Slashdot Mirror


Ultra-Orthodox Jews Rally For a More Kosher Internet

Hugh Pickens writes "Michael Grynbaum writes that 40,000 ultra-Orthodox Jewish men filed through the gates of Citi Field to discuss the dangers of the Internet. For the attendees, many of whom said they came at the instructions of their rabbis, it was a chance to hear about a moral topic considered gravely important in the Hasidic community: the potential problems that can stem from access to pornography and other explicit content on the uncensored, often incendiary Web. Schlomo Cohen, 24, said he came to Citi Field because the rally was a good way to remind his community to keep temptation at bay. 'Desires are out there,' said Cohen. 'We have to learn how to control ourselves.' The rally was sponsored by a rabbinical group, Ichud Hakehillos Letohar Hamachane, that is linked to a software company that sells Internet filtering software to Orthodox Jews. Those in attendance were handed fliers that advertised services like a 'kosher GPS App' for iPhone and Android phones, which helps users locate synagogues and kosher restaurants. 'No one here is a Luddite who denies the manifold benefits that technology has brought to mankind as a whole,' says Eytan Kobre, spokesman for the event. 'But at a certain point, a mature, thinking individual stops and says, "I've got to make a cost-benefit analysis [of] what ways it is enriching my life, [and] in what ways it is undermining it."'"

34 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. ...Or you could just not go to porn sites by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been on the internet since the early 90's and I don't ever recall even once being forced to go to a porn site (though I have been tricked into watching Rick Astley a couple of times). Unless you get some kind of phishing virus, no one is going to *force* anything on you. And if you're so weak that you can't control yourself, you may want to avoid the internet altogether. Anyway, if you really want the porn, I'm pretty sure you'll just find a way to bypass the filtering software this guy is hawking. If all that's standing between you being devout and becoming a porn-crazed sinner is some software, maybe it's time for you to reevaluate your faith.

    Just keep in mind that the second you start talking about fucking with MY internet or MY ability to access porn (or anything else), then we're going to have a problem. And that goes whether it's a bible you're thumping, or a Koran, or the Talmud, etc. It's not our job to protect you from yourself, Sparky.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yup. Just like it must be hard to walk past a good BBQ joint and smell those ribs and shoulders smokin'... don't wanna see it? Don't search for it or click on the link.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by jdgeorge · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sounds like they're trying to help people figure out how to USE the internet to their benefit, not how to censor it. Did you read a completely different article?

    3. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've been on the internet since the early 90's and I don't ever recall even once being forced to go to a porn site (though I have been tricked into watching Rick Astley a couple of times). Unless you get some kind of phishing virus, no one is going to *force* anything on you. And if you're so weak that you can't control yourself, you may want to avoid the internet altogether. Anyway, if you really want the porn, I'm pretty sure you'll just find a way to bypass the filtering software this guy is hawking. If all that's standing between you being devout and becoming a porn-crazed sinner is some software, maybe it's time for you to reevaluate your faith.

      Everything in that statement shows how little you understand religious people. Here's their perspective -->

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      You're way the fuck down here.

    4. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, I understand them just fine. I just don't AGREE with them.

      Unless you parents are ultra-orthodox, I am going to guess that none of the 40000 people at this conference actually care about whether or not you agree with them. They want to live their lives according to their rules and traditions, and this conference is about deciding how to deal with the Internet in that context -- how to keep traditions alive and relevant, and how to keep the community together, now that society has been fundamentally altered by the Internet. Here is an example of something they are probably concerned about: there is a rule prohibiting gossip, yet on social networking websites gossip is both common and sometimes more severe/malicious than it is offline.

      You know what they are not concerned about? Whether or not you are gossiping on a social networking site. Just like they do not care if you go out and eat some pork. You are not part of their community, so as far as they are concerned the rules are not even relevant to you. There is some irony here: you are probably in agreement with them about their rules and your own life.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This "tradition" is almost as savage as the Taliban's treatment of women. This state of affairs saddens me very much.

      "Almost" is not appropriate here. Orthodox Jews don't rape nine-year olds, kidnap girls of other religions, stone rape victims to death for adultery, etc. A backward prachice? Yes. Savage like Islam? No.

    6. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but how do you equate "men and women on different sides of the room" with "will beat or slice off parts of women's bodies if they try to read or drive"?

      It's just a question of degree, not of kind.

    7. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is Slashdot, we're lucky if people read the summary. In this case most seem to have just read the title. Kosher Internet is a great example, we know those Jews have been trying to outlaw non-Kosher food for ages rather than just putting a little logo on food they deem to be pure and letting everyone else make their own choices.

    8. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > I am going to guess that none of the 40000 people at this conference actually care about whether or not you agree with them.

      Ask any Israeli how well this works out where such people actually have some ability to impact public policy. Basically this is a case of "if they could, they would". They can't because they are a very tiny minority. This is the only reason not to be seriously concerned.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful
      1. We are not in Israel
      2. This is not a conference about public policy, it is about policies within their community.
      3. As I already said, Jews do not generally impose their religious rules on non-Jews, and the ultra-orthodox are not an exception. The reason the Haredi are so militant about their rules in Israel is that they are surrounded by other Jews in Israel, and most of those Jews are not orthodox. Unfortunately, aside from the fact that they are basically demanding that all Jews practice their particular brand of orthodoxy, they also tend to forget that there are large numbers of Muslims in Israel who are also affected by the Israeli government's decisions (perhaps because they have swallowed the "this land is our land" mantra hook, line, and and sinker).

        Of course, Israel's domestic politics are irrelevant to America's domestic politics, so there is really no point in getting into an in-depth discussion of the issue. Israeli politics are only relevant to America's foreign policy; we could discuss that issue ad infinitum, but as far as this story is concerned that is equally irrelevant.
      --
      Palm trees and 8
    10. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Ardeaem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A backward prachice? Yes. Savage like Islam? No.

      Islam never raped, kidnapped, or stoned anyone. A small number of people, who practice a particular version of Islam, have done those things and justified it using their particular doctrinal interpretation. The same is true of Christianity and Judaism. To blame some fictional, abstract, monolithic "Islam," which doesn't have existence independent from how people interpret it, for the actions of individuals is a logical fallacy.

    11. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fundies are notorious for limiting other people's choices because they find them disagreeable. You make it sound like we don't already have plenty of experience with people of this mindset.

      I used to work with several Jews of varying degrees of fundamentalism. All of them were at a minimum of the 'cannot do anything that resembles work, including using electricity during the sabbath' variety. And me, being completely non-religious, got along fine with most of them (one guy was just a total asshole, but that had nothing to do with his beliefs. The other Jews didn't like him either). Jewish fundamentalists tend not to be of the evangelical sort. They have their rules, and they abide by them, but they didn't give a damn whether or not I followed them.

      I have no objection to a group that wants to organize an opt-in censorship system for their own use.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    12. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Imbrondir · · Score: 5, Informative

      Every bigger religion has had bad apples, that's true. What's unique about Islam is that their leader Muhammed himself raped, enslaved, kidnapped, murdered and at least ordered people to stone in his name. This is pretty well documented in Hadith, an important source of Islamic knowledge for every interpretation of Islam as far as I know.

    13. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who was raised jewish, I am just dumbfounded at how people who are serious about religion manage to play the "moral card" and generally idiotic about the fact that religion is in conflict with rights, because people want and expect more rights than religion tends to allow.

      Not everyone lives in that little "religion-box" of thinking where doing what makes you happy = bad. In fact, most of us don't. That goes for any religion.

      “No one here is a Luddite who denies the manifold benefits that technology has brought to mankind as a whole,” said Eytan Kobre, spokesman for the event.

      Actually - yes, every single person that attended this rally is a luddite to me.

    14. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Read the Old Testament sometime. If you're going to judge the roots of Islam harshly, ponder the fate of the Amalekites sometime.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While obvious flamebait, the post does have merit in that judaism and its successor religions like christianity and islam glorify suffering as a path to God.

      Considering that its in direct conflict with our human nature to seek pleasure, it's not very surprising that reactions of those who choose suffering and then see others enjoy themselves around them are often violent. Similar reference: the sheer amount of people who are violently anti-gay that tend to end up coming out of the closet as homosexuals later in their lives.

      It just seems that it's the natural defence mechanism when denying something we actually want is to attempt to destroy those who live the way we would want to live.

    16. Re:...Or you could just not go to porn sites by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, living in Jerusalem my experience is rather different.
      A while back they used to have these huge protest over the opening of a parking lot on Saturday, blocking off streets burning trash containers, a friend of mine told me that one day he was driving home they actually rolled a burning trash container onto the road and he almost hit it.
      There was this whole thing about their treatment of women in the news a few months ago, exemplified by grown men spitting on a nine year old girl on her way to school because she wasn't dressed modestly enough for them.
      A deli that I lived down the street from got vomit smeared on its doors because it sells non-kosher meat.
      And the list goes on.

      You might not hear of Jewish suicide bombers anytime soon but the fundamentalists around here certainly don't think their rules only apply to themselves.
      And personally I'm planning to move somewhere else before they become the majority around here and start passing these things into law.

  2. No wonder they hate the Internet by Alranor · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:No wonder they hate the Internet by Alranor · · Score: 4, Informative
  3. Listen to Schlomo (from TFA) by Brannoncyll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Desires are out there,' said Cohen. 'We have to learn how to control ourselves.'

    Exactly. Just learn to control yourselves and stay away from porn sites. Treat them like you do pork. Or guys porking girls. Whatever, there's pork there.

    1. Re:Listen to Schlomo (from TFA) by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While I was dating my wife (but still living with my parents), my parents belonged to an Orthodox temple. My wife (then-girlfriend) came over for a visit and my mother had to drop something off at the rabbi's house. When he heard that we were alone together, he got very worried and told my mother to go back home immediately.

      This, plus other sermons the rabbi delivered, make me think that the ultra-orthodox live in fear that they are so weak-willed that they will give into desire/sin/whatever once the tiniest of opportunities present themselves. Thus, they make rules to prevent people from coming anywhere close to temptation. And then make rules to keep people from coming close to the rule which protects against temptation (lest they break that original rule). And then make rules to protect the rules which protect the rules which protect against temptation. Add in an adherence to tradition, even if the original source of temptation is gone, and this explains much of why they seem to have so many rules which don't make sense.

      (Disclaimer: I'm actually pretty religious, but I decide which religious rules make sense for me to follow and ignore the ones that I think make no sense whatsoever.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  4. It's Almost Like a Powerful Double-Edged Sword by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shlomo Cohen, 24, of Toronto, said he used the Internet for shopping, business and staying in touch with friends -- “Everyone needs e-mail,” he said.

    You might say it's a powerful tool that isn't inherently good or evil, it can just magnify the abilities and desires of the user?

    Basically: "New technology befuddles and stymies religious folks who wonder why their deity(s) of choice didn't write out rules for said technologies X millennia ago (at least for deities that are said to be omniscient)."

    As a former Catholic, I'm sort of glad that "thou shalt not play Diablo III for 12 hours on Sunday while occasionally watching free pornography" is no longer applied to me. Hard to shake the guilt that I'm enjoying so much while others deliberately stunt themselves though ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
  5. It is not just about pornography by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Informative
    What you need to understand about the ultra-orthodox is that all their rules and restrictions serve a single purpose: to keep the community together and maintain their traditions, no matter where they are or what sort of attitude the people around them have. One of the issues they are discussing at the conference is the effect that social networking websites have on the community; there are concerns that people will become more disconnected from each other, that they might gossip more, etc., which could create strife within the community itself. Sure, there is the matter of "purity" and abstaining from masturbation or pornography, but pornography is a pretty small issue within that community which has been addressed before -- as you say, "do not go to pornography sites," and additionally that if you accidentally go to one, you should close it and say a prayer (they are religious, after all).

    Just keep in mind that the second you start talking about fucking with MY internet

    Jews do not generally go around telling non-Jews what to do with their personal lives. If you take a look at the Talmud, there are sections that deal with how Jews should live when they are surrounded by non-Jews; the Talmud was written at a time when non-Jews were pagans whose rituals would be disgusting by modern standards, but the Talmud only commands Jews to stay away from pagan temples and to be careful about letting pagans become to "familiar" with a Jew's animals, and some regulations about wines and eating utensils that might be used by pagans. Note that the Talmud does not command Jews to stop pagans from practicing their religions or to judge them for their rituals. As long as you are not bringing your laptop full of pornography into an ultra-orthodox community, they really do not care what you are doing or what sort of information is on your computer network.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:It is not just about pornography by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Betterunixthanunix is spot-on. The topic is entirely misleading; this is not a summit where people are discussing changing the Internet. They are discussing the ramifications of some of its content and usage. This is one of the really cool things about Judaism, actually...they debate current issues in a really logical manner, and despite the optics of a bunch of ultra-orthodox walking around in traditional garb, they are actually very forward-thinking. Take the religious trappings out of it for a second. Imagine instead that it was a congregation of tens of thousands of people from the tech sector engaging in the debate instead. How would you feel about it then? That's very much like what this is...only without the inevitable commercial conflicts of interest that would arise from such a secular gathering.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  6. It isn't just porn by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    It isn't just porn. The charedi(ultra-orthodox) are having serious troubles with people leaving the fold due to simply learning about things on the internet, like evolution and the age of the Earth. Many of them don't become outright atheists or agnostics but instead transition to being some form of Modern Orthodox, or Yeshivish. But for most of the ultra-Orthodox population that's about as close to as bad as completely abandoning the religion. In some respects it is worse, because when they stay some form of Orthodox, it is a lot harder to get friends and families to shun a person who leaves, which means the person now becomes an influx of new ideas into the community. It also doesn't help the charedim, that there are organizations like Footsteps http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footsteps_(organization) specifically geared to getting people to leave the fold.

    Incidentally, it seems that people commenting on this article are slightly confused about terminology. Chassidic or hassidic is not a synonym for ultra-orthodox. The Chassidim are a specific movement founded around 1800 that have specific belief sets and communal organizations where each sect centers around a Rabbinic dynastic that leads that sect. Chassidim are essentially a subset of ultra-orthodox. The more general term for ultra-orthodox as whole is "charedi" (or in the plural "charedim"), although in some contexts that term is used to mean ultra-orthodox who aren't chassidic.

  7. Who said they hate the Internet? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yup, the ultra-orthodox really hate the Internet:

    http://www.chabad.org/

    This conference is about deciding what sort of rules should be applied to the Internet within the ultra-orthodox community, not banning the Internet all together. As for the issue of child molestation, yes, it is a problem within the community; and guess what? There are Jews standing outside of the conference protesting its purpose and demanding that the issue of child molestation be addressed first. So much for hating the Internet.

    You know what the worst thing you can do is? Point fingers at the ultra-orthodox and scream about child molestation, since that is exactly what they are afraid of happening if people speak about it outside of their community -- you are basically validating what they are saying to themselves when they keep it a secret. How about we take the rational approach and just bring child molesters to court, where they can be tried and sentenced like anyone else, without shouting about how they are Jewish?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Who said they hate the Internet? by Alranor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Point fingers at the ultra-orthodox and scream about child molestation, since that is exactly what they are afraid of happening if people speak about it outside of their community -- you are basically validating what they are saying to themselves when they keep it a secret.

      If they weren't actively trying to cover it up then people would be pointing at the particular people responsible for the child abuse and screaming at them. As it is, in exactly the same way as the Catholic church has, their community are trying desperately to cover it all up, shield the perpetrators from any sort of punishment and allow them to carry on doing it

      Damned right we should be screaming at people who do that, because they're enabling the molestors.

    2. Re:Who said they hate the Internet? by Alranor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, if the community are actively shielding these people from prosecution, they share in the responsibility. Why is that so hard to understand?

  8. Re:Either you can control yourself, or you can't by Morty · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are saying that you need filtering or censoring software, then you are saying you can't trust yourself to follow your beliefs.

    Judaism has a concept of a "geder", a "fence" around a law to prevent oneself from getting close to violating it. For example, one is supposed to avoid being in a room alone with a woman one is not married to or related to, to prevent temptation. The geder isn't there to stop someone determined to violate the law, it's there to prevent a situation from casually escalating.

    I suspect that these folks are viewing filtering software as a geder.

  9. Brooklyn's Orthodox child abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Orthodox Jews don't rape nine-year olds" - just read this article to see how wrong you are:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/29/brooklyn-orthodox-jews-child-abuse-cover-up-feature/

    1. Re:Brooklyn's Orthodox child abuse by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative

      I read this story as well, and the ongoing coverage on the NYT. The story isn't the abuse itself, by "one or two abberent (sic) individuals", but the fact that when one or two parents reported the rabbi in question, they were ostracized by everyone in the community. Not all Jews are ultra-orthodox, but there seems to be some kind of omertà in effect when it comes to reporting religious authorities to the police.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  10. the problem is organized religion by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the only logically and morally defensible position on rights and freedoms is that of the individual

    when people act as a group with a command and control structure and talk about rights and freedoms, the subject ceases to be valid because the command and control structure of organized religion, in the process of imposing edicts on its members, is breaking the rights and freedoms of the individual

    you can only talk about rights and freedoms of the individual. "religious freedom" in this context is an oxymoron because "religious freedom" is really just about imposing on the rights of freedoms of individuals born into a religion and unable to choose for themselves

    you have to talk about rights and freedoms from the point of view of the individual. all other perspectives are not logically coherent point of views to take and therefore are false and immoral

    society is only able to maintain true freedom when organized religion ceases to think it has the right to impose its will on others. as long as it does, it is an enemy of rights and freedoms. you should be able to worship your god as you choose, convert to any religion you want, as an individual. the organized religion has no right to dictate your choices, as an individual. or it is a force of authoritarianism and oppression

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Simple solution by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes the whole "Kosher" process kinda irks me in the sense that many of the most commonly consumed foods have been "made Kosher" with special branding and tiny little symbols on the labels which seem innocent and harmless enough, but those markings COST MONEY. The cost, of course, results in higher prices for things which do not affect the majority of people.

    So let's take a page from the "Halal" playbook and let them buy their stuff from Kosher stores instead of effectively taxing everything we eat. Seems reasonable -- you need something different, go ahead... get your something different, but don't make the rest of us pay for it.

    That said, what does it have to do with the original topic?

    PLENTY!

    I don't want some minority interest stepping in with things that will ultimately change and harm the internet. If they want something "sanitized" great! There's an app for that! It's called a VPN. You just connect to a regular public internet connection and then from there, log into a VPN which routes all traffic through a "Kosher-net." Now you're cleansed without affecting the rest of the planet.

    When small groups force their changes on the world, it invariably harms the world in some way.

  12. Re:Then I don't see why they're holding the rally. by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If there are things like an officially safe AdBlock/filter that accords to strict Jewish definitions of porn ..."

    I guess girls with pigtails are out then?