Slashdot Mirror


Super Bowl Bust: Feds Grab 307 NFL Websites; $4.8M

coondoggie writes "Speaking at a National Football League press conference ahead of this weekend's Super Bowl, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said special agents this week seized a total of 307 websites and snatched up 42,692 items of phony Super Bowl-related memorabilia along with other counterfeit items for a total take of more than $4.8 million – up from $3.72 million last year."

198 comments

  1. China by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because we can only transfer money through "legitimate" channels to China. Waste of my tax dollars if ever there was one...

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:China by nschubach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm more interested in how much money was spend doing the seize. I could imagine that tax bill may exceed the ~$5 million depending on what equipment they bought and how many people they paid to track down/seize/value all the stuff.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:China by joocemann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd almost bet a testicle that the resources used to acquire these goods was far more than $4.8M.

      Our taxes bought this trash on behalf of private industry---- why?

    3. Re:China by Soporific · · Score: 4, Funny

      What would you do with three testicles? Or did you lose a bet before? :)

      ~S

    4. Re:China by Firehed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not that I support this kind of action, but it at least proves that bills like SOPA are unnecessary. Rights-holders already have a legal means to deal with infringers. It may be inefficient, but I think most slashdotters would agree that's preferable to the alternative.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and I'd like to know when the copyright, trademark holders will be getting a bill for the government's services.

    6. Re:China by darth+dickinson · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's a Krogan.

    7. Re:China by Mattcelt · · Score: 0

      Mod points. Mod points!! My kingdom for mod points!!!

    8. Re:China by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ha, ha. No. I promise you it's not just about actual counterfeits. I know precious little about American football (and I have no intention of learning more), but one thing that is apparent is that the NFL, moreso than any of the other national sports leagues, is obsessive about controlling anything that might be linked to a team. If you want to show that you're a fan, either you made your memorabilia yourself, or you bought it from an approved vendor; there is nothing in between. No vague cultural links are permitted. It's like Righthaven, only without the whole "hilariously tragic disbarment forever" part, because they have money and cultural clout, and Righthaven did not.

      It's not a waste of time, it's an IP-related evil comparable to the MAFIAA.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    9. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and I'd like to know when the copyright, trademark holders will be getting a bill for the government's services.

      So could this be, "I'd like to know when the rape, murder and theft victims will be getting a bill for the government's services" when the perpetrators are captured??

      Counterfeiting is a serious crime. There is no problem if someone makes "football" shirts or running shoes. There is a problem when you start to use someone else's brand to push your goods. That's illegal. It's akin of someone else using your name to get a mortgage on their house.

      This stuff is done FOR PROFIT. This is not some fans stitching together an NFL logo on their shirts.

    10. Re:China by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to know why any of you think it's important for the government to make a profit when it comes to law enforcement.

      This retarded mindset is the reason we have speed traps everywhere.

    11. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. The reason you have speed traps is because we don't want to pay taxes. We also want tons of cops with shiny new toys to defeat the bad guys.

      These two choices can only be reconciled by having the police collect their own funds.

    12. Re:China by Skater · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On a related note, I wonder if Slashdot paid for the rights to use the term "Super Bowl" - the NFL defends that term pretty vigorously. This is why places that have, for example, televisions on sale this week have signs up that say, "Get your new TV for the big game!" Grocery stores refer to food for the "big game" party. And so on.

      The other day, I even heard a DJ on Sirius (satellite radio) saying he wasn't sure what he could say in regards to the game. The odd part is that Sirius will be carrying the game, so even within companies that ARE actually affiliated with the NFL, it's not clear.

    13. Re:China by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      If your house is robbed and the police show up to investigate should you get a bill? How about a fire? What is the point of taxes to pay for any government services if we have to pay to use them?

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    14. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like cops want tons of cops and shiny new toys.

      Cops get to decide which laws to enforce or not, remember.

    15. Re:China by couchslug · · Score: 2

      The businesses who OWN the government should reimburse taxpayers for its services to them.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:China by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Or did you lose a bet before? :)"

      Nah. Found it on Ebay.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    17. Re:China by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      IANAL but AFAIK as long as you're not implying in any way that you are in any way connected to or sponsored by the Super Bowl you should be OK. The problem is that the NFL doesn't really care what the laws say because they can intimidate you into doing what they want regardless.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    18. Re:China by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      I'd almost bet a testicle that the resources used to acquire these goods was far more than $4.8M.

      Our taxes bought this trash on behalf of private industry---- why?

      Because it's against the law. So the FBI has to do something about it.

      Like the way they failed to go after all those bankers that committed mortgage fraud...

      OK, let's try again.

      Because it's against a law that defends Corporations.

    19. Re:China by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      SUPERBOWL Super Bowl Superbowl S U P E R B O W L.

      JEHOVA!

      Let's see what gets here first, the FBI or the lightning.

      (NI!)

    20. Re:China by everett · · Score: 1

      if the victim of the rape, murder, or theft is a corporation and not an "actual" person, then yes. Your argument would then be congruent and I would support them paying for the services of the government.

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    21. Re:China by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      You know, we already have this. The loser of a court case often has to pay the court fees.

      Why don't we have some sort of fee or something of the like attached to the other aspects of the criminal justice system? Of course, it should be treated like charity care at a hospital - if you're poor enough, they don't collect.

    22. Re:China by crbowman · · Score: 1

      In many places in the US if an ambulance comes for you, you will get charged. I see stories all the time about people who didn't pay the fire insurance/protection bill in their jurisdiction and the fire department comes and watches their house burn down without lifting a finger. Traditionally a copyright or patent holder was granted a government privilege but they were required to pay for the enforcement. They were required to find the infringers and bring court cases and recover damages. Now they want to shift the cost of their business onto tax payers and the general public and this is what I object to. (I apologize for ending this sentence with a preposition.)

    23. Re:China by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      and this is what I object to. (I apologize for ending this sentence with a preposition.)

      "and it is to this that I object." Is that better?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  2. And nobody made any more money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's unclear what, if any, effect these seizures have on the economy.

    1. Re:And nobody made any more money... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's unclear what, if any, effect these seizures have on the economy.

      Well I can tell you, there's a few ware houses and container ships which are probably going to have a little problem disposing of inventory which is still in the pipe.

      Not to mention an end to my pursuit of an Official Super Bowl Batmobile Car Kit.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:And nobody made any more money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the contrary my good friend. The container ships will have very little problem disposing of the inventory, provided they have an accurate manifest and enough fuel to bring them outside the three-mile limit of the US waters once the other goods have been off-loaded. The ocean forgets, my friend. The ocean forgets.

      As for the warehouses, well, I know a guy. Let's leave it at that.

  3. Mathematics by don+depresor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they seize 43k items of merchandise, that means the average value for the caps, shirts and stuff on the photo is more than 100$ each... WTF???

    1. Re:Mathematics by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      It would depend on what valuation they're using... fake tickets could easily be "worth" that (while in truth benig less valuable than the paper and ink seperately)

      But yeah, something about that valuation is very fishy...

    2. Re:Mathematics by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When the DEA busts a grow house each plant is said to produce 1lb. So why would they not want to inflate prices to make it look good.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    3. Re:Mathematics by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm 120 miles north of the Superbowl, and the FBI paid a visit to our mall and cleaned out one store of their NFL merchandise as being counterfeit. A lot of what they took was jerseys. Authentic game jerseys MSRP for around $200 so I could see an average being around $100.

    4. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be surprised about tickets.

      What I'd expect to see a lot of are jerseys. Last I looked an official (in my case, hockey) jersey was something like $350... absurd as that is. Getting one from the factory in China that makes them legit during the day? Like $30.

    5. Re:Mathematics by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I looked quickly at the nfl.com shop, and their jerseys are $89-$99, but they had jackets and coats that range from $100 to $200, and framed lithographs for $150.

      I imagine that a counterfeiting organization might not just counterfeit logos, but possibly also signatures. Maybe there's a bunch of signed footballs in the group also.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    6. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and each of these lbs is said to sells at least 4540$, when in reality, if you paid more than 1500$ for it you got screwed....

    7. Re:Mathematics by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, it's 43K inventoried plus a bunch of cool extras distributed to friends and family.

    8. Re:Mathematics by Imrik · · Score: 1

      The 43k is only the items that were Super Bowl related, which may have been only a small portion of the total goods.

    9. Re:Mathematics by Glarimore · · Score: 2

      The feds always do this.

      I remember a news story not long ago where the DEA had seized 50 pounds of marijuana -- a street value of "about a million dollars". If you do the math, that means someone is selling grams of marijuana for forty five dollars. That's absurd -- that would mean that by weight, marijuana is worth about half as much as gold.

      But, hey hey! You need to let the populace know that their tax dollars are being well spent!

    10. Re:Mathematics by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Don't know where the heck you're sourcing your jerseys that they're $350, I got my NHL hockey team's jersey on sale for $75, they're regularly $120-150 depending on style and whether a player's name and number is stitched on.

      Yes, they're official. They don't get any more official than the team's store in their own arena.

    11. Re:Mathematics by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      but are you talking authentic or replica? when i was at a devils game last year i could get a replica for around 100 or an authentic for around 300

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    13. Re:Mathematics by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Had to lookup the difference between authentic and replica. Probably replica, then--it didn't include a fight strap.

    14. Re:Mathematics by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      What does "authentic" mean in this context? Was it worn by a player?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Mathematics by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Sort of.

      "Authentic" is an actual jersey that could be worn in a game (has all of the straps and stitching, a little more durable, larger to compensate for pads, etc). Replicas are just hockey sweaters that look like jerseys.

    16. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to convert to the Marijuana Standard!

    17. Re:Mathematics by compro01 · · Score: 2

      The $99 is the "replica" ones. "Authentic" ones are $130-200+.

      "Replica" jerseys look mostly like real jerseys, but aren't quite. The fit is a bit different (they're not designed to fit over pads), as is the construction (slightly different material and stitching), and they drop some of the unneeded features, whereas "authentic" jerseys are what the players actually wear.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    18. Re:Mathematics by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I will use football jerseys because I know football better.

      you ever see the football jerseys that are silk screened? the letters and numbers peel after a little while, these cost anywhere from 50-80 bucks depending on quality.

      an authentic jersey is the exact same as the one that would be worn in a game, usually with a different tag inside (collectible reasons need to differentiate between a real game jersey and a normal one) These will be of better material build, Instead of silkscreening it will be stitched and embroidered, A good write up would be here , I even learned something new about the "semi pro" class of jersey

      http://forums.icejerseys.com/index.php?showtopic=843

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    19. Re:Mathematics by Glsai · · Score: 1

      And to go one further, sometimes your best bet instead of going authentic is to go game worn. I will use baseball for this example (have we covered all the sports yet?) The year before last I wanted to buy a Twins jersey. I had already ordered an Authentic Personalized Jersey which was $250 bucks, but it wouldn't be ready for the season opener. I had a few extra bucks and went into the Twins Pro Shop to look at buying another one off the shelf. For a laugh I went to check the price of game worn jerseys. Turns out I could buy one of the lesser players game worn jerseys for $30 cheaper than buying an authentic jersey. Walked out with a game worn Jon Rauch jersey. Figured even if he left the Twins it would be fun to have a jersey from the tallest player to ever play Major League Baseball.

    20. Re:Mathematics by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      $230 worth of fun, though? That's like 5 AAA game titles - potentially 200 hours of carefully designed content. That's a year and a half of $popular_mmorpg. five to ten weekends worth of paintball supplies.

      It's a non-discounted skydiving intro jump. It's a 3-day ticket to disneyworld. It's nearly ten kayak rentals, or scuba gear rentals, or a scuba certification class. It's half of a round trip flight to Las Vegas.

      It's enough to buy mitts for half of a casual baseball team, or one really nice mitt, with enough left over for a weighted practice bat.

      It's a whole raft of of memory-building possibilities (including two seats on an actual raft through whitewater rapids in Maine...)

      Is a shirt really worth that much? Even if it was once worn by someone moderately famous?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  4. Doesn't this prove... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that the curren laws are enough to fight counterfeits?

    1. Re:Doesn't this prove... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      ...that the curren laws are enough to fight counterfeits?

      Yes. Yes they are. But why not pass a whole boat-load more, just so the official outlets and suppliers are kept safe.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Doesn't this prove... by w.hamra1987 · · Score: 1

      NO

      these websites shouldn't have even existed in the first place. we were supposed to have known they will be created, and arrested their owners before they can even register the domain

      yes, "minority report" all the way!

      --
      my sig pwns your sig
    3. Re:Doesn't this prove... by EdIII · · Score: 2

      The official outlets and suppliers are kept safe not just by the current laws, but by preferential treatment by the FBI as another posted noted.

      When you have the influence in government apparently you can get jackbooted thugs to come in and raid businesses for you.

      Copyright law is not just unjust towards society and the consumer, it is not even enforced equally.

    4. Re:Doesn't this prove... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When you have the influence in government apparently you can get jackbooted thugs to come in and raid businesses for you.

      These "businesses" are breaking the law, in order to make a profit. Do you call the police jackbooted thugs when they arrest a car thief, fraudster or drug dealer?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Doesn't this prove... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drug dealer? Yes. The other two, no.

    6. Re:Doesn't this prove... by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      When you have the influence in government apparently you can get jackbooted thugs to come in and raid businesses for you.

      These "businesses" are breaking the law, in order to make a profit. Do you call the police jackbooted thugs when they arrest a car thief, fraudster or drug dealer?

      How about when laws that are broken don't affect corporations, or are broken by corporations, so the FBI does nothing.

      What do you call that?

    7. Re:Doesn't this prove... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Of course not.

      However, when Law Enforcement selectively enforces the law depending on who you are or what company you are then Law Enforcement ceases to "serve and protect" and becomes nothing more than hired mercenaries or thugs.

      Why is it that a small private citizen can defraud somebody of 10k and go to prison for years, yet when Wall Street does it, or Big Pharma kills people doing it.... nobody goes to prison?

      That's what rightfully pisses people off. When laws and their enforcement effectively protect the rich and powerful and don't equally apply to an ostensibly free and just society.

      Keep in mind... we are talking about intellectual property here . Not stolen property, not somebody defrauded of property or money, or a drug dealer selling an illegal product (which is a whole other discussion).

      The fact the FBI is whored out for the NFL at great expense to the tax payer to make those fuckers a little bit richer while instilling fear in the populace is a disgrace when the FBI does not lift a fucking finger for the small business owner, but redirects him towards the local DA. That is what stinks.

      It was fear too. If you are in a mall and see a bunch of FBI running in with guns it might be a little unsettling.

      The FBI needs to concentrate on the most wanted, the serial killers, and you know basically crime .

  5. great use of our tax money by peas_n_carrots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, because counterfeit NFL gear is incredibly detrimental to society. Unlike drugs, murder, and other violence. And why spend money on education when money can be thrown towards law enforcement to satisfy the corporate overlords. Another way of looking at it... thousands of jobs have been destroyed so that the uber-rich NFL owners can snatch even more money from the commoners.

    1. Re:great use of our tax money by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To the Feds, it's not about priorities. It's about taking action to justify their department and funding necessary to maintain the status quo (and then some). It's precisely why the go after the low hanging fruit first and foremost.

      I suppose you could say their priorities are self-serving. Screw dealing with violent offenders and crime. That just too dangerous and politically incorrect.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:great use of our tax money by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another way of looking at it... thousands of jobs have been destroyed

      Thousands of criminal jobs...

      so that the uber-rich NFL owners can snatch even more money from the commoners.

      Those commoners are going to spend the money. Getting rid of the fake websites doesn't mean more people will spend more money, it only changes who they spend it with. Do you think it is better that they wind up with something that has no value should they ever try to resell it? You hate the rich so much that you'll throw your fellow citizen to the wolves who are making fake goods and selling them at real prices?

    3. Re:great use of our tax money by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      It isn't just the uber rich NFL owners benefiting, but all of the small companies that make officially endorsed NFL products, as well as the people who work for them. In addition the common consumer knows that their $50 tshirt is a quality product and not some cheap knockoff. Not everything the government does is to support the 1%

    4. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see the FEDS bust some pro ball players & the schools that gave them phoney diplomas
        I'll bet many have both High school & college diplomas & cant even write a complete sentence or score 30 % on a grade 5 reading comprehension test

    5. Re:great use of our tax money by EdIII · · Score: 2

      the common consumer knows that their $50 tshirt is a quality product and not some cheap knockoff

      That's a weak argument. Quality can be the same. I think you would have made your point better with authenticity instead.

      Not everything the government does is to support the 1%

      Just 99% of what they do. While I can understand your point, are these actions being enforced equally for all intellectual property holders or just the ones who can afford to donate to campaigns?.

      DigiShaman said it pretty well:

      To the Feds, it's not about priorities. It's about taking action to justify their department and funding necessary to maintain the status quo (and then some). It's precisely why the go after the low hanging fruit first and foremost.

      That's my biggest issue. The 1% is getting preferential treatment because they generate headlines in newspapers, magazine, and online news sources. The small business man with a branded product is not going to get an FBI task force running through the local malls taking down knockoff products.

    6. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about your alma mater, but at mine you didn't need to be a ball player to get their phoney diploma. You just needed a 0 or positive balance at the registrars office.

    7. Re:great use of our tax money by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, it's probably more about low-hanging fruit.

      Remember, when someone buys drugs they're buying something they generally know is illegal, same with the seller. Both have a personal interest in keeping the transaction as low-key as possible.

      A purchaser of sports memorabilia is not looking to buy anything illegal. That means that the sellers of sports memorabilia in general are not low-key, and have to seem legitimate, which could open them up to investigation if the copyright and trademark holders do a good job of documenting the supply chain. Remember, many products have minimum costs per the resale agreement, and any price coming in under that price could automatically trigger a more thorough look. If one is counterfeiting memorabilia and is not aware of the minimum price, attempting to undercut legitimate resellers to drive sales could attract attention.

      I know this because years ago I worked for a small business that did all manner of technology and equipment work. Among the company's offerings were OEM software products, and remember, the definition of OEM back then was loose enough that one could buy a copy of Office or Windows as an OEM product if buying a qualifying hardware product, which could mean something as cheap as a Microsoft mouse. Well, the owner of the small business found a supplier of Windows and Office that let him sell for really, really cheap, and he advertised. A few days later, an investigator on behalf of Microsoft stopped by. He and the owner talked, and basically the rep was willing to exchange all of our copies of everything we had bought for resale in exchange for being given the information on the party that sold us the software. It probably worked that way because we had about fifteen products, not exactly a mecca of commercial piracy. He collected the counterfeits, gave us real ones, and left with contact information. Before he left he explained the supply chain that Microsoft used to distribute, and how prices really never fell below a certain threshold for current products.

      Back to this situation, if the real owners and producers of the licensed memorabilia have a supply chain with defined prices, it's easy to catch sellers who have unlicensed product if you just watch for their ads.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:great use of our tax money by BoberFett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention that apparently the Super Bowl is enough of a national treasure to spend tens of millions of dollars in law enforcement, but not enough of a national treasure that it belongs to the citizens of the USA.

      So we all get to pay for protecting it but only a select few are allowed to profit off of it. More privatizing of profits while socializing the costs.

    9. Re:great use of our tax money by sjames · · Score: 1

      There's a fair chance of it being the very same items made in the very same factories, just after hours and off the books.

    10. Re:great use of our tax money by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      >>Another way of looking at it... thousands of jobs have been destroyed

      >Thousands of criminal jobs...

      "Counterfieting" goods whose price is kept artificially high by equally artificial so-called "intellectual property" BS? My g-d, it's not even software, it's a goddamned COPY of a jersey used by an athlete on the field. The entire "value" is wholly artificially created scarcity and extraction of $ by market manipulation -- the actual good, unlike, say, a handbag design, costs maybe $2 to produce.

      And the "counterfieters?" (pirates, like the US founding fathers?) Real hardened criminals those, Sherlock, real hardened criminals.

      >>so that the uber-rich NFL owners can snatch even more money from the commoners.

      >Those commoners are going to spend the money. Getting rid of the fake websites doesn't mean more people will spend more money, it only changes who they spend it with. Do you think it is better that they wind up with something that has no value should they ever try to resell it? You hate the rich so much that you'll throw your fellow citizen to the wolves who are making fake goods and selling them at real prices?

      What the pirates do is reduce the artificially inflated price, reducing the cost to the commoners and pocketing a profit as a result. Kinda like the people who sold tea to the colonies without paying the Crown's tax? It's called OPEN MARKET CAPITALISM.

      As far as the corporate pigs who have brought the United States to the brink of financial collapse? How much do I disdain them? Hand me a bayonet and put me next to the traitorous pig, and I show you exactly how a patriot treats a "capitalist" bent on raping his nation and people for maximum personal gain and profit.

    11. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw the video on the news. WTF is Homeland Security doing busting counterfeit NFL merch???

    12. Re:great use of our tax money by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      what pirates do is sell a vastly inferior price of shit for damn near the real deal prices, they aint giving these shirts away dumb fuck, they are selling them for a whole 2% less and it will fall apart in the wash first time though.

      but hey you go right ahead and fund the pointless morons that you think are gods, they grow up to be orginized crime, then legitimize themself in some biz like I dunno movies,recoding, maybe dock workers or fucking unions . Then they buy our politicions while extort an additional 40% of working smucks paychecks in exchange for "protection".

      Then in another 20 years there will be some dumb fuck somewhere screaming "down with the man" while all the while they have done nothing but fucking fund them like the shit for brains they are

      thanks asshole

    13. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting and all, but it begs the question: why isn't this price-fixing, if "prices really never fell below a certain threshold".

    14. Re:great use of our tax money by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Well, that's an articulate response. May want to work on your professional demeanor.

      But to return the sentiment, may you received a blow job from a prostitute with a combination of hepatitis and a porcupine tongue.

    15. Re:great use of our tax money by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Do your parents know you're on the internet past your bed time?

    16. Re:great use of our tax money by TWX · · Score: 2

      Interesting and all, but it begs the question: why isn't this price-fixing, if "prices really never fell below a certain threshold".

      Because one organization owns all of the intellectual property, and as the sole supplier they can dictate the price. Price-fixing is only illegal if there are multiple parties in collusion. A seller might even be able to sell for less than the price they paid for the merchandise, but they're not going to get a profit, and the supplier probably won't supply to them anymore.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    17. Re:great use of our tax money by trevelyon · · Score: 1

      Besides there is no anti-trust any more since the system is setup to create monopolies. Whether by IP, right of way, bandwidth auctions, laws forbidding municipal internet offerings or other actions if you look closely you will see the government creates far more monopolies that they limit or get rid of. It is the new model for business in America (buy congress and get a monopoly then bleed the potential customers). Might be why we pay more and get less for prescription drugs, health care, internet, mobile phones, etc, etc.

    18. Re:great use of our tax money by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Saw the video on the news. WTF is Homeland Security doing busting counterfeit NFL merch???

      Securing potential profits for the owners of the "homeland," at taxpayers' expense.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    19. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you assume the pirate shirt is inferior? The real jerseys and the fake ones both come from some place in China. As if one is hand made by skilled chinese jersey artisans and the other is loosely pieced together by unskilled slave laborers from bits of dryer lint or something.

      They're made on nearly identical machines in China. the difference between them is may be the tag on the back, and the quality of the silkscreen, That's probably it.

    20. Re:great use of our tax money by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      This could appear to be a waste of resources if you could show that otherwise they would have gone towards the other problems you mentioned. But that is generally not how budgetting works out at the federal level. So in this case it was probably more about either working on this bust or dozens of smaller ones. And if you believe that they have shown undue preference towards protecting the NFL's profits in this case then please unlighten us as to why you feel that way.

    21. Re:great use of our tax money by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      $2 for the materials to make some expensive designer item could be true but I don't really have any experience with that though it sounds implausibly low to me.

      My counter example would be my highschool football Jersey. That thing endured some pretty rough use and came out in pretty good condition. It was around $50 though. I definitely agree that the commemorative jerseys are way overpriced, but that doesn't mean that they can't be very well made and require some expensive materials and or manufacturing.

    22. Re:great use of our tax money by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      thousands of jobs have been destroyed so that the uber-rich NFL owners can snatch even more money from the commoners.

      Yes, and when the authorities break up an organised crime syndicate, they're putting thousands of poor drug dealers, pimps and gangsters out of business.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes, and when the authorities break up an organised crime syndicate, they're putting thousands of poor drug dealers, pimps and gangsters out of business."

      Really, you're comparing this to hardened criminals? It's almost as much of a stretch as the guy invoking MAFIAA's theft of property argument. It might legally be considered a crime but it's a petty one, and the law is based on an artificial construct to protect the oligopolies.

    24. Re:great use of our tax money by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      As far as the corporate pigs who have brought the United States to the brink of financial collapse? How much do I disdain them? Hand me a bayonet and put me next to the traitorous pig, and I show you exactly how a patriot treats a "capitalist" bent on raping his nation and people for maximum personal gain and profit.

      Calm down Mr Internet Tough Guy. Anyway I thought all you crazed libertarians used guns rather than bayonets?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:great use of our tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NFL is greedy. But they make no money from me. Please do not feed the beast. The game will be better when it is affordable to watch and the players are paid money that is reasonable for the job they do.

    26. Re:great use of our tax money by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

      the main difference i have found is that you are paying for the name. As another example, try trotting into your local mall and going into the Burberry store or whatever and there you have polo's for $100 or going into one of the fancy womens stores where you can buy a leather purse for $300, never mind the fact that you could go to any large retailer like JcPenny or something and the buy the exact same purse made with the exact same leather as the other one, yet it's $35-$40. The one for $300 was priced because of the tag on the front of the purse.

  6. More bad news? by Artea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reading Slashdot every day is starting to make me wonder if I'm allowed to do anything besides spend all my money and work (for less) without getting sued or arrested for copyright, patent, counterfeiting, or violating some all encompassing do-what-I-say law.

    1. Re:More bad news? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      so true, so true...

      so, can we have your liver, then?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:More bad news? by Fned · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, doing nothing but spending all your money and working is not enough to stop you getting sued or arrested for violating some random-ass law.

    3. Re:More bad news? by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:More bad news? by poity · · Score: 2

      Slashdot = nerd drama
      Don't take it too seriously.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    5. Re:More bad news? by guttentag · · Score: 2

      Reading Slashdot every day is starting to make me wonder if I'm allowed to do anything besides spend all my money and work (for less) without getting sued or arrested for copyright, patent, counterfeiting, or violating some all encompassing do-what-I-say law.

      This is why I only read Slashdot every other day. On my off days, I peruse the MPAA and RIAA news pages because I like reading about how everyone and their mother is stealing billions of dollars from them every day. It's not true, but it makes me feel like the 99% is winning, and it helps balance out all the pessimistic negative news you see here. And sometimes it's just plain funny:

      There is a near universal consensus that cracking down on foreign rogue websites is an important priority for the U.S. government. The Senate had an opportunity to have a national conversation about an important and urgent issue: protecting American workers and consumers from foreign criminals. It is a shame that the Senate will not have that debate next week.

      This issue is too important, too vital to our economy, to let misleading demagoguery have a veto over meaningful reforms. Everyone, every intermediary in the Internet ecosystem, has a role to play and a responsibility to help. We have been told repeatedly that the tech community agrees that something needs to be done. We take them at their word, and continue to hope that we can sit down with responsible leaders from that community to devise a solution that will address counterfeiting and theft and, yes, bring the rule of law to the Internet.

      They didn't even put a date on their news release. Know why? Because it's a timeless classic. They're going to use this for 10 years, and then they'll start charging you money for the next 120 years to go back and read it for the entertainment value. You gotta love these guys! If they pulled their PR people out of their cubicles and put them on stage doing stand-up, I might just pay to watch!

    6. Re:More bad news? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Reading Slashdot every day is starting to make me wonder if I'm allowed to do anything besides spend all my money and work (for less) without getting sued or arrested for copyright, patent, counterfeiting, or violating some all encompassing do-what-I-say law.

      slashdot != reality

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Gone are the dreams... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Dreams of anyone who wanted a souvenir on the cheap, that is. Official stuff is $$$.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Gone are the dreams... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      In modern Rome, you hand over all your bread for the circus, or ware the centurion...

      --
      Check your premises.
    2. Re:Gone are the dreams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i really fail to see how they would get the robots from a 1970s science fiction show to threaten people. to hand over money.

      in fact, i am sure people would willingly hand over money to meet murdock from a -team and tell fans about what it was like working with george lucas in star wars.

  8. ACTA? by t4ng* · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While everyone was fretting over SOPA/PIPA, Obama secretly signed the ACTA treaty back in October, 2011. Both Obama And Bush declared during their respective presidencies that the text of ACTA was classified due to national security. Both denied FOI petitions. So how does a citizen have any hope of not breaking the law when the laws themselves are kept secret from citizens?

    1. Re:ACTA? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      "Excessive law is no law" - Cicero

      There's more to the quote, generally talking about the criminalizing of all behaviors and making law useless. But the answer in itself is in the full quote. Funny how this was already discussed 2000 years ago.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:ACTA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of links, where's yours Junior?

    3. Re:ACTA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So how does a citizen have any hope of not breaking the law when the laws themselves are kept secret from citizens?

      I dunno, but it looks like there is another secret trade agreement called Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Ars Technica has the story

      Beyond ACTA: next secret copyright agreement negotiated this week—in Hollywood
      By Nate Anderson | Published February 1, 2012 6:30 PM ..
      But negotiators still insist of shielding their work from the public, even on matters of increasing public concern, such as digital copyrights. And each agreement they negotiate mysteriously ends up just a bit tougher than the one before it. The time for "trust us" is over, and unlike ACTA, people want meaningful access to TPP documents before the draft text has been so worked over that no substantive change is possible. But without significant public pressure, that's not going to happen. Again. ..

      Suggest calling your Congressional representatives and them you don't another trade agreement negotiated in secret and to put pressure on the administration to keep its promise of keeping government transparent.

    4. Re:ACTA? by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 2

      I would add to dear Cicero that a secret law is no law. The whole idea behind laws, if we're going back to Babylonian times, was that human beings were savages, and needed a code that the authorities could point to. "See, here's the list of shit you can't do." If a law is secret, how the hell are you supposed to comply?

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
    5. Re:ACTA? by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 2

      ...when the laws themselves are kept secret from citizens

      Here you go

      Consider yourself warned, citizen.

      Note that I believe the denial of the draft text due to "national security" was as bullshit as anything I've ever heard of, but now that it's signed, you can read it in all it's infamy

      I voted for O but this would be the very high on the long list of things I would call him to the floor for if I ever got to speak to him.

    6. Re:ACTA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make it a point to never vote for any of the 'big' parties. I may be in Canada, but all of our parties boil down to the exact same thing as with the US. They have their little 'wedge' issues that gets the populace all riled up and fighting for their respective sides, but on the whole they all do the same goddamn things.

      Not that I'd expect the Green party or anyone like that to actually be different... but I just want to see a party fail the public in a different way for once.

      That's all moot though, since the Harper government and it's successors will be running things for the next 50 years or so.

  9. If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we took all the money, time, energy, and resources wasted on football in the usa... We could solve our debt crisis in 5 years.

    TRILLIONS wasted on men playing 'ball'. that's just funny right there.

    Of course that would never happen. And i expect to be modded down to oblivion. Because there's nothing more rabid than sports fans.

    1. Re:If... by jdastrup · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you assuming that if we didn't spend money on a ballgame that we would instead take that money and send it to the IRS? Really?

      I think throwing money at a sports game and the genetic (or chemically enhanced) freak of natures (players) is a complete waste of money, but it's entertainment dollars, and I'm sure I spend that on other stuff that sports fans probably think is a waste of time in their opinion. Either way, it doesn't reduce the debt, doesn't feed the hungry, doesn't clothe the poor.

    2. Re:If... by cc_pirate · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. In Rome they had Bread and Circuses.

      In America we have McDonalds and the NFL.

      The ruling class messes with the circuses at their peril. They know the plebes need entertainment so that they remain docile and unwilling to rebel.

      --

      "There are laws that enslave men, and laws that set them free. " - Sean Connery as King Arthur

    3. Re:If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in theory, if any of the money in this system is paid out in capital gains (lower tax/no ss dedecuted), rather than income, then you'd be wrong. if the money going into cap gains were to be taxed like income (which it should be, or higher like lotto winnings because that's what it is essentially) more would go to reducing the deficit.

  10. Oh, hey by willaien · · Score: 0

    ICE doing things that aren't in their job description. Again.

    Shouldn't they be, I dunno, doing Immigration and Customs Enforcement?

    1. Re:Oh, hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much counterfeit merchandise actually passes THROUGH Customs, believe it or not

    2. Re:Oh, hey by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Shouldn't they be, I dunno, doing Immigration and Customs Enforcement?

      Well, if this merchandise was manufactured overseas (which of course even means Mexico), then seizing it is part of their job. I doubt they would have paid any customs tax. Even if this didn't fall under the scope of "customs", ICE does quite a number of things that you wouldn't think of just by looking at their name. They seize and return stolen artwork to Europe all the time.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Oh, hey by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't they be, I dunno, doing Immigration and Customs Enforcement?

      What do you think "Customs" is? The "customs" part of their name comes from their job of regulating the import of goods into the country; the term comes from import taxes being part of the "customary revenue" of the English King, and thus not subject to Parliamentary approval.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    4. Re:Oh, hey by EdIII · · Score: 1

      So much of what the government does is not tied to the name of the agency.

      In Texas the Rail Road commission oversees Oil & Gas.

    5. Re:Oh, hey by willaien · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have been more clear. I was referring to the sports streaming sites that were shutdown as part of this crackdown.

  11. Introducing the new War on .... by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    The new war on drugs. Wait till they take you down to see if that label on the back of your clothing is legit.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Introducing the new War on .... by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      You didn't rip off that tag on your mattress did you? Big brother has interests in your bedroom.

    2. Re:Introducing the new War on .... by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

      Just quit buying the sporting goods clothing, if they are spending tax dollars on this kind of shit just quit buying NFL apparel etc. I am a HUGE sports fan but I have decided I am done buying team clothing, for every sport. I don't need it to prove I like the team to anyone especially my friends and family, maybe I'll just start painting "Go Cubs" on hanes t-shirts myself and see if they can get me for counterfeiting their products. Insert cubs joke here... I've heard them all BTW.

      If we suck the money out of these industries maybe they will beg for a bunch of repeals that make the industry more fair and opened to even small businesses that cannot bid on the high volume orders but could still cater to their local markets... perhaps? This bullshit is killing one thing and one thing alone, SMALL BUSINESSES! This country is always talking about how bad we need small businesses, well I have just given you one way to attempt to help small businesses. Stop buying their high volume mass produced product that is made in china and make your own t-shirts, hats, or just wear clothing with other shit on it.

      --

      If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    3. Re:Introducing the new War on .... by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

      You didn't rip off that tag on your mattress did you? Big brother has interests in your bedroom.

      Just so you know, it is perfectly legal for the end-user to rip the tag off the mattress. The tag is only there for the middle handlers (e.g. wholesaler, retailer, etc). It cannot be legally removed until the customer receives the product. In this case, it is actually to protect the consumer by disclosing the materials used in the mattress, primarily "all new" versus "recycled".
      The sad truth is that Big Brother is much more covert in its interests in your bedroom.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    4. Re:Introducing the new War on .... by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Well, I believe that perfectly killed of that joke. Bravo.
      Sorry, I should have appended that message with some syntax indicating humor. Like :).

  12. Counterfeit costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4.8 million in goods. I'm sure they will find the other billion they say counterfeit goods cost companies very soon.

  13. Next time you get burgalized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember.. it is just your property that has been taken. It wasnt murder, drugs or anything violent.

    1. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      You mean... The next time someone sees pictures of my awesome couch and builds one similar to it claiming that that it has all the awesomeness of my original couch.

      Sorry, but lost sales != theft.

    2. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by EdIII · · Score: 2

      it has all the awesomeness of my original couch

      That's not possible. What about the hidden Cheetos and that expensive remote under the cushions?

    3. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by Firehed · · Score: 2

      This kind of counterfeiting is a lot closer to theft than piracy. I know the guy selling $5 Oakley's out of a shoebox on the street corner isn't selling authentic goods (although I have no doubt that some people really are that ignorant), but I may have no idea that my money isn't making it back to the claimed manufacturer in the case of somewhat cheaper-than-usual NFL jerseys. Chances are I was just trying to get the best deal but engage in a legitimate transaction. Counterfeiting isn't a lost sale so much as a hijacked one. Contrast that to pirating digital goods, where no money is changing hands.

      As noted in an earlier comment, I don't think this is a good of efficient use of my taxes. But if the money is going to be spent somewhere, I'd rather it go after counterfeiters (money going to the wrong party) than pirates (no transaction; could lead to one in the future). Given my choice, it would go after dangerous crime, or nowhere at all in the form of a lower tax rate.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's CLOSER to actual theft, but I imagine it still lacks the sting of coming home to an emptied out house.

    5. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I welcome the day when burglars do not even break into my place and only make bad copies of my stuff.

    6. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      know the guy selling $5 Oakley's

      Does anyone really think that if there were no such things as counterfeit Oakleys or Louis Vuitton that the poorer people who buy the bootlegs would just save up and buy a several hundred dollar pair of glasses or purse?

      It's not a lost sale, it's a non-existant sale.

    7. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But, in fairness, it might lead to a non-existent sale further up the line. Flooding the market with cheap imitations can kill a luxury brand's image - which *is* a serious problem!

    8. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You mean... The next time someone sees pictures of my awesome couch and builds one similar to it claiming that that it has all the awesomeness of my original couch. Sorry, but lost sales != theft.

      You can use that argument about individuals downloading stuff for their own use, but conterfeiters are selling their goods for money. While not a one-for-one loss (since presumably some of the people who buy the knock off stuff cheap wouldn't buy the much more expensive real thing), the money earned by counterfeiters is most certainly costing the owners.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Not all counterfeiting is $10 Rolexes that stop working five minutes after you buy them. A lot of things like sportswear that are sold are actually fairly good copies, for the simple reason that it's obvious if a t-shirt looks crap. In these cases, where customers might not even realise the goods are counterfeits, the original owners are definitely losing money.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I welcome the day when burglars do not even break into my place and only make bad copies of my stuff.

      How about if you could have sold your stuff, but now can't, because people don't bother as the bad copy is good enough?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's closer to say it's the buyer who was stolen from. He paid $5 thinking he was getting real Oakleys, and instead he got garbage. But that's fraud, not theft. I don't know if the people buying the counterfeit NFL merchandise talked about here think they're buying authorized merchandise or not.

    12. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      It can also heighten awareness of that brand and cause other people to desire it and purchase it later, assuming the knockoff isn't completely defective.

    13. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      A lot of this stuff is exact copies. The open secret is that the factories where clothes/handbags/electronics/etc. are made have two shifts every day. They run a secret third shift to make money under the table off of counterfeits.

    14. Re:Next time you get burgalized... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The difference between piracy and counterfeiting is that piracy won't hurt your bottom line and may in fact help it; that poor college kid can't afford Photoshop, but after learning it he'll probably throw tons of money at Adobe. The kid that downloads an unknown tune and likes it is more likely to buy tunes from that band.

      However, when you sell me a counterfeit copy of a movie, you've gotten money that the copyright holder should have gotten. You've cheated both him and me.

  14. in other news by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    nagios detected the 'seized' logo on 307 of my sites, and kicked off the rsync job for 307 new sites. lets hope this doesnt happen again, i only have 14,205 registered domains left from which to sell my yet-to-be-created JIT manufactured merchandise from china.

    Also, does anyone know if they still put the holographic sticker on the "authentic" merchandise? Ive got a trading partner from alibaba.com that can crank them out in rolls of 5000, but he needs some notice.

    heres hoping the superbowl is a huge success this year! I know the money really helped me last year when i had to pay off my foreclosure. this year my daughter needs braces, and my wifes blood pressure medication isnt covered by costco insurance.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:in other news by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      this year my daughter needs braces

      Is her name Lisa by any chance?

    2. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Simpsons reference? Really? It's a pretty far stretch to try to connect this to union bargaining, aside from the loose connection of corruption.

  15. this reminds me of by v1 · · Score: 1

    the olympics committee that go postal over anyone trying to edge in on their merchandising turf. But I suppose these are two of the biggest commercial events in the world. What are a few of the other lesser knowns that go to these lengths to protect their merchandising of the event? (I can kinda understand with the NFL, it's not about football as much is is about making money over football, but the olympics I feel should have a bit less greed in their heads)

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:this reminds me of by plover · · Score: 1

      What ever gave you the impression that the OoOoOlympics (TM) was ever about anything but money? The day they figured out they could get people to PAY for the privilege to host the games it stopped being about money and started being about shitloads of money. And hats. And ski trips, and family jobs, and Stupor Bowel tickets, and scholarships, and geld. And almost certainly hookers.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Winter_Olympic_bid_scandal

      And in case you were thinking of tossing a bid in the ring for your fair city, consider that Montreal went $1.6 billion in debt hosting the 1976 Olympics. They didn't pay off the final stadium bill until 2006. It's obviously very profitable to host the games.

      --
      John
    2. Re:this reminds me of by sempir · · Score: 0

      F1 Motor Racing, They go a few steps further....they take their money making machine all round the world. This year they do it 20 times. I have no idea how to work out the money it sucks up but it's in the Gazillions.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    3. Re:this reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can I immediately tell you're an American?

      But I suppose these are two of the biggest commercial events in the world.
      NFL
      biggest commercial events in the world
      in the world
      world

      Contrary to popular American belief, Football (or more specifically American Football, that being what this topic is about) is not even vaguely, remotely as popular anywhere else as you seem to beleive. Hell, even Canada has different rules! You can't even keep the rules consistent on one landmass!

      Try looking on the other side of the water for what sports are popular. I'll give you a hint on one of them... rioters in Egypt just killed dozens of people because the home team WON.

  16. One thing I always wondered ... by MacTO · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What counts as counterfeit goods? They always offer up fairly big numbers to justify these raids, but they rarely offer up enough details for the public to judge the real value of what they're doing.

    I'm bringing this up because I saw a news story that showed some counterfeit goods a few years ago. While some of them were pretty convincing, a lot of the stuff involved questionable cases of trademark infringement. One such example were batteries that used the colour scheme from a popular brand of batteries, yet everything else was distinguishable from the "genuine" goods (e.g. it went under a completely different product name). Claiming that they were counterfeit would be like claiming that Monopoly money was counterfeit.

    1. Re:One thing I always wondered ... by Adam+Appel · · Score: 1

      I worked for a retail manufacture that lost a trademark infringemt suite. Their product had some of the same letters of the better known product but in no other way did it seem to me there was any "consumer confusion". The product was called Tempinol it was a temporary tooth filling and Tylanol was the brand that filed the TM infringement.

      --
      They come in the dark, only in the darkest.
  17. Since When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did Federal law enforcement begin enforcing tort laws, and more importantly, how do I get the Feds to raid the guy down the street who's using my GPL code in violation of the license?

    1. Re:Since When by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Since when did Federal law enforcement begin enforcing tort laws, and more importantly, how do I get the Feds to raid the guy down the street who's using my GPL code in violation of the license?

      Well.. as much as I disapprove of the amount of money spent for such questionable gains, this does not fall under civil courts to my knowledge. It falls under the criminal infringement section of IP laws because of the scale of operation and the profit that was made. These were also physical items, not just 1's and 0's floating around in cyberspace.

      IP laws do make a distinction for criminal levels, but it is quite rare to see them enforced since 99.9999% of all infringement should be remanded to the civil courts as you suggest. In fact, most of the time it has been. For all the incorrect assertions that copyright infringement is stealing, those cases are tried in civil courts.

      Which is why we should all be fighting SOPA/PIPA/ACTA so damn hard. It will take simple copyright infringement and remove due process from the remediation provided to the copyright holder and go straight past the criminal trial to the sentencing and punishment phase.

    2. Re:Since When by tragedy · · Score: 1

      In simpler terms, it's actually written into the law that an entirely different law applies to offenses against you depending on how rich and powerful you are. If you're just a regular person, then offenses against you are just against you and you have to go yourself to civil court to seek justice in the form of limited monetary compensation. If you're big and powerful, offenses against you are offenses against the people, and the executive branch of government will take the vile offender to criminal court for you and see to it that they're thrown into a dark hole.

      Now, I know that there are legitimate reasons for a certain volume being a more serious offense, etc. but in reality, it pretty much works out to justice for the rich and powerful being more important in the eyes of the government. Try going to the police of the Feds when you've been defrauded out of a paltry $40,000 and see how much they care, but if you have a major brand and someone is selling $5000 worth of merchandise with a fake version of your logo on it, they'll spring into action.

  18. Warrents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't read the article but out of curiosity, did they need warrants/due process/proof or did they just seize a 307 websites because they could?

  19. At what cost? by kwiqsilver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did they bother to calculate how much it cost the federal government to do all of this?
    The feds spent $X to seize $Y of counterfeit goods that, if they entered the market, might have reduced NFL revenues by $Z.
    Y >> Z is definitely true (the guy willing to pay $10 for the counterfeit, might not pay $50 for the authentic).
    I seriously doubt X < Z.

  20. The Obama Administration's Priorities by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Taking down domains without a trial, secretly negotiating international IP treaties (ACTA), threatening American ISPs into adopting a "six strikes" policy...

    Judging by its actions, IP enforcement is clearly the Obama Administration's top priority. Is it corruption, or is it just plain disregard for justice and the due process of law?

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    1. Re:The Obama Administration's Priorities by NIN1385 · · Score: 0

      I for one apologize for voting for him, I was blinded by the possibility of real change.

      I intend to make up for that bad mistake by voting for Ron Paul this year.

      Again, I am sorry.

      --

      If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    2. Re:The Obama Administration's Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't call this real change?

      He only promised Change. Oh, and Hope.

      He Changed all the laws to suit him and now we Hope he isn't re-elected.

      Both promises kept.

      Good guy Mr. President.

    3. Re:The Obama Administration's Priorities by kirkb · · Score: 1

      Terrible. Bush would never have done anything like this. ;)

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    4. Re:The Obama Administration's Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist!!!11one

    5. Re:The Obama Administration's Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted for obama so that another nigger would never be president again. Prechter's theory of socionomics pretty much guaranteed that the people would hate obama -- regardless of what he did.

    6. Re:The Obama Administration's Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's national defense. IP is this country's only remaining P worth noting. Obama's primary goal is re-election, and in order to get it he has to make the country prosper financially. Legal precedent, civil liberties, ethics, due process, jobs, lives... these things only appear on the table when they can support the primary objective.

  21. Priorities by omems · · Score: 2

    I recommend going to the ICE Facebook page (WTF?) and let them know how much we appreciate their hard work protecting us from fake jerseys and other insidious chotchkies.

    You know, add yourself to the list of people to monitor. Fuckfaces all around.
    Too bad we have to use our real names...

  22. Whacking Moles by Froggels · · Score: 1

    Why won't the government realize that it is wasting its time and our money? Many of the sites are probably not even located in the US and will continue to operate even after their domains are seized. (You gotta the word "seized") And tools like Mafiaafire http://mafiaafire.com/ render their efforts increasingly pointless. The whole ordeal reminds of the Princess Leia quote from Star Wars "The tighter you clinch your fist, the more systems will slip through your fingers." When will they ever learn?

    1. Re:Whacking Moles by EdIII · · Score: 1

      At least quote it correctly.

      "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

      2 more strikes and you lose your geek card.

    2. Re:Whacking Moles by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      yes we should roll over and take it up the ass by some dumb shit in china cause thousands of years after gunpowder these geniusus figured out how to google an image and screen print it on a garment

  23. Thank god. by mtm_king · · Score: 1

    I feel so much safer now.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  24. Not real stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already watched the Supery Bowls! Now I'm thinking... maybe that was fake too. Well, they were using a football and they were playing with it and I think they were real people. Wait, is "football" trademarked? Maybe it wasn't even a real football.

    Anyway, thank god I didn't purchase any of the fake merch! I'd hate to get home and find the stuff disappear in my hands for lack of having the properties of real items.

    Or worse... if the NFL people didn't get a cut of the money I spent.

  25. ICE Correction by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Informative
    From TFA, ICE stated:

    "Visitors to these websites will then find a seizure banner that notifies them that the domain name has been seized by federal authorities and educates them that willful copyright infringement is a federal crime."

    Correction: Willful copyright infringement in the form of selling counterfeit merchandise is a Federal crime. If you are infringing copyright solely for personal use, the vast majority of the time there is no "crime" at all. It is a civil infraction.

    1. Re:ICE Correction by houghi · · Score: 2

      If you are infringing copyright solely for personal use, the vast majority of the time there is no "crime" at all. It is a civil infraction.

      You must be new here.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:ICE Correction by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Correction: Willful copyright infringement in the form of selling counterfeit merchandise is a Federal crime.

      As I recall, it was "profiting from copyright infringement", not just "selling counterfeit merchandise", and they got around it by saying that benefiting from the copyrighted work(s) was, in itself, a form of profit. (I.e., the "if you hadn't downloaded it you would have been compelled to buy it" fallacy.)

      However, this is all second-hand. If you have a more authoritative source I'd be glad to see it.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    3. Re:ICE Correction by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "As I recall, it was 'profiting from copyright infringement', not just 'selling counterfeit merchandise'..."

      I think you are correct, but on the other hand I believe 99.9% or more of actual criminal copyright infringement involves sales.

      To the best of my knowledge, nobody has made the theory that "downloading = profit" stick. As far as I know, you have to actually "make a profit", that is to say, material gain, from your infringement in order for it to be criminal. Also, it usually involves "mass" copying.

  26. 0.1% by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NFL revenue is about 4 billion. Clearly this is not a threat to their business.

    The FBI needs to have it's budget cut if this is the best thing they can do. I mean 4 million is one SUV full of cocaine.

    1. Re:0.1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually made 10 billion this year (net revenue).

    2. Re:0.1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 million is one SUV full of cocaine

      Was that a dealership special? Can I get that in a Land Rover, or does it only come in Escalade

  27. SOPA/PIPA by ALeavitt · · Score: 2

    It's a good thing SOPA and PIPA passed, or else the government would be powerless to stop this kind of criminal activity.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
  28. Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But what's more shocking is that this is done in the name of football.
    It's just a game. No more dignified then tiddlywinks, starcraft, or mumbley-peg. The NFL got the FEDS to bust up counterfeiters? For $4.8 million in loot? Really?

    Come on guys, get a grip. I'd like to say that nobody cares how "your team" did, but sadly I can't. All I can say is nobody should really care. It's an activity that does not warrant caring.

    1. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      But what's more shocking is that this is done in the name of football

      No, it's being done in the names of everyone in the country who actually run legitimate manufacturing and importing operations, and who don't rip other people off. This particular annual event stimulates a predictable wave of scams, thefts, counterfeit goods ... and the people who are involved plan for it. The rest of the year, they're doing other crap along the same lines. Busting them is a good thing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by houghi · · Score: 1

      Ask the Romans what they thought of violent games in huge arena's.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Ask the Romans what they thought of violent games in huge arena's.

      When they start releasing lions and rhinos on the pitch during NFL games, I might actually start watching them.

    4. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by sdguero · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your overall point, I do want to say that there is a LOT more to a playing physical team sport than video games or tiddlywinks. Communication, compassion, synergy, teamwork, etc are all things that can happen with a game like football. And those experiences can help people succeed in the real world.

      /ducks from shoe throwing, sports hating, /.ers

    5. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by FrkyD · · Score: 1

      because most geeks have only fond memories of the compassionate members of the football team.

      On the other hand, they did like to throw quarters at my head. Maybe it was their way of helping me add to my college fund...

    6. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The underlying discontent is in the disparity of compensation.. an average salary of 1.9 million to play a game while teachers make 40,000.. tells you where we're inevitably headed.

    7. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Communication, compassion, synergy, teamwork, etc are all things that can happen with a game like Starcraft.
      There, fixed that for you. The difference between playing a physical team game and playing a mental team game is that it's physical. And that's about it.
      What, you don't think there are teams of gamers out there?
      That guild leader don't have a ton of organizational work?
      That a CTF game doesn't involve coordination?
      That you don't have the gracious losers and humble winners when it's zerglings instead of pigskins?

      Where the hell have you been? And sure, while both physical sports and video games can tangentially teach people how to deal with situations and other people, they're still just games.

      Tidlywinks isn't a team game though, so if you were selectively talking about that, sure, you have a point.

      Damn right you should be ducking, your argument is weak.

    8. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by sdguero · · Score: 1

      I guess I left out exercise...

    9. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you should have thrown them back and told 'em to fuck off. I never played football but I learned at a young age to stand up for myself and my friends, even if it means a one (or two or three) time beat down. It's way better than getting shit on every day. Even now, I run into Engineer bullies in the corporate world, and I have never met one that didn't back down when they got called out (works a LOT better if called out in front of their boss). When executed well, not only will the bully leave you alone, but your coworkers/friends will have your back moving forward.

      For me, working with nerds that are so used to being bullied, I have the opposite problem of always having to make sure I don't accidentally bully someone because I can't even tell if they have no opinion, aren't paying attention, or do have a valid argument but are so meek that they can't elucidate their thoughts. To me, meekness is surprisingly common in the Engineering world and definitely counter productive.

    10. Re:Yeah yea, the feds being bullies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Team sports teach a lot of lessons that are important for children to learn.

  29. WTF does ICE have to do with NFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF does INS or ICE have to do with NFL.

    1. Re:WTF does ICE have to do with NFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INS and ICE have SFA to do with the NFL.

    2. Re:WTF does ICE have to do with NFL by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      TLA. They feel a kindred spirit because of it.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  30. And this is why by sdguero · · Score: 2

    I will never buy NFL licensed anything.

  31. You are breathing by kawabago · · Score: 1

    Disney has the rights to breathing which it earned with the movie Warhorse, stop breathing right now or pay through the nose!

  32. Well, since all other crimes were eliminated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they have to have something to keep them busy... seeing as they have worked diligently and put a stop to murder, illegal drugs, counterfeit money, break ins, robberies and all that stuff.

  33. But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next question to ask is how much of that seized merchandise is going to turn out to be real and how are the rightful owner going to retrieve it from the FBI agents' basements and such.

  34. Good work, BTW, Where were the feds when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't bust the fat cats at AIG, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and so on... After all it is not like they scammed their own clients and stole hundreds of millions and colapsed the economy.

  35. Welfare by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Waste of my tax dollars if ever there was one...

    My imaginary conservative friend, who always displays perfect consistency in all of his opinions, is outraged that his tax dollars are being spent to defend private trademarks and IP. Trademarks belonging, moreover, to corporations that pay very little in taxes themselves. "What has happened to individual responsibility in this country?" he might be heard to exclaim. "Surely these firms could defend their IP monopolies themselves, without public assistance. I mean, this is the NFL! You mean to tell me they can't find a few hired thugs to show these pirates how not to do business?"

  36. Thank Goodness by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Thank Goodness that the Federal Government is protecting the profits of the National Felons League rather than protecting our boarders from the drug cartels, going after Chris Dodd for his acknowledged bribery issues, or anything else they could be doing.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  37. Bet a testicle for an Expert S-ex Change by tepples · · Score: 1

    (#38909999)

    Congrats on quads.

    What would you do with three testicles?

    Perhaps someone is trying to gain or lose enough testicles to get an Expert S-ex Change done. Or maybe someone took one of the "is it low T?" commercials the wrong way.

    1. Re:Bet a testicle for an Expert S-ex Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (#38909999)

      Congrats on quads.

      Congrats on quads? What is this, 4chan?

  38. Supply Chain by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    There's a fair chance of it being the very same items made in the very same factories, just after hours and off the books.

    If you've worked the supply chain you'd know that it's the norm everywhere you look

    Vendor A put an order of 2 million jerseys, and somehow somewhere that order self-multiplied throughout the length of the supply chain

    And in this worldwide distributed supply chain that we are having right now, it's uncommon that an order placed in HongKong will be sub-contracted to factories in China, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Nigeria, India, Vietnam ...

    At the end, 2.5 to 4 million jerseys would be made and Vendor A will get the 2 million jerseys he ordered.

    As for the remainder ? Most of them would be stored in some warehouse somewhere, and part of those merchandises will find their way to the grey market

    These "extra merchandises" are of top quality - in fact, they are of the same quality as the jerseys the Vendor A is selling in its authorized franchises.

    From watches to jerseys to sport shoes to ... just look around your house/office, any of them could be from the 'extra merchandises" category

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  39. who wins? by hosecoat · · Score: 1

    are these "counterfeit" goods even hurting anyone. nfl makes money, merch seller makes money, more people have jobs. why are we cracking down on this.

  40. Banners by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    If you're wondering how many seized site banners there are out there, it's 11. Here they all are: DOJ Seized Domain Notices - Paul Nickerson - Picasa Web Albums

    My script found only 389 seized domains in total, and that should be over 465, so I'll try again in a few days and update the album.

  41. Corporate taxes by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    If your house is robbed and the police show up to investigate should you get a bill? How about a fire? What is the point of taxes to pay for any government services if we have to pay to use them?

    That's a fair point. But then I feel compelled to point out that corporations pay far less in taxes than real people do, sometimes no taxes at all. What then?

    If a real person is so poor that they don't pay taxes, I consider it fair that they still get to use public services -- that's part of the whole social contract thing. If disaster befalls me and I wind up so poor myself some day, I don't want to be stuck up a certain creek with no access to public services.

    If a corporation is so rich that they don't pay taxes, I consider it fair that they be denied use of public services -- this is a basic violation of the whole social contract thing. If the corporation is capable of paying any of its bills at all, its tax bill should be near the top of the list -- certainly above executive bonuses, at any rate.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  42. Yeat Another White House Petition by hemo_jr · · Score: 1
    http://wh.gov/kvY

    "Remind the DOJ and DHS of the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence when dealing with the Internet."