Slashdot Mirror


Pi Day Is Coming — But Tau Day Is Better

PerlJedi writes "A few months ago, a Tweet from Randal Schwartz pointed me to a YouTube video about 'Triangle Parties' made by Vi Hart. My nerdiness and my love of math made it my new favorite thing on YouTube. Now, with Pi Day coming up later this week, I thought it would be an appropriate time to point people to another of her YouTube videos: Pi is Wrong. The website she mentions at the end, Tauday, has a full explanation of the benefits of using Tau rather than Pi. Quoting: 'The Tau Manifesto is dedicated to one of the most important numbers in mathematics, perhaps the most important: the circle constant relating the circumference of a circle to its linear dimension. For millennia, the circle has been considered the most perfect of shapes, and the circle constant captures the geometry of the circle in a single number. Of course, the traditional choice for the circle constant is pi — but, as mathematician Bob Palais notes in his delightful article "Pi Is Wrong!", pi is wrong. It's time to set things right.'"

241 comments

  1. Agreed by Ardeaem · · Score: 5, Funny

    What, pi is 14.3? When did that happen?

    1. Re:Agreed by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being English, old-fashioned and inaccurate, I prefer to celebrate Pi Day on July 22nd.

    2. Re:Agreed by Hentes · · Score: 2

      Because that's not the standard.

    3. Re:Agreed by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2

      Dude, you put the more significant digits first.

      Pi is now 201203.14 (201.203,14 with European punctuation).

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    4. Re:Agreed by wjh31 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      22/7 is actually more accurate than 3.14 (0.05% vs 0.04%)

    5. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Columbus.

    6. Re:Agreed by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Actually with European punctuation it is 14/3 - 2012 which is around 2008BC or something

    7. Re:Agreed by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      What, pi is 14.3? When did that happen?

      It is a consequence of neutrinos going faster than light- all the laws of the universe are now backwards. And yes, Pie is now 14.3... or as an estimation 7 divided by 22.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Agreed by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      [whistling to self] hope no-one notices how I spelt pie... [/whistling to self]

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Agreed by Hatta · · Score: 1

      22/7 is misleading, in that people often think it's an exact value. I actually had math teachers in middle school who claimed as much, and refused to understand the term "transcendental number".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Agreed by DMiax · · Score: 1

      nevermind trascendental, did he ever hear about irrational?

    11. Re:Agreed by cyachallenge · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Mnemonic Method of Loci does wonders for remembering digits. I just started with it and on the second day I have Pi at 50 without much effort. From memory: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751

    12. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      On July 22nd, everyone should eat crumbles.

      They're pretty close, but not quite pies.

    13. Re:Agreed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      I'd switch to Loci-ing 11/7 instead before you run out of brain cells to store the digits.

      tauday.com's manifesto is actually pretty compelling.

    14. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22/7 is not irrational.

    15. Re:Agreed by obarel · · Score: 1

      And the next digit is zero. Memorised when I was 14 (25 years ago), I still remember quite a bit (and no, I don't recall it every day just to refresh my RAM).

      I didn't use any method, just sheer determination (although I do remember it by sound more than anything, and I can't recall it in other languages without having to hum it to myself in my native language).

      The brain is a strange thing... and I'm definitely not going to bother learning Tau by heart...

    16. Re:Agreed by cyachallenge · · Score: 2

      Actually it was interesting I had no problem with 50 digits. It feels like a brief stroll rather than a rigorous rote memorization. At some point I'll try a benchmark to find the upper limit if there is one. For now I don't really see the practical use of remembering Pi to that extent.

    17. Re:Agreed by cyachallenge · · Score: 2

      As a novice in Loci, I could probably do tau to 100 in an hour and thirty. I agree this isn't something worth bothering by itself. Primarily it's just a short benchmark. I plan to use Loci to memorize important books in rote memorization then go back over them mentally for deeper learning. At the moment I'm in the process of creating an imagined memory palace. The places in my apartment are fairly boring as individual locus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_loci

    18. Re:Agreed by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Pi is now 201203.14 (201.203,14 with European punctuation).

      Depends upon which part of Europe you are from. In the English speaking part it would be 201,203.14

    19. Re:Agreed by plj · · Score: 2

      “European punctuation” is an unfortunately generic term, if one includes the digit group separator in that definition, as you just did. While all of continental Europe (as well as the entire South America!) indeed uses comma as decimal separator, digit group separator varies. For example, Germans, Greeks, Italians and Swedes would group digits with dots, while Czechs, we Finns, as well as French and Poles would use spaces. (Thin) space is also used in some applications elsewhere in the world, due to ISO 31-0. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_mark (and specifically the section “Examples of use”).

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    20. Re:Agreed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 5, Funny

      For now I don't really see the practical use of remembering Pi to that extent.

      Chicks.

    21. Re:Agreed by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I assumed this was an early article about April 25th (366/pi).

    22. Re:Agreed by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Yeah but what's the practical use of those?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    23. Re:Agreed by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      I'll get back to you after mine gives me the answer.

      (I'd like to think this is a rather clever response, actually)

    24. Re:Agreed by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 1

      Keep your Pi day, I know what I'm attending... http://www.officialsteakandblowjobday.com/

      --
      ... wait, what?
    25. Re:Agreed by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      Measuring said chicks diameter... think Violet in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory...

    26. Re:Agreed by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I actually had math teachers in middle school who claimed as much, and refused to understand the term "transcendental number".

      nevermind trascendental, did he ever hear about irrational?

      He/they would probably object strongly to the idea of teaching their student something that's irrational. ;-)

      (Yeah, I remember teachers like that. I also remember when I was in high school, decided that math was interesting, and read all the school's math texts over a semester. When I went to the math teachers asking for more, they all told me that I "wasn't ready" for more advanced math. So I went to some college kids I knew, and borrowed math books from them. Sometimes the teachers function primarily as a barrier to their students' education.)

      (And the story of how pi and other numbers came to be called "irrational" is amusing. Look it up some time.)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    27. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For now I don't really see the practical use of remembering Pi to that extent.

      Chicks.

      What, your local chicken shop sells chickens for $Pi each, or do they sell in bundles of Pi chickens?

    28. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why burden your memory? I just memorized the Gregory–Leibniz series and generate the digits in my head:
      3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886

    29. Re:Agreed by somegeekynick · · Score: 1

      22/7 is misleading, in that people often think it's an exact value.

      Who says Pi or 22/7 don't have an exact values? 22/7 is mileading because it's a rational number while Pi is not.

    30. Re:Agreed by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The Mnemonic Method of Loci does wonders for remembering digits. I just started with it and on the second day I have Pi at 50 without much effort. From memory: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751

      Unless you're going to get locked in solitary confinement for the rest of your life a la Hannibal Lecter, the whole memory palace thing is just a waste of time. You've got the whole internet to learn, no one's ever going to do that unless you stop trying to absorb anything new.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:Agreed by Guignol · · Score: 1

      Ah funny, same experience here,
      I learned the first 360 digits quite effortlessly in fact and stopped when nobody was interested anymore and the contest was over
      several years later, I switched language and I eventually got to understand that my PI memory was mostly the sound of it, not the numbers themselves
      To my great regret in fact: All those years I thought I could memorise numbers, and I did, learn so many constants, e, 12 digits, log(2) log(3) sqrt(2) sqrt(3), N, c, etc. etc. for fun and I really felt/believed that I was remembering the numbers for themselves
      Switching languages I was completely unable to 'tell PI' by memory without first telling it in my head in my first language and then translating it pieces by pieces (slow, error prone, and overall disturbing)
      Before that I had no consciousness of my being 'locked to the sound of the number' instead of to the number itself :)

    32. Re:Agreed by johny42 · · Score: 1

      I celebrate at 3/14 1:59:26. Good luck beating that in July!

    33. Re:Agreed by obarel · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe we *are* still at the evolutionary stage of a bird: we can only "feel" numbers up to 5, but we can learn to "sing" any number of digits. We don't actually have any understanding of the number, just aural memory (unfortunately, unlike with birds, it's useless for attracting females).

    34. Re:Agreed by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that part of the joke?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thing is, we like pie. Being able to eat a Pi sized slice of Pi at 1:59 on 3.14 is a geeky excuse to consume treats.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. I'm the chief promoter of Pi Day at my workplace, and it's mostly almost all about the pie. One of the secretaries likes to sing Pi Carols, but it's pretty much about the pie eating.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    2. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by sideslash · · Score: 2

      If you want to observe the festivities with a more phonetically accurate English language reinterpretation of the ancient Greek letter name "Pi", you should go to the restroom and urinate. That can be a very satisfying feeling as well.

    3. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by buchner.johannes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With Tau, you can have two pies.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    4. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to imagine Pi Carols...

      Oh Pie Tree, Oh Pie Tree,
      How lovely is your crust baked...

      Rudolf the red cherry piedeer

      We three fillings, of orient are,
      figs, plums, kiwis stored in a jar

      Timer Bells, Timer Bells
      Time to open the oven

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      One of the secretaries likes to sing Pi Carols

      Wow, is your secretary some kind of frustrated geek or something?

      I didn't even know there were Pi carols.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Hmmm maybe not Pi Carols but there are at least two Carol Pi's in the US according to Whitepages.com

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.winternet.com/~mchristi/piday.html

    8. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Bah, they're both boring. Let me know when it's Summer Glau Day.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >Wow, is your secretary some kind of frustrated geek or something?

      Yes. Nice voice though.

      >I didn't even know there were Pi carols.

      Google is your friend, or not. You may not want to know. For starters: try this.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    10. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 2

      Ah, but you can do this: On June 28 at 3:18, everybody leaves work early to contemplate the nature of existence (which simply cannot be done at work). Mathematically religious holiday! That means you can eat pie at home in your underpants* WITHOUT your dumbass co-workers stealing your fork.

      *According to wikipedia, this is the ONLY way to properly contemplate existence, unless, of course, my edit was edited.

    11. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      Right, but if you have a cylinder with radius z and height a, its volume is Pizza. Who needs pie when we can have wonderful, tasty, Pizza?

    12. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      I this how the world is going to end?!
      With Pi being half a Pie?

      --
      -- no sig today
    13. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is your friend, or not.

      Google is DEFINITELY not my friend.

    14. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1
      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    15. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm the chief promoter of Pi Day at my workplace

      Oh God, let me guess, you're the office official whacky guy? Do you have a "you don't have to be mad to work here - but it helps!" plaque on your desk?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, they're both boring. Let me know when it's Summer Glau Day.

      Summer Glau is about as erotic as an iPhone. I can see why she's so popular on slashdot.

    17. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      I'm the chief promoter of Pi Day at my workplace

      Oh God, let me guess, you're the office official whacky guy? Do you have a "you don't have to be mad to work here - but it helps!" plaque on your desk?

      Nope, I'm the boss (CEO). No plaque, but if you are not happy and successful here, I will help you go be happy and successful somewhere else. Besides, who doesn't like pie?

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    18. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Partial to Kaylee myself...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    19. Re:Cant eat a slice of Tau to celebrate. by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Hell yes.

  3. Wait what? by BenJury · · Score: 2

    There are 14 months in a year now?

    --
    Blatant Advert: Android Apps!
    1. Re:Wait what? by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

      It's the year 3141?

    2. Re:Wait what? by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      Well with everyone so interested in the Mayans with thought; Oh, the Mayan calendar is 13 months long. We're gonna make ours 1 better you see? 14 is 1 better than 13. Our new calendar goes to 14!

    3. Re:Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends which calendar you use. There could be 19 months of 19 days in a year, with 4 (or 5 for leap year) Intercalary days to make up the number.
      And that would mean we were in the 19th month (Loftiness)

    4. Re:Wait what? by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... we got bored with adding one day every four years, so we just add two months roughly every 2.5 centuries now.
      Welcome to 2507, you'll like it here!

      --
      -- no sig today
  4. Submitted by Hipster Cat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next year there will be a post along the lines of "I liked Tau day before it was cool."

  5. Triangle Panties by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Darn.
      I read that wrong.

    I say we stick with pi. It's too labor-intensive to rewrite all the textbooks to read "tau" instead of "2*pi" and reteach everyone the new formulas.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Triangle Panties by RandomChars · · Score: 1

      nevermind the fact that tau is already the symbol for a bunch of other things. I think it would make more sense to redefine pi as whatever new constant you wanted, but then that would be about 60billion times more confusing.

    2. Re:Triangle Panties by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is? Like what? There's a lot of greek symbols that are used for different things, so you have to look at what domain you're in before you make any assumptions about their values. This also applies to latin symbols.

      Quick: what is i? Well, that depends. If you're a mathematician, it's the square root of -1. However, if you're an electrical engineer, the answer is the AC current. In EE, j is the square root of -1. Omega, theta, tons of symbols like these are reused in different domains for different things.

      Offhand, I don't remember tau being used for anything else in mathematics (specifically geometry), so it seems as good a symbol as any. According to Wikipedia, there's a handful of mathematical uses for tau already, but they seem pretty esoteric (or obsolete, in the case of the golden ratio, which more commonly uses phi). It is used for a bunch of things in physics and biology, but those are different domains, so that's pretty irrelevant. You don't use pi (the circle constant) much in biology either, I imagine.

      However, there are some greek letters that are barely used, so maybe one of those would be better. Upsilon, for instance, only has one use listed in Wikipedia's list of greek letters used in math, science, and engineering, to represent an elementary particle. Only physicists would ever see that (I don't think I ever saw that in college, as I was a EE major), so maybe that'd be a better choice than tau.

    3. Re:Triangle Panties by Mr+Z · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, I think it's perhaps a little wrongheaded anyway. The area of a circle is pi*r^2. That'd become tau*r^2/2... You took the 2 out of one place and put it in another. And it does nothing for spheres: Volume = (4*pi*r^3)/3 = (2*tau*r^3)/3; Surface area = (4*pi*r^2) = (2*tau*r^2).

      And besides, tau's already claimed as the "time constant" variable, so n'yah!

    4. Re:Triangle Panties by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds like a Tau of Babel to me

    5. Re:Triangle Panties by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Tau is used for both torque and shear stress (among others) in mechanical engineering. The former would cause quite a headache considering how often pi comes up in rotating systems.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    6. Re:Triangle Panties by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      The area of a circle is pi*r^2.

      For most people, yes.
      For some (including me), however, it will always be pi.d^2/4, for the simple reason that you can't easily measure an object's radius (measuring d then halving doesn't count). Seeing it that way might be ugly/wrong from a mathematical standpoint but practically speaking it seems more natural.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    7. Re:Triangle Panties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tau is torsion in the Frenet-Serret apparatus in differential geometry.

    8. Re:Triangle Panties by robot256 · · Score: 2

      (measuring d then halving doesn't count)

      This is where I stopped reading your post.

    9. Re:Triangle Panties by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the authors of this proposal weren't mechanical engineers. Maybe my upsilon idea would be better than their tau.

    10. Re:Triangle Panties by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ok, sounds interesting, but I never heard of that in all my years of math (I was a EE major), and that's certainly something grade school kids learning basic geometry (or high school kids in trigonometry) aren't going to be exposed to. My point here is that just because a greek letter is used in some highly esoteric advanced field doesn't mean it should be forever reserved for that, when almost no one uses it for that or has even heard of it.

      The other poster who commented that it'd create major conflicts in the mechanical engineering field (which isn't nearly as esoteric as higher math subjects) has a better point IMO, and for that reason I'd advocate using something else, perhaps upsilon. It looks like a y, which isn't that different-looking than tau (but different enough to not be confused, but not completely different like omega or theta, so it's sorta similar to pi), and from what I read on Wikipedia is only used for some fundamental particle in physics, so it's not likely to cause any conflicts.

    11. Re:Triangle Panties by lgw · · Score: 2

      i is always sqrt(-1). EEs just can't spell. Well known fact.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Triangle Panties by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      I think that the argument for Tau or whatever, whether it has merit or not, amounts to a replay of the QUERTY discussion. That train done left the station, ain't comin' back for nobody.

      Having said that:
      So this guy Jim's car broke down, so he called his friend Joe, who had a wrecker. When Joe came, Jim asked him how much it would cost to get the car home. Joe said, "Well, I've been hankering after your wife's baking. How about I get you home, and she gives me a batch of them cupcakes she makes."

      Jim responded, "OK fine, I'm sure she'd be glad to to make you up a batch. Chocolate is best. But say - the gas station is not much farther - how about you get me to the gas station, and then give me a ride home?"

      Joe thought for a bit, and then said, "That's quite a bit farther. That tau will be 2 pies." :D

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    13. Re:Triangle Panties by vAltyR · · Score: 1

      K = 1/2 * m * v^2 (kinetic energy; integral of momentum with respect to velocity)

      x = 1/2 * a * t^2 (position from acceleration; integral of velocity w.r.t. time)

      U = 1/2 * k * x^2 (potential energy of a spring; integral of force w.r.t. distance)

      E = 1/2 * C * V^2 (energy stored in a capacitor; integral of charge w.r.t. voltage)

      E = 1/2 * L * I^2 (energy stored in an inductor; integral of voltage w.r.t. current)

      A = 1/2 * tau* r^2 (area of a circle, integral of circumference w.r.t. radius)

      Changing the formula actually brings it into line with the others. This is explained in both the "Pi is Wrong!" article and the Tau Manifesto.

      As for spheres, remember that the volume of a sphere is 2/3 of that of a circumscribed cylinder. The volume of said cylinder is 1/2 * tau * r^2 * 2 * r = tau * r^3. The tau formula clearly shows this relationship, while the pi formula obfuscates it.

    14. Re:Triangle Panties by robot256 · · Score: 1

      All sarcasm aside, if you want to get into what's practical, then I think pi.(d/2)^2 is much better because then you don't have to square such a large number in your head, nor do you have to divide by four at the end. And oh look, that's the same as pi.r^2. Honestly I cannot fathom why people get so hung up over mathematical formulas that are ABSOLUTELY EQUIVALENT. You're perfectly welcome to simplify and redistribute equations in your head, I do it all the time too. Just don't screw with hundreds of years of written convention to suit the peculiarities of your particular mind.

    15. Re:Triangle Panties by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      But look at what happens to the coefficients for the surface area and volumes of the n-sphere for different values of n

      The numerical coefficients follow an obvious pattern when tau is used with S(n+2)=V(n)*tau*r

      With pi the pattern is nowhere near as obvious.

      I'd post a table but the Slashdot lameness filter doesn't like those.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    16. Re:Triangle Panties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At our EE classes we always used capital I for the current, presumably precisely to avoid conflict with i. We couldn't use j because j is the current density which shows up in some niche applications.

    17. Re:Triangle Panties by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      All this silliness over pi r squared. Everyone knows that pie are round. Strudels are square, sometimes. (Costco strudels are rectangular, but that's just Costco giving you a bit of extra).

      --
      Will
    18. Re:Triangle Panties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too labor-intensive to rewrite all the textbooks to read "tau" instead of "2*pi" and reteach everyone the new formulas.

      There's no need to rewrite all the textbooks. No-one's suggesting that all knowledge of pi be banished from the Earth, people will still know what it means when they see it. It's just that tau should be preferred for new stuff.

    19. Re:Triangle Panties by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      This is covered in the Tao Manifesto. tau*r^2/2 is more consistent with other formulas that are the result of integration. For example Distance fallen is g*t^2/2, Spring energy k*x^2/2, and Kinetic energy m*v^2/2. Think of it this way 1/2 was there but got canceled out by the 2 in 2*pi.

      Quadratic Forms

  6. Tau day is better by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tau day is better because I have an excuse to get 2 pies instead of just one. I still celebrate pie day as well as groundhog day, mmmmm ground hog).

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:Tau day is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think steak and blowjob day beats them both.

    2. Re:Tau day is better by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Now if only I could convince my wife it actually existed.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:Tau day is better by BobNET · · Score: 1

      Tau day is better

      But Einstein's birthday is best!

    4. Re:Tau day is better by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Now if only I could convince my wife it actually existed.

      Surely she's capable of verifying that with a google search.

      Convincing her it's anything other than a geek thing, well, that might be tougher. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  7. Pi day will always remain the same for me by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    It's the day we're all comfortable with Sin(), further we're so accomodating we'll embrace Cos().

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Pi day will always remain the same for me by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      tau day is better in this regard. It's easier to get a Tan() in June than march.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  8. Did someone say Tau by Moheeheeko · · Score: 0

    I refuse to celebrate xenos and heretics! The Emperor wills it!

  9. Breaking derivatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every Pi Day this tau crap comes around with the pseudomathematics community forgetting that using tau instead of pi in the way their way would change the lovely fact that d sin x/dx = cos x.

    1. Re:Breaking derivatives by tigre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it doesn't. Just using a different scale (x = 2y).

    2. Re:Breaking derivatives by TarMil · · Score: 1

      What the fail? Using tau wouldn't change anything to the properties of cos and sin.

      cos x and sin x are defined as the abscissa and ordinate of the point on the unit circle associated with an arc of length x. How does the name of a constant change anything to this definition?

    3. Re:Breaking derivatives by sudonymous · · Score: 2

      Not even this. The angle is in radians. It won't change a bit.

      Now, sin(pi*x) is not the same as sin(tau*x), but sin(x) doesn't care whether you prefer using pi or tau.

  10. Considering the counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I do think tau is the 'better' constant, and both exploring the possibilities of what tau can do, and just 'playing around' with the math involved, has been enjoyable. However, to evaluate it properly and determine just how strong it is, a strong counterpoint is needed - and it is supplied in The Pi Manifesto.

    Both its author and I recommend reading The Tau Manifesto (and Bob Palais's original work; both are linked in the article above) before reading The Pi Manifesto, to make proper sense of it.

    In the end, I think tau is a much stronger choice than pi for some aspects of math; others, deserve further investigation. It may all be academic discussion, given how firmly pi is entrenched in our mathematics, but perhaps there's a solid place for both - with pi reserved for certain advanced concepts, and tau used through introductory geometry, trig and calculus.

    1. Re:Considering the counterpoints by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      Dammit I'm American, and I refuse to learn new math just because it makes more sense. I will continue to to try and memorize that there are 12 inches in a foot, 3 feet in a yard, and dammit, I forgot how many feet in a mile. To hell with the metric system.

    2. Re:Considering the counterpoints by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The imperial system actually makes more sense for some things, depending on which measure you're talking about and what you're using it for. The whole 12 inches/foot thing can be easier to work with when you have to divide things evenly in quarters and thirds; by having something divisible by 12 instead of 10, you can easily divide by 3 or 4 without the math becoming complex. That's the whole reason 12 was the base for these units; back in medieval times, when they didn't have calculators and measurements were crude, it was easy to work with. Even now, woodworkers generally prefer English units for this reason.

      Miles, however, don't make so much sense since they in fact are equal to 5280 feet. The big problem with conversion however, at least here in America, is that many things are based on miles. For instance, here in Phoenix, all the main streets are laid out along a 1-mile grid system. It's stupidly easy to see how far you'll travel from one point to another (using Manhattan lengths; except for Grand Ave, all the roads are N-S or E-W) just by looking at a map and counting the number of main roads in each direction. If we tried to convert to km, it'd be a mess. If I ask "How far is it from Baseline to Ray?" the answer is a simple "5 miles", just by counting the roads in between (Guadalupe, Elliot, Warner, Ray). In km, I'd count the roads and then multiply by 1.6, getting 6.4km, not exactly a convenient measure.

    3. Re:Considering the counterpoints by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      5 miles is 8 kilometers, not 6.4.

    4. Re:Considering the counterpoints by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, a mile is simply 8 furlongs, which was a more practical unit of measurement for land. For some reason a furlong (220 yards) is divisable by 11. I doubt that's an accident, but I've always wondered why it was important.

      Historically a furlong is the distance that oxen could plow between rests, and so fields were generally a furlong in length along one axis. An acre is a furlong by a (surveyor's) chain, which made perfect sense at the time - and a chian is 1/10th of a furlong, so clearly Arabic numerals and base 10 math were commonplaceby the time that was standardized.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Considering the counterpoints by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that should read "4 miles", not 5. It's 5 miles to Chandler Blvd, not Ray Rd, but I was trying to show an example where converting to kilometers yielded a non-integer result, and it turns out that 5 is one of the few cases where it converts to an integer value, so I changed to 4 but forgot to change that one numeral.

    6. Re:Considering the counterpoints by sudonymous · · Score: 2

      5280 divides evenly by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20... which makes it convenient when you want to parcel up land.

    7. Re:Considering the counterpoints by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. The Pi Manifesto's first three arguments are "Tau is silly.", "It doesn't matter which one we use." and "Physicists are dumb. Even the Babylonians used Pi." Then it goes on to argue the Tau Manifesto uses cherry-picked examples by .... cherry picking examples. I think, if we had to decide on the number now, without the long history of Pi, Tau should win by a hair, as described by this analogy of Pi to 1/2 and Tau to 1 (from the Tau Manifesto):

      "Imagine we lived in a world where we used the letter h to represent “one half”, and had no separate notation for 2h. We would then observe that h is ubiquitous in mathematics. In fact, 2h is the multiplicative identity, so how can one doubt the importance of h? All mathematicians and geeks agree, h is where it’s at.

      But this is madness: 2h is the fundamental number, not h. Let us therefore introduce a separate symbol for 2h; call it “1”. We then see that h=1/2, and there is no longer any reason to use h at all. Arguing that is important in mathematics is the same as arguing that h is important. And indeed many mathematical formulas do contain a factor of 1/2, but that’s no reason to use a separate letter for the concept. The same goes for : like our hypothetical h, is superfluous—h is just 1/2; is just /2."

      Also the Tau are unstoppable at range in WH:40k, and the Pi isn't even a playable race. So there's that, too.

    8. Re:Considering the counterpoints by jc42 · · Score: 1

      "Imagine we lived in a world where we used the letter h to represent âoeone halfâ, and had no separate notation for 2h. We would then observe that h is ubiquitous in mathematics. In fact, 2h is the multiplicative identity, so how can one doubt the importance of h? All mathematicians and geeks agree, h is where itâ(TM)s at.

      To further stretch this to the breaking point, we might also observe that English, like nearly all other human languages, has a word for 1/2: "half". We use it a lot. Of course, we also have the word "whole", which we also use. But I'd guess offhand that I use "half" more than I use "whole". This is probably because in most phrases, you can just omit "whole", just as you can omit "1 *" in mathematical expressions. Thus, a recipe will call for a "teaspoon" of something, not a "whole teaspoon", and similarly for other uses. But with half of a unit, you need to write "half" or "1/2".

      Anyway, we could have a bit of fun arguing that this property of human languages implies that it would be more "natural" for a human mind to have words/symbols for both 1/2 and 1. I wonder why mathematicians don't do this?

      Maybe it's for reasons similar to why our languages usually have a word for exclusive-or but not for inclusive-or. But mathematicians (and most computer languages) reverse this, defining "or" to mean inclusive-or, and either not having or rarely using the exclusive-or word/operator. Similarly, they use 1 a lot, 1/2 not so often, unlike common speech.

      In any case, tongue-in-cheek technical "debates" like this can be fun, especially when some of the participants take it so seriously. It's almost as much fun as the repeated discussions about the meaning of "planet". ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    9. Re:Considering the counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually happy to see mention of tau as a replacement for pi in discussions I began reading last year. I do see tau as more fundamental than pi, but I'm surprised I haven't heard serious discussion about another option that I believe is an even better option for tau, that is, let tau = pi/2.

      With this change, the sine and cosine curves would be much easier to teach, as:

      sin 0 tau = 0
      sin 1 tau = 1
      sin 2 tau = 0
      sin 3 tau = -1
      sin 4 tau =0

      cos 0 tau = 1
      cos 1 tau = 0
      cos 2 tau = -1
      cos 3 tau = 0
      cos 4 tau = 1

      Also, sin tau/2 = cos tau/2 = 1/sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2

      This would also fundamentally align geometry with a mathematical constant, since right angles (= tau) are cornerstones of geometry. It would mean that a circle's circumference would be described by 4 tau r, but that seems appropriate, as there is one tau per each quadrant. Area would be 2 tau r^2. None of those look unreasonable, or significantly disadvantaged versus the alternative version of tau. Since the right angle is more fundamental than the circle in geometry, I think tau = pi/2 makes much more sense.

      For what it's worth, I am a mathematician.

    10. Re:Considering the counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess? Committee-think in action: Well these folks think a furlong should be divisible by 10 for such-and-such perfectly good reasons, and these other people think it should be divisible by 12 for other perfectly good reasons, how can we possibly decide? Let's just split the difference and call it good. What do you mean, 11 is a horrible base, what does that have to do with anything?

    11. Re:Considering the counterpoints by sita · · Score: 1

      Even now, woodworkers generally prefer English units for this reason.

      They do? Outside of U{K,SA}?

    12. Re:Considering the counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This year, I taught trigonometry in my precalculus classes using tau instead of pi. That was the least amount of time I've ever had to spend on that topic. The students had no trouble understanding right away that, say, 3/8*tau meant 3/8 of a turn, and so was equal to 3*45=135 degrees. Same for the unit circle, sketches of sinusoid graphs (transformed or otherwise), etc. They made short work of it. One of the students for whom the class is very much a struggle commented that this was the easiest stuff we'd done all year.

      Even the old "1 radian" type questions tripped very few students up compared to previous years. Perhaps because they already had a very clear idea of what 1*tau radians meant, they could recognize that 1 radian, 2 radians, etc. meant something different.

      Of course at the end, they learned how to translate back and forth between "pi language" and "tau language".

      Say what you want about the "wrongness" or "rightness" of pi or tau, or problems with its use in physics and engineering. But I'm planning on continuing this experiment in future years, because it seems like it lessens the pain of learning trigonometry for the first time.

  11. Four thirds pi! by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wait, what about four-thirds pi, the constant that relates the volume of a sphere to the radius???

    Using 2pi as the so-called "constant" is two-dimensional chauvinism!

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Four thirds pi! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      4/3 pi r^3 is actually 2/3 or of a circumscribed cylinder or 2/3 tau r^3..

      This tau thing kind of makes sense, though I tend to call it 2 pi.. If pie is good, two pi is twice as good.

    2. Re:Four thirds pi! by lzygenius · · Score: 1

      Using tau you can use two-thirds tau to relate the volume of a sphere to the radius.

    3. Re:Four thirds pi! by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Bah, use (pi^(n/2)*r^n)/gamma(n/2+1), the volume of an n-dimensional ball related to its radius and the number of dimensions!

      --
      Not a sentence!
    4. Re:Four thirds pi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that the fact that for every 4/3 of pi you only get back 2/3 of tau! Fiscally irresponsible, I say.

    5. Re:Four thirds pi! by ardiri · · Score: 1

      four-thirds pi = eight-thirds tau

      just as complex in both cases.. neither case holds up as being singular for the sphere.

    6. Re:Four thirds pi! by tragedy · · Score: 1

      But the logic demanding the use of tau instead of pi also demands the use of the diameter instead of the radius. So, to be consistent, wouldn't it be 1/12 tau d^3?

    7. Re:Four thirds pi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean two-thirds tau, right?

    8. Re:Four thirds pi! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      No I think it is the other way around. The argument is that pi using diameter, as in diameter * pi = circumference, while tau (2pi) uses radius, radius * tau = circumference.

    9. Re:Four thirds pi! by tragedy · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, the argument is all about all those unnecessary factors of two that crop up. It seems like you could get rid of those just by using diameter instead of radius in most of those formulae. I was just poking a little fun at the push for using Tau by pushing the use of diameter instead of radius based on the same reasoning. Obviously if you did both at the same time, you'd end up with lots of unnecessary factors of 1/2 all over the place instead.

    10. Re:Four thirds pi! by pmw57 · · Score: 1

      The 4/3 part of 4/3 pi * r^3 is actually a misnomer, because the sphere is in reality 2/3 of the cylinder.

      We can halve 4/3 and multiply pi by 2, resulting in 2/3 * 2 * pi * r^3.
      With Tau we can now gain a correct understanding of the formula by using 2/3 * tau * r^3

  12. Seems pretty unimportant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So Tau is C/r, Pi is C/d. Who cares? One is twice the other.

    That reads to me like "4 is wrong! Use 2, and square it!"

    I don't see how one is "right" and one is "wrong". If it significantly makes a particular equation or formula easier to read, go ahead and make the first line of your proof be "Let tau = 2*Pi" and get over yourself.

    1. Re:Seems pretty unimportant by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's not that one is right or wrong, it's that one is easier than the other, and simplicity and elegance are always preferable to needless complexity.

      For an extreme example, let's say that for some reason, people teaching math classes all suddenly decided to replace pi with a new constant, called Q, which is equal to pi * 13/59. Why? Just to make life difficult for everyone. So now, you're trying to teach little kids about simple geometry, and telling them that the circumference of a circle is 118/13 * Q * r, or 59/13 * Q * D. And they'll need to do all the math involving circles and arcs with these extra factors of 59 and 13. It should be pretty obvious that this will be a giant PITA. The authors of the proposal make a very good case that pi really doesn't make much sense, because you constantly wind up with extra factors of 2 everywhere in your equations, for no good reason, and by using tau (2 * pi), all the equations are suddenly much simpler. Obviously, the difference isn't as great as with my crappy "Q" constant, but it's still there.

    2. Re:Seems pretty unimportant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      But, my point is, it depends on the equation. Some might look simpler, some might not.

      IMO, TFA is cherry picking. I'm sure there's a whole list of equations that would suddenly introduce new factors of 1/2 or 0.5, which most would consider more annoying than a 2.

      For instance, the area of a circle would be (1/2)tau*r^2 - which seems a bit awkward to me. Since tau = C/r, You could simplify it to (C*r)/2, but again - fractions are awkward to write, especially with a keyboard, and mistakes get easy to make. I like PI*r^2, myself.

      There may exist equations in which inserting your 13's and 59s simplify the math, in which case a good old "let banana = 13/59 * pi" might make your paper more readable.

      To call any number "right" or "wrong", is a bit stupid.

    3. Re:Seems pretty unimportant by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      If it significantly makes a particular equation or formula easier to read

      Its not that it makes a particular equation easier to read, it is that it makes pretty much all the specific equations in which pi is used have a clearer relationship to more general principles.

  13. pi is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why are we still using pi? I mean, if pi = 3, then why don't we just use the number 3 and get rid of pi? It's useless.

    1. Re:pi is silly by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Because Pi is closer to 4 than it is to 3. If you're playing the Price is Right it is anyway.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:pi is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or just stop using damn circles. Everyone knows that nature is all about straight lines and linear vectors, these man-made curved abstractions are only confusing an already-difficult subject. I mean, really, how the hell does Pi apply to a balance sheet? Stop the insanity!

    3. Re:pi is silly by bossk538 · · Score: 1

      Because most of live in a part of the universe where Euclidean Geometry gives a better approximation of the local coordinate system.

  14. Bah. e is better than them all by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who cares about pi or tau? e shows a much more in depth understanding of mathematics.

    1. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then, when somebody wants to argue that twice e is actually a better constant, we can say "2e or not 2e, that is the question."

    2. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we put the tau folks in charge of updating all the world's software then. Well? I'm waiting...

    3. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by effigiate · · Score: 1

      I also came here to suggest an "e" day. I know that I use e much more frequently than pi.

    4. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you start doing real work, the constant factors all get tossed away and then put back in at the end. Take special relativity -- you pick your units h-bar=c=1 and then express mass in energy units etc. It gets a little weird when you start working out units of magnetic fields but for a lot of common calculations it's helpful. If you need to weasel your results around to get a measurable quantity then you figure out what constants to put back in as a unit conversion.

    5. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by arth1 · · Score: 1

      we can say "2e or not 2e, that is the question."

      Unless you use the Amerenglish pronunciation[*], you can say:
      "2 pi or not 2 pi, that's the tau question".

      [*]: At least they're mostly consistent, making "pi" rhyme with "bi-" and "Semper Fi". But not with "quay".

    6. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, e is indeed the natural base - unique base to have itself as the integral and derivative. Nothing can alter it as a universal constant.

    7. Re:Bah. e is better than them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're acting impatient because your request wasn't carried out before you even posted it?

  15. "American PI Day" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not PI, but 14.03 for majority of the world.

    1. Re:"American PI Day" by Stickybombs · · Score: 1

      That's fine, you guys can celebrate and eat your pie on the 3rd of.....whatever month comes 2 after December. We prefer ours now! Have to keep up the stereotype of the fat Americans :)

    2. Re:"American PI Day" by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      The ISO standard is YYYY/MM/DD, and that is used by China, Japan, and anybody who likes files and folders to be properly organized. The US system fucked up on the placement of the year, but is the same when the year is left out.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:"American PI Day" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The system I normally use is DDmmmYYYY, where mmm is a three-digit abbreviation of the month. I believe it's the standard for the US military. So today, for instance, is 12MAR2012. This system works well since there's no confusion about its meaning; since the middle three letters are obviously the month, and the last 4 obviously the year, the first two are obviously the day. Anyone in any country (at least who knows the English names of months, or can understand them well enough (most European languages have the same first 3 letters, or are very close)) should be able to read it and figure out what it means quickly instead of trying to think "was the person writing this date an American, and likely using MMDDYYYY? Or maybe they were an American, but they were writing for an international audience and thus using DDMMYYYY; how do I tell?"

    4. Re:"American PI Day" by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      It sucks for sorting. 01APR, 01AUG, 01DEC, 01FEB...

    5. Re:"American PI Day" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So does the commonly-used (in Europe I believe) DDMMYYYY system; everything's sorted by day of the month without regard for month or year.

      The problem with YYYYMMDD is that the year is first, and no one cares about that. When I look at the date on my computer or wherever, I already know what year it is, what I want to know is the current day. As a result, most date displays frequently omit the year altogether to save space. Then you don't know which is the month and which is the day (MMDD vs DDMM). With DDmmm, you can still omit the year and it's obvious which is which.

      For sorting, you just need to write your software to handle dates correctly in whatever format they may be in, and write the correct SQL queries to get sorted results. Let the computer do the sorting work for you; 'ls -ltr' works fine for me for showing a sorted list of files by their creation times, even though the date isn't stored in any of these formats internally.

    6. Re:"American PI Day" by psmears · · Score: 1

      It sucks for sorting.

      This is true, but I haven't yet discovered a good way of automatically sorting pieces of paper based on what I wrote on them :) When naming files, I always use the YYYY-MM-DD format, but when filling in forms for humans to read (especially non-technical ones of unknown nationality) I usually go with DD/MMM/YYYY.

    7. Re:"American PI Day" by sudonymous · · Score: 1

      That's no problem; just relabel the months:
      Anuary, Bebruary, Carch, Dapril, Fay, Gune, Huly, Jaugust, Keptember, Loctober, November, Pecember

      Then put the day after the month:
      -> BEB01, DAP01, JAU01, PEC01

      (bonus: Gune is a heterograph of June, and November doesn't change.)

    8. Re:"American PI Day" by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      +1 :D

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  16. Tau for the win by mjrauhal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tau is twice the constant Pi ever was!

    1. Re:Tau for the win by StikyPad · · Score: 2

      You could say it's two Pis and then sum.

  17. Pie are not squared! by jd2112 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I remember arguing with my geometery teacher years ago, she kept saying pie are squared. I can't recall ever seeing a square pie. (Cobbler perhaps but never a square pie.)

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    1. Re:Pie are not squared! by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      That apple pie has rounded corners, it's probably in violation of one or more design parents from a certian computer company whose name I can't seem to remember at this time.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    2. Re:Pie are not squared! by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      And I seriously doubt any of those pot pies have any put in them...

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  18. tau is wrong by w_dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Division is harder than multiplication. Given the choice between sometimes multiplying by 2, and sometimes dividing by two, we should pick the constant that forces the multiplication. Also, e^(pi * i) is nicer than e^((tau / 2) * i).

    1. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The really beautiful identity is e^(i \tau) = 1.

    2. Re:tau is wrong by Ironix · · Score: 1

      e^(pi*i) = -1 vs. e^(tau*i) = 1

      --
      Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
    3. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You didn't watch the video, as she specifically goes out of her way to note and address Euler's formula, which you failed to even type in full.

      e^(pi*i) = -1

      Corresponds to

      e^(tau*i) = 1

      So it's actually cleaner and "nicer" than the pi equivalent, having one less mathematical symbol (the negation of the one). You would have realized this if you had watched the video or actually done the math.

      Maybe you should have tried being informed BEFORE posting?

    4. Re:tau is wrong by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      e^(i*theta)=cos(theta)+i*sin(theta)

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:tau is wrong by artor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know that some people will point out that e^(tau * i) = 1, which they'll claim is nicer than e^(pi * i) = -1

      But the most beautiful equation in mathematics is e ^ (pi * i) + 1 = 0. The five most fundamental constants, being combined with the three most fundamental operators (addition, multiplication, exponentiation -- sorry, tetration), all equaling out, with absolutely nothing extra. There's no way to make it work as elegantly with tau.

    6. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that e^(tau*i) = 1 is inferior because it only uses 4 of the 5 fundamental numbers of pure mathematics (as zero is not used) and only 2 of the 3 elementary operations (as addition is not used).

      In fairness e^(pi*i)=-1 misses the point as well, but e^(pi*i)+1=0 cannot be improved upon as each fundamental number and each elementary operation is used exactly once.

    7. Re:tau is wrong by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure there is: e^(tau * i) + 0 = 1.

      Hey, it's really not any more ridiculous than "... + 1 = 0".

    8. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about e^(tau * i) + -1 = 0?

      It's even fancier because it has addition and a negative number.

    9. Re:tau is wrong by Jamu · · Score: 2

      e^(tau*i) + 0 = 1

      --
      Who ordered that?
    10. Re:tau is wrong by artor3 · · Score: 2

      How in your mind is "x+1=0" ridiculous in the sense that "x+0=1" is? The former is a perfectly valid equation. Setting things equal to zero is extremely common, as anyone with even a middle school level education ought to know. Do you complain that x^2+2x+1=0 is a ridiculous equation too?

    11. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      -1 isn't a fundamental number. Whereas 0 and 1 are the identities for addition and multiplication respectively.

      x + 0 = x
      x * 1 = x

    12. Re:tau is wrong by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Especially since Euler had to hack in a +1 to turn a -1 into that oh-so-elegant zero.

      That's like finding out all of Bob Ross' happy little trees were Photoshopped in during the commercial break. Tao is a "full-circle" representation, literally, while Pi is simply "half" assed. =)

    13. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, you're a fucking idiot.

      exp(i pi) + 1 = 0 (1)

      exp(i tau) - 1 = 0 (2)

      (1) has i, pi, e, 1, 0, a multiplication and an addition. (And raising to an exponent, which you seem in your idiocy to have missed.)

      (2) has i, tau, e, 1, 0, a multiplication and a subtraction (as addition is not used). It also has raising to an exponent, which you seem in your idiocy to have missed.

      There's no fucking difference. Same as with everything with this stupid fucking argument, started so far as I can tell by some bored mathematicians looking to troll the media. Who gives a shit? You can work with 37pi for all I fucking care, I'm not an idiot and I can follow through, even if I shake my head at the utter pointless bullshit of it all.

    14. Re:tau is wrong by HarvardAce · · Score: 1

      Division is harder than multiplication. Given the choice between sometimes multiplying by 2, and sometimes dividing by two, we should pick the constant that forces the multiplication. Also, e^(pi * i) is nicer than e^((tau / 2) * i).

      Hogwash! Multiply by 1/2 or divide by 1/2, and now the problem is reversed!

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    15. Re:tau is wrong by vakuona · · Score: 3, Informative

      No it isn't. It completely misses the point of e^(pi * i) = -1, which is that the left side gives you a bloody negative number.

      The tau version is rather obvious, since you are squaring (-1). Put it another way, if e^(pi * i) had happened to equal 1, the tau version would be exactly the same. The tau version doesn't really tell you what is special about Euler's identity.

    16. Re:tau is wrong by vakuona · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm, no!

      e^(pi*i) = -1 implies e^(tau*i) = 1

      e^(tau*i) = 1 does not imply e^(pi*i) = -1

      The tau version follows from the pi version. The pi version does not necessarily follow from the tau version, because the tau version would still be true if e^(pi*i) = 1.

      So the tau version is missing some very important information.

    17. Re:tau is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If information is your metric for this formula, any smaller fraction of pi is even better. You get more resolution each time you half it. My metric is elegance, in which case tau wins (it's the smallest multiple of pi such that the formula is periodic)

    18. Re:tau is wrong by flargleblarg · · Score: 0

      Totally agree with you. The tau version is far, far superior to the pi version. Makes things much more intuitive.

    19. Re:tau is wrong by flargleblarg · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me?! It's far more elegant with tau because 1 is much more elegant than -1.

      1 is simpler than -1. Simpler is more elegant. More elegant is more beautiful. More beautiful is better.

    20. Re:tau is wrong by pmw57 · · Score: 1

      Sure there is: e^(tau * i) + 0 = 1.

      Hey, it's really not any more ridiculous than "... + 1 = 0".

      Or even better: e^(tau * i) - 1 = 0

  19. It's not Pi day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last Pi day was in 1592. The next will be in 15926.

    What I'm trying to say here, is fuck off you pretentious wankers!

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Tau by brianerst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not a mathematician, but that Tau "article" seems to steal a few bases.

    It whines about A=(pi)r2 while C=(pi)D and how that shows that diameter is fundamental. But that's not the way I learned it anyway - the formula was always C=2(pi)r. Radius was fundamental, not diameter.

    Which is even more obvious when you go into spheres, where everything is based off radius (A=4(pi)r2, V=4/3(pi)r3).

    If we use diameter, you have to remember additional divisors (4 for the areas, 8 for the volumes). I can't speak on whether the whole "one turn" argument would help understanding other concepts, but aside from people who are working to become mathematicians, I suspect that the fact that the radius-based "magic formulas" are simpler will keep them around...

    p.s. What magic brew do you have to use to get Slashdot to accept HTML codes like pi? Or Unicode? Every attempt ended up getting stripped, so I went with (pi).

    1. Re:Tau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tau article also recommend substituting diameter divided by 2 (D / 2) for radius (r). So instead of V = 4/3 * pi * r^3 , V = tau * D^3 / 12 , which is even easier to remember IMHO. A = tau * D^2 / 2 seems like a wash.

      Slashcode strips Unicode and a lot of HTML entities.

    2. Re:Tau by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2

      A circle in n dimensions is defined as the set of all points at a given distance from a fixed point, the center. Circles are defined by the radius, not the diameter. The "standard" equation for a circle is x^2+y^2=r^2. Etc, etc. The diameter is not more fundamental.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Tau by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      And, a center and a diameter can define other shapes (namely curves of constant width) - a radius and a center can only define a circle. That said, I find it simpler to #define TAU when I'm programming trig. ~wm

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Tau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You read it wrong. The article argues that radius is important. The current convention emphasizes diameter.

    5. Re:Tau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What magic brew do you have to use to get Slashdot to accept HTML codes like pi? Or Unicode? Every attempt ended up getting stripped, so I went with (pi).

      I've had good results with praying to Cthulu.

  22. It was something I always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... even during back in school, when I learned more equations with that thing in it, IT WAS ALWAYS 2PI! (well, few obvious ones weren't 2pi, such as spherical stuff)
    It was maddening that the value they were using was "incorrect".

    A few changes could be done to equations for those rare occasions where 2pi isn't used, which would kill 2 birds with one stone since you get rid of so many useless 2s in equations and the equations that do rely on other values of Pi are completely fine.

    Pi really is half of something for almost all use-cases.
    It has its uses, but a fundamental value it ain't.

    1. Re:It was something I always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the highschool math that you remember. It is not "half of something" for all uses.
      Someone else posted http://www.thepimanifesto.com/
      Have a look.

  23. end the debate by ticktickboom · · Score: 0

    start using 366 degrees for a circle, its a lot more precise, and makes pi solvable

    1. Re:end the debate by DetriusXii · · Score: 1

      start using 366 degrees for a circle, its a lot more precise, and makes pi solvable

      Degrees are an arbitrary unit to divide a circle. It has nothing to do with PI. Units of degrees break when doing calculus because the unit isn't a natural unit to put into cosines and sines. Sines and cosines (and e^ix) take as arguments units of numbers. I still don't get what you mean by making PI solvable. There's nothing to solve about PI. It just happens to be the number that relates Diameter and circumference of a circle.

    2. Re:end the debate by sconeu · · Score: 1

      No, there should be 365.2422 degrees in a circle! That way, the Earth moves 1 degree per day!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:end the debate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring back the decimal/metric system! 400 degrees in a circle.

    4. Re:end the debate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the orbit is, you know, an ellipse...

    5. Re:end the debate by sudonymous · · Score: 1

      No, there should be 365.2422 degrees in a circle! That way, the Earth moves 1 degree per day!!!

      Only on the average.

      Now, if you can set up the units so that the area swept in a day is a nice round number like 1 (it's a constant - see Kepler's 2nd law), I might be impressed enough to sign up for your newsletter.

  24. Tau marathon bib by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 2

    I managed to get bib # tau for a marathon last year. Gave the timekeeper fits.

  25. Niether side is convincing by sdhankin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both are irrational.

  26. Tau of Pooh by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    The problem with Tau is that it will always be associated with Pooh thanks to the book the "Tau of Pooh".

    Pi day sounds way more appetizing than Pooh day. In the land of prunes, every day is a Pooh day.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Tau of Pooh by psmears · · Score: 1

      The problem with Tau is that it will always be associated with Pooh thanks to the book the "Tau of Pooh".

      I think you mean the "Tao of Pooh". Tau = Greek letter; Tao = (roughly) way/path/nature, associated with the Chinese philisophical system of Taoism.

    2. Re:Tau of Pooh by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I know... I was just being silly. - 'tis what I do.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  27. Towel Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always been more into Towel Day myself.

  28. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I'm in the minority I know- but I would be in favour of switching to a metric clock. Sure it would cause confusion at first. I'd be in favour of measuring degrees in fractions of 100 or 1000.

    There again- I'm always in favour of confusion. It's always more fun than the status quo.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  29. Oh and obligatory... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Oh and obligatory:

    Taumorrow, Taumorrow, I love you, Taumorrow, you're only a day away......

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  30. I know it's not /.'s way, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    March 14 is Steak and Blowjob day. If we have to put up with Valentine's Day, we get our own day. But no. People want to be nerds and avoid getting laid..

  31. It's nerd divided by zero by gelfling · · Score: 1

    For sufficiently large values of nerd.

  32. Area of a circle argues for pi by mophab · · Score: 1

    Which is better?

    Area = (pi) r^2

    or

    Area = (tau/2) r^2

    It all depends on what problem you are trying to solve.
    Just live with pi.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. ...hmmm by Pirulo · · Score: 1

    Tau is twice as wrong!

  35. Anyone going to bake a Pi-cake? by knarfling · · Score: 1

    I recently saw an image of a Pi-Cake with the caption, "It's cake. But it's pi. But it's CAKE. But it's PI. BUT IT'S CAKE!!!"

    After a little research, I even found a recipe for pi-cake. Pi-Cake
    While an irrational pursuit, it looks to be a tasty one. Anyone thinking about making one?

    --
    Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
  36. e^(pi i) = -1 by buglista · · Score: 1
    now, FUCK OFF.

    yours,
    a mathematician and coder, with frankly better things to worry about.

  37. Double steak, double BJ day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, can I get two steaks and two BJs on Tau Day? If so, let's talk. Otherwise, I'll stick to pi.

  38. They're both wrong. by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

    the circle has been considered the most perfect of shapes

    And yet, the circle needs a point to define the center, and an infinite number of points around the circumference to define the circle itself. The most perfect of shapes is a point. It is the basis for all other shapes, both in flatworld, in 3d space, and in space-time. Without the point, there would be no point (pun intended) to trying to define a circle either as pi or tau (where is your center to get your diameter or radius from, hmmmm?).

    So, when is point day? Since you ask, you have not yet achieved enlightenment :-)

    --
    Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    1. Re:They're both wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The radius needs a defining point. The diameter may be found with calipers applied from any direction.

    2. Re:They're both wrong. by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      You still need 2 points on the circumference (which is itself defined by a series of points) for the calipers. So, points are still the ultimate. (and if you look at the calipers, the fact that they're pointy should have been a clue :-).

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
  39. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Examples addressed:

    - Metric vs. Imperial: This is a travesty that should be remedied as quickly as possible.

    - 60 minutes and 360 degrees are both addressable by their qualities of ease of division. Since they are multiples of 12, they are divisible by more items, This makes navigational math easier, and taking fractions of hours easier as well.

    - Base 8 is hard to conceptually teach to children as most of them don't have any natural multiples of 8 on which to learn to count that they carry with them. Part of the reason the old cultures used 60 and 360 was that they counted in duodecimal (base 12) systems. Likely developed because you can count to 12 on the back of your hand, as four fingers with three joints each gives you a nice grid of 12 items on which you can count.

  40. Math Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Math nerds be gone! This is the domain of computer nerds!

  41. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You complain about miles instead of km, but then you complain about using base 10? You're not even being consistent; if you favor base 8, then you should be against switching to kilometers or any SI unit for that matter, as their entire existence is based on the supposed superiority of base 10.

    And why base 8? Why not base 12? 12 is evenly divisible by both 3 and 4, which is very useful in many real-world situations. 10 is only divisible by 2 and 5. 8 is only divisible by 2, so it really sucks to be honest. 8 (or 16) is good when working with computers since it's easier than binary, but that's about it.

    It's 360 degrees for the same reason there's 60 minutes in an hour. Base 12. Remember, degrees have smaller units: minutes and seconds.

  42. FUCK Tau day by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    I'll never support those filthy Xeno bastards.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  43. MIssed frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed getting a frist post because I was having pi for breakfast.

  44. Pi is like "half pint" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A Pi supporter and a Tau supporter walked into a bar, the Tau supporter ordered a pint of beer for himself, and the Pi supporter ordered two half pints for himself."

    Pi is like a "half glass" (or half pint), it should not be used as a fundamental constant, we should all start using Tau.

  45. e^(tau i) = 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now, please be more polite.
    yours,
    a coder, who doesn't call himself a mathematician after blindly repeating ready make formulas or expressions from the textbooks.

    1. Re:e^(tau i) = 1 by buglista · · Score: 1

      My first degree was in maths, my Erds number is 4. The "fuck off" stands.

    2. Re:e^(tau i) = 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be more impressive if you spelt it properly.

  46. So if she weighs as much as a duck... by RevSpaminator · · Score: 2

    Let me see if I get this straight... Tau = 2*Pi and Tau is right. But Pi is wrong. So, by this rational, two wrongs make a right?

  47. Re:Double steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmm... Why are you asking slashdotters this?

  48. Sigh by sootman · · Score: 2

    Pi will always be around because it relates to the diameter, which is easily measurable by actual humans in actual circumstances.

    If there's a big circle on the floor, you can measure the diameter with a tape measure and one other person: stand on opposite sides of the circle, one end of the tape stays in one spot, and the other end gets moved back and forth until its length is as long as possible. The widest part of the circle == the diameter.

    You can determine "the widest part of the circle" with simple physical measurements. Measuring the radius only requires a way to accurately determine where the center is, which is a non-trivial exercise. (Compared to the above.) Or you could measure the diameter and then divide by 2, but "measure the diameter" will always be one less step than "determine the radius."

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, finding the center is fairly trivial. The perpendicular bisectors of any two different chords will intersect at the center of the circle.

      Have fun.

      AC

    2. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's true that diameter is easier to measure for circles already formed. But if you're forming a circle in the first place, it's easier to use the radius.

    3. Re:Sigh by middlerun · · Score: 2

      So students, mathematicians, engineers, etc. who use these constants all the time should use an unintuitive system with ugly equations so that yokels with tape measures don't have to divide by two?

    4. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Measuring the radius only requires a way to accurately determine where the center is

      Why not measure the diameter and divide it by two?

    5. Re:Sigh by sootman · · Score: 1

      Students, mathematicians, engineers, etc., are free to do as they wish--but don't expect tau to gain traction among the general population.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  49. More for Particle Physicists by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    With Tau, you can have two pies.

    Actually, if you are a particle physicist you can have a lot more - one tau can decay into 5 pis (although 3 is more common).

  50. Down with Pi !!! by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    I just watched the "tau" video and ... I actually agree with it. Making it the ratio of diameter/circumference instead of radius/circumference was a dumb move.

    While we're at it can we swap the + and - on our electronic circuits?

    --
    No sig today...
  51. Pi is (still) wrong! by bmo · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG7vhMMXagQ

    If you haven't seen Vi Hart's channel, you've been missing out.

    --
    BMO

  52. read too fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the subject was: Pi day is coming -- But TATU day is better. I was like T.A.T.U. or PI. T.A.T.U. wins. Then I read the title again. Then I looked up images of T.A.T.U. to feel better again.

  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

    Which is what? If you're trying to make a point, why not try some examples that actually prove your point, instead of examples that prove the opposite? All you've proven is that things are better the way they are, by advocating something as dumb as base 8.

    If you want a better example, try QWERTY vs. Dvorak. QWERTY is a terrible keyboard layout, and is only good for one thing: it allows a circa-1900 typewriter salesman to type the word "typewriter" easily because all those letters are on the top row. Dvorak is a much better layout as it's based on the frequency of usage of letters in the English language and is specifically designed to place the most-used letters on the home row and allow greater alternation between left and right hands, but as you say, "the weight of history and inertia" keeps us from switching.

    But instead, you make up some ridiculous example about base 8, not only without explaining why it'd be better, but (unless I'm totally missing something, and I don't think I am) picking a number base that is greatly inferior to base-10. Even in computing fields we don't use base-8 any more, we use base-16. So you ended up picking an example where the weight of history is probably on the right side; i.e., people picked base-10 for good reasons (and in fact, base-10 is relatively new; other societies used things like base-60).

    Even your mile vs. km point doesn't help your point. What's the advantage to switching to kilometers? The main advantage I can think of is that most countries in the world use km rather than miles, so it can be argued that that's just more inertia, just from a different group of people (than the people who prefer the imperial standard). There's also the advantage that SI units are easier to do conversions with however, so an argument can be made the other way.

    If you're trying to be sarcastic, you need to realize you're no Jonathan Swift and make your sarcasm more obvious. Too many Slashdot posters make what they believe to be sarcastic posts, and then get annoyed when people don't "get it". If this describes you (you being any reader of this), the problem isn't them, it's you. You're not a renown satirist or author; get over yourself. You're just some random person on Slashdot. Satire is difficult to do well; either it needs to be blindingly obvious to anyone (and this includes all the people who speak English as a 3rd or 6th language), or you better be a really good writer to do it subtly. Going for subtle satire on a public forum where your entire post is a paragraph or two long is most likely a bad idea.

  55. e parties are two days long by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    On Feb 71 you party with the people who copied the digits, and on Feb 72 you party with the ones who rounded.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  56. Wimpy from Popeye always used to say.... by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

    I'll gladly pay you Pi day for a hamburger Tau day.

    --
    Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

    Ok if it wasn't poor satire, I have absolutely no idea what your point is. Maybe you should go back to school and taking some courses in basic English composition, because you don't seem to have a point.

  59. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we switch, it would be better to switch to base 12 or base 60 to have nice divisibility or some binary variant - octal or hex given the nature of the digital world. We think in base 10 because we have 10 fingers and 1o toes, how is that an intuitive base to work in?

    To answer the GGP 60 minutes are in the hour because the ancients (Sumerian IIRC) didn't like fractions and chose a base that divides nicely by 1,2,3,4,5,6,10, 12, 15, 20, 30.

  60. Leave me alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Pi on your Tau.

  61. Except that Tau is 1,6180339... (Golden ratio) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Golden Ratio is (SQRT(5)+1)/2 and amounts to 1,6180339... The official symbol for this ratio is Tau.
    It's said to be the perfect ratio, which can be found in nature, in architecture, ...

    Tau is one of the roots of X=1/X+1
    If you take a rectangle whose proportions are 1:tau, when you cut a square, the remaining rectagle has the same proportions
    When you take a pentagon whose sides have a length of 1, the diagonals will have a length of tau
    When you divide two consecutive members of the Fibonnacci serie (x[n]=x[n-1]+x[n-2], 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34,...) you get tau

    and so on...

    1. Re:Except that Tau is 1,6180339... (Golden ratio) by sudonymous · · Score: 1

      When you divide two consecutive members of the Fibonnacci serie (x[n]=x[n-1]+x[n-2], 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34,...) you get tau

      Correction: The ratio approaches tau for values farther in the sequence, but you don't "get tau". (You get the sequence 1, 2, 1.5, 1.666667, 1.4, 1.625, 1.615385, ... which oscillates around tau, each value being closer to it than the previous.)

      lim(x->Infinity) Fib(x+1)/Fib(x) = tau

  62. Justin Wilson by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I think that was the fellow's name, he was known as "The Cajun Cook" and was a pretty funny guy. He told this gem:

    A Cajun sends his son off to college. When the kid comes home on break, the old man asks, So, wad'ya larn, boy?" The son thinks for a second and says "Pi R squared." The old man jumps up and says "what kind o' tomfoolery is they teachin' you, boy?? Pie are Round, cornbread are square!"

  63. Steak and Blowjob Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but March 14th is Steak and Blowjob Day. Lets not confuse what's important here.

  64. Re:"wrong" is a sensationalist word. by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

    Why are there 60 minutes per hour? Wouldn't it be better to have 100?

    60/2 = 30
    60/3 = 20
    60/4 = 15
    60/5 = 12
    60/6 = 10
    That's why.

  65. For me... by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    ...It'll always be Commander Keen Day.

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  66. Re:Double steak by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

    I bet he could find at least two volunteers here for the BJs, as long as he's not hoping for women.

    --
    I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.