Slashdot Mirror


Canada To Stop Making Pennies

New submitter butilikethecookie writes with news that the 2012 federal budget for Canada calls for the Royal Canadian Mint to stop producing pennies. "The budget calls the lowly penny a 'burden to the economy.' 'It costs the government 1.6 cents to produce each new penny,' the budget says, adding the government will save about $11 million a year with its elimination (PDF). Some Canadians, it says, consider the penny more of a nuisance than a useful coin. ... Rounding prices will become the norm as the penny is gradually removed from circulation, the budget says. If consumers find themselves without pennies, cash transactions should be rounded to the nearest five-cent increment 'in a fair and transparent manner,' it says. Noncash payments such as checks and credit cards will continue to be settled by the cent, however."

473 comments

  1. I'll own up to it...I throw them away by crazyjj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pennies are so annoying here in the U.S. now that I refuse them when they're offered as change (or toss them into the penny jar or charity jar on the counter when they have one).

    Sometimes I forget though, and I usually just throw them in the trash. I just hope my Grandma never finds out. She would have a heart attack on that one. I could never get it through to her that they would cost me more in time to deal with than the pennies themselves are even worth.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by mmell · · Score: 5, Funny
      Big mistake.

      Value of one hundred pennies - $1.00

      Value of one sock - $1.98

      The look on the guy's face when you hit him in the head with a sock full of pennies - priceless

    2. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are they still copper in the US? If they are I believe they would be worth more as metal than as money. I believe Canadian $0.01 are an alloy cheaper than copper.

      Some enterprising guy figured this out about the Canadian dime in the 1960's - the silver was worth more than $0.10 so he would take armored cars full of dimes to New York and sell them for the silver - iirc he made quite a nice little profit for it too!

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    3. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      Damnit, you made me wish I saved 1 of my mod points I used today. Got a good laugh out of me at least.

    4. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Are they still copper in the US?

      No, they are Zinc. But even the Zinc is worth more than the face value of a penny.

    5. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      He should've had a reverse peephole...

    6. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by jythie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep. Though it is also illegal to melt down pennies for their metals anyway.

    7. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep them in plastic bottles. It's currently illegal to melt them. If they are withdrawn from circulation it will most likely be OK to melt them. I have enough to make something interesting. BTW copper+zinc=brass. A mix of old and new copper pennies can give you some kind of alloy.

      Keep them someplace for cryin' out loud. The whole idea of throwing anything away like that is abominable. Besides, a penny is actually worth $0.025 in copper if it's an old copper penny.

    8. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      That's silly. I toss my pennies in my car's cupholder, and when I come to a McDonald's drivein, I gather together the 6, 12, or 18 pennies to cover the tax appended to the food price. (Actually I do that with all my change; it all gets dumped in my car for future use at a drivein or tollbooth.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    9. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by bogidu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe in Canada, not in the US. If you ARE referring to the US, you are thinking about it's illegal to DEFACE currency, meaning revalue it.

    10. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      so what if it's illegal to melt them? no one will know where the ingot came from...

    11. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      It's better when they are half-dollars.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    12. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by BForrester · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the Canadian Mint, the final run of pennies are primarily a steel-based alloy:

      Composition: 94% steel, 1.5% nickel, 4.5% copper plating or copper plated zinc
      Weight (g): 2.35

    13. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm partial to a bag full of hot nickels, myself.

    14. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it is not. You cannot deface it and still use it though. Melting down coins is illegal but not for defacing reasons.

    15. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by xstonedogx · · Score: 1
    16. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is illegal to melt them down in the US, if this sketchy web site is to be believed.

    17. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like many others I keep everything but quarters in a change jar. The quarters go towards laundry.

      I'm not sure how much of the total comes from pennies, but it seems like some day soon it's going to be less expensive to throw the whole can in the garbage than burning the fuel to the bank and back.

    18. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet the drive-in cashiers love you...

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they wouldn't?

      I've talked to several cashiers who said they loved when customers actually had exact change for them. They're constantly having to break open new rolls of coins to re-fill the register drawers with otherwise.

    20. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by taj · · Score: 2

      US pennies made before 1982 are mostly copper with a current melt down (illegal) value of $0.02 each. Post 1982, the content is 95+% zinc.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny_(United_States_coin)

    21. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by bogidu · · Score: 5, Informative

      You linked an article in a newspaper. I'm referencing the actual law. btw, did you bother to READ the rest of the comments on the /. post you referenced? They pretty much nullified the post.

      The last line is most relevant. DOUBLE WRONG!

      Section 331 of Title 18 of the United States code provides criminal penalties for anyone who fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the Mints of the United States. This statute means that you may be violating the law if you change the appearance of the coin and fraudulently represent it to be other than the altered coin that it is. As a matter of policy, the Mint does not promote coloring, plating or altering U.S. coinage: however, there are no sanctions against such activity absent fraudulent intent.

    22. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Pennies are almost all zinc nowadays, very little copper.

    23. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Fallingcow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fun trick:

      1. Place a US penny on some pavement (gotta be a somewhat new one, mind you--don't try this with a steel wheat penny or something, obviously)

      2. Heat it with a butane lighter--the kind with the little blue flame that shoots straight out, 'cuz you gotta be able to point it down.
      2a. Maybe wear a glove on the lighter-holding hand; optional, and I've never seen it matter, but I've only seen it done a couple times so...

      3. Watch as the lower-melting-point zinc busts through the still-solid copper in liquid form!

      Hasn't been explosive when I've seen it--it just tears the copper and flows out a bit--but if there's an air bubble or something, who knows; be careful!

    24. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by AchilleTalon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hahaha, it remembers me this time I was in Kingston, NY and paid the guy using among other change pieces a Canadian penny, because in Canada we are always using indistinctly US and CDN pennies. The guy did notice it and told me with a frown face throwing my CDN penny on the counter: "Could you give me a regular penny?" Like I was a burglar or trying to make me rich using false money.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    25. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by jythie · · Score: 1

      Looks like the US mint also says it is illegal: United States Mint Moves to Limit Exportation & Melting of Coins

    26. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      The particular mix of metals is pretty much unique to pennies, so they will know exactly where the ingot came from.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    27. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by jythie · · Score: 2
    28. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by bogidu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I stand corrected. The link does not carry rule of law . . . . . but a bit more searching provided the actual regulation.

      http://www.usmint.gov/downloads/consumer/FederalRegisterNotice.pdf

      Interesting that it doesn't state that it replaces the prior law, I guess we get to choose which law we follow?

    29. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by sl149q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Senators from the states that mine zinc are the only thing preventing the US from getting rid of the penny.

    30. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by xstonedogx · · Score: 2

      The original claim was that it was illegal to melt down pennies for their metals. That is true. You claimed it wasn't. The whole defacement tangent is irrelevant to that point. I'm not disputing your definition of defacement.

    31. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      No, they are Zinc.

      Copper-clad zinc.

      It's a good bit of fun to file off the copper in a couple of small spots on the edge of the coin and then drop them in hydrochloric acid. The acid will slowly eat the zinc, leaving you with a copper shell of a penny.

      Hmm, I wonder if the ferric chloride I have to make printed ciruits would eat the copper out of the middle of a quarter without eating the rest. I'll have to try it tonight.

    32. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      You've got Section 331 of Title 18 covered, but you failed to realize that there is a separate, new law prohibiting melting pennies and nickels, and prohibiting the exportation of them in quantities over $100. Here's a story about it. This was enacted recently exactly because the metal content of these coins is worth more than their face values.

    33. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      It's trivial to add arbitrary metals to disguise the origin.

    34. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but I get angry when every time I get change from the USPS, there is ALWAYS Canadian money mixed in

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    35. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Al_Lapalme · · Score: 1

      It's true and I never thought of it that way- but we also often use American dimes here and nobody seems to care (or even notice). I never actually tried using Canadian coins while in the US before... could be a fun experiment!

      --
      Al
    36. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by compro01 · · Score: 2

      I believe Canadian $0.01 are an alloy cheaper than copper.

      Current Canadian pennies are copper-plated steel. Until 1997 they were solid copper (like pre-1982 US pennies) and from 1997-2000 they were copper-plated zinc, like the current US pennies.

      All currently minted coins are plated steel. Nickels, dimes, quarters, and toonies are nickel-plated (Toonies have a brass-plated aluminum bronze center), and loonies are brass-plated.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    37. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The particular mix of metals is pretty much unique to pennies, so they will know exactly where the ingot came from.

      Also, who the fuck wants an ingot of zinc? I suppose the same idiots that cut copper pipe to sell for scrap would try this with pennies.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    38. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      Better yet is hold one of the copper plated US pennies (all 1983 and newer and some 1982 ones) with a long pair of pliers, then take a propane brazing torch to it. Depending on how high you have it turned up you either create zinc splatters on the ground or you end up setting the molten zing flowing out of it on fire.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    39. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      In Michigan Canadian pennies abound

    40. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I save the quarters for the DIY car wash place but the rest of the change gets dumped in the donation bin at Wendy's for the Dave Thomas Foundation. I usually only get fast food a couple of times a year so it ends up being a few fistfuls of change that I dump in there.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    41. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Informative

      People who pay with exact change make window tellers VERY grateful. Dollar bills and pennies always ran low.
      I got to the point I would also make piles of change ready for future cars, assuming they would pay entirely in bills. Such a time saver...

      The catch is, if you do NOT have your exact change ready, don't dig for it. Just don't. I can break that $20 faster than you can dig out that quarter.

    42. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      They're constantly having to break open new rolls of coins to re-fill the register drawers with otherwise.

      Oh yeah - and what a burden that is.

    43. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Megane · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't drop a few dozen pennies on them at the end of their shift and make them have to count them when they turn in the till.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    44. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Volante3192 · · Score: 0

      When they have their exact change ready, yes. They are the BEST.

      Ironically, those that are the worst are those, "Oh! I've got a dime around...here..." *rummages for a minute*. Unless you can get that coin in under 5 seconds, don't bother. We can make change for whatever you give us in that length of time. I'd rather break an even $20 on a $5.51 bill than have you dig for a penny if it takes you that long.

    45. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by tirerim · · Score: 1

      I grew up in northern New York, twenty miles from the border -- we always used to mix Canadian pennies in, too, even when the Canadian dollar was worth about $0.65 USD. Now that the currencies are so close to parity it matters even less.

    46. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by tirerim · · Score: 1

      Also pretty trivial to separate out the copper from the zinc, since zinc has a much lower melting point.

    47. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Krokus · · Score: 2

      It didn't use to be illegal. That law was a response to people melting them down because the copper was worth more than the penny. A more rational response would have been to just ditch the penny at that point. There are other good reasons to get rid of it.

    48. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by asher09 · · Score: 1

      They should use aluminum like the Japanese 1 yen coin (which is worth about 1 cent US). I bet the metal would be worth less than 1 cent for sure.

      --
      Some were yelling one thing, some another. Most of them had no idea what was going on or why they were there. Acts19:32
    49. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you take your Canadian pennies to the US to melt down, and your America pennies to Canada to melt down, are you breaking the law?

    50. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, it remembers me this time I was in Kingston, NY and paid the guy using among other change pieces a Canadian penny, because in Canada we are always using indistinctly US and CDN pennies. The guy did notice it and told me with a frown face throwing my CDN penny on the counter: "Could you give me a regular penny?" Like I was a burglar or trying to make me rich using false money.

      with exchange rates (canadian used to be less than usd), and enough canadian coins, the business could lose money. More likely closer to canada...

    51. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by operagost · · Score: 1

      But even the Zinc is worth more than the face value of a penny.

      No, it's not. It's worth something like .8 cents. But it costs 1.5 cents to make the penny.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    52. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by operagost · · Score: 2

      Ex-cashier here. Yes, it is, when you're busy.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    53. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not if they give those coins back with the change (as it usually happens in Canada). Most of the time people don't even notice the difference, so it just keeps circulating.

    54. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also trivial to determine an ingot is exactly identical to that of a pile of pennies, with X added. Unless you have random piles of pure zinc, steel, nickle, or copper to throw off the the entire alloy completely of course.

      And for all your work and effort, you might eventually find someone who might pay $20 for all of it. WOOH! RICH!

    55. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by gnick · · Score: 2

      One of my favorites is to nick one side slightly and toss it in some hydrochloric acid (or muriatic acid off the shelf at the hardware/janitorial supply store). The copper stays intact, but the acid will eat away the zinc. What you have once you rinse it off is a paper-thin penny shell.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    56. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Interesting that it doesn't state that it replaces the prior law, I guess we get to choose which law we follow?

      You can always choose which law you follow. And they can always choose which law they enforce. Your answer is irrelevant to them, and they choose "both".

      The melting law adds criminal acts above the previous "defacement" law, so I would assume both would be still in force.

      The melting law does allow "amusement". As:

      (b) The prohibition contained in  82.1 against the treatment of 5-cent coins and one-cent coins shall not apply to the treatment of these coins for educational, amusement, novelty, jewelry, and similar purposes as long as the volumes treated and the nature of the treatment makes it clear that such treatment is not intended as a means by which to profit solely from the value of the metal content of the coins.

    57. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I could never get it through to her that they would cost me more in time to deal with than the pennies themselves are even worth.

      Really? Because all I do is just throw them in a big jar, then every once a while dump the whole jar into a Coinstar machine. Those pennies add up bro.

    58. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Kenshin · · Score: 2

      That happened to me in NYC. I bought something and made my payment, which included a Canadian penny, and the woman behind the counter had this expression on her face like I'd just dropped a dead rat on the counter. She asked me for a US penny, with a voice full of contempt.

      Wow. I almost cost you $0.0001. Sorry 'bout that.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    59. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could convert $10,000 into pennies, then melt down the pennies and turn that into $10,000 worth of zinc, and $8,000 worth of copper. Suddenly it's not exactly a waste of time now is it.

    60. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by geekoid · · Score: 1

      1 ten thousandth of a dollar? You do know the pennies are 1 one hundredth of a dollar, don't you?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    61. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Assuming, of course, that you keep the metals together. From what I gather, pennies are copper clad zinc rather than an alloy.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    62. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because they don't want to be paid for the extra 12 seconds of counting it will take?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    63. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by joocemann · · Score: 2

      The vast majority of americans do not want the penny. Metal lobbies keep them in circulation (polsci 101).

      Consider the man hours wasted among all citizens, across the span of a year, dealing with pennies at the register, at the bank, and in your pockets (aka waste).

      HERE HERE!

    64. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      They should use aluminum like the Japanese 1 yen coin (which is worth about 1 cent US).

      Uh, No.

      Unless you're talking about the value of the metals used to make the coin, in which case I rescind my criticism.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    65. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Yep. Though it is also illegal to melt down pennies for their metals anyway.

      As the old adage goes, it's only illegal if you get caught.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    66. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need to do in America is get rid of the dime, then make the penny smaller. Why is the penny so fucking big compared to the dime? Then we would increase (in value and size) from .01 to .05 to .25 to 1.00. Maybe then the dollar coin would take off?

      I also suggest getting rid of the $10 and $50 bills. Then we would have the $1, $5, $20, and $100. ATMs should be stocked with $20 and $100. So that when I get $200 I am not carrying around a 10 $20 bills. We can keep the $50 if more places would accept the fucking things.

    67. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by asher09 · · Score: 1

      I still don't get what you're saying no to... your link says 1 US cent is worth 0.83 yen, which I rounded to say 1 yen is worth about 1 cent. Are you saying I rounded up too much?

      --
      Some were yelling one thing, some another. Most of them had no idea what was going on or why they were there. Acts19:32
    68. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Just think, if he had taken your penny, he'd be slightly richer now.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    69. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected; forget I said anything.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    70. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant the US dollar difference between a US penny and a Canada penny.

    71. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by willy_me · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1 ten thousandth of a dollar? You do know the pennies are 1 one hundredth of a dollar, don't you?

      The difference between American and Canadian pennies is 1/100 of a cent - or 1/10000 or a dollar wich is 0.0001.

      Of course the real cost to an American retailer is the need to sort and exchange the Canadian coins. Sounds like a real pain in the ass so I can see why they would be annoyed. It's not that you're stealing from them, you're just making their job harder.

    72. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by arse+maker · · Score: 2

      We dumped the 1c and 2c coin about 20 years ago in Australia. Its hard to imagine having that crap in my pocket anymore. I cant be bothered carrying 5c coins as it is! Its just a waste of weight, You try buying something normal with 5c coins!

      Its hard even paying with 10c coins. 20c is about the limit.

    73. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if you separate the metals?

    74. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by mister2au · · Score: 0

      I think for the purpose of comparing coin denominations, 1.2 cents is about 1 cent !

    75. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by DMFNR · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you have a bank account, so why don't you take your change there instead of dropping it in the Coinstar machine and letting them rape you? I know it's "only" 8.5% (at least in my area), but with a decent amount of change that can really add up, and most banks will count change free for account holders in my experience.

    76. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost to manufacture a unit of money isn't as relevant to it's face value as it first appears. Every time the coin or paper money is used in a transaction, it creates wealth, because transactions by themselves create wealth. So you can have a coin that costs more than it's face value and still cover the cost of it's manufacture by creating more wealth in the nation that exceeds both the face value and the cost to make the unit of currency.

      Where this breaks down is when the coin or paper money is no longer used or rarely used in transactions. The penny is a great example of this. In Canada and I would be surprised if it were not the case in the US, people take pennies out of circulation by throwing them in a jar somewhere, instead of using them in transactions. Each coin thus removed does represent an increasing cost to the mint, because they have to replace a working number each year to account for the "missing" coins when that coin is still used in ordinary transactions.

      Basically what happens is the mint makes pennies, distributes them to banks who move the coin into circulation. But often that involves just one transaction (getting exact amount from your bank when you cash a check, or buying something from a store who got a roll of pennies from the bank to make change) before the coin goes from pocket to a jar somewhere. So the cost now does become important.

      By the way it costs the Canadian mint 3.5c to make a penny today, and this is a lower figure since they were changed from pure copper or 98% copper only recently (1997). This figure is bandied about during the announcement, because consumers automatically think it's saving money to eliminate the coin based on the difference between face value and manufacturing cost, so it reduces resistance to the change, which is the goal.

      A somewhat more dubious claim is also being promoted by the Bank of Canada with the introduction of the polymer notes. The $100 has been around for a few months and the $50 was just introduced. They claim they are "Greener" than "paper and cotton" bills. They don't mention that the "paper" used in Canadian notes is made from flax straw, a waste product of agriculture. Nor do they mention that the new bills are made from oil, not organic material. In other words, they're selling the pre-ordained change to the public, plain and simple.

    77. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Why would you get angry? It's a penny - who cares?

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    78. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by icebike · · Score: 1

      More interesting is that it only affects pennies and nickles. Probably the only coin worth less than the metal of which they are made.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    79. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Was the guy behind the counter tall, skinny, with a big glare and tapping the counter? I think I've seen him before...

      Tap tap, penny, tap tap, penny, tap tap, penny, tap tap, penny.

    80. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      And ironically, your Canadian penny was worth 1.01 US cents.

    81. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      In Canada, we've typically taken US change at par - the coins are the same size and roughly the same weight. If you don't want them, spend them the next time you spend change - people will take them.

      Given that Canadian dollars are worth the same as US, more or less (more right now), it makes sense for Americans to take Canadian change without worrying about it, especially in border regions.

      I tend to keep all the US change I get and take it back to the US on my trips, but people would take it here without problem.

    82. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you not follow both? A new law doesn't have to replace another law.

    83. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by thereitis · · Score: 1

      I always wondered about those "souvenir penny" machines that squish a penny and imprint it with something else.

    84. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      What about the required equipment? Energy required to melt the pennies?

    85. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      A quick trip to the Sun will take care of the energy requirements to melt all those coins, for free!

    86. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Back in the '60s my Canadian wife and I kept a home in Texas, an apartment in Manhattan, and an apartment in St.Johns, NFLD. One morning, after arriving in St.Johns (hardly a border town) the night before I went to the local store to buy some milk. I hadn't yet been to the bank, and still had only US funds. Not only was the storekeeper happy to take it, but she had a chart (probably not really up-to-date, but who cared) for conversion, and offered me change either in US funds or Canadian. I accepted Canadian, and went to the bank to get some Canadian money later.

    87. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Flights to the sun are free?

    88. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I live in New York, fairly close to the Canadian border, and Canadian small change gets mixed in without incident.
      When I was searching penny rolls, about 2% of them were Canadian. 5c,10c,25c and $1 show up sometimes too.
      I remember a Canadian nickel getting rejected when I was in the DC area.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    89. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      or at least making the change an even dollar amount - say $20.51 for a $8.51 total. $12 is easier than $20-$8.51=$11.49

      also in the supplying cashiers with change department: when I have extra small bills, I give the cashier $20 worth for a $20

      this also keeps you from accumulating too much of the small stuff.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    90. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In Minnesota they aboond.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    91. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing that out. None of us had actually grokked that he was referring to the difference between a US cent and a Can-eh-dian one.

      We all thought he was stupid, or he had his autorepeat set far too low. Or he had a stutter or something.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    92. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      It isn't "just a penny". It is usually a dime, a couple of pennies, and maybe a nickle. It is a significant amount of change that you receive back

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    93. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You linked an article in a newspaper. I'm referencing the actual law. btw,

      You didn't reference anything (other than the content of your own ass).

      This is referencing an actual law: US Title 18, Chapter 17, Section 331.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    94. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Interesting that it doesn't state that it replaces the prior law, I guess we get to choose which law we follow?

      It doesn't state in the law against murder that it replaces the one against robbery.

      What conclusions does your first-rate legal mind draw from that?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    95. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Must be true. After all, it's not like zinc has any other uses. Well, apart from pigments. And kitchenware. And batteries.

      I'll come in again. Second thoughts, I'll stay out - stupidity might be contagious.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    96. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the problem is.. They're basically interchangeable.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    97. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I still commonly get the pre-1982 copper ones in change. I would figure that people (myself included) would have managed to hoard them out of circulation by now, but alas there still seem to be lots of them out there.

    98. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      nonsense, what you call "copper" is always an alloy. For example, there are dozens of allowed types of "electrical copper". throw the metal from one extension cord in the mix and no one would be able to tell the origin

    99. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    100. Re:I'll own up to it...I throw them away by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I have an answer. FeCL eats the entire quarter. Bummer.

  2. In unrelated news by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    Happy Canadian April Fool's day to all my frosty friends North of the border!

    1. Re:In unrelated news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's actually true

  3. Just like in Switzerland by Wattos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here in Switzerland this is already implemented. The smallest unit is 5 Rappen (5 cents)

    1. Re:Just like in Switzerland by RodBee · · Score: 2

      It's also implemented here in Brazil, with the same smallest units, 5 centavos (also 5 cents). But here it doesn't round the prices UNLESS is for the seller's benefit. If I may offer an advice, keep your pennies, Canada, lest they use their non-existence to rip you off.

    2. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Here in Switzerland this is already implemented.

      I'm not surprised -- most countries already don't produce Canadian pennies.

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    3. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Rational · · Score: 2

      Finland also. Works well.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    4. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will ONLY apply to cash transactions. Transactions using debit/credit will be unaffected.

      So I may be atypical... but what the hell, let's take a ludicrously high number of cash transactions. I use cash maybe once a month. MAYBE.

      But what would happen if I used cash once every single day. Hell, let's say twice a day... I always buy coffee to and from work from some place and use said place to ditch my change or something.

      Now the absolute maximum they could conceivably rip me off is 4 cents a transaction. On average, it would be closer to 2, but let's take the worst case scenario that every single one of my purchases ended up as $2.41 and they always charged me 2.45.

      Even in this absolutely ludicrous, unbelievable scenario, I would be losing 365 * .04 * 2 (times a day) = $29.20. Over the course of an entire year.

      Now given that people won't be affected even remotely as much as the above example... I honestly wouldn't care even slightly if they always rounded up to the nearest nickel.

      Now, defraulding people by stealing this bit of money will most certainly be illegal. The minimal amount of free money the business gets is going to absolutely pale in comparasson to the penalty they will receive if they're caught.

      In short, non-issue that will be next to eliminated after the first few companies trying this are made examples of.

    5. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Inanna-qui-baille · · Score: 1

      Well in Switzerland, they round up to the nearest (not only to the seller's advantage) but usually the prices are already rounded. I frequently have an adjustment of the total to the nearest 5 cents increment on my phone bill.

    6. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Well in Switzerland, they round up to the nearest (not only to the seller's advantage)

      Rounding up is always to the seller's advantage. That's exactly how we should expect sellers to do things when the penny is eliminated.

    7. Re:Just like in Switzerland by registrations_suck · · Score: 2

      I use cash maybe once a month. MAYBE.

      I use cash every day. I don't have a debit/ATM card. I do have a credit card, but I only use it for "in person" transactions at gas pumps, for large purchases, and instances where I don't happen to have enough cash on me (I don't buy much, so it's not usually an issue). Generally speaking, if a transaction is under $40 or so, I'm paying with cash. Taking a look right now - my wallet has $152.....and no pennies. As an owner of a retail location - I find it really annoying that people use cards for the most minute of transactions. I mean, damn - is it expecting too much for you to pay for that $1 item with cash? On a related note - we don't keep pennies in our drawer. We don't round the transaction, nor do we give out pennies. If we "owe" someone pennies, we just ignore it. No one every says anything. We also don't accept pennies, generally speaking. If we do get a couple of them, we just toss them in the trash. Not a big fan of dollar bills either - the pennies of the currency world. Dollar coins make so much more sense. We DO stock our drawer with $2 bills, dollar coins and half dollar coins.

    8. Re:Just like in Switzerland by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Now, defraulding people by stealing this bit of money will most certainly be illegal. .

      It's not defrauding. Hey, if I say, "we don't stock pennies - you can pay with exact change or donate the difference if you like" and you choose to "overpay" by a few cents, that's your choice. I'm under no obligation to make change for you.

    9. Re:Just like in Switzerland by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Why can't I choose to under pay?

      Bottom line: if you post a price, and people can't pay it because of your policy, you are committing fraud.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Just like in Switzerland by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Not if you round up the change :)

      1-2c -> 0c. 3-4c -> 5c

      It's the world's simplest algorithm, heck even Australians can manage it in their heads.

    11. Re:Just like in Switzerland by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Fine. They'll just jack the prices all up, and you'll end up paying the same thing anyway.

    12. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bottom line: if you post a price, and people can't pay it because of your policy, you are committing fraud.

      I wish that was true, but in the US they increase the price at the register by almost 10% and blame the government for the wrong price.

    13. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Not if you round up the change :)

      If the seller has rounded the price, then the change will already be in the minimum currency unit.

      1-2c -> 0c. 3-4c -> 5c

      If you have paid someone using money that has no pennies, how would you manage to be owed 4c as change? He's rounded to a nickel, up. Anything you can pay him will be a multiple of a nickel. There will only be multiples of a nickel in change.

      He rounded the price up. There is nothing to round in the change.

      It's the world's simplest algorithm, heck even Australians can manage it in their heads.

      But not figure out when it will be applicable, it seems.

      You pay him X. X is a multiple of a nickel, because you have no pennies anymore that you can use to pay him. The price is Y. Y is a multiple of a nickel, because the seller has rounded up in a currency with no pennies. X/5 (the number of nickels) is an integer. Y/5 is an integer. The change (X/5 - Y/5) must also be an integer. You pay an integer number of nickels for a product that costs an integer number of nickels. There will be no pennies in your change to be rounded either way.

      Further, if Y is rounded UP to the next multiple of five (nickel) from the original price Z, then X - Y (your change) will be smaller than X - Z (your change using pennies) (assuming both Z and Y are positive, which they will be). You lose. Seller wins. Every time.

    14. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      Not if you round up the change :)

      1-2c -> 0c. 3-4c -> 5c

      It's the world's simplest algorithm, heck even Australians can manage it in their heads.

      That's all fine and good, but remember, this is Canada we're talking about. How many pine cones does that translate into?

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    15. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even New Zealand doesn't have pennies, and they even speak English (after a fashion).

    16. Re:Just like in Switzerland by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      If you round up the change, then obviously you don't round up the price - it's an alternative that no one would ever use hence the smily.

      The price comes to $13.32 you pay with a $20 note. Since the 5c is the smallest coin the and the seller owes you $6.68 in change they round up and pay you $6.70.

      Is that really that hard to grasp? It's essentially the inverse of the rounding up the price - the price is $13.32 since 5c is the smallest coin you get charged $13.35 and so get $6.65 change from your $20.

      The far better and just as simple system is the one I said that even Australian's can grasp (but apparently not you, thats a low bar you missed...)

    17. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... not sure if China will stop producing canadian pennies at the same time, they will probably continue until 2050 with incrementing years on them.

    18. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      At least toss them outside so poor people can pick them up.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    19. Re:Just like in Switzerland by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Why can't I choose to under pay?

      Bottom line: if you post a price, and people can't pay it because of your policy, you are committing fraud.

      You can choose to underpay. It's called "shoplifting" And your logic is flawed. 10 people could come in the store with $100 bills to buy $1 items. My policy is not to keep $1000 of change on-hand, so I could never make change for all of them. That's fraud? Please. On a similar note - if a place is "cash only" and someone can't pay because they only have a card, that's fraud? Again, no way.

    20. Re:Just like in Switzerland by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      They don't want them either.

    21. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 and a quarter, but the seeds add a half if they're all there.

    22. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      Um, I used to be poor and would feed myself off of peoples pennies. Apparently you don't know anything about poor people. Then again, someone who throws pennies, at the very least recyclable metal, into the garbage is a bit clueless about things.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    23. Re:Just like in Switzerland by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Bottom line: if you post a price, and people can't pay it because of your policy, you are committing fraud.

      Well, the precedent is already there with gas stations their stupid $x.xx9/gallon fuel prices that usually won't come out to an whole number of dollars and cents (I'm not even sure how the gas stations do the rounding, to be honest). Also, sales tax causes a similar problem, though you can certainly make the case that it's not the merchant's fault there.

    24. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The price comes to $13.32 you pay with a $20 note. Since the 5c is the smallest coin the and the seller owes you $6.68 in change they round up and pay you $6.70. Is that really that hard to grasp?

      All the people who have west-facing windows see wonderful sunrises. Realtors always push this as a feature when selling a house. Well, they would, IF THE SUN CAME UP IN THE WEST.

      The price won't come to $13.32. It will be rounded UP to $13.35. You pay with a $20, your change will be $6.65. No rounding of the change will happen. So yes, it is hard to grasp how change will be rounded when it will never happen that way.

      The far better and just as simple system is the one I said that even Australian's can grasp (but apparently not you, thats a low bar you missed...)

      Yes, it would be far better for buyers to have change rounded and not the selling price, but since it will never happen, why claim that it will? Apparently that's something that you fail to grasp.

    25. Re:Just like in Switzerland by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Rounding the change up is EXACTLY the same as rounding the price down. It's a joke on your claim that rounding up is always to the sellers advantage - you know a ludicrous case in which the claim is not true.

      And that wasn't what I said was a far batter and just as simple system and I never claimed the a round the price down system would happen. So I'm not sure what it is I'm failing to grasp...

    26. Re:Just like in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U R A troll using multiple sock puppet accts 4 trolling people http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2764185&cid=39570265

  4. My two cents on this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    is going to be rounded up to a nickel.

    1. Re:My two cents on this.. by Aladrin · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think you'll find it was rounded down to $.00. ;)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:My two cents on this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it would be rounded down to zero, making your input worthless.

    3. Re:My two cents on this.. by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, but since pennies currently cost 1.6 cents each to make, that means that his two cents would actually be worth 3.2 cents, and would thus actually really round up to a nickel.

    4. Re:My two cents on this.. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      It depends on whether he's buying or selling. Selling: rounded up. Buying: rounded down.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    5. Re:My two cents on this.. by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      But if you take it a step further...

      The nickel costs 11.18 cents to produce,[1] so we're now actually looking at a dime and a penny. According to a rather dated Business Week article[2], it costs 3 cents to make a dime. So we can now cut it back down to 4.6 cents. At this point, we round back to the nickel which drops us into a circular situation.

      1. http://news.coinupdate.com/cost-to-make-penny-and-nickel-rises-1139/
      2. http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/4.htm

    6. Re:My two cents on this.. by tecmec · · Score: 0

      Maybe your comment is going over my head, but the article actually says that cash transactions will be rounded to the nearest. Not up or down.

    7. Re:My two cents on this.. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      It was a general comment on individual greed; i.e. "people will systematically overvalue their own money and undervalue others."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    8. Re:My two cents on this.. by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

      It was a general comment on individual greed; i.e. "people will systematically overvalue their own money and undervalue others."

      Change the word money to opinion in your reply and you'll be more in the spirit of the [humorous] subthread.

      Husband gives his "two cent's worth"--rounds it up to a nickel. Wife rounds it down to zero. Appearance in divorce court ensues ...

      --
      Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
    9. Re:My two cents on this.. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Can't disagree. Nice catch! We'll call that a nickel right there.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    10. Re:My two cents on this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another way to raise taxes just like a cost of living increase.

      Ontario Canada lowered it's sales tax from 15% to 13% a year or so ago. But if they get rid of pennies they automatically get it back since it will be rounded to 15 cents without pennies.

    11. Re:My two cents on this.. by marka63 · · Score: 1

      Unless you sell exactly *one* item at a time you can't game this. Sell 1 coffee it's .99 (-> 1.00), 2 it's 1.98 (-> 2.00), 3 it's 2.97 (-> 2.95), 4 it's 3.96 (-> 3.95) as you do the rounding on the final balance.

  5. And So Begins by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phase II of our descent into a cashless society: the elimination of physical currency, starting with the lowest denominations and working up from there.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to my secret bunker, as I believe I hear the Hyperbole Police coming up the stairs. *dons tinfoil hat* Excelsior!!!

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:And So Begins by Volante3192 · · Score: 2

      Phase II started over 150 years ago, then, when the half-cent was kicked to the curb.

    2. Re:And So Begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Europe we have 1 cent, 2 cents, 5 cents, 10 cents, 20 cents and 50 cents coins.
      Way to go to eliminate all the 1 cent coins.

    3. Re:And So Begins by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Apparently the buying power of the half-cent coin when it was discontinued was greater than the current buying power of the dime. Perhaps it's time to ditch everything lower than a quarter.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:And So Begins by Teun · · Score: 2
      1 and 2 cent (euro) coins have never been minted or distributed in Finland and in The Netherlands they are hardly ever used, we round 7 cents off to 5 and 8 cents to 10.

      When you as most people pay by debit card the price is still charged to the cent.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    5. Re:And So Begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can always substitute ammo for cash. No worries.

    6. Re:And So Begins by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Honestly? I'd be OK with that. No chance in hell it'd happen though, so I'll settle for killing the penny and reformulating the nickel.

    7. Re:And So Begins by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a bullet is $4.96. So what does that actually cost?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:And So Begins by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I consider it an ascent, not a descent.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:And So Begins by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I consider it an ascent, not a descent.

      Uh, good for you...

      Want a biscuit or something? Perhaps I could interest you in a slightly used sense of humor?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:And So Begins by Xanny · · Score: 1

      I'd rather us just do a great currency conversion, and make the lowest denomination a whole dollar. That might not be fine grained enough now, but in a decade of the increasing inflation we will be getting, that will quickly level out.

      More importantly, we could just all around eliminate cents at once. Would be a great switch over. We could print $1, $5, $10, and 20% coins, and have bills for $50 and $100. We wouldn't need a higher currency because any large purchase is already done via credit or check, and checks are going as fast as traditional currencies are.

    11. Re:And So Begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually want the government to have more power over you than they already have? I'm inclined to believe that you haven't thought of the consequences of this yet.

    12. Re:And So Begins by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's working from both ways. The largest denomination, $100, is worth less and less as time progresses. And furthermore, having enough cash on hand to buy a decent used car is now considered suspicious by the police.

  6. That's OK by aclarke · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's OK. We'll just continue to use American pennies. Thanks, guys!

    1. Re:That's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness. Maybe this means no more Canadian pennies given to me as change when I rarely do cash transactions at stores. Although, I'm apt to check and refuse the Canadian pennies if that happens.

      I don't know about Canada, but I hope they don't stop pennies completely here in America. That isn't to say we should keep minting them at the current rate. Just drop the rate.

      Maybe it's time we should make 2 or 3 cent coins?

    2. Re:That's OK by c++0xFF · · Score: 4, Funny

      And American retailers will continue to accept your funny-looking pennies with some lady on them. I had one cashier remark how they're always changing the coins, and how it must be Lincoln's wife.

    3. Re:That's OK by Megane · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest Canadian Tire money, but according to Wikipedia, the smallest is currently 5 cents.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  7. Love It - even though I'm cynical about the intent by i_ate_god · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new federal budget included a lot of nasties. As much as I'm glad to see the penny go away, I can't help but think it's a ploy by the conservatives to deflect attention away from all the nasties they included in the budget.

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  8. It'll save $11 million a year? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That seems like a lot of inconvenience to go through for such a tiny return.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by residieu · · Score: 1

      Carrying around a penny seems like a lot of inconvenience for 1 cent.

    2. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      especially since each coin stays in circulation for up to 30 years (last paragraph of the article).

    3. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      Well the inconvenience is decidedly temporary, whereas the savings are eternal.

    4. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by dittbub · · Score: 1

      But in 30 years time the penny will probably cost even more to produce.

    5. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Oh please. When was the last 1980s penny you've seen? That's referring to dollar coins specifically.

      (As if to mock me, the two coins in my wallet are a 1983 quarter and a 1985 dime. No pennies though!)

    6. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by MalHavoc · · Score: 1

      By 'circulation', you probably mean that pennies sit in mason jars or under couch cushions for 30 years.

      I really wish we'd just do everything electronically. I hardly ever have physical cash on me. Everything here takes debit, CC, or some other form of electronic transaction, even our buses. Looking forward to not seeing the penny any more.

    7. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a 1974 penny and a 1983 penny in my wallet right now (completely random) as well as a scattering of other coins that range across from the 80s to last year.

    8. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems like a lot of inconvenience to go through for such a tiny return.

      It will end up costing the taxpayers *far* more -- as consumers.

      Businesses won't mind rounding up, but aren't going to go for rounding down. So they'll raise prices by an average of 2-1/2 cents on everything.

      You won't notice that the new system is costing more because it will be spread so thin. But then, the $11 million was spread really thin too.

    9. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      That seems like a lot of inconvenience to go through for such a tiny return.

      OK, then mothball this for another decade...is $110 million enough justification for you, or should we make it two decades and $220 million? Of course, this is assuming that precious metal and manufacturing costs will not increase in the next 20 years, which would be a pretty sillly assumption to make.

      When discussing the elimination of a process that has literally been going on for generations, it's best to look at the aggregate impact.

    10. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      I wish I could handle all my money with the swipe of a card too, but that would mean sacrificing all anonymity of transactions (you think any government is going to allow yet another form of payment that can be laundered?), so I'll gladly continue to handle annoying, stinky physical money.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    11. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's just the cost to produce those pennies. I saw another article which was estimating that the "cost" of dealing with pennies to the Canadian economy and Canadians in general to be over 100 million per year.

    12. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the Costcos in SoCal are cash-only and had 3 lines 10+ people deep when I went there yesterday afternoon. Cash currency is still good somewhere!

    13. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Actually, I got an dove penny in my change yesterday. Those things were circulated for Canada's centennial, in 1967. That's 45 years in circulation.

      I suspect that merchants will adjust their pricing to remove the pennies from the pricing, and that they will probably end up increasing their prices to counter the increased merchant fees they will be paying with more customers paying with plastic. In the end, I think this move will cost the economy far more than $11m.

    14. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      As I type this, I have a 1976 and a 1967 penny in my wallet.

    15. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Lithdren · · Score: 1

      The other day I got a 1951 Canadian Penny as change. Im in Wisconsin, USA.

    16. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the Costcos in SoCal are cash-only

      Not all of them. In fact not any of them that I've been to, I always use my card.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    17. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just found a 1942 D penny in my desk drawer, thx for getting me to look.

    18. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by residieu · · Score: 1

      I've got a '71 penny in my drawer, several 80s ones too.

      I'd expect a dollar coin to last much longer than 30 years, sitting in a warehouse.

    19. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I just happened to have 15 pennies in the change mug on my desk. 5 were older than 1980. 64,64,74,75,79.

      What odd is that several of the ones from 199* look crappier.

    20. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by melted+keyboard · · Score: 1

      Also one must consider the cost of transporting pennies, and the increasing cost of energy.

    21. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 1943 penny on my desk now.

      it looks sad...

    22. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple months ago I received a 1902 US penny from Taco Bell. Taco Bell!!!

    23. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if there is an organization with the power to keep information from the government, it would be the banks.

    24. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pulled 8 pennies out of my pocket. 2 from the 80s, 3 from the 90s.

      And a nickel from the 60s. These things last.

    25. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

      I vote that we balance the extra cost by laying off $220 million worth of politicians, starting with central bankers, finance ministers, the PM, and anyone else responsible for the monetary debasement that put us in this situation.

    26. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      As long as it is regular people absorbing the cost then it is a win for the conservatives. Pro-business, remember as a successful business will always share their profits [gr]

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    27. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Shit, just give them a pay and pension decrease. They can happily have a policy of average people having decreasing wages (figuring in inflation) but they deserve regular wage increases as well as their golden pension that kicks in after 6 years IIRC.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to go to the gym more.

    29. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a collection of pennies at work and checked out the older-looking ones to find one 1961 and one 1963 penny, along with several from the eighties. I also come across a wheat penny every decade or so, and production of those stopped in the late fifties.

    30. Re:It'll save $11 million a year? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What odd is that several of the ones from 199* look crappier.

      It's not really that odd. Zinc is a pretty reactive metal, which means that once the thin copper layer on the post 1982 coins gets compromised the coin tends to break down pretty fast. And there is also the whole thing with the mint continually lowering the relief of the coins (this makes the dies last longer which lowers the cost of minting the coins), to the point now where new coins are almost completely flat.

  9. Cheap Source of Copper by BennyB2k4 · · Score: 1

    Pre-1996 Canadian pennies are 99% copper. Last I checked, the ones I'm saving (hoarding?) are worth 3.6c each.

  10. It begins.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    First the penny. Then the nickel. Then the dime. Then the quarter. Then the loonie. Then the twonie. Everything will eventually be in $5 increments.

    1. Re:It begins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the nickel costs less to make than its worth.

    2. Re:It begins.... by residieu · · Score: 1

      Lucky Canadians. The US nickel costs more than 9 cents to mint, making it even worse than our 1-cent coin.

    3. Re:It begins.... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Blame the Fed and other central banks for constantly increasing the money supply. The lowly penny has lost 97% of its value since 1920 (hence why it's now worth less than the cost of making it). Your grandparents' SAVINGS have lost 97% of their value since 1920.

      And continue to lose value by about 3% per year. It's a hidden tax on your accumulated cash wealth. Time to End the fed and/or affix the dollar value to a fixed standard (like precious metal or land) that the Fed cannot alter. Cannot devalue.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:It begins.... by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Shrug. We've already ditched $1 and $2 bills in favour of coins, and ditched 25 cent bills entirely. We've survived.

      ...laura

    5. Re:It begins.... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, no it does not. The dime is currently the lowest denomination that, so far, costs less than its face value to produce. It costs roughly 7 cents to make a nickel (and only 4 cents to make a dime). For what it's worth, right now, quarters cost ten cents to produce, loonies about 15 cents, and twonies about 30 cents.

      But coins are insanely expensive compared to bills. Printed paper bills cost about 10 cents each. The newer plastic bills that Canada has started to use cost about 19 cents to manufacture, but last more almost 3 times as long (the plastic can also be reused to print other bills later, so the cost on the polymer bills will probably drop over time, although it probably will not ever be as cheap as the paper ones are).

    6. Re:It begins.... by LostOne · · Score: 1

      It's not actually the central banks that are increasing the money supply. Its the *commercial* banks. You might not realize it but banks do not lend money they have on hand when they make a loan. They actually create the money they "lend" out of thin air. Thus it is *borrowing* that is increasing the money supply.

      The central banks do contribute to this by buying government bonds (thus giving loans to the governments) but the vast majority of the money supply increase comes from things like mortgages.

      It's not clear that a gold standard or similar would actually help matters. The reason for that is too complex to go into here but basically if you peg the currency to a commodity, you will either significantly limit or reverse inflation which will actually cause a complete economic collapse.

      Check out http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/ for a decent explanation. (It's UK centric but the central bank structure is the same in most countries so the basic problem is the same.)

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    7. Re:It begins.... by geekmux · · Score: 2

      First the penny. Then the nickel. Then the dime. Then the quarter. Then the loonie. Then the twonie. Everything will eventually be in $5 increments.

      Calm down. It's taken 100 years for anyone to even propose the elimination of the most pointless of those coins. We won't have to legislate the removal of the others. At this rate of legislation, we'll run out of metal to make them first.

    8. Re:It begins.... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Where is your info from? I couldn't find anything about coin manufacturing costs in the RCM's annual report.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    9. Re:It begins.... by prgrmr · · Score: 2

      The Federal Reserve bank in the US measures the money supply using two formulas, neither of which include your "money from nothing" premise about lending: http://www.ny.frb.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed49.html As banks lend money, particularly the so-called "signature loans" (credit cards and other unsecured loans), they have to increase their cash-on-hand under minimum capitalization regulations by a corresponding percentage as well, and that only comes from operating capital, not thin air.

      As far as inflation goes, a gold standard would certainly help, but would not address every motive in capitalistic economy that drives inflation, i.e., the rise in cost to the consumer for goods and services. The fact is there is no single solution that does that. The US economy was on a gold standard until 1972, and the reasons it was suspended had more to do with competing with other countries than with the domestic economy, and being on the gold standard did not result in "economic collapse".

      Your assumptions about the UK banking system being applicable elsewhere are not entirely true either. While there are international standards on minimum capitalization, the US has additional standards in place, and while these standards appear shockingly low to the average person (6% and 10% respectively), they are sufficient to monetize an bank in a way that encourages it to operate in a risk-averse manner in both the short- and long-term. And the US Fed works differently than the Bank of England, as the US Fed is a private corporation, not an arm of the federal government.

    10. Re:It begins.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I remember reading it in an article when they were first announcing the new polymer bills. I don't recall the exact source. For some reason, the prices to manufacture each denomination stuck with me. I tried googling it just now, but couldn't find where I saw it. Sorry.

    11. Re:It begins.... by LostOne · · Score: 2

      I should have been more clear. The money from nothing is not a premise. It's a fact of fractional reserve banking which pretty much every country practices. Let's take a 10% reserve requirement - that means a bank with $1 in acceptable assets (varies some by jurisdiction) can "lend" $9. How is that not creating $8 out of nothing? Assuming they do "lend" that $9, that means for $1 in real money (federal reserve notes (cash) or deposits at the federal reserve in this case), there is an additional $8 in circulation (electronically usually). That means the real *usable* money supply is considerably more than the total cash in circulation. (I haven't shown the math but it's relatively easy to work out.)

      Every country that does fractional reserve has a similar situation, regardless of local regulations or specific structure. Thus, United States, Canada, United Kingdom, etc., which all have quite different specific rules, still have the same problem with money being created by bank lending.

      Incidentally, fractional reserve lending is exactly the same thing as renting a house to three different parties simultaneously except fractional reserve lending is legal and renting the house three times is fraud. In both cases, the same object is being let to different parties at the same time. It's clearly ridiculous to do so with physical objects so why is is okay with money? (And before you pounce, I am *well* aware of the way economics works and the history and reasons for fractional reserve. I still don't agree with it.)

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    12. Re:It begins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But coins are insanely expensive compared to bills.

      You're not taking into account that coins have a significantly longer life-span than bills. I don't have a source, but I remember reading that the 1 USD bill costs the government a great amount of money since they circulate a lot, whereas coins would last much longer and thus cost much less in the long run.

    13. Re:It begins.... by prgrmr · · Score: 1

      Your analogy is bogus. Fraud is fraud because it is intentionally dishonest and deprives a party of value. Fractional lending is sustainable because one, there's an actual exchange of value; and two, the majority of those obtaining the loans are faithful about paying them back under the terms of the loan, so you are willfully neglecting to include the on-going cash flow. If your argument is really that modern banking at the national level is a house of cards, then either limit the number of banks (i.e., the corporations, not the physical offices), increase the minimum capitalization requirements, or both. But let's not toss the baby out with the bathwater.

      And again, at no point is there any "missing money" in the process. For a signature loan like a credit card, the bank pays on the cardholders behalf, so whatever purchase the cardholder makes is paid for out of the banks' aggregate operating revenue (meaning all transactions to any one other bank are aggregated between the parties and only the net difference actually changes hands). The balance is the "risk" that the bank carries, and presumably responsibly so based against the creditworthiness of the cardholder. For long term secured loans, the bank owns the asset until the loan is cleared, so there's no missing value here either. So where is the money being "created"?

      The problem you have in the UK is that the banks that can issue the money are also commercial lenders. Not so in the US, where the Federal Reserve Bank only deals with the government and the banks, not individuals or commercial entities like corporations, and only the Fed prints the money.

      You also seem to be missing the point that, while money = value, there is more to value than just money. The currency is just a token, and the electronic money just a tally. The real value is in assets and accumulated value through investments, commercial transactions and gainful employment, as *represented* in money. The notion that there needs to be a physical unit of currency for each expression of value (or nearly so), is to limit the economy to the possibilities of the physical travel of the currency; and today's global economy is proof-positive that that viewpoint is neither advantageous nor necessary.

    14. Re:It begins.... by camperdave · · Score: 1
      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:It begins.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      We went off the 'Gold exchange standard' in 1972, we were already off the gold standard.

      When you see someone post 'we went of the gold standard in 1972' rant, it's a good clue that don't actual know what they are talking about. They wont understand the gilded cage(gold standard)) they won't understand how doing so means other countries can exchange currency for gold and impact the US dollar negativity, like the French did(Gold Exchange Standard).

      Gold standard would cripple us.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:It begins.... by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's far far worse. That $8 doesn't come out of nothing, it comes out of EVERYBODY's pockets in the form of inflation. That is, they swipe it from little kid's piggy banks and old lady's mattresses and make it their own. Naturally, they expect the interest to accrue to themselves alone.

    17. Re:It begins.... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Your first premise is wrong. The bank can't lend $9 on $1 in deposits - assets and liabilities have to come out even - it can lend $9 on $10 in deposits.

    18. Re:It begins.... by LostOne · · Score: 1

      Actually, it can. Let's use the $10 example. The bank lends $9 on the $10, which ends up deposited. Now the bank has $9 more in deposits of which it can now lend 90% ($8.10) which gets deposited. Now it can lend 90% of that $8.10 which gets deposited and then it can lend 90% of that, and so on. After the second iteration, the bank has lent $17.10 on the original $10 deposit. That is a convergent exponential series with a limit of about $90. Of course, if the first loan were taken in cash, there could be no further loan (no further deposit) so the practical limit is less than that since any amount withdrawn reduces the reserve. Also, I've assumed exactly one bank in the system but it works the same whether there is one bank or one hundred banks.

      That repetetive process is that part that is glossed over when fractional reserve is explained. The multiplication effect is quite significant when reserves start to get down into the single digit percents.

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    19. Re:It begins.... by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      But since the little kid's parents have on average over $10k in debt, and the little kid has less then a pittance to that amount... does it matter?

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    20. Re:It begins.... by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Aren't you glad that they don't melt down and re-stamp all the coins each time they trade hands...

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    21. Re:It begins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you have noticed, the dime is the only coin for which shape is smaller that its lower denomination (still talking about Canadian coins). If the dime and nickel switch sizes, than only the penny is not worth producing.

  11. DST by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now all they need to do is get rid of daylight saving time and they will REALLY make the US look silly... come on fed, the Canadians are making us look like idiots here.... THEY can get rid of pennies....

    1. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now all they need to do is get rid of daylight saving time and they will REALLY make the US look silly

      If you believe daylight savings time is the only thing keeping the US from looking silly, you're sadly mistaken.

    2. Re:DST by dwye · · Score: 1

      > come on fed, the Canadians

      That is the Department of the Mint's problem, not the Fed. DST is someone else's problem entirely, at least partially each state's (ask Arizona or Hawaii, or once upon a time, Indiana about that).

    3. Re:DST by VGPowerlord · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think he was implying that daylight saving time was one of the reasons Canada looks silly (just like the US) and eliminating daylight saving time would make them look less silly.

      No, all I need to make the US look silly are bunches of 3-letter acronyms: DHS and TSA to name two.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    4. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hearby proclaim DST to mean whatever I want it to mean! -- King George V

    5. Re:DST by psyque · · Score: 1

      Damn, I wish I had mod points for that one. Never have any when I need them.

    6. Re:DST by dittbub · · Score: 1

      we canadians can also colour our bills and make them plastic

    7. Re:DST by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      Yes, because modding ACs is so very helpful.

    8. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, you have to list more than 2 of the useless and silly organizations with three letters...DHS, TSA, FBI, NSA, CIA, DMV, DOL (those last two are state agencies, but still silly and useless!), ATF...can anyone think of more?

    9. Re:DST by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I do like living in Saskatchewan... No DST, though there's a significant portion of the population that think we're backwards for not changing our clocks twice a year.

    10. Re:DST by broken_chaos · · Score: 1

      We do have Saskatchewan. They've not used daylight savings time anywhere in the province for about forty years.

    11. Re:DST by asylumx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      come on fed, the Canadians are making us look like idiots here....

      I believe the folks in Washington DC are already working very hard at this.

    12. Re:DST by Hatta · · Score: 1

      DEA.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:DST by asavage · · Score: 0

      Daylight savings is more important the further north you are. I would much rather have light at 9pm than 4am in the summer.

    14. Re:DST by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Just like we use colorful objects to teach children.

      You do know that if you can read numbers, the color can be the same, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:DST by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      ...the Canadians are making us look like idiots here....

      We don't need Canadians for that, doin' a fine job on our own.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re:DST by Maow · · Score: 2

      I think he was implying that daylight saving time was one of the reasons Canada looks silly (just like the US) and eliminating daylight saving time would make them look less silly.

      No, all I need to make the US look silly are bunches of 3-letter acronyms: DHS and TSA to name two.

      As a non-American, you forgot the biggest fools having a 3 letter acronym: GOP.

    17. Re:DST by dittbub · · Score: 1

      bills are not like books. theres no label on the side. its much faster, simpler, convenient to open your wallet and reach for the coloured bill you want instead of sifting through and finding the one you want. so i simply ask: why NOT colour the bills?

    18. Re:DST by dittbub · · Score: 1

      we think you're backwards for loads of other reasons.

    19. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To point is to make the message more visible, whoever said it doesn't matter in the slightest.

    20. Re:DST by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      But the point is: you won't be able to use DST.

  12. About time! by Pope · · Score: 1

    This should have been done 10 years ago. I don't hoard my change, I always keep it in my wallet and spend it as I go, often clearing it out completely every 2 months or so. This is probably the only thing Harper's done right since he got into office.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  13. Good idea, take it further by spook+brat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I was deployed to Iraq in '05 the smallest unit of change the PX would give was $0.25, and we all got by with that just fine. When the smallest coin a bubble gum machine will accept is a quarter there's no need for even my children to want any denomination smaller than that. The cost of manufacturing pennies, nickels, and dimes isn't worth the benefit. Add the cost banks and vendors incur in transporting these too-heavy-for-their-worth slabs of metal to the cost of their original manufacture and it's clearly a drain on the economy.

    --
    Travel the Galaxy! Meet fascinating life forms... ...and kill them - http://schlockmercenary.com
  14. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything about this site, blame the conservatives but on here we have closed minds.

  15. Happened in Brazil too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some years ago it also happened in Brazil, the smallest coin now is the 5 cent.
    At the time, the government alleged that it was more expensive to make it than it was worth, it was copper but I'm not sure if it was mixed with some other alloy. Before that it was stainless steel. I still have a jar full of it somewhere as a door stopper...

  16. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the deficit is still going to grow. It feels like the 80s, with the Tories. I don't know how the conservatives do it, but cut, cut, cut and still they grow the deficit. The liberals were able to weather the dotcom crash without deficit. Right now, these guys have just about undone all the work of the grits on the fiscal side of things. Cutting, cutting, cutting. I'd like to know where their money goes.

  17. Is there anything wrong with that? by spook+brat · · Score: 2

    I think it's time our governments admitted that inflation over the past 20 years has made the penny worthless. We've long since abandoned the half penny, and good riddance. In 100 years it may be time to have $5 be the smallest unit. 3rd world countries deal with this on a regular basis, I think its just 1st world pride that's keeping us from following their example when it's obviously far past time.

    --
    Travel the Galaxy! Meet fascinating life forms... ...and kill them - http://schlockmercenary.com
    1. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it's worthless, why are electronic transactions going to continue to be done to the penny?

    2. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with pride. It is a bunch of curmudgeons in Congress too chicken sh*t to tell people to just round up. I think there is also a contingent that are of the opinion that rounding will lead to wide spread inflation.

    3. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      "20 years"?

      Try "from time eternal." Inflation is a consequence of a perpetually growing economy. In of itself it's not a good thing or a bad thing. As long as other factors keep up, it just is. The US ditched the useless half-cent 150 years ago and we didn't devolve into an anarchistic Thunderdome... We'd survive losing the penny.

    4. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      Why is gasoline still advertised at x&9/10/gallon?

      The penny will stay as long as the president is from the Land of Lincoln.

    5. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because for a electronic transaction it costs nothing to use a penny. For a cash transaction pennies cost space, time, and weight. Accumulating a million electronic pennies costs you nothing, however, to accumulate a million real pennies would not be so easy and it would _cost_ you money to convert those pennies into larger denomination currency.

    6. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well inflation isn't a consequence of a perpetually growing economy, it is a consequence of a perpetually growing money supply when the number of goods and services can't keep up. This is a problem created by central banks (or if your country doesn't have one then the government's treasury directly). Mild inflation is generally considered good from a government's perspective as it means they can spend money today and pay it back with money that is worth less later. From an individual's perspective the mild inflation slowly eats away a persons savings unless they can receive a return greater than the rate of inflation. Rampant inflation is just bad all around, just ask Zimbabwe. Deflation has similar issues but the roles tend to be reversed.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by spook+brat · · Score: 2

      "20 years"?

      Try "from time eternal." Inflation is a consequence of a perpetually growing economy.

      True. I only used 20 years because that's the last time I remember being able to buy something for a penny. I used to be able to buy penny candies at the convenience store; about 20 years ago the price went up to a nickel. Over my lifetime I've watched gumball machines gradually abandon pennies, then nickels, now dimes. Most coin-op vending machines charge at least $0.25 for a gumball, many require $0.50 (two quarters). That's been my metric for the utility of a coin - if I can't buy a gumball with it, it's worthless.

      In of itself it's not a good thing or a bad thing. As long as other factors keep up, it just is. The US ditched the useless half-cent 150 years ago and we didn't devolve into an anarchistic Thunderdome... We'd survive losing the penny.

      I agree completely. I think you perfectly restated exactly what I wanted to say.

      I love this thread; my favorite way to finish an argument is to tell the other person we've got no point of disagreement =)

      --
      Travel the Galaxy! Meet fascinating life forms... ...and kill them - http://schlockmercenary.com
    8. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      they are not worthless. For 100 of them you can get a dollar burger.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      except today the dollar is a global currency. removing the cent means the price will increase for every person along the supply chain, as well is impact price of items in other countries.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that mean inflation is good for the 99% if the government is providing good value in the services the population use? And bad for the people sitting on large amounts of real currency. If you are holding onto money, you need to invest it which means it will change hands...

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    11. Re:Is there anything wrong with that? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Rubbish.

      In the case of things that retail for considerably less than a dollar, like the penny candies, they'll just be sold in boxes of 100. If they tried to sell them for a dollar each, people would walk away.

      Businesses deal in such large quantities that it wouldn't matter. For a containerload of jeans or a tanker full of oil the difference will be just statistical noise.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by Fishchip · · Score: 2

    We still have a Liberal deficit. It's called 'Victoria-class submarines/corporate penalties for cancelling original Sea King replacements'.

  19. we do this already with euro's by pieterbos · · Score: 1

    not a big deal, in quite a ew countries of the euro-area anything under 5 cent is hardly used and everything is rounded to 5 cents. Works fine...

  20. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hookers, blow, and maple syrup?

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  21. How American. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Noncash payments such as checks and credit cards will continue to be settled by the cent, however.

    Us Canuckistanians tend to use debit for anything more than a few bucks. Timmies already makes sure their prices come out to a nice even number.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:How American. by Pope · · Score: 1

      What? A former Medium (now Small (GRRR don't even get me started on that debacle)) in Ontario is $1.34.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  22. Good on them by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Pennies cost more to make than their worth, that can't be good for an economy or cash strapped government.
    I wonder how Canadian retailers will price things now though. Instead of pricing something at $4.99, (to psychologically make you think it's $4 not $5) will they drop the price to $4.95 and lose 4 cents on every purchase, or just mark it up to an even $5.00? And yeah, even though that little trick doesn't work on most of us, it works on enough people that they keep doing it. Or at least US retailers do, I'm not sure about Canadian ones.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Good on them by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Pennies cost more to make than their worth, that can't be good for an economy or cash strapped government.
      I wonder how Canadian retailers will price things now though. Instead of pricing something at $4.99, (to psychologically make you think it's $4 not $5) will they drop the price to $4.95 and lose 4 cents on every purchase, or just mark it up to an even $5.00? And yeah, even though that little trick doesn't work on most of us, it works on enough people that they keep doing it. Or at least US retailers do, I'm not sure about Canadian ones.

      That trick is useful too because when people ask for "under $5", if the item costs $5, it technically isn't included in the search, but a $4.99 item will.

      Anyhow, the price change would depend on the local tax rate. Here in BC where it's 12%, a $4.99 item would cost $5.59 after tax. Though they probably would price it at $4.97 for an after tax amount of $5.57, thus getting 3 cents for free. If the item was 99 cents though, they'd probably bump it to $1.01 or something to get a free couple of cents.

      And other retailers will just round up and hope the customer doesn't catch it. I mean, if it says $5.61 on the register, they'd probably demand $5.65. And throw a big fuss if you try to object.

      Yes, there are retailers that sc[au]mmy.

      Of course, I'm not sure on why people hoard pennies. I spend them constantly turning them into more convenient change. Is it because they can't do the simple math so when a price comes up like $5.81 they can only make it $6? (I'd pay $6.01 and get two dimes in return). Heck, I had a price of $9.84 and I paid $10.09 to get a quarter back. (Even if I didn't have a nickle and 4 pennies, I'd use a dime to get a penny and quarter over getting a dime/nickel/penny combo).

    2. Re:Good on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, I'm not sure on why people hoard pennies.

      because the value of the metal in a penny is worth more than $0.01 and that value will only continue to rise in the future.

    3. Re:Good on them by TankSpanker04 · · Score: 1

      I would say that, in general, sales tax (VAT, etc) caused the need for pennies in the first place. Not because of the need to collect tax on items purchased -- but because of how it's calculated. Most items are advertised with a price before adding tax. There are places like my local Starbucks where all prices include tax and are multiples of $0.05. So they already have zero need to handle pennies.

      Get state and local governments to price things with tax included and you'll end up with the ability to price things to come out exactly what you intended. I think you'll also see more pricing set to whole dollars. What a concept -- charge $10.00 instead of trying to convince people that $9.99 is somehow not ten bucks.

    4. Re:Good on them by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Pennies cost more to make than their worth

      Their cost is rounding errors on the US federal spending.

      But if you really want them cheaper, make them from stainless steel and outsource their production to China!

    5. Re:Good on them by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I wish vendors would back-calc the price so the tax-in price was a nice round figure.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  23. Like the scheme from Office Space by Confusedent · · Score: 1

    Realistically I'd think larger companies will universally raise their prices just enough that they can round up. A assuming 1.25 cents per purchase over hundreds of thousands of purchases will actually add up, if you're doing lots of cash transactions.

  24. This is good economics! by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    1. Remove the penny, save $11m.
    2. All prices now a multiple of 0.02, so divide by two
    3. Reintroduce penny - lose $11m but all prices are now half what they were!

  25. Oh? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    Rounding prices will become the norm

    I can hear Billy Mays raging from his grave.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Oh? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's good that he didn't live to see this day.

      "JUST THIRTY DOLLARS! THAT'S RIGHT AN EVEN THIRTY!"

      "Cut! That's a wrap"

      "YOU BASTARDS DON'T PAY ME ENOUGH YOU KNOW! I'M GONNA GO CRY IN A CORNER :-( "

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  26. Re:Just like in Norway too by WegianWarrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in Norway we been doing this for years:
    - The 1 øre and 2 øre coins disappeared in '74
    - The 5 øre and 25 øre coins were withdrawn in '84
    - The 10 øre coin ended being legal tender in '92
    - The 50 øre coin will be withdrawn may 1st this year.
    So in a little over a month there will be no coins circulating that is worth less than 1 Norwegian krone... but you know what? The wast majority of Norwegians pay by card anyhow, and the prices has not changed with the smaller coins going away. If you pay by card, you pay the exact amount. If you pay cash, it is rounded up or down to the nearest coin-value.

    For those curious; after the retirement of the 50 øre coin, a purchase of 9.49 kroner will be rounded down to 9.00 while a purchase of 9.50 kroner will be rounded up to 10.00 - unless you pay by card, in which case you pay the exact sum owed.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  27. First read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada To Stop Making Ponnies

  28. They're mostly Zinc by neile · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wikipedia to the rescue. They're 97.5% zinc, 2.5% copper, and have been that way since 1983.

    1. Re:They're mostly Zinc by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The 1982 ones are a mix of copper plated ones and non copper plated ones. The all copper ones are heavier than the copper plated ones and if you have a digital scale accurate to the 0.1 gram they are easy to find.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:They're mostly Zinc by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      The all copper ones are heavier than the copper plated ones and if you have a digital scale accurate to the 0.1 gram they are easy to find.

      They've changed weight several times. I got the bright idea to count my pennies using a lab scale, weighing one penny and then the whole set and dividing, and I got a really wrong answer. I tried several single pennies and got different weights for most of them.

    3. Re:They're mostly Zinc by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      The numismatic way to tell them apart is to look at the date. The copper pennies use a bigger font.

      The coins age differently so just looking at the color is usually enough... copper coins become a dark even brown where the zinc coins darken mainly on the raised areas.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    4. Re:They're mostly Zinc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also flick them into the air. The copper ones have more of an audible "ring".

    5. Re:They're mostly Zinc by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The easiest way to tell them apart is to drop them onto a hard surface. The copper ones have a bit of a ring to them when they hit, whereas the zinc ones just go thud.

  29. Rounded Up by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Rounding prices will become the norm as the penny is gradually removed from circulation, the budget says. If consumers find themselves without pennies, cash transactions should be rounded to the nearest five-cent increment 'in a fair and transparent manner,' it says.

    My guess is it will always be rounded up when your paying, and when they are paying you, rounded down.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:Rounded Up by billtom · · Score: 2

      The government aren't complete idiots (nearly, but not complete). There are regulations surrounding how this is all going to work. It isn't being left up to the retailer to decide.

      Basically, all prices will still be in cents. So something that costs $9.99 will still cost $9.99 after the penny is gone.

      When you go to pay your bill, if you pay cash, then the after tax price (remember there's sales tax in Canada) is rounded following government mandated rules.

      And the rules are as you'd expect. x.y1 and x.y2 round to x.y0; x.y3 and x.y4 round to x.y5, etc.

  30. Purely a good thing by AdrianKemp · · Score: 2

    The penny should have gone some time ago, it's good that it's finally going away.

    This will make exactly 1 difference, half of the stores will go from $3.98 to $3.95 and half will round to $4.

    I'm fine with either, and since it will be about half and half it'll work out in the wash.

    1. Re:Purely a good thing by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      NO they'll all round to $4.25 because their point of sale systems will have to be updated and their pricing models adjusted. This will require hundreds of immigrant IT workers from Wipro working tirelessly to update the 20+ year old systems in their stores. This also means that their suppliers will round up and the increased costs will be passed onto the consumer. So instead of $4, it'll be $4.25.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:Purely a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya right. They will ALL start making sure that their final prices (after tax) ends up as a round up number. I guarantee this will end up costing the consumer more (although not much, I guess).

    3. Re:Purely a good thing by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      So wrong it's not even funny.

      Pennies aren't disappearing tomorrow, they're not being made anymore.

      So over the next 4 years, when prices change anyways they'll change to the nearest nickel. For the same marketing reasons that now peg prices at 2.99 and 97c and such they'll tend to fall just below.

    4. Re:Purely a good thing by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to be funny, it's going to be this way for every business and they'll want to pass the costs onto the consumers. It will happen because business will look for any excuse to raise prices and blame the government.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    5. Re:Purely a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      half of the stores will go from $3.98 to $3.95 and half will round to $4.

      Are you sure about that?...
      $3.98+13% tax = $4.50
      $3.95+13% tax = $4.46
      $4.00+13% tax = $4.52

      I don't know what the tax rate is in other provinces, but what it is here in the centre of the universe is all that really matters anyway.

  31. and in New Zealand by dingfelder · · Score: 1

    we dumped the penny already too

  32. Re:Just like in Norway too by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    So in a little over a month there will be no coins circulating that is worth less than 1 Norwegian krone... but you know what? The wast majority of Norwegians pay by card anyhow, and the prices has not changed with the smaller coins going away. If you pay by card, you pay the exact amount. If you pay cash, it is rounded up or down to the nearest coin-value.

    That's the problem, and my biggest problem with this boneheaded move...

    1. Not everybody has access to a card.
    2. Unless you keep a certain minimum balance in the bank, or pay a monthly fee, you get hit with a service charge every time you use your card in Canada
    3. The merchant gets hit with a service charge every time anyway.
    4. (and my main personal concern with it) it's harder to budget when you're paying with plastic, because the money is not tangible.

    I have quite happily been using folding money for small expenses for a while. It's much easier to budget if I take $100 cash out of the bank every payday, and tell myself that's my whatever money, and when it's gone it's gone. If they force me to start using a card for that, I will have to actually open a new bank account or buy a prepaid visa specifically so that I can have a card with separate funds from the money I use for groceries, gas, the rent, etc.. And yes, this would force me to use a card, because there's no way "rounding to the nearest $0.05" will work out in my favour.

    This, of course, will mean that the merchants have to eat the increased costs of running a merchant terminal, and decreased margins, which means that it will increase the costs for everybody. The price of a cup of coffee will go up because of this.

  33. Because it was never "worthless"! by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    The point is, the penny wasn't worth the expense of minting it, and the hassle of carrying the extra coins around. Nobody said the penny was utterly worthless though. The cash transactions being rounded will surely wind up rounded UP to the next closest 5 cent mark, not DOWN, in almost all cases -- because merchants don't want to lose that 1-4 cents per transaction that adds up over a month's time.

    1. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      It will just get rounded up or down. If the total is 1.12, then it should go to 1.10. If the total is 1.13, then it should go to 1.15. It's even more straightforward than rounding to the nearest dime, since you don't have to deal with evens and odds.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by sl149q · · Score: 1

      Strict rules on rounding:
      "For all prices, after tax of course, businesses will round up or round down based on government issued standards. Prices ending in .01, .02, .06, and .07 will be rounded down to the nearest dollar or nickel amount. Prices ending in .03, .04, .08, and .09 will be rounded up, accordingly. The penny will continue to be accepted indefinitely, and rounding rules will not apply to purchases made by check or credit/debit cards"

      The net effect over the long run is everyone averages out. Also this is done on the final total only. Everything will continue to be priced in $.01 increments as now and credit / debit transactions are paid exactly not rounded.

    3. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by mark-t · · Score: 2

      It also means that places can short customers by more.

      Instead of, at most, being able to short a customer by as much as only half of a cent on a purchase, they can now short a customer by as much as 2.5 cents.

      The effect on any individual is minor, but if the company uses a pricing structure such that their prices would always get rounded up, they stand to be able to increase profits as much as 5 times faster than they used to.

    4. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Which would work great if people bought single items. You start putting together a few random items together in a single transaction and it would be exceedingly difficult to screw your customer out of 2 cents. Hardly seems worth it.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    5. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      won't work.

      When the law is in the process of being drafted, all prices will change to .03, .04, .08, and .09

      Just round up and deal with it. ... of course when you take into account the entire chain, and not just the last consumer purchase, the end price will get rerounded up every time the merchandise goes through someone hands, so in the end the real price increase will be a quarter or more.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It will just get rounded up or down. If the total is 1.12, then it should go to 1.10. If the total is 1.13, then it should go to 1.15. It's even more straightforward than rounding to the nearest dime, since you don't have to deal with evens and odds.

      Prediction: merchants will price their goods so the final cost is never rounded down.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That will only work when merchants typically sell only one item.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      That will only work when merchants typically sell only one item.

      Got a workaround for that: convenience fees.

      C'mon, this is American Capitalism we're talking about! Where there's a will (to screw the consumer), there's a way!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      LOL @ "convenience fees".

      Of course, I'll just setup another store and emblazon "NO CONVENIENCE FEES" across the front...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      And this government (Canadian) will pass a law illegalizing not charging convenience fees as it's bad for business. They're building jails as quick as they can just for people like you who want to undermine business by competing.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      This government doesn't believe in regulating business so why would they force businesses to be fair? More likely they'll make it illegal to complain about any business that rounds the wrong way.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    12. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Don't you buy everything down south anyway? :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Because it was never "worthless"! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or when an item is only sold by one merchant.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. Crazy numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what if a highly reusable token with a face value of 1c costs 1.6c *to build*?

    Leading with that clip makes me doubt our government will save the promoted $11 million, and while we're on that, will it produce any savings at all in our economy?

    This is just more headline shenanigans by the Harper administration. Arguably being a democracy we deserve this, but please give us small credit because a hell of a lot more people did vote against the Conservatives than for them. These guys got a minority gov't from our riding system - they don't have popular support. But hey, didcha catch the game last night?

    Oh, and that promoted government savings? Works out about a third of a cent per person to have that highly useful token for a year. It's a pathetically small figure, and that's without going into how it's kept within the economy with our own mint and mines. As promoted, this is batshit math all over.

    1. Re:Crazy numbers by TermV · · Score: 2

      For crying out loud, people are so ignorant...You do realise that of the 9 majority governments in the past 50 years, only 1 managed to be elected with over 50% of the vote? The largest majority government in history was 53.66% popular vote back in 1958. Here, take a look at all the "illegitimate" Canadian majority governments.

      2011 Conservative majority 39.62%
      2000 Liberal majority 40.85%
      1997 Liberal majority 38.46%
      1993 Liberal majority 41.24%
      1988 PC majority 43.02%
      1984 PC majority 50.03%
      1980 Liberal majority 44.34%
      1974 Liberal majority 43.15%
      1968 Liberal majority 45.37%

  35. I understand why, but... by theshibboleth · · Score: 1

    I understand why they might want to do this, but it seems like it takes a certain amount of slack out of the monetary system. Surely some things really aren't worth 5 cents more than others and would benefit from the in-between increments. On the other hand, unless governments periodically redefined their currencies (which has been done in the past) the built-in inflation of most countries will lead to the value of the physical material of the coinage being greater than its face value. Of course there's also been a push for cashless systems which limits one's ability to conduct transactions without the government or other people knowing about it.

    1. Re:I understand why, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still charge in increments of whatever you feel like. Heck gas is priced down to the 1/10 cent. Its just at the end of your transaction your total is rounded if you pay with cash. Its not a big deal as your total is already rounded to the nearest penny. They should really just get rid of nickels too and round to the nearest decimal. It easier for the math impaired to understand.

  36. if they tried this in the USA by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    can you imagine all the looney tunes shouting about Bilderberg this, world domination that, UN plot this, communist muslims that...

    all countries have nut jobs, but what is it about my country that the nut jobs are so loud?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:if they tried this in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >all countries have nut jobs, but what is it about my country that the nut jobs are so loud?

      Your selection bias?

    2. Re:if they tried this in the USA by JazzHarper · · Score: 2

      On the contrary, one of the reasons this reform never gets off the ground in the US is that it is not a strong partisan issue, even for the fringe element. It's hard to get your constituents--on either side--fired up over something so mundane, so it doesn't give you any advantage over the Other Party.

    3. Re:if they tried this in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you have the zinc lobbies which would heavily oppose any attempts to take away demand for their product. So any legislator sees no upside and huge downsides to supporting such an action.

    4. Re:if they tried this in the USA by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      For a country that prides itself on so many advances, America is amazingly stuck in the past in some things.

      Like dollar bills (I know there's $1 coins, they never seem to be used by actual people), and the Imperial measurement system.

  37. Value by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    In the US, the dollar is now worth between 1% and 2% of its average value during the 1800s. By that measure, it would not be unreasonable to eliminate all coins below 50 cents.

    This is strictly the fault of government (and Nixon more than anyone else) for decoupling the dollar from gold.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curious, so what impact would all the gold hoarding of late have had on the dollar if it was still coupled?

    2. Re:Value by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Because...wait, what? The value of gold in 1800 would be the same as the value of gold in 2000 if we were on the gold standard?

    3. Re:Value by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      You have to go back to before Nixon if you want to blame a US president. It was FDR who took the first major steps in getting the US off a precious metal standard. What he did was worse than Nixon in that FDR did have people's gold confiscated and prevented US residents from owning gold coins or bullion (this wasn't changed until 1986). Under the FDR administration the dollar also went from $20.?? per ounce gold (I forget the exact value) to $35 per ounce of gold. Later in the 60s under Kennedy and Johnson administrations the other precious metal standard ended when silver certificates were no longer redeemable for real (90% pure silver) silver dollars and later not even redeemable for silver. All Nixon did was close the international gold window which removed the last semblance of the US being on a precious metal standard as the silver standard (the US was a bi-metallic standard) was ended during the previous administration.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  38. Simple Plan by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    1) Round all totals requiring 2 cents and below down to next lowest unit

    2) Round all requiring 3 or 4 cents up to next unit

    3) Monitor sales and adjust prices so most totals end in 3, 4, 8, or 9 cents

    4)No ?

    5) Profit!

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Simple Plan by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Even simpler plan, round all prices up to the next $.05 increment...profit.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  39. Re:Oops by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Hey, well, you know Canada has government-run health care...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  40. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    It was the cons who cancelled the helicopters, and it's worth pointing out that the penalties for cancelling that contract were higher than it would have cost to actually buy the damned helicopters.

    I do agree, however, that we got royally ripped off on the submarines.

  41. Label them 2 cents instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And they suddenly cost less.

  42. US Seniors use Pennies to buy Canadian Drugs! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I bet US Seniors use Pennies to buy Canadian Drugs!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  43. Wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the base unit goes to 5 cents, then essentially the 5 cent piece IS the new one cent piece since nothing can be priced as a fraction of it. You've achieved massive deflation. Instead of revamping the economy, you can simply revalue the currency. Does the same thing, functionally.

  44. Can't we just split the difference already!?!?? by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Can't we just split the difference already!?!??

    Lets just move the time forward or back, I don't care, half an hour and leave it there!!!!!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  45. Here in Holland by mpol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in Holland we don't use Eurocents anymore. Before the Euro, when we used Dutch Guilders (0,45 Euro) we already stopped using cents. The smallest coin then was 5 cents.
    When we got the Euro in 2001 we shortly used the Eurocent. But soon it was discarded. Every shop now rounds to 5 Eurocent. Only when you use your debitcard you pay in cents.
    At first there were some people complaining about losing cents in the rounding, but now most people can accept it. Of course rounding goes both ways anyway.
    I already think 5 Eurocents is too much hassle to bother with. But I guess that one will last for some years to come.

    --

    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    1. Re:Here in Holland by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Rounding doesn't (statistically) go both ways. The shops generally choose prices so that rounding benefits them (eg 0.99 rather than 0.96 etc). That introduces a bias. It's true that if you buy *a lot* of goods (at once) whose prices must be rounded, then the total could be anything, and even if there is *some* bias left, the amount is not more than 5 cents anyway.

      However, this isn't the case when many people just buy one thing (at a time), on impulse. For example, candy or a newspaper or bread or a coffee. In that case, the shop has an advantage if all prices are $X.98 or $X.99. This advantage can be preserved also if many people just buy one or two things (at a time), eg coffee and a pastry, provided all the prices are designed to be $X.99 and never $X.98 or less.

      In general, if you have good statistics on the number of items bought in the store, you can definitely design the prices to maximize the store's profit from rounding.

  46. Re:Just like in Norway too by Phisbut · · Score: 2

    And yes, this would force me to use a card, because there's no way "rounding to the nearest $0.05" will work out in my favour.

    So what you're saying is that for something that has cost $0.99$, which once 13% sales tax is added (e.g. in Ontario), the merchant will up the price to $1.00 just to make sure he can rip you off of 2 cents, or that something which now costs $2.00 will be priced $2.02? Stores won't change their pricing scheme and everything will keep ending in .99 where it currently ends in .99 and everything will have nice (before taxes) rounded prices where they currently already have nice (before taxes) rounded tax.

    Bitching about merchants who will rip you off for all of 2 cents because of this, without considering all the logistics they would have to go through just to do that reeks of tin-foil hatism from conspiracy theorists.

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  47. Way overdue. by jensend · · Score: 2

    Both Canada and the US should have gotten rid of not only the penny but also the nickel by now, rounding transactions to the nearest ten cents. The waste of good metal in making pennies which are worth less isn't even half the story; much more importantly, though the whole purpose of currency is to make transactions easier, pennies and nickels simply complicate transactions and waste everybody's time.

    See also this well-done youtube video.

  48. The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by Slugster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem here is that the article claimed that they are eliminating the penny for cash transactions and still using it for non-cash transactions. This means that paying cash in a transaction can legally save up to 2.49 cents over the same non-cash transaction.

    Doesn't sound like much, but when you're in a business that handles hundreds of thousands of transactions a day, that kind of difference can add up fast. 500K transactions = ~$12,500 a day, ~$4.5m a year. Some companies will gain that much, and other companies are going to lose it...

    If they want to eliminate the penny, they should do it for all transactions, at the same time.

    1. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by skine · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you can also stand to save 2.50 cents by using a non-cash transaction as opposed to cash, in certain situations.

      This means that you have a probability of losing money on a given transaction of 249/500, a probability of saving money of 250/500, and a probability of breaking even of 1/500 (assuming that any value is equally likely).

      Thus, the expected value of a $0.00005 benefit to the customer, and thus a $0.00005 loss for the business per transaction. For most businesses, this is negligible in comparison to the fees that they pay to VISA and MasterCard already.

    2. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I don't see the problem that you are referring to.

    3. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. Right now, even before the elimination of the penny, if you go to the post office to buy a three cent stamp, you only have to pay $0.03 and they give you the stamp TAX FREE! Yes, they don't charge you the 13% HST in Ontario! In BC, with only 12% HST, you can get $0.04 worth of stamps tax free! (Or any other items costing the same, of course.)

      Doesn't sound like much, but when you're in a business that handles hundreds of thousands of transactions a day, that kind of difference can add up fast. 500K transactions = ~$2000 a day, ~$0.7m a year!

      Strangely, other countries that have eliminated the penny don't seem to have suffered any ill effects due to this type of "problem". Maybe they were just lucky. Australia dropped the 1 and 2 cent coins back in 1991, but I suppose they are so backwards down under that nobody was bright enough to figure out an arbitrage method to rip people off....

    4. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by m85476585 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the credit card companies charge merchants fees. Usually something on the order of $0.30 + 2%, but maybe less for a very big merchant.

      If pricing is random, as many transactions will round up as round down, meaning the net result is no change. If merchants are careful with their pricing, they might be able to get more transactions to round up, or they can just increase all their prices by $0.025.

    5. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by It+took+my+meds · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would the post office give you the extra stamps tax free when you are buying more than one!?

      It wouldn't be nothing that's for sure for 500K transactions. I'll give you a hint... What is $700K rounded to the nearest 5 cents?

      Australians are backward compared to you? Riiiight.

    6. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by It+took+my+meds · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would the post office not tax you once you bought more than one stamp?!

      Let me ask you this. How much would the post office tax you on 500K transactions after removing the penny? Hint: What is $700K rounded to the nearest 5 cents.

      So let me get this straight... Somehow Australia is backward, yet is far ahead of the curve in such reform. Whilst you aren't backward, but could be outwitted by a 3 year old!

    7. Re:The mobsters are licking their lips at this.... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out the errors of my posting. How foolish of me! Of course, now I see that I and the parent were talking nonsense.

      I am glad nobody tried to parody our position by exaggerating it to the point of absurdity. If that had happened someone else might have thought they were serious and tried to point out the errors of their thinking!

  49. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by ocdscouter · · Score: 2

    Hookers, blow, and maple syrup?

    And Poutine, I'm told.

  50. Also what it "worth it" varies by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    For very large ticket items, you'll often find they are rounded to things larger than a dollar. It isn't worth fussing over fractions of a percentage of the total price. A house would be a simplistic example, you normally bid in increments of $1000 on it. Less is just not worth it.

    However it can go the other way too. If you order large quantities of small parts from a place like Newark, you'll find the price is spec'd to the tenth of a penny. Reason is if you are ordering 10,000 of something, it matters, it adds up. Heck some parts cost less than a penny each in quantity (a Fairchild 1N4148 diode is $0.009 in quantities greater than 2000).

    There is no magic subdivision amount that is worth it for all cases. For cash transaction, a penny is really not worth it.

    1. Re:Also what it "worth it" varies by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

      Fuel has been priced in tenths of cents for as long as I can remember.

    2. Re:Also what it "worth it" varies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Heck some parts cost less than a penny each in quantity (a Fairchild 1N4148 diode is $0.009 in quantities greater than 2000).

      It's important to distinguish between a price and an amount, in particular the final total. It's the latter - all the items added together, shipping, handling & (maybe) taxes applied - that'll be subject to rounding.

      In any case, if you systems can handle pricing with extra "virtual" decimals you'll still be able to do it. Alternatively, instead of saying they're 0.9 cents each, you say they're 9 cents for ten.

      I remember having to explain this to a CFO once who said the invoices "were all wrong". Well, more than once, because he just didn't get it until I resorted to the tried and trusted method of a car analogy and asked him if he ever buys eggs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  51. Re:They never had pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be pedantic all you want you're wrong...
    Penny is the official name of the one cent coin, just as Nickel, Quarter, and Dime are the official names of the coins.

  52. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by Chupathingy · · Score: 0

    That sounds like an AWESOME party. Count me in.

  53. Re:Oops by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 2

    It would never work. Our politicians will always be dicks.

  54. Death to Pennies by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1
    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  55. I say drop nickels too! by Stoutlimb · · Score: 2

    As a Canadian, I would have been happy with eliminating the nickel too. That way, they stick with a nice round decimal system, and drop one zero from all commonly used monetary calculations. 10 dimes makes a dollar, so a dollar and thirty dimes would be written $1.3. Newly printed dimes wouldn't say "10 cents" on them, they would say "1 dime". That way the dime becomes the new penny as the smallest denomination of coin. This would eliminate all confusing rounding rule. It also makes sense because dimes are the physically smallest coin anyways.

    Dime for your thoughts?

    1. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Ooops I wrote "thirty dimes", when I meant" thirty cents". My bad.

    2. Re:I say drop nickels too! by tknd · · Score: 1

      I agree, although you would change your coin system if you dropped one decimal.

      I'm all for dropping a decimal and going to dimes. However, I would go ahead and change a few things: dump all current coins and switch to dimes, 50c coins, and $1 coins. This way cash prices can only be in dimes and you phase in $1 coins. The shape of the new 50c coin would be slightly larger than today's nickel, and the dollar can still be those dollar coins they've been minting.

      Dimes will be dimes and they'll start to feel like pennies. The only difference is now you only need 50 to trade to a $5 bill (new lowest bill denomination) instead of 100 pennies to get to a $1 today. Similarly, 5 dimes would get you to 50c just as 5 pennies get you to 5c.

    3. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a problem with that: bilingual issues. "cent" works in English as French, not so much with "dime". And don't even think about adding small text to those already tiny coins...

    4. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a dollar and thirty dimes would be $4.
      thirty dimes = $3.

    5. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dime for your thoughts?

      I'll buy that for a DOLLAR!

    6. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that US dimes do say 1 dime and not 10 cents.

    7. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the quarter too? Are you bringing back the fifty-cent piece?

    8. Re:I say drop nickels too! by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I agree, although you would change your coin system if you dropped one decimal.

      I'm all for dropping a decimal and going to dimes. However, I would go ahead and change a few things: dump all current coins and switch to dimes, 50c coins, and $1 coins. This way cash prices can only be in dimes and you phase in $1 coins. The shape of the new 50c coin would be slightly larger than today's nickel, and the dollar can still be those dollar coins they've been minting.

      Dimes will be dimes and they'll start to feel like pennies. The only difference is now you only need 50 to trade to a $5 bill (new lowest bill denomination) instead of 100 pennies to get to a $1 today. Similarly, 5 dimes would get you to 50c just as 5 pennies get you to 5c.

      I agree, basically the quarter screws things up as far as nice patterns and good combinations go.

      In my opinion, the Euro countries got their base units right: 1, 2, 5 -- 10, 20, 50 -- 100, 200, 500 -- etc.

      With that system, starting at the dime we could go with the following coins: 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, 1, 2, 5 and then go to "paper" for 10, 20, 50 and 100, 200, 500

    9. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Convector · · Score: 1

      In the US, dimes actually do say "ONE DIME". So if you don't already know that 1 dime = 10 cents, you can't tell from the coin. Obvious if you grew up with it, but I could easily imagine foreign visitors getting confused by that one.

    10. Re:I say drop nickels too! by __Reason__ · · Score: 1

      New Zealand already got rid of its 5c coin a few years back, making 10c the smallest coin. That doesn't mean *everything* is priced in 10c increments, however. You'll sometimes see prices written as "$1.3" or "$5.5" in things like restaurant menus, but not at things like supermarkets. Price increments less than 10c still exist, and are still used for card transactions - it's just that the final total is rounded if you're paying with cash.

    11. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems you got yourself confused with your simple system. A dollar and THREE dimes will be $1.3.

      In Norway, 100 øre is worth one krone, just as your 100 cents are worth one dollar. One canadian dollar is worth 5.7 kroner. So when you're getting rid of 1 cent coins, that's worth about 5 øre. We got rid of 5 øre coins in 1974, and have been shedding other worthless coins since then. This year, we're losing 50 øre coins, which would be equivalent to your 10 cent coins.

      We'll then be using 1 krone (roughly 20 cent) as the smallest coin. We'll also keep 5 kroner (roughly one dollar), 10 kroner (roughly 2 dollars) and 20 kroner (roughly 4 dollars) coins as well.

      This is absolutely no problem at all. We've been rounding prices up or down to the nearest coin for decades, and noone gives it a second thought.

    12. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Everyone who speaks English knows what a dime is. Those cheesemunchers in Quebec presumably understand what dixième means.

      So in the spirit of compromise, i.e. piss everyone off equally, how about calling it a "Decim(e)" (with a soft c)?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:I say drop nickels too! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is the quarter, which will now be worth 2.5 dimes. If everything is priced in increments of dimes then this would become pretty annoying pretty fast, especially with the elimination of the five cent or half-dime coin*. So what you would have to also do is eliminate the quarter, and either replace it with a 20 cent piece as seen in many other countries or not replace it at all.

      *The five cent piece in the US used to be called the half-dime when it was minted out of silver.

    15. Re:I say drop nickels too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dollar and thirty dimes is not $1.3, it's $4.0

  56. Re:Just like in Norway too by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    My mother has an ongoing dispute with the electric company. The bill always seems to come to a value that will be rounded up, and despite the fact that no-one pays their bill with cash they round the total. She complains every month, and usually the person on the phone tells her to just pay the amount she actually owes, but then next month there's a 2 cent balance carried over. Now obviously she's not concerned about 2 cents ever month, but if you say something costs 98 cents, you should only charge people that amount, it's basic honesty.

  57. Re:Just like in Norway too by turing_m · · Score: 2

    No one is forcing you to get a card. All they would do is get rid of denominations that inflation has caused to cost more to produce than they are worth. The price of a coffee is already too high and it is caused by forcing staff to count out small change when they could be doing something productive, and you are paying for it. This move will actually REDUCE the real price of a cup of coffee.

    If you are worried about "rounding to the nearest "0.05", then logically you should be worried about rounding to the nearest "0.01" as well, since this is already what is being done. Are you up in arms about that? Do you want to bring in a "0.005" coin to stop the merchants you with the rounding? Well, once you get that "solved", you can move on to bringing in a "0.002" coin. And it's turtles all the way down.

    If you go back far enough in history to when the dollar was worth 10 times what it was now, the value of a fictional "0.005" coin then was worth more than the "0.01" coin is today but presumably you were happy about that state of affairs.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  58. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the cons who cancelled the helicopters

    Huh? The CBC says:

    Then came the 1993 federal election campaign, when Jean Chrétien and his Liberals attacked the Tory plan as wasteful, calling the EH-101 a "Cadillac" helicopter. When the Liberals won and Chrétien became prime minister one of his first acts was to scrap the Tory deal, an act that cost the Canadian government nearly $500 million in cancellation fees.

  59. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the (vast?) majority of transactions are already by card, prices won't go up because of this - that happened long ago.

  60. Re:Just like in Norway too by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    4. (and my main personal concern with it) it's harder to budget when you're paying with plastic, because the money is not tangible.

    Wow so do you not know how to use a calculator or at least count money that isn't physically in your hands? I mean you're at the very least capable of using the internet, WTH can't you just make the next logical step and use your computer to do some simple mathematics and learn to budget your money without having to look at it in your hands?

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  61. FIAT CURRENCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    And this is EXACTLY what happens when your nation issues currency that is backed by nothing!
     
    Inflate away. Good luck finding a savings account with interest (which, of course, is going to be taxed) that can even match the true inflation rate.

    1. Re:FIAT CURRENCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when are people from zh on /.?

    2. Re:FIAT CURRENCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when are people from zh on /.?

      Zoo Helpers?
      Zombie Hunters?
      Zealous Hipsters?
      Zigzag Hotels??
      Zulu Haters?!?!

    3. Re:FIAT CURRENCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zh

    4. Re:FIAT CURRENCY! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Since when are people from zh on /.?

      Zoo Helpers?
      Zombie Hunters?
      Zealous Hipsters?
      Zigzag Hotels??
      Zulu Haters?!?!

      All that and you missed Zaftig Humpers?

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:FIAT CURRENCY! by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Zero Hedge

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    6. Re:FIAT CURRENCY! by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

      And this is EXACTLY what happens when your nation issues currency that is backed by nothing!

      Well, at least it's better than company scrip ...

      --
      Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
  62. Re:Just like in Norway too by GuldKalle · · Score: 2

    [...]there's no way "rounding to the nearest $0.05" will work out in my favour.

    Why qouldn't there? In Norway it works fine, same in Denmark (almost same system). Merchants are required by law to round the way GP describes.

    --
    What?
  63. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    At least now they can't deflect attention by saying "Oh look, a penny!".

    --
    What?
  64. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked at the plant that built those CH-148 Cyclones.

    Ye Gods, I just did IT stuff, but from what I understand, that contract was a huge pain in the neck. Good news is that the cabins for the helicopters that were purchased were made in Japan. Major body sections are cockpit, cabin, sponsons and tail boom assembly. Sikorsky now sources the cabins from TASL in India. I saw photos of the production floor in India that made me cringe. We used well engineered stands, with safety features and padding, for doing wiring harness work on the cabins. This keeps the outside of the cabin from being beat up and is fairly important for making a good aircraft. TASL used bamboo and 2x4 "stands".

    I don't even want to think of the QC problems coming in the door after the transition completes.

  65. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Europe, where banking is electronic and many people carry debit cards. A homeless man may not be able to accept small change via card, but he can get a debit card of his own from whatever bank his account is in quite easily.

  66. If only... by Droog57 · · Score: 2

    I wish I had a nickel for ever time I heard about the costs of a penny...

    --
    "If the only tool that you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." Donny Rumsfeld
  67. How to earn $10/year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres a little trick to put the rounding to your advantage. When paying groceries, in the supermarket, just check if its rounded up or down to the nearest 5 cents. When its rounded up - pay by debit card. When its rounded down, pay cash. It doesnt sound like much, and it isnt, but at 2 transactions a day, saving a 1.5 cents per transaction on average, it totals to about $10 on a yearly base. Yes, saving pennies really works!

  68. Re:Just like in Norway too by hierophanta · · Score: 1

    at that level of rounding people WILL start gaming the system, hell i know i would. coffee costs $1.51 - i'm going to pay with a card. coffee costs 1.49 - i'm going to pay in cash.

  69. every time you do anything to the currency by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    the paranoid schizophrenic fringe perks up

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  70. Rounding to five by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know they will always round up to the next five not down. It will cause inflation.

    1. Re:Rounding to five by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      You do know they will always round up to the next five not down. It will cause inflation.

      That's not what happens in Australia. The price gets rounded to the nearest 5c.

    2. Re:Rounding to five by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Do they price things just below a round amount, e.g 9.99 rather then ten bucks? If so, they'd presumably have to round it to 9.95, which is actually less.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Rounding to five by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Do they price things just below a round amount, e.g 9.99 rather then ten bucks? If so, they'd presumably have to round it to 9.95, which is actually less.

      I haven't really paid enough attention to say for sure that it's all the time, but mostly ithings would be priced at, say, $9.95, rather than $9.99. If they were $9.99, though, they'd be rounded up to $10, not $9.95.

  71. Re:Just like in Norway too by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that setting prices to optimize for rounding won't work for purchases of multiple units.

  72. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which, if you had payed attention, is in the merchants favour. There's no reason to not require merchants to _always_ round down, and (for example) employers to _always_ round up, if it bothers them they could just have set the prices so no rounding is necessary.

  73. Re:Just like in Norway too by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 2

    at that level of rounding people WILL start gaming the system, hell i know i would. coffee costs $1.51 - i'm going to pay with a card. coffee costs 1.49 - i'm going to pay in cash.

    So you're going to pay $0.01 more for each coffee?

    $1.51 with card = $1.51, with cash = $1.50
    $1.49 with cash = $1.50, with card = $1.49

  74. The USA Cant' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even get rid of the 9/10 of a cent part of the price of a gallon of gasoline....

  75. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a ten kroner, a five kroner, a twenty kroner. No wait, that's another ten kroner. A fimty kroner? How much is that?

  76. burden on the economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government is a "burden on the economy".

  77. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This decision makes no cents.

  78. Prior Art by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    Canada's just following the US's example of eliminating the half penny way back in 1857.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  79. And what prevents the following from happening? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    And let's say that I discover an item (or possibly a group of items) in a store such that after tax, the total price in pennies ends with the number 8.

    And let's say that I intend to buy something from a store such that its price in pennies, after tax, would end with the number 4, 3, or 2.

    If I combine these purchases into one, and then pay in cash, then the resulting price will be rounded to the nearest nickel, which means they would round down.

    If I then later exploit the store return policy to return the first items on the list for a refund, since I paid in cash, I should receive cash back, which again, should be rounded to the nearest nickel... but this time, they would have to round it up, and I would get an extra 2 cents back.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.

    1. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by PPH · · Score: 1

      George Soros, is that you?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by rst123 · · Score: 2

      If you are willing to work for 25 cents an hour, foxcon has a job for you.

    3. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      If I then later exploit the store return policy to return the first items on the list for a refund, since I paid in cash, I should receive cash back, which again, should be rounded to the nearest nickel... but this time, they would have to round it up, and I would get an extra 2 cents back.

      Lather, rinse, repeat.

      If your objective is to spend time with the cute sales clerk, this might be an intelligent thing to pass your time with. If that is your goal, the price differential is not your primary motivation.

      On the other hand, if you wanted to actually make $10, you would only need to do this five hundred times. If it takes you more than 72 seconds for this purchase-return procedure, that would be more than ten hours in total for this little scheme. I suspect there are probably many legal ways to earn $10 quicker and with less work.

    4. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, are you for real? This is the worst make-money-quick scheme I've ever heard, and you're currently modded up to a three.

      The thing that prevents people from going to a store twice to earn 2 pennies is that the effort required means that you're earning less than minimum wage. You get 50 refunds per hour and you've just earn yourself a dollar. Just get the lowest paying job that you can find and you'll earn way more per hour.

      Now, if you can automate this with on-line stores, there's a greater chance of this working, but on-line transactions would typically remain in cents/pennies and your account will be disabled before you get to 100 refunds.

    5. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      If you could put it in a shell script or farm it out to a botnet, sure. Real-world transactions carry costs that make this scheme impracticable.

      Retailers might see a reason to algorithmically tweak their prices a cent or two to avoid bad aggregate effects from something like the above, but no single customer is going to benefit meaningfully.

    6. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I somehow fucking doubt it.

    7. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, if you can do it really really fast, it would be kind of a meatspace equivalent of high-frequency trading.

    8. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! You've discovered a loophole that will allow you to steal literally *dozens* of pennies before the merchant works out what you're doing and refuses to sell to you!

    9. Re:And what prevents the following from happening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an estimated 3000 pennies in my house.
      Not hoarded, just accumulated.

      If I was truly unhappy with the penny phase out, I could just carry a few with me.

      Whenever I am about to be the 'victim' of a roundoff not in my favor, I can whip out one or two pennies to achieve exact change.

      Whenever I am going to get the 'windfall' of a roundoff IN my favor, I'll leave the pennies in my pocket, and chortle all the way out the door, knowing I just screwed 'the man' out of TWO WHOLE CENTS.

      SCORE!

  80. Inevitable by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

    I'm old enough to remember half pennies and pound notes in the UK. The pound coin was met with bemusement when it came out but I came to like them very quickly. I was passing through Vancouver airport one time and the airline guy who was checking my boarding pass noticed the coins I'd taken out, he was fascinated by the British pound coin because I set a few of them on the counter (while digging something out of my pocket) and a few of them stood up on their edge. He asked me all sorts of questions about these coins, like what it was worth and what it could buy. He was a sweet old fella too, I let him keep one.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Inevitable by JSG · · Score: 1

      Well I'm just about old enough to remember the crack addled nonsense that was LSD:

      £1 = 20s, 1s=12d, hence £1=240d
      £=pound (libra)
      s=shilling (solidus)
      d=penny (denarius)

      The bit in brackets (parenthesis) is why the old abbreviation was "LSD". Obviously we had lots of other weird names for various sub divisions such as a "10 bob note" which was a paper note for 10 shillings or 120d.

      Then we got decimalized in 1971, the shilling got dropped as a sub unit and the d suffix replaced with p. £1 = 100p (1 pound = 100 pennies). For a while pennies were known as new pennies but the new was dropped after a few years.

      Guess why the US and Canada inter alia call their cents "pennies" 8)

    2. Re:Inevitable by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, I remember shillings being used as 5p pieces. And when we were taught money in primary school (late 70s) they were still referred to as "new pence" on the educational toy money and was still around on a lot of the coinage in circulation.

      What makes life in Northern Ireland even more interesting is how the local banks get to print their own money and pass it off as "sterling". I remember going into a bank in England one time and depositing some cash, I gave her a handful of £5 notes and they were all from different banks. She asked me why they were all different and I said "because these are the notes people gave to me in their change!" like it was a stupid question - I thought this was normal but she thought it was mad.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Inevitable by j-beda · · Score: 1

      The pound coin was introduced in 1983, while the Canadian dollar coin did not come into play until 1987 according to wikipedia. According to http://www.triacom.com/frame.html?http://www.triacom.com/archive/exchange.en.html&en in 1986 the US dollar was worth 1.401 CAD and 0.6894 GBP, so the GBP was worth about $2.03 CAD. Back in 1986 that had about the purchasing power of $3.80.

      Nice little gift.

    4. Re:Inevitable by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Oh please don't forget the Guinea, 10 bob note, Six Pence, Thruppence. Tuppence, Half-pennies and Farthings.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:Inevitable by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The pound coin was met with bemusement when it came out

      Pain in the arse it was. The tills didn't have a compartment for them so we had to put them on top of the pound notes during the changeover. Then some awkward Mrs Brady sod wants a note, so you have to go digging down for one.

      Some wag called them a Maggie Thatcher: thick, brassy, pretends to be a sovereign.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. where's richard pryor by cciardi · · Score: 1

    Didnt they do this in a movie once? Someone's going figure out a way to slide a few pennies into an account on the sly without no one knowing. Worked so well for the boys at Initech, "That sounds good Peter"

    1. Re:where's richard pryor by Noren · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Superman III.

  82. Re:Just like in Norway too by operagost · · Score: 1

    Sounds like someone with a calculator and a bunch of coins could save a lot of money in several small purchases. Beats using coupons.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  83. Re:Just like in Norway too by operagost · · Score: 1

    The half cent was minted in the USA until 1857. I think it took even longer for the Canucks to dump it.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  84. Re:Just like in Norway too by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Why qouldn't there? In Norway it works fine, same in Denmark (almost same system). Merchants are required by law to round the way GP describes.

    In the US this would be called "price controls" and the merchants would oppose them adamantly. They want to set the prices for what they sell. Any law forcing them to round "to the closest" would be followed if the "closest" is up. If the "closest" is down, they would obey the law and then immediately apply a price increase UP.

    I.e., a 97 cent item forced to be rounded up will become $1. A 92 cent item forced to be rounded down will become 90 cents, and then the price will go up ten cents to make it $1 anyway. You can't prohibit price increases, except when you are enacting price controls.

  85. meh-Forward thinking countries did this years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK - being provocative in the title - but Australia did this in 1992 and it worked well.
          We also moved the $1 and $2 notes to coins as they get used SO much and they are much more durable (your pockets DO wear out though - but on the plus side - when we are low in the bank - we raid the coin jars and live on them for months !)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_one-cent_coin

    Our notes are also Plastic - so you can wash them as many times as u want - they are also different colours (colors for the spelling challenged USA people) so you dont need to keep your wallet in denomination order - notes are EASY to spot in your wallet by the easy Monopoly money style colours and they are fairly indestructible except for supernovas etc....

  86. More economic quackery by shiftless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All they would do is get rid of denominations that inflation has caused to cost more to produce than they are worth.

    In other words, curing the symptoms, not the actual problem. (Which is inflation.) And in the process, introducing all kinds of second order effects which will inconvenience many.

    What else do we expect from the government?

    1. Re:More economic quackery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, curing the symptoms, not the actual problem. (Which is inflation.)

      You have much to learn about economics if you think (mild) inflation is a problem. It is actually a feature, not a bug.

    2. Re:More economic quackery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. It's theft of savings, plain and simple. Anyone who thinks otherwise has been brainwashed by bad schools of economics.

    3. Re:More economic quackery by turing_m · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is applying a temporary fix for a problem introduced by inflation. However, if we are going to keep the Keynesian system going it should at least be patched appropriately.

      I'm in two minds about what I think about inflation. On the one hand, it is a form of taxation or perhaps theft, depending on who the recipient is (which is somewhat difficult to find out). On the other hand, it does induce people to spend money so that people remain employed. And if it is a tax, at least it is somewhat difficult to find loopholes for. If people weren't taxed through inflation they would have to raise taxes elsewhere to get the same tax revenue.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  87. Poor Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real tragedy is that Canadians won't be able to read the pennyarcade web comic anymore...

  88. Re:Just like in Norway too by geekoid · · Score: 1

    All they would do is get rid of denominations that inflation has caused to cost more to produce than they are worth."

    common misconception.
    The cost to produce is a one time cost of 1.5 cents.

    A penny is worth a penny for EVERY TRANSACTION it is in. It is worth nothing between transactions.

    Rounding is different then adjustments for inflation.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  89. Curious by shiftless · · Score: 1

    I wonder....do Canadians have the opposite problem? American quarters somehow finding their way into a Canadian's pocket, ruining his plans when he tries to buy a pop from the machine or operate a payphone? Or do the Canuck machines happily accept both, since you know, why would one want a Canadian quarter when one can have an American one?

    Just curious...

    1. Re:Curious by aclarke · · Score: 1

      You're a pretty funny guy. FYI the C$ is currently worth slightly more than the USD.

      I've never encountered a vending machine in Canada that takes US coins. Then again, I don't really use vending machines. In general, Canadian stores will take US coins without blinking an eye, at least when it comes to pennies and dimes. I wouldn't try to use a US quarter in Canada, so I don't really know what would happen. In the US, I've never knowingly handed a cashier a Canadian coin and had it accepted. Here, US/Canadian dimes and pennies seem more or less interchangeable. Generally, American cashiers won't accept a Canadian penny if they notice it.

    2. Re:Curious by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I often have American change in my pocket including Quarters. They're treated the same as Canadian money though not sure about vending machines and pay phones seem to be all gone.
      The worse was a while back when someone slipped me a Greek coin, 50 somethings dated 1990, instead of a loonie. That was a dollar lost.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  90. Re:Just like in Norway too by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Those aren't global currencies.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. Re:Just like in Norway too by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    So you're going to pay $0.01 more for each coffee?

    $1.51 with card = $1.51, with cash = $1.50

    $1.49 with cash = $1.50, with card = $1.49

    I'll add my 0 cents:
    $1.49 + 12% HST = $1.6688
    This will be rounded down to $1.65, so you're paying $0.0188 LESS for each coffee at that price.

  92. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Buying the helicopters is not the only cost in the mix. They have to be fueled, maintained, piloted, housed, etc for who knows how long. The purchase cost plus the penalties may still have been less than the purchase cost plus the operating costs, which would make it cost effective to cancel. (I have no idea if this is true or not, I'm just throwing the possibility out there.)

    Given our arctic waters, we should be buying nuclear subs, not air breathing diesels.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  93. Long Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We Aussie's got rid of our 1 and 2 cent 20 years years ago.

  94. Americans for Common Cents by fade-in · · Score: 2
    Great! Now that Canada is getting rid of the penny, we in the USA will be stuck with them FOREVER out of principle.

    I don't understand these people:
    http://pennies.org/
    http://www.pennylovers.org/

    Just checkout this unassailable logic from pennies.org:

    Over three-quarters of Americans (77%) are concerned merchants would raise prices without the penny. And they're probably right. Raymond Lombra, Ph.D., Professor of Economics at Penn State University, told a Congressional committee in 1990 that rounding cash sales up or down to the nearest nickel would cost consumers over $600 million annually.

    So that's what, less than $2 for every man, woman and child in the nation each year? I'll gladly pay $2 a year to never have to waste time with pennies. My time is worth that much to me.

    --
    This sig is inappropriate in a post-9/11 world.
  95. Two sides of the coin to me by bjdevil66 · · Score: 2

    Bit of relevant trivia: There is a US precedent for eliminating a coin for being too small in currency. The US Half Cent was around until just before the Civil War. We ended that program without any major currency problem popping up.

    Just like we tossed the half cent and rounded up or down, it's probably time to do the same with the penny. In a decade or two (or sooner, depending on the coming wave of inflation), the nickel should probably follow suit. I'll miss what you WERE, Mr. Penny, but I won't miss what you are today.

    A question for the remaining defenders of the penny: Do you have a pile of pennies in your car or at home that you haven't touched or forgotten about for more than a month? If so, your own economic sensibilities should see the problem and want to eliminate it.

  96. Re:Just like in Norway too by lyml · · Score: 1

    Sounds like someone with a calculator and a bunch of coins could save a lot of money in several small purchases. Beats using coupons.

    Yes at a whopping maximum saving of NOK 0.49 per purchase (requiring you to buy fifty-one x.99 items) if you run from store to store you could make maybe six purchases an hour and get save a whopping of NOK 2.94 an hour or about USD 0.50.

    Something tells me this is not a big problem.

  97. Re:Just like in Norway too by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    I fired Verizon because they overcharged me $0.02. Then I was stuck getting screwed by AT&T for two years. Real bright move. Sometimes it's better just to pay the bill and be done with it. My time is worth more than that.

  98. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats! Now let's assume you actually did this right, instead of the wrong way you're doing it. You save $3.65 a year. Retard.

  99. Re:Just like in Norway too by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

    I've just been to Australia where they round to the nearest 5 cents. It works both ways - if the last digit it 1,2.3 or 4 they round down, otherwise up. They can fix the prices a bit, but it depends how many things you buy.

  100. Re:Love It - even though I'm cynical about the int by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

    Buying the helicopters is not the only cost in the mix. They have to be fueled, maintained, piloted, housed, etc for who knows how long. The purchase cost plus the penalties may still have been less than the purchase cost plus the operating costs, which would make it cost effective to cancel. (I have no idea if this is true or not, I'm just throwing the possibility out there.)

    Only if we didn't need helicopters. :)

    We still use the Sea Kings for SAR, among other uses. So rather than having newer helicopters that were more reliable, more fuel efficient, and easier to get parts for, we keep a fleet of ancient helicopters in the sky, because the conservatives cancelled a contract that was signed by the liberals. And in so doing, they paid cancellation fees that were more expensive than buying the silly helicopters would have been in the first place. :)

    And I agree with you on nuclear subs. We should be building our own, not buying 2nd hand subs that had been decommissioned by the Brits. There was a time when we had the best shipyards in the world, and I think if we're going to be buying ships, we should be putting that money into our own economy, not somebody else's.

  101. Before the ponze federal reserve by DCFusor · · Score: 1
    Pennies had value...it was a useful chunk of currency, there were even things priced at a penny - and 5 and dime stores. By printing more money than the increase in true goods and services, the money has been devalued so badly that a penny isn't worth it to carry anymore, much less make. But it's not like that's our fault. We didn't continuously devalue the currency as a stealth tax on everyone - they did.

    A $20 dollar gold piece, on the other hand, back in the cowboy days, would buy you a Colt Peacemaker, a holster and ammo, a suit, and a night on the town with a saloon girl.

    That hasn't changed much - that gold coin is now worth about $2k. Won't get you the Peacemaker - it's appreciated more than gold (who knew), but if you substitute a Glock or something cheaper yet, you're still right about there. It'll be a cheap suit and a cheap whore - but it was about like that then, too.

    Anybody get it yet?

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  102. "This sounds familiar." by billybob_jcv · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, they did it in Superman III."

  103. Re:Just like in Norway too by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    What does that have to do with anything? How many do you think is using US metal cash (not paper, not electronic) outside of the US?

    --
    What?
  104. Australia did that years ago by WillKemp · · Score: 1

    The Australian government got rid of 1c and 2c coins 20 years ago. The Australian dollar and the Canadian dollar have always been pretty much equivalent in value.

  105. Re:Just like in Norway too by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    I was gonna comment, but this is just too silly. You're trolling me, right?

    --
    What?
  106. Re:Just like in Norway too by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    Point me again to where it's in the merchants favour. He can set his prices how he wants and I can spend my money where I want

    --
    What?
  107. Now we are true pennyless... by irventu · · Score: 1

    ..for being pennywise yet pound foolish--look out Britain, you are next. ;)

    --
    Christopher Pecoraro - Irventu.com
  108. Re:Just like in Norway too by jmv · · Score: 1

    You know what? You're already being ripped off. When you buy this $1.95 item with 5% tax, the total is $2.0475 and the evil merchant rounds it up to $2.05, depriving you of a quarter of a cent. We have to bring the quarter cent back (yes I'm aware such a thing never existed)!

  109. Re:Just like in Norway too by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

    I'll add my 0 cents: $1.49 + 12% HST = $1.6688 This will be rounded down to $1.65, so you're paying $0.0188 LESS for each coffee at that price.

    See, the HST IS good for something after all!

  110. the pain with the pennies going away by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    is when things are really cheap they are useful. When I was a kid (~25 years ago) my favorite candies were penny candies. By the time I was 12 or so stores stopped selling them. I'm guessing they started costing more than a penny. So you had to pay a dollar for about 60 of them in a pack instead. Was great to have things like that because it was nice to be able to get a chocolate bar and a handful of different flavored candies when I was a kid. You can't do it anymore, you pretty much are stuck buying extra large chocolate bars, big bags of chips, whole bags of jelly candies etc. A kid can't go to a store and get a handful of different stuff anymore. Boo. As an adult I have a credit card so they could get rid of all physical cash as far as I'm concerned.

  111. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Unless you keep a certain minimum balance in the bank, or pay a monthly fee, you get hit with a service charge every time you use your card in Canada

    Not to sound like a schill, but three years ago, I moved all our day-to-day stuff to PC Financial - no minimum balance and no fees, I have yet to run into a downside.

  112. my 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd use the cent symbol located above the 2 on my keyboard, but /. doesn't handle that modern technology.

    This is a slick way for the CA Gov to increase taxes. They tried/talked about this in the U.S. (so i hear)
    many times and it didn't happen. I can bet that CA will begin making pennys again.

    From the sound of it, does it mean that they'll remove pennys from circulation?

  113. How about solving the devaluation problem.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone ever considered that the problem isn't the penny itself rather than the fact that governments insist on devaluing the money people are holding?

  114. Thank You! by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    It's because of people like you that when I was growing up young in a poor family I was able to feed myself by collecting pennies and rolling them up. I could usually get $1 a day, which was 2 steamed hot dogs or 1 quebec fry, plenty of calories for a starving child.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  115. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think you're being clever, but really, you're not.

    First, the proposal was to eliminate denominations smaller than 0.05. So no, a 92 cent item would not go through the progression 0.92->0.90->1.00. It would go 0.92->0.90->0.95.

    Second, regulating that bills paid in cash are rounded to the nearest minimum cash increment is already part of the law! Such laws are required in the US because sales taxes, discounts, and so forth routinely create final bill amounts which involve fractions of a penny. You're not supposed to get cheated by merchants choosing to round up instead of rounding to nearest. It would be a trivial legislative change to require that this rounding increment be $0.05 instead of $0.01.

    Third, before you repeat your claim about this requiring price controls to work around merchants gaming prices, no. You are being a stupid-head. Stop doing that. It's annoying.

    Problem #1 with that theory: Merchants who game their prices will have to compete with merchants who don't.

    Problem #2 with that theory: Merchants can't predict exactly which things their customers buy, and in what quantity. Let's say pennies go away and Bob's Sleazeball Jerk Store decides to reprice such that any item, after tax, is $0.03 more than the nearest $0.05 increment. After all, that means Bob makes $0.02 extra per item, right?

    Well, no. Buying more than one item affects the outcome of this little game a great deal, because it multiplies that $0.03 excess by N:

    $0.03 * 1 = $0.03 : You must pay $0.05, Bob wins 2 cents
    $0.03 * 2 = $0.06 : You must pay $0.05, You win 1 cent
    $0.03 * 3 = $0.09 : You must pay $0.10, Bob wins 1 cent
    $0.03 * 4 = $0.12 : You must pay $0.10, You win 2 cents
    $0.03 * 5 = $0.15 : Exact change is possible

    It's a repeating cycle from that point on. Which means that so long as the number of items bought is random, it averages out to even. If you think merchants are gaming you anyways, you can easily defeat it by randomizing your buying habits.

    In fact, regardless of whether they're gaming you, you can easily manipulate your buying patterns to always win the rounding stage of making change. It wouldn't be worth the time you'd have to invest, but it wouldn't be hard to do!

  116. Re:Just like in Norway too by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    You're obviously with the wrong bank if you pay for using your card. I have never had to have a minimum balance nor pay any fees nor pay for transactions with CIBC, Scotiabank, and President's choice.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  117. Re:Just like in Norway too by pnewhook · · Score: 1

    Companies and banks have been rounding up/down transactions to the nearest penny for years, and you've apparently never cared what happens to that fraction of a cent. Without pennies it will be exactly the same thing but it will be fractions of a nickel. I really don't see the issue.

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  118. Re:Just like in Norway too by turing_m · · Score: 1

    That is interesting. Back then people were supposedly paid $1 for one day's work. So $1 back then = $200 today. A half cent then would be $1 today. So if we wanted to get rid of other equivalently useless coinage, we would dispense with every denomination below $1 (not that I would advocate it).

    Source:
    http://www.coinfacts.com/half_cents/half_cents.html

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  119. Re:Just like in Norway too by dryeo · · Score: 1

    This is Canada, we now have a conservative government who wouldn't dream of regulating business in such a way that might benefit consumers and sure enough all they've done is decided to stop making pennies, it's up to business to decide how to rip people off, with the blessings of the government.
    I still can't believe these assholes who are out to destroy everything nice about Canada, got voted a majority (38%).

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  120. A penny is more cost effective than a dollar by chrismcb · · Score: 1

    Well I guess this is as relevant to Canada since they don't have a dollar bill. But for all the talk of "it costs more than one cent to make a cent" it is more cost effective to make 100 pennies than to make a one dollar bill. The life of a penny is decades. The life of a dollar bill is something like a year.

  121. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at that level of rounding people WILL start gaming the system, hell i know i would. coffee costs $1.51 - i'm going to pay with a card. coffee costs 1.49 - i'm going to pay in cash.

    So you're going to pay $0.01 more for each coffee?

    $1.51 with card = $1.51, with cash = $1.50

    $1.49 with cash = $1.50, with card = $1.49

    Not sure if GP referring to rounding to nearest dollar or dumb.

  122. Surcharges on cashless payments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I checked, paying by card in Norway had a surcharge on each purchase. Is that still the case and how much is it?

  123. Use caution by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    If a lighter gets too hot it'll explode in your hand, especially risky if you hold it at an angle to burn something on the ground. Maybe use a BBQ lighter or better yet acetylene torch.

  124. Re:Just like in Norway too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yes, this would force me to use a card, because there's no way "rounding to the nearest $0.05" will work out in my favour.

    It can if you want it to.

  125. A penny saved is a penny made by hundredrabh · · Score: 1

    Just my CDN 0.01

    --
    --whacky
  126. Nice scam! by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    I can see more than a few business adjusting their prices just so they can round up most cash transaction in their favours not the small business because it will not be worth it but supermarket, walmart and all the big retailers who make millions of small transaction every day. With the right software and maybe some social market simulation it going to be very easy for them to game us out of billions, two or one pennies at a time.

  127. Government's inflated sense of entitlement by shiftless · · Score: 1

    I agree that it is applying a temporary fix for a problem introduced by inflation. However, if we are going to keep the Keynesian system going it should at least be patched appropriately.

    We shouldn't--and can't--keep the fundamentally flawed Keynesian system going.

    I'm in two minds about what I think about inflation. On the one hand, it is a form of taxation or perhaps theft, depending on who the recipient is (which is somewhat difficult to find out).

    No, there is no "depending." It's theft, plain and simple.

    On the other hand, it does induce people to spend money so that people remain employed.

    People aren't driven to spend money because of inflation. They are driven to spend money because someone else has something they need. Money is only the value exchange mechanism.

    If people weren't taxed through inflation they would have to raise taxes elsewhere to get the same tax revenue.

    Wow, this is some SCARY thinking buddy.

    The government is NOT entitled to my money, especially considering 90% of what they steal from MY pocket is wasted by them.

  128. Rounding in software by eugene_sk · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian point of sale developer I see lots of pain implementing this rounding in software. I wish they would have made it round to 10 cents instead of a nickel

  129. yes [citation included] by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    The US law also forbids exporting the coins to melt down

    USC Title 31 Section 5111 subsection D (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5111) gives the Secretary of the Treasury the option, http://www.usmint.gov/pressroom/?action=press_release&ID=724 [usmint.gov] is about that option being used.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  130. this happens with paper currency too by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Massachusetts is the home of Crane Paper Company, which makes the paper for US paper currency; their lobbying has helped keep the $1 bill in circulation.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  131. Re:Just like in Norway too by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    since it's the government doing it (taking away pennies and forcing the rounding of transaction totals at point-of-sale).. THEY should be the ones to take the hit (not the consumer, as we know merchants will shoot to mark prices to maximize rounding UP otherwise).. for taxable transactions, the TAX owed on the sale, and collected by the merchant, should be reduced as needed to get the total transaction DOWN to the next $0.05.

  132. Re:Just like in Norway too by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    That's the beauty of being retired. You have the time to stand up and fight about small stuff that you wouldn't bother with if you were working. Very good for the soul.

  133. Re:Just like in Norway too by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
    Sorry, but it is hardly silly, and certainly not a troll. I lived through the price control era of the 70's in the US, where there were mandates on prices of gasoline. It wasn't pretty. Shortages meant things like "alternate day" purchases. If your license plate ended in an odd number, you got gas on odd days. Even then, lines around the block.

    Telling merchants what they have to do to their prices isn't going to happen. "You must round your prices down" will result in exactly the kinds of workarounds that I suggested. You can legislate rounding if you legislate the removal of the penny, but you can't legislate away price increases.

  134. Re:Just like in Norway too by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

    I agree that price controls are the work of the devil.
    I do not agree that a law on rounding is in itself a price control.
    And I do not agree that phasing out the penny will lead to prices increases, on average.
    If you make the 10-cent the smallest denomination, the 97-cent items will cost you $1, leaving you 3c short. But buy two 97c items, and you will leave the store with 4c "extra". Buy a lot of stuff, and the result quickly approaches random.
    Even now, there is rounding. You could make a 1/10c coin. Or a 1/2c. It would give more accurate pricing. Most people would agree that it would be more trouble than it's worth. The penny is going the same way, too.

    --
    What?
  135. Re:Just like in Norway too by hierophanta · · Score: 1

    no. if you can follow what was said in the post i responded to then:

    $1.51 with card = $1.51, with cash = $2

    $1.49 with cash = $1, with card = $1.49

    i thought that was pretty basic.

  136. Re:Just like in Norway too by hierophanta · · Score: 1

    we were discussing the rounding of the 50 øre coin. which is why i said - at that level instead of at this level to be clear that i was referring to what was just said and not the article

  137. Re:Just like in Norway too by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

    we were discussing the rounding of the 50 øre coin. which is why i said - at that level instead of at this level to be clear that i was referring to what was just said and not the article

    Actually, it wasn't clear at all. You used

    $1.51

    as your example. If you were discussing kroner, you shouldn't have used a dollar sign.

    Besides, $1.51 will buy you a coffee in Canada, but in Norway it'll be 20 NOK.

  138. Re:Just like in Norway too by hierophanta · · Score: 1

    i agree, i was not clear