Slashdot Mirror


Some Windows 8 Laptops May Come With Built-In Kinect Sensors

An anonymous reader writes to point out reports that Asus is "working on a new laptop that will include Kinect gestures and will be compatible with Windows 8," and adds, "What does this mean for the consumer? Portable gestures in Windows 8!" Wired has an article based on the same report, which mentions also the prospect of devices incorporating alternative gesture-tracking software from SoftKinectic and others.

140 comments

  1. This could be amazing for the disabled by assemblerex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope they make it have fine enough resolution it will work for challenged people.

    1. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Vecanti · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have Parkinson's you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not very much, or not in laptops at least.

      Kinect's recommendations were something like "at least 1.8m from sensor", not very useful with laptop. It leaves only face gestures recognition.

      But, well, if you limit "challenged people" to "quadriplegic", yep, that would be a lot of help.

    3. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Kinect's recommendations were something like "at least 1.8m from sensor"

      Maybe its a different sensor.

    4. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Gibgezr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I bet they are designing/calibrating these ones for closer use.

    5. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Vecanti · · Score: 2

      I have Bell's Palsy you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      Is that you, Rocky? Peter Petrelli perhaps?!

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by sbrown7792 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the new kinects that microsoft have been (are going to?) sell specifically for the PC (at a higher price, of course) were designed with a different sensor, such that the user could be much closer to the kinect than previously. This probably was the stepping stone for these new laptops.

    8. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by EdIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know I was confused for a moment because I work with "challenged" people all the time, until I realized you might have meant physically challenged people.

      Seriously though, how is extra resolution on the kinect sensor going to help physically challenged people? I know some people that have challenges like that and I don't see how extra resolution is going to help with recognizing their hand gestures. I would think that training the software would be far more effective and required because each challenged person is going to have different "quirks" to their movements that need to be learned.

      Having that sensor alone as a standard on laptops going forward, regardless of resolutions, seems to open the doors for software to help all sorts of people interact with their computers more effectively and easily.

      Of course, ironically, one of the last articles had a poster with ALS being lambasted because he did not take the time to cut and paste from his blog instead of just linking to it. The Jerk! I know right? Would extra resolution help with somebody like Stephen Hawking to recognize facial twitches reliably?

    9. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its probably just like the long range one works from 1.8 to 3 metres and the short range one works from 0.2 to 0.5 metres.

    10. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget that. I want to have a password in the form of an interpretive dance.

    11. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 2

      even if you don't have parkinsons, it might look like it sometimes...

    12. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you hold my penis?

    13. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you hadn't told us he was retarded, I would have assumed he was black.

    14. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kinect 2 has near mode that can see position fingers.

    15. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a position finger you dyslexic fuck?

    16. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a figure gesture for you ....

    17. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Q: What do you call a retarded nigger?

      A: A nigger!

    18. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the poster means that if it can recognize more subtle movements like by individual fingers, it would be more useful. I don't think they're talking about quirks.

    19. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is a different sensor, which was discussed on Slashdot recently. Microsoft announced it as CES 2012 - basically it's a special version for Desktop / PC use and it's useful range is from 30cm or there abouts. They've also released some APIs and so on, which will still work with the Xbox 360 1.8m version, but only while in beta. It's actually pretty cool and I am looking forward to it. I think it's the best way to get touchscreen like interface options, without the bad idea that having a touch screen laptop or desktop would be. It's one of the few IT announcements I am actually excited about, of late. (And please, because I know it is the fad on /. these days to accuse anyone who is positive on any MS product of being a paid shill, feel free to check my years long commenting history, much of which is -ve of MS. I am not a paid shill for MS. It just happens that I really like what I've seen of this product - albeit none of which has been in person; I've only seen product demos on youtube, etc, so perhaps the real thing actually sucks).

      I remember seeing the Samsung touch screen see through Window on youtube, from CES and think Kinect, coupled with Windows like that, would make for a pretty awesome house! :-)

    20. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I hope they make it have fine enough resolution it will work for challenged people.

      It could.

      One of the interesting things about Kinect is that it has two VGA imagers - an IR one (for depth) and an RGB one (for visuals). The problem is that the Xbox360's USB port can't handle the data required so the IR imager is only generating QVGA images. The end result of this is fine details like hands are resolved only into well, blocks. It's why there are no finger gestures - there's insufficient depth information to figure out the fingers.

      (The Xbox360 can theoretically do 30MB/sec through the USB port, but it's nowhere near that (it's roughly half). 1 VGA imager produces 0.3MB of information, at 30FPS, that's 9MB/sec. If both ran at VGA, you're talking about 18MB/sec for imaging information, plus we need 4 audio channels).

      The PC should be able to handle 2x VGA imagers, maybe even higher res imagers which should get you even more detailed depth imaging and be able to pick finer details. Even at VGA Kinect should be able to pick the general shape of the hand.

    21. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      If it works as "well" as some of the other camera software I wouldn't bet the farm on it buddy. of course trying to support people with physical problems is a royal bitch anyway, I ended up having to get one of those graphics pads with a ton of shortcuts for a relative who has some days of trouble typing because every kind of voice recognition software i tried couldn't make heads or tails out of what he said because his breathing treatments caused just enough changes to his voice day to day to throw the software off.

      Personally though I've had nothing but good luck with Asus laptops and netbooks so I say if anybody can pull it off they can. if you haven't tried one of their ExpressGate enabled laptops or netbooks you really should, its brilliant, I get anywhere from 7 to 8 hours on EG on my 1215B depending on Wifi strength and over 6 hours on Win 7 HP X64, this on a 6 cell that weighs only 3 pounds, hell thanks to the AMD E-350 having hardware acceleration its nearly 6 hours watching 720p HD video, great when I'm stuck at the doctor's office, and the whole thing only cost me $350 with 8gb of RAM and a nice little carrying case. Even after the flooding you can pick up the same model for like $450 so if they can do that and still make a profit while handing out Home instead of crappy Starter I'm sure if anyone can make it work Asus can.

      Funnily enough the only thing i don't really care for is the webcam on my 1215b as its seriously low res but i suppose its good enough for video chat but I'm sure a higher res camera would have made the price jump. of course i doubt MSFT is giving this tech away for free so i wonder how much having kinect built in will bump the price, its not like MSFT can make it up on games like they can with the X360. asus does have their own gamestore built into expressgate though, i wonder if they'll hack kinect to work with EG? Kinda ironic if they do as expressgate is Linux based and you know how most diehard Linux users would rather chew on broken glass than have MSFT anything on their systems. Just as well that Asus doesn't sell Linux EEEs anymore I guess, this would probably get them boycotted. I suppose it would make for an interesting social experiment though, announce a new Linux laptop with built in kinect and see if the simultaneous desire to cheer and boo would cause the diehards head to asplode.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    22. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Is this a variation of political correctness saying we can't call retards retards?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    23. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retarded - slow or limited in intellectual or emotional development or academic progress

      While colloquially it means 'a person who has a mental illness', that's a new usage. Mental Retardation was at one time used to academically replace words like 'cretin' and 'feeble minded'. However, due to the nature of the human population it was used to describe, people in arguments eventually started to use it as an insult. For example one might say 'only a retard would vote for the GOP', and in reality most of them aren't quite that dumb.

    24. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By challenged, do you mean Italian?

    25. Re:This could be amazing for the disabled by xmorg · · Score: 1

      And even more amazing if you could disable it.

  2. Can we get the systems with windows 7? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    With the big changes in windows 8 I don't think alot of people will want it right a way.

    1. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Doubt it. When Vista came out, there were tons of laptops people wanted to buy explicitly to wipe Vista and put XP on them, but the few I knew that tried had a ton of driver issues and all sorts of other problems. Granted, this was within the first month or so of Vista launch, so it could have taken a while for the XP drivers for the hardware to get out there, but it was pretty broken at first.

      I would expect similar issues with Windows 8 hardware, especially the Kinect sensors. I wouldn't be surprised if they just required Windows 8 completely.

    2. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      Most consumers use the version of Windows that came with their PC so the vast majority of buyers of new PCs will be using Windows 8. And seeing as Windows 7 appears to have gone down rather well with most Windows users, I think Windows 8 probably will too. It's not drastically different on the outside compared to Windows 7 except for the inclusion of Metro UI, which today's average smartphone / tablet type user might actually like.

    3. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by CodeReign · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think Windows eight will suck for no other reason than it doesn't follow mod2. You only ever purchase the mod2 of windows. 98 sucked 98 2nd edition didn't me/2000 xp/vista/seven there is a shit version before a non-shit version historically speaking. Though some features look nice. Perhaps this new filesystem will be worth it's weight in diamonds.

    4. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      It wont be the same and Windows 7 will be there. That was only true for the first 3 months of Vista where OEMS had a rude awakening.

      I am struggling to get my parents to leave XP. There excuse is its a new computer they bought in Christmas 2007 ( a year after Vista). My father is not a computere genius but he reads the news and knows Vista was a POS and Dell advertised their XP 64 line of XPS for consumers and not just business users.

      Most OEMs this time arround will learn the lesson and offer both or have drivers. The driver model is windows 7 64 bit for Windows 8 and many corporations are just trying to leave XP now and will still be this summer when Windows 8 hits the streets. Windows 7 will be the new XP of the 2010s. Like Vista Metro is not mature yet and has some many issues for desktop productivity.Windows 7 will install fine and OEMs this time around will anticipate a demand for Windows 7 after the Vista disaster.

      Who knows MS may work ont he desktop and add the start button back, add overlapping Windows, add a task bar for multiple apps on big screens, and better mouse controls by this fall so who knows. I think GUI designers are so used to whiny users who bitch about change that they assume every complaint is just that rather than realize the lack of input oriented, multitasking friendly, UI, is a serious problem. Not a WA Wa where is my start button, etc.

    5. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have not met a single person who likes Windows 8. Average Joes look at the screen funny and then ask why is this computer pretending to be a cell phone?

      Metro on Windows Phone 7 rocks and has great reviews but I am not blowing dough to leave tweets on tweetorama as the vast majority of users use PCs for work now and let their phones and tablets waste such time.

      I think it will bomb. Especially in the corporate environment. Many will be resentful and angry as after staying with IE 6/XP for 12 years the last thing they want is to use a 3 year old OS and standardize on IE 8 and get shit up the creek yet again (this time in only 7 years instead of 12). If they choose Windows 8 the users will FREAK OUT not being able to have 5 windows open at once, no task bar, no search function like their is in Windows 7, and people using tweeteroma instead of office working. The METRO versions of Office are just cheap notepad like functionality. Switch to desktop and you can't stay there. Since search is gone when you hit the Windows key you are back in the annoying Cell phone land UI. The gui is schzo and if Windows 9 gets rid of the desktop all hell will break loose and Macs might not look that bad in the corporate envrionment. /bitch
      I worked freelancing and in a pc shop wipping Windows Vista and 7 with XP. Yes consumers are actually willing to pay money to go back to Xp as late as 2010. Seriously. Ms is right but wrong in so many ways. The gui is the future ... just not with multitasking with big monitors. Metro 2.0 needs to address these shortcomings.

    6. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by dead_cthulhu · · Score: 1

      Depending on how long MS supports 7 (and given that yeah, most users do stick with the version it comes with), 8 may have quite a number of people hold off from hardware upgrades until something better comes along. It's really a pity that MS, Apple and Canonical seem determined to foist tablet OSes onto laptops and workstations. It's a serious regression. Windows 7 is actually good, I'll admit to keeping it on a spare partition on the laptop and a copy under Virtualbox on the Desktop. Apple had just about everything right with Snow Leopard, but now they're moving closer and closer to iOS on the mac.

      All of this makes me quite glad that I can use any DE I want on Linux.

    7. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by LocalH · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your mod2 theory falls flat because XP wasn't shit and Vista was (immensely so). 98 didn't suck either, at least not as bad as 95. The only thing that really sucked about ME was the removal of real mode DOS (yes, I know, there are mods available to bring this back, but that requires modifying system files and so IMO is only useful for hobby or bullshit usage).

      One does have to admit that Vista is way better than any 9x-based OS simply because it has the stronger NT underpinnings that make it more secure and reliable. And that half of the major "complaints" were just because something changed that they didn't like (for example, for a while there it seemed that people actually liked it when RAM went completely unused because I heard tons of bitching about SuperFetch). Also, UAC is a good thing, and the main problems with it were actually not UAC failings per se (like the hassle of trying to copy files into a protected folder and getting IIRC three or four dialogs to click through - this was an Explorer issue, as it did not happen with Directory Opus). 7 is heaps better than Vista, however.

      --
      FC Closer
    8. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I'm confident Microsoft is working really hard with their hardware partners to ensure that their innovative W8 platforms are in no way compatible with prior versions of Windows and cannot be made so. They've learned this lesson well. The locked bootloader requirement for WoA should be your first clue that they don't want people buying this stuff for unapproved uses. Avoid.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      All of this makes me quite glad that I can use any DE I want on Linux.

      Nothing prevents you from using alternative DEs on Windows. Other than the lack of interest in creating them.

    10. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am struggling to get my parents to leave XP.

      Why don't you just let them use what they want to use? You sound like a real asshole of a son.

    11. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by dead_cthulhu · · Score: 1

      An interest that might develop once Win8 comes out.

    12. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The locked bootloader requirement for WoA should be your first clue that they don't want people buying this stuff for unapproved uses. Avoid.

      Wow.. you're a mind reader?! Please tell us more about what Microsoft is going to do. We don't need any evidence - just irrational arguments, speculation and conspiracy theories.

    13. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by rhook · · Score: 3, Funny

      Secure boot is only required for the ARM version of Windows 8. MS has explicitly said that you'll be able to install any OS you want on x86 based Windows 8 machines. Do some research before you make accusations and you won't make yourself look like a fool.

      http://www.extremetech.com/computing/114173-windows-8-secure-boot-calm-down-microsoft-is-simply-copying-apple

    14. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by rhook · · Score: 1

      Most of the complaints about Vista were due to hardware manufactures not releasing compatible drivers. Once they did most of the complaints went away.

    15. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I am struggling to get my parents to leave XP. There excuse is its a new computer they bought in Christmas 2007 ( a year after Vista). My father is not a computere genius but he reads the news and knows Vista was a POS and Dell advertised their XP 64 line of XPS for consumers and not just business users.

      I think your father made a good decision there. Dell XPS with XP64 sounds like a nice classic combination. On the other hand I personally avoid XP installations so I understand your standpoint too.

    16. Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I think Windows eight will suck for no other reason than it doesn't follow mod2. You only ever purchase the mod2 of windows. 98 sucked 98 2nd edition didn't me/2000 xp/vista/seven there is a shit version before a non-shit version historically speaking. Though some features look nice. Perhaps this new filesystem will be worth it's weight in diamonds.

      Aside from their unrelated NT vs Win9x heritage and targeted audiences (Consumer:WinME, business:2000), Windows Me came out September 14, 2000. Windows 2000 came out 17 February 2000.

      Windows Me was Windows 98 third edition. Given the jump from NT6, Windows 2000 was "Mod1" using your terminology and Windows XP was "Mod2". All things considered Windows 2000 was pretty damn good.

      Main problem at the time was users were clinging on to DOS. Even though ME still had a DOS based boot system, it dissalowed real-mode drivers from loading in Autoexec.bat and config.sys. Users hated this but it was necessary to prime users for the eventual consumer move over to NT based Windows.

      Windows 2000 was a huge jump from NT6, or Win9x using different driver models than NT (though it uses WDM that can be used in Win98 many vendors clung to VxD), but offering USB support, plug and play, etc. As has always been the case with NT it requires more RAM to run well compared to Win9x. Many cheap computers at the turn of the century were offered with 32 or 64MB RAM, which didn't run 2000 very well.

  3. Exciting by redemtionboy · · Score: 2

    What really has me excited about Windows 8 is Kinect. I think we're going to see a big transformation in the landscape of user interface in the next several years pushing us towards device-less interfaces.

      Granted, this stuff isn't a replacement, it's a supplement. So don't think I'm preaching the death of touch or mouse and keyboard. The more options of well developed and useful interfaces we have the better.

    1. Re:Exciting by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What really has me excited about Windows 8 is Kinect. I think we're going to see a big transformation in the landscape of user interface in the next several years pushing us towards device-less interfaces.

      Yeah, we're all going to create Excel spreadsheets by randomly waving our hands in front of the screen.

    2. Re:Exciting by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What really has me excited about Windows 8 is Kinect. I think we're going to see a big transformation in the landscape of user interface in the next several years pushing us towards device-less interfaces.

        Granted, this stuff isn't a replacement, it's a supplement. So don't think I'm preaching the death of touch or mouse and keyboard. The more options of well developed and useful interfaces we have the better.

      I think device-less interface make sense for hand held computers, and less and less sense as you scale up the size of the computer.
      Contrary to the scenes in CSI-Miami, flinging things around a huge table sensor is not particularly useful or efficient. Nor is reaching across your keyboard to move or select some object by dragging it across your 24 inch screen.

      Even on a level of effort basis, waiving hands and fingers around in the air is pretty much a non-starter. (Not to be too George Jetson here...).
      Then there is the on/off problem. Were you gesticulating while talking to your work-mate, or editing paragraphs on the page? Mice do nothing much unless you click.

      The mouse still rules, and even the Wacom Bamboo line of touch/pen input devices are clumsy approximations.
      Mice cost anywhere from 2 to 40 dollars, are amazingly precise, and by now, fully intuitive across all platforms.

      If QWERTY can last from 1878 to the present, something far more elegant like the mouse is going to have a very long life.

      Kinect will probably remain for games, and maybe music (performance, not listening), and the air guitar is going to become a REAL instrument.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Exciting by EdIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm excited too.

      Something that might let me surf websites, go from links to links, control video playback, and have two hands free?

      It's A Good Thing.

    4. Re:Exciting by Globe199 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stop trying to drag us into the past. The future is now. You just think of the numbers and they'll appear in the spreadsheet.

      I don't know. Some bullshit I read on a tech blog.

    5. Re:Exciting by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      It may have some uses but I just don't see it being that big a deal aside from some casual gaming, although even that makes more sense on a console in front of the TV.

      It's the same with touch screens on PCs; it's just not comfortable to sit in front of a keyboard and hold your arms up to perform gestures on screen (or in the air) when you can just rest your arm on your desk and use a mouse.

      The voice recognition aspects of Kinect could have lots of uses though, if it's far better than alternative systems we already have available to us.

    6. Re:Exciting by n1hilist · · Score: 3, Funny

      That pretty much sums up my experience with Excel :)

    7. Re:Exciting by ShnowDoggie · · Score: 1

      I agree. Between Microsofts Kinect and Apples Siri the interface might get really good. I think it will take a while, eg a few missteps, before either are really good. But I am looking forward to good things with both. I hate using a mouse and attempting to touch a PC display sucks. I really like the apple trackpad. With good interface design the Kinect could make the mouse all but obsolete. (Good logical interface Microsoft. Interface! Come on MS, please think!!!!) I am not sold on the new look (Metro). I am hopefully for the filesystem. And some of the other changes worry me a bit.

    8. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you need the other hand for? Grabbing your partner's cock?

    9. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bamboo kicks ass. Granted there is a learning curve but afterwards your much quicker than a mouse.

    10. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is saying the keyboard and mouse is going to die (not yet, maybe with mind reading tech), you don't have to use these other interfaces the whole time. It's just for casual use, say your cooking dinner and you want to change the music track, then call out to the kinect. Maybe your standing up next to the computer and all you want to do is one click, then it's quicker to prod the screen than grab the mouse, find the cursor, move the cursor, and click. Passwords becomes easier with the kinect's 3d modeling, and the list goes on.

    11. Re:Exciting by thereitis · · Score: 1

      I think we're going to see a big transformation in the landscape of user interface in the next several years pushing us towards device-less interfaces.

      Apple is way ahead of them: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXyNgXTt0ns

    12. Re:Exciting by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What do you need the other hand for? Grabbing your partner's cock?

      A strange inference from my post. Let me try do the same with your post.

      You cannot understand what a 2nd hand could be used for, and your seemingly first thought is that it must be used for another man's cock.

      There are several possibilities that are floating around in my head right now and let me take a whack at drawing inferences from your post as well.....

      1) You are dealing with latent homosexual urges as evidenced by your apparent obsession with grabbing another man's cock.
      2) You don't often have partners, because if you did, you would realize that there are 4 hands present and several orifices with the additional person. Cirque Du Soleil abilities aside, your own orifices are irrelevant. Only a single hand is required from either party to work the remote/mouse.
      3) You are prepubescent and/or possessing of a small penis. Therefore it would never occur to you that an additional hand might be useful or desired.
      4) You have at least one unusually large hand, and again, it would never occur to you that an additional hand would be needed.

      Living in the post Atomic Age might cause one to conclude #4 to be correct, but statistically speaking, such mutations are very rare. #2 is certainly possible because this is Slashdot with the ever present stereotype that we are all in our mother's basements awaiting the delivery of Hot Pockets and Mountain Dew. #2 is also possible because the lack of logic and creativity with some people here never ceases to surprise me. #1 could be due to simple anonymous asshole syndrome, which is best explained by the Penny Arcade's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory.

      Hmmmmm.....

      I will have to go with #3. You must have a tiny little penis. Do not lament your tiny penis my anonymous friend, because it is not the size that matters but how well you can convince somebody other than yourself to touch it.

      These parting words I offer you as comfort.

    13. Re:Exciting by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we're all going to create Excel spreadsheets by randomly waving our hands in front of the screen.

      No that's how you create PowerPoint presentations!

    14. Re:Exciting by a_hanso · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd rather be able to wave my hand over a Google results page and say, "These are not the results I'm looking for".

    15. Re:Exciting by starakurva · · Score: 1

      That's also how you GIVE one!

      --
      All you need is lurv.
    16. Re:Exciting by mattventura · · Score: 1

      The hands really wouldn't be free because you'd be using them for gestures.

    17. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about try Gmail Motion BETA?

    18. Re:Exciting by hedpe2003 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad this got modded as insightful... /s

      --
      Comprehensive solutions via a competition of ideas like no other.
  4. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by game+kid · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's ok, someone will make a Metro app that unlocks the loader with a middle-finger gesture. (The devs just need a new name because "Angry Flipped Birds" won them a C&D...)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  5. HD or SSD? by Teun · · Score: 1

    With all the throwing around I hope these laptops will have an SSD instead of an HD.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:HD or SSD? by fostware · · Score: 2

      Don't worry - all your data will be safe in the cloud anyway!

      --
      "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
    2. Re:HD or SSD? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny. It's what they were going for.

      And the response is "until it's not."

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  6. And the purpose is..? by Digicrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kinect in the living room makes sense - voice/gesture commands in place of a remote control is surprisingly useful (when it works). On a laptop though -- what does the Kinect give that a touch screen can't do better? I mean outside of adult entertainment...

    On the other hand, if it can support gestures with your eyes, then it might be useful. For example, gaze at a specific window/monitor and having it automatically come into focus could be quite a convenience ... but I don't think we'll see that for a while.

    1. Re:And the purpose is..? by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      "automatically come into focus" mucho approve! That's one great idea (stick a keyboard modifier in front of the command, and it could be damned useful.

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    2. Re:And the purpose is..? by Gibgezr · · Score: 1

      It has one thing that could be much better than a touch screen: gesture input without greasy fingerprints on my screen.

      This is why, although my newest Sony e-reader has a touch screen, I still use the buttons to flip the pages 99% of the time.

      I am actually interested in this technology. I've gotten used to browsing the web on touch screen devices, so much so that I find myself annoyed when I'm browsing a website on my PC and can't "pinch-to-zoom" the tiny text on a page.

    3. Re:And the purpose is..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suddenly have a vision of a bunch of tech workers, professionals, what have you out in public, coffee shops, etc, flailing around like a bunch of epileptics jacked up on coke.

      The purpose may, in fact, be to troll the public at large.

    4. Re:And the purpose is..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl + mousewheel.

    5. Re:And the purpose is..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Price.
      A Kinect-licensed camera could be a cheaper component than a five-touch-point capacative digitizer and the hinge/engineering cost for designing a convertible laptop, as it's uncomfortable to use a touch screen at that angle.

    6. Re:And the purpose is..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check this. Kinect killer if I ever saw it. It's like thought control UI. Can you *imagine* games and whole UI systems with this. http://dvice.com/archives/2012/01/the-best-demo-w.php

    7. Re:And the purpose is..? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Drat, I was trying to mod this Funny as I was just imaging a bunch of people in a coffeehouse myself, and chose Overrated by accident. But I can't blame a Kinect interface for that.. yet. /replying to undo mod

    8. Re:And the purpose is..? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      what does the Kinect give that a touch screen can't do better?

      Actually touch screens are really not very suited to laptops. You don't want to be reaching up to the screen all the time, or covering part of it with your hand when you have a perfectly good keyboard and trackpad available. They only really make sense on phones and tablets.

      Eye tracking is another difficult technology. Your eyes tend to flick all over the place as you collate information so you can't really use it for selection or focus in a natural way. When people have tried it they end up staring wide eyed at the screen and working hard to control the system. At best it is useful for research when you want to know what people are looking at.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:And the purpose is..? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Aside from gesture control, you can also use Kinect (in theory at least) for making better video chat. One problem with video chat is that the eyes never match, i.e. you look at the other persons face, but they see you looking off into the wild, as the cameras are on top of the monitor, while they should be inside the monitor. With Kinect you have a 3D image where you can correct the perspective of the image so that you looking at the other person ends up looking like you are actually looking at the other person, canceling the camera offset.

      Not sure if it will actually be used for that, but it would be one possible usecase.

    10. Re:And the purpose is..? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      This idea is better:

      Have the computer figure out if you're talking based on the video feed (facial recognition). If so, activate the microphone and figure out if you're issuing a command to the computer. This will prevent random noises in the background issuing commands to the computer. Bonus points for developing a voice fingerprint to assist in the future if you're issuing commands.

      Best part: This will work with any laptop or desktop with a video cam pointed at the user.

      (So, if this isn't patented already, let's call this obvious and not let anyone patent it. :-) )

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    11. Re:And the purpose is..? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      It's also less likely to be covered by Apple patents!

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    12. Re:And the purpose is..? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      On a laptop though -- what does the Kinect give that a touch screen can't do better

      There aren't many touch-screen PCs out there - there's a few all-in-ones that have touch screens, but they all come with mice. Heck, Apple got patents on such stuff for probably half a decade or more, and nothing's come of it.

      Touch interfaces suck on a PC. If it's a desktop, your going to hold your hand up the whole time you're interacting with it? After a few minutes, your arm's going to get tired and then what? Stop using the computer? Then try accessing the screen when an elbow is on the table.

      Laptops are slightly better, but sitll suffer from the same problem (it's why Apple decided the touch interface is best impemented using the acres of touchpad space on the laptop (seriously - what's with non-Apple laptops having itty-bitty touchpads? You could almost measure Apple's in acres).

      Add Kinect to a laptop, and while your fingers are on the home row you can flick the cursor about (great for those apps that don't hide the mouse cursor when typing), or maybe scroll using finger gestures while keeping your hands on the home row.

  7. I have a suggestion! by goldaryn · · Score: 4, Funny

    BSOD - you can simply bang your head on the table to restart your computer!

    1. Re:I have a suggestion! by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bang Skull On Desk?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  8. 20 years ago by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    someone talking to themselves walking down the street would have been considered insane or on drugs

    now, they just have a bluetooth headset on and are perfectly normal

    today, someone sitting alone in the park making random jerky gestures would be someone on drugs, or insane

    in 5 years, that's just someone using their kinect-enabled laptop

    it's all part of technology's goal of virtualizing the experience of tourette syndrome and schizophrenia for us all

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:20 years ago by EdIII · · Score: 1

      today, someone sitting alone in the park making random jerky gestures would be someone on drugs, or insane

      Uhhhhhhh, I think you forgot the 3rd option dude.

    2. Re:20 years ago by mhotchin · · Score: 2

      As usual, 'Dilbert' seems apropos...
      http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1994-10-12/

    3. Re:20 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mime!?

  9. So let me get this straight... by jjoelc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows8... With a touch inspired graphical interface... And someone thinks the solution is to include a touch less hardware interface...

    I'll skip all the jokes about keeping away from Wwindows... Or a hands-off approach to management, etc. (or not...)

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still basically a touch device, the Kinect.
      It takes input from how fingers move around in a certain part of space. It'll operate in the same fashion.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight... by poity · · Score: 1

      Kinect interface seems like a useful extension to touch interfaces. There are lots of games out there still that rely on hovering your mouse in an area for an essential action, which is impossible to replicate on touch screens. Kinect can provide that layer of interaction.

      Also, inb4 "It looks like you're trying to touch the screen, would you like help?" :D

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    3. Re:So let me get this straight... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Windows8... With a touch inspired graphical interface... And someone thinks the solution is to include a touch less hardware interface...

      C'mon, the people who are OCD about fingerprints on their screen need some loving too.

    4. Re:So let me get this straight... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It's still basically a touch device, the Kinect. It takes input from how fingers move around in a certain part of space. It'll operate in the same fashion.

      But by using that analogy you could as well say that the standard mouse is a touch device.

  10. Metro UI is touch based and laptops don't have by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Metro UI is touch based and most laptops don't have touch screens and I hope windows 8 will have more of the older windows 7 desktop the betas cut to much.

  11. Gesture by Psicopatico · · Score: 1

    - Swing your left arm across your chest;
    - Block your left elbow with your right hand;
    - When you block your elbow you have to say "toe";

    Computer shuts down and powers off.

    (Courtesy of John Peter Sloan and Dave Dickens )

    --
    Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
  12. I've been making gestures for years! by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been making gestures MS products for years. Call it feedback. Hell, I feel like making a gesture right now. The big change? Now we can be ignored 4 ways (keyboard, mouse, sound, gesture).

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  13. And people thought Siri was silly... by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some people were complaining about Siri, saying that for some reason they didn't want to be seen out in public, talking on... a phone.

    Well I'd take that over being out in public with my mobile device looking like I was being attacked by an invisible cloud of bees.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  14. Worst airline seat neighbor ever by CambodiaSam · · Score: 1

    I typically have someone in the row ahead of me recline as far as humanly possible, which can be frustrating but is tolerable. I hope I don't get someone sitting next to me who is flailing wildly trying to perform a copy and paste shortcut.

  15. Afterthought by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

    The problem is that not all Windows 8 laptops will have this, so it will be an afterthought. When will Microsoft learn from Apple? If you build a platform that requires certain sensors, developers will use them. Otherwise...well, it will just be a gimmick.

    1. Re:Afterthought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that not all Windows 8 laptops will have this, so it will be an afterthought. When will Microsoft learn from Apple? If you build a platform that requires certain sensors, developers will use them. Otherwise...well, it will just be a gimmick.

      Yet, Nintendo did this, Sony and Microsoft followed suit, and that's STILL considered just a gimmick. What?

  16. so you want to locked hardware and AIO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so you want to locked hardware and AIO's on the desktop.

    Also add $100 to each video card for the UEFI rom.

  17. lessons not learnt by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Way to kill an excellent concept, MicroIdiots!

    Voice control largely failed because nobody wanted to be caught dead talking to his computer and it just doesn't work at all in office environments.

    Putting gesture control into notebooks must have been the winner of the "stupid idea of the year" contest, and for some reason it got mixed up with the actual product plan.

    Seriously, on a train, in the airport lounge, on the airplane - that's when you really wish your notebook had gesture controls, right? And when you pitch your product to your business partners and give a crucial presentation, that's exactly the moment where you want to rely on more-or-less reliable gesture controls instead of a mouse or keyboard click or remote control.

    Totally. The only place dumber than notebooks would've been the Zune.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:lessons not learnt by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it *will* work, if short finger gestures are used (and I'm not talking about the obvious finger gesture).

      One of the biggest problems with touch interfaces is that they have *friction* -- you're wearing your fingerprints away against a flat surface. I'd love an interface where I can just hover my index finger a few inches away from the screen and have the mouse pointer follow it. Goodbye trackpad. Added benefit -- the difference between move and drag (which is muddy when using a touch interface) is now clear. You actually touch the screen to click. Everything else is cursor motion.

    2. Re:lessons not learnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you do it more publicly it becomes more widely socially acceptable quicker. They seem to want to kill desktops too for some reason everything funny about win8 I hear seems to be directed at notebooks/tablets. i think they're mad that apple broke into that market more effectively than them, windows I think has had some kind of tablet mode since 95 or so just never any successful hardware. i guess they could also just assume you can't buy modularized hardware like that for a notebook but a desktop you can.

    3. Re:lessons not learnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going out on a limb here to guess you are a teenager or you are a college student? You have never been to an experimental hospital, a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant, a design agency, a Hollywood CGI studio, a war game facillity, etc.

      What I mean to say is your capacity to understand the myriad applications possible with Kinect are limited to your small world or mind. While the Enterprise uses are likely limited, the others I mentioned are not only unlimited, they are real.

  18. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by sowth · · Score: 0, Troll

    Considering most MS Windows lusers, they'll probably be comforted knowing they can't load any "rogue" software. Even though there will be plenty of security holes for malware to get through, including Microsoft signing it.

    (Yeah, mod me down microserfs. I don't care!)

  19. A thought by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "I see you're looking for *PORN*. I will open a Bing window and help you search."

    (5 minutes later)

    "You appear you have found what you were looking for. Have a nice evening."

  20. ctrl+alt+delete by Flipstylee · · Score: 2

    "OW!", that fucking hurt :S

  21. Touch screen with the actual touch? by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest advantage to this is that the Kinect will be able to read gestures so you can act like you have a touch screen without having to pull your hands too far from the keyboard or get your finger prints on your screen. It would also be useful to raise you hand four inches off the keyboard and use an imaginary mouse.

    1. Re:Touch screen with the actual touch? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah, if they include mind reading in the interface and joint medicine in the package..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  22. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

    Windows 7 also supports UEFI so you can still run Windows 7 on these locked machines too

  23. and you will pay $10 a gig and $20 meg roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you will pay $10 a gig and $20 meg roaming on 3g / 4g

  24. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    "Lusers". How...contemporary. I like how you're not at all embarrassed by your throwback behavior though. You're a real tiger!

  25. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but at least in Windows you can install apps regardless of what permissions they want and allow or disallow when they try to use the "permission". And at least you can change what they get access to after they've been installed.

  26. not too many visionaries on Slashdot right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amazing how people assume that we'll keep using technology to do the same things as the technology evolves. We won't.

    Think outside the box. Gestures aren't going to be so black and white and you're going to be able to do new, complex tasks that you hadn't even thought of doing before. Creative types will really love this.

  27. Kinect Sensors? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    when did cameras become classified as "Kinect Sensors"?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Kinect Sensors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up. Microsoft has achieved a marketing triumph by renaming its online optical camera pointed at you as a "sensor." Nobody would buy it if it was called a "Kinect camera."

    2. Re:Kinect Sensors? by Your.Master · · Score: 2

      When they started detecting distance.

    3. Re:Kinect Sensors? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      When they started detecting distance.

      stereoscopic cameras have been able to do this for quite some time and more accurately. it's still just a camera.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Kinect Sensors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not quite. IIRC, Kinect builds 3D image with a structured light IR projector coupled with IR camera. That's probably the part they called "Kinect sensor". Kinect box is this plus color camera and microphone array.

    5. Re:Kinect Sensors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly -- it's not just a camera. Besides which, if "stereoscopic camera" gets a special name instead of just being called "camera", why doesn't this other camera?

      The Kinect sensor works similarly to a stereoscopic camera, except:

      1. It works in the IR spectrum instead of the visible.
      2. Instead of making two recordings and correlating after the fact, one of them is actually fixed and projected (and this is the part that isn't a camera).

      For that reason I would expect the approach to fundamentally be more accurate than stereoscopic cameras, not less, under most circumstances, and particularly in low-light conditions. I tried to find comparisons online but mostly got qualitative university student reports on how the Kinect works without quantitative data before I got bored. Best one I found is:

      http://www.cs.illinois.edu/class/fa11/cs498dh/lectures/Lecture%2025%20-%20How%20the%20Kinect%20Works%20-%20CP%20Fall%202011.pdf

      A little over halfway down it compares pros and cons with natural light stereoscopic cameras.

    6. Re:Kinect Sensors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up. Microsoft has achieved a marketing triumph by renaming its online optical camera pointed at you as a "sensor." Nobody would buy it if it was called a "Kinect camera."

      Why mod up something that is factual incorrect? It is not just an optical camera. It is a combination of a camera and active IR depth sensor. From Wikipedia:

      "The device features an "RGB camera, depth sensor and multi-array microphone running proprietary software",[34] which provide full-body 3D motion capture, facial recognition and voice recognition capabilities"
      ...
      "The depth sensor consists of an infrared laser projector combined with a monochrome CMOS sensor, which captures video data in 3D under any ambient light conditions"

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTKlNGSH9Po

      And this is also the reason the robotic DIY scene have been all over Kinect. These projects aren't doing all the cool things they do with just an ordinary "renamed" camera. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/diy/top-10-robotic-kinect-hacks

  28. Interactive fapping. by Jimbookis · · Score: 2

    Kinect and WebGL might make all those POV porn movies a lot more interesting. It could also give a new metric for Google over just how much fapping a web site generates.

    1. Re:Interactive fapping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fap-roulette anyone?

  29. Army smartphones will have this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may look silly waving your hands around in the airport, but in some work enviroments, giving commands by gesture is standard proceedure.

    I think the army will eventually move toward bluetooth headset type device with with a forward facing camera that recognizes gestures.

      Combine this with a HUD monocle that has eye tracking and SIRI like voice control and you have the perfect hands free user interface that maps to basic human actions well enough to use when you're operating with your stress incuded monkey brain.

  30. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by geminidomino · · Score: 0

    You're absolutely right. He should totally call them "n00bfagz," since that's "contemporary."

  31. What will really happen with Windows 8... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Consumers and OEMs will demand downgrade rights to Windows 7.

    2) Corporations will refuse to upgrade to Windows 8.

    3) Steve Ballmer gets fired.

    Remember, you heard it here first.

  32. Re:And a locked down bootloader? by rhook · · Score: 1

    x86 based Windows 8 machines will be able to boot any OS you want them too. Only ARM based Windows 8 machines will require secure boot, and that's only if the OEM wants to have the Windows 8 sticker on the machine.

    http://www.extremetech.com/computing/114173-windows-8-secure-boot-calm-down-microsoft-is-simply-copying-apple

  33. It's not just about gestures, folks by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    I can think of a few useful applications that have nothing to do with gesture recognition; the z-depth would allow you to cut the image of the user away from the background, which could be useful for videoconferencing if you want to chat with someone but don't want them to see your surroundings or the other people in the room with you.

    Close-field Kinect on a laptop would probably allow you to do very accurate head / eye tracking, so you can do things like the '3d window' effect demonstrated in this video by Jonny Lee.

    3D object scanning. Microsoft already have a version of this for the Xbox with the Kinect Fun Labs, but it's rather limited in resolution. A close-field sensor would provide better resolution.

    It's possible you could use facial recognition for security. Unlike most webcam-based facial recognition systems, this couldn't be fooled by a paper mask.

  34. Even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you install Linux on it, the sensors will actually become useful!

  35. Indeed by goldcd · · Score: 1

    I just attached a nyko zoom to my kinnect (set of lenses mounted in a frame that clips over the kinect) - and that knocked a very handy third off the minimum distance I need to be.
    Aside from expense and size, there's no reason you couldn't have a kinect with motorized or even swivelling lenses.

  36. The majority of the first issues I came across by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Were plenty of other annoyances lurking about after that. Network file 'sharing' (shares/CIF etc) was a world of pain and registry hacking.

    1. Re:The majority of the first issues I came across by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I did was click on the Sharing tab in the properties section. Not sure what registry hacking you're referring to. There's even a nice option for the advanced settings if you don't want the dumbed down user friendly version for more customized settings.

  37. For a start, it's a 3d camera. by goldcd · · Score: 1

    3d screens seem to be limping onto the market, but with a 3d camera... you're right, it's just going to be used for porn...

  38. being lazy is nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I can sit down and watch a movie or check my email without picking up the remote or touching the keyboard. I think that I would have reached a higher state of being. A true American :)

  39. Do you know why you were modded funny? by symbolset · · Score: 1

    It's because W8 platforms will come with new devices. And these new devices will require drivers. And those drivers will magically be unavailable for prior versions of Windows, and Linux - as prior versions of Windows have done less successfully. It will be some thinly veiled part of the logo requirement. Sometimes it's because when you get a new PC your printer/scanner/MFD manufacturer would just prefer you buy a new one, or has gone out of business or whatever. Sometimes it's because the drivers for the device were contracted to out a dual-blind programming subsidiary of Microsoft under terms that prohibit disclosure of the hardware interface. I first ran into this one with SoundBlaster in the 1990s, and Winmodems and Broadcom latoptop wifi chipsets come immediately to mind. It was enough to put me off of programming for Windows forever. The why of it is irrelevant however.

    While they've promised W8 will work on legacy platforms in some form, they have worked quite closely with their "hardware partners" - including HP, Dell, Acer, Intel and others to ensure that a shipped W8 platform in its fully developed hardware incarnation will not and cannot fully support use of any other operating system ever. The Linux geeks will do their best to help you and reverse engineer it (for their own purposes of course, but sharing), but that will probably take three years or more - when the next generation is due - because Microsoft has learned some lessons about obfuscating hardware interfaces and filing patents along the way. The Linux geeks are really, really good. If they weren't Linux wouldn't run 91% of the top-500 supercomputers in the world. But there are limits to what they can do against determined opposition. The Windows geeks won't help you because they've long since moved on - they know which side of their bread has butter on it.

    It's one thing when a rollback will deprecate some legacy thing like parallel ports or SNAP printers. It's quite another thing when even the motherboard USB ports or sound or video or network can't be enabled in XP or W7 or Linux. And that is what we're looking at.

    Be forewarned that if you buy a W8 PC you're likely stuck with it on W8 because you're just not going to get it to fully work with something else. If you demand flexibility but want W8, buy a Linux PC and install W8 on it (after properly licensing W8, of course).

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Do you know why you were modded funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be surprised if that's the case. However I have seen one laptop that I could not find drivers for on XP as the hardware was all vista and above. But then XP is over 10 years old.

      "w8 working in some form" is a disclaimer to stop the morons that make up 99% of MS' market share installing windows 8 on that win 7 hardware they've already got for 3 years and moaning that the touch screen doesn't work.

      Given that w8 has lower requirements than w7 and they really want to work past vista. The MS store only in w8, the winRT they're pushing along with new metro apps. It's in MS' best interests to get w8 on every single bit of hardware they can touch. Hence why we're seeing it on ARM.

      But you are quite correct. The secure boot being locked on ARM is a sign of whats to come. Maybe not in w9, or w10. Once that control is going to be there, once MS own all the apps you have on your system we're in dangerous territory. And in that world you had better hope they are still a monopoly as that will be the only thing stopping them from locking you out of features on new hardware for no reason.

      Haven't MS worked closely with hardware vendors since windows 95? This is all nothing new, and the sweet new form factors coming out are all from intels ultrabook push not MS' doing.

    2. Re:Do you know why you were modded funny? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      And in that world you had better hope they are still a monopoly as that will be the only thing stopping them from locking you out of features on new hardware for no reason.

      Hopefully before this is a problem we'll have forgotten they were ever in charge of prevention of innovation.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Do you know why you were modded funny? by rhook · · Score: 1

      You don't do any research before making stuff up do you? Windows 8 works with Windows 7 drivers. Same as Windows 7 can use Vista drivers. Perhaps in the future you should do some research before you go spouting out inaccurate information?