Slashdot Mirror


MATE Desktop 1.2 Released

An anonymous reader writes "For those of you who still feel GNOME 2 is the best desktop environment, but don't want stick to old distros, MATE is a fork of GNOME 2, with all the names changed to avoid clashes with GNOME 3. Version 1.2 brings fixes, but also new features such as undo/redo in the file manager." This release features better freedesktop standards integration, adds a few missing utilities, and merges new features into the file manager. The project has a new wiki; the roadmap has a few details on future goals, including porting things to Gtk 3 and using bits and pieces of modern GNOME 3 infrastructure where appropriate.

9 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. Re:More Linux fragmentation... by abrotman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this fragmentation? It's just more choice. Gnome2 is dead as far as gnome.org is concerned. Don't like it? Don't use it.

  2. Re:More Linux fragmentation... by ddd0004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fragmentation is not a bad thing. Think of it as natural selection in the open source software world. This is the mutation that may result in a new or different product.

  3. Re:More Linux fragmentation... by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One man's "more choice" is another man's "fragmentation".

  4. Great by flakron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is what I love about open source: Don't like it ? Change it!

    1. Re:Great by slapout · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or in this case, change it back!

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  5. Fragmentation is a terrible thing by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I went to the Citroen garage to pick up my roof rack the other day, and do you know what? They had *five* different models of van. Five! Talk about fragmenting the market! Obviously everyone should all just use a Relay dually, because fragmentation is bad.

    It gets worse though, because on the way out of there shocked by the fragmentation of five different models, I drove past the Peugeot garage - and *they* had five different models too! Then I drove past the Ford Commercials garage and my Transit-identifying neurons melted.

    Fragmentation! Aaaaaargh!

  6. Re:More Linux fragmentation... by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you forgetting about Cinnamon? It's basically the same thing but starting from gnome3 and working back to gnome2's appearance.

    It's not the appearance that's an issue, but the functionality.

    Like working support for multiple buttoned mice, multiple displays and display orders, overlapping windows with focus-follows-mouse and user controlled Z order, multiple sessions of the same programs whether or not the apps themselves provide an "open new instance" functionality, remote X logins, adjustable DPI (for wysiwyg DTP this is a must)...

    Most people seem to complain about panel apps, but to me, that's a minor thing compared to how basic functionality has been sacrificed. The fallback mode is nothing like Gnome 2, and changing the looks to get it more like Gnome 2 will accomplish diddley squat.

    The first Gnome 3 dev who has guts enough to say "dudes, we fscked up this one, bad" will get my respect.

  7. Forks make me think by aglider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now we have MATE from GNOME v2 as a form of dissatisfaction of v3.
    We already had Trinity forked from KDE v3.5.
    Then there's Razor-Qt as "something almost completely new".
    And the pletora of "alternative" desktops we all love: XFCE, LXDE, etc.etc.
    Is it actually a problem of fragmentation, or is it that some projects after a few years (and some amounts of donated money) just go into technology decline?
    I personally tend towards the second option.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  8. Re:More Linux fragmentation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first Gnome 3 dev who has guts enough to say "dudes, we fscked up this one, bad" will get my respect.

    He would be a hero. A voice of reason. A voice of intelligence. A voice of sanity.

    The sad thing is, he would be shunned and likely ejected. The Gnome usability experts have all, already told the Gnome 3 developers they are fucking up very badly. The gnome 3 developers told them they didn't have the intelligence to understand their visionary thinking. In other words, according to the gnome 3 developers, if you disagree with the gnome 3 developers, you are an idiot. This is not hyperbole. This is straight from the mailing list. Its disgusting.

    At this point in time, either you've drank the koolaid and have long since turned off your brain, growing like a mushroom, or left gnome 3 development. Otherwise, according to the gnome 3 developers, you're an idiot and not likely unqualified to contribute to the project.

    It isn't going to happy because it already happen, in mass, and the gnome 3 developers labeled them idiots.