build stuff for the military are not welcome here. No, it's not cool that "one of us" gets DARPA funding. Security researcher? Arms dealer!

    1. Re:Not welcome by echo_kmem · · Score: 2

      Not all of 'us' feel as you do. Most of 'us' do it purely out of curiosity, not because we want to impress some stranger on a forum somewhere. Hackers make the world go round, money keeps the bills paid. So just because he won't be welcomed in your basement does not mean I won't invite him down to mine.

    2. Re:Not welcome by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      imo, awesome new weapons tech == good

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    3. Re:Not welcome by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Where is "here"?

      The world has always been a nasty place and being able to wage war is useful.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Not welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just like your opinion, man. I've got no problems with military research; wouldn't mind joining such a project myself.

    5. Re:Not welcome by houstonbofh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Internet was one of those things built for the military... Funded by DARP too. Doh!

  13. Not as usable as you think by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    They might be great against an adversary that knows they're being actively surveilled or to gather data in real time, but there's nothing covert about this. You're not going to see them dropping these on targets of interest that they want to remain unaware that they're being watched.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Not as usable as you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $46, you could drop a million of them. Now imagine having enough boots on the ground to *remove every single one of them.*

    2. Re:Not as usable as you think by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      For $46, you could drop a million of them. Now imagine having enough boots on the ground to *remove every single one of them.*

      Or more realistically, the enemy will just relocate.

    3. Re:Not as usable as you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he can get out from under a million spy computers

  14. Re:Coverage? Can you hear me now? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Pretty easy on my brother's farm- there are loads of places where we have NO cell signals at all.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  15. An interesting use for Raspberry Pi by scottbomb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article doesn't say, but I suspect the computer is Raspberry Pi. Throw in a cellphone-based modem, camera, and microphone and you've got yourself a spy.

    1. Re:An interesting use for Raspberry Pi by echo_kmem · · Score: 1

      I think the Raspberry Pi's are targeted for Schools and Developing Countries, I do not think they are available to the public, least at this time. PogoPlugs have been around a bit and seem to run twice as much as the suggested on the Raspberry Pi's. http://www.amazon.com/Pogoplug-Media-Sharing-Device-Remote/dp/B005DB6NG6/ref=dp_cp_ob_e_title_1

    2. Re:An interesting use for Raspberry Pi by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      Nevermind the PI's are JUST NOW starting production, its in the fucking second sentence!

      "Built from just the disassembled hardware in a commercially-available PogoPlug mini-computer"

      now goto a website called google.com and type in PogoPlug and see what pops up ... now is that a Raspberry PI?

      damnit man!

    3. Re:An interesting use for Raspberry Pi by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Raspberry Spi?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:An interesting use for Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Built from just the hardware in a commercially-available PogoPlug mini-computer"
      I'm pretty sure it does say, and no, it's not an RPi. :)

    5. Re:An interesting use for Raspberry Pi by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      It is easier and cheaper just to con sheeple into paying for the phone. They will keep it charged so the spying package works properly.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  16. Not exactly "drone deliverable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article had a pic of one disguised within a Carbon Monoxide Detector. That's not exactly a form-factor that could be deliverable by a drone, or is a drone the new DARPA employee?

    I wouldn't mind doing some shady activities to get the attention of DARPA, and they can install one of these discreetly in my easy-chair and I'll induct enough electrical disturbance so they bring me another couple and I'll flash them together so I can run some shells for wget to point at their website endlessly like what LOIC does. I wonder if maybe their software runs like Tivo and I don't even need to replace all their shit but maybe just spawn another shell to run what I want and cripple their ssh/telnet and top and ps console tools to not show my wget process on the tasklist. hmmm, endless posibilities.

    1. Re:Not exactly "drone deliverable" by swalve · · Score: 1

      I think the goal is to drop "interesting" things. A single CO detector isn't interesting, but maybe a case of them is. Someone sees a single thing sitting there, it looks suspicious. But you see a shipping case full of things? "Whoops, it fell off a truck."

  17. Similar project with less hardware hacking by bongk · · Score: 2

    I recently started a similar project based on the $23 TPLink TL-WR703N travel router. Without any need for soldering or other "hardware hacking" you can build a battery-operated network drop box running OpenWrt linux.
    http://www.minipwner.com/

    There is a serial interface on the circuit board for the WR703N but you have to crack the box and do some soldering to connect to it. I've been toying with the idea to do just that to interface it with an arduino/parallax processor or sensors or whatever. I'm also playing with connecting a USB sound card and adding a microphone to record audio in the local range of the box.

  18. Re:Report over WiFi??? or power by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Is it normal for a warzone to have functioning WiFi?

    Sure, just like it's normal to take things that drop out of the sky and plug them into the wall.

    Well, if they're USB 3.0, sure.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  19. Oblig by pesho · · Score: 2

    Can you build a Beowulf cluster if a B52 carpet bombs you with these?

  20. Re:Coverage? Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How big is a 3g module? Does the enemy sell prepaid sim-cards by mail-order to foreign lands or could we do roaming? At least we could use this thing with 3g in our country against our citizens...

    Seriously, though (and I didn't rtfa), wouldn't one want to ruggedize the board itself and not go with an off-the-shelf plug computer?

    And as for great firewalls and government control of the internet and such, they could load it with FreedomBox (sooner or later) to have it use TOR and mesh networking (later) and stuff. Possibly at least as ironic as any of the examples in that song...

    It's like ra-e-ain
    on your wedding day

    It's the wo-o-orld bully
    using freedombox to oppress you

    isn't ironic, don't you think?

  21. Hide them in cell phones by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Flood the market of the target country with modified cheap cell phones that include this capability hidden inside. Presto, involuntary Spy Nation! Maybe so US cell carriers have some experience that they could share here with the technology.

    The higher ups in such countries will want to have contraband high-end smart phones. Stuff 'em with all kinds of spy goodies, including a remotely activated battery bomb. When some particularly nasty critter answers the phone, relieve him of the weight on his shoulders.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Hide them in cell phones by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      If you're going to perform an act of war, it would be best to target their military installations. Targeting the general public with Trojan Remote Detonation Phones just might cause a bit more backlash than needed.

    2. Re:Hide them in cell phones by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

      Not if you're fighting an insurgency made up of folks who are not affiliated with a military.

  22. Wifi? That's secure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the whole point of bugging someone (spy wise, not by repeatedly poking them in the arm) was that they would not know about it.

    Any monkey with a $25 Ralink adapter and a copy of Backtrack can pretty much uncover/uncloak and record just about any Wifi network out there. Yeah, it might be WPA2 encrypted, but there's nothing stopping you from figuring out where the source is or determining the presence of an unidentified emitter. I personally mapped out my entire house, and using a set of coloured heat maps I can practically draw a radius around an emission point to determine where my neighbours APs are located within their houses. So if my smoke alarm or CO2 detector was emitting an 802.11 compliant signal, I'd know about it. And you can be damned sure that- if that unit didn't explicitly market a Wifi feature- I'd take it out on the driveway and go Office Space on its ass.

    This whole project reeks of another off-the-shelf military project, actually. I don't think they're using Wifi because they have to, but rather because it's cheap and you can get lots of cheap parts to build stuff with that happen to run on 802.11. Reminds me of an article I read once about a fairly hefty piece of military equipment. Some dude found some robotic parts in a warehouse, and wanted to know what they came off of because of the strange controls associated with the HID portion of what he bought. When he traced it back and found some more equipment from the same project for sale, among those things was a friggin' WRT54G Linksys router with a few cables soldered to it for remote status LEDs.

    But I'm sure the defence contractor is charging a couple million for a lame idea and $30 worth of parts.

    -AC

    1. Re:Wifi? That's secure. by swalve · · Score: 1

      Not if the thing only turns on briefly, and the data is gone by the time they find it.

  23. WTF by wbr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you drop it from a drone? Some retard is going to say oh, look a free carbon monoxide detector. I need to plug this into my mud hut next to my poppy field, how convenient! If you have to have them plugged in, why not just send them with the troops?

    If we can make tracking devices that we use on whales, sharks, bears, etc, that are self powered, unobtrusive to the animal, and auto-upload to satellite or base station, we have to rely on some twerp plugging in the device -and- for free WiFi to be available for a military device? Pshaw.

    And people complain about dropping DARPA funding. With idiotic projects like this we damn sure should.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The carbon monoxide detector was merely a cited example. FTFA: "'It can fit whatever use case you want,' he says. 'Put it in a box of stale Triscuits in the office kitchen, and no one will touch it. Or hide it in a carbon monoxide detector and you can leave it there for months.'"

      And people complain about dropping public education funding. With terrible reading comprehension like this we damn sure should.

    2. Re:WTF by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Strap a battery on it and they can drop it inside a rugged plastic case some unobtrusive solar collectors and it'd have days+ of runtime, capable of sitting in a field or roadside w/o anyone noticing.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:WTF by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      So, you are going to drop a stale box of Triscuits from a drone into a break room. What technology performs that miracle?

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    4. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do would you be limited to just those examples? If dropped by a drone near a small primitive village, you could disguise it as some animal turd. Probably nobody will take notice of it then and it could record the comings and goings for a very long time!

  24. Thumb drives by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 2

    Why not just drop $1.00 thumb drives loaded with spying software? 95% of the folks that find them will simply plug them into their computers (home or work) and "you're in".

  25. Re:Coverage? Can you hear me now? by icebike · · Score: 1

    >Seriously, though (and I didn't rtfa), wouldn't one want to ruggedize the board itself and not go with an off-the-shelf plug computer?

    Go ahead and read the article, we will wait.......

    The article talks about a number of different things, wall-wart style from the plug computer that an insider can park in a broom closet, to the innocuous looking useful device (gas leak detector, smoke alarm) that you hope to dupe some local into picking up and plugging in.

    The story also talked about AA battery powered devices which would just be tossed into the shrubbery or air dropped. Realistically these would never have enough battery power to last long enough to crack even basic wifi encryption, let alone transfer any meaningful amount of data. Probably intended to last just long enough for dumping a worm or virus onto the local wifi.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  26. Domestic use by enrevanche · · Score: 1

    It seems the real use of these would be domestic spying where wifi is more likely available. Even more likely is eventually equipping them with 3g or 4g. This would be usable in the US where for a fee they could get a wireless company or two to cooperate.

  27. All have become enemies foreign and domestic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I were ever impaneled on a jury and this sort of thing were submitted as evidence by the prosecution and the defendant were "majority", nullification.

    I am WHITE
    I eat PORK
    I own PROPERTY
    How DARE you treat those like me and those as one would the enemy for the sake of buying crude petroleum and selling Treasuries!

    1. Re:All have become enemies foreign and domestic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dare you to make less sense.

  28. OMFG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay, first, can we stop naming things so they'll come out with acronyms that mean funny things? As founder of the Society That Ostensibly Pushes Termination of Hilarious Atrocities Today, or S.T.O.P. T.H.A.T., I can tell you we work diligently to bring this kind of nonsense to a halt. Why can't the government come up with better names like in the old days, with Carnivore and Echelon, Blackhawk, and the Thud?

    Second... how is that made from parts from a mini-computer? A Mini-computer is the size of a fridge. Have we forgotten that, and so now the microcomputer is just the computer, and now the "mini-computer" is the new, even smaller than a microcomputer? So I guess soon, they'll have computers you can fit into the gemstone setting on a ring, and they'll call THOSE microcomputers. This is particularly a shame because I was looking forward to nanocomputers, picocomputers, and femptocomputers. But I guess we're just going to keep reusing computer, mini-computer, and microcomputer.

    Sad.

  29. power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    power is always a problem

  30. Re:Coverage? Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plug-in GSM modules can be had for $50 new (plus SIM card).

  31. Re:Coverage? Can you hear me now? by condition-label-red · · Score: 1

    Who's to say it would not be capable of cracking WEP, etc. to get access to encrypted APs? It seems that the encryption on many APs is (reasonably) crackable these days.

    --
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  32. Stupid Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our government is teaching the world, and eventually we will have infinitely cheap spybots patrolling the planet. You wont even know which ones belong to which government.

  33. Geek's Paradise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electronic parts falling from the sky. It sounds like hacker manna. My first thought was actually that they could throw these in a melting pot and get some metals out of them; but I suspect you'd need way too many for it to be worth it.

  34. BS by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    because of SSID and passwords.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  35. That term, "mini-computer"... by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > Built from just the disassembled hardware in a ... mini-computer,
    > ... the F-BOMB serves as 3.5"-by-4"-by-1" spy computer.

    I don't think the summary author knows what it means.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  36. 3D printed casing? by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they used the most modern technology to make something more fugly and less rugged than a $5 Bud box.

  37. mass production approach by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Why just not install the "F-bomb" into each operation system at the factory? Why spread them from airplanes? Nowadays almost each computer has got a mike and a camera.

    And activate it only when necessary by a special encrypted signal from the central office. What could possibly go wrong?

  38. Old idea from but you can soon make your own cheap by Stu101 · · Score: 1

    As above, this idea was first put onto paper with the set of books How to Steal a continent and was called a creeper box.

    I wanted to do the same with a rasperberrypi when they first come out, as it again is dirt cheap and has all the requirements (save a compatable wifi). It has no moving parts, draws a very small amount of power.

    The only issue I'd have is could a battery package be made small enough to provide several weeks of uptime without making it huge ?

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.