Slashdot Mirror


Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to SlashdotTV! (Video)

You may have noticed that we've posted quite a few original videos on Slashdot in the past few months. Rather than being the work of a few rogue editors with newly-acquired Christmas cameras, this was part of the groundwork for a new site we're launching today. SlashdotTV, found at http://tv.slashdot.org, will let you easily find and watch all of our videos in one convenient location. In addition to Slashdot content, you also can watch videos from our sister sites, SourceForge and ThinkGeek. The site is brand new, and we're interested in hearing your feedback -- what you think about it, and what kind of videos you'd like to see. Currently, you can embed our videos on your own site or show them to your friends with our share feature. Commenting is coming soon. Check back often for new videos, and keep watching!

203 comments

  1. Timmeey! by MasterMan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Timothy looks at Pixel Qi
    Timothy checks out Ubuntu TV
    Timothy Gets a MakerBot Replicator Demo at CES
    Timothy Lord Checks Out Keyboards & Tech At CES
    Timothy Lord @ Metrix Create:Space in Seattle
    Timothy Lord Checks Out Steve Jackson Games' Latest

    what you think about it, and what kind of videos you'd like to see

    We want more videos were timothy checks out and looks at things!

    1. Re:Timmeey! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about a video of Timothy Lord actually checking a submitted story before he posts it? Maybe also a video of Timothy Lord attending a remedial English class?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Timmeey! by crossmr · · Score: 0

      I would pay to actually see that. Obviously Timothy or one of his socks has mod points right now.

    3. Re:Timmeey! by virgnarus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      He takes after the Dear Leader

      .

    4. Re:Timmeey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd settle for them fixing the comment system and putting it back to how it was before all the ajax bullshit.

    5. Re:Timmeey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up next: I Love Lucy

    6. Re:Timmeey! by doesnothingwell · · Score: 1

      I was gonna reply but the video wouldn't upload.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    7. Re:Timmeey! by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      He's only missing the herd of officials buzzing along him.

    8. Re:Timmeey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      transcripts, cuz I don't have time to watch videos.

  2. It's Not April Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you sure this isn't intended as an April Fools article?

    1. Re:It's Not April Yet by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

      On Sunday I'm expecting lots of videos with ponies.

    2. Re:It's Not April Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. We're just warming up, but as Tom Lehrer put it, That's Mathematics!

    3. Re:It's Not April Yet by sootman · · Score: 1

      April 1 is on a Sunday this year? SWEET! Then I don't have to see it.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:It's Not April Yet by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      April 1 is on a Sunday this year? SWEET! Then I don't have to see it.

      What? You don't read Slashdot on the weekends when not at work?!?!?

      Philistine.....!!

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Stop doing it in Flash by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stop doing the videos in Flash. It's a proprietary wrapper usable on a decreasing number of platforms. Better formats for video already exist. If you want old, then go with MPEG. If you want new, go with WebM. Either way, you'll both reach a larger audience and future-proof your work.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This ^

      Use MediaElement.js or Video.js or something. But for the love of god, this is a technology site full of people who would LOVE to hate on Flash. Stop this madness.

    2. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of all the sites that could go HTML5 video only, this should be the first.

    3. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just like "we" were the first with UTF-8

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah stop the Flash it doesnt work on my iPad /me ducks

    5. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just like "we" were the first with UTF-8

      Never had it working fully.

      I'll bet you £1000 that the Pound Sterling sign prior to the integer in this sentence is preceeded by the letter A with a circumflex above it. This has been broken since the change to Unicode was made, and never fixed.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. Currently, flash blocking plugins are much more mature than ones to block HTML5 videos. I encourage Slashdot to keep using Flash for this kind of inanity. It makes it much easier to skip over the video, because it just renders as a grey box, which doesn't take a noticeable amount of CPU power.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... but.... but... what? You mean new /. is just like old /. only worse? OH NOES!!

    8. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stop doing the videos in Flash. It's a proprietary wrapper usable on a decreasing number of platforms. Better formats for video already exist. If you want old, then go with MPEG. If you want new, go with WebM. Either way, you'll both reach a larger audience and future-proof your work.

      No mobile access. Less resolution than a Youtube video. Lame.

    9. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Flash blockers are for preventing the runtime from loading, saving CPU cycles and the user from obnoxious content. The HTML5 video tag shouldn't eat any CPU if the video doesn't play on page load. And it can't be used for anything but video.

    10. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I had no idea unicode was supported at all it certainly doesn't work in my journal. I've got some cyrillic below that doesn't show up at all.

          - I don't see the preceding two words at all in preview.

      köszönöm szépen - this Hungarian looks o.k. in the preview though. In my journal entries it always previews o.k. but then gets all jacked up once I save.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    11. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm... Let me check the password protection...

      ***************

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    12. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Har vi fått äkta Unicode-stöd??

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    13. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's not all that they're for. They also stop us having to see videos - or even still images - of Timothy Lord...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Aw, damn, and well before my 60th birthday, too.

      Any Stockholm-area Slashdotters who want to collect can meet me this Friday night during Happy Hour at Akkurat for their complimentary starköl. :(

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Let me check the password protection...

      hunter2

      Looks broken to me.

    16. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Plus, when the masters of the internet decide to outlaw video-blocking, it won't matter whether our newly TV-ized internet is managed by a shitty plugin or a shitty markup language.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    17. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.

      I had to disable Flash because it didn't play well with Firefox 11 (as in, my browser was pretty much completely hosed until I disabled it). This is probably one of those things where if you ask either FF or Adobe, they'd say it's the other guy screwing up.

      So no Slashdot TV for me, I guess.

    18. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want new that doesn't work on the majority of platforms, go with WebM.

      FTFY.

      H.264 FTW.

    19. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most browsers will preload html5 video, so there will be bandwidth being used, even for videos that you don't end up hitting play on.

    20. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      You're visiting the section of the web site dedicated to videos and you're complaining that the videos are working?

    21. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's try this one: £
      I must have used it hundreds of times, but never noticed a problem.

    22. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by Kvorg · · Score: 2

      I was honestly suprized at the lack of HTML 5 support. I not only expected it to be there, this being a Slashdot subsite, but I expected it to be the default or at least to autodetect my browser support and start working from there. Well, let's say it's early days.

      --
      -Kvorg
    23. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by timothy · · Score: 1

      Only temporarily quite so much of that one guy -- I was just the first one to have an available camera.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    24. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      How are you typing the pound sign? It seems to work just fine whenever I do it.

      £

      Disclaimer: at least it works fine in the preview, would someone mind telling me if it appears correctly to other people?

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    25. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      British English keyboard layout, pressing Shift + 3 (Pound Sterling sign).

      £ £ £

      Nope, still broken.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    26. Re:Stop doing it in Flash by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I'm typing this from my MBP, where it's shift-3 too and it evidently works as it should: £
      How odd.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  4. Just make a YouTube page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is about 12 years too late.

    1. Re:Just make a YouTube page by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They Could follow the advice of the comments and use modern container files, modern html to display it, high res (like HD res, not 360 px instead of 240 px like youtube), make torrent available, working RSS feeds of the video files ready to feed into mythnettv and the other TV appliances...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Just make a YouTube page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter, though? The delivery isn't the most important. /. went from being very influential to becoming a punchline because of gross mismanagement and rigid commenting system which discourages meaningful community building.

      The center of gravity in geek culture is at places like reddit and hacker news these days. Quick, name the last notable thing that came out of slashdot in past 5 years.

    3. Re:Just make a YouTube page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is surely the highlight of the past 5 years for me!

    4. Re:Just make a YouTube page by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot has been my point of primary internet interaction for a while now. My first comment was posted almost 11 years ago - so I figure I've been here regularly for at least that long. I've done meet ups with slashdot friends 4 times over the years, the most recent was just a couple weeks ago. I'm not a neutral party - I have a bias towards the site. If I didn't like it I wouldn't have stayed this long.

      There are problems to be sure - but I do believe the site still has value. There are still a significant number of knowledgable people that are engaged with the site. There are of course, and always have been people who troll and (even more caustic in my opinion) people who gripe incessentaly about everything. But even with them, people keep coming.

      I'm not sure what you are looking for in regards to a "notable thing" coming out of slashdot. I view it as a place that provides a service - interaction with tech news in a primarily FOSS oriented community. A lot of the limits on community building come out of a desire to keep the signal to noise ratio good. I was very active on reddit for a while but a few months ago I deleted my account and visit rarely now. Too much crap to filter to get to the good stuff. It obviously works for a lot of people but I'm willing to bet that I'm not alone in preferring a place like this. I'm not as up on my advice animal memes as I was before - but I don't feel too bad about that. It's a cool community, but not really for me.

      HN is pretty awesome though the volume of posting and interaction there is a lot lower. Quality over quantity - but you can't site that as a good site compared to slashdot and blame slashdots woes on a rigid commenting system. I do like it though for the same reason I like it here - I've got a good idea of what I'll get and a good percentage of the commentors will be knowledgable.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:Just make a YouTube page by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      What is this HN site you like?

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    6. Re:Just make a YouTube page by vlm · · Score: 1

      What is this HN site you like?

      My gut level guess would be Paul Grahams thing at http://news.ycombinator.com/

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Just make a YouTube page by vlm · · Score: 1

      A lot of the limits on community building come out of a desire to keep the signal to noise ratio good. I was very active on reddit for a while but a few months ago I deleted my account and visit rarely now. Too much crap to filter to get to the good stuff.

      "we" make fun of about 1/4 to 1/3 of /. articles but about 9 in 10 of reddit stories read exactly like "weekly world news" headlines. Maybe if I bothered to create an account I could filter the crud so I don't have to see it?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Just make a YouTube page by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      Having an account will allow you to join and get out of subreddits - which will get you a long way. To me though it just got to be too much work for too little return but part of this was due to my own ability to avoid getting sucked into stuff that wasted my time - which is my problem - not the site.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    9. Re:Just make a YouTube page by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      yes - hacker news - I could have linked but the post I replied to mentioned it and I just assumed people would know. Of course assuming rarely works out.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  5. My Opinion by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that having a new tv.slashdot.org is completely fine and even a little cool. However, my preference is that these videos should only be posted to that site, and not to "regular" Slashdot. Or at least provide a standard tag or category which we can filter out if we choose. We know where to go if we want to watch videos - the TV icon at the top (nice job on that btw, it was immediately obvious to me what that new icon signified even before reading this article). Otherwise, I'm just looking for text blurbs and snarky/humorous user comments, sometimes with optional videos behind the summary's links. Maybe we can just get the story summary text, with a link below the summary that says "Check out the video over on Slashdot TV!"?

    Oh, transcripts for all videos on the TV site would be helpful for many as well.

    1. Re:My Opinion by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a "Slashdot TV" addition to the "Exclude stories by topic:" list in the Options > Exclusions section. I read /. in off-time and don't have sound on my workstation, so all it does is create animosity towards the editors.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:My Opinion by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of all the things that users have been asking for, this was not on the list. Do you even listen?

      What next - powerpoint slide decks?

      I want to be able to exclude it from the list of stories - life is too short to look at a video that takes 5 to 10 minutes to say what I can glom from reading a story in 30 seconds.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    3. Re:My Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh! Ooh! Can I haz PowerPoint pleez?

  6. April 1st by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

    Does this bring back the chat roulette feature?

  7. Sharing? by slyrat · · Score: 1

    I was curious if the sites that the sharing button has will be expanded? I specifically was not seeing google+ in there, but I'm sure there are other sites that might be wanted. I'm sure that as a tech site there is a bit more g+ users here than on a normal site. Slashdot tv looks like a neat site and I'll have to check it out when I'm not at work.

    1. Re:Sharing? by vlm · · Score: 2

      and I'll have to check it out when I'm not at work.

      The specs on this are going to be interesting. Not at work, not on a phone with poor data coverage, not in a meeting, not in a teleconference, not while "watching" tv... this is what, like 1% of my /. time?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  8. Is it just me...or? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I actually don't like video content on the web; for a variety of reasons, but the primary one is that the audio from the video would give me away at work.

    I mean, I hope this works out and is the revenue generator you hope it is, but as I think many of us are viewing the site from work, I don't know how popular a destination it's going to be.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Is it just me...or? by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      My video usage:

      At work: Videos without audio (double points if it has closed captioning)
      At home: Videos in the background so I only hear the audio... usually pulling up a song I haven't heard in a while on YouTube.

      The only time I pay attention to both the audio and video is when watching Netflix... and even then I usually have Netflix on my right monitor, Minecraft on my center monitor and Opera on my left monitor so it doesn't get my undivided attention. Videos lack the interactivity to keep me fully entertained on their own.

    2. Re:Is it just me...or? by cekander · · Score: 1

      Your boss doesn't allow headphones at work?

    3. Re:Is it just me...or? by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      Your boss doesn't allow headphones at work?

      Some jobs require awareness of phones ringing, people talking from across the room, etc.

    4. Re:Is it just me...or? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Either you're trying to tell us that you're a multi-tasking genius that gets bored easily or that you have serious ADD problems.

    5. Re:Is it just me...or? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last real fucking job I had didn't let us wear headphones either. The cords would always get tangled up.

    6. Re:Is it just me...or? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Honestly. It's bad enough that the layout is so distinctive and obvious that sometime I browse in lynx.

  9. TLDW by vlm · · Score: 1

    what kind of videos you'd like to see

    Rickrolls and pr0n? Mostly the latter?

    Seriously, short videos. TLDW = too long didn't watch. Please no "I recorded this rant because I can't be bothered to transcribe it"

    Even more seriously you're not going to displace youtube as the home of precious kitty videos. Or even pony videos. On the other hand, as far as I know, the "screencast" market is unserved. Yes there is "A" site for ruby screencasts, and "A" site for vim screencasts. But there is no "the tech screencast" site... that I know of.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  10. Does not work in Safari by objekt · · Score: 2

    Does not work in Safari, unlike youtube and 99% of all other online video sites which work fine in Safari (Mac OS X)

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Does not work in Safari by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Works fine for me in Safari 5.1.4 on OS X and ClickToPlugin installed. I see a grey box, just as I'd expect.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Does not work in Safari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash does work on firefox for mac and according to adobe it works on your browser as well. I do not know which planet you are on but mac system codecs are fine if all you browse is youtube. Because youtube does remote transcoding. The /. guys can't afford the cost to do this as well as the fact that it requires a system type server to client query to be done when someone goes to load up a vid. Seems that the ./ tv site just does a talkback javascript without doing a scripted system or browser type enquiry.

      If safari is choking on the sfv and you have flash installed then something else is going on and you should report it to the guys coding the site ...but considering the fact that a ton of ./ people actually use macs ...me thinks you are most like against installing flash or firefox on your pure apple device.

    3. Re:Does not work in Safari by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Does not work in Safari, unlike youtube and 99% of all other online video sites which work fine in Safari (Mac OS X)

      also doesnt work in Opera
      clip embedded in this post works, but all the clips under tv.slash... just dont show up

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    4. Re:Does not work in Safari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also they may want to add a bit more of a margin in their two column layout...first time I looked I read "Derek's 'amateur' rockets fly to Detroit venture partners" and had the image of someone sieging what is left of detroit with amateur rockets...

    5. Re:Does not work in Safari by APK's+Mom · · Score: 1, Troll

      Please forgive my son/daughter/thing (we never could tell which he/she/it was); we used to give APK a little LSD to get him/her/it to sleep at night. The dropping on the head likely didn't help either.

  11. Related Links by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    I like the Related Links that Slashdot gives for this.

    Linode Exploit Caused Theft of Thousands of Bitcoins
    European Parliament Blocks Copyright Reform With 113% Voter Turnout
    Microsoft's Azure Cloud Suffers Major Downtime
    Foxconn's Other Dirty Secret: the World's Largest "Internship" Program
    Sony's New CEO To Look Beyond Hardware

    Which boils down to theft, fraud, downtime, unpaid labor and Sony (always a winner). Nice to know what we can expect.

  12. flash? seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It always make me laugh the way slashdot posts all these supposedly technologically progressive articles but then uses some obsolete proprietary tech like flash for its videos. Did Adobe give you some payola to use that crap or what?

    1. Re:flash? seriously? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0

      You'll not how whenever Slashdot is hiring, they studiously avoid posting job adverts on Slashdot. They wouldn't want anyone technically competent (or literate) applying...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  13. Less videos than YouTube. No wireless. by mekkab · · Score: 1

    ... oh come on... you know where I'm going with this! ;) I'm glad there's an announcement, I noticed a new tab at the top this morning and said ".. hey... that wasn't there yesterday!"

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  14. Re:Ads...lots of ads. by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it was ad-free, and therefore a paid service, few would buy it. As long as they clearly mark the sponsored content I'm fine with it.

  15. Well, good luck with it, but text rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find text to be 10x faster to process than watching a video. Text is easier to skim, it's easier to search, a page of text can explain something in more detail and more precisely than 10 minutes of video, and it probably takes up 1000x less space/bandwidth, etc. When I watch video documentation it feels like everything is in slow motion compared to reading. As a bonus, text is also usable by people with visual and/or sound impairments, when using the right equipment.

    Resorting to video is like the equivalent of GUI operating systems versus command-line: it's easier to do in some ways (just sit in front of a camera), and sometimes it's the better way to go (so feel free to experiment with new ways of doing things), but often you can be vastly more efficient with the old way of doing things. Personally, I've skipped every video that has been posted on slashdot in the last few months. I'd rather read the comments. Considering the extra time and effort it takes to set up a video shoot and process it afterwards, and the extra bandwidth to deliver it, I'll be surprised if it pays off. But keep experimenting. It's healthy.

    1. Re:Well, good luck with it, but text rules by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      I find text to be 10x faster to process than watching a video. Text is easier to skim, it's easier to search, a page of text can explain something in more detail and more precisely than 10 minutes of video, and it probably takes up 1000x less space/bandwidth, etc. When I watch video documentation it feels like everything is in slow motion compared to reading. As a bonus, text is also usable by people with visual and/or sound impairments, when using the right equipment.

      Resorting to video is like the equivalent of GUI operating systems versus command-line: it's easier to do in some ways (just sit in front of a camera), and sometimes it's the better way to go (so feel free to experiment with new ways of doing things), but often you can be vastly more efficient with the old way of doing things. Personally, I've skipped every video that has been posted on slashdot in the last few months. I'd rather read the comments. Considering the extra time and effort it takes to set up a video shoot and process it afterwards, and the extra bandwidth to deliver it, I'll be surprised if it pays off. But keep experimenting. It's healthy.

      I've never had the slashdot videos work for me at all. So I've never seen one, just generally skipped it. At least, the ones that weren't YouTube based. (FYI Slashdot: YouTube is supposed by a LOT of devices - you might want to use them).

      And no, video is not easier to produce than text. Amateurs may think i tis, but it isn't if you want an enjoyable experience. Case in point - a website started doing video reviews - they took 20 minutes to do what text would've done in 5, had to spend extra effort putting up charts and such in the article, and the video was still unwatchable because it was obviously a first pass, full of "ums" "ahs" and "errs", and barely edited.

      A proper video with proper sound (you better get and use a microphone at a minimum, directional ones if it's going to be stuck to a camera), as well as a definite plan of action and rehearse, rehearse, rehearse. Some people are gifted enough to be able to do it in a single pass, but most aren't, so a script is handy (you want to know why the teleprompter was invented and why most speakers use one?).

      And editing, lots of editing. Don't just hold a sheet of paper with a chart or other graphic, you should cut to the graphic in the video.

      If you don't have a cameraperson to operate the camera, you better prepare to do a lot of editing, or have everything close at hand to reach and show.

      Doing a good video can take far longer and requires far more preparation than doing it in text - which may explain why sites stopped doing everything in video and started doing selections to augment the text, proper use of multimedia capabilities.

  16. Nooooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. was taking up enough of my time, now I have this too!!

  17. Can I get this thing on Roku? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer to watch TV on the TV. Will this content be available through a channel on my Roku box?

    1. Re:Can I get this thing on Roku? by tepples · · Score: 0

      It's 2012. Why don't you have a home theater PC already?

  18. I can't watch... by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I watch, I think it will count against my Bandwidth Cap

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  19. Re:U're modded funny: This = funnier... apk by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Why use the hosts file when you could just switch to Gamemaker?

  20. Catchy Tune by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Now look at them yo-yo's that's the way you do it
    You play the video on the STV
    That ain't workin' that's the way you do it
    Money for nothin' and chicks for free
    Now that ain't workin' that's the way you do it
    Lemme tell ya them guys ain't dumb
    Maybe get a blister on your little finger
    Maybe get a blister on your thumb

  21. Sounds great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict that SlashdotTV will be just as successful as FarkTV.

  22. I Want My /.TV by theodp · · Score: 2

    Now look at them yo-yo's that's the way you do it
    You play the keyboards on the /.TV

  23. Great by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Now Slashdot is going to be come synonymous with something people use to waste time, except for nerds.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  24. This must be piracy by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    I heard my Congressman (I'm from Texas - take your pick) say that posting videos on the Internet was piracy and cost Americans jobs. I guess we should have had them pass SOPA after all.

    1. Re:This must be piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yawn.

  25. Frequent advertising by thereitis · · Score: 1
    I don't mind watching the odd commercial, but one per video is too much. Other video sites fall into the same trap.

    How about an initial commercial and then 1 per 15 minutes of video content viewed.

    1. Re:Frequent advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about right after the video? This way when we fall asleep, we won't be disturbed by an advertisement.

  26. It's March 28 by Shompol · · Score: 1

    Slashdot TV is what happens when more than one person tears off calendar pages in the office.

  27. Provide a transcript by b0bby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find that unless there's actually something cool which you really need to see in action to understand, I'm much happier reading than watching something. So if you're doing an interview, provide a transcript.

  28. XBMC plugin anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be cool, right? :)

  29. bug or feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Flash 11.1.102.63 here on Fedora and none of the slashdot videos have played on this machine.
    Good luck with the "linux" category :)

    1. Re:bug or feature? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I'm running Fedora too - but haven't had any problems. Chrome and Firefox have played the videos well - so I wonder what the difference is. My plugins for Firefox list Shockwave Flash 11.0 r1

      Works fine on both my machines - Fedora 16, one is 32 bit the other 64. So it's possible.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  30. Exclamation mark in title! by sirdude · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a time-based analysis on the use of exclamation marks in article titles (such as this one). I reckon that it'll be indicative and illuminating :|

  31. A simple plea by concealment · · Score: 1

    Slashdot TV looks great and it looks like you'll do something good with it.

    Here is my concern however. Eventually, all internet sites try to become Facebook or Myspace or whatever the "it" network is that week. The problem with this is that what makes Slashdot great is that it's not for general consumption. It's for a higher standard of technical knowledge or those with the desire to attain that.

    If you try to make Slashdot into a cash cow that behaves just like Facebook, you will fail two ways. First, the people who are already using Facebook aren't going to come here. Second, you will drive away your faithful userbase.

    You cannot be what they are. You are born different (apologies to Lady Gaga).

  32. Will never visit. by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will never visit.

    Just like idle.slashdot.org (whose sarcastic "Waste of your time. Don't ever go there" I feel is the best advice I've heard).

    Whenever there's been a video post, I've been quite quick to complain about it (and I'm not the only one), so yeah, shove them off into tv.slashdot.org so I can ignore it totally.

    Sorry, but I (used to) come on here for information and news. It takes HUNDREDS of times longer to convey that information in a video than it does on a text page, which is why I don't watch TV News, and why I came to Slashdot for some techy/geeky news that other online outfits were lacking in.

    Separate it off, but don't be shocked that nobody goes on there. And I'd have preferred your developer time and bandwidth to have been put to some better use all along, if I'm honest.

    1. Re:Will never visit. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It takes HUNDREDS of times longer to convey that information in a video than it does on a text page.

      Right. Like remember that tsunami in Japan? It was breathtaking to read how tall it was -- VERY. Or when man walked on the moon? I can only imagine what that looked like. I wonder if they got dizzy seeing the earth looming above them like a giant ceiling.

    2. Re:Will never visit. by ledow · · Score: 1

      In all the years I've been coming to slashdot, not one single article has required video.

      I saw the tsunami video. Not on Slashdot. If I wanted to see it, Slashdot is neither where I would go, nor where I would first find out about it (by a long shot).

  33. Partner with YouTube or Vimeo, or do HTML5 please. by DdJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate watching videos on a conventional computer. I prefer to watch them on a tablet or real TV.

    If you were to partner with either YouTube or Vimeo, I could use existing integrations for set-top boxes or the app on my iPad to view the stuff.

    If you were to just to HTML5 video, I could at least bring the video up on my iPhone and "AirPlay" it to my TV.

    As it is, I can't even watch it in Google Chrome. I've removed the generic Flash player from my computer, but I do allow Chrome to maintain and use its own internal copy. But even that copy can't play your videos. I am guessing that this is because I've got paranoid security settings, forbidding Flash from ever using any local storage at all (because I don't trust advertisers).

    So, in short, I certainly can't see the videos in my preferred way, and when I try to view them the way I'm "supposed to", I get a blank screen with no warnings or errors or anything.

    Do Not Want.

  34. You're not alone. I prefer text. by concealment · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The contents of a three-minute video can generally be typed up into a half-page of text and read in thirty seconds.

    The exceptions are walk-throughs that are difficult to describe in writing, or content that requires visual or audio.

    For me, it's not a matter of being seen goofing off. I have headphones. But it's more a use of my time. If I'm going to goof off, I want to goof off *efficiently*.

  35. Re:Ads...lots of ads. by johny42 · · Score: 1

    As long as you fill it with tons of ads, that's cool with me. I love slashvertisements! Maybe you can even couch a few of them in "product reviews"? That may squeak a few more ads in front of people, what do you say?

    In the video, they explicitly said they are going to run slashvertisements. Maybe if you WTFV...oh nevermind.

    I appreciate they're up-front about it at least.

  36. Yay for more crap by Magada · · Score: 0, Troll

    The clueless twats who took over /. are destroying the site and the community with your hare-brained ideas. I'd like to see videos of them choking on wiffle-bats.

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  37. Transcripts, Transcript by QuasiSteve · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, transcripts for all videos on the TV site would be helpful for many as well.

    I think that may just be in the pipeline ;)

    For now, here's the Transcript for this video.
    -----
    Title: Welcome to SlashdotTV
    Description: Welcoe to SlashdotTV, the / dedicated channel for all video on / Slashdot. This new site lets you / easily browse and watch videos / based on a number of criteria, / including title, subject keywords, / popularity, and those handpicked / by the site's dedicated editors.

    [00:00] <TITLE>
    The SlashdotTV logo bar slides down from the top of the screen over a background that shows the SlashdotTV page, and "Welcome to TV.Slashdot.org" fades into the bar.

    [00:01] Timothy>
    Introducing SlashdotTV, where we get up-close and personal [...]

    [00:03] <TITLE>
    Various shots from interviews quickly pass by at this time.

    [00:03] Timothy>
    [...] or drop in via video chat with interesting people from all parts of the tech spectrum;

    [00:09] Timothy>
    From hobbyists [...]

    [00:10] <TITLE>
    A shot from the Qu8ke interview video is shown in which a 'hobby' rocket is launched.

    [00:14] <TITLE>
    Various shots from interviews quickly pass by again.

    [00:14] Timothy>
    [...] to entrepreneurs to project leaders - and sometimes, all three at once.

    [00:18] <TITLE>
    The shot at this time is of Chris Qiu with the his name and title "Senior Architect/Lead Developer for the Trove Insight Solution" displayed in the bottom.

    [00:18] Timothy>
    There's also a corner for sponsored videos, which means supported by advertisers.

    [00:22] <TITLE>
    Shots of the SlashdotTV webpage pass by, relating to the spoken words.

    [00:22] Timothy>
    You can explore our current categories or search for videos by keyword.

    [00:26] Timothy>
    You can comment on videos right from the Slashdot page, or watch or re-watch them at any time from this page.

    [00:32] Timothy>
    We're looking for good ideas of what should make the cut.
    So please help us shape Slashdot's future with your suggestions, [...]

    [00:37] <TITLE>
    The shot changes to that of several pinball machines.

    [00:37] Timothy>
    [...] and keep watching for more.

  38. There are more important things for Slashdot to do by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At this risk of sounding like a troll, or maybe just a fuddy-duddy: I think there are more important things for Slashdot to work on than adding new features.

    There are a lot of bugs and limitations on the site. The last time Slashdot posted one of their "Hey, look what we did!" stories there were a lot of good positive often-repeated suggestions - many of which were ignored. Unicode support was moderated to 5 many times in that story. Instead we get achievements, idle, and Slashdot TV. Unicode support, working & faster preview, better comments section, etc. were top suggestions that have been ignored for years. Maybe I'm biased: I use Slashdot because it is entirely text based so this feature doesn't excite me terribly. Nonetheless, I think priorities need to be straightened here.

  39. IPv6 by pantaril · · Score: 1

    Maybe you shall focus on enabling IPv6 on your existing sites before launching new ones.

  40. No. by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In and by itself, video: why not. But the "essence" of Slashdot, if I may use so vague a term, seems to reside in two strongly defined and profiled points: tech news in text format, and user-user-moderation. Video does not enhance either of these. Nor is it "stuff that matters".Therefore: irrelevant. Does not add any value to the core business. It MAY increase the site's worth in the eyes of a potential buyer. To me as a loooooooooooooong-time slashdotter, however, video on /. is... well... howshalliputit.... of no use.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:No. by seinman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have been regularly reading Slashdot for about 10 years now. I come here for the comments, mostly. I tend to get the actual stories/articles earlier from other sites that I frequent, but the conversation here is always insightful. Yes, even now, I still feel that way; although the quality of the comments have gone downhill from the early days.

    2. Re:No. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      So do: I come here for the comments, at least as much as for the news. On unexpected occasions one can have great fun here, and sometimes I leave more thoughtful than I came. Yes, the quality has gone down - but it is still higher than elsewhere on comparable sites. El Reg may be way funnier, what with its "boffinry", BOFH and Verity Stob - the comments there are blander. Here, *real* discussions are still flaming up. Sometimes.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    3. Re:No. by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      BTW you must have been coming here for more than 10 years. I signed up in 1999 or so, and my ID is higher than yours. You must have been here for at least 14 years. Dinosaur ;-)

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  41. There goes my bandwidth cap by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Sigh.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  42. Re:U're modded funny: This = funnier... apk by Goaway · · Score: 0

    Hey, who left the door open and let in all the crazy?

  43. There goes the last shred of readability in IE7 by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

    I'm forced to use IE7 at work. Yes, it's old and it would be nice if I could upgrade but I can't. This is a news blog with some forum functionality though. I expected it to at least let me read without a crazy layout. The change from last summer meant I was no longer able to moderate with that machine, and now with this TV icon, it's entirely unusable. Can someone enlighten me as to what all these changes improved? Visually the site isn't much different, green with white and black text. Links on the left, info on the right, posts in the middle. I never thought I'd be posting one of these "but... slashdot sucks now..." posts, but here I am. Please change it back.

    1. Re:There goes the last shred of readability in IE7 by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

      Here's a better idea: start a campaign to get IE7 updated at work. That way website developers everywhere won't want to lynch mob you. (That said they should at least do due diligence and try to make it work in IE7 (which I assume they already have).

    2. Re:There goes the last shred of readability in IE7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your bosses to fire the IT guy that can't understand why it's important to update IE7 -- an old, buggy, unsupported browser full of security holes that not only make your life harder by ignoring modern standards but also jeopardizing your company by being a bug-filled mess.

  44. Re:U're modded funny: This = funnier... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    uh-uh - APK is off his meds again ...

    Hey - to make this on-topic, how about posting a video of how you're going to restore your reputation as anything but a laughingstock trying to peddle a few Windows programs dating back to 2 decades ago? Maybe include some sex with a dead goat and your mama - we know you really get off on the whole humiliation and self-degradation thing.

  45. Not working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried IE 9 and Chrome - neither will play your videos.
    Why not use HTML5??

  46. Subtitles by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I think each video should have subtitles. There's many deaf readers here on slashdot and also many like to check in at work where they have to keep sound off.

    Really it's a basic accessibility feature that is often ignored. Not to thrilled about Apple's digital textbooks containing non-subtitled videos. Yay the first book I can't "read", now THAT'S thinking differently. So as more of the web becomes video more people are finding themselves shut out.

    So please add subtitles to all videos.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  47. XBMC Plugin Please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XBMC plugin or it doesn't get watched.

  48. Re:Partner with YouTube or Vimeo, or do HTML5 plea by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well, HTML5, whatever.

    I believe ALL videos should be done in ASCII (3D ASCII for things like Avatar).

  49. how? by statsone · · Score: 1

    how about a story on the technology behind the site.
    I have videos on my site and it is not easy to implement (without using an external provider)

  50. Really Like It by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    I have enjoyed the videos so far and I think this is a great idea.

    This will be added to the stuff I watch on PATV as well as Geek And Sundry. (Which has a slew of great shows - though I'm most stoked about Wil Wheaton's tabletop gaming show and The Guild.)

    Here I'd love to see stuff that shows off what slashdot is about - tech (especially FOSS tech) at a deeper depth than the 'non-technical' folks are interested in. I enjoyed the HD tv bit - since I don't know jack about tvs. But it did feel awfully fluffy. A lot of people complain about slashvertisements - and I don't think every mention of a physical product or software that can be purchased is an abomination - but I do want to dig a little deeper than consumer level.

    Being able to have user submitted video would be cool - though I have no idea how that would work. Based on what I see here in comments, I wouldn't dare go through a video firehose to look for stuff to recommend. So maybe that's just a non-starter unless there was a way to filter out the obviously horrific stuff that I anticipate would be submitted.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  51. Re:I encourage U to "face the music" here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You need to seek psychiatric help.

    This is not a joke. I am not aiming to get a +2 Funny, nor am I insulting or trolling you. You seriously need to get some professional medical attention.

  52. Seriously? SlashdotTV? by pz · · Score: 0

    How about spending less time on ... stuff ... like this, and more time on learning how to write headlines, how to select good submissions, how to avoid duplicate stories, how to perform even cursory verification of content, how to avoid typographical errors, and how to copyedit poor text? You know, things that enhance quality.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  53. Re:You're not technically competent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^^^ APK is now one stop past East Ham...

  54. Re:Partner with YouTube or Vimeo, or do HTML5 plea by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Suck for you but what do you know works fine on my preferred ways like on my laptop and HTC Amaze.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  55. obvious choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slash.tv doesn't seem to be registered yet, just a hint.

  56. Ha! by kunwon1 · · Score: 1

    How about fixing the glaring UI problems with the main site before wasting time on this crap? Broken AJAX and horrid android support. Let's move that archive link more than a millimeter away from the 'many more' link.

    --
    Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
  57. Will it be all repeats, just like the main site? by doobydoobydoo · · Score: 1

    Will it be all repeats, just like the main site?

  58. RSS Feed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about an RSS feed?

  59. Re:Partner with YouTube or Vimeo, or do HTML5 plea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is because you've disabled local shared objects (flash cookies). Seems they're using Ooyala's video tech, and the other place I've run into it, the video fails in the same way with Flash configured to not allow LSOs.

  60. antennae? by dittbub · · Score: 1

    Why does the Slashdot TV have antennae?

  61. gentlemen by nimbius · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    i give you, ZDnet 2.0.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  62. Arghhh - Fixed width site by ipb · · Score: 1

    Do not want.

    Over 50% wasted white space when I go full screen is not going to make it an enjoyable experience.
    Slashdot has a chance here to one-up YouTube and get it right.

    -
    Lotto - A tax on people who are bad at math

  63. Re:Ads...lots of ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather have Slashdot #hash tags like twitter, so that I can enjoy slashdot in post mode, but also in #followthistag mode. Diaspora does it.

  64. Re:U're modded funny: This = funnier... apk by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the slashdot admins wanted to keep APK out they could compile a kind of blocklist of IP addresses that he posts from. But what to keep it in...? Some kind FILE full of HOSTS maybe? I'm sure APK could weigh in with some suggestions...

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  65. New Slashdot by snikulin · · Score: 1

    Now with blackjack and hookers!

  66. Re:There are more important things for Slashdot to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this risk of sounding like a troll, or maybe just a fuddy-duddy: I think there are more important things for Slashdot to work on than adding new features.

    Slashdot is now Enterprise, not Hi-Perf software. Slow and full of useless features, instead of lean and fast.

    What I don't understand is why can't I comment on the videos? There's no mindless jibber-jabber.

    And why does the TV link from slashdot open in the same window, but slashdot from the TV site opens a new window?

    Darn, I modded, have to post AC

  67. Indeed by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    "You may have noticed that we've posted quite a few original videos on Slashdot in the past few months"

    Yes, and I hate them. Please stop putting them in the stream.

  68. Am I the only one sick of videos? by cixelsyd · · Score: 1
    Seriously, I go to news sites to READ news. I understand some things are best presented as video, but it seems like a lot of news sites are moving to lots of video, which makes it difficult to catch up in quiet environments, plus it forces me to get through a story at the pacing of the presentation, as opposed to an article where I can read at my own pace (be that faster or slower than the video would be).

    Enough with the videos!

    --
    Take a dollar, divide it by 100, take two and call me in the morning.
  69. Do want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I will be disappointed if that doesn't happen.

  70. I am old by KGBear · · Score: 1

    Yup. I am now officially old. I've been ranting for quite some time that video is replacing everything, and for no good reason. For almost everything useful, text is so much more efficient. For you half braindead so-called "developers" out there, the reason is simple to grasp: text can be random-accessed, can be easily searched, and can be grasped pages at a time with proper training. In contrast, video is sequential. It forces me to watch things in whatever order the person making it wanted me to. For us old timers, watching video when compared to reading documentation feels like what e-mails feel to you, when compared to texting. Slashdot, you are becoming less and less relevant to me as time goes on. I get that that's the point, though. You need to attract nerds who grew up watching, not reading. It's sad, though.

  71. Problem with the Slashdot TV icon by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    If you shrink the width of your window, the Slashdot TV icon "wraps" and goes over top of the user name link. At that point if you click on your user name it takes you to Slashdot TV. This is on Firefox 11.0.

    Normally the upper-right of Slashdot looks like this;
          [TV icon] Library Newsletter Jobs Submit Options Account Mobydisk [Power icon]
    if I shrink the window I see:
          Library Newsletter Jobs Submit Options Account [MESS] [Power icon]
    where [MESS] is my account name and the TV icon on top of each other.

  72. Re:There are more important things for Slashdot to by psydeshow · · Score: 1

    Amen.

    What kind of brillionaire would walk into Slashdot HQ, take a look around, and declare "What this company REALLY needs is its own video channel!" ??

    Good video is expensive to produce, expensive to host, and completely at odds with the core functionality of Slashdot (commenting on articles you didn't take the time to read). Who is this for? Advertisers? Editors who want to be famous, or like the sound of their own voices? It isn't for me, I can tell you that much.

    I don't ultimately care what /. does with their money and resources, but I will miss all of you who decide you're allergic to this kind of bullshit and move on.

  73. Jumping the Shark by psydeshow · · Score: 1

    Well, people have been saying for a couple years now that Slashdot has jumped the shark.

    Nothing like a big TV icon (with rabbit ears!) to really hammer that message home, guys. Say hi to Fonzi for me!

  74. Proof TheRaven64's technically challenged then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    I rest my case... proof's RIGHT there.

    APK

  75. NG in Mac Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't work in the current version of Mac Firefox, even after I whitelisted the site in FlashBlock and reloaded the page. I don't even see the gray square with the "F" button that FlashBlock usually shows. I see nothing except the links to the non-existent videos.

    P.S. I'm an experienced Web developer, I'm not fumbling around.

  76. Can we also have an imageboard? by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

    Maybe we could call it b.slashdot.org.

    Let's turn off accounts and all just post as Anonymous Cowards, too.

  77. HOW CREATIVE (a new 7 digit TROLL account) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Please forgive my son/daughter/thing (we never could tell which he/she/it was); we used to give APK a little LSD to get him/her/it to sleep at night. The dropping on the head likely didn't help either." - by APK's Mom (2605511) on Wednesday March 28, @10:59AM (#39496769)

    See subject-line! Ur pitiful TheRaven64: Especially ur ac fail troll vs. myself here -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    * After all - You're 'so brave' doing cowardly little trollish ad hominem attack attempts, in your snide little comment there directed my way, first -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223

    (You only brought the above now ac reply technical fail reply on yourself this time, lol, see 1st link above & trust me - you're not fooling anyone on it not being you either...!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Ironic: The /. "saying of the moment" balloon @ the bottom of this post quotes this now:

    History tends to exaggerate. -- Col. Green, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.4

    I have a BETTER favorite from the same character in the same episode:

    "OVERWHELM & DEVASTATE - that's the way to gain power and hold onto it" (or something VERY close)

    In the 1st link above? I did a far more than admirable job of living up to that one above vs. your technically challenged self, now didn't I?? Yes sir... lol! apk

    1. Re:HOW CREATIVE (a new 7 digit TROLL account) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, the slightest provocation and bam yet another delusional rant. Fun times, keep it up APK!

  78. I, for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new transvestite Slashdot overlords.

  79. You need 3 things to state that legally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1,) A license to practice the psychiatric sciences

    2.) A formal examination of myself administered in a professional psychiatric environs

    3.) A degree in the psychiatric sciences

    * Otherwise, you're trolling as ac with effete off-topic illogical ad hominem attacks is worthless, and yes, libel of myself...

    (U FAIL as always TheRaven64)

    APK

    P.S.=> Your COLOSSAL fail though? Here:

    http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    LMAO, and as yet another ac trolling reply and yes, we all KNOW it's you TheRaven64... especially after you started up with me here this week -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223

    ... apk

  80. Re:I encourage U to "face the music" here by Krokus · · Score: 1

    APK reads a lot better if you imagine the voice of Daniel (Gyro-Robo) from Robot Chicken speaking it. :)

  81. Actually I just submitted a program to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The security community that a competent coder who admins malwarebytes hpHOSTS says is "excellent" so... you're b.s. off-topic attempts @ ad hominem attacks? Useless...

    Write him yourself:

    services@it-mate.co.uk

    He's a good man, technically knowledegeable on networking and coding, AND does a great job on the hpHosts site for malwarebytes here:

    http://hosts-file.net/?s=Download

    (imo, and yes, I am pretty well informed on this? It is the single best overall hosts file out there for giving users more speed, & more security, bar-none!)

    U FAIL, TheRaven64... lol!

    Especially useless after this utter "overwhelm & devastate" reply of mine showed how technically WEAK you are TheRaven64:

    http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    * Do you really HONESTLY think people reading don't realize that was you trying to defend youself after trolling me on hosts files which you started up with myself here this week on ->

    ?

    (Guess again - we're NOT that stupid pal, but, judging on your "performance' OR rather, lack-thereof, lol? U FAIL, & on all accounts noted!)

    ---

    As to your quotes on wares I have done (inclusive of commercially done code that was a finalist 2 yrs. in a row @ Microsoft Tech Ed 2000-2002 in its hardest category SQLServer Performance Enhancement & making it later 40% more efficient for a certified Microsoft Partner that's been going strong now for 17++ yrs.?) Well...

    The day you can show you have done more than I have, earlier, & BETTER, + around the art & science of computing on that level, which I did odds are STRONGLY while you were still in diapers?

    That's the day you can even BEGIN to attempt to effetely & illogically ad hominem attack myself... which you have clearly failed in.

    APK

    P.S.=> You started this here -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223 and I am merely letting you finish it too (especially after your UTTER FAIL above via an AC post in the 1st link above, like that "fools anyone" (not))... and you are finishing yourself with it, I love it... apk

  82. Re:I encourage U to "face the music" here by Bensam123 · · Score: 1

    This shouldn't be rated up and if it was it should've been rated as funny or trolling. Don't believe someone merely because they say 'they're serious' and throw in a bit of reverse psychology.

  83. Thank you (sorry to see you modded down) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have submitted a program that automates the entire process yielding more speed, security, & even "anonymity" to an extent using HOSTS files for less CPU, RAM, & other forms of I/O costs by merely using native TCP/IP features (fast & efficient as it gets @ ring0/ rpl 0/pnp kernelmode operations, without layering on other potentially faulty things like local DNS servers, wasting the above, AND electric power too).

    You can inquire about it here with a respected member of the security community who runs malwarebytes hpHOSTS sites here, in Mr. Steven Burn -> services@it-mate.co.uk :

    From -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Download

    (imo, and yes, I am pretty well informed on this? It is the single best overall hosts file out there for giving users more speed, & more security, bar-none!)

    APK

    P.S.=> It works... now, as to TheRaven64? Well, he started it up with myself on HOSTS files here:

    http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    Tell HIM that... especially after his utter technical fail below:

    http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    And yes, it's he attempting to "defend his trolling myself" on hosts files, especially so many days later (nobody's stupid enough to NOT know it's he for Pete's sake)...

    ... apk

  84. I didn't know TheRaven64 had yet another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternate registered LUSER account here called Krokus too! Gosh, will wonders NEVER cease!

    APK

    P.S.=> Doesn't matter, especially after TheRaven64's UTTER FAIL on things technical here vs. myself:

    http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    Where he's now attempting, lol, DAYS later to defend himself (albeit via AC replies now, lol), & only to fall FLAT on his face on every single "point" of his I blew him utterly away with... easily? Please, lol!

    (After all, he started up with me on hosts files there -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223 and I am letting him finish it, and himself along with it, lol, in that link above... utterly hilarious & just (yes, I gotta say it) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'" as-per-my-usual vs. technically challenged noobz like himself that "talk a good game" until someone like myself blows they clear off the wall with facts as I did above in the 1st link posted)... apk

  85. TheRaven64 failed badly though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Defending himself' & failing by ac replies days later vs. apk http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061 on hosts though, did he? Yes, we know it's TheRaven64! Who else would show up there days later only to blunder on technical issues so badly vs. apk over there to defend TheRaven64 for his starting up with apk there http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223

  86. Re:You're not technically competent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never mind East Ham, the crazy bastard has gone all the way to Charing Cross!

  87. Flash? *sigh* by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    For an open-source centered site such as Slashdot, I am very surprised that you're using Adobe Flash for video delivery.

    Please support HTML5 video. Or anything other than Flash. I've been "working" with Flash for the past 10 years on the Linux desktop, including standalone installs of all varieties, LTSP networks, ... and Flash has always been the bane of my existence. To have my favorite site since 2000 use Flash is...blah.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  88. Rendering issues in Opera Mini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dagnamnit, as soon as this article hit Slashdot the Opera Mini Browser on my phone was unable to render the page properly!
    Now I have to do actual Work!

  89. Trolls use multiple accounts to game moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trolls here keep multiple registered accounts to accumulate mod points to mod themselves up and others down with by the same token Bensami. It's even obvious to readers like yourself that the moderation system here needs revision. Ask tomhudson (posts also as Barbara not barbie too) because he was caught trolling apk the same way only to fail on hosts files technicals, just as TheRaven64 has.

  90. Re:U're modded funny: This = funnier... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah I wondered where our favourite delusional malware writing troll had got to, still has delusions of adequacy and winning argument's he always loses, welcome back I will get the popcorn ready to watch you rant and rave like the nutjob you are!

  91. Re:Tell u what (a challenge) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copy pasta troll APK returns to amuse the audience with his mental health issues! Fun times!

    The best bit is with the slightest provocation you can get him to waste hours posting his supposed achievements and desperately claiming he has won whatever argument he is having with himself inside his very disturbed brain.

    Hours of harmless fun trolling him!

  92. Re:Disprove apk's points on hosts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey APK - why do you talk about yourself in the third person? Does your hosts file block your meds?

  93. HQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CAN I HAZ HQ BUTTON?

  94. HTML5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Timothy should start using HTML5 instead of Adobe's Horrible Flash.

  95. Works like f*^k... by PRFunky · · Score: 1

    This is just as bad as news sites such as CNN. I click on link to Ubuntu video, I get a mandatory commercial at first. Fine, gotta pay the rent, I understand. But then, the video goes so far before there's a pause. Great, I hit pause, let the whole thing buffer. With the progress bar of the whole thing buffered, I hit play again. It starts back up where I left off. Then, it pauses again. Followed by rewinding back to the beginning silly Slashdot robot voice crap. then bounces back to where it paused to play again. Repeat eight or nine times through the course of a lousy 3-4 minute video. It's as bad as Yahoo! Please leave the video technology to YouTube; they seem to be the only ones who ever get it right.

  96. Re:There are more important things for Slashdot to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead we get achievements

    I agree with most of your post, but complaining about achievements seems a little silly: they were added as an April Fools joke about appealing to WoW players.

  97. Re:Partner with YouTube or Vimeo, or do HTML5 plea by DdJ · · Score: 1

    Thanks for verifying this for me. You inspired me to conduct another experiment.

    Big established video platforms are often motivated to make their stuff work on iOS devices. So I brought up "tv.slashdot.org" directly on my iPad.

    I went to ooyala's own site and was able to play some bits of video that were backed by flash on the desktop version.

    But when I went to "tv.slashdot.org", it looked like it was supposed to work, with the conventional "press this thing to start the embedded video going" controls and all, but it always simply failed.

    So, it appears to be Ooyala, but broken and less functional here.

    Ah, well. They must care more about advertising revenue and viewing metrics than about ensuing that their "news for nerds" is seen by, you know, nerds (who are generally the ones disabling flash or turning off its local storage).

  98. Re:There are more important things for Slashdot to by vroom · · Score: 1
    We have made some significant commenting system improvements end of last year fixing a lot of problems. We didn't post an announcement story but I did post a journal entry going over some of it. Since those changes number of comments per day have gone up significantly which I see as a win for the site and community. A lot of those were bugfixes for longstanding bugs or annoyances, since there was not enough new I posted it as a journal entry rather than an announcement story.

    There's certainly more I'd like to take on as we're given the engineering bandwidth to get them done. If you have specific suggestions I'd love to hear them as a reply or sent to feedback@slashdot.org. We certainly have our list but I want to make sure your most pressing concerns are part of it. Thanks for being a longtime Slashdot reader!

  99. Re:Disprove apk's points on hosts then by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1
    What can I say - APK, you're the gift that keeps on giving :)

    Here's a deal - I'll start maintaining my own hosts file if you can have a conversation with yourself about the benefits while pretending to be 5 different anonymous cowards. Every sentence has to be a non-sequitur and there must be a link back to a similar conversation you've had that's at least ten years old

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  100. Re:I encourage U to "face the music" here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relax, he just has Asperger's.

  101. The security community's thoughts on TheRaven64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along w/ others of "ur kind" giving me a hard time on hosts files TheRaven64:

    "I don't actually get time for many sites such as slashdot anymore, but certainly see my fair share of trolls on the MyWot (Web of Trust (I'm a moderator there, and MyWot includes hpHosts in their "ratings")) and Malwarebytes forums, and you're correct - it's always either users of malicious software/sites, or the owners of such, that are doing it." Mr. Steven Burn - services@it-mate.co.uk -> hpHOSTS/malwarebytes http://hosts-file.net/?s=Download

    * So, that "all said & aside"? Do you *think* that others here aren't thinking the same of YOU (or anyone else) that tries to give me a hard time about hosts files usage for added security, speed, & even better "anonymity" vs. tracking online?

    APK

    P.S.=> Guess again IF you think they don't... & you FAILED hugely (even as ac posting to try to 'hide it was you' in this very exchange to attempt to do so)!

    Especially where I disproved each of your 'so-called points' point-by-point in your ac reply failing, & I did so, with ease -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    For your trolling/harassing myself as you & your kind here usually do starting it up with me -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223

    ... apk

  102. Security community's thoughts on TheRaven64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along w/ others of "ur kind" giving me a hard time on hosts files TheRaven64:

    "I don't actually get time for many sites such as slashdot anymore, but certainly see my fair share of trolls on the MyWot (Web of Trust (I'm a moderator there, and MyWot includes hpHosts in their "ratings")) and Malwarebytes forums, and you're correct - it's always either users of malicious software/sites, or the owners of such, that are doing it." Mr. Steven Burn - services@it-mate.co.uk -> hpHOSTS/malwarebytes http://hosts-file.net/?s=Download

    * So, that "all said & aside"? Do you *think* that others here aren't thinking the same of YOU (or anyone else) that tries to give me a hard time about hosts files usage for added security, speed, & even better "anonymity" vs. tracking online?

    APK

    P.S.=> Guess again IF you think they don't... & you FAILED hugely (even as ac posting to try to 'hide it was you' in this very exchange to attempt to do so)!

    Especially where I disproved each of your 'so-called points' point-by-point in your ac reply failing, & I did so, with ease -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39497061

    For your trolling/harassing myself as you & your kind here usually do starting it up with me -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2734503&cid=39406223

    ... apk

  103. Re:Disprove apk's points on hosts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U evade disproving apk's points on hosts cuz u can't. We know that.

  104. Re:U're modded funny: This = funnier... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ur ac illogical ad hominem attack attempt fails. U can't show u did more, earlier, n' better than apk in computers. U know it, I know it, anyone reading knows it.

  105. Re:Disprove apk's points on hosts then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U can't disprove apk's points on hosts? U failed ac troll n we know it.