Slashdot Mirror


MIT Lecturer Defends His Standing As Email Inventor

hapworth writes "IT professionals were recently outraged to hear that the Smithsonian acquired some code from MIT lecturer VA Shiva Ayyadurai who has convinced no less august pubs than Time Magazine and The Washington Post that he invented email. While objectors howl on forums and message boards, VA Shiva Ayyadurai spoke up today to defend his standing as email's creator, claiming he doesn't regret not patenting it because he doesn't believe in software patents."

249 comments

  1. Maybe... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... but Ray Tomlinson at BBN invented the use of the "@" sign.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... but Ray Tomlinson at BBN invented the use of the "@" sign.

      Yeah, but I first invented the "@" sign.

    2. Re:Maybe... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... but Ray Tomlinson at BBN invented the use of the "@" sign.

      Yeah, but Chuck Norris was the first one to use it.

      oh, and ..

      In Soviet Russia email patents YOU!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Maybe... by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Informative

      and Ray used it to send e-mail between different machines in 1971 on the ARPANET. How this 1978 guy's claim has any legs I don't get.

    4. Re:Maybe... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and Ray used it to send e-mail between different machines in 1971 on the ARPANET. How this 1978 guy's claim has any legs I don't get

      There are a lot of things claimed by a lot of people but it does NOT mean they are the actual inventors.

      As far as I can recall, I've been using "emails" since 1975

      If that 1978 guy wants to claim that he invented "email", let him claim

      Those of us who know better, know better

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    5. Re:Maybe... by forkfail · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only after Bruce Lee showed him how. Twice.

      --
      Check your premises.
    6. Re:Maybe... by smitty97 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      doesn't anyone remember bang paths?

      --
      mod me funny
    7. Re:Maybe... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Only after Bruce Lee showed him how. Twice.

      And the art of communicating without email.

    8. Re:Maybe... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He claims that he created a program called "email", and he says, it was the first. Well, except for the fact that the Unix mail program dates from '72. And that there are RFCs for protocols referring to electronic mail way before that. If we want to be strict about it, email probably started with the telegraph.

      This guy is an idiot looking for attention.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    9. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just your mother

    10. Re:Maybe... by hedronist · · Score: 2

      Sure do!

      ...!{sun,apple,pyramid}!thirdi!peter, or
      thirdi!peter@pyramid.com

      Ah, those were the days!

    11. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I invented the iPad in 1974, didn't tell anyone about it though.

    12. Re:Maybe... by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, you've sure got a lot of digits in your slashdot ID for someone who once had a bang path! :) ...!apple!darkside!xtifr

    13. Re:Maybe... by Nethead · · Score: 2

      Is that how he got ASN 1?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    14. Re:Maybe... by jhoegl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Judge not by the size of ones slashID, for they may have been too busy inventing the interwebs to know about such sites as slashdot.

    15. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was gonna invent the iPad next year, then just wait 30 years to tell anyone.

    16. Re:Maybe... by noh8rz2 · · Score: 0

      i read the rtf a, and think that maybe this dude is right. OK, he obv didn't invent computer - to - computer communication, but if he invented all the concepts of current email systems - to, from, cc, bcc, subject line, "re:" convention, inbox, outbox, sent box - then maybe he does deserve the claim "inventor of EMAIL".

    17. Re:Maybe... by Ghaoth · · Score: 2

      "concepts of current email systems - to, from, cc" It would be amusing to see how he arrived at "Carbon Copy" for an electronic message. Carbon paper over the monitor screen? Methinks the concepts were there before he used them.

      --
      Nos Morituri te salutamus
    18. Re:Maybe... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The To:, CC, BCC and subject lines all date back to the early 1970s. He didn't invent any of it. RFC680, from 1975, states all of these.

      The guy is a lying sack of shit.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re:Maybe... by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      How this 1978 guy's claim has any legs I don't get.

      What precisely is his claim? The Washington Post article gives no objectionable direct quotes. The internet evolution article quotes him as saying, "I did not claim that I created electronic communications". Shiva's web site says, "he was offered a position [...] to develop the world's first EMAIL System". It doesn't say electronic communication system, and it uses all caps to indicate the name of his program. Perhaps the Washington Post and Times journalists were sloppy and just used sensationalist headlines.

    20. Re:Maybe... by DMFNR · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are wrong. One's Slashdot UID is the sole determiner of technical proficiency, age, penis size, and validity of opinion, .

      For example, I have mastered HTML and gaining proficiency in Visual Basic 6. I am 12 years old and my penis is large enough not to be considered a micropenis by only a few millimeters. Of course, at my level of Slashdot inexperience, my words should be taken with a grain of salt.

      A person like Xtifr however, he received a blowjob for Ada Lovelace and can speak machine code in to a processor and hear the results coming out of the other end. He is older than most trees, and has the Unix beard to prove it. If he ever manages to get his elderly penis erect, we have solved our space elevator problem. Every word he speaks is handed down to Moses on stone tablets and entered in to Slashdot with care.

    21. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shiva's web site says, "he was offered a position [...] to develop the world's first EMAIL System".

      If EMAIL was used in that sentence to indicate his program name, it would be not "first", but "only".

      It's kinda like that bad segment of Apple community that's ready to claim "Apple invented (GUI|smartphone|tablet)!" and then backtrack to "Well, they were first to combine all the good parts, at least. Mostly. Probably."

      Perhaps the Washington Post and Times journalists were sloppy and just used sensationalist headlines.

      And perhaps grass is green and sky is blue. Even a short trip to wikipedia://E-mail would give enough insight to anyone with half a brain to see this guy as bogus.

    22. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USPS came out with a system to try to compete with the threat of email in 1977, for chrissakes.

    23. Re:Maybe... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      You are wrong. One's Slashdot UID is the sole determiner of technical proficiency, age, penis size, and validity of opinion, .

      I have still trouble deciding whether one's UID correlates with such qualities in reverse or not.

    24. Re:Maybe... by avm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nonsense :-) I drive a truck, have forgotten most of my IT related knowledge, and my UID is lower than his. I also have no beard, use a Mac, and have never managed to monetize any IT chops I may have once possessed.

      In my defense, I do possess an original boxed set of SCO Xenix manpages and 3.5" diskettes, as well as a copy of the original Softlanding Linux distro on same media. :-)

    25. Re:Maybe... by hawk · · Score: 2

      So what he *really* invented was the dorky use of capslock .
        . .

      this entitles him to share a cell in hell with the inventor of the blink tag . . .

      hawk

    26. Re:Maybe... by debiangruven · · Score: 1

      I used the "@" first

      --
      Stay negative.
    27. Re:Maybe... by baegucb · · Score: 0

      I used to drive a truck. I know how to weld, use a forklift, pallet jack, and front end loader (college jobs). And I don't have a beard or use Apple products. Could I interest you in buying IBM manuals from the early 70s? I think I have a few Linux diskettes laying around from the late 90s, but no current source for the 8" diskettes from around 1980. Want to bid on my blank punch cards? lol

    28. Re:Maybe... by bratwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, he is the Most Interesting Programmer in the World.

      "Friends, I don't always use parametric polymorphism, but when I do, I prefer hand-rolled Assembly."

    29. Re:Maybe... by Nexion · · Score: 1

      I must be a grey haired Cobol programmer then who often trips over his third leg then, huh?

    30. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Judging by your nick, you might have a sampling issue in your test methodology. Just sayin'.

    31. Re:Maybe... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      But then he got an arrow to the knee!

    32. Re:Maybe... by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

      doesn't anyone remember bang paths?

      What a nightmare. Like posting a letter and having to tell the post office what to do with it: "Take it from the postbox to the Bradford sorting office centre. From the Bradford sorting office take it to the Leeds regional centre. From the Leeds Regional centre send it to the London Regional centre. From the London regional centre take it to the Sunbury sorting office. Take it from the Sunbury sorting office to 12 bog-trotter terrace".

      And to think we actually used that!

    33. Re:Maybe... by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      How this 1978 guy's claim has any legs I don't get.

      What precisely is his claim? The Washington Post article gives no objectionable direct quotes. The internet evolution article quotes him as saying, "I did not claim that I created electronic communications". Shiva's web site says, "he was offered a position [...] to develop the world's first EMAIL System". It doesn't say electronic communication system, and it uses all caps to indicate the name of his program. Perhaps the Washington Post and Times journalists were sloppy and just used sensationalist headlines.

      True but stupid. If I write a program called THE WHEEL, I could truthfully claim to have invented THE WHEEL but this barely makes it as an "in joke" among friends, and I would justifiably look like an idiot if I published magazine articles about it.

    34. Re:Maybe... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I drive a truck, I know how to weld, use a forklift, pallet jack, and front end loader, and I have a beard and don't use Apple products.

      Can I offer you a complete set of PDP11 schematics and a set of Microsoft OS/2 1.3 installation disks?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    35. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have driven a truck once, and I once sat on a fork lift, but never driven one (does a Zamboni count?). I rode a pallet jack around an Office max like a scooter and I've never owned an Apple myself. I learned how to use an acetylene torch during a "industrial skills" competition with judges watching.. I won... Nothing like beginners luck...

      O damn, what were we talking about?

    36. Re:Maybe... by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      You got to drive a ZAMBONI?! AC, you lucky bastard!

    37. Re:Maybe... by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      I actually invented the Blu-Ray disc before I was born, but I decided to let Sony claim credit for it because the PS3 would've been an even more miserable flop for its first three years otherwise.

    38. Re:Maybe... by hippo · · Score: 1

      But what about dick size?

    39. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You are wrong. One's Slashdot UID is the sole determiner of technical proficiency, age, penis size, and validity of opinion, .

      Is that a inverse proportional to or inverse proportional to correlation?

    40. Re:Maybe... by FrootLoops · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry; you seem to have missed or ignored my point. The blame may be on the journalists and not the professor. The person I quoted referred to the professor's claims, and I haven't seen any questionable ones from him. The WaPo headline is certainly misleading, but he may not have had any control over it. Vilifying the professor without solid evidence is about as dishonest as what he's accused of, yet that's what everyone here is doing. Perhaps everyone just read the summary (which gave him an assertion not supported by the articles: he "convinced no less august pubs than Time Magazine and The Washington Post that he invented email") and not the articles; that's extremely common and might result in the present situation.

    41. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, his personal site says:

      In fact the term "Electronic Mail", "EMAIL" itself was a new term. The two words, "Electronic" and "EMAIL" juxtaposed together for me originally brought images of vaporizing paper and somehow transporting it across electrical wires, like the transporter in Star Trek. That is how NEW those two terms next to each other were in 1978.

      NEW. In 1978. When it was at least half decade of electronic mail. The man's delusional at least or a fraud at worst.

    42. Re:Maybe... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      This from a guy with SlashID envy so strong he posts as an AC ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    43. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went AC 'cause I was afraid the guy would get pissed off at me & then mod me down next time he saw me comment anywhere.

    44. Re:Maybe... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Just wear a tin foil hat

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    45. Re:Maybe... by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      He is P and NP.

    46. Re:Maybe... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      A Schroedinger's Coder: Maybe he is, maybe he is naught.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    47. Re:Maybe... by DataPath · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      Inconceivable!
    48. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what he *really* invented was the dorky use of capslock.

      Pshaw, you young whipper snappers and your fancy Caps Lock. Back in my day we only had the Alpha Lock key. Spoiled youngsters and their fancy technology....

    49. Re:Maybe... by pellik · · Score: 1

      I thought about modding this comment down but then I realized almost nobody would see the joke.

    50. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Al Gore was heard saying: "Dammit! Why didn't I think to say that?"

    51. Re:Maybe... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      ... but didn't read the recent article on this very site about identifying anonymous users by writing style.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    52. Re:Maybe... by dgharmon · · Score: 1

      I thank you, my memory isn't what it used to be :(

      Slashdot comment

      --
      AccountKiller
    53. Re:Maybe... by c600g · · Score: 2

      Yup - I also remember implementing a version of UUCP e-mail on my home grown Apple //e BBS software that could connect with other BBSs (specifically, a ProLine BBS a friend ran) to deliver e-mail to/from other systems. Good times... good times!

    54. Re:Maybe... by alexo · · Score: 2

      But what about dick size?

      What do you think is the reason that he has to drive a truck?

    55. Re:Maybe... by IMightB · · Score: 2

      I know your joking, but I've been reading slashdot since before they even had a login system, and at first refused to get an account because I did not want to be tracked. When I finally gave in, I went through two or three accounts before I could remember one after a few months.

    56. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was on Slashdot before the discussion section came out. When it did, it was seriously lame and I ignored it for a long time. Eventually I finally started reading it and then later wanted to post, so I created an account. Six digits. Personally, I'm not impressed by those people who got shorter IDs. However, those 7 digit kids should stay off my lawn!

      And yes, I'm very happy I no longer need bang paths. I remember posting my e-mail address in three forms, starting from three well known servers.

    57. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big deal. I've been alive forever and I wrote the very first song. I put the words and melody together. I am Music and I write the songs.

    58. Re:Maybe... by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What you mention really is the problem with the IP Patent system as a whole.

      Numerous people were inventing things simultaneously back in the day. It was primarily MIT, Berkley, AT&T and a mixture of the Government funded DARPA project and people developing tools to help them do their jobs.

      Many of these things on the internet people lay claim to are really copies of what we already had in a physical format. Email came out as the equivalent of the "Mail Room", and "Mail Clerks". UUCP and FTP which came out as the "Courier Services" to get data back and forth. HTTP/HTML, and much more came out as primarily the bulletin board.

      Over time, we had to add security and could add niceties. We also had numerous flavors of each utility since people had different ways of solving problems and saw different challenges and risks. Lots of these ended up merged, and many just vanished because a different product was better.

      Early on, there were no concerns about patents. Back then, it was copyright rules only. Everyone working on projects knew that what they did was for the betterment of the whole. Patents would have hindered or stopped development. I don't think the Government would have allowed a patent even if it was pushed.

      To this day, technical people developing services and software generally despise IP patents. It harms the business and kills growth and improvements. It's only the lawyers and money grubbers that like them.

      Do I expect to be able to Copyright and enforce the Copyright on my code, Icons, images, etc..? Absolutely. Do I expect to own the ideas I develop? Hell no. If you can do what I do, go right ahead. I hope you do it better, so that I'm challenged to improve myself.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    59. Re:Maybe... by strat · · Score: 1

      I don't know. When we worked at UUNET, it was pretty simple.

    60. Re:Maybe... by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      That page also lists "pre-EMAIL innovators" including, eg. "1971 Ray Tomlinson - Message transaction, multi-user, multi-computer"; it certainly doesn't deny various electronic communication methods existed before his 1978 system. The existence of similar prior similar systems also doesn't require the idea of electronic mail to be old, so long as they didn't have very high penetration. It probably was very new in his social circles.

    61. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://xkcd.com/154/

    62. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

    63. Re:Maybe... by Ghaoth · · Score: 1

      Or..... what constiutes ORIGINAL thought. Only the lawyers win. Shakespeare had it right...First, let's kill all the lawyers.

      --
      Nos Morituri te salutamus
  2. Doesn't believe in patents by Squiddie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If only the rest of the world saw it his way. If he did invent email, that is.

    1. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Which he didn't. The ancestor of the mail systems used on the Internet today was the mail command from the original versions of Unix, way back around 1971 or so. This guy is either a lunatic or a liar, but the one thing he isn't is the inventor of email.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies like Google would be in a much better position to innovate freely not being attacked by frivolous lawsuits from Microsoft and Oracle.

    3. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      If he did invent email, then he could not have gotten a patent, since there were no software patents when email was invented.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh yes, he sure did. In 1982. When every computer on the network already had networked mail services. Electronic mail was invented before this clown was even born. Let the burning at the stake proceed forthwith.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    5. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ...for the record, what he did appear to contribute (or at least copyright) was the word 'EMAIL', although 'electronic mail' existed as early as 1965.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by the+linux+geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      CTSS had email before UNIX did - 1964, if I recall.

    7. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      heck if you want to go down to the "stone age" version then a TELEGRAM would be considered the first "email" since it was the first transmitted media to have the basic format (you sent the telegram to a location addressed to a person)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    8. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, you're talking about the mail command versus email -- E mail! Don't you know that if you take something that already exists and put an e or an i in front of it, it's completely new computer wizardry? The entire USPTO is based around this concept. Anyone with a UID of fewer than seven figures should know this stuff.

    9. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was referring to Unix-style email, which is the granddaddy of most the email passed around today. By 1973 there was RFC 561, which was, so far as I'm aware the first description of a proper ARPANET text message.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      According to the parent's link, the first spam electronic mail message was sent on May 3rd, 1978.. Before Ayyadurai "invented email".. Doesn't sound like much of an invention.. Possibly Ayyadurai coined the term "email", but that's all.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    11. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      iAgree

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by tysonedwards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From TFA: VA Shiva Ayyadurai claims is to have created the first "graphical front end for an electronic mail system", and was the first to copyright the term "EMAIL".

      It is the craziness of the mass media that translates a copyright filing as "Invention".

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    13. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually it mentions the 1978 DEC marketing message (a fairly well-known event) in line with an earlier 1971 war protest message. The 1978 date was the first commercial spam. I guess we might use a different term for it today, but it was definitely unsolicited.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    14. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Informative

      From TFA: VA Shiva Ayyadurai claims is to have created the first "graphical front end for an electronic mail system",

      Which is still wrong. Even the piece about the "To:" and the use of user'@'host which existed in RFC469 around 74, reaffirmed in RFC498, and the Mail Transfer Protocol RFC772 dated 1980 which kicked off the the modern internet version of SMTP, none of which include VA Shiva's name, btw. I suppose all the programs that were running at that time that generated the need for those RFCs had no "graphical front end" for the electronic mail that they were serving?

      and was the first to copyright the term "EMAIL". It is the craziness of the mass media that translates a copyright filing as "Invention".

      Now that one I can believe, but whether it's a legitimate copyright is a different thing. Knowing the military's proclivity to abbreviate, I wouldn't be surprised if e-mail and email, as well as EML and all caps forms in various ARPANET related documentation, already existed long before VA Shiva came along to "claim" the copyright. (Copyright is automatically granted, and as far as I know you can't copyright a word, you can Trademark it though.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    15. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by PatPending · · Score: 4, Informative

      His name is on three separate patents; are these "software patents?" (Presumably he has had a change of mind.)

      6,718,368 System and method for content-sensitive automatic reply message generation for text-based asynchronous communications

      6,718,367 Filter for modeling system and method for handling and routing of text-based asynchronous communications

      6,668,281 Relationship management system and method using asynchronous electronic messaging

      Source: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&p=1&f=S&l=50&Query=in%2FShiva+and+in%2FAyyadurai+&d=PTXT>

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    16. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by paiute · · Score: 1

      iAgree

      eSright

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    17. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...for the record, what he did appear to contribute (or at least copyright) was the word 'EMAIL', although 'electronic mail' existed as early as 1965.

      This claim in itself is fishy. You can't copyright "terms." That's not what copyright is for. Copyright is for individual works. He could have copyrighted his source code (in fact it was automatically copyrighted as soon as he wrote it), but there's no way he could claim ownership of a "term" other than by trademarking it. Some bad reporting happened somewhere along the line, here, and now it's getting regurgitated all over the Interwebs.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    18. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The first GUI email claim seems a little questionable to me. The Xerox Alto (1973) had a GUI, WYSIWYG, mice, ethernet, and email (Laurel and Hardy). I can't find a date reference for Laurel and Hardy, but Steve Jobs visited them in December of 1979 and later said:

      And they showed me really three things. But I was so blinded by the first one I didn't even really see the other two. One of the things they showed me was object orienting programming they showed me that but I didn't even see that. The other one they showed me was a networked computer system...they had over a hundred Alto computers all networked using email etc., etc., I didn't even see that. I was so blinded by the first thing they showed me which was the graphical user interface. I thought it was the best thing I'd ever seen in my life. Now remember it was very flawed, what we saw was incomplete, they'd done a bunch of things wrong. But we didn't know that at the time but still though they had the germ of the idea was there and they'd done it very well and within you know ten minutes it was obvious to me that all computers would work like this some day.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    19. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by mrclisdue · · Score: 2

      Ah, if I had mod points, I could mod you iNteresting or iNsightful.

      cheers,

    20. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      mail is edited using vi, e-mail is edited using Emacs.

    21. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he also invented the flux capacitor?

    22. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I find it amusing that the incomplete 1971 ancestor to RFC561, RFC196 "A Mail Box Protocol", already includes the concept that instead of a full mail program you might just telnet somewhere and speak the mail protocol to that.

    23. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Fair point; that was lifted from the Multics article I linked. Here's the oldest trademark I could find for 'email' (that wasn't French for 'enamel'), which I'm afraid I'm not experienced enough in the area to interpret. Interestingly, there's one from 1982 that claims 'No claim is made to the exclusive right to use the word "Email", apart from the mark as shown.' That might be just about enamel, but it could also suggest that 'e-mail' was already widely used. I'm sure if we really wanted we could look it up in old archives of Usenet postings and RFCs.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    24. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is golden, /. at its finest.

    25. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by wurp · · Score: 1

      A single word is not copyrightable. It's possible he was the first to *trademark* the term, though.

    26. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, those trademarks were actually filed after this guy claims he invented the term EMAIL. But you're onto something. Here's an issue of Popular Mechanics from August 1983 where, on page 107, it says very clearly: "Both The Source and CompuServe (the two largest computer networks) ... began their services by offering electronic mail (called EMAIL on CompuServe and SMAIL on The Source)..." So not only was CompuServe more than likely operating a nationwide email network before 1982, but it actually called it EMAIL (all caps), just like what the guy claims he "copyrighted."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    27. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      According to the legal definition, a single general term is not copyrightable, however a non-generic term is.

      Copyright Registration Number: TXu000111775 - EMAIL

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    28. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And in other news, some Asian dude LInvented basketball

    29. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Let's keep going with it. InfoWorld from May 1981 says the same thing. Computerworld pushes the date back to March, and uses the term as though it were common (and not in all-caps.) That's as early as I can dig in publications.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    30. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Application Title: Computer program for electronic mail system.

      The program, not the term. Term can be trademarked.

    31. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      According to the legal definition, a single general term is not copyrightable, however a non-generic term is.

      That's not true. You can't copyright any single term, just like you can't copyright the title of a book.

      Read the text of that claim you cite. The work's title is "EMAIL." The actual work being submitted is the text of a computer printout, i.e. the source code of his email program.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    32. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's Popular Science from September 1980, though unfortunately they don't call it "email" -- they abbreviate it "EM."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    33. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      ...for the record, what he did appear to contribute (or at least copyright) was the word 'EMAIL', although 'electronic mail' existed as early as 1965.

      A quick wiki check indicates that what he copyrighted was an email program he wrote named "EMAIL".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    34. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by wurp · · Score: 1

      I think you are still thinking of trademark.

      And the link you provide is to the copyright registration for the source of a *program* that guy wrote. The name of that program is EMAIL.

      That link is not to a copyright on the word EMAIL.

    35. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, RFC561 mail was distributed via FTP. But cool on you for finding an ARPANet antecedent to 561, that pushes it back to the original mail command.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    36. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Doesn't believe in patents, yet holds several.

      A bullshitter AND a hypocrite!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    37. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      He could have copyrighted his source code (in fact it was automatically copyrighted as soon as he wrote it).

      In 1978 in the U.S. his code was NOT automatically copyrighted unless he placed a copyright notice on each source file.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    38. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Well yes and no. If he holds patents but doesn't enforce them then that's infinitely better than letting some other big corp take the idea, patent it, and then lock it down.

    39. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Rary · · Score: 1

      As is standard for anything involving copyrights, trademarks, or patents, the claim has been distorted. He has a copyright on "EMAIL"... meaning a program called "EMAIL", not the term. He registered both the program and its user manual with the Copyright Office.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    40. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      In 1978 in the U.S. his code was NOT automatically copyrighted unless he placed a copyright notice on each source file.

      Yes it was. Why is it that copyright is one of the things where /.ers always feel a need to "correct" people with misinformation? Automatic copyright was one of the provisions of the Copyright Act of 1976, which came into effect on January 1, 1978. Look it up.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    41. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Rary · · Score: 1

      It is the craziness of the mass media that translates a copyright filing as "Invention".

      He calls it his invention, too. Check out his website at www.inventorofemail.com. He basically claims that, while there were previous implementations of electronic mail-like messaging systems, the first to have the features of modern email, including multiple folders, to/cc/bcc, subject lines, etc, was his program called "EMAIL", thereby making EMAIL the first modern e-mail system.

      Also, it's not the term "EMAIL" that was copyrighted, but the program and its user manual. As others have pointed out, you can't copyright a term.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    42. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does explicitly claim that he copyrighted the "term", not the program.

    43. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      A better approach would be to assign his patents to an organization that exists for the express purpose of holding patents but never taking any enforcement action. If such an organization doesn't exist, it should.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    44. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by el+borak · · Score: 1

      He could have copyrighted his source code (in fact it was automatically copyrighted as soon as he wrote it)

      Nope. The US didn't pass the Berne Convention Implementation Act (which made copyright automatic) until 1989.

      --
      An imperfect plan executed violently is far superior to a perfect plan. -- George Patton
    45. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Not strictly the same - talking trademarks, not copyright - but as I recall the reason Intel switched to a name "Pentium" after a string of processors labeled with numbers (486, 386, 286, etc.) was because it was ruled they couldn't trademark or protect a number.

    46. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "A bullshitter AND a hypocrite!"

      At MIT? No way!

    47. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Automatic copyright was added later, retroactively. At that time you had to register.

    48. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The 1976 copyright laws were in place at the time which did not require registration. However, the 1976 Copyright Act did not include copyright protection for computer software. In August, 1983 (Apple Computer vs Franklin), computer software was declared eligible for copyright protection.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    49. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by suprcvic · · Score: 1

      Please cease & desist use of "iAgree" as *I* have a patent pending on it.

    50. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does explicitly claim that he copyrighted the "term", not the program.

      No he doesn't. Various journalists and bloggers have misrepresented his claims, but he doesn't make that claim anywhere. His website is full of references to his claim that he copyrighted the EMAIL software, and he even includes scans of the registration documentation.

      Everything he claims is literally true, but realistically preposterous.

    51. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      This story points out something far more significant that just who invented email. It really points out how so called unique 'inventions' are rarely that but they are far more often just developments of existing ideas and principles already in the community.

      It seems that 'inventing' and the associated patents have long since abandoned principles of being if benefit to society and have become a burden upon society locked in to greed.

      Major financial corporations are using every measure to buy up all access to all the planets resources, the gross abuse of the patent system, having nothing to with being of benefit to humanity is much lock copyright becoming a means by which to print money, create forgeries of original content the majority of which is simply derived from existing content.

      The means by which to devalue existing actual capital assets so that they can be purchased with, fraudulent value, enforced by extremes of violence and brutality. A global conspiracy of creating pseudo value in order to consistently and continuously, buy out the assets from under the shrinking middle class.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    52. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      If only the rest of the world saw it his way. If he did invent email, that is.

      He doesn't see it that way, and he certainly didn't (unless he had a time machine and could go back in time to invent email before his birth).

      This self-proclaimed Venture Capitalist has already filed three BS software patents in 2003-2004. And he's only claiming that he doesn't like software patents now, because he's still trying to imply that he could have patented email in 1982 (despite the fact that email systems and the term "email" itself have been around since the late 60's).

    53. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is this one of the worst retraction I've ever read?

      Clarification: A number of readers have accurately pointed out that electronic messaging predates V. A. Shiva Ayyadurai’s work in 1978. However, Ayyadurai holds the copyright to the computer program called“email,” establishing him as the creator of the “computer program for [an] electronic mail system” with that name, according to the U.S. Copyright Office.

      The Smithsonian has acquired the tapes, documentation, copyrights, and over 50,000 lines of code that chronicle the invention of e-mail. The lines of code that produced the first “bcc,” “cc,” “to” and “from” fields were the brainchild of then-14-year0old inventor V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai.

      The Washington Post writer Emi Kolawole apparently doesn't want to talk about the the scam she was the subject of, nor the responsibility she bears as a reporter in double-checking some of the more outlandish claims she comes across.

    54. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by tricorn · · Score: 1

      It wasn't called "e-mail" (nor even EMAIL), but PLATO's electronic mail system (called pnotes, for Personal Notes, as opposed to the forum-style General Notes, which the Unix "notes" program was modeled after) certainly had a "graphical user interface". I first saw it in 1974.

    55. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's sticking to the technical, narrowly-focused truth, but using words that to someone not looking for pedantic technicalities would interpret broadly (and falsely).

      VA: Here is my source code for the program I've written, "EMAIL." I'm registering copyright on it.
      News: VA, inventor of "EMAIL," blah blah today blah blah.
      John Q. Public: Huh, this guy invented email. I thought [AOL|Hotmail|their ISP|Google|Microsoft Outlook] invented email."
      Slashdot crowd: WHARRRRRRGAAARRBBLL

    56. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he works for a software company that wanted their solutions to be patented...

    57. Re:Doesn't believe in patents by s.petry · · Score: 1

      The "EDITOR" variable has been around since the 70s, so your statement is false.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  3. Give the kid a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in school, I invented all kinds of things!

    Factoring, long division!

    1. Re:Give the kid a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farting

    2. Re:Give the kid a break by Hartree · · Score: 1

      "Farting"

      It's a great way of keeping the teacher from coming close enough to check your factoring or long division.

  4. Patents... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd love to test our Social Networking application we ran in college, long before this interweb thing came along, against some of the patents people are claiming now.

    As for email, I've got junk from my Dad's Model 14 Teletype, with headers and all, which could certainly pass for early email. Back then it was passed between stations until intended recipient was expected to have received it - your TTY was always expected to be left on.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. Uh, 1980? by leighklotz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I got to MIT in 1979 email had been in use for a long time. Both " at " and "@" were in equal use on ITS to send mail over ARPAnet via NCP. I'm not sure what this guy is claiming about having invented email in 1980.

    1. Re:Uh, 1980? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      According to Time, he's also the King of Mars and Jennifer Aniston's husband. Not a bad life.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Uh, 1980? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Ah, but this email is very, very good quality. For you sir, I am having special price.

    3. Re:Uh, 1980? by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

      and Morgan Fairchild, "Yeah! That's the ticket!"

    4. Re:Uh, 1980? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      But did you call it "email"?

      The first NYT reference I can find is William Safire's On Language column November 27, 1983, where it is presented as a fairly new term.

    5. Re:Uh, 1980? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Whom he's seen naked...

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    6. Re:Uh, 1980? by hawk · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be called "email" until the algore invented toe Internet! :)

      hawk

    7. Re:Uh, 1980? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I don't envy him the first, My ancestors long ago traded in the gene for chlorophyll for a newer model that, while giving up the ability to metabolize carbon dioxide, allowed a massively faster and more compact body. We only sometimes deign to eat his kind these days.

    8. Re:Uh, 1980? by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      We called it "mail" and "netmail."

  6. Define e-mail? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

    I think the invention of the Teleprinter and the Fax machine soon after got him beat. Modern e-mail requires IP based servers and DNS.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Define e-mail? by alphatel · · Score: 1

      Booooring. I so invented Token-Ring and RIP way before all your silly email preponderances.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    2. Re:Define e-mail? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Any time you have a multi-user system the need for e-mail arises naturally and just about every multi-user system in the world had it. Before ARPAnet or Internet or DNS.

  7. Good point. by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many DIFFERENT items go into a modern email system.

    Tomlinson "invented" the practice of using the @ sign.

    Ayyadurai may have been the first person to use the term "email".
    But there is no evidence that he invented the concept of electronic messages between people.

    1. Re:Good point. by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if he is the first to use the term "email" (which I don't believe), electronic mail messages that even a modern email user would recognize had been in use for the better part of seven years by 1978. The guy is a liar, and he's trying to cover it up with clever semantics games. One can trace the evolution of modern email systems with trivial ease from the Unix version 1 mail command through the RFCs detailing out header formats, message body encoding, UUCP and SMTP transmission protocols right up to RFC2822 in 2001. I don't see this asshat's name on any of the RFCs or as an author of any of the mail variants. He's a liar, or nuts. In either case, if I was MIT, I'd be looking at giving this moron his walking papers.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Good point. by greg1104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ayyadurai may have been the first person to use the term "email".

      Nope; that was probably BBN Mercury in 1965. Every important component to e-mail can be found by that year; that page even specifically debunks this bozo at the top. Like a lot of things, the minute electronic mail became feasible to build, e-mail was built by multiple people. All the requirements were in place the minute a community of people on time-shared computers existed. The number of independent creations of the same thing during a short time period show it was really an obvious next step the minute two people could use the same computer.

    3. Re:Good point. by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 2

      I came here to say this. This assclown is as easily disproved by simply examining the RFCs.

    4. Re:Good point. by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, this self-important wanker even has inventorofemail.com. The Boston interview seems to state his weak-ass case the best. When faced with Tomlinson's 1971 record, he says that isn't really e-mail. Apparently he thinks that some subset of having folders or blind carbon copy are somehow amazing innovations, the things that made his work modern e-mail while earlier ones were not. Whatever.

    5. Re:Good point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it go back further to multics / ITS / TOPS-10, etc?

      Anyhow, I hear you after that

    6. Re:Good point. by meerling · · Score: 1

      Of course, even without looking up the specific programs and things, you know there's something hinky with that claim. After all, Arpanet was running for a very long time before 1978, and it's purpose was to allow the government, military, and universities to communicate (non-audio, aka text) and share data in adverse situations. Do you really think they had that network in place for more than a decade without some means of fulfilling their basic and primary purpose?
      (Next thing you know, someone will start claiming they invented automobile tires right after Henry Ford died...)

    7. Re:Good point. by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      That dudes site has a timeline of the "history of email". He actually puts "pre EMAIL"(he's the one that uses all caps) going back to 1961. What a tool. This seems akin to someone saying they invented physical mail because they started the post office. The idea had been around and in use prior, but it didn't have the same feature set. Seriously, WTF?

    8. Re:Good point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this self-important wanker even has inventorofemail.com. The Boston interview seems to state his weak-ass case the best. When faced with Tomlinson's 1971 record, he says that isn't really e-mail. Apparently he thinks that some subset of having folders or blind carbon copy are somehow amazing innovations, the things that made his work modern e-mail while earlier ones were not. Whatever.

      He has several more I believe ..... dremail.com?
      LOL propoganda

    9. Re:Good point. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      BCC was present in RFC680, from 1975. The Unix V6 mail program didn't explicitly have mail folders, but from what I can tell of the man page for the Unix V6 mail command ( http://man.cat-v.org/unix-6th/1/mail ), the notion that mail could stored somewhere other than the .mail file in the home directory did exist in 1975. The Unix V7 mail command (you can find its man page at http://plan9.bell-labs.com/7thEdMan/v7vol1.pdf on page 112) most certainly does support saving mail to multiple mailbox files (and what is an mbox file but a bloody folder, which is essentially what Thunderbird still uses with an additional index file). It's that basic multiple mbox structure that programs like Elm and Pine would ultimately build on top of. MH that appears to be from around 1979 also handles multiple mail folders.

      So no, the guy didn't invent bcc or multiple mail folders either. He didn't invent the first GUI mail system, which was probably Xerox's Laurel.

      The guy is a liar.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Good point. by Rary · · Score: 5, Informative

      He is playing a ridiculous semantic game. If you look at his website, he never claims to have invented "email". He claims only to have invented "EMAIL", which is technically correct, in that he did create a program called "EMAIL". He even goes so far as to admit that the word "email" was in use previously, but that he was the first to use the word "EMAIL".

      He's a tool, and his website makes it obvious.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    11. Re:Good point. by FrangoAssado · · Score: 2

      His bit about "to, from and BCC" in this Boston article is completely bogus. Just see RFC 680 (from 1975) and notice that all of them were completely specified.

    12. Re:Good point. by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's obvious this guy doesn't understand how RFCs work, or he wouldn't even be trying to make these claims. You can find every individual component he talks about in an earlier program. It seems he thinks his really was the first program to combine this exact feature set into a single one. I doubt that, too, but what I was trying to point out is that he's not claiming to have invented electronic messaging. Instead he's claiming to have written the first "modern" client including a critical mass of features, many of which really weren't popular in early clients. Debunking that practically requires a retrospective e-mail feature checkbox grid circa 1978.

    13. Re:Good point. by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      Just as bad, he claims everything afterwards is EMAIL (uppercase -- his copyrighted program) despite having nothing to do his system. It is impressive that he wrote an email system at ages 13-16, but as far as the history and timeline of email, it's a footnote for the EMAIL copyright.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    14. Re:Good point. by quenda · · Score: 2

      But there is no evidence that he invented the concept of electronic messages between people.

      I think some guy called Samuel Morse might have a prior claim on this one.

    15. Re:Good point. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's been corrected plenty enough, and he still seems to be shamelessly shilling. When exactly does ignorance become dishonesty?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    16. Re:Good point. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      E-mail surely predated the internet and all those RFCs.

      Before the Internet, there were LANs and BBSes, and they had person-to-person mail (as well as message boards / post it notes like things).

    17. Re:Good point. by dbIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      He even goes so far as to admit that the word "email" was in use previously

      Yes, I had a fridge (and stove) with EMAIL written on it in big chromed letters in the 1970s. Maybe that's where the "internet fridge" meme came from :)

    18. Re:Good point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When exactly does ignorance become dishonesty?

      When you're desperately attempting to save face on a global stage?

    19. Re:Good point. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If there is an RFC from 1975 detailing "to", "from" and "bcc", it in all likelihood means the features were already out there and this was simply formalizing them. There are numerous email programs, in the ARPA tree and out of it, who had these or similar features many years before this guy wrote his program.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    20. Re:Good point. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      So far as I can tell, he has no role in computer history. His program did not inspire the next major stage in email, which was Elm (which pretty much inspired all the later major email programs like Pine, Eudora, Pegasus and so forth), and I think Elm, with its continued compatibility with the mbox format (which in turn dates back to the early 1970s) indicates a pretty clear line of descent.

      He wrote an email program in 1978. At best that makes it an offshoot of the development of said systems, an evolutionary dead-end. Meanwhile, the various descendants of ARPAnet's mail system continue to this very day.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    21. Re:Good point. by strat · · Score: 1

      Everybody well-informed enough to have read the PARC memo knows that it's just "mail."

  8. Really... by medv4380 · · Score: 1

    Email is one of those things that becomes obvious once the tech comes into existence. Give someone a computer with the option of sending data back and forth and a whole slew of people will say "Send this Memo to EVERYONE" and thus Spam was born.

  9. This is silly. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is email? It isn't a protocol - you can send it over many, many protocols. It is a concept: The very idea of sending a text message by electronic means to be stored somewhere the recipient may access it for a non-realtime conversation. What is that, really? It's the telegraph. Computers made it much faster, cheaper and more accessible, but the real core of the idea is as old as the telegraph.

    1. Re:This is silly. by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quite right. There are a number of different formats. But the most widely used one is based on RFC561 all the way back in 1973 (though I imagine it only formalized what guys like Ray Tomlinson had already been doing for a couple of years). Both UUCP and SMTP were built specifically with this basic format in mind, since by the time they were developed, it had been in use for years.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:This is silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the telegraph is ultimately based on electromagnetism which goes back 13.5 billion years. Everything is a remix.

  10. Unix V6 by stox · · Score: 1

    Unix Version 6, released in 1975, had the mail command.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Unix V6 by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      The mail command dates back to v1. And the earliest RFC (561) stating the structure of ARPANET mail messages dates back to 1973. That's talking about direct ancestors of modern mail systems based on RFC 822. But just about any modern email program would be able to open up an RFC 561 formatted message and display it correctly.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. More details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai#Email_claims

    1) He did not invent it.
    2) He did copyright the term "EMAIL" in 1982.
    3) But he doesn't believe in software patents.

    Now he is trying to twist his "copyright on "EMAIL"" into "Invention of EMAIL" with nothing more than his own words.

    Wake me up when Dennis Ritchie returns to whoop his undeserving ass...

    1. Re:More details by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      2) He did copyright the term "EMAIL" in 1982. .

      What does that mean? How do you "copyright" a single word? I could understand if he applied for a trademark on the word "EMAIL", but I don't understand the claim of "copyrighting" the word "EMAIL". Does that mean using the word "EMAIL" is copyright infringement?

    2. Re:More details by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      I did some digging. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, you can't "copyright a term."

      Here's his actual claim. What he did was register the copyright on his software. The title of his software is "EMAIL." That doesn't give him any kind of rights to the term, and it is not proof that he was the first one to use the term, either. There could have been a thousand software systems that called themselves that -- there just isn't a government record to prove it. Either A.) they didn't register their copyrights with the copyright office; or B.) they did so before 1978, which is as far back as the current online records go.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:More details by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And how did he copyright it? Register it? Send himself registered mail with the word "email" in the envelope. I think he's a liar from top to bottom. ARPANet email had been around for over a decade by the time of this alleged copyrighting, and older email systems had been around several years before the Unix V1 mail command.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:More details by almitydave · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the Wikipedia article linked above, he copyrighted his email program which was called "EMAIL". So the copyright is on the software, not the term, which as numerous people here have mentioned is not eligible for copyright.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    5. Re:More details by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai#Email_claims

      1) He did not invent it.
      2) He did copyright the term "EMAIL" in 1982.
      3) But he doesn't believe in software patents.

      Correction:
      He did not even copyright the term "email". He copyrighted a program titled "email" in 1982. In other words, he appropriated a term which was already well in use at the time, and named his program after it. That's the only thing he did. The name itself "email" is not protected (that's what trademarks are for, not copyrights). And the only thing that ends up being protected by this copyright is the content of his program, not its actual title. In effect, you and I could send our own code listings, label them "email", and the USPTO would still register the copyright for those code listings without batting an eyelash (Note: the only term that we technically couldn't use is Echo Mail, because that's the registered name of his company as of 1996).

      And like you said, the claim that he doesn't believe in software patents is pure BS. In 2003 and 2004, as a self-proclaimed Venture Capitalist he's been patenting email-like programs with org chart interfaces left and right. No, this guy believes in patents alright. If there is anything he's proven so far, it's that he's a very good fast talker and a good scam artist.

  12. check the rfcs by amyzing · · Score: 1

    Okay, this is kind of stupid, on his part.

    It's true that RFC 822 came out after he claims to have invented email. It obsoleted RFC 733, where you find To, Cc, Bcc, and in fact much of what was (better-) formalized in 822. 1977. If November 1977 is insufficiently early, then 733 obsoleted 724, which was released in May of that year (and is basically a first attempt).

    He didn't "invent" email. He implemented something that a lot of people were doing. Crocker et al. invented the format used for messages, as described in the series of RFCs 724 - 733 - 822. See rfc-editor.org for details.

    Amy!

    1. Re:check the rfcs by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      The word play in your signature looks like something I'd recognize if I had seen it before. Sure enough, it appears that you've been on hiatus for nine years. Congratulations on your triumphant return.

  13. AUTODIN by nsaspook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Digital_Network
    http://jproc.ca/crypto/autodin.html

    I managed a few Technical Control sites long ago. We could route normal telegrams on the system with a little creative address routing.

    --
    In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
    1. Re:AUTODIN by nsaspook · · Score: 1

      A little more info about the 1960's version of AUTODIN.
      http://rogerdmoore.ca/PS/ADINallB.png
      http://rogerdmoore.ca/PS/ADINC.html

      We had a UNIVAC DCT 9000 node at our site with plated wire memory.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plated_wire_memory
      http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5292/5466910191_d889cb8990_z_d.jpg

      --
      In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  14. VA Shiva Ayyadurai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How this charlatan got a MIT gig is the real fraud.

  15. Re:Get an iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know what else ruined the joke? Not being funny.

  16. CTSS 1965, Multics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "CTSS had mail and inter-user messaging in 1965. These facilities were useful in the initial construction of Multics. Multics provided mail and inter-user messaging between users on the same system as early as 1968. Extending mail on a single system to mail across the network was a development effort started in the early 70s that continued into the 1990s.

    THVV wrote the first mail command for 645 Multics in 1968, imitating the CTSS MAIL command. "

    Etc.

    http://multicians.org/mx-net.html#tag22

    See 3.3.2

  17. wikipedia by trip23 · · Score: 1
    At least they could have looked up the wikipedia entry on email. More trustable than a random claim or news article.

    hubhost!middlehost!edgehost!user@uucpgateway.somedomain.example.com

    'nuff said.

  18. Anything to get on TV by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    Electronic mail was invented by me, can I get on TV for relatively little effort too? :0)

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
  19. Doesn't believe in patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet here he seems to have them: http://www.ptodirect.com/Results/Patents?query=PN/6718368

  20. Great by eyenot · · Score: 1

    The guy in the sleeper car chewing watermelon, in "The Man Who Would Be King", invented e-mail. Well, guess what, I caught him stealing your watch!

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  21. is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wanker a friend of that bloated white whale carcass, Al Bore?

  22. Question mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, this is an outrage! Of course this person invented email.

    To even consider thinking otherwise ranks up there with the invention of the question mark* as one of the great invention misjustices of all time!

    *which was actually invented some time in the 30s by Mr. Evil Snr.

  23. A fake pumping himself up by loose+electron · · Score: 1

    Good grief - looks to me like somebody trying to re-write history.
    Look at:
    http://www.vashiva.com/inventing_email.asp
    Got his own web site pumping himself.

    Then:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai
    A wiki page that many have said needs to be deleted.
    I wonder who wrote that little work?

    Maybe Big Brother can get him a job
    working for the Thought Police!

    --
    www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    1. Re:A fake pumping himself up by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      What I can't figure out is how the piece of shit thought he wouldn't be outed? If he's so fucking smart, he must surely have realized that all the information showing him to be a conman can be found in about five minutes.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:A fake pumping himself up by elo_sf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He seems to be using a variant of the "big lie" wrapping some pieces of truth in the bigger lie. He does appear to have a valid copyright registration for a computer program entitled "EMAIL." from 1982. He's then taking advantage of the mainstream press' unfamiliarity with copyrights vs trademarks vs patents AND their unfamiliarity with software technology--or even willingness to read something as basic as the wikipedia entry for email to realize that 1982 was late to the party and at best the guy did develop a neat computer program at a young age, but certainly is in no way is the inventor of email as a technology. Shame on the media as much as on him.

    3. Re:A fake pumping himself up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 bucks say he's yet another Internet madman with megalomania - judging by his site. Just count how many times "V A Shiva" is encountered on that page and consider the header:

      title="V A Shiva - The Science of Connection" ... title="V A Shiva - bridging media and medicine from molecule to cosmos"

      What the fuck does that even mean?

      All in all, just one of Internet population of crazy "inventors", yet again riding on sensationalism and lack of fact-checking.

  24. Did I Miss Something? by tgeek · · Score: 1

    When the hell did Time and the Washington Post become "august" pubs???

    1. Re:Did I Miss Something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sometime back in august, i suppose

    2. Re:Did I Miss Something? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Well, believe it or not, the New York Times is considered the "Paper of Record".

      Wapo and Time are just below the category of NYTimes, so that's probably why someone decided to call them august.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  25. Software patents are evil, k? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    But I'm fairly sure we started with message board symbolic links first, and file attachments, which is what we used it for.

    Maybe the first spam used his system, but not the first Corriere Electronique as the French would say.

    (On ARPA*NET since 1978 and internal mil systems circa 1982, my old slashdot account had 4 digits but I spaced the password and the email account was an old CIS one I can't remember the number of)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  26. Re:Al Gore by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

    He funded it, dip shiite. Electrons don't grow on trees.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  27. Re:Al Gore by PatPending · · Score: 1

    Everybody know's the when Al Gore was a congressman he invented the internet...

    And while he was at it, Al Gore invented his namesake--algorithms!

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  28. Electronic Mail described in 1957 by TheSync · · Score: 4, Informative

    This NYTArticle from April 28, 1957 says:

    Mail Sped by Electronics Predicted by Summerfield; One-Day Delivery Sought Between Any 2 Cities --Many 'Ifs' in Plan ELECTRONIC MAIL SEEN IN A DECADE Senate to Study Bill Full Report Planned 'Pattern' for Country Fire From Two Sides Question of 'Intangibles'

    WASHINGTON, April 27--The Post Office Department envisions a five-to-ten-year transition to the electronic age...

  29. RFC 1149 by PatPending · · Score: 1

    Say, isn't this the same guy who "invented" RFC 1149?

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:RFC 1149 by Skapare · · Score: 1

      At the time, that was a more reliable method.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. Shiva Ayyadurai by rlk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As it happens, I actually knew Shiva in high school (I was one year behind him in Livingston -- class of 1982; he was class of 1981). We lived about 1/4 mile apart, and took the same bus to and from school. We were both science/math geeks.

    I do remember (not the details) the project he's talking about. We discussed it on the bus. He did indeed submit it to the Westinghouse Talent Search, and as I recall he got past the first round. It certainly was an interesting project for the time, and my recollection is that he designed it very well and he well deserved to advance. I don't know one way or the other whether he came up with it independently, but he most certainly didn't invent email.

    It has been well over a decade since I last saw him.

  31. Inventor of "EMAIL(TM)", not of e-mail by Guy+Harris · · Score: 3, Informative

    As he says on his Web site, he's the "inventor of EMAIL".

    He does not, however, say he's the inventor of email or e-mail or electronic mail, so I guess he means he's the inventor of a system named "EMAIL". the copyright he got was for a "COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR Electronic Mail System", which suggests that "EMAIL" was a program that implemented, err, umm, email.

    He als says "Every software system needs a User's Manual, so did the world's first E-MAIL system. At that time, Shiva was everything on the project: software engineer, network manager, project manager, architect, quality assurance AND technical writer.", so maybe "the world's first E-MAIL system" was the first system that "handled it all" - ARPANET e-mail involved different mail user agents and mail transfer agents on different operating systems, so there wasn't a single "COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR Electronic Mail System".

    Or not. A historical overview of the CTSS system, from its fiftieth anniversary, quotes Tom Van Vleck (also cited in another posting):

    Electronic Mail. Noel Morris and I wrote a command, suggested by Glenda Schroeder and Louis Pouzin, called MAIL, which allowed users to send text messages to each other; this was one of the earliest electronic mail facilities.[11] (I am told that the Q-32 system also had a MAIL command in 1965.)

    Reference 11 is to Van Vleck's The History of Electronic Mail (which mentions the copyrighting of "EMAIL" in a parenthetical note at the top of the page) and Errol Morris's New York Times Opinionator blog post "Did My Brother Invent E-Mail With Tom Van Vleck?" (my head asplode when I learned that Errol Morris was Noel Morris' brother).

    The news article he cites says he "created an electronic mail system", which may well be the case. It doesn't say he created the first electronic mail system, and "created an electronic mail system" suggests that the notion of an "electronic mail system" wasn't a Shiny New Idea (and, in fact, it wasn't).

    And, in fact, the article to which the "to defend his standing as email's creator" link takes you quotes him as saying "I did not claim that I created electronic communications," so at least give him credit for that.

    1. Re:Inventor of "EMAIL(TM)", not of e-mail by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I don't give him credit for that, because the fact is that the notion of an electronic mail system (much more specific than the very broad notion like electronic communications system) dates back to the first half of the 1960s, at least, and most certainly the antecedent of the modern email client dates back to 1971, with the first official description of a standardized header format that we would recognize as being Internet/ARPANet email dating back to 1973.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Inventor of "EMAIL(TM)", not of e-mail by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

      If you could send missives over a computer network, and another person could read them at some point in the future, that's email. This fellow is implying he invented THAT functionality. That is classical email.

      The correct claim, it seems, is that he created one of the early email-management programs.

      The use of all caps versus mixed case only usually matters to compilers. In written English, EMAIL versus email contains no difference in conveyed information. Unless one is an acronym and no one is making that claim. And all-caps does not mean anything in spoken communication.

      This fellow seems to be intentionally misleading gullible reporters for self-aggrandizing purposes.

      Specifically, he's IMPLYING he invented classical email, and letting the reporters INFER that he did in fact create classical email. When confronted with the truth, he will say he was referring to his program called "EMAIL." It would be like me telling a reporter that I invented THE INTERNET, which is a program which prints "Hello World" seven times, and a reporter then reporting that I invented the Internet.

    3. Re:Inventor of "EMAIL(TM)", not of e-mail by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      This fellow seems to be intentionally misleading gullible reporters for self-aggrandizing purposes.

      Well, more like attempting to mislead anybody who reads his site.

      Specifically, he's IMPLYING he invented classical email, and letting the reporters INFER that he did in fact create classical email. When confronted with the truth, he will say he was referring to his program called "EMAIL." It would be like me telling a reporter that I invented THE INTERNET, which is a program which prints "Hello World" seven times, and a reporter then reporting that I invented the Internet.

      Well, more like reporting on your web site that you invented "THE INTERNET", which is a BBS program that lets you send email, upload and download files, do chat, and the like, and letting everybody infer that you invented the Internet. It's not as if his program "EMAIL(R)(TM)(LSMFT)" had nothing to do with electronic mail.

      But it's still a bit misleading for him not to explicitly note, when he refers to "EMAIL", that it's the name of his program, not electronic mail in general. (The program's name was chosen back in 1978, so I wouldn't assume he named it that in order to mislead people.)

    4. Re:Inventor of "EMAIL(TM)", not of e-mail by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      And, in fact, the article to which the "to defend his standing as email's creator" link takes you [internetevolution.com] quotes him as saying "I did not claim that I created electronic communications," so at least give him credit for that.

      He owns the domain "inventorofemail.com" - surely that alone is enough for you to consider withdrawing the credit...

  32. espam by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I first used an email like system in 1980 on an IBM mainframe. I was referred to as mail, but not "email". I think at best he might be able to say he was the first to coin the silly term "email". I see no more reason to use the "e" as we don't refer to the network as "electronic". No doubt others might already be using words like "iMail" (Steve, is that you?) or "cmail" or "nmail".

    Who cares, though. It all became worthless as soon as spam (all lower case) was invented a few days afterwards.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  33. Re:Al Gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Source: http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

    During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.

    As Snopes.com points out (emphasis added), "Clearly, although Gore's phrasing might have been a bit clumsy (and perhaps self-serving), he was not claiming that he "invented" the Internet (in the sense of having designed or implemented it), but that he was responsible, in an economic and legislative sense, for fostering the development the technology that we now know as the Internet."

  34. how do we differentiate different email systems? by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    As someone else pointed out: was the telegraph really the first email? How closely does a system need to resemble what we currently know as "email" in order for it to really be "email"? If we were to identify the inventor of "modern" email, would that be Postel in 1982 with the RFC for SMTP (proposed in 1980), or someone earlier?

  35. Check out this guy's website! by sdguero · · Score: 1

    http://www.vashiva.com/

    Talk about a self-aggrandizing asshat...

    1. Re:Check out this guy's website! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. his ass-hattiness is truly outstanding. Reminds me of Stephen Wolfram's book _a new kind of asshat_.

    2. Re:Check out this guy's website! by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out why Slashdot has it in for this guy.

      Looking over some of the articles (there's 14-year old Vashiva sitting in front of a computer), he did indeed invent a system called EMAIL.

      Whether he was the very first to integrate all the functions of what we today expect an email program to do, as opposed to piping text from cat to mail, I don't know.

      Maybe he was to email like Steve Jobs was to smartphones: making them usable?

      Anyway, there are plenty of other self-promoters in Tech: Nicholas Negroponte, Metcalfe, and so on. Even Sir Tim probably wouldn't be safe as someone could come up with some antecedent which resembled his web system.

      So why the special opprobrium for the "creator of EMAIL"?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  36. Re:Al Gore by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I was in Canada at the time. I don't care what you say. Our funding was from our country, and his help was invaluable.

    Sit on it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. semantics, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coining a term isn't the same as inventing technology.

    1. Re:semantics, but I'll bite by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      coining a term isn't the same as inventing technology.

      When it comes to the term, perhaps he was the first to combine "e" and "mail", which would make him not only the creator of "EMAIL", in the sense of the program he wrote, apparently named "EMAIL", but also perhaps the creator of the term "email" if he was the first to use it and anybody else who used it got the idea from him rather than independently coining it without having seen his use of the term as the name for his software.

      When it comes to the technology, no, he clearly didn't invent the technology, but, apparently, he did implement the idea in his system - which, again, wasn't the first implementation of the concept.

      So perhaps he could claim to be the inventor of the term "email" (but his claim might be challenged), and could claim to be the creator of a program called "EMAIL" that provided a system for sending, reading, and storing electronic mail, but, while both of those might technically make his claim to be "the inventor of EMAIL" valid, with "EMAIL" being the name of his software system, the way it's stated makes it easy for somebody to misread it as claiming that he invented electronic mail, and perhaps it's stated that way intentionally to encourage people to misread it that way and give him credit where it's not due.

  38. Re:how do we differentiate different email systems by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Another poster has found RFC196 as an early mailbox protocol in 1971, but the earliest variant of a recognizable mail format would be RFC561 from 1973, which gives a header format that would be recognizable to pretty much any modern mail client.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  39. Re:Get an iphone by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    So how long did you stand in the rain for your 4s?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  40. Politics by Bensam123 · · Score: 1

    There is politics and drama even in academia.

  41. One cannot copyright a term. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    He most likely registered the mark EMAIL as a trademark. "Word" marks are always registered in all caps. They still apply to usage in other fonts and in lower case.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  42. Re:Al Gore by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    His phrasing is what allows us to sound bite him like that. He phrased it very VERY poorly, enough so that his original message was distorted.

    --
    Good-bye
  43. Maybe he did invent it by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    I am actually the author of all of Shakespeare's works.

    I invented the automobile.

    And the electric Can Opener.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  44. The real beginning of email by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    The real beginning of email, in the sense of fully automatic message switching, was "Western Union Plan 55-A", introduced in 1948 and shut down in 1976. Imagine Sendmail, with paper tape punches and readers with bins between them as the buffers. Such systems handled most telegrams in the US for over 25 years.

    There were message switching systems before that, but Plan 55-A was the first one that could forward a message from source to destination without human intervention at the switching points. It could even handle messages with multiple destination addresses.

    Before that, there were teletypewriter exchanges, but they involved dialing up a connection directly between sender and receiver. They were basically telephone switches repurposed for teletypes. That's what TWX and Telex were. Those were automatic dial back to the early 1930s.

    1. Re:The real beginning of email by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      There was also V-Mail (WWII)/Airgraphs (1930s) which involved taking a picture of a letters, sending just the film, then reprinting on the other end of the ocean. Wikipedia claims this was also used in the Franco-Prussian war (1870s) with carrier pigeons sending microfilm.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  45. All i have to say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he can SucK MY MoTHeRFuCKING DICK

  46. EMAIL != email by Jeremy+Kister · · Score: 1

    for god sakes, please read articles before they're posted to slashdot. he invented EMAIL, an email management system. he is not claiming that he invented electronic email, e.g., email.

    --

    Jeremy Kister
    http://jeremy.kister.net./

    1. Re:EMAIL != email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to look at this.

  47. Re:Get an iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, I have a Galaxy Tab. It's a phone, a tablet, and an umbrella.

  48. So then by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    He must have been working with Al Gore when Al invented the Internet.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  49. "he doesn't believe in software patents" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good man!

  50. timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the timeline on this guy's claims is way off base. we all know that al gore didn't even invent the internet until years after this.

  51. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Steve Jobs invented e-mail.

  52. Re: Xenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was shipped on 5.25" floppy disks.

  53. Who invented email by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    I recall reading somewhere that the originator of email was looking at his VAX/VMS terminal and spotted the @ sign and arbitrarily decided to use that symbol for msg redirection. I understand that email was originally relayed using UUCP and the exclamation mark or bang character as in !machine1!machine2!machine3!user. If a machine didn't recognise the user then it relayed the msg to the next machine along. This was before they invented Internet Routers.

    UUCP

    --
    AccountKiller
  54. You got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I could use PING to send a communications using timing inervals to convey a morse code message and my firewall to capture those ping timestamps, does that mean my firewall and PING are together a version of email ?! No! THat's crazy, Jesus christ, and those old arpanet shit wasn't email either. look.

    apparently the claim is that he invented a UI for electronic mail and called it email. So technically he invented a software system that accomplished functionality that did not exist before. IF THAT IS TRUE, then, as a software engineer myself, I have to admit that constitutes an invention.

    Additionally, in the vernacular today we use the term "email" to refer to just such systems - except for very technical uses of the word among engineers, most people think of it as a software system that ALSO integrates the functionality of composition of an message, the conveyance of such messages, and the receiving of such messages, as a total abstraction from RFC's and mail commands. When someon says "email" they think of the entire system, UI and all.

    So I would dispute the invention of his system and UI, (show me an example of that prior to 1981) not the invention of protocols and mail senders, otherwise you sound like a bunch of retards whose lack of critical reading skills justifies the necessity to emphasize writing and communication classes for future computer scientists. You can't even extract from the text the specific assertions you're trying to debate about, but you're good enough to read requirements and build the software our economy depends on? Wtf?

    1. Re:You got it all wrong by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The Xerox Alto had a GUI email program in 1973.

      He didn't invent email or the UI. He's full of shit. Beyond that, the reason to bring up ARPANet mail systems is because the email we use nowadays via SMTP, POP3 and IMAP is a direct descendant of those mail systems dating back to the early 1970s (and a somewhat indirect descendant of earlier mail systems). This guy's program, so far as I can tell, inspired no later mail system. If you can show me where the guys that wrote Elm in the mid-1980s were inspired by this software, that might even be something, but a survey of history indicates that their inspiration was mailx, present in Unix v7, which was written to be compatible with the mail command, which had been present in one form or another since Unix V1 back in 1971.

      Every one of this guys claims have been debunked, so why are you still defending his very obvious lies?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:You got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well, in that case the automobile was invented with the wheel, because it inherited the features of the wheel. Yea, that makes sense.

    3. Re:You got it all wrong by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      WTF? We're talking about fully functional mail systems including all the features he claims he invented, at least three years before his program even existed. GUI mail program in 1973. Check. Mail with cc and bcc by 1975, check.

      No modern mail system descends from his system. The majority of email systems out there are direct descendants of the ARPAnet systems. The header formats have a clear descent back to 1971, the mbox format in place by 1973. He didn't do fuck all.

      Your analogy is bullshit. The proper analogy is some guy building a car years after other automobiles were built and up and running, copyrighting the name of it as CAR and then going around claiming he invented the CAR.

      If you can show even one single email system after his software that is in the least bit based on his software then you might have something. But you don't, because it was a dead end, not based on any of the functional systems that came before it, and not inspiring any of the systems that came after it. If anything, the actual inspiration of modern mail clients is Elm, which was specifically designed to be compatible with mail and mailx.

      Fucking apologetic AC retard. No wonder you post AC. Probably too fucking stupid to even figure out how to get an account.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  55. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no this is not a lunatic geek , it's bad journalism

  56. This is bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *I* invented email three weeks ago! Haters gonna hate.

  57. Boston University RAX had $mail before 1978 by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

    BU's home grown time sharing VPS (nee RAX) timesharing system had an email program called $mail created by Michael Krugman before 1978 (1975?). I know because I worked at the BU computing center at the time and used $mail. If I recall, it had CC capabilities, etc.

    --
    Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
  58. I used to drive a truck by billstewart · · Score: 1

    But now it's a series of tubes.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  59. email used in 1977 by multicsfan · · Score: 1

    I worked for Honeywell from 1977 to 1979 in a multi-company ARPA contract. We exchanged informaton with all the other developers around the country via email. I can see him claiming to have written a specific email system for a specific purpose, but he did not invent email.

  60. Chicken or the egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fidonet
    binklyterm
    opus
    SEADOG
    FOSIL = FIDO OPEN STANDARD INTERFACE LAYER
    echo mail
    I can go on on and on ...

    Go hunt for a clue.

    Christopher
    AKA Sherman of the Wayback Machine - 147/7 & 11 & 14
    @ 1979 - 2012