Slashdot Mirror


FBI Says American Universities Infiltrated by Spies

An anonymous reader writes, using various bits of the article: "While most international students, researchers and professors come to the U.S. for legitimate reasons, universities are an 'ideal place' for foreign intelligence services 'to find recruits, propose and nurture ideas, learn and even steal research data, or place trainees,' according to a 2011 FBI report. Tretyakov was quoted as saying, 'We often targeted academics because their job was to share knowledge and information by teaching it to others, and this made them less guarded than, say, UN diplomats.' China has 'lots of students who either are forced to or volunteer to collect information,' he said. 'I've heard it said, "If it wanted to steal a beach, Russia would send a forklift. China would send a thousand people who would pick up a grain of sand at a time."' China also has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S. 'for the sole purpose of acquiring our technology,' said former CIA officer S. Eugene Poteat."

81 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.

    1. Re:So it begins by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.

      It's worse than that. It's the next Great American War. The country needs one every decade or it's entire political system crumbles.

      The only difference is the movies that will be done about this one. It would be quite nice it China finally switched hollywood from sand war movies to spies, subs and intrigue like in COMMUNISTS! time.

    2. Re:So it begins by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your last comment comment about China is interesting:

      The villain in the remake of Red Dawn was actually switched from China (realistic) to North Korea (ridiculous) in order to not upset China (and its movie audiences). I guess the producers figured that "vaguely Asian-looking" actors could just as easily be viewed by American audiences as Korean.

      There is "sand" involved here, though: heads are nestled deeply in it.

      It's interesting that you and the parent AC believe this is somehow a "war on the academic sector". There is indeed a war, but it's not coming from within. First, a backdrop, beginning with the fact that China is on track to exceed US military spending by 2025:

      Chinese Insider Offers Rare Glimpse of U.S.-China Frictions
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/world/asia/chinese-insider-offers-rare-glimpse-of-us-china-frictions.html

      "The senior leadership of the Chinese government increasingly views the competition between the United States and China as a zero-sum game, with China the likely long-range winner if the American economy and domestic political system continue to stumble, according to an influential Chinese policy analyst. China views the United States as a declining power, but at the same time believes that Washington is trying to fight back to undermine, and even disrupt, the economic and military growth that point to China’s becoming the world’s most powerful country."

      Asia's balance of power: China’s military rise
      http://www.economist.com/node/21552212

      "NO MATTER how often China has emphasised the idea of a peaceful rise, the pace and nature of its military modernisation inevitably cause alarm. As America and the big European powers reduce their defence spending, China looks likely to maintain the past decade’s increases of about 12% a year. Even though its defence budget is less than a quarter the size of America’s today, China’s generals are ambitious. The country is on course to become the world’s largest military spender in just 20 years or so."

      China’s military rise: The dragon’s new teeth
      http://www.economist.com/node/21552193

      And now on to what's happening every day in US academic and business environments:

      How China Steals Our Secrets
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/opinion/how-china-steals-our-secrets.html

      China's Cyber Thievery Is National Policy—And Must Be Challenged
      http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970203718504577178832338032176-lMyQjAxMTAyMDAwOTEwNDkyWj.html

      FBI Traces Trail of Spy Ring to China
      http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970203961204577266892884130620-lMyQjAxMTAyMDAwNzEwNDcyWj.html

      NSA: China is Destroying U.S. Economy Via Security Hacks
      http://www.dailytech.com/NSA+China+is+Destroying+US+Economy+Via+Security+Hacks/article24328.htm

      Former cybersecurity czar: Every major U.S. company has been hacked by China
      http://www.itworld.com/security/262616/former-cybersecurity-czar-every-major-us-company-has-been-hacked-china

      China Att

    3. Re:So it begins by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Educated is dangerous for two reasons.

      1 - the more educated you are the more capable of making BOMBS you are. This educated people who have degrees in science are dangerous.

      2 - the more educated you are the greater resistance to the propaganda bullshit that we need the TSA, Homeland security and the PATRIOT ACT. And that is the most dangerous of them all. Someone that can see through bullshit and think for themselves.

      WE need to round these people up and put them in concentration camps to keep society safe.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:So it begins by BLKMGK · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You missed this one http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/3319656

      3 years old and as pertinent as ever. I know someone who works in a manufacturing sector for highly specialized parts, China is a customer. It was VERY interesting that they sent a team of 10 to visit their plant to "inspect" and were quite pissed when they weren't given free reign to look around and were only allowed to inspect product in a sanitary room....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    5. Re:So it begins by c0lo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      Yes, with a single condition... that US upholds those ideals and principles and not trample them down... The end does NOT justify the means, especially when the means run contrary to the ends.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:So it begins by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The simple facts:

      China has more people than the USA
      China has more raw materiel than the USA
      China has more money than the USA
      China has more academics than the USA

      This is a no win situation, unless you are China

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    7. Re:So it begins by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

      But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China believes it to be.

    8. Re:So it begins by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...China’s generals are ambitious. The country is on course to become the world’s largest military spender in just 20 years or so.

      So a country with four times the population of the United States may match the U.S.'s military spending two decades from now...shocking.

      Look, what exactly did you think was going to happen when China became a developed country with a modern economy and a fully-educated workforce? They're going to have money to spend. When did not having the absolute most-powerful military become a disaster for the U.S.?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    9. Re:So it begins by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When did not having the absolute most-powerful military become a disaster for the U.S.?

      Right around the time we decided it was our job to put our fingers into every country's business and to hell with what anyone else thought.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    10. Re:So it begins by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      The problem there is that while the US has good university level education, particularly the postgraduate level it has quite poor high school education.

      Making it hard to sustain the university level on the back of that high school education. And of course you would also be killing an earner on the export side of the trade balance.

      Homeland Security could of course do their job with respect to visas and not let the spies in in the first place. Though of course when all the documentation you have on a person comes from the government you suspect of doing the spying that's going to be a rather hard job. And of course we don't want them to stop our spies in return....

    11. Re:So it begins by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Informative

      The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.

      You speak as if this is ridiculous, unprecedented, or illogical. But the Soviets did this for years, poking around in colleges looking for kids ripe for their cause. Take youthful rebellion, gather those youths in a place where that rebellion is nurtured and encouraged, and it's a perfect recipe to recruit. And we're talking about people that are young enough to be angry but not old enough to be worldly or wise, smart and capable and yet putty in the hands of those that know what they're doing. Perfect place to find passionate recruits ready to fight "the system".

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    12. Re:So it begins by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The simple facts:

      China has more people than the USA
      China has more raw materiel than the USA
      China has more money than the USA
      China has more academics than the USA

      This is a no win situation, unless you are China

      China does not have more money than the US. They're not even the number one economy yet (though they're projected by some to be so by 2016). Also, China has a huge problem. While they've made great strides in bettering their economy, out of their 1+ billion people, the vast majority are still poor. I mean really poor, not American Poor with cable TV, cell phones, free school lunch for the kids, and two cars. There's beginning to be some problems with envy among their rural populace. And China has some financial issues in the structure of their economy that could be quite catastrophic, at least in the long term. So yes, China is our biggest potential adversary, but things are not perfect in the Middle Kingdom either, and it's going to get very interesting there.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    13. Re:So it begins by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China is not American. Mock the culture, but the USA is where it's at precisely because they're American.

      China is also competing in a region with relatively new found global powers. The BRIC union could fall apart at the slightest provocation from one of it's neighbors. It's only held together by common interests...for now.

      Will America lose it's #1 position in the world in terms of GDP and growth? Perhaps. But assuming politics and our currency doesn't implode (which it might), the nation is rather stabile. China is stabile too. But it's stability is held together by force. Smooth and polished. But also prone to minor cracks which leads into major fissures. China's political system is simply not sustainable in the modern world of high speed communication.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    14. Re:So it begins by UltimaBuddy · · Score: 2

      Begins? Anti-intellectualism has been around since there have been intellectuals.

    15. Re:So it begins by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny how none of your links support the idea that universities should be protected from Chinese spies. It almost sounds like the fact that they might actually LEARN something there is not really surprising!

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      The problem arises when in the name of protecting principles and ideals, processes and procedures are enacted that kill off those exact principles and ideals.

      And that's exactly what is happening right now. What good is it to fight a war, when fighting the war means you are the same as your enemy?

      By the way, China holds another lesson that is far more important than all this handwringing about Communists (which they really aren't): that even if you conquer a country, you might not actually conquer the people. And that's really all that matters.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    16. Re:So it begins by timeOday · · Score: 2

      So finish your story. Did that oh-so-insidious strategy work out pretty well for the Soviet Empire?

    17. Re:So it begins by cjcela · · Score: 2

      In the long term, and if not corrected, the unequal distribution of wealth in the US will be a major factor for our country decline. In a sense, the people with power to decide is playing against our own country, because their personal interests conflict with the common interests. 50 years from now we will look back and wonder how could we have been so blind.

    18. Re:So it begins by FhnuZoag · · Score: 2

      Maybe the absence of a global steward is better than the US.

    19. Re:So it begins by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      No, only since intellectuals started questioning religion.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    20. Re:So it begins by sadboyzz · · Score: 2

      Yes, because the 1.3 billion Chinese are a borg-like entity, collectively known as "China", sharing a single hive mind and bent on a single purpose -- to destroy the US and the "West"!

      Your fantasies aside, what you refer to as "China" is really the Chinese Communist Government, the current ruling entity in the country known as China. It has been in power for a little over 60 years, and unless helped by, ironically, people like you, it is extremely unlikely to see another 60 in power. (Coincidentally, the communists would never even have risen to power in the first place without the help of the Japanese invasion at a crucial point in the Chinese civil war http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March )

      But yes, I guess China isn't really a threat, and doesn't view the West as a threat

      If China really does view the West as threat, it is only because the history of the past one hundred and fifty years taught it to:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Summer_Palace#Destruction_of_the_Summer_Palace
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shandong_Problem

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      Oh please....

    21. Re:So it begins by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 2

      I also meant to add that former Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Fyodorovich Dobrynin wrote a book where he said less than 20% of Soviet spy activity went into trying to get state secrets/military technology, while most of their effort went into trying to boost the 60s counter-culture movement and, in particular, take over the education system so that children could be indoctrinated to accept Soviet style socialism as dogmatic truth so they could defeat us without firing a weapon in the long run.

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
    22. Re:So it begins by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Precisely the point -> spies are two-way corridors.

      For example: you're a Soviet lad who is in the US, studying at University. Your minders have asked you to pick up a few technologies of interest, and have made vague threats, directed at family members, should you fail to complete your quest. Being a good citizen, having attended all the 'right' schools, and attended party meetings, you agree to the task. During your stay, however, you start to enjoy living in the US. Perhaps it's the part where the CIA is a little less belligerent than the KGB, perhaps it's the fact that you have freedom of speech (you can speak your mind, and not worry about someone writing it down in a file somewhere), perhaps it's the weather (winters in Moscow can be harsh), or the supermarkets (food, on demand, and lots of choices). Whatever the case, you slowly begin questioning your commitments back home: you start thinking how nice it would be if you could stay here.

      So, you make one of the following choices: to return to your country, or to work to bring your family over. If you return, your minders will get some information, but they also have to deal with someone who knows, first-hand, the depth of their lies: if you're morally casual, then you may be happy with the lies, and work to continue them while profiting; if you're not, then you slowly work to introduce some of the concepts you've experienced first-hand into your native land. If you stay, you have to quietly get your family out of harm's way, which is a difficult task at best, but the CIA, supposedly, can pull things off, provided it's worth it to them (like every intelligence agency, they love defectors from the other side).

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    23. Re:So it begins by alambda · · Score: 2

      No, USA is not where it is simply because it is American.

      The Western culture, as derived from Europe, is not The Universal culture, a precondition to civilization. At a glance you might think it is, as it has been the dominant culture for the past two hundred years or so, but this has more to do with luck and coincidence than with the values of ancient greece. Indeed, until the 18th century China was the GDP leader, by far, and even it's GDP per capita in the major cities surpassed that of any European city.

      China has the longest-running statecraft in history. I don't expect this to be replaced by any other system anytime soon. Take Japan, which you might think is a Western country, but had you lived there, you'd quickly realize it's not. In Japan, from where I'm currently writing this comment from, the important values are not those of democracy and justice, but that of harmony. This manifests in a multitude of forms, some difficult or long to explain, but if you look at numbers, most court cases are settled out of the court, to keep harmony, to avoid conflict. See the voter turnouts, and you'll see Japan is not really a properly functioning democracy, although on paper it is. The government is seen in a completely different light. This all is even more true in China, which has had less Western influence on it than Japan.

      Economic growth, modernization is not synonymous to Westernization. You are wrong to expect China to change to more Western values as it modernizes. In fact, quite the opposite might take place: The big global co-operation organizations, such as the IMF, were all spawned by the economic leaders, namely the West, at the time; pushing Western culture, brainwashing people to think that to have all the modern marvels, also the culture should change to resemble that of the West. Now when China is going to be No. 1, don't you think the opposite is going to happen, G7 has already largely been replaced by G20...

  2. underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This was a headline for the 1960's. Today its much, much worse - and sadly only now noticed. 3,000 companies? Only? And how many tens of thousands of grain-pickers? China, Iran, you name it - the US and the West are over-run....

    1. Re:underestimated and decades late by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was a headline for the 1960's. Today its much, much worse - and sadly only now noticed. 3,000 companies? Only? And how many tens of thousands of grain-pickers? China, Iran, you name it - the US and the West are over-run....

      Since the 1960s? The Cambridge Five were recruited at university back in the 1930s. This sort of thing has probably been going on as long as there have been universities. I bet the Romans infiltrated Greek universities to steal their latest catapult technology.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:underestimated and decades late by Luckyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost as if US didn't have far more front companies, students in exchange programs and "N"GOs. for stealing from other nations. This is a norm, and intelligence war for tech has been ongoing for centuries at the very least.

    3. Re:underestimated and decades late by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the simple fact is i'm sure we do the same thing duh! Universities are where one often begins to question the way things are for the first time. You are a young adult, in some ways grown and others not, and many cling to idealism before that lovely jaded cynicism that so many of us have seeps in. Remember its a lot harder to recruit someone who just blindly accepts things at face value, easier when they begin to question why things are the way they are. I do find it ironic that the same things that help someone grow as a person can be labeled as "potentially subversive" depending on which flag you are waving.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:underestimated and decades late by wisty · · Score: 2

      The difference is, Chinese don't often have handlers. They aren't generally spies, but know that if they can knock fo some IP, they can be very successful in a Chinese university.

      This is not too different from what other academics do - it's quite common for academics to leave with a USB stick full of the stuff they were working on, which they use in their next gig.

      I guess there might be some more active encouragement in strategic stuff.

    5. Re:underestimated and decades late by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the Romans conquered Greece and stole all their academics wholesale. But Greece had the last laugh because all these academics captured by the Romans became tutors who raised the next generation of Roman elite to in the image of Greece. Roman mythology and culture became Greek in all but name only. History can repeat again. All these Chinese academics coached in USA go back with a lot more culture acclimatization than the stolen grains of sand. In the end China might become America in all but name.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:underestimated and decades late by mbone · · Score: 2

      This is not too different from what other academics do - it's quite common for academics to leave with a USB stick full of the stuff they were working on, which they use in their next gig.

      Yeah, because they wrote it.

    7. Re:underestimated and decades late by couchslug · · Score: 2

      I don't find it ironic. If my job were industrial espionage I'd be all over the low-hanging fruit. Hormonal youth whose bullshit filters only work in ONE direction are vulnerable to "affirmation exploits".

      I believe in "putting on your OPFOR hat" and considering what you'd do if you were the other guy/gal.

      "Remember its a lot harder to recruit someone who just blindly accepts things at face value, easier when they begin to question why things are the way they are"

      But harder yet again to recruit someone wise enough to trust NO ONE and to QUESTION EVERYTHING. "Lovely jaded cynicism" is HEALTHY. Innocence/ignorance is praised only because we are taught to admire it from a _religious_ perspective where being a chump is valued by mullahs (of whatever superstition). In other news, hyena value slow zebra...

      If you wish to exploit the orthodox "blindly accepting" you can use what they blindly accept. If you appeal to the naive ignorant yearnings of youth, you use their need for affirmation by a "counter-culture" to exploit what they "blindly accept".

      Nothing unusual, and done before every election.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  3. World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Virtually all of us are infested with CIA. What's the problem?

    1. Re:World Responds by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a clear difference.

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      The chinese are:
      1 - far.
      2 - non white.
      3 - non americans.

      Thus, they are inherently bad. Now it's just a matter of finding out which kind of bad they are.

      Terrorists doesn't seem to match, they are way down on the "terrorist-brown scale". So it's obviously either druglords, or spies.

      This month we'll try "SPIES!". It it doesn't stick, we'll try "DRUGLORDS!" next month.

      As a last resort, it's always possible to go back to "COMMUNISTS!".

    2. Re:World Responds by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      Lol. You don't need the rest of the comment, that's funny enough.

    3. Re:World Responds by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      Lol. You don't need the rest of the comment, that's funny enough.

      As happens when you watch "Idiocracy" it's funny until you remember how many people actually, seriously, believe that.

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      It might not even be a bad thing if it wasn't for the other side of the coin. "We are mostly good, except for some rotten apples." isn't bad. The problem comes when the subconscious adds "Unlike everybody else."

    4. Re:World Responds by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      Well, appropriately, China does. If and when they get to the top of the economic heap, all of us non-Han will be niggers.

    5. Re:World Responds by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      I do. My grandfather died fighting it. It was called the "Third Reich".

      Not a hundred years ago, patriotism to a degree that would alarm us today was pretty much the norm. Germany overdid it, but the rest of the western world wasn't all that much behind. Look at UK or US propaganda films from the early war years.

      But, over here in Europe, everyone got the idea of the nation pretty much bombed out of them. Some by the Axis, some by the Allies, a few especially lucky ones first by the one and then by the other. Afterwards, we sat down and said "ok, that was fucked up. Let's not do that again, ok?" - and the idea of the European Union was born.
      While we don't have a european identity, yet, and identify as german, french, british, etc. that spirit of Europe is there. And while the german press, for example, calls the greek dirty, lazy bastards, almost nobody in Europe would so much as contemplate the idea of bombing another European country.

      But this strong concept of national identity has remained in the US. We Europeans look with bemusement at quirks such as playing the national anthem before national(!) football games. International games, ok we did that. But national games? That simply makes no sense to us. Everyone is from the same country, so why the heck play the national anthem?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:World Responds by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice revisionism. Not so long ago Yugoslavia was bombed by the enlightened Europeans among others for daring to defend it's historic province of Kosovo against KLA Albanian narco-thugs. And prior to that, once the most economically successful and the least authoritarian country of the socialist block it had the best chance for smooth transition to post-soviet era. Yet the West actively encouraged nationalism and disintegration processes.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    7. Re:World Responds by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This. One thing that amazes me is how quickly certain "Europeans" forget their own history, and their own dirty dealings. There is a reason for the saying "Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it".

      Even more so how they like to label those who are not pro-EU as "anti-european" or "un-european", even if they live in Europe (the continent), which pretty much shuts down any intelligent discourse on the path and future of Europe (the "My way or the highway" approach). Their blind faith in the whole thing is scary. Even those of us who don't like the EU are still European you know ;)

    8. Re:World Responds by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ha ha ha ha.

      "...almost nobody in Europe would so much as contemplate the idea of bombing another European country..."

      I recall reading almost exactly the same sentiment in a book written in about 1906.
      And then again, in a book written in 1931.

      And then considering the genteel, restrained conflict that took place in Europe 1992-1995 (you might remember the RAPE CAMPS?), I'm going to take those genteel protestations of "European Pacifism" with a gigantic grain of salt.

      Europe has had the longest period of interstate peace in its history, MAINLY because of the Cold War (something few Europeans I've met will credit) and the likelihood of nuclear annihilation. It's had very little to do with general Euro-amity.

      Now that the nuclear arsenals of the US and Russians are no longer necessarily hair-triggered on Europe, well, good luck with that European peace.

      Having traveled and worked extensively in Europe and with Europeans for the past 2 decades (British, German, Dutch, Belgian, Swedes, Austrians, and Italians, primarily) I find them generally MORE fundamentally racist in their judgments and assertions than any but the most redneck rural Americans.

      --
      -Styopa
    9. Re:World Responds by Tom · · Score: 2

      Good point on Yugoslavia there. However, even though I grant the point, I was talking about the european union and Yugoslavia wasn't part of it.

      There is still a border between the former east and western Europe. 50 years of forced seperation do that to people. It's still a massive difference. Travel to any french. british, spanish, italien or german city and you won't notice much difference aside from the language. But eastern Europe still is quite different.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    10. Re:World Responds by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2

      Just mentioning my personal experiences that is all, from many road trips across the European continent and from talking to many many locals.

      The opinions of the original poster is not uncommon, I have come across many EUphiles who seem hell bent on forming a EU superstate, and in doing so are papering over the cracks and just brushing past history under the carpet in the attempt to form a concept of a "European nationality".

      The same people describe those that disagree with them as non-European, which is silly. So they were born in Europe, their country is in Europe, but they are not "European" because they are not pro-EU? Come on! Talk about rubbish...

      Most people in Europe are actually quite normal, and are not particularly pro EU. Many don't like it, but do admit to the benefits it brings. Personally, I like the free travel, free movement and easy ability to work in other EU countries without much hassle, but I don't see why that needs the whole political/bureaucratic machine on top of it, most of which is grossly wasteful of money, or the Euro which never made much sense from the Monetary/Economic perspective.

      Or the whole "European" identity stuff for that matter, what is wrong with your national identity? Rather than forge a new super-identity to encompass the whole of Europe, just spend all those resources on teaching tolerance of others. Both helps keep peace in Europe, and has the advantage that it extends to the rest of the world as well.

      It is only a select minority that is pushing for all the other stuff, and they are particularly vocal (and well funded). The masses don't really seem to care one way or another, as long as the economy is good, their quality of life is getting better and they can take care of their concerns.

      You make a distinction between "forgetting" and "ignoring", which I'd argue is superfluous. How else to you "forget" history if not by ignoring it? Hitler will not be forgotten because of all the memorials, remembrance days and active effort put into not ignoring it. From days to mark when it started, to days marking certain events, to days marking the end of it all.

      And you're exhibiting the same problem... "The anti-european hysteria is from the right wing and the scared," pretty much proves my point. That sentence does not really allow for any intelligent discourse on the future of Europe and the EU, it is also a common mantra trotted out (in variations, but the same concept) whenever someone dares question the wisdom of what is being done in Europe, despite the fact it affects the entire continent.

    11. Re:World Responds by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      And prior to that, once the most economically successful and the least authoritarian country of the socialist block it had the best chance for smooth transition to post-soviet era

      What the fuck - Tito was the leader of the least authoritarian country of the socialist block? Really? Do you also consider Castro an englightened, democratic leader? What about that guy from Iraq - Hussein something or other. I mean, he lead a secular party, surely he was leading Iraq on the way to a post-Islamic era?

      Newsflash: the only reason Yugoslavia didn't fall apart was because Tito brutally repressed any time of dissent or splinter faction.

      Fucking moron.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  4. The japanese by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile the Japanese would study the beach, then copy it, in miniature.

    The Brits would copy it but get all the good bits wrong and make the bad bits worse.

    The Australians would make a copy that is just better but they would never stop feeling inferior about it.

    The greeks would expect the rest of the world to pay for it.

    The saudies would just buy it and see nothing wrong with paying a fortune for sand.

    The Germans would dig a hole in it.

    The dutch wouldn't feel happy on it until they build a sand castle to protect against the tide.

    Apple would put it in a pretty box and sell it for a premium but you could only use it as Jobs intended.

    Have I insulted everyone yet? Not on topic? Oh come on, universities have always been a haven for spies and the recruitment of spies. Duh, where else to find information, underpaid people with lots of info and impressionable young minds looking for a cause?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:The japanese by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Patent trolls would sue anyone who had a bit of land that sloped into the ocean.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:The japanese by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Patent trolls would sue anyone who had a bit of land that sloped into the ocean, a pool, a pond, a bird feeder, someone's iced tea or any other body of liquid.

      FTFY

    3. Re:The japanese by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      The Mexicans wouldn't bother to steal it, they just use America's beaches.

      The French wouldn't bother, until Britain stole it first. Then they'd want it.

    4. Re:The japanese by Tom · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're 50+ years behind the times.

      We Germans would put our towels down to mark our spot and then go for breakfast.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:The japanese by sycodon · · Score: 2

      I have to say, Slashdot comments are much more fun when they take place before American college students wake up.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  5. OH MY GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Foreigners are at an university to "nurture ideas" and to "learn"!! CALL THE FBI!!!

    1. Re:OH MY GOD by boaworm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Foreigners are at an university to "nurture ideas" and to "learn"!! CALL THE FBI!!!

      Was feeling the same. Isnt this the whole purpose of exchange students?

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
  6. How about sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, knowledge is supposed to be shared.

    As for technology, one could argue that the current patent system is broken. Besides, I personally find it hard to believe that it's necessary for the Chinese to spy a lot on US universities when all the latest gizmos are produced in China anyway.

    1. Re:How about sharing? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DARPA has a 10 stage model for this kind of thing where, roughly speaking, stage 1 is 'wouldn't it be cool to be able to listen to all of your music wherever you are?' and stage 10 is an iPod. Typically, universities only do stages 1-4 in this, where the end result is a mostly working proof-of-concept. Corporate research does stages 3-7, where the end result is a working prototype, possibly too big, or with some other serious limitations. Corporate development does stages 6-10, where the end result of the last couple of stages is a shipping product and a revision.

      If universities are trying to do stages 5-8 in this model, then that's probably the problem. It means that they're failing badly at technology transfer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  7. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The purpose of universities is to share knowledge. That's why research gets published - for the whole world to see.
    Information can not get stolen. Not when it's about copyright and not when it's about research. It can only get copied and doing that generally leads to more knowledge.

  8. Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't trust anything the FBI says. Any more than I would trust an announcement from the NKVD (The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs). What is the purpose of this announcement supposed to be? To induce paranoia and racism against any student whose genetics cannot be traced from Western Europe? Is it something along the lines of "If you see something, say something."? And look where that got us. The persecution of innocent people who look middle eastern or Indian or Pakistani. I think it's clear that our government's vision of an ideal society is to that of East Germany except more racially pure.

    The school's campus in Dubai needed a bailout and an unlikely savior had stepped forward: a Dubai-based company that offered to provide money and students.

    Simon was tempted. She also worried that the company, which had investors from Iran and wanted to recruit students from there, might be a front for the Iranian government, she said. If so, an agreement could violate federal trade sanctions and invite enemy spies.

    The CIA couldnâ(TM)t confirm that the company wasnâ(TM)t an arm of Iranâ(TM)s government. Simon rejected the offer and shut down undergraduate programs in Dubai, at a loss of $3.7 million.

    Un-fucking-believable. Paranoia, distrust, racism. It's truly a shameful time to be an American. Yes. College students are a threat. All Iranians and people from Dubai are a threat. Everyone and everything except lily white Americans of pure European descent are threats to our 'national security'. Trust no one. There are conspiracies everywhere you look and only the FBI and CIA can save us. Better increase their funding or we're all gonna die!

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  9. Re:Paranoia paranoia paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know, for years I've been telling the Chinese students at my school they need to relax more, and that America's greatest technology is the weekend. And now they say Foxconn is going to improve worker conditions, coincidence or Chinese spy?

  10. Fifth columnist journalisim by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    I don't trust anything the FBI says. Any more than I would trust an announcement from the NKVD (The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs). What is the purpose of this announcement supposed to be? To induce paranoia and racism against any student whose genetics cannot be traced from Western Europe?

    OMFG the little yellow people with the funny eyes want to steal everything we own! They are a threat to the AMURICAN WAY OF LIFE, and they would steal that too! They aren't even real commies, they are yellow instead of red!

    I too tire of this constant barrage of borderline racist propaganda from the media. While I distrust the motives of the alphabet soup agents, the real culprit is the media. Say the FBI does a study about corporate espionage in China, at the request of a senator or some other asshole in Washington that has hear there is a 'Yellow menace', and wants to know more. They do a report, and find 3k companies that are stealing shit from us. (Aside: 3k companies in a country of 1.5 BILLION people that are illicit, really? BTW, how many companies are in all of China? How do you know they are stealing stuff? How many companies are there in the US that are conducting corporate espionage?) They write the report and that would be the end of it, except some jerk editor throws a story on the wire about how China is stacked 10 people deep with thieves which causes everybody else to believe it too, because the media always tells the truth.

    Lets be real here, China has a problem with corruption, and there are some people there stealing stuff and committing IP violations. Guess what, so does every other country in the world. Enough with the propaganda.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Fifth columnist journalisim by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd note that the 3k companies claim came not from the CIA, but from a guy who's retired from the CIA in the 90s, and was previously involved in - get this - the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

  11. False threats from everywhere by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you notice how the ideas that there are all these threats from everywhere are invading the public discourse?

    There are all these 'stories' about spies, these have been coming out fairly consistently. Anybody remembers Anna Chapman? AFAIC it was a story about a Russian prostitute mistaken for a super-secret spy.

    But there are all these other stories, everything, from spies to the idea that there is more racism or sexism than ever, to supposed nuclear threats from Iran and such, take your pick.

    In reality of-course there are various political forces that are gaining power from proliferation of ideas that there is this huge division: us vs. them, them vs. us, divide you into international camps, then into race camps and into gender camps, again, choose your poison.

    This is a very old trick - divide and conquer, use every bit of negative news and blow it way out of proportion, use any anecdotal evidence to create various false movements, whatever.

    It's all done in order to be able to take your attention away from the real problems. How about the fact that Obama was basically an agent of the banks and the ruling elite, very skilfully disguised as a populous movement with ideology of CHANGE - changing what? Changing the way that the government works!

    All the while Ron Paul is marginalised, the guy who is building real momentum, a real movement of change - this is scary, this has to be stopped and you know it's being actively fought against by the media and the government and every dollar that is coming from the corporate ruling elite.

    Your government and your corporate monopolistic elite are one and the same. Ask yourself: exactly what is fascism? How is it possible that a Republic descends into fascism? Through the little trick of 'democracy' of-course. Democracy is a gateway drug to fascism, democracy comes after republic creates enough freedoms that the economy booms and allows a few to feed the many, allows the many to ask the few to give them more and more without bothering themselves to produce. This is 'bread and circuses' and the politicians are using it very effectively to destroy the very concept of individual freedoms on daily basis.

    Notice how they even destroyed the concept of INDIVIDUAL freedoms by introducing the false flags of so called 'civil rights' and 'women rights' and 'minority rights' and whatever else rights. Why am I saying those are false flags? Because all of those people should have the same exact rights, and all of those rights are individual rights, but creating these separate concepts of 'rights' what really is done is that some are given not rights, but privileges, while others are forced into obligations.

    And you can't have individual freedoms when some are given something at the expense of others. You NEED a powerful state to ensure that these entitlements are given to some at the expense of others, and that's just another way to 'divide and conquer'.

    --

    Closer to TFA: the universities are supposed to be these bastions of free expression of ideas, where non-mainstream ideas can be expressed and looked at without bias, but are they?

    Who will it help if the universities end up being 'secured' the way airports are with TSA agents, for example, looking for signs of 'infiltration'?

    How about FBI raiding universities with (or without) search warrants, turning papers and files over, breaking hands and throwing charges around? How about military doing it? (don't forget NDAA). What if they find a TERRORIST SYMPATHISER?! Will you ever see or hear from that person again, after all, they are terrorists, otherwise they wouldn't have been taken into the custody in the first place, right?

    You think it's too far? Where do you think this is going?

    1. Re:False threats from everywhere by bytesex · · Score: 2

      Dude. Chapman was real.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    2. Re:False threats from everywhere by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      - no, such organisations sprang out out of general public not caring to stop the federal government from grabbing powers that it was not authorised to have.

      No, such organisations came sprang out of the general public realising that companies were basically wrecking the environment and lying about drug efficacy or selling tainted drugs.

      It doesn't mean at all that those functions must not be handled somehow

      And his methods are nuts. Apparently, rather than the EPA stopping companies wrecking the environment, land owners should all sue the company after the damage has been done. Never mind that by that stage, the damage to their land and life has already been done.

      He's full of ideas of things that shouldn't be done and wants to scrap the entities that do them. He provides absolutely no mechanism to stop same abuses happening that the entities were specifically designed to stop.

      no, it's only since about 1913 that the companies stopped thinking about the long term development, but it really took off since 1971 and it well coincides with Nixon getting the world off the gold standard

      Do you have any evidence for that at all? Companies have done bad things before 1913 and will continue to do bad thingd for as long as they exist. There is no market incentive not do bad things.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  12. People whine about outsourcing by guises · · Score: 5, Funny

    China also has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S.

    See? That's what you call a job creator. Outsourcing works both ways.

  13. What about multinationals in China? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 2

    Apple's i-everything devices are manufactured in China (e.g. Foxconn). Not only do they have the final products in their hands, they also have the individual components and the instructions to assemble them. Otherwise, Foxconn's assembly lines wouldn't work. Ditto for smartphones/laptops/computers/routers.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  14. Irrelevant example by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Cambridge group were not academic spies looking for research and trade secrets. The idea was to infiltrate the Establishment, for which they were well placed. Attendance at a university wasn't relevant; what was relevant was their connections through the Apostles, and the contacts they made.

    Incidentally, Kim Philby maintained that he did not spy on Britain for the Soviet Union; he spied on the USA on behalf of both. Perhaps bizarrely to American ideas, the Cambridge group seem to have seen themselves as patriots, helping to protect Britain against American domination. Their motivation was completely different from the Chinese spies in the USA, and the two cases are in no way comparable.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  15. More concerned with law enforcement than spies by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These days, I'm more afraid of the law enforcement on campus. I'm not aware of spies braining anyone with a nightstick (and stealing their phone) for recording them, or pepper-spraying someone for sitting on the sidewalk.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  16. S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm 90% certain this 3000 front companies figure is going to appear in a ton of places now. But where the hell does it come from?

    Because S. Eugene Poteat is no longer a CIA agent. He's been out of the CIA for over 10 years. So how does he have access to privileged intel on Chinese intelligence activities? How on earth could he, a man whose intel career ended well before the start of this nonsense, know?

    The answer is, by my reckoning, he doesn't. It's just a made up statistic. And there's a pattern behind this guy's statements too: he's long been a proponent of the removal of accountability from the intel services.

    "Thirty years ago," he wrote, "the Church and Pike Committees bought into the KGB perception management campaigns to discredit American intelligence and proceeded to limit the activities of the intelligence community ..."

    Since the Church and Pike Committee hearings are probably not covered in high school history courses, let me remind younger readers that these were congressional committees convened to investigate egregious excesses by an intelligence community that had come to act with little or no external accountability.

    The agency' excesses included assassinations, coups detats, revolutionary and counter-revolutionary movements, covert action to influence the elections of friends and enemies alike, mind control experiments that sometimes led to murder, and other behaviors that caused lots of reasonable people to question the agency' unlimited freedom to act without transparency or accountability. The excesses were not about how they gathered intelligence so policies could be set. The excesses were about policies devised and executed in a black box.

    Poteat is saying that citizens concerned with that unrestrained behavior were deceived by the KGB.

    http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0316-27.htm

    There's a certain wing of the US who is pushing the intel agenda. By reproducing the cold war, they get more funding and the unlimited powers they always coveted. S. Eugene Poteat's proper title is 'Intellaine security company employee, and lobbyist for greater surveillance powers without civilian oversight'. Don't buy into their bullshit, unless they show their working.

  17. Re:Naval history by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    Not to mention the small fact that the brits invented the jet engine but gave the design to the US for free for war costs (yes, the US charged the british for the some help in the war whereas the west germans got a nice free rebuild of their society at no cost)

  18. The FBI needs more money by qbzzt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Classified research doesn't belong in universities. They aren't equipped to handle information controls. It's that simple.

    But the FBI, of course, needs more money to investigate this issue. When the deficit is sky high and government budgets are likely to be cut, it is very important to shout loudly about the importance of your agency.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
  19. Entropy of information by DarkOx · · Score: 2

    Information acts like just about everything else in the universe. Without constantly applied effort and energy it flows from high concentration to lower concentrations.

    We as a society need to recognize that its not possible to have it both ways. We are going to be open, and with that comes acceptance, our ideas, invention, imaginary property, etc will be making their way out in to the world; or we can close down and with concerted effort and expenditure we can keep our secrets.

    I think history shows us open *is* better. If for no other reason than closed is actually really hard. We'd have to limit what you can buy/sell/manufacture abroad in ways that would probably be the undoing of many of our biggest business when they suddenly lose their foreign plant investments over night. Locking down our boards will push American wages up but it will also push prices of things like agricultural products typically produced with lots of immigrant and alien labor high enough to stave today's poor and impoverish today's middle class.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  20. Yeah and... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The TSA says that everyone that has a carry on with more than 3oz of liquid is a terrorist.

    So how are we to believe these departments that make crap up to keep the fear machine going?:

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  21. Ron Paul has the best strategy by mdsolar · · Score: 2

    Ron Paul voted against Pi Day. If we simply give up all interest in science and technology, the Chinese will have noting to steal. Just close the universities. Stop inventing stuff. Stop teaching math. That'll do the trick.

    1. Re:Ron Paul has the best strategy by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Ron Paul voted against Pi Day.

      Of course, because Pi is wrong!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  22. You're right and you're wrong - Schrodinger's Cat! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

    That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

    But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China and us believe it to be.

    There. Fixed that for'cha. Not to say there isn't aggressive competition from China, our greatest competitor/adversary for the rest of the 21st century, but it is not like us and the USSR during the Cuban Missile Crisis as many chicken haws in our political establishment want to pander to our ignorant masses (who are more than happy to believe it.)

    You are right. It is not a zero-sum game. It does not have to be. And we must not let it be.

    But you are wrong (or at least your sentence as constructed gives the wrong impression). Badly formulated perceptions are being made on both sides of the Pacific.

  23. Re:Naval history by camperdave · · Score: 2

    I don't know why we have a special relationship with the US. We are much closer to France - we built cool stuff with them like Concord, Eurofighter and the Channel Tunnel. In the 60s there was even talk of merging the two countries. For some reason we prefer to be the US's bitch instead.

    It is the unspoken, subconscious hope of reuniting the empire.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  24. Re:Naval history by idontgno · · Score: 2

    How much of it was simple Cold-War realism?

    Go ahead. Align yourself with the awesome French nuclear umbrella.

    NATO was an American alliance with Europe. England hung in there because aligning with anyone else was basically going it alone. And the mindset and habits of an entire generation of politics was shaped by that.

    Yeah. The U.S. was not very generous to its WWII allies. At some point, it became a critical objective to break down all the old colonial empires and reduce them to second fiddles. U.S. hegemony couldn't tolerate competition. In exchange, you got Pax Americana and 50 years of thermonuclear brinkmanship.

    I guess it could have been worse. WWI segued into WWII largely because European empires were allowed to persist and continue their competition for power, prestige, and colonial holdings.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  25. Re:You're right and you're wrong - Schrodinger's C by seyyah · · Score: 2

    That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

    But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China and we believe it to be.

    There. Fixed that for'cha. Not to say there isn't aggressive competition from China ...

    And I fixed it for you!

  26. And the current run of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    shows that communism was right: wealth is only being transferred. Upward.

  27. Only buggy whip makers fear sharing knowledge by Medievalist · · Score: 2

    The Zen master Ryokan lived a simple life in a little hut high on a mountain. One evening while Ryokan was out walking, a thief made the arduous climb up the mountain, only to find there was nothing in the hut worth stealing.

    Ryokan returned and found the thief. "You have taken great pains to come a long way to visit me," he said, "and you should not return empty-handed. Please let me give you my clothes as a gift."

    The thief was confused and bewildered, but he took Ryokan's clothes and climbed back down the mountain.

    Ryokan left the hut and sat naked, watching the moon. "That poor fellow," he mused, "I wish I could have given him this beautiful moon."

    People are welcome to share all my knowledge. I don't care if they are brown, yellow, or pink with polka dots. Hoarding knowledge is a practice of the weak and foolish, it's how you can easily identify them. Smart, strong minds have new thoughts every day.

    1. Re:Only buggy whip makers fear sharing knowledge by Medievalist · · Score: 2

      The principle is "pay it forward". If you have enriched the lives of those around you, the young will treat you as a respected elder, and care for you in your dotage.

      My Dad can hardly walk at this point, so I've occasionally had to carry him, and changing the sheets for a beloved uncle was only slightly harder than changing diapers on my own children. It's OK. I share the burden with others who have benefited from these men's presence in their lives, but I would do it even if it was just me. Or I'd pay someone else to help.

      And if the young lose their way, there's always sky diving and other high risk activities. Why would you want to live in a society where the young prey on the old? Hoarding knowledge will not protect you in such a system.

  28. Re:Actually, that's the fundamental difference by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    Communism generally espouses the view that wealth can only be transferred.

    That's plainly not true. Ever heard of this thing called "labor theory of value" that's the underpinning of Marxist economics?