Slashdot Mirror


Dell To Offer Ubuntu Laptops Again

An anonymous reader writes "TechCrunch reports that Dell will be officially re-entering the Linux laptop market. Beginning this fall, it will sell a 'developer edition' of one of its Ultrabooks that comes pre-loaded with Ubuntu 12.04. Dell first started offering computers with Linux installed in 2007, but they dropped the products in 2010. This spring, a skunkworks effort called Project Sputnik was announced, and now, after the completion of a short beta test, the Ubuntu laptops have been given a green light for commercial sale. Canonical has been working alongside Dell to help make this happen."

218 comments

  1. Two steps forward, one step back by DeTech · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's good that Dell caught back up to 2007... but who the hell is buying Dell branded equipment in 2012? It'd be nicer to see a MS licence rebate for doing a clean linux install, now a model program like that would be news.

    1. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by oakgrove · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dell is the fourth largest PC vendor in sales numbers in the last quarter so a few people are buying their stuff still.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    2. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by davydagger · · Score: 1

      well, come the fall, a lot more people hopefully.

      it could be a great way for dell to re-vitalize the brand, and a great way for linux to get into the home.

    3. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      I've worked at 4 businesses in the past 10 years, varying in size from a small enviornmental testing lab (about 10 total employees) up to a prominent cosmetics company owned by a global conglomerage, including a software company that had about 400 support technicians and a giant room full of enterprise servers.

      each and every one of those sourced the vast majority of their workstations from dell, and a good number of servers as well.

      in my experience, it's 'who ISN'T buying dell' anymore.

      Hell, even I'm writing this on a dell laptop.

    4. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      i should note, for on-topic's sake, that the dell laptop i'm writing this on -is- running ubuntu 12.04, but I put it on there, not them.

    5. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by DeTech · · Score: 1

      And they only lost 11% of their market share... Looks like they're getting dangerously close to the 'others'.

    6. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by red+crab · · Score: 2

      Dell does offer a "N Series" model on their Vostro family of laptops and desktops, that are shipped without any pre-installed OS.. All you get is a FreeDOS installation disk for free; better still there is no "Designed for Windows xx" logo on these machines.

    7. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say, I'm loving my Dell laptop for work. E6520 with a quad i7, 8GB of RAM and an nVIDIA video card. I'm able to do triple monitor on the dock, and running a 1080 screen when portable. Honestly, Their build quality on their business products is superb and are quite robust with their magnesium casing.

      On top of that, if you run ticketing software than can do computer inventory and such then they are even better. The application we use is able to pull the system info, and give you not only the system service tag, but also make it a clickable link to see existing/expired warranty status and also a direct page for all driver downloads for that specific machine if needed.

      Dell does this better than any other mfg. IMO.

    8. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

      i should note, for on-topic's sake, that the dell laptop i'm writing this on -is- running ubuntu 12.04, but I put it on there, not them.

      from the Project Sputnik FAQ:

      How can I get an Ubuntu-based XPS13 today?

      Today you can order a XPS13 off dell.com which will come with Microsoft pre-loaded. You can then get the Ubuntu install image and load it yourself.

      You and everyone else, apparently.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by DeTech · · Score: 1

      'who ISN'T buying dell'

      89.3% of the market

    10. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Mitsoid · · Score: 2

      Are we looking at the same article?

      They would have to lose another 50% to fall below ASUS.. and ASUS is still listed above "Others"

    11. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 1

      I miss the 16x10 ratio screens on the e6x00 and e6x10 models. with the e6x20, dell caved to the "1366x768 res is synonymous with 'laptop'" BS that has been going on the past few years.

      Also, I like the keyboard on the non-backlit e6x00s the best (what I'm using right now).

      other than that, I agree. The 6x20 series is a fantastically built laptop. light, smooth, incredibly sturdy. it inspires confidance in its build quality.

      It's attractive too, without being gaudy. For some reason, consumer laptops the past few years from almost any manufacturer have been getting slapped with all sorts of weird textures, colors, patterns, and plastic cladding. looks like a 1990s honda civic owner got hold of the design team. the dell latitude series has managed to avoid that so far.

    12. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      Sad, in a way. I'd bought nothing but Dells until my last Dell/Linux laptop kicked the bucket. Because Dell no longer allowed me to avoid the Microsoft tax on my laptop, I bought from someone else. It makes me wonder about the cost/benefit of carrying a Linux line for folks like me who just want a laptop we're going to wipe and put our own OS on anyway. It isn't as though they need to manufacture the computers separately. While they would have to put different images on the HDDs, this is no different from when one orders and of the numerous flavors of Windows or chooses different software packages. I wonder, therefore, why they chose to ditch the Linux line in the first place.

    13. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's no license rebate because the Windows license is, in practice, free for OEMs. In fact, it's better than free. The pre-installed bullshitware on an OEM Windows install more than pays for the cost of the OS license.

    14. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to find Vostros you have to head into the "small company" section of their site.

      Still, if my suspicions about quality is correct i think everyone would be better of stay out of the "home computing" section of all the major brands (with perhaps the exception of their gaming rigs).

    15. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      "'who ISN'T buying dell"

      Nor am I, nor will I ever. Back in the mid to late 90s DELL was an awesome system.
      Anyone remember the Dimension 450? Anyway, in the early and mid-2000s, their overall service and quality level just tanked.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    16. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know who buys these.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    17. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      Just going to dell.com/ubuntu takes you straight to the Vostro Linux line.

    18. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too, loaded Ubuntu on my Dell Vostro 3560 machine, but Dell refuses to reimburse my Windows licence. So yeah, you can already put Ubuntu on it, if you pay the Microsoft tax first that is.

    19. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Today you can order a XPS13 off dell.com which will come with Microsoft pre-loaded.

      I hate Windows as much as the next guy, but if they're bundling a $250B company with each XPS laptop purchased, even *I* want to get in on this promotion!

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    20. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Today you can order a XPS13 off dell.com which will come with Microsoft pre-loaded. I hate Windows as much as the next guy, but if they're bundling a $250B company with each XPS laptop purchased, even *I* want to get in on this promotion!

      ... hadn't thought of it that way....


      Truth in advertising, bitches! You owe me a software giant!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    21. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite yet. You can't order one online with Ubuntu preinstalled. Seriously, they should have updated their website prior to this press release.

    22. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      In Mexico it's as far as I know the only brand one can buy that doesn't have piss poor support (HP/Compaq, Acer), have the option of an USA keyboard, etc. Built your own? You must be kidding... parts are here both antique and overpriced (sometimes 2x as much as they used to cost in the USA). And if you want to order them, don't be surprised if you have to pay at least 50% in advance. And warranty? Good luck with that. Last time it took me 50 minutes of talking to get my 2 month (!) old router (well under warranty) exchanged in OfficeMax and only because I stated that if I didn't have a new one within 5 minutes we would call the police. When I left I had to promise that if the new one got the same problems that I would work things out with Cisco and not come back....

      Anyway, I am happy with my Dell Vostro 200 ST, especially I paid as much for it as I would have paid for it in the USA. And while it took some effort, I could buy my Dell Vostro 200 Windows Tax Free in Mexico. Shortly after Dell even offered a similar machine without Windows (but didn't call it the Vostro Bokma, alas) ;-)

      Great machine; shame it's running Ubuntu. Which is the reason why my next machine is going to be an Apple made one; I don't care for a hackingtosh, and am sick of the Ubuntu "dance". Yes, I am aware of Linux mint, but I am afraid that I will end up with too much tinkering that option as well.

      Anyway, thanks Dell! And I am happy to read that they keep their Linux support going.

    23. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      as noted - selling it without the windows tax is significant. Only selling a high end model is not going to foster adoption, however. It's when they sell the low end models that Dell would actually matter. People who spend $1500 on a laptop are not as common as those who spend $500.

    24. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      I have a Vostro V131n... it was $400 for a 13.3" laptop that tips the scales at just over 3lbs. And because it came from the business line of product rather than the consumer line, it included 1 year of next business day onsite hardware support at that price.

    25. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Time_Ngler · · Score: 2

      Probably due to customer returns from people not knowing what linux is and getting upset when they found out that windows wasn't on the machine that they bought.

    26. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It's good that Dell caught back up to 2007... but who the hell is buying Dell branded equipment in 2012? It'd be nicer to see a MS licence rebate for doing a clean linux install, now a model program like that would be news.

      One of the issues I have with Linux is that it lacks an ABI and drivers can break during an update. Also for 10 years now mp3 and other codecs are removed for copyright reasons making a new install a pain.

      Dell makes sure the hardware works and locks it to its own repositories so I do not have to worry during an apt-get update and one school from my previous employer used the Dell branded Ubuntu and it had mp3, mp4, and other codecs right out of the box!

      That is a good deal if you ask me and I wonder if system76 has the same benefits? It is nice to just turn it on and start working without looking for medibuntu repositories.

    27. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you ever actually look for the Linux laptops on Dell's web site? I did, and it wasn't like they plastered them on the home page. It's not like it was even a choice when you were configuring your system. You had to go to a special sub-site with few or no links from other pages. You really had to know where it was to get to it.

      Trust me, people weren't buying Linux machines by accident.

    28. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by westlake · · Score: 0

      It'd be nicer to see a MS licence rebate for doing a clean linux install, now a model program like that would be news.

      I am betting Dell sees a better return for its investment from the Home Shopping Network then from sales to the lone geek shopping for Ubuntu laptop online.

      Talk of a rebate is nonsense when retailers won't stock bare bones because bare bones doesn't sell worth shit.

    29. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      No way business users will go with Asus. In corporate land it is HP or Dell and that is it. I guess some use Lenovo but I have not seen those desktops and servers common.

      I do admit the corps frankly stopped investing in IT by 2008 when the financial crises hit and they love old XP with their 512 meg systems still. Dell will start raking in money soon as XP gets near retirement and the corps start refreshing and EOL their older systems as they move to Windows 7.

    30. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Grant_Watson · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I bought mine you had to go looking for the Ubuntu machines page; when you got there it explained very clearly, in non-technical language, that if you don't know what we're talking about you don't want one: go over here to buy a Windows machine. They thought that out ahead of time and were very clear about it.

    31. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which will come with Microsoft pre-loaded.

      So now it will come with Canonical pre-loaded?

    32. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by imahawki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reality is a Linux laptop should cost MORE because while Dell may have to pay $25 to Microsoft they get $50 from the crapware vendors.

    33. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I hate Windows as much as the next guy, but if they're bundling a $250B company with each XPS laptop purchased, even *I* want to get in on this promotion!

      I'll take two!

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    34. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2

      It's interesting that Gartner doesn't include tablets running iOS or Android but they do include tablets running Windows. I wonder how they justify that? I wonder if Windows RT tablets will be counted as a PC?

    35. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Or you could just install a distribution that includes things like mp3 support right out of the box.

      Although it's not like it's hard to "install" support afterwards. You simply let Ubuntu do it's thing and stuff gets sorted out much better than they would under Windows or MacOS.

      It's time to put the codec FUD to rest already.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    36. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to know who buys these.

      Business groups that are going to just slap their own machine image on it come to mind.

    37. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Macrat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dell is the fourth largest PC vendor in ...

      a declining PC market.

    38. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      I purchase Dell Precision N-series desktops at my workplace all the time.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    39. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I had a 4MHz 286 AT that could be stuck in turbo mode for a screaming 8MHz, and it was one of the best machines on the market in its day. But now they just suck. Guess that they couldn't hold the quality when they dropped the prices, and their failure/return rates show it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    40. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Teun · · Score: 1

      That's the advantage of living in a country where software patents protect your intellectual property!
      But you could still add medibuntu.org to your list of repositories.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    41. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Because Windows tablets aren't true tablets. They're crippled crunched down PC's squeezed into an ill fitting form factor. That's why "tablets" mostly gathered dust unsold on CompUSA shelves until the iPad showed the world and (Google) the right kind of interface for a true tablet OS.

    42. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by anomic_event · · Score: 1

      And what about the cost of supporting an entirely different operating system? To have to train and pay for a linux-educated support staff surely represents an additional cost.

    43. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      And what about the cost of supporting an entirely different operating system? To have to train and pay for a linux-educated support staff surely represents an additional cost.

      That's hilarious. For business support, they already have those people in the server division. For home or small business sales the people aren't trained anyway: it's just another call center script/q&a that needs to be written and sent to India.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    44. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only selling a high end model is not going to foster adoption, however. It's when they sell the low end models that Dell would actually matter. People who spend $1500 on a laptop are not as common as those who spend $500.

      You mean like how they're selling Vostros for $349 with Ubuntu on them. Right now.

    45. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1) It's highly unlikely that anyone looking to buy a Windows laptop will accidentally type "Dell Linux Laptop" into Google. Prove to me that it can happen by accident.

      2) That link only shows how to buy rack-based server hardware with linux. Even back in 2009, when Dell did sell consumer based machines with linux, they had a huge section of the website about linux, but it was all server-based information. You could spend an hour clicking link after link through the Dell linux site without finding the consumer products. Actually finding a link to configure a dell laptop or desktop model with linux pre-installed was nearly impossible. I know... I tried.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    46. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently bought a 64-bit Acer notebook computer and installed Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS and with the exception of a manual file edit to stop the WiFi connection from intermittently dropping (turned off hardware encryption for the WiFi chipset) I have been very pleased with Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS. Previously, on my 32-bit IBM ThinkPad notebook I was running PCLinuxOS.

    47. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by formfeed · · Score: 1

      But maybe MyCleanPC could run under Wine. (ducks)

    48. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 1

      Funny you say that, since I'm typing this on an Asus laptop at work. This is the third company I've worked for where Asus is the brand of choice...

      --
      ... wait, what?
    49. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we purchased a Dell "Ubuntu" laptop, it was difficult to find and costs more than a similar Windows Laptop. The quality was good but was overpriced. I suspect Dell is using Ubuntu again as leverage to get a better deal from Microsoft and afterwards will drop Ubuntu . We replaced the Dell with a cheap Acer with Windows that costs about 1/3 the price of the Dell with Ubuntu but had a bigger screen and more processors, hdmi out etc. It did take a little work to get Kubuntu on it but it has been very dependable. I guess those days are over as once they start locking the laptops down with secure boot we will have to pay the higher "Linux" prices
        .

    50. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by ZosX · · Score: 1

      I use and prefer their gear all the time. Every ASUS motherboard I have used has been an real pleasure to work with. I bought their transformer tablet and quite honestly, the only thing that bests it right now is the prime marginally and the infinity. I can overclock to 1.5ghz on stock and really the gap just narrows. The nexus 7 is only marginally faster, but lacks the lovely keyboard dock with sd card reader and powered (super useful!) usb port. Want the tablet to keep the usb port powered in sleep? Play some music and turn the volume off and close the dock. Works great. You could easily charge a few cell phones with it and probably browse the web for several hours. USB host support is killer. Plug in a huge drive of videos and hook it up via hdmi....etc...etc..etc... I never thought I would be so impressed. As a photographer I find it easy to just plug in my usb-powered drive and dump sd cards rather quickly.

      Asus makes great hardware and their laptops are killer. I ended up buying another damned acer laptop and quite honestly, its pretty nice and plays games really well and was on the cheap side. I would buy again. Their build quality has gone up a lot and I'm getting 3x the performance that my old amd turion acer laptop had. I'm pretty impressed with what you can get for like $700 right now.

    51. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by ZosX · · Score: 1

      sorry...didn't mean to ramble really. asus rocks though. i fried a motherboard somehow and they replaced it no questions asked.

    52. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by ZosX · · Score: 1

      I wish a PC maker would just install windows 7, the latest drivers from the manufacturer's website and call it a day and save me the fucking hassle every time I buy a new machine. Spending an entire evening to another day trying to figure out why the awful sound card drivers were crackling at the slightest amount of system load. The manufacturer of the chipset doesn't have drivers (fuck you connexant for not supporting your own hardware with reference drivers!) and you are left with whatever the OEM cooks up, which in my case wasn't working. After MUCH googling, I finally found a downloadable zip of the drivers. I don't know if they are the same as the ones I started with, but uninstalling, letting windows reinstall their own drivers (which were rather generic and too quiet) and then reinstalling the drivers I found after 3 hours of googling seemed to work actually. Oh yeah, if you are on an optimus system, get the latest intel and nvidia verde drivers. They really play nice in the newer releases.

      I don't even bother booting into the OEM install of windows when I get a new machine anymore. Since I already paid for windows and I have to reinstall anyways, I just get ultimate and use the OEM key and preactivate. I just immediately unbox and install windows. It seems faster than uninstalling hours of bloatware and then you still don't know what they tweaked in the registry, etc.

    53. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Did you ever actually look for the Linux laptops on Dell's web site? I did, and it wasn't like they plastered them on the home page. It's not like it was even a choice when you were configuring your system. You had to go to a special sub-site with few or no links from other pages. You really had to know where it was to get to it.

      So you're saying they want to get users ready for the "out of the box linux experience".

    54. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Prove to me that it can happen by accident.

      I hope you don't mind some anecdotal evidence, but this morning whilst brewing a cup of coffee I slipped on my USB key containing 'MyCleanPC' software...as i fell i grasped at anything to stop myself, my fingers ran across the keyboard of my laptop that was sitting on the kitchen bench - coincidentally with the google search page open - the keys i hit formed the query 'dell linux lappot', as it happens the folks at Google (there quite good) presented me a page 'Showing results for dell linux laptop' even though my stumble 'n fumble had caused the word 'lappot' to be input, so i found they're laptop offerings.

      The best thing about it is that since i accidentally found dell linux laptops, for all intensive purposes i don't need 'MyCleanPC' anymore and so their is no danger of slipping on a USB stick containing the software! Netcraft confirms its so secure i can use the password 12345 (which coincidentally is the same combination as on my luggage), in soviet russia this laptop secures you!

    55. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by eric_herm · · Score: 1

      In fact, that's already paid by Canonical. They are doing this almost for free in the hope this will drive adoption of Ubuntu. ( now, if the plan was working , they would be able to get money, but they don't, despites claiming to be so successfull on every possible market that they eclipse all others such as RH who, for some reason, are still able to be 10 bigger and have 1 billion in revenue despites that. Seek the error ).

    56. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      One of the issues I have with Linux is that it lacks an ABI and drivers can break during an update. Also for 10 years now mp3 and other codecs are removed for copyright reasons making a new install a pain.

      Pain?

      I wiped a Dell laptop, inserted a generic Ubuntu install CD, and my daughter has been using it for the last year, watching Youtube, playing MP3s, doing her schoolwork with LibreOffice. I just let it update automatically whenever it wants, never an issue. I don't remember if the MP3 codec was installed or if I had to click for it to download, but it was painless and seamless. Meanwhile I spent a few hours disinfecting a Windows laptop she had used, that had been recruited into a spam botnet.

    57. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also for 10 years now mp3 and other codecs are removed for copyright reasons making a new install a pain.

      Yeah, it's really painful installing the single 'ubuntu-restricted-extras' package.
      Retard.

    58. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      you can now, just checked.

      humorously, the OS button is a windows logo, but the only option on the page is ubuntu.

    59. Re:Two steps forward, one step back by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      It's also a piece of garbage when it comes to hardware. a P4600? You can buy a new laptop for $350 with better hardware.

  2. Can't wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to buy one, wipe off that buggy, proprietary OS and install Debian on it.

    1. Re:Can't wait.... by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... because you can't do that now with a windows-based dell machine?

      yes yes, I know, it's fashionable to hate ubuntu. Because if there's one thing that unites hardcore linux fanboys, it's hating any other distro except their own. Sometimes I wonder if they hate other distros more than they hate MS.

    2. Re:Can't wait.... by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      Linux is so divided over each distro that I sometimes wonder if MS doesn't have agent provocateurs stirring the pot just to keep the community divided (and forever ineffectual). But then, like my grandma always used to say "Kid, never attribute to conspiracy what can be attributed to sheer blind fanboism."

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    3. Re:Can't wait.... by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      >>>to buy Ubuntu, wipe off that buggy, proprietary OS and install Debian on it.

      Debian sucks ass too.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Can't wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your grandma does not say that.

    5. Re:Can't wait.... by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      yes yes, I know, it's fashionable to hate ubuntu. Because if there's one thing that unites hardcore linux fanboys, it's hating any other distro except their own. Sometimes I wonder if they hate other distros more than they hate MS.

      Ubuntu still is very popular, and for good reason. Its very good, because a lot of work is done on it and it is based on Debian unstable, which in itself is pretty good, unsurprisingly this means immature technology gets rolled out [pulseaudio, Intel drivers] for the sake of features over stability. Some users prefer the stability move to Debian, Some users get bitten by bugs/regressions from running more unstable options. Overall though most benefit from the new features because even unstable...is pretty stable. It may seem more fashionably to speak out against Ubuntu, not because of Ubuntu itself, but because of Unity, but then a large number of users are objecting to having these tablet interfaces forced on us. I myself have moved to Mint/Cinnamon [Ubuntu with traditional interface]. Now Ubuntu lately have come up with a fairly unpopular fix!? for Microsoft locking computers. I see no good solution other than a legal one.

      Now I posted that whole damn paragraph, which is true and factual, which states how it is. Notice I how I am not mentioning "fanboys" or "hate", because emotive language is not necessary. That is because the choices made are not being made emotionally.

    6. Re:Can't wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind Unity after I get rid of :

      • the vertical bar on left side of the screen
      • HUD
      • Hot keys being activated on pressing Alt

      After this Unity stops getting in the way and I can focus on what I want to do. Unity gets rid of the bottom horizontal bar in Gnome and hence increases the usable screen space.

    7. Re:Can't wait.... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting your $0 reimbursement check from Canonical. You think it's difficult to get in touch with a US company... try a South African one!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Can't wait.... by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You joke, but the big benefit of computers sold with Linux pre-loaded (any Linux- even crap) is that there's a good chance that it'll be 100% Linux-compatible hardware. Makes life far easier when installing your actual distro of choice.

    9. Re:Can't wait.... by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes it is popular, and that's part of the reason so many of the linux faithful hate it. Despite whatever many linux users claim about how it's the true best choice and everybody should use it, a good number of them like it specifically because it gives them computer hipster status. Ubuntu's popularity is a bad thing to them. if "the masses" use something, it -must- be bad, since the masses are idiots.

      that said, rational discussion follows:

      Having used both cinnamon (about a month) and unity (going on 3 months now I believe), I'll go out on the limb here and mention I actually prefer unity. for all the complaints i hear of "tablet interface", I swear I wonder if people don't realize you can resize the unity bar and unity icons. my unity bar and icons are only slightly larger than the windows 7 taskbar on the computer next to this one. Also, considering that on modern displays, horizontal screen space abounds and it is vertical screen space that is at a premium, I don't mind the taskbar on the left at all. I dig it actually.

      I'm not saying I don't have any problems with unity, but 12.04's version at least (never tried any of the previous versions) isn't bad. I also applaud canonical for producing the first linux interface i've used that really feels as polished and modern as the competiting interfaces from apple and MS. sure maybe it's got a little knock on it here and there, but at least they're trying. good ole gnome 2 is rock solid and reliable but god is it boring and sterile. it feels like state-of-the-art circa 2001. unity has some character at least.

      cinnamon is an interesting gnome3/gnome2 hybrid, but it was buggy as all fuck when last i used it in mint lisa. maybe it's better in the new mint? haven't tried mint again since I went to ubuntu 12.04.

    10. Re:Can't wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used it before Mint 13, but it's pretty decent now. Only really irritating bit is that the taskbar can't be resized (the patch is already in the works to fix this in Mint 14, as I understand).

    11. Re:Can't wait.... by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      And furthermore, no Microsoft tax.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    12. Re:Can't wait.... by undefinedreference · · Score: 2

      Yes it is popular, and that's part of the reason so many of the linux faithful hate it. Despite whatever many linux users claim about how it's the true best choice and everybody should use it, a good number of them like it specifically because it gives them computer hipster status. Ubuntu's popularity is a bad thing to them. if "the masses" use something, it -must- be bad, since the masses are idiots.

      I love Xubuntu in spite of losing all my geek cred by using anything related to Ubuntu. I still use *BSD for servers and routers, so it's not like I'm a sellout, but I'd rather have a slightly unstable laptop/desktop than go to the effort of using a higher-cred distro that is similarly-unstable. Huge bonus points for being realistically-usable by people without special training.

      I, for one, welcome a future where MS Windows is just an option among many.

    13. Re:Can't wait.... by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      I've always been fascinated by the term hipster. Ignoring the usual fashion change that associated with white yoof. Its the whole liking ironically thing. Which as far as I can see is simply coping with being ashamed of liking best of low art [pop] culture of prior generation or non mainstream. The only ironic thing is its stuff I just like. I don't need to justify myself to society at large.

      The bottom line is Linux is pretty good, and your talk of "hipsters"; "hate"; "fanboys" is ridiculous.

      As for your rest of your post...trying to claw it back with backhanded compliments in reference to Microsoft and Apple seriously!! And then making a vague claim to buggy software. Its kind of sad really.

    14. Re:Can't wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a real Linuxer, you first build your own distribution. Then you brag about it. Then someone else starts using it. Then you have to hate it or shoot the other user.

    15. Re:Can't wait.... by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      This myth must go. There is no such thing as 100% Linux compatible hardware.

      Changing distro can and does break things. Changing kernel version by the minutest amount can and does break things. Hell, a security fix can and have broken things. I currently have Linux friendly HW (Asus 722) and it has far too many issues (volume up does not work, PXE must be on or machine hangs, wifi hangs on heavy load, ...).

      Linux really needs more or less stable ABI.

    16. Re:Can't wait.... by eric_herm · · Score: 1

      Nope, Canonical is located in England ( Isle of Mann to be precise, cause there is so much cheap and good internet infrastructure there and located near good international airports, and not at all because that's a tax evasion scheme, of course )

    17. Re:Can't wait.... by w7md · · Score: 1

      I hope that Dell will sell a bunch of those machines, but I do not think that Unity will facilitate that end. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with the Gnome 2.0 desktop manager would probably be better welcomed by users I use Unity regularly now without too much difficulty because I know what apps are available on the system. I have been using Ubuntu for many years and like it better than most distros that I have tried as a 20 year Linux user, since SLS and Slackware. I have recently been experimenting with Mint, Mate and the so called "Classic Gnome" as alternative desktop managers for 12.04 but have noted some bugs in those on my Thinkpad. I have also installed the KED version of OpenSuSe 12.1 on another Thinkpad and painfully bypassed some of its problems. I could live with Unity but think it is a terrible choice for a Linux newbie, who will not be familiar with the names of the applications or their functions. IMHO, an alternative menu tree should be offered as an option.

    18. Re:Can't wait.... by LourensV · · Score: 1

      ... because you can't do that now with a windows-based dell machine?

      Well, that's what I tried to do...Ubuntu, not Debian. It didn't go so well.

      My work laptop is a Latitude E6410 that came with Windows (Vista from Dell, replaced with XP by our IT department). It's their most expensive 14" Latitude, titanium shell and stuff, quite nice mechanically. It is officially certified for Ubuntu, albeit only for the 32-bit version of the OS. I got it about 1 1/2 years ago, and tried to install the then-current LTS, 10.04. It gave a blank screen on boot. Apparently there was some issue with the Intel video driver. 10.10 didn't work either, so I used the VESA driver for a while, and went through the kernel sources trying to isolate the problem, but failed (it's complicated code, and I don't know the hardware). After a couple of months, 11.04 came out, and there were some tweaks, and lo and behold, it started working. A few kernel updates later, it broke again. I'm still running 11.04 (an attempted upgrade to 11.10 hosed my system), but with an older kernel.

      There were other issues: the touchpad wouldn't scroll, which turned out to be because the ALPS driver didn't recognise it. Dell eventually supplied a patch, which added a quirk to the ALPS driver to send a special byte sequence to the keypad that switches it into ImPS/2 compatibility mode. Now it does vertical scrolling, but not horizontal, and it still doesn't get recognised as a touchpad so you can't adjust the sensitivity or do any other configuration. Apparently this is considered a "fix". I've also had intermittent issues with the Broadcom wireless chip refusing to connect to anything, and I still get occasional random hangs that I've been unable to trace to anything but suspect may be wireless-related, since I get them more often in the confused spectrum at home than at work. Sometimes when I suspend the machine and then wake it up again, an additional battery is detected, which since it doesn't really exist shows up empty, causing the machine to go into an emergency shutdown. I mostly quit using suspend, but that isn't a fix either.

      Now to be fair, the certification page has a disclaimer saying that it's only certified with the exact, 32-bit image that it came with if you ordered the machine with Ubuntu on it, and that it may not even boot with the normal Ubuntu that you download from the web. It also shows only one particular configuration that they're testing with, which has nVidia graphics. I'm not paying Canonical for support, so I have no right to expect anything from them. But it does read, right at the top "The Dell Latitude E6410 laptop has been awarded the status of Certified for Ubuntu". I'm not giving much weight to that statement anymore.

      I switched to GNU/Linux 14 years ago mostly for practical reasons, it was more stable and more usable for me than Windows 98 was. Then I learnt about Free Software, and now I'm using it because it's Free and has a few key features that really help my productivity. But looking at my coworkers' screens, Windows has mostly caught up in terms of general quality, so that argument is gone, and it seems to me that Linux has actually got worse. Back in the late 90s when I started using it, quite a lot of hardware was not supported, but the stuff that was supported Just Worked, and the whole thing was rock solid. Now almost all hardware has some kind of support, but "supported" has grown to mean "works most of the time, any bugs may get fixed for some people in a couple of months' time if you're lucky". From a practical perspective, Ubuntu on Dell doesn't seem to be a very happy combination to me (my previous Dell, a Latitude D540, also had issues, although not as bad as the E6410). I'm planning to get a Thinkpad next time, on the theory that that seems to be what most kernel hackers are using, so that it should be well-supported (and it's good hardware). I don't think I'll be buying a Dell, not even with Ubuntu preloaded.

    19. Re:Can't wait.... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but the point still stands somewhat. When I bought a netbook, I bought one with Xandros- and Ubuntu worked with it out of the box. And this was at a time when wireless drivers were still a very flaky subject. Buying a netbook with Linux (even Xandros) gave me at least a fighting chance that Linux would work relatively pain free.

    20. Re:Can't wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke, but the big benefit of computers sold with Linux pre-loaded (any Linux- even crap) is that there's a good chance that it'll be 100% Linux-compatible hardware. Makes life far easier when installing your actual distro of choice.

      Having used various Linux distros since 2006 on various machines(desktops ,laptops,notebook) ,I never ever had a hardware compatibility problem.
      Currently while using 3 Debian derived distros on the same HD , e.g. Lubuntu - Ubuntu -Linux Mint (April 2012 versions) , my preference for any of these has gradully faded ;they all work well....................Linux has truly ALSO come of age for desktop users .

      Anybody buying a desktop -laptop -notebook is no longer forced to a Windows pre-installed machine . At least in the UK one can buy a bare bone desktop PC or a laptop without an OS ,thus avoiding paying the M$ Tax . Life is getting rosier.

      Frank in northern Scotland

    21. Re:Can't wait.... by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Yes, somewhat. I think 722 will work flawlessly in 13.04 or so. It took two years for EeePC to work OK in Ubuntu, that is how I got my estimate. The EeePC came with some favour of Linux, can't remember what.

      Still my point, stable ABI, stands. It would greatly speed up development (i.e. decrease time for a HW to work *for users*).

  3. We'll see by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Last time I bought a Dell laptop, it was because I needed a high end laptop workstation, and it had to run Linux. I ended up buying a Windows one and putting ubuntu on it because ubuntu had restricted linux to only the really low end laptops.

    At least they've got an ultrabook this time.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:We'll see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because ubuntu had restricted linux to only the really low end laptops"

      I guess you mean that Dell had restricted Linux to the low end laptops.

  4. Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Animats · · Score: 3

    Is this announcement definitely from Dell, or is it more bullshit from Canonical? Canonical has previously announced various machines as coming with their Linux preloaded. Canonical claimed that for an EeePC model. Didn't happen.

    1. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It most definitely did happen, but not in all geographies. Asus ships Ubuntu on a number of machines (including those EEEPc models), both online and in retail. Sorry that it is not available in your location - Canonical are working on expanding the reach of Ubuntu with Asus, Dell, and other OEMs.

      -- A Canonical employee

    2. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know Asus has a 1025c listed with Ubuntu on their site, and it has been sighted on sale in Italy.

      And right now it seems Dell is limiting their Ubuntu efforts to english speaking markets.

    3. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by GeLeTo · · Score: 1

      My old eeepc came preinstalled with some crappy linux distro. It had the same price and specs as the windows version except for larger hard drive. You can still see the Windows./Linux designation on their support site: http://support.asus.com/download.aspx?SLanguage=en-us&m=eee+pc+1000h/linux

    4. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Tarlus · · Score: 1
      --
      /* No Comment */
    5. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      My EEE 4Gs (one for me, one for wife) came with the worst distro I've ever used - Xandros.

      And I've tried a LOT of distros.

      Fortunately I got rid of that crap and put Arch on it fairly quickly.

      How could Asus (who make some good gear) put such (unsupported, unupdated) crap on their machines?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    6. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to wake up and realise that they are hampering efforts to get GNU/Linux out there. Dell, HP, Asus, and other major manufacturers will never properly support GNU/Linux. There bread and butter is Microsoft Windows. GNU/Linux is a risk to them. They will always hide GNU/Linux and/or "upsell" to Microsoft Windows. I've seen this with Linspire and dozens of other manufacturers/ditributions/retail outlets over the years.

      What we need to do is support ThinkPenguin. ThinkPenguin is actually going places and doing stuff. They've chosen not to go the route of other manufacturers. They only chip free software friendly hardware. And not just laptops/desktops. They do everything. USB Wireless adapters, printers, and anything you might want. They are actively expanding and have outlets in the United States and Europe. They are working with chipset companies like Atheros to get better support for free software. What is Dell doing? They can't even ship a system that works out of the box with GNU/Linux. Ohh and they FUND GNU/Linux development. Linux Mint, Trisquel, the Free Software Foundation, and others.

      I had a friend who bought a Dell with GNU/Linux. He setup a return almost immediately because:

      1. It didn't work with GNU/Linux and this was a laptop that Dell advertised as coming with Linux
      2. Dell's tech support passed him around for an hour until finally they said they don't support Linux and to call Canonical. He calls Canonical and finds out he has to wait until Monday to get support. He gives up and calls Dell back to return the unit. Now had he actually called Canonical on Monday he wold have found out Dell and Canonical have NO AGREEMENT in place to support Dell users. Dell is really doing jack shit for GNU/Linux and Canonical is wasting its time.

      This wasn't an issue exclusive to this customer. I've talked to a @*#$( load of people who experieced this. That INCLUDES a Canonical employee (LinuxCon or maybe Libre Planet).

      Last thing. I work in the industry. I've worked for GNU/Linux distributions. I've seen FIRST hand how we are making the same damm mistakes again and again. If you want to do Canonical a favour get Mark to dump propritary software (does not have to be immediate, start with drivers, as it it is an immediately solvable issue- point customers to hardware with free drivers/firmware), dump unity (for desktops), and utilise GNU/Linux exclusive companies to sell GNU/Linux. Dell proved a catalog/phone/TV business model works. Now copy that except use a GNU/Linux company or develop your own operations!

    7. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Lenovo? I plan on buying an X230 ultrabook and will have to buy a Windows license with it, no refund.

    8. Re:Is this announcement from Dell, or Canonical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could Asus (who make some good gear) put such (unsupported, unupdated) crap on their machines?

      It was so bad you'd almost think MS paid Asus to do it to discredit Linux. I bought an eeePC 1000 for my wife and she found that the WiFi connection dropped for several minutes about once every 15 minutes - almost unusable; I replaced Xandros with with Ubuntu Netbook 9.04 (later 10.4) and it's been rock solid ever since, still running 10.4 today. Hardware wise it's been fine (slightly noisy fan), but shipping it with software-broken WiFi was appalling (not to mention this version of Xandros's other major deficiencies). I just wish 10.4 LTS had 5 year support like 12.04 does...

  5. yay by misfit815 · · Score: 0

    My aging Dell laptop is due for replacement. I'm familiar with their hardware, BIOS, support site, etc, so I was not eager to have to shop elsewhere.

    --
    Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
    1. Re:yay by DeTech · · Score: 1

      News flash: Dell has nothing to due with the hardware or BIOS in the laptops they sell.

    2. Re:yay by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      Two beers later and I still can't figure out what you're trying to say....?

      In any case dell actually seem to put some effort into their BIOS version... As do ASUS.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    3. Re:yay by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      News flash: Dell has nothing to due with the hardware or BIOS in the laptops they sell.

      I don't understand, maybe you mean they license the BIOS from third parties rather than produce their own. In fact Compaq did legally reverse engineering IBM's BIOS. There is no reason at all why they couldn't invest in coreboot, or create their own, other than time and money.

  6. Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last time I looked at one of these Linux laptops, the price was higher than the $350 Windows laptop I saw at staples. Therefore it saved me money to buy the Windows version, download Lubuntu, and install a dual boot, rather than support Dell Linux offering.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprised. Dell seems to offset the bulk discounted Windows License by getting payed by Symantec and others for bundling their 30 day demo programs. And likely accounting goes "hang on, these will likely sell less than our normal fare so they need to be priced higher to bring in the usual margin!". All in all it is a uphill battle.

    2. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      And Staples saved themselves having any support for Linux, testing for Linux, returns because the buyer didn't really want Linux or it didn't work out for them. And if you say geeks support themselves I think you'll find that switches quickly when they've paid for a Linux laptop, they'll be expecting that it works far more smoothly than a DIY install that may or may not run well on that model. If it did, great for you. Linux is niche. Niche usually means expensive to stock, expensive to test, expensive to support. If Windows has an issue maybe you fix it for a million users, if Linux has a similar issue you fix it for ten thousand. That means a lot fewer people to spread the cost on. So the license is free, big whoop. With all the trialware they get paid to install on Windows I doubt it costs them much at all. So why exactly should it be cheaper?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Last time I looked at one of these Linux laptops, the price was higher than the $350 Windows laptop I saw at staples. Therefore it saved me money to buy the Windows version, download Lubuntu, and install a dual boot, rather than support Dell Linux offering.

      All that crapware that comes with your new PC pays for the Windows license AND a bit of the hardware. Software vendors basically beg, plead and bargain their way onto the default image with an OEM, and the OEM gets paid a per-unit fee for doing it.

      Heck, Microsoft offers "Premium PCs" that are free from crapware (through their hard to find Microsoft store). Guess what? They cost more!

      Until you can get vendors paying to preinstall crapware for the Linux version, the price will always be higher.

    4. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by westlake · · Score: 1

      Last time I looked at one of these Linux laptops, the price was higher than the $350 Windows laptop I saw at staples.

      Product that sits on the shelves costs money. Successfully marketing the "Other OS" has always been a problem --- even Walmart couldn't crack that one. Dual inventory and support structures cost money. After-market sales in the Windows market are golden. The return is always better on the mass market product.

    5. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Software vendors basically beg, plead and bargain their way onto the default image with an OEM

      I rather suspect there is a lot less begging and pleading and a lot more forking over cash.

    6. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Last time I looked at one of these Linux laptops, the price was higher than the $350 Windows laptop I saw at staples.

      That's because the OEM makes a profit from the folks willing to pay to have their crapware preinstalled (Norton, AOL, Yahoo, whoever). It actually is cheaper for the OEM to pay ten bucks for the Windows license and make another $100 from the crapware firms. Windows users don't know any better, because all their computers come with crapware, but Linux users would scream bloody murder (I would, that's for sure).

      And since most distros are dirt simple to install, there's really no reason (short of UEFI/Palladium... remember Palladium?) to buy a computer with Linux preinstalled. Installing Linux takes less time and effort than removing crapware from a new Windows machine.

    7. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by hodet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Losing that Staples tech support is a real show stopper for me.

    8. Re:Will it be any cheaper than Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell's "thing" is customization and building to order. They don't have inventory sitting on shelves. There may not be a lot of customization to be done on an Ultrabook, but there is at least the software that goes on it, so Dell's costs go about as far as maintaining another image for Ubuntu, along with the Windows ones which they can put on the machine after it is ordered.

  7. Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by toygeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I can get a cheaper laptop and put on my pirated Windows 7 Ultimate! w00t!!!!!

    (because *nobody* pirates the home edition)

    1. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually .. you'd be surprised how many people actually want to pirate the Home edition based on download in "alternative" sites. My guess is that some people fear the Enterprise/Ultimate editions as they "might be bloated".

      Obviously we're talking about Home Premium. Who the fuck came up with a boxed edition of Home Basic?

    2. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by couchslug · · Score: 4, Funny

      "(because *nobody* pirates the home edition)"

      Since you mentioned, I checked and (at the moment) this has 421 seeders and 145 leechers! Comedy Gold!

      http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/6863991/Windows_7_home_premium_64_bit_by_(oldBen)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, last time i checked Windows 7 holds the ability to install all editions. The only difference is the serial used.

    4. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Of course.

      BTW, anyone can download a clean LEGAL .iso from digitalriver since it's the license key that matters. No point in warezing unless you like the package.

      That makes it all even more amusing.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by toygeek · · Score: 1

      Seems like every time I see some P4 with 1GB ram and Windows 7.. its Ultimate edition. Must be just my luck.

    6. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know where you can download a pirate copy of Debian....

    7. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think any computer will be cheaper without windows?
      A normal windows machine comes with so much crap pre-installed, the money they get for the preinstallation evens out the cost of windows.
      Thus a clean machine without windows and without that extra income for the manufacturer will most likely not cost much less.

    8. Re:Very cool, no Microsoft tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've torrented Win7 Home Premium but only because I was reinstalling it on someone else's borked laptop with a valid serial. Arguable that's not pirating it but it would explain the busy torrent.

  8. Really? by SomePgmr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've always reserved "skunkworks project" for what I thought were interesting, kinda secret, complicated pursuits.

    You know, like the exact opposite of dell slapping ubuntu on a laptop and selling it on their website. ;)

    1. Re:Really? by Antipater · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. I also got a kick out of something called "skunkworks" kicking out something called "Sputnik".

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:Really? by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I've never heard that term applied to anything besides airplanes developed at the lockheed martin facilities. But wiki tells me it "describes a group within an organization given a high degree of autonomy and unhampered by bureaucracy, tasked with working on advanced or secret projects."

      Or else maybe lockheed martin researchers got tired of making the next stealth plane and decided to go in a different direction.

    3. Re:Really? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Yeah Lockheed is what everyone knows the name from, but it's been used elsewhere for a long time since. Their Skunk Works (tm) still exists and they've made attempts to protect the name and logo.

  9. Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing with by melted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM Windows pricing with Microsoft. Out comes the old pal, Linux, and stays there right up until Microsoft complies with Dell's demands. This is getting tiresome. It's the third or fourth time they've done this, there's no element of surprise to anyone but people with Alzheimers.

  10. Cool! by davidwr · · Score: 2

    $write you "Dude, you're getting a Dell"

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Cool! by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      I wonder whatever happened to the "Dude, you're getting a Dell" kid. I'm betting drug addiction and eventual homelessness. Even as I write this, I bet he's somewhere selling his blood for crack. Kinda warms my heart.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't sell blood, you sell plasma or semen. My guess is he's on the receiving end of one of those bodily fluids.

    3. Re:Cool! by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 4, Informative

      On February 9, 2003, Curtis was caught attempting to buy a bag of marijuana on Manhattan's Lower East Side.[2] Curtis was arrested and charged with criminal possession of marijuana. Due to recognizability of Curtis, word of the arrest spread quickly through the media. A chain email of the story even cropped up as it was forwarded around the internet using the iconic parodied phrase "Dude, you're getting a cell!"

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Curtis_(actor)

    4. Re:Cool! by tburke261 · · Score: 0

      'On February 9, 2003, Curtis was caught attempting to buy a bag of marijuana on Manhattan's Lower East Side.[2] Curtis was arrested and charged with criminal possession of marijuana. Due to recognizability of Curtis, word of the arrest spread quickly through the media. A chain email of the story even cropped up as it was forwarded around the internet using the iconic parodied phrase "Dude, you're getting a cell!"'

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Curtis_(actor)#Arrest

    5. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, funny you should mention drugs, because he got busted for pot a while back, and after the new stories, I never heard from him again.

    6. Re:Cool! by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

      Actually, he has a minor acting career. It's nothing to get hugely excited about yet, but he's young.

      Wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Curtis_(actor)
      IMDB link: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1120236/

      So, yeah, you can dream of crack-addicted homeless people all you want, but apparently, that ain't him.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
  11. Dell has never stopped selling Ubuntu machines by hweimer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even now, there are some notebooks available on their website, and you can probably get even more options when you ask them on the phone.

    --
    OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  12. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by slazzy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Normally OEM licences are often on a 5 year term, so this would make sense timing wise.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  13. Its a shake down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pressuring MS to give deep OEM discounts on their upcoming WIndows 8?

    It happened at the same stage of the Windows release cycle before and probably worked.

  14. so the headline is by nimbius · · Score: 2

    dell gives linux laptops another chance, implying they were never a viable idea from the get-go. Personally? Fuck Dell. id rather take my business to system76 or penguin computing, or even los alamos if i had the cash. these are places where linux on the desktop is something thats existed and will continue to exist as long as your favourite linux is produced, so you dont need to worry about getting redmonds buy-in on how powerful your linux desktop is allowed to be, or at what pricepoint its required to be set.

    TL;DR: stop buying linux from people who pander to the community for extra scratch in the fourth quarter earnings report.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  15. Why now? W8 for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if you didn't get it... I was saying that Windows 8 is looking so bad that Dell is hedging their bet.

  16. Dell XPS 13 Ultrabook by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    I was actually very interested in a XPS 13 Ultrabook. It had good reviews, a decent price and Linux would work on it. My only problem was that it supported a max for 4GB of memory. If it had at least supported 8GBs, I would probably own one right now.

  17. *zzzzzzz* by characterZer0 · · Score: 2

    I want a good laptop. Wake me up with Lenovo sells ThinkPads without Windows.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    1. Re:*zzzzzzz* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does if you buy it in Europe. More precisely, I got mine online from Germany. It came clean with no OS pre-installed.

    2. Re:*zzzzzzz* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they might not sell them with linux currently, but they do support it.

      http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/detail.page?LegacyDocID=MIGR-48NT8D

      always have.

    3. Re:*zzzzzzz* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In October of last year, Lenovo did sell Thinkpads with no OS. So a ThinkPad T420 that was going for $1,131.00 went for $620.00. Currently it's unavailable. I don't know if enough people contacted them they'd run the sale again.

    4. Re:*zzzzzzz* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this sarcasm? They already do...

    5. Re:*zzzzzzz* by InfoJunkie777 · · Score: 1

      I want a good laptop. Wake me up with Lenovo sells ThinkPads without Windows.

      Perhaps your forgot to indicate that was sarcasm? As the poster directly above your post mentioned, The good folks at System76, Penguin Computing and Los Alamos Computing ALL sell Thinkpads with Linux installed. They seem a bit pricey considering the operating system is FREE; but supposedly the hardware is already compatible with the Linux kernel.

      --
      Don't explain computers to laymen. Simpler to explain sex to a virgin. -- Robert A. Heinlein
    6. Re:*zzzzzzz* by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      They sell Thinkpads with Linux installed for more than it costs to get them with Windows directly from Lenovo.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    7. Re:*zzzzzzz* by InfoJunkie777 · · Score: 1

      They sell Thinkpads with Linux installed for more than it costs to get them with Windows directly from Lenovo.

      Okay, I thought the prices seemed high. I am new to Linux. Am just testing Ubuntu 12.04 on a USB drive to make sure I like it. I think I will. I was a DOS wizard in my day. So far I am not connecting on internet, but I have the 147 page manual. I will check it out further. From looking at the sites, I gathered the main "advantage" they pushed is that the machine's hardware was optimized for Linux. If I got a Windows machine and installed it, you are saying that would be cheaper and just as good?

      --
      Don't explain computers to laymen. Simpler to explain sex to a virgin. -- Robert A. Heinlein
  18. The always-high costs of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it amazing how much work (meaning money) Dell has to put in to offering a "free" operating system on it's computers?

    Bad for Dell, but definitely good for the legions of high paid consultants who provide incompetent support for Teh Lunix.

    1. Re:The always-high costs of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By legions you mean the company in India they farm their level 1 support out to.

      By high paid you mean - I have no idea what you mean... see previous clarification.

      By incompetent support you mean the same people who provide incompetent support for Windows?

      Yeah, now I get what you're saying.

    2. Re:The always-high costs of "free" by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      In two years, first level support: "What is this Linux? You must reinstall windows 8 and send it back or warranty invalid!"

      You need the right accent, too.

    3. Re:The always-high costs of "free" by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      What money? Dell's offerings have always been lackluster at best. If they have spent any money or other resources on them then that is genuinely and truly sad.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  19. great idea by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Hmmm typical Dell customers + Linux OS + Dell's legendary support quality = fantastic idea! I'm sure they won't have any problems with people calling in, asking how to do basically everything.

  20. I'll buy by randallman · · Score: 1

    I currently have a MacBook Air, which is a nice piece of hardware, but I've yet to stamp out all issues (hangs on external display, random suspend borks, etc) running Ubuntu. If they deliver a laptop of similar quality with everything working nicely, I will buy it.

  21. on-off-relationships are painful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so why accept such an offer?

  22. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    >>>It's the third or fourth time they've done this,

    Don't you mean second? You can draw a line with two points, but you can't establish a pattern. You can't claim this is Dell's modus operandi with only 2 samples.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  23. What do you mean, "again?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dell.com/ubuntu

    Vostro 1440 still for sale, as always.

  24. It's still a Dell. by NalosLayor · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'll be honest, I haven't given a Dell laptop a serious look in years, but I handled tons of them through the late 2000's and the build quality was so poor that I really don't even look at their equipment anymore when picking a laptop for myself or someone else. I don't know if they've changed recently, but I haven't heard anyone make that claim. It doesn't matter to me what OS ships with the hardware if the hardware itself is flimsy. A laptop that won't bend, crack or break at the hinges within a few weeks is worth a $50 premium, IMO.
    I actually feel that Asus and Toshiba build much nicer laptops at about the same price point, but I'm sure someone will disagree (after all, this is /.)

    1. Re:It's still a Dell. by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I'm posting this mainly because you mentioned Asus, and I've sworn an oath of vengeance against them.

      Asus sucks. It seems to have started sucking recently, last year or two. But they suck.

      Dell laptops crack within weeks. My Asus laptop fried itself within hours. And then took over a month to repair. And when I finally did get it back, it was in a cheap cardboard box instead of the original packaging they had insisted I use, and the power cable they had also insisted I return was half-missing as well. And this was after they'd already fucked me over by taking two months to get ship it out in the first place.

      So yeah. Fuck Asus. They're worse than Dell, in my book.

    2. Re:It's still a Dell. by NalosLayor · · Score: 1

      No doubt that ASUS has no reputation for good customer service -- but I've been fortunate enough to not have to deal with them, yet. That said, Dell's consumer level CS is incredibly bad too. Their business class CS, however, was, as of last year, still really solid. I wouldn't hesitate to buy a Dell server, or even a desktop for employees, but I wouldn't touch their laptops with a ten foot pole. After all, the best warranty is the one you never use.

    3. Re:It's still a Dell. by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      You're so right. The company I work for allows you to buy a Dell laptop for a certain budget. I can't choose anything else, even if I wanted to. So my new laptop was a Precision M4500 which has Windows pre-installed. I changed Windows to Linux and all was well. Until after a few weeks the battery would no longer charge. Fine, small problem and one call to CS ensured a new battery was shipped the next day. Then a few weeks later the keyboard malfunctioned. Okay, that was replaced as well. And then the charger failed on me. And then the harddisk. And meanwhile I discovered the nvidia card was having problems (doesn't want to refresh the screen sometimes, leaving you editing a file in vim in the wrong place) but they didn't want to swap the mainboard because I couldn't show that the card was running fine in Windows.

      Right now everything works fine again, but I won't be surprised if next month I'll have to contact CS again. It's good that I have a 3yr warranty but it would be better if I never had to use it. Hopefully the company's policy will change and I can buy something else.

    4. Re:It's still a Dell. by cusco · · Score: 1

      I'm exceedingly hard on hardware, and yet the Dell laptop that I'm working on has survived being dropped off a ladder, off desks, used in high-temp locations, left in the sun in the closed car in summer, had coffee slopped over it a couple of times, and has generally survived pretty well. The case looks a bit rough, as one would expect after three years, but it hasn't fallen apart yet. By and large I'm fairly impressed.

      Having said that, the first one that I had, back about 2006, wasn't worth the powder to blow it up.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:It's still a Dell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a little like hard drives - you can always find a group who've been burned and will never buy [BRANDNAME] again. For every brandname.

      Quality seems to vary across the years like weather. FWIW I'm sending right now on a Dell D610 running U 10.04LTS. It's remarkably well-engineered and has been one reliable little brick shithouse of a laptop for me.

      I /will/ look at Dell again because of this one. And had I not gotten this particular good-luck model, there is no way in hell I'd look at Dell either, due to crap in earlier years.

      So, there's "a claim". Tape YMMV all over it, but I got a Dell that was damn good. It /can/ happen.

    6. Re:It's still a Dell. by adolf · · Score: 1

      I'm still flogging a Dell Inspiron 9000d laptop. It's been through one display, one power supply, and one hard drive, all of which Dell shipped to me "free" under the terms of the only super-duper extended warranty I've ever bought (which did pay for itself). I also fed it a new battery a couple of years ago (the old one lasted forever, and didn't owe me anything).

      It's 8 or 9 years old, by this point. Runs Windows 7 along with whatever else I throw at it with ease. I see no need to replace it.

      It's been dropped, frozen, run frozen, run covered in condensation, lived in a work truck in Ohio (think -15 to +110 outside temps), baked in direct sunlight, and has always been absurdly reliable. It just doesn't seem to want to die, so I just keep using it. (Perhaps simply having a motherboard made with lead-based solder is a large part of its reliability. RoHS has killed so much gear that it's probably counterproductive.)

      And I'm still in love with the 15.4" 1920x1200 display.

      The only thing inherently wrong with the machine is that the hinges for the display have self-loosening fasteners by default. I re-tightened them periodically for years until I realized that slightly longer screws would fix the problem altogether. (Later, superficially-similar models have a somewhat improved design in this area.)

      (I got the screws from an HP DV9000 that had succumbed to the equivalent of the Red Ring of Death at less than half the age of my cheap-shit Dell.)

    7. Re:It's still a Dell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my wife bought a Dell laptop in hmmm fall 2007. Never even ran the winwhatever that was on it but loaded Ubuntu on it for her right away. In two weeks she was a die-hard Linux grrl. Don't get me wrong, she is not a geek, but she is a partisan, and for that we can think about people who have used macs (she was an early iMac purchaser in Holland, she has a tray-loaded CD player on that old blue and white clunker) and used winPCs and made the switch without geek creds. I leave her alone with it, automagic everything, let her load the desktop with a ton of crap, do everything that makes me crazy and it don't matter.

      When Unity came along she tried Mint instead and didn't really love it. She decided she finally had the creds to run with me and the boy (my 9 year old) who use fedora 17. She fell in love with it and with gnome3. There is nothing wrong with any of the distros that a little love and attention can't solve, frankly. Those who whine are just whiners.

      If my wife can handle all this with a cheap Dell laptop, what are you whining about? Geeks indeed!

  25. as a long time Dell user... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

    As a user of Dell for Linux before the N Series came out and as a person that still uses an N series laptop and Ubuntu, I can tell you my next laptop, even if the are partnering with Ubuntu, will not be from Dell. Over the years I've felt pretty screwed over as a Linux user and the last re neg of their commitments to Linux users has convinced me to no longer be their customer. My next laptop purchase in on the horizon, and it will be from a vendor like System 76 or someone else that seems committed. Who knows when Dell will decide to defecate on the Linux community again.

  26. Intentionally Damaging their Brand to Upsell it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "'who ISN'T buying dell"

    Nor am I, nor will I ever. Back in the mid to late 90s DELL was an awesome system.

    Anyone remember the Dimension 450? Anyway, in the early and mid-2000s, their overall service and quality level just tanked.

    Intentionally so, actually. I am posting this as AC since I worked for Dell for a great many years as a Gold Tech Support Agent, and I don't particularly like the idea of being sued for letting the cat out of the bag.

    The reason your service and quality level tanked -- why calls were outsourced to India, why parts became just a little bit flakey, etc -- was to give sales a reason to upsell you.

    Yes, outsourced techs are cheaper (they make pathetically low wages), but they also gave us an opportunity to sell you a service contract to speak to an American for a vastly inflated price, and they make a killing doing so.

    Yes, the cheaper parts are cheaper, but they gave us an opportunity to sell you a next day or 4 hour service contract for your hardware, rather than have you ship in the laptop or wait for service, and again, they make a killing doing so.

    It's the latter (upsells) not the former (direct discounts) that Dell was interested in.

    The higher ups were quite open with this when they were explaining why we couldn't help frustrated customers who India sent over to us -- if India couldn't fix something, and it was past 5 o'clock over there, they'd punt the customer over to us-- and we'd punt them right back, most of the time.

    And yes, you can still get an American. When you buy your next Business model Dell, ask for a "Pro Support" warranty. Unfortunately, you won't get me, as my site (as well as all the Canadian sites) were outsourced... to Dell. They closed our site claiming they didn't need 3 Pro Support sites, then outsourced our jobs to a company Dell owns down in Florida -- but this way, they don't have to give benefits nor a fair wage. Ain't economics grand?

  27. Buyer beware by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 0

    After a long time on Macs, I took the plunge into Linux with a Dell Mini 10.

    I was amazed to find out that, once purchased, you were pretty much stuck with the OS as it shipped. If you upgraded, you broke the graphics driver.

    There were gigantic, epic forum threads (this I think is the main one -- 543 pages. Not comments -- pages.) devoted to fiddling with command-line settings to try to get things working again. Eventually, it just got to be too much and I installed XP on the thing.

    ||||| Alaska Jack

  28. Windows 8 also launches this fall by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    Windows 8 is also launching the same time as this change. We've never seen them in the same room together. Coincidence? I think not!

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  29. Retaliation by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is Dell's way of jabbing back at Microsoft, after they announced their tablet, undermining many of their partners.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  30. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Yep. Dell kept doing the same thing for years with AMD, threatening to start selling AMD-based systems to keep Intel motivated to give them sweetheart deals.

    By the time Intel got tired of the tactic, the Core 2 had been released anyway so AMD was no longer the best. Kind of how Ubuntu's interface is no longer as-good-or-better than Windows' now that it's saddled with Unity.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  31. Lenovo make the best Ubuntu laptops by HangingChad · · Score: 2

    I was going to order a Dell with Ubuntu, but the price was almost the same!

    Instead I buy lightly used IBM and Lenovo laptops and add Ubuntu. They rock.

    Be nice if I could find Linux drivers for the fingerprint reader and my camera is kind of dark, but other than those minor niggles, they're great Ubuntu boxes.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Lenovo make the best Ubuntu laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, Dell laptops also have issues: Latitudes (at least 6xxx series) come with ALPS touchpad, which doesn't support any of fancy moves except two finger scrolling, but even that sucks because it's not sensitive enough. After using my private Macbook, this is torture. My employer barely allowed me to install Linux on it, so I can't complain :D :(

  32. Dell: we need graphics acceleration,better hardwar by asparagus6000 · · Score: 1
    Rant incomming:

    If Dell is targeting these laptops for "developers", then why are they only offering laptops with lowest-common-denominator aesthetic features that many developers (myself at least) could not care less about? "Thin", "Beautiful Design" "Fast Startup", tiny hard drive, tiny screen, low RAM?

    Serious? Hardware specifications of every ubuntu-bundled dell machine I've ever seen are entry-level and honestly quite terrible for development work. (For for my work at least. I write simulation and bioinformatics software). For years, the lack of graphics acceleration, and a tiny hard drive has been a deal killer. I can't speak for others, but I think it's safe to say that "developers" are not the kinds of people who (only) use laptops to give powerpoint/libre-office presentations or check facebook. We actually know what a dedicated graphics card is. We need reasonable hardware.

  33. Argue with Dell if you don't want MS by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

    I managed to get a Vostro without MS Windows and with FreeDOS: Dell Vostro 200 Windows Tax Free in Mexico. It took some effort, but I had a very good point: Dell advertised that the Vostro was sold with any software the customer wanted ;-).

  34. Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they've offer it on a wider range, but this could be cool. I bought the Vostro 13 right before they dropped it. Unfortunately it's currently waiting me to figure out what's dead, the HD data cable or the HD, I already eliminated that audio card that they sandwiched in there. It was an awfully sudden death :(.

  35. Odd Marketing by organgtool · · Score: 1

    I know it's natural to think of Linux as a developer's operating system, but if I had to develop software using the Unity interface, I would promptly fall on a sword. It would have been nice if they went with Linux Mint, but then they wouldn't get official support from Canonical. Oh well, at least it should guarantee a laptop complete with Linux-friendly hardware (not that Linux has too much trouble with modern hardware anyway) and then the user can install their favorite distro.

    1. Re:Odd Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I develop enterprise software under Ubuntu 12.04. It is the best environement I've ever used.
      After getting used to it try to use the old stuff like Gnome 2 or win XP... It's hilarious.
      The only thing I miss are the panel add-on for gnome 2, but the indicators are getting pretty good.

    2. Re:Odd Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming the default desktop environment is Unity for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS I have to disagree with your comments. I actually like the interface and I have been a KDE user for years.

  36. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM Windows pricing with Microsoft. Out comes the old pal, Linux, and stays there right up until Microsoft complies with Dell's demands. This is getting tiresome. It's the third or fourth time they've done this, there's no element of surprise to anyone but people with Alzheimers.

    Then I think they are doing it for the wrong reasons. They have with the launch of surface been sent a clear signal, "You are our bitch, It is our OS", we will take all the high end early adopter money, and we will keep all of your margins.

    Dell needs to get going with a strategy that involves Coreboot; Libreoffice; dual boot android; full refund for windows + free penguin plush + credits; Chrome for Ubuntu Store; massive investing in Open source OS [hell their own closed source] and putting their skin all over it pick Meego/Android/Tizen/Gnome/KDE I don't care which.

    The need to be talking to Asus; Samsung; Intel; Sony; etc etc about forming an effective defensive cartel against Microsoft, talk openly with transparency about what happens behind closed door with Microsoft, and to regulars within various Governments.

    After Microsoft saying how rubbish your machines are produce a machine not limited by Microsoft restrictive OS. Say Debian+ARM+Valve Store+Google talk+touchscreen+Netbook+game controls+led keyboard though in some teaching materials/Edutainment and hdmi out and bundle with docking station, keyboard, Monitor and put unused alienware logo on it make glow with LEDs, link it with celebrity Sound system ...and sell it for peanuts look at how well Android hardware is doing.

    At the very least they need to get their patent trolling on.

    They need to show Microsoft that they are not Bitches, they need to show that Hardware controls the Software not the other way around. There is even the chance of Apple like money from these strategy.

    Putting Linux on a few machines buried on their web site, is a *cough* symbolic gesture at best like a child kicking back at a parent by *sulking*.

  37. Windows R8 response... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    This is likely in response to Microsoft's announcement/memo to PC distributors that they are basically getting into the hardware business.

    Dell: "Yeah, well we'll just use Linux then!" *pouty lip*

  38. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I find interesting is how closely this is following Microsoft's notice to these vendors that they're looking into selling their own hardware with their Windows 8 OS. Hmm...panicking much?

  39. Re:Dell: we need graphics acceleration,better hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what the hell drivers are you going to use to power this dedicated graphics card? The awful, barely-supported commercial ones from AMD, or the awful, barely-supported commercial ones from nVidia? Or the Free Libre Open Source Freedom Software ones that only support cards at least two years old?

  40. Needs more screen real estate by otakuj462 · · Score: 1

    Developers love pixels. Apple is driving this, but even PC vendors are jumping on this bandwagon. For example, see the upcoming Asus Zenbook UX31. 13.3" screen, Full HD resolution: http://ultrabooknews.com/database/ASUS/Zenbook%20Prime%20UX31A/

    I want all the pixels.

  41. Downward slide by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I actually bought a Dell back in 2000. First computer I bought for myself using my own money. It was a 2700$ Dell Dimension 4200. Had a PIII 800 in it. Seems expensive now, and the video card was rubbish (TNT32), but it was rock solid.

    Literately the thing is so heavy and over engineered, I would take odds of it smashing other PC's to splinters and being just fine if you used it like a physically PC smashing device. It also came with a piddly PSU (by today's standards), I think it might have been 230W, but you could plug in a fridge to that thing and it would run. Everything was quality, and it was noticeable. It still works today (though I don't use it much). I had a buddy come to me with a dead PC and wanted to recover the data on the old ATA drives, which of course I couldn't plug in my more modern system. I just levered the 4200 behemoth out from under the desk, threw on a Live CD of Ubuntu, and Boom data recovered. The only thing that was shit about it, was that it came with Windows ME, which was replaced by a cracked 2000, later cracked XP, and when I got sick of the viruses, Linux.

    In addition, when I bought the thing, all the tech support (not that I really needed it) was in NA. Later I heard they moved the "consumer" tech support to India, while keeping business support in NA. It is likely all in India now I suppose. Heck even the huge CRT monitor I just dropped off last weekend to the hazardous waste depot, it still worked after a fashion, but has some lines thought the display. Anyway, they used to make solid products, but they have been in a race to the bottom (likely for lower and lower costs) with the rest of them (big box PC builders)...

    About the only thing that hasn't changed is that their video card selections always suck. In my opinion the best bang for buck video card is always the mid range card, usually in the 150-200$ range. However without fail, the choices you are given by Dell every time thought out history are, low end, low end, extreme high end. So a 30$ card that is barely better than integrated graphics, an 75$ card which is better than integrated graphic, but not really suitable for gaming, or a 500-600$ bleeding edge overpriced card that is crazy. That was the one thing that always got to me about Dell.

    1. Re:Downward slide by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      You experience with Dell's graphics cards was similar to mine: about two years ago I needed to buy a new laptop, and I wanted something that might run Civ 5. The reports indicated the processor requirements weren't bad, but you needed at least a mid-range graphics card. Dell had their consumer / business line at $300-400, but had the cheapest integrated graphics possible; or their Alienware line that started about $1200 if I remember correctly. I wound up getting a refurbed Asus laptop for $750 from Newegg, I think I could have gotten a new one for just under $1k. I guess Dell just doesn't want to compete in the mid-range: either its the low-low end mass production and business contracts; or its the high-end, high-margin stuff. Well whatever, I voted with my wallet.

    2. Re:Downward slide by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Same. Oddly enough I started building computers for fun about a year after I bought my Dell. Once I figured out how easy it was, and that I could research each component individually and get exactly the system I wanted to configure, it was an easy decision after that. Don't think I've bought a new one that I didn't build myself (well I bought an iPhone, but that barely counts). Particularly when you consider that most of what you are getting is 3 things when you buy from a Dell like company, 1) tech support, which I really don't need, and honestly I am likely more knowledgeable and better trained than any phone jockey, 2) Warranty which seemly most company fight tooth and nail not to honor so why bother, not to mention that usually you have to send it away anyway, and manufacturers all have warranties you can use, and some stores now have limited warranties on top of that to make it even easier, and 3) someone else puts it together physically and installs your software, which honestly is easy and fun, with perhaps the exception of the software install and the 1000 patches that need to be updated now... As for cost, I would say it is cheaper to build your own, particularly considering the components and quality you can get. Not to mention that Dell and the big box store may have volume on their side, but they also need to make a profit, and also I have found that they don't keep up with the times and fast changing (dropping) prices. A buddy sent me a computer build, and to get the video card he wanted it as Add(200$) in addition to the bargain basement card that came standard say 50$ or 250$ total. I could go to a store, and buy retail in a box, the exact same card for less than 130$.

      So really there are no compelling reason to ever buy from them again.

  42. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by Lennie · · Score: 1

    At least with Ubuntu it is easy to install any Linux DE you want it, but with Windows 8 you can't remove it.

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  43. Dell does more harm than good for linux by DaveInAustin · · Score: 2

    I purchased a dell laptop (m1530) with Ubuntu several years ago, with extended tech support. I had a harder time getting it to run properly than any other laptop in the last few years. Whenever I tried calling the tech-support, I had to transfer several times because they couldn't be bothered creating prompts for it in their phone support menus. I was actually told by their tech-support that my laptop stopped working because I did updates. With 12.04 I was finally able to get the sound working. Their website used to say "the most important thing you need to know about linux is that you don't get Windows". Look at their ubuntu website now. It has a underpowered laptop with a 15 month-old version of Ubuntu that you can't customize at all.

    --
    --- http://davidnehme.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Dell does more harm than good for linux by yonaada · · Score: 1

      i am fan linux and i like your blog my friendgoogle

  44. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just in time for Windows 8 too!

  45. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    No. He means 3rd or 4th.

    I can certainly remember 3 iterations including this one. If you just fell off the turnip truck just yesterday, then that's just you.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  46. Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they'll have a ace team of technical support agents in Canada again?

    Probably not, since they laid them all off.

  47. Dell started offering Linux in 1999, not 2007. by crankyspice · · Score: 1

    Dell start selling PC's [sic] with Linux (although in 2001 Dell Drop[ped] Linux on Desktops and Laptops); also, AFAIK you have always (well, since at least the late 90s) been able to order PowerEdge machines from Dell with Linux pre-loaded (Red Hat Enterprise, natch), and Dell has been pretty good about supporting Linux on their servers (see, e.g., the Dell Linux Engineering Web).

    --
    geek. lawyer.
  48. Remember the Mini 10 Poulsbo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fiasco that was the Dell Mini 10 Poulsbo makes it hard for me trust them to support a Linux machine. It worked great until I tried to upgrade to a newer Ubuntu. Then the proprietary graphics driver had all sorts of problems.

    Show me a machine will all open source drivers, and I'll be the first in line.

  49. Another meetoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I'm writing this post in a Dell Latitude I bought explicitly because it came with Ubuntu (10.04). I couldn't be more satisfied: zero issues, ever. Curiously I'm looking for a new laptop (not a replacement, but a bigger one). I guess I will have a look at what Dell has to offer.

  50. Don't need Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great that Dell is finally embracing Ubuntu, but they're doing it all wrong.

    Still fanning the flames of "Linux is only for techie nerd programmers" (I have about a half-dozen relatives that are NOT techie-nerd programmers all using Ubuntu...most are Baby-boomer generation who find Ubuntu about as challenging as Windows, easier in some ways, even).

    Still making it more costly, which is absurd, in it's own right.

    If you want an Ubuntu laptop, just buy from a company like System76 or something; they specialize in it and are priced accordingly. (No, I am not a shill for them, just a fan.)

    It's like Dell is setting themselves up for failure with this; "Hey guys, I've glued all these feathers to my arms, just like the birds have, and I still can't fly. No, you don't want that contraption that those bicycle guys are doing -- look how hard it is to operate!"

  51. Windows refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a refund for the Windows, Office and McAffe licenses of my new Dell Inspiron \o/

  52. Putting people off Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to attract people to Linux and sell more of them why not offer a quality distro (Debian or CentOS) instead of shitty Ubuntu with all its bugs, flakey hardware suuport and everytime a new version comes out its a gamble what will break.

  53. Makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark S. is currently doing a big tour throughout the US with his jet, visting Dell, Lenovo, the White House etc.
    Perhaps we can expect a similar announcement from Lenovo soon.

  54. Dell still makes laptops? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I thought they had strategized the paradigm to move everything to tabletspace vitally interlinked to all social media all the time. Laptops are so 3 minutes ago.

  55. Dell + Linux RUINS YOUR LIFE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet Dell still had to take the hit from clueless mainstream media because LINUX MAKES YOU DROP OUT OF COLLEGE AND RUINS YOUR LIFE!!!

    And it doesn't run Verizon Windows CDs and you can't install Microsoft Word!!!

    AND EVEN IF A VERIZON COMES TO UR HOUSE AND GETS YOUR LINUX ON THE INTERTUBES AND YOUR COLLEGE ACCEPTS OPENOFFICE FILES YOU STILL HAVE TO DROP OUT!!!

    AND YOU CAN'T HAZ CHEEZBURGER!!!

    http://www.wkow.com/global/story.asp?s=9667184

  56. started ... Linux installed installed in 2007, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true. My employer purchased several desktop systems (from Dell) with RH 6.2 installed in 2000 or 2001.

  57. Dell & Canonical don't get it; nor almost anyo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    GNU/Linux is about the freedom stupid. If you're going to call your stuff "Linux compatible" it at least aught to be designed to the extent currently possible to be freedom friendly. Dell, Canonical, System76, ZaReason, EmperorLinux, LinuxCertified, and every company I've come across except one doesn't get this. It's been pointed out and disscussed a number of times in recent years that even of the companies the Free Software Foundation is linking to that only one offers 100% compatibility with free versions of GNU/Linux. The first three companies the FSF links to are: Garlach44, Los Alamos Computers (LAC), and InaTux. The last being ThinkPenguin.com. Of them only one is forging ahead and removing dependancies on non-free software. ThinkPenguin removed support for "Trusted Computing" recently and is working with chipset manufacturers to fix long standing issues.

    And before you bash me for critisizing the stance of Canonical, and dare I say the Free Software Foundation. I'll point out that 95% of the problems people have with GNU/Linux (distributions which include non-free software) are related to non-free components. I shouldn't have to buy a Lexmark printer and replace it three months later because there was only one release of a propritary driver for a particular distribution or two.

    Software needs to be free in order to be properly maintained by the community. The ALSA project (for audio) and many others agree here. Just because Linus doesn't see the issues doesn't mean the don't exist. The truth is he was just bitching about the lack of freedom last week though. It was regarding nVidia. nVidia doesn't properly support GNU/Linux. It's a nightmware dealing with that and another reason Linus should turn the kernel free.

    Debian's inching ever closer to being a free software distribution. They've reconized these issues and removed the non-free firmware. Although there are other distributions that are better: Trisquel. It's a derivative Ubuntu without any non-free software.

    But regardless of if you have Adobe Flash and other non-free software this is one area where there is no exscuse. You can avoid nVidia / ATI graphics, you can avoid Intel wireless chipsets, you can avoid Lexmark printers. Selling them as "Linux" compatible or "free" is just wrong. It's lying to your uninformed customers and hurting us users.

    And before you respond negatively. I'm not perfect. I don't use a 100% distribution like Trisquel. That doesn't mean I have to agree with either "open source" or free software camps. We can find middle ground. Now lets do it. Stop promoting these sponges and start promoting companies that are actively supporting free software. Atheros has a free software USB wifi chipset (the only company to have such) as well as free software Mini PCIe Wireless chipsets. Intel has a free software graphics chipset. There are no Mini PCIe bluetooth chipsets that are free. You can get a USB wireless chipset that is free though. Once we have these issues fixed the community can move onto things like the BIOS and coreboot.

  58. Toshiba Z830 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose the computer first then the OS. Many computers work with Linux. When they do not, there is a close alternative that works. I looked for a 13" ultrabook. An Asus and the Toshiba Z830 came out tops with the Asus having a slightly higher screen resolution. When I looked for Linux use, the Toshiba had several successful installs of Ubuntu described on the Web. There is very little difference between the two. The Z830 fits.

    The same happens every time I look at a computer for a specific use. There are a small number that fit the requirements and at least one works with Linux. There is no need to look for Linux preloaded.

  59. bad idea: Dell forks and bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first round of Linux netbooks, like Asus eee, should warn us away from "preloaded" Linux. They forked ubuntu, pointed their "preloaded" laptops at their own repository servers, then abandoned their fork. When users tried to reimage their EEE's to stock Ubuntu, they discovered Asus had taken advantage of "preloading" to roll a bunch of proprietary drivers into the thing, so it was actually much harder to install Linux than it would be on some random Intel reference design netbook, so while you might think preloading would mean optimized glitch-free hardware, in fact the opposite is the case. Finally, what's to stop Dell from selling various partners the rights to push bloatware onto these laptops?

    I would want to buy a preloaded laptop if it were branded by a major Linux distribution with something to lose if they pull any of these tricks again. From Dell? No.

  60. I avoid later-model Toshibas ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I avoid later-model Toshibas because they include firmware to enable Intel AMT - and consider it a feature!

    Quoting Wikipedia:

    Intel AMT includes hardware-based remote management, security, power-management, and remote-configuration features. These features allow an IT technician to access an AMT featured PC remotely.

    Intel AMT relies on a hardware-based out-of-band (OOB) communication channel that operates below the OS level, the channel is independent of the state of the OS (present, missing, corrupted, down). The communication channel is also independent of the PC's power state, the presence of a management agent, and the state of many hardware components (such as hard disk drives and memory).

    Most AMT features are available OOB, regardless of PC power state. Other features require the PC to be powered up (such as console redirection via serial over LAN (SOL), agent presence checking, and network traffic filtering). Intel AMT has remote power-up capability.

    Hardware-based features can be combined with scripting to automate maintenance and service.

    Which means all sorts of bad guys can potentially get at it, too. And this is at a level below the OS, so even the OS can't defend against being turned into a zombie.

    Toshiba isn't the only one that does this - with AMT or some other spy hardware/firmware combo. Plug your machine into an Ethernet, turn it off, and see if the green light on the Ethernet jack stays on.

    (And you thought "secure boot" was bad...)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  61. WUXGA? No? Not interested. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without a developer friendly screen resolution of at least WUXGA on a 15.4 or 15.6 inch screen, I fail to see how it will attract many developers.

    Everywhere you go on slashdot and in other forums, every geek worth anything is screaming for such a laptop.

    If Dell can't produce a laptop to meet that very basic spec., how can they hope to get anything else right?

  62. Next Day, Anywhere in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When you travel, Dell's service is second to none. I've had my laptops serviced on 4 different continents, the next day. Including countries where English isn't the native language.

    Broken power supplies, screens failing, keyboards broken, etc.

    One phone call and someone is there the next day.

    Sure, that's another $200 or $300, but when you need it, it is worth its weight in gold. And then some.

    Folks that buy computers with fruit logos on them can only dream of worldwide service like that even though they pay twice as much.

    So maybe the Pro support warranty seems like a rip off to you, but then it has never saved your bacon in a way that a lesser arrangement would not have.

    1. Re:Next Day, Anywhere in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you travel, Dell's service is second to none. I've had my laptops serviced on 4 different continents, the next day. Including countries where English isn't the native language.

      Broken power supplies, screens failing, keyboards broken, etc.

      One phone call and someone is there the next day.

      Sure, that's another $200 or $300, but when you need it, it is worth its weight in gold. And then some.

      Folks that buy computers with fruit logos on them can only dream of worldwide service like that even though they pay twice as much.

      So maybe the Pro support warranty seems like a rip off to you, but then it has never saved your bacon in a way that a lesser arrangement would not have.

      Hi, GP poster here.

      Don't get me wrong, I don't believe it is worthless. I believe they intentionally weakened their base offering to make the other one more appealing, at least in part. Pro Support is definitely worth it if your machine is vital to doing your job, especially on a laptop.

      On a laptop, make sure you get Complete Care as well (accidental damage coverage). Without it, no matter how upset you get, you're probably not getting a replacement screen if you spill a drink on your laptop, for example.

  63. Re:Looks like it's time to negotiate OEM pricing w by samwichse · · Score: 1

    It may not be Linux, but it is not-Windows...

    Dell has been offering their workstation class computers for federal government procurement with FreeDOS for years:

    http://www.dell.com/us/fedgov/p/precision-m4600/fs

    Sucks they won't do this for mere mortals though.

  64. Haters and Fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seems to be a lot of hateful words being thrown back and fourth on the concept of a Linux dev machine. People need to realize how much of the commercial industry is running Linux and unix operating systems! If your a developer you should already know this. If your a developer using Linux to develop then you know new technology and Linux dont mix well. That's all that is really being presented here; a laptop that doesn't have hardware compatibility issues or bugs you just have to live with. As for which distro you go with; I have been an SE for a long time now using all sorts of flavors of Linux and the thing that has ever been horrible about a Linux distro is hardware buggynesss. You hand me a Linux machine with full support and hand it to me in an ultrabook at that and I'm one happy developer. If your not a developer, I can see you not understanding this concept and if you are you know that code, script and html all looks the same. Sure deployment might be a little different based on the OS but that's what multi-platform development IDE's are for right?

  65. Hopefully Dell is all in this time by apexwm · · Score: 1

    Last time Dell offered systems but their cost was still higher than those with Windoze. Hopefully they offer the hardware this time at a reasonable price. Or offer PCs without an OS at all, which seems to be hard to find now too. I used to be an avid supporter of Dell, but after they dropped Linux and started playing games and ruined their Dell Outlet site, I stopped buying their equipment.