Slashdot Mirror


Using Non-Newtonian Fluids To Fill Potholes

sciencehabit writes in with a link about a group of students who have come up with an interesting idea about how to fill potholes. "Non-Newtonian fluids are the stars of high school science demonstrations. In one example, an ooey-gooey batter made from corn starch and water oozes like a liquid when moved slowly. But punch it, or run across a giant puddle of it, and it becomes stiff like a solid. Now, a group of college students has figured out a new use for the strange stuff: filler for potholes."

43 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. More Patents by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The students plan to patent their invention, so they won't divulge their exact formulation,

    Exact formulation isn't necessary for this application, as every 7th grade science class learns it by trial and error with a $1.29 box of corn starch.
    You can do this in your kitchen in 10 minutes, and the stuff is fun to play with but nobody has found a real good application for it in over a
    hundred years.

    The trick in keeping the right proportions of water and starch, something that rain and sun will contrive to disrupt. Burst their bag and you have a big mess.
      If you stop with a tire one of these, such as at a traffic light, you will sink into it, because given constant pressure, it will flow. It only resists changing pressure, or active kneading, not static weights.

    But the beauty here is the rapidity with which these can be thrown down, and they fact that they flow into the pothole, conform to its shape, and thereby resist being ejected by cars.

    P.S. It will be a cold day in hell before you find Police patching potholes.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:More Patents by Fned · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A better candidate would be the fire department. Get them off the lazy boys, out of the station and doing some work.

      Yeah, it's not like they have to be ready to put out fires or anything.

    2. Re:More Patents by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they have something that's really worthwhile, it's a combo system that uses the NNF to fill the hole to a level surface, the a traditional asphalt cap over that. The beauty of the NNF is that it fills the gaps and voids quickly, but still provides strong resistance for shock from cars driving over.

      I also assume that they've used something non-biodegradable, corn starch wouldn't make it very long exposed on a highway.

      Of course I could RTFA, but what would happen to my Karma if I did that?

    3. Re:More Patents by knarf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the stuff is fun to play with but nobody has found a real good application for it in over a hundred years.

      Viscous couplings have been made using dilatant (non-newtonian) fluids for quite a while now, at least since the 1985 VW Transporter 'Syncro' (4WD rear-engined van made by Volkswagen, quite popular here in Europe).

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    4. Re:More Patents by julesh · · Score: 2

      Corn Starch mixtures also have a nasty side effect of growing mold after a period of time.

      That's what benzylkonium chloride is for.

    5. Re:More Patents by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 3, Funny

      of course! benzykllul...lolo...konoleum chloride! why didn't i think of that?

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    6. Re:More Patents by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

      Question:

      Do you see cops sitting in the neighborhood donut shops or do you see fire fighters sitting there?

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    7. Re:More Patents by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh even better, lets abandon a closed off section of road quickly without making sure it remains safe for the traffic.

      Here's a bit of info for you, to repair a pothole 90% of the time is spent setting up, packing up, and managing traffic flow. The actual job is over in a few minutes.

    8. Re:More Patents by ancienthart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe that's because they're so busy, they have to get some food into themselves as fast as possible?
      When I worked in a warehouse, you quickly notice everyone's diet getting progressively worse (chips, softdrinks, pre-packaged food, breakfast burgers) whenever we hit a busy time of the year.

    9. Re:More Patents by Jessified · · Score: 2

      Right. Cause if you have a heart attack all you need is for the fire department to need to take a bunch of minutes to put all their roadwork gear away and take down the cones and traffic redirection equipment before they come save your sorry ass.

      Part of the reason they send fire first for first aids is because they are ready for quick responses. But yea, lets drop that part.

    10. Re:More Patents by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This site puts it well http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/Asphalt/tabid/3350/Default.aspx. Potholes simply reflect cheap ass government focusing taxpayers dollars on kickbacks rather than on routine road maintenance. When you have pot holes, that represent either an unusual problem (flooding, water main burst etc.) or quite simply a break down in the proper duties of local government and or state government.

      If you have pot holes in a major city and you ain't firing your elected representatives and replacing them with new representatives than you're bloody idiots and, yes according to Google street view US infrastructure roads and footpaths largely looks like shit.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:More Patents by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      This is about pinching pennies to spend pounds. Money always will have to be spent to maintain roads. You either spend a little along the all of the time or you end up spending 10 or even a hundred times as much at irregular intervals having to complete rebuild roads and footpaths. So not tax simply incompetent management.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:More Patents by perbu · · Score: 2

      I think there are uses for non-newtonian fluids. My wife's car uses such fluids to power the 4x4 drive. When there is a difference in speed on the front and back axial the fluids tense up and block, delivering power of the rear axial. A very simple and robust solutions that works fairly well.

    13. Re:More Patents by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      Not sure if you're whooshing the parent or not. I've seen these trucks out and about. So have you, I think.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    14. Re:More Patents by craash420 · · Score: 2

      "...to rescue idiots like you trapped in their mom's basement."

      I've only known a couple of firefighters, but I seriously wouldn't want one of them to find me in their mom's basement!

      --
      Extra medication for all!
  2. Stopping on it? by int2str · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Neat idea and looks to be working well for cars moving fast.
    What about traffic jams though where cars come to a stop on these bags. I'd imagine they'd sing in somewhat and might have trouble moving out of the hole from there.

    1. Re:Stopping on it? by istartedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Worst case scenario, you're back to having a pothole. As long as the bag can "bounce back" after being sqeezed it's not so bad. Also, it would feel weird to slowly sink but it wouldn't ruin your suspension and you should be able to drive out of it. The problem with the potholes is when you hit them at speed and ruin your tires and/or suspension.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Stopping on it? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fluid is kept in a bag that is then covered by a black cloth to make it less visible to drivers. Even if they did sink into the pothole while at rest, they could still get out easily, and the bag would simply flow back into its original shape after a few seconds. The only hazard or concern I see there is if the next car drives over it before it flows back to being flat, in which case they may get a bit of a bump, but still no worse than the original pothole itself.

    3. Re:Stopping on it? by eyrieowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I see another problem...what happens if the bag gets knocked out of the hole? Now you have a sizable road hazard which acts a lot like a big rock to all the cars hitting it. You'd have to ensure that the bag is fully anchored into the hole. Worst case, you could have the bag get pulled up by the friction of a tire and thrown back into a car behind...I'd imagine that would not lead to good things.

    4. Re:Stopping on it? by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buy a car that has tires instead of rubber bands on the wheels you fucking moron.

  3. What happens when people take them? by samazon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I cannot foresee a way to prevent people from stealing these. I mean, I know it sounds silly, but renters steal light fixtures, for crying out loud.

    --
    I have the hiccups.
    1. Re:What happens when people take them? by sixtyeight · · Score: 2

      A free cement bag of Silly Putty? What couldn't you do with one of those?

      It's similar to a city leaving Giant Slinkies all around town.

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
  4. What happens when a car stands still on them? by CityZen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Traffic isn't always flowing, after all. (And traffic itself acts like a non-Newtonian fluid, as well.)

    1. Re:What happens when a car stands still on them? by hamjudo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, this is a feature. These can be used to pave "no parking/no standing" zones. Rule breaker's vehicles will get eaten, by the pavement. If used on streets, it will encourage drivers to avoid congested areas.

    2. Re:What happens when a car stands still on them? by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting. .. actually on the same vein .. why not make speed bumps out of non newtonian fluids? Just fill a cylindrical rubber (like a hose with a huge diameter) with the fluid .. people going slow will feel hardly any bump while speeders get the full effect?

  5. Wonderful idea ... by Auroch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a great idea ... until you read that "The bag might cost a hundred dollars but you can reuse it a hundred times, and by that time you'd be saving a ton of money". So yes, great idea ... until kids start stealing them BECAUSE THEY CAN.

    Also : Read the AC posts in any slashdot story and you'll be quick to agree : the world is filled with angry kids.

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    1. Re:Wonderful idea ... by c0lo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Another idea: let's use pitch - it maybe not a non newtonian fluid (but again, it may be... just haven't had enough time to check), but it is a fluid nonetheless.

      Now, because it tends to stick on the tires (and the use of mats tends to be expensive over time), I suppose we can mix the pitch with sand and/or fine gravel before filling in the holes - should keep the pothole filled for some years without the need of revisiting it... what a boon for the taxpayers. (hmmm... I think I'm going to patent this)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  6. This couldn't happen last week? by XPeter · · Score: 2

    If it's cheap, and will get towns to fix shit fast, then I'm all for it.

    Blew $300 on a new tire last week. Had to swerve so I wouldn't hit a deer, and went straight over a pothole.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:This couldn't happen last week? by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Use cheaper tires?

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    2. Re:This couldn't happen last week? by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      That's a huge amount for a single tyre. Someone is ripping you off

  7. Re:Well then by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 2

    Actually, that'd do wonders to keep traffic flowing. And fast. Because who'd want to stop?

  8. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. Mass TRANSIT is part of the transit budget.

    2. There are more then one pothole. There a lot, and the queue is often very long. Plus, if work is going to be done for some other reason, they put off the pot hole repair. And some street required special permissions to close, as well as cost a lot of money in diversions.

    3. Depends on your environment, and weather or not the budget allows for quality material and labor.

    You need to close off portion of the street, have it located*, check for other work.
    That means back ups, delays, store owners angry.

    *marked to determine whats under the road at that spot.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    it's crap like that is that makes Americans want SUVs

    And the more bigger, heavier SUV's, the quicker the roads wear out... same with them hybrids, they're a few hundred kilograms heavier than a similar sized non-hybrid car.

  10. inverse problem by slew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Instead of allowing people on highways to drive faster w/o damaging their cars, why not deploy them to cause damage to cars that are driving too fast.

    Maybe this stuff can be used as a movable speed bumps in school zones and children play zones? If you drive slow enough, no problem. If you run over them too fast, you destroy your car's suspension. People are pointing out that it can be stolen, perhaps this mobility is just what you need for this problem. In the middle of the day (or the weekend), you can just move them away. That seems like this would be much more effective than the radar speed-signs that exist there now and less of a liability and expense for hiring lots of crossing guards. You might also sell this to HOAs that can't convince local fire departments to allow them to put in speed bumps or neighborhood groups that have lots of children playing in their front yards.

    Dibs on the patent for this use case. ;^)

  11. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    1. Don't loot the road maintenance budget to fund other projects. Next time you want to add a feature, put it on the ballot and tell everyone that taxes are going up to pay for it. And then take ONLY the EXTRA funds collected by the raise to pay for your project. Leave the existing programs alone or you'll starve them and they'll fall appart.

    2. The queue is long because you don't fill any of the holes. They sit there for months. If you have so many holes that you leave them there for months then clearly you need more people filling the holes. Yes, that costs money. Like maybe the money that was set aside for road maintenance in the first place before it was looted. As to closing streets, do it at night. Why is it that public officials make average citizens look like rocket scientists? This shit is obvious. Lots of businesses do disruptive activities at night. For example, grocery stores restock goods at around 2AM so they don't disrupt customers during the day. Why close a busy street in the middle of rush hour to fill a pothole? Oh that's right, because the transit union charges extra for the night shift. Which is one of many reasons we shouldn't even have a transit union in the fist place. It should just be subcontracted to construction companies that are more then competent to run around with asphalt and fill in some god damn holes. As to permission to fill the holes, you have to be kidding me. The communities are begging to get the holes filled. Recently we offered to fill them in ourselves and the city threatened us with legal action if we did it ourselves. So no. Permission is not an issue unless the permission is from the city to for it to do it's f'ing job.

    3. I can't speak for every place on earth. But in my city, it's one hundred percent laziness. They could fill them on contract very easily. License a bunch of small construction companies and pay them PER pothole. Set a flat rate for pothole filling and then rather then paying someone per hour, overtime, health benifits, etc... you're just paying a flat rate for each hole. Lots of companies would jump at that.

    You create jobs in the city. The city saves money. The potholes get filled. Everyone wins.

    There's no counter argument to that.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  12. "Non-Newtonian" =/= shear-thickening by manicb · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm getting fed up of the constant references to the magical properties on "non-Newtonian" fluids. Non-Newtonian fluids have a huge range of properties in terms of their response to shear and change over time. This is constantly abused by geeks who should know better. Off the top of my head:

    What people usually mean is a "shear-thickening" fluid such as corn starch and water. These become more effectively viscous in response to shear.

    "Shear-thinning" fluids are *also* non-Newtonian, are fairly common, and have the exact opposite behaviour. Ketchup is a great example - shaking the bottle helps it flow more easily.

    Another interesting case are Bingham plastics - these have a yield stress before they will flow. The classic example is toothpaste - it will stay as a lump on the bristles under its own weight, but spreads easily enough under pressure.

    So the next time somebody wants to demonstrate non-Newtonian properties on their speaker cone, pass the ketchup!

    1. Re:"Non-Newtonian" =/= shear-thickening by PPH · · Score: 2

      Precisely. I was just chatting with the paving crew working out in front of my house about how they handled the various possible solutions for the viscous stress tensor.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:"Non-Newtonian" =/= shear-thickening by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 2

      I'm getting fed up of the constant references to the magical properties on "non-Newtonian" fluids. Non-Newtonian fluids have a huge range of properties in terms of their response to shear and change over time. This is constantly abused by geeks who should know better. Off the top of my head:

      What people usually mean is a "shear-thickening" fluid such as corn starch and water. These become more effectively viscous in response to shear.

      "Shear-thinning" fluids are *also* non-Newtonian, are fairly common, and have the exact opposite behaviour.

      So you recognize that others are using the term "non-newtonian fluid" in a technically correct fashion, but you are frustrated by the fact that they do so without using more specific terminology? Furthermore, their choice of words amounts to some kind of abuse?

      Come off it, really. Yes, you know more about the subject than others do--good for you. That you feel it necessary to speak out as you have only reveals the height of your hubris and the depth of your snobbery.

      Most people will never have a need in their lives to understand these substances even in terms as specific as "non-newtonian." If you expect people to give a damn about something so esoteric, you are setting yourself up for this kind of frustration.

      Also, if you had RTFA you would have seen that the author dedicated several paragraphs to non-newtonian fluids. He went into a good bit more detail than you have above.

  13. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    Oh like cars in the 50s were light? Have you seen what a 1956 Cadillac looks like? It's an all steel boat on wheels. Don't tell me the cars today are too heavy. That's just whining. Yes, cars in the 1980s were lighter then today. They mostly got heavier when the safety standards were changed which required more steel reinforcement. That's like the utilities saying we use too much water or use too much electricity. We use less water per capita then we did 50 years ago and apparently we're still too wasteful for the local utilities.

    Funny that this wasn't a problem 50 years ago. What changed? Oh, the population doubled a few times and they didn't build any new dams or aqueducts to handle the population increase. So is the problem really that we use too much water or that there are too many people in this region for the infrastructure to handle? See, if that's their game they should either restrict new construction once they hit saturation or they should... you know... maybe build some new facilities.

    Sorry if I'm coming off crazy and angry... I'm just fed up with this stupid crap.

    Fill the pot holes. Offer it on commission if you must. It will probably cost less that way. Just offer construction companies a flat rate to fill each hole. Magically the streets will be free of pot holes overnight as about thousand construction companies all run of in a thousand different directions and together fill all the potholes.

    I love that they'll leave a stupid pothole unfilled for months sometimes on the grounds that they're thinking about doing roadwork soon. Never mind that the pot hole shouldn't cost more then a couple hundred bucks to fill max and that the damage done to cars in that time period is magnitudes of whatever the city is saving.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  14. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not if you do it at night which is the only time you should ever do it.

    Grocery stores restock at around 2AM. If they can get 20 guys to show up in a truck every night to unload and restock the shelves in a SINGLE store... I should think the city should be able to fill some god damn pot holes in the wee hours of the night. This is not complicated. It's obvious and easy.

    Businesses across the country do disruptive things at night. Most server updates don't happen during business hours. They happen at midnight or 2 am.

    If practically every business does this already, why can't the city? And don't give me that it's too many people. Think about how many people it takes to restock every grocery store in the city every night? That workforce ALONE dwarfs what the city would need to take care of pot holes several times over. And bargain grocery stores find the practice entirely economical.

    The problem is not the asphalt. The problem is the city, the transit unions, and people that find it acceptable to leave pot holes unfilled for months on end.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  15. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by SomeJoel · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's no counter argument to that.

    There's always a counter argument.

    If you fill the potholes, property values would go up, and with them property taxes. I am firmly against your plan to raise taxes. You must be some sort of democrat.

    --
    <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
  16. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Grocery stores restock at around 2AM. If they can get 20 guys to show up in a truck every night to unload and restock the shelves in a SINGLE store... I should think the city should be able to fill some god damn pot holes in the wee hours of the night.

    That's not how it works. The night crew is like five or six people, unless it's a 24 hour store in a busy area. But in a non-busy area even for a whole Safeway store you only need a half-dozen people. A guy shows up and unloads a truck with a pallet jack and the midnight down crew breaks down the shipment and stocks and faces the shelves.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Re:Seems inferior to the current solution. by DaleSwanson · · Score: 2

    Gas was so cheap then it didn't matter. Good times.

    http://inflationdata.com/inflation/images/charts/Oil/Gasoline_inflation_chart.htm

    Inflation adjusted gas prices in the 1950s seems to be pretty average, and higher than they were in the 1990s.