Slashdot Mirror


Finding Lost Recording From the 1880s

An anonymous reader writes "The NY Times recently ran a story on the discovery of a cache of wax cylinder records, recorded in Europe in the 1880s, of Otto von Bismarck, Helmuth von Moltke, and various musicians. 'In June 1889, Edison sent Wangemann to Europe, initially to ensure that the phonograph at the Paris World’s Fair remained in working order. After Paris, Wangemann toured his native Germany, recording musical artists and often visiting the homes of prominent members of society who were fascinated with the talking machine. Until now, the only available recording from Wangemann’s European trip has been a well-known and well-worn cylinder of Brahms playing an excerpt from his first Hungarian Dance. That recording is so damaged "that many listeners can scarcely discern the sound of a piano, which has in turn tarnished the reputations of both Wangemann and the Edison phonograph of the late 1880s," Dr. Feaster said. "These newly unearthed examples vindicate both."'"

128 comments

  1. Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick! Adopt the BCTEA! 2012-1880+50 = 182 years of protection! What if everyone is going to copy this wax cylinder?!!

    1. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nobody knows Bismark anymore.

      And it can't sound totally ridiculous, like "The Mickey Mouse Copyright Extension Act" [which is what the last one was, but was named the Sonny Bono act to be slightly less ridiculous].

      This time, it'll be something like "The Lady Gaga Copyright Enhancement Act" [using the work enhancement so any attempt to send an email concerning it will automatically be flagged as spam].

      And copyright will be extended to 50 years after every copy of the IP ceases to exist in any form, including thoughts and memories.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nobody knows Bismark anymore.

      But at least in Germany, about everyone has heard of Bismarck.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by vleo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Nobody knows Bismark anymore." - too bad for the US then... In Russia everybody knows him for this saying:

      "Do not expect that once taken advantage of Russia's weakness, you will receive dividends forever. Russian always come for their money. And when they come - do not rely on the Jesuit agreement you signed, you are supposed to justify. They are not worth the paper it is written. Therefore, with the Russian cost or fair play or no play. "

      So... what about that NATO expansion in Europe? What about ridiculous "Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe"? What about all these Russian people discriminating pseudo-countries that were breaded by the US around Russia?

      Very symbolic timing to find these recordings of Bismark indeed...

      p.s. but it's even more complicated then that. Nobody was able to trace that citation to original Bismark's speech or writing... I hope some Germans may shed more light on this. But regardless of this Bismark is adored in Russia, as on of very rare well known Western pro-Russian politician of all times.

      --
      Vassili Leonov ...it is the actions that affect us, not the motive...RMS
    4. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would dare say that anyone who can be considered to have even passing knowledge of Western history would know who Bismarck is, and why he is famous.

    5. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But at least in Germany, about everyone has heard of Bismarck."

      But only because pickled herrings are called 'Bismarck-Hering' not because German teens know more about history than US ones.

    6. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone who can be considered to have even passing knowledge of Western history would know who Bismarck is, and why he is famous.

      The tasty cream filling. Duh.

    7. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Swampash · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would dare say that anyone who can be considered to have even passing knowledge of Western history would know who Bismarck is, and why he is famous.

      So no Americans then?

    8. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Funny

      >>So no Americans then?

      Uh, Bismarck is the capital of North Dakota.

      He also runs a killer Chicken and Biscuit restaurant in between forays into the Atlantic to do some quality commerce raiding.

      Checkmate, Europeans.

    9. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you buddy.

    10. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      In America, he's more famous for saying, "Laws are like sausages. It is better not to see them being made."

      Though he probably never said it.

    11. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the UK, about everyone has heard of Bismarck too, though perhaps in a slightly different context.

    12. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oddly enough, he's less famous for some things about politics he did actually say, which are widely used, but less widely remembered as originating with Bismarck:

      "Politics is not an exact science."

      "Politics is the art of the possible."

      He's also the source of the prediction: "If there is ever another war in Europe, it will come out of some damned silly thing in the Balkans."

    13. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bullshit. Don't be so full of yourself. German teens are far more likely to know some of the greater historical figures of the 19th century than they are of the US, no matter what you'd like to think.

    14. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by sourcerror · · Score: 2

      I've seen a lot of westerns, but still don't know who this Bismarck guy is.

    15. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, the ship is better known than it's namesake. Probably because we are still rather proud of blowing it up.

    16. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Why? Do they have alot of relatives in North Dakota?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    17. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he made that donut with the cream inside. Duh!

      Then they named a ship after him in WW2.

    18. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      No, it was a ship. I've seen it on the WWII channel.

      --
      No sig today...
    19. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would dare say that anyone who can be considered to have even passing knowledge of Western history would know who Bismarck is, and why he is famous.

      And for that matter, they would know Edison was a lier a crook and a cheat - I doubt an old record - good or terrible quality - is going even be a discernible tickmark on a graph of how fucking low he was.

    20. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by fafaforza · · Score: 2

      Dumping on Americans has become a pastime, it seems. I was taught about Bismarck in a US school. Don't remember anything more than him uniting Germany, and other generalities. Sorry if I'm interrupting a circlejerk here.

    21. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      anyone who can be considered to have even passing knowledge of Western history would know who Bismarck is, and why he is famous.

      The tasty cream filling. Duh.

      Don't forget the Berliners.

    22. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, the ship is better known than it's namesake. Probably because we are still rather proud of blowing it up.

      I tought you sunk it.

    23. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      That's one up on history education here in the UK. Here we learn exactly 3 topics- The Tudors, the two World Wars, and 1x classical civilization of choice.

      I believe some Tory politician or other decided once that it would be unpatriotic to learn too much about the history of anywhere that isn't British and didn't involve winning...

    24. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      I should hope so.

      He guest stars on Yo Gabba Gabba, he figured prominently in Men in Black II, and who can forget "Just A Friend"?

      The Clown Prince of Hip Hop

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biz_Markie

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    25. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she was a ship. I've seen it on the WWII channel.

      FTFY

    26. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by sbjornda · · Score: 1

      In America, he's more famous for saying, "Laws are like sausages. It is better not to see them being made." Though he probably never said it.

      He might have said it. A search on German Google finds a lot of hits attributed to him (and not Saxe) for variations on "The less the people know about how sausages and laws are made, the better they sleep."

      Je weniger die Leute wissen, wie Würste und Gesetze gemacht werden, desto besser schlafen sie.

    27. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Nidi62 · · Score: 0

      Then they named a ship after him in WW2.

      The Bismarck was sunk in WWI......

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    28. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm american and i know who he is.

    29. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Hatta · · Score: 1

      This was 10th grade history where I was from.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Huge_UID · · Score: 1
    31. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by SomeKDEUser · · Score: 1

      I have bad news for you: it was scuttled. The armour was too strong for the Royal Navy. So you disabled the Bismark, yes, but she had to sink herself.

    32. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Ich bin eine jelly filled donut

    33. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Alphathon · · Score: 1

      I assume you are referring to English history education - Scotland has a totally separate curriculum and set of qualifications from England, so I don't think that statement applies. I'm not sure how things differ in Wales and N.I. (I think Wales generally falls in line with England with regard to education). Certainly, prior to Standard Grade level (equivalent of GCSE) we learn about things like the Scottish wars of independence (which seems to fall into the same patriotism category that you mentioned, but with regard to Scotland) and the Victorians certainly popped up quite a bit (certainly things like the suffragettes were covered too, although that may have crossed over into Modern Studies). At Standard Grade level (which I didn't do, opting instead for Geography, so take everything I say with a pinch of salt) the World Wars are discussed, but along with those come the reunification of Germany and Weimar Germany, since they are kinda important topics to understand if you are to have any context for the wars.

    34. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Ships tend to do that once you've hit them with two torpedoes.

    35. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The ship was on fire, listing heavily, and took on so much water the stern was lower than the bow. True, the ship was scuttled... but if it hadn't been, it would have sunk. Even if it stayed afloat in that shape, the next torpedo would have done it, or the one after. Bismark was in no shape to fight back - steam catapult out of operation, engines dead, all four main gun batteries dead. Sitting duck. That ship was going down, one way or another.

    36. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Bismarck was sunk in WWI......

      Can't tell if trolling or just stupid. The Bismarck was commissioned in August 1940 and sunk by a British squadron led by the HMS King George V after British torpedo bombers had crippled her, on 27 May 1941. So, yeah, World War II.

    37. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMlXVpUAwAA

      I hate dumping on Americans. I hate it even more when we deserve it.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    38. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, it would have stayed afloat until the RN captured her, hence the scuttling.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    39. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Germany, about everyone has heard of Bismarck.

      Yes, it's a kind of herring. Now what I find really amazing is Bismarck reciting the Marseillaise.

    40. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a NORTH Dakota. Something new every day.

    41. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by formfeed · · Score: 5, Funny

      anyone who can be considered to have even passing knowledge of Western history would know who Bismarck is, and why he is famous.

      The tasty cream filling. Duh.

      Don't forget the Berliners.

      The Berliner are the same as the Polish Paczki, and in the US some call them Bismarck. Which in Germany is a pickled fish.
      Confusing, I know. The only thing I get out of this is that Bismarck must have been some kind of chef - like Julius Cesar, who invented the salad dressing.

    42. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by DrXym · · Score: 1

      That's a fairly unlikely scenario. The Bismarck had 2000 crew. It would have been lunacy for the RN to attempt to board it short of surrender and there was absolutely no chance of that. The Brits would have simply pounded shells and torpedoes into it until it sank.

    43. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      WTF? A female ship? Ahhh pull the other one.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    44. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by bickerdyke · · Score: 1
      --
      bickerdyke
    45. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Remember how they wanted to pull stuff OUT of Public Domain?

      We can't have anything German! It might infect us with the same virus that created the world's ultimate terrorist!
      (Some portions of Godwin applies, see below for details.)

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    46. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one up on history education here in the UK. Here we learn exactly 3 topics- The Tudors, the two World Wars, and 1x classical civilization of choice.

      Well, if the kids get their choice, I'd imagine that teenage British boys are very much into studying the Minoans.

    47. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by bbbaldie · · Score: 1

      "Is a bismawck a hewwing?" Lilly Von Schtupp

    48. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bismark was scuttled by its crew

    49. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Canadian, and it just struck me that we probably spent more time on European history than we did on ANYTHING else. Once we reach high school our history and political theory classes focus completely on Europe and the Americas, we learn next to nothing about the eastern hemisphere. (I'm eight years the other side of my graduation, and was educated under the Alberta curriculum, it may be worth noting) In fact, I wouldn't hesitate to suggest we spent more time covering the American Civil War than we did covering the entirety of Asian history. Just thought I'd throw something out there for the circle jerk.

    50. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Nimey · · Score: 1

      The German crew knew their position was untenable - they could stay and get the shit pounded out of them without being able to maneuver or fire back, slowly getting killed, or they could abandon ship. Naval honor dictated scuttling their ship before abandoning so the enemy couldn't have her.

      As it happened the RN left the area because they believed U-boats were on the way and they didn't want their nice battleships and cruisers getting torpedoed.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    51. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Yes, Johnny Horton sung "Sink the Bismark"

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    52. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      And the name under which you posted tells us your moral qualities.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    53. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by heroid1a · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, so mathematics is out then ?

    54. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by heroid1a · · Score: 1

      Ah, but since the Yanks didn't make it to the party until December 1941, perhaps they count May 1941 as being part of the preceding world war? (Just to keep things even for accounting purposes...)

    55. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You've never seen Star Trek? All ships are female. It's always "she was a good ship," never "he was a good ship." Same with cars.

    56. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was a boat. A song was written about sinking it.

    57. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, so mathematics is out then ?

      That's one up on history education here in the UK.

      The key word in that sentence began with an "h" and rhymed with "mystery".

    58. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Apologies, yep. The National Curriculum applies to England, Wales and N. Ireland. You lucky Scottish devils.

    59. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apologies, yep. The National Curriculum applies to England, Wales and N. Ireland. You lucky Scottish devils.

      Dont worry. We have the "Curriculum for Excrement!"...Oh, sorry. Meant "Curriculum for Excellence", which is doing its best to ruin education north of the border.

    60. Re:Bismarck Copyright Term Extension Act by heroid1a · · Score: 1

      "History" does not rhyme with "Mystery" - unless you consider it to be a "mis-toory"... At least to those of us speaking the Queen's English. Ah, the delights of RP. Incidentally, my point was that "the two World Wars" are scarcely one subject, therefore there were precisely 4 items in the list of "precisely" 3 items.

  2. Handle them carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Immediately made me think of this old TechTV segment on one of these cylinders being destroyed on camera.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnsizkVjGm8

    1. Re:Handle them carefully by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      That's like watching gore. Eww

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Handle them carefully by fleebait · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Those old recordings, really are more delicate than eggshells. When I was 5 or 6, in 1949, or 1950, I was at my friend's house. His father was a professor at University of Minnesota -- and had a box of old cylinders on a table in the basement. My friend showed them to me, and I proceeded to break, two, or three. I remember one being so delicate, just picking it up out of the box, by putting my finger through, was enough to break it. They were dull reddish brown, and I always thought they were made out of clay or plastic. Still feel guilty about it..

    3. Re:Handle them carefully by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Dear god, I feel like I'm going to throw up. Here's a link for those you who aren't as squeamish about this kind of thing as I am.

    4. Re:Handle them carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that's real? If so, what idiot decided to let someone with Parkinson's handle such a delicate artefact?

    5. Re:Handle them carefully by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Yes, that guy should have put that cylinder down rather quickly. He should have realized his health condition was not conducive to handling delicate items.

    6. Re:Handle them carefully by Sulphur · · Score: 0

      That's like watching Gore. Eww

      FTFY

    7. Re:Handle them carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more reason to handle them carefully, in a figurative sense, is with 150 years of copyright coverage, these things will not fall into the public domain until the year 2030, another 18 years away.

      Someone's great great great grandson could sue for loss of profits

  3. I smell RIAA by BenJCarter · · Score: 2

    Paranoid, or not paranoid enough...

    --
    For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
  4. Copyright from the past by evanism · · Score: 1

    Wonder what Brahms would make of the insanity that passes for copyright today.

    That phonograph is going to destroy my business! (radio, record, cassette, cd, DVD, Internet).

    Their squealling probably has been the same.

    --
    Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    1. Re:Copyright from the past by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Wonder what Brahms would make of the insanity that passes for copyright today.

      It's a fact that many authors are very much for the kind of copyright laws being passed today. What makes you think Brahms would be any different?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Copyright from the past by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wonder what Brahms would make of the insanity that passes for copyright today.

      Dunno about Brahms, but we all know what happened when Bismark found out about Franz Ferdinand's bootleg copies of his hit song "eis eis baby".

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Copyright from the past by luke923 · · Score: 1

      True, but I don't think that Brahms' contemporaries would advocate for what passes for copyright law today where some multinational corporation can hold rights to an author's work ad infinitum.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    4. Re:Copyright from the past by zarlino · · Score: 1

      Also it's a fact that many authors today create music not as nearly sophisticated as Brahms'. So there is hope that Brahms and other musical giants like him would have thought otherwise about copyright.

      --
      Check out my cross-platform apps
    5. Re:Copyright from the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wonder what Brahms would make of the insanity that passes for copyright today.

      It's a fact that many authors are very much for the kind of copyright laws being passed today. What makes you think Brahms would be any different?

      I don't know how many classical composers you know in person, but I know quite a few. They all seem to agree one thing: the current copyright laws don't benefit them at all. They get very little money from it. Most of it goes to the publisher or the rights-organization...

    6. Re:Copyright from the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a fact that many authors are very much for the kind of copyright laws being passed today. What makes you think Brahms would be any different?

      Most "authors" today doesn't have the skill to write and perform a song.
      It's not surprising that they are willing to support whatever the record companies wants, after all they would not be able to compete with composers/performers of Brahms caliber if they didn't have the backing of the record companies.

    7. Re:Copyright from the past by Johann+Lau · · Score: 3, Informative

      Classical composers were paid for composing; as in "we need a new tune for next sunday's mass, and another completely different tune, which will likely never get played again in your lifetime, for the mass on sunday after that". Kinda like a carpenter gets paid to make a table, not every time someone uses that table. People back then did NOT listen to that music over and over and over again. It was written, it got played, something new was written. Totally different from today, and I'm pretty sure classical composers would be laughing at things like Mickey Mouse Copyright. Also, not few of that music was more or less dedicated to God, not to Mammon. Sure, they liked being well fed, who doesn't... but that's not why they wrote those pieces, that is simply not how they operated. It kinda shows in the music, too. The heart, it cannot be hidden.

    8. Re:Copyright from the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how many classical composers you know in person, but I know quite a few...

      Sure you do...

      Fucking moron.

  5. MP3 of recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.nps.gov/edis/photosmultimedia/audio-wangemann-1889-1890-european-recordings.htm

    1. Re:MP3 of recordings by Edzilla2000 · · Score: 1

      They are offering the mp3's for free... Did someone tell Birsmarck about all the money he's losing?

    2. Re:MP3 of recordings by Solandri · · Score: 1

      These recordings give us a good idea how crazy Copyright law has become. Under current copyright law, recordings made prior to 1978 but which weren't published until after 1978 fall under modern copyright terms. For personal works that's life of the author + 70 years. But fo anonymous and pseudonymous works (e.g. various performances recorded by the Edison company), it's 95 years after publication, or 120 years if not published. Since these recordings were never published, they fall under the 120 year term.

      In other words, the 1889 recording of Otto von Bismark finally entered the public domain in 2009.

    3. Re:MP3 of recordings by RDW · · Score: 1

      Free? That's a clear violation of Edison's EULA!:

      http://boingboing.net/2009/01/13/thomas-edisons-crapp.html

    4. Re:MP3 of recordings by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They are offering the mp3's for free... Did someone tell Birsmarck about all the money he's losing?

      The fact that he is getting no money will totally discourage him and all his contemporaries from making any new recordings.

    5. Re:MP3 of recordings by Fnord666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They are offering the mp3's for free... Did someone tell Birsmarck about all the money he's losing?

      Might as well use mp3s since you're going to digitize it anyway. I'm telling you, there's no way digital interpretation of the medium can faithfully reproduce the warm, rich feel that you get from the original analog recordings.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    6. Re:MP3 of recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it didn't, not necessarily. A lawyer would probably argue that Bismarck commissioned Edison to make the recordings - that being the case, the relevant copyright law would be German, since under both codes Bismarck would hold the copyrights. If Edison was found to have commissioned Bismarck - unlikely - only then would the relevant law be American. Now, I have no idea if the German law would give a 120 year term or less, but for all I know, it's less, and the recordings could have entered the public domain as early as, say, 1989 -- a full 71 years after the collapse of the German Empire...

      [Further, we have no idea whether German law states the same, or instead argues that recordings made in Germany before, say, 1960, are subject to modern German law, regardless of who would possess copyright under a modern code. Almost certainly not, but without knowing any German law we actually don't know what it would say.]

      This in no way invalidates your point that the copyright laws are dumb, but it's always worth being aware that in law there are always myriad complications, which is why lawyers exist - to perpetuate the complications and profit from them.

    7. Re:MP3 of recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, they should have told that guy on the snare drum to take a rest!

    8. Re:MP3 of recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes! Playing them digitally will cause them to sound harsh, and think about the loss of precious information from compression!

  6. For thoses interested... by Vlaix · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... the first actual recordings ever made of sounds and voice can be found there : http://www.firstsounds.org/.

    1. Re:For thoses interested... by luke923 · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that their site is so old, they had to resort to tables?

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    2. Re:For thoses interested... by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing that their site is so old, they had to resort to tables?

      stupid joke. Why would you expect everybody being professional in html AND in his field of research? If he recovers wax cylinders he can have a website without latest www whistles. Besides I think that it browses and feels very good, and flash applets play music well, which is most important here.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    3. Re:For thoses interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's less forgivable than ancient HTML or the use of Flash is that the recording is full of mp3 encoding artifacts. A sound specialist should do better than that.

  7. Not bad but not exactly great either by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    Those 1860's Phonautograph recordings are more impressive IMO, though I could imagine how eery it must have been seeing someone's voice being rapidly printed in a snaky fashion, as if ribbons of silk were being pulled from their throats...

  8. Ah huh! Just as I expected... by arcite · · Score: 2

    So it was Colonel Mustard in the Billiard room with the candlestick that caused the Great War after all!

  9. First recording of 'fuck' by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Click here to hear, from March 11, 1885, the first time the word 'fuck' was ever recorded. (Disc 3) Some fellow is making a test recording of 'mary had a little lamb' and screws it up in the middle, uttering 'oh fuck' before stopping and restarting the recording. There is no evidence he meant to say fuck, it was meant for internal use within the company. It survives to us today.

    I wonder who the first person to say 'shit' was?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:First recording of 'fuck' by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      The first Goatse encounter

    2. Re:First recording of 'fuck' by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      "Watson, come in here, I - goddammit!"

      Now come on, that could have been "heck" for all we know. The audio's such a garbled mess.

      That! stilted and formal! cadence all of these! speakers use! on these old! recordings! is amusing! too!

    3. Re:First recording of 'fuck' by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it's rather clear (although I ran it through Audacity's noise removal first, so I suppose I cheated). In fact I was so surprised by the sudden exclamation of "Oh, fuck!" that I went back to the website to read more detail about the recording and confirm that I had heard correctly.

      Unscripted history in the making is the best kind of history.

      WRT to the stilted speaking style, also of some amusement (to me anyway) is the tendency in turn-of-the-century recordings to use operatic divas to record Tin Pan Alley popular songs. You end up with this hilarious combination of BBC-perfect pronunciation and trilled R's with whimsical lyrics, often using faux-black dialect.

    4. Re:First recording of 'fuck' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that they were using "operatic divas." It's that anybody who knew how to sing professionally, or who even sang in church, had at least minimal voicetraining in the classical style, so they sound "operatic" to us. Even "minstrel singers" trying to sound rustic sang that way, because you had to get pretty darned rustic to find untrained singers. (Which is why "hillbilly style" country singing was also a bit shocking, even though it was mostly a difference in accent.)

      That's why it was very shocking when people began to sing professionally like most of today's singers, in what was then called "jazz style" -- without rounded sound or projected tones. It never would have caught on without microphones to project your voice for you.

      The other factor is that early recordings aren't particularly kind to the warm tones of women's voices, so the ladies generally sound very high and fluty.

  10. Famous 1889 Poster ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with message superimposed over picture of wax cylinder with skull and crossbones: Home-made wax cynlinder recordings are killing the music industry!!!

  11. Bismarck singing the Marseillaise...priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's a link with a transcript: http://www.cylinder.de/deeplink_resource_bismarck.html

    1. Re:Bismarck singing the Marseillaise...priceless by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      I think I heard that before - they were saying "Houston we have a problem"

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  12. don't actually play them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just laser-scan them or some shit, so that you don't wear them down! This is a treasure that will be of interest literally for forever.

  13. In a following century... by tchiwam · · Score: 1

    Found on an old mechanical magnetic device, this information has been restored for the last 60 years but only now our quantum analysis have been able to decifer the information, probably due to some form or content protection. This is probably the earliest form of audio binary storage known to humans.

  14. Just ten years later, there are better recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the turn of the 19th century, magnetic wire recordings become very popular in Northern Europe (except perhaps in Britain). It was the first widely distributed recording technology of N. Europe and in the 1910's, even relatively poor musicians could afford a machine (they usually started clubs for the purpose of buying and using one). There are lots of Northern European magnetic wire recordings from the late 1890's well into the 1950's. Compared to wax rolls, they have the advantage that the sound quality is good enough that you can actually hear how something sounded, so if you want to get a feeling of how Bismarks voice sounded, listen to one of the electric wire recordings of him, not this crappy recording.

  15. They still use needles? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

    I was surprised to read that they still use a device with a needle to play these. I would have thought that they'd be scanned with lasers, to avoid wear entirely and possibly to reconstruct the groove more precisely.

    1. Re:They still use needles? by KingofSpades · · Score: 2

      There is an explanation here http://www.archeophone.org/bismarck_moltke_en.php.
      In short, scanning works well for flat 2D documents ("lateral cut").
      For 3D "vertical cut", laser scanning doesn't work (yet).

  16. Specs of the Archeophone by KingofSpades · · Score: 1

    For the technically inclined, here are the specs of the "Archeophone", the device used to listen to these recordings.

  17. Dont worry by jopsen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every digital recording of the wax cylinder is probably copyrighted from date of the digital recording :)

  18. title by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    When I read the title: I couldn't help but add: "Finding Lost Recording From the 1880s"... in tree rings.

    I would like to humbly introduce ".. in tree rings" as a catch phrase for research that goes into technological wonders of experimental advancement for a dubious cause. Think of it as a marriage of "..that's what she said" and IgNoble prize.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  19. Please don't link to NY Times anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They require a log in now to read articles; please either link to an article in a different outlet or drop it.

    1. Re:Please don't link to NY Times anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Press escape just after the text has loaded.

    2. Re:Please don't link to NY Times anymore by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      I just go and remove nytimes.com cookies when that happens, you get some random # of views before they get to that; ten I think, except if you link from google they don't count 'em.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  20. Interesting Timing by guttentag · · Score: 2

    Were they found on megaupload's seized servers?

  21. Re:Just ten years later, there are better recordin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... so if you want to get a feeling of how Bismarks voice sounded, listen to one of the electric wire recordings of him, not this crappy recording.

    I think some historians would like to know where you found those electric wire recordings of him, as the second paragraph of the article quite clearly states
    "The cylinders, from 1889 and 1890, include the only known recording of the voice of the powerful chancellor Otto von Bismarck."

  22. Re:Just ten years later, there are better recordin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you tell us where to find 'electric wire' recordings of him?

  23. Re:Just ten years later, there are better recordin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you mean, "At the turn of the 20th century..."?

  24. Oblig by shiftless · · Score: 2

    I would like to humbly introduce ".. in tree rings" as a catch phrase for research that goes into technological wonders of experimental advancement for a dubious cause.

    Rejected

    1. Re:Oblig by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      How about recordings in clay? Tenser, said the Tensor: Pottery Recordings. Been covered here at some point, I'm certain.

  25. Lost Mark Twain recordings by Creosote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It has long been known that Mark Twain dictated part of his novel The American Claimant onto Edison cylinders. It was an experiment that he never repeated. Strangely, for someone whose manner of speaking was celebrated and often described during his lifetime, no one else ever thought to record him for posterity.

    The American Claimant cylinders have long since gone missing. Keep your eye out for them in antique shops or your relatives' attics—if found, they would be worth who knows how many thousands or millions of dollars on the open market.

  26. I've removed some of the noise using audacity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "deep in the nylon front"
    > "our lives have been managed to be telephoned at 6:30, whoever the children manage to tell I want you to tell her baby brother and Julia"
    > brother is working at school and is working very nicely indeed, use it every day"
    > "you might tell her, that in my opinion my children are very much nicer and they are vinyl something than they have ever been before"
    > "i have been looking forward to the time when a vast something would arrive, it did not come until last night and we were having a dinner party and it come while we were at the table"
    > "and my eyes came quickest then i have ever saw in my life, don't know how greatful Ida and I are for for it, for the glass, "
    > "something complete control, i have dropped in a letter make plans for our apartment which i have told you"

    Thats all that I could make out just using audacity's noise removal and equalizer and some compression.

    1. Re:I've removed some of the noise using audacity. by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      thanks, every little bit helps.

  27. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that anyone with even a passing knowledge of history would use Google Chrome.

  28. Re:Just ten years later, there are better recordin by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    According to wikipedia, the wire recorder was invented in the late 1890s, was patented in the US in Nov 1900, and never saw widespread use. Peak use was between 1946 and 1954.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  29. Re:Just ten years later, there are better recordin by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    most interesting wire recording i've ever heard is tom lehrer's physical revue, the earliest recordings of his material that exist. (the last song, "Any Questions", is particularly brilliant.)

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  30. interest in these recordings,,, by schlachter · · Score: 1

    has waxed over the years

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.