Slashdot Mirror


Reddit Cofounder Says Site Was Built By a Horde of Fake Accounts

derekmead writes "How, exactly, did Reddit get so big? Well, according to Reddit cofounder Steve Huffman, in the early days the Reddit crew just faked it 'til they made it.' In a video for Udacity, Huffman describes how the first Redditors populated the site's content with tons of fake accounts. These days, with the site's users are wary of people using expendable accounts to try to seed their own content. But early on, Huffman said that using fake accounts driven by the founders was key to building the tone they wanted to the site. Early on the Reddit crew could shape the discourse of the site in the direction they wanted, and as the real user base grew, those standards held allowing the fake accounts to fade away."

108 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Le first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don't say

    1. Re:Le first post by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, so are all these lame first posts made by Taco and Cowboy Neal?

    2. Re:Le first post by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      I imagine it is their subtle and slight way of getting back at all the readers for headaches we caused.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    3. Re:Le first post by Waldeinburg · · Score: 1

      I never thought I would see a FP modded 5 o_O

  2. Who says they stopped? by cephalien · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Been to r/circlejerk, lately? :)

    Either way, who cares. If it hadn't taken off, they'd just end up as a bunch of weirdos talking to their multiple personalities. But it did, and the same tactic is used all the time - ever see a single dollar bill in a tip jar? Priming isn't new.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
    1. Re:Who says they stopped? by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      ever see a single dollar bill in a tip jar? Priming isn't new.

      Well, I have.. I took all the other bills out when the cashier had his back turned. :D Everything I learned, I learned from Batman movies.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Who says they stopped? by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ever see a single dollar bill in a tip jar? Priming isn't new.

      Yep. At least according to local legend, when the built the first Costco they had the employees park close in and move their cars several times a day - to create the illusion of a busy parking lot.

    3. Re:Who says they stopped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not too much different than a restaurant with windows on a busy sidewalk seating people in tables near the windows if business is slow, to make the restaurant at first glance look active...

    4. Re:Who says they stopped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not too much different... if the people sitting by the windows are made of cardboard. Reddit was created with totally fake accounts. And by the looks of it, still populated with fakes.

    5. Re:Who says they stopped? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Been to r/circlejerk, lately? :)

      You mean there is a difference from reddit? ;-) /me ducks

    6. Re:Who says they stopped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      r/depression was really helpful to me. At least, I'm still alive because of them.

    7. Re:Who says they stopped? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      That reminds me, my grandmother used to have a saying "It is bad luck to buy a coin bank without anything in it". In hindsight, I think she just liked tricking people into thinking they suckered her out of potential money. Usually it was just a few pennies or old washers she picked up.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    8. Re:Who says they stopped? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      to create the illusion of a busy parking lot.

      To anyone watching the parking lot for an extended amount of time to before deciding whether or not to shop there?

      I'm not sure that necessarily proves the principle is sound, it just proves that some people believe in the principle.

    9. Re:Who says they stopped? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Been to r/circlejerk, lately? :)

      Man, k5 already made me hate the word "meta" with a passion. Or rather more. You just flat out call it what it is like that, I'm not dumb enough to look.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:Who says they stopped? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      to create the illusion of a busy parking lot.

      To anyone watching the parking lot for an extended amount of time to before deciding whether or not to shop there? I'm not sure that necessarily proves the principle is sound, it just proves that some people believe in the principle.

      The first Costco was alongside a medium busy road, so lots of chances for people to see the lot day after day. But it was also in a somewhat dodgy somewhat rundown semi industrial area, so convincing those people that they were open and a going concern was probably not without value.

    11. Re:Who says they stopped? by auldnic · · Score: 1

      I am happy to hear this.

    12. Re:Who says they stopped? by splatter · · Score: 1

      That is actually not uncommon from the previous generation. My wife was told the same by her grandmother, and to this day always makes sure there is a penny or some change in a gift wallet, handbag, purse, or piggy bank.

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    13. Re:Who says they stopped? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      I've seen this a lot with year-round firework stores. Firework stores (aside from the 3 weeks before the 4th of July, and the 2 weeks before Christmas) are generally not busy places. The employees part right in front to make it seem that other people are there. Many people don't like to go into a store with nobody else inside.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  3. Ask yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Am I real?

    1. Re:Ask yourself... by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I'm complex. Or maybe quaternion.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Ask yourself... by jvkjvk · · Score: 2

      Well, all I know is I'm not fixed precision. :)

    3. Re:Ask yourself... by i_ate_god · · Score: 2

      I just float around, uncaring of the world below me...

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    4. Re:Ask yourself... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm irrational, so yes.

    5. Re:Ask yourself... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      How the hell should I know if you're real?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    6. Re:Ask yourself... by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I keep insisting I have lots of complex friends, but my wife says they're imaginary.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  4. I knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Everyone on Facebook and LinkedIn is fake too.

  5. shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the biggest collection of self-important douchebags on the internet was started using self-important douchebaggery?

    never saw that coming.

    1. Re:shocking by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      I know you are; but what am I talking about?

  6. Matchmaking sites do the same thing by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You can buy a turnkey matchmaking site, complete with a few thousand profiles to get things going. These profiles will even send messages to your "real" users. You can toggle a switch to choose if your users have to pay to see the message, pay to reply, or whatever. There's nothing wrong with what reddit did, even if it went against their own terms of service. What's the phrase..."by any means necessary".

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  7. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A Nasdaq cofounder admitted today that their site was built by a horde of fake accountants.

  8. You mean to tell me... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are real people behind those posts now?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:You mean to tell me... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      There are real people behind those posts now?

      Close, there's redditors.

  9. How is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Reddit groupthink is pretty overpowering. I wouldn't be surprised if there are still a horde of fake accounts designed to upvote politically favored things and downvote badthink articles right into the memory hole.

    1. Re:How is this a surprise? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Wish I could upvote this spot-on comment.

  10. Not really new news by AEton · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:Not really new news by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

      you went through the trouble of finding that post (which has zero replies and therefore doesn't indicate any discussion having taken place btw)... just so you can show off how little this interests you? hahahaha.... yeah, hackernews. *pats head*

    2. Re:Not really new news by nazsco · · Score: 1

      No, he didn't search because there's no search at hn. Pg wants it to be like 4Chan.

      He tried to submit it there for karma whoring and got denied because it was already posted, hence he tried to karma whore here

  11. just another flash in the pan by Stalyn · · Score: 1

    With this new web 3.3 society it seems people get intensely focused on one site only to migrate to a newer site. Remember Digg? Remember Slashdot? Reddit will get replaced, it's only a matter of time. For me I'm going back to usenet and gopher.

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    1. Re:just another flash in the pan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I preferred Web 3.11 for Workgroups instead.

    2. Re:just another flash in the pan by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Funny

      With this new web 3.3 society

      You must have some kind of pre-release. I'm still on web 2.0.4-RC2. I think the 3.x series has more we- scale techonlogies like nosql and cloud. That will allow us to leverage javascript on every teir to make a thicker thin client with rich apps using HTML6 technology with XML for unstructured social tags. This is perfect for enterprise.

      I'm looking forward to the upgrade.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:just another flash in the pan by horza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Digg was destroyed by its owner. Slashdot and Reddit survive by... well doing nothing. How long did Slashdot go with it's appalling mess of code? And the moment they tried to clean things up including the interface... nothing but complaints! Sometimes if it ain't broke don't fix it (except secretly behind the scenes). Hell, I live in France where fax is still more respected than email.

      The only reason Slashdot is dying is dilution. Nobody wants to watch TV, we don't have time, and the previous poor quality of submissions and editing was border-line acceptable as it served as a trigger-point for a lively comments thread but the pollution of slashvertisement by timothy etc makes reading bitching threads tiresome.

      Getting momentum is tough. I don't think Slashdot or Reddit are going anywhere for now. However as the spectacular demise of Digg shows, things can change pretty quickly.

      Phillip.

    4. Re:just another flash in the pan by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Digg tried to kill themselves four times. They just got better at it as they went along. Part of their charm was their noobishness. They were known for it. Periodically re-engineering the discussion system to make it worse, presumably to make their noob members feel at home. It was weird and low rent and they finally put themselves out of their misery.

    5. Re:just another flash in the pan by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      What's a Digg? And I do care about my lawn. And I am a bit drunk. It shows. I'll just turn off the computer now an snuggle up with my MIRF.

    6. Re:just another flash in the pan by mangu · · Score: 2

      Well, FWIW Slashdot has done a lot of effort to kill themselves by trying so much to eliminate the trolls.

      When I first came here I had seen several discussion forums before, but what caught my attention was how, from time to time, a really funny troll appeared from nowhere.

      Slashdot without trolls is rather bland and uninteresting.

  12. Same with their up/down voting by LulzAndOrder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Still today, if you pay attention, you can tell that the tone of the site is maintained by editorial up/down voting. I know, because my tone they hate and it consistently gets one downvote. Not a lot, just the two needed to make it negative. Then if people reply to me, that discussion is not manipulated, but that comment that started my thread sticks with the negative one. It happens over and over. Regular folks can swoop in and pour more ups or downs, but more often than not, there is a "first psas" (ha ha First!) that zooms through right away and keeps the 'jerk tone pristine. Used to be that way on Slashdot too, you can tell by how quickly the needle moves to where it "wants" to be. I don't know any more, I don't pay attention or post.

    1. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      hah, that's nothing. try hackernews.

    2. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe you're just an asshole and, indeed, nobody cares about what you have to say.

    3. Re:Same with their up/down voting by ffflala · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know, because my tone they hate and it consistently gets one downvote. Not a lot, just the two needed to make it negative . . . . more often than not, there is a "first psas" (ha ha First!) that zooms through right away and keeps the 'jerk tone pristine.

      I'm curious: how would you characterize your "tone"? Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but it sounds like you're describing your own tone as that of a jerk.

      If that's the case, it just sounds like effective & efficient modding.

    4. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Augh, I'm out of mod points, so everybody look at this reply and mentally add +1 Insightful. Everybody should shut the fuck up about 10 times a day and ponder quietly to themselves "Maybe I'm just an asshole?" Do not continue posting on the Internet until you can demonstrate to yourself (to at least 2 sig figs) that you are not.

    5. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please take your own advice.

    6. Re:Same with their up/down voting by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The +4 Interesting mod on GP says otherwise.

      It's one thing to downmod comments because they're not constructive towards the discussion. It's altogether another thing to downmod individuals completely (though it happens all the time, in the form of credibility in real life, and karma on /.).

      Still, I expect even trolls have interesting things to say once in a while.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    7. Re:Same with their up/down voting by craznar · · Score: 1

      When you have +2000 over a week, then -4000 in one day, it is hard to imagine it has anything to do with what I'm saying.

      I am just not that important.

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    8. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And if you mention the ongoing project of genocide directed at white people, you can expect a million downvotes from white anti-white cultural marxists.

      EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief

      “You’re (white people) on the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around.” – Tim Wise, “anti-racist activist”

      “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race.” – Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor

      “Is it the duty of every good revolutionary to kill every newborn White baby?” – A member of the Weather Underground

      UNACCEPTABLE: “Affirmative action and racial quotas are special treatment for minorities.”
      ACCEPTABLE: “Affirmative action and racial quotas are necessary to overcome the legacy of slavery which is still keeping any non-Asian minority from succeeding in Post-Racial America. Besides, white people are all rich, connected, and racially privileged, so the very notion of treating them unfairly is racist and stupid, and you are racist and stupid for saying it.”

      UNACCEPTABLE: “There’s black people out there, rioting, looting, and setting fire to grocery stores!”
      ACCEPTABLE: “Although partially blinded by my white privilege, I think I see some oppressed minorities fighting back against institutional racism, seeking social justice through involuntary reparations, and opening a combustion-based dialogue with the Korean community.”

      UNACCEPTABLE: “Black men just keep raping white women at a ridiculously high rate.”
      ACCEPTABLE: “Today’s race-conscious African-American male seeks to overcome historical barriers to inter-racial unions, as well as discriminatory female consent practices.”

    9. Re:Same with their up/down voting by LulzAndOrder · · Score: 1, Interesting
      you did read it wrong :) but plenty of people do think i'm a jerk, and plenty of people don't.

      I wrote 'jerk with an apostrophe as a shortening of circlejerk, meaning the site likes its own circlejerk tone, and tries to maintain it.

      They downvote me because of the following: I read sites like these for learning and for humor. Most of the time, i just lurk, or really, just read along enjoying the jokes, learning here or there, and ignoring the noise. If I agree with what's being said, why comment, right? However, when somebody says something that is both wrong/uneducated, and I can tell it's emotional, bigoted, and antithetical and intolerant of things I believe in, then I get motivated to set the record straight in a way that "does not suffer fools" (yeah i realize that's not very grammatical, im lzy). As an example, I think the various Occupy movements are retarded, which is ok, it's ok to be retarded, but coupled with their venom or selfrighteousness...

      I get plenty of positive karma for many things I write (i'm pretty smart and pretty well educated); karmawise I'm way net positive; and I participate in friendly back and forths with people I disagree with. However, if I "put an uneducated slob in his place", that collects a -1, and very quickly. If it were reader passion that was driving it, you'd expect more downvotes over time as more people see it, and you'd expect more downvotes on the rest of the thread. But for a certain kind of post that I make to repeatedly and quickly zoom to it's final number, and for a it to consistently be the "hinge" of a subthread means it's not governed by Poisson arrival times, and it's not passion. (clever eh, neither passion nor Poisson) My humor often gets upvoted, my informative posts often get upvoted (still talking about reddit here) but my tart rejoinders get a very precise treatment.

      And btw, I rarely write stuff like this, because when i figure out a good indicator that something "is a lie", why teach the liar how to improve? Some of you are thinking "oh, like reddit cares what it says in this thread"... believe me, they are poring over it.

    10. Re:Same with their up/down voting by ffflala · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well I can think of a few simpler explanations for your experience than your claim, but I believe that you'd just find them insulting and it would shut down this exchange. So in the hope of being constructive, I will suggest an slight tweak to your approach. Try this for a week or so, and if you still run into the immediate -1 mods. If you do? Well there goes my theory, maybe you're onto something. But if you find that the downvotes disappear (as I suspect they will), well I'll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions.

      (W)hen somebody says something that is both wrong/uneducated, and I can tell it's emotional, bigoted, and antithetical and intolerant of things I believe in, then I get motivated to set the record straight in a way that "does not suffer fools"

      It's this shit right here that sounds to me like prime downvote bait. Here's the suggestion: next time you see something both wrong/uneducated, something that is emotional, bigoted, antithetical, and intolerant of the things you believe in, try a minor variation on your approach to setting the record straight. No need to "suffer fools" as you put it, but just stick to disputing the something they posted. Do not --no matter how strongly a negative reaction it provokes in you-- belittle, embarrass, or try insult the *person*, even by implication (such as "only idiots would think that.") Whatever you own conclusions about the person might be, don't post them. Just disagree --as vehemently as you prefer-- and explain why you disagree.

      Attack the argument, not the person -- even if they're attacking others and/or you. It can be a subtle distinction, but this is the difference between civilized-but-lively debate and ego-wanking.

    11. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lot of dumb people think they're pretty smart. The number of individuals in the group does not have to be large for at least one to be smarter than you (you could generalize from the birthday paradox).

      It is not a measure of intelligence to 'put fools in their place'. It is wrestling with a pig. When you can, stick to facts. When you don't have facts, stick to logic. When the person you're arguing with has a fundamentally different view of truth as you (e.g. skepticism vs religion), appeal to emotion. Connect with your reader, and your opponent if possible. When your argument is lost, cut your losses. This can mean preemptively censoring yourself. Often. Please.

      Everyone in this world is a fool. Some of us have a small idea of the limits of our knowledge. If you wish to be influential (or at least upmoderated) you must to be polite to fools. Because, cher ami, you most certainly are one.

      What you have identified is not a flaw in the system, it is a flaw in your "tone", by which we mean a social failure. You have the capacity to correct this. If you don't, no one will ever care, and that will be your punishment, Cassandra. Although really it's far more likely that you'll just be another angry idiot.

    12. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Johann+Lau · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't mind stuff getting voted down, any reader worth their salt reads at -1 (or highlights text on HN) anyway. But hellbanning for fuck all? Slowbanning for even less, for basically "not cheering instantly" --- wow haha. I'm a potty mouth, and I can see how my first accounts were expelled, but seriously, from then on I tried to behave better, but just for disagreeing or pointing out hypocrisy --- BAM, slowban, then log out and you realize your posts don't even show up for anyone. It's so petty and stupid it's hilarious. "Spammers and trolls" my ass -- that's a spineless echo chamber if I've ever seen one. And they even call themselves hacker news of all things.

      Oh well, fuck these clowns. It kinda made me realize how good slashdot is all over again (you can say what you want about it, but at least it's not squeamish and deceptive); I'm just "ranting" about it here because well, I can't do it there :P

    13. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

      but plenty of people do think i'm a jerk, and plenty of people don't.

      Mystery solved, then. The people who think you're a jerk are going to down vote you every time. The people who don't think you're a jerk may not vote at all.

    14. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One doesn't "put an uneducated slob in his place". That makes the person bitter, causes him to believe more strongly in the belief now that he has had to defend himself and if he was wrong then he wasted all that effort and would look foolish, and makes him hate you. Instead one helps to gently raise him/her up to a higher level.

      If you'd like to convince people of the value of your arguments and point of view, please keep the above in mind.

      If you want /. to agree/disagree with you and tell you why, post a link to your Reddit posts. It's faster to show us your tone instead of in trying to put it in words and have us guess.

    15. Re:Same with their up/down voting by ffflala · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was trying to be polite, but I suppose I'll have to be blunt. Your description leaves a much more plausible explanation than your claim that a group of editors tracks every new post for some proper "tone" that you occasionally are just too rebellious to match.

      It seems much, *much* more likely to me that instead, you occasionally come off like a self-righteous, unbearably narcissistic ass who grossly overestimates his own cleverness and the value of his opinion, and whose comments, once modded to -1, simply aren't worth wasting any time nor effort moderating further. In other words, people --occasionally-- simply aren't that interested in bothering with what you have to say on those occasions when you feel justified in acting out.

    16. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      ORLY? They also seem to have posting "styles" they dislike for no well-founded reason which they censor -- which IS assholery, of the weakest kind, just so happens to be the kind they approve of, like fish who don't notice they're swimming in water -- and you seem to be confusing the two.

    17. Re:Same with their up/down voting by oddfox · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine why a jagoff like you gets downvoted on Reddit. Oh wait, I can, it's because you take a lot of text and time to say a lot of bullpucky amounting to nothing of real value. The fact that you got modded up for posting conspiratorial drivel is kind of worrying, but I guess a lot of people here on /. really do want to think they're being silenced by "the man", whoever or whatever "the man" may be for a particular website. Honestly, you're not nearly as important to the people that run the site or the various sub-reddits that you seem to believe you are.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    18. Re:Same with their up/down voting by Tyndmyr · · Score: 2

      People who post as you claim to are prime candidates for me to downvote here. I can't imagine that reddit is any different. Trying to work in personal insults or assuming the OP is a fool is a great way to come across as offensive.

      --
      Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
  13. Fake /. comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Setting the desired tone? Gates bad. Torvalds good. Portman hot. Jobs cool.

    1. Re:Fake /. comment by jalet · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Setting the desired tone? Gates bad. Torvalds good. Portman hot. Jobs cold.

      FTFY

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    2. Re:Fake /. comment by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      > Gates bad. Torvalds good. Portman pants, grits hot. Jobs cold.

      FTFTFY

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    3. Re:Fake /. comment by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Burma Shave

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  14. Re:Simulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yea, I mean its not like the owners of Slashdot NASDAQ: GKNT have any desire to monetize their user base at *all*...

  15. Re:Sentence no parses by neminem · · Score: 2

    I'd like to say I've never been to reddit, but that's no longer true: I quite enjoyed Mr. Skullhead's AMA thread (Skullhead being one of the creators of KoL; I only went to reddit, and for that matter, only learned what "AMA" meant, because Skully announced it to the whole kingdom that he was doing one.)

    Haven't been back since, though. Anyway, since when is requesting that sentences be grammatical English, a sign of pomposity? (Pedantry perhaps. Though, I think of myself as a staunch descriptivist!)

  16. Re:Sentence no parses by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    communication occurred, forcing it into a protocol ex post facto is pointless.

    --
    Good-bye
  17. Re:They all do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Probably not, but I know a few guilds that are staffed primarily by dupe accounts. I.E. people playing 5-10 accounts at once.

  18. Re:They all do it. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People do it all the time, but from the perspective of Blizzard's bottom-line it isn't a huge deal. That person still pays for each of the accounts, so the only real difference is that unlike with 5 people (each with one account), all 5 accounts could disappear at once if the person quits. That is a downside, but not enough that it merits bothering much with, imo.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  19. Re:They all do it. by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Duplicate ACCOUNTS? Unlikely; you have to PAY for accounts. But each real cash-paying player may have up to 50 different ALTernate characters. You just can't have all of them online at once.

  20. Re:Ahhh.... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given that they are now a top-100 site, or close to it, it would be pretty stupid to infer anything about Reddit's current user base from the tactics they used in their first few weeks.

  21. Fake it 'til you make it by c0lo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hear that sex life is like this as well. Can anyone confirm please?

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  22. Re:They all do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Multi-boxing has always been common thing in MMOs, for some people if they can justify $14.99 a month for the majority of your entertainment $44.97 doesn't seem to bad ever. It is becoming even more common now that the F2P model is really taking off the barrier to entry is lower to do so.

  23. Re:Sentence no parses by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Really? Your english skills are so bad you can't pull the obvious meaning from that? You can't work out a word to drop to handle the author changing their train of thought in the middle?

    I guess my X skills are worse than your English skills since clearly X must be your first language.

  24. digg.com by p51d007 · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, reddit is admitting they are as fake as digg.com? LOL, dropped both sites a few years back.

  25. Illegal? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't what they did constitute fraud and manipulation and put them in an actionable position from their advertisers and/or actual human users, if not criminal in some locales? It's wholly unethical at best and I have been asked to create fake accounts and posts by some of my web clients and have told them so. That's just so wrong on so many levels.

    1. Re:Illegal? by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      if the fake accounts were loading ads, yes, otherwise no way

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Illegal? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      if the fake accounts were loading ads, yes, otherwise no way

      I'm sorry, but I'm not gonna buy that from anyone who isn't a lawyer, and that might be true where you live but might not in every locale. If you pretend to be something else for monetary gain with the express purpose of manipulation, that's fraud. Not acting, fraud. Something tells me this admission by the co-founder may come back to bite him and Reddit. I know I will never go there after this. BTW, how do you separate fake account posts and non-fake posts from ads when they appear on the same page? I've been developing websites for a long time and don't know a way to do that. You can have ads not appear for some users, but the ads will display to everyone else that also has a post on the page. So, yeah, fraud. And you can't tell me they "filtered" out their hits from the impressions either, or did they tell all their advertisers that some of their posts were fake? Yeah, right.

    3. Re:Illegal? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      who was defrauded? advertisers paid a certain amount per ad impression, or per ad click, and got the amount they paid for.

      luring people under false pretenses to a website is not fraud otherwise goatse would be in prison

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  26. Much like starting anything else by mea_culpa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A computer operating system requires a bootstrapper to load it into memory before it can run.
    An engine on an automobile or aircraft requires rotation by an external source before it can power itself.
    A business requires capital before it can generate its own.
    A social media site requires 'social media' before it can launch.

  27. Ghost towns.. by jmerlin · · Score: 2

    I loathe the idea of ever living in New York City but would love to live in a ghost town. You know what they say about assumptions, man!

  28. Reddit has jumped the shark by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    The general population of redditors and their self-masturbatory attention whoring has become annoying enough that I don't bother any more. I used to waste hours a day there, but the signal/noise ratio has turned decidedly flamboyant hipster. The resulting Imgur postings each day, however, are still worth watching, so I just subscribe to those feeds. Funny/Sexy/Nerdy content without the self-pleasuring drivel. Much better way to 'reddit'.

  29. Since they got their first real user today by slazzy · · Score: 2

    They can remove the fake accounts!

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  30. Uhh... why is this news? by v3xt0r · · Score: 2

    In the course of developing a large, scalable, social networking application, one aspect of this is 'Stress Testing', in which, common sense dictates that you need to set-up a staging environment with fake users, and scripts (aka: bots) that act as users interacting with the system.

    The fact that they used this practice in production to get attention or mislead and entice real people to use their system, is not that surprising, or un-common. The real news here is that the majority of reddit users are, and have always been, complete morons.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  31. Nothing new here... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 1

    'Social' sites have been seeding themselves since the beginning. Nobody really wants to join a ghost-town, and no site-owner really wants a free-for-all.

    This is less a 'revelation' and more just an acknowledgement of what everyone savvy knew was going on anyway.

  32. How did they make the video? Software / Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I LOVE how they made the video and would like to do something similar.

    Anyone have any specifics on how they created it so the hand is in the screen capture?

    So far I can tell it's a wacom tablet but what's the software & method. Chromakey on the tablet surface?

  33. Golden era of Reddit by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In other words, the Golden Era of Reddit where there was supposedly more intelectual discussions, content and the lack to rage comics and cat pictures was all fake? Now that Reddit has actual users it's just a shit as 4chan?

    --
    We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    1. Re:Golden era of Reddit by McDutchie · · Score: 1

      No. In the first few weeks, when the fake account operated, Reddit didn't even have comments (as you could have learned from watching the video).

    2. Re:Golden era of Reddit by Pope · · Score: 1

      I guess all those /jailbait pictures were fakes.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  34. Re:Simulation by icebraining · · Score: 1

    They're not owned by Nast anymore, they're now a direct subsidiary of its parent company.

  35. Re:Ahhh.... by makomk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah. These days the site is basically run by users who managed to get in early enough and become well-know enough that they got moderator positions on the default subreddits - and they run a horde of fake accounts so the users don't have to. Seriously, one of the most prolific moderators (Karmanaut) was actually caught posting replies to his own comments with a sockpuppet to make it look like people agreed with him because he later accidentally sent someone a message from the wrong account.

  36. Re:Simulation by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Tools? Who else would have deliberately shaped the "know nothing, shit-for-brains" hive-mind that is Reddit?

    It's like 4chan for jocks.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  37. Re:Simulation by elp · · Score: 1

    I'm sure 4chan was grown the same way.

  38. Turing Test by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Is this a Turing Test or something?

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Turing Test by mlk · · Score: 1

      What makes you ask "Is this a Turing Test or something?"?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  39. Re:Simulation by bigtomrodney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say it's more the case of explaining why redditors remember the earliest years containing coherent and knowledgable discussion. You had a focussed audience with a vested interest in getting quality discussion going. When the great unwashed outnumber these quality submissions you get a link aggregator that thinks it's a forum, where every second post is in the form of a badly phrased meme.

    --
    I never get used to these constant resurrections
  40. Yep, I wear the T shirt with pride. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Because I've always known it was true: Everyone else on the Internet is just one big fat guy.

  41. Common Password or Fake Accounts by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Ever notice some of the common passwords revealed in the password hacks are kind of not that common. Why would 40 accounts have the password Michael and another 40 accounts have the password Jordon? Fake accounts with common passwords duh.

  42. Did they write it using JBOSS? by tomhath · · Score: 1

    That would make the circle complete.

  43. Get your popcorn ready.... by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

    ... because somewhere along the line someone gave them money based on their success, which appears to have been faked for some period of time.

    Fire up your lawsuits and get the popcorn ready.

  44. That's how we got listeners to call talk radio by efalk · · Score: 1

    Back in my college radio days, we learned that the best way to get a call-in show rolling was to prime the pump with a number of calls made by station staff themselves.

  45. Re:They all do it. by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    Color me astonished; I like playing WoW, but not enough to pay $5,700 per year to do it. I suspect that he's one of the very few who is that idio\\\\dedicated to do so.

  46. Re:Ahhh.... by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

    The worst case of this was the guy that owned r/jailbait and most of the other creepy pedophile shit. He had a close enough relationship with the site admins that they were very much complicit in that activity continuing as long as it did. Dude had a ton of sockpuppets that he would use to upvote his own posts and bury anyone that criticized him. Reddit groupthink being what it is (which is very much a product of how the site is structured, not related to TFA), he had a pretty significant vocal minority of the userbase convinced that masturbating to the stolen vacation photos of underage girls is socially acceptable behavior by hiding behind the godawful broken internet libertarian misinterpretation of what "free speech" means that's so popular over there.

    It was pretty bizarre to see people publicly lament the closing of r/jailbait as some sort of great tragedy of internet censorship taking place on their beloved "free speech site". Sadly, that's what's possible when you give a bunch of people with a (generally frowned upon) shared interest an echo chamber where they can validate and reinforce each other's behavior and silence anyone that disagrees.

  47. Depression Comix by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1
    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.