Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Windows RT Will Cost OEMs Over Twice As Much as Windows 7

Posted by Unknown on from the backroom-deals-with-intel dept.

MrSeb writes with this excerpt from Extreme Tech: "Good news: Last month's unbelievable rumors that a Windows RT (Windows 8 ARM) licenses would cost OEMs $90-100 were off the mark — in actual fact, as confirmed by multiple vendors at Computex in Taiwan, the Windows RT license cost is only $80-95. At this point, we're not entirely sure what Microsoft's plan for Windows RT is. It would seem that Microsoft doesn't want to flood the markets with cheap Windows RT tablets. At this rate, though, we would expect the cheapest Windows RT tablets to hit the market at around $600, with top-spec models (if they exist) in the $800-900 range — well above Android tablets or the iPad. We can only assume that Microsoft doesn't want to go head-to-head with iOS and Android, instead trying to stake out a position at the top end of the market. Whether this is a good plan, with x86 tablets and their full 20-year PC ecosystem also vying for market share, remains to be seen." For comparison, sources say that Windows Phone 7 ran OEMs the equivalent of $30 per device, and Windows 7 for desktops around $50.

60 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Good news for AAPL investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPad still has nothing to worry about. Does Microsoft secretly hold a ton of Apple stock? Are they just trying to make money by driving it up and then selling it?

    1. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This will not work that way, the OEM will use lower quality tablet parts if they have to pay more for the OS. They will do this to get a competitive price and a reasonable profit margin. There are quite a few good android tablets out there, Samsung, Acer and Asus just off the top of my head all make more than one. Plus there is the fire and the nook for the lower end but still quite nice devices.

    2. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I can understand that MS doesn't want 'Windows RT' associated with the sort of hardware that floats around on the dodgy end of the Android spectrum, it seems like pricing the software license as they have isn't an obviously helpful way to do that.

      If the OEM has to make a price point, because their customers or sales network says so, the money spent on software licenses will come out of something else(or, since Windows for x86 is apparently cheaper, simply cut a bloody swath through ARM devices and lead Intel to sell a bunch of Atoms...), which won't help hardware quality much.

      Given that they maintained a relatively iron grip over 'approved' specs for Windows Phone licencees(you either built the handset within certain parameters, or you didn't get a license, period.) it seems like that already have a template for a much better way to ensure uniform quality and a consistent experience.

      With this pricing strategy(along with the 'Ha Ha, no AD for you, not even with some sort of premium SKU" thing), one just gets the impression that they don't really want to sell this particular product...

    3. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      We have a real shill here, people.

    4. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by Gobelet · · Score: 2

      since Windows for x86 is apparently cheaper, simply cut a bloody swath through ARM devices and lead Intel to sell a bunch of Atoms...

      Especially considering Intel now has their Medfield Atom processor going head-to-head with ARM smartphones. This single-core chip is faster than a lot of dual-core ARM SoCs, if not most, and sips just as much juice.

      Intel's Medfield & Atom Z2460 Arrive for Smartphones: It's Finally Here
      Lava Xolo X900 Review - The First Intel Medfield Phone - Performance

    5. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > one just gets the impression that they don't really want to sell this particular product...

      I think you are confused by trying to understand behavior that doesn't appear to make sense. Usually means we are missing part of the decision process. So lets toss theories around until one makes sense.

      Here is mine. Microsoft has a couple of long term problems. They have a monopoly on the desktop. It produces a shedload of cash. How much per unit is a secret somehow, odd that a large publicly traded corporation's flagship revenue stream's details are a closely guarded secret. (just an aside that may be significant) They fear the desktop might not stay so important and produce the revenue. But they have a second, equally important problem. They can't even stay the same, they have around 90% of the market and PC sales are flat, shareholders have been waiting patiently for a decade to see some share appreciation on MSFT and there doesn't appear to be a lot of upside on the Windows PC. They see Linux as a threat and we know shutting off the oxygen supply is a tactic that has worked for them. The open PC is the air supply.

      So Windows RT is designed to address all those needs. It answers the threat to the platform. It will produce Apple like per unit revenue which will make the pension fund managers smile. And it ends the Linux threat by carefully locking the platform and keeping a very tight leash on the OEMs.

      The question is whether the marketplace will allow them to get away with it. A lot of people have wanted to make insanely great margins on consumer electronics. Only one has succeeded. The chains are even questionable, phone vendors are removing them, not building stronger ones.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    6. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      Which is really why if MS is that concerned they need to go first party with their own tablet like Apple rather than rely on Samsung, Acer, Asus, and others to produce quality tablets. Unfortunately, with what happened to the Courier it looks like this will never happen as it seems it's against what they want to do, but who knows.

    7. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well considering we are talking about a company with pretty much ZERO market share in tablets and cell phones to have the gold plated brass balls to think they can sell for more than iPad? To me this just shows Forbes is right, Ballmer IS the worst CEO out there.

      Both he and Sinofsky have shown how completely clueless they are, both of the actual people that buy their products and of the market in general. Did anybody see Sinofsky's last conference on Win 8? Count how many times the moron says the word "touchscreen". i swear that dumbass honestly thinks he is gonna get the ENTIRE X86 market to switch to touchscreens, all so he can sell an OS that so far nobody has shown any interest in!

      So if any MSFT execs read this? WinPhone was a FLOP, a MASSIVE FLOP that you spent hundreds of millions on that went exactly NOWHERE. I can tell you as a small retailer that the X86 version of Win 8 is looking to also be a MASSIVE FLOP with not a single customer that has played with the Win 8 CP unit in my shop expressing a desire to have your new OS. When you have had nothing but flops in an arena, and you competition which is NOT a flop is cheaper? That is NOT GOOD, that is horribly bad.

      Frankly if I didn't know any better I'd swear that just like everyone says Elop at Nokia was a MSFT plant, so too were Ballmer and Sinofsky Apple or Google plants, but for the future of the company they are actually much worse than that, they are truly clueless of their own customers and of the market they are trying to sell to. The only way I can see this possibly flying is if they do massive subsidies of the hardware, losing money on every single unit as they did with the X360 at the start, and hoping their massive capital can basically buy them a chunk of the market. More likely from the talks I've seen Sinofsky is so damned arrogant that he honestly believes people will pay $900 for a WOA tablet which i think come Xmas he's gonna get a massive shock, what he is gonna see is his new baby is gonna be the next touchpad.

      Gotta look on the bright side though, I have a feeling next summer Woot! is gonna be having massive sell offs of the turkeys and i bet the hardware will be nice so all of us who missed out on getting a touchpad will hopefully be able to score on for like $100 and the hackers will figure out a way to put Android on it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I would think it would be a better score for AMD than for Intel, as most tablets i've seen were used for portable PMPs and the AMD C and E series Bobcats are frankly perfect for that niche, much better than Atom now that Intel killed ION.

      As for the product itself...WHAT...THE...FUCK...I used to make Vista comparisons but now that I've been playing with Win 8 CP for awhile at the shop, I have to wonder if it isn't actually the next MS Bob. How can a company that is so famous for using focus groups out the ass suddenly come up with such a poorly designed product from the user perspective? want to see how the average user fares on Win 8? Here see for yourself and I can tell you that in my shop? that's the perfectly typical reaction, followed by frustration and them walking away.

      If the reports are accurate and Win8RT has no more support for AD and GPOs than an iPad I honestly can't see how it can do any better in that market as it doesn't really seem to follow tablet UI conventions either, its just not very intuitive or naturally discoverable. Charging premium prices when they couldn't give away WinPhone just cranks the WTF? knob to 11, as why would companies like Asus bend over backwards and pay crazy prices for an unproven product when they can get Android which IS a proven product, for free?

      That is why I have to make comparisons to MS Bob, because like Bob not only is the UI nothing like what folks are expecting (and at least in my shop are wanting) but I just can't see who the market this is supposed to be for. Its not business, as no AD makes it not any better than the more popular iPad, its not consumers who find it unintuitive, its not high end ARM tablet buyers as Asus with Transformer and Apple with iPad 3 seem to have that market covered, so who? people who want their tablet to LOOK like their desktop OS but not actualy run the same programs on the two? Its just a head scratcher.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't having any beliefs one way or another if MS will succeed. It does seem to me that MS is banking on two concepts from their past: they can get into Corporate America better than Apple or Google, and Corporate America will want their tablets and smartphones to say Winders because their laptops and workstations do. MS has never held its customers in high regard and so I believe they think this strategy will work for them.

      Maybe it will, maybe it won't. I don't have any faith that Corporate America has very much intelligence. What may make things different this time is that MS is late to the party leaving CA with time to try alternatives and attempts to get them integrated into their businesses. Once CA finds that RT doesn't allow them to carry over any previous MS investment except maybe their mail server infrastructure, then CA might not be so accepting. On the other hand, all MS has to do is lie their ass off about "new" technologies to come from MS and that buying into RT systems now will allow them experience the joys of this new tech...blah, blah, blah.

    10. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

      So Windows RT is designed to address all those needs. It answers the threat to the platform. It will produce Apple like per unit revenue which will make the pension fund managers smile. And it ends the Linux threat by carefully locking the platform and keeping a very tight leash on the OEMs.

      The problem is that this doesn't explain why any customers (and by customers I include OEMs) would go along with this arrangement. What incentive do they have to do so?

      They can't even stay the same, they have around 90% of the market and PC sales are flat, shareholders have been waiting patiently for a decade to see some share appreciation on MSFT and there doesn't appear to be a lot of upside on the Windows PC.

      Then the expectation of share appreciation needs to change. Microsoft is now a mature company, so they should be switching from capital appreciation to a greater focus on dividends.

      Just wanting share appreciation really badly won't make it happen. In fact, the rollout of Windows 8 not only won't bring back the startup-level growth or Apple-style profit margins they want, but is likely to make matters worse by hurting Microsoft in their core market (business desktops and servers).

    11. Re:Good news for AAPL investors by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft wants to associate its tablets with quality, and that is what they are.

      There's a big problem with this: in the consumer space, no one thinks "quality" when they think of Microsoft. Instead, that's exactly what they think of Apple. (How true this is is debateable, but we're talking about average consumers here, not geeks). And Apple already has a wildly popular tablet, the iPad. Why on earth would anyone pay more for a Windows tablet?

      Don't forget, Windows has always been about being cheap. People who wanted a PC and wanted a premium brand bought a Mac; everyone else, wanting something cheap, bought Windows. Windows has never been positioned as the high-end option, and it's built a 2-decade-long reputation of being low quality and crashing a lot (mainly due to the ridiculous variety of hardware and dodgy vendor-written drivers, compared to the Mac's single-vendor hardware). MS trying to jump into the tablet market with a high-priced offering (even higher priced than Apple's offering) is going to be a lot like Ford or Kia suddenly trying to sell cars in the Rolls Royce price range.

  2. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems that Linux will finally get a chance.

    1. Re:Nice! by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No it will just go to Apple and Android (Some people count Android as Linux, others do not)...

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Nice! by Andtalath · · Score: 2

      It's linux.
      It's not GNU though,

    3. Re:Nice! by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair though, OS X is a very heavily modded Unix based system that is a pretty far ways away from any *nix, aside from a handful of terminal commands.

      It *is* certified Unix though, despite what people say. At least, it was - I'm not sure if the more recent releases have been technically certified, but the kernel and BSD layers haven't changed drastically.

    4. Re:Nice! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      Specific versions of OSX are Unix. Others are not.

      Leopard and Snow Leopard are Unix.

      http://www.opengroup.org/csq/public/search.mhtml?t=XY1&w=apple&sort=bycomponent&display=short&pid=11720

      The others are not officially Unix, but Unix-like.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  3. What is Microsoft thinking? by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So they're basically screwing up the desktop experience on Windows 8 in favor of tablets and smartphones, and on top of that they're pricing it so high that it won't have any reasonable chance of success in the market they want.

    I'm betting that Steve Ballmer will be out the door by the time all this is over.

    1. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are thinking they want to keep the same profits margins they have always had (which of course won't work). It's pretty short sighted since they now have the windows apps market which means they can make much more through app sales then the OS itself.

      I highly doubt this would kick Ballmar out however. This isn't HP. Setbacks are common for MS yet you don't see a revolving door of CEO at MS.

    2. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by hmmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. They appear to be betting the company on Windows 8 in an attempt to capture the market for touch enabled devices, and are willing to risk alienating millions of their customers as a consequence. Why they wouldn't follow through on that strategy by all but giving away the RT licenses is beyond me. Windows 8 makes it clear that they are not willing to settle on becoming merely niche players in this market, whereas high pricing on licenses seems to indicate the reverse.

      Perhaps we have two parts of the company engaging in competing strategies, in which case responsibility for the mess would fall very squarely on Ballmer and senior management who should be setting the overall company strategy.

    3. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They survived Vista so they'll survive Windows 8, Microsoft is far too entrenched to flop in one generation. Much like Intel when they were selling PIVs and Itanics, they still come back to be on top of the game. I run Windows 7, it works very well and with extended support even my Home Premium is supported until 2020. It's not like there's going to be a pressing need to use Win8 for many years yet, assuming it actually ends up that bad.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it is more of a cautious approach to entering the market. Price the OS, so that it will only be included on the high end Tablets (ones with faster processors and more memory) So when these go on the market they run very well and smooth. You don't want bad reviews out of the starting gate because the starting tables are just running of the systems minimum specifications.

      The problem with this argument is that WinRT will never even get "out of the starting gate" if the first devices are so grossly overpriced. This isn't a new market; Microsoft has to compete with Apple and Google, both of which have substantial installed bases. Apple, in particular, already has the premium tablet market sewn up, while Google's Android is found on a very wide array of devices and can be implemented at a very low price due to lack of licensing costs.

      Microsoft has to seriously consider, from the customer's perspective, why anyone would choose a WinRT tablet over an iPad 3. The iPad 3 is $629 for the least expensive model with 3G/4G capability. WinRT tablets are going to be considerably more expensive. The iPad 3 has a premium name, massive installed software base, and Retina Display. The WinRT tablet won't have any of these things. What's more, you will get some customers who think because it's called "Windows 8" that it can run normal Windows software, and they aren't going to be very happy when they find out that this is not true.

      The whole Windows 8 project is shaping up to be a failure greater even than Vista.

    5. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they're basically screwing up the desktop experience on Windows 8 in favor of tablets and smartphones, and on top of that they're pricing it so high that it won't have any reasonable chance of success in the market they want.

      I'm betting that Steve Ballmer will be out the door by the time all this is over.

      I'm not saying I agree that Ballmer will be out soon but apparently they have removed all chairs from his office.

    6. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

      It feels more like they are trying to kill ARM at an OEM level: "It's too expensive with Windows and no one wants it without" ... Of course, that thought is nonsense...but have you seen reason and sanity at work lately there?

      If they really are thinking that, they have delusions of grandeur. ARM existed before Microsoft had any products for it, and will continue to thrive after WinRT flops.

      Microsoft really needs to come to its senses and give up the 1990s-era delusion that they can own the whole IT market. They have a *lock* on the business desktop, for good reasons (and a few bad reasons as well), a lock on the PC gamer desktop, almost total domination of the office suite market, and a decent though not overwhelming market share in the server OS business. They need to focus on maintaining and building this, rather than trying to control everything under the sun. This is their bread and butter. If they really want to spread their wings, they would have been better off buying Adobe (as was inaccurately rumored a while back), since Photoshop/Creative Suite fits in very well with their core business demographic and is the industry standard.

    7. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure, Microsoft will survive on the desktop and on "classic" laptops. Windows 7 is good enough to keep them in business for those types of device, even if Windows 9 takes another five years to produce. Windows 7 will just become the new XP.

      But for touchscreen devices, Windows 7 is not fun to use as it is. Neither are most existing Windows applications. So Windows 8 (RT) starts from a difficult position and I could imagine the pricing as described is the final nail in its coffin.
      Which would give iOS and Android time until Windows 9 to get even more entrenched on smartphones and tablets. That cannot be good for Microsoft.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    8. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's possible they realize the folly of Windows RT and are trying to make it possible but not probable.

      It's not really clear who windows RT is actually going to be good for. It's clear who it's aimed at. But if the whole plan is to have a single windows 8 family why the hell would you buy the ugly incompatible step child of the family? That doesn't mean windows RT will be bad, or won't behave exactly the same from a user perspective as x86/IA64, at least until they go to install software and find out nothing works. But for a tablet the whole advantage of windows is that it runs windows software, if it's not going to run windows software... why would you want it?

      The fact that intel and AMD haven't really kicked into gear for mobile has hurt microsoft a lot. There should be x86 phones running well... actual windows. And there should have been for 5 or 6 years at this point. I have a 6 year old touch and pen enabled windows XP tablet that behaves pretty much exactly as you'd expect a touch device to, other than the whole having a fold out keyboard because it's a convertible laptop, and I have a touch enabled windows vista HP laptop thats about 4 years old that's the same deal.

      I'm still struggling to figure out what Windows RT is aimed at. Maybe it's for emerging markets and developers for emerging markets? It's possible they want regular windows as the main product line in rich countries, and poor ones that only get arm devices to have a cheap edition? Selling a cheap tablet to compete on price with the iPad in any market is a stupid plan if there's no software for it, which seems to be what windows RT would be, that's just going to make millions of customers angry, fast. Making a shitty product more expensive doesn't make it a better product, but it might make manufacturers think twice about trying to stuff it in every pile of bad hardware they can shovel out the door. But as you say... who whole strategy seems internally inconsistent.

    9. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by symbolset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When Vista launched there was no heir apparent. Now there are two.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

      > Microsoft really needs to come to its senses..

      It is trying to survive. It will do ANYTHING.

      A publicly traded corporation has two paths to success.

      1. Growth. But you have to give the shareholders regular good news to drive the share price up and up. This was MSFT up to the .bomb crash.

      2. Dividends. A utility type. A monopoly with a saturated market like Microsoft currently exists as is a perfect example of one. Everyone needs em, they rake in nice healthy revenue and.... they aren't handing out utility company dividends. WTF? But if things stay as they are they will and it would be a good midlife for a corporation that could go on and on. Until the market changes. And they see it changing.

      No corporation is going to face the shareholders and announce a plan for a controlled implosion, to make the company half it's current size over the next decade. There must be, if not growth, at least preservation of capital and dividends.

      Of what use is migrating to tablets if they make less money? Making the same money is almost as bad, a huge risk with no potential reward?

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    11. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by JDG1980 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong. A tablet OS that can do actual office work, and produce media instead of just consuming it, is a new market. I'm fine with paying an extra $50 for a tablet OS that enables me to retouch photos with Photoshop, produce e-learning content with flash or html 5, and edit sound with Audacity. These things are impossible or slow and kludgy on IOS and Android devices.

      And it will still be impossible or slow or kludgy on a WinRT tablet. The problem isn't with the software, the problem is with the form factor. You need a keyboard and mouse to do this kind of work effectively.

    12. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Well, look at it from Ballmer's standpoint. He thinks that the desktop / laptop markets are going to disappear (he really, really believes the bullsh*t that comes out of Marketing's 'This Shiny Thing is the hotness!' butthole), and is trying to maneuver the company into a financially stable long term position.

      The key here is that he really believes that the desktop / laptop markets are going to disappear. Feel free to take this *facepalm*, and apply it to your forehead.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    13. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      And it will still be impossible or slow or kludgy on a WinRT tablet. The problem isn't with the software, the problem is with the form factor. You need a keyboard and mouse to do this kind of work effectively.

      That's what all those recently announced hybrid tablets/laptops, a la Asus Transformer, are for.

    14. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Well, the problems for MS are...

      Aside from the fact that AMD/Intel haven't had competitive mobile cpus, x86 has more legacy cruft to carry around than ARM so all else (eg manufacturing process) being equal, ARM will always have an advantage.

      Windows also expects not just an x86 cpu, but an ibm compatible system... The really low power x86 designs are different enough that they are not compatible at the kernel level, linux has been modified to run on them but i don't believe windows has and it may cause problems for drivers etc too...

      Windows has been available for touch devices for a long time, but compared to the ipad those devices are big, expensive, have poor battery life and the vast majority of apps people would want to run on a windows device are not suited to a touch ui.

      Selling an incompatible device under the windows brand will dilute the brand, users will buy it expecting it to be compatible with x86 windows applications, and be annoyed to find that it's not... Aside from that, it will also dilute the brand and force people obtaining software to find out which version of windows it's for. No doubt MS are hoping to trick users into buying it this way, knowing that their existing lock-in will ensure that very few x86 windows users jump ship over the annoyance.

      Making the OS expensive on ARM isn't going to force OEMs to ship premium devices... There's no point having a premium device with no apps... When you're coming from behind, you have to do with android and hp did, sell em cheap... If cheap enough, people will buy them even if they are inferior, and this will create a market for people to write apps towards.

      Making the software expensive could also cause OEMs to cut down on the hardware in order to meet price targets, which given that windows will almost certainly be heavier weight than ios or android this will result in really terrible tablets which are still more expensive as well as slower than the cheapest and nastiest android devices.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    15. Re:What is Microsoft thinking? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2

      Windows 8 *is* Windows, because Microsoft said so. Claiming it is not "Windows" is as ridiculous as those claiming "The Soviet Union wasn't not really communist", or the Inquisition was "not really Christian", or jihadis are "not really Muslim". Now bend forward and get ready for your "upgrade" ...

  4. Office included by robmv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't Office included on Windows RT? I think that is the reason of that higher price, some big corporations have so disconnected divisions that each one demands their cut to meet their yearly quota and do not see the big picture

    1. Re:Office included by Tridus · · Score: 2

      When I'm buying a home tablet I don't care about Office. I do care about price.

      Unless they're just going exclusively after the corporate market, this strategy is suicidial.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  5. we are in the era of Good Enough by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MS still doesn't get it, we are in the era of Good Enough Computing. my ipad 2 is not as powerful as my Lenovo, but i don't care. for a lot of things its more than good enough. most times i use my lenovo laptop the CPU is in the 5% range or less so it's not like i'm stressing it.

    and the form factor of the ipad allows it to have applications that are not available on my laptop. Flipboard for one as well as lots of educational apps for kids

    1. Re:we are in the era of Good Enough by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lets be honest, this is about Office.

      Microsoft is still living in that fantasy land where MS Office is relevant or necessary to everyone with a computer.

      Apple's Pages and Google Docs cover about 95% of the consumer population. I'm not even mentioning all the 3rd party, dirt cheap apps which have carved out their niches and do some tasks far better without the pricetag or the bloat of Office suite.

      I do love unending analyst guarantees (10 year running) how Office is this one thing that will turn the tide by making Microsoft cool and relevant again. Then the kids will finally discover the joys of mail merge and start sharing their hip-hop playlists with their friends at the Microsoft store.

  6. how to make lockin discounts irresistable by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 2

    I'm forced to assume they set it so ludicrously high to make the inevitable OEM 'loyalty' discount impossible to resist. I can only hope they've misjudged this badly, that OEMs will decide to avoid Win8 rather than agree whatever restrictive terms (dropping Android?) come with that discount.

  7. Stupid if true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this news is accurate, then Microsoft is fairly stupid and we can be happy about it.

    They should license Windows RT for 10$, maximum 20$, and target the extreme low-cost segment. Heck, they should consider giving it away for free (for the time being). There is just no way a company can get a reasonable piece of the mobile market cake with their own proprietary operating system on the basis of primarily targeting high-end devices.

    Luxury customers are rare and Apple's quasi-monopoly is hard to break, especially not by Microsoft whose design decisions have historically always been dominated by completely tasteless marketing managers. Anyway, cheap masses is what wins in the long run, see PC vs. Apple.

  8. Doesn't want to flood the market?! by jimicus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, this bit I don't get:

    It would seem that Microsoft doesn't want to flood the markets with cheap Windows RT tablets.

    If what we see on PC's is anything to go by, this sort of pricing strategy will have the exact opposite effect. Manufacturers will grit their teeth, pay Microsoft and then cut every other conceivable corner they can think of in order to build products down to a price.

  9. iPad has nothing to worry about by erp_consultant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $600 - $900 for a Windows tablet? Really? Good luck with that one Ballmer. Look - Apple is a premium brand so they can get away with charging what they do for the iPad. The android tablets are priced at a discount to that, presumably because the OS is free but also because the quality of components is not quite as good. On the ones I've used the touch screens don't seem to be quite as responsive as the iPad. In any case, where does this leave the Windows tablets? Selling at a premium to the iPad? I don't think so.

    1. Re:iPad has nothing to worry about by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that RT won't even be able to fully integrate into AD domains, so you won't even have the benefit of group policies and software distribution.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:iPad has nothing to worry about by Tridus · · Score: 2

      Corporates also want that shiny toy that the CEO sees his kid with and decides he should have one too.

      That's not a Windows tablet.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  10. Re:Lol... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not a tablet, it's a 'touch-enabled blade chassis'...

  11. WinRT comes with Office by tgd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All the reports say WinRT is including Office RT. Its as simple as that. WinRT comes with Office, so it costs more.

    Win8 bundled with Office would cost more, too.

    1. Re:WinRT comes with Office by bravecanadian · · Score: 2

      All the reports say WinRT is including Office RT. Its as simple as that. WinRT comes with Office, so it costs more.

      Win8 bundled with Office would cost more, too.

      The correct information has no place in this latest opportunity for everyone to sound off about how bad Microsoft is!!

    2. Re:WinRT comes with Office by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All the reports say WinRT is including Office RT. Its as simple as that. WinRT comes with Office, so it costs more.

      That may be Microsoft's reasoning, but it doesn't change the impact on the minimum profitable selling price of a Win8RT tablet compared to, e.g., an Android tablet with similar hardware.

      And its hardly as if premium office suites with even retail prices in the range of the increase in the OEM price of Windows RT being attributed to office are things that tablet purchasers buy anywhere close to universally. So even if it Office RT is worth the price increase to people who would buy a tablet office suite, for a lot of purchasers there'll be no relevant benefit for the added costs.

    3. Re:WinRT comes with Office by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Uhhh...friend? the biggest users of Office is corporate and without AD its a non starter, so just saying "We have Office!" don't mean shit when you are pushing a CONSUMER device. Do you honestly see many people going "Wow this ipad sure is nice, too bad it doesn't come with MS office, i could sure use me some Excel right about now" because i don't, because for consumers frankly Google docs does what they need.

      So having office alone doesn't justify the price. It would be like saying "Hey we have Outlook, no Exchange support though" because you just made sure folks that would actually WANT Outlook won't take it, the whole thing is just head scratching stupid.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  12. "touch enabled devices" by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Touch enabled devices does not mean specifically tablets or phones. MS has long seen their demise and plans to corner the touch enabled coffee table market. Truly they are visionaries!

  13. Re:Lol... by symbolset · · Score: 3, Funny

    I prefer "Domain controller with integrated Facebook and Twitter". Those are the key features we've been missing all along.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  14. More "I can do it, too." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Presumably there is a high level business executive at Microsoft saying, "Let's create an also-ran copycat tablet OS, charge way more money than the successful competitors with already huge markets, and dump billions into it. Obviously people will buy it because [unintelligible]. Sound good? It's a plan, then!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  15. Re:Standard Slashdot Comment by symbolset · · Score: 2

    Yes, the strategy does seem to be to find a way to be crushed between Android on the low end and Apple on the high. I believe they can achieve it.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  16. er by symbolset · · Score: 2

    ^ pardon me, I believe you dropped this.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  17. Windows RT is like iOS by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the need for AV on Microsoft products

    What need for antivirus? Windows RT runs only applications preinstalled on the device and applications obtained through the Windows Store unless you're a registered developer.

    1. Re:Windows RT is like iOS by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I predict Windows 8 will be the largest clusterfuck yet and the walled garden approach will backfire on them in the most spectacular way.

    2. Re:Windows RT is like iOS by rsborg · · Score: 2

      I predict Windows 8 will be the largest clusterfuck yet and the walled garden approach will backfire on them in the most spectacular way.

      I also predict that Windows8 (at least RT) will be a prodigious fail, but it won't be due to the walled garden... no the users love App Stores.

      Instead, UI changes and other annoyances will kill their approach, and it looks like the whole Oracle vs. Android thing is going nowhere, so while Android kills the low-end, Apple will clean up on the high end. The middle is not going to be a comfortable place to be, even for the likes of Microsoft... if it were, maybe the Amazon Kindle Fire would be doing better - but it's sales are off quite a bit since it's launch, despite Amazon's continued improvement of their device.

      Microsoft, with Windows8 is trying to have it's cake and eat it as well. Their attempt to straddle the fence between desktop and tablet markets is going to earn them a sore crotch.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:Windows RT is like iOS by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      Given WinRT tablets cannot join domains...

      To be a target for virus writers, you have to have a critical mass of compatable devices with enough security holes to exploit.

      This will not be true of WinRT any time soon. It's very locked down, and will have a market share that is a fraction of the iPad for a long time to come.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  18. Re:MSFT focusing tablets on businesses? by david.emery · · Score: 2

    Several people pointed out Win 8 Tablets don't support AD. Thanks, I didn't know that.

    But we've been here before! MSFT Win 8 Tablets not supporting AD is exactly like RIM Tablets not supporting Email. In both cases, the developer fscked up by ignoring their greatest strength for using and integrating their devices into corporate networks.

    (Queue "repeat lessons of history" quote...)

  19. Re:Value vs. growth by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

    shareholders have been waiting patiently for a decade to see some share appreciation on MSFT

    How is this necessary? Why can't shareholders just treat MSFT as a value stock that pays dividends instead of a growth stock, like in other mature markets?

    Why is it necessary? Inflation for one, and the fact that historically, the stock has had gradual depreciation that cannot be made up by any amount of stock. Even for billionaires, it is not a money maker if you factor in inflation.

    A value stock has to at least keep up with inflation or the dividends must more than offset that depreciation based on inflation. However, if the stock depreciates in value of actual current dollars then you are losing money hand over fist when you factor in inflation.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  20. Re:Virus medium compared to USB mass storage by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    Yes, the usb storage can only passively hold the virus, it cannot execute it so you rely on stupid configuration (autorun) or user error to pass the virus from the usb stick to a device it can actually infect.
    A tablet that's actively infected with a running virus can proactively attack other systems.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!