Slashdot Mirror


The Pirate Bay Returns, Anonymous Hater Takes Credit For DDoS

An anonymous reader writes "After being the victim of a massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack by an unknown party, The Pirate Bay has returned. An Anonymous traitor who goes by the name AnonNyre has claimed responsibility for the DDoS attack that kept the site offline for days."

63 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Works for the feds? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    QUOTE: I am Nyre. I am highly against Anonymous. I do not support Anonymous anymore. I sometimes help the feds.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Works for the feds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Translation: I'll be a real hacker when I grow up.

    2. Re:Works for the feds? by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Helping them and working for them are two very different things. Nyre may simply have desired to support the Feds on a particular issue.

    3. Re:Works for the feds? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Feds != MPAA. Oh wait, yes they are.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Works for the feds? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      The Pirate Bay, I am so f******* pissed, WHY THERE IS NO ANAL PORN IN HERE. F*** YOU PIRATE BAY.
      F*** that shit, N**** Bay.

      Doesn't sound like proxy action on behalf of the feds.

    5. Re:Works for the feds? by NickFortune · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nyre may simply have desired to support the Feds on a particular issue.

      Or maybe the feds trained someone from the MPAA to use twitter, and then thought "I know a cool way to turn to major anti-establishment groups against one another."

      Of course, this is assuming that no-one from the MPAA is smart enough to learn how to use twitter for themselves. Which is doing them a massive disservice, I'm sure...

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    6. Re:Works for the feds? by Hentes · · Score: 2

      This whole thing sounds fake to me.

    7. Re:Works for the feds? by Dishevel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Feds != **AA
      Feds are a wholly owned subsidiary of the **AAs.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    8. Re:Works for the feds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dell servers == Anal Rape.

      Ever worked on an IBM xSeries?

      If Dell is like anal rape, then xSeries is like sticking a Dremel in your pee hole and pulling the trigger.

    9. Re:Works for the feds? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Feds are a wholly owned subsidiary of the **AAs.

      Hardly. There are plenty of corporations who hold interests there besides just media corporations. Feds is to moneyed interests like RIAA is to media corporations.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:Works for the feds? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with that either, only with what the given "issue" might be. Eg, I'd have no compunctions of helping to nail a child-porn producer.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  2. Thank god! by arcite · · Score: 5, Funny

    I almost thought I wouldn't be able to download the rest of ST:TNG. Gotta see how season 7 ends!

    1. Re:Thank god! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Funny

      Picard wakes up in a prison camp and it was all a dream

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Thank god! by LordNicholas · · Score: 1

      Picard's crazy, Geordi can see, and everything is Q's fault.

    3. Re:Thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      TPB doesn't run a tracker anymore. TPB being down would not have disrupted your download.

    4. Re:Thank god! by NNUfergs · · Score: 1

      Really? You know every episode of every season of every series is streaming on Netflix.

    5. Re:Thank god! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Don't be daft. He wakes up in a whore house where he discovers he's actually a "working girl" who has a fondness for Romulan Ale.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Thank god! by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      TNG season 7 ends with a great finale to wrap the show.
      Too bad the rest of the season is suckish.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    7. Re:Thank god! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "LaForge here, we're geeting a whoosh sound from the phase inducers!"

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Thank god! by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Picard wakes up in a prison camp and it was all a dream

      ... and then he woke up from that dream and he found out he was Sisko in a psychiatric ward.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    9. Re:Thank god! by isorox · · Score: 1

      TNG season 7 ends with a great finale to wrap the show.
      Too bad the rest of the season is suckish.

      Parallels was alright. Attached too Journey's End wasn't the end of the world, and Preemptive strike was good.

    10. Re:Thank god! by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2

      "For only $7.99 a month."

    11. Re:Thank god! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 2

      arcite,

      This is Lieutenant Commander Data, attempting to communicate with you through a sub-space channel modulating the reality you are currently perceiving through the 21st century website "Slashdot". An unknown being has locked us out of the holodeck where you are being held and filmed as part of Season 7. Whatever you do, do not initiate the .torrent from TPB. Doing so may trigger a paradox singularity destroying the fabric of space-time. After all, you wouldn't steal a car...

    12. Re:Thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      arcite,

      This is Spock in the Alternate Universe. I became aware of the sub-space channel and my attempt to patch into it was met with success. I agree with Lt. Cmdr. Data; his reasoning is sound and his conclusion logical. However, the 'magnetic link' available at the same location requires no interaction with the .torrent file. I believe you are now in Earth Year 2012, the last episode aired May 23, 1994 which would put you at an estimated temporal distance of 17 years, 360 days and 2 hours, putting you well over the Falkvinge Contrition Limit.

    13. Re:Thank god! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Stop teasing the guy. Everyone knows it ends with Picard turning on a light, and viewers see Picard in bed, saying, "Honey, you won't believe the dream I just had." to his wife Emily played by Suzanne Pleshette.

    14. Re:Thank god! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's not a solution if you're running Linux.

    15. Re:Thank god! by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      You jest, but I still haven't seen the last season of Voyager. The station that carried it changed networks right before the last season, and it wasn't available here at all. I've looked for it on the shelves of stores, but never saw anything past season 2.

      I'm going to HAVE to pirate it to see it.

    16. Re:Thank god! by crAckZ · · Score: 1

      ....and then he wakes up only to find that he is in DiCaprio's dream. DAMN you Inception. DAMN YOU TO HELL

  3. Except it didn't. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Informative

    kept the site offline for days

    As several people pointed out in the last article, getting to the site was trivial.
    It was hardly down.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Except it didn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Funny definition of "retarded" you have there.

      I'm a neurosurgeon. A coworker called me up last night asking if I knew a different way for him to download a movie since it was down. I can guarantee he's much, much smarter than you. He just doesn't know computers. Really, why should anyone? That's why we pay 8 bucks an hour to people, so we can concentrate on more important things.

    2. Re:Except it didn't. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      When I was searching for the mirrors, it was funny to see in google "The world's most resilient bittorrent - The Pirate Bay" and then... it doesn't work.

    3. Re:Except it didn't. by Iniamyen · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm a neurosurgeon.

      Really? It says you are an AC.

    4. Re:Except it didn't. by hazah · · Score: 1

      8 bucks an hour eh? Interesting perception. I think you tinkered with yourself too much.

    5. Re:Except it didn't. by morari · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, why should anyone? That's why we pay 8 bucks an hour to people, so we can concentrate on more important things.

      The same reason you should have a basic understanding of how your vehicle works and be able to at least change the oil and spark plugs when need be. Sure you could go pay some grease monkey to do it all for you, but then you're being exploited due to sheer laziness. If your comfortable existence depends upon something, such as vehicles or communications networks, then you should try to be as self sufficient as possible in its use. As a doctor, I'm sure you expect your patients to have a basic understanding of how their bodies work and how to properly maintain them. Wait, you'd rather they didn't. Why else would they come to you, right? It sure would be hard for you to get out from all of that student loan debt if you didn't have misinformed patients to scam and exploit.*

      *See, playing the elitist can easily work both ways.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    6. Re:Except it didn't. by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Well, since he's a "neurosurgeon" (uh huh...) he probably knows a good dermatologist.

    7. Re:Except it didn't. by loufoque · · Score: 2

      That's why we pay 8 bucks an hour to people

      Sorry to disappoint, but an IT consultant costs 10 times as much as that.

    8. Re:Except it didn't. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can guarantee he's much, much smarter than you.

      Since when is someone else more intelligent than someone else merely because they can do something the other can't? Computers included.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    9. Re:Except it didn't. by techybod · · Score: 1

      best post this month :D

      --
      "Friends help you move, Real Friends help you move bodies"
    10. Re:Except it didn't. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Oh, a neurosurgeon eh? Well, I'm a rocket scientist. Oh wait, no... I'm a world renowned entomologist. Wait, no...

      See, I can claim to be anyone.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:Except it didn't. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The same reason you should have a basic understanding of how your vehicle works and be able to at least change the oil and spark plugs when need be.

      I have a basic understanding of how my car works, and use to maintain my own cars all the time. Hell, I've changed clutches. When I had that damned Mustang I spent more time under the hood than behind the wheel (Fix Or Repai Daily). Now? It took a trained mechanic 45 minutes to change my battery, since he had to remove the wheel, fender, and wheel well to get to it. It would have taken me all day, it was money well spent. 25 years ago I would have spent five minutes and a crescent wrench to do it. I'd rather have paid a mechanic to spend 15 minutes changing the water pump on my old '74 LeMans rather than two hours in the hot sun, but I couldn't afford mechanics back then.

      Plus, if I had changed the battery by myself, who knows what I might have screwed up? It's the same with computers. I'm fine working on my own computers rather than getting a half-assed job for way too much much money at the Geek Squad, but Joe Normal may know the basics of his computer, but do you really think he needs to know how to fdisk and reinstall an OS, or swap out a hard drive?

      There's no reason to know how to change your oil, just that you need to know when and why.

      Neurosurgeons make shitloads of money. He'd be a fool to spend five times as long as it takes you while risking making a n00b mistake. Retarded? Sorry, son, you're the confused one here.

    12. Re:Except it didn't. by psiclops · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee he's much, much smarter than you.

      you can guarantee that someone is much, much smarter than someone else whom you don't have the faintest idea who is, and whom your entire knowledge of is 1 sentence that they wrote on some website.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
  4. So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kids aren't getting enough attention doing bot/channel war ddosing on IRC anymore so they turn them on high profile websites for whatever pretend outrage they can conjur up in their idiotic little brains.

    We got it, 15 years ago.

  5. Still don't think it was a DDoS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still don't think it was a DDoS. First, all the well known mirrors still worked, rather than being targeted as well. Second, the traffic for the pirate bay, at least for my computer, disappeared whenever it entered AT&T's part of the network (hop 5) instead of transversing it. And third, many other people report the same thing with different big pipes. All that suggests to me is bad routing information.

    1. Re:Still don't think it was a DDoS by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      No, no. It was a hattack.

      - Access mainframe
      Err
      - Access firewall gateway
      Err
      - Access internal network
      Err

      *sigh*...

      Oh, wait!

      - Access backdoor
      Access granted

      Yes!

      - Download secret*.zip.
      Downloading confidential information

  6. And.. by nirgle · · Score: 1

    And nothing of value was truly lost.

  7. Say wat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    An Anonymous traitor who goes by the name AnonNyre
    An Anonymous traitor who goes by the name
    Anonymous...who goes by the name....

    1. Re:Say wat? by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      "Anonymous" is in reference to the Anonymous meme (n), rather than the named person actually being anonymous (adj), which as you pointed out, would be ridiculous.

  8. nuts by bs0d3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
  9. FUD? by Anachragnome · · Score: 2

    FUD? Maybe. Quite possibly. Easy enough to pull off with backdoors into almost everything, provided you have access to those backdoors. Guess who has the most access to them?

    That being said, and I made this realization long ago, is that by the very nature of "Anonymous" one must assume that at any time the entire situation could be a scam and that possibility never goes away. Since no one can be absolutely sure who, exactly, Anonymous is, one must assume it can be anybody.

    Therefore, whenever I see the word anonymous used in the sense that we are now speaking, I automatically replace the word with "somebody". For example, let's use this approach on the very article we discuss.

    "The Pirate Bay Returns, Somebody Hater Takes Credit For DDoS"

    See how that changes things? The headline now leaves it to the reader to decide who the threat is, as opposed to whoever wrote headline...or concocted the event the headline discusses.

    Taking this approach--replacing the word anonymous with the word somebody--removes any control of perception that the source of such misinformation might be trying to wield, effectively defeating the effort.

    1. Re:FUD? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      An excellent example was when the FBI was running and controlling LulzSec for all those months and launching attacks in the name of 'Anonymous'. For all those months were those FBI agents in control of those attacks members of 'Anonymous' or not. They acted anonymously and the carried out those attacks in the names of 'Anonymous' so by definition they were members of 'Anonymous', now should they arrest themselves, well if any of those attacks that they orchestrated were outside the United States, them the legally correct answer is yes. The should arrest themselves and offer themselves up for extradition to the affected countries and then be prosecuted by those countries for their crimes.

      Now as one of the members of LulzSecwas a minor and the FBI sought to draw the minor into committing a crime, that does make those agents guilty of child abuse. So now 'Anonymous' is officially guilty of child abuse thanks to the no longer anonymous FBI members, talk about dragging 'Anonymous' name through the muck, for those who use the name 'Anonymous' for nothing other than legal protest, thanks for nothing FBI, I mean really computer hacking, DDOS attacks, invasions of privacy, data theft and child abuse all under the watch and control of the FBI.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  10. aaaaaaaaaarrrrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But why is the rum gone?

  11. Looks like The Jester? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    AnonNyre says "Tango Down" which is The Jester's catchphrase. Motivation lines up too, anti-Wikileaks and anti-Anonymous.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Looks like The Jester? by nstlgc · · Score: 1

      Tango Down is hardly attributable to The Jester. Many anons use this phrase.

      --
      I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
  12. FBI is on the case by 0111+1110 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure the FBI will leave no stone unturned and is doing a complete investigation to see if the person responsible is a US citizen or lives in a country with an extradition agreement. They will find this villain and put him behind bars, right? Because of course they don't want it to look like they only investigate cases where a large corporation with lots of bribe money is involved.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:FBI is on the case by mitcheli · · Score: 2

      As tempting as it might be to point the finger at the FBI for not investigating the attack based on some sort of bias against hackers, I think the more relevant reason would be the fact that the Pirate Bay isn't an American company. A more pointed view on this would be if www.2600.com was DDoS'd whether or not the FBI would investigate that.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    2. Re:FBI is on the case by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Yes, the FBI will investigate because that DDoS-er dared to stop his attacks... The FBI is firmly in the pockets of the MAFIAA; they'll act accordingly, however bizarre this may seem to us outsiders.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  13. No honor among... by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    There is no honor between the swarm of resent-their-mommies script kiddies and petty credit card thieves that call themselves "Anonymous".

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    1. Re:No honor among... by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      There is no honor between the swarm of resent-their-mommies script kiddies and petty credit card thieves that call themselves "Anonymous".

      Awww damn, now you upset them. They're going to take down slashdot...

  14. Re:Was it even DDoS? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    TPB doesn't work like a traditional website. It's more like a darknet site made accessible through a number of public portals. It seems like the "portal" for the US and some surrounding areas was taken down, it was available in other areas and the proxies still worked.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  15. Excellent Work! by organgtool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great job, AnonNyre! For your next target, I recommend taking down Excite search engine and Geocities!

  16. HELLO! by shiftless · · Score: 3, Funny

    ME SA JAR JAR BINKS!!

  17. Spark Plugs by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    A goodly amount of modern cars feature aluminum heads and utterly buried spark plugs. Removing them without damage and (far more probable) cross-threading or stripping out the threads during installation isn't worth me trying (especially now that most spark plugs last at least 30k if not 50k).

    I'm reminded of that crack about Linux being worth spending time on, if your time has no value. At least if you eff up your Linux install, you won't be forced to walk everywhere.

    1. Re:Spark Plugs by morari · · Score: 1

      Just one of many reasons not to drive modern vehicles, aye?

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune