Slashdot Mirror


German Pirate Party Enters 2nd State Parliament

An anonymous reader writes "After its recent success in the Berlin elections, the German Pirate Party scores 7.4% of votes for the state parliament of Saarland, earning them 4 seats out of 51. While the campaign didn't center around copyright issues and/or ACTA (the party's stance is well-known), it centered around open government, access to education, and participative governing models, effectively ridding the party of its 'one issue' notion."

24 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Working within the rules can still work by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To me, this sort of win, the power that it gives them to promote and further the gains that they stand for is likely to have a MUCH bigger impact on the actual lives of their constituents than all the Occupy movements put together. Recently in Australian politics, the Green Senators have shown themselves to be a wonderful constant badgering voice calling Bullshit when needed and keeping the government here in check. I can't help but hope that the Pirate Party in Australia has similar success.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:Working within the rules can still work by vux984 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This works in places with a system of government where getting 7% of the votes translates to a voice in government.

    2. Re:Working within the rules can still work by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly. Having participated in the French PP, I can say that our chances of ever having a representative are far slimer : here you need a majority vote in a district for that to happen. But it can happen through deals with other big parties. "We are worth 3%. We'll call to vote for you if you put net neutrality in your program and let a PP candidate run without your opposition in 3% of the winnable districts"

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Working within the rules can still work by schwitzkroko · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are represented in the Saarland parliament now. That is the legislative, not the executive body. Theoretically they could be included into government by a coalition, but this is not going to happen for now.

    4. Re:Working within the rules can still work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > [Citation needed]. No, seriously, I'm genuinely interested.
      Flat-out refusal to support anything with the word "nuclear" is one thing the international Slashdot crowd will get:
      http://greens.org.au/policies/climate-change-and-energy/nuclear

      They wish to close Australia's only nuclear reactor, a research reactor whose main product is radioactive isotopes for medical imaging. The policy also blindly ignores things like thorium cycle fission reactors or even nuclear fusion reactors if they were viable.

    5. Re:Working within the rules can still work by rrohbeck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The US has one party with two right wings."
      - Gore Vidal

  2. Copyright vs Education by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we just did something outrageous and said,"All copyrights expire after 7 years", we'd have a great wealth of free media for the uneducated. We could put K-12-College books on 100$ laptops. Then schools, instead of paying 10,000$ for books for k-12, kids could get a laptop and schools could save 10 grand on each student. Schools keep complaining they're strapped for cash. Well, here is a solution. Not to mention how great it'd be for third world kids with OLPC.

    1. Re:Copyright vs Education by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are lots and lots of free textbooks. That has never been a problem.

      The problem is to start actually using them.

    2. Re:Copyright vs Education by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a massive stigma that if it is free then it can't be any good. Its the 'open' movement's worst problem, whether it is books or software.

    3. Re:Copyright vs Education by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      an informed population will not be one that submits to state (and now, corporate) control.

      they don't want an educated population. they REALLY do not.

      that's all I have to say on this subject.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Copyright vs Education by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's safe to say that the Germans know all about the risks of totalitarianism. Especially those over the age of 25 living in former East Germany. I'd be very very surprised if they'd forgotten that lesson.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:Copyright vs Education by Sique · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No. Not being able to buy a western car, and not being able to fly to a tropic vacation location were enough to overthrow the former GDR. There were three main topics in the 1989 turnover: freedom of travel, west german money, and better environmental protection. They got all three of them, and they like it.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  3. Re:Better: Some new "Pro-Electric Vehicle Party" w by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    don't underestimate the destruction caused by patents, copyright, etc. The damage to our culture has barely begun to show - while it's not direct, our culture is being less and less documented as a result.

    Patents around green products can affect the life on earth issue, and patents on medicine cost actual lives (and money).

  4. Ugh by Formalin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm so jealous of proportional representation. Here 7% of the vote would get you 0% of the seats, barring some sort of miracle - like all of your votes being concentrated, instead of low level throughout the popular vote.

    This makes it pretty difficult for new ideas to get out there... If large party A, B (or sometimes even C!) won't buy your idea, it's not getting represented.

    1. Re:Ugh by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One problem with any kind of proportional system (hybrid or otherwise) is that you always end up with members whom the public has not elected directly. They can be whatever lunatic attack dog the party wants to appoint (or vote internally). Unlike a plurality system, you can't really vote those idiots out.

      The biggest problem with democracy is that it promises far more than any practical solution will ever deliver. There is no perfect system.

    2. Re:Ugh by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think what you're referring to is the Free State Project, which is a libertarian effort to implement their ideas in New Hampshire.

      It hasn't fallen apart, really - they moved to NH and elected a bunch of state reps (not that difficult, since each represents about 4500 people). They then discovered very quickly that many of their ideas had already been adopted, and received a pretty warm reception from the established political leadership. Anyone who joined up gearing for a political fight would have been a bit surprised to find that instead of a fight they basically got handshakes and smiles.

      This was partially possible because New Hampshire has an incredibly responsive and functional state government, and a strong tradition of believing in democracy more than in partisanship. That means, for instance, that the Secretary of State has stayed in his appointed office for a couple of decades, despite several changes in the party affiliation of the governor, because he's very good at his job and treats people fairly.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Ugh by robmcdiarmid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's no reason why you couldn't design a proportional system that forced each party to pre-post an ordered list of candidates. That way, you'd know exactly whom you would get for each percentage chunk that resulted in another representative from that party. And, if a specific individual within a given party is causing more people to not vote for the party than to vote for it, it's in the party's best interest to dump them, or at least put them lower on the candidate list.

    4. Re:Ugh by c0lo · · Score: 4, Funny

      First past the post. "Throwing your vote away". "Letting the worse of two evils win by wasting your vote".

      Ah... I see... "stuck in local optimum" when better optimum points exists.
      Hmmm... I'd recommend a "reheating the system in simulated annealing", but I feel that the things should go much worse for such a thing to happen.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    5. Re:Ugh by The+Snowman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And what exactly is stopping the 3rd party to arise?

      First past the post voting, for one. Instant runoff would be a huge help to get even a small number of non R or D candidates into offices that matter. Second, proportional representation.

      But the real thing preventing a viable third party is the first two parties. They are the ones in government, they are the ones that passed laws in every state (e.g ballot access restrictions, electoral votes being winner take all) making it extremely difficult to get elected if you don't have an R or D after your name.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    6. Re:Ugh by maweki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funnily enough, this is almost exactly how it works in Germany. There is a pre-ordered and published list but we have a mixed system where you can vote for your district's candidate directly and the guy or girl who wins a district overrides his position (if placed) in the list. But the list/party-vote guarantees that the party is at least that represented.
      And if there are more candidates that won directly than the percentage would allow for (in terms of representation), we add seats to the parliament in order for every directly elected representative to have his place.

  5. Re:Better: Some new "Pro-Electric Vehicle Party" w by abridgedslashdotuser · · Score: 5, Informative

    Frankly, I'd prefer to see some issue-specific "Green" party get in: Eg, the Subj ones.

    They have a green party in Germany and they are also just got voted in and will be sitting "right beside" the "pirates" in the state parliament after this election there in Saarland.

    There are, after all, some more critical (eg, to life on Earth) issues to be solved here.

    A party who opposes censorship, data retention and supports more government transparency is also needed and these issues do matter there, because the "pirates" got 7,4 % of the votes in Saarland so their program is more supported then that of the green party who barely got over the 5 percent threshold with their 5,0 %. I think you just said something without knowing the political situation there, or am i wrong?

    But besides all these things got me wondering... in Germany even new and small parties have a chance to get into parliaments and now there are six different bigger parties (cdu/csu, spd, the green party, the left party and now the pirate party) and many more small parties there to chose from, but in the us they just got stuck with two, why? I don't get it where is the democracy in that?

  6. Hyperlinking by mikethicke · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems to be a fairly common problem on Slashdot that posts are poorly hyperlinked. There are two key pieces of information here: (1) The party received 4 seats and (2) the party can no longer be considered a "single issue" party. The second two hyperlinks (7.4% and 4 out of 51 seats) are related to (1), but there is no hyperlink for (2). If a reader wants to know where (2) comes from, they have to randomly click the links to find that it comes from the pcworld.com link (7.4%). This is just annoying.

  7. Re:Opinions on the Pirate Party by abridgedslashdotuser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A small warning for American readers, some views of mine will contradict what you believe is right and wrong, we have public health care here (i think this is how it should be) and other things you don't like so don't get too upset and also what i consider liberal could be something other then what you do. And my also my view of things can differ from the views other Germans have.

    - What is your opinion on the party?

    Germany needs a liberal party and not a neoliberal party in my opinion, so i think the pirates can be a win for the political landscape. There is/was a other liberal party the FDP who just got voted out of the parliament there in Saarland and they are also Germany wide in big trouble not only because the pirates but also because their economic liberalism isn't liked by the people in here anymore. People rights and opposing the rise of government surveillance where just a small fig-leaf in the end they didn't really deliver and right after the last federal election they made a big mistake on focusing on some tax cuts for the hotel lobby. That upset many people because if the rich pay lesser taxes then the rest has to pay more or the government has to cut spending and in the end this will result in a big decrease of the living standard here because a working government is better than a not working one and money is needed for that. The FDP then did cut some spending in our health system and the people got even angrier with them but they didn't listen and now they are at there dawn and i think the pirates are on the rise if they stick to their main program of more transparency, less government surveillance and if they don't try to cut the social safety net.

    - On what issues do you agree with them and which do you disagree?

    The pirates and there are a lot of issues the don't cover so it's hard to point out thing i truly disagree but if i think if they just focus on freedom and don't on social justice then in the long-view the freedom part can not be full-filled in my opinion. A party who cuts taxes for the rich and then also cuts government spending on social security is, in my opinion not liberal, because then Germany would be in a state as bad as England or the USA are now and no German citizen in their right mind would really want that. So if the would try to copy the business policies of the FDP than they won't ever get my vote. But the points that led to the founding of the German pirate party, which i had already had some listed above, these are the things (more government transparency, less government surveillance, no internet censorship, and a fairer copyright and patent law) i can agree with.

    - Do you think that they will be able to affect the policies or are they an ineffective tongue-in-cheek gesture?

    The funny thing is that even just by "jumping" over the 5% threshold and now having seats in two state parliaments (Berlin and Saarland) has the other parties in uproar and could lead to some opinion changes. How they behave in a coalition with other parties has yet to be seen. The theory how this could play out is one thing but how it will play out is the other. They got many votes from people who don't want to vote for the other five big pirates anymore, so if they now or some time in the future screw this up, this could be a blow to democracy here. Because if people get the feeling of powerlessness it could lead to more radicalism (left and or right).

    - What do you see will be the biggest challenge for them in the future?

    This year there will be many elections in other and bigger Federal states and the challenge for them is the same as in Berlin and Saarland, they have to get in the Parliament by "jumping" over the 5% threshold which is also their goal for the upcoming federal elections in 2013. And another challenge will be their increasing attention to the media here and also how the other parties will now react, now that they have seen that the pirates could possibly more than a one hit wonder.

  8. Re:One of the corners of the world, fixed. by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Informative

    My stepbrother was born in Kaiserslautern, so he technically has German citizenship.

    Only if he has a German parent, or in some specific cases is of German descent.
    Germany doesn't have "ius soli":
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nationality_law