Slashdot Mirror


Student Expelled From Indiana High School For Tweeting Profanity

First time accepted submitter OopsIDied writes with the story that high-school senior Austin Carroll of Garrett, Indiana was recently expelled after tweeting profanity from his own home, writing "Supposedly the school has a system which tracks students' social networks after they have logged in at school. Although the tweet was done at home at 2 AM, the school decided that such behavior was unacceptable and that the most fitting punishment was expulsion. He did use a school computer, but it was set up to use the school network even when used outside the school because the school claimed the tweet was associated with the school's IP address." As usual, TechDirt has some biting commentary about the expulsion. But Hey, at least they didn't throw him in jail.

37 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. It's their network by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They can enforce the rules as they wish (just like employers). Student should have used a private ISP, instead of the government-owned school network.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:It's their network by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      He fucking did fucking use his fucking home network as you would fucking know if you had just fucking read the fucking article about his fucking post containing fucking lots of use of the fucking word fucking.

      First amendment indeed.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:It's their network by bryan1945 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I fucking agree with this comment 100 fucking %.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:It's their network by residieu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He says he tweeted on "his own computer", and it was 2am so it seems likely it would have been on the school's network.

      What it sounds like is he logged into his twitter account later when he was on the school network. The school scanned his twitter feed and found his astute observation about the word fuck.

  2. Step up that Expulsion by residieu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like the school is really behind. They need to get themselves in gear and expel the 90% of the student body that says "fuck" on a daily basis in the halls, in the cafeteria and on the buses.

    1. Re:Step up that Expulsion by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 5, Funny

      this gives me an idea for a device that would use speech recognition to detect profanities. it could be an android pda in a box, rigged with a flashing light and a siren that would go off if they detected a profanity.

      John Spartan, you are fined five credits for repeated violations of the verbal morality statute.

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    2. Re:Step up that Expulsion by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Twitter and facebook are not really private (unless you specifically block viewing by strangers). It's a public venue and what you post can be seen by your school (as this article shows). Or google.

      BTW the school that was spying on students stripping naked in their bedrooms through laptop cameras never got punished. Nor the school with cameras in the boys/girls shower rooms. Hiring the ACLU to sue this school is like a waste; looking at public tweets is a far lesser crime.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  3. High school student != Expert by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can enforce the rules as they wish (just like employers). Student should have used a private ISP, instead of the government-owned school network.

    Perhaps. But should a high school student have been expected to know this?

    Maybe they should have opted for jailing him for life. After all, isn't tweeting "fuck" an incitement to the masses to commit rape?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:High school student != Expert by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes a student should know not to use profanity on the school network, just as he knows not to use it in the school building. (IMHO)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:High school student != Expert by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are sidestepping the real question though. He should know not to use it on the school network (whatever profanity is.... silly concept anyway) but... is it right to expect him to know that he is, indeed, on the school network vs home. Clearly he has a home internet connection.

      I mean, for me with work, its easy. I am either connected to the VPN or not, and if I am, then its all through their netowork... but I do this shit for a living...I am not even sure if people outside of the IT department understand this.... but... a HS kid is expected to?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:High school student != Expert by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes a student should know not to use profanity on the school network, just as he knows not to use it in the school building. (IMHO)

      Did you RTFA? He connected to his home ISP, but the computer automatically connected him to the school's VPN. So, at the risk of repeating myself, should a high school student have been expected to know/spot this?

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:High school student != Expert by residieu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Where does it say it was school equipment? The linked article mentions "Carroll says he doesn't think he should be punished by the school for what he posts on his own time and on his own computer. " and I find no other mention of the computer's ownership.

    5. Re:High school student != Expert by tophermeyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FWIW The summary says it was a school issued laptop. The article doesn't specify, but as you quoted implies that it was a personal computer. Obviously the summary could very well be wrong, but it's also possible that the student is confused about who owns the computer and the article wasn't thorough enough to elaborate.

      Also, the guy's tweet was hardly all that offensive. It uses a naughty word for sure. But in the context of describing how it can be used for various parts of speech, not as a swear word directed at somebody or something. Either this is another zero tolerance policy gone out of control, or this kid has other issues and the school needed a reason to expel him.

    6. Re:High school student != Expert by GmExtremacy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      not as a swear word directed at somebody or something.

      I don't really care if it was directed at someone. What happened? Why do some people seem to have this mentality that someone getting offended will bring about the apocalypse?

    7. Re:High school student != Expert by Moses48 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I bring my work laptop home, I sure as hell am not going to do anything on it that I wouldn't do at work. I know it doesn't automatically VPN into work, but it's still my work computer and should be used for work purposes. If the student has a school computer that should only be used for school purposes, that is fine. I still think the punishment for cussing is ludicrous.

    8. Re:High school student != Expert by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is iffy. This may need more research than just the initial summary and article. From reading comments on the other sites, yet to see confirmation, there are three conflicting versions of the story:
      1) Tweeted from home using own computer.
      2) Tweeted from home, using school computer.
      3) Tweeted from home, using own computer. Accessed Twitter from school where the school then began inspecting his Twitter account.

      Two and three are the most logical with the information given. It would explain the school network part of the story. One leaves me asking why the school is forcing student home computers to use their VPN constantly.

      http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/news/local/High-School-Senior-Expelled-For-Tweeting-Profanity---144022966.html implies that Three is the case. Tweeted from home, home network, visited Twitter from school so the school detection software picked it up. Punished for it.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    9. Re:High school student != Expert by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes a student should know not to use profanity on the school network, just as he knows not to use it in the school building. (IMHO)

      Because, heretofore, using four letter words at school was an unheard of atrocity that would have surprised even dear old mom, right?

      Come on. I think I learned the f-bomb well before second grade. He wasn't selling drugs, carrying weapons, threatening a teacher, or being a repeat offender of general delinquency. He didn't even do it at school so you can't argue he was disrupting class. Expulsion is way over the top, this is worth a letter home to mom and dad, with the exact text of his message included.

      The most extreme, maybe they should sue him for stealing George Carlin's material.

    10. Re:High school student != Expert by GodInHell · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do some people seem to have this mentality that someone getting offended will bring about the apocalypse?

      Lo it is written, that the first seal shall break when some-random-school-marm-in-Minnesota hears the harsh sound of a cuss word uttered across the internet. On that day the skys shall darken with Orrlys and the deeps shall spill forth their Trolls. Also, 4chan and Reddit will merge.

      Pray for the hour of thy death and be spared this dread vision.

      -GiH

    11. Re:High school student != Expert by KhabaLox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would you set up a VPN that effectively takes over your computer?

      To make sure that any traffic sent to or from said computer routes through your network so that you can monitor it.

      Now, I can understand this on a certain level (e.g. to prevent students from visiting porn sites or spam/virus sites). But it seems what's going on in this case is that the school is looking at packets or URLs to link students to social networking accounts, and then monitoring those accounts for illicit content. That's a bit more intrusive. Of course, there is plenty of precedent for restricting students rights both on and off campus, but actively monitoring (or logging) students "private" online communication seems a bit much. What's their policy on data retention? Do they stop monitoring Twitter accounts when the student graduates?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    12. Re:High school student != Expert by jasomill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if the AUP forbids it, who cares? In what fucked-up world could "a system which tracks students' social networks after they have logged in at school" even arguably be a responsible use funds earmarked for education?

      Also, given that the student's transgression required special technological measures merely to detect, how could it possibly be argued that it fucked with the school's educational mission to a degree that merits such a "last resort" as expulsion?

      Then again, while it's hard to imagine this being the idea, "don't trust technology you don't control, and don't enter into agreements you don't understand, because they'll be used to fuck you in the end" might be a more useful lesson than those he's missing.

    13. Re:High school student != Expert by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real issue is the profanity, not what he did. If the headline had read "school expels student for swearing in class" there would be no technological boogie man to focus attention on. There would only be the issue itself: a student is being denied an education because he used a word the principal didn't like.

    14. Re:High school student != Expert by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is there a list of schools that are... uh... tolerance schools? Non-zero tolerance? Greater than zero tolerance?

      Going to need to choose a school for my kid in a few years, would rather he not grow up being taught that a police state is acceptable.

  4. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Using profanity in the halls, cafeteria, and buses is safe, because such incidents are not visible to parents, school board members, or the general public.

    Twitter, however, is visible to the whole world, so anything undesirable must be just as visibly punished.

    1. Re:No... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Twitter, however, is visible to the whole world, so anything undesirable must be just as visibly punished.

      Correct - so when did the punishment for swearing become expulsion? They are a school after all - don't they have a duty to educate? Require a public apology (via the same medium) and a publicly visible punishment like picking up litter from the school grounds. That sends the message, both to the pupil and the student body, that swearing is not tolerated and that rules are enforced. Expelling him for a minor offence like this sends the message that the school is vindictive and unreasonable and it completely undermines any moral authority they have.

  5. Who cares? by webheaded · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All issues of who own what aside, honestly, who gives a fuck what the kid said unless it was like...death threats? Seriously...why would you expel someone for using profanity in the first place? A stern talking to, perhaps, but expulsion for this? Good lord.

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  6. Re:precedents have been established by oracleguy01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually this is interesting, the school has clearly established the punishment for doing this. So the easy way to protest this would be get a sizable percentage of the student body to swear on their twitter accounts. What is the school going to do? Expel 30+% of their student body? If they did, it would make national headlines and the people that run that school would become a laughing stock. It would also energize the debate enough where we could finally sort this out. And if they don't expel them, they can't expel this student.

  7. Another Example by pbscoop · · Score: 3

    Of educators, lawmakers having no idea what the internet is. "Hmm, since he said it from our address, it's like he's speaking for the school. The whole internet is going to thing we use bad language. It reflects poorly on me!"

  8. Oblig by Cobralisk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure you've all heard this before, but it bears repeating here:

    Perhaps one of the most interesting words in the English language today, is the word fuck. Out of all the English words that begin with the letter 'f' ...fuck is the only word referred to as 'the f word... It's the one magical word. Just by its sound can describe pain, pleasure, hate and love. Fuck, as most words in the English language is derived from German ...the word fuieken, which means to strike.

    In English, fuck falls into many grammatical categories:

    As a transitive verb for instance.. John fucked Shirley.
    As an intransitive verb... Shirley fucks.

    Its meaning is not always sexual, it can be used as...

    An adjective such as... John's doing all the fucking work.
    As part of an adverb... Shirley talks too fucking much.
    As an adverb enhancing an adjective... Shirley is fucking beautiful.
    As a noun... I don't give a fuck.
    As part of a word... absofuckinglutely -or- infuckingcredible.
    And as almost every word in a sentence... Fuck the fucking fuckers.

    As you must realize, there aren't too many words with the versatility of fuck...such as these examples describing situations such as:

    Fraud: I got fucked at the used car lot.
    Dismay: ahhh fuck it.
    Trouble: I guess I'm really fucked now.
    Aggression: Don't fuck with me buddy.
    Difficulty: I don't understand this fucking question.
    Inquiry: Who the fuck was that?
    Dissatisfaction: I don't like what the fuck is going on here.
    Incompetence: He's a fuck-off.
    Dismissal: Why don't you go outside and play hide and go fuck yourself...

    I'm sure you can think of many more examples.

    With all these multi-purpose applications, how can anyone be offended when you use the word. We say use this unique, flexible word more often in your daily speech.

    It will identify the quality of your character immediately.

    Say it loudly and proudly: FUCK YOU!

    --
    Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
  9. The school was SPYING on his PRIVATE ACCOUNT by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember kids, wiretap laws and the Bill of Rights don't apply to you when you're enrolled in school.

    Anyone agreeing with the school here really needs to read TFA (specifically the TechDirt article). Apparently he Tweeted while at home, and the school had a system set up that tracked all Twitter logins, recording all Tweets on those accounts. The kid must have logged in subsequently to posting the Tweet, and their spy system picked it up.

    I mean, what the fuck. The school is literally spying on its students' private accounts. I bet their system picked up Direct Messages too, all in the name of anti-bullying. I really hope this kid calls the ACLU and gets this shut the hell down. This is a huge violation of his and the other students' rights. If he had posted the Tweet from the school it may have been slightly different but still an overreaction. This is outright wiretapping, unauthorized use of an account, a declaration that students' private lives are subject to the school's rules... what the hell is going on here?

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  10. Re:Good life lesson by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That said expulsion might seem a bit harsh, but we really don't know what else this kid has done or not done.

    This.

    In my mind, expulsion for this is the right punishment only if the student has a long record of other issues, including a suspension or maybe two. If so, I think it would be okay to expel him for even just spitting on the school sidewalk. If not, this is a ridiculous and difficult to understand result from a public school. Hell, I doubt even private schools are this punitive.

    Swearing is bad manners and should be discouraged as a way of maintaining order and courtesy, but as far as I know, it has never impeded the learning of anyone or those around them. I sincerely hope this isn't some over-the-top punishment, and is instead, a measured reaction to a chain of incidents.

  11. After reading things like this... by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and stories like the assistant principal at a Lower Merion PA school district spying through the webcam on student issued laptops (remember that?), I have to say one thing about student-issued laptops:

    Laptops are cheap enough. Use your own. Treat the school issued one as toxic. Refuse it.

    They are simply too dangerous to even turn on.

    And those in authority wonder why they are distrusted.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:After reading things like this... by DaMattster · · Score: 3

      Good idea but it may be impractical because the school (much like corporations) might have a policy forbiding outside equipment from connecting to the network. There might be policies in place preventing the non-school issued laptop from being even able to obtain an IP address inside of the network.

    2. Re:After reading things like this... by bmo · · Score: 3

      Then leave the school issued laptop at school. That's what lockers are for. Use it only for classes and that's it.

      --
      BMO

  12. Re:On the fence on this. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last I checked profanity was not illegal and generally protected speech.

    You surrender a lot of rights when you enter a school. He was only there virtually, but he was using the school's network none the less.
    On top of that, yes you have free speech, but there are still consequences. I can't run into a crowded theater and yell "FIRE" and expect to get away scott free.

    schools are not the place for indoctrination of any sort

    You're kidding, right? The whole point of the American school is to turn you into a boring, uncreative, mindless drone.
    If that doesn't qualify as indoctrination, what does? |:

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  13. What really happened? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Informative
    T(source)FA implies he used a school computer, on his own time, to tweet; and the school's tracking software flagged his tweet. If that's the case, TechDirt's fee speech argument falls apart - the school did not prevent him from tweeting, just punished him for using their equipment to do something that violated their rules; not unlike yelling the same thing out of a bus would get you in trouble. Is the punishment unreasonable? I would argue it is; unless of course anyone who utters a profanity on school property is similarly punished; even then i would find it excessive. However, using school equipment leaves him open to punishment by the school.

    Now, if as per HuffPost, he did it on his own time using his own equipment; then the school is way out of line.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  14. Contact them if you are outraged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Phone 260.357.4114 press 3 for the principle's office

  15. Original Story by cforciea · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the original local story:

    http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20120325/LOCAL0201/303259931

    It appears the confusion all over the place here derives from the fact that there were two separate incidents. First, last year, he used school equipment to post a profane tweet and was suspended. Then, recently, he posted the above linked profane tweet, but it was from home, on his own computer, not on the school's network at all. They just saw it because they were examining his Twitter account because of the last incident.

    Hopefully that clears up some of the confusion.