Slashdot Mirror


Why People Don't Live Past 114

kkleiner writes "Average life expectancy has nearly doubled in developed countries over the 20th century. But a puzzling part to the equation has emerged. While humans are in fact living longer lives on average, the oldest age that the oldest people reach seems to be stubbornly and oddly precisely cemented right at 114. What will it take for humans to live beyond this limit?"

153 of 916 comments (clear)

  1. Genesis 6:3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.

    1. Re:Genesis 6:3 by dintech · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boring, wake me up when there's begetting and pause it for me if you can see tits.

    2. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So he owes us each six years? Can I choose which ones? I want 21-27 again. Thanks.

    3. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's 5% tax

    4. Re:Genesis 6:3 by g0bshiTe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      -1000 pts for mentioning "rational thought" in a place were a flame war can start over using a CLI vs a GUI.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    5. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      But if you have a Christian loyalty card (sold at participating Churches), the tax is rebated with eternal afterlife! What a bargain.

    6. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Omegawar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well I wanted to die before I was 70. But I have a new goal. Live to 120 and a day by any means necessary.

    7. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bible verse by Anonymous Coward modded Informative... Obviously the Jehovah's Witnesses won the Wheel of Mod spin today.

      --
      I8-D
    8. Re:Genesis 6:3 by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Funny

      The earth must have rotated faster around the sun 6000 years ago. I guess the earth was more streamlined when it was still flat.

    9. Re:Genesis 6:3 by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Considering Jeanne Calment lived to be 122, I'd say God needs to update his manual.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Genesis 6:3 by AJH16 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just fast forward to Song of Solomon. It has plenty of tits for you.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    11. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Gutboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Challenge excepted. Try base 1+10.908712114635714i

    12. Re:Genesis 6:3 by AdrianKemp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sold being the key word.

    13. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Jerslan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His days shall be an hundred and twenty years. - "His days" are the days of man, not the individual, but the race, with whom the Lord still strives. Hence, they refer to the duration, not of the life of an individual, but of the existence of the race. From this we learn that the narrative here reverts to a point of time before the birth of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, recorded in the close of the preceding passage as there were only a hundred years from their birth to the deluge. This is according to the now well-known method of Scripture, when it has two lines of events to carry on. The former narrative refers to the godly portion of mankind; this to the ungodly remnant.

      Not forever will the Lord strive with man; but his longsuffering will still continue for one hundred and twenty years. Meanwhile he does not leave himself or his clemency without a witness. He sent Noah with the message of warning, who preached by his voice, by his walking with God, and also by his long labor and perseverance in the building of the ark. The doomed race, however, filled up the measure of their iniquity, and when the set number of years was accomplished, the overwhelming flood came.

      Taken in context of Genesis (as a whole) it would seem that "yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years" means something quite different.
      [Source]

    14. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      that would be 1/2 of leviticus, and if you are not Baptist, the songs of solomon are good old bible porn.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Only 5%? God must not be a democrat or a republican then.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    16. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

      Awesome... I guess I'm going to live for ever then... ... and I was just doing it for fun- didn't even know about that passage in the bible.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    17. Re:Genesis 6:3 by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, signed late-1800s birth certificate > ancient texts of obscure origin.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    18. Re:Genesis 6:3 by alex67500 · · Score: 2

      Only Catholic Paypal(tm) Blessings are accepted by the LORD

      There. FTFY.

    19. Re:Genesis 6:3 by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Could have sworn the protestant reformation had something to say about that practice.

    20. Re:Genesis 6:3 by stating_the_obvious · · Score: 5, Informative

      Length of life (in years) dropped from 120 years to 114 years when the Romans added August to the Calendar...

    21. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Larryish · · Score: 2

      VIM kicks Libre Office in the ass.

    22. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Anomalyst · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe he doesn't have a job, you insensitive clod.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    23. Re:Genesis 6:3 by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or Eze 23:20, if you swing the other way.

      The chances of a woman on slashdot seem slim :>

    24. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Informative

      And Psalms 90:10 cheerfully pegs the number at 70: "The days of our years are threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years, yet is their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away." Doesn't seem like a very reliable scientific text to me. ;)

    25. Re:Genesis 6:3 by sglewis100 · · Score: 5, Informative

      And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.

      Which has nothing to do with how long a human may live, but was a prophecy about the coming flood.

    26. Re:Genesis 6:3 by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And the best part:

      In 1965, aged 90 years and with no heirs, Calment signed a deal to sell her former apartment to lawyer Andre-Francois Raffray, on a contingency contract. Raffray, then aged 47 years, agreed to pay her a monthly sum of 2,500 francs until she died. Raffray ended up paying Calment the equivalent of more than $180,000, which was more than double the apartment's value. After Raffray's death from cancer at the age of 77, in 1995, his widow continued the payments until Calment's death.

    27. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Peristaltic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't dump it all on religion- while religion is and has been a very popular excuse used for legitimizing brutality and stupidity, I would say that if Mankind didn't have religion as an excuse for brainwashing, fighting wars and brutalizing itself, it would have (and has) found something else... Nationalism, wealth (someone else's), race, you name it. Parts of humanity have always rationalized some justification for shitting on other parts of humanity. Religion just happens to be one of the more convenient vehicles.

    28. Re:Genesis 6:3 by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      [shakes fist at moon]

      Curse you!!!!!!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    29. Re:Genesis 6:3 by voidphoenix · · Score: 5, Informative

      January and February were added to the calendar. July and August were just renamed, from Quintilis and Sextilis.

    30. Re:Genesis 6:3 by maple_shaft · · Score: 2

      It does give a specific upper limit, which some people passed, and having the upper limit different from some, but not others makes no sense from a design perspective.

      It was a feature, not a bug. I am sure this will correct itself in Humanity 2.0, but if you are not patient enough for the end of times later this year you can always fix the problem yourself in the open source version, OpenHumanity.

    31. Re:Genesis 6:3 by houghi · · Score: 2

      My great aunt was 115. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrikje_van_Andel-Schipper

      My dad has her birth certificate. Also look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_people

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    32. Re:Genesis 6:3 by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2

      My wife was a loan officer at a bank that was popular with the local churches (small ones, mega ones, lots of them).

      It really puts a bit of a crimp in faith and ups your cynicism a few notches when you constantly here pastors talking about their profit margins and loss leaders like some CEO.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  2. The oldest person lived to 122. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, I didn't read the article. It really doesn't matter. 114 is not some magic barrier.

    1. Re:The oldest person lived to 122. by boef · · Score: 5, Interesting

      TFA does not state you get suddenly croak when you hit 114.. That number is more when the odds change.. and the question is why.
      quote:
      “the odds of a person dying in any given year between the ages of 110 and 113 appear to be about one in two. But by age 114, the chances jump to more like two in three.”

    2. Re:The oldest person lived to 122. by neyla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah. "more like", and the statistical data are tiny, given that the population of people above say 112, is *tiny*.

      It makes sense that the odds of living another year, dwindle with mounting age. A 10-year old in the first world has more than 99.9% chance of turning 11, but the same cannot be said about a 110 year olds chances of living to 111.

      The question is if there's a "knee" in the curve around 114. Maybe, but I don't think we've even got enough data to say for sure.

      That the curve is squarer makes sense; it just means it's (on the average) easier to prevent young people from dying, than it is to prevent old people from dying. It's easier to come up with some treatment that'll make a person who'd otherwise die at 30 live for 4-5 more decades, than it is to do the same for a person who is 80 to begin with.

      That's because there's *many* things it's "normal" to die of at 80, and *few* (relatively speaking) at 30. Thus if you've got (say) HIV and are 30, *only* removing HIV (not that we can), would add decades to your life-expectancy.

      But if you remove HIV from a 80-year-old, you're left with "something else will still probably kill him soon".

      It's nothing magic, and the same for cars. If a single thing is broken in an otherwise new and good car, odds are that fixing that single thing will make the car work for a significant period. Fix the single thing that stops a old-and-worn-down car from working, and odds are *another* problem will show up in short order.

    3. Re:The oldest person lived to 122. by mitashki · · Score: 2

      Humans are a disease. They should all be killed on sight so our planet doesn't get destroyed by those greedy parasites.

      Hey Agent Smith, I believe you shared the same revelation in 1999?

      Agent Smith: I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You're a plague and we are the cure. "The Matrix"

      --
      "When all you have is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail."
    4. Re:The oldest person lived to 122. by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      The question is if there's a "knee" in the curve around 114. Maybe, but I don't think we've even got enough data to say for sure.

      More like a crunch where it all really collapses. I have some mortality data from Norway here, "Dødssannsynlighet for alder x" = "Death probability at age x" in parts of 1000, "Begge kjønn" = "Both sexes". Already around 98 years it's up to over 30% per year but it doesn't continue the collapse, it stays in the 30-40% range up until 105 in this table and as I understood it up to 114. Of course with only 60-70% surviving each year the chance of living from 98 to 114 is 0.65^16 = 0.1%, but right now 114 looks very close to a cutoff. That perhaps now it's an additional cause of death, not just the sum of everything that's affected "younger" hundred and something year olds.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:The oldest person lived to 122. by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      2/3 / 1/2 = 4/3 = 1/3 increase.

      I think we can safely attribute the 33% increase in the chance of dying this year to:

      1) The fact that the sample size is so low. Not very many 114 year olds to run data on, and many of them aren't actually 114. A lot of people that old don't have a reliable record of their birth.

      2) The fact that they're 114 fucking years old.

  3. Additional information. by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been noticed before. Here is another article on it.

  4. Tell that to Jeanne Calment by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    1. Re:Tell that to Jeanne Calment by dredwerker · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_person

      You would have a job doing that as she is dead. :)

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
    2. Re:Tell that to Jeanne Calment by necro81 · · Score: 2

      You would have a job doing that as she is dead.

      Nah, you can still tell her, just don't expect a response.

    3. Re:Tell that to Jeanne Calment by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly you would see a LOT of 113's in this list. Instead you see many almost making 115 and a few as high as 120.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_people#Chronological_list_of_the_verified_oldest_living_person_since_1955

      It looks like summary is trying to pull in clicks by challenging and making sweeping statements. When it is trivial to prove it wrong. Also the article ends with "Just my two cents for what they’re worth". So this is an opinion piece.

      The 99.999% percentile though will probably not make it past 100. Supercenturions are fairly rare...

      Go ahead and look at the Wikipedia article. Unsurprisingly, a number of the > 114 yo crowd have their birth dates as 'disputed'. So, no you didn't 'prove it wrong'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Tell that to Jeanne Calment by sirdude · · Score: 2

      IIRC, at the age of 120, Jeanne Calment claimed, "I have only one wrinkle and I'm sitting on it!" :D Lots of olive oil, el vino tinto and cigarettes were apparently her secret :o

    5. Re:Tell that to Jeanne Calment by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      The 99.999% percentile though will probably not make it past 100. Supercenturions are fairly rare...

      Hmm, 99.999% not making it past 100 implies about 65000 centenarians in the world today.

      A quick wikipedia check shows 70,000+ in the USA alone. And as estimated 450,000+ worldwide.

      Given that these are people born on or before 1912, it's very likely that a much larger fraction of the, ahh, more recently born will live to 100+.

      Note that I don't expect to myself. Cancer really reduces the chances of living to 100. But I wouldn't be surprised if my daughter made it to 100. Assuming, of course, that she doesn't get what I have (there is a hereditary component to my flavour of cancer)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  5. Because, as we all know, the answer to life by Rooked_One · · Score: 5, Funny

    is 42. And 114 is 42 backwards if you add the 1's together. The opposite of life is death - metaphysically speaking of course.

    Look a bunny!

    what?

    1. Re:Because, as we all know, the answer to life by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you factor out 114, you get 19, 3, and 2. (19 * 3 * 2 = 114)
      If you add these up, you get 24.
      Flip the numbers (since death is the opposite of life) and you get 42.
      Thus, the answer to life, the universe and everything is 42.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Because, as we all know, the answer to life by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry I couldn't follow your logic, I was distracted looking for the bunny.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Because, as we all know, the answer to life by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

          You sir, have managed to master the art of numerology. And what an art it is. It can find anything relates to any number, and those numbers can relate to other things, to positively prove that any two completely unrelated things are equal and tied through destiny, predetermination, or that some deity has made himself known through an image of a dead guy on your grilled cheese sandwich.

          That's also why I stopped eating grilled cheese sandwiches. But they did sell nicely on eBay to religious nuts.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Because, as we all know, the answer to life by El+Torico · · Score: 3, Funny

      Amazing how my "Pressa del panino griglia della Madonna" wouldn't sell for over 35 Euro each, but a cheese sandwich made with it was bought for 28,000 dollars. Maybe the name was too long.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  6. Time travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    From TFA:

    A person born in the US at the turn of the 20th century could expect to live 49.2 years. Their ancestor born in 2003 could reasonably expect to see their 77th birthday.

    The emphasis is mine.

    1. Re:Time travel by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ooh, a lesson on not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  7. Time for a ethics of dying by zarlino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if medicine could keep me alive that long, I'd rather just live a normal lifespan and make space for my sons.

    --
    Check out my cross-platform apps
    1. Re:Time for a ethics of dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      /dev/world is full - please kill yourself or anyone you can

    2. Re:Time for a ethics of dying by shadowrat · · Score: 2

      At this point medicine can't keep you alive all that long. TFA pointed out that in spite of advances the best they can do is get you to ~114. Then they speculated on some sci-fiy stuff about keeping you alive indefinitely. You see doom and gloom in that, but as long as we're in the realm of sci-fi pipe dreams, i say you could take off in a spaceship. Maybe FTL travel isn't attainable anytime soon. We don't need it if a 100 year flight to a new planet is only an annoyance.

    3. Re:Time for a ethics of dying by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      as an aside, euthanasia and predetermined lifespans are recurring themes in sci-fi. Usually it's a story where people are only allowed to live x years and the protagonist rebels reaffirming that people want to live! It's a good story because it's true about humanity. I don't think i've ever seen a story where society has decided not that it will kill you after x years, but instead that after x years, it becomes your duty to humanity to start doing more and more dangerous things for the benefit of the race. Youd do stuff like going to habitable worlds and other grand adventures where you'll likely be killed by alien monsters.

    4. Re:Time for a ethics of dying by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't know about you, but I would like to see a mid twenties Sigourney Weaver battle alien monsters. Not grandma. What's she going to do anyway? Stab it with her knitting needles? Make it tea? Relive stories of her neighbors dog 70 years ago?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Time for a ethics of dying by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

      cat /dev/null > /dev/world

      In the beginning, there was nothingness.

      dd bs=1024 count=1 if=/dev/random of=/dev/world

      Then he brought something from nothingness.

      mke2fs -j /dev/world

      Then he brought order from the chaos.

      mount /dev/world /mnt/world

      And he looked upon it, and saw that it was good.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Time for a ethics of dying by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

      You don't need FTL or extended lifespans, special relativity is your friend! The subjective flight time for the crew decreases the closer they get to the speed of light, and you can get as close as you like if you have enough thrust. Take a 100 light year journey - here's the time the crew will experience at various velocities (as a % of the speed of light):

      99% - 14 yrs 99.9% - 4.5 yrs 99.99% - 1.4yrs 99.99999% - 16 days

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  8. Obviously... by geogob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...God plays with the same modus operandi than most corporations built to his image; It simply planned obsolescence.

    1. Re:Obviously... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, because god used a shareware version of Genome Creator.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:Obviously... by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Aside from the god joke, you are right on the money.

      Living organisms haven't evolved to survive very long. Passing on your genes to a couple new specimen has turned out to be the superior strategy. Obviously, since eternal life is pretty much the end of evolution in organisms that don't do runtime-mutations very well.

      Shapeshifters are about the only imaginable species where eternal life could evolve, and even there I'd say the odds are stacked against the trait for reasons of risk-spread.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  9. A statistical blimp by bjourne · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here's the gist of the article, and also an explanation of why it isn't really interesting at all:

    “This is a fascinating phenomenon and nobody has really much idea of what’s going on. What we do know is that it’s absolutely essential to not jump to conclusions about what’s going on. Time and time again over the decades past demographers have been brutally misled by short-term phenomena, by statistics gathered only over a few years. Blips happen for all manner of impenetrable reasons. In this case we’re talking about people born in a small segment of time, around 1900, and most of them born in particular countries and going through certain types of life they might not have gone through had they been born 20 years previously or 20 years later. There are many factors called ‘cohort effects’ that can cause early life phenomena to have an influence on longevity.” Bottom line: don’t believe the hype.

    1. Re:A statistical blimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      So what has the non-rigid dirigible got to do with it?

  10. They do in Soviet Georgia.... by bossk538 · · Score: 2

    ...by eating Dannon Yogurt.

  11. Ugly Bags of Mostly Water by na1led · · Score: 2

    Turn me into a machine, then I'll live past 114!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Ugly Bags of Mostly Water by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      But that will begin a conflict over the transfer of consciousness from flesh to machine, escalating into a war that will decimate a million worlds and exhausting the resources of a galaxy in the struggle for domination...

  12. What will it take for humans... by slidersv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...to live beyond that limit? Cryogenic freezing, I guess. But seriously, the problem is not the ability, but purpose. It's one thing to be able to survive into 100+, and completely another to enjoy your time on this planet. If you survive for 150 years, but enjoy the first 50 and suffer for the next 100, that sounds more like a Doom episode: Hell on Earth. All people are measuring when it comes to age is heart beating. But what they should be focusing on are different questions. Like: "do you enjoy getting up in the morning?" "how fast can you read?" "and write?" "do you hear me well enough?" "can you describe me what you see outside the window?" Can people over 80 on this forum add to this discussion, if they are interested to live another 34 years, until the "current limit" of 114?

    --
    there is no issue with my network
    1. Re:What will it take for humans... by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Nowhere near 80, but I think you answered your own question - it's not about how many years but how they'll be. As long as I'm able to feed myself, clothe myself, go to the bathroom by myself, see well enough to use a computer and is not in chronic pain I think I'd want to live, even if I was so fragile I'd be in a wheelchair. I've known people well into their 90s that have been a lot healthier than that, while others have had huge health problems long, long before that. Of course you're more likely to get them with age, but in itself I don't think it matters much.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:What will it take for humans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I would happily be immortal.
      To want to die is insanely stupid IMHO.

      As for suffering, I suffer every day. I'd still rather live forever suffering those pains, than die.

      Even the sort of fairy-tale immortal where I cannot die. Even if I were sucked in to a blackhole and left there for millions of years till it evaporated, I'd still rather exist than UNexist. To become infinitely nothing, lesser even, is the most frightening thing in existence.

    3. Re:What will it take for humans... by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

      The day I can't take myself for a piss will be the day I pull the plug on myself.

      With the parting words, "So long, and thanks for all the fish."

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    4. Re:What will it take for humans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You didn't exist for billions of years in the past, and you seem to have handled that just fine. This 'existence' thing is just a glitch.

    5. Re:What will it take for humans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember how horrible non-existance was before you were born? No? Then let go of that fear. You fear, literally, nothing.

    6. Re:What will it take for humans... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

      Forever is a long time.

      You may think a couple million years is a long time, but it's nothing compared to forever.

      I think that I would go mad with the possibility of living forever.

      To see everyone and everything I cared about die, and then just evaporate away, as all matter must do.

      To survive the heat death of the universe.

      To be so completely alone and live with just memories.

      Sounds like a curse that I wouldn't put on anyone.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    7. Re:What will it take for humans... by na1led · · Score: 2

      And you'd miss out on those 72 virgins when you die.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  13. I agree, we shall form a line by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Funny

    You first. Don't worry, the rest will be right behind you. laughing.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  14. Oblig. by Scutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tyrell: The facts of life... to make an alteration in the evolvement of an organic life system is fatal. A coding sequence cannot be revised once it's been established.
    Batty: Why not?
    Tyrell: Because by the second day of incubation, any cells that have undergone reversion mutation give rise to revertant colonies, like rats leaving a sinking ship; then the ship... sinks.
    Batty: What about EMS-3 recombination?
    Tyrell: We've already tried it - ethyl, methane, sulfinate as an alkylating agent and potent mutagen; it created a virus so lethal the subject was dead before it even left the table.
    Batty: Then a repressor protein, that would block the operating cells.
    Tyrell: Wouldn't obstruct replication; but it does give rise to an error in replication, so that the newly formed DNA strand carries with it a mutation - and you've got a virus again... but this, all of this is academic. You were made as well as we could make you.
    Batty: But not to last.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  15. yet more biblical contradictions by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Informative

    So if the lord limited humans to 120, why did Methuselah get 8 times that much time?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lifespans gradually decreased post-flood.

    2. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by djdanlib · · Score: 3, Informative

      He died before the limit was imposed. Prior to that, many people lived hundreds of years, such as Adam.

    3. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is a little known fact that Methuselah exploited the life span mechanics of the Real Life MMO. That and other bugs, hackers, gimmicks, etc. got so bad that God had to nearly completely revamp the game. The new mechanics were firmly put in place after The Flood patch.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    4. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The calendar was lunar, so each "year" was 29 days. Back in those times, iiving up to 80 was something to note.

    5. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by batquux · · Score: 2

      But He told Adam that if he ate the fruit that on that day he would surely die. And... he didn't. He lived to be like 930.

    6. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gorramn legacy support...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    7. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by josh609 · · Score: 2, Informative

      He did die........If he hadn't ate of that fruit it is believed he would have lived forever.

    8. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rather than being immortal. So yes, he traded immortality for a sure death in the indeterminate future. Interpretation is fun.

    9. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      He traded immortality for sex. Pretty much every man would do this if given the choice.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      and he did... Adam got married.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by batquux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see. So he might as well have warned them that they would be given a ride in a helicopter if they ate the fruit, for all their understanding of the matter.

    12. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by AJH16 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, my bad, the word is yom, it can mean day or afternoon or age or daily or eternity or entire or lifetime or long or perpetually... the word doesn't translate well to a term we have in English, but in short, it roughly translates as "when you eat from the tree you will die". Also, even if you assume the 24 hour day is the correct translation, in a very real sense, Adam did die at that point even if it took time for him to physically die. The Bible clearly refers to both spiritual death and physical death and the spiritual death was at the time of eating from the tree.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    13. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by quintus_horatius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When a lion ate a lamb, what happened to it if death didn't exist?

      The image I have in my head is horrible, just horrible, if things continued to live after being eaten. Or experienced bone-shattering falls, or drownings.

      Are you sure this is a merciful god we're talking about?

    14. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, he traded immortality for the knowledge of good and evil. Essentially for a loss of innocence. Pretty crappy trade if you ask me.

      Also, it is fairly certain that Adam and Eve were banging regularly already. (They were both naked, physically mature, and had all the functional bits as far as we know.)

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    15. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by legojenn · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a little too Torchwood for me.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    16. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by techvet · · Score: 2

      The thought is that there was s*x in the Garden before he ate the apple. See Aquinas for details. As for the decreasing life-span in the Old Testament, Catholic thought has been that it was because we were getting farther from the Garden and more steeped in sin.

    17. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by DC2088 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The real question is this: If the fruit of knowledge is how Adam gained the understanding of what is good and what is evil, how on earth was he supposed to know that disobeying the big guy was wrong? And my understanding isn't that he was banished as punishment, but rather, as a pre-emptive strike so that he didn't think too hard about what the "Tree of Life" would mean. Wait a minute - tree of life - the tree that granted immortality? Guess Adam wasn't going to live forever to begin with after all, or else the big guy wouldn't have put that tree there or cared! ... Why the hell did he put either tree in the garden? What was the purpose? To catch someone who doesn't know the difference between right and wrong doing something wrong? What the hell kind of Poseidon-as-a-horse-copulating-with-a-Nereid nonsense is this??

    18. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Gilmoure · · Score: 2

      I prefer the term marinaded, or maybe smoked in sin.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    19. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Gilmoure · · Score: 2

      When 900 years old you reach look this good you will not.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by operagost · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure why someone gave this a "Funny" mod. Methuselah dies in chapter 5, God's proclamation is in chapter 6, following the flood. He didn't even have to be "grandfathered" in, if you'll excuse the pun.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is like arguing if Superman can beat Spiderman.
      Yeah, accepting that superheros are real and superpowers are real and the Marvel universe is real and the D.C. universe is real... ok Superman can beat Spiderman.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    22. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > he traded immortality for the knowledge of good and evil. Essentially for a loss of innocence. Pretty crappy trade if you ask me.

      You think that's bad? The Highlander fought and beat every other immortal to gain "the prize". What was "the prize" you ask? He lost his immortality and gained mind-reading. That's like picking the goat behind door number 3.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    23. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 3, Funny

      But "with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day" (2 Peter 3:8).

      Very similar to sitting in history class.

    24. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everything was, apparently, vegetarian in the Garden of Eden. The lions and the lambs were, also apparently, good pals, lounging about all day. This also explains why they didn't fall or drown. And last, God's only merciful sometimes, other times he's wrathful, dopey, sleepy, happy, grumpy, sneezy, bashful, doc, and pissed.

      Funny bit is, back in the days I went to church, there were nutjob answers to everything, and as a kid, that shit was presented as if it made a damn bit of sense (it was grownups telling me, so it HAD to be truth by definition).

    25. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm.. No. you've got that all pretty much wrong.

      1. It was the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil", not the "Tree of Life."

      2. He knew it was wrong because God told him so. To Paraphrase: "You can eat anything that grows here in the garden except the fruit from that tree over there. If you eat that fruit you'll die, so don't eat it." Not a good/evil thing so much as a "Hey that's bad stuff, if you're smart you'll obey my instructions and not eat it" kind of thing.

      3. Adam and Eve were kicked out AFTER they ate from the tree and were corrupted by sin. It was as punishment for disobeying his instructions. Also, they then started to age and die.

      4. He put the tree there as a basic test of obedience. He wanted to be obeyed, but he also wanted people to have the free choice to do it. Not that making the wrong choice would be without consequences, but the choice had to be there or it wasn't ever REALLY a free will. (If you have only one choice, is it really free will to choose it?)

      Adam and Eve chose to go their own way, as have most of humanity since that day. Thus we have sin, the fallen state of man, and the need for redemption through Christ. Of course, it is all still free will. You don't HAVE to believe in and obey God, but that doesn't mean there won't be consequences for choosing not to. Every choice has consequences. What sense would it make if they didn't?

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    26. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by JockTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

      It has nothing to do with support. It was reasoned that humans could develop proper emotional responses if they were left to live beyond 120, so a limiting factor was built in.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    27. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by DC2088 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you joking with me? Genesis 3:22. ""Lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever ..." therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden." As for the "Not a good/evil thing", if you had absolutely NO moral faculties, would you know whether to trust glowy beard guy versus snake and sexy rib woman? Just because someone tells you something is wrong, if you have no sense of morality whatsoever, you'll take their word for it? Don't answer that, actually. I think I know the answer. :(

    28. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      A Man said to god "What's a million years to you?"
      God said "A second."
      Then the man said to god "what's a million dollars to you?"
      God said "A penny."
      So the man said to god, "Would you give me a penny?"
      God said "Of course I will. Just a second..."

    29. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      well actually long enough for them to give birth to seth the son they had after able was killed and cain was exiled.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    30. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by maple_shaft · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is still theological debate though if animals truly were not sentient in the GoE. One would think Eve would have been surprised at the prospect of a talking snake, but she didn't even begin to question the validity of this. When Adam found out about the snakes advice he didn't even question the validity of the story.

      It is because of this that it is thought animals were significantly different before the fall, possibly more akin to Angels than how we know them today.

    31. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2

      Recently, I have come to interpret "die" as a process. Usually, we refer to it, as a completed action, but I think that dieing is more of a process.

      That's not to say that all vocabulary is used in the same way throughout the Bible. I'm just saying that dieing can be a slow process or a quick process.

      A while ago, Slashdot had that big discussion about euthanasia, and somebody said that a particular woman was already dead, because of her brain being mostly deteriorated. I don't know what to believe about the specific incident, but I do believe that death is more of a process and destination.

      When there is a corpse that is rotting, then yes, the person has "arrived". What about when the brain is gone, but the heart cells are still alive? What about if the heart is completely gone, but the brain is still active?

      Frankly, I don't trust the typical scientific definition of death for an accurate definition, but I do trust it for a general use.

    32. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Talderas · · Score: 2

      4. He put the tree there as a basic test of obedience. He wanted to be obeyed, but he also wanted people to have the free choice to do it. Not that making the wrong choice would be without consequences, but the choice had to be there or it wasn't ever REALLY a free will. (If you have only one choice, is it really free will to choose it?)

      Adam and Eve chose to go their own way, as have most of humanity since that day. Thus we have sin, the fallen state of man, and the need for redemption through Christ. Of course, it is all still free will. You don't HAVE to believe in and obey God, but that doesn't mean there won't be consequences for choosing not to. Every choice has consequences. What sense would it make if they didn't?

      It's rather interesting that the Bible was talking about free will. I've noticed something disconcerting with humanity. We have free will but we don't want it. If you ask people to make a decision between two situations one of which is entirely negative and one that is positive they will tell you they don't have a choice. Humans, on the whole, only want free will when the situation is to choose between two options with fairly equivalent outcomes.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    33. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe this is a different interpretation, given my Jewish and not Christian upbringing, but I learned that after Adam and Eve ate the apple, they realized they were naked and clothed themselves. God came walking by (metaphorically speaking) and they hid. He asked where they were not because He didn't know, but because it was a test. Adam and Eve revealed themselves and God asked why they ate the fruit of the tree. Here, He was giving them a chance to repent their sins, but they chose to blame each other. Adam blamed Eve and Eve blamed the snake. (Not sure it's recorded who the snake blamed.) Only after they chose not to repent (especially having now learned good from evil), did they get their punishments.

      Like I said, though, this might be different interpretations from different religious perspectives. Christianity is big on the "Fall of Man" in Eden leading up to Jesus sacrificing himself to absolve that sin. Judaism, meanwhile, is big on repenting as a means of absolving sins. (See: Yom Kippur when Jews fast and repent in order to have our sins from the past year forgiven.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    34. Re:yet more biblical contradictions by modecx · · Score: 2

      Here's the thing about the Adam Eve myth: according to the scripture itself; in both the new testament and the old Hebrew writings, God is an all knowing being, past, future present, his hand is in it all, right?

      So, he up and creates the universe one day, gets bored and makes humanity's prototypes. Regardless of what he commands of them, he already knows they're going to fail, because he knows every possible variation in the endless series of contingencies he set into motion. In other words, they've already failed the instant they were created; unless God himself chose to be willfully ignorant of the foreseeable.

      One could therefore argue that in fact, he would have created Adam and Eve with not only the potential to disobey, but they were designed with this in mind, and it was never a question of free will.

      Or, you know, the whole thing is bullshit anyway.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  16. Contractual? by Senior+Frac · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm betting there is some warranty clause that kicks in at 115.

    1. Re:Contractual? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aren't things supposed to break down shortly after the warranty expires?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  17. Quality not quantity by concealment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one likes the idea of dying, but I think we might be less traumatized by it if we felt our time on earth meant something. Let's face it, working a McJob, fighting with an unfaithful spouse, buying lots of crap on Amazon.com and cheering for corporate football teams just doesn't make us "feel alive."

    1. Re:Quality not quantity by hitmark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. One truly need either a thick skin or a dark sense of humor to keep on going these days. And that is for the western world. Hell if i understand how someone in famine or war zone manage to keep going.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:Quality not quantity by corbettw · · Score: 2

      All men die; not all men truly live. If you can achieve the latter, the former will hold no fear for you.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  18. Time travel is what it takes by bregmata · · Score: 2

    "A person born in the US at the turn of the 20th century could expect to live 49.2 years. Their ancestor born in 2003 could reasonably expect to see their 77th birthday".

    Wow. Just wow. Any article involving the violation of the known laws of physics is a waste of the electrons it was written in.

    The rest is crap, too.

  19. Oh, yeah? by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2

    Whatever happened to, "Hope I die before I get old"?

  20. Re:Lifestyle by Kjella · · Score: 2

    A lifetime of healthy food (fruits, vegetables, nuts and algae), regular exercise, no stress, meditation, happiness and joy. Achievable, but not easy.

    Or just to as the world's oldest person ever did, smoke for 96 years.... I doubt what shape you were in 50+ years ago matters for whether you become 100, 110 or 120.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  21. I find myself thinking it is unfortunate by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

    I find myself thinking it is unfortunate that we keep people alive for so long. My grandmother who is 84 is living in an assisted living facility. It's one thing to live into your hundreds if you can actually do things that make living life worthwhile, but it seems the elderly I've seen living in those facilities are miserable. It's a horrible place to live. You can play board games with other strange elderly people that you may not like, or you can watch tv, or you can stare at the walls and wish for death.

    Maybe I'm not your standard issue human, but I sincerely hope I don't live anywhere close to 114.

    1. Re:I find myself thinking it is unfortunate by meburke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just spent a couple of years working at a "retirement community" where I was as old as the residents. There were a couple of very healthy residents, such as a Vietnamese doctor (76) who got up every morning and did Tai Chi and an 87-year-old guy who walked two miles around the campus each morning. But most of the residents were rotting away under the burden of a lifetime of bad food and no exercise.

      I don't mind the thought of dying, but I want to die reasonably suddenly after a full, active life. Frank Lloyd Wright was brilliant well into his 80's. I just read something about a biotech entrepreneur who started two major companies while in his 70's and 80's.

      Exercise may be the fountain of youth.

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  22. Heart rate by ewrong · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well according to this post http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/02/15/2338229/scientists-study-how-little-exercise-you-need?utm_source=feedburnerGoogle+UK&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot)&utm_content=Google+UK earlier today. A person's maximum heart rate can be calculated: "very roughly, by subtracting our age from 220".

    From these two 'facts' that I have learnt today I conclude that once your maximum heart rate drops to 106 - you die.

  23. Re:Should we? by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Should we even live past that age - from a practical perspective?

    I'd rather take population control and live to be a thousand years old. The trick here being, of course, to make sure that when you age you don't spend the first 50 of those years healthy and then spend 950 years old and weak.

    I suspect most others would feel the same way. I'd gladly sign a contract stating that I would not procreate irresponsibly if it meant I could lead an extremely long and healthy life.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  24. Matrix limitation by advid.net · · Score: 4, Funny

    Simple: the Matrix has a 4 Yotta bytes limitation for any human memory.

    Each lived day stores 150 Peta bytes of sense information in short term memory, which quickly decays in 100 Peta bytes for long term memory (of lot of which is kept for dreams and feelings, only 3% is used by conscience simulation).

    This storage limit translates into 114,9 years of life simulation.

  25. Epiphenomena by nfk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I haven't read the article (shock), so I'm not arguing with those who say this isn't interesting, but it reminded me of Douglas Hofstadter in GEB:

    "I was talking one day with two systems programmers for the computer I was using. They mentioned that the operating system seemed to be able to handle up to about thirty-five users with great comfort, but at about thirty-five users or so, the response time all of a sudden shot up, getting so slow that you might as well log off and go home and wait until later. Jokingly I said, "Well, that's simple to fix -- just find the place in the operating system where the number '35' is stored, and change it to '60'!" Everyone laughed. The point is, of course, that there is no such place. Where, then, does the critical number -- 35 users -- come from? The answer is: It is a visible consequence of the overall system organization -- an "epiphenomenon".

    Similarly, you might ask about a sprinter, "Where is the '9.3' stored, that makes him be able to run 100 yards in 9.3 seconds?" Obviously, it is not stored anywhere. His time is a result of how he is built, what his reaction time is, a million factors all interacting when he runs. The time is quite reproducible, but it is not stored in his body anywhere. It is spread around among all the cells of his body and only manifests itself in the act of the sprint itself.

    Epiphenomena abound. In the game of "Go", there is the feature that "two eyes live". It is not built into the rules, but it is a consequence of the rules. In the human brain, there is gullibility. How gullible are you? Is your gullibility located in some "gullibility center" in your brain? Could a neurosurgeon reach in and perform some delicate operation to lower your gullibility, otherwise leaving you alone? If you believe this, you are pretty gullible, and should perhaps consider such an operation".

    1. Re:Epiphenomena by gregor-e · · Score: 2

      Aubrey deGrey gives a spirited TED talk on the subject.

  26. 114 by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 2
    Well, although he makes this claim that the oldest people on live 114 years, however it should be clarified that MOST of the oldest people live to 114 years old.

    In the article there is a link to yet another article here

    It states that at least 2 people have made it to 115 and the oldest person lived to 122. From the article:

    The longest-living person ever, a French woman named Jeanne Calment, died at age 122 in August 1997; no one since 2000 has come within five years of matching her longevity.

    So although it seems MOST people can only live until 114, there are some exceptions. Too bad Jeanne Calment died in 1997 because it would be interesting to see her DNA and how it compares or differs from all of the other people that live that long.

    I'm with the article it must be genetics, and I think that GE(yes genetic engineering), will push that number even higher...

    Frankly I cannot believe that many people live past 100 years old, let alone 114.

  27. Mod parent up by tigre · · Score: 5, Informative

    I for one love the Bible, and I found this hilarious, not trollish.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      The movie will, of course, be a disappointment.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But returns as a zombie. I heard there's a lot of flesh and blood eating.

      I love that post apocalyptic stuff.

  28. Is average lifespan a useful metric? by lazlo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd say the answer here is fairly simple, we haven't put much effort into keeping 100+ year olds alive, relative to the amount of effort to keep, for instance, 5 year olds alive. As I understand it, a huge amount of the gains in average life length have come from squeezing the bottom of the graph, not extending the top of it. Here's an interesting, though somewhat morbid, exercise. Go to a very old graveyard and look at the stones on the family plots. You'll often see a family with 12 children, half of whom died in childhood, and the other half lived to their 90's. So in that family the average life length was around 50, but that doesn't mean that a 50 year old should be looking for the grim reaper around the corner, quite the opposite in fact. As I understand it, the life expectancy of a 25-year old has been fairly stable for a fairly long time. Once you've survived the fragility of youth and the stupidity of adolescence, the following decades are a cake-walk, morbidity-wise.

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    1. Re:Is average lifespan a useful metric? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is table backing the above up. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html It shows that the average lifespan of someone who survives childhood has increased from 60.1(20 + 40.1) in 1850 to 76.7 (20 + 56.7) in 2004. That is an increase of 16.7 years.

      Compare that with a newborn. 38.3 in 1850 to 75.7 in 2004. That is an increase of 37.4 years.

  29. lunar counts confused with years by peter303 · · Score: 2

    We live about 1000 moons (82 years).

    1. Re:lunar counts confused with years by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are getting ripped off! Demand the full 1024 moons that you thought you were getting!

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  30. Matthew 6:4 by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some Christian denominations have become more sane about this. Jehovah's Witnesses, for example, don't "pass the hat". Instead, people discreetly put their donations in a slot in a box outside the auditorium so that only the Father needs to see (Matthew 6:4).

    1. Re:Matthew 6:4 by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 2

      Lolz. "Jehova's Witnesses" and "more sane" right next to each other. Thanks for the laugh. I needed that. :-)

      (I'm very thankful that my family escaped from that cult before I was born...)

  31. Re:Should we? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

    except you could also produce 10x as much. With the growing experience of living 10x as long you'd probably contribute much more than 10x as much.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  32. Re:Lifestyle by Strawser · · Score: 2

    Logical flaw: How are you supposed to find happiness and joy if you're stuck with a lifetime of eating algae, nuts & veggies?

    I think I'm going to have to settle for 72 years of steak, pork, fried foods & beer.

    --
    The louder he talked of his honour, the faster we counted our spoons. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
  33. Re:Thank you, thank you... by Tastecicles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, this is;

    Roy Batty: I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. :)

    Has to be watched again. I'm always just utterly gobsmacked when he lets the dove go, then dies on the roof.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  34. quote fail by Palshife · · Score: 3, Informative

    The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. And you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy.

    --
    Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
  35. Job 26:7, 26:10 by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you search to the ends of the Earth, I suspect you'll find someone who can elaborate on it.

    It could be argued that the ends of the earth are merely the shore.

    Until then, I suggest Job 26:7.

    You make a good point about this. Some people reading along might not get the Job 26 reference. Verse 7 ("hanging the earth upon nothing") suggests that there isn't anything that "holds the earth up", as some cultures' myths about turtles all the way down suggest. Likewise, the shape of the curve between day and night is "a circle [...] where light ends in darkness" (26:10), which along with Isaiah 40:21-22 too shows biblical knowledge of the spherical earth.

  36. Re:Telomeres by TheLink · · Score: 2
    --
  37. Before the flood it was easier to be vegan by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When a lion ate a lamb, what happened to it if death didn't exist?

    Before the fall, did animals even eat animals?

    Before the flood, which happened 1,656 years later, it was easier to be vegan because there were probably plants with nutritional profiles similar to meat. I'm guessing these plants may have died off in the flood. Notice that God didn't mention eating meat until after the flood: "Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for YOU. As in the case of green vegetation, I do give it all to YOU. Only flesh with its soul--its blood--YOU must not eat." --Genesis 9:3-4.

    1. Re:Before the flood it was easier to be vegan by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These are things that can be figured out in a few minutes of actually reading the bible, but people are more interested in making snarky comments on the internet.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  38. List of Oldest People by Arrepiadd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wikipedia has a list of the oldest people in the world.. 27 of them got older than 114 (only three of them disputed) and one of them is still alive.

    So... "nothing to see here, move along..."

  39. I can see the job ads on monster ..... by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..."must have 435 years of experience with C++, Objective-C and XML. At LEAST 145 years of scripting and linux experience...." "... please forward your resume with work history, titles, salaries and referrals "

  40. and also Larry Niven by MRe_nl · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  41. Re:Thank you, thank you... by gknoy · · Score: 2

    Reading that, I can nearly hear his voice, and am picturing the tears as they mingle with the rain on his face. What a brilliant scene. Thanks, you guys, for reminding me that I need to see that movie again.

  42. Staying challenged and not coasting by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    It seems when someone has challenges in life (no, not fighting unfriendly people at home or at McJobs) but on new gadgets or architecture or ballroom dance competition (even open amateur takes as much work as open pro). There are some that keep working on a endeavour until they are dead of old age but it was that passion that kept them going. As opposed to someone that retires, is financially secure but simply "coasting" which statistically they will be dead six months after they retire. OK so I didn't RTFA (was it biological limitations?) but I've read and seen people that work on something passionate and it keeps them going, but not everyone is immortal, and they leave their endeavour "feet first."

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  43. Spoilers: by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mary was no virgin; Jesus was just a man; it's a horrible tale about deception, greed and lust for power; the taking advantage of people's gullibility, fear and inability to think critically. Jesus catches out Judas using GPS, buttonhole cameras, and bribed Roman constabulary. Three stars; needed more CGI, and story seems at least partially cribbed from the Egyptian Book of the Dead [a Warner Bros. title.]

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  44. What will it take for humans to live past 114? by mj1856 · · Score: 2

    I don't know, but I'm sure it has something to do with Cialis.