Slashdot Mirror


Windows 8 Features With Linux Antecedents

itwbennett writes "As details about new features in Windows 8 started to be discussed in the Building 8 blog and bandied about in Linux/Windows forums, Linux users were quick to chime in with a hearty 'Linux had that first' — even for things that were just a natural evolution, like native support for USB 3.0. So ask not 'did Linux have this first', but 'does Windows 8 do it better?'"

96 of 642 comments (clear)

  1. "Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Microsoft twist: No Linux distro does ISO mounting as easily as Windows 8, as it requires some command line trickery (or, again, third-party tools).

    Here's your "command line trickery" (once you've gotten superuser):

    mkdir -p /mnt/iso
    mount -o loop image.iso /mnt/iso

    Did you see that trickery? Someone call the pope, I'm well on my way to sainthood after that "miracle." Hahah that's funny though, this guy should see some of the command line paragraphs I've typed out for stuff like ffmpeg back in the day. I think the author doesn't understand that there are many linux machines that are servers or headless and many distros that love to leave you the option of not having to run a window manager. As a result, it's almost always up to you if you want to run a heavy GUI to execute two whole commands.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by MrEricSir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, because there's absolutely nothing arcane or overly complex about having to open a terminal window, read a bunch of man pages, and then issue two commands with various flags just to mount a disk image.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      hm I just right click and tell it mount

    3. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't even do that. I just double click it.

      It sounds like someone needs to update their FUD playbook. They're at least 5 years behind the times.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by tscheez · · Score: 3

      What? I can mount an ISO in F14 and GNOME with a right click. How is that not easy?

      --
      Supplies!
    5. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Microlith · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not for anyone who has bothered to learn how to use their computer. But then, that's just one way to do it on modern Linux distributions, which now simplify the process by letting you right click and mount the volume.

      And has since the days I was using Daemon Tools on Windows.

    6. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by gparent · · Score: 2

      Compare this to Right-Click -> Mount. Which is also available on some distros of Linux depending on DE and such.

      No, two lines of fucking arcane bullshit isn't ease of use. It's nerdy crap.

    7. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or you could click on it in Gnome/Nautilus (and probably whatever file manager KDE uses), but don't let that get in your way of your rant.

    8. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by s.petry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      KDE has build in point click for those to retarded to know the benefits of using the command line. I believe Gnome has an add on as well, but I hate Gnome so don't care if it does.

      Look, even Microsoft started realizing (15 years to late) the benefits and power of the command line vs. depending on a GUI for everything that's done. Hence they released "Power Shell".

      It is always refreshing to see an idiot fan boy that thinks it's hard to do things without a GUI though, so thanks for the laugh!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      mkdir -p /mnt/iso
      mount -o loop image.iso /mnt/iso

      You kind of proved the author's point right there.

    10. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Medievalist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, that sounds hard! You have to do all that? Windows 8 must really suck!!!

      In modern linux distributions, if there's an ISO on the media, it appears the same as any other container object, except the icon's a shiny CD looking disc instead of a manila folder. You click on it like any other container object, say for example a folder or an archive file, and it opens.

      Why do you use windows if it makes you do all that crap?

    11. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not for anyone who has bothered to learn how to use their computer.

      Learning to use your computer should *NOT* require knowledge of shell command flags. The very attitude that it should, is why its so bloody hard to hire good product people. Not coders, not sysadmins, people who actually get users and what they want. (Also explains the huge salary gap seen in the IT world)

    12. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Linux requires root for too many things. You shouldn't need root to mount a file/device.

      So you're saying I should be able to plug in a USB stick with a setuid root shell on it, mount that without root permissions, and own your system with almost zero effort?

    13. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by localman57 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck, I can mount an ISO with a double click.

      Can somebody please tell me what ISO stands for? Everbody in in this thread keeps saying "I mounted this ISO...I mounted that ISO." I finally found out what you guys mean by "Mounting a MILF", and now you come up with some other mess of letters.

    14. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      That's really a horrible example, though.

      If Win 8 can handle ISO images half as simply as WinCDEmu (Open source, too), then it's kicking Linux's ass in that regard. Double-Click on ISO, mounted. Right Click->Eject, unmounted.

      Tilting at this particular windmill might not have been the best illustration.

      [0]which I won't be updating to, so fanboy accusations to /dev/null

    15. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Linux requires root for too many things. You shouldn't need root to mount a file/device. Only read (and optionally write) permissions on the file/device.

      In my linux desktop, my CD-ROM and USB devices automount when I plug them in, no root required, I don't even need to run a command, they just mount. And I can unmount them by clicking through my file manager. I can mount an ISO by right-clicking on it in my file manager. No root required.

      What mounts do you need root for? If it's something you need to do more than once, add it to fstab and add the "user" option.

    16. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by inhuman_4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, because there's absolutely nothing arcane or overly complex about having to open a terminal window, read a bunch of man pages, and then issue two commands with various flags just to mount a disk image.

      While yes it can be arcane to go through man pages to find out how to using things, I doubt many people do that anymore. If I need to know the command I go to google and type "Linux ${thing I want to do}" and get exactly what I need 90% of the time.

      However what I find stupid is having to run a gui to do the stupidest little thing. For example:

      Yesterday I had to print out quizzes for my students, I had 4 .doc versions of the quiz and needed 15 of each. On a gui I would have to this 4 times: 1) LibreOffice 2) Press Ctrl+P 3) Type in the number of copies. Opening LibreOffice/MS Office can be brutally slow on older machines.

      Or 1)Open terminal. 2) for i in quiz*.doc;do lp -n 15 $i;done. Now not many people would know how to do that and need to have the GUI to guide them. But for those of us who do know, not having the option of using a command line (especially for remote connections!) is dreadful. Why do I have to have so many GUIs, wizards, pop-ups, tips of the day, and other nonsense between me and the code that will send my stuff to the printer?

      And that is really the crux of the problem for me. It's not that the command line is better or the GUI is better. They each have their pros and cons. The problem is MS has crap command-line support, so when something is better done via command-line the option isn't there.

      MS is just adding insult to injury with their command line trickery comment. They claim the Win8 is better because you can mount ISOs from the GUI while on Linux you have to use the command line. Okay that is fair, but what about all of the windows versions currently available? You know, the ones where you just can't do it at all, command line or not?

    17. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by RCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is why KDE and Gnome make this stuff easier. But there SHOULD be a way to do everything with shell commands, for users who are willing to learn them. Without that, I just don't have the feeling that I'm in control of the machine.

      BTW, Windows actually has plenty of command line tools (made by Microsoft) which allow you to script much more than one might think without ever touching the GUI. Too bad a lot of the said tools aren't included by default and need to be searched for in various * Kit packages from Microsoft.

    18. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, because the command line is so unimportant that Microsoft came up with an entirely new command shell called PowerShell and OSX has full-on bash.

      You know, the two major OSes pointed at consumer idiots have powerful shells. Go figure.

      --
      BMO

    19. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Jorl17 · · Score: 2

      Like many have pointed out, if you get used to it and know it, it's intuitive. As an analogy, I have a friend who grew up with Linux, so whenever he reached Windows he had the same criticism, because he had to memorize all the clicks here and there, besides interpreting the arcane translations and dubious time estimates, etc, etc, etc.
      Furthermore, even though they are "3rd party", many simple applications do that with ease and without having to be tied up to a crappy monopolist OS.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    20. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Microlith · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Learning to use your computer should *NOT* require knowledge of shell command flags.

      It should if you want to be considered proficient. It shouldn't be required for basic day to day operations, as I noted. But go on, be an angry anonymous coward.

    21. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But when you want to do something more complex, that GUI won't help you. Instead it gets in the way. Of course, only in the Windows world are a functional GUI and functional CLI somehow mutually exclusive.

    22. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Johann+Lau · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can do the same thing in many Linux distros by just right-clicking an .iso file, or even just double-clicking it. So both you and the article are plain wrong.

    23. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Jorl17 · · Score: 2

      Exactly, much like you have to pay to use closed, inherently unsafe, monopolist and overly priced shitty OS with an ever more arcane API. The good thing about it is that it has been mostly the same API and mostly the same technique to force users to use that OS. If it weren't for that, then Windows would have died a long time ago.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    24. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      I kind of wonder if he was trolling, though.

      Possibly. But then again, this being Slashdot and all it's likely he was entirely serious.

    25. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      loopback mount this image here

      For most people, every word you said except "this" and "here" is gibberish.

      You don't even have to take your hands off the keyboard.

      For most people, the productivity bottleneck isn't the time spent moving hands to and from the keyboard; it's having to memorize 1000 commands to use the damn thing. rm, ls, cd, cp, grep, etc. and all their associated flags are not easy for most people. The one I get tripped up on the most is renaming a folder. I want to rename, so is it rn? No it's mv... but I'm not moving it so that's confusing. How about copying a directory? cp is for one file, I guess I need a flag for more, which was it again? and do I type the source first or the destination first? And what about naming conflicts? I guess if I want to deal with those I need to know some more flags...

      This is going to go through your head every time if you're anything but an expert. And guess what, not everyone wants to be an expert. People use computers as tools and GUIs help them do that more effectively. I don't need to know the inner workings of a drill, I just know I press the button and the bit turns. Likewise, I don't need to know all the features of cp or mv by memorizing the man page. I just click and drag or right click rename and I'm done.

    26. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2

      The point of the terminal is that you have all the commands for every program accessible in one location. The downfall is that you have to know the commands beforehand.

      There's actually a number of other reasons why the terminal works well. You can chain commands, you can express them without resorting to screenshots or ambiguous descriptions, scripting is easy, there's no gui overhead, and remote system access is dramatically simplified. Multitasking is sort of prevented but most people, including myself, would work better without it.

      What I'm interested in is how well Powershell's object-based architecture works. It seems like the best thing Microsoft could have done under the circumstances, but is there an advantage there? Has anyone here done any serious PS scripting? From what I understand there are constraints on what programs will accept as input, a tradeoff of flexibility for consistency and reliability I suppose. Is that something that linux should adopt?

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    27. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

      Learning to use a computer should *NOT* require knowledge of mice and keyboards. The computer should know what I want it to do and just do it. I shouldn't even have to plug it in (electricity is dangerous!).

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    28. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by NoobixCube · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Learning to use your computer certainly SHOULD require familiarising yourself with your chosen platforms command line. The very idea that it shouldn't is why it'sso bloody rare to find an "average" user who knows how to do more than hit Play in iTunes. Not that it even involves the command line, do you know how many customers I have who don't know how to install software in Windows? This is simple, Computer Literacy 101 stuff. I learned how to use computers back when they were actually hard to use (though people who learned before I did, would probobaly look at my cosy DOS prompt and wish they'd learned there), these days there's no excuse for not having some basic and essential skills, yet every time I dare say we coddle the users, and that the problem is user education, NOT the programming and design, I'm told I'm being elitist. If a grown man with no intellectual disabilities couldn't work out how to use a spoon, and got cereal everywhere, would you blame the bowl, the spoon, the cereal, or him? I'd blame him just a bit, for not seeking out some user education. I'm sure a copy of Spoons for Dummies can't cost that much.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    29. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by negativeduck · · Score: 2

      Just jumping in here... I think the org poster had it write. Yes there are ways around Yes they can do it you can split the hairs of "well you *should* be able to do that" if you want. But this example and the large number of respondents as said is what really holds linux back. People in the linux community like to have a holier than thow attitude that's comparable to the mac users. Talk OS's and the guy who responds "I run linux" may have a smugness about them that you won't find with most windows users. It should be out of the gate right click "mount" that's it, no setup, no coding, no command line. That's a user experience. Sorry as a old school developer and linux user for a very long time I'm still urked at the smugness and the attitude that "if you don't know how to do it this way then you have no business doing it!". Just a thought

    30. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As someone else already pointed out, you *can* use the gui to mount an iso if you want.

      If i was explaining to someone how to mount an iso, i would probably explain the command line way because its easier... Someone could simply cut+paste the command that were posted here, whereas explaining a gui is much harder in a textual or vocal setting.

      It's very important that both options be available, so that people can choose which method they want to use.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    31. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do not think you understand.
      I do not have to use the terminal.
      There is almost nothing I can not do in the GUI of Linux that you can do in the GUI of windows.
      The difference is that I can open up a terminal anytime I want and do shitloads more and do it faster.
      The terminal in most desktop distributions of Linux is not a mandatory monthly use tool.
      It is an added powerful feature.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    32. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For most people, the productivity bottleneck isn't the time spent moving hands to and from the keyboard; it's having to memorize 1000 commands to use the damn thing.

      You could say the same thing about the English language. If complexity was a barrier, we'd all be pointing and grunting. But it turns out that the human brain has evolved for language, because language is empowering. Learing shell syntax is similarly empowering.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    33. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by raynet · · Score: 2

      Noh, but you should be able to mount random USB stick and access any files on it and run any executables on it with your user rights and the OS should ask for admin password if more rights are needed.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    34. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, because the command line is so unimportant that Microsoft came up with an entirely new command shell called PowerShell and OSX has full-on bash.

      You know, the two major OSes pointed at consumer idiots have powerful shells. Go figure.

      -- BMO

      Optional for power users who want them, not required for simple tasks like mounting an image where a mouse click will do.

    35. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Learning to use your computer should *NOT* require knowledge of shell command flags.

      Yes it should. Whenever someone wants to do something ridiculously repetitive with say, OpenOffice - converting thousands of documents into pdfs, I show up with my "magical powers" and open a terminal window, and convert them all into pdfs. Because they don't bother to learn something simple (command line basics, or just %*&^ing Google), they would have either wasted hours of their time manually converting the docs, or wasted money hiring a person to manually convert the docs. As it is, I suppose they wasted a little money, because they had me do something they should have been able to do for themselves.

    36. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, mount and its ilk are more complicated than they need to be. The flags and path should be optional, and the default behavior should be to detect the FS type where possible and mount in /mnt/volumename as read-only, creating the folder if necessary. This is the behavior that the majority of people want the majority of the time, and "mount image.iso" should accomplish that automatically. Commands without default behavior are like doorknobs that don't return to center because hey, *someone* might not want the door to latch after they close it. Conform to desired/expected functionality with as little user input as possible by default and let actual power users handle the corner cases.

    37. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

      International Standards Organization, specifically, this is ISO9660, the definition of a cd image.

      Or, you know, you could just FUCKING GOOGLE IT!

      No way. The last time I did that, I almost got fired.

      Our SysAdmin: "Yeah, I mounted a MILF last night."

      Me:What's a MILF?

      Sysadmin: You don't know? It's uh...[pause]...I forget what it stands for, Mobile..Image..Something...Format. Fucking google it. It's an image type, so be sure to use Google Images. Also, we have udev set up so it won't mount automatically. You'll need root access. Google's closest equivalent is turning off safe search. So you'll want to do that too when you go looking. Then just look for "Mounting a MILF".

    38. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Optional for power users who want them, not required for simple tasks like mounting an image where a mouse click will do.

      And that's the way it's been on almost any Linux distribution, for quite a while. On Ubuntu 10.04, I just right click on an ISO file and select the mount option. Then it appears as a new drive on the desktop. It works about the same, whether you're using a Gnome desktop, or KDE, or LXDE, or xfce. Probably also on other desktop environments or window managers, but those are the ones I'm familiar with.

      Of course, with Linux, you can ALSO do it via the command line. This is very useful on a headless (no GUI) machine, which Windows curiously lacks support for.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    39. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats right. Everything *MUST* be by hand, manually each time via means of a GUI. Why on earth would anyone want to automate anything using a computer of all things? Sheer madness.

    40. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by JBMcB · · Score: 3, Informative

      Suppose you want to delete everything from a directory that was created in the past 24 hours. How would you do that with Explorer?

      View by detail, sort by date, ctrl-down until the date changes. Or use the search-folder tool using date criteria.

      Or if you want to find all the TIFF files under a tree, and move them to a single directory?

      Organize-group by file type.

      Or even just batch renaming? How do you do that with Explorer?

      Yeah, you need a third party utility for that - or use the command line.

      The CLI is superior in some situations, but I find myself mostly using the UI for file management, mostly because I regularly have to move around arbitrary files in large file collections during development/debug work. For batch operations the CLI (or scripts) are usually superior.

      That, or I have to find one of my folders in that hideous tree dialog on the left.

      If your directories are laid out properly this isn't a big deal anymore.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    41. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shell is as empowering in the computing domain as speech is empowering in the social domain.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    42. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But we're not talking about people who need to be "empowered" in the computing domain. How does a bash shell help a baker? How does a shell help my lawyer, or my auto mechanic? How much of their jobs would really be made better, and by how much, if they were bash gurus?

    43. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by gparent · · Score: 2

      To me, learning the shell is useful because I spend a lot of time on my computer. For my roommates, learning the shell is a skill that they'll have to actively maintain just so that the one time they try and do something esoteric, it takes them 10 seconds less to do it. A complete waste of time.

    44. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait... someone paid you to do something you are good at that they are not good at.... and you're pissed off about this? Isn't this the way society functions? I pay someone to bake my bread because I don't know how to do it and they are better at me. Does the baker turn around and say "Wow, what a fucking moron that guy is. Doesn't he see how easy it is to bake his own damn bread?" Why do geeks seem to be the only people with this attitude?

    45. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Wait... someone paid you to do something you are good at that they are not good at.... and you're pissed off about this?

      I'm pissed that my job, which used to be less user-based, is slowly migrating into butt-wiping; something degrading and unnecessary. Would you be happy exploiting illiterate folk if you're the only one who knows how to read? Doesn't it make it worse when they refuse to try to read?

    46. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by rev0lt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Considering the commands were about mounting an ISO file, why the hell would I want 1) mount to automatically detect a filesystem inside a file; 2) mount it as read-only on a predefined location? I actually sometimes use files as raw devices for writing (for example, if I need to demonstrate how ZFS resiliency works, a couple of files and mount allows me to quicly show how it works instead of having to use physical devices)?
      Every mainstream linux distro with gnome/kde will automagically mount a recognized device on a predefined location without any user intervention, and creating folders as necessary. I'm no expert, but not only Linux's udev seems to work quite well (and recognize a lot more filesystems than Windows), but automounter has been available for ages in almost all modern/relevant unix operating systems.

    47. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by makomk · · Score: 2

      There's various standard programs like pmount that do that for removable media already, but ISO mounting is a bit more obscure and quite often you genuinely do want to specify a specific directory where it should be mounted.

    48. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by rjstanford · · Score: 2

      Or 1)Open terminal. 2) for i in quiz*.doc;do lp -n 15 $i;done. Now not many people would know how to do that and need to have the GUI to guide them. But for those of us who do know, not having the option of using a command line (especially for remote connections!) is dreadful. Why do I have to have so many GUIs, wizards, pop-ups, tips of the day, and other nonsense between me and the code that will send my stuff to the printer?

      That's assuming, of course, that the lp command knows how to print a .doc format file. Its interesting to me though - that never used to be the case (its been a while since I've done command-line *nix printing though). How do you register a file format with the print daemon?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    49. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering the commands were about mounting an ISO file, why the hell would I want 1) mount to automatically detect a filesystem inside a file; 2) mount it as read-only on a predefined location?

      Because that's what 99% of people who are mounting an ISO file need.

      I actually sometimes use files as raw devices for writing (for example, if I need to demonstrate how ZFS resiliency works, a couple of files and mount allows me to quicly show how it works instead of having to use physical devices)?

      For that kind of thing, you'd use additional parameters. His point was that the default should be to automatically do whatever is most reasonable for most users. If you know better, by all means, use your knowledge to specify the exact switches in advance.

    50. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

      I actually sometimes use files as raw devices for writing (for example, if I need to demonstrate how ZFS resiliency works, a couple of files and mount allows me to quicly show how it works instead of having to use physical devices)?

      Thanks, I don't think I could find a better example of a corner case if I tried.

    51. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Fallacy number 364- A program developed for a completely different purpose counts no matter what! In reality though PS is a SERVER program designed for SERVERS and used by these things called ADMINS that are actually paid real money to learn these things! Now I have been building and selling computers since before there ever was a Windows and you know what i've never seen? I've never seen powershell installed on a desktop and I've certainly never seen any OEM include it. but I've seen a ton of Linux distros that put bash right on the desktop or in the quicklaunch position, probably because they know you'll need it often.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    52. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      No, it's the Gnome3 and Unity devs who are the reason for that.

    53. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      USB is something where the drivers should be built into the OS, not something you have to depend on a vendor for. And while it's no surprise that Linux got its USB3 drivers first due to its fast release cycle (esp. on the kernel itself), MS has no real excuse. There's nothing forcing them to wait until the next major OS release to pop in some extra drivers; they can easily include that in a service pack or even a downloadable patch like they do for security fixes. They didn't confine new IE releases to only major OS releases, did they? Nope, you can download later versions of IE (up to 8 IIRC) even for the now-ancient XP, instead of being stuck with the crappy IE version that came with it (6 IIRC).

      I should probably shut my mouth though; I could be giving them ideas and I don't really want them to get better.

    54. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      The difference and IMHO why Windows is worth the money is this...when something goes wrong in Windows you can fix it IN THE GUI and in Linux its bash or you're SOL, period. Driver for sound not working? Open up bash and type, screen resolution won't stick? open up bash and type, latest upgrade crapped all over your wireless card? open up bash and type. oh and you had damned well better be skilled enough to tweak said bash typing because the code you will be given WILL NOT WORK if you don't. that is because it is written for driver B, rev D, firmware H and you have Driver H, rev l, firmware q.

      The problem with Linux is that the terminal has become a crutch, nothing more. We don't have an option to change this? meh, let them fire up Bash. what if they have a problem? meh let 'em fire up Bash. Well what if I want to do... i told you they can open bash didn't I? We all know why this is, its because of what I call the "busted toilets" problem. Nobody wants to fixed the busted crapper because there is no pay involved and its all devs scratching their personal itches, so the shitter just don't get fixed. how many have launched a help file in Linux only to find a "to be done" there instead? Empty man pages, lists of arcane commands with ZERO explanation of what they actually do, you can pretend Windows and Linux are equal but they are nowhere close, in fact if I had to compare them I would say Linux is about where Windows was around Win98 because with both it was mostly stable but at the slightest hint of trouble its was back to CLI.

      I'm sure i'll get hate for daring to point that out but anyone not suffering from a perception bubble knows this is true. don't get me wrong in some cases it IS getting better, at least on initial install, but nobody seems to do the work to get beyond that point. hell go to any forum and you'll see them advocate having to do a clean install on upgrade which is what the Linux devs USED to make fun of Windows for, now they just accept it, why? Because to fix it would be long boring crappy thankless work that nobody wants to do, hence it don't get done.

      But mark my words, what we've seen with canonical cutting Kubuntu loose is just the tip of the iceberg, after they see that selling search and having Amazon MP3 referrals won't pay the bills eventually they'll cut Ubuntu loose too and go strictly servers like Red hat. If you want to make a desktop that can compete with Windows and OSX you need to spend serious money on the nasty jobs and without it they just don't get done. And THAT dear friend is why Linux can't compete with Windows, it isn't a conspiracy, it isn't that there is something wrong with the kernel, its that nobody will put in the millions needed to polish it up to that level and without money getting the developers focused on the bad jobs is like herding cats. they won't do the busted toilet jobs without money so they just won't get done, that's all.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    55. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by rev0lt · · Score: 2

      And how conveniently you ignore most desktop Linux distros actually allow you to mount ISOs without recurring to the commandline or being a privileged user. But hey, don't let facts interfere with your rant against mount.

    56. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by rev0lt · · Score: 2

      The point is that not everyone uses mount the same way. Most modern linux distros with GUI usually allow the mounting of ISO files without recurring to the commandline, and they even create the appropriate temporary mountpoint folders as needed. Most users that are actually aware of mount funcionality probably don't need it to guess automagically the file format, but need it to be consistent and allow a certain degree of freedom.
      My ZFS example is a good one - automatic filesystem detection could expose the file volumes to corruption, and I use them on a mountpoint with enough available free space, so /mnt or /tmp is out of the question, and predefining folders is not that of a good idea (I actually use FreeBSD and not Linux, and usually have dozens of /dev mountpoints and dozens of nullfs mountpoints on each machine). If a user wants an automated dumber version of the mount command (instead of using the GUI options available), it is easy to create it as a shellscript of even as an alias command, so its a non-issue.

    57. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      claims OTHER people copied them and tries to stop them from shipping their products.

      WTF are you talking about? The only times this has happened is when other people REALLY DID copy them. That's called "copyright infringement".

      MS sues people (companies actually) for not licensing their bogus, obvious patents. There's a world of difference.

    58. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      You can't get cheep windows VPSs probably due to the cost of windows license. I don't know why you would want to mount an ISO on a server with less than 256 MB of RAM but you could serve the content of an ISO from one if you somehow wanted to avoid extracting it.

      You are right that any "machine" with the RAM to meet windows requirements probably can handle a GUI.

      When ram runs under $20 for your choice of brand in 4GB sticks I fail to find myself concerned with how much ram windows wants. It is one of the (if not the) cheapest components of a computer these days. Splurge and get yourself an 8GB upgrade for 40 bucks. May or may not be a surprise to you but Linux runs slicker than snot on a healthy amount of RAM as well.
      My source for pricing: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007611%20600006067&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=20

    59. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Rennt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even in Windows land, it is the GUI that is optional. The shell is always there - you can poke at it through a GUI like some terminally obese person with a dialling wand, or you can just use it directly.

      Server 2008 doesn't even install a GUI by default.

    60. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by atriusofbricia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well... since you didn't bother to limit it to only "simple user tasks".....

      for i in *
      do
      mv $i `echo $i | tr [:upper:] [:lower:]`
      done

      Done, all the files in that directory are now lower case. Can you do that with some GUI tool pulled off ZDNet or some other random place? Yes. Would it take you longer to find it, download it, virus scan it and figure out how to use it? Absolutely.

      The parent specifically said "if you want to be proficient" then you should learn the CLI. This is true.

      The parent also specifically said you shouldn't have to drop to a CLI for basic day to day activities. Did you even read the post you were replying to?

      Another example? Oh, okay.

      for i in `cat listofservers`
      do
      rdesktop (bunchofoptions) $i &
      done

      30 RDP sessions open and ready. It would work equally well with an actual list of servers instead of a handy text file laying about. A Linux/KDE specific example has all those 30 sessions grouped into tabbed windows of 5 each, windowshaded and placed where I want them on the desktop for rapid access.

      More?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    61. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by AndGodSed · · Score: 3

      Hey.

      Ubuntu user here and right click on ISO and select "Open with archive mounter" and you're done.

      The writer of the article missed the boat completely there.

    62. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by mdragan · · Score: 2

      Right, because there's absolutely nothing arcane or overly complex about having to open a terminal window, read a bunch of man pages, and then issue two commands with various flags just to mount a disk image.

      Learning to use your computer should *NOT* require knowledge of shell command flags.

      I call bullshit on these statements, for trying to skew reality to make their point.

      There are two use cases: 1. You don't have internet access and want to mount an ISO (very rare, almost impossible). In Windows your lost. In Linux you can do it if you have some knowledge (maybe requiring you to read some man pages). 2. You have internet access. In Window you google "open iso file with windows", find a page recommending some tool, go to their homepage or some downloading site (Softpedia), download the tool, install it, reboot (since it installs some low level drivers), and then figure out how to use that tool. In Linux you google "open iso file with linux", read the first two or three posts in a forum, open the terminal, and copy paste some commands.

      In no way is that as the parents described: no reading man pages if you have internet, no "knowledge of shell command flags", and, to me, it seems easier to do with Linux, with the exception that next time you need to mount an iso, in windows you already have the tool installed and probably remember how to use it, while in Linux you have to search for those commands again.

    63. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      IE releases *were* going to be tied to windows versions, the dedicated IE team was even disbanded at one point...
      It's only thanks to competition from firefox that they're bothering to update IE at all, otherwise IE8 would be "IE6 thats had minor tweaks to make it compatible with windows 7 and fit in graphically"...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    64. Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! by Penguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well... since you didn't bother to limit it to only "simple user tasks".....

      for i in * do mv $i `echo $i | tr [:upper:] [:lower:]` done

      Done, all the files in that directory are now lower case.

      Except:

      • it fails with file names with spaces in them (which shouldn't be anything out of the blue)
      • it fails with file names beginning with "-"
      • it might overwrite in an unwanted way if two files exist with the same name but different case
      • it warns when file is already lowercase

      And that's just it. It's another case of "See how easy that was? Oh, we just need to add some quotes. Oh, and -- as an argument for mv. Oh, and -i as an argument for mv. But remember to put -i before --. Everybody knows that." - and yet you created a script that is a text book example of creating a fragile script.

      Great default settings are of utter importance and the whole list of the default tools is much influenced by historic (and backwards compatible) reasons. It still leads to different interesting design cases:

      • head and tail are extremely similar but have two different commands. GNU head can't even behave as tail with command switches.
      • most people would want to create soft links (as opposed to hard links) in their daily routine but still have to go through ln -s instead of a command just for soft links. That is not unlike the -o loop example in GP, as a case of "yeah, you should obviously know that".
      --
      - Peter Brodersen; professional nerd
  2. Common sense by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    That goes for anything, but a more mature implementation will be more robust and so will the applications that support that implementation.

  3. Linux *Implemented* It First by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As details about new features in Windows 8 started to be discussed in the Building 8 blog and bandied about in Linux/Windows forums, Linux users were quick to chime in with a hearty 'Linux had that first' — even for things that were just a natural evolution, like native support for USB 3.0.

    Perhaps they're not jeering Windows for "copying" Linux so much as they are happy to show that the flexibility and community involvement in open source is starting to surpass those closed source equivalents? Isn't that what Windows used to gain so much marketshare? Supporting everything before everyone else?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Linux *Implemented* It First by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Interesting

      USB 3.0 works fine with Windows 7, you just have to install the drivers provided by the mobo/card manufacturer. Big deal...

    2. Re:Linux *Implemented* It First by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      That's a problem with a specific driver, though, not Windows 7. Just look it up - ASMedia USB3 drivers have that problem, but not all others...

  4. The real question is... by pwolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does it really matter?

  5. Meh. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't really see anything here worth the attention -- this really just looks like an attempt to generate traffic.

    Move along, nothing to see here.

    ...No, really. It's quite dull and profoundly uncontroversial.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  6. ISO Mounting by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 5, Funny

    ISO Mounting

    It boggled my mind that even Windows 7 didn't have that. At my job, I'm the Mac tech and there are a couple of PC techs. When they're overbusy, I take some of their workload... had to do an install of Office on someone's machine, so I found a folder of ISOs on a network share, downloaded it, and...? Hmm. "I may be an idiot," I said to my colleagues, "but I can't figure out how to mount this ISO file." "Burn it," they said. "Why, how do you open it on a Mac?" "Uh... you double-click it."

    Talk about your long times coming.

    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
    1. Re:ISO Mounting by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      Your comment obviously means you have never used a Magic Mouse on Lion.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:ISO Mounting by Korin43 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The one that really gets me is updating.

      On Windows:
          * Run Windows Update
          * Run a program that detects out-of-date software like FileHippo's update checker (or open all of your programs and see which ones annoy you)
          * Download each program's update individually
          * Run each of those (clicking through the damn wizard every time)
          * Reboot your machine
          * Watch as a "new update available" popup appears an hour later when you open a program

      On Linux, pick one of the following:
          * Click the update icon (Ubuntu, maybe other distros)
          * Run 'yum upgrade', 'aptitude update && aptitude upgrade' or 'pacman -Syu'

      "OMG Linux is so hard. You expect me to open a terminal and type two words??! It's much easier to spend an hour clicking 'Yes"!"

    3. Re:ISO Mounting by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Hmm. "I may be an idiot," I said to my colleagues, "but I can't figure out how to mount this ISO file."

      This post seems fake to me. Even your average "mac tech" should have enough passing familiarity with windows to be able to figure this out.

      "Burn it," they said.

      This part is especially fake sounding. Where did you find a windows tech who didn't know how to deal with an iso file?

      Half the PCs out there come with some sort of 3rd party CD burning software that can deal with opening and extracting ISOs just fine.

      On the rest I usually just use 7zip portable to extract isos to a folder. Its what? an 8 second download that doesn't need to be installed.

      I agree I'm boggled that it wasn't built in in Windows Vista/7 as well, but its hardly like it was a hard problem to solve.

    4. Re:ISO Mounting by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I don't understand the update fetish. Why should it be up to the system or the user to update a program? If a program has such a short development cycle, or periodic bug fixes then it should update itself. And really most of the programs out there do and do so transparently to the user.

  7. "things that were just a natural evolution" by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "things that were just a natural evolution"

    Try to tell that to the patent jerks at Apple, and Microsoft...

    Maybe someone like SCO will sue Microsoft for using the the USB protocol, even if Microsoft and Apple may have paid for using USB, and SCO doesn't even own the patents. This business is so litigious.

  8. A better question may be by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And what will Linux do that Windows 8 doesn't when Win8 finally gets on the market?

    Or maybe:

    When will people start to care about paying for low quality products when hight quality ones are free?

    1. Re:A better question may be by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When the producer of the low quality product has coerced the hardware vendors into making it exceedingly hard, if not impossible, to install the high quality one.

    2. Re:A better question may be by michrech · · Score: 2

      When will people start to care about paying for low quality products when hight quality ones are free?

      'People', like me, will start to care when the software we run (for me it's games) run *natively* under the freely available operating systems.

      THAT is one of the biggest issues preventing 'people' from migrating to Linux.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    3. Re:A better question may be by kbielefe · · Score: 2

      Ah, the brilliant circular argument: I use windows because all my apps are windows apps. Good thing I learned English, because all the books I read are in English.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:A better question may be by rev0lt · · Score: 2

      Shure. Show me a photo editor that runs on Linux on a color-managed environment. Or where I can specify printer profiles for different papers supported by my expensive printer. Or a professional-grade video-editing suite that actually works (Smoke used to run on RedHat, but it seems there are no recent versions for Linux). Or a word processor that won't barf when you are editing a 10,000 page document. Or a graphical file manager with thumbnail visualization that actually works. Or a decent CAD suite (2D and 3D) with full AutoCad compatibility and plotter support. Or a professional-grade multitrack sound editing software that actually take advantage of expensive hardware. Or a DTP package with decent font hinting and rendering (Xara is very good, but not that compatible). And the list goes on and on and on.
      Shure, you can do all this stuff on OSX, if you want to pay the Apple tax. At least with Windows machines, you can install whatever you want if you're fed with it, including Linux. (For now).

    5. Re:A better question may be by qxcv · · Score: 2

      Or a word processor that won't barf when you are editing a 10,000 page document.

      I would suggest that you are "doing it wrong" if you have a 10, 000 page document in a word processor ;)
       
      You've got some good points, though. The lack of a decent CAD suite in particular is a major pain.

      --
      "The most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough." -- Eric S. Raymond
  9. Immitation/Flattery by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would have thought Linux users would be happy if MS borrowed their ideas- it makes the "mainstream" operating system more like the one they have chosen to use for themselves.

    Surely MS copying Linux can only be a good thing? No?

    I've heard MS is going to even start using a penguin as their logo too. ;)

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Immitation/Flattery by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 2

      I started working on UNIX systems before I touched Windows (yes, I'm THAT old!) and the first GUI I used was Workbench on the Commodore Amiga.

      When the Amiga became "dead in the water" and I reluctantly went to PCs, I did struggle adjusting to the Windows 95 GUI, but then went through Windows 98 to Windows 2000 where I've stuck that "Windows Classic" look and feel ever since. I've found no reason to move my Windows computing beyond XP yet but I absolutely loathe the default XP desktop and didn't move from Windows 2000 until I discovered you could use Windows Classic in XP.

      And despite being a mainly Linux guy, I do like Windows Classic on XP and emulate it as closely as possible in Gnome - I don't care about eye candy and 3D desktops, CPU cycles are too important to waste.

      I could argue that Microsoft copied the Amiga Workbench look and feel to a degree when the whole look of Windows changed with Windows 95 - and one thing I've never understood is why a decent two-pane view in any file manager isn't the default - one of the best file managers I've ever worked with was Directory Opus on the Amiga which had the two-pane functionality from the word go and you didn't need to frig about positioning windows side by side like you do in Windows. At least in Nautilus on Gnome you can just press F3 and have that two-pane view.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    2. Re:Immitation/Flattery by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      The problem is not the "borrow" thing. The real problem is that MS will eventually patent it, and then Linux will be out of luck in developing the similar feature!

  10. And worse, with random abbreviations by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Things you mount aren't located in /mount, no it is /mnt. Ahh well that is so easy, I can't believe it didn't know that right off the top of my head!

    That's what makes the *NIX command line even worse as a tool (not saying the Windows command line is better, but you needn't use it) is that commands are all kinds of random abbreviations. You can't make the argument with a straight face that it is "intuitive" or people can "use commands that seem natural." You don't list directories, you ls them, you don't put user programs in "Programs" you put them in /usr and it isn't short for "user" it is short for "unix system resource" of course that isn't what it originally meant since it used to be where user stuff is that is a backronym.

    You really have to already know how to do what you want before you can do it. You can't stumble through things by looking through a list of menu options and finding the one that says what you want.

    1. Re:And worse, with random abbreviations by Jorl17 · · Score: 2

      While I understand your point of view, most of these things can be changed. Many of my user programs go in a ~/bin folder. I can have aliases for ls (in fact I do; I am ware that it still means that ls is the actual command). I rarely ever mount stuff at /mnt, just because it is a plain old directory, with no particular implications.
      Again, I kind of agree with you, but that isn't different to Windows. Your personal stuff is in the registry, in the My Documents folder (which has been changing name recently, besides splitting itself), in the Application Data folder (hidden and now split in three), in the Local Data folder (again, split in whatnot) and a bunch of other crap. It's mostly the same in these OSes -- what happens is that most of us got used to using Windows and learned their way of trying to think.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
  11. "ISO is taken from the ISO 9660 file system" by MisterSquid · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can somebody please tell me what ISO stands for?

    The name ISO is taken from the ISO 9660 file system used with CD-ROM media, but what is known as an ISO image might also contain a UDF (ISO/IEC 13346) file system or a DVD or Blu-ray Disc (BD) image.

    --
    blog
  12. Wrong Question by Malibee · · Score: 2

    There's no question that companies like Microsoft borrow good ideas from F/OSS, and often improve upon them. This is not a bad thing in and of itself: borrowing good ideas is a central tenant of F/OSS. The important question is, how much of the improved idea does Microsoft let F/OSS borrow back? For example, will the Gnome project get sued if they incorporated elements of Windows 8's file copy dialog into Nautilus?

  13. Re:What bugs me is... by cadeon · · Score: 2

    HTC and Samsung are known to be paying Microsoft royalties for the devices they sell with Android.

    AC is pointing out that something similar could happen if Microsoft patented ideas it gleaned from the open source community. An "Embrace, Extend, Patent, Profit" modus, if you will.

  14. The big guys have always been inspired by FOSS ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and vice versa.

    Quite a few features on the Mac OS X UI are directly lifted from Enlightenment and similar projects. Enlightenment was the first UI emphasizing beauty and, for instance, had first spikes into OpenGL support about 10 years ago. They also were the the first to introduce the 'brushed metal' look throughout an entire UI. That all was back in the day when Mac OS 9 still looked like a souped up Windows 3.1 in a few places.

    The new system settings tray introduced in Windows XP is a direct copy of the KDE settings layout of the time - which at the time also was a first. As where the Frog Design UI element designs.

    All this is quite natural though, and can be taken for granted.

    To be honest, I wouldn't take a professional UI designer serious, if he *weren't* intimately familiar with the various alternatives outside of mainstream OSes and UIs.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  15. Articles like this are the problem, not Microsoft by caywen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not like Microsoft said, "hey, we invented an easy way to mount ISO's. Take THAT Linux! wait, you already have that? Oh well, our way is superior!"

    It's more like Microsoft said, "Hey, we made ISO's easy to mount."

    The rest of the crap comes from those who make a living trying to instigate fights between users in both camps.

  16. Re:So finally... by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 2

    You may laugh but I suspect there's a lot more in your one-liner than you realise...

    I think the PC desktops and laptops do have a while to go yet but they're certainly on the decline as Joe Sixpack's main computing device in the house and Microsoft currently have very little to offer in the portable device arena, which are mostly ARM-based CPUs. Therefore Windows 8 is targeted primarily at ARM devices and Microsoft will be hoping that people will want to use similar environments on both PCs and portables, and therefore also upgrade to Windows 8 PCs as well.

    Windows 7 has been a success story but over a much longer period than XP was a success story and it's a clear demonstration that a lot of Windows users aren't going to "just" upgrade to Windows 8 like they have done with previous upgrades.

    Another thing to bear in mind is that with Windows Vista and 7, Microsoft was able to play the "unavailable for Windows XP" hand with DirectX and Internet Explorer versions - but these days PC games manufacture has slowed considerably (unless you look at indie titles which probably aren't too bothered about state-of-the-art DirectX and graphics in most cases) and IE is slowly dying away anyway.

    Yes, as long as PC desktops and laptops survive, Microsoft will find some way of making Windows 8 successful (unless they shoot themselves in the foot with it like they did with Vista) but they definitely have an uphill struggle to get it there.

    --
    Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
  17. Re:The big guys have always been inspired by FOSS by H0p313ss · · Score: 3

    Quite a few features on the Mac OS X UI are directly lifted from Enlightenment and similar projects.

    Actually, I think you'll find that Enlightenment "lifted" features from NeXTSTEP, which significantly predates E. OSX is really just the latest and greatest flavor of NeXTSTEP.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  18. OS X had OpenGL graphics since 2002 by toby · · Score: 2

    OS X has had hardware accelerated Quartz, "Quartz Extreme" since 10.2 Jaguar, available August 2002, so close enough to 10 years.

    And yeah, as another replier notes, NEXTSTEP had hardware accelerated blitting in the 1980s. The window manager on a NeXT Cube is not noticeably less snappy moving windows around than a Mac of today.

    --
    you had me at #!